43
Ethno/CA News: Bibliography Interactional Linguistics 28 September 2014 In this list I collect titles that can be seen as doing ‘interactional linguistics’, a cross-discipline that partly overlaps with CA, but that in part has a particularly language-oriented perspective. I also include texts on second-language acquisition/teaching and multilingualism. For studies of language involving aphasics, autism, etc. see the list on ‘medical’ studies. See also Interactional Linguistics Bibliography , collected by Sandra A. Thompson Aoki, Hiromi (2011) ‘Some functions of speaker head nods’ . In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, C. LeBaron, eds., Embodied interaction: Language and the body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 93-105 Archakis, Argiris; Giakoumelou, Maria; Papazachariou, Dimitris; Tsakona, Villy (2010) ‘The Prosodic Framing of Humour in Conversational Narratives: Evidence from Greek Data’, Journal of Greek Linguistics, 10/2: 187-212 Auer, Peter (1984) Bilingual Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins Auer, Peter (1990) ‘Rhythm in telephone closings’, Human Studies 13: 361-92 Auer, Peter (1992) ‘A “clash of ideas” or an exercise in scholastic ‘misunderstanding’?: A response to Button’s response’, Human Studies 15: 291-7 Auer, Peter (1996). ‘On the prosody and syntax of turn-taking’. In E. Couper-Kuhlen. M. Selting, eds., Prosody and conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57–100. Auer, Peter, ed. (1998) Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. London: Routledge 1

Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

  • Upload
    dohuong

  • View
    225

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

EthnoCA News

Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

28 September 2014

In this list I collect titles that can be seen as doing lsquointeractional linguisticsrsquo a cross-disciplinethat partly overlaps with CA but that in part has a particularly language-oriented perspectiveI also include texts on second-language acquisitionteaching and multilingualism For studiesof language involving aphasics autism etc see the list on lsquomedicalrsquo studies

See also Interactional Linguistics Bibliography collected by Sandra A Thompson

Aoki Hiromi (2011) lsquoSome functions of speaker head nodsrsquo In J Streeck C Goodwin CLeBaron eds Embodied interaction Language and the body in the material worldCambridge Cambridge University Press 93-105

Archakis Argiris Giakoumelou Maria Papazachariou Dimitris Tsakona Villy (2010) lsquoTheProsodic Framing of Humour in Conversational Narratives Evidence from Greek DatarsquoJournal of Greek Linguistics 102 187-212

Auer Peter (1984) Bilingual Conversation Amsterdam Benjamins

Auer Peter (1990) lsquoRhythm in telephone closingsrsquo Human Studies 13 361-92

Auer Peter (1992) lsquoA ldquoclash of ideasrdquo or an exercise in scholastic lsquomisunderstandingrsquo Aresponse to Buttonrsquos responsersquo Human Studies 15 291-7

Auer Peter (1996) lsquoOn the prosody and syntax of turn-takingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen MSelting eds Prosody and conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 57ndash100

Auer Peter ed (1998) Code-switching in conversation Language interaction and identityLondon Routledge

1

Auer Peter (2000) lsquoOn line-Syntax ndash oder Was es bedeuten koumlnnte die Zeitlichkeit dermuumlndlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmenrsquo Sprache und Literatur 85 43-56

Auer Peter (2005) lsquoDelayed self-repairs as a structuring device for complex turns inconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 75-102

Auer Peter (2005) lsquoProjection in interaction and projection in grammarrsquo Text 251 7-36

Auer Peter (2006) lsquoIncrements and more Anmerkungen zur augenblicklichen Diskussionuumlber die Erweiterbarkeit von Turnkonstruktionseinheitenrsquo In Arnulf Deppermann ReinhardFiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds Grammatik und Interaktion Verlag fuumlrGespraumlchsforschung 279-294

Auer Peter (2007) lsquoWhy are increments such elusive objects An afterthought Pragmatics174 647-658

Auer Peter (2009) lsquoOnline-syntax thoughts on the temporality od spoken languagersquoLanguage Sciences 31 1-13

Auer Peter (2009) lsquoProjection and minimalistic syntax in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes46180ndash205

Auer Peter (2010) lsquoZum Segmentierungsproblem in der gesprochenen Sprache In InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures 49 (httpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthde)

Auer Peter (2014)Theres no harm in glossing (but a need for a better understanding of thestatus of transcripts)rsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 17-22

Auer Peter (2014) lsquoThe temporality of language in interaction Projection and latencyrsquoInLiSt 54 1-25 URL httpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthdeissues54inlist54pdf

Auer Peter Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Frank Muumlller (1999) Language in time The rhythmand tempo of spoken interaction New York NY Oxford University Press

Auer Peter Aldo Di Luzio eds (1992) The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins

Auer Peter Barbara Roumlnfeldt (2004) lsquoProlixity as adaptation Prosody and turn-taking inGerman conversation with a fluent aphasicrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 171 ndash 200

Ayaszlig Ruth Cornelia Gerhardt eds The Appropriation of Media in Everyday Life Amsterdam Benjamins

2

Barnwell Brendan (2013) lsquoPerception of prosodic boundaries by untrained listenersrsquo InBeatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 125 ndash 166

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (1994) lsquoA very delayed acceptance to an invitation in a Frenchconversationrsquo In R Gardner ed Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia Australian Reviewof Applied Linguistics series S 11153-172

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (2003) lsquoPast troubles-talk in nonnative-native interviewsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 354 615-629

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (2011) lsquoUsing conversation analysis in the second languageclassroom to teach interactional competencersquo Language Teaching Research 154 479-507

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie C Ruth Pritchard (1997) Beyond Talk A course incommunication and conversation for intermediate adult learners of English MelbourneWestern Melbourne Institute of TAFE [httpeslandcateachingwordpresscom]

Barske Tobias (2009) lsquoSame token different actions a conversation analytic study of social roles embodied actions and ok in German business meetingsrsquo Journal of BusinessCommunication 461 120-149

Barske Tobias Andrea Golato (2010) lsquoGerman so managing sequence and actionrsquo TextampTalk 303245-66

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoThe fuzziness of intonation units Some theoreticalconsiderations and a practical solutionrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 51URL lthttpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthdeissues51InLiSt51pdfgt

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoResponse tokens in interaction-prosody phonetics and avisual aspect of German JAJA (with 36 Audio- and 18 Videoclips)rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12 301-370 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoThe fuzziness of intonation units Some theoreticalconsiderations and a practical solutionrsquo In InLiSt ndash Interaction and Linguistic Structure 51(httpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoResponse tokens in interaction-prosody phonetics and avisual aspect of German JAJA (with 36 Audio- and 18 Videoclips)rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12 301-370 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011 ) lsquoDouble sayings of German JA More observations ontheir phonetic form and alignment functionrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 442 157-185

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2013) lsquoFrom ldquointonation unitsrdquo to cesuring ndash an alternativeapproach to the prosodic-phonetic structuring of talk-in-interactionrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 91 ndash124

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds (2009) Where Prosody meetspragmatics Bingley Emerald

3

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 23]

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Elke Schumann Rainer Wohlfarth (2012) lsquoDa capo al fineBeobachtungen zu Vorgeformtheit von Prosodie und Phonetik in retold stories rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 13 322-352(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Benjamin Trevor (2012) lsquoWhen problems pass us by Using ldquoyou meanrdquo to help locate thesource of troublersquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 451 82-109

Benjamin Trevor Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and other-initiated repairrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Benjamin Trevor Traci Walker (2013) lsquoManaging problems of acceptability with high risefall repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 502 107-38

Betz Emma (2008) Grammar and Interaction Pivots in German conversation [Studies inDiscourse and Grammar 21] AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins

Betz Emma (2008) Grammar and Interaction Pivots in German conversation [Studies inDiscourse and Grammar 21] AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins

Betz Emma (2013) lsquoQuotendashunquote in one variety of German Two interactional functions ofpivot constructions used as frames for quotation in Siebenbuumlrger Saumlchsischrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 16-34

Betz Emma Andrea Golato (2008) lsquoRemembering relevant information and withholdingrelevant next actions The German token achjarsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction411 58-98

Betz Emma Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm Veronika Drake Andrea Golato (2013)lsquoThird-Position Repeats in German The Case of Repair- and Request-for-InformationSequencesrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14 133-166(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Birkner Karin Sofie Henricson Camilla Lindholmc Martin Pfeiffer (2012) lsquoGrammar andself-repair Retraction patterns in German and Swedish prepositional phrasesrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 44 1413--1433

Blythe J (2010) lsquoSelf-association in Murriny Patha talk-in-interactionrsquo Australian Journal ofLinguistics 304 447-469

Blythe Joe (2013) lsquoPreference organization driving structuration Evidence from AustralianAboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalizationrsquo Language894 883-919

Bolden Galina B (2000) lsquoTowards understanding practices of medical interpretingInterpretersrsquo involvement in history takingrsquo Discourse Studies 2 387-419

Bolden Galina B (2003) lsquoMultiple modalities in collaborative turn sequencesrsquo Gesture 3187-212

Bolden Galina B (2004) lsquoThe quote and beyond Defining boundaries of reported speech inconversational Russianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1071-1118

4

Bolden Galina B (2006) lsquoLittle words that matter Discourse markers ldquosordquo and ldquoohrdquo and thedoing of other-attentiveness in social interactionrsquo Journal of Communication 56 661-88

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoSo whatrsquos up Using the discourse marker so to launchconversational businessrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3) 302-327

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoReopening Russian conversations The discourse particle ndashndashto andthe negotiation of interpersonal accountability in closingsrsquo Human Communication Research34(1) 99-136

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing incipient actions The discourse marker lsquosorsquo inEnglish conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 974-998

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing delayed actionsrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed ConversationAnalysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 326-54

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoBeyond answering Repeat-prefaced responses in conversationrsquoCommunication Monographs 762 121-143

Bolden Galina B (2010) lsquoldquoArticulating the unsaidrdquo via and-prefaced formulations of othersrsquotalkrsquo Discourse Studies 121 5-32

Bolden Galina B (2011) lsquoOn the organization of repair in multiperson conversation the caseof ldquootherrdquo-selection in other-initiated repair sequencesrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 443 237-262

Bolden Galina B (2012) lsquoAcross languages and cultures Brokering problems ofunderstanding in conversational repairrsquo Language in Society 411 97 - 121

Bolden Galina B Estefania Guimaraes (2012) lsquoGrammatical flexibility as a resource inexplicating referentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 452 156ndash174

Bowles Hugo Paul Seedhouse eds (2007) Conversation analysis and language for specificpurposes Bern etc Peter Lang

Brouwer Catherine E (2004) lsquoDoing pronunciation A specific type of repair sequencersquo InRod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second language conversations London Continuum93-113

Brouwer Catherine E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis methodology in second languagestudiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Brouwer Catherine E Gitte Rasmussen Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoEmbedded corrections insecond language talkrsquo In Rod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second languageconversations London Continuum75-92

Brouwer Catherine E Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoDevelopmental issues in second languageconversationrsquo Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 29-47

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoVariation in transcriptionrsquo Discourse Studies 9 784-808

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoReply variability in transcribersrsquo Discourse Studies 9 837-842

Bucholtz Mary (2000) lsquoThe politics of transcriptionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1439ndash65

5

Carroll D (2004) lsquoRestarts in novice turn beginnings Disfluencies or interactionalachievementsrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second language conversations LondonContinuum 201-220

Carroll D (2005) lsquoVowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversationrsquo In K Richards P Seedhouse eds Applying conversation analysisBasingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 214-234

Cekaite Asta Polly Bjoumlrk-Willeacuten (2013) lsquoPeer group interactions in multilingual educationalsettings Co-constructing social order and norms for language usersquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 174-188

Chang Miao-Hsia Hsin-Yi Su (2012) lsquoTo mark or not to mark the cause that is the questionCausal marking in Taiwanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1743-1763

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in french conversation how contextmattersrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 411 1-30

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2009 ) lsquoThe facework of unfinished turns in French conversationrsquoDiscourse Studies 11 267-284

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoManaging impartiality in French tourist offices Responsesto recommendation-seeking questionsrsquo Discourse Studies 13 139-161

Chevalier Fabienne H G ed (2011) lsquoFrench Language and Social Interaction Studies inConversation Analysis and Interactional Linguisticsrsquo special issue of Nottingham FrenchStudies 502 Copies may be obtained at sueruszczynski [at] nottinghamacuk

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2011) lsquoLanguage and social interaction An introductionrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoOn the emergent and interactive character of grammaticalresources in interaction a single-case analysis of a left dislocation in spoken FrenchrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG Rebecca Clift (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in French conversationProjectability syntax and actionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4010 1731-52

Clift Rebecca (1999) lsquoIrony in conversationrsquo Language in Society 28 523ndash53

Clift Rebecca (2001) lsquoMeaning in interaction the case of ldquoactuallyrdquorsquo Language 772245-291

Clift Rebecca (2003) lsquoSynonyms in actionrsquo International Journal of English Studies 31167-187

Clift Rebecca (2005) lsquoDiscovering Orderrsquo Lingua 115 1641-65

Clift Rebecca (2006) lsquoIndexing stance Reported speech as an interactional evidentialrsquoJournal of Sociolinguistics 105 569-95

Clift Rebecca (2007) lsquoGetting there first non-narrative reported speech in interactionrsquo InElizabeth Holt Rebecca Clift eds Reporting Talk Reported Speech in InteractionCambridge Cambridge University Press 120-49

6

Clift Rebecca (2012) lsquoWho knew A view from linguisticsrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 451 69-75

Corrin Juliette (2010) lsquoA young childrsquos experience of maternal open-class repair initiationlearning about talk and learning about talk-in-interactionrsquo In Hilary Gardner MichaelForrester eds Analysing Interactions in Childhood insights from conversation analysisOxford WileyBlackwell 23-41

Corrin Juliette Clare Tarplee Bill Wells (2001) lsquoInteractional linguistics and languagedevelopment A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntaxrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 199-225

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1986) An introduction to English prosody Tuumlbingen Niemeyer

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1992) lsquoContextualizing discourse The prosody of interactiverepairrsquo In P Auer amp A di Luzio eds The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins 337-364

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1993) English speech rhythm Form and function in everydayverbal interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1996) lsquoThe prosody of repetition On quoting and mimicryrsquo InElisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Margret Selting eds Prosody in conversation CambridgeCambridge University Press 366ndash405

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1996) lsquoIntonation and clause-combining in discourse The case ofbecausersquo Pragmatics 63 389-426

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1998) lsquoProsody in interactional discoursersquo In SKY Yearbook1998 The yearbook of the Linguistic Association Finland 7-40

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2001) lsquoInteractional prosody High onsets in reason-for-the-callturnsrsquo Language in Society 30 29-53

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoProsody and sequence organization in Englishconversation The case of new beginnings In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 335 ndash 376

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoAnalyzing language in interaction The practice of ldquonevermindrdquorsquo English Language and Linguistics 82 207-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2007) lsquoAssessing and accountingrsquo In Elizabeth Holt RebeccaClift eds Reporting Talk Reported speech in interaction Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 81-119

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2009) lsquoA sequential approach to affect The case ofldquodisappointmentrdquorsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 94-123

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) Prosody In Sigurd Drsquohondt ed The Pragmatics ofInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins Amsterdam Benjamins174-189

7

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) lsquoRelatedness and timing in talk-in-interactionrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds Where Prosody Meets PragmaticsBingley Emerald 257-276 Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2010) lsquoCommentary on Stivers and Rossano ldquoMobilizingResponserdquorsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 431 32-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoSome truths and untruths about final intonation inconversational questionsrsquo In J P De Ruiter ed Questions Formal functional andinteractional perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 123-145

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2012) lsquoExploring affiliation in the reception of conversationalcomplaint storiesrsquo In M-L Sorjonen A Peraumlkylauml eds Emotion in interaction OxfordOxford University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoTurn continuation and clause combinationsrsquo DiscourseProcesses 493-4 273-299

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Dagmar Barth-Weingarten (2011) lsquoA system for transcribingtalk-in-interaction GAT 2 Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12 1-51 [httpwwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde]

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) Sound patterns in interactionAmsterdam Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono eds (2007) lsquoTurn-continuation in cross-linguisticperspectiversquo [Special Issue] Pragmatics 174 505-646

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) lsquoIncrements in cross-linguistic perspectiveIntroductory remarksrsquo Pragmatics 174 505-512 Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting eds (1996) Prosody in conversationInteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting(1996) lsquoTowards an interactional perspective onprosody and a prosodic perspective on interactionrsquo In Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen MargretSelting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 11-56

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting (2001) lsquoIntroducing interactional linguisticsrsquo InMargret Selting Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 1-22

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Sandra A Thompson (2005) lsquoA linguistic practice for retractingoverstatements ldquoConcessive repairrdquorsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 257-288

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoOn assessing situations and events inconversation lsquoExtrapositionrsquo and its relatives Discourse Studies 104 443-467

Cromdal Jakob (2000) lsquoCreating a monolingual story in bilingual conversationrsquo In JNJoslashrgensen A Holmen red Det er Conversation 801 degil mi Perspectives on thebilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western EuropeCopenhagen Studies in Bilingualism Koslashge Series K7 Copenhagen The Royal DanishSchool of Educational Studies

8

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Auer Peter (2000) lsquoOn line-Syntax ndash oder Was es bedeuten koumlnnte die Zeitlichkeit dermuumlndlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmenrsquo Sprache und Literatur 85 43-56

Auer Peter (2005) lsquoDelayed self-repairs as a structuring device for complex turns inconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 75-102

Auer Peter (2005) lsquoProjection in interaction and projection in grammarrsquo Text 251 7-36

Auer Peter (2006) lsquoIncrements and more Anmerkungen zur augenblicklichen Diskussionuumlber die Erweiterbarkeit von Turnkonstruktionseinheitenrsquo In Arnulf Deppermann ReinhardFiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds Grammatik und Interaktion Verlag fuumlrGespraumlchsforschung 279-294

Auer Peter (2007) lsquoWhy are increments such elusive objects An afterthought Pragmatics174 647-658

Auer Peter (2009) lsquoOnline-syntax thoughts on the temporality od spoken languagersquoLanguage Sciences 31 1-13

Auer Peter (2009) lsquoProjection and minimalistic syntax in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes46180ndash205

Auer Peter (2010) lsquoZum Segmentierungsproblem in der gesprochenen Sprache In InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures 49 (httpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthde)

Auer Peter (2014)Theres no harm in glossing (but a need for a better understanding of thestatus of transcripts)rsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 17-22

Auer Peter (2014) lsquoThe temporality of language in interaction Projection and latencyrsquoInLiSt 54 1-25 URL httpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthdeissues54inlist54pdf

Auer Peter Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Frank Muumlller (1999) Language in time The rhythmand tempo of spoken interaction New York NY Oxford University Press

Auer Peter Aldo Di Luzio eds (1992) The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins

Auer Peter Barbara Roumlnfeldt (2004) lsquoProlixity as adaptation Prosody and turn-taking inGerman conversation with a fluent aphasicrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 171 ndash 200

Ayaszlig Ruth Cornelia Gerhardt eds The Appropriation of Media in Everyday Life Amsterdam Benjamins

2

Barnwell Brendan (2013) lsquoPerception of prosodic boundaries by untrained listenersrsquo InBeatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 125 ndash 166

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (1994) lsquoA very delayed acceptance to an invitation in a Frenchconversationrsquo In R Gardner ed Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia Australian Reviewof Applied Linguistics series S 11153-172

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (2003) lsquoPast troubles-talk in nonnative-native interviewsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 354 615-629

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (2011) lsquoUsing conversation analysis in the second languageclassroom to teach interactional competencersquo Language Teaching Research 154 479-507

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie C Ruth Pritchard (1997) Beyond Talk A course incommunication and conversation for intermediate adult learners of English MelbourneWestern Melbourne Institute of TAFE [httpeslandcateachingwordpresscom]

