Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    1/19

    Masonite Chile

    Best Practices

    Energy Efficiency

    March 2010

    Francisco Mora AmsticaMechanical Engineer

    Engineering Department of Masonite Chile

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    2/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 2

    Masonite Chile BestPractices

    Energy Efficiency

    Energy can be neither created nor destroyed, it can only be misused

    Summary

    The need to increment energy generation and use efficiency, generates opportunities of

    cooperation among companies. Best Practices also allow sharing continuous improvement

    programs experiences, contribute with energy policies, participate in sustainable energy

    development and lead companies into a socially responsible operation.

    For Masonite Chile applying an Energy Efficiency program has allowed a 40% reduction in

    the electric energy consumption, granting a financial benefit over 500.000 US$ annually.

    Energy Efficiency must not only be related with electric energy consumption, but it must

    be a part of a global concept for Industrial Best Practices.

    Introduction

    Energy is a topic of significant relevance for industrial activity; it is a strategic supply for

    any company, so Energy Efficiency must be an integral part of any company performance

    optimization effort. The industrial sector consumes 23% of the total energy in Chile

    (Source: C.N.E.)

    Energy can be defined from a variety of approaches; anyway all of them have some kind of

    relationship. Energy allows transforming different raw material into final product and by

    being properly used; it contributes to generate a non contaminated, emission free

    environment. In the panel manufacturing process, energy is associated to the physical

    mechanic transformation, such as raw material washing, transport and refining or to

    physical chemical changes as resin curing in the press and paint curing in finishing

    process. Energy is also use in the waste water treatment process, such as physical

    chemical changes in the cells electrocoagulation during Primary Treatment. Appendix N5shows energy consumption distribution in Masonite Chile S.A.

    Nevertheless, Energy is found interrelated with equipment and machinery that turn

    energy into a final product. These equipments have certain efficiency due to thermal or

    mechanical irreversibilities, internal or external. The efficiency is the ration between

    useful works obtained and consumed work, so for producing the same product, same

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    3/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 3

    quality, you could manufacture it consuming more o less energy depending on the

    operation and the equipment used.

    All the actions that allow optimizing the relationship between amount of consumed

    energy and the final products obtained are called Energy Efficiency(E.E.).

    Masonite Chile S.A. has chosen to develop and openly inform the Best Practices concerning

    the efficient use of Energy.

    Benefits of an E.E. program are well-known, such as, environmental benefits by reducing

    greenhouse gases emissions; economic benefits by reducing specific costs; strategic

    benefits at national levels by reducing dependency from foreign energy sources and

    commercial benefits by producing environmental friendly assets which allow entering into

    most demanding markets.

    The Best Practices task must be undertaken by a multidisciplinary group of people withinthe industry. Maintenance, production, finances, engineering and general management

    areas, should not be away from this task, and should compromise to apply this E.E.

    management methodology.

    Taking into consideration that fundamental energy flows are heat cycles and mechanical

    power, the issues to concentrate on an E.E. program, can be divided into two areas:

    thermal area (ex.: combustion control, steam generation, heat exchanger, thermal

    equipment insulation, air conditioning system, etc.) and the area of power transmission

    equipment (ex. Turbo machinery, mechanical transmission equipments, compressed air,

    etc.)

    Motor-driven equipment accounts for 64 percent of the electricity consumed in the

    industrial sector (Source: U.S. Department of Energy)

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    4/19

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    5/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 5

    Projects from EE Program used in Masonite Chile

    Working with a multidisciplinary team along with the utilization of an EE Program led us to

    develop a series of projects and optimizations in the process.

    The next chart shows a summary of projects carried out. Savings are expressed in reducedpower in kW and also in US$/year. Examples of the main projects development are shown

    in appendix No.1

    ID Project Improvement Power Saving Investment Savings Payback

    1Process Optimization: fiber transport fan in forming

    line

    Suction fan damper head loss decreased (change

    speed of rotation by pulley) 20 kW 780 US$ 12.624 US$ 0,06

    2Process Optimization: induced circulating fan (flue

    gases from heat exchanger chamber)

    Suction fan damper head loss decreased (change

    speed of rotation by pulley) 10 kW 1.240 US$ 6.312 US$ 0,20

    3Decreased Consumption: Optimizing air conditioning

    system for office

    Timer installation to turn on & off air conditioning

    equipments. 3 kW 250 US$ 1.894 US$ 0,13

    4Process Optimization: painting booth extractionsystem

    Elimination of one filter bag. Joint of the extractionsystem into only one filter bag. 18 kW 2.160 US$ 11.361 US$ 0,19

