115
Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States December 2004 FDOT BC137- 43

Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

December 2004

FDOT BC137- 43

Page 2: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No.

NCTR - 527 - 03 FDOT BC137-43

2. Government Accession No.

3. Recipient's Catalog No.

5. Report Date

December 2004 4. Title and Subtitle

Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States 6. Performing Organization Code

7. Author(s)

Perk, Victoria; and Kamp, Nilgün 8. Performing Organization Report No.

10. Work Unit No.

9. Performing Organization Name and Address

National Center For Transit Research (NCTR) University of South Florida CUT 100 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620

11. Contract or Grant No.

DTRS98-G-0032 13. Type of Report and Period Covered

12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Research and Special Programs (RSPA) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 20590 Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS 26, Tallahassee, FL 32399

14. Sponsoring Agency Code

15. Supplementary Notes

Supported by a Grant from the USDOT Research and Special Programs Administration, and the Florida Department of Transportation 16. Abstract

Benchmarking is a well-established practice among public and private entities that are interested in improving their performance. Benchmarking allows agencies to measure their own performance against other similar agencies, assuming that similar types of data are maintained to allow for meaningful comparisons. The benchmarking practice also allows agencies to measure their own progress over time. Transit agencies do maintain considerable data that are required by the federal government in order to receive federal funds. These data could provide the foundation for meaningful benchmarks of performance to be established, which would help transit agencies realize “where they stand” in the industry. However, at this time there is no effort to utilize these data on a national basis that is universally regarded as constructive by the transit industry. Part of the problem is that transit agencies do operate in different economic and geographic environments with different policy goals, making broad comparisons of system performance misleading.

17. Key Words

public transit, National Transit Database (NTD); transit performance measures; benchmarking; peer analysis

18. Distribution Statement

Available to the public through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650, http://www.ntis.gov/, and through the NCTR web site at http://www.nctr.usf.edu/.

19. Security Classif. (of this report)

Unclassified

20. Security Classif. (of this page)

Unclassified 21. No. of pages

45

22. Price

Form DOT F 1700.7

Page 3: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

State of Florida D Pub 605 Tallaha ( P

Plan

National Cen

Center for Urba Univer 4202 E. F Tamp ( Project Staff: Victo Nilgü Meli

The opinions, findings and conclusionauthors and not necessarily those of tof Florida Department of Transporta

epartment of Transportation lic Transit Office

Suwannee Street ssee, FL 32399-0450 850) 414-4500

roject Manager: Tara Bartee

ning Administrator

ter for Transit Research n Transportation Research

sity of South Florida owler Avenue, CUT 100 a, FL 33620-5375

813) 974-3120

ria A. Perk, Senior Research Associate n Kamp, Senior Research Associate

ssa Salzler, Research Assistant

s expressed in this publication are those of the he U.S. Department of Transportation or the State tion.

Page 4: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

BENCHMARK RANKINGS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS IN THE UNITED STATES

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1

RELEVANT LITERATURE ............................................................................................. 2

SUMMARY OF INPUT FROM ADVISORY COMMITTEE & OTHERS........................... 7

INITIAL BENCHMARK DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................... 10

Source of Data............................................................................................. 10 Peer Group Selection ................................................................................... 10 Initial Benchmarks ....................................................................................... 12

Scoring Procedure .................................................................................... 13 Results of Initial Benchmarking.................................................................... 14

Southeast (SE) Region............................................................................... 14 Northeast (NE) Region .............................................................................. 19 Midwest (MW) Region ............................................................................... 24 Southwest (SW) Region ............................................................................. 29 Northwest (NW) Region............................................................................. 36 Largest Transit Systems in the U.S............................................................ 39

CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................ 42

REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 44

APPENDIX A – LIST OF DEFINITIONS..................................................................... A-1

APPENDIX B – DETAILED DATA TABLES .............................................................. B-1

ii

Page 5: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

List of Tables

TABLE 1: Geographic Groups for Peer Comparisons............................................................11 TABLE 2: Initial Benchmarking Criteria..............................................................................12 TABLE 3: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group A............................................14 TABLE 4: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group B............................................15 TABLE 5: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group C............................................16

TABLE 6: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group D ...........................................18 TABLE 7: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group A ...........................................19

TABLE 8: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group A(1).......................................19

TABLE 9: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group B ...........................................20

TABLE 10: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group C .........................................21

TABLE 11: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group D .........................................23

TABLE 12: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group A........................................24

TABLE 13: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group A(1) ...................................25

TABLE 14: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group B........................................26

TABLE 15: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group C........................................27

TABLE 16: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group D .......................................28

TABLE 17: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group A ........................................30

TABLE 18: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group A(1) ....................................30

TABLE 19: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group B ........................................31

TABLE 20: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group C ........................................32

TABLE 21: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group D ........................................33

TABLE 22: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group E.........................................35

TABLE 23: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group A ........................................36

TABLE 24: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group B ........................................37

TABLE 25: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group B(1)....................................37

TABLE 26: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group C ........................................38

TABLE 27: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group – (> 500 Vehs)...............................39

TABLE 28: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group – (> 1000 Vehs).............................40

TABLE 29: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group – (< 1000 Vehs).............................41

iii

Page 6: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

iv

Page 7: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

INTRODUCTION As part of its National Center for Transit Research (NCTR) Program, the Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) has been working with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to conduct analyses regarding benchmark rankings of U.S. transit systems. Benchmarking is a well-established practice among public and private entities that are interested in improving their performances. Benchmarking allows agencies to measure their own performances against other similar agencies, assuming that similar types of data are maintained to allow for meaningful comparisons. The benchmarking practice also allows agencies to measure their own progress over time. Transit agencies do maintain considerable data that are required by the federal government in order to receive federal funds (the National Transit Database, or NTD). These data could provide the foundation for meaningful benchmarks of performance to be established, which would help transit agencies realize “where they stand” in the industry. However, at this time there is no effort to utilize these data on a national basis that is universally regarded as constructive by the transit industry. Part of the problem is that transit agencies operate in different economic and geographic environments with different policy goals, making broad comparisons of system performance misleading. This study aimed to develop a method of measuring commonly maintained performance statistics in a manner that is broadly acceptable to the transit industry, and thereby provide useful information that helps agencies improve their performance over time. In the course of this study, CUTR reviewed previous research that ranked transit agencies or otherwise studied transit performance measurements. Strengths and weaknesses of these studies were evaluated. Also, this study benefited from guidance in the form of an advisory committee composed of representatives of transit agencies and the transit industry throughout the United States. With assistance from the study advisory committee, CUTR used existing NTD information to develop comparative measures that can allow transit agencies to measure their own performance against relative peers. Suggestions in the selection of an appropriate peer group are provided (e.g., geographical location, agency size, service area population size, etc.). In addition, a variety of categories are established (e.g., service availability, quality of service, cost efficiency, etc.), along with a simple index system, that provide transit agencies with an instant means of comparison for their fixed-route motorbus services. This report first discusses existing literature on the subject of transit performance, and then summarizes input obtained from the study advisory committee and other representatives of the

1

Page 8: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

transit industry. This information is followed by a description of the selection of peer groups and performance measurement categories developed for this study, along with the results for the fixed-route motorbus service of all transit systems that operate this mode in the United States (as of 2001). Finally, conclusions are presented along with suggestions for future refinements of the process developed herein.

RELEVANT LITERATURE The first task of this study was to examine some of the literature related to transit performance measurement and rankings. This section summarizes that literature. One of the more well-known and controversial reports is Hartgen’s and Horner’s Compa ative Performance of Major U.S. Bus Transit Systems: 1988—1995 (1997). This report uses NTD data, and ranked the performance of the 127 largest urban bus operators in the country. The transit agencies were categorized into six groups using American Public Transportation Association (APTA) definitions for mode and population served. The groups are:

r

Multi-modal, serving over 2 million persons Multi-modal, serving between 500,000 and 2 million persons Bus only, serving over 2 million persons Bus only, serving between 500,000 and 2 million persons Bus only, serving between 250,000 and 500,000 persons Bus only, serving less than 250,000 persons.

Twelve measures were used to rank the transit agencies, and were chosen to measure the resources available to operate service, the amount of service provided, and the resulting utilization of the service. Measures commonly used in the transit industry were targeted. To determine system performance, the authors computed the ratio of each system’s statistics to the overall mean of the statistic. This yielded 12 ratios for each operator, for each year. The overall system ratio was then computed as the average of these 12 ratios, and the 127 systems were ranked according to this overall performance ratio, with the best performing systems having the lowest ratios. The systems were also ranked within their own peer groups. Some of the criticism of this study included that there was no industry consensus or agreement on the measures that were used, that inconsistencies in the data exist, and that systems have different goals, regional demographics, and regional economies. The authors do not believe that geographic or size differences affect their results. Their top-rated systems were those with lower-than-average costs and subsidies, low fares, high relative ridership, and area-targeted

2

Page 9: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

service. The authors did acknowledge that their findings did not shed light on the reasons why apparently similar systems differed so much in performance. Hartgen and Collins also performed a similar analysis in 1996 (Comparative Per ormance of Transit Systems is Valuable but Con roversial), using 108 of the largest urban bus operators and reviewing their performance from 1988 to 1993.

ft

In the Winter 2002 issue of Transportation Quarterly, Hartgen and Neumann engaged in a Point/Counterpoint Exchange on performance. Key points included the comparison of performance measurements used in the private sector versus the public sector. In the private sector, performance measures are reinforced by clear, quantifiable objectives that tend to be widely agreed upon among firms and their ownership. In transportation agencies in the public sector, some broad agreement has been reached on appropriate measures of performance; however, there is less consensus regarding objectives, many of which are not easily quantified and can tend to vary over time even within the same agency. For example, policies change, political leadership changes, and objectives/measures must reflect these changes. Another key point from the Hartgen/Neumann discussion is that the existence of performance measures alone cannot guarantee effective change or improved performance. To be truly effective, performance measures must be integrated into the ongoing planning, management, and decision-making processes of agencies. Other studies have explored the performance measurement and ranking of transit systems. A Transit Performance Index was developed by APTA (1998), which suggested using NTD information to highlight a set of performance indicators that evaluate resource utilization and transit output, including:

Cost per passenger mile Cost per seat mile Load factor In-service productivity (passenger miles per driver).

APTA’s study explains that these measures can be used directly to compare systems, assess changes over time, and identify potential sources of improvement for a given system. To resolve the difficulty in understanding the relationship among the measures and the inter-city comparisons, a model was constructed to transform the key measures into an index between 0 and 1 (with the best performers near 1 and the worst performers near 0). With this index system, different agencies can be compared. Factors that are unique to cities of various sizes can be identified and accounted for in the index. Rey, Perk, and Thompson conducted annual performance reviews, including trend and peer analyses, over a period of several years for the FDOT. The last complete report was the 2000

3

Page 10: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Performance Evaluation of Florida’s Transit Systems (CUTR, 2000). In this study, the performance of each transit system in Florida was compared against itself over a 16-year period and against peer systems for the most recent year complete NTD data were available. Fixed-route and demand-response modes were considered separately. The peer selection process developed by Rey, Perk, and Thompson, was tailored to Florida and therefore was concentrated in the Southeastern U.S. Systems were first selected based on the number of vehicles operated in maximum service, and then further analyzed based on seven additional indicators:

Passenger trips Revenue miles Revenue hours Average speed Total operating expense Service area population Service area population density.

Using a simple scoring system based on the standard deviations from the Florida means for each measure, the peer groups were formed. The peer groups were then analyzed using several NTD-based indicators and measures, divided into three categories: general performance indicators, which consisted of absolute values obtained directly from the NTD; effectiveness measures, which indicate the extent to which various service-related goals are being achieved and are developed from the performance indicators (vehicle miles per capita, passenger trips per revenue mile, etc.); and efficiency measures, which involve reviewing the level of resources (labor or cost) required to achieve a given level of output and are also developed from the performance indicators (operating expense per passenger trip, maintenance expense per revenue mile, farebox recovery, etc.). This study simply presented the transit systems’ data along with the peer group means; the intent was not to explicitly rank systems. The study’s authors indicated that performance evaluation based solely on NTD information will not directly measure several relevant considerations such as passenger satisfaction with regard to levels of service, public attitudes toward the agency, employee morale, quality of planning, contributions to economic development, air quality improvements, or other goals that may be important to an agency. In addition, this type of performance review does not measure several aspects of quality of service such as vehicle cleanliness and comfort, operator courtesy, on-time performance, quality of marketing and passenger information support, and level of satisfaction with hours of operation, frequency of service, and geographic coverage of service. It should be noted that the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 100, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Second Edi ion (Kittelson & Associates, Inc., et. al., 2003) includes a framework t

4

Page 11: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

designed to measure several of these quality of service characteristics from the transit passenger’s point of view. Chu, Fielding, and Lamar created single measures of efficiency and effectiveness for peer groups (1992). Two peer groups were included, one serving large metropolitan areas and the other serving small cities and large towns. The efficiency measure was a function of annual revenue hours divided by the sum of weighted annual vehicle operating expenses, maintenance expenses, general/administrative expenses, and other expenses. The effectiveness measure was a function of annual unlinked passenger trips divided by the sum of weighted annual revenue hours, urbanized area population density, proportion of households without automobiles, and annual financial assistance per passenger. The results showed that a transit system might be relatively efficient but ineffective, and vice versa. Chu also evaluated six alternative approaches to creating a transit performance index (1996), including:

Average Performance Approach—ranks transit systems based on their average performance across a set of performance dimensions (used by Hartgen, for example).

Best Performance App oach—ranks systems by what they do best, and assumes that a system’s priority objective is the one for which it achieves the most.

r

r

Worst Performance Approach—is the opposite of the Best Performance Approach, and ranks systems with respect to the objective for which they achieve the least.

Stated Objective App oach—ranks systems by their priority objective obtained from a system survey, and addresses the issue of a system not being able to achieve its priority objective due to external constraints.

Stated Priority Approach—ranks systems by a weighted average of their performance across a set of performance dimensions (or categories), with the weights derived from a survey of systems.

Total Performance Approach—ranks systems based on how they rank on individual dimensions, and overcomes the potential problem encountered by the previous methods of results being dominated by dimensions that show wide variation across systems.

Other studies have addressed the issue of transit performance more broadly. For example, accurate estimates of transit service area population are essential if an agency uses measures that incorporate density or per-capita data. Horner and Murray investigated issues of spatial representation of potential transit riders using geographic information systems (GIS). The authors concluded that the best estimates are those obtained suing block-group level data based on the location of transit stops. The Transit Performance Monitoring System (TPMS) was designed to collect data on transit customers through an ongoing, systematic program of on-board surveys (McCollom, et. al.). It

5

Page 12: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

resulted from an effort by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to develop and test a plan for collecting data on transit benefits that could be implemented by transit systems at minimal cost. The TPMS involved 14 standard on-board survey questions, and implementation in conjunction with NTD surveys. Some of the results included the following:

Low-income users represent a larger percentage of users at small transit systems (61%) than in medium (51%) or large (40%) systems.

Work trips are a greater percentage of transit trips in large systems (58%) than in small systems (33%).

There are more choice riders in medium (39%) and large (42%) systems than in small systems (33%).

In terms of policy objectives, mobility is most important in smaller systems. In terms of congestion management, on average, 79% of riders are associated with

this objective (large shares of riders associated with this objective in larger systems and in rail services of multi-modal systems).

The National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis Report 238 addresses performance measures in state departments of transportation (Poister, 1997). The report notes Washington DOT’s transit mobility index (which was under development), which is intended to be able to track the availability, connectivity, and affordability of both fixed-route and paratransit services in the state’s counties. The report found that, in terms of public transit operating, ridership, and financial statistics, most of the measures tracked by state DOTs are the same as those used by individual agencies. The amount of service provided is typically measured by vehicle miles/hours, or revenue miles/hours. Overall capacity can be measured by the number of seat-miles operated. Labor productivity is often measured by revenue hours per employee (or vehicle operator, or maintenance employee). Vehicle productivity is also sometimes monitored, in terms of measures including vehicle hours/miles per vehicle. Indicators of service quality may include on-time performance, and measures incorporating breakdowns and collisions. Many state DOTs track the number of passenger trips per vehicle hour/mile as a measure of overall transit system productivity. Passenger trips per capita can be a measure of the need for (or importance of) public transportation in a given service area. The cost per passenger trip is a standard measure of cost-effectiveness. Also, most state DOTs compare farebox recovery across transit systems and over time. NCHRP Report 446, A Guidebook for Performance-Based Transportation Planning (Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 2000) provides an ideal summary for this literature review. It indicates that no two performance-based planning processes will be exactly alike. This is because agencies across the country have different organizational needs to satisfy, different types and levels of resources, and unique local and regional issues to consider. These differing needs, resources, and issues affect the environments in which transit agencies operate and make it difficult to

6

Page 13: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

develop a performance review/ranking process that can reveal the true relative performance of these agencies throughout the country.

SUMMARY OF INPUT FROM ADVISORY COMMITTEE & OTHERS As part of this study, input was gathered from an advisory committee consisting of transit industry representatives from around the United States. In addition, others with relevant experience also provided input. Those willing to share ideas and opinions were informed that the intent of this study is to develop a method of measuring commonly-maintained performance statistics in a manner that is broadly acceptable to the transit industry, and to provide useful information that helps agencies improve their performance over time. It was also noted that this particular study’s scope was limited to NTD data representing the fixed-route motorbus mode. There are several national ranking studies available in various industries. Typically, these studies provide a resource for customers to make more informed decisions. In the case of transit, such a study could target a national audience, the media, the industry policy-makers, or it could target individual agencies either focusing on information for management or the oversight board. Committee members were asked about any thoughts on where the greatest need and prospect for added value would be, and whether trend or peer analyses would be most appropriate. Members of the committee responded that one of the major current issues in transit is the balance between ridership and cost-effective service with a reasonable farebox return. Support was voiced for the use of both trend and peer analyses. It was thought that there needs to be a way for agencies to compare and contrast themselves with one another, and that the study should include several peer groups with a detailed set of measurement criteria. It was noted that the most challenging part of this effort would be in the appropriate selection of peers. One member indicated the importance of benchmarking at the local level so agency management and governing boards can determine where a transit system stands relative to its peers and itself over time. Advisory committee members were also asked if they had any opinions as to whether any study, regardless of methodology, would be embraced by the transit industry. The general consensus is that it will be difficult to get the industry to accept any methodology used for performance measurement. Peer comparison, if done well, is not simple. Previous studies have tended to focus on a single measure or small set of measures, and the committee members do not believe that such studies produce meaningful and useful results. There has always been a

7

Page 14: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

level of resistance to performance rankings, and the low-ranked agencies, especially, will always argue that the studies are inherently flawed or biased in some manner. According to the committee, the argument that all systems are different is often used, and may be valid, but it is not supported in most other industry comparisons. One member stated that the transit industry should have standards or benchmarks that practitioners and managers can use to identify areas that are strong and areas that are weak. In most cases, transit managers succumb to political pressures to run clearly inefficient service instead of making decisions that will result in optimal efficiency and use of available resources. Without a national or industry standard, transit agencies operate in a vacuum with no comparative accountability for efficient operations. Committee members were asked if there are any types of measures that they believe strongly should be included or excluded. Some members provided a list of measures used at their agency. For example, one member noted that the measures provided do well at explaining the “overall picture,” are easy to understand, and others can see the analogy in other industries (most of the measures provided by this member are included in the methodology presented later in this report). One noted that caution should be used in applying cost-per-employee measures, because different agencies outsource different functions, and comparisons would not be meaningful. Another member noted that, because transit agencies often cannot conduct “business” as a private entity would, it is necessary to evaluate transit agencies against their particular constraints, and keeping in mind other various goals of a public service. For example, farebox recovery might not be the best indicator for agencies required to keep lower fares or operate routes with low ridership. Others cautioned against the aggregation of measures for multi-modal agencies, which could reduce the usefulness of results. When asked their opinions on the number of measures that can be usefully absorbed, responses were varied. Some believed a large number of measures should be used, with the research focused on “tell(ing) the story” rather than just assembling large amounts of data. Others believed the number of measures used should not exceed six to ten. Some committee members expressed reservations about using NTD data for benchmarking in this study. It is clear that some NTD requirements necessitate agencies to compile data differently from their internal accounts. Also, some noted limitations in the accuracy of NTD information, and that some agencies remain inconsistent in their reporting despite experience and the validation process. Committee members were informed that this relatively small study would begin with NTD data, and the results would make apparent any need for revisions or additional types of data that could be explored in further research. Other types of data suggested include cost of living, regional wage rates, and the consumer price index (CPI) to normalize wage and/or benefit information.

8

Page 15: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

At least one of the committee members was not in favor of using peer comparisons. However, this study examines the establishment of peer groups. In categorizing transit agencies into peer groups, committee members indicated that common variables such as population (actual service area population, as defined by a ¾-mile route buffer), population density, geographic region, agency size (in terms of vehicles operated and/or operating budget), and other fleet information might be used. Modes operated, governance structure, and contracting information might also be incorporated. Other variables not derived from the agency itself such as climate, labor market information, cost of living, and transit-dependency levels could also be appropriate (some of these variables would be at least partially addressed by looking at geographic regions). Overall, committee members advised that any type of benchmarking or peer comparison study, such as this one, should not be considered an end in itself. The data used alone are never sufficient without further explanation and analysis. Results of such efforts are best used as a starting point for fully understanding the performance of a particular agency. They can also be presented to the industry and policy-makers as comparative information on how well their transit dollars are being utilized, and can make transit governing boards more accountable for the decisions they make and the priorities they set. It is hoped that the industry will welcome this effort.

9

Page 16: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

INITIAL BENCHMARK DEVELOPMENT Based on a review of previous transit performance/ranking analyses, input from the study advisory committee, and the scope of services prepared for this study, CUTR developed an initial transit benchmarking system incorporating several measures from the National Transit Database for all NTD reporters in the U.S. that operate fixed-route motorbus. Initial sets of peer groups were also established. This section of the report outlines how the peer groups were selected, which measures were chosen for inclusion in the benchmarking, and the derivation of the results. It should be noted that the process described herein is not considered to be “finished.” It is anticipated that this process will evolve as future research efforts allow deeper analysis and further refinements.

Source of Data This study is limited to the NTD data. Data were compiled using a relatively new tool called the Florida Transit Information System (FTIS) prepared for FDOT by the Lehman Transportation Center at Florida International University. This software tool contains a database with NTD information dating back to 1984, with 2001 being the most current report year available. While additional, more detailed information is available with this tool for Florida transit systems (such as precalculated measures and geographic information systems, or GIS, capabilities), data compiled directly from the NTD report forms are available for every transit system in the U.S. All data used in this benchmarking study (unless otherwise noted) are report year 2001 NTD data compiled from the latest available version of the FTIS at the time this report was written.

Peer Group Selection According to previous studies, advisory committee input, and CUTR’s past experience with transit performance evaluation, it is clear that the appropriate selection of peers is one of the most important tasks in this benchmarking study, yet it is also one of the most difficult. It is the goal of this study to allow for comparisons among transit systems that have some similarities, rather than compare all transit systems across the country with each other. Factors including climate, population characteristics, and cost of living issues have an effect on the environment in which a transit agency operates. It was beyond the scope of this study to collect detailed data such as that mentioned previously for all transit systems; however, grouping first by geographic region does address some of the issues related to climate, populations, and costs. Table 1 shows how fixed-route transit agencies in different states were initially grouped.

10

Page 17: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 1: Geographic Groups for Peer Comparisons Southeast Southwest Midwest Northeast Northwest

Alabama Arkansas Florida Georgia Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Virginia West Virginia

Arizona California Colorado Hawaii Nevada New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Utah

Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Michigan Minnesota Missouri Nebraska North Dakota Ohio South Dakota Wisconsin

Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Maine Maryland Massachusetts New Hampshire New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Rhode Island Vermont

Alaska Idaho Montana Oregon Washington Wyoming

Once placed into their respective geographic groups, the transit systems were further divided based on the following variables, obtainable from the NTD (for the fixed-route motorbus mode):

Service area population Service area population density Total Operating Expense Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Annual Total Vehicle Miles.

Service area population and density provide information on the size of the area served while operating expense, vehicles operated, and vehicle miles convey information on the size of the system. Operating expense, vehicles operated, and vehicle miles were compiled for fixed-route motorbus service only (directly-operated and purchased services). From the ranges for each of the above variables, a mean and standard deviation were calculated. This information was used to generate a simple scoring system based on whether an agency’s value for a variable was within one standard deviation of the mean, between one and two standard deviations above than the mean, or greater than two standard deviations above the mean. For each transit system a composite score was computed as the sum of the five individual scores for the variables being considered. Then, the mean and standard deviation of the composite scores were calculated to provide break points for the peer groups. In general, for each geographic region, peer groups were determined based on whether the transit systems’ scores were greater than one standard deviation above the mean, above the mean but within one standard deviation, or below the mean. This analysis was performed again on the transit systems that fell below the mean of the original composite scores to break

11

Page 18: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

them down into two additional peer groups per geographic region. In some instances, closer inspection of the group results indicated that, due to an unusually high score on one of the measures in the selection criteria, an agency needed to be re-categorized into the next group (either above or below). Approximately 10 transit agencies were re-categorized in this way. In some cases, the very largest systems in each geographic region (such as New York City Transit, Chicago Transit Authority, etc.) did not have other comparable systems within their regions. As such, 20 of the largest systems from around the country were also put into a separate group and compared among themselves.

Initial Benchmarks The measures selected for this benchmarking process were determined based on the other studies that were reviewed, input from the advisory committee and others, and CUTR’s past experience conducting similar performance analyses. A total of 37 measures were used, which are listed in Table 2. As Table 2 indicates, some measures are absolute values (revenue miles, passenger trips, etc.), while others are ratios derived from these absolute values (passenger trips per capita, revenue miles per route mile, etc.). Several comparisons were completed, some using all 37 measures and some using just the ratios. The results presented in this report were generated from a composite index of the 23 measures shown in italics in Table 2. Appendix A provides a list of definitions for the measures shown in Table 2. Table 2: Initial Benchmarking Criteria

Service Supply/Availability Service Consumption Quality of Service

Revenue Miles Revenue Hours Vehicle Miles Vehicle Hours Total Operating Expense Revenue Miles per Route Mile Average Weekday Span of Service

Passenger Trips Passenger Trips per CapitaPassenger Trips per Revenue Mile Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour Passenger Miles

Average Speed Number of Vehicle System Failures Revenue Miles Between FailuresNumber of Collisions Revenue Miles Between CollisionsAverage Headway

Cost Efficiency Operating Ratios Vehicle Utilization

Operating Expense per Capita

Vehicle Maintenance Expense Non-Vehicle Maintenance Expense General/Administrative Expense Operating Expense per Revenue Hour Vehicle Maint. Exp. per Operating Exp.Non-Veh. Maint. Exp. per Operating Exp.Gen./Admin. Exp. per Operating Exp.

Farebox RecoveryLocal Revenue per Operating Expense*

Peak Vehicles Total Vehicles Vehicle Miles per Peak Vehicle Vehicle Hours per Peak Vehicle Revenue Miles per Vehicle Mile Revenue Miles per Total VehiclesRevenue Hours per Total VehiclesRevenue Miles per Peak Vehicle Spare Ratio

*System total measure NOTE: Benchmarking results shown later in this report were derived from a composite of the measures shown in italics.

12

Page 19: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Scoring Procedure All data used in this analysis were compiled from the FTIS (2001 NTD data) and imported into Microsoft Excel. For each peer group, the mean and standard deviation of the transit agencies’ values for each of the measures shown in Table 2 were computed. Each transit agency received a score for each measure based on the following relatively simple method:

2 points if the agency’s value was greater than 2 standard deviations above the mean. 1.5 points if the agency’s value was between 1 and 2 standard deviations above the

mean. 1 point of the agency’s value was within 1 standard deviation above the mean. 0.75 point if the agency’s value was within 1 standard deviation below the mean. 0.5 point is the agency’s value was between 1 and 2 standard deviations below the

mean. 0 points if the agency’s value was greater than 2 standard deviations below the mean.

By awarding 1 point to an agency whose value for a particular measure was within one standard deviation above the mean, and only 0.75 point if the agency’s value was within one standard deviation below the mean, a slight weight is given to being greater than the average of those in the group. No other weights were introduced to the procedure in this initial phase. Composite scores were calculated for each transit agency, and then the agencies in each group were ranked by their composite scores in descending order. Agencies with higher scores would be considered the better performers in their respective group. Because group means and, subsequently, scores, were calculated separately for each peer group, composite scores cannot be compared outside of a given peer group (that is, Miami-Dade Transit’s composite score should not be compared to Central Ohio Transit Authority’s score, or that for Tallahassee Transit). Composite scores can only be compared within each peer group analysis. Several composite scores were calculated in each peer group. For example, a composite score was calculated using all 37 measures from Table 2, and one was calculated using only the 23 measures in italics from the same table. Results based on the latter score are presented in the next section of this report. In addition, composite scores were computed for each of the six subcategories from Table 2 so that the transit agencies can be compared on the basis of, for instance, service consumption or cost efficiency alone. The composite scores from the subcategories can also be used to help explain a transit agency’s particularly high or low overall composite score. For example, an agency may have a low overall composite score in its peer group, but closer inspection of the subcategory results may show it performs very well in one or two areas, but has relatively worse performance in other areas, thus compressing its overall score. Using the 23 measures, composite scores could have a range between 0 and 46.

13

Page 20: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Results of Initial Benchmarking This section of the report details the results of the initial benchmarking process. Results are shown for each of the peer groups developed in each geographic region (southeast, northeast, midwest, southwest, and northwest). In addition, results are shown for a peer group containing the largest transit systems in the U.S. Benchmark rankings are presented using the composite score of the 23 measures shown in italics in Table 2. For each group examined, a brief discussion of the results is included, although further analysis beyond what is revealed by the NTD data is not provided. It should be noted that all information is for the fixed-route motorbus mode. Directly-operated and purchased transportation data were combined for those measures that are reported for purchased transportation service; where noted, data represent directly-operated service only. Appendix B provides detailed data tables for all transit agencies reviewed in this report.

Southeast (SE) Region The Southeast (SE) Region includes a total of 95 transit agencies in the following states:

Alabama Mississippi Arkansas North Carolina Florida South Carolina Georgia Tennessee Kentucky Virginia Louisiana West Virginia

The transit agencies in this region were divided into four separate peer groups, using the methodology discussed previously. Table 3 shows the results for the SE Region Group A. Table 3: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group A

Transit Agency Composite Score

Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority (Lynx) – FL 23.25

Regional Transit Authority of Orleans and Jefferson – LA 21.50

Broward County Mass Transit Division – FL 20.50

Miami-Dade Transit – FL 19.25

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority – GA 19.25

Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads – VA 15.50

14

Page 21: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

The composite scores in Table 3 exclude the measure of revenue miles between collisions, because there were no data available in FTIS for the Regional Transit Authority of Orleans and Jefferson for the number of collisions. The most noticeable result in Table 3 is the relatively low score for the Transportation District of Hampton Roads. Further examination of the scores for the subcategories of measures shows this agency to be comparably weak in most areas, but very strong in cost efficiency. The data also show that, based on the peer selection criteria for this study, this agency does belong in this particular peer group. Just for informational purposes, Transportation District of Hampton Roads was reviewed in the SE Region Group B, and it appeared third from the bottom out of 19 transit agencies. Table 4 lists the results of the next group in this region, Group B, which contains 18 agencies. Table 4: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group B

Transit Agency Composite Score

Lee County Transit – FL 24.25

City of Kingsport – TN 24.00

Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority – FL 23.00

Capital Transportation Corporation – LA 23.00

Palm Tran, Inc. – FL 22.50

Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority – NC 22.25

Jacksonville Transportation Authority – FL 22.00

Greater Richmond Transit Company – VA 22.00

City of Alexandria, Alexandria Transit Company – VA 21.75

Charlotte Area Transit System – NC 20.75

Fairfax Connector Bus System – VA 20.50

Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky – KY 20.25

Petersburg Area Transit – VA 19.75

Memphis Area Transit Authority – TN 19.50

Transit Authority of River City – KY 19.25

Metropolitan Transit Authority – TN 19.25

Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority – FL 18.50

Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority – AL 15.00

Lee County Transit and the City of Kingsport are the best performers in this peer group, despite the fact that these two transit agencies are fourth-last and second-last, respectively, in the subcategory of service consumption, and they are second-last and last, respectively, in the subcategory of operating ratios (which includes farebox recovery and local revenue as a percent of operating expense). However, Lee County and Kingsport perform well in every other subcategory, with Lee County being the best in terms of vehicle utilization, and third-best in

15

Page 22: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

cost efficiency, and Kingsport being the best in service supply and cost efficiency. The agencies with the lowest scores in Table 4 are Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority and Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority. In all subcategories, Hillsborough ranks in the middle to lower part of the group. Birmingham-Jefferson is last in three subcategories (service supply, quality of service, and vehicle utilization). Closer inspection of the peer selection criteria used in this study confirms that Birmingham-Jefferson should be in this group. Table 5 shows results from the next group, SE Region Group C, which contains 27 agencies. Table 5: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group C

Transit Agency Composite Score

Durham Area Transit Authority – NC 24.00

Albany Transit System – GA 23.25

Charleston Area Regional Transportation – SC 22.75

Shreveport Area Transit System – LA 22.75

South Carolina Electric & Gas Company-Columbia – SC 22.50

Chatham Area Transit Authority – GA 21.75

Central Arkansas Transit Authority – AR 21.50

Gainesville Regional Transit System – FL 21.25

Chapel Hill Transit – NC 21.00

Kanawha Valley Regional Transportation Authority – WV 21.00

Sarasota County Transportation Authority – FL 20.75

Transit Authority Lexington- Fayette Urban County Government – KY 20.75

Jefferson Parish Department of Transit Administration – LA 20.25

Winston-Salem Transit Authority - Trans-Aid of Forsyth County – NC 20.00

Greensboro Transit Authority – NC 19.50

Knoxville Transportation Authority – TN 19.50

Capital Area Transit – NC 19.25

Cobb Community Transit – GA 19.00

County of Volusia dba: VOTRAN – FL 19.00

City of Tallahassee-TALTRAN – FL 18.75

Metro Transit – AL 18.75

Augusta Richmond Co. Transit Dept – GA 18.50

Escambia County Area Transit – FL 18.50

Greater Roanoke Transit Company – VA 18.50

Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority – TN 17.75

Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission – VA 17.25

Space Coast Area Transit – FL 17.00

16

Page 23: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

The composite scores listed in Table 5 do not include the measure of revenue miles between vehicle system failures. Six of the transit agencies in this peer group operate purchased motorbus services only, and so failures are not reported in the NTD (these six agencies are: Charleston Area Regional Transportation, Cobb Community Transit, Greensboro Transit Authority, Jefferson Parish Department of Transit Administration, Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission, and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company-Columbia). The two best performers in SE Region Group C are Durham Area Transit Authority and Albany Transit System. Despite ranking second-last in the subcategory of quality of service, Durham performs well in the other areas, ranking fourth-best in cost efficiency and best in vehicle utilization. Albany was strong in the subcategories of cost efficiency and the operating ratios, placing third-best in each, and was tied for best in the subcategory of vehicle utilization with Durham. Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission and Space Coast Area Transit placed at the bottom of this peer group. Potomac and Rappahannock ranked high in the subcategories of quality of service and the operating ratios, but ranked low in the subcategories of service consumption and cost efficiency (placing last in the latter subcategory). Space Coast appeared in the middle of the group in most subcategories but placed last in service consumption and second-last in vehicle utilization. Space Coast does have a unique service area geography that may help explain its performance in this peer group. However, when Space Coast was placed in the next peer group, Group D, it ranked 40th out of 45 transit agencies. Table 6, on the following page, shows the results of the initial benchmarking within the SE Region Group D, the last group in this region. Group D contains 44 transit agencies. The best performers in this group are the City of Fairfax CUE Bus and Okaloosa County Transit. Those ranked near the bottom of this group are Polk County Transit Services, Lee-Russell Council of Governments, and Indian River County. It must be noted that the composite scores for this group do not include measures incorporating failures or collisions, due to a lack of data for several transit agencies in this group. The City of Fairfax performs well in most of the subcategories, and is best in service supply. However, Fairfax did rank near the bottom of the group for the subcategory of quality of service (which, in this group, only contains the measures for average speed and average headway). Okaloosa County performs best in the group for cost efficiency, and is ranked near the top for the operating ratios. However, Okaloosa County ranked in the middle of the group for most of the other subcategories, and was second-last in service consumption. Polk County, Lee-Russell, and Indian River County were the three transit agencies with the lowest composite scores in this group. Polk ranked near the bottom in most subcategories but was near the top in terms of cost efficiency. Lee-Russell’s strongest subcategories were quality

17

Page 24: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

of service and cost efficiency, where it ranked near the top of the group. Indian River was sixth-best in cost efficiency, but ranked near the bottom of the group in most other subcategories, placing last in terms of service supply, and second-last in quality of service. Table 6: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group D

Transit Agency Composite

Score Transit Agency

Composite Score

City of Fairfax CUE Bus – VA 23.25 Greenville Transit Authority – SC 19.00

Okaloosa County – FL 22.00 Athens Transit System – GA 18.75

Clarksville Transit System – TN 21.75 City of Rome Transit Department – GA 18.75

Department of Transportation/METRA – GA

20.75 Loudoun County Commuter Bus Service – VA

18.75

Jackson Transit Authority – TN 20.75 High Point Transit – NC 18.50

Wilmington Transit Authority – NC 20.75 Johnson City Transit System – TN 18.50

Lafayette Transit System LTS – LA 20.50 City of Alexandria – LA 18.25

Lakeland Area Mass Transit District – FL 20.50 City of Danville Mass Transit System – VA

18.25

Pasco County Public Transportation – FL 20.50 Fayetteville Area System of Transit – NC

18.25

SunTran – FL 20.50 Mid-Ohio Valley Transit Authority – WV 18.25

Bay County Council On Aging - Bay Coordinated Transportation – FL

20.25 Tuscaloosa County Parking and Transit Authority – AL

18.25

City of Key West - Department of Transportation – FL

20.25 City of Jackson Transit System – MS 18.00

Manatee County Area Transit – FL 20.25 City of Monroe Transit System – LA 18.00

Mississippi Coast Transportation Authority – MS

20.25 Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government – LA

18.00

City of Huntsville Department of Parking & Public Transit – AL

19.75 The Tri-State Transit Authority – WV 18.00

James City County Transit – VA 19.75 Pee Dee Regional Transportation Authority – SC

17.50

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville/Razorback Transit – AR

19.75 Santee Wateree Regional Transportation Authority – SC

17.50

Charlottesville Transit Service – VA 19.50 CRPTA - Waccamaw Regional Transportation Authority – SC

17.00

Greater Lynchburg Transit Company – VA 19.50 Montgomery Area Transit System – AL 17.00

Ohio Valley Regional Transportation Authority – WV

19.50 Polk County Transit Services Division – FL

16.75

Spartanburg Transit System – SC 19.50 Lee-Russell Council of Governments – AL

16.50

Asheville Transit Authority – NC 19.25 Indian River County Council on Aging, Inc. – FL

16.00

18

Page 25: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Northeast (NE) Region In this analysis, the Northeast (NE) Region includes a total of 107 transit agencies in the following states:

Connecticut New Hampshire Delaware New Jersey District of Columbia New York Maine Pennsylvania Maryland Rhode Island Massachusetts Vermont

The transit agencies in this region were divided into four separate peer groups, using the methodology discussed previously. Table 7 shows the results for the NE Region Group A. Table 7: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group A

Transit Agency Composite Score

New York City Transit – NY 25.25

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority – PA 22.25

New Jersey Transit Corporation (Consolidated) – NJ 22.25

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – MA 21.00

Port Authority of Allegheny County – PA 19.75

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC 19.50

GTJC – NY 19.50

Maryland Transit Administration – MD 18.75

Because New York City Transit is so much larger than the other systems in this peer group (as well as the entire country), this group was analyzed without it; results are shown in Table 8. Table 8: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group A(1)

Transit Agency Composite Score

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority – PA 23.50

New Jersey Transit Corporation (Consolidated) – NJ 23.25

GTJC – NY 21.00

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – MA 21.00

Port Authority of Allegheny County – PA 21.00

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC 19.75

Maryland Transit Administration – MD 18.50

19

Page 26: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

It is clear from Tables 7 and 8 that the results are not significantly different when New York City Transit is excluded from the analysis. The best performer in the group is the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), and the agency with the lowest composite score is the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA). In terms of the measures used in this study, New York City Transit is strong in all subcategories except cost efficiency. SEPTA is strong in vehicle utilization, and MTA’s low rank in quality of service and vehicle utilization accounted for its relatively low composite score in both Tables 7 and 8. Table 9 presents the results of NE Region Group B, which consists of 14 transit agencies. Despite ranking last in the subcategory of service consumption, Suburban Transit Corporation is first overall in this group, largely due to ranking best in terms of cost efficiency and vehicle utilization. Delaware Transit Corporation and Queens Surface Transportation had relatively low scores in this group. Delaware Transit appeared in the middle of the group for most subcategories, but finished last in quality of service and the operating ratios. Queens Surface Transportation ranked second-best in terms of service consumption, but ranked last in the group in terms of service supply and cost efficiency. Table 9: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group B

Transit Agency Composite Score

Suburban Transit Corporation – NJ 26.00

Academy Lines, Inc. – NJ 23.50

Ride-On Montgomery County Government – MD 23.50

Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. – NJ 23.25

Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority dba MTA Long Island Bus – NY 22.00

Liberty Lines Transit, Inc. – NY 21.75

New York Bus Tours, Inc., dba New York Bus Service – NY 21.00

Connecticut Transit-Hartford Division – CT 21.00

Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc. – NY 20.75

Capital District Transportation Authority – NY 20.50

Regional Transit Service, Inc. and Lift Line, Inc. – NY 20.00

Rhode Island Public Transit Authority – RI 20.00

Delaware Transit Corporation – DE 18.00

Queens Surface Corporation – NY 17.75

On the following page, the results of NE Region Group C are shown in Table 10. This peer group contains a total of 25 transit agencies.