Barske Tobias (2009) lsquoSame token different actions a conversation analytic study of social roles embodied actions and ok in German business meetingsrsquo Journal of BusinessCommunication 461 120-149

Barske Tobias Andrea Golato (2010) lsquoGerman so managing sequence and actionrsquo TextampTalk 303245-66

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoThe fuzziness of intonation units Some theoreticalconsiderations and a practical solutionrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 51URL lthttpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthdeissues51InLiSt51pdfgt

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoResponse tokens in interaction-prosody phonetics and avisual aspect of German JAJA (with 36 Audio- and 18 Videoclips)rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12 301-370 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoThe fuzziness of intonation units Some theoreticalconsiderations and a practical solutionrsquo In InLiSt ndash Interaction and Linguistic Structure 51(httpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoResponse tokens in interaction-prosody phonetics and avisual aspect of German JAJA (with 36 Audio- and 18 Videoclips)rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12 301-370 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011 ) lsquoDouble sayings of German JA More observations ontheir phonetic form and alignment functionrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 442 157-185

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2013) lsquoFrom ldquointonation unitsrdquo to cesuring ndash an alternativeapproach to the prosodic-phonetic structuring of talk-in-interactionrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 91 ndash124

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds (2009) Where Prosody meetspragmatics Bingley Emerald

3

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 23]

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Elke Schumann Rainer Wohlfarth (2012) lsquoDa capo al fineBeobachtungen zu Vorgeformtheit von Prosodie und Phonetik in retold stories rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 13 322-352(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Benjamin Trevor (2012) lsquoWhen problems pass us by Using ldquoyou meanrdquo to help locate thesource of troublersquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 451 82-109

Benjamin Trevor Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and other-initiated repairrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Benjamin Trevor Traci Walker (2013) lsquoManaging problems of acceptability with high risefall repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 502 107-38

Betz Emma (2008) Grammar and Interaction Pivots in German conversation [Studies inDiscourse and Grammar 21] AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins

Betz Emma (2008) Grammar and Interaction Pivots in German conversation [Studies inDiscourse and Grammar 21] AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins

Betz Emma (2013) lsquoQuotendashunquote in one variety of German Two interactional functions ofpivot constructions used as frames for quotation in Siebenbuumlrger Saumlchsischrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 16-34

Betz Emma Andrea Golato (2008) lsquoRemembering relevant information and withholdingrelevant next actions The German token achjarsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction411 58-98

Betz Emma Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm Veronika Drake Andrea Golato (2013)lsquoThird-Position Repeats in German The Case of Repair- and Request-for-InformationSequencesrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14 133-166(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Birkner Karin Sofie Henricson Camilla Lindholmc Martin Pfeiffer (2012) lsquoGrammar andself-repair Retraction patterns in German and Swedish prepositional phrasesrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 44 1413--1433

Blythe J (2010) lsquoSelf-association in Murriny Patha talk-in-interactionrsquo Australian Journal ofLinguistics 304 447-469

Blythe Joe (2013) lsquoPreference organization driving structuration Evidence from AustralianAboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalizationrsquo Language894 883-919

Bolden Galina B (2000) lsquoTowards understanding practices of medical interpretingInterpretersrsquo involvement in history takingrsquo Discourse Studies 2 387-419

Bolden Galina B (2003) lsquoMultiple modalities in collaborative turn sequencesrsquo Gesture 3187-212

Bolden Galina B (2004) lsquoThe quote and beyond Defining boundaries of reported speech inconversational Russianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1071-1118

4

Bolden Galina B (2006) lsquoLittle words that matter Discourse markers ldquosordquo and ldquoohrdquo and thedoing of other-attentiveness in social interactionrsquo Journal of Communication 56 661-88

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoSo whatrsquos up Using the discourse marker so to launchconversational businessrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3) 302-327

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoReopening Russian conversations The discourse particle ndashndashto andthe negotiation of interpersonal accountability in closingsrsquo Human Communication Research34(1) 99-136

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing incipient actions The discourse marker lsquosorsquo inEnglish conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 974-998

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing delayed actionsrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed ConversationAnalysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 326-54

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoBeyond answering Repeat-prefaced responses in conversationrsquoCommunication Monographs 762 121-143

Bolden Galina B (2010) lsquoldquoArticulating the unsaidrdquo via and-prefaced formulations of othersrsquotalkrsquo Discourse Studies 121 5-32

Bolden Galina B (2011) lsquoOn the organization of repair in multiperson conversation the caseof ldquootherrdquo-selection in other-initiated repair sequencesrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 443 237-262

Bolden Galina B (2012) lsquoAcross languages and cultures Brokering problems ofunderstanding in conversational repairrsquo Language in Society 411 97 - 121

Bolden Galina B Estefania Guimaraes (2012) lsquoGrammatical flexibility as a resource inexplicating referentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 452 156ndash174

Bowles Hugo Paul Seedhouse eds (2007) Conversation analysis and language for specificpurposes Bern etc Peter Lang

Brouwer Catherine E (2004) lsquoDoing pronunciation A specific type of repair sequencersquo InRod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second language conversations London Continuum93-113

Brouwer Catherine E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis methodology in second languagestudiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Brouwer Catherine E Gitte Rasmussen Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoEmbedded corrections insecond language talkrsquo In Rod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second languageconversations London Continuum75-92

Brouwer Catherine E Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoDevelopmental issues in second languageconversationrsquo Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 29-47

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoVariation in transcriptionrsquo Discourse Studies 9 784-808

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoReply variability in transcribersrsquo Discourse Studies 9 837-842

Bucholtz Mary (2000) lsquoThe politics of transcriptionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1439ndash65

5

Carroll D (2004) lsquoRestarts in novice turn beginnings Disfluencies or interactionalachievementsrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second language conversations LondonContinuum 201-220

Carroll D (2005) lsquoVowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversationrsquo In K Richards P Seedhouse eds Applying conversation analysisBasingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 214-234

Cekaite Asta Polly Bjoumlrk-Willeacuten (2013) lsquoPeer group interactions in multilingual educationalsettings Co-constructing social order and norms for language usersquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 174-188

Chang Miao-Hsia Hsin-Yi Su (2012) lsquoTo mark or not to mark the cause that is the questionCausal marking in Taiwanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1743-1763

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in french conversation how contextmattersrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 411 1-30

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2009 ) lsquoThe facework of unfinished turns in French conversationrsquoDiscourse Studies 11 267-284

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoManaging impartiality in French tourist offices Responsesto recommendation-seeking questionsrsquo Discourse Studies 13 139-161

Chevalier Fabienne H G ed (2011) lsquoFrench Language and Social Interaction Studies inConversation Analysis and Interactional Linguisticsrsquo special issue of Nottingham FrenchStudies 502 Copies may be obtained at sueruszczynski [at] nottinghamacuk

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2011) lsquoLanguage and social interaction An introductionrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoOn the emergent and interactive character of grammaticalresources in interaction a single-case analysis of a left dislocation in spoken FrenchrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG Rebecca Clift (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in French conversationProjectability syntax and actionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4010 1731-52

Clift Rebecca (1999) lsquoIrony in conversationrsquo Language in Society 28 523ndash53

Clift Rebecca (2001) lsquoMeaning in interaction the case of ldquoactuallyrdquorsquo Language 772245-291

Clift Rebecca (2003) lsquoSynonyms in actionrsquo International Journal of English Studies 31167-187

Clift Rebecca (2005) lsquoDiscovering Orderrsquo Lingua 115 1641-65

Clift Rebecca (2006) lsquoIndexing stance Reported speech as an interactional evidentialrsquoJournal of Sociolinguistics 105 569-95

Clift Rebecca (2007) lsquoGetting there first non-narrative reported speech in interactionrsquo InElizabeth Holt Rebecca Clift eds Reporting Talk Reported Speech in InteractionCambridge Cambridge University Press 120-49

6

Clift Rebecca (2012) lsquoWho knew A view from linguisticsrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 451 69-75

Corrin Juliette (2010) lsquoA young childrsquos experience of maternal open-class repair initiationlearning about talk and learning about talk-in-interactionrsquo In Hilary Gardner MichaelForrester eds Analysing Interactions in Childhood insights from conversation analysisOxford WileyBlackwell 23-41

Corrin Juliette Clare Tarplee Bill Wells (2001) lsquoInteractional linguistics and languagedevelopment A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntaxrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 199-225

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1986) An introduction to English prosody Tuumlbingen Niemeyer

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1992) lsquoContextualizing discourse The prosody of interactiverepairrsquo In P Auer amp A di Luzio eds The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins 337-364

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1993) English speech rhythm Form and function in everydayverbal interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1996) lsquoThe prosody of repetition On quoting and mimicryrsquo InElisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Margret Selting eds Prosody in conversation CambridgeCambridge University Press 366ndash405

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1996) lsquoIntonation and clause-combining in discourse The case ofbecausersquo Pragmatics 63 389-426

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1998) lsquoProsody in interactional discoursersquo In SKY Yearbook1998 The yearbook of the Linguistic Association Finland 7-40

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2001) lsquoInteractional prosody High onsets in reason-for-the-callturnsrsquo Language in Society 30 29-53

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoProsody and sequence organization in Englishconversation The case of new beginnings In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 335 ndash 376

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoAnalyzing language in interaction The practice of ldquonevermindrdquorsquo English Language and Linguistics 82 207-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2007) lsquoAssessing and accountingrsquo In Elizabeth Holt RebeccaClift eds Reporting Talk Reported speech in interaction Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 81-119

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2009) lsquoA sequential approach to affect The case ofldquodisappointmentrdquorsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 94-123

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) Prosody In Sigurd Drsquohondt ed The Pragmatics ofInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins Amsterdam Benjamins174-189

7

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) lsquoRelatedness and timing in talk-in-interactionrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds Where Prosody Meets PragmaticsBingley Emerald 257-276 Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2010) lsquoCommentary on Stivers and Rossano ldquoMobilizingResponserdquorsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 431 32-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoSome truths and untruths about final intonation inconversational questionsrsquo In J P De Ruiter ed Questions Formal functional andinteractional perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 123-145

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2012) lsquoExploring affiliation in the reception of conversationalcomplaint storiesrsquo In M-L Sorjonen A Peraumlkylauml eds Emotion in interaction OxfordOxford University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoTurn continuation and clause combinationsrsquo DiscourseProcesses 493-4 273-299

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Dagmar Barth-Weingarten (2011) lsquoA system for transcribingtalk-in-interaction GAT 2 Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12 1-51 [httpwwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde]

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) Sound patterns in interactionAmsterdam Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono eds (2007) lsquoTurn-continuation in cross-linguisticperspectiversquo [Special Issue] Pragmatics 174 505-646

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) lsquoIncrements in cross-linguistic perspectiveIntroductory remarksrsquo Pragmatics 174 505-512 Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting eds (1996) Prosody in conversationInteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting(1996) lsquoTowards an interactional perspective onprosody and a prosodic perspective on interactionrsquo In Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen MargretSelting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 11-56

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting (2001) lsquoIntroducing interactional linguisticsrsquo InMargret Selting Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 1-22

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Sandra A Thompson (2005) lsquoA linguistic practice for retractingoverstatements ldquoConcessive repairrdquorsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 257-288

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoOn assessing situations and events inconversation lsquoExtrapositionrsquo and its relatives Discourse Studies 104 443-467

Cromdal Jakob (2000) lsquoCreating a monolingual story in bilingual conversationrsquo In JNJoslashrgensen A Holmen red Det er Conversation 801 degil mi Perspectives on thebilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western EuropeCopenhagen Studies in Bilingualism Koslashge Series K7 Copenhagen The Royal DanishSchool of Educational Studies

8

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Barnwell Brendan (2013) lsquoPerception of prosodic boundaries by untrained listenersrsquo InBeatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 125 ndash 166

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (1994) lsquoA very delayed acceptance to an invitation in a Frenchconversationrsquo In R Gardner ed Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia Australian Reviewof Applied Linguistics series S 11153-172

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (2003) lsquoPast troubles-talk in nonnative-native interviewsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 354 615-629

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie (2011) lsquoUsing conversation analysis in the second languageclassroom to teach interactional competencersquo Language Teaching Research 154 479-507

Barraja-Rohan Anne-Marie C Ruth Pritchard (1997) Beyond Talk A course incommunication and conversation for intermediate adult learners of English MelbourneWestern Melbourne Institute of TAFE [httpeslandcateachingwordpresscom]

Barske Tobias (2009) lsquoSame token different actions a conversation analytic study of social roles embodied actions and ok in German business meetingsrsquo Journal of BusinessCommunication 461 120-149

Barske Tobias Andrea Golato (2010) lsquoGerman so managing sequence and actionrsquo TextampTalk 303245-66

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoThe fuzziness of intonation units Some theoreticalconsiderations and a practical solutionrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 51URL lthttpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthdeissues51InLiSt51pdfgt

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoResponse tokens in interaction-prosody phonetics and avisual aspect of German JAJA (with 36 Audio- and 18 Videoclips)rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12 301-370 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoThe fuzziness of intonation units Some theoreticalconsiderations and a practical solutionrsquo In InLiSt ndash Interaction and Linguistic Structure 51(httpwwwinlistuni-bayreuthde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011) lsquoResponse tokens in interaction-prosody phonetics and avisual aspect of German JAJA (with 36 Audio- and 18 Videoclips)rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12 301-370 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2011 ) lsquoDouble sayings of German JA More observations ontheir phonetic form and alignment functionrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 442 157-185

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2013) lsquoFrom ldquointonation unitsrdquo to cesuring ndash an alternativeapproach to the prosodic-phonetic structuring of talk-in-interactionrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 91 ndash124

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds (2009) Where Prosody meetspragmatics Bingley Emerald

3

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 23]

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Elke Schumann Rainer Wohlfarth (2012) lsquoDa capo al fineBeobachtungen zu Vorgeformtheit von Prosodie und Phonetik in retold stories rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 13 322-352(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Benjamin Trevor (2012) lsquoWhen problems pass us by Using ldquoyou meanrdquo to help locate thesource of troublersquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 451 82-109

Benjamin Trevor Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and other-initiated repairrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Benjamin Trevor Traci Walker (2013) lsquoManaging problems of acceptability with high risefall repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 502 107-38

Betz Emma (2008) Grammar and Interaction Pivots in German conversation [Studies inDiscourse and Grammar 21] AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins

Betz Emma (2008) Grammar and Interaction Pivots in German conversation [Studies inDiscourse and Grammar 21] AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins

Betz Emma (2013) lsquoQuotendashunquote in one variety of German Two interactional functions ofpivot constructions used as frames for quotation in Siebenbuumlrger Saumlchsischrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 16-34

Betz Emma Andrea Golato (2008) lsquoRemembering relevant information and withholdingrelevant next actions The German token achjarsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction411 58-98

Betz Emma Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm Veronika Drake Andrea Golato (2013)lsquoThird-Position Repeats in German The Case of Repair- and Request-for-InformationSequencesrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14 133-166(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Birkner Karin Sofie Henricson Camilla Lindholmc Martin Pfeiffer (2012) lsquoGrammar andself-repair Retraction patterns in German and Swedish prepositional phrasesrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 44 1413--1433

Blythe J (2010) lsquoSelf-association in Murriny Patha talk-in-interactionrsquo Australian Journal ofLinguistics 304 447-469

Blythe Joe (2013) lsquoPreference organization driving structuration Evidence from AustralianAboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalizationrsquo Language894 883-919

Bolden Galina B (2000) lsquoTowards understanding practices of medical interpretingInterpretersrsquo involvement in history takingrsquo Discourse Studies 2 387-419

Bolden Galina B (2003) lsquoMultiple modalities in collaborative turn sequencesrsquo Gesture 3187-212

Bolden Galina B (2004) lsquoThe quote and beyond Defining boundaries of reported speech inconversational Russianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1071-1118

4

Bolden Galina B (2006) lsquoLittle words that matter Discourse markers ldquosordquo and ldquoohrdquo and thedoing of other-attentiveness in social interactionrsquo Journal of Communication 56 661-88

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoSo whatrsquos up Using the discourse marker so to launchconversational businessrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3) 302-327

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoReopening Russian conversations The discourse particle ndashndashto andthe negotiation of interpersonal accountability in closingsrsquo Human Communication Research34(1) 99-136

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing incipient actions The discourse marker lsquosorsquo inEnglish conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 974-998

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing delayed actionsrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed ConversationAnalysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 326-54

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoBeyond answering Repeat-prefaced responses in conversationrsquoCommunication Monographs 762 121-143

Bolden Galina B (2010) lsquoldquoArticulating the unsaidrdquo via and-prefaced formulations of othersrsquotalkrsquo Discourse Studies 121 5-32

Bolden Galina B (2011) lsquoOn the organization of repair in multiperson conversation the caseof ldquootherrdquo-selection in other-initiated repair sequencesrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 443 237-262

Bolden Galina B (2012) lsquoAcross languages and cultures Brokering problems ofunderstanding in conversational repairrsquo Language in Society 411 97 - 121

Bolden Galina B Estefania Guimaraes (2012) lsquoGrammatical flexibility as a resource inexplicating referentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 452 156ndash174

Bowles Hugo Paul Seedhouse eds (2007) Conversation analysis and language for specificpurposes Bern etc Peter Lang

Brouwer Catherine E (2004) lsquoDoing pronunciation A specific type of repair sequencersquo InRod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second language conversations London Continuum93-113

Brouwer Catherine E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis methodology in second languagestudiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Brouwer Catherine E Gitte Rasmussen Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoEmbedded corrections insecond language talkrsquo In Rod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second languageconversations London Continuum75-92

Brouwer Catherine E Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoDevelopmental issues in second languageconversationrsquo Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 29-47

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoVariation in transcriptionrsquo Discourse Studies 9 784-808

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoReply variability in transcribersrsquo Discourse Studies 9 837-842

Bucholtz Mary (2000) lsquoThe politics of transcriptionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1439ndash65

5

Carroll D (2004) lsquoRestarts in novice turn beginnings Disfluencies or interactionalachievementsrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second language conversations LondonContinuum 201-220

Carroll D (2005) lsquoVowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversationrsquo In K Richards P Seedhouse eds Applying conversation analysisBasingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 214-234

Cekaite Asta Polly Bjoumlrk-Willeacuten (2013) lsquoPeer group interactions in multilingual educationalsettings Co-constructing social order and norms for language usersquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 174-188

Chang Miao-Hsia Hsin-Yi Su (2012) lsquoTo mark or not to mark the cause that is the questionCausal marking in Taiwanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1743-1763

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in french conversation how contextmattersrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 411 1-30

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2009 ) lsquoThe facework of unfinished turns in French conversationrsquoDiscourse Studies 11 267-284

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoManaging impartiality in French tourist offices Responsesto recommendation-seeking questionsrsquo Discourse Studies 13 139-161

Chevalier Fabienne H G ed (2011) lsquoFrench Language and Social Interaction Studies inConversation Analysis and Interactional Linguisticsrsquo special issue of Nottingham FrenchStudies 502 Copies may be obtained at sueruszczynski [at] nottinghamacuk

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2011) lsquoLanguage and social interaction An introductionrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoOn the emergent and interactive character of grammaticalresources in interaction a single-case analysis of a left dislocation in spoken FrenchrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG Rebecca Clift (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in French conversationProjectability syntax and actionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4010 1731-52

Clift Rebecca (1999) lsquoIrony in conversationrsquo Language in Society 28 523ndash53

Clift Rebecca (2001) lsquoMeaning in interaction the case of ldquoactuallyrdquorsquo Language 772245-291

Clift Rebecca (2003) lsquoSynonyms in actionrsquo International Journal of English Studies 31167-187

Clift Rebecca (2005) lsquoDiscovering Orderrsquo Lingua 115 1641-65

Clift Rebecca (2006) lsquoIndexing stance Reported speech as an interactional evidentialrsquoJournal of Sociolinguistics 105 569-95

