Upload
duongxuyen
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 1
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 1
Best Practices in the Governance of
Business Process Management
Paul Harmon
Executive EditorBusiness Process Trends
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 2
The Gradual Revolution in Management Thinking
• In the aftermath of the Industrial Revolution managers followed Adam Smith, Henry Ford, and Frederick Taylor subdivided tasks toachieve productivity
• In the Seventies computers were used to reinforce departmental or functional specialization
• Starting in the Eighties, with Michael Porter, Edwards Deming, and Geary Rummler, the tide began to reverse and managers began to think in terms of value chains and processes
• In the Nineties IT gurus joined in with Business Process Reengineering, Workflow, and, more recently BPM Systems and executives like Jack Welch promoted Six Sigma
• Today we are witnessing a shift from management based on departments to management based on processes. For most companies its just begun, but its steadily gaining traction
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 2
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 3
Process Integration in Nineties
SalesDepartment
ExecutiveManagement
Horizonally Integrated Business Process
That Delivers A Specfic Product to a Targeted Group ofCustomers
StrategyCommittee
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 4
Today: Horizontal & Vertical Alignment
SalesDepartment
ExecutiveManagement
StrategyCommittee
VerticallyIntegrated
Measures,Managers, and
Resources
Employees & IT Applications andInfrastructure
Horizonally IntegratedProcesses
From Suppliers to Customers
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 3
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 5
Process Management and Organization Management
• BPM as a Management Philosophy– Senior Executives– KPIs
• BPM as a Way of Organizing the Company– Middle Managers– Reporting Relationships– BPM Architecture and Dashboards
• The Management of Specific Processes– Supervisors– Improving Specific Processes– Managing the Employees Executing the Processes
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 6
Three Levels of Governance
• Executives – Organization Performance & Responsiveness
• Line and Process Managers – Value Chain/Process Performance and Priorities for Improvement
• Process Supervisors – Efficient & Effective Organization of Subprocesses and Activities
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 4
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 7
Some Management Concerns
Specific Process
Value Chain
Plans & Goals
Process Automatedby IT Systems
Process Performedby Employees
Physical Plant and Hardware Used.
StrategyLevel
Business ProcessLevel
ImplementationLevel
ProcessManagement and
Measurement
Senior Management - Better Overview of What's Happening - Better Way to Plan for Change - Better Way to Assign Responsibilities
Middle Management (Including IT Mangers) - Better Overview of What's Happening - Better Way to Plan for Change - Clearer Priorities - Better Way to Assign Responsibilities
Supervisors and Change Specialists - Clearer Priorities - Better Understanding of Task - Better Way of Measuring Results
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 8
An Aside: Processes Come in Different Sizes
Value Chain
Business Process Business Process Business Process
ProcessProcess Process
Sub-Process Sub-ProcessSub-Process
Sub-Sub-Process
Activity Activity
Sub-Sub-Process
ArchitectureSCOR Framework
Process Redesign ProjectsBusiness Rule Projects
Six Sigma ProjectsIT Automation Projects
SAP Process Models
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 5
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 9
Michael Porter’s Value Chain
New ProductDevelopment Operations Distribution Marketing
and SalesService
Procurement
Technology Development
Human Resource Management
Corporate ManagementM
arginSu
ppor
t Pro
cess
esC
ore
Busi
ness
Pro
cess
es
Finance and Accounting
From Michael Porter, Competitive Advantage, Harvard, 1985
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 10
Unisys Corp. Functions and Value Chains
UnisysSenior
