Upload
jeevasakthi
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
1/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
1
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
ProductCognos Performance
Management Solution DynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Vendor Cognos Dynac Inc. 5 Macs Controlling
Version 8 1.5 Jul-08 2.7
Release date (mmm-yy) Jun-08 Jun-05 Dec-07
Contact
Name Gary MacFarlane Sales Chris Meyer
Telephone 519.571.3254 800-468-0834, ext 5940 1800 946 3160
E-mail [email protected] [email protected]@macscontr
olling.com
Website www.cognos.com www.dynactools.ca www.exactba.comwww.macscontrolling.co
m
Cost (Canadian dollars)
Licence based
Average cost per user $575 $700 $3,500
Average no. of users 10 40 10
Average cost $5,750 $28,000 $35,000
Ratio - average implementation cost/licence cost 1.00 0.50
Average implementation cost $5,750 $14,000 $0
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
2/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
2
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Total licence based $11,500 $42,000 $35,000
Annual Maintenance % 20% 18% 18%
Annual Maintenance Dollars $1,150 $5,040 $6,300
Support included in maintenance fee Partly Yes
ASP (Application service provider) based
Average annual fee / user
Average no. of users
Average annual fees
Average implementation costs / average fees - year one
Average implementation costs
Total ASP based - 1st Year
Support included in ASP fee
Applications
Business intelligence Yes Third Party Yes Yes
Strategic planning Yes Yes No Yes
Budgeting and Forecasting Yes Yes No Yes
Consolidation Yes Yes Yes No
Financial Reporting Yes Yes Yes Yes
Scorecarding Yes Yes Yes Yes
Dashboard Yes Yes Yes Yes
Profile
World head office Ottawa, Canada Kitchener, Ontario Delft, The Netherlands Rottweil, Germany
Canadian head office Ottawa, Canada Kitchener, Ontario Cambridge, ON None
No. of customers - worldwide - all products 23,000+ 150
No. of customers - worldwide - this product 200 150
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
3/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
3
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
No. of customers - Canada - all products 2
No. of customers - Canada - this product 175 2
Revenue 2007 - CAD - all products (est.) 252
Revenue 2007 - CAD - this product (est.)
Revenue 2006 - CAD - all products 242
Revenue 2006 - CAD - this product
Target market
Average revenue/customer (CAD) >$200M $10M-$49M >$200M >$200M
Average no. of employees/customer >500 100-499 100-499 10-49
Industry classification based on The North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) - see
http://www.naics.com/info.htm#Structure for more about
NAICS (approximate % of implementations)
DynacTools is applicable to all
industry classifications
11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1%
21 Mining
22 Utilities
23 Construction 4%31-33 Manufacturing 80% 80%
42 Wholesale trade 15%
44-45 Retail trade
48-49 Transportation and warehousing 5%
51 Information
52 Finance and insurance 5%
53 Real estate and rental and leasing
54 Professional, scientific, and technical services
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
4/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
4
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
55 Management of companies and enterprises
56 Administrative and support and waste management
and remediation services
61 Education services
62 Health care and social assistance 5%71 Arts, entertainment and recreation
72 Accommodation and food services
81 Other services (except public administration)
92 Public administration 5%
Total 100% 100%
Technology
Supported database (% of implementations)
Microsoft SQL Server Supported 70% 70%Oracle Supported 3% 20%
Pervasive SQL Supported 2%
IBM DB2 Supported 25% 5%
Sybase Supported 5%
Informix Supported
Access Supported
Btrieve Supported
Proprietary Supported
FoxPro Supported
Progress Supported
MySQL Supported
Other Supported
Total 100% 100%
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
5/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
5
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Supported networks (% of implementations)
Microsoft Supported 100% 80%
Linux Supported 10%
Unix Supported 10%
AIX SupportedNovell Netware Supported
IBM AS/400 (OS/400) Supported
IBM S/390 Supported
Other Supported
Total 100% 100%
Development tools used to build application Yes Borland Delphi, VBA Delphi, C++, C# .Net .net, C++, C#
Report writer used - which one(s)? Yes DynacViews Own macs Analyzer
Data Extract Transform Load (ETL) tools - which one(s)? Yes ODBC Own ODBC, SOA
Cubes supported - which one(s)? Yes Own, MS SQL None, not cube based
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
6/45
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
7/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
7
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Share same database Yes Yes Yes Yes
Same user interface Yes Yes Yes Yes
Integrated Yes Yes Yes Yes
Dashboard Yes Yes Yes Yes
Role specific Yes Third Party Yes Yes
Graphical Yes Third Party Yes Yes
Drill down to: Yes Yes Yes
Business Intelligence Yes Third Party Yes Yes
Consolidation Yes Yes Yes No
Budgeting and forecasting Yes Yes Customization Yes
Scorecarding Yes Third Party Yes Yes
Excel integration Yes Yes Yes
Formatting intact Yes No Yes Yes
Formulas intact Yes No No Yes
Business Intelligence Yes
Analytic functionality Yes Yes Yes
Bubble up exceptions Yes Yes Yes No
Drill down Yes Yes Yes Yes
