BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    1/12

     

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    2/12

    ' .

    . -

    .,

    ' ·

    1

    I

    '

    ...

    .

    (

    • I

    .

    .

    ...

    · I

    \

    .r

    ••

    t

    : •

    ,  

    t

    .i

    ,•

    .

    '

    ••

    ·'

    /

    /

    I

    I

    .

    I

    l

    ·<

    (

    l.t.

    .

    •• _

    '

    • I 0 4 •

    .t. .

    · : .. i1

    -

    .

    .

    •• 

    .

     

    • ••

    '

    ••

    '

    . .

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    3/12

    Dor is

      Betts  

    Dir

    ec tor of

    Fre

    shman

    -Soph

    omore

      Engli

    sh

    at U.N

    .C. C

    hapel

    Hill N

    .C . He

    r fifth

     book 

    of

    fi c

    t ion

    T

    he R

    iver

    to Pick le

      Beac

    h ,

    was

     

    pu

    lished

     

    by H

    arper nd

    Ro

    w in 1

    972.

    Ear ly  

    each s

    emes

    te r in

    a new

      crea ti

    ve w ri

    t ing

    c

    lass , 1

     g lanc

    e arou

    nd th e

      se m i

    nar tab

    le an

    d

    try

      separ

    a t in g

    by visu

    a l c lu

    es th e

      dedu

    ct ive

    f rom t

    he ind

    uct ive

      reaso

    ners.

    I can

      a lmo s

    t d

    o

    th

    is by a

    pp ly in

    g sy ll

    og ism

    s

    of

    m

    y own

    .

    Tha t  

    one : p

    enc i l

    poised

      ove r

      page

    one of

      a

    new c

    ompos

    i t ion n

    otebo

    ok. H

    e

    will

    w

    ant a

     

    sh

    or t s t

    o ry ch

    alked

    out

     

    w i

    th r is in

    g ac t

    ion ,

    cl ima

    x, and

      deno

    umen t

      on my

      b l

    ackbo

    ar

    d

    ,

    a

    nd he

      wi l l c

    o py it  

    w i th s

    tra igh

    ter l ine

    s than

     

    m i

    ne. T

    he ha

    iry stud

    ent

    li kes All

    en Gin

    sbe

    rg 

    and

      Watts

    , read

    s Far in

    a; he

     l l ske

    tch T

    hor and

     

    S

    pider

    Man

    during

    c lass o

    n a s

    heet

    of

     

    pape

    r

    he 

    bor row

    s from

      the

    f i rst.

    Wh i le

    I d isco

    urse

    on W

    ayne 

    C Boo

    th , he

      wi ll

    scr ibb l

    e ad je

    c

    t ives a

    b o ut o

    rgasm

    .

    Be

    side h

    im sits

      a gi

    rl who p

    lans

    to rec i

    te

    Kah l

    il G ib r

    an at

    her

    outdo

    or wedd i

    ng ce r

    e

    mony .

      She

    wi l l m

    arry so

    meon

    e ve

    ry much

      l ike

    the   nearby nai lb iter. I p ictu re the  

    pair

    teach

    ing c

    raf ts in

      a su

    m m e r 

    camp ,

      readin

    g eac

    h

    oth

    er

     s

      ha iku

    s abo

    ut the

    Appa l

    achian

    s.

    Eac

    h Autu

    m n , s

    eeing 

    th is sp

    ectru

    m , I de

    c la re

     

    a

    new a

      prefe

    rence

      for

     

    tea

    ch ing

      h ind s

    igh

    t

    l i te

    rature

     ove r  

    fo res ig

    h t s to

    ry-wri

    t ing , o

    ne

    cour

    se ins

    tead

    of

     

    fiftee

    n t u to

    r ia l co

    urses

    , w i th  

    su

    bject m at

    ter w h

    ich w o

    uld

    for once

      hold  

    still

    and

      wear

      tags.  

    Bi ldu

    ngstom

    an. P

    icares

    que.

    GO

     f

     

    C OO

    J

    M

    · . 

    r J. 

