BI Comparison 2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    1/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    1

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    ProductCognos Performance

    Management Solution DynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Vendor Cognos Dynac Inc. 5 Macs Controlling

    Version 8 1.5 Jul-08 2.7

    Release date (mmm-yy) Jun-08 Jun-05 Dec-07

    Contact

    Name Gary MacFarlane Sales Chris Meyer

    Telephone 519.571.3254 800-468-0834, ext 5940 1800 946 3160

    E-mail [email protected] [email protected]@macscontr

    olling.com

    Website www.cognos.com www.dynactools.ca www.exactba.comwww.macscontrolling.co

    m

    Cost (Canadian dollars)

    Licence based

    Average cost per user $575 $700 $3,500

    Average no. of users 10 40 10

    Average cost $5,750 $28,000 $35,000

    Ratio - average implementation cost/licence cost 1.00 0.50

    Average implementation cost $5,750 $14,000 $0

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    2/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    2

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Total licence based $11,500 $42,000 $35,000

    Annual Maintenance % 20% 18% 18%

    Annual Maintenance Dollars $1,150 $5,040 $6,300

    Support included in maintenance fee Partly Yes

    ASP (Application service provider) based

    Average annual fee / user

    Average no. of users

    Average annual fees

    Average implementation costs / average fees - year one

    Average implementation costs

    Total ASP based - 1st Year

    Support included in ASP fee

    Applications

    Business intelligence Yes Third Party Yes Yes

    Strategic planning Yes Yes No Yes

    Budgeting and Forecasting Yes Yes No Yes

    Consolidation Yes Yes Yes No

    Financial Reporting Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Scorecarding Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Dashboard Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Profile

    World head office Ottawa, Canada Kitchener, Ontario Delft, The Netherlands Rottweil, Germany

    Canadian head office Ottawa, Canada Kitchener, Ontario Cambridge, ON None

    No. of customers - worldwide - all products 23,000+ 150

    No. of customers - worldwide - this product 200 150

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    3/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    3

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    No. of customers - Canada - all products 2

    No. of customers - Canada - this product 175 2

    Revenue 2007 - CAD - all products (est.) 252

    Revenue 2007 - CAD - this product (est.)

    Revenue 2006 - CAD - all products 242

    Revenue 2006 - CAD - this product

    Target market

    Average revenue/customer (CAD) >$200M $10M-$49M >$200M >$200M

    Average no. of employees/customer >500 100-499 100-499 10-49

    Industry classification based on The North American

    Industry Classification System (NAICS) - see

    http://www.naics.com/info.htm#Structure for more about

    NAICS (approximate % of implementations)

    DynacTools is applicable to all

    industry classifications

    11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1%

    21 Mining

    22 Utilities

    23 Construction 4%31-33 Manufacturing 80% 80%

    42 Wholesale trade 15%

    44-45 Retail trade

    48-49 Transportation and warehousing 5%

    51 Information

    52 Finance and insurance 5%

    53 Real estate and rental and leasing

    54 Professional, scientific, and technical services

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    4/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    4

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    55 Management of companies and enterprises

    56 Administrative and support and waste management

    and remediation services

    61 Education services

    62 Health care and social assistance 5%71 Arts, entertainment and recreation

    72 Accommodation and food services

    81 Other services (except public administration)

    92 Public administration 5%

    Total 100% 100%

    Technology

    Supported database (% of implementations)

    Microsoft SQL Server Supported 70% 70%Oracle Supported 3% 20%

    Pervasive SQL Supported 2%

    IBM DB2 Supported 25% 5%

    Sybase Supported 5%

    Informix Supported

    Access Supported

    Btrieve Supported

    Proprietary Supported

    FoxPro Supported

    Progress Supported

    MySQL Supported

    Other Supported

    Total 100% 100%

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    5/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    5

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Supported networks (% of implementations)

    Microsoft Supported 100% 80%

    Linux Supported 10%

    Unix Supported 10%

    AIX SupportedNovell Netware Supported

    IBM AS/400 (OS/400) Supported

    IBM S/390 Supported

    Other Supported

    Total 100% 100%

    Development tools used to build application Yes Borland Delphi, VBA Delphi, C++, C# .Net .net, C++, C#

    Report writer used - which one(s)? Yes DynacViews Own macs Analyzer

    Data Extract Transform Load (ETL) tools - which one(s)? Yes ODBC Own ODBC, SOA

    Cubes supported - which one(s)? Yes Own, MS SQL None, not cube based

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    6/45

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    7/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    7

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Share same database Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Same user interface Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Integrated Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Dashboard Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Role specific Yes Third Party Yes Yes

    Graphical Yes Third Party Yes Yes

    Drill down to: Yes Yes Yes

    Business Intelligence Yes Third Party Yes Yes

    Consolidation Yes Yes Yes No

    Budgeting and forecasting Yes Yes Customization Yes

    Scorecarding Yes Third Party Yes Yes

    Excel integration Yes Yes Yes

    Formatting intact Yes No Yes Yes

    Formulas intact Yes No No Yes

    Business Intelligence Yes

    Analytic functionality Yes Yes Yes

    Bubble up exceptions Yes Yes Yes No

    Drill down Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Drill through to source data Yes Yes Yes No

    Ranking Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Sorting Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Restrict results by date range Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Includes dashboard Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Time trending (for example, over 12 months) Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Pareto filtering (automatically groups the categories that

    amount to less than 20% of a row or column total into

    "other")

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Calculations Yes Yes Yes

    Counts Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Percentage of total Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    8/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    8

