BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE ROTTERDAM RULES

GENERAL COMMENTS

ALCÁNTARA, José María, Estado de la regualción internacional sobre transporte puerta-a-puerta: el Proyecto de UNCITRAL y el CMI, I Congreso Internacional de Transporte: los retos del transporte en el siglo XXI: Castellón de la Plana, 4-6 mayo 2004 , Coord. por Fernando Martínez Sanz , María Victoria Petit Lavall , Vol. 1, 2005, ISBN 84-8456-381-2 , pp. 735-742

ALCANTARA, HUNT, JOHANSSON, OLAND, PSYDEN, RAMBERG, SCHMITT, TETLEY, VIDAL, Particular concerns with regard to the Rotterdam Rules, available online at www.amya.es

ANTAPASSIS, Anthony-BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Mise en œuvre et interprétation des conventions internationales, in Droit Maritime Français, 2008, p. 309

ARROYO, Ignacio, UNCITRAL : la labor de la conferencia de Naciones Unidas para el comercio y el desarrollo en el transporte marítimo, Anuario de Derecho Marítimo , ISSN 0211-8432, Nº 23, 2006 , pp. 545-552

ASARIOTIS, Regina, Draft instrument on transport law: an update on proceedings at the UNCITRAL Working Group, Journal of international maritime law (Witney, U.K.), 2003, p. 400

ASARIOTIS, Regina, What future for the bill of lading as a document of title? in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2008, p. 75

BAUGHEN, Simon, International maritime law, in International maritime and commercial law yearbook 2003, London, Informa Professional, 2003, p. 142

BEARE, Stuart, UNCITRAL Draft Convention on the Carriage of Goods – Presentation, in CMI Yearbook 2005-2006, p. 394

BEARE, Stuart, Strenghts and Weaknesses of the new Convention, paper delivered at the Congress “The Rotterdam Rules: A New Era in Uniform Transport Law”, held at Carlos III University of Madrid on the 17 th and 18th of September 2009, in the course of publication by Carlos III University of Madrid

BERLINGIERI, Francesco-DELEBECQUE, Philippe-FUJITA, Tomotaka-ILLESCAS, Rafael-STURLEY, Michael-VAN DER ZIEL, Gertjan-VON ZIEGLER, Alexander-ZUNARELLI, Stefano, The Rotterdam Rules, an attempt to clarify certain concerns that have emerged, on CMI and UNCITRAL websites

BERLINGIERI, Francesco-ZUNARELLI, Stefano-ALVISI Chiara, La nuova Convenzione UNCITRAL sul Trasporto Internazionale di Merci “Wholly or Partly by Sea” (Regole di Rotterdam), in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2008, p. 1161

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Il progetto UNCITRAL di convenzione sul trasporto di merci door-to-door. I lavori delle due ultime sessioni del Working Group on Transport Law, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2006, p. 959

FB 12.05.2010

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, The Rotterdam Rules: The “Maritime Plus” approach to uniformity, in European Journal of Commercial Contract Law, 2009, p. 49

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Revisiting the Rotterdam Rules, in the course of publication

BERLINGIERI, Francesco-ZUNARELLI, Stefano Analisi comparata delle Regole dell’Aja-Visby e delle Regole di Rotterdam, paper delivered at the Genoa Conference “Dalle Regole dell’Aja-Visby alle Regole di Rotterdam –Effetti del cambiamento sul commercio marittimo”, 19-20 October 2009, available online at http://www.aidim.org/pdf/Aja_Rotterdam.pdf

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A comparative analysis of the Hague-Visby Rules,the Hamburg Rules and the Rotterdam Rules, paper delivered at the General Assembly of the International Association of Average Adjusters-AMD, Marrakesh, 5-6 November 2009, available online at www.comitemaritime.org/draft/pdf/Comparative_analysis.pdf

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Convenzione delle Nazioni Unite sui contratti per il trasporto internazionale di merci in tutto o in parte per mare , Italian translation of the Rotterdam Rules, available online at http://www.aidim.org/pdf/Italian_transl.pdf

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, The Discipline in the Rotterdam Rules of the Obligations of the Carrier and of his liability , “paper delivered at the Congress “The Rotterdam Rules: A New Era in Uniform Transport Law”, held at Carlos III University of Madrid on the 17 th and 18th of September 2009, in the course of publication by Carlos III University of Madrid

BIFA (BRITISH INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT ASSOCIATION), So what are the Rotterdam Rules? Press Release 64 by Pysden Solicitors, London, available online at www.pysdens.com/press

BONNEVIE, Philippe, Evaluation of the new Convention from the perspective of cargo interests, in Transportrecht, Vol. 32, No. 9, September 2009, p. 361-366

CARLSON, Mary Helen, U.S. participation in private international law negotiations: Why the UNCITRAL Convention on contracts for the international carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea is important to the United States, in Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 44, Spring 2009, p. 269