Drill through to source data Yes Yes Yes No
Ranking Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sorting Yes Yes Yes Yes
Restrict results by date range Yes Yes Yes Yes
Includes dashboard Yes Yes Yes Yes
Time trending (for example, over 12 months) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pareto filtering (automatically groups the categories that
amount to less than 20% of a row or column total into
"other")
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Calculations Yes Yes Yes
Counts Yes Yes Yes Yes
Percentage of total Yes Yes Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
8/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
8
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Allocations Yes Yes Yes Yes
Total and Sub-total Yes Yes Yes Yes
Create OLAP cubes Yes Yes Yes No
Data extraction and transformation tools Yes Yes Yes
Incremental extraction Yes Yes Yes Yes
Impact analysis - objects impacted by change Yes Yes Yes Yes
Can schedule process to run overnight Yes Yes Yes Yes
Formatting Yes Yes Yes
By dimension Yes Yes Yes Yes
By level Yes Yes Yes Yes
By cell Yes Yes Yes Yes
Zero-row suppression Yes Yes Yes Yes
Conditional formatting by cell, e.g., highlight cells
below threshold Yes Yes Yes Yes
Returns text (e.g., if value > 90, returns "excellent") Yes Yes Yes Yes
French version Yes Yes No Yes
Screens Yes Yes No Yes
Reports Yes Yes No Yes
Documentation Yes Yes No Yes
Metadata Yes Yes Yes Yes
OLAP functionality Yes Yes Yes
Skip missing levels - support ragged dimensions Yes Yes Yes NoWrite back Yes Yes No No
With audit trail Yes Yes No No
Includes charting tools Yes Yes Yes No
Access multiple cubes at a time Yes Yes Yes No
Excel client Yes Yes Yes No
Internet Explorer client Yes Yes Yes No
Netscape client Yes Yes Yes No
Geographical representation Yes Yes Yes No
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
9/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
9
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Drag and drop Yes Yes Yes No
Attach notes to cube Yes Yes Yes No
Attach notes to cells Yes Yes No No
Attach files to cube Yes Yes No No
Attach files to cells Yes Yes No No
Password security Yes Yes Yes Yes
By company Yes Yes Yes Yes
By department or division Yes Yes Yes Yes
By menu Yes Yes Yes Yes
By function (view, add, change, delete) Yes Yes Yes Yes
By dimension Yes Yes Yes Yes
By level Yes Yes Yes Yes
By cell Yes Yes Yes Yes
Respect active directory authentication Yes Yes Yes Yes
Respect database security Yes Yes Yes Yes
Portal generation that includes HTML reports Yes Yes Yes Yes
Report writer Yes Yes Yes Yes
Web-based Yes Yes Yes Yes
Generate cube Yes Yes Yes No
Drag and drop Yes Yes Yes Yes
WYSIWYG report design Yes Yes Yes Yes
Technology
API-enabled (SDK provided) Yes No No
Web-based (only need browser at client) Yes No Yes Yes
For entire application Yes No No No
Support for .NET web services Yes No Yes Yes
Support for Java web services Yes No Partly No
Transfer data to:
Report writer Yes Yes Yes Yes
Excel Yes Yes Yes Yes
PivotTable Yes Yes Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
10/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
10
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
HTML Yes Yes Yes Yes
PDF Yes Yes Yes Yes
PowerPoint Yes Yes Yes No
XML Yes Yes Yes Yes
Views
Crosstabs Yes Yes Yes
Charts Yes Yes Yes
Both crosstabs and chart at the same time Yes Yes Yes
Work flow Yes Yes Customization
Alerts can be automatically triggered Yes Yes Yes Yes
Consolidation Yes
Journal entries Yes Yes Yes No
Manual Yes Yes Yes No
Recurring Yes Yes Not Applicable No
Automated for currency translation gains/losses Yes Yes Not Applicable No
Automated for Intercompany eliminations Yes Yes Not Applicable No
Reclassification journal entry - EG used to generate
cash flow report or balance sheetYes Yes No No
Intercompany processing Yes Yes Partly No
Automated balancing Yes Yes No No
Consolidation processor Yes Yes Yes No
Consolidate actuals and budgets Yes Yes Yes No
Consolidate statistical ledgers such as headcounts Yes Yes Partly No
Incremental for entities that have changed Yes Yes Yes No
Different fiscal periods Yes Yes Yes No
Different fiscal calendars Yes Yes Yes No
Short year-ends Yes Yes Yes No
Multiple levels or tiers Yes Yes Yes No
Automated Intercompany eliminations to first common
parentYes Yes No No
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
11/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
11
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Data collection Yes Yes Yes No
Online over the internet Yes No Partly No
Only a browser required (don't need Citrix or terminal
services)Yes No Yes No
Work offline and synchronize Yes Yes Yes NoParsing Yes No Yes No
Mapping Yes Yes Yes No
Wildcards Yes Yes Yes No
Validation Yes Yes Partly No
Can proceed or stop depending on variance Yes Yes Partly No
Maintain status Yes Yes Not Applicable No
Approvals Yes Yes No No
Escalations if late Yes Yes Customization No
Intercompany eliminations Yes Yes Partly No
Define intercompany accounts Yes Yes Yes No
Automated eliminations Yes Yes Partly No
Reporting tool to identify out of balance entities Yes Yes Yes No
Foreign currency translation Yes Yes Yes No
Support temporal method Yes Yes Yes No
Multiple rate types Yes Yes Yes No
Define which rate type by account Yes Yes Yes No
Maintain rate schedule that can be shared across all
legal entities Yes Yes Yes NoDownload daily rates automatically Yes Yes Yes No
Methods: Yes Yes Yes No
Proportional Yes Yes Yes No
Equity Yes Yes Partly No
Minority interest Yes Yes No No