20

Page 27: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 10: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group C Transit Agency Composite Score

Olympia Trails Bus Co., Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 25.25

Trans-Bridge Lines, Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 22.50

Trans-Hudson Express c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 22.00

Private Transportation – NY 20.00

City of Long Beach – NY 19.75

Worcester Regional Transit Authority – MA 19.50

York County Transportation Authority – PA 19.25

Pioneer Valley Transit Authority – MA 19.25

Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority – CT 19.25

Rockland Coaches, Inc. – NJ 19.25

Connecticut Transit-New Haven Division – CT 19.00

CNY Centro, Inc. – NY 19.00

Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 19.00

Red Rose Transit Authority – PA 19.00

Transit Express – MA 18.75

New Jersey Transit Corporation – NJ 18.75

Transport of Rockland – NY 18.75

Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. - -NY 18.75

Private One of New York LLC, d.b.a. New York Airport Service – NY 18.25

Liberty Lines Express, Inc. – NY 18.00

Southeastern Regional Transit Authority – MA 17.75

Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority – PA 17.50

DeCamp Bus Lines c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 17.50

Westchester County Department of Transportation – NY 16.75

Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority – PA 16.50

Due to several transit agencies not having complete NTD data for vehicle failures and/or collisions, the composite scores in Table 10 do not include the measures of revenue miles between failures and revenue miles between collisions. Olympia Trails Bus Co., Trans-Bridge Lines, and Trans-Hudson Express, all part of NJ Transit, are the best performers in this peer group. Olympia Trails had the highest score, and is ranked best in terms of service supply and vehicle utilization, but is not as strong in terms of service consumption and cost efficiency. Trans-Bridge lines ranked best in quality of service, while Trans-Hudson ranked best in service consumption.

21

Page 28: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Westchester County Department of Transportation and Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority had the lowest scores in NE Region Group C. Further examination of the subcategory scores can provide insight into these results. Westchester ranked last in the group in terms of quality of service and cost efficiency, but ranked best in the operating ratios and was strong in terms of vehicle utilization. Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in each of the subcategories of measures. Table 11, on the following page, presents the initial benchmarking results of the last peer group in the NE Region, which is Group D. This peer group, one of the largest in this report, contains 60 mostly small and medium-sized transit agencies in the NE Region. Once again, because of a lack of data on failures and collisions for several systems in this group, composite scores listed in Table 11 do not include the measures of revenue miles between failures and revenue miles between collisions. The best three performers in this peer group are Orange-Newark-Elizabeth, Inc. and South Orange Avenue IBOA, both affiliated with NJ Transit, and Putnam County Transit. Both Orange-Newark-Elizabeth and South Orange Avenue IBOA ranked near the top of the group in all subcategories except cost efficiency, where the ranked near the bottom (South Orange Avenue actually ranked last). The three transit agencies with the lowest scores in Table 11 are Western Maine Transportation Services, Inc., G G & C Bus Company, Inc., and Cape Ann Transportation Authority. Western Maine ranked in the middle to lower part of the group for most all subcategories, ranking lowest in cost efficiency. Similarly, G G & C and Cape Ann both ranked in the lower part of the group in most subcategories. G G & C ranked last in quality of service and Cape Ann ranked last in vehicle utilization.

22

Page 29: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 11: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group D

Transit Agency Composite Score Transit Agency Composite

Score

Orange-Newark-Elizabeth, Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ

26.50 City of Nashua Nashua Transit System – NH

18.75

Putnam County Transit – NY 24.50 New Britain Transp. Co. Inc. (1047)–CT 18.75

South Orange Avenue IBOA c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ

24.00 Middletown Transit District – CT 18.75

Clarkstown Mini-Trans – NY 23.25 Berks Area Reading Transp. Auth. – PA 18.50

Howard Transit c/o Corridor Transp – MD 23.25 Village of Spring Valley Bus – NY 18.50

Community Transit, Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ

22.25 Norwalk Transit District – CT 18.25

Greater Glens Falls Transit System – NY 22.00 Centro of Cayuga, Inc. – NY 18.25

Lafeyette-Greenville IBOA c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ

22.00 Southeast Area Transit – CT 18.25

Connecticut Transit-Stamford Div. -- CT 21.25 TransIT Svcs of Frederick Count – MD 18.25

Centre Area Transp. Authority – PA 21.00 Merrimack Valley Reg Transit Auth–MA 18.00

Monsey New Square Trails Corp. – NY 21.00 T-Tran – NY 18.00

Dutchess Cty. Div. of Mass Transp – NY 20.75 Huntington Area Rapid Transit – NY 18.00

Greater Hartford Transit District – CT 20.50 Manchester Transit Authority – NH 18.00

Milford Transit District – CT 20.50 Beaver County Transit Authority – PA 18.00

Greater Attleboro-Taunton Regional Transit Authority – MA

20.25 Centro of Oswego, Inc. – NY 18.00

Chemung County Transit System – NY 20.25 Montachusett Reg Transit Auth – MA 18.00

Leisure Line c/o NJT, Carrier Admin. – NJ 20.25 Connecticut Dept. of Transp. – CT 17.75

Greater Portland Transit District – ME 20.25 Utica Transit Authority – NY 17.75

Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit – NY 20.00 Cty of Lackawanna Trans. System – PA 17.75

Harford County Transp. Services – MD 19.75 Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority 17.75

Broome Cty Dept. of Public Transp. – NY 19.50 Northeast Transp. Company, Inc. – CT 17.50

Chittenden County Transp. Auth. – VT 19.50 Washington County Transp Dept – MD 17.25

Luzerne County Transp. Auth. – PA 19.25 Cambria County Transit Authority – PA 17.25

Williamsport Bureau of Transp. – PA 19.25 Lowell Regional Transit Authority – MA 17.00

City of Bangor – ME 19.25 New Britain Transp. Co. Inc. (1052)–CT 17.00

Housatonic Area Regional Transit – CT 19.25 Altoona Metro Transit – PA 16.00

Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority – PA 19.00 Cape Cod Regional Transit Auth. – MA 16.00

Westmoreland County Transit Auth. – PA 19.00 Western Maine Transp Svcs, Inc. – ME 15.50

Brockton Area Transit Authority – MA 18.75 G G & C Bus Company, Inc. – PA 14.75

Annapolis Department of Transp. – MD 18.75 Cape Ann Transp. Auth – MA 14.75

23

Page 30: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Midwest (MW) Region For this benchmarking analysis, the Midwest (MW) Region includes a total of 105 transit agencies in the following states:

Illinois Missouri Indiana Nebraska Iowa North Dakota Kansas Ohio Michigan South Dakota Minnesota Wisconsin

Following the peer selection methodology discussed previously, the transit agencies in this region were divided into four separate peer groups. Tables 12 and 13 show the results for the MW Region Group A, which contains 11 of the largest transit agencies in the region. Due to its size in comparison with the other transit agencies in this region, Chicago Transit Authority is included in Table 12, but is not included in the results in Table 13 (on the following page). Table 12: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group A

Transit Agency Composite Score

Chicago Transit Authority – IL 27.75

Milwaukee County Transit System – WI 23.50

Pace, Suburban Bus Division – IL 23.25

Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation – MI 22.25

City of Detroit Department of Transportation – MI 21.50

The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority – OH 20.00

Bi-State Development Agency – MO 19.75

Metro Transit – MN 19.50

Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority – OH 19.25

Kansas City Area Transportation Authority – MO 19.25

Central Ohio Transit Authority – OH 18.50

24

Page 31: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 13: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group A(1)

Transit Agency Composite Score

Milwaukee County Transit System – WI 27.50

Pace, Suburban Bus Division – IL 23.25

City of Detroit Department of Transportation – MI 22.50

Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation – MI 21.75

The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority – OH 20.75

Metro Transit – MN 20.75

Bi-State Development Agency – MO 20.00

Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority – OH 19.25

Kansas City Area Transportation Authority – MO 19.25

Central Ohio Transit Authority – OH 18.75

Table 12 shows Chicago Transit Authority to be the best performer in the group, which might be expected given its size relative to the other agencies in the group. Chicago performed well in all subcategories, with its lowest ranking in quality of service (still in the middle of the group). Milwaukee County Transit System is the best performer when Chicago Transit Authority is not considered. Upon closer examination of the subcategories of performance measures, Milwaukee ranked high in terms of service consumption, cost efficiency, and vehicle utilization, but ranked lower in terms of quality of service. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, Kansas City Area Transportation Authority, and Central Ohio Transit Authority had the lowest overall composite scores in this group. While Kansas City and Central Ohio are two of the smaller transit agencies in this group, it should be noted that Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation is similarly sized, but ranked much higher. Southwest Ohio was very strong in terms of cost efficiency, but ranked last in vehicle utilization. Kansas City ranked in the middle to lower part of the group for most subcategories but was very strong in terms of quality of service. Central Ohio ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in all subcategories, but did not have one or more areas in which it performed well enough to boost its score. Table 14, on the following page, presents the results of the next group in this region, MW Region Group B. This group consists of 10 transit agencies. It should be noted that the composite scores shown in Table 14 do not include the measure of revenue miles between failures, because the Metropolitan Council is a purchased-transportation service and failures are not reported in the NTD.

25

Page 32: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 14: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group B

Transit Agency Composite Score

Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation – IN 22.50

Miami Valley Regional Transit Authority – OH 22.00

Capital Area Transportation Authority – MI 21.75

Madison Metro Transit – WI 20.25

Mass Transportation Authority – MI 20.25

Interurban Transit Partnership – MI 20.00

Transit Authority of Omaha – NE 19.50

Metropolitan Council – MN 19.50

Metro Regional Transit Authority – OH 19.00

Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority – OH 18.50

As shown in Table 14, Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation is the best performer in this group, based on the analysis used in this report, while Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority has the lowest composite score. Interestingly, both Indianapolis and Toledo are in the middle of the group in terms of service consumption and cost efficiency. However, Indianapolis ranked second-best in terms of both service supply and vehicle utilization. Toledo ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in most subcategories of measures. The next group in this region, MW Region Group C, contains 30 transit agencies. Its results are listed in Table 15 on the following page. Due to a lack of data on vehicle system failures for several transit agencies in this group, the composite scores in Table 15 do not include the measure of revenue miles between failures. According to Table 15, University of Michigan Parking and Transportation Services and Stark Area Regional Transit Authority have the highest overall composite scores in this group. University of Michigan ranked best in the subcategories of service supply and service consumption, and was also strong in cost efficiency. Stark ranked best in terms of vehicle utilization, and ranked well in the other subcategories except service consumption, where it was one of four transit agencies with the lowest score in the group. Five Seasons Transportation and Springfield Mass Transit District have the lowest composite scores in this group, as shown in Table 15. Both transit agencies ranked in the middle to lowest parts of the group in all subcategories of measures.

26

Page 33: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 15: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group C Transit Agency Composite Score

University of Michigan Parking and Transportation Services – MI 26.25

Stark Area Regional Transit Authority – OH 24.00

Belle Urban System-Racine – WI 23.25

Southwest Missouri State University – MO 23.25

Lorain County Transit – OH 23.00

Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District – IL 22.25

LaCrosse Municipal Transit Utility – WI 21.25

Madison County Transit District –IL 21.00

Butler County Regional Transit Authority – OH 21.00

Wichita Transit – KS 20.25

Campus Bus Service – OH 20.25

Pekin Municipal Bus Service – IL 20.25

South Bend Public Transportation Corporation – IN 20.00

Greater Peoria Mass Transit District – IL 19.75

Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation – IN 19.75

Kalamazoo Metro Transit System – MI 19.50

Ann Arbor Transportation Authority – MI 19.25

Waukesha County Transit System – WI 19.25

Gary Public Transportation Corporation – IN 19.25

Greater Lafayette Public Transportation Corporation – IN 19.00

Muncie Indiana Transit System – IN 19.00

Duluth Transit Authority – MN 18.75

Western Reserve Transit Authority – OH 18.75

Rock Island County Metropolitan Mass Transit District – IL 18.75

StarTran – NE 18.75

Kenosha Transit – WI 18.25

Des Moines Metropolitan Transit Authority – IA 18.00

Green Bay Metro – WI 17.75

Five Seasons Transportation – IA 17.25

Springfield Mass Transit District – IL 16.75

On the following page, Table 16 presents the results for the 54 transit agencies in MW Region Group D, the last group in this region. Group D represents most of the smaller transit agencies in this region. With several agencies lacking NTD data for vehicle failures and/or collisions, the composite scores in Table 16 do not include measures derived from these two variables.

27

Page 34: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 16: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group D

Transit Agency Composite Score Transit Agency Composite

Score

Heart City Rider/Goshen Transit – IN 24.00 City of Holland Macatawa Area Express – MI

19.00

University of Iowa – IA 22.75 Ozaukee County Transit Services – WI 19.00

Brunswick Transit Alternative – OH 22.75 City of Appleton-Valley Transit – WI 18.75

City Utilities of Springfield Transit Services – MO

22.50 City of Newark Transit Operations – OH 18.75

Eau Claire Transit System – WI 21.75 Columbia Transit System – MO 18.75

City of Anderson Transportation System – IN

21.50 Sioux Falls Transit – SD 18.50

Rockford Mass Transit District – IL 21.00 Sheboygan Transit System – WI 18.50

Iowa City Transit – IA 21.00 Johnson County Transit – KS 18.00

Lawrence Transit System – KS 20.75 Richland County Transit – OH 18.00

Metropolitan Evansville Transit System – IN

20.50 Blue Water Area Transportation Commission – MI

18.00

Oshkosh Transit System – WI 20.50 Janesville Transit System – WI 18.00

Rapid Transit System – SD 20.50 LAKETRAN – OH 17.75

Fort Wayne Public Transportation Corporation – IN

20.25 Twin Cities Area Transportation Authority – MI

17.75

City of Rochester, Minnesota – MN 20.25 Hammond Transit System – IN 17.25

St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission – MN

20.25 Decatur Public Transit System – IL 17.25

City of Jackson Transportation Authority – MI

20.00 Wausau Area Transit System – WI 17.25

Davenport Public Transit – IA 19.75 Springfield City Area Transit – OH 17.00

Fargo Metropolitan Area Transit – ND 19.75 Saginaw Transit Authority Regional – MI

16.75

Bloomington-Normal Public Transit System – IL

19.50 Portage Area Regional Transportation Authority – OH

16.75

Bettendorf Transit System – IA 19.50 East Chicago Transit – IN 16.75

Grand Forks City Bus – ND 19.50 Battle Creek Transit – MI 16.75

Sioux City Transit System – IA 19.50 City of Beloit Transit System – WI 16.75

Topeka Metropolitan Transit Authority – KS

19.25 City of Moorhead-Transit – MN 16.75

Waukesha Transit Commission – WI 19.25 Muskegon Area Transit System – MI 16.50

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Black Hawk County – IA

19.25 Terre Haute Transit Utility – IN 16.00

St. Joseph Transit – MO 19.25 Bay Metropolitan Transportation Authority – MI

15.75

Middletown Transit System – OH 19.00 City of Dubuque-KeyLine – IA 15.25

28

Page 35: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Further examination of the subcategory scores can be used to help explain the results shown in Table 16. Heart City Rider/Goshen Transit, University of Iowa, and Brunswick Transit Alternative had the highest composite scores in this group. Heart City Rider performed best in terms of cost efficiency and vehicle utilization, but ranked low in terms of service consumption. University of Iowa ranked best in service supply and service consumption, but ranked lowest in terms of the operating ratios, mainly as a result of a low farebox recovery ratio, which can be expected for a university transit system that often has low or free fares (University of Iowa reported low passenger fare revenues). Brunswick Transit Alternative ranked low in terms of service supply and service consumption, but ranked very high in terms of quality of service, operating ratios, and vehicle utilization. Bay Metropolitan Transportation Authority and City of Dubuque—Key Line had the lowest composite scores in this group. Both transit agencies ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in all subcategories of measures, but ranked lowest in terms of service supply.

Southwest (SW) Region The Southwest (SW) Region includes a total of 110 transit agencies in the following states:

Arizona New Mexico California Oklahoma Colorado Texas Hawaii Utah Nevada

Using the peer selection methodology discussed previously, the transit agencies in this region were divided into five separate peer groups. Table 17, on the following page, shows the results for the SW Region Group A, which contains 9 of the largest transit agencies in the region, including Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Due to its size in comparison with the other transit agencies in this group, LACMTA is included in Table 17, but is not included in the results in Table 18 (on the following page).

29

Page 36: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 17: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group A Transit Agency Composite Score

San Francisco Municipal Railway – CA 25.00

City and County of Honolulu Dept of Transportation Services – HI 23.50

Orange County Transportation Authority – CA 23.25

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County – TX 21.50

Regional Transportation District – CO 21.50

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District – CA 21.50

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – CA 21.00

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority – CA 19.00

Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority – TX 18.75

Table 18: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group A(1)

Transit Agency Composite Score

San Francisco Municipal Railway – CA 25.50

Orange County Transportation Authority – CA 22.75

City and County of Honolulu Dept of Transportation Services – HI 22.75

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District – CA 21.75

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County – TX 21.25

Regional Transportation District – CO 21.00

Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority – TX 19.50

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority – CA 18.50

Both Table 17 and Table 18 show San Francisco Municipal Railway (which directly-operates motorbus services), to be the best performer in this group. Both tables also indicate that Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority have the overall lowest composite scores in this peer group. From closer inspection of the results in Table 17, LACMTA ranked high in the subcategories of service supply and service consumption, as well as the operating ratios. However, LACMTA ranked lower in terms of quality of service. San Francisco Municipal Railway, upon examination of the subcategory measures, ranked the best in the group in terms of service supply and service consumption, and was strong in vehicle utilization. Dallas and Santa Clara ranked in the middle to lower part of the group for most of the subcategory measures; however, Dallas ranked the best in the group in terms of the

30

Page 37: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

operating ratios. Both Dallas and Santa Clara ranked solidly in the middle of the peer group in terms of vehicle utilization. Table 19 below presents the initial benchmarking results of the next group in this region, SW Region Group B. This group consists of 8 transit agencies from this region. Table 19: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group B

Transit Agency Composite Score

RTC of Southern Nevada – NV 25.25

San Diego Transit Corporation – CA 21.25

First Transit, Inc. (6057) – TX 20.50

VIA Metropolitan Transit – TX 20.50

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority – TX 19.75

City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation – CA 19.25

City of Phoenix Public Transit Department – AZ 18.50

San Mateo County Transit District – CA 16.50

The scores in Table 19 show that RTC of Southern Nevada is the strongest performer in this group, while San Mateo County Transit District has the lowest overall score. Further examination of the subcategory scores shows that both RTC and San Mateo have the same scores for service supply, placing them in the middle of the group; however, RTC ranks near the top in terms of service consumption while San Mateo ranks near the bottom. Also, RTC’s high overall composite score was due, in part, to its very high score in the subcategory of vehicle utilization. RTC ranked best in the group in terms of vehicle utilization, while San Mateo ranked the lowest. The next group in this region is SW Region Group C. Results for this group are shown on the following page in Table 20. SW Region Group C includes 18 transit agencies. As shown in the table, there is more than one transit system operated by Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., and First Transit, Inc. These transit systems are differentiated by their NTD identification numbers, which are the four-digit numbers in parentheses. In addition, the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority in this peer group represents the purchased motorbus services operated for LACMTA under a separate NTD identification number. It should also be noted that the composite scores shown in Table 20 do not include the measure of revenue miles between failures, due to a lack of data on vehicle system failures for several transit agencies in this group.

31

Page 38: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. (9178), which operates in El Monte, California, ranked the best in this group. Laidlaw (9178) ranked the best in the subcategories of quality of service and the operating ratios, and was strong in the other subcategories. Another system operated by Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., (NTD #9158) which operates in Santa Ana, California, had one of the lowest scores in this group. This system ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in most subcategories but ranked the best in the group in terms of cost efficiency. Finally, Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation Authority and Fort Worth Transportation Authority had the two lowest composite scores in the group. Golden Gate did rank near the top in terms of service supply and quality of service. Fort Worth ranked in the lower part of the peer group in most of the subcategories of measures. Table 20: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group C

Transit Agency Composite Score

Laidlaw Transit Services Inc. (9178) – CA 25.25

Long Beach Public Transportation Company – CA 22.50

Santa Monica's Big Blue Bus – CA 22.25

Mass Transit Department-City of El Paso – TX 22.00

North San Diego County Transit Development Board – CA 22.00

San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board – CA 21.75

OMNITRANS – CA 21.75

First Transit, Inc. (6087) – TX 21.25

Riverside Transit Agency – CA 20.50

City of Tucson – AZ 20.50

Sun Tran of Albuquerque – AZ 19.50

First Transit, Inc. (9179) – CA 19.25

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – CA 18.50

Sacramento Regional Transit District – CA 18.25

Central Contra Costa Transit Authority – CA 18.00

Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. (9158) – CA 17.50

Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District – CA 17.25

Fort Worth Transportation Authority – TX 15.50

32

Page 39: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 21 below summarizes the results of the next group, SW Region Group D. A total of 27 transit agencies form this peer group. Composite scores in this group exclude the measure of revenue miles between failures due to a lack of NTD data on vehicle system failures from several agencies. Table 21: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group D

Transit Agency Composite Score

Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County – NV 24.25

Culver City Municipal Bus Lines – CA 24.00

City of Vallejo: Vallejo Transit Vallejo-San Francisco Ferry – CA 24.00

Laredo Metro, Inc. – TX 23.25

UNITRANS University of California, Davis – CA 22.50

Fresno Area Express – CA 22.00

Norwalk Transit System – CA 21.75

Montebello Bus Lines – CA 21.50

City of Gardena Transportation Department – CA 21.50

Golden Empire Transit District – CA 21.50

Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District – CA 21.50

Santa Clarita Transit – CA 21.50

County of San Diego Transit System – CA 20.50

City of Tempe Transportation Planning & Transit Division – AZ 20.25

South Coast Area Transit – CA 20.00

Regional Public Transportation Authority – AZ 19.75

Colorado Springs Transit System – CO 19.00

Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority – CA 18.75

Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District – CA 18.50

Monterey-Salinas Transit – CA 18.50

Sonoma County Transit – CA 18.50

Central Oklahoma Transit & Parking Authority – OK 17.75

City of Torrance Transit System – CA 17.75

Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority – OK 17.75

Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority – TX 17.25

SunLine Transit Agency – CA 17.25

San Joaquin Regional Transit District – CA 15.25

According to the results in Table 21 above, the Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County has the highest overall composite score in this peer group, while San Joaquin Regional

33

Page 40: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Transit District has the lowest. Closer examination of the subcategory scores provides some insight into these results. Washoe County ranks at the top of the group in terms of service supply, while San Joaquin ranks at the bottom. San Joaquin also ranks lowest in the group in terms of vehicle utilization, while Washoe County ranks best in this subcategory. Both transit agencies place in the middle of the group in terms of cost efficiency and the operating ratios. The final group in this region is SW Region Group E, which contains 48 of the smaller transit agencies in the southwest region. Table 22, on the following page, provides the initial benchmarking results of this group. It should be noted that, due to a lack of NTD data on vehicle system failures and collisions from several agencies in the group, the composite scores listed in Table 22 do not include the measures of revenue miles between failures and revenue miles between collisions. The City of Lodi, National City Transit, Beaumont Transit System, and The Logan Transit District have the best composite scores in this group. All four are strong in the subcategories of service supply and service consumption. The City of Lodi ranked best in the group in terms of vehicle utilization. National City was strong in most subcategories, but ranked low in terms of quality of service and cost efficiency. Beaumont also was strong in most subcategories, ranking third-best in vehicle utilization, but it ranked relatively low in the operating ratios. Finally, Logan’s strongest subcategory is service consumption, where it ranked second-best in the group. Santa Fe Trails, Waco Transit System, and the Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council have the lowest composite score in this group. Santa Fe ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in each subcategory, and ranked last in terms of vehicle utilization. Waco ranked in the lower part of the group in each subcategory. Lower Rio Grande also ranked in the lower part of the group in most subcategories, including having the lowest score in quality of service; however, this transit agency was relatively strong in terms of cost efficiency and the operating ratios.

34

Page 41: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 22: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group E

Transit Agency Composite Score Transit Agency Composite

Score

City of Lodi – CA 24.00 Livermore/Amador Valley Transit Authority – CA

19.00

National City Transit – CA 23.50 Chico Area Transit System City of Chico – CA

19.00

Beaumont Transit System – TX 23.25 City of Union City Transit Division – CA 19.00

The Logan Transit District – UT 23.00 Amarillo City Transit – TX 18.75

Island Transit – TX 22.25 Pueblo Transit – CO 18.50

City of Mesa – AZ 22.00 City of Greeley-Transit Services – CO 18.25

Western Contra Costa Transit Authority – CA

21.75 Santa Maria Area Transit – CA 18.25

Victor Valley Transit Authority – CA 21.50 City of Fairfield, Fairfield/Suisun Transit – CA

18.00

City Transit Management Company, Inc. – TX

21.25 City of San Angelo – TX 18.00

Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority – CA

21.25 Yuba-Sutter Transit Authority – CA 18.00

Yolo County Transportation District – CA 21.00 City of Denton Public Transportation Department – TX

17.75

Merced County Transit – CA 21.00 Mesa County – CO 17.75

City of Santa Rosa – CA 20.75 Roseville Transit – CA 17.75

Antelope Valley Transit Authority – CA 20.50 Thousand Oaks Transit c/o City of Thousand Oaks – CA

17.75

Modesto Area Express – CA 20.25 City of Scottsdale - Scottsdale Connection – AZ

17.50

Simi Valley Transit – CA 20.25 Abilene Transit System – TX 17.50

City of Commerce Municipal Buslines – CA 20.00 Brazos Transit District – TX 17.50

Redding Area Bus Authority – CA 20.00 Hill County Transit District – TX 17.25

Transfort – CO 20.00 Port Arthur Transit – TX 17.25

City of Visalia-Visalia City Coach – CA 19.75 City of Lompoc-Lompoc Transit – CA 16.50

City of Napa Napa Valley Transit/ The V.I.N.E. – CA

19.75 City of Glendale – Transit – AZ 16.25

City of Brownsville Brownsville Urban System – TX

19.50 Santa Fe Trails - City of Santa Fe – NM 16.00

City of San Luis Obispo – CA 19.50 Waco Transit System, Inc. – TX 16.00

Las Cruces Area Transit-RoadRUNNER – NM

19.25 Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council – TX

15.75

35

Page 42: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Northwest (NW) Region The Northwest (NW) Region includes 24 transit agencies in the following states:

Alaska Idaho Montana Oregon Washington Wyoming

Transit agencies in this region were divided into four separate peer groups based on the peer selection process used throughout this study. The NW Region contains two transit agencies that are significantly larger in size than the other agencies in the region: King County Department of Transportation (Seattle Metro) and Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon. These two agencies are too large to compare with the other agencies in the region, and are too few to be considered one peer group. For informational purposes, Table 23 presents their composite scores when compared with the next two largest agencies in the region, Pierce County Public Benefit Authority and Snohomish County Transportation Benefit Area Corporation (NW Region Group A). King County and Tri-County are also included in the “Large” peer comparisons presented after this region’s results are discussed. The two large systems, Tri-County and King County ranked the best in terms of service supply, service consumption, and the operating ratios. However, Pierce County ranked very strong in terms of quality of service, cost efficiency, and vehicle utilization. Table 23: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group A

Transit Agency Composite Score

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon – OR 23.25

Pierce County Public Benefit Authority – WA 22.00

King County Department of Transportation - Metro Transit Division – WA 20.75

Snohomish County Transportation Benefit Area Corporation – WA 17.25

Table 24, on the following page, presents the results of NW Region Group B, which places Pierce County and Snohomish County with this next peer group. Group B has a total of 9 transit agencies.

36

Page 43: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 24: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group B

Transit Agency Composite Score

Pierce County Public Benefit Authority – WA 24.50

Clark County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority – WA 22.75

Spokane Transit Authority – WA 22.00

Lane Transit District – OR 22.00

Municipality of Anchorage - Public Transportation Department – AK 21.75

Salem Area Mass Transit District – OR 21.25

Snohomish County Transportation Benefit Area Corporation – WA 21.00

Intercity Transit – WA 19.25

Kitsap Transit – WA 19.25

Table 24 shows that Pierce County ranks best in this group, while Snohomish County ranks lower in the group. The two lowest scores belong to Intercity Transit and Kitsap Transit. In this peer group, Pierce County ranked best in the subcategories of service supply and vehicle utilization, but ranked low in the operating ratios. Snohomish County ranked second-best in terms of quality of service, but ranked the lowest in cost efficiency. Intercity Transit ranked in the middle to lower part of the group for all subcategories except cost efficiency, where it ranked best in the group. Finally, Kitsap Transit ranked lowest in terms of service supply and vehicle utilization, but did rank best in the group in quality of service. Table 25 presents this peer group without the relatively large systems of Pierce County and Snohomish County. Now, NW Region Group B(1) contains 8 transit agencies, with the addition of Ben Franklin Transit (Ben Franklin was on the border between this group and Group C, and so was not included in Group B with the two larger agencies of Pierce and Snohomish). Table 25: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group B(1)

Transit Agency Composite Score

Clark County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority – WA 22.75

Spokane Transit Authority – WA 22.50

Lane Transit District – OR 22.25

Municipality of Anchorage - Public Transportation Department – AK 21.75

Ben Franklin Transit – WA 21.50

Kitsap Transit – WA 20.75

Salem Area Mass Transit District – OR 20.50

Intercity Transit – WA 19.00

37

Page 44: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

The results of NW Region Group B(1), shown in Table 25 on the previous page, indicate that Clark County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority ranks the highest in this group. Intercity Transit has the lowest composite score in this peer group. Upon closer examination of the subcategory scores, it is evident that Clark County ranked near the top of the group in most of the subcategories. Intercity Transit mostly ranked near the bottom of the group, but ranked third-best in terms of cost efficiency. Both Clark County and Intercity Transit had the same score for the operating ratios, placing them in the middle of the peer group for that subcategory. The final group in the NW Region is Group C. This peer group contains 12 transit agencies, and the results are provided in Table 26. Targhee Regional Public Transit Authority operates only purchased motorbus services, and does not report failures in the NTD; as such, the composite scores in Table 26 do not include the measure of revenue miles between failures. Table 26: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group C

Transit Agency Composite Score

Whatcom Transportation Authority – WA 24.75

Yakima Transit – WA 22.25

Community Urban Bus Service – WA 22.00

Boise Urban Stages/VIATrans – ID 21.00

Everett Transit – WA 20.25

City of Pocatello, Pocatello Regional Transit – ID 20.25

Targhee Regional Public Transit Authority – ID 20.25

Rogue Valley Transit District – OR 19.75

Missoula Urban Transportation District – MT 19.75

The City of Cheyenne Transit Program – WY 19.00

Great Falls Transit District – MT 18.50

Billings Metropolitan Transit – MT 18.25

Whatcom Transportation Authority has the highest composite score in this peer group. Whatcom ranked near the top of most subcategories, having the best score in service consumption (tied with another transit agency); however, it ranked lowest in terms of cost efficiency. Great Falls Transit District and Billings Metropolitan Transit received the lowest composite scores in this peer group. Both ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in each of the subcategories of measures.

38

Page 45: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Largest Transit Systems in the U.S. There are several transit agencies from each of the geographic regions analyzed thus far in the report that are significantly larger than most of the agencies in their respective regions or groups. For informational purposes, the 20 largest transit agencies from all geographic regions were placed in a peer group called simply “Large.” Transit agencies were placed in this group using the arbitrary criterion of operating more than 500 vehicles in peak service. This group of 20 agencies was then further categorized into those agencies operating greater than 1,000 peak vehicles, and less than 1,000 peak vehicles. Table 27 shows the first of these comparisons, using all 20 of the transit agencies operating more than 500 vehicles in peak service. Table 27: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group (> 500 Vehs)

Transit Agency Composite Score

Chicago Transit Authority – IL 25.50

New York City Transit – NY 24.25

Miami-Dade Transit – FL 23.50

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County – TX 22.75

Utah Transit Authority – UT 22.75

Regional Transportation District – CO 22.50

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority – GA 22.25

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – CA 21.25

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon – OR 20.75

GTJC – NY 20.50

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District – CA 20.25

The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority – OH 20.25

New Jersey Transit Corporation (Consolidated) – NJ 19.75

King County Department of Transportation - Metro Transit Division – WA 19.75

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – MA 19.75

Pace, Suburban Bus Division – IL 19.75

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC 19.25

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority – PA 19.25

Port Authority of Allegheny County – PA 18.75

Metro Transit – MN 18.75

39

Page 46: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 27 indicates that Chicago Transit Authority and New York City Transit have the highest scores in this group, followed by Miami-Dade Transit. Port Authority of Allegheny County and Metro Transit have the lowest scores in this group. Further examination of the subcategory results shows that Chicago and New York are tied for the best score in terms of service supply, and are second-best and best, respectively, in service consumption. Both agencies rank at the top or in the upper part of the group for all the subcategories; except New York ranked lowest in terms of cost efficiency. Miami-Dade Transit ranked best in the group in terms of vehicle utilization. Port Authority and Metro Transit ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in all subcategories; Metro Transit ranked lowest in vehicle utilization. Table 28 shows the results of all transit systems that operate more than 1,000 vehicles in peak service. There are 7 transit agencies in this group. Table 28: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group (>1000 Vehs)

Transit Agency Composite Score

Chicago Transit Authority – IL 24.75

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County – TX 22.75

New York City Transit – NY 21.00

New Jersey Transit Corporation (Consolidated) – NJ 21.00

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – CA 20.00

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority – PA 19.75

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC 18.00

In this group of agencies that operate more than 1,000 vehicles in their peak, Chicago Transit Authority had the highest composite score, while Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) had the lowest score. Chicago tied for the best score in terms of service supply (with New York City Transit), had the highest score in vehicle utilization, and was second-best in terms of service consumption. WMATA, however, ranked mainly in the middle to lower part of the group in the subcategories, and ranked lowest in service supply. Lastly, Table 29, on the following page, illustrates the results of those transit systems in this larger group that operate less than 1,000 vehicles in the peak. A total of 13 transit agencies are placed in this group.