CARLSON, Mary Helen, U.S. participation in the international unification of private law: the making of the UNCITRAL draft carriage of goods by sea convention, Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2007. p. 615

CHAMBER OF SHIPPING OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, Rotterdam Rules: why we should support early ratification, by Donald Chard, available online at www.british-shipping.org

CHAMI, Diego Esteban, The Rotterdam Rules from an Argentinean perspective, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 847

2

CHAN, Felix W.H., In search of a global theory of maritime electronic commerce: China’s position on the Rotterdam Rules, in Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 2009, p. 185

CLARKE, Malcolm, A conflict of conventions: the UNCITRAL/CMI draft transport instrument on your doorstep, in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2003, p. 28

CLARKE, Malcolm, Carrier Liability under Global and Regional Regimes – Air Carriage by Road: Quantum Rumbles On, in General Trends in Maritime and Transport Law 1929-2009, Stockholm: Jure AB, 2009, p. 235

CLECAT – EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR FORWARDING, TRANSPORT, LOGISTIC AND CUSTOMS SERVICES, Position Paper on Rotterdam Rules, 29 May 2009, available on line at www.clecat.org

CMI, A Brief History of the Involvement of the CMI, in CMI Yearbook 2009, p. 252

CMI INTERNATIONAL WORKING GROUP ON THE ROTTERDAM RULES, Questions and Answers on the Rotterdam Rules, available on line at www.comitemaritime.org

DE LA GARZA, Nicholas, UNCITRAL’s proposed instrument on the international marine carriage of goods, in Transportation Law Journal, 2004, p. 95

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, Le projet de Convention sur le transport de marchandises entièrement ou partiellement par mer, in Droit Maritime Français, 2006, p. 691

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, Le projet de Convention sur le transport de marchandises entièrement ou partiellement par mer (après la session de Vienne de novembre 2006), in Droit Maritime Français, 2007, p. 291

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, Le projet CNUDCI sur le transport de marchandises entièrement ou partiellement par mer: derniers pas avant une adoption? , in Droit Maritime Français, 2007, p. 771

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, ICC commission on transport and logistics - Draft convention on the carriage of goods (wholly or partly) (by sea) , in ICMA XVI Congress papers, Singapore, ICMA, 2007. p. 316

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, La Convention sur le contrat de transport international entièrement ou partiellement par mer: dernières précisions, in Droit Maritime Français, 2008, p. 787

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, Transport maritime: Convention CNUDCI: Règles de Rotterdam: adoption, in Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Commercial et de Droit Economique, 2008, p. 901

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, La Convention sur le contrats internationaux de transport de marchandises effectué entièrement ou partiellement par mer: “a civil law perspective”, in Droit Maritime Français, 2008, p. 335

3

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, Le projet CNUDCI, suite et fin: la “Convention des Nations Unies sur le contrat de transport international de marchandises entièrement ou partiellement par mer”, in Droit Maritime Français, 2008, p. 211

DERRINGTON, Sarah, The Hague Rules – A lost opportunity, in The Law Quarterly Review, 2005, p. 209

DERRINGTON, Sarah, The UNCITRAL Draft Instrument on Transport Law - does Australia need it?, in Australian Business Law Review, 2005, p. 70

DIAMOND, Anthony, The next sea carriage convention?, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2008, p. 135

DIAMOND, Anthony, The Rotterdam Rules, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2009, p. 445

EDELMAN, Paul S., A new regime for cargo claims, in New York Law Journal, 2003, p. 3

EDMONSON, R.G., All together now: U.S. seeks compromise on international cargo liability rules: U.N.-sponsored meetings to resume , in Traffic World, 2003, p. 32

ENRÍQUEZ, David, UNCITRAL y las oscilaciones del régimen jurídico del transporte marítimo internacional de mercancías. Advertencias en torno a la búsqueda de una tercera vía, in Anuario mexicano de derecho internacional, 2008, p. 79.

ESTRELLA FARIA, José Angelo, Uniform Law for International Transport at UNCITRAL: New Times, New Players, and New Rules, in Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 44, Spring 2009, p. 277

ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE-INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE, WORKING PARTY ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, Reconciliation and harmonization of civil liability regimes in intermodal transport , ECE/TRANS/WP.24/2009/3 of 8 January 2009

ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE-INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE, Report of the Working Party on Intermodal Transport Logistics at its fifty-first session , ECE/TRANS/WP.24/123 of 6 May 2009

EUROPEAN SHIPPERS’ COUNCIL, View of the European Shippers’ Council on the Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea also known as the “Rotterdam Rules”, March 2009

FABRE-TESTE, Pascale, Le projet de Convention de la CNUDCI sur le transport transmaritime multimodal, Faculté de droit et de sciences politiques aix Marseille III, année universitaire 2005-2006, Centre de droit maritime et des transports, p. 52