Management
Marketing FinanceSales ServiceManufacturingNew ProductDevelopment
Strategy Committee
Value Chain: Systems Integration
Value Chain: Outsourcing
Value Chain: Network Services
Value Chain: Core Services
Value Chain: Enterprise Server Technology
Other Value Chains
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 6
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 11
Defining a Business Process Architecture
• The key tool for process management• A high-level overview of the value chains and key
processes that make up the organization• An alignment of strategic goals, value chains and key
processes• A clear-cut way to monitor the performance of the
value chains and processes (KPIs)
• A BP Architecture is NOT an IT EA Architecture
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 12
The Process Management Alignment ProcessOngoing BusinessStrategic Process
BusinessModel
Managem entPlan
Perform anceMeasures
Business Process Architecture
CEO
Value Chain
SubProcess
Activities
Process
SubProcess
SubSubProcess
Activities
Organizational AlignmentSee that m odels, m easures and m anagem ent plans are
aligned with those abov e and below
ProcessHierarchy
ManagementHierarchy
LineManagers
MiddleManagers
Supervisors
Bus Process Bus Process
Process
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 7
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 13
Available Business Process Frameworks
• BP Frameworks are often called Operation Reference (OR) Frameworks
• A BP or OR Framework is a template for a BP Architecture
• The Supply Chain Council’s SCOR Framework• The TeleManagement Forum’s eTOM/NGOSS
Framework• Hewlett Packard’s Framework Suite• The VCOR Initiative
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 14
SCOR MODEL: Level 1
SupplyChain
DeliverMakeSource
Plan
Return
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 8
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 15
The Level 1 SCOR Notation
S1 M1 D1 S1
S1 D1 S1M1 D1
Key OtherRM Suppliers
EuropeanRM Supplier
RMSuppliers ALPHA
AlphaRegional
WarehouseCustomer
DR1 SR1 DR1 SR1
SR3DR3
P1
P2
P3
P4
P1
P2
P3
P4
P1
P2 P4
S2 M2
DR1
D2
SR1
S2
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 16
SCOR’s Level 1 ScorecardPerformance
Attribute Performance Attribute Definition Level 1 Metric
Supply Chain DeliveryReliability
The performance of the supply chain indelivering: the correct product, to the correctplace, at the correct time, in the correctcondition and packaging, in the correctquantity, with the correct documentation, tothe correct customer.
Delivery Performance
Fill Rates
Perfect Order Fulfillment
Supply ChainResponsiveness
The velocity at which a supply chain providesproducts to the customer. Order Fulfillment Lead Times
Supply ChainFlexibility
The agility of a supply chain in responding tomarketplace changes to gain or maintaincompetitive advantage.
Supply Chain Response Time
Production Flexibility
Supply Chain Costs The costs associated with operating thesupply chain.
Cost of Goods Sold
Total Supply Chain ManagementCosts
Value-Added Productivity
Warranty / Returns ProcessingCosts
Supply Chain AssetManagementEfficiency
The effectiveness of an organization inmanaging assets to support demandsatisfaction. This includes the managementof all assets: fixed and working capital.
Cash-to-Cash Cycle Time
Inventory Days of Supply
Asset Turns
Cus
tom
er F
acin
g A
ttrib
utes
Inte
rnal
Fac
ing
Attr
ibut
es
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 9
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 17
SCOR Benchmarks Provide Instant ROI
50%
$30M Revenue
$30M Indirect Cost
35 days
97 days
0%
63%
Supply Chain SCORcard Industry Benchmarks
Overview Metrics SCOR Level 1 Metrics Actual Parity Advantage Superior Value from Improvements
Delivery Performanceto Commit Date 85% 90% 95%
Fill Rates 94% 96% 98%
EXTE
RN
AL
Supply ChainReliability
Perfect OrderFulfillment 80% 85% 90%
Order FulfillmentLead Times 7 days 5 days 3 days
Flexibility
Responsiveness
Production Flexibility 30 days 25 days 20 days
Total SCMManagement Cost 19% 13% 8% 3%
INTE
RN
AL
Cost Warranty Cost NA NA NA NA NA
Value Added EmployeeProductivity NA $156K $306K $460K NA
Inventory Days ofSupply 119 days 55 days 38 days 22 days NA