Wholly owned Yes Yes Yes No
Multi tier consolidation Yes Yes Yes No
On-line review and approval of consolidation process at
each tierYes Yes Yes No
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
12/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
12
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Drill down to any tier Yes Yes Yes No
Multiple ledgers Yes Yes Yes No
Ownership Yes Yes Yes No
Date sensitive ownership - for changes during the
monthYes Yes Partly No
Reorganizations Yes Yes Yes No
Change account structure and replicate across system Yes Yes No No
Revaluations Yes Yes No
Partly
Financial Reporting Yes
Analysis Codes Yes Yes Yes
Attach to accounts or g/l segments Yes Yes Yes
Can be used in any financial report for selection orordering
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Results in home or reporting currency Yes Yes Yes Yes
Rows can be defined Yes Yes Yes Yes
Columns can be defined Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cell Override Yes Yes Yes Yes
Hierarchical reporting Yes Yes Yes Yes
Multiple hierarchies Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lead schedules Yes Yes Yes Yes
Ready for external reporting Yes Yes Partly YesRounding to nearest 1000 and allocation of rounding error
to specified financial statement lineYes Not Applicable Yes Yes
Trend analysis showing last 12 periods Yes Yes Partly Yes
Exception reporting Yes Yes Yes Yes
Highlight all accounts with a variance over a certain % or
amountYes Yes Yes Yes
Consolidate Accounts Receivable subledger Yes Third Party Yes No
Compute Daily Sales Outstanding Yes Third Party Yes
Eliminate intercompany accounts Yes Third Party Yes No
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
13/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
13
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Budgeting Yes
Automatic % change of previous budget Yes Yes No Yes
Automatic based on actual Yes Yes No Yes
Excel like formulas Yes Yes No YesSeasonality allocations Yes Yes No Yes
Budgeting process Yes Yes No Yes
Bottom up Yes Yes No Yes
Top down Yes Yes No Yes
Export to Excel Yes Yes Yes Yes
Import from Excel Yes Yes Yes Yes
Lockable Yes Yes No Yes
Maintain explanation of budget variances Yes Yes No Yes
Based on employee information in HR system Yes No No Yes
Multiple Budgets Yes Yes No Yes
Rolling budget Yes Yes No Yes
Sign assumed Yes Yes No Yes
What if analysis Yes Yes Customization Yes
Ability to update assumptions which are used in the
calculationsYes Yes No Yes
Rollup forecast to budget Yes Yes No Yes
Approval process Yes Yes No Yes
Forecasting Yes
Quotes and their probability Yes Yes No Yes
Outstanding orders Yes Yes No Yes
Customer forecasts Yes Yes No Yes
Historical trends Yes Yes No Yes
Average of 13 weeks volume Yes Yes No Yes
Can apply factors such as seasonality Yes Yes No Yes
Apply regression analysis Yes Yes No Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
14/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
14
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Apply factors such as housing starts and market
adjustment factorYes Yes No Yes
Ability to accept input from multiple users Yes Yes No Yes
Approval process Yes Yes No Yes
What if Analysis Yes Yes Customization Yes
Name one to five unique or very important features of
your product (limit of 250 characters)
Unique/important feature no.1All features are designed to be
Owned by Finance
Create Budgets and Forecasts
(at the Account or SKU level
with an optional feature to
drive MPS) in hours not weeksor months complete with multi-
user inputs
All benefits of data
warehouse/data mart without
the need to have one
Maintains accurate split
between fixed and variable
costs enabling contribution
margin decisions making atcustomer and product level
Unique/important feature no. 2
Rich ecosystem of best-
practice solutions surrounds
core product capabilities
DynacViews outperforms most
GL report writers complete with
auto synchronization of row
and column structure and
dynamic filtering where
reporting structure is user
defined with a drag an drop
interface called Dynac Account
Manager
Prebuilt business analytics
suite with analytic views,
reports and supporting
metadata
Driver based modelling
enabling accurate cost profit
simulations of how a change in
volume/mix influences your
cost base
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
15/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
15
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Cognos Performance
Management SolutionDynacTools Exact Software Macs Controlling
Additions
Changes
Product
Unique/important feature no. 3
Rich global consolidation
capabilities to support
currency, minority interest,intercompany - and multi-
jurisdictional GAAP reporting
Cognos / Hyperion like
consolidation features at afraction of the price
online/offline analysis
Accurate Variance Analysis:
Ability to flex the variableportion of budgeted cost for
comparison against actual cost
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
16/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
16
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Product
Vendor
Version
Release date (mmm-yy)
Contact
Name
Telephone
Website
Cost (Canadian dollars)
Licence based
Average cost per user
Average no. of users
Average cost
Ratio - average implementation cost/licence cost
Average implementation cost
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint Server PROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Microsoft PROPHIX Software PROPHIX Software QlikTech, Inc.