FIATA, UNCITRAL Convention so-called Rotterdam Rules, a complex issue , Doc. MTI/507-2009-03-25 with four Annexes

FOGLAR, Vesna Polic, Evaluation of the new Convention from the perspective of insurers, in Transportrecht, Vol. 32, No. 9, September 2009, p. 366-369

4

FRESNEDO DE AGUIRRE, Cecilia, The Rotterdam Rules from the perspective of a country that is a consumer of shipping services, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 869

GARD, New UNCITRAL carriage of goods convention, GARD News, 2009, p. 6

GASKELL, Nicholas, Bills of Lading in an Electronic Age, in General Trends in Maritime and Transport Law 1929-2009, Stockholm: Jure AB, 2009, p. 147

GLASS, D.A., Meddling in the multimodal muddle? A network of conflict in the UNCITRAL Draft Convention on the Carriage of Goods [wholly or partly] [by sea], in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2006, p. 37

GLASS, D.A. – NAIR, Rawindaran, Towards flexible carriage documents? Reducing the need for modally distinct documents in international goods transport, in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2009, p. 37

HERBER, Rolf, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (“Rotterdam Rules”) , Symposium of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Transportrecht, held at Hamburg on 25 June 2009. Introduction, Transportrecht, Vol. 32, No. 9, September 2009, p. 345-346

HERBER, Rolf, Welcome and introduction [to: UNCITRAL’s attempt toward global unification of transport law], in Transportrecht, 2004, p. 274

HONKA, Hannu, The legislative future of carriage of goods by sea; could it not be the UNCITRAL draft?, in Scandinavian Studies in Law, 2004, p. 93

HONKA, Hannu, Regulation of Shipping and Transport within International Organisations – Is it Effective? in General Trends in Maritime and Transport Law 1929-2009, Stockholm: Jure AB, 2009, p. 29

HOOPER, Chester D., The Rotterdam Rules: An Overview of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, in Currents, No. 29, November 2009, p. 11

HOOPER, Chester D., The Rotterdam Rules: simpler than they appear , in The Arbitrator, April 2009, p. 5

ICC COMMISSION ON TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS – ICC COMMITTEE ON MARITIME TRANSPORT, Comments on the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (the “Rotterdam Rules”), 27 May 2009.

ILLESCAS ORTIZ, Rafael, El nuevo Convenio sobre el Contrato de Transporte Marítimo de Mercancías, in Derecho de los negocios, 2009, p. 1

ILLESCAS ORTIZ, Rafael, What changes in international transport law after the Rotterdam Rules?, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 893

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF SHIPPING, The Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (the “Rotterdam Rules”) – A Position Paper by the International Chamber of Shipping

5

INTERNATIONAL ROAD TRANSPORT UNION, IRU position on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (the “Rotterdam Rules”), 17 August 2009

JACQUES, Linda, The Rotterdam Rules: how are they different from the Hague Visby regime?, in Mondaq, June 2009

JOHANSSON, OLAND, PYSDEN, RAMBERG, TETLEY, SCHMITT, A response to the attempt to clarify certain concerns over the Rotterdam Rules published 5 August 2009, www.pysdens.com

KATSIVELA, Marel, International carriage of goods: ocean carrier liability and the European Union, in European Transport Law, 2008, p. 3

LANNAN, Kate, Overview of the Convention – The UNCITRAL perspective, in CMI Yearbook 2009, p. 271

LANNAN, Kate, The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea: a general overview , in Uniform Law Review, 2009, p. 290

LANNAN, Kate, Navigating the Rotterdam Rules, paper delivered at the Congress “The Rotterdam Rules: A New Era in Uniform Transport Law”, held at Carlos III University of Madrid on the 17 th and 18th of September 2009, in the course of publication by Carlos III University of Madrid

LEFEBVRE, Guy, Le projet préliminaire de la CNUDCI et la responsabilité du transporteur de marchandises par mer: périple difficile ou échouement? , in Revue Juridique Thémis, 2003, p. 431

LEJNIEKS, Maris, Diverging solutions in the harmonisation of carriage of goods by sea: which approach to choose?, in Uniform Law Review, 2003, p. 303

LI, Xiaonian, Reunification of certain rules relating to sea transport documents: some observations on the UNCITRAL draft instrument on transport law , in Uniform Law Review, 2007, p. 121

LLOYD’S LIST, Opinion: Onward to Rotterdam, 1 July 2009.