40

Page 47: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Table 29: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group (<1000 Vehs) Transit Agency Composite Score

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority – GA 24.00

Miami-Dade Transit – FL 24.00

GTJC – NY 22.50

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon – OR 22.25

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – MA 21.75

Utah Transit Authority – UT 21.00

Regional Transportation District – CO 20.75

Metro Transit – MN 20.25

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District – CA 20.00

The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority – OH 20.00

King County Department of Transportation - Metro Transit Division – WA 19.75

Pace, Suburban Bus Division – IL 19.75

Port Authority of Allegheny County – PA 18.50

The results in Table 29 above indicate that large systems from the southeast region perform the strongest in this peer group. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) and Miami-Dade Transit tied for the best score in the group. Port Authority of Allegheny County had the lowest composite score in the group. Closer analysis of the subcategory scores shows that MARTA ranked in the middle to upper part of the group in all subcategories, ranking second-best in vehicle utilization. Miami-Dade ranked second-worst in quality of service, but had the third-best score in cost efficiency and the best score in vehicle utilization. Port Authority typically ranked in the middle to lower parts of the group, having the group’s lowest score in the operating ratios. However, Port Authority did rank second-best in terms of quality of service.

41

Page 48: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Conclusions As the results and discussion on the previous pages illustrate, placing transit agencies into different peer groups produces varied results. It is clear that the most crucial element of a benchmarking analysis, such as the one undertaken in this study, is the categorization of transit agencies into appropriate peer groups. The intent of this study was to be a first approach to this issue using NTD data, and to address the limitations of previous efforts, as described in the review of literature. It should be noted that the peer groups presented in this report are reasonable given the NTD information used, and provide a valid analysis for 2001 data. However, the work presented in this report lays the foundation for a refinement of the peer selection process used herein. Additional research is required to incorporate other NTD and non-NTD data (such as U.S. Census or other available socio-economic data including transit-dependency, income levels, cost of living, and/or wage rates) into the process. Other factors that might be considered include the age of the transit agency, modes operated systemwide, and whether services are directly operated, contracted, or some combination of both. It may also be appropriate to form peer groups of only the smallest transit agencies in each region, such as those operating less than 10 peak vehicles, for example. This study developed benchmark rankings for fixed-route motorbus systems in the U.S. The method used in this study can also be applied to other modes such as rail and demand-response, creating additional peer groups. Future efforts may also refine the measures used in the generation of the benchmarking results. One issue that arose during the study involved the lack of NTD data on vehicle failures and collisions for some transit agencies. Without such information, some of the benchmarks do not include the quality of service measures dealing with safety (revenue miles between failures) and security (revenue miles between collisions). It should be noted that, beginning in 2002, NTD data are more complete with regard to incidents (collisions); however, vehicles system failures are still not required to be reported for purchased transportation services. This study used a relatively simple scoring method; other, more complex techniques might be explored, such as different indexes and the introduction of weighting schemes. Everything required for the benchmarking process has been prepared in Microsoft Excel. Modifications to peer groups, measures used, or the scoring method would be relatively simple to accomplish using what was developed in this study as a starting point (or template). Future benchmarking studies might also examine performance indexes based on three to five years of trend data for each transit agency, to capture major changes that can occur from year to year. The initial benchmarking results presented in this report are not intended to indicate that one particular transit agency is “better” than another. Rather, the development of peer groups and

42

Page 49: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

a composite scoring system based on an array of standardized NTD information allows transit agencies to see where they fit into a group of similar agencies. An inspection of the tables listing benchmarking results in this report show that many transit agencies have identical composite scores within their groups; this is not unintentional, as it shows that such transit agencies are performing at about the same level, as opposed to explicitly ranking them from “best” to “worst.” These benchmarking results show how transit agencies in the U.S. perform within the peer groups as defined in this study, using measures and a scoring system developed for this project. Brief discussions of results are included, but the analysis does not go beyond what is revealed by the NTD data used in the study. While this benchmarking process is intended to be comprehensive, there is no doubt that future benchmarking efforts will benefit from additional input from the industry. Finally, it must be noted that the results of this initial benchmarking study, or any other single ranking effort, do not conclusively define the overall performance of any transit agency. As discussed earlier in this report, there are countless other factors, both exogenous and endogenous to a transit agency’s operations, that influence performance. One of the most important factors is the agency goals. Goals such as geographic coverage, service to specific areas or groups, low fares, etc., often dictate a level of performance that can be acceptable to transit agencies and their governing boards, even when that performance appears “low” by the definitions used in a study such as this one. Benchmarking studies such as this never reveal the whole picture regarding transit performance, and should always be used as only one of many tools to measure performance and target areas for improvements.

43

Page 50: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

References American Public Transportation Association (APTA), Measuring Transit Fixed Route Performance

r f

t f r

– The T ansit Per ormance Index, October 4, 1998. Chu, Xuehao, On Ranking Transit Operators (Internal CUTR Report), December 1996. Chu, Xuehao, Gordon J. Fielding, Bruce W. Lamar, Measuring Transit Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis, 1992. CUTR, 2000 Performance Evaluation of Florida’s Transit Systems, December 2000. Hartgen, David T. and Mark W. Horner, Compara ive Performance o Major US Bus T ansit Systems: 1988-199, Transportation Publication Report Number 163, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, May 1997.

44

Page 51: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Appendix A – List of Definitions Average Headway - Average headway, in minutes, for the system as a whole that is computed utilizing the following performance indicators: directional route miles, revenue miles, revenue hours, and the number of vehicles operated in maximum service. The equation used to determine this measure first doubles the directional route mileage to produce an estimate of system size in terms of total (non-directional) route miles. The resulting mileage figure is then divided by the system’s calculated average speed (revenue miles per revenue hour) to produce an estimate of the time it would take, in hours, to traverse all of the system’s total route miles. Finally, this time figure is divided by the system’s number of peak vehicles (then multiplied by 60 to convert time in hours to minutes) to determine the number of minutes it takes for a vehicle to complete its portion of the total route miles one time. Average Speed - Average speed of vehicles in revenue service operation (i.e., not including travel to and from the garage or any other deadhead) calculated by dividing total revenue miles by total revenue hours.

Average Weekday Span of Service – Time, in hours, from the start of service to the end of service, for an average weekday. Directly-Generated Non-Fare Revenue - All revenues, except passenger fares, generated through the operation of the transit agency. Includes special transit fares, school bus service revenues, freight tariffs, charter service revenues, auxiliary transportation revenues, subsidy from other sectors of operations, and non-transportation revenues. Farebox Recovery - Ratio of passenger fare revenues to total operating expenses; an indicator of the share of total operating costs that is covered by the passengers’ fares. This measure is expressed as a percentage.

General/Administrative Expense - General administration is all the activities associated with supporting the provision of transit service. Usually, these activities benefit all modes and types of service and are reported using a cost allocation plan. General/Administrative Expense Per Operating Expense - Calculated by dividing general/administrative expense by operating expense; expressed as a percent of total operating expense. Local Contribution - Any financial assistance obtained from a local government or agency (below the State level) to assist in paying the operating costs of providing transit service. Local Revenue - All revenues originating at the local level (excluding state and federal assistance). This represents the sum of local contribution, directly-generated non-fare revenue, and passenger fare revenue.

A-1

Page 52: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Local Revenue Per Operating Expense - Ratio of total local commitment with respect to total operating expense; expressed as a percent of total operating expense. Non-Vehicle Maintenance Expense - Non-vehicle maintenance are all the activities associated with ensuring buildings, grounds and equipment (garages, passenger stations and shelters, administration buildings); fare collection equipment; and communications systems, track, structures, tunnels and power systems are operable. Non-Vehicle Maintenance Expense Per Operating Expense - Calculated by dividing non-vehicle maintenance expense by operating expense; expressed as a percent of total operating expense. Number of Collisions - Total number of unforeseen occurrences resulting in collisions (excluding suicides) with property damage in excess of $1,000 as reported in the Safety and Security NTD forms. Number of Vehicle System Failures - Total number of failures that occur during revenue service, deadheading, and layovers. A failure is classified as the breakdown of either a major or minor element of the revenue vehicle’s mechanical system. Failures are tabulated regardless of whether they result in a vehicle completing or not completing its trip. Operating Expense Per Capita - Annual operating budget divided by the service area population; a measure of the resource commitment to transit by the community. Operating Expense Per Revenue Hour - Operating expense divided by revenue hours of operation; a key comparative measure which differs from operating expense per vehicle mile in that the vehicle speed is factored out. This is often important since vehicle speed is strongly influenced by local traffic conditions. Passenger Fare Revenue - Revenue generated annually from carrying passengers in regularly scheduled service. Passenger Miles - Number of annual passenger trips multiplied by the system's average trip length (in miles). This number provides a measure of the total number of passenger miles of transportation service consumed. Passenger Trips - Annual number of unlinked passenger boardings on the transit vehicles. A trip is counted each time a passenger boards a transit vehicle. Thus, if a passenger has to transfer between buses to reach a destination, he/she is counted as making two passenger trips.

Passenger Trips Per Capita - Average number of transit boardings per person per year. This number is larger in areas where public transportation is emphasized and in areas where there are more transit dependents, and is a measure of the extent to which the public utilizes transit in a given service area.

A-2

Page 53: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Passenger Trips Per Revenue Hour - The ratio of passenger trips to revenue hours of operation; reports on the effectiveness of the service since hours are a better representation of the resources consumed in providing service Passenger Trips Per Revenue Mile - The ratio of passenger trips to revenue miles of service; a key indicator of service effectiveness that is influenced by the levels of demand and the supply of service provided. Peak Vehicles - Number of revenue vehicles operated to meet the annual maximum service requirement, i.e., the revenue vehicle count during the peak hours of the peak days/weeks of the peak season (typically the rush period). Vehicles operated in maximum service exclude atypical days or one-time special events. Revenue Hours - Total hours of operation by revenue service vehicles in active revenue service. Revenue Hours Per Total Vehicles - Total revenue hours of service that are provided, on average, by each vehicle available for maximum service. Revenue Miles - Number of annual miles of vehicle operation while in active service (available to pick up revenue passengers). This number is smaller than vehicle miles because of the exclusion of deadhead miles such as vehicle miles from the garage to the start of service, vehicle miles from the end of service to the garage, driver training, and other miscellaneous miles that are not considered to be in direct revenue service. Revenue Miles Between Collisions - Number of revenue miles divided by the number of collisions (excluding suicides); reports the average interval, in miles, between collisions. Revenue Miles Between Failures - Number of revenue miles divided by the number of vehicle system failures; an indicator of the average frequency of delays because of a problem with the equipment. Revenue Miles Per Peak Vehicle - Total revenue miles of service that are provided, on average, by each vehicle operated in maximum service. Revenue Miles Per Route Mile - Number of revenue miles divided by the number of directional route miles of service; an indicator of the availability of transit service. Revenue Miles Per Total Vehicles - Total revenue miles of service that are provided, on average, by each vehicle available for maximum service. Revenue Miles Per Vehicle Mile - Reflects how much of the total vehicle operation is in passenger service. Higher ratios are favorable, but garage location, training needs, and other considerations may influence the ratio.

A-3

Page 54: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Route Miles - Number of directional route miles as reported in NTD data; defined as the mileage that service operates in each direction over routes traveled by public transportation vehicles in revenue service. Service Area Population - This measure provides a suitable approximation of overall market size for comparison of relative spending and service levels. According to NTD definitions, it should be measured as a ¾-mile buffer around a fixed-route network; however, agencies that serve a larger area with another mode such as demand-response will report the larger figure.

Service Area Population Density – Measured as service area population per square mile of service area. Service area size, in square miles, is reported in the NTD.

Spare Ratio - Vehicles operated in maximum service subtracted from vehicles available for maximum service divided by vehicles operated in maximum service. This measure is an indicator of the number of spare vehicles available for service. A spare ratio of approximately 20 percent is considered appropriate in the industry. However, this varies depending on the size and age of fleet as well as the condition of equipment. Total Operating Expense - Reported total spending on operations, including administration, maintenance, and operation of service vehicles. Total Vehicles - Number of vehicles available for use by the transit agency to meet the annual maximum service requirement. Vehicles available for maximum service include spares, out-of-service vehicles, and vehicles in or awaiting maintenance, but exclude vehicles awaiting sale and emergency contingency vehicles.

Vehicle Hours - Total hours of operation by revenue service vehicles including hours consumed in passenger service and deadhead travel. Vehicle Hours Per Peak Vehicle - Substitutes vehicle hours for vehicle miles and again reflects how intensively equipment is utilized. Vehicle Maintenance Expense - Vehicle maintenance are all the activities associated with ensuring revenue vehicles and service vehicles are operable, cleaned, fueled, inspected and repaired. Vehicle Maintenance Expense Per Operating Expense - Calculated by dividing vehicle maintenance expense by operating expense; expressed as a percent of total operating expense. Vehicle Miles - Total distance traveled annually by revenue service vehicles, including both revenue miles and deadhead miles.

A-4

Page 55: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Vehicle Miles Per Peak Vehicle - Vehicle miles divided by the number of vehicles operated in maximum service. It is an indicator of how intensively the equipment is used and is influenced by the bus travel speeds as well as by the levels of service in the off-peak time periods. A more uniform demand for service over the day would result in a higher number.

A-5

Page 56: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States
Page 57: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Appendix B – Detailed Data Tables

B-1

Page 58: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-2

Page 59: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up A

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

14,6

78.9

31

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

24.0

01

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

34.4

30.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t2.

601

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it A

utho

rity

13,5

88.0

91

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity22

.00

1M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

60.1

51

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

991

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n10

,019

.19

0.75

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n21

.50

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

19.4

20.

75Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

2.38

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

19,8

04.6

51.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs14

.00

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

102.

151.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs4.

181.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

9,11

7.96

0.5

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct C

omm

issi

on o

f Ham

pton

9.

500.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

12.9

30.

75Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

1.50

0.5

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

11,7

47.2

60.

75C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it22

.83

1C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it14

.85

0.75

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

1.84

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

re

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

33.2

30.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t12

.79

0.75

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

1,54

30.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t14

.71

1M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y37

.34

1M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

12.4

90.

5M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,24

70.

75M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

15.9

81

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n32

.65

0.75

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n13

.72

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

28,3

021.

5Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

22.6

70.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs57

.75

1.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

13.8

31

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

1,69

40.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs8.

551.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

19.0

50.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

12.6

60.

75Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

4,89

70.

75Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

19.3

10.

75C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it25

.71

0.75

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

13.9

81.

5C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it16

,851

1C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it22

.26

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r R

even

ue H

our

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

$85.

220.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t$8

2.25

0.75

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

21.5

8%0.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t4.

90%

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it A

utho

rity

$130

.50

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$8

1.01

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity27

.99%

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

86%

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

$38.

111

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n$6

4.07

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

18.8

1%1

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n2.

89%

1R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs$1

74.9

60.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs$9

8.92

0.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

19.5

1%1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

3.39

%1

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct C

omm

issi

on o

f Ham

pton

$3

5.45

1Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

$52.

241.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

17.7

1%1

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct C

omm

issi

on o

f Ham

pton

3.

71%

0.75

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

$35.

151

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

$60.

871

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

18.0

6%1

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

3.43

%1

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

11.0

4%1.

5M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t26

.82%

0.75

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

52.1

5%1

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

53,6

851

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it A

utho

rity

15.5

0%1

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity30

.26%

1M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

62.0

1%1

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity53

,137

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

12.2

0%1

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n22

.56%

0.5

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n56

.89%

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

56,3

011

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffer s

26.0

3%0.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs37

.43%

1.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

54.8

2%1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

41,1

080.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

23.8

9%0.

75Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

28.2

9%0.

75Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

19.5

2%0.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

41,6

770.

5C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it21

.48%

0.75

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

33.9

0%1

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

40.4

3%0.

75C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it66

,294

1.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Hou

rs

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

3,94

51

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

0.86

0.5

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

34,3

930.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t2,

690

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it A

utho

rity

3,98

41

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

850.

5M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

38,2

891

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

065

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

3,94

61

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n0.

921

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n40

,382

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

2,94

31

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffer s

3,33

80.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs0.

951.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs30

,911

0.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

2,23

50.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

3,09

60.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

0.89

0.75

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct C

omm

issi

on o

f Ham

pton

35

,141

0.75

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct C

omm

issi

on o

f Ham

pton

2,

775

0.75

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

4,65

41.

5C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it0.

921

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

49,4

741.

5C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it3,

539

1.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

46,0

250.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t33

.82%

1.5

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

23.2

5M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y45

,210

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.08%

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffer s

21.5

0Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

51,9

431

Brow

ard

Cou

nty

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Div

isio

n28

.63%

1Br

owar

d C

ount

y M

ass

Tran

sit D

ivis

ion

20.5

0R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Orle

ans

and

Jeffe

rs39

,024

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of O

rlean

s an

d Je

ffers

26.2

5%1

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

19.2

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

37,1

490.

5Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

Com

mis

sion

of H

ampt

on

5.71

%0.

5M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.2

5C

entra

l Flo

rida

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it60

,931

1.5

Cen

tral F

lorid

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

23.1

6%1

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct C

omm

issi

on o

f Ham

pton

15

.50

B-3

Page 60: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up B

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

4,38

8.43

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

21.0

01

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

21.4

11.

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Riv

er C

ity2.

121

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

6,85

0.73

0.75

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

22.1

41.

5Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity9.

600.

75Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

1.07

0.75

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

10,3

39.9

41

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

19.8

31

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

27.2

71.

5C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

781

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4,22

6.87

0.75

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.1

70.

75Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity10

.58

0.75

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.30

0.75

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

7,46

2.44

0.75

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

20.6

71

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

6.58

0.75

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

1.20

0.75

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.5,

174.

990.

75Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

17.0

00.

75Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

6.64

0.75

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.0.

980.

75M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

7,70

9.54

0.75

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.17

1M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

15.0

11

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

611

Hills

boro

ugh

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

6,68

5.23

0.75

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.67

1H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

17.3

61

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

480.

75G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny9,

688.

001

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

20.3

31

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

25.6

61.

5G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny3.

532

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4,31

1.13

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.9

21

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

12.2

10.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

701

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny12

,021

.61

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

19.3

31

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny0.

790.

5C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

2.49

1.5

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

12,6

74.8

41

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

18.9

21

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

14.6

71

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

2.09

1Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

853.

090.

5Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y15

.00

0.5

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4.09

0.5

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.44

0.75

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

5,89

1.04

0.75

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

12.5

00.

5Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t19

.33

1Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t1.

801

City

of K

ings

port

23,5

25.5

42

City

of K

ings

port

10.5

81

City

of K

ings

port

6.47

0.75

City

of K

ings

port

0.45

0.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Ken

tuck

y7,

798.

650.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

21.0

81

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Ken

tuck

y18

.78

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n Ke

ntuc

ky1.

300.

75Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t6,

603.

590.

75Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t16

.50

0.75

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

5.26

0.75

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.82

0.75

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

4,40

5.80

0.75

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

19.0

01

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

0.71

0.5

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

0.43

0.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

26.9

71

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

12.7

40.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Riv

er C

ity2,

283

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

190,

787

0.75

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

14.7

30.

75Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity13

.78

0.75

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

6,12

40.

75Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

115,

314

0.75

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

25.4

71

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

14.3

40.

75C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

269

0.75

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

144,

617

0.75

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.0

70.

75Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity14

.64

0.75

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

20,9

251.

5Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

9,96

30.

75Fa

irfax

Con

nect

or B

us S

yste

m18

.71

0.75

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

15.6

11

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

11,4

781

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

64,5

080.

75Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

16.2

70.

75Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

16.5

21

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.21

,886

1.5

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.24

0,74

11

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y25

.29

1M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

15.6

61

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

546

0.75

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y28

7,26

41

Hills

boro

ugh

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.7

20.

75H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

12.6

20.

75H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3,98

30.

75H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

182,

878

0.75

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

41.1

82

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

11.6

70.

5G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny2,

018

0.75

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

130,

025

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

23.7

51

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.9

50.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

272

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

342,

735

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

26.1

81

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny10

.52

0.5

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny4,

021

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny88

,459

0.75

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

33.7

31.

5C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n16

.13

1C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n12

,732

1C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n12

9,28

30.

75Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.66

0.75

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

12.9

50.

75Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

261

0.75

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

123,

120

0.75

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

26.4

31

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

14.7

21

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

3,90

40.

75Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t79

,647

0.75

City

of K

ings

port

6.50

0.5

City

of K

ings

port

14.3

40.

75C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt38

,229

2C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt15

2,91

60.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

19.9

30.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

15.3

71

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Ken

tuck

y4,

000

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Kent

ucky

475,

941

1.5

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

13.1

90.

75Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t16

.04

1Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t4,

630

0.75

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

216,

903

0.75

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

9.78

0.5

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

22.6

32

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

8,15

70.

75R

esea

rch

Tria

ngle

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tio82

3,88

42

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

39.3

90.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Riv

er C

ity$5

3.59

0.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

$67.

520.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Riv

er C

ity21

.34%

0.75

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

32.8

60.

75Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$3

8.85

0.75

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$59.

581

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y18

.64%

1C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m16

.48

1C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m$6

6.93

0.5

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$62.

520.

75C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m17

.98%

1Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity57

.19

0Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$3

2.39

1Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

8.38

1Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity14

.52%

1.5

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

20.2

01

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

$21.

291

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

$60.

591

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

21.2

2%0.

75Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

37.3

70.

75Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

$31.

041

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.$7

6.11

0.5

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.23

.12%

0.75

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.02

1M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$44.

000.

75M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$74.

120.

5M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

20.3

0%0.

75H

illsbo

roug

h Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity27

.37

0.75

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

5.05

0.5

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

9.35

1H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

20.2

0%0.

75G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny17

.12

1G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny$4

1.28

0.75

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

$66.

240.

75G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny18

.29%

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity37

.65

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$36.

980.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$7

1.90

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

26.8

3%0.

5C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

15.7

31

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny$1

.60

1.5

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny$5

3.24

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

24.5

0%0.

5C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n13

.89

1.5

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

$23.

741

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

$54.

571

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

21.5

9%0.

75Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y41

.09

0.5

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$19.

151

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$87.

460

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

14.0

5%1.

5Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t22

.97

1Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$3

5.91

0.75

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

$49.

091

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

9.64

%2

City

of K

ings

port

6.80

1.5

City

of K

ings

port

$27.

121

City

of K

ings

port

$27.

232

City

of K

ings

port

15.3

0%1

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Ken

tuck

y17

.75

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

$51.

640.

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

$54.

801

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Kent

ucky

18.7

2%1

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

37.1

50.

75Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t$1

8.17

1Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t$4

5.56

1.5

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

16.1

3%1

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

30.9

90.

75R

esea

rch

Tria

ngle

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tio$4

.77

1.5

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

$65.

700.

75R

esea

rch

Tria

ngle

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tio25

.77%

0.5

B-4

Page 61: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

In

itial

Ben

chm

arki

ng R

esul

ts:

SE

Reg

ion

-- G

roup

B

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

1.77

%1

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

19.0

4%0.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Riv

er C

ity13

.26%

0.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

67.8

6%1

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1.51

%1

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

20.1

1%0.

75Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity28

.39%

1Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

54.1

1%1

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

1.15

%1

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

24.7

0%0.

5C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m20

.17%

0.75

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

71.5

5%1.

5Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity5.

31%

0.5

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

20.5

4%0.

75Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity25

.17%

1Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity49

.25%

1Fa

irfax

Con

nect

or B

us S

yste

m1.

14%

1Fa

irfax

Con

nect

or B

us S

yste

m19

.72%

0.75

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

22.4

2%1

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

72.6

9%1.

5Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

0.91

%1

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.14

.62%

1Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

15.2

8%0.

5Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

53.5

8%1

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y4.

77%

0.5

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y16

.88%

1M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

24.9

0%1

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y43

.59%

0.75

Hills

boro

ugh

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4.44

%0.

5H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.9

4%1

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.39%

0.75

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity61

.04%

1G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny4.

08%

0.5

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

25.0

2%0.

5G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny32

.65%

1.5

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

29.4

1%0.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3.

47%

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

11.0

0%1.

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity25

.90%

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity32

.76%

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny1.

40%

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

12.4

5%1

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny29

.56%

1.5

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny1.

17%

1C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n2.

43%

0.75

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

19.5

9%0.

75C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n32

.44%

1.5

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

15.5

3%0.

5Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2.

43%

0.75

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

23.9

7%0.

5Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.25%

0.75

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

63.1

3%1

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

1.45

%1

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

27.6

0%0.

5Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t22

.87%

1Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t18

.67%

0.5

City

of K

ings

port

0.00

%1.

5C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt8.

51%

1.5

City

of K

ings

port

10.2

9%0.

5C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt20

.33%

0.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Ken

tuck

y1.

77%

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

16.9

3%1

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Ken

tuck

y21

.85%

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Kent

ucky

69.9

7%1.

5Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t2.

80%

0.75

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

17.5

0%1

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

16.6

9%0.

75Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t33

.45%

0.75

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtati o

1.31

%1

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

9.63

%1.

5R

esea

rch

Tria

ngle

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tio16

.96%

0.75

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

64.9

6%1

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

40,2

170.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Riv

er C

ity3,

063

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

0.91

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Riv

er C

ity28

,476

0.75

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

59,9

001.

5Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

953

1.5

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.86

0.75

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y42

,109

1C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m43

,356

0.75

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3,00

50.

75C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

941

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

34,9

491

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

65,0

541.

5Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity4,

265

1.5

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.91

1Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity42

,096

1Fa

irfax

Con

nect

or B

us S

yste

m50

,373

1Fa

irfax

Con

nect

or B

us S

yste

m3,

031

0.75

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

0.78

1Fa

irfax

Con

nect

or B

us S

yste

m29

,121

0.75

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.59

,103

1.5

Palm

Tra

n, In

c.3,

745

1Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

0.90

1Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

46,2

961.

5M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

47,3

121

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

958

0.75

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

850.

75M

emph

is A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

29,8

960.

75H

illsbo

roug

h Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity43

,990

0.75

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

289

1H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.88

0.75

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity31

,805

0.75

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

35,3

600.

5G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny3,

028

0.75

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

0.91

1G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny22

,118

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

43,0

360.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

952

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.88

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

28,7

610.

75C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

35,5

940.

75C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

3,35

01

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny0.

931

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny21

,663

0.5

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

49,0

201

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

3,06

30.

75C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n0.

971.

5C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n41

,498

1Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y28

,827

0.5

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,17

00.

5Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

880.

75Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y24

,300

0.5

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

33,4

720.

5Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t2,

303

0.5

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

0.99

1.5

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

33,1

860.

75C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt38

,229

0.75

City

of K

ings

port

2,66

60.

75C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt1.

001.

5C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt38

,229

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

43,5

410.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

2,63

20.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

0.81

0.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Kent

ucky

27,9

970.

75Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t70

,167

1.5

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

4,36

62

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.93

1Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t48

,616

1.5

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtati o

59,4

781.

5R

esea

rch

Tria

ngle

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tio2,

717

0.75

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

0.87

0.75

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

41,1

941

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

2,23

60.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Riv

er C

ity36

,690

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

28.8

5%1

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

24.2

5Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

056

1.5

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

51,6

921

Jack

sonv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

22.7

6%0.

75C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt24

.00

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2,43

81

Cha

rlotte

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

40,7

170.

75C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m16

.50%

0.75

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

23.0

0Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

874

1.5

Pine

llas

Sunc

oast

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

59,0

031.

5Pi

nella

s Su

ncoa

st T

rans

it Au

thor

ity40

.16%

1.5

Cap

ital T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

23.0

0Fa

irfax

Con

nect

or B

us S

yste

m1,

866

0.5

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

39,2

010.

75Fa

irfax

Con

nect

or B

us S

yste

m34

.62%

1Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

22.5

0Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

2,80

21.

5Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

53,2

611.

5Pa

lm T

ran,

Inc.

15.0

4%0.

75R

esea

rch

Tria

ngle

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tio22

.25

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

909

0.75

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y40

,287

0.75

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y34

.76%

1Ja

ckso

nville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

22.0

0H

illsbo

roug

h Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

519

1H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

38,5

010.

75H

illsbo

roug

h A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.0

5%0.

75G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny22

.00

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

1,89

50.

75G

reat

er R

ichm

ond

Tran

sit C

ompa

ny32

,262

0.75

Gre

ater

Ric

hmon

d Tr

ansi

t Com

pany

45.8

6%1.

5C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria, A

lexa

ndria

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

21.7

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

062

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

37,7

320.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity31

.19%

1C

harlo

tte A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m20

.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny2,

059

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny33

,172

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

, Ale

xand

ria T

rans

it C

ompa

ny53

.13%

1.5

Fairf

ax C

onne

ctor

Bus

Sys

tem

20.5

0C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n2,

573

1C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n47

,343

1C

apita

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n14

.08%

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of N

orth

ern

Kent

ucky

20.2

5Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

877

0.5

Birm

ingh

am-J

effe

rson

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

25,2

990.

5Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y4.

11%

0.5

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

19.7

5Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t2,

255

0.75

Pete

rsbu

rg A

rea

Tran

sit

33,1

860.

75Pe

ters

burg

Are

a Tr

ansi

t0.

00%

0.5

Mem

phis

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.50

City

of K

ings

port

2,66

61

City

of K

ings

port

38,2

290.

75C

ity o

f Kin

gspo

rt0.

00%

0.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of R

iver

City

19.2

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

1,82

20.

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

35,4

420.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Nor

ther

n K

entu

cky

26.6

0%1

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.2

5Le

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t3,

031

1.5

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

65,5

752

Lee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

34.8

8%1

Hills

boro

ugh

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.50

Res

earc

h Tr

iang

le R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtati o

1,82

00.

5R

esea

rch

Tria

ngle

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tio51

,493

1R

esea

rch

Tria

ngle

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tio25

.00%

1Bi

rmin

gham

-Jef

fers

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y15

.00

B-5

Page 62: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

5,70

6.60

0.75

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

14.5

80.

75Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em9.

110.

75Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

460.

75Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t5,

200.

820.

75Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t15

.50

0.75

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

11.0

90.

75Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t1.

951

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

5,77

9.01

0.75

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

19.6

71.

5C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t11

.63

0.75

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

1.85

1C

entra

l Ark

ansa

s Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y8,

809.

571

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.0

01

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

20.5

41

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.41

0.75

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t9,

907.

771.

5C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

19.0

81

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t50

.34

2C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

2.23

1.5

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta7,

499.

871

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta8.

001

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta11

.63

0.75

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta2.

081

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y10

,688

.46

1.5

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.50

1C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

16.6

81

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

440.

75C

hatta

noog

a Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut h

9,04

8.02

1.5

Cha

ttano

oga

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

th19

.42

1C

hatta

noog

a A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

th11

.55

0.75

Cha

ttano

oga

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

1.17

0.75

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN8,

106.

731

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN16

.67

1C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

25.6

11

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN2.

411.

5C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it4,

684.

550.

75C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it19

.25

1C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it10

.17

0.75

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

1.40

0.75

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN3,

692.

000.

5C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

12.0

00.

5C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

8.61

0.75

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN1.

540.

75D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

7,86

1.64

1D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.0

01

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y21

.43

1D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.91

1Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

4,93

9.28

0.75

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it13

.75

0.75

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it5.

740.

75Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

1.07

0.75

Gai

nesv

ille R

egio

nal T

rans

it Sy

stem

9,65

8.58

1.5

Gai

nesv

ille R

egio

nal T

rans

it S

yste

m15

.00

0.75

Gai

nesv

ille R

egio

nal T

rans

it S

yste

m45

.02

2G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3.21

2G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny6,

075.

210.

75G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny14

.50

0.75

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

20.5

01

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

1.63

1G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y3,

964.

680.

5G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y14

.00

0.75

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

9.58

0.75

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.79

1Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

8,56

3.67

1Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

19.5

01

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t8.

350.

75Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

1.63

1Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

o r4,

969.

400.

75Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or20

.58

1.5

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

8.97

0.75

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

0.82

0.5

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity7,

001.

801

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.00

1Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

11.9

10.

75Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.80

0.5

Met

ro T

rans

it5,

437.

380.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

13.5

00.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

5.03

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it0.

930.

5Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o5,

084.

440.

75Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o16

.85

1Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o3.

900.

75Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o0.

670.

5Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

4,02

8.06

0.5

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity15

.42

0.75

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity5.

780.

75Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

1.05

0.75

Shre

vepo

rt A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m6,

594.

220.

75Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em15

.08

0.75

Shre

vepo

rt Ar

ea T

rans

it S

yste

m13

.74

0.75

Shre

vepo

rt Ar

ea T

rans

it S

yste

m1.

711

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b9,

195.

421.

5So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

19.0

01

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b12

.83

0.75

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b1.

370.

75Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

1,05

9.95

1Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

13.0

00.

5Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

0.69

0.5

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t0.

480.

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

9,31

6.05

1.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n19

.33

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

16.0

91

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n2.

061

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-A

id o

f F7,

934.

511

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F18

.00

1W

inst

on-S

alem

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

- Tr

ans-

Aid

of F

16.5

11

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F1.

981

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

re

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

19.1

90.

75Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em13

.17

0.75

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

79,2

270.

75Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em47

.43

0.75

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

23.8

81

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

12.2

20.

75Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t13

4,80

50.

75Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t35

.36

0.75

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

24.5

01

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

13.2

60.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t12

5,90

00.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t30

.01

1C

entra

l Ark

ansa

s Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.10

0.75

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

14.3

01

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

265,

168

0.75

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

25.7

71

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t31

.58

1.5

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t14

.18

0.75

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t94

,832

0.75

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t11

.34

1.5

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta30

.47

1.5

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta14

.62

1C

harle

ston

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

104,

748

0.75

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta27

.99

1C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.6

30.

75C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

13.5

90.

75C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

241,

559

0.75

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y22

.17

1C

hatta

noog

a Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut h

16.6

50.

75C

hatta

noog

a Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

14.1

70.

75C

hatta

noog

a A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

th44

1,09

11

Cha

ttano

oga

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

16.1

91

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN28

.37

1.5

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN11

.75

0.5

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN74

,066

0.75

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN21

.38

1C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it23

.19

1C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it16

.53

1.5

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

154,

590

0.75

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

35.3

90.

75C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

22.2

51

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN14

.45

1C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

495,

910

1C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

58.0

90.

5D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

25.6

11

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y13

.43

0.75

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y16

7,71

50.

75D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

34.6

50.

75Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

14.9

50.

75Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

14.0

00.

75Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

1,40

6,70

62

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it32

.12

1G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Syst

em39

.11

2G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

12.1

70.

5G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

490,

173

1G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

13.9

01

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

19.8

10.

75G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny12

.15

0.5

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

402,

584

1G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny31

.66

1G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.49

0.75

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

11.4

70.

5G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y49

,577

0.75

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

59.7

00.

5Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

25.6

41

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t15

.72

1Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

38,2

710.

75Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

20.1

91

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

tho r

14.0

50.

5Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or17

.14

1.5

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

194,

762

0.75

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

38.7

70.

75Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

10.9

00.

5Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

13.6

10.

75Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1,30

0,93

52

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity24

.09

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

13.3

10.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

14.2

51

Met

ro T

rans

it18

3,16

20.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

39.7

10.

75Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o12

.72

0.5

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

18.9

22

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

210,

157

0.75

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

18.1

51

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity15

.83

0.75

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity15

.01

1Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

317,

733

1Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

54.3

50.

75Sh

reve

port

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

25.6

11

Shre

vepo

rt Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.0

01

Shre

vepo

rt Ar

ea T

rans

it S

yste

m14

7,42

80.

75Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

33.8

51

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b18

.59

0.75

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b13

.56

0.75

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b34

3,35

71

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b24

.30

1Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

9.44

0.5

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t19

.72

2Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

234,

603

0.75

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t11

8.87

0Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

26.1

41

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n12

.71

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n67

,001

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n21

.22

1W

inst

on-S

alem

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

- Tr

ans-

Aid

of F

24.8

11

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F12

.51

0.75

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F91

,013

0.75

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F25

.27

1

B-6

Page 63: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r R

even

ue H

our

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

$18.

431

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

$38.

811.

5Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.99%

1Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em4.

28%

0.5

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

$22.

301

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

$48.

031

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

20.7

0%0.

75Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t4.

22%

0.5

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

$29.

071

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

$61.

250.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t20

.46%

0.75

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

1.41

%1

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$47.

120.

75C

entra

l Ark

ansa

s Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$4

6.11

1C

entra

l Ark

ansa

s Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.91%

0.75

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.09

%1.

5C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

$106

.30

0C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

$66.

690.

5C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

12.7

8%1.

5C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

0.69

%1

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta$2

2.58

1C

harle

ston

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

$59.

130.

75C

harle

ston

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

31.7

6%0

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta0.

62%

1.5

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$4

5.24

0.75

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$5

3.26

1C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

21.8

4%0.

75C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.46

%1.

5C

hatta

noog

a Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut h

$46.

750.

75C

hatta

noog

a Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

$67.

360.

5C

hatta

noog

a A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

th22

.98%

0.75

Cha

ttano

oga

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

1.98

%1

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN$5

4.02

0.5

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN$5

9.86

0.75

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN21

.42%

0.75

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN1.

96%

1C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it$2

5.88

1C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it$5

9.03

0.75

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

18.0

0%1

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

2.00

%1

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN$1

8.38

1C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

$47.

501

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN22

.68%

0.75

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN2.

63%

0.75

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$4

1.87

0.75

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$5

0.03

1D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

14.7

9%1.

5D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.33

%1

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it$1

9.96

1Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

$51.

981

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it21

.04%

0.75

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it4.

21%

0.5

Gai

nesv

ille R

egio

nal T

rans

it Sy

stem

$60.

420.

5G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

$52.

491

Gai

nesv

ille R

egio

nal T

rans

it S

yste

m16

.73%

1G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1.28

%1

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

$43.

740.

75G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny$4

2.26

1.5

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

17.0

2%1

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

4.08

%0.