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Allocations Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Total and Sub-total Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Create OLAP cubes Yes Yes Yes No

    Data extraction and transformation tools Yes Yes Yes

    Incremental extraction Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Impact analysis - objects impacted by change Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Can schedule process to run overnight Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Formatting Yes Yes Yes

    By dimension Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By level Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By cell Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Zero-row suppression Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Conditional formatting by cell, e.g., highlight cells

    below threshold Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Returns text (e.g., if value > 90, returns "excellent") Yes Yes Yes Yes

    French version Yes Yes No Yes

    Screens Yes Yes No Yes

    Reports Yes Yes No Yes

    Documentation Yes Yes No Yes

    Metadata Yes Yes Yes Yes

    OLAP functionality Yes Yes Yes

    Skip missing levels - support ragged dimensions Yes Yes Yes NoWrite back Yes Yes No No

    With audit trail Yes Yes No No

    Includes charting tools Yes Yes Yes No

    Access multiple cubes at a time Yes Yes Yes No

    Excel client Yes Yes Yes No

    Internet Explorer client Yes Yes Yes No

    Netscape client Yes Yes Yes No

    Geographical representation Yes Yes Yes No

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    9/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    9

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Drag and drop Yes Yes Yes No

    Attach notes to cube Yes Yes Yes No

    Attach notes to cells Yes Yes No No

    Attach files to cube Yes Yes No No

    Attach files to cells Yes Yes No No

    Password security Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By company Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By department or division Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By menu Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By function (view, add, change, delete) Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By dimension Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By level Yes Yes Yes Yes

    By cell Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Respect active directory authentication Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Respect database security Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Portal generation that includes HTML reports Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Report writer Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Web-based Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Generate cube Yes Yes Yes No

    Drag and drop Yes Yes Yes Yes

    WYSIWYG report design Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Technology

    API-enabled (SDK provided) Yes No No

    Web-based (only need browser at client) Yes No Yes Yes

    For entire application Yes No No No

    Support for .NET web services Yes No Yes Yes

    Support for Java web services Yes No Partly No

    Transfer data to:

    Report writer Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Excel Yes Yes Yes Yes

    PivotTable Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    10/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    10

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    HTML Yes Yes Yes Yes

    PDF Yes Yes Yes Yes

    PowerPoint Yes Yes Yes No

    XML Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Views

    Crosstabs Yes Yes Yes

    Charts Yes Yes Yes

    Both crosstabs and chart at the same time Yes Yes Yes

    Work flow Yes Yes Customization

    Alerts can be automatically triggered Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Consolidation Yes

    Journal entries Yes Yes Yes No

    Manual Yes Yes Yes No

    Recurring Yes Yes Not Applicable No

    Automated for currency translation gains/losses Yes Yes Not Applicable No

    Automated for Intercompany eliminations Yes Yes Not Applicable No

    Reclassification journal entry - EG used to generate

    cash flow report or balance sheetYes Yes No No

    Intercompany processing Yes Yes Partly No

    Automated balancing Yes Yes No No

    Consolidation processor Yes Yes Yes No

    Consolidate actuals and budgets Yes Yes Yes No

    Consolidate statistical ledgers such as headcounts Yes Yes Partly No

    Incremental for entities that have changed Yes Yes Yes No

    Different fiscal periods Yes Yes Yes No

    Different fiscal calendars Yes Yes Yes No

    Short year-ends Yes Yes Yes No

    Multiple levels or tiers Yes Yes Yes No

    Automated Intercompany eliminations to first common

    parentYes Yes No No

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    11/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    11

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Data collection Yes Yes Yes No

    Online over the internet Yes No Partly No

    Only a browser required (don't need Citrix or terminal

    services)Yes No Yes No

    Work offline and synchronize Yes Yes Yes NoParsing Yes No Yes No

    Mapping Yes Yes Yes No

    Wildcards Yes Yes Yes No

    Validation Yes Yes Partly No

    Can proceed or stop depending on variance Yes Yes Partly No

    Maintain status Yes Yes Not Applicable No

    Approvals Yes Yes No No

    Escalations if late Yes Yes Customization No

    Intercompany eliminations Yes Yes Partly No

    Define intercompany accounts Yes Yes Yes No

    Automated eliminations Yes Yes Partly No

    Reporting tool to identify out of balance entities Yes Yes Yes No

    Foreign currency translation Yes Yes Yes No

    Support temporal method Yes Yes Yes No

    Multiple rate types Yes Yes Yes No

    Define which rate type by account Yes Yes Yes No

    Maintain rate schedule that can be shared across all

    legal entities Yes Yes Yes NoDownload daily rates automatically Yes Yes Yes No

    Methods: Yes Yes Yes No

    Proportional Yes Yes Yes No

    Equity Yes Yes Partly No

    Minority interest Yes Yes No No

    Wholly owned Yes Yes Yes No

    Multi tier consolidation Yes Yes Yes No

    On-line review and approval of consolidation process at

    each tierYes Yes Yes No

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    12/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    12

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Drill down to any tier Yes Yes Yes No

