Upload
lenhan
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B.
Best Practices in Quality and Control Management MEDTEC 14.‐15.th May 2014
Dr.Boris Lux
Head of Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs
JenaValve Technology GmbH
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 1
Hypothesis: QbD is a big Change
from fullfill Test => understand Product how it works
from Table of Tests => Flow of Tests up to test mind mapping
from linear Steps => Loops in Development
from sideline => integrated Risk Management
from department isolated => all level covering Testing/Evaluation
from Failure Reaction => Risk Prevention
from straight => life cycle Processes
from static => dynamic Maintenance of Effectiveness
QbD needs to follow Best Practice in Quality and Controll Management
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 2
Target: Robust and Safe Design by repated Controll of Results
knowledge about borderlines
vs. fulfill requirements
Identifying process design space, CQAs and CCPs
During development use of tools:
Design of Experimentes
Mulivariable Experiments
Process Control Charts
Confidence, action limits
Statistically robustness, PCC as learning tool
Adjusting processes
Gage R&R (repeatability and reproducibility)
Destructive, Attributive, Variable
FUZZY logic (attributive) for benchmarking
QbD: change from fullfill Test => understand Product how it works
„testing, testing, testing,..“ (Dr.Werner.v.Braun)
„Know the limits“
„Understand how it works - design and process“
- inherent safety by design
- protective measures in the
medical device itself or in
the manufacturing process
- information for safety (IFU)
Are the residual risks
accepable?
How successful was
the design solution in
preventing a harms?
What can we do to
prevent harms by the
design?
Which harms could
apear during indication
of the design?
Preventive ActionVerification/
Valiadtion
Frequency
Likelihood of harms
Risk
Ranking
Occurance Detection
Frequency
Hazard
Analysis
Severity
Design
concept - final
Indication
Safe Design
Risk Reduction
Safe Design
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 3
Scientific view on relations between Product attributes and tests
Flow charts can be used for
Complex relationships
Forward and backward relations
Multiple using of attributes/tests
Integration of explanation pictures
QbD: change from Table of Tests => Flow of Tests up to test mind mapping
„Complex relationships requires more visualization“
Share knowledge and collaborate with and coach the Inspectors/Auditors.
5
6.07 Radial Fatigue Test - Stent
600 Mio Cycles 15 yrs
- Fracture
- Migration
- Fretting Corrosion
6.06 FE Analysis (radial)
(Calculation) - Stent
worst case
verification
Implant Free Surface Area
(Calculation) - Stent
5.2
Implant Length/Diameter
Relationship
(Calculation) – Stent
- LL = f(LD)
Simulated Use Test
(Stent)
Test Flow
Process-Fishbone
Bonding
Raw material Manuf.flow
Employee Manuf.methodEnvironment
Production Aids
Mr.YYY
Clean room
Glueing
Loctite wwww
Loctite yyyyStent Funnel
Filler blue AAW (step xx)
Glue duration
Cleaning of
Glue-area
Primer zzzz
Temperature
Air-Huminity
Training
Time record
2
5PEEK-Part
duedate3
4
Primer zzzz
duedate4
Glue-space
<0,1mm
1
6
Mr. ZZZ
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 4
Development Process = Hypersonic Flight
Classic Development process = step by step
No direct feedback from next step
Start of next step after final closing of pre-step
Worst case = restart of development
QbD: change from linear Steps => Loops in Development
Project
Progress
Innovation
Design
Change
1 loop2.loop
3.loop4.loop
3.loop
Design Process Change
Classic development loops
1 loop
Project
Progress
Innovation
Design
Change
2.loop
3.loop4.loop
3.loop
Design
Process
Robustness
Progressive development loops
Every loop enter the next development phase in a rough way
Early feedback
Dynamic design formation
Product and Process development are closer together
Overlapping relationship
Emerging final design
Target: Robustness
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 5
Development process = built up living Risk Management file and DMR
Risk management drive the Development process
Development process drive the Risk Management
step by step; cycle by cycle, review by review
Documentation is fundamental for design
DHF - Design History File
DMR - Device Master Record (design freeze = version 1.0)
DHR - Device History Records (start with DVV test samples )
QbD: change from sideline => integrated Risk Management
Design History
File (DHF)
Device Master
Record (DMR)
Extraction
Extraction
(used for DVV,
Clinical investigation, PV)
Design Dossier
(DD)
Device History
Record (DHR)
Finalize
Design History File
Design request
Initial Stock
Idea Generation /
Concept
Feasibility
Product Launch /
Commercialization
Post Market
Surveillance
Design and
Development
Product-/Productions-
Transfer
Clinical
Evaluation
Risk
Managment
Process
Design
Inital
Market
Market AppovalProdcution
Verification and
validation
Review
Appraise
Review
Review
Review
feedback
feedback
feedback
feedback
feedback
feedback
Risk Management Development
Documentation Development
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 6
Risk management => Test structure = water fall model
Risk management
Requires steady team integration:
Physician
Marketing
R&D
Technician
Quality,…
Identification of Test
Requirements
Analysis of Results
Residual Risks
QbD: change from department isolated => all level covering Testing/Evaluation
Intended Use
Product
Specification
Technical Frame
Risk Management
- Safety Characteristics
- FMEA
- Risk – Benefit Assessment
Test
Requirements
Anatomic Model
Animal Model
IFU, Label,
Training
Indication, Contraindication,
Warnings, Precautions
Residual Risks
Intended Use
FlowProduct
Features
Technical
Realization
Clinical
Application
Patient Population
In vivo Requirements Clinical Conditions
Requirem.