Clift Rebecca (2007) lsquoGetting there first non-narrative reported speech in interactionrsquo InElizabeth Holt Rebecca Clift eds Reporting Talk Reported Speech in InteractionCambridge Cambridge University Press 120-49

6

Clift Rebecca (2012) lsquoWho knew A view from linguisticsrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 451 69-75

Corrin Juliette (2010) lsquoA young childrsquos experience of maternal open-class repair initiationlearning about talk and learning about talk-in-interactionrsquo In Hilary Gardner MichaelForrester eds Analysing Interactions in Childhood insights from conversation analysisOxford WileyBlackwell 23-41

Corrin Juliette Clare Tarplee Bill Wells (2001) lsquoInteractional linguistics and languagedevelopment A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntaxrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 199-225

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1986) An introduction to English prosody Tuumlbingen Niemeyer

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1992) lsquoContextualizing discourse The prosody of interactiverepairrsquo In P Auer amp A di Luzio eds The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins 337-364

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1993) English speech rhythm Form and function in everydayverbal interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1996) lsquoThe prosody of repetition On quoting and mimicryrsquo InElisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Margret Selting eds Prosody in conversation CambridgeCambridge University Press 366ndash405

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1996) lsquoIntonation and clause-combining in discourse The case ofbecausersquo Pragmatics 63 389-426

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1998) lsquoProsody in interactional discoursersquo In SKY Yearbook1998 The yearbook of the Linguistic Association Finland 7-40

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2001) lsquoInteractional prosody High onsets in reason-for-the-callturnsrsquo Language in Society 30 29-53

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoProsody and sequence organization in Englishconversation The case of new beginnings In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 335 ndash 376

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoAnalyzing language in interaction The practice of ldquonevermindrdquorsquo English Language and Linguistics 82 207-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2007) lsquoAssessing and accountingrsquo In Elizabeth Holt RebeccaClift eds Reporting Talk Reported speech in interaction Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 81-119

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2009) lsquoA sequential approach to affect The case ofldquodisappointmentrdquorsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 94-123

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) Prosody In Sigurd Drsquohondt ed The Pragmatics ofInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins Amsterdam Benjamins174-189

7

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) lsquoRelatedness and timing in talk-in-interactionrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds Where Prosody Meets PragmaticsBingley Emerald 257-276 Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2010) lsquoCommentary on Stivers and Rossano ldquoMobilizingResponserdquorsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 431 32-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoSome truths and untruths about final intonation inconversational questionsrsquo In J P De Ruiter ed Questions Formal functional andinteractional perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 123-145

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2012) lsquoExploring affiliation in the reception of conversationalcomplaint storiesrsquo In M-L Sorjonen A Peraumlkylauml eds Emotion in interaction OxfordOxford University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoTurn continuation and clause combinationsrsquo DiscourseProcesses 493-4 273-299

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Dagmar Barth-Weingarten (2011) lsquoA system for transcribingtalk-in-interaction GAT 2 Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12 1-51 [httpwwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde]

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) Sound patterns in interactionAmsterdam Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono eds (2007) lsquoTurn-continuation in cross-linguisticperspectiversquo [Special Issue] Pragmatics 174 505-646

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) lsquoIncrements in cross-linguistic perspectiveIntroductory remarksrsquo Pragmatics 174 505-512 Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting eds (1996) Prosody in conversationInteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting(1996) lsquoTowards an interactional perspective onprosody and a prosodic perspective on interactionrsquo In Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen MargretSelting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 11-56

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting (2001) lsquoIntroducing interactional linguisticsrsquo InMargret Selting Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 1-22

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Sandra A Thompson (2005) lsquoA linguistic practice for retractingoverstatements ldquoConcessive repairrdquorsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 257-288

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoOn assessing situations and events inconversation lsquoExtrapositionrsquo and its relatives Discourse Studies 104 443-467

Cromdal Jakob (2000) lsquoCreating a monolingual story in bilingual conversationrsquo In JNJoslashrgensen A Holmen red Det er Conversation 801 degil mi Perspectives on thebilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western EuropeCopenhagen Studies in Bilingualism Koslashge Series K7 Copenhagen The Royal DanishSchool of Educational Studies

8

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 23]

Barth-Weingarten Dagmar Elke Schumann Rainer Wohlfarth (2012) lsquoDa capo al fineBeobachtungen zu Vorgeformtheit von Prosodie und Phonetik in retold stories rsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 13 322-352(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Benjamin Trevor (2012) lsquoWhen problems pass us by Using ldquoyou meanrdquo to help locate thesource of troublersquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 451 82-109

Benjamin Trevor Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and other-initiated repairrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Benjamin Trevor Traci Walker (2013) lsquoManaging problems of acceptability with high risefall repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 502 107-38

Betz Emma (2008) Grammar and Interaction Pivots in German conversation [Studies inDiscourse and Grammar 21] AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins

Betz Emma (2008) Grammar and Interaction Pivots in German conversation [Studies inDiscourse and Grammar 21] AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins

Betz Emma (2013) lsquoQuotendashunquote in one variety of German Two interactional functions ofpivot constructions used as frames for quotation in Siebenbuumlrger Saumlchsischrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 16-34

Betz Emma Andrea Golato (2008) lsquoRemembering relevant information and withholdingrelevant next actions The German token achjarsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction411 58-98

Betz Emma Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm Veronika Drake Andrea Golato (2013)lsquoThird-Position Repeats in German The Case of Repair- and Request-for-InformationSequencesrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14 133-166(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Birkner Karin Sofie Henricson Camilla Lindholmc Martin Pfeiffer (2012) lsquoGrammar andself-repair Retraction patterns in German and Swedish prepositional phrasesrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 44 1413--1433

Blythe J (2010) lsquoSelf-association in Murriny Patha talk-in-interactionrsquo Australian Journal ofLinguistics 304 447-469

Blythe Joe (2013) lsquoPreference organization driving structuration Evidence from AustralianAboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalizationrsquo Language894 883-919

Bolden Galina B (2000) lsquoTowards understanding practices of medical interpretingInterpretersrsquo involvement in history takingrsquo Discourse Studies 2 387-419

Bolden Galina B (2003) lsquoMultiple modalities in collaborative turn sequencesrsquo Gesture 3187-212

Bolden Galina B (2004) lsquoThe quote and beyond Defining boundaries of reported speech inconversational Russianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1071-1118

4

Bolden Galina B (2006) lsquoLittle words that matter Discourse markers ldquosordquo and ldquoohrdquo and thedoing of other-attentiveness in social interactionrsquo Journal of Communication 56 661-88

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoSo whatrsquos up Using the discourse marker so to launchconversational businessrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3) 302-327

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoReopening Russian conversations The discourse particle ndashndashto andthe negotiation of interpersonal accountability in closingsrsquo Human Communication Research34(1) 99-136

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing incipient actions The discourse marker lsquosorsquo inEnglish conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 974-998

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing delayed actionsrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed ConversationAnalysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 326-54

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoBeyond answering Repeat-prefaced responses in conversationrsquoCommunication Monographs 762 121-143

Bolden Galina B (2010) lsquoldquoArticulating the unsaidrdquo via and-prefaced formulations of othersrsquotalkrsquo Discourse Studies 121 5-32

Bolden Galina B (2011) lsquoOn the organization of repair in multiperson conversation the caseof ldquootherrdquo-selection in other-initiated repair sequencesrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 443 237-262

Bolden Galina B (2012) lsquoAcross languages and cultures Brokering problems ofunderstanding in conversational repairrsquo Language in Society 411 97 - 121

Bolden Galina B Estefania Guimaraes (2012) lsquoGrammatical flexibility as a resource inexplicating referentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 452 156ndash174

Bowles Hugo Paul Seedhouse eds (2007) Conversation analysis and language for specificpurposes Bern etc Peter Lang

Brouwer Catherine E (2004) lsquoDoing pronunciation A specific type of repair sequencersquo InRod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second language conversations London Continuum93-113

Brouwer Catherine E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis methodology in second languagestudiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Brouwer Catherine E Gitte Rasmussen Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoEmbedded corrections insecond language talkrsquo In Rod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second languageconversations London Continuum75-92

Brouwer Catherine E Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoDevelopmental issues in second languageconversationrsquo Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 29-47

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoVariation in transcriptionrsquo Discourse Studies 9 784-808

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoReply variability in transcribersrsquo Discourse Studies 9 837-842

Bucholtz Mary (2000) lsquoThe politics of transcriptionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1439ndash65

5

Carroll D (2004) lsquoRestarts in novice turn beginnings Disfluencies or interactionalachievementsrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second language conversations LondonContinuum 201-220

Carroll D (2005) lsquoVowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversationrsquo In K Richards P Seedhouse eds Applying conversation analysisBasingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 214-234

Cekaite Asta Polly Bjoumlrk-Willeacuten (2013) lsquoPeer group interactions in multilingual educationalsettings Co-constructing social order and norms for language usersquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 174-188

Chang Miao-Hsia Hsin-Yi Su (2012) lsquoTo mark or not to mark the cause that is the questionCausal marking in Taiwanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1743-1763

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in french conversation how contextmattersrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 411 1-30

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2009 ) lsquoThe facework of unfinished turns in French conversationrsquoDiscourse Studies 11 267-284

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoManaging impartiality in French tourist offices Responsesto recommendation-seeking questionsrsquo Discourse Studies 13 139-161

Chevalier Fabienne H G ed (2011) lsquoFrench Language and Social Interaction Studies inConversation Analysis and Interactional Linguisticsrsquo special issue of Nottingham FrenchStudies 502 Copies may be obtained at sueruszczynski [at] nottinghamacuk

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2011) lsquoLanguage and social interaction An introductionrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoOn the emergent and interactive character of grammaticalresources in interaction a single-case analysis of a left dislocation in spoken FrenchrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG Rebecca Clift (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in French conversationProjectability syntax and actionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4010 1731-52

Clift Rebecca (1999) lsquoIrony in conversationrsquo Language in Society 28 523ndash53

Clift Rebecca (2001) lsquoMeaning in interaction the case of ldquoactuallyrdquorsquo Language 772245-291

Clift Rebecca (2003) lsquoSynonyms in actionrsquo International Journal of English Studies 31167-187

Clift Rebecca (2005) lsquoDiscovering Orderrsquo Lingua 115 1641-65

Clift Rebecca (2006) lsquoIndexing stance Reported speech as an interactional evidentialrsquoJournal of Sociolinguistics 105 569-95

Clift Rebecca (2007) lsquoGetting there first non-narrative reported speech in interactionrsquo InElizabeth Holt Rebecca Clift eds Reporting Talk Reported Speech in InteractionCambridge Cambridge University Press 120-49

6

Clift Rebecca (2012) lsquoWho knew A view from linguisticsrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 451 69-75

Corrin Juliette (2010) lsquoA young childrsquos experience of maternal open-class repair initiationlearning about talk and learning about talk-in-interactionrsquo In Hilary Gardner MichaelForrester eds Analysing Interactions in Childhood insights from conversation analysisOxford WileyBlackwell 23-41

Corrin Juliette Clare Tarplee Bill Wells (2001) lsquoInteractional linguistics and languagedevelopment A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntaxrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 199-225

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1986) An introduction to English prosody Tuumlbingen Niemeyer

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1992) lsquoContextualizing discourse The prosody of interactiverepairrsquo In P Auer amp A di Luzio eds The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins 337-364

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1993) English speech rhythm Form and function in everydayverbal interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1996) lsquoThe prosody of repetition On quoting and mimicryrsquo InElisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Margret Selting eds Prosody in conversation CambridgeCambridge University Press 366ndash405

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1996) lsquoIntonation and clause-combining in discourse The case ofbecausersquo Pragmatics 63 389-426

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1998) lsquoProsody in interactional discoursersquo In SKY Yearbook1998 The yearbook of the Linguistic Association Finland 7-40

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2001) lsquoInteractional prosody High onsets in reason-for-the-callturnsrsquo Language in Society 30 29-53

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoProsody and sequence organization in Englishconversation The case of new beginnings In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 335 ndash 376

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoAnalyzing language in interaction The practice of ldquonevermindrdquorsquo English Language and Linguistics 82 207-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2007) lsquoAssessing and accountingrsquo In Elizabeth Holt RebeccaClift eds Reporting Talk Reported speech in interaction Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 81-119

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2009) lsquoA sequential approach to affect The case ofldquodisappointmentrdquorsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 94-123

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) Prosody In Sigurd Drsquohondt ed The Pragmatics ofInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins Amsterdam Benjamins174-189

7

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) lsquoRelatedness and timing in talk-in-interactionrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds Where Prosody Meets PragmaticsBingley Emerald 257-276 Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2010) lsquoCommentary on Stivers and Rossano ldquoMobilizingResponserdquorsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 431 32-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoSome truths and untruths about final intonation inconversational questionsrsquo In J P De Ruiter ed Questions Formal functional andinteractional perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 123-145

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2012) lsquoExploring affiliation in the reception of conversationalcomplaint storiesrsquo In M-L Sorjonen A Peraumlkylauml eds Emotion in interaction OxfordOxford University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoTurn continuation and clause combinationsrsquo DiscourseProcesses 493-4 273-299

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Dagmar Barth-Weingarten (2011) lsquoA system for transcribingtalk-in-interaction GAT 2 Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12 1-51 [httpwwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde]

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) Sound patterns in interactionAmsterdam Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono eds (2007) lsquoTurn-continuation in cross-linguisticperspectiversquo [Special Issue] Pragmatics 174 505-646

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) lsquoIncrements in cross-linguistic perspectiveIntroductory remarksrsquo Pragmatics 174 505-512 Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting eds (1996) Prosody in conversationInteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting(1996) lsquoTowards an interactional perspective onprosody and a prosodic perspective on interactionrsquo In Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen MargretSelting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 11-56

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting (2001) lsquoIntroducing interactional linguisticsrsquo InMargret Selting Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 1-22

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Sandra A Thompson (2005) lsquoA linguistic practice for retractingoverstatements ldquoConcessive repairrdquorsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 257-288

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoOn assessing situations and events inconversation lsquoExtrapositionrsquo and its relatives Discourse Studies 104 443-467

Cromdal Jakob (2000) lsquoCreating a monolingual story in bilingual conversationrsquo In JNJoslashrgensen A Holmen red Det er Conversation 801 degil mi Perspectives on thebilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western EuropeCopenhagen Studies in Bilingualism Koslashge Series K7 Copenhagen The Royal DanishSchool of Educational Studies

8

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Bolden Galina B (2006) lsquoLittle words that matter Discourse markers ldquosordquo and ldquoohrdquo and thedoing of other-attentiveness in social interactionrsquo Journal of Communication 56 661-88

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoSo whatrsquos up Using the discourse marker so to launchconversational businessrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3) 302-327

Bolden Galina (2008) lsquoReopening Russian conversations The discourse particle ndashndashto andthe negotiation of interpersonal accountability in closingsrsquo Human Communication Research34(1) 99-136

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing incipient actions The discourse marker lsquosorsquo inEnglish conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 974-998

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoImplementing delayed actionsrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed ConversationAnalysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 326-54

Bolden Galina B (2009) lsquoBeyond answering Repeat-prefaced responses in conversationrsquoCommunication Monographs 762 121-143

Bolden Galina B (2010) lsquoldquoArticulating the unsaidrdquo via and-prefaced formulations of othersrsquotalkrsquo Discourse Studies 121 5-32

Bolden Galina B (2011) lsquoOn the organization of repair in multiperson conversation the caseof ldquootherrdquo-selection in other-initiated repair sequencesrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 443 237-262

Bolden Galina B (2012) lsquoAcross languages and cultures Brokering problems ofunderstanding in conversational repairrsquo Language in Society 411 97 - 121

Bolden Galina B Estefania Guimaraes (2012) lsquoGrammatical flexibility as a resource inexplicating referentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 452 156ndash174

Bowles Hugo Paul Seedhouse eds (2007) Conversation analysis and language for specificpurposes Bern etc Peter Lang

Brouwer Catherine E (2004) lsquoDoing pronunciation A specific type of repair sequencersquo InRod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second language conversations London Continuum93-113

Brouwer Catherine E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis methodology in second languagestudiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Brouwer Catherine E Gitte Rasmussen Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoEmbedded corrections insecond language talkrsquo In Rod Gardner Johannes Wagner eds Second languageconversations London Continuum75-92

Brouwer Catherine E Johannes Wagner (2004) lsquoDevelopmental issues in second languageconversationrsquo Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 29-47

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoVariation in transcriptionrsquo Discourse Studies 9 784-808

Bucholtz Mary (2007) lsquoReply variability in transcribersrsquo Discourse Studies 9 837-842

Bucholtz Mary (2000) lsquoThe politics of transcriptionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1439ndash65

5

Carroll D (2004) lsquoRestarts in novice turn beginnings Disfluencies or interactionalachievementsrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second language conversations LondonContinuum 201-220

Carroll D (2005) lsquoVowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversationrsquo In K Richards P Seedhouse eds Applying conversation analysisBasingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 214-234

Cekaite Asta Polly Bjoumlrk-Willeacuten (2013) lsquoPeer group interactions in multilingual educationalsettings Co-constructing social order and norms for language usersquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 174-188

Chang Miao-Hsia Hsin-Yi Su (2012) lsquoTo mark or not to mark the cause that is the questionCausal marking in Taiwanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1743-1763

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in french conversation how contextmattersrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 411 1-30

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2009 ) lsquoThe facework of unfinished turns in French conversationrsquoDiscourse Studies 11 267-284

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoManaging impartiality in French tourist offices Responsesto recommendation-seeking questionsrsquo Discourse Studies 13 139-161

Chevalier Fabienne H G ed (2011) lsquoFrench Language and Social Interaction Studies inConversation Analysis and Interactional Linguisticsrsquo special issue of Nottingham FrenchStudies 502 Copies may be obtained at sueruszczynski [at] nottinghamacuk

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2011) lsquoLanguage and social interaction An introductionrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoOn the emergent and interactive character of grammaticalresources in interaction a single-case analysis of a left dislocation in spoken FrenchrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG Rebecca Clift (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in French conversationProjectability syntax and actionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4010 1731-52

Clift Rebecca (1999) lsquoIrony in conversationrsquo Language in Society 28 523ndash53

Clift Rebecca (2001) lsquoMeaning in interaction the case of ldquoactuallyrdquorsquo Language 772245-291

Clift Rebecca (2003) lsquoSynonyms in actionrsquo International Journal of English Studies 31167-187

Clift Rebecca (2005) lsquoDiscovering Orderrsquo Lingua 115 1641-65

Clift Rebecca (2006) lsquoIndexing stance Reported speech as an interactional evidentialrsquoJournal of Sociolinguistics 105 569-95

Clift Rebecca (2007) lsquoGetting there first non-narrative reported speech in interactionrsquo InElizabeth Holt Rebecca Clift eds Reporting Talk Reported Speech in InteractionCambridge Cambridge University Press 120-49

6

Clift Rebecca (2012) lsquoWho knew A view from linguisticsrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 451 69-75

Corrin Juliette (2010) lsquoA young childrsquos experience of maternal open-class repair initiationlearning about talk and learning about talk-in-interactionrsquo In Hilary Gardner MichaelForrester eds Analysing Interactions in Childhood insights from conversation analysisOxford WileyBlackwell 23-41

Corrin Juliette Clare Tarplee Bill Wells (2001) lsquoInteractional linguistics and languagedevelopment A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntaxrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 199-225

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1986) An introduction to English prosody Tuumlbingen Niemeyer

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1992) lsquoContextualizing discourse The prosody of interactiverepairrsquo In P Auer amp A di Luzio eds The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins 337-364