    Multiple ledgers Yes Yes Yes No

    Ownership Yes Yes Yes No

    Date sensitive ownership - for changes during the

    monthYes Yes Partly No

    Reorganizations Yes Yes Yes No

    Change account structure and replicate across system Yes Yes No No

    Revaluations Yes Yes No

    Partly

    Financial Reporting Yes

    Analysis Codes Yes Yes Yes

    Attach to accounts or g/l segments Yes Yes Yes

    Can be used in any financial report for selection orordering

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Results in home or reporting currency Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Rows can be defined Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Columns can be defined Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Cell Override Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Hierarchical reporting Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Multiple hierarchies Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Lead schedules Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Ready for external reporting Yes Yes Partly YesRounding to nearest 1000 and allocation of rounding error

    to specified financial statement lineYes Not Applicable Yes Yes

    Trend analysis showing last 12 periods Yes Yes Partly Yes

    Exception reporting Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Highlight all accounts with a variance over a certain % or

    amountYes Yes Yes Yes

    Consolidate Accounts Receivable subledger Yes Third Party Yes No

    Compute Daily Sales Outstanding Yes Third Party Yes

    Eliminate intercompany accounts Yes Third Party Yes No

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    13/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    13

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Budgeting Yes

    Automatic % change of previous budget Yes Yes No Yes

    Automatic based on actual Yes Yes No Yes

    Excel like formulas Yes Yes No YesSeasonality allocations Yes Yes No Yes

    Budgeting process Yes Yes No Yes

    Bottom up Yes Yes No Yes

    Top down Yes Yes No Yes

    Export to Excel Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Import from Excel Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Lockable Yes Yes No Yes

    Maintain explanation of budget variances Yes Yes No Yes

    Based on employee information in HR system Yes No No Yes

    Multiple Budgets Yes Yes No Yes

    Rolling budget Yes Yes No Yes

    Sign assumed Yes Yes No Yes

    What if analysis Yes Yes Customization Yes

    Ability to update assumptions which are used in the

    calculationsYes Yes No Yes

    Rollup forecast to budget Yes Yes No Yes

    Approval process Yes Yes No Yes

    Forecasting Yes

    Quotes and their probability Yes Yes No Yes

    Outstanding orders Yes Yes No Yes

    Customer forecasts Yes Yes No Yes

    Historical trends Yes Yes No Yes

    Average of 13 weeks volume Yes Yes No Yes

    Can apply factors such as seasonality Yes Yes No Yes

    Apply regression analysis Yes Yes No Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    14/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    14

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Apply factors such as housing starts and market

    adjustment factorYes Yes No Yes

    Ability to accept input from multiple users Yes Yes No Yes

    Approval process Yes Yes No Yes

    What if Analysis Yes Yes Customization Yes

    Name one to five unique or very important features of

    your product (limit of 250 characters)

    Unique/important feature no.1All features are designed to be

    Owned by Finance

    Create Budgets and Forecasts

    (at the Account or SKU level

    with an optional feature to

    drive MPS) in hours not weeksor months complete with multi-

    user inputs

    All benefits of data

    warehouse/data mart without

    the need to have one

    Maintains accurate split

    between fixed and variable

    costs enabling contribution

    margin decisions making atcustomer and product level

    Unique/important feature no. 2

    Rich ecosystem of best-

    practice solutions surrounds

    core product capabilities

    DynacViews outperforms most

    GL report writers complete with

    auto synchronization of row

    and column structure and

    dynamic filtering where

    reporting structure is user

    defined with a drag an drop

    interface called Dynac Account

    Manager

    Prebuilt business analytics

    suite with analytic views,

    reports and supporting

    metadata

    Driver based modelling

    enabling accurate cost profit

    simulations of how a change in

    volume/mix influences your

    cost base

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    15/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    15

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Cognos Performance

    Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Unique/important feature no. 3

    Rich global consolidation

    capabilities to support

    currency, minority interest,intercompany - and multi-

    jurisdictional GAAP reporting

    Cognos / Hyperion like

    consolidation features at afraction of the price

    online/offline analysis

    Accurate Variance Analysis:

    Ability to flex the variableportion of budgeted cost for

    comparison against actual cost

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    16/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    16

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Product

    Vendor

    Version

    Release date (mmm-yy)

    Contact

    Name

    Telephone

    E-mail

    Website

    Cost (Canadian dollars)

    Licence based

    Average cost per user

    Average no. of users

    Average cost

    Ratio - average implementation cost/licence cost

    Average implementation cost

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint Server PROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Microsoft PROPHIX Software PROPHIX Software QlikTech, Inc.

    2007 7 4.1 8.5

    Sep-07 Mar-08 Aug-08 Jun-08

    Susan Lawson Susan Lawson Neil Florio

    (877) 568-2495 (905) 279-8711 ext. 245 (905) 279-8711 ext. 245 888-828-9768

    [email protected]

    [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

    www.microsoft.ca/bi www.prophix.com www.prophix.com www.qliktech.com

    $261 $1,500 $2,000 $2,000

    100 5 30 40

    $26,100 $7,500 $60,000 $80,000

    3.00 0.75 0.75

    $78,300 $5,625 $45,000 $0

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    17/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    17

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Total licence based

    Annual Maintenance %

    Annual Maintenance Dollars

    Support included in maintenance fee

    ASP (Application service provider) basedAverage annual fee / user

    Average no. of users

    Average annual fees

    Average implementation costs / average fees - year one

    Average implementation costs

    Total ASP based - 1st Year

    Support included in ASP fee

    Applications

    Business intelligence

    Strategic planning

    Budgeting and Forecasting

    Consolidation

    Financial Reporting

    Scorecarding

    Dashboard

    Profile

    World head office

    Canadian head office

    No. of customers - worldwide - all products

    No. of customers - worldwide - this product

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    $104,400 $13,125 $105,000 $80,000

    25% 20% 20% 20%

    $6,525 $1,500 $12,000 $16,000

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    $0

    1.00

    $0

    $0

    Yes No Yes Yes

    Yes No Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Redmond, WA Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Radnor, PA

    Mississauga, On Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

    > 1 Billion 1,400 1,400 9,500

    >500 1,250 150 9,500

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    18/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    18

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    No. of customers - Canada - all products

    No. of customers - Canada - this product

    Revenue 2007 - CAD - all products (est.)