    5Process Optimization: fan detention After several industrial trails, stop some

    equipments did not alter normal production 104 kW 0 US$ 65.327 US$ 0,00

    6Decreased Consumption: compressed air Reduction in air compressed consumption

    100 kW 6.000 US$ 63.118 US$ 0,10

    7Equipment s efficiency increasing: Lightning study Upgrade to high efficiency lightning

    49 kW 5.000 US$ 30.928 US$ 0,16

    8Process Optimization Press hydraulic pumps units Operational and press control changing

    50 kW 0 US$ 31.559 US$ 0,00

    9Process Optimization: Cleaning system in forming line Fiber dust extraction system modification

    50 kW 4.500 US$ 31.559 US$ 0,14

    10Process Optimization: panel humidification process Water diminishing consumption. Pump changing

    17 kW 2.500 US$ 10.730 US$ 0,23

    11Rotation velocity reduction: Dust extraction system

    Door assembly plant

    Recalculation extraction system. Calibration

    extraction system 40 kW 2.000 US$ 25.247 US$ 0,08

    12Process Optimization: Cooling system press hydraulic

    unit

    Recalculation coolant flow for hydraulic oil. Pump

    replacement. 11 kW 2.500 US$ 6.943 US$ 0,36

    13Process Optimization: belt conveyors in coating line Unification in a drive system.

    8 kW 10.000 US$ 5.049 US$ 1,98

    14Process Optimization: Dryer fan Control system change. A variable-frequency drive

    (VFD) installation 100 kW 10.000 US$ 63.118 US$ 0,16

    15Process Optimization: Electrical motor efficiency study Oversized or under load motor changing

    15 kW 10.000 US$ 9.468 US$ 1,06

    16Process Optimization: ADI screen cleaning water

    pumps

    Piping modification, use only one pump7 kW 2.000 US$ 4.418 US$ 0,45

    17Process Optimization:

    Eliminate Z-Sifter & Forming using only one Pendistor

    Engineering study to eliminate one Pendistor & Z-

    Sifter 125 kW 50.000 US$ 78.898 US$ 0,63

    18Process Optimization: Compressed air equipment Operational air pressure decreasing, use a VFD air

    compressed equipment 38 kW 10.000 US$ 23.985 US$ 0,42

    19Process Optimization:

    Refiner main motor

    Change 1.6 MW motor for 2 x 250 kW in s eries

    motors 40 kW 25.000 US$ 25.247 US$ 0,99

    20Process Optimization:

    Several equipment rotation speed reducing

    A variable-frequency drive (VFD) installation55 kW 40.000 US$ 34.715 US$ 1,15

    21Alternative energy usage: from LPG oven to thermaloil oven

    From LPG oven change to thermal oil exchangeroven 80 kW 35.000 US$ 30.000 US$ 1,17

    22Process Optimization: water consumption reduction Water flow optimization

    5 kW 500 US$ 3.156 US 0.16

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    6/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 6

    Results of EE Program in Masonite Chile

    The results of an EE Program, must be clearly identified in the financial balance sheet of the

    company.

    An EE Program savings, usually have tangible results expressed in a reduction of the unitary cost of

    production. In the case of electric energy, there must be a diminishing in the recorded consumed

    energy and a reduction in the monthly electricity invoice. A representative from Finance area must

    verify and assess reported savings. An EE Program, however, not only delivers hard savings, but

    also gives soft savings, like improving environment and safety, equipment improved designs, lead

    time optimizing, organizational improvement, etc.

    For Masonite Chile, the EE program gave a US$666.626 savings for 2008 and a US$542.501 for

    2009 in electrical energy, US$30.000 additional saving in LPG fuel. The difference in the saving

    amount is due to the variation in the cost of the electrical energy for those years. (See the electric

    energy cost variation in appendix No.2)

    The following box plot charts show a reduction over 40% in the electrical energy consumption and

    a 20% decrease in the specific energy consumption (kW-hr/skin). These variables are the main

    metrics used in the result evaluation.