    76

    Grace

      in F l

    annery

      O Co

    nnor .

    The e

    xisten

    tial

    ism o

    f John

      Fow l

    es.

    The

    re , too

    , som e

     

    of

    th

    e ta

    gs w o u ld

      c la t t

    e r to

     

    th

    e c las

    s room

      floo r

    . The  

    poles  

    wou ld

      touch

     

    an

    d retou

    ch in

      a c

    ircu lar

     

    f l

    ow

    fr

    o

    m rea

    der t

    wri te

    r, pre

    m ise

    to c

    o

    nc

    lusion

    , spec

    i f ic an

    d

    general, deduct ive- induc t ive. ut in a w rit ing

    cou

    rse it  

    seems

      espe

    cia l ly

    ne cess

    ary to

     

    work 

    b

    ack

    war

    d

    in o

    rder to

     

    a

    rr ive a

    nd I e

    nvy an

    nu

    al ly th

    e chem

    ists a

    nd m a

    them a

    tician

    s who

      are

    ope

    ning a

      mo re

     or

    derly sem

    este r

    in nea

    rby

    bu ild

    ings. W

    hile

    their

     

    s

    t udent

    s lear

    n , m in

    e

    m

    ust le

    arn , u

    nlearn

    , and 

    relear

    n. Ho

    w to

     

    d

    o it

    th i

    s year

    ? Ho

    w to re

    ach

    the hai r

    y exp

    ressio n

    ist as 

    we

    ll

    a

    s the y

    oung  

    man w

    hose 

    ob

    je

    c t

    ive

    a

    nalyse

    s

    of

    M

    oby

    ick

     

    we

    re fam

    ous in

      h

    i

    s

    prep sc hoo l , th e gir l who stil l re re ad s

    B lack

    P

    u

    e  <

     co

     r

    H

      T

     

    S

    OO

    L

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    4/12

      ea

    uty as

      w e

    ll as

      the

      boy

     w ho

    se

    pom

    pos

    it y ,

    he  s

    ays,

      com

    es s

    tra i

    gh t

    fr om

      Joh

    n   B

    arth

      so

    m us

    t be

      som

    eth

    in g

    else

    .

    The

      c h ie

    f pr

    ob le

    m   in

      a  f

    ic tio

    n w

    rit ing

      co

    urse

     

    is  

    ho

    w to

     

    te

    ach

      f lux

      and

      f lo

    w  

    to stu

    den

    ts w

    ho  

    ha

    ve  a

    l rea

    dy a

    rran

    ged

      t he

    m se

    lves

      a lo

    ng  s

    om e

     

    s

    ca le

      of e

    ithe

    r-o r

      cho

    ices

      and

      a tt

    ache

    d  th

    em

    se l

    ves

    in   p

    la ce

      by

     suct

    io n.

      Eve

    n  in

      the

     

    spe

    ctfu l

    , w a

    iting

      s iie

    nce

      of

    our

    f irs t

    c las

    s

    m

    eet

    in g

    I can

      an

    t ic ip

    a te

    the

    argu

    m en

    ts 

    Sel

    f-exp

    ress

    io n,

      h a l

    f w il

    l say

    . S

    e lf-d

    isc i

    p line

    ,

    f if t

    y pe

    rcen

    t w i

    l l re

    jo in .

      Ex

    p lor

    e or

    rev

    ise.

    Inte

    llec

    t/em

    ot io

    n O

    rga

    nic  v

    s.   m

    ech

    anic

    a l 

    fo rm

    .  T

    rad

    it ion

    a l  or

    ex

    perim

    en

    ta l?

    W il

    l the

    y

    be

      gr

    aded

    , the

    y as

    k un

    eas

    i ly,

    for e

    ffo r

    t

    o

    r

    in

    nat

    e ta l

    ent?

      T e

    ach

    us h

    ow

    to

     

    m

    ake

      sto

    rie s

    and

    we l

    l ma

    ke   s

    ome

    . N

    o, 

    let us

      m a

    ke   s

    to rie

    s

    R ~

    G

      R

     

    and

      t hu

    s d i

    scov

    er h

    ow.