    Revenue 2007 - CAD - this product (est.)

    Revenue 2006 - CAD - all products

    Revenue 2006 - CAD - this product

    Target market

    Average revenue/customer (CAD)

    Average no. of employees/customer

    Industry classification based on The North American

    Industry Classification System (NAICS) - see

    http://www.naics.com/info.htm#Structure for more about

    NAICS (approximate % of implementations)

    11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting

    21 Mining

    22 Utilities

    23 Construction31-33 Manufacturing

    42 Wholesale trade

    44-45 Retail trade

    48-49 Transportation and warehousing

    51 Information

    52 Finance and insurance

    53 Real estate and rental and leasing

    54 Professional, scientific, and technical services

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    >20,000,000 140 140 60

    >60 14 14 60

    n/a n/a $85,200,000

    n/a n/a $85,200,000

    n/a n/a $46,860,000

    n/a n/a $46,860,000

    >$200M 25 Mil. - 500 Mil. 25 Mil. - 500 Mil. $50M-$200M

    >500 >500 >500 100-499

    2% 2% 5%

    3% 3%

    2% 2% 5%

    2% 2% 5%23% 23% 25%

    5% 5% 10%

    3% 3% 5%

    3% 3% 5%

    5% 5%

    10% 10% 20%

    2% 2%

    10% 10% 5%

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CA i

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    19/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    19

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    55 Management of companies and enterprises

    56 Administrative and support and waste management

    and remediation services

    61 Education services

    62 Health care and social assistance71 Arts, entertainment and recreation

    72 Accommodation and food services

    81 Other services (except public administration)

    92 Public administration

    Total

    Technology

    Supported database (% of implementations)

    Microsoft SQL ServerOracle

    Pervasive SQL

    IBM DB2

    Sybase

    Informix

    Access

    Btrieve

    Proprietary

    FoxPro

    Progress

    MySQL

    Other

    Total

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    1% 1%

    5% 5%

    12% 12% 10%3% 3% 5%

    3% 3%

    5% 5%

    1% 1%

    100% 100% 100%

    90% Supported Supported Yes8% Supported Supported Yes

    Supported Supported Yes

    2% Supported Supported Yes

    Supported Supported Yes

    Supported Supported Yes

    Supported Supported Yes

    as long as it is ODBC

    compliant

    as long as it is ODBC

    compliantYes

    as long as it is ODBCcompliant

    as long as it is ODBCcompliant

    Yes

    as long as it is ODBC

    compliant

    as long as it is ODBC

    compliantYes

    Supported Supported Yes

    as long as it is ODBC

    compliant

    as long as it is ODBC

    compliantYes

    Pilot Software Pilot SoftwareYes - HP NeoView and any

    ODBC compliant database

    100%

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CA i 20

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    20/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    20

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Supported networks (% of implementations)

    Microsoft

    Linux

    Unix

    AIXNovell Netware

    IBM AS/400 (OS/400)

    IBM S/390

    Other

    Total

    Development tools used to build application

    Report writer used - which one(s)?

    Data Extract Transform Load (ETL) tools - which one(s)?

    Cubes supported - which one(s)?

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    100% Supported Supported Yes

    Supported Supported Partial (Database)

    Supported Supported Partial (Database)

    Supported Supported Partial (Database)Supported Supported Partial (Database)

    Supported Supported Partial (Database)

    Supported Supported Partial (Database)

    Partial (Database)

    100%

    BIDS, Dashboard Designer,

    Business Modeller

    Visual Basic, HTML, Active X

    Controls, XML

    Visual Basic, HTML, Active X

    Controls, XMLQlikView Developer

    Visual Studio, Report Builder,

    Office WriterEmbedded in Product Embedded in Product QlikView Developer

    SSIS Embedded in Product Embedded in Product QlikView Developer

    SSAS

    Pilot Software, Analysis

    Services

    Pilot Software, Analysis

    Services

    QlikView customers utilize

    ODBC to connect to and

    retrieve data from a wide range

    of OLAP data sourcesincluding Microsoft, SAP,

    Hyperion, Cognos, and

    BusinessObjects.

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine 21

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    21/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    21

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Existing integration to accounting and ERP systems -

    which systems?

    Existing integration to customer relationship management

    systems - which systems?

    Existing integration to payroll systems - which systems?

    Existing integration to HRMS systems - which systems?

    Available from Application Service Provider

    Approx. no. of implementations

    2-tier, 3-tier or n-tier architecture

    Metadata standard supported

    Maximum size of OLAP cube

    Generic

    Integration of applications in Section D.