    201020092008200720062005200420032002

    2.5

    2.0

    1.5

    1.0

    0.5

    ElectricalEnergyGW-hr

    1.26 GW-hr

    1.03 GW-hr

    1.10 GW-hr

    1.56 GW-hr

    2.02 GW-hr2.10 GW-hr

    2.07 GW-hr

    1.92 GW-hr

    1.88 GW-hr

    Electrical Energy Consumption

    Chart No.1: Annual Electrical Energy Consumption

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    7/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 7

    The box plot chart N2 shows the energy consumed per produced unit (skin). A decrease

    of this factor during 2005, 2006 and 2007, is explained due to the high production level,

    reaching 7,4 million units for 2006, so the specific energy differs in comparison with a 4,9

    million units manufactured during 2009, so the use of specific energy significantlyimproved even with lower production. (See Annual Production appendix No.6)

    It is clear that operational continuity of a plant, improves the energy demand per

    produced unit. During 2008 and 2009, due to low sales and continuous press dressing

    changes, it was not possible to run continuously, nevertheless specific energy

    consumption still decreased.

    201020092008200720062005200420032002

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    SpecificEnergyConsumptionkW-hr/skin

    2.57

    2.72

    2.60

    3.063.31

    3.71

    4.104.154.92

    Specific Energy Consumption

    Chart No.2: Specific Energy Annual consumption

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    8/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 8

    Conclusions

    The principle saying that Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it can only be

    misused, fully applies to all projects carried out in Masonite Chile under the Energy

    Efficiency Program. Inefficient use of energy can be attributed to oversized equipment

    designs, unnecessary equipment, incorrect operational procedures, operational pressures

    and temperatures over requirements and technological updates of equipment.

    An EE Program is a task requiring continuous development, clear objective and actions

    which require joint participation of government, industry and educational area.

    Francisco Mora [email protected] (+56) (43) 404 400

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    9/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 9

    APPENDIX No.1

    Practical Cases Analysis

    Project ID : #16

    Type : Mechanical Power Transmission Process Optimization

    Name : Eliminate Z-Sifter & Forming using only one Pendistor

    Strategic Opportunity: Reduces energy consumption. Optimizes the process,

    reduces or eliminates equipments (fans) in z-sifter area and

    forming line.

    Project description

    The Z-Sifter is installed as an integrated part of the fiber transport system between the

    fiber bin and the forming stations (Pendistor).

    Z-Sifter was originally designed by the MDF industry for removal of foreign particles, such

    as resin lumps, latex and wood splinters from the fiber stream. It was also designed for

    separating fine and coarse fiber to feed two different forming stations.

    Also, two forming stations (Pendistor) were originally designed for our plant, one for fine

    fiber and the other one for coarse fiber.

    After numerous laboratory analysis (fiber length analysis), it was concluded that the Z-Sifter does not separate fibers and Pendistors had the same fiber quality.

    In the same way, after field tests, it was concluded that if we re-use the reject of the Z-

    Sifter, there is no quality problems.

    Justification.

    Z-Sifter is a very convenient system for MDF process, but not necessary for primed boards,

    primed hide foreign particles.

    Due to elimination of Z-Sifter and associated components, we expect to save energy,

    maintenance cost reduction and have extra spare parts such as frequency converters,

    electrical motors, fire detection components, fans, etc., coming from eliminated

    equipment.

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    10/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 10

    Process Diagram

    Original Improved

    Implementacin de las mejoras.

    Improvements implementation.

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    11/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 11

    Statistical verification of electrical energy savings

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    12/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 12

    Project ID : #18 - #19 - #20

    Type : Mechanical Power Transmission Process Optimization

    Name : Refiner main motor optimization. Compressed air equipment & fans

    optimization

    Strategic Opportunity: Reduce energy consumption.

    Project description

    The energy saving projects were developed in the refiner main motor, air compressor and

    fans.

    A speed-torque study and a starting timing for the 1,6 MW refiner main motor, was

    carried out. It is concluded that it is oversize in relation to real charge load. The alternative

    was replacing the 1,6 MW motor by a lower power capacity, matching the demands of the

    process. A solution to install two 250 kW motor, mechanically connected in series, is

    proposed and carried out.

    An analysis concerning real power (kW) and air flow (lt/s) consumption for the air

    compressors was carried out. The two originally installed air compressors, with an 802

    (lt/s) nominal air flow and a 294 kW installed power, were not working according to their

    nominal capacity, so working with only one compressor was enough. Additionally the

    alternative to acquire an air compressor including a VFD (90 kW @ 284 lt/s) came up,

    which was used to replace one of the old existing air compressors.

    Finally all improvements implemented allowed to reduce the operating air pressure from

    7.5 bar to 6.2 bar, thus reducing energy consumption.