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1993) English speech rhythm Form and function in everydayverbal interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1996) lsquoThe prosody of repetition On quoting and mimicryrsquo InElisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Margret Selting eds Prosody in conversation CambridgeCambridge University Press 366ndash405

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1996) lsquoIntonation and clause-combining in discourse The case ofbecausersquo Pragmatics 63 389-426

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1998) lsquoProsody in interactional discoursersquo In SKY Yearbook1998 The yearbook of the Linguistic Association Finland 7-40

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2001) lsquoInteractional prosody High onsets in reason-for-the-callturnsrsquo Language in Society 30 29-53

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoProsody and sequence organization in Englishconversation The case of new beginnings In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 335 ndash 376

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoAnalyzing language in interaction The practice of ldquonevermindrdquorsquo English Language and Linguistics 82 207-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2007) lsquoAssessing and accountingrsquo In Elizabeth Holt RebeccaClift eds Reporting Talk Reported speech in interaction Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 81-119

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2009) lsquoA sequential approach to affect The case ofldquodisappointmentrdquorsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 94-123

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) Prosody In Sigurd Drsquohondt ed The Pragmatics ofInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins Amsterdam Benjamins174-189

7

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) lsquoRelatedness and timing in talk-in-interactionrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds Where Prosody Meets PragmaticsBingley Emerald 257-276 Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2010) lsquoCommentary on Stivers and Rossano ldquoMobilizingResponserdquorsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 431 32-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoSome truths and untruths about final intonation inconversational questionsrsquo In J P De Ruiter ed Questions Formal functional andinteractional perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 123-145

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2012) lsquoExploring affiliation in the reception of conversationalcomplaint storiesrsquo In M-L Sorjonen A Peraumlkylauml eds Emotion in interaction OxfordOxford University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoTurn continuation and clause combinationsrsquo DiscourseProcesses 493-4 273-299

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Dagmar Barth-Weingarten (2011) lsquoA system for transcribingtalk-in-interaction GAT 2 Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12 1-51 [httpwwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde]

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) Sound patterns in interactionAmsterdam Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono eds (2007) lsquoTurn-continuation in cross-linguisticperspectiversquo [Special Issue] Pragmatics 174 505-646

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) lsquoIncrements in cross-linguistic perspectiveIntroductory remarksrsquo Pragmatics 174 505-512 Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting eds (1996) Prosody in conversationInteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting(1996) lsquoTowards an interactional perspective onprosody and a prosodic perspective on interactionrsquo In Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen MargretSelting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 11-56

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting (2001) lsquoIntroducing interactional linguisticsrsquo InMargret Selting Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 1-22

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Sandra A Thompson (2005) lsquoA linguistic practice for retractingoverstatements ldquoConcessive repairrdquorsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 257-288

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoOn assessing situations and events inconversation lsquoExtrapositionrsquo and its relatives Discourse Studies 104 443-467

Cromdal Jakob (2000) lsquoCreating a monolingual story in bilingual conversationrsquo In JNJoslashrgensen A Holmen red Det er Conversation 801 degil mi Perspectives on thebilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western EuropeCopenhagen Studies in Bilingualism Koslashge Series K7 Copenhagen The Royal DanishSchool of Educational Studies

8

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Carroll D (2004) lsquoRestarts in novice turn beginnings Disfluencies or interactionalachievementsrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second language conversations LondonContinuum 201-220

Carroll D (2005) lsquoVowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversationrsquo In K Richards P Seedhouse eds Applying conversation analysisBasingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 214-234

Cekaite Asta Polly Bjoumlrk-Willeacuten (2013) lsquoPeer group interactions in multilingual educationalsettings Co-constructing social order and norms for language usersquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 174-188

Chang Miao-Hsia Hsin-Yi Su (2012) lsquoTo mark or not to mark the cause that is the questionCausal marking in Taiwanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1743-1763

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in french conversation how contextmattersrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 411 1-30

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2009 ) lsquoThe facework of unfinished turns in French conversationrsquoDiscourse Studies 11 267-284

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoManaging impartiality in French tourist offices Responsesto recommendation-seeking questionsrsquo Discourse Studies 13 139-161

Chevalier Fabienne H G ed (2011) lsquoFrench Language and Social Interaction Studies inConversation Analysis and Interactional Linguisticsrsquo special issue of Nottingham FrenchStudies 502 Copies may be obtained at sueruszczynski [at] nottinghamacuk

Chevalier Fabienne H G (2011) lsquoLanguage and social interaction An introductionrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG (2011) lsquoOn the emergent and interactive character of grammaticalresources in interaction a single-case analysis of a left dislocation in spoken FrenchrsquoNottingham French Studies 502

Chevalier Fabienne HG Rebecca Clift (2008) lsquoUnfinished turns in French conversationProjectability syntax and actionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4010 1731-52

Clift Rebecca (1999) lsquoIrony in conversationrsquo Language in Society 28 523ndash53

Clift Rebecca (2001) lsquoMeaning in interaction the case of ldquoactuallyrdquorsquo Language 772245-291

Clift Rebecca (2003) lsquoSynonyms in actionrsquo International Journal of English Studies 31167-187

Clift Rebecca (2005) lsquoDiscovering Orderrsquo Lingua 115 1641-65

Clift Rebecca (2006) lsquoIndexing stance Reported speech as an interactional evidentialrsquoJournal of Sociolinguistics 105 569-95

Clift Rebecca (2007) lsquoGetting there first non-narrative reported speech in interactionrsquo InElizabeth Holt Rebecca Clift eds Reporting Talk Reported Speech in InteractionCambridge Cambridge University Press 120-49

6

Clift Rebecca (2012) lsquoWho knew A view from linguisticsrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 451 69-75

Corrin Juliette (2010) lsquoA young childrsquos experience of maternal open-class repair initiationlearning about talk and learning about talk-in-interactionrsquo In Hilary Gardner MichaelForrester eds Analysing Interactions in Childhood insights from conversation analysisOxford WileyBlackwell 23-41

Corrin Juliette Clare Tarplee Bill Wells (2001) lsquoInteractional linguistics and languagedevelopment A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntaxrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 199-225

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1986) An introduction to English prosody Tuumlbingen Niemeyer

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1992) lsquoContextualizing discourse The prosody of interactiverepairrsquo In P Auer amp A di Luzio eds The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins 337-364

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1993) English speech rhythm Form and function in everydayverbal interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1996) lsquoThe prosody of repetition On quoting and mimicryrsquo InElisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Margret Selting eds Prosody in conversation CambridgeCambridge University Press 366ndash405

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1996) lsquoIntonation and clause-combining in discourse The case ofbecausersquo Pragmatics 63 389-426

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1998) lsquoProsody in interactional discoursersquo In SKY Yearbook1998 The yearbook of the Linguistic Association Finland 7-40

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2001) lsquoInteractional prosody High onsets in reason-for-the-callturnsrsquo Language in Society 30 29-53

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoProsody and sequence organization in Englishconversation The case of new beginnings In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 335 ndash 376

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoAnalyzing language in interaction The practice of ldquonevermindrdquorsquo English Language and Linguistics 82 207-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2007) lsquoAssessing and accountingrsquo In Elizabeth Holt RebeccaClift eds Reporting Talk Reported speech in interaction Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 81-119

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2009) lsquoA sequential approach to affect The case ofldquodisappointmentrdquorsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 94-123

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) Prosody In Sigurd Drsquohondt ed The Pragmatics ofInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins Amsterdam Benjamins174-189

7

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) lsquoRelatedness and timing in talk-in-interactionrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds Where Prosody Meets PragmaticsBingley Emerald 257-276 Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2010) lsquoCommentary on Stivers and Rossano ldquoMobilizingResponserdquorsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 431 32-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoSome truths and untruths about final intonation inconversational questionsrsquo In J P De Ruiter ed Questions Formal functional andinteractional perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 123-145

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2012) lsquoExploring affiliation in the reception of conversationalcomplaint storiesrsquo In M-L Sorjonen A Peraumlkylauml eds Emotion in interaction OxfordOxford University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoTurn continuation and clause combinationsrsquo DiscourseProcesses 493-4 273-299

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Dagmar Barth-Weingarten (2011) lsquoA system for transcribingtalk-in-interaction GAT 2 Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12 1-51 [httpwwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde]

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) Sound patterns in interactionAmsterdam Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono eds (2007) lsquoTurn-continuation in cross-linguisticperspectiversquo [Special Issue] Pragmatics 174 505-646

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) lsquoIncrements in cross-linguistic perspectiveIntroductory remarksrsquo Pragmatics 174 505-512 Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting eds (1996) Prosody in conversationInteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting(1996) lsquoTowards an interactional perspective onprosody and a prosodic perspective on interactionrsquo In Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen MargretSelting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 11-56

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting (2001) lsquoIntroducing interactional linguisticsrsquo InMargret Selting Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 1-22

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Sandra A Thompson (2005) lsquoA linguistic practice for retractingoverstatements ldquoConcessive repairrdquorsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 257-288

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoOn assessing situations and events inconversation lsquoExtrapositionrsquo and its relatives Discourse Studies 104 443-467

Cromdal Jakob (2000) lsquoCreating a monolingual story in bilingual conversationrsquo In JNJoslashrgensen A Holmen red Det er Conversation 801 degil mi Perspectives on thebilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western EuropeCopenhagen Studies in Bilingualism Koslashge Series K7 Copenhagen The Royal DanishSchool of Educational Studies

8

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Clift Rebecca (2012) lsquoWho knew A view from linguisticsrsquo Research on Language amp SocialInteraction 451 69-75

Corrin Juliette (2010) lsquoA young childrsquos experience of maternal open-class repair initiationlearning about talk and learning about talk-in-interactionrsquo In Hilary Gardner MichaelForrester eds Analysing Interactions in Childhood insights from conversation analysisOxford WileyBlackwell 23-41

Corrin Juliette Clare Tarplee Bill Wells (2001) lsquoInteractional linguistics and languagedevelopment A conversation analytic perspective on emergent syntaxrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 199-225

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1986) An introduction to English prosody Tuumlbingen Niemeyer

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1992) lsquoContextualizing discourse The prosody of interactiverepairrsquo In P Auer amp A di Luzio eds The contextualization of language AmsterdamBenjamins 337-364

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1993) English speech rhythm Form and function in everydayverbal interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (1996) lsquoThe prosody of repetition On quoting and mimicryrsquo InElisabeth Couper-Kuhlen Margret Selting eds Prosody in conversation CambridgeCambridge University Press 366ndash405

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1996) lsquoIntonation and clause-combining in discourse The case ofbecausersquo Pragmatics 63 389-426

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (1998) lsquoProsody in interactional discoursersquo In SKY Yearbook1998 The yearbook of the Linguistic Association Finland 7-40

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2001) lsquoInteractional prosody High onsets in reason-for-the-callturnsrsquo Language in Society 30 29-53

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoProsody and sequence organization in Englishconversation The case of new beginnings In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Soundpatterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 335 ndash 376

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2004) lsquoAnalyzing language in interaction The practice of ldquonevermindrdquorsquo English Language and Linguistics 82 207-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2007) lsquoAssessing and accountingrsquo In Elizabeth Holt RebeccaClift eds Reporting Talk Reported speech in interaction Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 81-119

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2009) lsquoA sequential approach to affect The case ofldquodisappointmentrdquorsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 94-123

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) Prosody In Sigurd Drsquohondt ed The Pragmatics ofInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins Amsterdam Benjamins174-189

7

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) lsquoRelatedness and timing in talk-in-interactionrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds Where Prosody Meets PragmaticsBingley Emerald 257-276 Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2010) lsquoCommentary on Stivers and Rossano ldquoMobilizingResponserdquorsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 431 32-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoSome truths and untruths about final intonation inconversational questionsrsquo In J P De Ruiter ed Questions Formal functional andinteractional perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 123-145

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2012) lsquoExploring affiliation in the reception of conversationalcomplaint storiesrsquo In M-L Sorjonen A Peraumlkylauml eds Emotion in interaction OxfordOxford University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoTurn continuation and clause combinationsrsquo DiscourseProcesses 493-4 273-299

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Dagmar Barth-Weingarten (2011) lsquoA system for transcribingtalk-in-interaction GAT 2 Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12 1-51 [httpwwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde]

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) Sound patterns in interactionAmsterdam Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono eds (2007) lsquoTurn-continuation in cross-linguisticperspectiversquo [Special Issue] Pragmatics 174 505-646

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) lsquoIncrements in cross-linguistic perspectiveIntroductory remarksrsquo Pragmatics 174 505-512 Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting eds (1996) Prosody in conversationInteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting(1996) lsquoTowards an interactional perspective onprosody and a prosodic perspective on interactionrsquo In Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen MargretSelting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 11-56

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting (2001) lsquoIntroducing interactional linguisticsrsquo InMargret Selting Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 1-22

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Sandra A Thompson (2005) lsquoA linguistic practice for retractingoverstatements ldquoConcessive repairrdquorsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 257-288

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoOn assessing situations and events inconversation lsquoExtrapositionrsquo and its relatives Discourse Studies 104 443-467

Cromdal Jakob (2000) lsquoCreating a monolingual story in bilingual conversationrsquo In JNJoslashrgensen A Holmen red Det er Conversation 801 degil mi Perspectives on thebilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western EuropeCopenhagen Studies in Bilingualism Koslashge Series K7 Copenhagen The Royal DanishSchool of Educational Studies

8

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2009) lsquoRelatedness and timing in talk-in-interactionrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Nicole Deheacute Anne Wichmann eds Where Prosody Meets PragmaticsBingley Emerald 257-276 Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2010) lsquoCommentary on Stivers and Rossano ldquoMobilizingResponserdquorsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 431 32-37

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoSome truths and untruths about final intonation inconversational questionsrsquo In J P De Ruiter ed Questions Formal functional andinteractional perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 123-145

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth (2012) lsquoExploring affiliation in the reception of conversationalcomplaint storiesrsquo In M-L Sorjonen A Peraumlkylauml eds Emotion in interaction OxfordOxford University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (2012) lsquoTurn continuation and clause combinationsrsquo DiscourseProcesses 493-4 273-299

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Dagmar Barth-Weingarten (2011) lsquoA system for transcribingtalk-in-interaction GAT 2 Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12 1-51 [httpwwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde]

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) Sound patterns in interactionAmsterdam Benjamins

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono eds (2007) lsquoTurn-continuation in cross-linguisticperspectiversquo [Special Issue] Pragmatics 174 505-646

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) lsquoIncrements in cross-linguistic perspectiveIntroductory remarksrsquo Pragmatics 174 505-512 Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting eds (1996) Prosody in conversationInteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting(1996) lsquoTowards an interactional perspective onprosody and a prosodic perspective on interactionrsquo In Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen MargretSelting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 11-56

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Margret Selting (2001) lsquoIntroducing interactional linguisticsrsquo InMargret Selting Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 1-22

Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth Sandra A Thompson (2005) lsquoA linguistic practice for retractingoverstatements ldquoConcessive repairrdquorsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 257-288

Couper-Kuhlen Elisabeth Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoOn assessing situations and events inconversation lsquoExtrapositionrsquo and its relatives Discourse Studies 104 443-467

Cromdal Jakob (2000) lsquoCreating a monolingual story in bilingual conversationrsquo In JNJoslashrgensen A Holmen red Det er Conversation 801 degil mi Perspectives on thebilingualism of Turkish-speaking children and adolescents in North Western EuropeCopenhagen Studies in Bilingualism Koslashge Series K7 Copenhagen The Royal DanishSchool of Educational Studies

8

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquordquoCan I be withrdquo Negotiating play entry in a bilingual schoolrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 33 515-43

Cromdal Jakob (2001) lsquoOverlap in bilingual play Some implications of code-switching foroverlap resolutionrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 421-51

Cromdal Jakob (2003) lsquoThe creation and administration of social relations in bilingual groupworkrsquo Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24 56-75

Cromdal Jakob (2004) lsquoBuilding bilingual oppositions Code-switching in childrenrsquos playrsquoLanguage in Society 33 33-58

Cromdal Jakob ed (2013) lsquoSpecial Issue Bilingual and Second-Language InteractionrsquoInternational Journal of Bilingualism 172

Cromdal Jakob (2013) lsquoBilingual and second language interactions Views fromScandinaviarsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 121-131

Curl Traci S (2004) lsquoldquoRepetitionrdquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds (2004) SoundPatterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 273-98

Curl Traci S (2005) lsquoPractices in other-initiated repair resolution The phoneticdifferentiation of repetitionsrsquo Discourse Processes 391 1ndash44

Curl Traci S (2006) lsquoOffers of assistance Constraints on syntactic designrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 388 1257-80

Curl Traci S John Local Gareth Walker (2006) lsquoRepetition and the prosodyndashpragmaticsinterfacersquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1721-51

Drsquohondt Sigurd (2009) lsquoThe pragmatics of interaction A surveyrsquo In Sigurd DrsquohondtJan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 1 ndash 19

Drsquohondt Sigurd Jan-Ola Oumlstman Jef Verschueren eds The Pragmatics of InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins

Deppermann Arnulf (2005) lsquoConversational interpretation of lexical items andconversational contrastingrsquo In A Hakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 289ndash317

Deppermann Arnulf (2007) Grammatik und Semantik aus gespraumlchsanalytischer Sicht Ber-lin de Gruyter

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoThe study of formulations as a key to an interactionalsemanticsrsquo Human Studies 342 115ndash128

Deppermann Arnulf (2011) lsquoNotionalization The transformation of descriptions intocategorizationsrsquo Human Studies 342 155ndash181

Deppermann Arnulf (2013) lsquoTurn-design at turn-beginnings Multimodal resources to dealwith tasks of turn-construction in GermanrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 461 91-121

9

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Deppermann Arnulf Reinhold Fiehler Thomas Spranz-Fogasy eds (2006) Grammatik undInteraktion Radolfzell Verlag fuumlr Gespraumlchsforschung

Dingemanse Mark Joe Blythe Tyko Dirksmeyer (2014) lsquoFormats for other-initiation ofrepair across languages An exercise in pragmatic typologyrsquo Studies in Language 381 5-43

Duranti Alessandro (2007) lsquoTranscripts like Shadows on a Wallrsquo Mind Culture andActivity 13(4) 301ndash10

Duranti Alessandro Charles Goodwin eds (1992) Rethinking context language as aninteractive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Duvallon Outi Sara Routarinne (2005) lsquoParenthesis as a resource in the grammar ofconversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies onthe use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 45-74

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSome interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multi-person conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 27 611-34

Egbert Maria M (1997) lsquoSchisming the collaborative transformation from a singleconversation to multiple conversationsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 301-51Egbert Maria M (1998) lsquoMiscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-yearGerman students A comparison with natural conversationrsquo In R Young A W He edsTalking and testing Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 147-169

Egbert Maria (2004) lsquoOther-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization Someconversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorizationrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 368 1467-98

Egbert Maria Monika Voumlge (2008) lsquoWh-interrogative formats used for questioning andbeyond German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English whyrsquo Discourse Studies 1017-36

Enfield NJ (2011) lsquoSources of asymmetry in human interaction enchrony statusknowledge and agencyrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 285-312

Enfield N J(2011) lsquoElements of formulationrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck Charles Goodwin CurtisLeBaron eds Embodied interaction language and body in the material world CambridgeCambridge University Press

Enfield NJ (2012) lsquoReference in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 433-54

Enfield N J Mark Dingemanse Julija Baranova Joe Blythe Penelope Brown TykoDirksmeyer Paul Drew Simeon Floyd Sonja Gipper Roacutesa Giacutesladoacutettir Gertie HoymannKobin H Kendrick Stephen C Levinson Lilla Magyari Elizabeth Manrique GiovanniRossi Lila San Roque and Francisco Torreira (2013) lsquoHuh What ndash A first survey in 21languagesrsquo In Makoto Hayashi Geoffrey Raymond Jack Sidnell eds Conversational Repairand Human Understanding Cambridge Cambridge University Press 343-380