LOPUSKI, Jan, The UNCITRAL preliminary draft instrument on the carriage of goods by sea: some reflections on the transformation and future of maritime law, Revista Europea de Derecho de la Navegación Marítima y Aeronáutica , ISSN 1130-2127, Nº 19, 2003 , pp. 2665-2674

MARTIN, Patrick V., Rotterdam Rules, in ASBA News, October 2008

MCLAUGHLIN, J., Carriage of goods: finishing line finally in sight in long race for liability reform, in Lloyd’s List, 2003, p. 6

MUTIGANDA, Jean Claude, International rules applicable to contracts of international transport of goods: are shippers better off? , in 2009 Uganda Proceedings Papers: 10th Annual International Conference on Repositioning African business and development for the 21st century, May 19-23, 2009

6

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION LEAGUE, Response of the National Industrial Transportation League to the European Shipper’s Council Position Paper on the Rotterdam Rules, 5 May 2009, available on line at UNICTRAL website

NIKAKI, Theodora, Conflicting laws in "wet" multimodal carriage of goods: The UNCITRAL draft convention on the carriage of goods [wholly or partly] [by sea], in Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 2006, p. 521

PAGE, Paul, Rotterdam Rules, in Journal of Commerce, 2009, p. 27

PARKER, Alexandra, The Rotterdam Rules: a step backwards for Australian shippers?, Logistics Development Award articles, 2007

PONTOPPIDAN, Knud, Shipowner’s view on the UNCITRAL Convention on contracts for the international carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea, Summary and Speech, in CMI Yearbook 2009, p. 282

Proyecto de “Convenio de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Contrato de Transporte Internacional de Mercancías Total o Parcialmente Marítimo”, in Derecho de los Negocios, 2008, n. 210, p. 19-22

RAMBERG, Jan, UN Convention on Contracts for International Carriage of Goods wholly or partly by sea, in CMI Yearbook 2009, p. 277

RAMBERG, Jan, Evaluation of the new Convention from the perspective of freigth forwarders, in Transportrecht, Vol. 32, No. 9, September 2009, p. 370-371

RASMUSSEN, Uffe Lind, Evaluation of the new Convention from the perspective of carriers, in Transportrecht, Vol. 32, No. 9, September 2009, p. 357-361

ROSAEG, Erik, Multimodal Transport Company Groups Above and Beyond Nation States – How Does the Law Respond to That? in General Trends in Maritime and Transport Law 1929-2009, Stockholm: Jure AB, 2009, p. 15

SCHELIN, Johan, The UNCITRAL Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea: Harmonization or De-Harmonization, in Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 44, p. 321

STURLEY, Michael F., Transport law for the twenty-first century: An introduction to the preparation, philosophy, and potential impact of the Rotterdam Rules, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 1; also in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2009, p. 461 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 957

STURLEY, Michael F., Modernizing and Reforming U.S. Maritime law: The Impact of the Rotterdam Rules in the United States, in Texas International Law Journal, 44, 2009, p. 427

STURLEY, Michael F., The UNCITRAL Carriage of Goods Convention: Changes to Existing Law, in CMI Yearbook 2007-2008, p. 254

7

STURLEY, Michael F., Steady Progress in New York: The Spring 2005 Session of UNCITRAL’s Transport Law Working Group, in Benedict’s Maritime Bulletin, 3, 2005, p. 197

STURLEY, Michael F., The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law’s Transport Law Project: An Interim View of a Work in Progress , in Texas International Law Journal, 39, 2003, p. 65

TETLEY, William, A critique of and the Canadian response to the Rotterdam Rules, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 298 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 988

TETLEY, William, Some general criticisms of the Rotterdam Rules, in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2009, p. 625

TSCHILSCHKE, Anna, Panel discussion and its results, in Transportrecht, Vol. 32, No. 9, September 2009, p. 371

UNCTAD, Adoption of a new United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea: the “Rotterdam Rules”, in Review of Maritime Transport 2009 – Report by the UNCTAD Secretariat, Chapter 6, p. 123

VAN DER ZIEL, Gertjan, The UNCITRAL/CMI draft for a new convention relating to the contract of carriage by sea, in Transportrecht, 2002, p. 265

VON ZIEGLER, Alexander, Main concepts of the new Convention: Its aims, structure and essentials, in Transportrecht, Vol. 32, No. 9, September 2009, p. 346-357

CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

DEBATTISTA, Charles, Analysis of Chapter 1, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 1 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 993

CHAPTER 2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Ambito di applicazione e libertà contrattuale, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2006, p. 1016

HONKA, Hannu, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea – Scope of application and Freedom of contract, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

HONKA, Hannu, Scope of application, Freedom of contract, in CMI Yearbook 2009, p. 255

8

ROSAEG, Erik, The applicability of Conventions for the carriage of goods and for multimodal transport, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, &CLQ 2002, p. 316

STANILAND, Hilton, Analysis of Chapter 2, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 15

STURLEY, Michael F., Solving the Scope-of-Application Puzzle: Contracts, Trades, and Documents in the UNCITRAL Transport Law Project, in Journal of International Maritime Law, 11, 2005, p. 22