Assets Cash-to-Cash CycleTime 196 days 80 days 46 days 28 days
Net Asset Turns(Working Capital) 2.2 turns 8 turns 12 turns 19 turns NA
Supply ChainResponse Time 82 days 55 days 13 days
45 days
$7 M Capital Charge
Key enabler to cost andasset improvements
$30M Revenue
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 18
Three Levels of Governance
• Executives – Organization Performance & Responsiveness
• Line and Process Managers – Value Chain/Process Performance and Priorities for Improvement
• Process Supervisors – Efficient & Effective Organization of Subprocesses and Activities
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 10
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 19
Basic BP Management Model
Plan & OrganizeProcess
Set goals and expectiationsEstablish plans and budgetProvide resources & staffImplement process
Monitor & ControlProcess
Monitor processReinforce successDiagnose deviationsTake necessary correctiveactions
Expectations,Plans & Resources
Results
Data AboutResults
Goals/Measures
Job Functions of a Manager Responsible for a Process
Inputs
Changes in Goals and Plans
Feedback
ProcessExecuted
Process Measures
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 20
Aligning Managers and Measures
SOURCEPROCESS
S2 SourceMTO Products
S2.2 Recieve Product
MeasureProcess
Monitor &Plan &
ReportingRelationship
MeasureProcess
Monitor &ControlProcess
Manager Responsible for Process
Plan &OrganizeProcess
Monitor &ControlProcess
Manager Responsible for Process
Plan &OrganizeProcess
MeasureProcess
Monitor &ControlProcess
Manager Responsible for Process
Plan &OrganizeProcess
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 11
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 21
Coordinating the Management of Processes
CEO
Executive Committee
ProcessManagementTeam
DeliveryDepartment
ManufacturingDepartment
SalesDepartment
Customer
Process ArchitectureCommittee
Sales Supervisor Manf.Supervisor
DeliverySupervisor
Widget Value Chain
SalesProcess
DeliveryProcess
ManufacturingProcess
VPDelivery
VPManufacturing
VPSales
SVP WidgetProcess
WidgetProcess
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 22
A Specific Example of BPM Management
Pamela GarretsonDirector, Business Excellence
Boeing Airlift and Tanker Programs
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 12
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 23
The Boeing Airlift and Tanker Organization
CommercialAirplanes
SharedServices
PhantomWorks
IntegratedDefenseSystems
The Boeing Company
HQ in Long Beach, CA
Airlift andTanker
Programs
BoeingCapital
Corporation
Connexionby
Boeing
AirTraffic
Management
Air ForceSystems
C-17 Program 767 Tankers Program
C-17 Program Advanced A&T
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 24
The Boeing A&T Enterprise Process Model
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 13
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 25
As one process level is defined, the next lower level is identified
Level 1 Process 6.02
Level 2 Process 6.02.03
Level 0 Process 6.0
Levels of ProcessesLevels of Processes
Aircraft and Missiles - Southern California (A&M-Aircraft and Missiles - Southern California (A&M-SoCalSoCal))
Enterprise Process ModelEnterprise Process Model
1.0 Enterprise Management1.0 Enterprise Management1.0 Enterprise Management
8.0 Support & Services8.0 Support & Services8.0 Support & Services
1.05 Provide Communications
1 .06 Manage Customer Satisfaction Approach and Deploym ent
1.03 Learn and Im plement Improvements
1.04 Strengthen the Team
8.01 Provide Human Resource S ervices8 .02 Provide Security and Fire Protection Services8 .03 Provide General S ervices8 .04 Provide Safe ty, Hea lth, & E nvironm ental
Services
8.07 Perfo rm Accounting8.08 Perfo rm Financial Services8.09 Prov ide Integrated Information Systems
Solutions8.10 Prov ide Flight Operations S ervices
8.05 Manage Facilities & E quipment8.06 Provide Legal S ervices
4.01 Integra te Productwith SystemRequirements
4.02 Plan and Contro lProductDevelopment
4.03 ProvideConcurrentDefinition
4.04 Verify Validate /Product Definition
4.0IntegrateProduct
Definition
4.04.0IntegrateIntegrateProductProduct
DefinitionDefinition