2007 7 4.1 8.5
Sep-07 Mar-08 Aug-08 Jun-08
Susan Lawson Susan Lawson Neil Florio
(877) 568-2495 (905) 279-8711 ext. 245 (905) 279-8711 ext. 245 888-828-9768
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
www.microsoft.ca/bi www.prophix.com www.prophix.com www.qliktech.com
$261 $1,500 $2,000 $2,000
100 5 30 40
$26,100 $7,500 $60,000 $80,000
3.00 0.75 0.75
$78,300 $5,625 $45,000 $0
Prepared by 180 Systems
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
17/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
17
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Total licence based
Annual Maintenance %
Annual Maintenance Dollars
Support included in maintenance fee
ASP (Application service provider) basedAverage annual fee / user
Average no. of users
Average annual fees
Average implementation costs / average fees - year one
Average implementation costs
Total ASP based - 1st Year
Support included in ASP fee
Applications
Business intelligence
Strategic planning
Budgeting and Forecasting
Consolidation
Financial Reporting
Scorecarding
Dashboard
Profile
World head office
Canadian head office
No. of customers - worldwide - all products
No. of customers - worldwide - this product
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
$104,400 $13,125 $105,000 $80,000
25% 20% 20% 20%
$6,525 $1,500 $12,000 $16,000
Yes Yes Yes Yes
$0
1.00
$0
$0
Yes No Yes Yes
Yes No Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Redmond, WA Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Radnor, PA
Mississauga, On Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
> 1 Billion 1,400 1,400 9,500
>500 1,250 150 9,500
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
18/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
18
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
No. of customers - Canada - all products
No. of customers - Canada - this product
Revenue 2007 - CAD - all products (est.)
Revenue 2007 - CAD - this product (est.)
Revenue 2006 - CAD - all products
Revenue 2006 - CAD - this product
Target market
Average revenue/customer (CAD)
Average no. of employees/customer
Industry classification based on The North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) - see
http://www.naics.com/info.htm#Structure for more about
NAICS (approximate % of implementations)
11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting
21 Mining
22 Utilities
23 Construction31-33 Manufacturing
42 Wholesale trade
44-45 Retail trade
48-49 Transportation and warehousing
51 Information
52 Finance and insurance
53 Real estate and rental and leasing
54 Professional, scientific, and technical services
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
>20,000,000 140 140 60
>60 14 14 60
n/a n/a $85,200,000
n/a n/a $85,200,000
n/a n/a $46,860,000
n/a n/a $46,860,000
>$200M 25 Mil. - 500 Mil. 25 Mil. - 500 Mil. $50M-$200M
>500 >500 >500 100-499
2% 2% 5%
3% 3%
2% 2% 5%
2% 2% 5%23% 23% 25%
5% 5% 10%
3% 3% 5%
3% 3% 5%
5% 5%
10% 10% 20%
2% 2%
10% 10% 5%
Prepared by 180 Systems
CA i
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
19/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
19
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
55 Management of companies and enterprises
56 Administrative and support and waste management
and remediation services
61 Education services
62 Health care and social assistance71 Arts, entertainment and recreation
72 Accommodation and food services
81 Other services (except public administration)
92 Public administration
Total
Technology
Supported database (% of implementations)
Microsoft SQL ServerOracle
Pervasive SQL
IBM DB2
Sybase
Informix
Access
Btrieve
Proprietary
FoxPro
Progress
MySQL
Other
Total
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
1% 1%
5% 5%
12% 12% 10%3% 3% 5%
3% 3%
5% 5%
1% 1%
100% 100% 100%
90% Supported Supported Yes8% Supported Supported Yes
Supported Supported Yes
2% Supported Supported Yes
Supported Supported Yes
Supported Supported Yes
Supported Supported Yes
as long as it is ODBC
compliant
as long as it is ODBC
compliantYes
as long as it is ODBCcompliant
as long as it is ODBCcompliant
Yes
as long as it is ODBC
compliant
as long as it is ODBC
compliantYes
Supported Supported Yes
as long as it is ODBC
compliant
as long as it is ODBC
compliantYes
Pilot Software Pilot SoftwareYes - HP NeoView and any
ODBC compliant database
100%
Prepared by 180 Systems
CA i 20
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
20/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
20
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Supported networks (% of implementations)
Microsoft
Linux
Unix
AIXNovell Netware
IBM AS/400 (OS/400)
IBM S/390
Other
Total
Development tools used to build application
Report writer used - which one(s)?
Data Extract Transform Load (ETL) tools - which one(s)?
Cubes supported - which one(s)?
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
100% Supported Supported Yes
Supported Supported Partial (Database)
Supported Supported Partial (Database)
Supported Supported Partial (Database)Supported Supported Partial (Database)
Supported Supported Partial (Database)
Supported Supported Partial (Database)
Partial (Database)
100%
BIDS, Dashboard Designer,
Business Modeller
Visual Basic, HTML, Active X
Controls, XML
Visual Basic, HTML, Active X
Controls, XMLQlikView Developer
Visual Studio, Report Builder,
Office WriterEmbedded in Product Embedded in Product QlikView Developer
SSIS Embedded in Product Embedded in Product QlikView Developer
SSAS
Pilot Software, Analysis
Services
Pilot Software, Analysis
Services
QlikView customers utilize
ODBC to connect to and
retrieve data from a wide range
of OLAP data sourcesincluding Microsoft, SAP,
Hyperion, Cognos, and
BusinessObjects.