STURLEY, Michael F., Scope of Coverage Under the UNCITRAL Draft Instrument , in Journal of International Maritime Law, 10, 2004, p. 138

STURLEY, Michael F., Scope of Coverage and the Treatment of Performing Parties Under the Current UNCITRAL Draft Instrument, in Benedict’s Maritime Bulletin, 2, 2004, p. 19

STURLEY, Michael F., Scope of Application, Duration of Coverage, and Exceptions to Coverage in International Regimes Relevant to International Transport Law, in CMI Yearbook, 1999, p. 122

CHAPTER 3. ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT RECORDS

ALBA, Manuel, Electronic Commerce Provisions in the UNCITRAL Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, in Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 44, Spring 2009, p. 387

ALBA, Manuel, The use of electronic records as collateral in the Rotterdam Rules: future solutions for present needs, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 801

BRUNNER, Raphael, Electronic transport documents and shipping practice not yet a married couple, in European transport law, 2008, p. 123

CMI, A guide to the e-commerce features in the draft instrument on the carriage of goods [wholly or partly] [by sea], in CMI Yearbook, 2003, p. 250

DEBATTISTA, Charles, Analysis of Chapter 3, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 23 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 996

GAUTHIER, Johanne, The new elements – The facilitation of electronic commerce, in CMI Yearbook 2009, p. 296

GOLDBY, Miriam, Electronic alternatives to transport documents, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 225 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 982

9

GOLDBY, Miriam, The CMI rules for electronic bills of lading reassessed in the light of current practices, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2008, p. 56

GOLDBY, Miriam, The performance of the bill of lading’s functions under UNCITRAL’s draft Convention on the Carriage of Goods: unequivocal legal recognition of electronic equivalents, in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2007, p. 160

JONES, Peter, A new transport convention: a framework for e-commerce? , in Electronic Communication Law Review, 2002, p. 145

VAN DER ZIEL, Gertjan, The legal underpinning of e-commerce in maritime transport by the UNCITRAL draft instrument on the carriage of goods by sea, in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2003, p. 461

CHAPTER 4. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CARRIER

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, The Discipline in the Rotterdam Rules of the Obligations of the Carrier and of his liability, paper delivered at the Congress “The Rotterdam Rules: A New Era in Uniform Transport Law”, held at Carlos III University of Madrid on the 17 th and 18th of September 2009, in the course of publication by Carlos III University of Madrid

CHAMI, Diego Esteban, The Obligations of the Carrier, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, Obligations and liability exemptions of the carrier, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

DEBATTISTA, Charles, The CMI/UNCITRAL cargo liability regime: regulation for the 21st century?, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 304

HONKA, Hannu, Main obligations and liabilities of the carrier, in Transportrecht, 2004, p. 278

MORA ́N BOVIO, David, Ocean carriers’ duty of care to cargo in port: the Rotterdam Rules of 2009, in Fordham International Law Journal, 2009, p. 1162

NIKAKI, Theodora, The obligations of carriers to provide seaworthy ships and exercise care, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 89 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 965

NIKAKI, Theodora, The fundamental duties of the carrier under the Rotterdam Rules, in International Maritime Law, Vol. 14, Issue 6, November-December 2008, p. 512

TSIMPLIS, Michael, Analysis of Chapter 4, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 29 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 996

10

CHAPTER 5. LIABILITY OF THE CARRIER FOR LOSS, DAMAGE OR DELAY

ASARIOTIS, Regina, Loss due to a combination of causes: burden of proof and commercial risk allocation, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 138 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 970

ASARIOTIS, Regina, Burden of proof and allocation of liability for loss due to a combination of causes under the new Rotterdam Rules, in International Maritime Law, Vol. 14, Issue 6, November-December 2008, p. 537

ASARIOTIS, Regina, Allocation of liability and burden of proof in the Draft Instrument on Transport Law, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 382

BEARE, Stuart, Liability regime: where we are, how we got there and where we are going, , in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 306

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, The Discipline in the Rotterdam Rules of the Obligations of the Carrier and of his liability, paper delivered at the Congress “The Rotterdam Rules: A New Era in Uniform Transport Law”, held at Carlos III University of Madrid on the 17 th and 18th of September 2009, in the course of publication by Carlos III University of Madrid

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Basis of liability and exclusions of liability , in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 336

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, The liability of the sea carrier in the UNCITRAL Draft Convention on contracts for the international carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea, Colloque Athènes, Mai 2008

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, La partie exécutante maritime: obligations et responsabilité, paper delivered at the Congress “The Rotterdam Rules: A New Era in Uniform Transport Law”, held at Carlos III University of Madrid on the 17th and 18th of September 2009, in the course of publication by Carlos III University of Madrid