3.0Program
Planning &Control
3.03.0ProgramProgram
Planning &Planning &ControlControl
2.0Acquire
Business
2.02.0AcquireAcquire
BusinessBusiness
2.01 DevelopOpportunity/Pop-Up Opportunity
2.02 Develop WinStrategy
2.03 Execute Campaign2.04 Docum ent Offering2.05 Keep It Sold
3.01 (UNASS IGNED)3.02 (UNASS IGNED)3.03 Manage Transfer of
Work (out)
3.04 Administer Contracts3.05 Manage Change3.06 Manage Risk3.07 Manage Cost and
Schedule3.08 Manage Material
Requirements3.09 Manage Inventory3.10 Manage Government
Property
7.0Post
DeliverySupport
7.07.0PostPost
DeliveryDeliverySupportSupport
6.0Production
6.06.0ProductionProduction
5.0Supplier
Management
5.05.0SupplierSupplier
ManagementManagement
5.01 Select Source5 .02 Issue Orders5 .03 Manage Supplie r
Perform ance
5 .04 Assure SupplierQuality
6 .01 (UNASSIG NED)6 .02 Fabrica te Tools6 .03 Assem ble
Product
6 .04 Provide FODControl
6 .05 Assure ProductQuality
6 .06 (UNASSIG NED)6 .07 Certify Factory
Floor Processes
7.01 P rovide TechnicalP ublica tions
7.02 P erform Spares SalesS ervices
7.03 P erform ProductTraining S upport
7.04 P erform Field S ervices7.05 P erform Repair
S ervices7.06 P erform Maintenance
and ModificationsS ervices
7.07 Manage Support & TestE quipment
7.08 P erform AssetManagem ent Services
1.01 Plan and Integrate P erform ance
1.02 Manage Procedural Docum entation
Sherry W ilson (562) 593-1339(atpm) Revised Ju ly 18, 2002http://am s-socal.web.boeing.com/dbbg/epm/epm .html
(UNASSIGNED) = A process is now performed within another process or is no longer performed at al l.
1.07 Perform Self Governance
and so on…
• 6.01 ______
• 6.02 ______
• 6.03 ______
• 6.04 ______
• 6.05 ______
• 6.02.01 ______
• 6.02.02 ______
• 6.02.03 ______
• 6.02.04 ______
• 6.02.05 ______
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 26
Process Owners: What Do They Do?
• Responsible for:• Implementing the steps of PBM• Documenting the process• Ensuring process performance• Ensuring both internal and external customer involvement• Involving suppliers of incoming processes• Improving the process
• For certain processes, may manage the process jointly with the Government Customer
• Must ensure associated procedures are current and are adhered to
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 14
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 27
ImplementImprovementsImplement
ImprovementsSet
GoalsSet
Goals
Return to Step 3
Six to Ten Manageable
Steps
Metrics from Customer’s Perspective
How YouAre Doing
Predictable Performance
Where You Are Going and Why
How and Why You Will Get There
Get There!
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7
Definethe
Process
Definethe
Process
EstablishMetrics
EstablishMetrics Determine
PerformanceDetermine
PerformanceAnalyze ProcessStability
Analyze ProcessStability
Analyze and Plan
Improvements
Analyze and Plan
Improvements
Process Owners Use PBM Seven-Step MethodologyProcess Owners Use PBM Seven-Step Methodology
Process-Based Management (PBM) is a management approach that defines an organization as a collection of processes focused on customer satisfaction and waste reduction by defining measures, stabilizing and improving processes
DEFINE MEASURE IMPROVE
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 28
Quality
Timeliness
Efficiency
Cycle Time
Concurrence Concurrence Concurrence
MinimumAcceptableLevel (MAL)
Annual / Multi-Year
Goals Benchmark
WeightingFactor
(Must Have At Least One “1”)
Metric DefinitionMetric Category
Process Measurement
Process Owner’s Name Process Customer’s Name(s) Process Specialist’s Name
Process Title Process No.Creation DateRevision Date
Next-higher level process
Quality Metric Definition (list company/organization/source benchmarked [if applicable])
Timeliness Metric Definition (list company/organization/source benchmarked [if applicable])
Efficiency Metric Definition (list company/organization/source benchmarked [if applicable])
Cycle Time Metric Definition (list company/organization/source benchmarked [if applicable])
MAL
MAL
MAL
MAL
Goals
Goals
Goals
Goals
BenchmarkWeight
Weight
Weight
Weight
(Must have concurrence on file for all process changes. Use second page if necessary for additional metric definitions and/or signatures.)