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine 21
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
21/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
21
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Existing integration to accounting and ERP systems -
which systems?
Existing integration to customer relationship management
systems - which systems?
Existing integration to payroll systems - which systems?
Existing integration to HRMS systems - which systems?
Available from Application Service Provider
Approx. no. of implementations
2-tier, 3-tier or n-tier architecture
Metadata standard supported
Maximum size of OLAP cube
Generic
Integration of applications in Section D.
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Microsoft Dynamics no limitations no limitations
QlikView customers utilize
ODBC to connect to and
retrieve data from a wide range
of applications including SAP,
Oracle, Sage, Intentia, Baan,JD Edwards, Great Plains,
Navision
Microsoft Dynamics no limitations no limitations
QlikView customers utilize
ODBC to connect to and
retrieve data from a wide range
of CRM data sources including
Sage, Lawson, Microsoft CRM,
Salesforce, Peoplesoft
Microsoft Dynamics no limitations no limitations
QlikView customers utilize
ODBC to connect to and
retrieve data from payroll
systems such as ADP
Microsoft Dynamics no limitations no limitations
QlikView customers utilize
ODBC to connect to and
retrieve data from a wide range
of OLAP data sources
including Stratum, JD
Edwards, Peoplesoft, Agresso
Yes No No Yes
n/a n/a Partner Implementations
n-Tier 2-Tier 3-Tier n-Tier
Yes Not Applicable
4 TB unlimited unlimited No Limit
Yes Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine 22
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
22/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
22
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Share same database
Same user interface
Integrated
Dashboard
Role specificGraphical
Drill down to:
Business Intelligence
Consolidation
Budgeting and forecasting
Scorecarding
Excel integration
Formatting intact
Formulas intact
Business Intelligence
Analytic functionality
Bubble up exceptions
Drill down
Drill through to source data
Ranking
Sorting
Restrict results by date range
Includes dashboard
Time trending (for example, over 12 months)
Pareto filtering (automatically groups the categories that
amount to less than 20% of a row or column total into
"other")
Calculations
Counts
Percentage of total
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Yes Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes
Yes No Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes No Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine 23
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
23/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
23
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Allocations
Total and Sub-total
Create OLAP cubes
Data extraction and transformation tools
Incremental extractionImpact analysis - objects impacted by change
Can schedule process to run overnight
Formatting
By dimension
By level
By cell
Zero-row suppression
Conditional formatting by cell, e.g., highlight cells
below threshold
Returns text (e.g., if value > 90, returns "excellent")
French version
Screens
Reports
Documentation
Metadata
OLAP functionality
Skip missing levels - support ragged dimensionsWrite back
With audit trail
Includes charting tools
Access multiple cubes at a time
Excel client
Internet Explorer client
Netscape client
Geographical representation
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
No Yes
Yes No Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine 24
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
24/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Drag and drop
Attach notes to cube
Attach notes to cells
Attach files to cube
Attach files to cellsPassword security
By company
By department or division
By menu
By function (view, add, change, delete)
By dimension
By level
By cell
Respect active directory authenticationRespect database security
Portal generation that includes HTML reports
Report writer
Web-based
Generate cube
Drag and drop
WYSIWYG report design
Technology
API-enabled (SDK provided)
Web-based (only need browser at client)
For entire application
Support for .NET web services
Support for Java web services
Transfer data to:
Report writer
Excel
PivotTable
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes No Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes No Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Customization
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes
Yes Future Date Future Date Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Partly Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
No No No Yes
Yes
Yes Yes Yes Future Date
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Future Date Future Date Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine 25
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
25/45
g
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
HTML
PowerPoint
XML
ViewsCrosstabs
Charts
Both crosstabs and chart at the same time
Work flow
Alerts can be automatically triggered
Consolidation
Journal entries
Manual
Recurring
Automated for currency translation gains/losses
Automated for Intercompany eliminations
Reclassification journal entry - EG used to generate
cash flow report or balance sheet
Intercompany processing
Automated balancing
Consolidation processor
Consolidate actuals and budgets
Consolidate statistical ledgers such as headcounts
Incremental for entities that have changed
Different fiscal periods
Different fiscal calendars
Short year-ends
Multiple levels or tiers
Automated Intercompany eliminations to first common
parent
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
No Future Date Future Date
No No Future Date Not Applicable
No No Future Date Not Applicable
Yes No Yes Not Applicable
Yes No Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
No Partly Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Partly Yes Not Applicable
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine 26
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
26/45
g
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Data collection
Online over the internet
Only a browser required (don't need Citrix or terminal
services)
Work offline and synchronizeParsing
Mapping
Wildcards
Validation
Can proceed or stop depending on variance
Maintain status
Approvals
Escalations if late
Intercompany eliminationsDefine intercompany accounts
Automated eliminations
Reporting tool to identify out of balance entities
Foreign currency translation
Support temporal method
Multiple rate types
Define which rate type by account
Maintain rate schedule that can be shared across all
legal entitiesDownload daily rates automatically
Methods:
Proportional
Equity
Minority interest
Wholly owned
Multi tier consolidation
On-line review and approval of consolidation process at
each tier
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Third Party Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Future Date Future Date Not Applicable
Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Partly Future Date Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Not Applicable
No No Partly Not Applicable
Yes