FUJITA, Tomotaka, The Comprehensive Coverage of the New Convention: Performing Parties and the Multimodal Implications, in Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 44, Spring 2009, p. 349

FUJITA, Tomotaka, Performing Parties and Himalaya Protection, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

GIRVIN, Stephen The right of the carrier to exclude and limit liability, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 111 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 967

11

GIRVIN, Stephen, Exclusions and limitation of liability, in International Maritime Law, Vol. 14, Issue 6, November-December 2008, p. 524

MARGETSON, Nick J., Liability of the carrier under the Hague (Visby) Rules for cargo damage caused by unseaworthiness of its containers , in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2008, p. 153

MBIAH, Kofi, The Convention on contracts for the international carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea: the liability and limitation of liability regime, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

NIKAKI, Theodora, Shipping law: the statutory Himalaya-type protection under the Rotterdam Rules: capable of filling the gaps? , in Journal of Business Law, 2009, p. 403

RAMBERG, Jan, The carrier’s liability for loss other than loss of or damage to goods or delay, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2010, p. xxx

STURLEY, Michael F., Liability for Delay Under UNCITRAL’s Proposed Transport Law Convention, in Benedict’s Maritime Bulletin, 4, 2006, p. 108

STURLEY, Michael F., Scope of Coverage and the Treatment of Performing Parties Under the Current UNCITRAL Draft Instrument, in Benedict’s Maritime Bulletin, 2, 2004, p. 19

STURLEY, Michael F., The Treatment of Performing Parties, in CMI Yearbook, 2003, p. 230

THOMAS, Rhidian, An analysis of the liability regime of carriers and maritime performing parties, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 52 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 960

THOMAS, Rhidian, An appraisal of the liability regime established under the new UN Convention, in International Maritime Law, Vol. 14, Issue 6, November-December 2008, p. 496

TSIMPLIS, Michael, Analysis of Chapter 5, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 45 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 999

VON ZIEGLER, Alexander, Schadenersatz im internationalen Seefrachtrecht (Zurich: Nomos Verlag, 1989)

VON ZIEGLER, Alexander, Haftungsgrundlage im internationalen Seefrachtrecht (Zurich/Basel/Geneva: Schulthess, 2002)

VON ZIEGLER, Alexander, The Liability of the Contracting Carrier, in Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 44, Spring 2009, p. 329

VON ZIEGLER, Alexander, Delay and the Rotterdam Rules, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 997

12

YUZHOU, Si-LI, Henry Hai, The New Structure of the Basis of Liability for the Carrier, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009 and in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 931

ZUNARELLI, Stefano, The liability of the shipper, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 350

ZUNARELLI, Stefano, Elementi di novità e di continuità della regolamentazione della responsabilità del vettore marittimo di cose nell’attività del gruppo di lavoro dell’UNCITRAL, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2006, p. 1022

ZUNARELLI, Stefano, The carrier and the maritime performing party in the Rottterdam Rules, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 1011

CHAPTER 6. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO PARTICULAR STAGES OF CARRIAGE

ALCANTARA, José M., The new regime and multimodal transport, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 399

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Multimodal aspects of the Rotterdam Rules, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A new convention on the carriage of goods by sea: port-to-port or door-to-door?, in Uniform Law Review, 2003, p. 265

CLARKE, Malcolm, Harmonization of the regulation of carriage of goods in Europe, in Transportrecht, 2002, p. 428

CLARKE, Malcolm, The law between land and sea, in Journal of Business Law, 2003, p. 522

CLARKE, Malcolm, Multimodal transport in the new millennium, in WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2002, p. 71

FAGHFOURI, Mahin, International regulation of liability for multimodal transport - in search of uniformity, in WMU journal of maritime affairs, 2006, p. 95

GIRVIN, Stephen, The right of the carrier to exclude and limit liability, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 484 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 967

HAAK, Krijn F. and HOEKS, Maih, Arrangements of multimodal transport in the field of conflicting conventions, in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2004, p. 422

HAAK, Krijn F. and HOEKS, Maih, Intermodal transport under unimodal arrangements. Conflicting conventions: the UNCITRAL/CMI draft instrument and the CMR on the subject of intermodal contracts , in Transportrecht, 2005, p. 89

HAAK, Krijn F., The harmonization of intermodal liability arrangements , in European Transport Law, 2005, p. 11

13

HANCOCK, Christopher, Multimodal transport under the Convention, Christopher Hancock, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 34 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 958

HANCOCK, Christopher, Multimodal transport and the new UN Convention on the carriage of goods, in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2009, p. 484

HOEKS, Marian, Multimodal carriage with a pinch of sea salt: door-to-door under the UNCITRAL draft instrument, in European Transport Law, 2008, p. 257

LORENZON, Filippo, Analysis of Chapter 6, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 73 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1004