5G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$2

9.72

1G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$6

3.54

0.75

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

8.17

%2

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.01

%1

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t$2

3.01

1Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

$70.

640.

5Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

14.5

6%1.

5Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

4.38

%0.

5Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

o r$3

0.61

1Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or$4

7.96

1Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or24

.51%

0.75

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

3.46

%0.

5Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$49.

120.

75Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$44.

931

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity17

.89%

1K

noxv

ille T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1.43

%1

Met

ro T

rans

it$1

6.31

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

$43.

141

Met

ro T

rans

it20

.20%

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it1.

15%

1Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o$2

7.91

1Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o$9

1.08

0Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o24

.12%

0.75

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

3.56

%0.

5Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

$17.

401

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$4

7.69

1Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

21.6

1%0.

75Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

0.91

%1

Shre

vepo

rt A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m$2

7.03

1Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$5

0.39

1Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

22.3

2%0.

75Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

2.97

%0.

75So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

$26.

231

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b$3

8.01

1.5

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b16

.00%

1So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

1.00

%1

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$4

.09

1.5

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$5

6.22

0.75

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t28

.13%

0.5

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t1.

00%

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

$28.

441

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n$4

6.21

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

21.1

2%0.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

1.47

%1

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-A

id o

f F$3

5.35

0.75

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F$5

3.11

1W

inst

on-S

alem

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

- Tr

ans-

Aid

of F

14.0

4%1.

5W

inst

on-S

alem

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

- Tr

ans-

Aid

of F

1.39

%1

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

13.6

1%1.

5Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em20

.10%

0.75

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

66.5

7%1.

5Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em60

,118

1.5

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

18.3

2%1

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

23.4

5%1

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

47.5

6%1

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

41,0

380.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t18

.24%

1C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t22

.03%

0.75

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

48.2

1%1

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

40,5

250.

75C

entra

l Ark

ansa

s Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.97%

0.75

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.1

7%0.

75C

entra

l Ark

ansa

s Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y65

.50%

1.5

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

58,0

531.

5C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

16.0

8%1

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t24

.31%

1C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

23.1

1%0.

75C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

27,2

611

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta13

.70%

1.5

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta18

.44%

0.75

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta0.

00%

1C

harle

ston

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

51,1

561

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.34%

0.75

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y31

.46%

1.5

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y51

.30%

1C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

55,2

651

Cha

ttano

oga

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

t h19

.30%

0.75

Cha

ttano

oga

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

th30

.36%

1C

hatta

noog

a A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

th29

.17%

0.75

Cha

ttano

oga

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

38,5

230.

75C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

23.3

6%0.

75C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

29.3

5%1

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN49

.41%

1C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

36,0

870.

5C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it33

.50%

0C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it26

.12%

1C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it44

.74%

1C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it50

,110

1C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

12.6

1%1.

5C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

13.6

7%0.

5C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

43.6

0%1

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN55

,425

1D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

15.2

6%1

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y23

.67%

1D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

41.9

9%1

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y63

,845

1.5

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it21

.17%

0.75

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it15

.25%

0.75

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it39

.81%

0.75

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it37

,447

0.5

Gai

nesv

ille R

egio

nal T

rans

it Sy

stem

23.8

0%0.

75G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

8.66

%0.

5G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

63.9

9%1.

5G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

29,5

830.

5G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny21

.67%

0.75

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

29.7

1%1

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

12.0

5%0.

5G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny41

,925

0.75

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

18.0

4%1

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

11.4

2%0.

5G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y39

.24%

0.75

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

45,7

390.

75Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

26.8

8%0.

5Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

43.7

3%2

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t38

.38%

0.75

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t49

,466

1Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or15

.37%

1Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or16

.56%

0.75

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

66.3

3%1.

5Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or56

,289

1Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

18.3

2%1

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity15

.13%

0.75

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity45

.69%

1Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

40,9

530.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

19.2

0%0.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

21.3

6%0.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

63.0

0%1.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

55,1

631

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

26.0

2%0.

5Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o31

.16%

1.5

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

32.3

3%0.

75Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o40

,950

0.75

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity14

.03%

1Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

9.62

%0.

5Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

49.0

4%1

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity58

,935

1.5

Shre

vepo

rt A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m10

.85%

1.5

Shre

vepo

rt Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

25.7

6%1

Shre

vepo

rt Ar

ea T

rans

it S

yste

m47

.56%

1Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

57,1

831.

5So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

13.0

0%1.

5So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

22.6

7%0.

75So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

0.00

%1

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b50

,833

1Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

19.4

0%0.

75Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

34.5

0%1.

5Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

14.8

1%0.

5Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

44,5

510.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

14.3

1%1

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n22

.48%

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n50

.32%

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

43,8

360.

75W

inst

on-S

alem

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

- Tr

ans-

Aid

of F

22.6

9%0.

75W

inst

on-S

alem

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

- Tr

ans-

Aid

of F

27.7

5%1

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F21

.65%

0.5

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F43

,352

0.75

B-7

Page 64: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Hou

rs

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

4,98

92

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.99

1Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em29

,710

0.75

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

2,25

50.

75Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t3,

113

0.75

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

0.91

0.75

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

24,9

640.

5Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t2,

043

0.75

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

3,06

80.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t0.

951

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

26,3

070.

5C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t1,

984

0.75

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3,99

11

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.93

0.75

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

40,7

951

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,85

21

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t1,

973

0.5

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t0.

971

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t23

,292

0.5

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t1,

643

0.5

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta3,

498

1C

harle

ston

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

1.00

1.5

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta45

,827

1.5

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta3,

134

1.5

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y4,

046

1C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.97

1C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

39,6

001

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

913

1C

hatta

noog

a Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut h

3,01

10.

75C

hatta

noog

a Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

0.90

0.75

Cha

ttano

oga

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

26,7

330.

5C

hatta

noog

a A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

th1,

886

0.5

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN3,

027

0.75

City

of T

alla

hass

ee-T

ALTR

AN0.

940.

75C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

28,0

940.

75C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

2,39

10.

75C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it3,

038

0.75

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

0.91

0.75

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

37,9

181

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

2,29

40.

75C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

3,74

51

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN0.

930.

75C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

42,0

261

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN2,

908

1D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4,65

61.

5D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.96

1D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

46,8

041.

5D

urha

m A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3,48

41.

5Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

2,67

40.

75Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

0.99

1Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

37,0

191

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it2,

644

1G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Syst

em2,

369

0.5

Gai

nesv

ille R

egio

nal T

rans

it S

yste

m0.

920.

75G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

23,9

110.

5G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1,96

50.

75G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny3,

361

1G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny0.

930.

75G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny31

,783

0.75

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

2,61

51

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4,03

11

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.99

1G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y35

,901

1G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y3,

129

1.5

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t3,

144

0.75

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t0.

920.

75Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

38,2

711

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t2,

434

0.75

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

tho r

3,31

10.

75Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or0.

981

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

46,0

351.

5Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or2,

686

1Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,99

20.

75Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.93

0.75

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity29

,567

0.75

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

172

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it3,

795

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

0.93

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it40

,067

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

2,81

21

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

1,89

40.

5Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o0.

711

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

24,2

490.

5Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o1,

282

1Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

3,92

41

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

930.

75Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

32,4

220.

75Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

2,15

90.

75Sh

reve

port

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3,91

41

Shre

vepo

rt Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.98

1Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

45,8

661.

5Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3,05

91.

5So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

3,76

41

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b0.

991

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b40

,876

1So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

3,01

41.

5Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

2,25

20.

5Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

0.93

0.75

Spa

ce C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t33

,515

0.75

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t1,

700

0.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n3,

380

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

0.96

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

36,4

141

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

Lexi

ngto

n- F

ayet

te U

rban

Cou

n2,

865

1W

inst

on-S

alem

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

- Tr

ans-

Aid

of F

3,44

71

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F0.

961

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F28

,652

0.75

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F2,

290

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

59,4

201.

5Al

bany

Tra

nsit

Syst

em10

0.00

%2

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y24

.00

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

37,4

460.

75Au

gust

a R

ichm

ond

Co.

Tra

nsit

Dep

t50

.00%

1.5

Alba

ny T

rans

it Sy

stem

23.2

5C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t38

,317

0.75

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

sit

45.6

5%1

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta22

.75

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

54,1

161

Cen

tral A

rkan

sas

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

32.6

5%1

Shre

vepo

rt Ar

ea T

rans

it S

yste

m22

.75

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t26

,553

0.5

Cha

pel H

ill Tr

ansi

t14

.00%

0.75

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b22

.50

Cha

rlest

on A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rta51

,156

1C

harle

ston

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

11.6

3%0.

75C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

21.7

5C

hath

am A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

53,6

801

Cha

tham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y35

.56%

1C

entra

l Ark

ansa

s Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y21

.50

Cha

ttano

oga

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

t h34

,595

0.5

Cha

ttano

oga

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

th29

.41%

1G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

21.2

5C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

33,9

470.

5C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

20.8

3%0.

75C

hape

l Hill

Tran

sit

21.0

0C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it45

,674

1C

obb

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it20

.45%

0.75

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

tho r

21.0

0C

ount

y of

Vol

usia

dba

: VO

TRAN

51,6

571

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN22

.92%

0.75

Sara

sota

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity20

.75

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y60

,987

1.5

Dur

ham

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y30

.30%

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

20.7

5Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

37,0

190.

75Es

cam

bia

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

0.00

%0.

5Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

20.2

5G

aine

sville

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Syst

em27

,232

0.5

Gai

nesv

ille R

egio

nal T

rans

it S

yste

m13

.89%

0.75

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F20

.00

Gre

ater

Roa

noke

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

38,9

600.

75G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny22

.58%

0.75

Gre

ensb

oro

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.5

0G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y45

,266

1G

reen

sbor

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y26

.09%

0.75

Knox

ville

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.50

Jeffe

rson

Par

ish

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nsit

Adm

inis

t45

,300

1Je

ffers

on P

aris

h D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

it Ad

min

ist

18.3

7%0.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansi

t19

.25

Kana

wha

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

55,0

421.

5Ka

naw

ha V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or19

.57%

0.75

Cob

b C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit

19.0

0Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

38,2

630.

75Kn

oxvi

lle T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

29.4

1%1

Cou

nty

of V

olus

ia d

ba: V

OTR

AN19

.00

Met

ro T

rans

it51

,285

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

28.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Tal

laha

ssee

-TAL

TRAN

18.7

5Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o29

,099

0.5

Poto

mac

and

Rap

paha

nnoc

k Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Co

20.0

0%0.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

18.7

5Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

54,7

821.

5Sa

raso

ta C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

68.9

7%2

Augu

sta

Ric

hmon

d C

o. T

rans

it D

ept

18.5

0Sh

reve

port

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

55,7

841.

5Sh

reve

port

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em21

.62%

0.75

Esca

mbi

a C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it18

.50

Sout

h C

arol

ina

Elec

tric

& G

as C

ompa

ny-C

olum

b50

,494

1So

uth

Car

olin

a El

ectri

c &

Gas

Com

pany

-Col

umb

23.5

3%0.

75G

reat

er R

oano

ke T

rans

it C

ompa

ny18

.50

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t41

,400

0.75

Spac

e C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t23

.53%

0.75

Cha

ttano

oga

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut h

17.7

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

41,8

760.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y Le

xing

ton-

Fay

ette

Urb

an C

oun

15.0

0%0.

75Po

tom

ac a

nd R

appa

hann

ock

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

o17

.25

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-A

id o

f F41

,817

0.75

Win

ston

-Sal

em T

rans

it Au

thor

ity -

Tran

s-Ai

d of

F45

.95%

1Sp

ace

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

17.0

0

B-8

Page 65: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4,73

6.83

1As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.50

0.75

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.4

81.

5As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

911

Athe

ns T

rans

it S

yste

m3,

879.

210.

75At

hens

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

13.2

50.

75At

hens

Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.40

1At

hens

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2.

681.

5Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T1,

487.

550.

75Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T12

.50

0.75

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

0.61

0.75

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

0.43

0.75

Cha

rlotte

sville

Tra

nsit

Serv

ice

9,40

7.18

1.5

Cha

rlotte

sville

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

17.7

51.

5C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce16

.39

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce1.

231

City

of A

lexa

ndria

3,06

2.30

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

13.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria8.

891

City

of A

lexa

ndria

1.95

1C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2,92

5.29

0.75

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m11

.83

0.75

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m4.

040.

75C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.76

0.75

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

19,0

51.4

22

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

18.5

81.

5C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E Bu

s48

.53

2C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E Bu

s1.

961

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P3,

977.

160.

75C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

13.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

1.53

0.75

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P0.

480.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nsit

Syst

em3,

600.

670.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nsit

Syst

em13

.67

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

4.17

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.87

0.75

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n7,

188.

761.

5C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

16.5

01

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n11

.16

1C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

1.60

1C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m4,

221.

011

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.4

50.

75C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m12

.37

1C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

050.

75C

ity o

f Rom

e Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent

1,42

2.05

0.75

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t12

.00

0.75

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t29

.50

2C

ity o

f Rom

e Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent

2.02

1C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em3,

570.

970.

75C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.58

1C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em5.

080.

75C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

0.88

0.75

CR

PTA

- W

acca

maw

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

3,81

2.79

0.75

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A21

.50

2C

RPT

A - W

acca

maw

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

12.2

51

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A0.

680.

75D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

5,33

4.80

1D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

16.0

01

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A3.

930.

75D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

0.90

0.75

Faye

ttevi

lle A

rea

Syst

em o

f Tra

nsit

5,30

5.37

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it13

.75

0.75

Faye

ttevi

lle A

rea

Syst

em o

f Tra

nsit

7.99

0.75

Faye

ttevi

lle A

rea

Syst

em o

f Tra

nsit

1.11

0.75

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny6,

393.

551

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny17

.83

1.5

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny13

.43

1G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

1.27

1G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4,59

8.71

1G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

15.0

01

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

230.

75G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.12

0.75

Hig

h Po

int T

rans

it4,

650.

111

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

12.7

50.

75H

igh

Poi

nt T

rans

it8.

641

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

1.97

1In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

1,03

2.00

0.5

Indi

an R

iver

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

on A

ging

, Inc

.10

.00

0.5

Indi

an R

iver

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

on A

ging

, Inc

.1.

380.

75In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

0.68

0.75

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

5,25

4.74

1Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y16

.50

1Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y9.

791

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.04

0.75

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t2,

507.

050.

75Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

12.0

80.

75Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

1.54

0.75

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t0.

360.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

3,16

2.54

0.75

John

son

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

12.0

00.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m6.

900.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m1.

150.

75La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

4,34

2.12

1La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

12.0

00.

75La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

8.28

0.75

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS2.

231.

5La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

5,74

0.64

1La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

13.5

00.

75La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

12.6

21

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n1.

070.

75Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

2,49

2.86

0.75

Lee-

Rus

sell

Cou

ncil

of G

over

nmen

ts11

.00

0.5

Lee-

Rus

sell

Cou

ncil

of G

over

nmen

ts0.

490.

75Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

0.48

0.75

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o2,

728.

090.

75Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

15.0

01

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o1.

000.

75Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

0.60

0.75

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

4,32

2.46

1M

anat

ee C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it13

.00

0.75

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Are

a Tr

ansi

t2.

740.

75M

anat

ee C

ount

y A

rea

Tran

sit

1.03

0.75

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3,86

5.64

0.75

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

11.4

20.

75M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y5.

520.

75M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

720.

75M

issi

ssip

pi C

oast

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

6,13

2.11

1M

issi

ssip

pi C

oast

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

17.7

51.

5M

issi

ssip

pi C

oast

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

5.63

0.75

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.59

0.75

Mon

tgom

ery

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em29

3.67

0.5

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.0

00.

75M

ontg

omer

y A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

290.

75M

ontg

omer

y A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

550.

75O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity5,

645.

721

Ohi

o V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.0

00.

75O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity5.

200.

75O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

490.

75O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e2,

249.

390.

75O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e12

.33

0.75

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

0.17

0.75

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

0.22

0.75

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n2,

113.

060.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

13.9

20.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

0.78

0.75

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

460.

75Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

581.

580.

5Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

14.0

00.

75Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.36

0.75

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

160.

5Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

1,88

2.06

0.75

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y13

.00

0.75

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y1.

760.

75Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

0.41

0.75

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

o r58

1.30

0.5

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or12

.00

0.75

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or0.

620.

75Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

0.36

0.75

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

771.

020.

75Sp

arta

nbur

g Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

24.1

72

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m9.

401

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m2.

781.

5Su

nTra

n2,

915.

770.

75Su

nTra

n12

.50

0.75

SunT

ran

3.16

0.75

SunT

ran

0.65

0.75

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t4,

934.

301

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t14

.00

0.75

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t3.

790.

75Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

0.75

0.75

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,65

2.89

0.75

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

17.6

71.

5Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it A

utho

rity

8.10

0.75

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y0.

870.

75Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Par

king

and

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

2,74

7.88

0.75

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y P

arki

ng a

nd T

rans

it A

utho

rit19

.00

1.5

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

1.14

0.75

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

0.61

0.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T5,

599.

201

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T13

.00

0.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T28

.14

2U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

5.83

2W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

5,69

7.76

1W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

14.0

00.

75W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

25.6

01.

5W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2.36

1.5

B-9

Page 66: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-10

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Hea

dway

(m

inut

es)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

re

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

25.5

91

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.4

10.

75As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity36

.99

1As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$3

7.14

0.75

Athe

ns T

rans

it S

yste

m37

.43

1.5

Athe

ns T

rans

it S

yste

m13

.94

0.75

Athe

ns T

rans

it Sy

stem

35.9

51

Athe

ns T

rans

it Sy

stem

$24.

830.

75Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T7.

100.

75Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T16

.66

1Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T10

6.25

0.75

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

$2.0

81.

5C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it Se

rvic

e14

.53

0.75

Cha

rlotte

sville

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

11.7

90.

5C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce21

.15

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce$4

8.05

0.5

City

of A

lexa

ndria

25.7

01

City

of A

lexa

ndria

13.1

80.

75C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria72

.83

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

$19.

381

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m10

.26

0.75

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m13

.43

0.75

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m61

.29

1C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$12.

301

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

23.0

51

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

11.7

60.

5C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E Bu

s11

.05

1C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E Bu

s$9

3.89

0C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

8.14

0.75

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P16

.96

1C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

46.5

71

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P$6

.64

1C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nsit

Syst

em13

.89

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

16.0

51

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

36.4

21

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

$16.

941

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n23

.88

1C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

14.9

71

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n25

.33

1C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

$39.

830.

5C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m14

.31

0.75

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

13.6

70.

75C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m45

.07

1C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m$3

9.19

0.5

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t38

.81

1.5

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t19

.18

1.5

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t48

.86

1C

ity o

f Rom

e Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent

$50.

040.

5C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.10

0.75

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.9

41

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

71.2

90.

75C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

$15.

661

CR

PTA

- W

acca

maw

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

10.3

40.

75C

RPT

A - W

acca

maw

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

15.1

91

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A22

.67

1C

RPT

A - W

acca

maw

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

$38.

110.

75D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

13.1

50.

75D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

14.5

50.

75D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

41.2

31

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A$1

2.32

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it17

.72

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it15

.97

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it33

.60

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it$2

2.52

0.75

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny18

.07

1G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

14.2

60.

75G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

33.1

61

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny$3

5.45

0.75

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.21

1G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16.3

11

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity42

.62

1G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$6.5

71

Hig

h Po

int T

rans

it26

.92

1H

igh

Poi

nt T

rans

it13

.66

0.75

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

30.7

51

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

$14.

071

Indi

an R

iver

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

on A

ging

, Inc

.7.

810.

75In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

11.4

30.

5In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

144.

380.

5In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

$5.2

61

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

12.6

20.

75Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.18

0.5

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

52.0

01

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$30.

720.

75Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

6.85

0.75

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t19

.15

1.5

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t84

.58

0.75

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t$1

9.92

1Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

16.5

71

John

son

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

14.3

60.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m64

.98

0.75

John

son

City

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$2

2.81

0.75

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS28

.60

1.5

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS12

.81

0.75

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS41

.55

1La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

$15.

071

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n17

.43

1La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

16.3

61

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n33

.30

1La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

$31.

450.

75Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

7.55

0.75

Lee-

Rus

sell

Cou

ncil

of G

over

nmen

ts15

.86

1Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

27.0

11

Lee-

Rus

sell

Cou

ncil

of G

over

nmen

ts$1

.61

1.5

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o10

.74

0.75

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o17

.94

1.5

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o33

.99

1Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

$7.5

81

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

16.1

10.

75M

anat

ee C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it15

.64

1M

anat

ee C

ount

y A

rea

Tran

sit

49.2

21

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$9

.52

1M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y9.

670.

75M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y13

.42

0.75

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

49.1

61

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$23.

130.

75M

issi

ssip

pi C

oast

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

7.64

0.75

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y12

.86

0.75

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y37

.10

1M

issi

ssip

pi C

oast

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$2

6.05

0.75

Mon

tgom

ery

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em7.

870.

75M

ontg

omer

y A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m14

.40

0.75

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

482.

320

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$9.8

41

Ohi

o V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

6.31

0.75

Ohi

o V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.8

50.

75O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity44

.01

1O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$3

1.15

0.75

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

3.20

0.5

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

14.8

61

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

76.8

70.

75O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e$0

.75

1.5

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n7.

940.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

17.3

71.

5Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

69.4

20.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

$3.6

31

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3.

440.

5Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

21.2

12

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity14

8.49

0.5

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$3

.15

1.5

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y5.

750.

75Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

14.0

10.

75Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

76.8

90.

75Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

$10.

061

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

o r6.

800.

75Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

19.0

51.

5Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

132.

100.

75Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

$2.5

61.

5Sp

arta

nbur

g Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

34.9

41.

5Sp

arta

nbur

g Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.5

70.

75Sp

arta

nbur

g Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

37.0

91

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m$1

2.45

1Su

nTra

n10

.68

0.75

SunT

ran

16.3

71

SunT

ran

79.3

40.

75Su

nTra

n$1

2.79

1Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

12.8

80.

75Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

17.1

51

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t33

.77

1Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

$13.

631

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.4

60.

75Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.51

1Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it A

utho

rity

65.3

10.

75Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it A

utho

rity

$37.

570.

75Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Par

king

and

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

5.34

0.75

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y P

arki

ng a

nd T

rans

it A

utho

rit8.

741

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

77.7

70.

75Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Park

ing

and

Tran

sit A

utho

rit$6

.11

1U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

62.1

32

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T10

.66

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T17

.02

1U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

$19.

881

Wilm

ingt

on T

rans

it Au

thor

ity31

.02

1.5

Wilm

ingt

on T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.17

0.75

Wilm

ingt

on T

rans

it Au

thor

ity34

.47

1W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$35.

730.

75

Page 67: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$51.

430.

75As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity16

.03%

1As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

92%

0.75

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

14.3

6%1

Athe

ns T

rans

it S

yste

m$5

3.41

0.75

Athe

ns T

rans

it S

yste

m13

.15%

1At

hens

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

90%

1At

hens

Tra

nsit

Syst

em20

.70%

0.75

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

$24.

281.

5Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T7.

08%

1.5

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

0.08

%1

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

23.2

5%0.

75C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it Se

rvic

e$4

2.60

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce14

.89%

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce1.

33%

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille

Tran

sit S

ervi

ce20

.60%

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

$56.

040.

75C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria16

.11%

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria3.

52%

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

41.0

9%0

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m$3

1.19

1C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

16.6

9%1

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m2.

08%

1C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

13.8

9%1

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

$44.

601

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

11.8

5%1

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

0.00

%1.

5C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E Bu

s5.

67%

1.5

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P$3

5.27

1C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

25.1

0%0.

5C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

0.59

%1

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P9.

07%

1.5

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

$56.

450.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nsit

Syst

em19

.65%

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

3.84

%0.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.14%

1C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

$85.

250

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n12

.57%

1C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

2.43

%0.

75C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

27.8

7%0.

75C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m$4

5.32

1C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m31

.10%

0C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

08%

1C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m11

.28%

1C

ity o

f Rom

e Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent

$65.

840.

5C

ity o

f Rom

e Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent

28.8

5%0.

5C

ity o

f Rom

e Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent

2.04

%1

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t20

.45%

0.75

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

$43.

481

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

10.0

5%1.

5C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em8.

17%

0C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

19.0

3%1

CR

PTA

- W

acca

maw

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

$32.

161

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A8.

77%

1.5

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A2.

43%

0.75

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A25

.06%

0.75

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A$4

1.21

1D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

19.2

3%0.

75D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

1.17

%1

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A13

.16%

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it$4

9.94

0.75

Faye

ttevi

lle A

rea

Syst

em o

f Tra

nsit

22.5

8%0.

75Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it3.

32%

0.75

Faye

ttevi

lle A

rea

Syst

em o

f Tra

nsit

20.6

9%0.

75G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

$47.

710.

75G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

11.9

8%1

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny4.

32%

0.75

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny29

.67%

0.5

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

3.65

0.75

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity27

.43%

0.5

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3.

07%

0.75

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity22

.44%

0.75

Hig

h Po

int T

rans

it$4

3.87

1H

igh

Poi

nt T

rans

it20

.12%

0.75

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

0.99

%1

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

17.8

8%1

Indi

an R

iver

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

on A

ging

, Inc

.$2

9.63

1.5

Indi

an R

iver

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

on A

ging

, Inc

.16

.47%

1In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

1.19

%1

Indi

an R

iver

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

on A

ging

, Inc

.18

.61%

1Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$3

9.58

1Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y23

.07%

0.75

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.95

%1

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

13.8

2%1

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t$8

8.43

0Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

17.8

7%0.

75Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

6.95

%0

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t16

.66%

1Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

$54.

810.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m19

.14%

0.75

John

son

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

2.81

%0.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m18

.20%

1La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

$52.

070.

75La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

11.2

8%1.

5La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

1.87

%1

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS22

.34%

0.75

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n$4

3.43

1La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

20.2

3%0.

75La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

0.18

%1

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n17

.45%

1Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

$25.

061.

5Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

22.2

0%0.

75Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

3.29

%0.

75Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

17.7

8%1

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o$8

1.14

0Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

22.0

1%0.

75Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

0.17

%1

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o9.

42%

1.5

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

$55.

900.

75M

anat

ee C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it14

.66%

1M

anat

ee C

ount

y A

rea

Tran

sit

9.77

%0

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Are

a Tr

ansi

t12

.75%

1M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$4

0.49

1M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.81%

0.75

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.70

%1

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

22.1

2%0.

75M

issi

ssip

pi C

oast

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

$35.

321

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y24

.05%

0.5

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y3.

32%

0.75

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.4

9%1

Mon

tgom

ery

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$6

0.03

0.75

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

13.3

4%1

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

6.29

%0.

5M

ontg

omer

y A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m12

.40%

1O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$3

7.76

1O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity21

.00%

0.75

Ohi

o V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1.77

%1

Ohi

o V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

19.8

7%0.

75O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e$1

4.12

2O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e16

.74%

1O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e0.

00%

1.5

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

0.00

%2

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$3

7.21

1Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

2.82

%2

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

00%

1.5

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n7.

74%

1.5

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$3

0.16

1Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

10.6

1%1.

5Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.00

%1.

5Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

16.4

6%1

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y$3

2.79

1Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

12.0

9%1

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y0.

71%

1Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

19.8

9%0.

75Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

tho r

$27.

911.

5Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

11.9

4%1

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or0.

00%

1.5

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or30

.45%

0.5

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m$4

6.25

0.75

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m10

.38%

1.5

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

34%

1Sp

arta

nbur

g Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

34.2

5%0.

5Su

nTra

n$4

3.21

1Su

nTra

n16

.85%

1Su

nTra

n0.

00%

1.5

SunT

ran

40.2

2%0

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t$4

6.33

0.75

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t25

.98%

0.5

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t1.

61%

1Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

16.7

0%1

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$62.

410.

5Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it Au

thor

ity23

.76%

0.5

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y4.

90%

0.5

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y13

.94%

1Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Par

king

and

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

$28.

681.

5Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Par

king

and

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

18.6

0%0.

75Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Park

ing

and

Tran

sit A

utho

rit3.

58%

0.75

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

44.1

0%0

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T$4

3.89

1U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

21.2

5%0.

75U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

0.45

%1

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T16

.17%

1W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$43.

301

Wilm

ingt

on T

rans

it Au

thor

ity16

.43%

1W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3.53

%0.

75W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

15.4

8%1

B-11

Page 68: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

re

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.2

8%1

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

31.4

7%0.

75As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity39

,560

0.75

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,99

50.

75At

hens

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

28.7

4%1

Athe

ns T

rans

it S

yste

m50

.30%

1At

hens

Tra

nsit

Syst

em35

,568

0.75

Athe

ns T

rans

it Sy

stem

2,47

40.

75Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T51

.28%

2Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T0.

00%

0.5

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

47,5

451

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

2,89

10.

75C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it Se

rvic

e13

.02%

0.75

Cha

rlotte

sville

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

44.3

4%1

Cha

rlotte

sville

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

39,6

410.

75C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce3,

358

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria11

.50%

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

54.1

4%1

City

of A

lexa

ndria

49,5

821

City

of A

lexa

ndria

3,75

51

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m27

.21%

1C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

21.1

9%0.

75C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

41,8

070.

75C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3,07

51

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

8.77

%0.

75C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E B

us35

.71%

1C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E Bu

s43

,189

0.75

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

3,60

41

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P11

.97%

0.75

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P43

.46%

1C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

54,3

101

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P3,

228

1C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.07%

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

85.9

8%2

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

38,1

110.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2,

317

0.75

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n9.

14%

0.75

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n63

.13%

1.5

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n53

,935

1C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

4,23

51.

5C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m16

.19%

0.75

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

38.9

8%1

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

44,8

871

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3,25

61

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t28

.04%

1C

ity o

f Rom

e Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent

47.4

4%1

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t22

,272

0.5

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t1,

402

0.5

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

13.6

9%0.

75C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em28

.95%

0.75

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

67,6

101.

5C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

4,24

31.

5C

RPT

A -

Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A5.

12%

0.75

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A5.

74%

0.5

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A24

,812

0.5

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A1,

511

0.5

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A25

.90%

1D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

71.3

4%1.

5D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

53,3

481

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A3,

666

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it14

.30%

0.75

Faye

ttevi

lle A

rea

Syst

em o

f Tra

nsit

30.3

1%0.

75Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it48

,528

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it3,

095

1G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

25.1

7%1

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny16

.43%

0.75

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny53

,991

1G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

3,81

01

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity16

.92%

1G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.2

7%0.

75G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

53,7

301

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

395

1H

igh

Poin

t Tra

nsit

28.5

6%1

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

16.8

8%0.

75H

igh

Poi

nt T

rans

it32

,706

0.75

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

2,47

60.

75In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

2.24

%0.

5In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

20.1

5%0.

75In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

29,0

250.

5In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

2,54

80.

75Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.33%

1Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.53%

0.75

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

55,5

921

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4,64

51.

5Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

8.54

%0.

75Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

29.9

5%0.

75Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

77,6

112

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t3,

841

1Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

11.4

9%0.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m24

.27%

0.75

John

son

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

49,8

221

John

son

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3,52

21

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS12

.47%

0.75

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS62

.71%

1.5

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS41

,930

0.75

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS3,

357

1La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

13.8

5%0.

75La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

22.4

8%0.

75La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

52,7

461

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n3,

220

1Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

7.52

%0.

75Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

8.08

%0.

5Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

19,3

290.

5Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

1,22

41

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o55

.07%

2Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

29.0

0%0.

75Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

51,6

591

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o2,

341

0.75

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

8.07

%0.

75M

anat

ee C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it38

.14%

1M

anat

ee C

ount

y A

rea

Tran

sit

58,8

291.

5M

anat

ee C

ount

y A

rea

Tran

sit

3,72

61

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

9.64

%0.

75M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y49

.92%

1M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y43

,084

0.75

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3,19

61

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y12

.19%

0.75

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y33

.41%

0.75

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y51

,521

1M

issi

ssip

pi C

oast

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

981

1.5

Mon

tgom

ery

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em11

.13%

0.75

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

85.4

6%2

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

34,4

940.

75M

ontg

omer

y A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

400

0.75

Ohi

o V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.6

5%0.

75O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity35

.80%

1O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity53

,606

1O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity4,

184

1.5

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

54.9

2%2

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

4.42

%0.

5O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e42

,978

0.75

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

2,96

40.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

4.91

%0.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

20.9

7%0.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

45,8

281

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n2,

641

0.75

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity11

.07%

0.75

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

53%

0.5

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity37

,407

0.75

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1,

931

0.5

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y2.

09%

0.5

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y48

.44%

1Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

40,5

560.

75Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

2,93

60.

75Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

tho r

5.84

%0.

75Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

53.2

8%1

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or27

,961

0.5

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or1,

457

0.5

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m22

.46%

1Sp

arta

nbur

g Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

35.0

3%1

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m21

,964

0.5

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m1,

750

0.5

SunT

ran

12.9

5%0.

75Su

nTra

n27

.91%

0.75

SunT

ran

66,5

861.

5Su

nTra

n3,

978

1.5

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t20

.00%

1Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

8.94

%0.

5Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

47,7

871

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t2,

811

0.75

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

10.5

6%0.

75Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it Au

thor

ity52

.73%

1Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it A

utho

rity

47,9

361

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y3,

089

1Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Par

king

and

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

20.6

9%1

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y P

arki

ng a

nd T

rans

it A

utho

rit33

.02%

0.75

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

34,3

020.

75Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Park

ing

and

Tran

sit A

utho

rit3,

925

1.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T0.

00%

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T2.

85%

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T18

,845

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T1,

656

0.5

Wilm

ingt

on T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.49%

1W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

22.0

3%0.

75W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

44,0

160.

75W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3,34

81

B-12

Page 69: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per V

ehic

le M

ileAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.99

1As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity39

,168

1As

hevi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

920

1.5

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

39,1

680.

75At

hens

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

0.91

0.75

Athe

ns T

rans

it S

yste

m26

,231

0.75

Athe

ns T

rans

it Sy

stem

1,88

20.

75At

hens

Tra

nsit

Syst

em32

,403

0.75

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

0.92

0.75

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

29,2

550.

75Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T1,

756

0.75

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

43,8

831

Cha

rlotte

sville

Tra

nsit

Serv

ice

0.99

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce32

,119

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce2,

723

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it S

ervi

ce39

,101

0.75

City

of A

lexa

ndria

0.99

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria35

,634

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria2,

703

1C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria48

,997

1C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.96

1C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

28,0

830.

75C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2,09

20.

75C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

40,1

180.

75C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E B

us0.

961

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

41,2

781.

5C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E Bu

s3,

509

2C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E Bu

s41

,278

0.75

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P0.

961

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P44

,299

1.5

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P2,

612

1C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

52,3

541

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.92

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

25,5

940.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1,

595

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

35,0

730.

75C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

0.84

0.5

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n22

,716

0.75

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1,

518

0.75

City

of K

ey W

est -

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n45

,433

1C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

971

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

34,2

121

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2,50

31

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

43,3

361

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t1.

001

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t13

,719

0.5

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t71

51

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t22

,211

0.5

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

1.00

1C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em46

,807

1.5

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

2,93

71.

5C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

67,6

102

CR

PTA

- W

acca

maw

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

0.88

0.75

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A21

,009

0.5

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A1,

383

0.5

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A21

,884

0.5

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A1.

001

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A32

,009

1D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

2,19

91

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n/M

ETR

A53

,348

1Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it0.

981

Faye

ttevi

lle A

rea

Syst

em o

f Tra

nsit

33,3

851

Faye

ttevi

lle A

rea

Syst

em o

f Tra

nsit

2,09

10.

75Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it47

,441

1G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

0.93

0.75

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny35

,697

1G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

2,50

31

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny50

,396

1G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.99

1G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

35,5

121

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

178

1G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

53,2

681

Hig

h Po

int T

rans

it1.

001

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

24,4

130.

75H

igh

Poi

nt T

rans

it1,

787

0.75

Hig

h P

oint

Tra

nsit

32,5

510.

75In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

0.98

1In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

18,9

200.

5In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

1,65

60.

75In

dian

Riv

er C

ount

y C

ounc

il on

Agi

ng, I

nc.

28,3

800.

5Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

001

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

35,6

571

Jack

son

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,92

81.

5Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y55

,467

1.5

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t0.

870.

75Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

33,8

451

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t1,

767

0.75

Jam

es C

ity C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t67

,690

2Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.99

1Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m24

,589

0.75

John

son

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1,71

30.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

49,1

781

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS0.

920.

75La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

27,8

140.

75La

faye

tte T

rans

it Sy

stem

LTS

2,17

21

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS38

,511

0.75

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n0.

991

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n50

,120

2La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

3,06

31.

5La

kela

nd A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

Citr

us C

onn

52,1

251

Lee-

Rus

sell

Cou

ncil

of G

over

nmen

ts0.

920.

75Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

17,7

990.

5Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

1,12

20.

5Le

e-R

usse

ll C

ounc

il of

Gov

ernm

ents

17,7

990.

5Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

0.54

1Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

25,4

170.

75Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

1,41

70.

5Lo

udou

n C

ount

y C

omm

uter

Bus

Ser

vice

Offi

ce o

27,7

270.

5M

anat

ee C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it0.

941

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

45,0

621.

5M

anat

ee C

ount

y A

rea

Tran

sit

2,88

11.

5M

anat

ee C

ount

y A

rea

Tran

sit

55,4

601.

5M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

991

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

22,5

120.

75M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

677

0.75

Mid

-Ohi

o Va

lley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

42,5

221

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y0.

951

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y40

,625

1.5

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y3,

160

1.5

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

48,7

501

Mon

tgom

ery

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

991

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

19,8

350.

5M

ontg

omer

y A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m1,

377

0.5

Mon

tgom

ery

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

34,0

030.

75O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

991

Ohi

o V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

39,1

931

Ohi

o V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

3,05

11.

5O

hio

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity53

,191

1O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e1.

001

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

32,1

101

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

2,16

11

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

42,8

131

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

930.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

33,0

341

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1,

902

0.75

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n42

,473

1Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.82

0.5

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity30

,533

0.75

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1,

439

0.5

Pee

Dee

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity30

,533

0.75

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y0.

830.

5Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

33,7

911

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Pol

k C

ount

y2,

412

1Po

lk C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

33,7

910.

75Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

tho r

0.87

0.75

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or24

,376

0.75

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or1,

280

0.5

Sant

ee W

ater

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

or24

,376

0.5

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

981

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m21

,538

0.5

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m1,

713

0.75

Spar

tanb

urg

Tran

sit S

yste

m21

,538

0.5

SunT

ran

0.95

1Su

nTra

n45

,069

1.5

SunT

ran

2,75

41

SunT

ran

63,0

971.

5Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

1.00

1Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

35,7

121

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t2,

083

0.75

Terr

ebon

ne P

aris

h C

onso

lidat

ed G

over

nmen

t47

,616

1Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

930.

75Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it Au

thor

ity26

,007

0.75

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y1,

677

0.75

The

Tri-S

tate

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y44

,790

1Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Par

king

and

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

0.91

0.75

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y P

arki

ng a

nd T

rans

it A

utho

rit21

,560

0.5

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

2,46

61

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

31,1

430.

75U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

0.90

0.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T10

,697

1U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

1,00

30.

5U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

16,9

380.

5W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.98

1W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

33,5

221

Wilm

ingt

on T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

546

1W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

43,1

001

B-13

Page 70: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-14

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: SE

Reg

ion

-- G

roup

DTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Spar

e Ve

hicl

e R

atio

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yC

ompo

site

Sco

re

(Mea

sure

s O

nly)

Ashe

ville

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.00

%0.

5C

ity o

f Fai

rfax

CU

E B

us23

.25

Athe

ns T

rans

it Sy

stem

23.5

3%0.

75O

kalo

osa

Cou

nty

Boar

d of

Cou

nty

Com

mis

sion

e22

.00

Bay

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

On

Agin

g Ba

y C

oord

inat

ed T

50.0

0%1

Cla

rksv

ille T

rans

it S

yste

m21

.75

Cha

rlotte

sville

Tra

nsit

Serv

ice

21.7

4%0.

75D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

ME

TRA

20.7

5C

ity o

f Ale

xand

ria37

.50%

1Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.75

City

of D

anvi

lle M

ass

Tran

sit S

yste

m42

.86%

1W

ilmin

gton

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y20

.75

City

of F

airfa

x C

UE

Bus

0.00

%0.

5La

faye

tte T

rans

it S

yste

m L

TS20

.50

City

of H

unts

ville

, Ala

bam

a D

ept.

of P

arki

ng &

P18

.18%

0.75

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n20

.50

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

37.0

4%0.

75Pa

sco

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

20.5

0C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

100.

00%

2Su

nTra

n20

.50

City

of M

onro

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

26.6

7%0.

75Ba

y C

ount

y C

ounc

il O

n Ag

ing

Bay

Coo

rdin

ated

T20

.25

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t61

.90%

1C

ity o

f Key

Wes

t - D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

20.2

5C

lark

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em44

.44%

1M

anat

ee C

ount

y Ar

ea T

rans

it20

.25

CR

PTA

- Wac

cam

aw R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

A4.

17%

0.5

Mis

siss

ippi

Coa

st T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

20.2

5D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion/

MET

RA

66.6

7%1.

5C

ity o

f Hun

tsvi

lle, A

laba

ma

Dep

t. of

Par

king

& P

19.7

5Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it42

.11%

1Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

19.7

5G

reat

er L

ynch

burg

Tra

nsit

Com

pany

41.1

8%1

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ark

ansa

s, F

ayet

tevi

lle/R

azor

back

T19

.75

Gre

envi

lle T

rans

it Au

thor

ity50

.00%

1C

harlo

ttesv

ille T

rans

it Se

rvic

e19

.50

Hig

h Po

int T

rans

it33

.33%

0.75

Gre

ater

Lyn

chbu

rg T

rans

it C

ompa

ny19

.50

Indi

an R

iver

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

on A

ging

, Inc

.50

.00%

1O

hio

Valle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

19.5

0Ja

ckso

n Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y55

.56%

1Sp

arta

nbur

g Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

19.5

0Ja

mes

City

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

100.

00%

2As

hevi

lle T

rans

it A

utho

rity

19.2

5Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

100.

00%

2G

reen

ville

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y19

.00

Lafa

yette

Tra

nsit

Syst

em L

TS38

.46%

1At

hens

Tra

nsit

Syst

em18

.75

Lake

land

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct C

itrus

Con

n4.

00%

0.5

City

of R

ome

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t18

.75

Lee-

Rus

sell

Cou

ncil

of G

over

nmen

ts0.

00%

0.5

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o18

.75

Loud

oun

Cou

nty

Com

mut

er B

us S

ervi

ce O

ffice

o9.

09%

0.75

Hig

h Po

int T

rans

it18

.50

Man

atee

Cou

nty

Area

Tra

nsit

23.0

8%0.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

18.5

0M

id-O

hio

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y88

.89%

1.5

City

of A

lexa

ndria

18.2

5M

issi

ssip

pi C

oast

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

20.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Dan

ville

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

18.2

5M

ontg

omer

y Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

71.4

3%1.

5Fa

yette

ville

Are

a Sy

stem

of T

rans

it18

.25

Ohi

o Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity35

.71%

0.75

Mid

-Ohi

o V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.25

Oka

loos

a C

ount

y Bo

ard

of C

ount

y C

omm

issi

one

33.3

3%0.

75Tu

scal

oosa

Cou

nty

Park

ing

and

Tran

sit A

utho

rit18

.25

Pasc

o C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n28

.57%

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

it Sy

stem

18.0

0Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.00

%0.

5C

ity o

f Mon

roe

Tran

sit S

yste

m18

.00

Pol

k C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s D

ivis

n P

olk

Cou

nty

0.00

%0.

5Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

18.0

0Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

0.00

%0.

5Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it A

utho

rity

18.0

0Sp

arta

nbur

g Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.00

%0.

5Pe

e D

ee R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

17.5

0Su

nTra

n40

.00%

1Sa

ntee

Wat

eree

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

17.5

0Te

rreb

onne

Par

ish

Con

solid

ated

Gov

ernm

ent

33.3

3%0.

75C

RPT

A - W

acca

maw

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

17.0

0Th

e Tr

i-Sta

te T

rans

it Au

thor

ity72

.22%

1.5

Mon

tgom

ery

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.00

Tusc

aloo

sa C

ount

y Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

44.4

4%1

Polk

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

Div

isn

Polk

Cou

nty

16.7

5U

nive

rsity

of A

rkan

sas,

Fay

ette

ville

/Raz

orba

ck T

58.3

3%1

Lee-

Rus

sell

Cou

ncil

of G

over

nmen

ts16

.50

Wilm

ingt

on T

rans

it Au

thor

ity28

.57%

0.75

Indi

an R

iver

Cou

nty

Cou

ncil

on A

ging

, Inc

.16

.00

Page 71: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up A

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

9,14

8.97

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

22.2

50.

5M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity24

.14

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

4.17

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y13

,253

.66

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y23

.67

1W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

42.4

20.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3.91

0.75

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it54

,239

.05

2N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

24.0

01

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it12

6.47

2N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

9.17

2So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

13,9

48.8

70.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

24.0

01

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o44

.09

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

ho4.

420.

75M

aryl

and

Tran

sit A

dmin

istra

tion

7,94

9.24

0.75

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n24

.00

1M

aryl

and

Tran

sit A

dmin

istra

tion

40.0

20.

75M

aryl

and

Tran

sit A

dmin

istra

tion

3.89

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

16,2

05.8

40.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)24

.00

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)20

.41

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

2.13

0.5

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Av e

11,2

68.6

50.

75Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

ve22

.58

0.5

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

47.0

81

Port

Auth

ority

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve2.

230.

5G

TJC

24,9

03.6

91

GTJ

C24

.00

1G

TJC

11.6

20.

75G

TJC

6.25

1

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

46.4

90.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity11

.15

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

4,94

5.64

1M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity15

1,82

01

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y43

.93

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y11

.22

1W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4,35

9.76

1W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

30,8

880.

75N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

72.4

51.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

7.90

0.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it2,

863.

620.

75N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

17,9

350.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

45.6

90.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

10.3

30.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

6,37

3.48

1.5

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

ho10

5,91

61

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n46

.95

1M

aryl

and

Tran

sit A

dmin

istra

tion

12.0

81

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n5,

271.

811

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n12

,039

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

31.3

20.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)14

.74

1.5

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

4,45

6.73

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)21

1,00

91.

5Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

v e29

.21

0.5

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Ave

13.0

91

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

961.

050.

5Po

rt Au

thor

ity o

f Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

163,

420

1G

TJC

57.1

11

GTJ

C9.

130.

75G

TJC

4,06

0.60

0.75

GTJ

C21

,338

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

17.3

70.

5M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$4

9.20

1M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$9

4.76

1M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity24

.76%

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.13

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$9

7.83

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$1

01.3

20.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

27.4

9%0.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

3.64

1.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it$1

92.7

00.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

$110

.40

0.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it24

.40%

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o13

.99

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o$9

4.61

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o$9

8.05

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

17.7

9%2

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n17

.29

0.5

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n$8

5.96

1M

aryl

and

Tran

sit A

dmin

istra

tion

$100

.83

1M

aryl

and

Tran

sit A

dmin

istra

tion

24.0

3%1

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

9.84

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)$6

6.10

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)$1

01.4

60.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)23

.93%

1Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

v e14

.19

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Ave

$141

.58

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

$87.

831.

5Po

rt Au

thor

ity o

f Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

23.8

4%1

GTJ

C5.

851.

5G

TJC

$23.

441.

5G

TJC

$115

.19

0.5

GTJ

C26

.83%

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1.61

%1.

5M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity12

.49%

1.5

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

40.9

2%1

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

19.4

5%1.

5W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3.69

%1

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.21%

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y46

.75%

1W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

23.3

7%1.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

5.43

%0.

75N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

15.7

2%1

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it57

.06%

1.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it14

.43%

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

11.1

2%0

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o18

.34%

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o41

.22%

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

8.97

%0.

75M

aryl

and

Tran

sit A

dmin

istra

tion

3.43

%1

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n18

.80%

0.75

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n31

.09%

0.75

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n0.

00%

0.5

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

3.94

%1

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

22.6

0%0.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)48

.91%

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)1.

40%

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Av e

6.05

%0.

75Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

ve14

.02%

1Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve22

.90%

0.5

Port

Auth

ority

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve9.

22%

0.75

GTJ

C2.

83%

1G

TJC

11.5

6%1.

5G

TJC

38.4

2%0.

75G

TJC

0.00

%0.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

33,7

330.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

010

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.88

1.5

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

24,9

650.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

37,0

121

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

957

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

810.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

25,4

881

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it30

,240

0.75

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it3,

801

1.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it0.

861

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it22

,667

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o39

,232

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

3,59

91.

5So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

0.86

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

27,7

231

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n32

,803

0.75

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n2,

598

0.5

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n0.

841

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n22

,880

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

48,5

051.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)3,

067

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

0.81

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

32,7

511.

5Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

v e45

,051

1.5

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Ave

3,11

60.

75Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve0.

770.

5Po

rt Au

thor

ity o

f Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

28,6

621

GTJ

C28

,401

0.5

GTJ

C3,

080

0.75

GTJ

C0.

780.

5G

TJC

18,4

350.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,23

90.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity29

,540

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

18.3

3%0.

75N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

25.2

5W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,27

10.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

30,0

720.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.9

9%0.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

uth o

22.2

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

2,86

81.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

25,9

910.

75N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

14.6

6%1

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

22.2

5So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

2,68

31.

5So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

33,6

141

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o21

.25%

1M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity21

.00

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n1,

894

0.5

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n27

,675

0.75

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n20

.96%

1Po

rt Au

thor

ity o

f Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Av e

19.7

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)2,

222

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

39,1

481.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)19

.53%

1W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.5

0Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

v e2,

190

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Ave

34,8

811

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

21.7

0%1.

5G

TJC

19.5

0G

TJC

2,01

80.

75G

TJC

22,1

660.

5G

TJC

20.2

4%1

Mar

ylan

d Tr

ansi

t Adm

inis

tratio

n18

.75

B-15

Page 72: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up B

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s Au

thor

ity d

ba M

TA L

10,2

27.2

30.

75M

etro

polit

an S

ubur

ban

Bus

Aut

horit

y db

a M

TA L

24.0

01

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L23

.26

1M

etro

polit

an S

ubur

ban

Bus

Aut

horit

y db

a M

TA L

3.08

1N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 26

,550

.06

1.5

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

21.0

01

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

0.57

0.5

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

1.49

0.75

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.41

,248

.18

2Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

18.0

00.

75Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

1.83

0.5

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.1.

130.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

6,75

7.41

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n21

.75

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

15.6

71

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n2.

581

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

6,32

3.15

0.75

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

21.3

31

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

16.7

71

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

2.44

1D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n3,

896.

370.

75D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n24

.00

1D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n10

.21

0.75

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

1.46

0.75

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.4,

595.

320.

75H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

23.2

01

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.0.

490.

5H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

0.35

0.5

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

18,4

58.9

01

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

15.1

70.

5Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n0.

990.

5Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n0.

540.

5C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

5,76

9.42

0.75

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

22.0

81

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

17.1

31

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1.76

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

8,71

8.88

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

21.1

71

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

29.8

21.

5Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.3.

391.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

it Se

rvic

e, In

c. a

nd L

ift L

ine,

Inc.

5,45

2.06

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.23

.67

1R

egio

nal T

rans

it Se

rvic

e, In

c. a

nd L

ift L

ine,

Inc.

16.9

71

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.2.

131

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity14

,605

.38

1R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

8.25

1R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.9

61

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

121

Rid

e-O

n M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y G

over

nmen

t8,

126.

060.

75R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

19.0

00.

75R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

27.2

81.

5R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

2.31

1Q

ueen

s Su

rface

Cor

pora

tion

8,60

4.93

0.75

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n24

.00

1Q

ueen

s Su

rface

Cor

pora

tion

14.1

81

Que

ens

Sur

face

Cor

pora

tion

4.67

2

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide )

Alt S

core

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s Au

thor

ity d

ba M

TA L

38.2

81.

5M

etro

polit

an S

ubur

ban

Bus

Aut

horit

y db

a M

TA L

12.4

20.

75M

etro

polit

an S

ubur

ban

Bus

Aut

horit

y db

a M

TA L

2,73

7.09

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L55

3,80

41

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

16.2

40.

75N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 10

.90

0.75

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

14,8

06.7

61

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

57,3

370.

75Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

23.8

50.

75Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

21.0

31.

5Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

82,9

24.4

12

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.43

,950

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n34

.58

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

13.4

10.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

1,28

5.29

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n90

,756

0.75

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

24.5

60.

75N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.10

.05

0.5

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

2,04

3.44

0.75

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

114,

289

0.75

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

20.4

60.

75D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n14

.04

0.75

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

7,45

2.28

0.75

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

274,

617

0.75

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.8.

120.

5H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

22.8

92

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.14

,979

.46

1H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

28,9

260.

75Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n10

.87

0.5

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

20.1

91.

5Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n12

,705

.44

0.75

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

32,6

770.

75C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

21.8

90.

75C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity12

.43

0.75

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,07

7.50

0.75

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

507,

709

1Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.40

.06

1.5

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

11.8

20.

75Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.23

,767

.87

1Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.47

8,15

41

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.26

.11

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.12

.25

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.3,

570.

640.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

it Se

rvic

e, In

c. a

nd L

ift L

ine,

Inc.

196,

631

0.75

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity34

.08

1R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16.0

81

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1,

649.

840.

75R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

335,

413

0.75

Rid

e-O

n M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y G

over

nmen

t33

.07

1R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

14.3

20.

75R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

5,59

5.10

0.75

Rid

e-O

n M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y G

over

nmen

t1,

913,

525

2Q

ueen

s Su

rface

Cor

pora

tion

45.6

21.

5Q

ueen

s Su

rface

Cor

pora

tion

9.77

0.5

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n4,

318.

130.

75Q

ueen

s S

urfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n11

8,57

60.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s Au

thor

ity d

ba M

TA L

17.5

11

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L$6

0.54

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L$9

9.63

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L23

.75%

1N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 4.

361.

5N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s $3

.37

1.5

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

$96.

410.

75N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 14

.62%

1.5

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.2.

191.

5Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

$5.5

61.

5Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

$72.

481

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.31

.56%

0.5

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n23

.51

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n$3

2.21

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

$71.

091

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n23

.06%

1N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.27

.65

0.75

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

$46.

880.

75N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.$6

8.66

1N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.21

.37%

1D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n35

.42

0.5

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

$34.

201

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

$68.

531

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

17.9

1%1.

5H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

30.7

60.

5H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

$4.2

41.

5H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

$69.

891

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.21

.11%

1Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n9.

041

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

$4.7

51.

5Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n$5

2.17

1.5

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

32.8

1%0.

5C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

29.0

50.

75C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$5

2.37

0.75

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$66.

941

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

21.2

4%1

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

17.1

41

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

$71.

270.

5Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.$9

5.74

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

26.9

7%0.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

it Se

rvic

e, In

c. a

nd L

ift L

ine,

Inc.

25.8

70.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

it Se

rvic

e, In

c. a

nd L

ift L

ine,

Inc.

$49.

390.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

it Se

rvic

e, In

c. a

nd L

ift L

ine,

Inc.

$75.

971

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.22

.32%

1R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

9.17

1R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$64.

660.

5R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$116

.23

0.5

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity21

.80%

1R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

19.6

60.

75R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

$67.

520.

5R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

$81.

851

Rid

e-O

n M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y G

over

nmen

t23

.11%

1Q

ueen

s Su

rface

Cor

pora

tion

15.1

11

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n$4

2.01

0.75

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n$1

35.1

80

Que

ens

Sur

face

Cor

pora

tion

35.7

8%0

B-16

Page 73: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-17

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up B

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s Au

thor

ity d

ba M

TA L

6.06

%0.

75M

etro

polit

an S

ubur

ban

Bus

Aut

horit

y db

a M

TA L

15.5

6%0.

75M

etro

polit

an S

ubur

ban

Bus

Aut

horit

y db

a M

TA L

36.6

2%0.

75M

etro

polit

an S

ubur

ban

Bus

Aut

horit

y db

a M

TA L

13.5

2%0.

75N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 2.

69%

1N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 16

.29%

0.75

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

46.6

3%1

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

59.4

2%2

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.0.

51%

1Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

12.5

5%1

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.77

.42%

1.5

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.0.

00%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n3.

57%

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

14.2

2%1

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n31

.50%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n0.

00%

0.75

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

6.85

%0.

75N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.14

.04%

1N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.29

.85%

0.75

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

36.2

7%1.

5D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n3.

26%

1D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n27

.02%

0D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n5.

26%

0.5

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

0.00

%0.

75H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

19.9

1%0

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.8.

66%

1.5

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.99

.68%

1.5

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.0.

00%

0.75

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

0.71

%1

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

8.70

%1.

5Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n94

.86%

1.5

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

0.00

%0.

75C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

1.31

%1

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

20.4

5%0.

5C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity24

.43%

0.75

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

17.2

9%1

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

3.85

%1

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

8.03

%1.

5Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.53

.97%

1Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.0.

00%

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.5.

08%

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.12

.27%

1R

egio

nal T

rans

it Se

rvic

e, In

c. a

nd L

ift L

ine,

Inc.

39.7

6%0.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

it Se

rvic

e, In

c. a

nd L

ift L

ine,

Inc.

20.0

7%1

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

57%

1R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

20.7

2%0.

5R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.3

0%0.

75R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.00

%0.

75R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

2.16

%1

Rid

e-O

n M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y G

over

nmen

t11

.78%

1R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

16.3

9%0.

75R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

51.9

8%1.

5Q

ueen

s Su

rface

Cor

pora

tion

0.82

%1

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n9.

66%

1Q

ueen

s Su

rface

Cor

pora

tion

38.1

8%0.

75Q

ueen

s S

urfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n0.

00%

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s Au

thor

ity d

ba M

TA L

42,3

691

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L3,

315

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L0.

871

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L30

,672

1N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 27

,760

0.5

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

2,33

20.

75N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 0.

760.

5N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 18

,845

0.5

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.36

,609

0.75

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.1,

654

1Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

0.86

0.75

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.29

,203

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

39,7

621

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n2,

884

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

0.89

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

29,4

341

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

33,9

290.

75N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.3,

301

1.5

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

0.86

0.75

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

24,4

410.

75D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n34

,602

0.75

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

2,51

70.

75D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n0.

931

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

27,0

560.

75H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

55,5

031.

5H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

2,41

30.

75H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

0.97

1.5

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.43

,640

1.5

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

58,2

682

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

2,87

11

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

0.96

1.5

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

47,8

432

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y37

,650

0.75

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,98

61

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.92

1C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity26

,401

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

39,1

410.

75Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.2,

920

1Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.0.

750.

5Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.23

,699

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.32

,831

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.2,

678

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.0.

881

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.21

,518

0.75

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity43

,054

1R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3,20

81

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

830.

75R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

28,7

911

Rid

e-O

n M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y G

over

nmen

t42

,487

1R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

3,47

31.

5R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

0.90

1R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

31,0

641

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n29

,926

0.5

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n2,

732

0.75

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n0.

710.

5Q

ueen

s S

urfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n17

,593

0.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s Au

thor

ity d

ba M

TA L

2,47

01.

5M

etro

polit

an S

ubur

ban

Bus

Aut

horit

y db

a M

TA L

37,0

581

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L20

.82%

0.75

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

26.0

0N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 1,

728

0.75

New

Yor

k Bu

s To

urs,

Inc.

D/B

/A N

ew Y

ork

Bus

21,0

530.

5N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 11

.72%

0.5

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.23

.50

Acad

emy

Line

s, In

c.1,

388

1Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

31,6

190.

75Ac

adem

y Li

nes,

Inc.

8.27

%0.

5R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

23.5

0C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

2,19

41

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n35

,513

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-H

artfo

rd D

ivis

ion

20.6

5%0.

75H

udso

n Tr

ansi

t Lin

es, I

nc.

23.2

5N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.2,

431

1.5

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

29,2

940.

75N

iaga

ra F

ront

ier T

rans

it M

etro

Sys

tem

, Inc

.19

.86%

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Sub

urba

n Bu

s A

utho

rity

dba

MTA

L22

.00

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

1,92

60.

75D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n32

,308

0.75

Del

awar

e Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

19.4

1%0.

75Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.21

.75

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.1,

907

0.75

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.53

,926

1.5

Hud

son

Tran

sit L

ines

, Inc

.23

.57%

1N

ew Y

ork

Bus

Tour

s, In

c. D

/B/A

New

Yor

k Bu

s 21

.00

Subu

rban

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

2,37

01.

5Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n56

,175

2Su

burb

an T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n17

.42%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Har

tford

Div

isio

n21

.00

Cap

ital D

istri

ct T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y2,

123

1C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity34

,738

1C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity31

.58%

1.5

Nia

gara

Fro

ntie

r Tra

nsit

Met

ro S

yste

m, I

nc.

20.7

5Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.2,

004

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

29,4

510.

75Li

berty

Lin

es T

rans

it, In

c.24

.28%

1C

apita

l Dis

trict

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity20

.50

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.1,

757

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.28

,800

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.33

.84%

1.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Serv

ice,

Inc.

and

Lift

Lin

e, In

c.20

.00

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1,

791

0.75

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity35

,873

1R

hode

Isla

nd P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

24.6

0%1

Rho

de Is

land

Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity20

.00

Rid

e-O

n M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y G

over

nmen

t2,

169

1R

ide-

On

Mon

tgom

ery

Cou

nty

Gov

ernm

ent

38,1

181

Rid

e-O

n M

ontg

omer

y C

ount

y G

over

nmen

t22

.71%

1D

elaw

are

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n18

.00

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n1,

800

0.75

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n21

,174

0.5

Que

ens

Surfa

ce C

orpo

ratio

n20

.36%

0.75

Que

ens

Sur

face

Cor

pora

tion

17.7

5

Page 74: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per

Rou

te M

ileA

lt Sc

ore

Tran

sit A

genc

yA

vera

ge

Wee

kday

Spa

n of

Se

rvic

eA

lt Sc

ore

Tran

sit A

genc

yP

asse

nger

Trip

s Pe

r Cap

itaA

lt Sc

ore

Tran

sit A

genc

yP

asse

nger

Trip

s Pe

r Rev

enue

Mile

Alt

Scor

e

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtat i

2,57

8.92

0.75

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

17.5

00.

5W

estc

hest

er C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti0.

360.

75W

estc

hest

er C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti1.

170.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n6,

637.

200.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n21

.17

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n17

.27

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

3.53

1.5

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss8,

555.

270.

75Tr

ansi

t Exp

ress

20.8

31

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss15

.02

0.75

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss2.

021

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.8,

186.

420.

75C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

22.7

51.

5C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

22.0

70.

75C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

2.71

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

4514

,200

.67

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

4519

.00

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

0.76

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

3.56

1.5

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A12

,656

.67

0.75

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A21

.00

1P

rivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

0.18

0.75

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A0.

730.

5Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rit4,

815.

740.

75Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rit18

.58

0.75

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

9.89

0.75

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

1.83

1Y

ork

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

4,93

9.29

0.75

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y18

.17

0.75

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y11

.02

0.75

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y0.

950.

75P

ione

er V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y5,

757.

820.

75P

ione

er V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.08

0.75

Pio

neer

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4.53

0.75

Pio

neer

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2.84

1.5

City

of L

ong

Bea

ch5,

648.

940.

75C

ity o

f Lon

g B

each

18.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Lon

g B

each

13.8

80.

75C

ity o

f Lon

g B

each

2.53

1La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

7,42

7.23

0.75

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r 21

.08

1La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

328.

501.

5La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

0.67

0.5

DeC

amp

Bus

Lin

es c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i12

,669

.94

0.75

DeC

amp

Bus

Lin

es c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i21

.08

1D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

471.

521.

5D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

1.20

0.75

Tran

s-H

udso

n E

xpre

ss c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A46

,536

.83

1.5

Tran

s-H

udso

n E

xpre

ss c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A24

.00

1.5

Tran

s-H

udso

n E

xpre

ss c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A96

0.17

2Tr

ans-

Hud

son

Exp

ress

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

2.81

1.5

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y7,

670.

730.

75G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

18.3

30.

75G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.0

60.

75G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2.49

1C

umbe

rland

-Dau

phin

-Har

risbu

rg T

rans

it A

utho

ri2,

650.

170.

75C

umbe

rland

-Dau

phin

-Har

risbu

rg T

rans

it A

utho

ri19

.58

0.75

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Aut

hori

6.45

0.75

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Aut

hori

1.35

0.75

Tran

s-B

ridge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A13

,862

.88

1Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

21.1

71

Tran

s-B

ridge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A15

1.69

1Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

0.28

0.5

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

5,00

4.98

0.75

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

19.5

00.

75W

orce

ster

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y16

.00

0.75

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

2.03

1S

outh

east

ern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y3,

619.

350.

75S

outh

east

ern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y15

.00

1S

outh

east

ern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y12

.65

0.75

Sou

thea

ster

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

1.66

0.75

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y4,

000.

490.

75R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.0

80.

75R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4.82

0.75

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

230.

75Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d4,

524.

450.

75Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d21

.67

1Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d7.

780.

75Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d1.

220.

75O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

94,6

25.3

62

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r24

.00

1.5

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r16

6.07

1O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

0.43

0.5

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n12

,239

.94

0.75

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n17

.00

0.5

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n0.

210.

75P

rivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

2.63

1Li

berty

Lin

es E

xpre

ss, I

nc.

16,9

67.9

61

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.20

.58

1Li

berty

Lin

es E

xpre

ss, I

nc.

2.17

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.1.

400.

75R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.10

,642

.35

0.75

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

21.7

51

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

0.82

0.75

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

0.99

0.75

Met

ro-N

orth

Com

mut

er R

ailro

ad C

o.4,

298.

370.

75M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

18.2

50.

75M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

0.06

0.75

Met

ro-N

orth

Com

mut

er R

ailro

ad C

o.2.

911.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rA

lt Sc

ore

Tran

sit A

genc

yA

vera

ge S

peed

Alt

Scor

eTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ave

rage

H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)A

lt Sc

ore

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaA

lt Sc

ore

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

14.6

70.

75W

estc

hest

er C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti12

.52

0.75

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

62.7

00

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

$89.

371

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

41.2

91.

5C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n11

.71

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

27.7

70.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n$2

9.09

1Tr

ansi

t Exp

ress

25.9

51

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss12

.84

0.75

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss18

.35

1Tr

ansi

t Exp

ress

$27.

841

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.32

.86

1.5

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.12

.14

0.75

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.14

.50

1C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

$52.

291

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

28.1

81

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

7.93

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

12.2

31

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

$1.3

21

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A10

.95

0.5

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A15

.01

0.75

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A11

.99

1P

rivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

$1.5

41

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

23.0

61

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

12.6

20.

75Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rit34

.63

0.75

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

$25.

401

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y13

.66

0.75

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y14

.33

0.75

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y37

.81

0.75

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y$3

7.91

1P

ione

er V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y42

.81

2P

ione

er V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y15

.08

0.75

Pio

neer

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

20.2

61

Pio

neer

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$33.

421

City

of L

ong

Bea

ch20

.85

0.75

City

of L

ong

Bea

ch8.

240.

75C

ity o

f Lon

g B

each

27.5

00.

75C

ity o

f Lon

g B

each

$42.

501

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r 23

.12

1La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

34.4

62

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r 11

.36

1La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

$1,8

97.7

40.

5D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

17.2

60.

75D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

14.3

80.

75D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

10.6

71

DeC

amp

Bus

Lin

es c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i$2

,443

.97

0Tr

ans-

Hud

son

Exp

ress

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

30.9

01

Tran

s-H

udso

n E

xpre

ss c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A11

.01

0.75

Tran

s-H

udso

n E

xpre

ss c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A3.

301.

5Tr

ans-

Hud

son

Exp

ress

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

$1,3

68.5

50.

5G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

32.2

11

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.95

0.75

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y31

.91

0.75

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$3

7.92

1C

umbe

rland

-Dau

phin

-Har

risbu

rg T

rans

it A

utho

ri16

.09

0.75

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Aut

hori

11.8

80.

75C

umbe

rland

-Dau

phin

-Har

risbu

rg T

rans

it A

utho

ri47

.43

0.5

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Aut

hori

$26.

251

Tran

s-B

ridge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A13

.07

0.5

Tran

s-B

ridge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A47

.18

2Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

8.04

1.5

Tran

s-B

ridge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A$1

,394

.28

0.5

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

24.9

21

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

12.3

00.

75W

orce

ster

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y49

.44

0.5

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

$42.

931

Sou

thea

ster

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

20.1

40.

75S

outh

east

ern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y12

.16

0.75

Sou

thea

ster

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

37.4

00.

75S

outh

east

ern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$4

0.09

1R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

18.1

10.

75R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

14.7

40.

75R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

46.7

10.

5R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$13.

071

Tran

spor

t of R

ockl

and

24.4

31

Tran

spor

t of R

ockl

and

19.9

51

Tran

spor

t of R

ockl

and

27.0

00.

75Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d$3

5.36

1O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

6.32

0.5

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r14

.56

0.75

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r3.

021.

5O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

$2,0

28.8

20

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n38

.71

1.5

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n14

.73

0.75

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n10

.86

1P

rivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

$0.2

41

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.14

.86

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.10

.59

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.9.

181

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.$1

4.00

1R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.23

.08

1R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.23

.35

1R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.11

.07

1R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.$3

.48

1M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

14.8

90.

75M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

5.12

0.5

Met

ro-N

orth

Com

mut

er R

ailro

ad C

o.33

.99

0.75

Met

ro-N

orth

Com

mut

er R

ailro

ad C

o.$0

.21

1

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rA

lt Sc

ore

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt

Scor

eTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Exp

ense

Per

O

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Alt

Scor

eTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt

Scor

e

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

$3,6

25.8

60

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

22.7

9%0.

75W

estc

hest

er C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti0.

36%

1W

estc

hest

er C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti21

.44%

0.5

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

$69.

581

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

21.4

5%0.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n3.

62%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

14.1

4%1

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss$4

8.10

1Tr

ansi

t Exp

ress

18.5

2%1

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss2.

47%

0.75

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss10

.90%

1C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

$77.

861

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.16

.56%

1C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

4.11

%0.

75C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

16.2

1%0.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

45$4

8.84

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

4525

.06%

0.5

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

3.93

%0.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

4518

.99%

0.75

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A$9

2.02

1P

rivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

20.0

4%0.

75P

rivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

2.00

%1

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A22

.98%

0.5

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

$59.

261

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

15.2

6%1

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

5.44

%0.

5Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rit20

.23%

0.75

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y$4

6.98

1Y

ork

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

17.1

8%1

Yor

k C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y1.

79%

1Y

ork

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

15.8

4%0.

75P

ione

er V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$3

15.9

50.

75P

ione

er V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.10%

1P

ione

er V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2.

06%

1P

ione

er V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y15

.86%

0.75

City

of L

ong

Bea

ch$6

3.83

1C

ity o

f Lon

g B

each

16.1

1%1

City

of L

ong

Bea

ch0.

14%

1.5

City

of L

ong

Bea

ch4.

45%

1.5

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r $1

33.5

51

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r 23

.51%

0.75

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r 0.

49%

1La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

18.1

6%0.

75D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

$89.

471

DeC

amp

Bus

Lin

es c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i24

.01%

0.75

DeC

amp

Bus

Lin

es c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i0.

50%

1D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

10.9

4%1

Tran

s-H

udso

n E

xpre

ss c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A$4

4.05

1Tr

ans-

Hud

son

Exp

ress

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

28.8

1%0.

5Tr

ans-

Hud

son

Exp

ress

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

1.07

%1

Tran

s-H

udso

n E

xpre

ss c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A2.

72%

1.5

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$6

4.09

1G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

14.7

0%1

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y6.

62%

0.5

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y15

.17%

0.75

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Aut

hori

$65.

551

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Aut

hori

15.9

5%1

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Aut

hori

2.35

%1

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Aut

hori

17.0

8%0.

75Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

$120

.12

1Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

24.6

8%0.

5Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

0.94

%1

Tran

s-B

ridge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A24

.46%

0.5

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

$66.

891

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

20.4

4%0.

75W

orce

ster

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y2.

64%

0.75

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

15.0

5%0.

75S

outh

east

ern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$6

3.81

1S

outh

east

ern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y13

.59%

1.5

Sou

thea

ster

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

1.56

%1

Sou

thea

ster

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

31.3

9%0

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$4

9.07

1R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

15.7

3%1

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2.

24%

1R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

15.7

3%0.

75Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d$1

10.9

91

Tran

spor

t of R

ockl

and

23.6

4%0.

75Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d9.

46%

0Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d5.

43%

1.5

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r$7

7.25

1O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

21.5

1%0.

75O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

0.58

%1

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r13

.79%

1P

rivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

$45.

021

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n12

.25%

1.5

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n0.

00%

1.5

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n12

.77%

1Li

berty

Lin

es E

xpre

ss, I

nc.

$95.

871

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.27

.46%

0.5

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.0.

87%

1Li

berty

Lin

es E

xpre

ss, I

nc.

8.65

%1

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

$98.

391

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

13.3

5%1.

5R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.1.

22%

1R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.8.

58%

1M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

$54.

931

Met

ro-N

orth

Com

mut

er R

ailro

ad C

o.7.

63%

2M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

3.81

%0.

75M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

7.63

%1.

5

B-18

Page 75: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

re

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

43.8

1%0.

75W

estc

hest

er C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti44

.29%

2W

estc

hest

er C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti37

,713

0.75

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

2,84

60.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n31

.58%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

0.00

%0.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n38

,578

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

3,33

21

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss32

.35%

0.75

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss0.

00%

0.75

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss34

,449

0.75

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss2,

705

0.75

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.30

.20%

0.75

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.20

.50%

1C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

26,2

330.

75C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

2,17

80.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

4510

8.33

%1.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

450.

00%

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

25,9

820.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

453,

053

1Pr

ivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

100.

00%

1.5

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A0.

00%

0.75

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A43

,990

1Pr

ivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

3,17

01

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

20.3

5%0.

75Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it3.

88%

0.75

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

39,8

040.

75Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it3,

028

1Yo

rk C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y34

.32%

0.75

York

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

5.75

%0.

75Yo

rk C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y46

,150

1Yo

rk C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

3,28

11

Pion

eer V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.50%

0.75

Pion

eer V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.36%

1Pi

onee

r Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

30,5

540.

75Pi

onee

r Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,16

20.

75C

ity o

f Lon

g Be

ach

26.2

7%0.

75C

ity o

f Lon

g Be

ach

48.2

6%2

City

of L

ong

Beac

h21

,920

0.5

City

of L

ong

Beac

h2,

630

0.75

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r 87

.70%

1La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

0.00

%0.

75La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

58,1

501

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r 1,

633

0.5

DeC

amp

Bus

Line

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i10

1.08

%1.

5D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

0.00

%0.

75D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

41,3

110.

75D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

2,63

40.

75Tr

ans-

Hud

son

Expr

ess

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

109.

67%

1.5

Tran

s-H

udso

n Ex

pres

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A0.

00%

0.75

Tran

s-H

udso

n Ex

pres

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A36

,753

0.75

Tran

s-H

udso

n Ex

pres

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A3,

189

1G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.24

%0.

5G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.00

%0.

75G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

55,7

611

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y4,

304

1.5

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Auth

ori

24.9

0%0.

75C

umbe

rland

-Dau

phin

-Har

risbu

rg T

rans

it Au

thor

i6.

81%

0.75

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Auth

ori

28,2

770.

75C

umbe

rland

-Dau

phin

-Har

risbu

rg T

rans

it Au

thor

i2,

308

0.75

Tran

s-Br

idge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A10

3.19

%1.

5Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

0.00

%0.

75Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

88,8

482

Tran

s-Br

idge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A1,

880

0.5

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.02%

0.75

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.54%

1W

orce

ster

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

53,5

201

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity4,

350

1.5

Sout

heas

tern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.2

0%0.

75So

uthe

aste

rn R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

16.7

9%1

Sout

heas

tern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y28

,917

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y2,

342

0.75

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y23

.89%

0.75

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2.