      W h

    at  is

      t he

      d

    iffer

    en

    ce   b

    etw

    een s

    lick

    an

    d lit

    e ra r

    y?  

    Art a

    nd 

    e

    n ter

    ta inm

    ent

    ? I

    w rit

    e f

    or my

    se lf.

      I  w

    rite

    fo

    r

    a re a

    der

    . I w

    rite

      fo

    r a ce

    rta i

    n re

    ader

    . I w

    rite

     

    for

     the

    page

      i ts

    elf .

    The

      on ly

      co

    rrec

    t ans

    w er

      to  t

    h is

    conf

    used

     

    cho

    rus

      is :

    No.

    And

      e ve

    ry   S

    epte

    m b

    er  b

    r ings

     

    th

    e ch

    a lle

    nge

    to   d evis e a sy llabus  w h ich   wil l

    c

    onv

    ey  to

      e a

    ch  s

    tude

    n t  th

    at,

    in   w

    r it in

    g fic

    tio n

    ,

    the

    aim  

    of  th

    e  s

    o lo is

    t is

    to   s

    in g

    in un

    is on

      w h

    ile  

    s t

    and i

    ng   a

    t th

    e No

    rth

    and

    Sou

    th   P

    oles

    .

    (

    And

      no

    mix e

    d m

    etap

    hor

    s, e i

    th er

    .)

    A ll w

    r it in

    g   c

    ours

    es  h

    ave

      to

     

    s

    tart

      som

    ewh

    ere

     

    am

    ong

    th e

    cho

    ices

      of e

    xtre

    m es

    , an

    d m

    ost

    b

    egin

      f ro

    m   fr

    eed

    om .

    M o

    st of

     the

      te a

    cher

    s, 

    a fte

    r all

    , a re

      a ls

    o w

    riters

      w h

    o co

    nsid

    e r t

    hem

    sel

    ves se lf-em ancipated. Early  a ssig nments

    w

    il l be

      op

    en-e

    nde

    d.  A

      c

    hara

    cter

     sket

    ch.

    A

    d

    esc

    r ip ti

    on.

    Rea

    d W

    elty

    , M a

    nsfie

    ld ,

    Che

    khov

    ,

    P o

    rte r

    , Pla

    th , B

    arth

    e lm

    e ,  O

    ates

    , Ka

    fk a ,

      Joy

    ce,

    a

    nd  F

    it zg

    era ld

    . B

    rin g

      in   a

      poe

    m.

    Kee

    p a

    n

    ote

    book

      of

    id ea

    s.

    W ith

    out

    m uc

    h g

    u ida

    nce o

    r

    adv

    ice

    stud

    e nts

      w il

    l p lu

    nge

      in to

      the

    ir ow

    fi r

    s t s t

    orie

    s an

    d s

    ink or

    sw

    im   t

    here

    . Th

    ey

    re

    ad

    th es

    e fir

    s t  e

    ff ort

    s a lo

    ud;

    clas

    sm a

    te s

    deb

    ate

    th e

    gen

    era l

    effe

    ct.

    B roa

    d ly ,

      ver

    y

    b roadly .  W ith second stories, the cr it ic ism  

    b

    ecom

    es

     g ra

    dua l

    ly m

    ore

    prec

    ise.

      T h

    e sp

    ira l

    of  th

    e  s

    y llab

    us   t

    ig h t

    ens

    as  th

    a t m

    an

    uscr

    ip t i

    s

    rev

    is ed

    . Pe

    rha

    ps  th

    e  s

    tu d

    ent fe

    els

    it co

    m es

     

    r ig

    h t w

    ith

    a c

    lick ,

    as  Y

    eats

      sai

    d a

    poe

    m w

    ould

    ,

    lik

    e a  c

    losin

    g  b

    ox.

    Idea

    s ab

    out

      th e

    natu

    re   o

    f

    fic

    ti on

    em e

    rge

      from

      th e

      s to

    ries

      th e

    mse

    lv es

    .