Enfield Nick J Tanya Stivers eds (2007) Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Enfield NJ Tanya Stivers Stephen C Levinson (2010) lsquoQuestionndashresponse sequences inconversation across ten languages An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2615-2619

Erickson Frederick (2010) lsquoThe neglected listener Issues of theory and practice intranscription from video in interaction analysisrsquo In Juumlrgen Streeck ed New Adventures inLanguage and Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash 256

Ewing C Michael (2014) lsquoMotivations for first and second person subject expression andellipsis in Javanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 48-62

Faureacute Laurent (2002) lsquoTranscrire les donneacutees vocales en quoi les correacutelas prosodiques desinterjections sont-ils notablesrsquo cahiers de praxeacutematique 39 101-133

Field Margaret (2007) lsquoIncrements in Navajo conversation Pragmatics 174 637-646

Firth Alan (1996) lsquoThe discursive accomplishment of normality On ldquolingua francardquo Englishand conversation analysisrsquo Journal of pragmatics 26 237-59

Firth Alan (2009) lsquoDoing not being a foreign language learner English as a lingua franca inthe workplace and (some) implications for SLArsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics47 127-156

Firth Alan (2009) The Lingua Franca Factorrsquo Intercultural Pragmatics 6-2 147-170

Firth Alan (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and lingua francarsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1997) lsquoOn discourse communication and (some) fundamentalconcepts in second language acquisition researchrsquo The Modern Language Journal 81 3285-300 [followed by six lsquoresponsersquo articles]

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (1998) lsquoSLA property no trespassing A responsersquoThe ModernLanguage Journal 82

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2003) lsquoSLA property No Tresspassingrsquo In B Seidlhofer edControversies in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press Oxford UK 232-236

Firth Alan Johannes Wagner (2007) lsquoSecondforeign language learning as a socialaccomplishment Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLArsquo Modern Language Journal 91800-818

Fogtmann Fosgerau Christina (2013) lsquoThe co-construction of understanding in Danishnaturalization interviewsrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 221-236

Ford Cecilia E (1993) Grammar in Interaction Adverbial Clauses in American EnglishConversations Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ford Cecilia E (1994) lsquoDialogic aspects of talk and writing because on the interactional-edited continuumrsquo TEXT 14 531-54

Ford Cecilia E (1997) lsquoSpeaking conditionally Some contexts for if-clauses inconversationrsquo In A Athanasiadou R Dirven eds On Conditionals Again AmsterdamBenjamins 387-413

Ford Cecilia E (1999) lsquoCollaborative Construction of Task Activity Coordinating MultipleResources in a High School Physics Labrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 32

11

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Ford Cecilia E (2000) lsquoThe treatment of contrasts in interactionrsquo In Bernd KortmannElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Cause Condition Concession and Contrast Cognitive andDiscourse Perspectives Berlin Mouton de Gruyter 283-311

Ford Cecilia E (2001) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence Negation and what comesnextrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 51-79

Ford Cecilia E (2002) lsquoDenial and the construction of conversational turnsrsquo In J Bybee andM Noonan eds Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins61-78

Ford Cecilia E (2004) lsquoContingency and units in interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 6 27-52

Ford Cecilia E (2008) Women speaking up getting and using turns in workplace meetingsNew York Palgrave Macmillan

Ford Cecilia E (2010) lsquoQuestioning in meetings Participation and positioningrsquo In A FFreed S Ehrlich eds lsquoWhy do you askrsquo The function of questions in institutionaldiscourse Oxford Oxford University Press 211-234

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoClarity in applied and interdisciplinary conversation analysisrsquoDiscourse Studies14 507-513 [comment on Hansung et al 2012]

Ford Cecilia E (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and turn takingrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Ford Cecilia E Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2004) lsquoConversation and phonetics Essentialconnectionsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 3-25

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (1996) lsquoInteractional motivations for reference formulationHe had This guy had a beautiful thirty-two Oldsrsquo In Studies in Anaphora B Fox (Ed)Amsterdam Benjamins 145-68

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox (2011) lsquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 339-68

[see Birkner Karin (2010) lsquoMultimodal laughing Comments on Cecilia Ford andBarbara Fox ldquoMultiple practices for constructing laughablesrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 369ndash372 ]

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox John Hellerman (2004) lsquoldquoGetting past nordquo Sequence actionand sound production in the projection of no-initiated turnsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Fordeds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 233-269

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoPractices in the constructionof turns The lsquoTCUrsquo revisitedrsquo Pragmatics 6427-54

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds ( 2002) The Language of Turnand Sequence New York Oxford University Press [Dedicated to Emanuel A SchegloffOxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]

12

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2002) lsquoConstituency and the grammarof turn incrementsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson Eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 14-38

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson (2003) lsquoSocial interaction andgrammarrsquo In Michael Tomasello ed The new psychology of language Cognitive andfunctional approaches to language structure vol 2 Mahwah NJ Erlbaum 119-43

Ford Cecilia E Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson lsquoUnits andor Action TrajectoriesThe language of grammatical categories and the language of social actionrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 13 ndash 56

Ford Cecilia E Junko Mori (1994) lsquoCausal markers in Japanese and English conversationsA cross linguistic study of interactional grammarrsquo Pragmatics 431-61

Ford Cecilia E Trini Stickle (2012) lsquoSecuring recipiency in workplace meetingsMultimodal practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 141 11-30

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1986) lsquoConditionals in discourse A text-based studyfrom Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Closs Traugott Alice ter Meulen Judy Snitzer Reilly CharlesA Ferguson eds On Conditionals Cambridge Cambridge University Press 353-73

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson (1996) lsquoInteractional units in conversation Syntacticintonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turnsrsquo In E Ochs E ASchegloff S A Thompson eds Interaction and grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 134ndash84

Ford Cecilia E Sandra A Thompson Veronika Drake (2012) lsquoBodily-Visual Practices andTurn Continuationrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 192-212

Ford Cecilia E Johannes Wagner (1996) lsquoInteraction-based studies of languageIntroductionrsquo Pragmatics 63 277-279

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (2000) lsquoLrsquoanalyse de conversation delrsquoethnomeacutethodologie agrave la linguistique interactionnellersquo Histoire Eacutepisteacutemologie Langage22131ndash55

Fornel Michel de JM Marandin (1997) lsquoLrsquoanalyse grammaticale des auto-reacuteparationsrsquo[Gramatical analysis of self-repairs] Le greacute des langues 10 8-68

Fornel Michel de Jacqueline Leacuteon (1997) lsquoDes questions-eacutechos aux reacuteponses-eacutechos Uneapproche seacutequentielle et prosodique des reacutepeacutetitions dans la conversationrsquo [Echo-questions toecho-responses sequential and prosodic analyses of repetitions in conversation]Cahiers dePraxeacutematique 28 101-126

Fox Barbara A (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoAn exploration of prosody and turn projection in Englishconversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 287-315

Fox Barbara A (2001) lsquoOn the embodied nature of grammar Embodied being-in-the-worldrsquo In J Bybee M Noonan eds Complex sentences in grammar and discourse AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 79-100

13

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Fox Barbara A (2007) lsquoPrinciples shaping grammatical practices an explorationrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 299-318

Fox Barbara A (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and self-repairrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed TheEncyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Trevor Benjamin Harrie Mazeland (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and repairorganization Overviewrsquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied LinguisticsOxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Fox Barbara A Makoto Hayashi Robert Jasperson (1996) lsquoResources and repair across-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repairrsquo In Elinor Ochs Emanuel ASchegloff Sandra A Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 185-237

Fox Barbara A Y Maschler S Uhmann (2010) lsquoA cross-linguistic study of self-repairEvidence from English German and Hebrewrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 429 2487-2505

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson (2010) lsquoResponses to Wh-Questions in Englishconversationrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 432 133-156

Fox Barbara A Sandra A Thompson Cecilia E Ford Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2012)lsquoConversation analysis and linguisticsrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook ofConversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 726-40

Fox Barbara Fay Wouk Makoto Hayashi Steven Fincke Liang Tao Marja-Leena SorjonenMinna Laakso Wilfrido Flores Hernandez (2009) lsquoA cross-linguistic investigation of the siteof initiation in same-turn self-repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell ed Conversation AnalysisComparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 60-103

Franck Dorothea (1979) Gramatik und Konversation dissertation Universiteit vanAmsterdam (also Koumlnigstein Scriptor 1980)

Freese Jeremy Douglas W Maynard (1998) lsquoProsodic features of bad news and good news inconversationrsquo Language in Society 27 195-220

French P John Local (1986) lsquoProsodic features and the management of interruptionsrsquo In C Johns-Lewis ed Intonation and discourse London Croom Helm 157ndash80

French P John Local (1983) lsquoTurn competitive incomingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 7 17-38

Gafaranga Joseph (1999) lsquoLanguage choice as a significant aspect of talk organisation Theorderliness of language alternationrsquo Text 19 201-225

Gafaranga Joseph (2000) lsquoMedium repair vs other-language repair telling the medium of abilingual conversationrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 4 327-350

Gafaranga Joseph (2011) Transition space medium repair Language shift talked into beingJournal of Pragmatics 43 118-135

Gardner Rod (1997) lsquoThe conversation object Mm a weak and variable acknowledgingtokenrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 131-56

Gardner Rod (2001) When Listeners Talk Response tokens and listener stance AmsterdamBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 92]

14

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Gardner Rod (2004) lsquoOn delaying the answer Question sequences extended after thequestionrsquo In R Gardner J Wagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoThe right connections Acknowledging epistemic progression in talkrsquoLanguage in Society 363 319-341

Gardner Rod (2007) lsquoldquoBrokenrdquo starts Bricolage in turn starts in second language talkrsquo In ZHua P Seedhouse L WeiV Cook eds Language learning and teaching as social interaction Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 58-71

Gardner Rod Richard Fitzgerald Ilana Mushin (2009) lsquoThe underlying orderliness in turn-taking Examples from Australian talkrsquo Australian Journal of Communication 363 65-90 [httpaiemcanetpage_id=229]

Gardner Rod Mike Levy (2010) lsquo The coordination of talk and action in the collaborativeconstruction of a multimodal textrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 8 2189-2203

Gardner Rod Ilana Mushin (2007) lsquoPost-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in aGarrwa communityrsquo In Johanna Rendle-Short amp Maurice Nevile eds Language as actionAustralian studies in conversation analysis Special thematic issue Australian Review ofApplied Linguistics 30(3) Available via httppublicationsepressmonasheduloiaral

Gardner Rod Johannes Wagner eds (2004) Second Language Conversations Studies ofCommunication in Everyday Settings London Continuum

Geluykens R (1988) lsquoOn the myth of rising intonation in polar questionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 124 467-485

Georgakopoulou Alexandra (2010) lsquoClosing in on Story Openings and Closings Evidencefrom Conversational Stories in Greekrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 345-361

Georgalidou Marianthi Kaili Hasan Celtek Aytac (2010) lsquoCode Alternation Patterns inBilingual Family Conversation A Conversation Analysis Approachrsquo Journal of GreekLinguistics 102 317-344

Golato Andrea (2000) lsquoUnd ich so und er so [and Irsquom like and hersquos like] An innovativeGerman quotative for reporting on embodied actionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 29-54

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGerman compliment responsesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 345 547-71

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoSelf-quotation in German reporting on past decisionsrsquo InGuumlldemann Tom Manfred von Roncador eds Reported Discourse A Meeting Ground forDifferent Linguistic Domains AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 49-70

Golato Andrea (2002) lsquoGrammar and interaction reported discourse and subjunctive inGermanrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 22 24-55

Golato Andrea (2003) lsquoStudying Compliment Responses A Comparison of DCTs andRecordings of Naturally Occurring Talkrsquo Applied Linguistics 24 90-121

Golato Andrea (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses Grammatical structure andsequential organization Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 15]

Golato Andrea (2010) lsquoMarking understanding versus receipting information in talk Achso and ach in German interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 122 147-176

15

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoGerman oh marking an emotional change of statersquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 453 245-268

Golato Andrea (2012) lsquoImpersonal quotation and hypothetical discoursersquo In IsabelleBuchstaller Ingrid van Alphen eds Quotatives Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinaryperspectives Amsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash36

Golato Andrea Emma Betz (2008) lsquoGerman ach and achso in repair uptake Resources tosustain or remove epistemic asymmetryrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlr Sprachwissenschaft 27 7-37

Golato Andrea Zsuzsanna Fagyal (2008) lsquoComparing single and double sayings of theGerman response token ja and the role of prosody A conversation analytic perspectiversquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 413 241-270

Golato Andrea Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (2006) The negotiation of face in chatsMultilingual 25 293-322

Greer Tim (2013) lsquoScandinavian bilingual and L2 interaction A view from afarInternational Journal of Bilingualism 17 237-244

Guumllich Elisabeth Katrin Lindemann (2010) lsquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 269ndash294

[see Reber Elisabeth (2010) lsquoDouble function of prosody Processes ofmeaning-making in narrative reconstructions of epileptic seizures Comments onElisabeth Guumllich and Katrin Lindemann ldquoCommunicating emotion in doctor-patientinteraction A multidimensional single-case analysisrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 295ndash302]

Gumperz JJ D Hymes ed (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics the ethnography ofcommunication New York Rinehart amp Winston

Guumlnther Susanne (1996) lsquoThe prosodic contextualization of moral work an analysis ofreproaches in lsquowhyrsquo-formatsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 271-302

Guumlnthner Susanne (2005) lsquoGrammatical constructions in ldquoreal life practicesrdquo WO-constructions in everyday Germanrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis inconversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 159-184

Guthrie Anna M (1997) lsquoOn the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in academicadvising sessionsrsquo Pragmatics 7 397-415

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoOn some uses of the discourse particle lsquokyl(lauml)rsquo in Finnishconversationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins 171-198

Hakulinen Auli (2001) lsquoMinimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questionsrsquo Pragmatics1111-15

Hakulinen Auli (2009) lsquoConversation typesrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 55 ndash 65

16

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting eds (2005) Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on theuse of linguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Hakulinen Auli Margret Selting (2005) lsquoIntroductionrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 1 ndash 14

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2009) lsquoDesigning utterances for action Verb repeatresponses to assessmentsrsquo In Markku Haakana Minna Laakso Jan Lindstroumlm eds Talk inInteraction Comparative Dimensions Helsinki Finnish Literature Society (SKS) 124-151

Hakulinen Auli Marja-Leena Sorjonen (2011) lsquoWays of agreeing with negative stancetakingrsquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledgein Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 235-56

Hall J K (2004) lsquoLanguage learning as an interactional achievementrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 884 607-612

Hall J K John Hellermann S Pekarek Doehler eds (2011) L2 interactional competenceand development Clevedon England Multilingual Matters

Hausendorf Heiko Lorenza Mondada Reinhold Schmitt Hrsgs (2012) Raum als interaktiveRessource Tuumlbingen Narr [Reihe Studien zur deutschen Sprache Band Vol 62]

Hayano Kaoru (2011) lsquoGiving support to the claim of epistemic primacy yo-markedassessments in Japanesersquo In Tanya Stivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds TheMorality of Knowledge in Conversation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 58-81

Hayano Kaoru (2012) lsquoQuestion design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers edsThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 395-414

Hayashi Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japaneseconversation In N Akatsuka ed JapaneseKorean linguistics IV Stanford CSLI77-93

Hayashi Makoto (1997) lsquoAn exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle inJapanese spoken discoursersquo In H Sohn J Haig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 6565-581 Stanford CSLI

Hayashi Makoto (1999) lsquoWhere Grammar and Interaction Meet A Study of Co-ParticipantCompletion in Japanese Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 475-99

Hayashi Makoto (2001) lsquoPostposition-initiated utterances in Japanese conversation Aninteractional account of a grammatical practicersquo In Margret Selting Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam amp Philadelphia JohnBenjamins317ndash43

Hayashi Makoto (2003) lsquoLanguage and the body as resources for collaborative action Astudy of word searches in Japanese conversationrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 36109ndash41

Hayashi Makoto (2003) Joint utterance completion in Japanese conversation AmsterdamJohn Benjamins

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoDiscourse within a sentence An exploration of postpositions inJapanese as an interactional resourcersquo Language in Society 33 343ndash376

17

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Hayashi Makoto (2004) lsquoProjection and grammar Notes on the ldquoaction-projectingrdquo use of thedistal demonstrative are in Japanesersquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1337ndash1374

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoJoint turn construction through language and the body Notes onembodiment in coordinated participation in situated activitiesrsquo Semiotica 14 (156) 21-53

Hayashi Makoto (2005) lsquoReferential problems and turn construction An exploration of anintersection between grammar and interactionrsquo Text 254 437-68

Hayashi Makoto (2009) lsquoMarking a ldquonoticing of departurerdquo in talk Eh-prefaced turns inJapanese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2100-2129

Hayashi Makoto (2010) lsquoAn overview of the questionndashresponse system in Japanese lsquo Journalof Pragmatics 4210 2685-2702

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoTurn allocation and turn sharingrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 167-90

Hayashi Makoto (2012) lsquoClaiming uncertainty in recollection A study of kke-markedutterances in Japanese conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 495 391-425

Hayashi Makoto (2014) lsquoActivity participation and joint turn construction A conversationanalytic exploration of lsquogrammar-in-actionrsquo In K Kabata T Ono eds Usage-BasedApproaches to Japanese Grammar Toward the Understanding of Human LanguageAmsterdam John Benjamins 223-258

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori (1998) lsquoCo-construction in Japanese revisited We do ldquofi nisheach other lsquo s sentencesrdquo Japanese Korean Linguistics 7 77-93

Hayashi Makoto Junko Mori Tomoyo Tagaki (2002) lsquoContingent achievement ofco-tellership in a Japanese conversation an analysis of talk gaze and gesturersquo In Cecilia EFord Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds 2002) The Language of Turn and SequenceNew York Oxford University Press 81-122

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2006) lsquoA cross-linguistic exploration of demonstrativesin interaction with particular reference to the context of word-formulation troublersquo Studiesin Language 303 485-540

Hayashi Makoto Kyung-eun Yoon (2009) lsquoNegotiating boundaries in talkrsquo in Jack Sidnelled Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 250-78

He A W (2004) lsquoCA for SLA Arguments from the Chinese language classroomrsquo TheModern Language Journal 884 568-582

Heinemann Trine (2005) lsquoWhere grammar and interaction meet The preference for matchedpolarity in responsive turns in Danishrsquo In Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax andLexis in Conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interactionAmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 375ndash402

Heinemann Trine (2006) lsquoWill you or canrsquot you Displaying entitlement in interrogativerequestsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1081-1104

Heinemann Trine (2008) lsquoQuestions of accountability yesmdashno interrogatives that areunanswerablersquo Discourse Studies 10 55-71

18

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoTwo answers to inapposite inquiriesrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press159-86

Heinemann Trine (2009) lsquoParticipation and exclusion in third party complaintsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 4112 2435-2451

Heinemann Trine (2010) lsquoThe questionndashresponse system of Danish lsquo Journal of Pragmatics4210 2703-2725

Heinemann Trine Anna Lindstroumlm Jakob Steensig (2011) lsquoAddressing epistemicincongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbsrsquo In TanyaStivers Lorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 107-30

Helasvuo M-L (2001) Syntax in the making The emergence of syntactic units in Finnishconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins

Helasvuo M-L (2001) lsquoEmerging syntax for interaction Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interactionrsquo In M Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 25-50

Helasvuo M-L (2004) lsquoShared syntax The grammar of co-constructionsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 368 1315-1336

Hellermann John (2003) lsquoThe interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange Teacher repetition in feedback movesrsquo Language in Society 321 79-104

Hellermann John (2005) lsquoSyntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talkrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 381 105-130

Hellermann John (2008) Social actions for classroom language learning ClevedonEngland Multilingual Matters