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Microsoft Dynamics no limitations no limitations

    QlikView customers utilize

    ODBC to connect to and

    retrieve data from a wide range

    of applications including SAP,

    Oracle, Sage, Intentia, Baan,JD Edwards, Great Plains,

    Navision

    Microsoft Dynamics no limitations no limitations

    QlikView customers utilize

    ODBC to connect to and

    retrieve data from a wide range

    of CRM data sources including

    Sage, Lawson, Microsoft CRM,

    Salesforce, Peoplesoft

    Microsoft Dynamics no limitations no limitations

    QlikView customers utilize

    ODBC to connect to and

    retrieve data from payroll

    systems such as ADP

    Microsoft Dynamics no limitations no limitations

    QlikView customers utilize

    ODBC to connect to and

    retrieve data from a wide range

    of OLAP data sources

    including Stratum, JD

    Edwards, Peoplesoft, Agresso

    Yes No No Yes

    n/a n/a Partner Implementations

    n-Tier 2-Tier 3-Tier n-Tier

    Yes Not Applicable

    4 TB unlimited unlimited No Limit

    Yes Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine 22

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    22/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    22

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Share same database

    Same user interface

    Integrated

    Dashboard

    Role specificGraphical

    Drill down to:

    Business Intelligence

    Consolidation

    Budgeting and forecasting

    Scorecarding

    Excel integration

    Formatting intact

    Formulas intact

    Business Intelligence

    Analytic functionality

    Bubble up exceptions

    Drill down

    Drill through to source data

    Ranking

    Sorting

    Restrict results by date range

    Includes dashboard

    Time trending (for example, over 12 months)

    Pareto filtering (automatically groups the categories that

    amount to less than 20% of a row or column total into

    "other")

    Calculations

    Counts

    Percentage of total

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    No Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    No Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes No Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes No Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine 23

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    23/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    23

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Allocations

    Total and Sub-total

    Create OLAP cubes

    Data extraction and transformation tools

    Incremental extractionImpact analysis - objects impacted by change

    Can schedule process to run overnight

    Formatting

    By dimension

    By level

    By cell

    Zero-row suppression

    Conditional formatting by cell, e.g., highlight cells

    below threshold

    Returns text (e.g., if value > 90, returns "excellent")

    French version

    Screens

    Reports

    Documentation

    Metadata

    OLAP functionality

    Skip missing levels - support ragged dimensionsWrite back

    With audit trail

    Includes charting tools

    Access multiple cubes at a time

    Excel client

    Internet Explorer client

    Netscape client

    Geographical representation

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    No Yes

    Yes No Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine 24

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    24/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Drag and drop

    Attach notes to cube

    Attach notes to cells

    Attach files to cube

    Attach files to cellsPassword security

    By company

    By department or division

    By menu

    By function (view, add, change, delete)

    By dimension

    By level

    By cell

    Respect active directory authenticationRespect database security

    Portal generation that includes HTML reports

    Report writer

    Web-based

    Generate cube

    Drag and drop

    WYSIWYG report design

    Technology

    API-enabled (SDK provided)

    Web-based (only need browser at client)

    For entire application

    Support for .NET web services

    Support for Java web services

    Transfer data to:

    Report writer

    Excel

    PivotTable

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes No Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes No Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Customization

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes

    Yes Future Date Future Date Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Partly Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    No No No Yes

    Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Future Date

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Future Date Future Date Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine 25

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    25/45

    g

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    HTML

    PDF

    PowerPoint

    XML

    ViewsCrosstabs

    Charts

    Both crosstabs and chart at the same time

    Work flow

    Alerts can be automatically triggered

    Consolidation

    Journal entries

    Manual

    Recurring

    Automated for currency translation gains/losses

    Automated for Intercompany eliminations

    Reclassification journal entry - EG used to generate

    cash flow report or balance sheet

    Intercompany processing

    Automated balancing

    Consolidation processor

    Consolidate actuals and budgets

    Consolidate statistical ledgers such as headcounts

    Incremental for entities that have changed

    Different fiscal periods

    Different fiscal calendars

    Short year-ends

    Multiple levels or tiers

    Automated Intercompany eliminations to first common

    parent

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    No Future Date Future Date

    No No Future Date Not Applicable

    No No Future Date Not Applicable

    Yes No Yes Not Applicable

    Yes No Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    No Partly Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Partly Yes Not Applicable

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine 26

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    26/45

    g

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Data collection

    Online over the internet

    Only a browser required (don't need Citrix or terminal

    services)

    Work offline and synchronizeParsing

    Mapping

    Wildcards

    Validation

    Can proceed or stop depending on variance

    Maintain status

    Approvals

    Escalations if late

    Intercompany eliminationsDefine intercompany accounts

    Automated eliminations

    Reporting tool to identify out of balance entities

    Foreign currency translation

    Support temporal method

    Multiple rate types

    Define which rate type by account

    Maintain rate schedule that can be shared across all

    legal entitiesDownload daily rates automatically

    Methods:

    Proportional

    Equity

    Minority interest

    Wholly owned

    Multi tier consolidation

    On-line review and approval of consolidation process at

    each tier

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Yes Yes Yes

    No Yes Yes Yes

    No Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Third Party Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Future Date Future Date Not Applicable

    Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Partly Future Date Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Not Applicable