    T

    he  t

    each

    er-w

    rite

    r, su

    sp ic

    io us

      o f

    ru le s

      an

    d

    f

    earf

    ul o

    f d is

    cove

    ring

      t ha

    t he

      h as

      a lw

    ays

      b ee

    n

    Low

    er  L

    eft :

    D

    raw

    ing

    by M

      Jo

    y H

    a rtm

    an (m

    othe

    r} 

    To

    p r i

    gh t

    D ra

    w in

    g by

      Har

    vey

      H ar

    tm an

     

    Low

    er  r

    igh t

    D

    raw

    ing

    y L

    ee H

    artm

    an 

    To

    p  r i

    gh t

    awi

    ng y

     Ju

    dy

    Hart

    m an

     

    Lo

    we

    r r ig h

    t

    Drawing  by R o ger Hartman

    77

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    5/12

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    6/12

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    7/12

    d

    er

    f

    ound

    th is

    leap to o

      wide

    . Said

     David

    ,

    Yo

    u  don

    't  kno

    w you

    rself v

    ery

    well.  

    But

    we ar

    e

    back

    in

    t im

    e and

      both

    boys a

    re

    ch

    ild ren.

      Ente

    r the f

    irst -gr

    ade te

    acher

    , who

    kn

    ew-co

    rrect

    ly-ho

    w

    l i

    m i ted

    th

    eir

    e

    xper i

    ences

     were

     and

    ho

    w

    l im

    ited

    the

    ir

    c

    onclus

    ions

    wer

    e boun

    d  to b

    e. He

    r jo

    b was to

     w

    ider

    co

    ncepts

    .  Bec

    ause

    David'

    s m ot

    her wa

    s  kind

     

    h

    e t

    hough

    t

    , i

    nduct i

    ve ly ,

    ll m ot

    hers w

    ere.

    His

     exam

    ples

    w

     r

    in

    adequ

    ate . A

    lexan

    der 's

    fa

    ther, o

    n  the

    oth

    er hand,

     was a

     d icta

    to r

    in

    th e ho

    m e an

    d  Alex

    ander

     asso

    ciated

    th ose

     

    tra its

     w ith

    malen

    ess an

    d  pow

    er. Th

    e  tea

    cher

    cou

    ld   not

     trans

    m it ge

    ograp

    hy by

    s ippi

    ng  the

     

    c lass

    to  Spa

    in . Th

    ey wo

    u ld ha

    ve to

    take

    he

    r

    word

     fo

    r

    th

    e  flig

    hts of

    atoms

    , the

    co lo

    r

    o

    f the

    sto

    m ach

    lin ing

    , the e

    xisten

    ce of

     Georg

    e W as

    h

    in

    gton.

    She t

    aught

      the bo

    ys pre

    mises

     a m

    il

    l ion pr

    ior m

    inds h

    ad le a

    ped to

    , and

    showe

    the

    m  m o

    re f re

    quent l

    y

    how to a

    pp ly th a

    to

    t

    est th

    em . S

    in ce v

    erbs w

    ere a

    c tion w

    ords ,

     

    run  

    was

    a verb

    . I

    f

    on

    got into

     

    w

    hethe

    r the

    c

    hicken

     or egg

    came

    fi rs t , f

    irst-g r

    ade w

    ould

    la st a

    lifet im

    e.  The

      Latin

     de a

    nd d

    u e re

    mea

    n le

    ad from

    , and

      she

    led  fr o

    m trum

    ps.

    She

     taug

    h t s x-

    year-o

    ld s wh

    at the

     State

     

    28

    De

    partm

    ent o

    f Publ ic

      Inst r

    uct ion

     said s

    ix

    y

    ear-ai

    ds sho

    u ld kn

    ow . M

    axim

    s spro

    uted o

    her bu llet

    in  boa

    rd , w i

    th  il

    lustratio

    ns from

     

    la

    d ies ' m

    agaz

    in es.