Requirem.
Anatomical Parameter
Design
Verification /
Validation
Animal Tests
Cinical
Investigation
User friendly, Useability
Result
Anaysis
Results
Results
FMEA Steps
Risk Management - Testing
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 7
Risk Management structure = road map for development / life cycle
Risk Management operational areas
Design Verfication / Validation
Process Validation
Supplier Qualification
Rework Qualification
Change Qualification
Risk Management Inputs for Planning
DVV Master Plan
Process Validation Master Plan
Supplier / Semi-Finished Goods Release
QbD: change from Failure Reaction => Risk Prevention
Risk
Management
Material Risk
Design Risk
Design
Verification/
Validation
Process Validation,
In-process Control,
Quality Control (IPC, QC)
Supplier Qualification
Incomming Quality Control
(IQC)
Process Risk
Functional Groups
Material / SFG
Rework Qualification
Rework Quality Control
(RQC)
Rework Risk
Change Qualification
Change Release
Change Risk
Risk
Management
R-FMEA =>
Material Risk
D-FMEA =>
Design Risk
P-FMEA =>
Process Risk
DVV Master
Plan
PV Master
Plan
Risk Assessment
Supplier
Release
Material /
SFG
Release
Risk Planning
Risk Areas
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 8
Risk Management is a life cycle process
QbD: change from straight => life cycle Processes
Risk
ManagementISO 14971
- Risk Assessment
(Design)
- Product Validation - Risk Assessment
(Material / SFG)
- Supplier Release
- Risk Assessment
(Process)
- Process Validation
- Training Observation
- First Use
- Clinical Observation
- Competitor Observation
- Complaint Analysis
Functional
Groups
Non-conforming
Material
Material /
Semi-finished Goods
Product
Risk Assessment
(DMR Change, CAPA)
Product
Life cycle
Observation, AssessmentInherent Safety
Product Design
Regulatory
RequirementImplementation, Practice
- State of the Art in Medicine
- State of the Art in Technique
- Risk Assessment
(Rework)
- Rework Release
determine
Customer
Requirements
meet
Customer
Requirements
JenaValve Core Processes
Trained
Employees
Equip-
ment/
Materials
Infor-
mation
Basics
Strategic
OrientationLife Cycle
Management
Quality
Management
Common straight line processes
Strategic and Quality processes
Core processes (Development, Manufacturing, Sales)
Basic processes
Permanent running life cycle processes
Risk Management
Document Management
Change Management
Quality Management
CAPA Management
Life Cycle
Risk Management
Process Landscape
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 9
Control of Change Process - dominate all
As much as the change process is under control right from the beginning as much
- is a „hypersonic“ development successful
- are changes effective, but non-substantial
QbD: change from static => dynamic Maintenance of Effectiveness
Change
Management
Risk
Management
Document
Management
Quality
Management
Change
Request
Close
Change
Affected
Documents
Release Change
Record
Qualification Results
Prepare Change
Change
Documents
Evaluation of change = team work
Risk assessment
Change classification (Change in risks, Labeling)
Test structure
Validation
• Biocomp, Steri, DVV, Packaging, Shelf-life
Qualification
• Raw material, Training, Manufacturing, Transport/Storage
Documentation identification
Change control tools
templates for documents => traceability
Document management system (e.g. WSS)
• Collecting ideas before update
• Related areas and documents/test/reports
• Knowledge management
Change Flow
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 10
Thank You for Your Attention
© JenaValve™ Technology GmbH | confidential | MEDTEC 2014 | Author: Lux, B. page 11
Dr.rer.nat. Boris Lux (1953)
• Since more than 23 years he has experience in Quality Assurance for medical
device development and manufacturing.
• Comprising the entire product life cycle he has implemented and optimized quality
management systems and related procedures required for EU, US and other
markets.
• He received a Diploma and Ph.D. in Physics from the Technical University Dresden
(IPA). Thesis: “Picture Quality Parameter for Microfich Technics” and leads the
development of an optical and tactile measuring computer aided system (MMC).
• For Dräger Medical AG, biolitec AG and Angiomed GmbH a C.R.BARD subsidiary,
he held leading positions in risk, change/improvement and corrective management
for medical devices and equipment, like anesthesia workstations, diode lasers
(PDT), fibre probes, stents (Chromaxx) and ePTFE covered stents (Fluency, Flair).
• Always embedded in a complex, international company environment he has exercised a wide spectrum of quality
tools in team, knowledge, data, and document management.
• Since Apr 2009 he is responsible for Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs at JenaValve Technology GmbH
during all development steps of bioprosthesis heart valves for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement applications.
• Over the last 5 years he assured e.g. the compliance in quality requirements during development and lead the CE
mark approval process of THE JENAVALVE and all activities for other market approvals.
• For commercial products he is responsible for all quality processes, like process quality control and improvement,
manufacturing documentation, supplier qualification and control, implantation feedback and medical reporting.