Upload
buimien
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Best Practice in Cardiac Best Practice in Cardiac Rehabilitation ReferralRehabilitation Referral::
Integration across the Integration across the continuum of carecontinuum of care
Sherry L. Grace, PhDAssociate Professor, York University
Scientist TGRI & Adjunct Scientist TRI
CRCARE: Cardiac RehabCare Continuity through Automatic Referral Evaluation
2
CR Use in the United StatesCR Use in the United States
Suaya et al., 2007. Circ.
3
CR Use in OntarioCR Use in Ontario
CCN CR Pilot Project; Suskin, Arthur et al. CJC.
4
The ProblemThe Problem• Under-utilization of CR• Due to a combination of factors:
1.Patients (preferences), 2.physicians (referral failure, encouragement,
time constraints),3.CR programs (distance, waits, hours)4.and the health care system (fragmentation, short
stays, funding)
5Pasquali, S. K., Alexander, K. P., Lytle, B. L., Coombs, L. P., & Peterson, E. D. (2001). Testing an intervention to increase cardiac rehabilitation enrollment after coronary artery bypass grafting. The American Journal of Cardiology, 88(12), 1415-1416, A6.
6
CR Referral ProcessCR Referral Process
7
Automatic ReferralAutomatic Referral
• DEF’N: –The implementation of standing
referral orders to CR based on eligible diagnoses supported by clinical practice guidelines
Fischer, 2008; JCN 23(6): 475
8
The Cardiac Continuum of CareThe Cardiac Continuum of Care
In-pt. Cardiac
Unit
PrimaryCare
Cardiac Rehab
Patient
9
CR Referral StrategiesCR Referral Strategies1. Liaison • Allied health professional talks to patients one-on-one
regarding CR (i.e., more interpersonal, less universal)2. Systematic Discharge Order Set/Pathway
a. Electronic • prompts to CR referral are electronically generated,
such as via electronic health records.b. Paper-based
• -Manual standard order, such as a discharge order set3. Usual care - referral to CR is at the discretion of the cardiac specialist
or other physician
Krepostman, Grace et al. 2005
“aut
omat
ic”
10
Liaison Referral Strategy: PT, NP, RN, PeerLiaison Referral Strategy: PT, NP, RN, Peer
11
eReferraleReferral StrategyStrategy
CR SITE
12
Safer Healthcare Now! AMISafer Healthcare Now! AMI
13
CRCARECRCARE: : CCardiac ardiac RRehab care ehab care CContinuity ontinuity through through AAutomatic utomatic RReferral eferral EEvaluationvaluation
• Study objective: to compare cardiac rehab enrollment following different referral strategies
• 5 yr study tracking pts from 11 hosps• Which referral strategy can optimize the number of
patients who enroll? – Automatic?
14
11 Participating Ontario Sites11 Participating Ontario Sites
St. Mary’s (KW)
Windsor Regional
Hotel Dieu-Grace
Sudbury RegionalWilliam Osler
Ottawa Heart
York Central
Sunnybrook
UHN
Hamilton Health Sciences
Trillium
15
MethodsMethods• Prospective, observational design
– Comparative effectiveness / quality improvement• ACS & revascularization inpatients recruited at all
participating sites• Clinical data extracted from charts• Patients completed baseline survey• Follow-up survey mailed 1 yr later
– Assesses self-reported CR utilization– We have data to show high concordance with CR site
report (Kayaniyil, Grace et al. CJC)
16
CRCARE Flow DiagramCRCARE Flow Diagram5781 CAD in-
patients approached from 11 hospitals
1537 ineligible N =2636 participants
62% response rate
1608 declined
N =1803 participants
79% retention
446 declined401 ineligible
Chart Extraction
In-Hospital Survey
1 YR Follow-up Mailed Survey
17
RESULTS: CR Utilization by Referral Strategy
•Pts referred to 1 of 52 CR programs•ps≤.001w GEE controlling for site
OR=12.8 OR=5.1 OR=3.1*86%
71%59%
32%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Automatic+ Liaison
Automaticonly
AlliedHealth /Liaison
Only
Usual
ReferralEnrolmt
So what is Best So what is Best Practice for integration Practice for integration across the cardiac care across the cardiac care
continuum?continuum?
19
AHA/ACC/AACVPR Performance MeasuresAHA/ACC/AACVPR Performance Measures
AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, Oldridge N, Piña IL, Spertus J, Bonow RO, Estes NA 3rd, Goff DC, Grady KL, Hiniker AR, Masoudi FA, Radford MJ, Rumsfeld JS, Whitman GR; AACVPR; ACC; AHA; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Sports Medicine; American Physical Therapy Association; Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation; European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation; Inter-American Heart Foundation; National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists; Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association; Society of Thoracic Surgeons.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1400-33.