    No No Partly Not Applicable

    Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Partly Yes Not Applicable

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine 27

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    27/45

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Drill down to any tier

    Multiple ledgers

    Ownership

    Date sensitive ownership - for changes during the

    month

    Reorganizations

    Change account structure and replicate across system

    Revaluations

    Financial Reporting

    Analysis Codes

    Attach to accounts or g/l segments

    Can be used in any financial report for selection or

    ordering

    Results in home or reporting currency

    Rows can be defined

    Columns can be defined

    Cell Override

    Hierarchical reporting

    Multiple hierarchies

    Lead schedules

    Ready for external reporting

    Rounding to nearest 1000 and allocation of rounding error

    to specified financial statement line

    Trend analysis showing last 12 periods

    Exception reporting

    Highlight all accounts with a variance over a certain % or

    amount

    Consolidate Accounts Receivable subledger

    Compute Daily Sales Outstanding

    Eliminate intercompany accounts

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine 28

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    28/45

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Budgeting

    Automatic % change of previous budget

    Automatic based on actual

    Excel like formulasSeasonality allocations

    Budgeting process

    Bottom up

    Top down

    Export to Excel

    Import from Excel

    Lockable

    Maintain explanation of budget variances

    Based on employee information in HR systemMultiple Budgets

    Rolling budget

    Sign assumed

    What if analysis

    Ability to update assumptions which are used in the

    calculations

    Rollup forecast to budget

    Approval process

    Forecasting

    Quotes and their probability

    Outstanding orders

    Customer forecasts

    Historical trends

    Average of 13 weeks volume

    Can apply factors such as seasonality

    Apply regression analysis

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Partly Yes Yes Partly

    Partly Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Third Party

    Yes No No Yes

    Yes Yes No Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes No No No

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 C P f M B i I lli S

    29

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    29/45

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Apply factors such as housing starts and market

    adjustment factor

    Ability to accept input from multiple users

    Approval process

    What if Analysis

    Name one to five unique or very important features of

    your product (limit of 250 characters)

    Unique/important feature no.1

    Unique/important feature no. 2

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Associations, being able to

    map data fields across

    planning models.

    Fully integrated budgeting,

    planning and reporting

    implemented remotely in less

    than 2 weeks.

    InfoFlex gives users

    numerous options to transform

    their data. Users can copy or

    move data, allocate existing

    data, increase data by apercentage, or forecast based

    on YTD data or assumptions

    In memory data model for high

    performance, ad-hoc analysis,

    Economics, in terms of lower

    end user training costs,

    expansive ecosystem of

    individuals skilled on Microsoft

    technology and licensing costs

    Pre-built and pre-defined

    financial statements with the

    unlimited ability to create more

    reports.

    Delta Analysis is an

    interactive, graphical tool used

    to compare, contrast and

    update any data point. For

    example, users can perform a

    year-on-year comparison or

    drill down to the monthly orweekly level to get a more

    detailed analysis.

    Single platform for

    development, reporting, end

    user and enterprise

    deployment

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    30

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    30/45

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Unique/important feature no. 3

    Microsoft Office

    PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView

    Strong integration with

    productivity and collaborationtools

    Personnel Planning module

    with predefined payroll

    calculations linking to definedpayroll accounts and budgets.

    Advanced Data Visualization

    (ADV) is a reporting solution

    that delivers visualization

    capabilities for analytics and

    monitoring of key decisionmetrics. ADV provides analysis

    of details from many different

    perspectives with drillable

    dashboards.

    Ability to select any dimension,

    presentation of included and

    excluded based on eachselection

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    31

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    31/45

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Product

    Vendor

    Version

    Release date (mmm-yy)

    Contact

    Name

    Telephone

    E-mail

    Website

    Cost (Canadian dollars)

    Licence based

    Average cost per user

    Average no. of users

    Average cost

    Ratio - average implementation cost/licence cost

    Average implementation cost

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    Platform

    For CPM: SAP Strategy

    Management, Business

    Objects Profitability and Cost

    Management, SAP Business

    Planning and Consolidation,

    Business Objects FinancialConsolidation, SAP Spend

    Analytics. For BI: SAP

    NetWeaver Business

    Intelligence

    SAS Business Intelligence and

    Financial Intelligence SolutionsYellowfin

    SAP SAP SAS Yellowfin

    XI 3.1

    SAP NetWeaver BI - 7.0; CPM

    - all 7.0 except SAP Spend

    Analytics 2.0

    SAS 9.2 4

    Sep-08SAP NetWeaver BI - 2006;

    CPM- all in 2008 Jul-08 Aug-08

    Joy Chan Joy Chan Jim LaRue Glen Rabie

    416-250-3347 416-250-3347 416 307 4552 61396422241

    [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] i

    www.sap.ca;

    www.sap.com

    www.sap.ca;

    www.sap.comwww.sas.com www.yellowfin.bi

    $650

    100

    $0 $65,000

    0.75

    $0 $48,750

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    32

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    32/45

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Total licence based

    Annual Maintenance %

    Annual Maintenance Dollars

    Support included in maintenance fee

    ASP (Application service provider) basedAverage annual fee / user

    Average no. of users

    Average annual fees

    Average implementation costs / average fees - year one

    Average implementation costs

    Total ASP based - 1st Year

    Support included in ASP fee

    Applications

    Business intelligence

    Strategic planning

    Budgeting and Forecasting

    Consolidation

    Financial Reporting

    Scorecarding

    Dashboard

    Profile

    World head office

    Canadian head office

    No. of customers - worldwide - all products

    No. of customers - worldwide - this product

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    $0 $113,750

    20%

    $0 $13,000

    Yes

    Can Be - by Partners$300

    1,000

    $0 $300,000

    3.00

    $0 $900,000

    $0 $1,200,000

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    No Yes Yes No

    No Yes Yes No

    No Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    No Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Walldorf, Germany Walldorf, Germany Cary, NC USA Australia

    Toronto, Ontario Toronto, Ontario280 King Street East, Toronto,

    ONOttawa

    approximately 75,000 approximately 75,000 44,000 300

    300

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    33

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    33/45

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    No. of customers - Canada - all products

    No. of customers - Canada - this product

    Revenue 2007 - CAD - all products (est.)

    Revenue 2007 - CAD - this product (est.)