Hellermann John (2009) lsquoLooking for evidence of language learning in practices for repair Acase study of self-initiated self-repair by an adult learner of Englishrsquo Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 532 113-132

Hellermann John (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and language acquisitionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Hellermann John E Cole (2009) lsquoPractices for social interaction in the language-learning classroom Disengagements from dyadic task interactionrsquo Applied Linguistics 302 186-215

Hellermann John Yo-An Lee (2014) lsquoMembers and their competencies Contributions ofethnomethodological conversation analysis to a multilingual turn in second languageacquisitionrsquo System 44 54ndash65

Hennoste Tiit (2013) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Estonianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 5473-91

Hitzler Sarah (2013) lsquoRecipient Design in institutioneller MehrparteieninteraktionrsquoGespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 14110-132(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

19

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1985) lsquoKan een verzoek met ldquojardquo worden geaccepteerdrsquoTijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 5 23-40

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoEigenschappen van aangrenzende parenrsquo GrammaNijmeegs Tijdschrift voor Taalkunde 10 41-62

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1986) lsquoClaimen en demonstreren in gesprekkenrsquo Tijdschriftvoor Taalbeheersing 8 222-34

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1987) Establishing agreement an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences DordrechtProvidence RI Foris Publications

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke (1991) lsquoOpening sequences in Dutch TelephoneConversationsrsquo In Boden Deirdre amp Don H Zimmerman eds Talk and social structureStudies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Cambridge Polity Press 232-50

Houtkoop-Steenstra Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1982) lsquoBeurten en groteregesprekseenhedenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 2 105-35

Houtkoop Hanneke Harrie Mazeland (1985) lsquoTurns and discourse units in everydayconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 595-619 Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2006) lsquoFactors affecting turn-taking behaviour Genremeets prosodyrsquo In Rebecca Hughes ed Spoken English TESOL and Applied LinguisticsChallenges for theory and practice Basingstoke Palgrave 126-140

Hughes R Beatrice Szczepek Reed(2011) lsquoLearning about speech by experiment Issues inthe investigation of spontaneous talk within the experimental research paradigmrsquo AppliedLinguistics 322 197-214

Huls Erica Carel van Wijk (2012) lsquoThe development of a directive repertoire in contextA case study of a Dutch speaking young childrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4483ndash103

James Deborah Sandra Clarke(1993) lsquoWomen men and interruptions A critical reviewrsquo InDeborah Tannen ed Gender and conversational interaction New York Oxford UniversityPress 231-280

Iwasaki Shimako (2013) lsquoEmerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit inJapanese interaction Local organization at a finer level of granularityrsquo In Beatrice SzczepekReed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 243 ndash276

Jasperson Robert (2002) lsquoSome linguistic aspects of closure cut-offrsquo In Cecilia Ford et aleds The language of turn and sequence Oxford Oxford University Press 257ndash86

Jasperson Robert Makoto Hayashi Barnara Fox (1994) lsquoSemantics and interaction Threeexploratory case studiesrsquo TEXT 144 555-580

Kaimaki Marianna (2011) lsquoTransition relevance and the phonetic design of English callopeningsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 43 2130ndash2147

Kaimaki Marianna (2010) lsquoTunes in free variation and sequentially determined pitchalignment evidence from interactional organisationrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 213-250

20

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation Amsterdam JohnBenjamins Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise (2007) lsquoThe tole of I guess in conversational stancetakingrsquo In REnglebretson ed Stancetaking in discourse Subjectivity evaluation interaction Amsterdamamp Philadelphia John Benjamins 183-219

Kaumlrkkaumlinen Elise Tiina Keisanen (2012) lsquoLinguistic and embodied formats for making(concrete) offersrsquo Discourse Studies 14 587-611

Kasper Gabriele (2006) lsquoBeyond repair Conversation analysis as an approach to SLArsquo AILAReview 19 83-99

Kasper Gabriele (2009) lsquoLocating cognition in second language interaction and learningInside the skull or in public viewrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics in LanguageTeaching 471 11-36

Kasper Gabriele (2009) Categories context and comparison in conversation analysis In HT Nguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives HonoluluForeign Language Resource Centre University of Hawai at Matildenoa 1-28

Kasper Gabriele (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interview studiesrsquo In Carol A Chapelleed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Kasper Gabriele Johannes Wagner (2011) lsquoConversation analysis as an approach to secondlanguage acquisitionrsquo In Dwight Atkinson ed Alternative approaches to seconds languageacquisition New York Routledge 117-142

Keevallik Leelo (2008) lsquoClause combining and sequenced actions The Estoniancomplementizer and pragmatic particle etrsquo In RLaury ed Crosslinguistic studies of clausecombining The multifunctionality of conjunctions Amsterdam JohnBenjamins125-152

Keevallik L (2009) lsquoThe grammar-interaction interface of negative questions in EstonianrsquoSKY Journal of Linguistics 22 139-173

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMarking boundaries between activities The particle nii in EstonianrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 432157-182

Keevallik Leelo (2010) lsquoMinimal answers to yesno questions in the service of sequenceorganizationrsquo Discourse Studies 123 283-309

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoGrammar for adjusting assumptions The Estonian enclitic -gi-ki ininteractionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4312 2879-2896

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoThe terms of not knowing and social affiliationrsquo In Tanya StiversLorenza Mondada Jakob Steensig eds The Morality of Knowledge in ConversationCambridge Cambridge University Press 184-206

Keevallik Leelo (2011) lsquoPro-forms as projective devices in interactionrsquo Discourse Processes486 404-431

Keevallik Leelo (2013) lsquoThe interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntaxrsquoResearch on Language amp Social Interaction 4611-21

21

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Kelly John John K Local (1989) lsquoOn the use of general phonetic techniques in handlingconversational materialrsquo In Roger D Peter Bull eds Conversation an interdisciplinaryperspective Clevedon Multilingual Matters 197-212

Kelly John John K Local (1989) Doing phonology Observing recording interpretingManchester Manchester University Press

Kern Friederike (2010) lsquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of live radio commentary offootball matchesrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 217ndash238

[see Wagner Johannes (2010) lsquoCommentating fictive and real sports Comments onFriederike Kern ldquoSpeaking dramatically The prosody of radio live commentary offootball matchesrdquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 239ndash242]

Kern Friederike Margret Selting (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and interactional linguisticsrsquoIn Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UKWiley-Blackwell

Kerr Betsy (2014) Left dislocation in French Information structure vs () interactionallinguistics In S Katz Bourns LL Myers eds Perspectives on Linguistic Structure andContext Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht Amsterdam John Benjamins 223-240

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2010) lsquoA high boundary tone as a resource for a social action TheKorean sentence-ender -tarsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4211 3055-3077

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquoReshaping the response space with kulenikka in beginning torespond to questions in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 303-317

Kim Hye Ri Stephanie (2013) lsquolsquolsquoAnirsquorsquo-prefaced responses to wh-questions as challenges in Koreanrsquo In P Sells B Frellesuig eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol 20 CSLI Stanford 381-396

Kim Mary Shin (2011) lsquoNegotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversationAn examination of the Korean evidential marker ndashtamyersquo Discourse Studies 134 435-459

Kim Kyu-hyun (1993) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation asinteractional resourcesrsquo In SChoi ed JapaneseKorean Linguistics Vol3 Center for theStudy of Language and Information Leland Stanford Junior University 3-18

Kim Kyu-hyun (1995) lsquoWh-clefts and left-dislocation in English conversation Cases oftopicalizationrsquoIn P Downing M Noonan eds Word order in discourse Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 247-296

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoPhrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences inKorean Conversationrsquo Human Studies 22 425-46

Kim Kyu-hyun (1999) lsquoOther-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo Discourseand Cognition 6 141-68

Kim Kyu-hyun (2001) lsquoConfirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaborationorganization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversationrsquo InMargret Selting Elizabeth Couper-kuhlen eds Studies in Interactional LinguisticsAmsterdam Benjamins

22

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Kim Kyu-hyun (2007) lsquoSequential organization of post-predicate elements in Koreanconversation Pursuing uptake and modulating action Pragmatics 174 573-603

Klewitz Gabriele Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (1999) lsquoQuote-unquote The role of prosody inthe contextualization of reported speech sequencesrsquo Pragmatics 94 459-485

Koivisto Aino (2012) lsquoDiscourse patterns for turn-final conjunctionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics44 1254-1272

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoA conversation-analytic study of yesno questions which conveyreversed polarity assertionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 34 1851-77

Koshik Irene (2002) lsquoDesignedly incomplete utterances A pedagogical practice for elicitingknowledge displays in error correction sequencesrsquo Research on Language and SocialInteraction 35 277-309

Koshik Irene (2003) lsquoWh-questions used as challengesrsquo Discourse Studies 5 51-77

Koshik Irene (2005) lsquoAlternative questions in conversational repairrsquo Discourse Studies 7192-211

Koshik Irene (2005) Beyond rhetorical questions Assertive questions in everydayinteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Koshik Irene Mi-Suk Seo (2012) lsquoWord (and other) search sequences initiated by languagelearnersrsquo Text amp Talk 322 167ndash189

Kupetz Maxi (2014) lsquoEmpathy displays as interactional achievements ndash Multimodal andsequential aspectsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 61 4-34

Kurhila Salla (1999) lsquoDoes nativeness legitimize correctingrsquo In Jef Verschueren edPragmatics in 1998 Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics ConferenceVolume 2 International Pragmatics Association Antwerp 321-330Kurhila Salla (2001) lsquoCorrection in talk between native and non-native speakerrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 33 1083-1110

Kurhila Salla (2006) Second language interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Labov William (1972) lsquoRules for ritualinsultsrsquo In D Sudnow edStudies in socialinteraction NewYork Free Press 120-169 Labov William David Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse Psychotherapy asconversation New York Academic Press

Labov William J Waletsky (1967) lsquoNarrative analysis Oral versions of personalexperiencersquo In JHelm ed Essays on the verbal and visual arts Seattle University ofWashington Press 12-44

Labov William J Waletsky (1968) lsquoNarrative analysisrsquo In W Labov PR Cohen C RobinsJ Lewis eds A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in NewYork City New York City Columbia University286-338

Lafford BA (2007) lsquoSecond language acquisition reconceptualized The impact of Firth andWagner (1997)rsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91735-756

23

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Lee Yo-An (2004) lsquoThe work of examples in classroom instructionrsquo Linguistics andEducation 15 99-120 Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoRespecifying display questions Interactional resources for languageteachingrsquo TESOL Quarterly 40 691-713

Lee Yo-An (2006) lsquoTowards respecification of communicative competence Condition of L2instruction or its objectiversquo Applied Linguistics 27 349-76

Lee Yo-An (2007) lsquoThird turn position in teacher talk Contingency and the work ofteachingrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 180-206

Lee Yo-An (2008) lsquoYes-no question in third turn position Pedagogical discourse processesrsquo Discourse Processes 45(3) 237-262

Lee Yo-An (2010) lsquoLearning in the contingency of talk-in-interactionrsquo Text amp Talk 304403-422

Lee Yo-An (2012) lsquoBuilding connected discourse in non-native speech Re-specifyingnon-native proficiencyrsquo Pragmatics 224 519-614

Lee Yo-An (2013) lsquoDescriptions of L2 interaction Toward descriptive adequacyrsquo ModernLanguage Journal 974 853-868

Lee Yo-An Akihiko Takahashi (2011) lsquoLesson plans and the contingency of classroominteractionsrsquo Human Studies 342 209-227

Lee Seung-Hee (2012) lsquoResponse design in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stiverseds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 415-32

Lehti-Eklund Hanna (2013) lsquoCode-switching to first language in repair ndash A resource forstudentsrsquo problem solving in a foreign language classroomrsquo International Journal ofBilingualism 17 132-152

Levinson Stephen C (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Levinson Stephen C (1992) lsquoActivity types and languagersquoIn P Drew John HeritageedsTalk at work Interaction in institutional settings Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress 66-100)

Levinson Stephen C (1995) lsquoInteractional biases in human thinkingrsquo In ENGoodyedSocial intelligence and interaction Expressions and implications of the social bias inhuman intelligence Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress 221-260

Levinson Stephen C (2005) lsquoLiving with Mannyrsquos dangerous idearsquo Discourse Studies 7431-53

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoOn the human ldquointeraction enginerdquorsquoIn NJEnfield SCLevinson eds Roots of human sociality Culture cognition and interaction Oxford Berg39-69

Levinson Stephen C (2006) lsquoCognition at the heart of human interactionrsquo Discourse Studies81 85-93

24

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Levinson Stephen C (2007) lsquoOptimizing person reference Perspectives from usage onRossel Islandrsquo In NJEnfield TStivers eds Person reference in interaction Linguisticcultural and social perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 29-72

Levinson Stephen C (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in YeacutelicircDnye the Papuan language ofRossel Islandrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 42 2741-2755

Levinson Stephen C (2012) lsquoAction formation and ascriptionrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 103-30

Li Xiaoting (2013) lsquoLanguage and the body in the construction of units in Mandarinface-to-face interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 343 ndash 376

Li Xiaoting (2014) Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversationJournal of Pragmatics 671 34ndash60

Liddicoat Antony J (2004) lsquoThe projectability of turn constructional units and the role ofprediction in listeningrsquo Discourse Studies 64 449-470

Lindstroumlm Jan (2009) lsquoInteractional linguisticsrsquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 96-103

Lindstroumlm Jan K (2013) lsquoOn the pivot turn construction method in Swedish and FinnishrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 54 57-72

Lindstroumlm Jan (2006) lsquoGrammar in the service of interaction Exploring turn organization inSwedishrsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 391 81-117

Linell Per lsquoThe dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building Processes and resourcesrsquoIn Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 57 ndash 90

Local John K (1992) lsquoContinuing and restartingrsquo In PAuer AdiLuzio eds Thecontextualization of language Amsterdam John Benjamins 273-296

Local John (1996) lsquoConversational phonetics some aspects of news receipts in everydaytalkrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactional studiesCambridge Cambridge University Press 177-230

Local John (1996) lsquoSome aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation In ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Margret Selting Eds Prosody in Conversation Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 177-230

Local John K (2004) lsquoGetting back to prior talk ldquoAnd-uh (m)rdquo as a back-connecting devicein British and American EnglishrsquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns ininteraction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 377-400

Local John (2004) lsquoOn the interactional and phonetic design of collaborative completionsrsquoIn William Hardcastle Janet Mackenzie Beck eds A Figure of Speech A Festschrift forJohn Laver New York Lawrence Erlbaum

Local John K (2007) lsquoPhonetic detail in talk-in-interaction On the deployment and interplayof sequential context and phonetic resourcesrsquo Nouveau Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise28 67-86

25

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Local John Peter Auer Paul Drew (2010) lsquoRetrieving redoing and resuscitating turns inconversationrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten et al eds Prosody in Interaction AmsterdamBenjamins 131-160

Local John John Kelly (1986) lsquoProjection and lsquosilencesrsquo Notes on phonetic andconversational structurersquo Human Studies 92-3185-204

Local John John Kelly WHG Wells (1986) lsquoTowards a phonology of conversationturn-taking in Tyneside Englishrsquo Journal of Linguistics 22 411-437

Local John Gareth Walker (2004) lsquoAbrupt-joins as a resource for the production ofmulti-unit multi-action turnsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 36 1375-1403

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoMethodological imperatives for investigating thephonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speechrsquo Phonetica 62 (2-4)120-130

Local John K Gareth Walker(2008) lsquoStance and affect in conversation On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resourcesrsquo TextampTalk 286723-747

Local John K Gareth Walker (2005) lsquoldquoMind the gaprdquo further resources in the production of multi-unit multi-action turns York Papers in Linguistics Series 21133-143

Local John Bill Wells M Sebba (1985) lsquoPhonology for conversation Phonetic aspects ofturn delimitation in London Jamaicanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 9 309ndash30

Luke Kang Kwong (1990) Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation AmsterdamBenjamins

Luke Kang Kwong (2002) lsquoThe initiation and introduction of first topics in Hong Kongtelephone callsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 171-200

Luke Kang-kwong (2012) lsquoDislocation or afterthought A conversation analytic account ofincremental Sentences in Chinese Discourse Processes 493-4 338-365

Luke Kang Kwong Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds (2002) Telephone Calls Unity anddiversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures Amsterdam JohnBenjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series 101]

Luke Kang-kwong Sandra A Thompson Tsuyoshi Ono (2012) lsquoTurns and increments Acomparative perspective Discourse Processes 493-4 155-162

Luke Kang-kwong Wei Zhang (2007) lsquoRetrospective turn continuations in Madarin Chineseconversation Pragmatics 174 605-635

MacWhinney Brian Johannes Wagner (2010) lsquoTranscribing searching and data sharing TheCLAN software and the TalkBank data repositoryrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschriftzur verbalen Interaktion 11 154-173 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

Markee N (1995) lsquoTeachersrsquo answers to studentsrsquo questions Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaningrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 62 63-92

Markee N (2000) Conversation analysis Mahwah NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

26

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Markee N (2004) lsquoZones of interactional transition in ESL classesrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 884 583-596

Markee N (2005) lsquoConversation analysis for second language acquisitionrsquo In E Hinkel edHandbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah NJ LawrenceErlbaum

Markee N (2005) lsquoThe organisation of off-task talk in second language classroomsrsquo In KRichards PSeedhouse eds Applying conversation analysis () Basingstoke PalgraveMacmillan 197-213

Markee N Gabriele Kasper (2004) lsquoClassroom talks An introductionrsquo The ModernLanguage Journal 884 491-500

Mazeland Harrie (1990) lsquordquoYesrdquo ldquonordquo and ldquomhmrdquo variations in acknowledgment choicesrsquoIn Bernard Conein M de Fornel L Queacutereacute Les formes de la conversation vol 1 Issy lesMoulineaux CNET 251-82

Mazeland Harrie (1991) lsquoPragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden invraagwoordvragenrsquo Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap 10 122 (ook in R van Hout ampE Huls red Artikelen van de Eerste Sociolinguiumlstische Conferentie Delft Uitgeverij Eburon309-28)

Mazeland Harrie (1996) lsquoPragmatic aspects of the use of pronouns in wh-questionsrsquo In Wde Mulder L Tasmowski eds Coherence amp anaphora Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10185-206

Mazeland Harrie (2006) lsquoVAN as a quotative in Dutch Marking quotations as atypificationrsquo In Tom Koole et al eds Artikelen van de vijfde sociolinguiumlstische conferentieDelft Eburon 354-65

Mazeland Harrie (2007) lsquoParenthetical sequencesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3910 1816-1869

Mazeland Harrie (2009) lsquoPositionsexpansionen Die interaktive Konstruktion von Stellungnahme-Erweiterungen in Arbeitsbesprechungenrsquo In S Guumlnthner J Buumlcker Hgs Grammatik im Gespraumlch Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung BerlinNew York De Gruyter 185-214

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoNOU als discourse marker in het taalgebruik van kleutersrsquo InKees de Glopper Myrte Gosen Jacqueline van Kruiningen red Gesprekken in het onderwijs Bijdragen over onderzoek naar interactie en leren voor Jan Ber enst DelftEburon 39-71

Mazeland Harrie (2012) lsquoGrammar in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell Tanya Stivers eds TheHandbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 475-91

Mazeland Harrie Marc Huiskes (2001) lsquoDutch lsquobutrsquo as a sequential conjunction Its use as aresumption markerrsquo In M Selting amp E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactionallinguistics Amsterdam Philadelphia Benjamins (Studies in Discourse and Grammar Vol10) 141-69

Mazeland Harrie Leendert Plug (2010) lsquoDoing confirmation with janee hoor Sequentialand prosodic characteristics of a Dutch discourse particlersquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 161ndash188