    LEARN

    ING

    S  FUN

    , said

     

    one. A

    lexan

    der an

    d  Dav

    id   had

     forgo

    tt en th

    lack

    of fun

     

    in 

    lea

    rn ing

    that be

    es w i

    l l st ing

    .

    S i

    nce le

    arning

      was f

    un, an

    d  sinc

    e they

     wou l

    d

    le a

    rn

    now th ings

     on a

    fie ld

    tr ip to

    the wo

    ods,

    th e

     

    f

    irst g

    rade

    w ould

     have

    fu n on

     the f i

    e ld

    tr

    ip . As

     it tu r

    ned

    out, Dav

    id hat

    ed th e

      f ield

    tr ip b

    ecause

     he

    got p

    o

    is

    on ivy

     when

     some

    body

     pu sh

    ed h

    im into

    a  th

    icket. A

    lexand

    er

    p

    ushed

     

    him- i

    m

    ita

    ting h

    is  fath

    er- an

    d  con

    firme

    d fo r h

    im sel

    f that f

    ie ld tr

    ips w

    ere fun

    .

    A lex

    ander

      trace

    d  the

    outl ine

     of a

    map

    le leaf

     

    an

    d show

    ed its

     fa l

    l

    c

    olors

    w ith h

    is  cr

    ayo la

     

    c

    rayon

    . Davi

    d  was

      too

    itchy to

     d

    raw p ictur

    es

    and

      had f

    ound

    a sma

    shed s

    lu g on

     h is s

    hoe

    so

    le .

    In the

    libra

    ry

    ,

     A lexa

    nder l

    ooked

     up

     

    dec idu

    ous t

    rees s

    o  he

    could

    repor t

      to th

    c lass

     what

      a m

    aple wa

    s. Da

    vid co

    u ld f in

    d  no

    raw in

    g y 

    Lee H

    artman

     

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    8/12

    re

    fe renc

    es  abo

    ut ho

    w   s lug

    s   per

    is h un

    der

    p

    ressu

    re ,

    how t

    hat feels

    to   th e

      s lug.

      And

    w hy

    had A

    le xan

    de r to

    uched

      t he s

    ame th

    ree- le

    afed

    pl

    ant an

    d  cau

    ght no

      rash?

      W ha

    t f irst

      g rade

     

    t

    eache

    r had

    the t im

    to recon

    c ile bo

    th   bo

    ys 

    expe

    rience

    s?  

    or Ale

    xande

    r , scho

    o l

    did

    wha

    t  it p

    romise

    d. o

    r Davi

    d, it w

    ould

    be 

    up

    h ill a

    ll the

    way .

    Their

    separa

    tion h

    ad

    begu

    n .

    Sat

    urdays

    , in d

    ifferen

    t neig

    hborh

    ood s,

    both

    bo

    ys wa

    tched

      t elev

    is ion.

    Dedu

    ct ive m

    ethod

     

    was

    everyw

    here ,

      untes

    te d. B

    oys w

    ant

    to g

    row

    big

      and

    stro ng

    . W on

    der B

    re ad c

    ontain

    s  

    tw

    elve

    essent

    ia l foo

    d  elem

    ents.

      Boys

      w ho

    eat

    W ond

    er  Bre

    ad w il

    l be b

    ig   and

      stron

    g. On

    boy

    gr

    ew talle

    r

    t

    han th

    e   othe

    r, eat

    ing no

    th ing

    b

    ut Tip

      T op

    and M

    erita.

    They

    could

      see

    throug

    h   tele

    vision

    .

    Bo

    th   stu

    d ied t

    wo ho

    urs

    for a h i

    s tory

    te st.

    T hei r

      score

    s  wer

    e   wide

      apar

    t. A t

    tw elve

    ,

    raw i

    ng

    y N ina H

    ar tm a

    n

    David

    had a

      m yst

    ica l ex

    per ien

    ce inv

    o lving

      a

    dead

      frie nd

    . A le

    xande

    r fell

    out of

     his de

    sk

    laug

    hing.