Process Title: Process No.:Creation Date:Revision Date:
Next-Higher-Level Process:
PROCESS PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTIntegrated Defense Systems (IDS) – Long Beach
MD-1773-01 (4 OCT 2002) REVISED
T
Q
E
CT
Benchmark
Benchmark
Benchmark
Quality
Timeliness
Efficiency
Cycle Time
Concurrence Concurrence Concurrence
MinimumAcceptableLevel (MAL)
Annual / Multi-Year
Goals Benchmark
WeightingFactor
(Must Have At Least One “1”)
Metric DefinitionMetric Category
Process Measurement
Process Owner’s Name Process Customer’s Name(s) Process Specialist’s Name
Process Title Process No.Creation DateRevision Date
Next-higher level process
Quality Metric Definition (list company/organization/source benchmarked [if applicable])
Timeliness Metric Definition (list company/organization/source benchmarked [if applicable])
Efficiency Metric Definition (list company/organization/source benchmarked [if applicable])
Cycle Time Metric Definition (list company/organization/source benchmarked [if applicable])
MAL
MAL
MAL
MAL
Goals
Goals
Goals
Goals
BenchmarkWeight
Weight
Weight
Weight
(Must have concurrence on file for all process changes. Use second page if necessary for additional metric definitions and/or signatures.)
Process Title: Process No.:Creation Date:Revision Date:
Next-Higher-Level Process:
PROCESS PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTIntegrated Defense Systems (IDS) – Long Beach
MD-1773-01 (4 OCT 2002) REVISED
T
Q
E
CT
Benchmark
Benchmark
Benchmark
Process Objective:
Process TasksBeginning Boundary Task:
Ending Boundary Task:
Inputs
Suppliers Customers
Process Requirement Sources: Process Owner:
Process Customer(s):
Process Specialist:Information
Systems
Outputs
(Must have concurrence on file for all process changes. Use second page if necessary.)
Negotiate and Award Purchase Order
Supplier Management 5.0
Establish a contract with a supplier, including compliant documentation and provide clearrequirements to the supplier.
5.02
01/03/0101/10/03
• Purchase Requisition (PR)• Select Source 5.01
• Select Source 5.01
• Purchase Order• Manage Supplier Performance 5.03
• TA-QA-039• 1.8.2.6• TA-QA-111
Name of Process Owner
Name of Process Customer(s)
Name of Process Specialist (if applicable)
MAIN, TPS, EDI, UDFC TRACKING SYS
.01 Evaluate Purchase Requisition
.02 Issue Undefinitized Purchase Order
.03 Receive and evaluate proposal from Supplier and Develop Negotiation Plan.04 Solicit & Evaluate Bids from Suppliers & Select Supplier.05 Negotiate Contract Requirements with Supplier.06 Develop Procurement File to Requirements.
• Manage Supplier Performance 5.03
Receive Purchase Requisition
Issue Purchase Order
Process Title: Process No.:
Next-Higher-Level Process:
Creation Date:Revision Date:
MD-1771-01 (06 JUN 2002) REVISED
PROCESS DEFINITIONIntegrated Defense Systems (IDS) – Long Beach
Process Objective:
Process TasksBeginning Boundary Task:
Ending Boundary Task:
Inputs
Suppliers Customers
Process Requirement Sources: Process Owner:
Process Customer(s):
Process Specialist:Information
Systems
Outputs
(Must have concurrence on file for all process changes. Use second page if necessary.)
Negotiate and Award Purchase Order
Supplier Management 5.0
Establish a contract with a supplier, including compliant documentation and provide clearrequirements to the supplier.