27

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Mazeland Harrie Minna Zaman-Zadeh (2000) lsquoThe logic of clarification Some observationsabout word-clarification repairs in Finnish-as-a-lingua-franca interactionsrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 26 August 2001 URL lthttpinlistuni-konstanzdeissues26indexhtmrsquo

Mi-Suk Seo Irene Koshik (2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Moerman Michael (1996) lsquoThe field of analyzing foreign language conversationsrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 262 147-58

Mondada Lorenza ed (1995) Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnelles[Linguistic forms and interactional dynamics] Cahiers de lrsquoILSL 7 University of Lausanne

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoIntroduction pour une approche des formes linguistiques dans lesdynamiques interactionnellesrsquo [Introduction towards a linguistic approach of interactionaldynamics] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiques interactionnellesActes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 1-18

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoLa construction interactionnelle du topicrsquo [Interactionalconstruction of topic] in Lorenza Mondada eds Formes linguistiques et dynamiquesinteractionnelles Actes du colloque de Lausanne Cahiers de lrsquoILSL no 7 111-135)

Mondada Lorenza (1995) lsquoPlanification des eacutenonceacutes et seacutequences interactionnellesrsquo[Utterance planning and interactional sequences] Actes du Colloque BENEFRI-StrasbourglsquoProblegravemes de seacutemantique et de relations entre micro- et macro-syntaxersquo Neuchacirctel 19-21mai 1994 SCOLIA 5 319-342

Mondada Lorenza (1998) lsquoPour une linguistique interactionnellersquo [Towards an interactionallinguistics] ARBA (Acta Romanica Basiliensa) 8 113-130

Mondala Lorenza (1999) lsquoLrsquoorganisation seacutequentielle des ressources linguistiques danslrsquoeacutelaboration collectives des descriptionsrsquo [The sequential organisation of linguistic resoursesin the collective elaboration of descriptions] langage amp socieacuteteacute nE 89 9-36

Mondada Lorenza (2000) lsquoGrammaire-pour-lrsquointeraction et analyse conversationnellersquo InA-C Berthoud Lorenza Mondada eds Modegraveles du discours en confrontation Berne Lang

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoTemporaliteacute seacutequentialiteacute et multimodaliteacute au fondement delrsquoorganisation de lrsquointeraction Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tourrsquo Cahiers deLinguistique Franccedilaise 26 169-92

Mondada Lorenza (2004) lsquoWays of ldquoDoing Being Plurilingualrdquo in international workmeetingsrsquo In Rod Gardner JohannesWagner eds Second Language Conversations LondonContinuum 27-60

Mondada Lorenza (2006) lsquoParticipantsrsquo online analysis and multimodal practices projectingthe end of the turn and the closing of the sequencersquo Discourse Studies 8 117-129

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoCommentary transcript variations and the indexicality oftranscribing practicesrsquo Discourse Studies 96 809-21

Mondada Lorenza (2007) lsquoBilingualism and the analysis of talk at work Code-switching as aresource for the organization of action and interactionrsquo In M Heller ed Bilingualism ASocial Approach New York Palgrave 297-318

28

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe dynamics of embodied participation and language choice inmultilingual meetingsrsquo Language in Society 41 213-235

Mondada Lorenza (2012) lsquoThe conversation analytic approach to data collectionrsquo In JackSidnell Tanya Stivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 32-56

Mondada Lorenza Simona Pekarek Doehler (2004) lsquoSecond language acquisition assituated practice Task accomplishment in the French as a second language classroomrsquoModern Language Journal 88(4) 501-18

Monzoni Chiara (2005) lsquoThe use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-partyconversationrsquoIn Auli Hakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in ConversationStudies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins 129ndash157

Mori Junko (1999) lsquoWell I may be exaggerating but Self-qualifying clauses in negotiationof opinions among Japanese speakersrsquo Human Studies 22 447-73

Mori Junko (1999) Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese Connectiveexpressions and turn construction Amsterdam John Benjamins [Studies in Discourse andGrammar 8]

Mori Junko (2004) lsquoNegotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities A casefrom a Japanese language classroomrsquo The Modern Language Journal884 536-550

Mori Junko (2006) lsquoThe workings of the Japanese token hee in informing sequences Ananalysis of sequential context turn shape and prosodyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 38 1175-1205

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoReconstructing the participantsrsquo treatments of interculturalityvariations in data and methodologiesrsquo Pragmatics 17 123-41

Mori Junko (2007) lsquoBordercrossings Exploring the intersection of second languageacquisition conversation analysis and foreign language pedagogyrsquo The Modern LanguageJournal 91 849-862

Mori Junko Makoto Hayashi (2006) lsquoThe achievement of intersubjectivity throughembodied completions A study of interactions between first and second language speakersrsquoApplied Linguistics 272195-219

Morita Emi (2002) lsquoStance marking in the collaborative completion of sentences Final particles as epistemic markers in Japanesersquo In NAkatsuka SStrauss edsJapaneseKorean Linguistics 10 StanfordCSLI 220-233

Morita Emi (2005) Negotiation of Contingent Talk The Japanese interactional particles neand sa Amsterdam Benjamins

Morita Emi (2008) lsquoHighlighted moves within an action segmented talk in Japaneseconversationrsquo Discourse Studies 10 517-541

Morita Emi (2012) lsquoDeriving the socio-pragmatic meanings of the Japanese interactionalparticle nersquo Journal of Pragmatics 443 298-314

Morita Emi (2012) lsquorsquolsquoThis talk needs to be registeredrsquolsquo The metapragmatic meaningof the Japanese interactional particle yorsquo Journal of Pragmatics 44 1721--1742

29

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Mulder J Sandra A Thompson (2008) lsquoThe grammaticization of but as a final particle inEnglish conversationrsquo In R Laury ed Studies of clause-combining the multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp) Amsterdam John Benjamins179-204

Muumlller Frank Ernst (1996) lsquoAffiliating and disaffiliating with continuers prosodic aspects ofrecipiencyrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation interactionalstudies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 131-76

Mushin Ilana Rod Gardner (2009) lsquoSilence is talk Conversational silence in AustralianAboriginal talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4110 2033-2052

Negretti Raffaella (1999) lsquoWeb-based activities and SLA a conversation analysis researchapproachrsquo Language Learning amp Technology 31 75-87

Neacutemeth Zsuzsanna (2012) lsquoRecycling and replacement repairs as self-initiated same-turnself-repair strategies in Hungarianrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4414 2022-2034

Nevile Maurice Johannes Wagner (2008) lsquoManaging languages and participation in amultilingual group examinationrsquo In H Haberland J Mortensen A Fabricius B Preisler KRisager amp S Kjaeligrbeck eds Higher Education in the global village cultural and linguisticpractices in the international university Department of Culture and Identity RoskildeUniversity Denmark 149-173

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2007) lsquoRapport building in language instruction A Microanalysis of themultiple resources in teacher talkrsquo Language and Education 214 284-303

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2008) lsquoSequence organization as local and longitudinal achievementrsquoText amp Talk 284 501ndash528

Nguyen Hanh Thi (2009) lsquoThe recommendation sequence in Vietnamese family talkNegotiation of asymmetric access to authority and knowledgersquo In Hanh Thi Nguyen GabrieleKasper eds Talk in interaction Multilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National ForeignLanguage Resource Center University of Hawairsquoi Press 57-87

Nguyen Hanh Thi Gabriele Kasper eds (2009) Talk in interaction Multilingualperspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Niemi Jarkko (2014) lsquoTwo ldquoyeah butrdquo formats in Finnish The prior action engaging nii mutand the disengaging joo mut utterancesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 60 54-74

Nordberg Bengt (1999) lsquoOn closings in alarm callsrsquo Spraringk och stil 8 65ndash103

Noreacuten Niklas Per Linell (2013) lsquoPivot constructions as everyday conversational phenomenawithin a cross-linguistic perspective An introductionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 541-15

Noreacuten Niklas (2013) lsquoPivots constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns attalkrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 35-56

Ochs Elinor (1992) Indexing gender In A Duranti C Goodwin eds Rethinking contextLanguage as an interactive phenomenon Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335-358

Ochs Elinor Emanuel A Schegloff Sandra A Thompson eds (1996) Interaction andGrammar Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Ochs Elinor (1979) lsquoTranscription as theoryrsquo In E Ochs BB Schieffelin edsDevelopmental pragmatics New York Academic Press 43-72

30

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Ogden Richard (2001) lsquoTurn transition creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interactionrsquoJournal of the International Phonetic Association 31 139-52

Ogden Richard (2004 ) lsquoNon-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 29 ndash 62

Ogden Richard (2006) lsquoPhonetics and social action in agreements and disagreementsrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 38101752-1775

Ogden Richard (2010) lsquoProsodic constructions in making complaintsrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 81ndash104

[see Hakulinen Auli (2010) lsquoThe relevance of context to the performing of acomplaint Comments on Richard Ogden ldquoProsodic constructions in makingcomplaintsrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 105ndash108]

Ogden Richard ed (2012) The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction (Special Issue) Languageand Speech 551 3-163

Ogden Richard (2012) lsquoProsodies in conversationrsquo In O Niebuhr ed UnderstandingProsody The Role of Context Function and Communication Mouton de Gruyter Berlin 201-218

Ogden Richard Auli Hakulinen Liisa Tainio (2004 ) lsquoIndexing ldquono newsrdquo with stylization inFinnishrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 299 ndash 334

Ogden Richard Traci Walker (2013) lsquoPhonetic resources in the construction of socialactionsrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins 277 ndash 312

Oh Sun-Young (2005) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resourcersquo Research onLanguage and Social Interaction 382 267-302

Oh Sun-Young (2006) lsquoEnglish zero anaphora as an interactional resource II lsquo DiscourseStudies 86 817-46

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoOvert reference to speaker and recipient in Koreanrsquo DiscourseStudies 9 462-492

Oh Sun-Young (2007) lsquoThe interactional meanings of quasi-pronouns in Koreanconversationrsquo in NJ Enfield and T Stivers eds Person Reference in Interaction LinguisticCultural and Social Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 203-25

Ono Tsuyoshi Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2007) lsquoIncrementingrsquo in conversation Acomparison of practices in English German and Japanesersquo Pragmatics 174 513-552

Ono Tsuyoshi Sandra A Thompson Yumi Sasaki (2012) lsquoJapanese negotiation throughemerging final particles in everyday talkrsquo Discourse Processes 493-4 243-272

Osvaldsson Karin Daniel Persson-Thunqvist Jakob Cromdal (2013) lsquoComprehensionchecks clarifications and corrections in an emergency call with a nonnative speaker ofSwedishrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 205-220

31

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Pallotti G Johannes Wagner eds (2011) L2 learning as social practice Conversation-analytic perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center

Park Yujong (2009) lsquoInteraction between grammar and multimodal resources quotingdifferent characters in Korean multiparty conversationrsquo Discourse Studies 11 79-104

Park Yong-Yae (2002) lsquoRecognition and identification in Japanese and Korean telephoneconversation openingsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds TelephoneCalls Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and culturesAmsterdam John Benjamins 25-47

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2001) lsquoReferential processes as situated cognition Pronominalexpressions and the social co-ordination of talkrsquo In Cognition in Language Use Selectedpapers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol 1 Edited by Enikouml NeacutemethAntwerp International Pragmatics Association 302-16

Pekarek Doehler Simona (2006) lsquolaquoCA for SLAraquo Analyse conversationnelle et recherche surlrsquolsquoacquisition des languesrsquo Revue Franccedilaise de Linguistique Appliqueacutee 112 123-37

Pekarek Doehler Simona Elwys De Stefani And Anne-sylvie Horlacher (2011) lsquoThegrammar of closings the use of dislocated constructions as closing initiators in Frenchtalk-in-interactionrsquo Nottingham French Studies 502

Pekarek Doehler Simona Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (2013) lsquoThe patching-together of pivotpatterns in talk-in-interaction On ldquodouble dislocationsrdquo in Frenchrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 54 92-108

Persson Rasmus (2013) lsquoIntonation and sequential organization Formulations inFrench talk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 57 19-38

Plug Leendert (2010) lsquo Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology with reference tosome Dutch phrasesrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 427 2014-2035

Rasmussen Gitte (2000) Zur Bedeutung kultureller Unterschiede in interlingualeninterkulturellen Gespraumlchen Eine Mikroanalyse deutschsprachiger Interaktionen zwischenFranzosen und Daumlnen und zwischen Deutschen und Daumlnen [On the meaning of culturaldifferences in cross-language and cross-cultural conversations a micro analysis of interactionsin German between Frenchs and Danes and between Germans and Danes] MuumlnchenIudicium

Rasmussen Gitte Johannes Wagner (2002) lsquoLanguage choice in international telephoneconversationsrsquo In Kang Kwong Luke Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou eds Telephone CallsUnity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures AmsterdamJohn Benjamins 111-31

Rasmussen Gitte see also Hougaard Rasmussen Gitte

Rasmussen Gitte (1998) lsquoThe use of forms of address in intercultural business callsrsquo Revuede Seacutemantique et Pragmatique 3 57-72

Raymond Geoffrey (2013) lsquoAt the intersection of turn and sequence organization On therelevance of ldquoslotsrdquo in type-conforming responses to polar interrogativesrsquo In BeatriceSzczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Units of Action AmsterdamBenjamins 169 ndash 206

32

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Reed Darren Beatrice Szczepek Reed (2013) Building an instructional project Actions ascomponents of music masterclassesrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond edsUnits of Talk ndash Units of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 313 ndash 342

Rosenthal Benjamin M (2008) lsquoA resource for repair in japanese talk-in-interaction thephrase TTE YUU KArsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction 412 April 227-40

Saft Scott (1998) lsquoSome uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese discoursersquo InN Akatsuka et al eds JapaneseKorean Linguistics 7 Stanford CSLI 261-37

Saft Scott (2001) lsquoConcession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur inJapanese discourse Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievementrsquo InPragmatics in 2000 Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference Vol2 Edited by Enikouml Neacutemeth Antwerp International Pragmatics Association 496-507

Saft Scott (2001) Displays of concession in University Faculty Meetings Culture andinteraction in Japanesersquo Pragmatics 11 223-62

Saft Scott (2004) lsquoConflict as interactional accomplishment in Japanese Arguments inuniversity faculty meetingsrsquo Language in Society 33 549ndash84

Saft Scott L (2006) The moderator in control Use of names the particle ne and responsetokens on a Japanese discussion TV programrsquolsquo Research on Language amp Social Interaction39 155-93

Saft Scott (2007) lsquoExploring aizuchi as resources in Japanese social interaction The case of apolitical discussion programrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 39 (7) 1290-1312

Sandlund E (2004) Feeling by doing The social organization of everyday emotions inacademic talk-in-interaction KarlstadKarlstad University Studies

Santamariacutea-Garciacutea Carmen (2011) lsquoBricolage assembling CL CA and DA to exploreagreementrsquo International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 163 345ndash370

Scheutz Hannes (2005) lsquoPivot constructions in spoken Germanrsquo In AHakulinen Margret Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 103-128

Schmitt Reinhold ed Koordination Studien zur multimodalen Interaction TuumlbingenGunther Narr Verlag

Schmitt Reinhold (2012) lsquoGehen als situierter Praktik lsquolsquoGemeinsam gehenrsquorsquo und lsquolsquohinterjemandem herlaufenrsquorsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online 13 1--44

Scheutz Hannes (2001) lsquoOn causal clause combining The case of lsquoweilrsquo in spoken GermanrdquoIn E Couper-Kuhlen and M Selting eds Studies in Interactional Linguistics AmsterdamBenjamins 111-140

Schoumlnfeldt Juliane Andrea Golato (2003) lsquoRepair in ChatsA Conversation AnalyticApproachrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 363 241ndash84

Schulze-Wenck Stephanie (2005) lsquoForm and function of lsquofirst verbsrsquo in talk-in-interactionrsquoIn AHakulinen M Selting eds Syntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in - interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 319-348

33

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoThe Case of the Missing lsquoNorsquo The Relationship between Pedagogyand Interactionrsquo Language Learning 47 547-83

Seedhouse Paul (1997) lsquoCombining Form and Meaningrsquo English Language TeachingJournal (ELTJ) 51 336-44

Seedhouse Paul (1998) lsquoCA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction A Reply toWagnerrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 30 85-102

Seedhouse Paul (1999) lsquoThe Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repair inthe L2 Classroomrsquo International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 37 59-80

Seedhouse Paul (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom AConversation Analysis Perspective Malden MA Blackwell

Seedhouse Paul (2004) Conversation analysis methodology Language Learning 54S1 1-54

Seedhouse Paul (2005) lsquoConversation analysis and language learningrsquo Language Teaching384 165-187

Seedhouse Paul (2006) lsquoInteraction in Second Language Classroomsrsquo Revue Franccedilaise deLinguistique Appliqueacutee 112 111-22

Seedhouse Paul (2007) lsquoOn ethnomethodological CA and linguistic CA A reply to HallrsquoThe Modern Language Journal 91(4) 526-532

Seedhouse Paul (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and classroom interactionrsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Selting Margret (1988) lsquoThe role of intonation in the organization of repair and problemhandling sequences in conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 12 293-322

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen eds (2001) Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdamPhiladelphia Benjamins

Selting Margret (1995) Prosodie im Gespraumlch Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie derKonversation [Prosody in conversation Aspects of an interactional phonology ofconversation TuumlbingenNiemeyer

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoOn the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turns in conversationrsquo Pragmatics 6371-388

Selting Margret (1996) lsquoProsody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation The caseof so-calledrsquo astonished lsquoquestions in repair initiationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting edsProsody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 231-270

Selting Margret (2000) lsquoThe construction of units in conversational talkrsquo Language inSociety29 (4) 477-517

Selting Margret (2001) lsquoFragments of units as deviant cases of unit production inconversational talkrsquoIn M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 229-258

34

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Selting Margret (2003) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 35

Selting Margret (2004) lsquoThe lsquoupwardrsquo staircase intonation contour in the Berlin vernacularAn example of the analysis of regionalized intonation as an interactional resourcersquo In ECouper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 201 ndash 231

Selting Margret (2005) lsquoSyntax and prosody as methods for the construction andidentification of turn-constructional units in conversationrsquo In AHakulinen M Selting edsSyntax and lexis in conversation Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in -interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 17-44

Selting Margret (2007) lsquoLists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction asan interactional resourcersquo Journal of Pragmatics 393 483-526

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoAffectivity in conversational storytelling An analysis of displays ofanger or indignation in complaint storiesrsquo Pragmatics202 229-277

Selting Margret (2010) lsquoProsody in interaction State of the artrsquo In DagmarBarth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam John Benjamins 3ndash40

[see Deppermann Arnulf (2010) lsquoFuture prospects of research on prosody The needfor publicly available corpora Comments on Margret Selting ldquoProsody in interactionState of the artrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 41ndash48]

Selting Margret (2012) lsquoComplaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affectdisplaysrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 444 387-415

Selting Margret et al (1998) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptions-system (GAT)rsquoLinguistische Berichte 173 91-122

Selting Margret et al (2009) lsquoGespraumlchsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2)rsquo InGespraumlchsforschung 10 353-402 ( wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde )

Selting M P Auer D Barth-Weingarten J Bergmann P Bergmann K Birkner ECouper-Kuhlen A Deppermann P Gilles S Guumlnthner M Hartung F Kern C MertzlufftC Meyer M Morek F Oberzaucher J Peters U Quasthoff W Schuumltte A Stukenbrock SUhmann (2011) lsquoA system for transcribing talk-in - interaction GAT2 GespraumlchsforschungZeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121-51 Translated and adapted for English by ElizabethCouper-Kuhlen Dagmar Barth-Weingarten wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde

Selting Margret Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2000) lsquoArgumente fuumlr die Entwicklung einerlsquointeraktionalen Linguistikrsquolsquo Gespraumlchsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalenInteraktion 1 76-95 (wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