    Installing VFD in the motor was the option taken for the process controlled by damper or

    throttle. Using VFD allows controlling fans or pumps rotation speed thus eliminating the

    pressure drop caused by damper action.

    Justification

    Reduction of energy consumption and maintenance costs

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    13/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 13

    Improvements implementation.

    Before After

    Energy consumption KW-hr.

    Before After Reduction

    Compressed air 63.653 34.440 46%

    Main motor 39.101 15.570 60%

    VFD 50.210 22.801 55%

    Total 155.829 73.269 53%

    Statistical verification of electrical energy savings.

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    14/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 14

    Appendix No.2

    Variation in the cost of electric energy

    The electric energy cost for Masonite Chile until end of 2006, was 50 US$/MW-hr,

    however from that date forward, the cost increased by 6 times by the end 2008 and has

    varied according to the attached chart that shows the marginal cost tariffs and spot

    pricing in the Chilean electric power sector in US$/MW-hr.

    The electric energy cost has decreased due to new power supplier contracts; however is

    still a main valuable input for our production.

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    Jun-05

    Ago-05

    Oct-05

    Dic-05

    Feb-06

    Abr-06

    Jun-06

    Ago-06

    Oct-06

    Dic-06

    Feb-07

    Abr-07

    Jun-07

    Ago-07

    Oct-07

    Dic-07

    Feb-08

    Abr-08

    Jun-08

    Jul-08

    Sep-08

    Nov-08

    Ene-09

    Mar-09

    May-09

    Jul-09

    Sep-09

    Nov-09

    Ene-10

    Mar-10

    May-10

    Jul-10

    Sep-10

    Nov-10

    US$/MW-hr

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    15/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 15

    Appendix No.3

    Methods of the generation of Energy Efficiency Program

    Previous actions:

    Update process flow diagrams (PI&D) Selection of EE work team Select a Project Leader who reports directly to the GM and define responsibilities of areas.1. Definition

    a. Making interdisciplinary meetingb. Establish clear and attainable objectivesc. Diagram analysis search process opportunities (VSM)d. Establish communication and information plane. Project planning (Gantt chart)f. Review progress of each stage

    2. Measurementa. Develop a plan for collecting data and information. (power consumed by areas

    and equipment, fuel consumption, etc.).

    b. Definition of a metric (kW-hr/units, kW, etc.)c. Defining a baseline against metrics (average monthly consumption, etc.).d. Review progress of each stage

    3. Analysisa. Identify, select and summarize the potential causesb. Prioritize the major causes (Pareto, FMEA)c. Identify and assess the impacts on processes because of the potential

    improvements

    d. Process capability analysise. Review progress of each stage

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    16/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 16

    4. Improvementsa. Development and evaluation of potential solutions for improvementb. Developing an implementation plan for improvementsc.

    Balances of the process and engineering studies

    d. Implement improvementse. Review progress of each stage

    5. Controla. Information transfer production linesb. Standard Operating Proceduresc. Controlling and monitoring plan and process variablesd. Statistical Controle. Feedback session of the teamf. Review progress of each stage

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    17/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 17

    ANEXO No.4

    Ideas for energy savings

    Thermodynamics Area

    Insulation of piping & equipment Insulating tanks and reactors Condensate steam recovering Regulatory purging of steam generators or boilers Analysis of amount of excess combustion air Continuous controls thermal efficiencies of equipment Review of the production process parameters (set point) Turning off equipment not in use Optimizing HVAC equipment Lightning Control Reducing processes operating temperatures Optimization of reverse osmosis plants Using alternative fuels

    Power transmission area

    oversized electric motors (less than 50% load) Control variable speed fans and pumps Changing transport system of raw materials (pneumatic conveyors systems for mechanical

    conveyors)

    Optimization of pneumatic conveying system Reduction of process pressures Reducing compressed air consumption Reducing process water consumption Improved suction pump system (pressure drop)

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    18/19

    Masonite Chile S.A. BestPractices Energy Efficiency

    F.M.A. March 2011 18

    Appendix No.5

    Energy Data Masonite Chile S.A.

    Installed electrical power : 6,271 MW.

    Energy Plant : 16,07 MW 13,84 Gcal/hr.

    The pie charts below shows the distribution of energy consumption in Masonite Chile

  • 8/6/2019 Best Practices Energy Effeciency Masonite Chile March 2011

    19/19