    In th

    e seve

    nth g

    rade,

    a new

      g

    irl

    m

    oved

    to town

    .  She

      liked

     A lexa

    nder s

      joke

    s

    b

    e t ter

    th an D

    avid s

      conf i

    dence

    s.  He

      sto pp

    ed 

    con

    fiding

    . In th

    e  te n

    th   gra

    de, a

    d if fere

    n t g ir

    l

    fo

    und A

    lexand

    er too

      f l ipp

    ant an

    d  Dav

    id   to o

     

    re serv

    ed  and

      chos

    e   the

    footba

    ll   cap

    ta in o

    ve r

    both.

      Davi

    d conc

    luded

      that

    gir

    ls were u

    npre

    d ic

    table.

    A lexa

    nder

    dec ide

    d   th i s

      p rti

    cul r

    g

    irl

    d

    id  no t

      m eet

      h is st

    andard

    s. By

      now

    th

    eir

    resp

    onses

      to ex

    per ien

    ce ~ r

    d iv

    erg ing

      more

    .

    Fo

    r Alex

    ander

    , the y

    ears

    arrang

    ed the

    m

    s

    elves

    in

    t

    o s

    yllogis

    m s. He

     cho

    se o

      , hel

    d it

    up to

      life , a

    nd so

    m etim

    es l i fe

      c ol la

    psed

    with

    -

    out h is

    not icin

    g. M e

    antim

    e,  Dav

    id  

    grew 

    suspic

    ious o

    f all g

    enera

    lit ies w

    h ich

    did no

    spr in

    g   st ra

    igh t fr

    om th

    e spin

    a l cor

    d . He

    fa v

    ored t

    he  im m

    ediat

    e and

    spont

    aneou

    s so

    m

    uch th

    at he

    was o

    ften ta

    rdy, r

    ude , a

    nd   eas

    ily

    dist r

    ac ted.

     

    A

    t seve

    nteen

    th ey a

    rgued

      a bou

    t God

    and

    death .

      A lex

    ande r

    won.

    He s

    et  up

    prem is

    es

    and

    def ini

    t ions . H

    e d i

    sm em

    bered

    David

      by

    So

    crat ic

    metho

    d. Da

    vid, w

    ho ha

    d neith

    er

    died 

    ~

    ·

    -

    -. ..-k

     

    28

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    9/12

    nor seen God

    -yet- def

    ended h imse

    lf as

    an exis te

    ntial ist. Ale

    xander rede

    fined h im as

     

    s loppy-mind

    ed. The ne

    xt fal l they

    regis tered

    D e

    mocra t and

      Republ ican

    . Both fe l t s

    e t apar t

    from  

    the common

      herd of m

    en which wa

    s,

    to David

    , insens itive

     and con for

    mist , to A le

    x

    ander, i r rat io

    nal and und

    isc ip l ined.

    They

    rarely

    saw each ot

    he r except

    in the c i ty

    librar

    y

    wh

    ere one was

      reading Ma

    c h iavel li and

     

    o

    ne was read

    ing Jung , o

    r Wi lhelm R

    eich

    and

      Wi l liam Bu

    ckley, o r Jos

    e ph Hel ler 

    and

    Saul B

    el low, or Ril k

    e and Nietz

    sche ,

    etc. etc. e

    tc.

    ow

     

    the

    y face each

     othe

    r

    in my

      f ic t ion

    writing

    sem

    inar

    as

      i f the table

    between wer

    e a

    bo

    t tomle

    ss

    ab

    yss. In th i s

    tax-suppor te

    d

    inst it

    u t ion I

    mu

    st 

    teach both , 

    and both, be

    ing

    c

    rippled and one-s id

    ed, wi l l be u

    nhappy

    half

    Dra

    w ing y N ina

      Ha rtm an

    the t ime.

      I know (ind

    u c tively) tha

    t David 's

    work may h

    ave more ea

    rly intens ity  

    and

    power, that

    he wil l resis t c

    r i t i c ism and 

    rewr it

    ing , a

    nd that

     

    he e

    xpects a

    gu ru

     

    f

    or

     a teach

    e r.