    Revenue 2006 - CAD - all products

    Revenue 2006 - CAD - this product

    Target market

    Average revenue/customer (CAD)Average no. of employees/customer

    Industry classification based on The North American

    Industry Classification System (NAICS) - see

    http://www.naics.com/info.htm#Structure for more about

    NAICS (approximate % of implementations)

    11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting

    21 Mining

    22 Utilities

    23 Construction31-33 Manufacturing

    42 Wholesale trade

    44-45 Retail trade

    48-49 Transportation and warehousing

    51 Information

    52 Finance and insurance

    53 Real estate and rental and leasing

    54 Professional, scientific, and technical services

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    more than 1,170 customers

    collectively with Business

    Objects, an SAP company

    more than 1,170 customers

    collectively with Business

    Objects, an SAP company

    2,000 + 20

    64 20

    342.6 million Euros 342.6 million Euros 2,150 Million $5,000,000

    as a privately held company

    we do not report product

    revenue

    $5,000,000

    304.7 million Euros 304.7 million Euros 2,100 Million $3,000,000

    as a privately held company

    we do not report product

    revenue

    $3,000,000

    500

    Yes Yes 5%

    Yes Yes 1% 5%

    Yes Yes 10% 5%

    Yes YesYes Yes 12% 10%

    Yes Yes 1% 5%

    Yes Yes 10% 5%

    Yes Yes 2% 10%

    Yes Yes 1% 20%

    Yes Yes 20% 5%

    Yes Yes 1%

    Yes Yes 2%

    Prepared by 180 Systems

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    34/45

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    35

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    35/45

    p g g y

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Supported networks (% of implementations)

    Microsoft

    Linux

    Unix

    AIX

    Novell Netware

    IBM AS/400 (OS/400)

    IBM S/390

    Other

    Total

    Development tools used to build application

    Report writer used - which one(s)?

    Data Extract Transform Load (ETL) tools - which one(s)?

    Cubes supported - which one(s)?

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    YES YES Supported 40%

    YES YES Supported 50%

    YES YES Supported 5%

    YES YES Supported

    Supported 5%

    Supported

    100%

    Java, C++ Java, C++, ABAP/4 SAS AppDev Studio Eclipse

    SAP BusinessObjects CrystalReports

    SAP NetWeaver

    SAS Web Report Studio, SAS

    Enterprise Guide - part of SASEnterprise BI Server; SAS

    Financial Management; Add-in

    for Microsoft Office

    Yellowfin

    SAP BusinessObjects Data

    IntegratorSAP NetWeaver SAS Data Integration Studio Talend, Kett le, Informatica

    SAP NetWeaver, Oracle,

    MicrosoftSAP NetWeaver MDX Compliant

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    36

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    36/45

    p g g y

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Existing integration to accounting and ERP systems -

    which systems?

    Existing integration to customer relationship management

    systems - which systems?

    Existing integration to payroll systems - which systems?

    Existing integration to HRMS systems - which systems?

    Available from Application Service Provider

    Approx. no. of implementations

    2-tier, 3-tier or n-tier architecture

    Metadata standard supported

    Maximum size of OLAP cube

    Generic

    Integration of applications in Section D.

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    SAP, Oracle SAP, OracleOracle, PeopleSoft, SAP,

    Siebel

    SAP, JD Edwards, Oracle,

    Pronto, many others

    SAP, Oracle SAP, Oracle Siebel Multiple

    SAP, Oracle/Peoplesoft SAP, Oracle/Peoplesoft Multiple

    SAP, Oracle/Peoplesoft SAP, Oracle/Peoplesoft Multiple

    Yes Yes

    50

    n-Tier n-Tier n-Tier

    CWM CWM CWM, XML Yes

    no limit No limit NA

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    37

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    37/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Share same database

    Same user interface

    Integrated

    Dashboard

    Role specific

    Graphical

    Drill down to:

    Business Intelligence

    Consolidation

    Budgeting and forecasting

    Scorecarding

    Excel integration

    Formatting intact

    Formulas intact

    Business Intelligence

    Analytic functionality

    Bubble up exceptions

    Drill down

    Drill through to source data

    Ranking

    Sorting

    Restrict results by date rangeIncludes dashboard

    Time trending (for example, over 12 months)

    Pareto filtering (automatically groups the categories that

    amount to less than 20% of a row or column total into

    "other")

    Calculations

    Counts

    Percentage of total

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Future Date Partly Yes

    Yes Future Date Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Future Date

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes No Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Partly Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    38

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    38/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Allocations

    Total and Sub-total

    Create OLAP cubes

    Data extraction and transformation tools

    Incremental extraction

    Impact analysis - objects impacted by change

    Can schedule process to run overnight

    Formatting

    By dimension

    By level

    By cell

    Zero-row suppression

    Conditional formatting by cell, e.g., highlight cells

    below threshold

    Returns text (e.g., if value > 90, returns "excellent")

    French version

    Screens

    Reports

    Documentation

    Metadata

    OLAP functionality

    Skip missing levels - support ragged dimensions

    Write back

    With audit trail

    Includes charting tools

    Access multiple cubes at a time

    Excel client

    Internet Explorer client

    Netscape client

    Geographical representation

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Partly Yes No

    Yes Partly Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Customization Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Partly

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Partly Yes Yes

    Yes Partly Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes No Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    39

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    39/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Drag and drop

    Attach notes to cube

    Attach notes to cells

    Attach files to cube

    Attach files to cells

    Password security

    By company

    By department or division

    By menu

    By function (view, add, change, delete)