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Partly Yes Not Applicable
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine 27
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
27/45
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Drill down to any tier
Multiple ledgers
Ownership
Date sensitive ownership - for changes during the
month
Reorganizations
Change account structure and replicate across system
Revaluations
Financial Reporting
Analysis Codes
Attach to accounts or g/l segments
Can be used in any financial report for selection or
ordering
Results in home or reporting currency
Rows can be defined
Columns can be defined
Cell Override
Hierarchical reporting
Multiple hierarchies
Lead schedules
Ready for external reporting
Rounding to nearest 1000 and allocation of rounding error
to specified financial statement line
Trend analysis showing last 12 periods
Exception reporting
Highlight all accounts with a variance over a certain % or
amount
Consolidate Accounts Receivable subledger
Compute Daily Sales Outstanding
Eliminate intercompany accounts
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Yes Yes Yes
Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Not Applicable
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine 28
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
28/45
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Budgeting
Automatic % change of previous budget
Automatic based on actual
Excel like formulasSeasonality allocations
Budgeting process
Bottom up
Top down
Export to Excel
Import from Excel
Lockable
Maintain explanation of budget variances
Based on employee information in HR systemMultiple Budgets
Rolling budget
Sign assumed
What if analysis
Ability to update assumptions which are used in the
calculations
Rollup forecast to budget
Approval process
Forecasting
Quotes and their probability
Outstanding orders
Customer forecasts
Historical trends
Average of 13 weeks volume
Can apply factors such as seasonality
Apply regression analysis
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Partly Yes Yes Partly
Partly Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Third Party
Yes No No Yes
Yes Yes No Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes No No No
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 C P f M B i I lli S
29
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
29/45
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Apply factors such as housing starts and market
adjustment factor
Ability to accept input from multiple users
Approval process
What if Analysis
Name one to five unique or very important features of
your product (limit of 250 characters)
Unique/important feature no.1
Unique/important feature no. 2
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Associations, being able to
map data fields across
planning models.
Fully integrated budgeting,
planning and reporting
implemented remotely in less
than 2 weeks.
InfoFlex gives users
numerous options to transform
their data. Users can copy or
move data, allocate existing
data, increase data by apercentage, or forecast based
on YTD data or assumptions
In memory data model for high
performance, ad-hoc analysis,
Economics, in terms of lower
end user training costs,
expansive ecosystem of
individuals skilled on Microsoft
technology and licensing costs
Pre-built and pre-defined
financial statements with the
unlimited ability to create more
reports.
Delta Analysis is an
interactive, graphical tool used
to compare, contrast and
update any data point. For
example, users can perform a
year-on-year comparison or
drill down to the monthly orweekly level to get a more
detailed analysis.
Single platform for
development, reporting, end
user and enterprise
deployment
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
30
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
30/45
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Unique/important feature no. 3
Microsoft Office
PerformancePoint ServerPROPHIX Express PROPHIX for SQL Server QlikView
Strong integration with
productivity and collaborationtools
Personnel Planning module
with predefined payroll
calculations linking to definedpayroll accounts and budgets.
Advanced Data Visualization
(ADV) is a reporting solution
that delivers visualization
capabilities for analytics and
monitoring of key decisionmetrics. ADV provides analysis
of details from many different
perspectives with drillable
dashboards.
Ability to select any dimension,
presentation of included and
excluded based on eachselection
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
31
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
31/45
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Product
Vendor
Version
Release date (mmm-yy)
Contact
Name
Telephone
Website
Cost (Canadian dollars)
Licence based
Average cost per user
Average no. of users
Average cost
Ratio - average implementation cost/licence cost
Average implementation cost
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
SAP BusinessObjects BI
Platform
For CPM: SAP Strategy
Management, Business
Objects Profitability and Cost
Management, SAP Business
Planning and Consolidation,
Business Objects FinancialConsolidation, SAP Spend
Analytics. For BI: SAP
NetWeaver Business
Intelligence
SAS Business Intelligence and
Financial Intelligence SolutionsYellowfin
SAP SAP SAS Yellowfin
XI 3.1
SAP NetWeaver BI - 7.0; CPM
- all 7.0 except SAP Spend
Analytics 2.0
SAS 9.2 4
Sep-08SAP NetWeaver BI - 2006;
CPM- all in 2008 Jul-08 Aug-08
Joy Chan Joy Chan Jim LaRue Glen Rabie
416-250-3347 416-250-3347 416 307 4552 61396422241
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] i
www.sap.ca;
www.sap.com
www.sap.ca;
www.sap.comwww.sas.com www.yellowfin.bi
$650
100
$0 $65,000
0.75
$0 $48,750
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
32
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
32/45
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Total licence based
Annual Maintenance %
Annual Maintenance Dollars
Support included in maintenance fee
ASP (Application service provider) basedAverage annual fee / user
Average no. of users
Average annual fees
Average implementation costs / average fees - year one
Average implementation costs
Total ASP based - 1st Year
Support included in ASP fee
Applications
Business intelligence
Strategic planning
Budgeting and Forecasting
Consolidation
Financial Reporting
Scorecarding
Dashboard
Profile
World head office
Canadian head office
No. of customers - worldwide - all products
No. of customers - worldwide - this product
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
$0 $113,750
20%
$0 $13,000
Yes
Can Be - by Partners$300
1,000
$0 $300,000
3.00
$0 $900,000
$0 $1,200,000
Yes Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes No
No Yes Yes No
No Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Partly
No Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Walldorf, Germany Walldorf, Germany Cary, NC USA Australia
Toronto, Ontario Toronto, Ontario280 King Street East, Toronto,
ONOttawa
approximately 75,000 approximately 75,000 44,000 300
300
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
33
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
33/45
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
No. of customers - Canada - all products
No. of customers - Canada - this product
Revenue 2007 - CAD - all products (est.)