    A lexand

    er wi l l be im

    pat ient unles

    s I can

    just i fy and 

    expla in my l

    it e

    r

    ry taste;

      he

    d

    epl

    or

    es sensi t iv i ty

      tra in ing , an

    d he wi l l

    write

    intr ica

    te p lots and

     sub-plots.

    It ha

    rdly matters

     whic

    h half of

     

    the class

     

    starve

    s first. I cho

    ose to let Da

    vid starve;

    he

    has a l rea

    dy been tra in

    ed to it by

    public edu

    cat ion. In S

    ep tember, to

    o, I can

    work

     

    bet te r

    w ith

      dead p

    ro

    se

     than wi th r

    ash prose;

    teachers w

    ith o th

    er

    tem

    peraments 

    may s tar t

    a

    t the opposi

    te po le.

    The im

    portant th ing

      is to break

     down both

    the deduc

    t ive and ind

    uct ive extrem

    es so they 

    can

    be

    seen m

    ore l ike the

    ir physica l c

    ou nter

    p

    arts the le f t e

    ye and the ri

    ght eye. Ste

    reo

    scop ic vi s io

    n. The prop

    e r s tance

    for a f ict ion

    writer is Fitzge

    rald 's: The

      te st

    of

    a firs

    t-rate

    inte ll

    igence is its 

    abi l i ty to ho

    ld two d iam e

    tr i-

    1

    p.h

    s :   ~

    _ _

     

    ·

    -

    i  H

     o rf

    naf1

    • 

    Th

    t?r q

    r m

      ny

    .

    s

    o ,

    .

    l

    on

     

    .

    ._

    he

     tr _

      __ O

    r

    1

    rs ver-

      tt

     

    o

    · l

     

    h

     

    o \ o

      t

    ~

    an

    ts 

    .

    pe

     

    1 . 1

    _ :   O i-

    ·

    I •

    . ..

    -- 

    · ·

    . ·

    ·

    . · -

    -

      ·

     

    -

     

    -

    .

    · .

    ·· - · · - - - ·

      -  

    -

      8

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    10/12

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    11/12

  • 8/20/2019 BETTS, Doris. Fiction, Induction and Deduction

    12/12

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    ;

     

    : -

    ,.

     

    .

     

    .

     '  

    ''

     

    • •

     

    f

    ,

    r

     

    :\

     

    ..

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    ·

     

    .

    ,

     

    .

     

    .

     

    '

     

    .

     .

     

    ..

     

    .

     

    ·

    .

    ..

     

    .

    .

    .

    .

     

    '

     

    .

     

    • 

    .

     

     

    .

     .

    .

     

    .

     

    .

    .

     

    .

    .

     

    .

     .

     

    •'

     

     

    \

     

    '

     

    ••

     

    .

    • 

    '

     

     

    ·-

    ,

     

    .

     

    f

    '

     

    ·'

     

    .

     

    )

    ,

     

    i

    ..

     

    .

     

    }

     

     

    .

    .

     

    I

     

    ..

     

    /

     

     

    -

    ..

     

    :

     

    ••

     

    .

     

    .

    . .

     

    :: 

    ...

     

    .

     

     

    .

     \

    ,

    . .

     .

    '

    .

     .

    .

    • 

    .

    ·

     

    .

     

    •.·

     

    ..

    .

     

    :.

     

    .

     

    .

    .

     

    f

    • 

    .

     

    .

     

    .

    .

     

    .-

    ..

     

    ..

     

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

     

    ·.

     

    i

     

    .

    .

     

    ..

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    .

    . .

     

    .

     

    ·

    ·

    .

    : -

     

    .

    ,

    ,  '

     

    -

    Q

     

    :

     

    )

    .  

    .

     

    ..

     . .

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

     

    -

    ,

     

    .

    .

     

    4

    -

    \

    .

    ,

    *

     

    ~

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    .

     

    ·

      .

    ,

     

    .

     

    ·

    "

     

    .

      '

    .

     

    ·-

    ·

     -

    -

    .

     .

    .

    -

    ·

     

    .

    .•

     

    ..