18%

0.75

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y47

,409

1R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3,29

31

Tran

spor

t of R

ockl

and

14.6

9%0.

5Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d52

.95%

2Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d47

,869

1Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d2,

529

0.75

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r95

.41%

1.5

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r0.

00%

0.75

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r77

,104

2O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

5,29

52

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n88

.61%

1.5

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n0.

00%

0.75

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n34

,569

0.75

Priv

ate

Tran

spor

tatio

n2,

331

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.41

.42%

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.0.

00%

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.37

,354

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.3,

020

1R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.73

.36%

1R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.0.

00%

0.75

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

57,1

411

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

2,55

10.

75M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

58.5

3%1

Met

ro-N

orth

Com

mut

er R

ailro

ad C

o.10

.10%

1M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

14,5

290.

5M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

2,67

50.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per V

ehic

le M

ileAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtat i

0.89

0.75

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

20,7

700.

75W

estc

hest

er C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti1,

658

0.75

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

33,7

520.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n0.

931

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

28,5

910.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n2,

441

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n35

,969

0.75

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss0.

971.

5Tr

ansi

t Exp

ress

27,3

140.

75Tr

ansi

t Exp

ress

2,12

81

Tran

sit E

xpre

ss33

,583

0.75

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.0.

921

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.20

,723

0.75

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.1,

707

0.75

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.24

,020

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

0.88

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n-45

20,1

750.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

452,

545

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

4522

,944

0.75

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A0.

860.

75Pr

ivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

32,5

461

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A2,

169

1Pr

ivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

37,9

701

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

0.88

0.75

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

orit

26,9

800.

75Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it2,

138

1Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it35

,075

0.75

York

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

0.97

1.5

York

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

37,6

471

York

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

2,62

71.

5Yo

rk C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

44,6

181

Pion

eer V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

961

Pion

eer V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y21

,995

0.75

Pion

eer V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

458

0.5

Pion

eer V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y29

,327

0.75

City

of L

ong

Beac

h0.

971.

5C

ity o

f Lon

g Be

ach

16,0

050.

5C

ity o

f Lon

g Be

ach

1,94

20.

75C

ity o

f Lon

g Be

ach

21,3

400.

5La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

0.83

0.75

Lake

land

Bus

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r 38

,632

1La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

1,12

10.

5La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

48,4

661

DeC

amp

Bus

Line

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i0.

780.

5D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

27,0

720.

75D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

1,88

20.

75D

eCam

p B

us L

ines

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmi

32,4

040.

75Tr

ans-

Hud

son

Expr

ess

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

0.77

0.5

Tran

s-H

udso

n Ex

pres

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A22

,160

0.75

Tran

s-H

udso

n Ex

pres

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A2,

013

0.75

Tran

s-H

udso

n Ex

pres

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A28

,204

0.75

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

951

Gre

ater

Brid

gepo

rt Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y38

,682

1G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,98

71.

5G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

52,8

341

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Auth

ori

0.88

0.75

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Auth

ori

20,5

000.

75C

umbe

rland

-Dau

phin

-Har

risbu

rg T

rans

it Au

thor

i1,

725

0.75

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Auth

ori

24,8

930.

75Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

0.99

1.5

Tran

s-Br

idge

Lin

es, I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A80

,555

2Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

1,70

80.

75Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

87,6

622

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

951

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity37

,834

1W

orce

ster

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3,07

61.

5W

orce

ster

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

50,7

321

Sout

heas

tern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.95

1So

uthe

aste

rn R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

18,2

920.

75So

uthe

aste

rn R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

1,50

40.

5So

uthe

aste

rn R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

27,4

370.

75R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.97

1.5

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y38

,423

1R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,60

71.

5R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

45,8

951

Tran

spor

t of R

ockl

and

0.85

0.75

Tran

spor

t of R

ockl

and

34,2

441

Tran

spor

t of R

ockl

and

1,71

60.

75Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d40

,615

1O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

0.90

1O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

44,2

931.

5O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

3,04

11.

5O

lym

pia

Trai

ls B

us C

o., I

nc. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arr

69,3

921.

5Pr

ivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

0.94

1Pr

ivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

27,9

770.

75Pr

ivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

1,90

00.

75Pr

ivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

32,6

400.

75Li

berty

Lin

es E

xpre

ss, I

nc.

0.74

1Li

berty

Lin

es E

xpre

ss, I

nc.

23,9

520.

75Li

berty

Lin

es E

xpre

ss, I

nc.

2,26

31

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.27

,465

0.75

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

0.80

0.5

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

36,2

181

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

1,55

10.

5R

ockl

and

Coa

ches

, Inc

.45

,827

1M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

0.86

0.75

Met

ro-N

orth

Com

mut

er R

ailro

ad C

o.10

,907

0.5

Met

ro-N

orth

Com

mut

er R

ailro

ad C

o.2,

131

1M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

12,4

650.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtat i

62.5

0%2

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r25

.25

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

New

Hav

en D

ivis

ion

25.8

1%0.

75Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

22.5

0Tr

ansi

t Exp

ress

22.9

5%0.

75Tr

ans-

Hud

son

Expr

ess

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

22.0

0C

NY

Cen

tro, I

nc.

15.9

1%0.

75Pr

ivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

20.0

0N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

4513

.73%

0.75

City

of L

ong

Beac

h19

.75

Priv

ate

One

of N

ew Y

ork

LLC

, d.b

.a. N

ew Y

ork

A16

.67%

0.75

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.50

Lehi

gh a

nd N

orth

ampt

on T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

30.0

0%1

York

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

19.2

5Yo

rk C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y18

.52%

0.75

Pion

eer V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.25

Pion

eer V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y33

.33%

1G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.2

5C

ity o

f Lon

g Be

ach

33.3

3%1

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

19.2

5La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

25.4

5%0.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-N

ew H

aven

Div

isio

n19

.00

DeC

amp

Bus

Line

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i19

.70%

0.75

CN

Y C

entro

, Inc

.19

.00

Tran

s-H

udso

n Ex

pres

s c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A27

.27%

1La

kela

nd B

us L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier

19.0

0G

reat

er B

ridge

port

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

36.5

9%1

Red

Ros

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.00

Cum

berla

nd-D

auph

in-H

arris

burg

Tra

nsit

Auth

ori

21.4

3%0.

75Tr

ansi

t Exp

ress

18.7

5Tr

ans-

Brid

ge L

ines

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

8.82

%0.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion-

4518

.75

Wor

cest

er R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity34

.09%

1Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d18

.75

Sout

heas

tern

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

50.0

0%1.

5M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

18.7

5R

ed R

ose

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.4

4%0.

75Pr

ivat

e O

ne o

f New

Yor

k LL

C, d

.b.a

. New

Yor

k A

18.2

5Tr

ansp

ort o

f Roc

klan

d18

.60%

0.75

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.18

.00

Oly

mpi

a Tr

ails

Bus

Co.

, Inc

. c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

r56

.67%

2So

uthe

aste

rn R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

17.7

5Pr

ivat

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

16.6

7%0.

75Le

high

and

Nor

tham

pton

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

it17

.50

Libe

rty L

ines

Exp

ress

, Inc

.14

.67%

0.75

DeC

amp

Bus

Lin

es c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

i17

.50

Roc

klan

d C

oach

es, I

nc.

26.5

3%1

Wes

tche

ster

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtati

16.7

5M

etro

-Nor

th C

omm

uter

Rai

lroad

Co.

14.2

9%0.

75C

umbe

rland

-Dau

phin

-Har

risbu

rg T

rans

it Au

thor

i16

.50

B-19

Page 76: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,88

8.95

0.75

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

19.0

81.

5Be

rks

Area

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

15.6

00.

75Be

rks

Area

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

2.22

1C

onne

ctic

ut D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

2,41

8.28

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n13

.67

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

470.

75C

onne

ctic

ut D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

0.92

0.75

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

8,65

1.13

1G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct15

.50

0.75

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.08

0.75

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

1.18

0.75

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

844.

350.

75M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

16.0

00.

75M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.91

0.75

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct1.

160.

75G

reat

er A

ttleb

oro-

Taun

ton

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut h

3,10

1.73

0.75

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th13

.08

0.5

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th3.

470.

75G

reat

er A

ttleb

oro-

Taun

ton

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

0.41

0.75

Luze

rne

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

690.

420.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

13.5

00.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

16.0

90.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

3.33

1.5

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.3,

705.

060.

75N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

13.0

00.

5N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

11.7

10.

75N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

2.13

1Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

4,11

7.11

0.75

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it16

.00

0.75

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it10

.34

0.75

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it1.

090.

75Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

8,01

2.83

1Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.0

01.

5Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.0

20.

75Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2.26

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-St

amfo

rd D

ivis

ion

9,47

6.82

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-St

amfo

rd D

ivis

ion

17.9

21

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n20

.83

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n4.

152

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4,46

5.83

0.75

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

17.7

51

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.0

90.

75Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

681

Mer

rimac

k V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

927.

170.

75M

errim

ack

Valle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.00

0.75

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

10.1

10.

75M

errim

ack

Valle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

210.

75C

entre

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

11,5

96.6

81

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity18

.92

1C

entre

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

69.5

71

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity5.

062

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

6,80

4.14

1To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t22

.00

2To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t27

.34

0.75

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

1.76

1U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4,70

8.41

0.75

Utic

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.50

1U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

9.47

0.75

Utic

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

170.

75T-

Tran

1,04

7.26

0.75

T-Tr

an12

.25

0.5

T-Tr

an0.

570.

75T-

Tran

0.09

0.5

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t5,

380.

470.

75W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

16.0

00.

75W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

0.83

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t0.

120.

5W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces,

Inc.

2,99

0.57

0.75

Wes

tern

Mai

ne T

rans

porta

tion

Serv

ices

, Inc

.11

.25

0.5

Wes

tern

Mai

ne T

rans

porta

tion

Serv

ices

, Inc

.1.

720.

75W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

0.76

0.75

Wes

tmor

elan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

249.

580.

75W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.1

71

Wes

tmor

elan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

040.

75W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.40

0.75

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n4,

057.

810.

75W

illiam

spor

t Bur

eau

of T

rans

porta

tion

18.2

51

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n16

.49

0.75

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1.

631

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

5,15

3.45

0.75

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

17.2

51

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

20.6

90.

75N

orw

alk

Tran

sit D

istri

ct1.

811

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

port a

5,43

2.41

0.75

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

porta

18.2

51

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

porta

22.7

60.

75Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rta2.

811.

5O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C34

,825

.14

2O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C21

.17

1.5

Ora

nge-

New

ark-

Eliz

abet

h, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

1726

.11

2O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-El

izab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C6.

162

Sout

h O

rang

e Av

enue

IBO

A c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

ar30

,045

.99

2So

uth

Ora

nge

Aven

ue IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

21.4

21.

5So

uth

Ora

nge

Ave

nue

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

ar10

21.5

02

Sout

h O

rang

e A

venu

e IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

4.61

2C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

640.

120.

75C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m16

.75

1C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m6.

450.

75C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

450.

75C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

25,1

22.4

52

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A20

.42

1.5

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A11

4.07

1C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

0.65

0.75

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it Sy

stem

2,66

1.83

0.75

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it S

yste

m13

.33

0.75

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it S

yste

m7.

480.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1.45

1D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

ti o1,

552.

410.

75D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio20

.00

1.5

Dut

ches

s C

ount

y D

ivis

ion

of M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

3.38

0.75

Dut

ches

s C

ount

y D

ivis

ion

of M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

0.79

0.75

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1,

520.

240.

75C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.4

20.

75C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.48

0.75

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

540.

75C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

9,77

7.31

1C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

17.7

51

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y19

.51

0.75

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y1.

571

Leis

ure

Line

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmin

.5,

218.

940.

75Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

16.6

71

Leis

ure

Line

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmin

.79

.64

1Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

0.77

0.75

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity4,

192.

680.

75Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

12.3

50.

5Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

6.42

0.75

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

871

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n8,

068.

431

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n18

.00

1An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

23.1

10.

75An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

2.39

1C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

151.

250.

75C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.50

1C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y13

.51

0.75

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.42

1C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

966.

950.

75C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m17

.75

1C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m3.

080.

75C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

471

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns3,

576.

130.

75C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

13.1

70.

5C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

0.59

0.75

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns0.

470.

75G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

941.

700.

75G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

12.5

00.

5G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

0.84

0.75

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.0.

430.

75G

reat

er G

lens

Fal

ls T

rans

it Sy

stem

3,03

3.28

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.00

0.5

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

5.54

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1.07

0.75

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

6,19

3.28

1G

reat

er P

ortla

nd T

rans

it D

istri

ct18

.42

1G

reat

er P

ortla

nd T

rans

it D

istri

ct15

.98

0.75

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

1.69

1H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Serv

ices

1,88

3.77

0.75

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

13.0

00.

5H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s0.

460.

75H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s0.

470.

75H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

1,28

3.50

0.75

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it14

.00

0.75

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it1.

410.

75H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

0.85

0.75

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

258.

750.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.4

20.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3.31

0.75

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

800.

75M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y3,

899.

810.

75M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.33

1.5

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3.27

0.75

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.69

0.75

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n21

,501

.82

2M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

17.0

01

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n1.

680.

75M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

0.53

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.2,

202.

580.

75N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

Inc.

12.0

00.

5N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

Inc.

1.08

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.0.

660.

75N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.1,

997.

520.

75N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.13

.75

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

3.15

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

0.92

0.75

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

565.

000.

75Be

aver

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

16.5

01

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2.

040.

75Be

aver

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.58

0.75

Cap

e An

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

2,71

4.27

0.75

Cap

e A

nn T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

13.0

00.

5C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity7.

350.

75C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1.

080.

75C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.1,

084.

350.

75C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.19

.52

1.5

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

4.76

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

0.67

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

1,25

7.42

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

19.0

01.

5C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.4.

860.

75C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.1.

190.

75C

ity o

f Ban

gor

4,60

1.36

0.75

City

of B

ango

r13

.00

0.5

City

of B

ango

r7.

620.

75C

ity o

f Ban

gor

1.01

0.75

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

4,18

2.51

0.75

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

17.3

31

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

4.14

0.75

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

1.01

0.75

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n4,

017.

220.

75H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

18.1

71

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1.

960.

75H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

0.37

0.75

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

ri e7,

126.

141

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rie19

.00

1.5

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rie54

1.92

1.5

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rie4.

062

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct4,

489.

910.

75M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

13.0

00.

5M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

3.74

0.75

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

960.

75M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

5,42

9.41

0.75

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y13

.50

0.75

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y4.

250.

75M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

0.84

0.75

Putn

am C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t2,

041.

050.

75Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

16.1

71

Putn

am C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t3.

120.

75Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.37

0.75

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t2,

396.

150.

75So

uthe

ast A

rea

Tran

sit

14.2

50.

75So

uthe

ast A

rea

Tran

sit

4.67

0.75

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t1.

210.

75Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

4,30

8.79

0.75

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt16

.00

0.75

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt1.

220.

75Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

0.83

0.75

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s2,

080.

000.

75Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

12.5

00.

5Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

2.06

0.75

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s0.

800.

75

B-20

Page 77: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Hea

dway

(m

inut

es)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Ca p

itaAl

t Sco

re

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

27.4

61

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.3

90.

75Be

rks

Area

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

56.3

60.

75Be

rks

Area

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

$29.

251

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n25

.62

1C

onne

ctic

ut D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

27.9

62

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n14

.18

1.5

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$1

4.77

1G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct15

.76

0.75

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

13.3

00.

75G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct18

.05

1G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct$0

.39

1M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

13.5

00.

75M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

11.6

50.

75M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

86.9

40.

5M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$2.9

71

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

t h9.

570.

75G

reat

er A

ttleb

oro-

Taun

ton

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

23.1

01.

5G

reat

er A

ttleb

oro-

Taun

ton

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

40.4

21

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th$1

6.71

1Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

49.6

72

Luze

rne

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity14

.91

0.75

Luze

rne

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity34

.40

1Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

$20.

701

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.26

.41

1N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

12.3

90.

75N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

37.5

11

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.$2

7.99

1Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

14.9

90.

75Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

13.7

20.

75Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

24.9

81

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it$4

0.78

1Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

28.5

41

Broc

kton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.66

0.75

Broc

kton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.76

1Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$44.

811

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n48

.22

2C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-St

amfo

rd D

ivis

ion

11.6

10.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-St

amfo

rd D

ivis

ion

20.2

01

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n$2

7.37

1Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity21

.04

1Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity12

.54

0.75

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

31.4

01

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$36.

681

Mer

rimac

k V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity16

.90

0.75

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.9

60.

75M

errim

ack

Valle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity51

.56

0.75

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$38.

031

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity48

.44

2C

entre

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

9.58

0.5

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity12

.39

1.5

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$6

8.18

1To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t21

.70

1To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t12

.29

0.75

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

26.1

51

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

$64.

011

Utic

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y14

.15

0.75

Utic

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.14

0.75

Utic

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y35

.63

1U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$28.

221

T-Tr

an3.

000.

5T-

Tran

33.4

92

T-Tr

an71

.22

0.75

T-Tr

an$8

.97

1W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

1.88

0.5

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t15

.66

1W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

21.6

31

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t$1

7.21

1W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces,

Inc.

10.4

80.

75W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

13.7

80.

75W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

38.4

51

Wes

tern

Mai

ne T

rans

porta

tion

Serv

ices

, Inc

.$6

.50

1W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

7.29

0.75

Wes

tmor

elan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.01

1W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

112.

500.

5W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$8.5

81

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n25

.04

1W

illiam

spor

t Bur

eau

of T

rans

porta

tion

15.3

51

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n42

.47

1W

illiam

spor

t Bur

eau

of T

rans

porta

tion

$35.

221

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

24.7

81

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

13.6

90.

75N

orw

alk

Tran

sit D

istri

ct29

.37

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$4

6.27

1Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rt a38

.17

1.5

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

porta

13.5

80.

75Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rta27

.86

1Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rta$3

2.03

1O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C56

.55

2O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C9.

180.

5O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-El

izab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C7.

531.

5O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-El

izab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C$9

95.2

40

Sout

h O

rang

e Av

enue

IBO

A c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

ar43

.70

2So

uth

Ora

nge

Aven

ue IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

9.47

0.5

Sout

h O

rang

e A

venu

e IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

7.70

1.5

Sout

h O

rang

e A

venu

e IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

$1,0

29.9

20

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

9.71

0.75

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

21.4

91.

5C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m65

.37

0.75

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$38.

881

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A9.

270.

75C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

14.2

20.

75C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

7.62

1.5

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A$5

24.3

80

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it Sy

stem

17.9

80.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

12.4

30.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

67.6

20.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

$19.

421

Dut

ches

s C

ount

y D

ivis

ion

of M

ass

Tran

spor

tati o

17.9

00.

75D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio22

.65

1.5

Dut

ches

s C

ount

y D

ivis

ion

of M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

78.6

30.

75D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio$8

.03

1C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

6.82

0.75

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity12

.51

0.75

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity53

.37

0.75

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$8

.67

1C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

20.5

01

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y13

.06

0.75

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y13

.52

1.5

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y$4

8.70

1Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

24.6

41

Leis

ure

Line

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmin

.31

.80

2Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

5.62

1.5

Leis

ure

Line

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmin

.$3

83.4

50.

5Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.6

41

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity10

.52

0.75

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity37

.47

1Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$19.

231

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n36

.40

1.5

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n15

.25

0.75

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n13

.11

1.5

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$4

7.61

1C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.39

0.75

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

12.2

50.

75C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y80

.11

0.75

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$46.

991

City

of N

ashu

a N

ashu

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

18.6

21

City

of N

ashu

a N

ashu

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.6

30.

75C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m55

.37

0.75

City

of N

ashu

a N

ashu

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$7.3

51

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns8.

480.

75C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

17.9

01

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns62

.36

0.75

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns$4

.15

1G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

5.82

0.5

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.13

.51

0.75

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.14

2.13

0G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

$9.0

61

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.02

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Syst

em15

.98

1G

reat

er G

lens

Fal

ls T

rans

it S

yste

m72

.75

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

$13.

641

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

18.5

71

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

11.0

10.

75G

reat

er P

ortla

nd T

rans

it D

istri

ct27

.92

1G

reat

er P

ortla

nd T

rans

it D

istri

ct$4

9.71

1H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Serv

ices

7.14

0.75

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

15.3

41

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

89.1

80.

5H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s$1

.87

1H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

12.3

70.

75H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

14.6

30.

75H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

104.

580.

5H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

$10.

851

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity9.

880.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

12.3

00.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

54.4

90.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$17.

951

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

9.47

0.75

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

13.6

40.

75M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y31

.16

1M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$1

6.26

1M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

12.8

30.

75M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

24.2

21.

5M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

4.37

1.5

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n$7

.42

1N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

Inc.

10.9

50.

75N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

Inc.

16.5

11

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.53

.55

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.$4

.56

1N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.14

.92

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

16.2

11

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

82.7

80.

5N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.$9

.14

1Be

aver

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

12.7

70.

75Be

aver

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

22.0

91.

5Be

aver

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

47.8

01

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$1

1.63

1C

ape

Ann

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity16

.42

0.75

Cap

e A

nn T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

15.2

70.

75C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity23

.99

1C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$2

7.18

1C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.13

.91

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

20.7

81.

5C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.11

9.99

0C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.$2

1.92

1C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.17

.60

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

14.8

10.

75C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.12

5.59

0C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.$1

5.04

1C

ity o

f Ban

gor

16.2

70.

75C

ity o

f Ban

gor

16.1

41

City

of B

ango

r37

.51

1C

ity o

f Ban

gor

$14.

251

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

16.3

60.

75H

ousa

toni

c Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it16

.16

1H

ousa

toni

c Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it37

.14

1H

ousa

toni

c Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it$1

1.76

1H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

6.49

0.5

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n17

.35

1H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

46.8

91

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$1

5.92

1La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arri e

22.3

61

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rie5.

510.

5La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

44.4

31

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rie$7

53.5

40

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct15

.36

0.75

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct16

.04

1M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

41.9

51

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$1

3.12

1M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

8.81

0.75

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y10

.52

0.75

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y36

.11

1M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

$23.

671

Putn

am C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t7.

630.

75Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

20.6

51.

5Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

110.

400.

5Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

$22.

591

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t19

.19

1So

uthe

ast A

rea

Tran

sit

15.8

71

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t65

.39

0.75

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t$1

4.15

1Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

9.57

0.75

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt11

.49

0.75

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt31

.44

1Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

$5.7

61

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s7.

700.

75Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

9.67

0.5

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s86

.85

0.5

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s$9

.89

1

B-21

Page 78: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$51.

481

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

15.0

9%1

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y1.

84%

1Be

rks

Area

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

20.0

7%0.

75C

onne

ctic

ut D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

$807

.64

0C

onne

ctic

ut D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

12.2

8%1

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

85%

1C

onne

ctic

ut D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

16.1

7%1

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$81.

000.

75G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct2.

47%

2G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct0.

00%

1.5

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

6.61

%1.

5M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$44.

241

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct7.

47%

1.5

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

00%

1.5

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct21

.10%

0.75

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

t h$4

6.03

1G

reat

er A

ttleb

oro-

Taun

ton

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

8.66

%1.

5G

reat

er A

ttleb

oro-

Taun

ton

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

0.90

%1

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th7.

54%

1.5

Luze

rne

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$6

3.90

1Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

23.6

5%0.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

2.13

%1

Luze

rne

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity14

.93%

1N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

$63.

111

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.13

.90%

1N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

1.29

%1

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.20

.19%

0.75

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it$5

9.13

1Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

16.8

0%1

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it2.

94%

0.75

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it17

.73%

0.75

Broc

kton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$6

7.23

0.75

Broc

kton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.09%

1Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.07

%1

Broc

kton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y15

.98%

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-St

amfo

rd D

ivis

ion

$63.

361

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n22

.70%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n3.

49%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n10

.77%

1Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

8.97

1Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity21

.37%

0.75

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.71

%1

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

7.40

%1.

5M

errim

ack

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$63.

571

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16.2

1%1

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.38

%1

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

15.9

6%1

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$4

7.47

1C

entre

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

15.2

7%1

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity4.

71%

0.5

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity10

.82%

1To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$5

0.80

1To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t17

.38%

0.75

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

1.24

%1

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

23.8

7%0.

75U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$42.

181

Utic

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y14

.14%

1U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

5.33

%0.

5U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.8

8%0.

75T-

Tran

$47.

191

T-Tr

an10

.58%

1T-

Tran

1.81

%1

T-Tr

an24

.45%

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t$3

8.94

1W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

20.3

6%0.

75W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

2.55

%0.

75W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

15.9

1%1

Wes

tern

Mai

ne T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s, In

c.$3

9.55

1W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

35.0

2%0

Wes

tern

Mai

ne T

rans

porta

tion

Serv

ices

, Inc

.7.

02%

0W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

0.72

%1.

5W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$60.

241

Wes

tmor

elan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y10

.84%

1W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.00

%1.

5W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

26.6

7%0.

5W

illiam

spor

t Bur

eau

of T

rans

porta

tion

$53.

451

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n19

.89%

0.75

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n2.

60%

0.75

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n14

.74%

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$5

5.42

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit D

istri

ct18

.87%

0.75

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.67

%1

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

9.96

%1

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

port a

$53.

711

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

porta

17.3

9%0.

75Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rta1.

64%

1Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rta9.

11%

1O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C$3

2.60

1O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C20

.12%

0.75

Ora

nge-

New

ark-

Eliz

abet

h, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

2.16

%1

Ora

nge-

New

ark-

Eliz

abet

h, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

13.9

3%1

Sout

h O

rang

e Av

enue

IBO

A c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

ar$4

4.06

1So

uth

Ora

nge

Aven

ue IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

40.2

5%0

Sout

h O

rang

e A

venu

e IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

4.93

%0.

5So

uth

Ora

nge

Ave

nue

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

ar11

.42%

1C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m$5

8.49

1C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m17

.56%

0.75

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

8.66

%0

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

28.8

5%0.

5C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

$42.

611

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A18

.51%

0.75

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A0.

76%

1C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

23.7

6%0.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$4

6.71

1C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

15.5

2%1

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it S

yste

m4.

84%

0.5

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it S

yste

m16

.10%

1D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

ti o$4

2.51

1D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio14

.58%

1D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio1.

47%

1D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio5.

64%

1.5

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$3

9.88

1C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

9.17

%1.

5C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4.59

%0.

5C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

8.28

%1

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y$5

1.17

1C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

19.1

4%0.

75C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

0.82

%1

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y11

.84%

1Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

$118

.62

0.75

Leis

ure

Line

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmin

.28

.28%

0.5

Leis

ure

Line

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmin

.0.

35%

1Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

4.83

%1.

5Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$58.

811

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity11

.21%

1Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

7.85

%0

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity23

.18%

0.75

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$7

5.01

0.75

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n17

.44%

0.75

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

46%

1An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

9.94

%1

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$60.

491

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

22.1

1%0.

75C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y6.

07%

0.5

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

16.9

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m$4

4.40

1C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m13

.44%

1C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

69%

1C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m15

.09%

1C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

$59.

271

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns12

.92%

1C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

0.68

%1

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns16

.07%

1G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

$62.

581

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.25

.68%

0.5

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.2.

89%

0.75

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.39

.13%

0G

reat

er G

lens

Fal

ls T

rans

it Sy

stem

$41.

901

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.62%

1G

reat

er G

lens

Fal

ls T

rans

it S

yste

m3.

05%

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

16.5

8%1

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$57.

791

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

17.0

1%1

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2.40

%0.

75G

reat

er P

ortla

nd T

rans

it D

istri

ct13

.85%

1H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Serv

ices

$29.

131

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

24.4

5%0.

75H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s0.

05%

1.5

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

5.86

%1.

5H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

$95.

070.

75H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

18.7

3%0.

75H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

1.83

%1

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it11

.21%

1M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$53.

631

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity20

.48%

0.75

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity4.

46%

0.5

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.54%

1M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$4

7.11

1M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.00%

1M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2.

00%

1M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.00%

0.75

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n$5

6.62

1M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

9.95

%1.

5M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

7.24

%0

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n24

.37%

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.$4

6.45

1N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

Inc.

14.0

1%1

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.1.

19%

1N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

Inc.

18.1

8%0.

75N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.$4

3.28

1N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.15

.83%

1N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.1.

28%

1N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.16

.85%

0.75

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$7

2.70

0.75

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.01%

1Be

aver

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.52

%1

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y45

.90%

0C

ape

Ann

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$6

0.69

1C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity14

.06%

1C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

91%

1C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity34

.41%

0C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.$6

4.01

1C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.19

.75%

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

1.57

%1

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

26.0

1%0.

5C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.$5

4.50

1C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.15

.68%

1C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.1.

66%

1C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.24

.11%

0.75

City

of B

ango

r$3

0.41

1C

ity o

f Ban

gor

13.4

0%1

City

of B

ango

r0.

28%

1C

ity o

f Ban

gor

14.9

1%1

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

$46.

501

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

12.2

7%1

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

1.07

%1

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

24.3

2%0.

75H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

$52.

781

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n6.

98%

1.5

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1.

18%

1H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

14.6

6%1

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rie$3

1.09

1La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

43.9

1%0

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rie1.

00%

1La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

13.2

6%1

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$5

3.94

1M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

14.9

3%1

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct1.

56%

1M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

39.0

0%0

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$4

9.12

1M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

15.4

3%1

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y4.

20%

0.75

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y14

.59%

1Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

$55.

331

Putn

am C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t25

.44%

0.5

Putn

am C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t0.

30%

1Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.45

%1.

5So

uthe

ast A

rea

Tran

sit

$58.

151

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t24

.54%

0.5

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t1.

86%

1So

uthe

ast A

rea

Tran

sit

16.3

3%1

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt$4

5.26

1Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

13.8

5%1

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt0.

04%

1.5

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt16

.49%

1Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

$36.

941

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s13

.12%

1Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

0.40

%1

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s10

.51%

1

B-22

Page 79: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

re

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

29.0

5%0.

75Be

rks

Area

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2.

81%

0.75

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y34

,295

0.75

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y2,

771

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n21

.55%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

00%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n27

,698

0.5

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1,

283

0.5

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.45

%0.

5G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct52

.43%

1.5

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

36,4

260.

75G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

739

0.75

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct33

.53%

1M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

18.0

6%0.

75M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

49,5

181

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct4,

382

1.5

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

t h27

.39%

0.75

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th10

.61%

0.75

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th51

,110

1G

reat

er A

ttleb

oro-

Taun

ton

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

2,28

10.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

16.1

6%0.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

7.83

%0.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

34,0

150.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

2,34

80.

75N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

22.8

5%0.

75N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

0.00

%0.

75N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

32,2

760.

75N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

2,49

00.

75Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

25.6

5%0.

75Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

2.91

%0.

75Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

24,9

670.

5Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

1,78

00.

5Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

26.6

7%0.

75Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

12.4

6%0.

75Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

34,5

340.

75Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,66

80.

75C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-St

amfo

rd D

ivis

ion

40.5

0%1

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n0.

00%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n37

,849

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n3,

276

1Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity42

.19%

1Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity4.

75%

0.75

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

30,7

990.

75Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

464

0.75

Mer

rimac

k V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity11

.80%

0.75

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.7

6%1

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

40,1

101

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,92

91

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity43

.14%

1C

entre

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

5.31

%0.

75C

entre

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

30,5

970.

75C

entre

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

2,95

71

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

32.9

1%1

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

21.0

4%1

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

38,0

220.

75To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t3,

110

1U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

26.8

6%0.

75U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

8.53

%0.

75U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

35,3

750.

75U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,87

81

T-Tr

an41

.67%

1T-

Tran

7.22

%0.

75T-

Tran

45,0

081

T-Tr

an1,

403

0.5

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t21

.58%

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t24

.86%

1W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

30,8

280.

75W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

2,08

20.

75W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces,

Inc.

5.64

%0.

75W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

0.00

%0.

75W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

28,9

580.

75W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

2,04

20.

75W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

10.7

9%0.

75W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

16.4

5%0.

75W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

52,6

531.

5W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,80

81

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n18

.14%

0.75

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n9.

06%

0.75

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n45

,451

1W

illiam

spor

t Bur

eau

of T

rans

porta

tion

3,12

31

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

22.6

6%0.

75N

orw

alk

Tran

sit D

istri

ct6.

42%

0.75

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

36,3

980.

75N

orw

alk

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

689

0.75

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

port a

26.1

0%0.

75Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rta10

.78%

0.75

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

porta

37,1

230.

75Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rta2,

653

0.75

Ora

nge-

New

ark-

Eliz

abet

h, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

97.8

4%2

Ora

nge-

New

ark-

Eliz

abet

h, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

0.00

%0.

75O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-El

izab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C45

,765

1O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-El

izab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C4,

722

2So

uth

Ora

nge

Aven

ue IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

109.

47%

2So

uth

Ora

nge

Aven

ue IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

0.00

%0.

75So

uth

Ora

nge

Ave

nue

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

ar39

,237

0.75

Sout

h O

rang

e A

venu

e IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

4,01

71.

5C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m43

.23%

1C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m6.

96%

0.75

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

62,7

481.

5C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

996

1C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

116.

40%

2C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

0.00

%0.

75C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

56,1

401.

5C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

3,56

71

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it Sy

stem

18.6

1%0.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

8.63

%0.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

40,7

001

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it S

yste

m3,

183

1D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

ti o19

.55%

0.75

Dut

ches

s C

ount

y D

ivis

ion

of M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

22.5

0%1

Dut

ches

s C

ount

y D

ivis

ion

of M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

54,4

171.

5D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio2,

564

0.75

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity26

.86%

0.75

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.73%

0.75

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity17

,480

0.5

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1,

456

0.5

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y23

.40%

0.75

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y39

.25%

1.5

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y30

,584

0.75

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y2,

319

0.75

Leis

ure

Line

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

dmin

.87

.60%

2Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

0.00

%0.

75Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

22,6

740.

5Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

687

1Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.9

2%0.

75Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.5

4%1

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity31

,047

0.75

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

861

1An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

24.1

8%0.

75An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

23.5

3%1

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n27

,277

0.5

Anna

polis

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1,

781

0.5

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

14.0

3%0.

75C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y8.

56%

0.75

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

36,4

720.

75C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

957

1C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m15

.40%

0.75

City

of N

ashu

a N

ashu

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

28.9

6%1

City

of N

ashu

a N

ashu

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

36,3

710.

75C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

951

1C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

5.49

%0.

75C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

66.6

8%2

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns71

,064

2C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

3,86

01.

5G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

33.8

3%1

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.15

.60%

0.75

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.33

,569

0.75

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.2,

384

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.80%

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Syst

em10

.80%

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

64,7

172

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3,80

11.

5G

reat

er P

ortla

nd T

rans

it D

istri

ct26

.21%

0.75

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

57.6

3%2

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

32,5

360.

75G

reat

er P

ortla

nd T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

977

1H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Serv

ices

12.3

7%0.

75H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s50

.40%

1.5

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

47,4

001

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

3,05

01

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it8.

07%

0.75

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it71

.61%

2H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

33,9

680.

75H

untin

gton

Are

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

2,46

50.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

11.2

8%0.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

38.6

8%1.

5M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

37,7

960.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3,16

01

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

23.4

5%0.

75M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

02%

0.75

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

30,3

290.

75M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

230

0.75

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n54

.68%

1.5

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n9.

54%

0.75

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n37

,897

0.75

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n1,

565

0.5

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.19

.04%

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.0.

00%

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.36

,741

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.2,

244

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

28.2

3%0.

75N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.0.

00%

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

47,3

381

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

2,92

21

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y26

.65%

0.75

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y13

.85%

0.75

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y50

,436

1Be

aver

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,59

80.

75C

ape

Ann

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity13

.02%

0.75

Cap

e A

nn T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

16.1

6%0.

75C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity18

,213

0.5

Cap

e A

nn T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1,20

00.

5C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.18

.49%

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

20.4

2%1

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

46,7

381

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

2,34

80.

75C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.19

.66%

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

16.4

4%0.

75C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.42

,460

1C

entro

of O

sweg

o, In

c.2,

861

1C

ity o

f Ban

gor

31.9

4%1

City

of B

ango

r30

.96%

1C

ity o

f Ban

gor

47,4

001

City

of B

ango

r2,

979

1H

ousa

toni

c Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it14

.75%

0.75

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

25.5

4%1

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

44,6

701

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

2,77

30.

75H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

4.72

%0.

75H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

60.0

5%2

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n57

,804

1.5

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n3,

214

1La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

100.

76%

2La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

0.00

%0.

75La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

31,9

880.

75La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

5,70

92

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct13

.09%

0.75

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct24

.39%

1M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

51,7

721

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct3,

525

1M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

23.8

5%0.

75M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

17.0

8%0.

75M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

35,8

390.

75M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

3,35

51

Putn

am C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t10

.68%

0.75

Putn

am C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t60

.07%

2Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

80,5

362

Putn

am C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t3,

856

1.5

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t31

.31%

1So

uthe

ast A

rea

Tran

sit

6.70

%0.

75S

outh

east

Are

a Tr

ansi

t45

,098

1So

uthe

ast A

rea

Tran

sit

2,72

60.

75Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

18.0

5%0.

75Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

20.6

0%1

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt27

,184

0.5

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt2,

308

0.75

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s12

.73%

0.75

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s61

.22%

2Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

29,4

080.

75Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

3,16

11

B-23

Page 80: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per V

ehic

le M

ileAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.98

1Be

rks

Area

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity25

,206

0.75

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y2,

035

0.75

Berk

s Ar

ea R

eadi

ng T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y33

,608

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

581

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n15

,981

0.5

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n57

21

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n15

,981

0.5

Gre

ater

Har

tford

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.95

1G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct34

,605

1G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

602

1G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct34

,605

0.75

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

971

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct36

,017

1M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

3,09

11.

5M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

48,0

221

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

t h0.

941

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th44

,411

1.5

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th1,

923

0.75

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

th48

,272

1Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

0.93

1Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

25,7

360.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

1,72

60.

75Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

31,5

470.