20
21
Safer Healthcare Now! AMISafer Healthcare Now! AMI
22
CR Referral Policy In OntarioCR Referral Policy In Ontario
• GAP Tool / "Get with the Guidelines" - Best Practice for ACS
• Priority project for CCN for 2008/09 – Approved through the OMoHLTC– Rolled out at regional cardiac centres– Mandated to be implemented across province– Soon to be posted on CCN website
• All ACS patients ordered onto a clinical pathway – Discharge procedure and contract– Component of discharge care is an automatic referral to
cardiac rehab
23
UOHI ACS Clinical Pathway Excerpt: UOHI ACS Clinical Pathway Excerpt: CR ReferralCR Referral
http://www.ccpnetwork.ca/GWG/resources/ACS_Clinical_Pathway.pdf
24Sherrard & Kearns, CICRP June 2007
Ottawa Model: Pt Tool
25
ConclusionsConclusions• Automatic referral can result in significantly
greater CR enrollment– 3-13x greater– Can achieve 85% referral & 70% enrolment
• Gold standard = systematic + patient discussion• Presentation to participating sites has lead to
implementation of standard order sets and discussion on use of EPR to improve referral flow
• Discussions with CR programs re: handling increased pt volumes through evidence-based alternative program models
26
Cardiac Inpatients Cardiac Rehab & Chronic Disease
Management
Primary Care
ACS Gap/SHN!CR Barriers ScaleGeographic IssuesContinuity of Care
CR2DoC
Research Program: Understanding & Optimizing Post-Acute Cardiac Care & Recovery
CR Program Models
CR4HER Healthy Living in Community
CRCARECR Wait TimesCCS Position Statement
CR Registries & Dashboards
HFStroke
DM
Psychosocial Well-being
DepressionPosttraumatic GrowthInsomniaSocial Support
Vulnerable GroupsWomenLow SESRuralSouth Asian
PATIENTPROVIDERHEALTH SYSTEM
YU: Central LHIN = YCH, SouthlakeUHN: Global Impact
27
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements• Co-PI: Donna E. Stewart MD, UHN• Co-Investigators: Alter D., Rush J., Anand S.,
Williamson K., Harvey P., Oh P., Gupta M…. • Co-Authors: Kelly Russell, Terry Fair, Gilbert
Wu & Paul Oh• Research Assistants & Graduate Students
• Funding:
28
29
AHA GWTG ProgramAHA GWTG Program
GWTG is a national initiative of the AHA to improve guidelines adherence in patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease.
GWTG uses collaborative learning sessions, conference calls, e-mail and staff support to assist hospital teams improve acute and secondary prevention care systems.
A web-based Patient Management Tool is used for point of care data collection and decision support, on-demand reporting, communication and patient education
30
CR
Interactivelychecks patient’sdata with theAHA guidelines
SIMPLE, ONE PAGE, ON-LINE FORMSIMPLE, ONE PAGE, ON-LINE FORM
©2001 Outcome Sciences, Inc.
31
• N=45,988 pts from 92 US hospitals
• Significant increase (12.7%) in referral to CR following GWTG pathway implementation (p<0.0001)
• No control grp
LaBresh, K. A., Fonarow, G. C., Smith, S. C.,Jr, Bonow, R. O., Smaha, L. C., Tyler, P. A., et al. (2007). Improved treatment of hospitalized coronary artery disease patients with the get with the guidelines program. Critical Pathways in Cardiology, 6(3), 98-105.
Impact of AHA GWTGImpact of AHA GWTG--CAD Program on CAD Program on Quality of CareQuality of Care
32
AHA GWTG: CR Referral & EnrollmentAHA GWTG: CR Referral & Enrollment
n=2540%
n=46.1%
n=39255%
n=13934%
19% of total
GWTG PathwayN=714
CR Referral
CR Enrolment
Usual ReferralN=66
OR=2.3*
P=.08
Mazzini, M. J., Stevens, G. R., Whalen, D., Ozonoff, A., & Balady, G. J. (2008). Effect of an AHA GWTG program-based clinical pathway on referral and enrollment into CR after AMI. AJC, 101(8), 1084-1087.
•N = 780 AMI patients admitted to a single center during an 18-month period and discharged to home •Retrospective design
33
How Many Cardiac Patients Should How Many Cardiac Patients Should we Aim to Reach?we Aim to Reach?
UK:
Bethell et al., JPH 2006
34JACC 50(7): e100
35
Comparative Effectiveness of CR Comparative Effectiveness of CR Referral Strategies in OntarioReferral Strategies in Ontario
1. Automatic (paper or electronic) referral (n=3 wards)-prompts to CR referral are electronically generated, such as via
electronic health records.2. Liaison referral (n=7 wards)- Allied health professional talks to patients one-on-one
regarding CR (i.e., more interpersonal, less universal)3. Automatic referral + liaison (n=5 wards)- Manual standard order, such as a discharge order set4. Usual referral (n=2 wards)- referral to CR is at the discretion of the cardiologist or other
physician, signature required.