5.02
01/03/0101/10/03
• Purchase Requisition (PR)• Select Source 5.01
• Select Source 5.01
• Purchase Order• Manage Supplier Performance 5.03
• TA-QA-039• 1.8.2.6• TA-QA-111
Name of Process Owner
Name of Process Customer(s)
Name of Process Specialist (if applicable)
MAIN, TPS, EDI, UDFC TRACKING SYS
.01 Evaluate Purchase Requisition
.02 Issue Undefinitized Purchase Order
.03 Receive and evaluate proposal from Supplier and Develop Negotiation Plan.04 Solicit & Evaluate Bids from Suppliers & Select Supplier.05 Negotiate Contract Requirements with Supplier.06 Develop Procurement File to Requirements.
• Manage Supplier Performance 5.03
Receive Purchase Requisition
Issue Purchase Order
Process Title: Process No.:
Next-Higher-Level Process:
Creation Date:Revision Date:
MD-1771-01 (06 JUN 2002) REVISED
PROCESS DEFINITIONIntegrated Defense Systems (IDS) – Long Beach
Key to PBM: Process Owners Document and Define Processes, with Customer Agreement
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 15
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 29
Process Owners Define the Process in a Flow ChartProcess Owners Define the Process in a Flow Chart
W hoResponsib le
O rganization or Ind ividuals
Input O utput
P R O C E S S FLO W C H AR TP R O C E S S FLO W C H AR T
M D -7148 (02 JU L 2004 ) R E V IS E D
E S T. T IM E
M ajo r Tasks for:P rocess O w ner:
P rocess N um ber:C reation D ate:R evis ion D ate :
LE G E N DInpu t/O utputInpu t/O utput TaskTask a C onnecto r R R ecordD ec isionD ec ision C ontro l
P o in t
TO TA L T IM E
App lies To:5 .02
N egotia te and A w ard P urchase O rder<Process O wner N am e H ere>
<B us. U nit/P rogram N am e H ere>
PurchaseR equisition
Supp lierP roposal
TechnicalE va luation
C ost/PriceAnalysis
R eceivePurchase
R equis it io n
E va lua tePurc hase
R equisition
Proc ure me ntC om petitive?
IssueU nde fin it ized
Purchase O rder
R eceive andE va lua te
Prop osa l fromSupp lie r and
D evelopN ego tia tion
P lan
So lic it andE valua te B ids
fro m S upp lie rsand Se lec t S upp lie r
N ego tia teC ontrac t
R equire m entsw ith S upp lie r
N ego tia tion P lanA deq ua te ?
Procu re m e ntFile C o m plian t?
D evelopProcu re m e nt F ileto R equire m ents
IssueD efin it ized
Purc hase O rder
a
a
b
b
3 .08.04 R elease Purchase R equisitions and W ork O rders
Supp liers
Program E ngineer
C ost Ana lyst
B uyer
Procurem ent M anagem ent
Procurem ent A dvisor
PurchaseO rder
P rocurem en tFile
Y
N Y
NYN
R
<O rig in D a te H ere><R evis ion Da te H ere>
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 30
ProcessPerformance
Meet or ExceedCustomer
Expectations
AttainSuperiorBusinessResults
QualityQuality
EfficiencyEfficiency
TimelinessTimeliness
CycleCycle--TimeTime
Measure of conformance or non-conformance (defects) to requirements or expected performance
Measure of success in meeting a customer commitment
Measure of output that a process produces in relation to costs
Measure of time between a customer request and delivery of the product or service to the customer
RequirementsRequirements Key Performance CategoriesKey Performance Categories
Process Owners Use Metric Categories to Establish Measures
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 16
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 31
The Same Metrics Are Used at All Levels
Shared DataExecutiveLeadershipExecutive
Leadership
LeadershipLeadership
TeamsTeams
Customers
Suppliers
Quality Timeliness
Efficiency Cycle Time
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 32
Process Owners Use Metrics to Measure a ProcessProcess Owners Use Metrics to Measure a Process
Good Good100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Quality (1X)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Efficiency (1X)
Process Performance Assessment
Assessment Assessment
Per
cent
Com
plia
nt O
rder
s
Com
plet
ed It
ems
per M
an-h
our
02 03 J F M A M J J A S O N DND ND 1 2 2 2 2 2
03 J F M A M J J A S O N D02ND ND 2 2 2 2 1 1
1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.502 03 J F M A M J J A S O N DND ND
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 17
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 33