Revenue 2007 - CAD - this product (est.)
Revenue 2006 - CAD - all products
Revenue 2006 - CAD - this product
Target market
Average revenue/customer (CAD)Average no. of employees/customer
Industry classification based on The North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) - see
http://www.naics.com/info.htm#Structure for more about
NAICS (approximate % of implementations)
11 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting
21 Mining
22 Utilities
23 Construction31-33 Manufacturing
42 Wholesale trade
44-45 Retail trade
48-49 Transportation and warehousing
51 Information
52 Finance and insurance
53 Real estate and rental and leasing
54 Professional, scientific, and technical services
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
more than 1,170 customers
collectively with Business
Objects, an SAP company
more than 1,170 customers
collectively with Business
Objects, an SAP company
2,000 + 20
64 20
342.6 million Euros 342.6 million Euros 2,150 Million $5,000,000
as a privately held company
we do not report product
revenue
$5,000,000
304.7 million Euros 304.7 million Euros 2,100 Million $3,000,000
as a privately held company
we do not report product
revenue
$3,000,000
500
Yes Yes 5%
Yes Yes 1% 5%
Yes Yes 10% 5%
Yes YesYes Yes 12% 10%
Yes Yes 1% 5%
Yes Yes 10% 5%
Yes Yes 2% 10%
Yes Yes 1% 20%
Yes Yes 20% 5%
Yes Yes 1%
Yes Yes 2%
Prepared by 180 Systems
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
34/45
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
35
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
35/45
p g g y
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Supported networks (% of implementations)
Microsoft
Linux
Unix
AIX
Novell Netware
IBM AS/400 (OS/400)
IBM S/390
Other
Total
Development tools used to build application
Report writer used - which one(s)?
Data Extract Transform Load (ETL) tools - which one(s)?
Cubes supported - which one(s)?
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
YES YES Supported 40%
YES YES Supported 50%
YES YES Supported 5%
YES YES Supported
Supported 5%
Supported
100%
Java, C++ Java, C++, ABAP/4 SAS AppDev Studio Eclipse
SAP BusinessObjects CrystalReports
SAP NetWeaver
SAS Web Report Studio, SAS
Enterprise Guide - part of SASEnterprise BI Server; SAS
Financial Management; Add-in
for Microsoft Office
Yellowfin
SAP BusinessObjects Data
IntegratorSAP NetWeaver SAS Data Integration Studio Talend, Kett le, Informatica
SAP NetWeaver, Oracle,
MicrosoftSAP NetWeaver MDX Compliant
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
36
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
36/45
p g g y
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Existing integration to accounting and ERP systems -
which systems?
Existing integration to customer relationship management
systems - which systems?
Existing integration to payroll systems - which systems?
Existing integration to HRMS systems - which systems?
Available from Application Service Provider
Approx. no. of implementations
2-tier, 3-tier or n-tier architecture
Metadata standard supported
Maximum size of OLAP cube
Generic
Integration of applications in Section D.
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
SAP, Oracle SAP, OracleOracle, PeopleSoft, SAP,
Siebel
SAP, JD Edwards, Oracle,
Pronto, many others
SAP, Oracle SAP, Oracle Siebel Multiple
SAP, Oracle/Peoplesoft SAP, Oracle/Peoplesoft Multiple
SAP, Oracle/Peoplesoft SAP, Oracle/Peoplesoft Multiple
Yes Yes
50
n-Tier n-Tier n-Tier
CWM CWM CWM, XML Yes
no limit No limit NA
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
37
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
37/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Share same database
Same user interface
Integrated
Dashboard
Role specific
Graphical
Drill down to:
Business Intelligence
Consolidation
Budgeting and forecasting
Scorecarding
Excel integration
Formatting intact
Formulas intact
Business Intelligence
Analytic functionality
Bubble up exceptions
Drill down
Drill through to source data
Ranking
Sorting
Restrict results by date rangeIncludes dashboard
Time trending (for example, over 12 months)
Pareto filtering (automatically groups the categories that
amount to less than 20% of a row or column total into
"other")
Calculations
Counts
Percentage of total
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Future Date Partly Yes
Yes Future Date Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Future Date
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes No Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Partly Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
38
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
38/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Allocations
Total and Sub-total
Create OLAP cubes
Data extraction and transformation tools
Incremental extraction
Impact analysis - objects impacted by change
Can schedule process to run overnight
Formatting
By dimension
By level
By cell
Zero-row suppression
Conditional formatting by cell, e.g., highlight cells
below threshold
Returns text (e.g., if value > 90, returns "excellent")
French version
Screens
Reports
Documentation
Metadata
OLAP functionality
Skip missing levels - support ragged dimensions
Write back
With audit trail
Includes charting tools
Access multiple cubes at a time
Excel client
Internet Explorer client
Netscape client
Geographical representation
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Partly Yes No
Yes Partly Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Customization Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Partly
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Partly Yes Yes
Yes Partly Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes No Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
39
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
39/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Drag and drop
Attach notes to cube
Attach notes to cells
Attach files to cube
Attach files to cells
Password security
By company
By department or division
By menu
By function (view, add, change, delete)
By dimension
By level
By cell
Respect active directory authenticationRespect database security
Portal generation that includes HTML reports
Report writer
Web-based
Generate cube
Drag and drop
WYSIWYG report design
Technology
API-enabled (SDK provided)Web-based (only need browser at client)
For entire application
Support for .NET web services