NIKAKI, Theodora, The UNCITRAL draft instrument on the carriage of goods [wholly or partly] [by sea]: multimodal at last or still all at sea? , in Journal of Business Law, 2005, p. 647

ROSAEG, Erik, Conflicts of conventions in the Rotterdam Rules , in The journal of International Maritime Law, 2009, p. 238

VAN DER ZIEL, Gertjan, Multimodal aspects of the Rotterdam Rules, in CMI Yearbook 2009, p. 314 and in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 981

YUZHOU, Si-LI, Henry Hai, The New Structure of the Basis of Liability for the Carrier, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

CHAPTER 7. OBLIGATIONS OF THE SHIPPER TO THE CARRIER

ASARIOTIS, Regina, Main obligations and liabilities of the shipper , in Transportrecht (Neuwied, Germany) 2004, p. 284.

ASARIOTIS, Regina, Loss due to a combination of causes: burden of proof and commercial risk allocation, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 138 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 970

BAUGHEN, Simon, Obligations owed by the shipper to the carrier, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 169

BAUGHEN, Simon, Obligations of the shipper to the carrier, in International Maritime Law, Vol. 14, Issue 6, November-December 2008, p. 555 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 975

14

DE LA GARZA, Nicholas, La responsabilité du chargeur dans ses relations avec le transporteur. Le point de vue français, in Droit Maritime Français, 2008, p. 112

DIALLO, Ibrahima Khalil, Obligations et responsabilité du chargeur, (dans les Règles de Rotterdam), CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

HJALMARSSON, Johanna, The Rotterdam Rules signing ceremony – baptism or wake? in Shipping and Trade Law, 2009, p. 1

HOOPER, Chester D., Obligations of the shipper to the carrier under the Rotterdam Rules, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 885

LORENZON, Filippo, Analysis of Chapter 7, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 79 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1005

ZUNARELLI, Stefano, The liability of the shipper, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 350

CHAPTER 8. TRANSPORT DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT RECORDS

CLARKE, Malcolm, Transport documents: their transferability as documents of title, electronic documents, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 356

CROWLEY, Michael E., The limited scope of the cargo liability regime covering carriage of goods by sea: the multimodal problem, in Tulane Law Review, 2005, 1461

CZERWENKA, Beate, Scope of application and rules on multimodal transport contracts, in Transportrecht, 2004, p. 297

LORENZON, Filippo, Analysis of Chapter 8, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 99 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1008

SCHELIN, Johan, Documents under the UNCITRAL draft instrument on carriage of goods by sea, in Scandinavian studies in law, 2004, p. 191

STURLEY, Michael F., Phantom Carriers and UNCITRAL’s Proposed Transport Law Convention, in Lloyd’s Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly, 2006, p. 426

WILLIAMS, Richard, Transport documentation – the new approach, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 190

ZEKOS, Georgios I., The contractual role of documents issued under the CMI draft instrument on transport law 2001, in Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 2004, p. 99

15

CHAPTER 9. DELIVERY OF THE GOODS

DEBATTISTA, Charles, Analysis of Chapter 9, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 123 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1011

DEBATTISTA, Charles, The Goods carried – Who gets them and who controls them?, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, Le chapitre 9 des Règles de Rotterdam: la livraison, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 857

VAN DER ZIEL, Gertjan, Delivery of the goods, rights of the controlling party and transfer of rights, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 242; also in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2009, p. 597 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 983

WILLIAMS, Richard, Transport documentation under the new Convention, in International Maritime Law, Vol. 14, Issue 6, November-December 2008, p. 566

CHAPTER 10. RIGHTS OF THE CONTROLLING PARTY

DEBATTISTA, Charles, Analysis of Chapter 10, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 151 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1016

PEJOVIC, Caslav, Stoppage in transit and right of control: "conflict of rules"?, in Pace International Law Review, 2008, p. 129

VAN DER ZIEL, Gertjan, Chapter 10 of the Rotterdam Rules: Control of Goods in Transit, in Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 44, Spring 2009, p. 375

16

CHAPTER 11. TRANSFER OF RIGHTS

DEBATTISTA, Charles, Analysis of Chapter 11, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 173

CHAPTER 12. LIMITS OF LIABILITY

GIRVIN, Stephen, Exclusions and limitation of liability, in International Maritime Law, Vol. 14, Issue 6, November-December 2008, p. 524

HUYBRECHTS, Marc, Limitation of liability and of actions, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 370

KARAN, Hakan, Revising liability limits in international maritime conventions: a Turkish perspective, in Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 2003, p. 615

LANNAN, Kate, Behind the numbers: the limitation on carrier liability in the Rotterdam Rules?, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 901

MBIAH, Kofi, The Convention on contracts for the international carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea: the liability and limitation of liability regime, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