Airlift and Tanker Programs’ Quality Journey: Results FocusAirlift and Tanker Programs’ Quality Journey: Results Focus
PerformanceFactorPerformanceFactor
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Mal
colm
Bal
drig
e R
ange
RONA
KEYKEY
Milestones
Systems
Awards
DeliveryWaivers
COQRework/Repair $
Span Time
Schedule
CPAR
5X 7.5X 17X
‘92 ‘93 ‘94 ‘95 ‘96
58% 67% 100% 92%
120Aircraft
Decision
LargestMulti-yearcontract
Collier CalQED
‘97
100%
FlexSustainment
Daedalian
‘98
C32/C40
100%
Baldrige
80 50 17 12 8
4.3% 2.9% 2.5% 2.2% 1.9%4.0M 2.5M 1.8M 1.4M 866K
100
4.2%5.0M
442 Days 380 Days 374 Days 349 Days 286 Days
+10 Days +25 Days +40 Days +20 Days +60 Days
58%2.31.6 2.9 3.3 3.4 4.11.7 4.2
100%
1.4%
6
268 Days
+100 Days
‘99
707K
15 C-17add-on
+60 appropriation
18X
4.1100%
1.4%
10
223 Days
+204 Days
‘00
644K
UKORDER
31X
* Days ahead of schedule to USAF decreased due to a insertion of four UK planes into 2001 schedule
4.2100%
1.1%
15
208 Days
+107 Days*
‘01
535K
UK1-4Deliveries
50X+
IW Finalist
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 34
A BP Group and a BP Process
• Most companies that are serious have a business process group to coordinate their efforts and provide special training and mentoring
• Many companies conclude that process change is its own kind of process and develop and document
The Process Change Processin the same way they do other processes.
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 18
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 35
Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced ScorecardECI's Balanced Business Scorecard
Customer Perspective
Financial Perspective Internal Business Perspective
Innovation & Learning Perspective
Goals
Survive
Succeed
Prosper
Measures
Cash flow
Quarterly sales growth & operatingincome by division
Increased market share and ROE
Goals
Technologycapability
Manufacturingexperience
Designproductivity
New productintroduction
Measures
Manufacturing geometry vs.competition
Cycle time, Unit cost, Yield
Silicon efficiency, Engineeringefficiency
Actual introduction schedule vs. plan
Goals
Technologyleadership
Manufacturinglearning
Product focus
Time to market
Measures
Time to develop next generation
Process time to maturity
Percent of products that equal 80%sales
New product interdiction vs.competition
Goals
New products
Response supply
Preferred supplier
Customerpartnership
Measures
Percent of sales from new products,Percent of sales from proprietaryproducts
On-time delivery (defined by customer)
Share of key accounts' purchases,Ranking by key accounts
Number of cooperative engineeringefforts
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 36
Extending It Further
Improve Shareholder Value
Revenue Growth Strategy Productivity Strategy
share price return on capital employed
Build the Franchise Increase Value toCustomers
Improve Cost Structure Improve Use ofAssets
Operational Excellence
Cutomer Intimacy
Product Leadership
Build FranchiseThrough Innovations
Increase CustomerValue Through
Customer ManagementProcesses
Achieve OperationalExcellence Through
Operations andLogistics Processes
Become a GoodCorporate Citizen
Through Regulatoryand Environmental
Processes
Employee Competencies Technology Corporate Culture
Financial Perspective
Customer Perspective
Internal Process Perspective
Learning & Growth Perspective
customer profitabilityrevenue from new
sourcesoperating cost per unit
produced asset utilization
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 19
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 37
An Overview of SEI’s CMM Maturity Model
The process is ad hoc. Fewactivities are explicitlydefined and success
depends on individual effortand heroics.
Basic project managementprocesses are established to
track cost, schedule, andfunctionality. The necessary
discipline is in place torepeat earlier successes
The process for bothmanagement and
engineering is documented,standardized and integrated
by an organizationmethodology
Detailed measures of theprocess and product quality
are collected. Both theprocess and products are
quantitatively understood andcontrolled.