SeltingMargret(1992) lsquoProsody in conversational questionsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 174315-345

Seo M-S Irene Koshik(2010) lsquoA conversation analytic study of gestures that engenderrepair in ESL conversational tutoringrsquo Journalof Pragmatics 428 2219-2239

Seppaumlnen Eeva-leena Ritva Laury (2007) lsquoComplement clauses as turn continuations TheFinnish et(tauml)-clausersquo Pragmatics 174 553-572

35

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Slotte-Luumlttge Anna Michaela Poumlrn Fritjof Sahlstroumlm (2013) lsquoLearning how to be a taumlhti Acase study of language development in everyday situations of a 7-year-old multilingualFinnish childrsquo International Journal of Bilingualism 17 153-173

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) Responding in Conversation A study of response particles inFinnish Amsterdam Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond NS 70]

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2001) lsquoldquoSimplerdquo answers to polar questions The case of Finnishrsquo InM Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguistics Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 405-431

Sorjonen Marja-leena (2002) lsquoRecipient Activities The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Responsein Finnish Conversationsrsquo In Cecilia E Ford Barbara A Fox Sandra A Thompson eds TheLanguage of Turn and Sequence New York Oxford University Press 165-95

Sorjonen Marja-Leena Auli Hakulinen (2009) lsquoAlternative responses to assessmentsrsquo inJack Sidnell ed Conversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge CambridgeUniversity Press 281-303

Sorjonen Marja-leena (1996) lsquoOn repeats and responses in Finnish conversationrsquo In OchsE Emanuel A Schegloff SA Thompson eds Interaction and Grammar CambridgeCambridge University Press 277-327

Steensig Jakob (2001) lsquoNotes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkishconversationrsquo In M Selting ECouper-Kuhlen eds Studies in interactional linguisticsAmsterdam John Benjamins 259-286

Steensig Jakob Birte Asmuszlig (2005) lsquoNotes on disaligning lsquoyes butrsquo initiated utterances inDanish and German conversations Two construction types for dispreferred responsesrsquo InAuli Hakulin en Margret Selting eds Syntax and Lexis in Conversation Studies on the use oflinguistic resources in talk-in-interaction AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins349ndash373

Steensig Jakob Trine Heinemann (2013) lsquoWhen ldquoyesrdquo is not enough ndash as an answer to ayesno questionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndash Unitsof Action Amsterdam Benjamins 207 ndash 242

Streeck Juumlrgen (1996a) lsquoA little Ilokano grammar as it appears in interactionrsquo Journal ofPragmatics 26 189-213

Streeck Juumlrgen (1991) lsquoSprachanalyse als empirische Geisteswissenschaft Von derphilosophy of mind zur kognitiven Linguistik In UFlick LvRosenstiel SWolff hrsgHandbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung Muumlnchen Psychologie Verlags

Svennevig Jan (2013) lsquoReformulation of questions with candidate answersrsquo InternationalJournal of Bilingualism 17 189-204

Svennevig Jan (2001) lsquoJa jo and nei initiating responses to wh-questions in Norwegianrsquo InHVater OLetnes eds Modality and more Trier Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier143-165

Svennevig Jan (2003) lsquoEcho answers in nativenon-native interactionrsquo Pragmatics 13 285-309

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFormal aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 17

36

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2000) lsquoFunctional aspects of collaborative productions in Englishconversationrsquo InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 21

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2001) lsquoProsodic orientation in spoken interactionrsquo InLiSt -Interaction and Linguistic Structures No 27

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2004) lsquoTurn-final intonation in Englishrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 97-118

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2006) Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation BasingstokePalgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoProsodic orientation A practice for sequence organization inbroadcast telephone openingsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 416 1223-47

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2009) lsquoFIRST or SECOND Establishing sequential roles throughprosodyrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten A Wichman N Dehe eds Where Prosody MeetsPragmatics Elsevier Series Studies in Pragmatics Bingley Emerald 205-222

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoSpeech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-culturaltalk-in-interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 424 1037-59

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoIntonation phrases in natural conversation A participantsrsquocategoryrsquo In D Barth-Weingarten E Reber M Selting eds Prosody in InteractionAmsterdam Benjamins 191-212

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) lsquoProsody and alignment A sequential perspectiversquo CulturalStudies of Science Education 54 859-867

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2010) Analysing Conversation An Introduction to ProsodyBasingstoke Palgrave

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoPhonetics and Phonology Suprasegmentals Prosody indiscoursersquo In Carol A Chapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics OxfordWiley-Blackwell

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody syntax and action formation intonation phrases asldquoaction componentsrsquolsquorsquo in P Bermann J Brenning M Pfeiffer E Reber eds Prosody andEmbodiment in Interactional Grammar Berlin de Gruyter 142-169

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoProsody in conversation Implications for teaching Englishpronunciationrsquo In J Romero-Trillo ed Pragmatics Prosody and English LanguageTeaching London Springer 147-168

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoBeyond the particular Prosody and the coordination ofactionsrsquo Language and Speech 551 12-33

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2012) lsquoA conversation analytic perspective on teaching Englishpronunciation The case of speech rhythmrsquo International Journal of Applied Linguistics221 67-87

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2013) lsquoGlottalisation and word linking as resources for multi-unitturn construction in German talk-in-interaction Initial observationsrsquo Gespraumlchsforschung -Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion Ausgabe 14 Seite 8-30(wwwgespraechsforschung-ozsde)

37

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Szczepek Reed Beatrice (2014) lsquoPhonetic practices for action formation Glottalizationversus linking of TCU-initial vowels in Germanrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 62 13-29

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond eds (2013) Units of Talk ndash Units of ActionAmsterdam Benjamins

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Geoffrey Raymond (2013) lsquoThe question of units for languageaction and interactionrsquo In Beatrice Szczepek Reed Geoffrey Raymond eds Units of Talk ndashUnits of Action Amsterdam Benjamins 1 ndash 10

Szczepek Reed Beatrice Darren Reed Elizabeth Haddon (2013) lsquoNOW or NOT NOWCoordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classesrsquo Research onLanguage amp Social Interaction 461 22-46

Szczepek Reed Beatrice S Schulze-Wenck (2003) lsquoInteractional Linguisticsrsquo Zeitschrift fuumlrGermanistische Linguistik 293-298

Takagi Tomoyo (1999) lsquordquoQuestionsrdquo in argument sequences in Japanesersquo Human Studies 22397-423

TalmyS (2009) lsquoResisting ESL Categories and sequence in a critically lsquomotivatedrsquo analysisof classroom interactionrsquo In HthiNguyen Gabriele Kasper eds Talk-in-interactionMultilingual perspectives Honolulu HI National Foreign Language Resource Center 181-213

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) lsquoGrammar and social interaction in Japanese and Anglo-AmericanEnglish The display of context social identity and social relationrsquo Human Studies 22 363-95

Tanaka Hiroko (1999) Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation A Study in Grammar andInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoTurn-Projection in Japanese Talk-in-InteractionrsquoResearch onLanguage and Social Interaction 33 1-38

Tanaka Hiroko (2000) lsquoThe particle ne as a turn-management device in Japaneseconversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 32 1135-76

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoAdverbials for turn-projection in Japanese Towards a demystificationof the ldquotelepathicrdquo mode of communicationrsquo Language in Society 30 559-587

Tanaka Hiroko (2001) lsquoThe implementation of possible cognitive shifts in Japaneseconversation complementisers as pivotal devicesrsquo In M Selting E Kouper-Kuhlen edsStudies in Interactional Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins 81-109

Tanaka Hiroko (2004) lsquoProsody for marking transition-relevance places in Japaneseconversation The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objectsrsquo In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen Cecilia E Ford eds Sound Patterns in Interaction Cross-linguistic studies fromconversation AmsterdamPhiladelphia John Benjamins 63-96

Tanaka Hiroko (2005) lsquoGrammar and the ldquotimingrdquo of social action Word order andpreference organization in Japanesersquo Language in Society 34 389ndash430

Tanaka Hiroko (2008) lsquoDelaying dispreferred responses in English From a Japaneseperspectiversquo Language in Society 374 487-513

38

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Tanaka Hiroko (2010) lsquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese response particle HuunDisplaying involvement without topical engagementrsquo In Dagmar Barth-WeingartenElisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam JohnBenjamins 303ndash332

[see Barth-Weingarten Dagmar (2010) lsquoResponse tokens-A multimodal approachComments on Hiroko Tanaka ldquoMultimodal expressivity of the Japanese responseparticle Huunrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds(2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 333ndash338]

Tanaka Hiroko Mihoko Fukushima (2002) lsquoGender orientations to outward appearance inJapanese conversation a study in grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse amp Society 136 749-65

Tanaka Hiroko (2013) lsquoThe Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement ofepistemic coherencersquo Journal of Pragmatics 55 51-67

TaoH (1996) Units In Mandarin conversation Prosody discourse and grammarAmsterdam John Benjamins

Tarplee Clare (1996) lsquoWorking on young childrenrsquos utterances prosodic aspects of repetitionduring picture labellingrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversationinteractional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 406-35

Tekdemir Yurtdas Goumlklem (2012) Repetitions in Turkish Talk among Friends [39paragraphs] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum Qualitative Social Research 132Art 22 httpnbn-resolvingdeurnnbnde0114-fqs1202227

Terkourafi Marina Chryso Hadjidemetriou Alexandra Vasilopoulou eds (2010) lsquoGreekConversation Analysisrsquo special issue of Journal of Greek Linguistics 102

Thompson Sandra A (2002) lsquo ldquoObject complementsrdquo and conversation towards a realisticaccountrsquoStudies in Language 261 125-164

Thompson Sandra A E Couper-Kuhlen (2005) lsquoThe clause as a locus of grammar and interactionrsquo Discourse Studies 74-5 481-505 Thompson Sandra A PJ Hopper (2001) lsquoTransitivity clause structure and argument structure Evidence from conversationrsquo In JL Bybee PJ Hopper eds Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure Amsterdam John Benjamins 27-60

Traverso Veacuteronique (2002) lsquoTranscription et traduction des interactions en langue eacutetrangegraverersquocahiers de praxeacutematique 39 77-99

Uhmann Susanne (2001) lsquoSome arguments for the relevance of syntax to same-sentence self-repair in everyday German conversationrsquo In Margret Selting E Couper-Kuhlen eds Studiesin interactional linguistics Amsterdam John Benjamins 373-404

Uhmann Susanne (1996) lsquoOn rhythm in everyday German conversation Beat clashes in assessment utterancesrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 303-365

Vasilopoulou Alexandra Hadjidemetriou Chryso Terkourafi Marina (2010) lsquoIntroducingGreek Conversation Analysisrsquo Journal of Greek Linguistics 102 157-185

Wagner Johannes ed (1996) `Conversation analysis of foreign language datarsquo Special Issueof Journal of Pragmatics 262 145-259

39

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Wagner Johannes (1996) lsquoLanguage aquisition through foreign language interaction - acritical review of studies in Second Language Aquisitionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 26 215-35

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoOn doing being a guinea pig - a response to Seedhousersquo Journal ofPragmatics 30 103-113

Wagner Johannes (1998) lsquoSilences in international communicationrsquo In D Albrechtsen et aleds Perspectives on Foreign and Second Language Pedagogy Odense University Press 79-91

Wagner Johannes (2012) lsquoConversation analysis and transcription and datarsquo In Carol AChapelle ed The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics Oxford UK Wiley-Blackwell

Wagner Johannes Alan Firth (1997) lsquoCommunication strategies at workrsquo In E KellermanGabriele Kasper eds Communication strategies psycholinguistics and sociolinguisticperspectives Oxford Oxford University Press 323-44

Wagner Johannes Monika Voumlge eds (2010) Laughter in Interaction Special Issue in Honorof Gail Jefferson Journal of Pragmatics 426 1469-1576

Walker Gareth (2007) lsquoOn the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversationrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 3912 2217-2243

Walker Gareth (2010) lsquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs inEnglish talk-in-interactionrsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 51ndash72

[see Guumlnthner Susanne (2010) lsquoRush-throughs as social action Comments on GarethWalker ldquoThe phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice Rush-throughs in Englishtalk-in-interactionrdquorsquo In Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Seltingeds (2010) Prosody in Interaction Amsterdam John Benjamins 73ndash80]

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoCoordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resourceslsquoTrail-offrsquo conjunctionsrsquo Language and Speech 55 141-163

Walker Gareth (2012) lsquoPhonetics and prosody in conversationrsquo In Jack Sidnell TanyaStivers eds The Handbook of Conversation Analysis Wiley-Blackwell 455-74

Walker Traci (2004 ) lsquorsquoRepetitionrsquo repairs The relationship of phonetic structure andsequence organizationrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen C E Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 273 ndash 298

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoForm Function The independence of prosody and actionrsquo Researchon Language and Social Interaction 471 1-16

Walker Traci (2014) lsquoThe independence of phonetic form and interactionalaccomplishmentsrsquo Research on Language and Social Interaction 471 23-27

Walker Traci Paul Drew John Local (2011) lsquoResponding indirectlyrsquo Journal of Pragmatics43 2434ndash2451

Walker Gareth (2004) lsquoOn some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turnsin talk-in-interactionrsquo In ECouper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 147-169

Waring Hansun Zhang (2001) lsquoBalancing the competing interests in seminar discussion Peerreferencing and asserting vulnerabilityrsquo Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 29-50

40

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoExpressing noncomprehension in seminar discussionrsquoJournal of Pragmatics 34 1711-31

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoThe unofficial businesses of repair initiation Vehicles foraffiliation and disaffiliationrsquo In A Tyler et al eds Language in use Cognitive anddiscourse perspectives on language and language learning Washington DC GeorgetownUniversity Press163-75

Waring Hansun Zhang (2005) lsquoPeer tutoring in a graduate writing center Identity expertiseand advice resistingrsquo Applied Linguistics 262 141-68

Waring Hansun Zhang (2002) lsquoDisplaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussionrsquoResearch on Language and Social Interaction 35 453-479

Waring Hansun Zhang (2003) lsquoAlso as a discourse marker Its use in disjunctive anddisaffiliative environmentsrsquo Discourse Studies 5 415-36

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoComplex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetriesrsquo Text and Talk 27(1) 107-37

Waring Hansun Zhang (2007) lsquoThe multi-functionality of accounts in advice givingrsquo Journalof Sociolinguistics 11(3) 367-69

Waring Hansun Z (2008) lsquoUsing explicit positive assessment in the language classroomIRF feedback and learning opportunitiesrsquo The Modern Language Journal 924 577-594

Waring Hansun Z (2009) lsquoMoving out of IRF A single case analysisrsquo Language Learning594 796-824

Waring Hansun Z (2011) lsquoLearner initiatives and learning opportunitiesrsquo ClassroomDiscourse 22 201-218

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoThe advising sequence and its preference structures ingraduate peer tutoring at an American universityrsquo In Limberg Holger Miriam A Lochereds Advice in Discourse Amsterdam Benjamins 97ndash118)

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoYes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the languageclassroomrsquo Language and Education 265 451-469

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoDoing disaffiliation with now-prefaced utterancesrsquo Languageand Communication 32 265-275

Waring Hansun Zhang (2012) lsquoldquoAny questionsrdquo Investigating understanding-checks in thelanguage classroomrsquo TESOL Quarterly 464 722-752

Waring Hansun Zhang Sarah Creider Tara Tarpey Rebecca Black (2012) lsquoA search forspecificity in understanding CA and contextrsquo Discourse Studies14 477-492

Waring Hansun Z Barbara Hruska B (2011) lsquoGetting and keeping Nora on board Anovice elementary ESOL student teacherrsquos practices for lesson engagementrsquo Linguistics andEducation 22 441-455

Waring Hansun Zhang Barbara Hruska (2012) lsquoProblematic directives in pedagogicalinteractionrsquo Linguistics and Education 23 289-300

41

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Wells Bill John Local (1993) The sense of an ending a case of prosodic delay ClinicalLinguistics amp Phonetics 7 59-73

Wells Bill Juliette Corrin (2004) lsquoProsodic resources turn-taking and overlap in childrenrsquo stalk-in-interactionrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen CE Ford eds Sound patterns in interactionCross-linguistic studies from conversation Amsterdam John Benjamins 119-144

Wells WHG Sue Peppeacute (1996) lsquoEnding up in Ulster Prosody and turn taking in English dialectsrsquo In E Couper-Kuhlen M Selting eds Prosody in conversation Interactional studies Cambridge Cambridge University Press 101-130

Wells B S Macfarlane S (2009) Prosody as an interactional resource A clinical linguistic perspective International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 11 321-325

Wells Bill (2010) lsquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrsquo InDagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds (2010) Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 243ndash262

[see Walker Traci (2010) lsquoRepetition and contrast across action sequences Commentson Bill Wells ldquoTonal repetition and tonal contrast in English carer-child interactionrdquorsquoIn Dagmar Barth-Weingarten Elisabeth Reber Margret Selting eds Prosody inInteraction Amsterdam John Benjamins 263ndash266]

WellsWHG S Macfarlane (1998) lsquo Prosody as an interactional resource Turn-projectionand overlaprsquo Language and Speech413-4 265-294

WellsWHG John K Local (2009) lsquoProsody as an interactional resource A clinicallinguistic perspectiversquo International Journal of Speech - LanguagePathology 114 321-325

Wide Camilla 2009 lsquoInteractional construction grammar Contextual features ofdetermination in dialectal Swedishrsquo In Alexander Bergs Gabriele Diewald eds Context andconstructions Amsterdam 111ndash142

Wide Camilla (2014) lsquoThe functions of subjectless declarative main clauses in spokenSwedishrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 63 35-47

Wong J (2005) lsquoSidestepping grammarrsquo In K Richards PSeedhouse eds ApplyingConversation Analysis Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan159-173

Wong Jean (2000) lsquoDelayed next turn repair initiation in native-non-native speaker Englishconversationrsquo Applied Linguistics 21244ndash 67

Wong Jean Hansun Zhang Waring (2010) Conversation analysis and second languagepedagogy A guide for ESLEFL teachers New York Routledge

Wouk F (2005) lsquoThe syntax of repair in Indonesianrsquo Discourse Studies 72 237-258

Wright Melissa (2011) lsquoThe phoneticsndashinteraction interface in the initiation of closings ineveryday English telephone callsrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 434 1080-1099

Wu RR (2005) lsquoldquoThere is more here than meets the eye The use of final ou in twosequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 3 77 967-995

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2004) Stance in talk A conversation analysis of Mandarin finalparticles Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins [Pragmatics amp Beyond New Series]

42

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2006) lsquoInitiating repair and beyond The use of two repeat-formattedrepair initiations in Mandarin conversationrsquo Discourse Processes 41 67ndash109

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2009) lsquoRepetition in the initiation of repairrsquo in Jack Sidnell edConversation Analysis Comparative Perspectives Cambridge Cambridge University Press 31-59

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2011) lsquoA conversation analysis of self-praising in everydayMandarin interactionrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4313 3152-3176

Wu Ruey-Jiuan Regina (2014) lsquoManaging turn entry The design of EI-prefaced turns inMandarin conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 66 139ndash161

Xudong Deng (2009) lsquoListener responsersquo In Sigurd Drsquohondt Jan-Ola Oumlstman JefVerschueren eds The Pragmatics of Interaction Amsterdam Benjamins 104 ndash 124

Yoon KE (2010) lsquoQuestions and responses in Korean conversationrsquo Journal of Pragmatics 4210 2782-2798

Zellers Margaret Brechtje Post (2012) lsquoCombining formal and functional approaches to topicstructurersquo Language and Speech 55 119-139

Zhang Wei (2012) lsquoLatchingrush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions inretrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation Findings from Mandarin conversationDiscourse Processes 493-4 163-191

43

  • EthnoCA News
    • Bibliography Interactional Linguistics