STURLEY, Michael F., Setting the Limitation Amounts for the UNCITRAL Transport Law Convention: The Fall 2007 Session of Working Group III , in Benedict’s Maritime Bulletin, 5, 2007, p. 147

TSIMPLIS, Michael, Analysis of Chapter 12, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 181 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1020

CHAPTER 13. TIME FOR SUIT

BAATZ, Yvonne, Analysis of Chapter 13, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 195 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1024

CHAPTER 14. JURISDICTION – CHAPTER 15. ARBITRATION

BAATZ, Yvonne, Jurisdiction and arbitration, in A New Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Sea – The Rotterdam Rules, Edited by Prof. Rhidian Thomas, Lawtext Publishing, 2009, p. 258, also in Journal of International Maritime Law, 2009, p. 608 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 985

17

BAATZ, Yvonne, Analysis of Chapter 14, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 211 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1027

BAATZ, Yvonne, Analysis of Chapter 15, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 235 and, for a review of this article, BERLINGIERI, Francesco, A review of some recent analyses of the Rotterdam Rules , in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2009, p. 1028

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Giurisdizione e arbitrato nel Progetto UNCITRAL di Convenzione sul trasporto di cose, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2007, 694

BERLINGIERI, Giorgio, Jurisdiction and arbitration in the UNCITRAL draft convention on carriage of goods (wholly or partly) (by sea), in ICMA XVI Congress papers, Singapore, ICMA, 2007, p. 308

HERBER, Rolf, Jurisdiction and arbitration: should the new Convention contain rules on these subjects?, in Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, p. 405

HETHERINGTON, Stuart, Jurisdiction and arbitration, in CMI Yearbook, 2003, p. 245

HOOPER, Chester D., Forum Selection and Arbitration in the Draft Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, or The Definition of Fora Conveniens Set Forth in the Rotterdam Rules, in Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 44, Spring 2009, p. 417

LOPEZ DE GONZALO, Marco, Giurisdizione e arbitrato, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2006, p. 1048

STURLEY, Michael, Jurisdiction under the Rotterdam Rules, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009 and in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 945

STURLEY, Michael, Overruling Sky Reefer in the International Arena: A Preliminary Assessment of Forum Selection and Arbitration Clauses in the New UNCITRAL Transport Law Convention, in Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 37, 2006, p. 1

VON ZIEGLER, Alexander, Jurisdiction and forum selection clauses in a modern law on carriage of goods by sea, in Jurisdiction and forum selection in international maritime law, Essays in honor of Robert Force , M. Davies, eds., 2005, p. 85

CHAPTER 16. VALIDITY OF CONTRACTUAL TERMS

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Ambito di applicazione e libertà contrattuale, in Il Diritto Marittimo, 2006, p. 1016

BERLINGIERI, Francesco, Freedom of contract under the Rotterdam Rules, in Uniform Law Review, Vol. XIV, 2009, p. 831

18

DELEBECQUE, Philippe, La Convention des Nations Unies sur le contrat de transport international de marchandises entièrement ou partiellement par mer et la liberté contractuelle, Mélanges Yves Tassel, in Annuaire de Droit Maritime et Océanique, 2008, T. XXVI, p. 485

HAICONG, Z., A call for the restoration of contractual freedom in cargo shipping , in Uniform Law Review, 2003, p. 309

HONKA, Hannu, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea – Scope of application and Freedom of contract, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

LÓPEZ-RUEDA, Francisco Carlos, Las Reglas de Rotterdam: ¿Un régimen uniforme para los contratos de volumen? , Anuario de Derecho Marítimo, Vol. XXVI, 2009, pp. 101-134

LORENZON, Filippo, Analysis of Chapter 16, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 243

MUKHERJEE, Proshanto K-BASU BAL, Abhinayan, A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Volume Contract Concept under the Rotterdam Rules: Selected Issues in Perspective, CMI Colloquium on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21, 2009

STURLEY, Michael F., Freedom of Contract and Carriage of Goods by Sea: A Retrospective on Shifting Attitudes from Hague to Rotterdam , in General Trends in Maritime and Transport Law 1929-2009, Eleventh Hässelby Colloquium 2009, 2009, p. 211

STURLEY, Michael F., The Mandatory Character of the Convention and its Exceptions: Volume Contracts, paper delivered at the Congress “The Rotterdam Rules: A New Era in Uniform Transport Law”, held at Carlos III University of Madrid on the 17 th and 18th of September 2009, in the course of publication by Carlos III University of Madrid

CHAPTER 17. MATTERS NOT GOVERNED BY THIS CONVENTION

STANILAND, Hilton, Analysis of Chapter 17, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 257

CHAPTER 18. FINAL CLAUSES

SERDY, Andrew, Analysis of Chapter 18, in The Rotterdam Rules, A practical annotation, Informa, 2009, p. 263

19