Continuous processimprovement is enabled by
quantitative feedback for theprocess and from pilotinginnovative new ideals and
technologies.
1. Initial
2. Repeatable
3. Defined
4. Managed
5. Optimizing
Organizations with an immature mastery of their processes.
Organizations with an mature mastery of their processes.
Entrepreneurial organizations and newdivisions that do things any way they can to
get started.
As organizations become more mature they begin toconceptualize business processes and seek to organizethem, repeat successes and measure results.
Most organizations are between levers 2 and 3. Theyhave processes documented and standardized but in
many cases manager's goals are only loosely linked toprocess goals.
Only a few organizations have an organization wideunderstanding of how processes relate and have
their corporate strategies and goals aligned, via themanagement hierarchy to specific process activities.
Organizations at this level routinely expect managers and employees to work together toimprove processes. They understand their processes well enough that they can conduct
systematic experiments to determine if changes will be useful or not.
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 38
Three Levels of Governance
• Executives – Organization Performance & Responsiveness
• Line and Process Managers – Value Chain/Process Performance and Priorities for Improvement
• Process Supervisors – Efficient & Effective Organization of Subprocesses and Activities
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 20
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 39
A Process Includes Its Management
Process
Measure
Manage
plan control
PeopleImplement
Process
SoftwareImplements
Process
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 40
One of Rummler’s Rules
75% of potential improvement you can obtain from a redesigning a process will come from changing
the way the process is managed
• Geary Rummler, Serious Performance Consulting, • ASTD Press, 2004
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 21
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 41
Rummler’s Human Performance Model
ExpenseReports
Updated ExpenseReport Ledger Consequences
Feedback
Activity Support
4. Consequences
Feedback
Activity:Enter Expense
Reports
Process Defined
activitymeasures
Activity Specifications
Skill, Knowledge & Capability
*
Geary Rummler & Alan Brache, Improving Performance, Josey-Bass, 1985
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 42
A More Detailed Human Performance Model
ExpenseReports
Updated ExpenseReport Ledger Consequences
Feedback
1. Activity Support
- Can the performer easily recognize theinput requiring action?- Can the activity be done withoutinterference from other activities?- Are adequate resources available forperformance (time, tools, staff, information)?
4. Consequences
- Are consequences aligned to support thedesired performance?- Are consequences meaningful from theperformer's perspective?- Are consequences timely?
5. Feedback
- Do performers receive informationabout their performance?- Is the information they receive: 1)relevant? 2) accurate?3) timely? 4) specific? 5) easy tounderstand?
Activity:Enter Expense
Reports
0. Process Defined
- Define the steps in the activityor process.- Define who will do what
activitymeasures
3. Activity Specifications
- Do activity standards exist?- Does performer know the desired output &standards?- Do performers consider the standardsattainable?
2. Skill, Knowledge andCapability
- Do the performers have the necessaryskills & knowledge to perform?- Do the performers know why desiredperformance is important?- Are the performers physically, mentally &emotionally able to perform?
*
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 22
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 43
Rummler’s Rule Applies To All Level’s of Management
• The biggest problem most organizations face is that they don’t align bonuses and incentives with processes
• Thus, it is common for employees, supervisors and senior managers to get rewards for behaviors that do not result in improved performance
• Aligning incentives should be a major goal of every business process change program
• Jack Welch, the CEO of GE, made 40% of every executive’s bonus dependent on the success of their 6 Sigma program
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 44
SUMMARY
• The challenge for managers is to learn how to manage business processes
• We have too many technologies and not enough focus on why we should do BPM in the first place
• We manage processes to improve corporate performance
• Companies need to set goals, develop a strategy, and then create a business process organization that can organize and coordinate their BPM resources
Best Practices in BPM Governance Paul Harmon
IQPC BPM – May 2005 www.bptrends.com 23
© 2005, Business Process Trends www.bptrends.com 45
For More Information
www.bptrends.comThe most comprehensive source of information and analysis on
trends, directions and best practices in Business Process Management
Slides available on BPTrends. Go to site and enter into search:
IQPC BPM Governance Talk