    By dimension

    By level

    By cell

    Respect active directory authenticationRespect database security

    Portal generation that includes HTML reports

    Report writer

    Web-based

    Generate cube

    Drag and drop

    WYSIWYG report design

    Technology

    API-enabled (SDK provided)Web-based (only need browser at client)

    For entire application

    Support for .NET web services

    Support for Java web services

    Transfer data to:

    Report writer

    Excel

    PivotTable

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes No Future Date

    Yes Yes No Future Date

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Partly Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes

    Partly Partly Yes Yes

    Partly Partly Yes Yes

    Partly Partly Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    No Partly Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    40

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    40/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    HTML

    PDF

    PowerPoint

    XML

    Views

    Crosstabs

    Charts

    Both crosstabs and chart at the same time

    Work flow

    Alerts can be automatically tr iggered

    Consolidation

    Journal entries

    ManualRecurring

    Automated for currency translation gains/losses

    Automated for Intercompany eliminations

    Reclassification journal entry - EG used to generate

    cash flow report or balance sheet

    Intercompany processing

    Automated balancing

    Consolidation processor

    Consolidate actuals and budgets

    Consolidate statistical ledgers such as headcounts

    Incremental for entities that have changed

    Different fiscal periods

    Different fiscal calendars

    Short year-ends

    Multiple levels or tiers

    Automated Intercompany eliminations to first common

    parent

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes No Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes NoYes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    41

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    41/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Data collection

    Online over the internet

    Only a browser required (don't need Citrix or terminal

    services)

    Work offline and synchronize

    Parsing

    Mapping

    Wildcards

    Validation

    Can proceed or stop depending on variance

    Maintain status

    Approvals

    Escalations if late

    Intercompany eliminations

    Define intercompany accounts

    Automated eliminations

    Reporting tool to identify out of balance entities

    Foreign currency translation

    Support temporal method

    Multiple rate types

    Define which rate type by account

    Maintain rate schedule that can be shared across all

    legal entities

    Download daily rates automatically

    Methods:

    Proportional

    Equity

    Minority interest

    Wholly owned

    Multi tier consolidation

    On-line review and approval of consolidation process at

    each tier

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes No No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    42

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    42/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Drill down to any tier

    Multiple ledgers

    Ownership

    Date sensitive ownership - for changes during the

    month

    Reorganizations

    Change account structure and replicate across system

    Revaluations

    Financial Reporting

    Analysis Codes

    Attach to accounts or g/l segments

    Can be used in any financial report for selection or

    orderingResults in home or reporting currency

    Rows can be defined

    Columns can be defined

    Cell Override

    Hierarchical reporting

    Multiple hierarchies

    Lead schedules

    Ready for external reporting

    Rounding to nearest 1000 and allocation of rounding errorto specified financial statement line

    Trend analysis showing last 12 periods

    Exception reporting

    Highlight all accounts with a variance over a certain % or

    amount

    Consolidate Accounts Receivable subledger

    Compute Daily Sales Outstanding

    Eliminate intercompany accounts

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    No Yes Yes

    No Yes Yes Yes

    No Yes Yes No

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    43

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    43/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Budgeting

    Automatic % change of previous budget

    Automatic based on actual

    Excel like formulas

    Seasonality allocations

    Budgeting process

    Bottom up

    Top down

    Export to Excel

    Import from Excel

    Lockable

    Maintain explanation of budget variances

    Based on employee information in HR system

    Multiple Budgets

    Rolling budget

    Sign assumed

    What if analysis

    Ability to update assumptions which are used in the

    calculations

    Rollup forecast to budget

    Approval process

    Forecasting

    Quotes and their probability

    Outstanding orders

    Customer forecasts

    Historical trends

    Average of 13 weeks volume

    Can apply factors such as seasonality

    Apply regression analysis

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes

    Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Customization Customization Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    44

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    44/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    Additions

    Changes

    Product

    Apply factors such as housing starts and market

    adjustment factor

    Ability to accept input from multiple users

    Approval process

    What if Analysis

    Name one to five unique or very important features of

    your product (limit of 250 characters)

    Unique/important feature no.1

    Unique/important feature no. 2

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Customization Customization Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes No

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Yes Yes Yes Yes

    All business intelligence users

    and all data sources on a

    single unified platform

    For CPM - unified platform,

    user-driven and high usability

    Real Time consolidation

    integration with advanced

    analytics such as forecasting,

    operations research, and data

    mining

    Usability

    Business Intelligence solutions

    for query, reporting, analysis,

    dashboard, and user-friendly

    information search and

    exploration, enabling quick

    access to information to make

    enlightened decisions

    For CPM - complete Office of

    the CFO solution - core suite,

    CPM and GRC

    Complete integration of CPM

    components through common

    SAS 9 Platform (including

    analytical human capital mgmt)

    100% Web Based

    Prepared by 180 Systems

    CAmagazine

    2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey

    45

  • 8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008

    45/45

    Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference

    from the previous year:

    AdditionsChanges

    Product

    Unique/important feature no. 3

    SAP BusinessObjects BI

    PlatformSAP CPM

    SAS Business Intelligence

    and Financial Intelligence

    Solutions

    Yellowfin

    `

    Information management

    solutions for delivering data,

    structured or unstructured,

    across the enterprise that is

    integrated, accurate,reconciled, and well

    understood

    For CPM - SOA-enabled;

    integration with MDM, process

    management and portaltechnology

    Capacity to incorporate data to

    measure and optimize Carbon

    Footprint / Offsetting

    Security

    Prepared by 180 Systems