Support for Java web services
Transfer data to:
Report writer
Excel
PivotTable
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes No Future Date
Yes Yes No Future Date
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Partly Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes
Partly Partly Yes Yes
Partly Partly Yes Yes
Partly Partly Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
No Partly Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
40
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
40/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
HTML
PowerPoint
XML
Views
Crosstabs
Charts
Both crosstabs and chart at the same time
Work flow
Alerts can be automatically tr iggered
Consolidation
Journal entries
ManualRecurring
Automated for currency translation gains/losses
Automated for Intercompany eliminations
Reclassification journal entry - EG used to generate
cash flow report or balance sheet
Intercompany processing
Automated balancing
Consolidation processor
Consolidate actuals and budgets
Consolidate statistical ledgers such as headcounts
Incremental for entities that have changed
Different fiscal periods
Different fiscal calendars
Short year-ends
Multiple levels or tiers
Automated Intercompany eliminations to first common
parent
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes No Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes NoYes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
41
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
41/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Data collection
Online over the internet
Only a browser required (don't need Citrix or terminal
services)
Work offline and synchronize
Parsing
Mapping
Wildcards
Validation
Can proceed or stop depending on variance
Maintain status
Approvals
Escalations if late
Intercompany eliminations
Define intercompany accounts
Automated eliminations
Reporting tool to identify out of balance entities
Foreign currency translation
Support temporal method
Multiple rate types
Define which rate type by account
Maintain rate schedule that can be shared across all
legal entities
Download daily rates automatically
Methods:
Proportional
Equity
Minority interest
Wholly owned
Multi tier consolidation
On-line review and approval of consolidation process at
each tier
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes No No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
42
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
42/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Drill down to any tier
Multiple ledgers
Ownership
Date sensitive ownership - for changes during the
month
Reorganizations
Change account structure and replicate across system
Revaluations
Financial Reporting
Analysis Codes
Attach to accounts or g/l segments
Can be used in any financial report for selection or
orderingResults in home or reporting currency
Rows can be defined
Columns can be defined
Cell Override
Hierarchical reporting
Multiple hierarchies
Lead schedules
Ready for external reporting
Rounding to nearest 1000 and allocation of rounding errorto specified financial statement line
Trend analysis showing last 12 periods
Exception reporting
Highlight all accounts with a variance over a certain % or
amount
Consolidate Accounts Receivable subledger
Compute Daily Sales Outstanding
Eliminate intercompany accounts
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes
No Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes No
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
43
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
43/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Budgeting
Automatic % change of previous budget
Automatic based on actual
Excel like formulas
Seasonality allocations
Budgeting process
Bottom up
Top down
Export to Excel
Import from Excel
Lockable
Maintain explanation of budget variances
Based on employee information in HR system
Multiple Budgets
Rolling budget
Sign assumed
What if analysis
Ability to update assumptions which are used in the
calculations
Rollup forecast to budget
Approval process
Forecasting
Quotes and their probability
Outstanding orders
Customer forecasts
Historical trends
Average of 13 weeks volume
Can apply factors such as seasonality
Apply regression analysis
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Customization Customization Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
44
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
44/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
Additions
Changes
Product
Apply factors such as housing starts and market
adjustment factor
Ability to accept input from multiple users
Approval process
What if Analysis
Name one to five unique or very important features of
your product (limit of 250 characters)
Unique/important feature no.1
Unique/important feature no. 2
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Customization Customization Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes No
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes
All business intelligence users
and all data sources on a
single unified platform
For CPM - unified platform,
user-driven and high usability
Real Time consolidation
integration with advanced
analytics such as forecasting,
operations research, and data
mining
Usability
Business Intelligence solutions
for query, reporting, analysis,
dashboard, and user-friendly
information search and
exploration, enabling quick
access to information to make
enlightened decisions
For CPM - complete Office of
the CFO solution - core suite,
CPM and GRC
Complete integration of CPM
components through common
SAS 9 Platform (including
analytical human capital mgmt)
100% Web Based
Prepared by 180 Systems
CAmagazine
2008 Corporate Performance Management / Business Intelligence Survey
45
8/4/2019 BI Comparison 2008
45/45
Question - Highlighted questions indicate a difference
from the previous year:
AdditionsChanges
Product
Unique/important feature no. 3
SAP BusinessObjects BI
PlatformSAP CPM
SAS Business Intelligence
and Financial Intelligence
Solutions
Yellowfin
`
Information management
solutions for delivering data,
structured or unstructured,
across the enterprise that is
integrated, accurate,reconciled, and well
understood
For CPM - SOA-enabled;
integration with MDM, process
management and portaltechnology
Capacity to incorporate data to
measure and optimize Carbon
Footprint / Offsetting
Security
Prepared by 180 Systems