75N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

0.89

0.75

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.21

,697

0.75

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.1,

751

0.75

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.28

,696

0.75

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it0.

941

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it16

,891

0.5

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it1,

231

0.5

Alto

ona

Met

ro T

rans

it23

,526

0.5

Broc

kton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

920.

75Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

27,6

000.

75Br

ockt

on A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,18

11

Broc

kton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y31

,710

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n0.

981

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n28

,430

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n2,

449

1C

onne

ctic

ut T

rans

it-St

amfo

rd D

ivis

ion

37,0

461

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.95

1Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity23

,251

0.75

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1,85

50.

75Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity29

,296

0.75

Mer

rimac

k V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

880.

75M

errim

ack

Valle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity28

,239

0.75

Mer

rimac

k Va

lley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,02

20.

75M

errim

ack

Valle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity35

,126

0.75

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

751

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity20

,574

0.75

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

147

1C

entre

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

22,9

480.

5To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t0.

961

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

24,9

140.

75To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t2,

027

0.75

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

36,4

600.

75U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.96

1U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

27,1

610.

75U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,23

71

Utic

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y33

,951

0.75

T-Tr

an0.

921

T-Tr

an37

,003

1T-

Tran

1,10

50.

5T-

Tran

41,6

291

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t0.

991

Was

hing

ton

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

epar

tmen

t30

,366

1W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

1,94

00.

75W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

30,3

660.

75W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces,

Inc.

0.91

0.75

Wes

tern

Mai

ne T

rans

porta

tion

Serv

ices

, Inc

.19

,813

0.5

Wes

tern

Mai

ne T

rans

porta

tion

Serv

ices

, Inc

.1,

438

0.75

Wes

tern

Mai

ne T

rans

porta

tion

Serv

ices

, Inc

.26

,417

0.75

Wes

tmor

elan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

800.

5W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

28,1

250.

75W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1,56

20.

75W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

42,1

871

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

971

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n30

,681

1W

illiam

spor

t Bur

eau

of T

rans

porta

tion

1,99

80.

75W

illiam

spor

t Bur

eau

of T

rans

porta

tion

44,1

031

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.95

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit D

istri

ct30

,115

0.75

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

2,19

91

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

34,5

430.

75Br

oom

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rt a0.

921

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

porta

31,0

661

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

porta

2,28

81

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

porta

34,2

520.

75O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C0.

880.

75O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C32

,454

1O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-El

izab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C3,

535

2O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-El

izab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C40

,141

1So

uth

Ora

nge

Aven

ue IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

0.93

1So

uth

Ora

nge

Aven

ue IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

28,0

200.

75So

uth

Ora

nge

Ave

nue

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

ar2,

959

1.5

Sout

h O

rang

e A

venu

e IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

36,5

100.

75C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

981

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

46,8

851.

5C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

182

1C

hem

ung

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m61

,803

2C

omm

unity

Tra

nsit,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rier A

0.81

0.5

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A41

,397

1.5

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A2,

912

1.5

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A45

,340

1C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

920.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

30,0

490.

75C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

2,41

71

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it S

yste

m37

,302

1D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

ti o0.

850.

5D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio42

,786

1.5

Dut

ches

s C

ount

y D

ivis

ion

of M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

1,88

90.

75D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tio46

,077

1C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.97

1C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16,3

700.

5C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1,30

90.

5C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16,9

150.

5C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

0.94

1C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

23,9

780.

75C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

1,83

50.

75C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

28,7

730.

75Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

0.69

1Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

15,5

410.

5Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

489

1Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

15,5

410.

5Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.89

0.75

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity22

,724

0.75

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

160

1Lo

wel

l Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

27,5

450.

75An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

0.99

1An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

26,8

950.

75An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

1,76

30.

75An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

26,8

950.

75C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

961

Cam

bria

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

28,3

830.

75C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

316

1C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y35

,194

0.75

City

of N

ashu

a N

ashu

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.95

1C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m24

,710

0.75

City

of N

ashu

a N

ashu

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

1,95

60.

75C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m34

,595

0.75

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns0.

941

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns33

,258

1C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

1,85

80.

75C

lark

stow

n M

ini-T

rans

66,5

162

G G

& C

Bus

Com

pany

, Inc

.0.

900.

75G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

20,0

900.

5G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

1,48

70.

75G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

30,1

340.

75G

reat

er G

lens

Fal

ls T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.91

0.75

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Syst

em58

,785

2G

reat

er G

lens

Fal

ls T

rans

it S

yste

m3,

678

2G

reat

er G

lens

Fal

ls T

rans

it S

yste

m58

,785

1.5

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.98

1G

reat

er P

ortla

nd T

rans

it D

istri

ct23

,805

0.75

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,16

11

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

31,7

410.

75H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Serv

ices

0.91

0.75

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

17,8

960.

5H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s1,

167

0.5

Har

ford

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

42,9

501

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it0.

961

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it25

,176

0.75

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it1,

721

0.75

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it32

,729

0.75

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

961

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity31

,545

1M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,56

51

Man

ches

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity36

,398

0.75

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.91

0.75

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

25,3

160.

75M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

857

0.75

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

27,6

180.

75M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

1.00

1.5

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n37

,897

1M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

1,56

50.

75M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

37,8

971

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.0.

880.

75N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

Inc.

32,4

511

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.1,

966

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.32

,451

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

0.94

1N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.44

,672

1.5

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

2,75

61

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

44,6

721

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

900.

75Be

aver

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

34,3

951

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

557

0.75

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y45

,144

1C

ape

Ann

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

910.

75C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity16

,570

0.5

Cap

e A

nn T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1,08

50.

5C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity16

,570

0.5

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

0.96

1C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.39

,058

1C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.1,

879

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Cay

uga,

Inc.

45,0

671

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

0.92

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

36,1

961

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

2,44

41

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

38,9

801

City

of B

ango

r0.

981

City

of B

ango

r33

,163

1C

ity o

f Ban

gor

2,05

50.

75C

ity o

f Ban

gor

46,4

281

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

0.94

1H

ousa

toni

c Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it25

,095

0.75

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

1,55

30.

75H

ousa

toni

c Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it41

,825

1H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

0.94

1H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

54,4

562

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n3,

139

1.5

How

ard

Tran

sit

(HT)

c/o

Cor

ridor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n54

,456

1.5

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

ri e0.

910.

75La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

25,9

600.

75La

feye

tte-G

reen

ville

IBO

A c/

o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

4,71

12

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

rie29

,075

0.75

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

971

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct35

,246

1M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

2,19

71

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit D

istri

ct50

,351

1.5

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y0.

961

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y25

,790

0.75

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y2,

451

1M

onta

chus

ett R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

34,3

860.

75Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.96

1Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

64,6

332

Put

nam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

3,13

01.

5Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

77,5

602

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t0.

920.

75So

uthe

ast A

rea

Tran

sit

31,5

051

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t1,

985

0.75

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t41

,453

1Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

0.95

1Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

25,9

310.

75Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

2,25

71

Tran

sIT

Serv

ices

of F

rede

rick

Cou

nt25

,931

0.75

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s0.

991

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s23

,296

0.75

Villa

ge o

f Spr

ing

Valle

y Bu

s2,

409

1Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

29,1

200.

75

B-24

Page 81: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

E R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Berk

s A

rea

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity33

.33%

1O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-El

izab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C26

.50

Con

nect

icut

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

00%

0.75

Put

nam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

24.5

0G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct0.

00%

0.75

Sou

th O

rang

e A

venu

e IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

24.0

0M

ilfor

d Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

33.3

3%1

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns23

.25

Gre

ater

Attl

ebor

o-Ta

unto

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

uth

8.70

%0.

75H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

23.2

5Lu

zern

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y22

.58%

0.75

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A22

.25

Nor

thea

st T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.32

.26%

1G

reat

er G

lens

Fal

ls T

rans

it Sy

stem

22.0

0Al

toon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

39.2

9%1

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

ri e22

.00

Broc

kton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y14

.89%

0.75

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Stam

ford

Div

isio

n21

.25

Con

nect

icut

Tra

nsit-

Sta

mfo

rd D

ivis

ion

30.3

0%1

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

21.0

0Er

ie M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity26

.00%

1M

onse

y N

ew S

quar

e Tr

ails

Cor

pora

tion

21.0

0M

errim

ack

Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y24

.39%

1D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

ti o20

.75

Cen

tre A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

11.5

4%0.

75G

reat

er H

artfo

rd T

rans

it D

istri

ct20

.50

Tom

pkin

s C

onso

lidat

ed A

rea

Tran

sit

46.3

4%1

Milf

ord

Tran

sit D

istri

ct20

.50

Utic

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y25

.00%

1G

reat

er A

ttleb

oro-

Taun

ton

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

h20

.25

T-Tr

an12

.50%

0.75

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

20.2

5W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

0.00

%0.

75Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

20.2

5W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

33.3

3%1

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

20.2

5W

estm

orel

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

50.0

0%1.

5To

mpk

ins

Con

solid

ated

Are

a Tr

ansi

t20

.00

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n43

.75%

1H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s19

.75

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

14.7

1%0.

75B

room

e C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rt a19

.50

Broo

me

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Pub

lic T

rans

port a

10.2

6%0.

75C

hitte

nden

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

19.5

0O

rang

e-N

ewar

k-E

lizab

eth,

Inc.

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

C23

.68%

0.75

Luze

rne

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.25

Sout

h O

rang

e A

venu

e IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

30.3

0%1

Willi

amsp

ort B

urea

u of

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n19

.25

Che

mun

g C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

31.8

2%1

City

of B

ango

r19

.25

Com

mun

ity T

rans

it, In

c. c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r A9.

52%

0.75

Hou

sato

nic

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

19.2

5C

ount

y of

Lac

kaw

anna

Tra

nsit

Syst

em24

.14%

0.75

Erie

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.0

0D

utch

ess

Cou

nty

Div

isio

n of

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

ti o7.

69%

0.75

Wes

tmor

elan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.00

Cap

e C

od R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

3.33

%0.

75B

rock

ton

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.75

Chi

ttend

en C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y20

.00%

0.75

Ann

apol

is D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

18.7

5Le

isur

e Li

ne c

/o N

J Tr

ansi

t, C

arrie

r Adm

in.

0.00

%0.

75C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m18

.75

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity21

.21%

0.75

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

18.7

5An

napo

lis D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

0.00

%0.

75M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

18.7

5C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y24

.00%

0.75

Ber

ks A

rea

Rea

ding

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

18.5

0C

ity o

f Nas

hua

Nas

hua

Tran

sit S

yste

m40

.00%

1V

illage

of S

prin

g V

alle

y B

us18

.50

Cla

rkst

own

Min

i-Tra

ns10

0.00

%2

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

18.2

5G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

50.0

0%1.

5C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.18

.25

Gre

ater

Gle

ns F

alls

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

0.00

%0.

75S

outh

east

Are

a Tr

ansi

t18

.25

Gre

ater

Por

tland

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

33.3

3%1

Tran

sIT

Ser

vice

s of

Fre

deric

k C

ount

18.2

5H

arfo

rd C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Serv

ices

140.

00%

2M

errim

ack

Valle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.00

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it30

.00%

1T-

Tran

18.0

0M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y15

.38%

0.75

Hun

tingt

on A

rea

Rap

id T

rans

it18

.00

Mid

Mon

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

9.09

%0.

75M

anch

este

r Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y18

.00

Mon

sey

New

Squ

are

Trai

ls C

orpo

ratio

n0.

00%

0.75

Bea

ver C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.00

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.0.

00%

0.75

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

18.0

0N

ew B

ritai

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

pany

, Inc

.0.

00%

0.75

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y18

.00

Beav

er C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y31

.25%

1C

onne

ctic

ut D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

17.7

5C

ape

Ann

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

0.00

%0.

75U

tica

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.7

5C

entro

of C

ayug

a, In

c.15

.38%

0.75

Cou

nty

of L

acka

wan

na T

rans

it S

yste

m17

.75

Cen

tro o

f Osw

ego,

Inc.

7.69

%0.

75M

id M

on V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.75

City

of B

ango

r40

.00%

1N

orth

east

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

17.5

0H

ousa

toni

c A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

66.6

7%1.

5W

ashi

ngto

n C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

17.2

5H

owar

d Tr

ansi

t (H

T) c

/o C

orrid

or T

rans

porta

tion

0.00

%0.

75C

ambr

ia C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.25

Lafe

yette

-Gre

envi

lle IB

OA

c/o

NJ

Tran

sit,

Car

ri e12

.00%

0.75

Low

ell R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

17.0

0M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

42.8

6%1

New

Brit

ain

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

ompa

ny In

c.17

.00

Mon

tach

uset

t Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y33

.33%

1A

ltoon

a M

etro

Tra

nsit

16.0

0Pu

tnam

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

20.0

0%0.

75C

ape

Cod

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y16

.00

Sout

heas

t Are

a Tr

ansi

t31

.58%

1W

este

rn M

aine

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es, I

nc.

15.5

0Tr

ansI

T Se

rvic

es o

f Fre

deric

k C

ount

0.00

%0.

75G

G &

C B

us C

ompa

ny, I

nc.

14.7

5Vi

llage

of S

prin

g Va

lley

Bus

25.0

0%1

Cap

e A

nn T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

14.7

5

B-25

Page 82: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up A

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

13,4

19.0

41

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

22.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n38

.70

1C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n2.

320.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y10

,162

.34

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

23.1

71

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.1

30.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

910.

75Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

7,99

0.59

0.75

Subu

rban

Mob

ility

Auth

ority

for R

egio

nal T

rans

p23

.17

1Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

3.65

0.5

Subu

rban

Mob

ility

Auth

ority

for R

egio

nal T

rans

p1.

000.

5So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

9,10

4.35

0.75

Sout

hwes

t Ohi

o R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity21

.83

0.75

Sout

hwes

t Ohi

o R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity35

.05

1So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2.13

0.75

Kans

as C

ity A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity8,

903.

430.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

19.7

51

Kans

as C

ity A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity29

.71

0.75

Kans

as C

ity A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity1.

700.

75M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m11

,620

.13

0.75

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

23.5

01

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

70.8

01.

5M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m3.

531.

5Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

13,9

92.0

01

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

it24

.00

1.5

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit33

.35

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit2.

050.

75Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y8,

781.

000.

75Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y22

.50

0.75

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

13.9

00.

75Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y1.

870.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

10,2

26.1

10.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

24.0

01.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

44.8

71

Met

ro T

rans

it2.

921

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

4,31

3.79

0.75

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

21.4

20.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n8.

820.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n1.

690.

75C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

47,8

91.6

82

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y24

.00

1.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y81

.35

1.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y4.

732

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

27.2

30.

75C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n11

.76

0.75

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

2,27

00.

75C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n29

1,85

31.

5C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y24

.36

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

12.7

30.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y3,

010

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

108,

018

0.75

Subu

rban

Mob

ility

Auth

ority

for R

egio

nal T

rans

p17

.79

0.5

Subu

rban

Mob

ility

Auth

ority

for R

egio

nal T

rans

p17

.82

2Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

3,84

10.

75Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

202,

555

1So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

28.3

80.

75So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.3

40.

75So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

10,4

231.

5So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

49,2

130.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

26.0

10.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

15.2

71

Kans

as C

ity A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity8,

383

1Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

177,

712

1M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m45

.81

1.5

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.9

60.

75M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m1,

905

0.75

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

126,

378

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

it25

.72

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

it12

.56

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit4,

938

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit80

,420

0.75

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

28.9

80.

75Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y15

.51

1Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y6,

828

1Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y54

,415

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it39

.87

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

13.6

71

Met

ro T

rans

it1,

304

0.5

Met

ro T

rans

it14

7,05

90.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n23

.87

0.75

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

14.1

61

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

10,2

111.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n41

5,52

32

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y47

.09

1.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y9.

950.

5C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

3,83

80.

75C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

44,4

930.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

17.4

10.

75C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$1

59.1

80.

5C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$1

12.0

10.

5C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n21

.28%

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

15.8

11

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$70.

001

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$89.

150.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y16

.83%

1Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

20.8

90.

75Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

$20.

941.

5Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

$102

.02

0.5

Subu

rban

Mob

ility

Auth

ority

for R

egio

nal T

rans

p32

.80%

0So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16.0

11

Sout

hwes

t Ohi

o R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$8

9.04

1So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$72.

091.

5So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.4

5%0.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

16.6

91

Kans

as C

ity A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$9

7.27

0.75

Kans

as C

ity A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$8

5.13

1Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

22.1

4%0.

75M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m17

.45

0.75

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$115

.38

0.75

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$74.

661.

5M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m16

.71%

1Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

12.7

91

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

it$1

20.6

80.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

$93.

050.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

20.5

2%1

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

18.2

80.

75Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y$4

3.81

1.5

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

$91.

310.

75Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y21

.37%

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it13

.63

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

$113

.41

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it$1

00.7

80.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

16.7

1%1

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

32.7

80

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

$26.

271.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n$7

1.11

1.5

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

16.5

0%1

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y4.

931.

5C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

$141

.02

0.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$8

1.64

1C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

21.3

7%0.

75

B-26

Page 83: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up A

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

5.88

%0.

75C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n25

.67%

0.5

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

14.0

1%0.

75C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n46

.02%

1C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y6.

15%

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

22.3

2%0.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.49%

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

58.4

9%1

Subu

rban

Mob

ility

Auth

ority

for R

egio

nal T

rans

p3.

40%

1Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

13.1

8%1.

5Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

12.1

1%0.

5Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

26.3

2%0.

75So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3.36

%1

Sout

hwes

t Ohi

o R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.84%

0.75

Sout

hwes

t Ohi

o R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity27

.64%

1So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

43.4

8%0.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

4.88

%0.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

19.0

8%0.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

15.7

0%0.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

58.2

1%1

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3.95

%1

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

14.5

4%1

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

31.0

2%1

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

13.1

5%0.

5Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

7.11

%0.

5Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

21.8

5%0.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

17.9

6%0.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

76.6

2%1.

5Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y5.

93%

0.75

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

18.8

8%0.

75Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y21

.54%

0.75

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

63.9

1%1

Met

ro T

rans

it3.

62%

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

19.3

3%0.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

35.0

5%1.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

32.5

9%0.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n2.

33%

1.5

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

16.7

8%1

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

n/a

2Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

nn/

a2

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y5.

78%

0.75

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y10

.76%

1.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y41

.93%

1.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y31

.90%

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

52,1

321

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

4,04

91.

5C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

881

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

30,4

330.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y41

,608

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,97

50.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

820.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y27

,785

0.75

Subu

rban

Mob

ility

Auth

ority

for R

egio

nal T

rans

p64

,661

2Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

3,28

81

Subu

rban

Mob

ility

Auth

ority

for R

egio

nal T

rans

p0.

770.

5Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

35,9

961.

5So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

37,7

000.

5So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,65

10.

5So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.86

1So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

24,2

490.

5Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

42,8

220.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

2,68

90.

5Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

0.88

1Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

28,8

490.

75M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m48

,214

1M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m3,

577

1M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

911

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

38,4

521.

5Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

43,6

360.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

3,27

71

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit0.

861

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit30

,343

0.75

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

51,4

261

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

3,53

91

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

0.81

0.75

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

33,6

901

Met

ro T

rans

it40

,666

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it2,

977

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it0.

780.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

26,3

870.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n41

,648

0.75

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

2,72

40.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n0.

800.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n29

,594

0.75

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y39

,750

0.75

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y4,

006

1.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y0.

992

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y33

,225

1

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

2,58

91

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

45,7

661.

5C

ity o

f Det

roit

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n50

.39%

2C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

27.7

5C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

182

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

34,0

910.

75C

entra

l Ohi

o Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y22

.70%

0.75

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

23.5

0Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

2,02

00.

75Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

49,5

881.

5Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

37.7

6%1.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n23

.25

Sout

hwes

t Ohi

o R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1,

818

0.5

Sout

hwes

t Ohi

o R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity32

,399

0.5

Sout

hwes

t Ohi

o R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity33

.61%

1Su

burb

an M

obilit

y Au

thor

ity fo

r Reg

iona

l Tra

nsp

22.2

5Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

1,89

00.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

37,8

110.

75Ka

nsas

City

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

31.0

6%1

City

of D

etro

it D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

21.5

0M

ilwau

kee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

967

1.5

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

43,8

001

Milw

auke

e C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

13.9

1%0.

5Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

20.0

0Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

2,41

61

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

it37

,459

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit23

.45%

0.75

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

19.7

5Bi

-Sta

te D

evel

opm

ent A

genc

y2,

172

0.75

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

41,4

811

Bi-S

tate

Dev

elop

men

t Age

ncy

23.1

3%0.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

19.5

0M

etro

Tra

nsit

1,93

00.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

31,7

510.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

20.3

3%0.

75So

uthw

est O

hio

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.2

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n2,

090

0.75

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

33,3

780.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n12

.79%

0.5

Kans

as C

ity A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.25

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y3,

338

2C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

39,1

881

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y17

.95%

0.75

Cen

tral O

hio

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

18.5

0

B-27

Page 84: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up B

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity6,

453.

100.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

18.6

70.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

18.1

31

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity2.

742

Tole

do A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y5,

210.

310.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.25

0.75

Tole

do A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

10.1

30.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

170.

75In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n6,

928.

800.

75In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n23

.08

1.5

Indi

anap

olis

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

12.6

40.

75In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n1.

651

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it Pa

rtner

ship

10,1

99.1

41

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it Pa

rtner

ship

19.0

80.

75In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip11

.45

0.75

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it P

artn

ersh

ip1.

330.

75M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

9,45

0.01

1M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

20.9

21

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

11.7

10.

75M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y1.

550.

75M

iam

i Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

7,84

1.50

0.75

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity21

.25

1M

iam

i Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

25.8

71

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

831

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it11

,819

.28

1.5

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it21

.33

1M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

46.5

92

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it2.

191.

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

5,91

0.68

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of O

mah

a19

.58

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of O

mah

a6.

930.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

1.04

0.75

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

13,6

64.4

11.

5M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity18

.25

0.5

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

18.1

61

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

1.64

1M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il2,

636.

230.

5M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il18

.00

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

1.42

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

0.79

0.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

re

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity37

.19

2C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

13.5

70.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

239,

840

1C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

25.6

10.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

17.1

80.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity14

.71

1To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity20

5,37

30.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.82

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n23

.75

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n14

.39

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n11

8,99

20.

5In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n29

.19

0.75

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it Pa

rtner

ship

18.2

90.

75In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip13

.74

0.75

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it Pa

rtner

ship

179,

403

0.75

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it P

artn

ersh

ip16

.70

1M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

22.2

90.

75M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

14.3

61

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

277,

493

1M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y11

.84

1M

iam

i Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

25.2

01

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.80

0.75

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity32

9,96

41

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity25

.23

0.75

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it27

.35

1M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

12.4

70.

5M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

186,

177

0.75

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it11

.42

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

13.8

50.

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

13.2

90.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

139,

197

0.75

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of O

mah

a24

.26

0.75

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

25.0

71

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

15.2

61

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

469,

714

2M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity5.

411.

5M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il13

.63

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

17.2

62

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

195,

896

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

35.7

40.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r R

even

ue H

our

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$4

0.05

1C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

$82.

130.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

15.4

2%1

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity4.

37%

0.75

Tole

do A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$4

3.87

1To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$7

4.40

0.75

Tole

do A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.1

0%0.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

67%

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n$3

4.26

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n$6

4.37

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n14

.85%

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n3.

53%

1In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip$3

7.30

1In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip$5

9.57

1In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip15

.22%

1In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Par

tner

ship

2.51

%1

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$4

1.55

1M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$79.

120.

75M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y15

.97%

1M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y4.

31%

0.75

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$7

7.20

0.75

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$7

5.22

0.75

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.09%

0.5

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity7.

25%

0M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

$130

.65

0M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

$76.

710.

75M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

18.3

4%0.

75M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

2.71

%1

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of O

mah

a$2

6.32

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

$52.

591.

5Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

17.5

1%0.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

3.74

%1

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

$42.

401

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

$58.

541

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

19.4

8%0.

5M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity3.

03%

1M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il$1

1.17

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

$106

.97

0M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il11

.64%

2M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il3.

31%

1

B-28

Page 85: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up B

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity16

.79%

1C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

12.2

3%0.

5C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

42.2

5%0.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

42,0

571

Tole

do A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y15

.25%

1To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity22

.57%

1To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity49

.50%

1To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity30

,309

0.75

Indi

anap

olis

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

25.5

1%0.

5In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n18

.65%

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n26

.80%

0.5

Indi

anap

olis

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

55,1

001.

5In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip20

.15%

0.75

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it Pa

rtner

ship

13.8

2%0.

75In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip41

.31%

0.75

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it P

artn

ersh

ip40

,576

1M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.7

5%0.

75M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.2

5%0.

75M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y67

.64%

1.5

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

30,5

430.

75M

iam

i Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

14.8

1%1

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.23%

0.75

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity69

.30%

1.5

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity47

,923

1.5

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it11

.80%

1.5

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it19

.22%

1M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

29.1

6%0.

75M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

33,0

150.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

14.7

5%1

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of O

mah

a25

.76%

1.5

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

of O

mah

a50

.86%

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

34,8

290.

75M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity16

.95%

1M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity25

.68%

1.5

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

20.4

1%0.

5M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity21

,056

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

20.5

7%0.

75M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il18

.49%

1M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il58

.87%

1M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il42

,413

1

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Hou

rs

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

067

1C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

0.89

1C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

29,9

801

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

210

1To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

2,24

70.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

840.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity20

,201

0.75

Tole

do A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1,37

30.

75In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n3,

664

1.5

Indi

anap

olis

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

0.88

1In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n41

,491

1.5

Indi

anap

olis

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

2,88

31.

5In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip2,

953

1In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip0.

961.

5In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip32

,036

1In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Par

tner

ship

2,33

21

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

168

0.75

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

881

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

26,2

490.

75M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y1,

828

0.75

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

478

1.5

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

951

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity35

,353

1.5

Mia

mi V

alle

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

562

1.5

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it2,

515

0.75

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it0.

850.

75M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

23,6

270.

75M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

1,89

50.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

2,52

60.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

0.91

1Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

26,0

370.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

1,96

01

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

1,28

20.

5M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

891

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

16,7

760.

5M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity1,

099

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

2,32

30.

75M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il0.

641

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

18,5

760.

5M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il1,

076

0.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Cap

ital A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity37

,378

1C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

24.6

8%1

Indi

anap

olis

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

22.5

0To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rity

25,3

200.

75To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity25

.34%

1M

iam

i Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

22.0

0In

dian

apol

is P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n48

,512

1.5

Indi

anap

olis

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

16.9

2%0.

75C

apita

l Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

21.7

5In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip39

,001

1In

teru

rban

Tra

nsit

Partn

ersh

ip21

.74%

0.75

Mad

ison

Met

ro T

rans

it20

.25

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity26

,792

0.75

Met

ro R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

07%

0.5

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

20.2

5M

iam

i Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

45,5

121.

5M

iam

i Val

ley

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

28.7

4%1

Inte

rurb

an T

rans

it Pa

rtner

ship

20.0

0M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

28,0

390.

75M

adis

on M

etro

Tra

nsit

18.6

7%0.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

19.5

0Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

31,7

470.

75Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y of

Om

aha

21.9

3%1

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

19.5

0M

ass

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity18

,789

0.5

Mas

s Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

12.0

0%0.

75M

etro

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y19

.00

Met

ropo

litan

Cou

ncil

27,1

050.

75M

etro

polit

an C

ounc

il45

.91%

2To

ledo

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.50

B-29

Page 86: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4,21

5.35

0.75

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

17.7

50.

75D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity11

.41

0.75

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.87

1C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct12

,991

.07

1C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct21

.50

1C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct86

.60

2C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct4.

012

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

6,79

4.84

0.75

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

17.0

00.

75An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity21

.97

1An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1.

650.

75M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

3,70

8.27

0.75

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct19

.00

0.75

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct7.

090.

75M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.71

0.75

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

6,35

5.41

0.75

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

13.0

00.

75W

ichi

ta T

rans

it8.

530.

75W

ichi

ta T

rans

it1.

671

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct14

,399

.03

1G

reat

er P

eoria

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

13.7

50.

75G

reat

er P

eoria

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

12.1

10.

75G

reat

er P

eoria

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

1.22

0.75

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

9,14

8.35

1D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.75

1D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y25

.61

1D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

650.

75W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it A

utho

rity

3,19

6.60

0.75

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y18

.67

0.75

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y3.

710.

75W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

060.

75W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m3,

054.

290.

75W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m18

.75

0.75

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

1.42

0.75

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.61

0.75

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n9,

333.

161

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n17

.00

0.75

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n18

.76

1So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

1.64

0.75

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,13

8.71

0.75

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.0

00.

75Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

410.

75Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

480.

5R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

10,1

53.8

51

Roc

k Is

land

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t D22

.00

1R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

23.6

81

Roc

k Is

land

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t D1.

440.

75C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce2,

225.

920.

75C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce17

.00

0.75

Cam

pus

Bus

Ser

vice

1.44

0.75

Cam

pus

Bus

Serv

ice

2.09

1Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n5,

146.

790.

75Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n18

.33

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

31.8

41

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

2.56

1La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

7,97

7.49

0.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity17

.67

0.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity19

.07

1La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

1.26

0.75

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

7,00

9.97

0.75

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

13.5

80.

75Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t21

.59

1Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t1.

821

Star

Tran

3,87

9.16

0.75

Star

Tran

13.8

30.

75St

arTr

an6.

870.

75St

arTr

an1.

110.

75Ka

lam

azoo

Met

ro T

rans

it Sy

stem

8,34

3.64

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.58

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.27

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

600.

75Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

3,41

8.93

0.75

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t17

.67

0.75

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t1.

330.

75Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.27

0.5

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

r a13

,293

.74

1G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

16.5

00.

75G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

28.6

11

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra2.

451

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n7,

568.

350.

75G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

18.0

00.

75G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

16.8

80.

75G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

1.27

0.75

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e7,

578.

160.

75Be

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

-Rac

ine

81.5

02

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e17

.47

0.75

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e1.

460.

75Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

11,6

64.6

81

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n13

.58

0.75

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n11

.04

0.75

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1.

100.

75M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

6,80

2.69

0.75

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m15

.00

0.75

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m17

.99

0.75

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

550.

75Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

4,49

6.26

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct12

.67

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct12

.99

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct1.

490.

75Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce2,

873.

000.

75Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce12

.00

0.75

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

0.11

0.75

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

0.36

0.5

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

6,53

7.27

0.75

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

17.5

00.

75G

reen

Bay

Met

ro10

.73

0.75

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

1.25

0.75

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

28,6

48.8

72

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

17.0

00.

75So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity37

.38

1.5

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

4.61

2U

nive

rsity

of M

ichi

gan

Park

ing

and

Tran

spor

tati o

35,4

68.0

82

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio21

.33

1U

nive

rsity

of M

ichi

gan

Park

ing

and

Tran

spor

tatio

66.1

02

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio4.

922

Star

k Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity10

,739

.15

1St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.0

01

Star

k Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3.

570.

75St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.42

0.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

re

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

25.1

31

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.4

60.

75D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity24

8,23

10.

75D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity25

.01

1C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct46

.57

2C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct11

.61

0.75

Cha

mpa

ign-

Urb

ana

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

58,0

070.

75C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct13

.59

1An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity22

.95

1An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity13

.92

1An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1,

260,

783

2An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity25

.80

1M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

12.3

30.

75M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

17.3

71.

5M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

517,

674

1M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

40.8

70.

75W

ichi

ta T

rans

it24

.11

1W

ichi

ta T

rans

it14

.46

1W

ichi

ta T

rans

it1,

554,

533

2W

ichi

ta T

rans

it21

.60

1G

reat

er P

eoria

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

21.2

41

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct17

.46

1.5

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct48

8,12

71

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct8.

321.

5D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y22

.70

1D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y13

.76

1D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y63

6,11

51

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

14.4

41

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y12

.98

0.75

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y12

.20

0.75

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y62

9,73

01

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

53.8

20.

5W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m11

.91

0.75

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

19.5

42

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

249,

719

0.75

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

41.8

50.

75So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

24.1

11

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n14

.68

1So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

183,

552

0.75

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n16

.45

1Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity4.

900.

5Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity10

.10

0.5

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

n/a

2Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity75

.41

0R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

18.8

40.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

13.0

80.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

159,

839

0.75

Roc

k Is

land

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t D16

.99

1C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce23

.60

1C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce11

.29

0.75

Cam

pus

Bus

Ser

vice

92,3

760.

75C

ampu

s Bu

s Se

rvic

e91

.88

0Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n26

.83

1Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n10

.50

0.5

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

377,

775

1Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n32

.27

0.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity17

.07

0.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity13

.58

0.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity77

3,81

71.

5La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

26.7

81

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

25.5

81

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

14.0

91

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

178,

637

0.75

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

14.8

01

Star

Tran

15.4

00.

75St

arTr

an13

.91

1St

arTr

an82

,398

0.75

Star

Tran

33.1

30.

75Ka

lam

azoo

Met

ro T

rans

it Sy

stem

20.7

51

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.95

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em13

1,98

10.

75Ka

lam

azoo

Met

ro T

rans

it Sy

stem

24.4

41

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t5.

630.

5Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

20.9

62

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t17

4,53

60.

75Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

64.9

60.

5G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

por a

29.1

61

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra11

.92

0.75

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra84

,548

0.75

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra10

.01

1G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

18.3

80.

75G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

14.5

01

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n19

5,48

00.

75G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

26.7

21

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e19

.44

0.75

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e13

.32

0.75

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e89

,422

0.75

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e30

.67

0.75

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n14

.24

0.75

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n12

.93

0.75

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n81

,653

0.75

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n10

.53

1M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

20.7

11

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m13

.33

0.75

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m84

4,21

41.

5M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

22.3

41

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct18

.39

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct12

.37

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct12

2,89

80.

75Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

26.5

21

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

5.89

0.5

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

16.2

81

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

n/a

2Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce47

.37

0.75

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

20.2

60.

75G

reen

Bay

Met

ro16

.26

1G

reen

Bay

Met

ro32

5,88

30.

75G

reen

Bay

Met

ro18

.87

1So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity35

.55

1.5

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

7.71

1So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ityn/

a2

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

4.12

1.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

ti o44

.27

2U

nive

rsity

of M

ichi

gan

Park

ing

and

Tran

spor

tatio

8.99

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio14

1,87

20.

75U

nive

rsity

of M

ichi

gan

Park

ing

and

Tran

spor

tatio

5.00

1.5

Star

k Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity5.

790.

5St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.7

21

Star

k Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity35

4,98

80.

75St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

24.5

61

B-30

Page 87: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r R

even

ue H

our

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$28.

441

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$62.

670.

75D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.99%

1D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3.

26%

0.75

Cha

mpa

ign-

Urb

ana

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$108

.48

0C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$5

8.34

0.75

Cha

mpa

ign-

Urb

ana

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

23.2

8%0.

75C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct1.

87%

1An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$8

4.21

0.5

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$87.

960

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

21.3

2%0.

75An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity6.

89%

0.5

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$3

0.88

1M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$53.

651

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct16

.23%

1M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.50

%1.

5W

ichi

ta T

rans

it$2

1.04

1W

ichi

ta T

rans

it$5

9.49

0.75

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

22.0

3%0.

75W

ichi

ta T

rans

it0.

99%

1G

reat

er P

eoria

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$50.

460.

75G

reat

er P

eoria

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$88.

520

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct23

.20%

0.75

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

72%

1D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$7

0.01

0.5

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$62.

060.

75D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y14

.09%

1D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y3.

40%

0.75

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$1

5.22

1.5

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$5

3.31

1W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it A

utho

rity

19.2

7%0.

75W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3.

43%

0.75

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$9.0

71.

5W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m$7

6.30

0.5

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

15.0

0%1

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3.00

%0.

75So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

$44.

740.

75So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

$57.

520.

75So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

14.2

0%1

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n4.

05%

0.75

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$3.5

31.

5Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$4

2.50

1.5

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3.94

%2

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.49

%1

Roc

k Is

land

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t D$6

7.44

0.5

Roc

k Is

land

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t D$5

3.67

1R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

19.4

2%0.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

3.49

%0.

75C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce$3

.06

1.5

Cam

pus

Bus

Ser

vice

$50.

061

Cam

pus

Bus

Ser

vice

26.6

6%0.

5C

ampu

s Bu

s Se

rvic

e3.

81%

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

$48.

630.

75Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n$4

0.97

1.5

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

23.8

5%0.

75Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n3.

07%

0.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity$5

6.63

0.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity$5

0.69

1La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

16.0

6%1

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity1.

37%

1Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t$4

7.24

0.75

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

$55.

981

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

22.4

5%0.

75Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t1.

55%

1St

arTr

an$2

4.39

1St

arTr

an$5

4.65

1St

arTr

an23

.96%

0.75

Star

Tran

2.85

%1

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$4

7.22

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$6

0.22

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em24

.56%

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2.

49%

1Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

$11.

501.

5Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

$48.

551

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t30

.47%

0Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.00

%1.

5G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

por a

$45.

170.

75G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

$46.

051

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra19

.55%

0.75

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra1.

06%

1G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

$77.

910.

5G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

$84.

830.

5G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

21.6

1%0.

75G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

11.2

4%0

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e$4

7.17

0.75

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e$5

2.50

1Be

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

-Rac

ine

13.3

4%1.

5Be

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

-Rac

ine

3.53

%0.

75Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

$48.

850.

75Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

$63.

000.

75Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

22.4

4%0.

75Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

5.78

%0.

5M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$52.

980.

75M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$60.

990.

75M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.8

9%1.

5M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2.25

%1

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$4

2.26

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$5

9.83

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct21

.40%

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct3.

35%

0.75

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

$1.3

21.

5Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce$7

0.32

0.75

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

10.8

6%1.

5Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce0.

00%

1.5

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

$30.

541

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

$57.

660.

75G

reen

Bay

Met

ro13

.99%

1G

reen

Bay

Met

ro3.

60%

0.75

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

$31.

211

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

$29.

