Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm
Benchmarking case for validation of draping software
K. Vanclooster, S.V. Lomov and I.Verpoest
K.U. Leuven - Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering
Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm
Benchmarking case for validation of draping software
� Thermoforming of woven reinforced compositeon “salami” shaped mould using different blank orientations
Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm
Benchmarking case for validation of draping software
� Measurement of the local shear profile of the formed composite
Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm
Benchmarking case for validation of draping software
� Compare shear angle measurements withkinematic mapping and FEM approach
� Kinematic
Largediscrepancy
Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm
Benchmarking case for validation of draping software
� FEM-simulation
Downloaded from http://www.mtm.kuleuven.ac.be/Research/C2/poly/index.htm
Benchmarking case for validation of draping software
� The mapping approach severely fails in predicting the fiber reorientation that occurs during forming.
� The mechanical simulation approach gives a fairly good prediction of the fiber reorientation and seems the most promising technique in having good draping simulations.
� The test results present a simple and distinctive benchmark for validation of any draping software