Beta Analytic Comments on Biodiesel, Glycerol, and the Renewables Obligation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Beta Analytic Comments on Biodiesel, Glycerol, and the Renewables Obligation

    1/3

    Beta Analytic LimitedLondon Bioscience Innovation Centre2 Royal College StreetLondon NW10NHUnited KingdomTel: (44) 207 617 7490Fax: (44) 207 160 5350Email: [email protected]

    Beta Analytic Inc. (Headquarters)4985 SW 74 CourtMiami, Florida 33155USATel: (1) 305-662-7760Fax: (1) 305-663-0964Email: [email protected] Site: http://www.betalabservices.com/

    Beta Public Comment on Biodiesel, Glycerol, and the Renewables Obligation

    Mr. Fletcher,

    Please find below our answers to your questions for the biodiesel, glycerol and renewablesobligation consultation.

    Chapter 1, Question 1: Chapter 1 summarises the most frequently used manufacture process forBiodiesel. Are you aware of any techniques used, available or foresee in the near future thatshould be taken into account?

    We are not aware of any future techniques that need to be taken into account.

    Chapter 1, Question 2: Can any further evidence be provided to show that the source of thetransferred hydrogen atoms within the glycerol cannot come from the methane used in themanufacture of the methanol?

    We believe that this would not be possible. On the other hand, we believe that radiocarbon datingcan be used to determine whether the glycerol is derived from fossil fuels, such as methanolmade from fossil fuel methane.

    By analyzing the carbon atoms with radiocarbon dating of both the biodiesel and the glycerolproduced in the manufacturing process, one can easily determine whether glycerol might becoming from fossil fuel derived methane.

    Radiocarbon dating is regularly used to determine the biomass percentage of biofuels such asbiodiesel. Consequently, there is no reason why this method cannot be used to address whetherglycerol is made from fossil fuel components. In fact, radiocarbon dating has been standardizedas an analytical method called ASTM D6866 precisely for this type of determination.

    Radiocarbon dating has been used for decades for dating archaeological artifacts. The sameprinciples of dating (i.e. analysis of the carbon 14 atom) can also be used to measure thebiomass component of materials. In effect, biomass contains a well-characterized amount ofcarbon 14 that is easily distinguished from other materials such as fossil fuels that do not containany carbon 14. Since the amount of carbon 14 in biomass is well known, a percentage ofbiomass carbon can be calculated easily from the overall carbon atoms in the sample.

    Although ASTM D6866 is now used throughout the world to measure biomass carbon, the origins

    of the method are American. It was written at the request of the USDA to satisfy legislationrequiring Federal agencies to give preferred procurement to manufacturers using the greatestamount of biomass in their products (per the Farm Security and Rural Investment act of 2002). Itwas quickly established that radiocarbon dating was the only viable accurate technique to makethe determination of the biomass percentage. A working standard of radiocarbon dating forindustrial use was completed in 2004 and is now cited in US Federal Law (7 CFR part 2902).

    Our firm, Beta Analytic, has been in direct contact for the past year and half with OFGEM withregard to their Renewable Obligation Certificate program for Energy from Waste Combined Heatand Power plants. A study was commissioned on behalf of OFGEM by the Renewable Energy

  • 8/14/2019 Beta Analytic Comments on Biodiesel, Glycerol, and the Renewables Obligation

    2/3

    Beta Analytic

    2

    Association, with Beta Analytic, Columbia University and Fichtner's participation to demonstratethe viability of radiocarbon dating for determining the biomass fraction of materials. I haveattached to this email a copy of this study.

    The study clearly shows that radiocarbon can accurately determine the biomass fraction ofdifferent materials (see in particular page 20). Furthermore, the study demonstrates thatradiocarbon dating can be used to determine the energy produced from biomass. The sameprincipals and findings in this report can be used to bolster the use of radiocarbon dating as aviable analytical method for verifying the biomass fraction of biodiesel and glycerol.

    Chapter 3, Question 1: Are there any circumstances in which Biodiesel (produced using methanolderived from natural gas) would not contain atoms from the natural gas?

    In general, we believe that this would not be possible. On the other hand, as stated above,radiocarbon dating can easily determine whether biodiesel is made with fossil fuel feedstocks.Precision of the method is excellent with an error of less than +/- 0.3%. We therefore believe thatradiocarbon dating can easily address whether biodiesel is manufactured with methanol derivedfrom natural gas.

    Chapter 3, Question 2: What are your views on this approach to the eligibility of Biodiesel?

    As stated above, we believe that radiocarbon dating using the standardized method ASTM D6866can easily address the issue of eligibility of biodiesel.

    Chapter 4, Question 1: What are your views on the proposed interpretations?

    We believe some of the interpretations are overly restrictive since radiocarbon dating can addresssome, if not all the concerns of the biomass fraction of glycerol.

    Chapter 4, Question 2: Do you agree with our preferred option of adopting the total exclusioninterpretation?

    We believe that this option is overly restrictive considering that radiocarbon dating can addresssome, if not all the concerns of the biomass fraction of glycerol.

    Chapter 4, Question 3: Do you agree with our assessment of the benefits and consequences ofeach interpretation, and do you foresee any others for either interpretation provided in thischapter?

    Radiocarbon dating is a cost effective method to verify whether glycerol is made with fossil fuelfeedstocks. We therefore believe that the total exclusion suggestion is too restrictive since aproven analytical is available for determining the biomass fraction of glycerol.

    Chapter 4, Question 4: Are there any other valid interpretations that should be evaluated in orderto determine Ofgem's policy on glycerol?

    Yes. Ofgem should take into account the composition of the carbon atoms during themanufacture of both biodiesel and glycerol to make the proper interpretation whether to allow theuse of glycerol in the Renewable Obligations program. As stated above, radiocarbon can be usedto make this determination.

    Chapter 4, Question 5 (glycerol's use in Anaerobic Digestion): Would there be any impact onAnaerobic Digestion if either interpretation for glycerol was adopted? If so would this besignificant?

  • 8/14/2019 Beta Analytic Comments on Biodiesel, Glycerol, and the Renewables Obligation

    3/3

    Beta Analytic

    3

    We believe that it would have an impact, but we are not in the measure to attest how large wouldbe the impact.

    Chapter 4, Question 6 (glycerol's use in Anaerobic Digestion): Is there any information that wouldshow glycerol's methane producing ability, which Ofgem could use to form our policy and allow usto determine the renewable fraction of the biogas from an anaerobic digester using glycerol?

    Yes. Radiocarbon dating can easily determine the renewable fraction of the biogas from ananaerobic digester using glycerol. See the answer to question 2, chapter 1 for an explanation ofradiocarbon dating.

    Sincerely,

    Thierry Sam TamersDirector