692

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

23.7

0%0.

75So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity4.

30%

0.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

ti o$5

5.82

0.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio$3

7.39

1.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio11

.77%

1.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio2.

44%

1St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$27.

451

Star

k Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$4

4.55

1St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

20.8

3%0.

75St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.34

%1

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

22.0

1%0.

75D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity32

.30%

1.5

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

36.6

2%1

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

27,4

110.

75C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct17

.40%

1C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct30

.30%

1.5

Cha

mpa

ign-

Urb

ana

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

26.8

2%0.

75C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct35

,548

0.75

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

25.4

4%0.

75An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity12

.32%

0.75

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

37.8

4%1

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

43,3

861

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct9.

32%

1.5

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct11

.70%

0.75

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct26

.05%

0.75

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct54

,019

1.5

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

20.2

5%0.

75W

ichi

ta T

rans

it20

.51%

1W

ichi

ta T

rans

it42

.91%

1W

ichi

ta T

rans

it37

,053

0.75

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct19

.83%

0.75

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct11

.71%

0.75

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct73

.92%

1.5

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct48

,913

1D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y21

.13%

0.75

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.4

3%1

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

26.7

3%0.

75D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y32

,296

0.75

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y16

.82%

1W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it A

utho

rity

10.4

1%0.

75W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it A

utho

rity

35.6

8%1

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

35,4

790.

75W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m19

.00%

0.75

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

17.0

2%1

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

18.9

0%0.

75W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m49

,737

1So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

17.7

5%1

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n16

.73%

1So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

67.3

1%1.

5So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

38,7

580.

75Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.84%

1Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity41

.63%

2Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity12

.41%

0.75

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

32,3

840.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

20.4

8%0.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

12.1

6%0.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

21.1

4%0.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

41,1

671

Cam

pus

Bus

Ser

vice

23.2

9%0.

75C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce8.

06%

0.75

Cam

pus

Bus

Ser

vice

90.7

2%2

Cam

pus

Bus

Serv

ice

40,0

841

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

12.8

1%1

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

24.8

9%1.

5Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n20

.64%

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

30,3

200.

75La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

15.9

8%1

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity15

.97%

1La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

23.7

6%0.

75La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

49,8

641

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

10.3

5%1

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

11.2

1%0.

75Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t19

.55%

0.75

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

25,8

610.

5St

arTr

an12

.53%

1St

arTr

an14

.72%

0.75

Star

Tran

71.4

9%1.

5St

arTr

an31

,084

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em20

.53%

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em13

.59%

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em42

.82%

1Ka

lam

azoo

Met

ro T

rans

it Sy

stem

44,6

281

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t22

.07%

0.75

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t6.

34%

0.5

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t46

.84%

1Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

83,8

602

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

r a18

.03%

1G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

24.3

1%1

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra17

.37%

0.75

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra28

,291

0.75

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n15

.45%

1G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

16.1

4%1

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n26

.70%

0.75

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n50

,204

1Be

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

-Rac

ine

17.3

0%1

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e17

.71%

1Be

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

-Rac

ine

16.3

0%0.

75Be

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

-Rac

ine

54,4

961.

5Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

17.8

4%1

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n11

.44%

0.75

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n47

.28%

1Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

27,4

850.

75M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

24.4

2%0.

75M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

6.57

%0.

5M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

57.7

2%1

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m35

,526

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct17

.71%

1Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

12.8

5%0.

75Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

16.2

6%0.

75Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

26,5

230.

75Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce55

.35%

0Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce3.

97%

0.5

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

12.7

6%0.

75Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce38

,052

0.75

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

11.2

6%1

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

14.9

4%0.

75G

reen

Bay

Met

ro21

.09%

0.75

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

34,3

860.

75So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity17

.00%

1So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity0.

00%

0.5

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

0.00

%0.

5So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity16

,184

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

ti o3.

03%

1.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio25

.93%

1.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio0.

00%

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio28

,597

0.75

Star

k Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.06%

1St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

8.01

%0.

75St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

78.3

4%1.

5St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

61,8

801.

5

B-31

Page 88: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Hou

rs

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,01

00.

5D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

860.

5D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity17

,420

0.75

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1,29

50.

5C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct3,

020

1C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

961

Cha

mpa

ign-

Urb

ana

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

28,0

260.

75C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

414

1An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

047

1An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

941

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

33,1

791

Ann

Arb

or T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,38

31

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

894

1M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.81

0.5

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct34

,058

1M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

1,96

10.

75W

ichi

ta T

rans

it2,

399

0.75

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

0.89

0.75

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

31,0

911

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

2,15

11

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

668

0.75

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

711

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct25

,691

0.75

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct1,

471

0.75

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,34

60.

75D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

941

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

24,4

660.

75D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

779

0.75

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y2,

997

1W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it A

utho

rity

0.99

1W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it A

utho

rity

23,7

630.

75W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1,

948

0.75

Wau

kesh

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2,66

90.

75W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

840.

5W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m37

,836

1W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m1,

937

0.75

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n2,

839

0.75

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n0.

971

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n29

,499

1So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

2,01

00.

75Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

893

1Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

840.

5Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

,401

0.75

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1,92

00.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

3,13

71

Roc

k Is

land

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t D0.

910.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

29,0

621

Roc

k Is

land

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t D2,

221

1C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce3,

522

1C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce0.

961

Cam

pus

Bus

Ser

vice

16,4

960.

5C

ampu

s Bu

s Se

rvic

e1,

461

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

2,89

41

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

0.96

1Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n22

,895

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

2,18

11

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity3,

731

1.5

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity0.

971

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity32

,242

1La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

2,37

41

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

1,87

90.

5Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t0.

941

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

20,6

120.

75Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t1,

463

0.75

Star

Tran

2,24

50.

75St

arTr

an0.

961

Star

Tran

24,5

750.

75St

arTr

an1,

766

0.75

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em3,

440

1Ka

lam

azoo

Met

ro T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.99

1Ka

lam

azoo

Met

ro T

rans

it Sy

stem

35,4

101

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2,

735

1.5

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t3,

975

1.5

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t0.

930.

75Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

55,8

522

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t2,

665

1G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

por a

2,36

00.

75G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

0.93

1G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

22,2

500.

75G

reat

er L

afay

ette

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

1,86

70.

75G

ary

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

3,49

91

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n0.

971

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n45

,612

1.5

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n3,

146

1.5

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e4,

137

1.5

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e0.

951

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e40

,646

1.5

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e3,

052

1.5

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n2,

114

0.5

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

961

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n21

,774

0.75

Five

Sea

sons

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n1,

684

0.75

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

717

0.75

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

951

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m25

,582

0.75

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m1,

919

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

125

0.5

Sprin

gfie

ld M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

930.

75Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

22,1

220.

75Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

1,78

90.

75Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce2,

394

0.75

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

0.97

1Pe

kin

Mun

icip

al B

us S

ervi

ce18

,459

0.75

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

1,13

40.

5G

reen

Bay

Met

ro2,

182

0.5

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

0.97

1G

reen

Bay

Met

ro33

,424

1G

reen

Bay

Met

ro2,

056

0.75

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

2,08

80.

5So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity0.

941

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

9,49

00.

5S

outh

wes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

1,23

10.

5U

nive

rsity

of M

ichi

gan

Park

ing

and

Tran

spor

tati o

3,08

51

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio0.

931

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio15

,477

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Mic

higa

n Pa

rkin

g an

d Tr

ansp

orta

tio1,

721

0.75

Star

k Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity4,

548

2St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.97

1St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

60,2

812

Star

k Ar

ea R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity4,

395

2

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

23,6

410.

5D

es M

oine

s M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity35

.71%

1U

nive

rsity

of M

ichi

gan

Park

ing

and

Tran

spor

tati o

26.2

5C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct34

,168

0.75

Cha

mpa

ign-

Urb

ana

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

21.9

2%0.

75St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

24.0

0An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity40

,670

1An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity22

.58%

0.75

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e23

.25

Mad

ison

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct43

,871

1M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

28.8

1%0.

75So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity23

.25

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

33,0

750.

75W

ichi

ta T

rans

it6.

38%

0.75

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t23

.00

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct34

,866

0.75

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct35

.71%

1C

ham

paig

n-U

rban

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct22

.25

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

30,2

910.

75D

ulut

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y23

.81%

0.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity21

.25

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y34

,985

0.75

Wes

tern

Res

erve

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y47

.22%

1M

adis

on C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

21.0

0W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m41

,620

1W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m10

.00%

0.75

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.0

0So

uth

Bend

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

37,5

451

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n27

.27%

0.75

Wic

hita

Tra

nsit

20.2

5Bu

tler C

ount

y R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

ity27

,162

0.75

Butle

r Cou

nty

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

40.0

0%1

Cam

pus

Bus

Ser

vice

20.2

5R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

37,6

091

Roc

k Is

land

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t D29

.41%

0.75

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

20.2

5C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce38

,490

1C

ampu

s B

us S

ervi

ce13

3.33

%2

Sout

h Be

nd P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n20

.00

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

29,0

600.

75Bl

oom

ingt

on P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n26

.92%

0.75

Gre

ater

Peo

ria M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct19

.75

LaC

ross

e M

unic

ipal

Tra

nsit

Util

ity48

,364

1La

Cro

sse

Mun

icip

al T

rans

it U

tility

50.0

0%1

Bloo

min

gton

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

19.7

5Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t24

,360

0.75

Keno

sha

Tran

sit

18.1

8%0.

75Ka

lam

azoo

Met

ro T

rans

it Sy

stem

19.5

0St

arTr

an29

,803

0.75

Star

Tran

21.2

8%0.

75An

n A

rbor

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.25

Kala

maz

oo M

etro

Tra

nsit

Syst

em43

,994

1Ka

lam

azoo

Met

ro T

rans

it Sy

stem

24.2

4%0.

75W

auke

sha

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

yste

m19

.25

Lora

in C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t77

,572

2Lo

rain

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

38.8

9%1

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n19

.25

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

r a26

,421

0.75

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra18

.75%

0.75

Gre

ater

Laf

ayet

te P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ra19

.00

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n48

,870

1.5

Gar

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n7.

14%

0.75

Mun

cie

Indi

ana

Tran

sit S

yste

m19

.00

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e51

,590

1.5

Belle

Urb

an S

yste

m-R

acin

e26

.92%

0.75

Dul

uth

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

18.7

5Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

26,4

820.

75Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

21.6

2%0.

75W

este

rn R

eser

ve T

rans

it A

utho

rity

18.7

5M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

33,7

690.

75M

unci

e In

dian

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

32.0

0%0.

75R

ock

Isla

nd C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an M

ass

Tran

sit D

18.7

5Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

24,5

800.

75Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

11.1

1%0.

75St

arTr

an18

.75

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

36,9

181

Peki

n M

unic

ipal

Bus

Ser

vice

100.

00%

2Ke

nosh

a Tr

ansi

t18

.25

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

33,4

240.

75G

reen

Bay

Met

ro0.

00%

0.5

Des

Moi

nes

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.0

0So

uthw

est M

isso

uri S

tate

Uni

vers

ity15

,184

0.5

Sout

hwes

t Mis

sour

i Sta

te U

nive

rsity

60.0

0%1

Gre

en B

ay M

etro

17.7

5U

nive

rsity

of M

ichi

gan

Park

ing

and

Tran

spor

tati o

26,6

010.

75U

nive

rsity

of M

ichi

gan

Park

ing

and

Tran

spor

tatio

71.8

8%1.

5Fi

ve S

easo

ns T

rans

porta

tion

17.2

5St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

60,2

811.

5St

ark

Area

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.00

%0.

5Sp

ringf

ield

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

16.7

5

B-32

Page 89: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

5,90

6.79

1C

ity o

f App

leto

n-V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t17

.50

1.5

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

5.68

0.75

City

of A

pple

ton-

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t0.

940.

75R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

5,01

9.10

0.75

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct22

.25

2R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

12.2

91

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2.

161.

5C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s5,

900.

951

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it S

ervi

ces

18.5

01.

5C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s9.

271

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it Se

rvic

es1.

411

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n4,

658.

550.

75Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

16.2

51

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n7.

350.

75Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

1.13

0.75

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

5,01

8.25

0.75

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

13.8

30.

75D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it10

.04

1D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it1.

471

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l4,

921.

670.

75Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

15.4

21

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l5.

400.

75Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

1.09

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it Sy

stem

6,12

9.93

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em18

.50

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it Sy

stem

10.3

61

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it Sy

stem

1.08

0.75

John

son

Cou

nty

Kan

sas

aka

John

son

Cou

nty

T r2,

279.

950.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr14

.67

1Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr1.

420.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr0.

500.

75LA

KETR

AN1,

799.

970.

5LA

KETR

AN17

.00

1LA

KETR

AN2.

550.

75LA

KETR

AN0.

770.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

4,02

2.77

0.75

Siou

x Fa

lls T

rans

it14

.25

0.75

Siou

x Fa

lls T

rans

it5.

270.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

0.99

0.75

Ric

hlan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t3,

482.

290.

75R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

11.0

00.

5R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

3.64

0.75

Ric

hlan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t1.

221

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity2,

421.

530.

75Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

11.7

50.

75Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

2.25

0.75

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity0.

640.

75C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

4,67

9.38

0.75

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta16

.50

1C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

11.7

51

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta1.

511

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

10,9

01.2

51.

5Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m19

.00

1.5

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.4

61

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.91

0.75

Blue

Wat

er A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

omm

issi

on5,

599.

621

Blue

Wat

er A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

omm

issi

on12

.00

0.75

Blue

Wat

er A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

omm

issi

on2.

560.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

1.14

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

5,19

3.10

1C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity12

.00

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

3.99

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

1.68

1M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em3,

313.

030.

75M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em11

.42

0.5

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

2.68

0.75

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

1.08

0.75

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity97

3.22

0.5

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

17.2

51

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

0.35

0.75

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

0.32

0.5

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

1,70

6.56

0.5

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

12.5

00.

75Ba

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

4.59

0.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

660.

75St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on7,

010.

851

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

19.4

21.

5St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on23

.64

2St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on1.

631

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity5,

386.

611

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.00

0.75

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity9.

981

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it A

utho

rity

1.39

1Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

4,63

5.50

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m19

.00

1.5

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m8.

801

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m1.

211

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne1,

807.

720.

5C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

12.5

00.

75C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

5.95

0.75

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne1.

661

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

5,60

3.25

1C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m14

.00

0.75

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

1.94

0.75

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.31

0.5

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3,49

8.54

0.75

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m3.

960.

75C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

000.

75Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it3,

816.

210.

75Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it14

.75

1Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it7.

510.

75Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it1.

371

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

4,73

5.94

0.75

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

16.0

01

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

5.25

0.75

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

0.84

0.75

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

5,00

6.13

0.75

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

13.5

80.

75H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m3.

990.

75H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

820.

75Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

8,48

0.34

1.5

Iow

a C

ity T

rans

it17

.00

1Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

22.0

11.

5Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

2.40

1.5

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

,784

.35

2O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

12.9

20.

75O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

13.9

61

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

411

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

2,79

8.35

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

11.0

00.

5Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t7.

050.

75Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t2.

031.

5U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

21,6

52.9

32

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a18

.00

1.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a47

.49

2U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

5.59

2W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on7,

078.

631

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

17.4

21.

5W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on11

.40

1W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on0.

950.

75Ba

ttle

Cre

ek T

rans

it4,

700.

360.

75Ba

ttle

Cre

ek T

rans

it13

.50

0.75

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

6.81

0.75

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

1.26

1Be

ttend

orf T

rans

it Sy

stem

3,34

0.47

0.75

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.00

0.75

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

4.14

0.75

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

0.52

0.75

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

3,66

3.00

0.75

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

13.3

30.

75Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e0.

500.

75Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e0.

160.

5C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em4,

137.

260.

75C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em13

.50

0.75

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

4.61

0.75

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

0.84

0.75

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em2,

853.

050.

75C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

12.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

7.39

0.75

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

900.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss5,

422.

761

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

12.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss1.

100.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss0.

320.

5C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t6,

697.

171

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

12.5

00.

75C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t9.

201

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

1.09

0.75

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns38

0.37

0.5

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns12

.33

0.75

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns0.

310.

75C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

0.33

0.5

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

4,05

7.90

0.75

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

16.0

01

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

9.14

1C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

271

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m4,

254.

350.

75D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.50

0.75

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

8.59

1D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

271

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

7,27

9.47

1Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.83

1.5

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

12.7

81

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

1.48

1G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us3,

603.

270.

75G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us12

.00

0.75

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

14.1

61

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

2.69

1.5

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

6,21

4.12

1H

eart

City

Rid

er/G

oshe

n Tr

ansi

t14

.92

1H

eart

City

Rid

er/G

oshe

n Tr

ansi

t1.

030.

75H

eart

City

Rid

er/G

oshe

n Tr

ansi

t0.

230.

5Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

3,06

6.49

0.75

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.00

1Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

8.09

1Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

1.07

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o4,

717.

970.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

12.0

00.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

3.59

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o0.

810.

75O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s7,

515.

221

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

18.5

01.

5O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s1.

030.

75O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s0.

380.

75R

apid

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

4,99

2.38

0.75

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

12.0

00.

75R

apid

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2.

800.

75R

apid

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

020.

75Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3,58

0.02

0.75

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m12

.00

0.75

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m12

.90

1Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2.

111.

5St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

6,33

3.65

1St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

15.8

31

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t3.

310.

75St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

0.62

0.75

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

848.

420.

75Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y8.

501

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

0.99

0.75

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

0.38

0.75

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em5,

186.

781

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.50

0.75

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em18

.12

1.5

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

451

B-33

Page 90: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Hea

dway

(m

inut

es)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Ca p

itaAl

t Sco

re

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

15.7

71

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

16.7

61

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

22.3

11

City

of A

pple

ton-

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t$2

1.55

1R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

29.0

91.

5R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

13.4

60.

75R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

40.4

61

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$2

5.84

0.75

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it S

ervi

ces

19.6

01

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it S

ervi

ces

13.9

50.

75C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s38

.82

1C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

$29.

280.

75Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

15.2

70.

75Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

13.5

30.

75Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

52.5

90.

75Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

$29.

350.

75D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it18

.91

1D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it12

.85

0.75

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

39.2

31

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

$34.

050.

75Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

8.08

0.75

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l7.

440.

5Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

40.0

61

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l$2

9.49

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.2

10.

75M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.11

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em27

.22

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$3

1.44

0.75

John

son

Cou

nty

Kan

sas

aka

John

son

Cou

nty

T r8.

080.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr16

.15

1Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr33

.31

1Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr$1

1.39

1LA

KETR

AN12

.86

0.75

LAKE

TRAN

16.6

11

LAKE

TRAN

50.0

80.

75LA

KETR

AN$1

3.00

1Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

13.0

50.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

13.1

40.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

32.8

91

Siou

x Fa

lls T

rans

it$1

8.27

1R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

14.9

90.

75R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

12.2

70.

75R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

58.6

70.

75R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

$10.

031.

5Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

5.47

0.5

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity8.

590.

5Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

93.1

40.

5Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

$16.

741

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta22

.23

1C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

14.7

11

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta25

.97

1C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

$26.

170.

75Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m11

.65

0.75

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.8

00.

75Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m13

.50

1Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m$5

1.81

0Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

14.7

50.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

12.8

80.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

25.6

21

Blue

Wat

er A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

omm

issi

on$8

.88

1.5

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

22.4

51

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

13.3

40.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity37

.66

1C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$9

.58

1.5

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

13.8

60.

75M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.89

0.75

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

45.8

20.

75M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$1

0.11

1.5

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity5.

180.

5Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y16

.13

1Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y12

5.77

0.5

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

$2.3

61.

5Ba

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y10

.27

0.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

15.6

01

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity56

.71

0.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$2

7.50

0.75

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

23.0

11

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

14.1

41

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

25.8

11

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

$53.

000

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity22

.72

1To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16.3

41

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity28

.50

1To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$2

3.77

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m14

.98

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m12

.34

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m46

.65

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m$2

7.14

0.75

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne15

.39

0.75

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne9.

270.

5C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

96.2

90.

5C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

$19.

471

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3.70

0.5

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.0

90.

75C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m45

.00

1C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m$2

1.78

1C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m14

.00

0.75

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

14.0

40.

75C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m60

.03

0.75

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$14.

821

East

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

18.5

21

East

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

13.5

50.

75Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it36

.00

1Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it$2

8.06

0.75

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

9.63

0.75

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

11.5

20.

75Fa

rgo

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t48

.91

0.75

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

$17.

221

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.3

50.

75H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m15

.10

1H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m34

.18

1H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m$2

2.02

1Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

29.2

21.

5Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

12.1

60.

75Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

18.7

31

Iow

a C

ity T

rans

it$4

5.72

0.5

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em20

.78

1O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

14.7

51

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.23

1O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

$34.

700.

75Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t25

.00

1Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t12

.33

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

32.2

21

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

$13.

471

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a57

.34

2U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

10.2

60.

5U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

8.62

1U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

$22.

980.

75W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on12

.50

0.75

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

13.1

30.

75W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on27

.66

1W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on$4

1.70

0.5

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

18.9

71

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

15.1

11

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

22.4

91

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

$23.

890.

75Be

ttend

orf T

rans

it Sy

stem

9.05

0.75

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.43

1Be

ttend

orf T

rans

it S

yste

m42

.40

1Be

ttend

orf T

rans

it S

yste

m$1

7.13

1Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e2.

990.

5Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e18

.44

1.5

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

60.1

90.

75Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e$7

.49

1.5

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

2.04

0.5

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

2.42

1C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em32

6.52

0C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em$2

5.88

0.75

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.69

0.75

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.29

1C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

41.7

81

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em$3

5.36

0.5

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

4.16

0.5

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

12.8

40.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss30

.45

1C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss$9

.08

1.5

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

15.8

31

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

14.5

01

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

22.5

01

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

$26.

410.

75C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

9.63

0.75

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns29

.36

2C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

94.0

10.

5C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

$2.4

61.

5C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m15

.29

0.75

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.0

20.

75C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m52

.20

0.75

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$36.

140.

5D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

20.4

01

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

16.0

31

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

25.9

11

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

$28.

130.

75Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em22

.13

1Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.99

1Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em27

.72

1Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$2

9.01

0.75

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

38.7

52

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

14.4

11

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

34.6

81

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

$20.

251

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

3.76

0.5

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

16.4

21

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

36.5

41

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

$11.

551

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.56

1Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.4

91

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em41

.12

1Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

$31.

260.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

11.7

60.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

14.5

21

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o35

.62

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

$15.

771

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

9.44

0.75

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

24.6

62

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

11.9

61

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

$10.

401.

5R

apid

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

13.9

00.

75R

apid

Tra

nsit

Syst

em13

.65

0.75

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

36.0

51

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

$7.1

01.

5Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

27.0

11.

5Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

12.8

00.

75Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

40.5

41

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

$23.

030.

75St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

5.35

0.5

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t8.

630.

5St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

43.3

81

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t$1

8.33

1Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

6.34

0.75

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

16.4

91

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

30.0

11

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

$7.0

41.

5W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

21.2

21

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.65

1W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

20.9

11

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$4

9.91

0

B-34

Page 91: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

$59.

880.

75C

ity o

f App

leto

n-V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t16

.04%

1C

ity o

f App

leto

n-V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t5.

01%

0.75

City

of A

pple

ton-

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t14

.72%

1R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$61.

180.

75R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

15.9

4%1

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct4.

39%

0.75

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct21

.00%

0.75

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it S

ervi

ces

$61.

940.

75C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s10

.05%

1.5

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it S

ervi

ces

2.05

%1

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it Se

rvic

es23

.26%

0.75

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n$6

0.96

0.75

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n16

.71%

1Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

1.91

%1

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n15

.77%

1D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it$6

4.15

0.75

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

19.3

6%0.

75D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it5.

13%

0.75

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

13.6

4%1

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l$4

4.14

1Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

8.03

%1.

5Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

7.80

%0.

5Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

20.5

1%0.

75M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$4

6.17

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.72%

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

02%

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em10

.03%

1Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y K

ansa

s ak

a Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y T r

$64.

820.

75Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr12

.63%

1Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr0.

17%

1Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr10

.11%

1LA

KETR

AN$6

5.61

0.75

LAKE

TRAN

15.0

6%1

LAKE

TRAN

2.64

%1

LAKE

TRAN

16.0

3%1

Siou

x Fa

lls T

rans

it$4

5.23

1Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

8.17

%1.

5Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

5.06

%0.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

12.9

2%1

Ric

hlan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t$4

1.31

1R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

21.2

5%0.

75R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

15.6

7%0

Ric

hlan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t8.

23%

1Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

$40.

681

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity8.

81%

1.5

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity6.

80%

0.5

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity44

.19%

0C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

$49.

501

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta16

.44%

1C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

1.00

%1

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta5.

05%

1.5

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$48.

441

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

21.9

0%0.

75Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m2.

13%

1Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m8.

44%

1Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

$51.

081

Blue

Wat

er A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

omm

issi

on28

.01%

0.5

Blue

Wat

er A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

omm

issi

on6.

89%

0.5

Blue

Wat

er A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

omm

issi

on16

.31%

1C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$5

3.98

0.75

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

24.6

0%0.

5C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

24%

1C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity13

.88%

1M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$5

2.30

0.75

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

26.8

6%0.

5M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

00%

1M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.10%

1Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$35.

171.

5Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y14

.30%

1Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y0.

64%

1Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y29

.21%

0.5

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

$61.

470.

75Ba

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y16

.21%

1Ba

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

5.64

%0.

75Ba

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

19.2

4%0.

75St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on$5

1.61

1St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on19

.68%

0.75

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

2.53

%1

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

12.8

6%1

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

4.13

0.75

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.68%

1To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4.31

%0.

75To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y17

.66%

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m$4

6.19

1Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

16.6

9%1

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m2.

45%

1Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

10.6

6%1

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne$5

0.34

1C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

36.4

9%0

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne0.

15%

1C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

17.1

9%0.

75C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m$4

1.47

1C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m11

.20%

1.5

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.00

%1

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

8.33

%1

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$52.

390.

75C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m14

.12%

1C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m2.

09%

1C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m20

.23%

0.75

East

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

$69.

230.

5Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it17

.23%

1Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it8.

89%

0.5

East

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

17.5

6%0.

75Fa

rgo

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$3

1.59

1.5

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

23.1

7%0.

75Fa

rgo

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t9.

05%

0.5

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

14.2

5%1

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$68.

100.

5H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m27

.27%

0.5

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2.68

%1

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

20.2

3%0.

75Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

$60.

700.

75Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

16.6

3%1

Iow

a C

ity T

rans

it2.

44%

1Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

11.3

4%1

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$5

1.66

1O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

16.5

0%1

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

33%

1O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

22.6

9%0.

75Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$4

7.74

1Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t19

.88%

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

8.20

%0.

5Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t20

.72%

0.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a$2

7.75

1.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a27

.00%

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a2.

27%

1U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

8.74

%1

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

$45.

731

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

18.3

7%0.

75W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on2.

38%

1W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on10

.69%

1Ba

ttle

Cre

ek T

rans

it$6

6.51

0.5

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

16.1

9%1

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

2.00

%1

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

9.86

%1

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em$3

7.46

1.5

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em15

.56%

1Be

ttend

orf T

rans

it S

yste

m0.

12%

1Be

ttend

orf T

rans

it S

yste

m20

.33%

0.75

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

$44.

431

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

20.6

6%0.

75Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e0.

00%

1Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e11

.52%

1C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em$1

1.44

2C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em10

.78%

1.5

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

13.3

0%0

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

19.6

8%0.

75C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

$70.

350.

5C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

17.3

3%1

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em2.

00%

1C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

24.1

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss$3

4.31

1.5

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

9.26

%1.

5C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss0.

39%

1C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss9.

58%

1C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t$4

5.45

1C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t24

.03%

0.5

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

1.09

%1

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

67.3

3%0

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns$7

6.90

0.5

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns9.

56%

1.5

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns0.

80%

1C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

10.1

4%1

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$60.

460.

75C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m16

.58%

1C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

40%

1C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m26

.73%

0.5

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m$6

6.84

0.5

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

19.3

2%0.

75D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2.

91%

1D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em22

.28%

0.75

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

$50.

231

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

16.5

4%1

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.00

%1

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

20.3

0%0.

75G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us$5

5.43

0.75

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

17.7

0%0.

75G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us0.

18%

1G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us22

.65%

0.75

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

$42.

231

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

4.15

%2

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

0.00

%1

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

5.90

%1.

5Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

$63.

960.

75Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

17.7

0%0.

75Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

8.58

%0.

5Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

8.40

%1

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o$5

1.70

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

15.5

7%1

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o2.

62%

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

17.1

3%0.

75O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s$9

4.89

0O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s15

.82%

1O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s3.

80%

0.75

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

19.1

4%0.

75R

apid

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

$35.

271.

5R

apid

Tra

nsit

Syst

em23

.71%

0.5

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

1.73

%1

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

7.09

%1

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m$4

8.23

1Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

19.9

6%0.

75Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1.63

%1

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

7.70

%1

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t$2

9.62

1.5

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t24

.50%

0.5

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t2.

40%

1St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

6.82

%1

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$4

5.19

1Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y22

.62%

0.75

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

7.00

%0.

5Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y20

.06%

0.75

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$5

8.47

0.75

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em13

.91%

1W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

4.51

%0.

75W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

17.0

3%0.

75

B-35

Page 92: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

re

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

13.2

7%0.

75C

ity o

f App

leto

n-V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t24

.35%

0.75

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

42,3

821

City

of A

pple

ton-

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t2,

476

0.75

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct14

.93%

1R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

19.5

8%0.

75R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

45,5

441

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct3,

385

1C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s10

.08%

0.75

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it S

ervi

ces

53.0

8%1.

5C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s54

,447

1.5

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it Se

rvic

es3,

915

1Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

12.9

0%0.

75Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

47.7

3%1

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n57

,688

1.5

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n4,

325

1D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it7.

53%

0.75

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

72.0

4%2

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

44,4

371

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

3,41

61

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l13

.01%

0.75

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l23

.39%

0.75

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l25

,288

0.5

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l3,

352

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em19

.73%

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em33

.73%

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em41

,152

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2,

997

0.75

John

son

Cou

nty

Kan

sas

aka

John

son

Cou

nty

T r12

.51%

0.75

John

son

Cou

nty

Kans

as a

ka J

ohns

on C

ount

y Tr

55.1

4%1.

5Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr34

,553

0.75

John

son

Cou

nty

Kans

as a

ka J

ohns

on C

ount

y Tr

1,65

00.

75LA

KETR

AN9.

19%

0.75

LAKE

TRAN

62.5

8%1.

5LA

KETR

AN35

,050

0.75

LAKE

TRAN

1,91

20.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

13.9

4%0.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

61.2

7%1.

5Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

30,1

040.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

2,29

40.

75R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

14.5

4%1

Ric

hlan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t23

.12%

0.75

Ric

hlan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t42

,767

1R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

3,52

41

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity8.

11%

0.75

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity21

.76%

0.75

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity32

,782

0.75

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity3,

867

1C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

39.8

8%2

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta11

.43%

0.75

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta34

,480

0.75

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta2,

297

0.75

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

16.3

6%1

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

17.6

8%0.

75Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m32

,373

0.75

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2,69

10.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

27.2

3%1.

5Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

9.45

%0.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

31,2

320.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

2,44

20.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity24

.22%

1.5

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.8

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity45

,525

1C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

565

1M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em11

.49%

0.75

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

2.25

%0.

5M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em37

,861

0.75

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

2,84

70.

75Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

5.60

%0.

5Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y5.

22%

0.5

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

35,9

040.

75Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y2,

499

0.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

9.18

%0.

75Ba

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y28

.24%

0.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity25

,413

0.5

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1,

629

0.75

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

17.0

5%1

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

20.4

2%0.

75St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on44

,034

1St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on3,

142

0.75

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity16

.81%

1To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

45.3

2%1

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity44

,213

1To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y2,

633

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m12

.23%

0.75

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m0.

03%

0.5

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m46

,307

1Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3,76

61

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne13

.06%

0.75

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne36

.72%

1C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

27,7

170.

5C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

3,00

90.

75C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m4.

20%

0.5

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

42.4

8%1

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

53,3

211.

5C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m4,

350

1C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m11

.55%

0.75

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

19.4

3%0.

75C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m51

,278

1.5

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

3,57

71

East

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

0.00

%0.

5Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it46

.50%

1Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it32

,574

0.75

East

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

2,37

30.

75Fa

rgo

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t22

.31%

1.5

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

21.2

5%0.

75Fa

rgo

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t45

,839

1Fa

rgo

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t4,

012

1H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m14

.15%

0.75

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

27.4

0%0.

75H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m46

,334

1H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m3,

284

1Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

20.2

1%1

Iow

a C

ity T

rans

it56

.24%

1.5

Iow

a C

ity T

rans

it34

,216

0.75

Iow

a C

ity T

rans

it2,

754

0.75

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.50%

1O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

19.6

4%0.

75O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

45,7

651

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em3,

099

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

15.3

2%1

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

11.5

1%0.

75Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t18

,995

1Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t1,

541

0.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a2.

72%

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a0.

00%

0.5

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a33

,261

0.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a3,

265

1W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on14

.38%

1W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on19

.16%

0.75

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

45,3

661

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

3,37

11

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

11.3

6%0.

75Ba

ttle

Cre

ek T

rans

it17

.93%

0.75

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

27,4

500.

5Ba

ttle

Cre

ek T

rans

it1,

849

0.75

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em6.

32%

0.5

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em51

.13%

1.5

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

41,4

441

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

2,37

80.

75Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e2.

30%

0.5

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

97.7

0%2

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

68,4

402

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

3,71

31

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

5.83

%0.

5C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em35

.67%

1C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em56

,829

1.5

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

22,6

672

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em11

.34%

0.75

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em21

.76%

0.75

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em34

,169

0.75

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em2,

100

0.75

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

8.60

%0.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss13

.47%

0.75

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

36,9

000.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss2,

803

0.75

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

13.0

2%0.

75C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t21

.48%

0.75

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

39,5

570.

75C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t2,

617

0.75

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns38

.18%

2C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

14.7

0%0.

75C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

33,2

910.

75C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

1,13

50.

75C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m7.

97%

0.75

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

65.0

1%1.

5C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m44

,166

1C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m3,

746

1D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

9.82

%0.

75D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em12

.31%

0.75

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

30,8

940.

75D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1,

881

0.75

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.7

1%1

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

23.7

2%0.

75Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em51

,401

1.5

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

3,41

41

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

14.8

2%1

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

27.1

1%0.

75G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us32

,020

0.75

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

2,16

50.

75H

eart

City

Rid

er/G

oshe

n Tr

ansi

t24

.73%

1.5

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

15.1

3%0.

75H

eart

City

Rid

er/G

oshe

n Tr

ansi

t69

,431

2H

eart

City

Rid

er/G

oshe

n Tr

ansi

t4,

014

1Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

17.4

3%1

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em19

.56%

0.75

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em34

,042

0.75

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2,

257

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o21

.23%

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

44.4

7%1

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o41

,724

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

2,90

30.

75O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s14

.12%

0.75

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

18.0

9%0.

75O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s50

,339

1O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s1,

901

0.75

Rap

id T

rans

it S

yste

m25

.58%

1.5

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

32.8

6%1

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

42,6

881

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

3,25

01

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m26

.56%

1.5

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m25

.64%

0.75

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m33

,983

0.75

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it Sy

stem

2,52

10.

75St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

4.98

%0.

5St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

59.7

4%1.

5St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

41,4

951

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t4,

840

1Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

14.1

3%0.

75Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y10

.03%

0.75

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

31,7

500.

75Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y1,

925

0.75

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em15

.02%

1W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

21.1

8%0.

75W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

27,1

370.

5W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

1,89

60.

75

B-36

Page 93: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per V

ehic

le M

ileAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

0.87

0.75

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

31,5

591

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

1,88

30.

75C

ity o

f App

leto

n-Va

lley

Tran

sit

36,8

190.

75R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

1.00

1R

ockf

ord

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

30,7

421

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

285

0.75

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct45

,544

1C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s0.

981

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it S

ervi

ces

41,6

661.

5C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s2,

988

1C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

53,2

401.

5Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

0.96

1Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

37,9

961.

5Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

2,80

71

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n55

,267

1.5

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

0.95

1D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it35

,498

1D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it2,

763

1D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it42

,153

1Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

0.97

1Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

18,7

600.

5Sa

gina

w T

rans

it Au

thor

ity R

egio

nal

2,52

21

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

Reg

iona

l24

,444

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.95

1M

etro

polit

an E

vans

ville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em39

,251

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it Sy

stem

2,78

11

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it Sy

stem

39,2

511

John

son

Cou

nty

Kan

sas

aka

John

son

Cou

nty

T r0.

591

John

son

Cou

nty

Kans

as a

ka J

ohns

on C

ount

y Tr

17,6

000.

5Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

Tr1,

090

0.75

John

son

Cou

nty

Kans

as a

ka J

ohns

on C

ount

y Tr

20,4

390.

5LA

KETR

AN0.

711

LAKE

TRAN

20,8

000.

75LA

KETR

AN1,

252

0.75

LAKE

TRAN

24,9

600.

5Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

0.96

1Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

25,7

460.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

1,96

00.

75Si

oux

Falls

Tra

nsit

28,9

640.

75R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.98

1R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

29,2

511

Ric

hlan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t2,

384

0.75

Ric

hlan

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t41

,787

1Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

0.98

1Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

25,1

030.

75Te

rre

Hau

te T

rans

it U

tility

2,92

41

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity32

,276

0.75

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta0.

860.

75C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

22,1

400.

75C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

1,50

50.

75C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

29,8

040.

75Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

971

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

23,0

850.

75Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m1,

803

0.75

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

31,3

960.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

0.99

1Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

28,4

290.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

2,20

70.

75Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

30,7

980.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

961

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

31,6

311

City

of J

acks

on T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,37

10.

75C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity43

,492

1M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

860.

75M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em23

,559

0.75

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

1,82

70.

75M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em32

,621

0.75

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

920.

75Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y23

,496

0.75

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

1,45

70.

75Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y32

,895

0.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

0.99

1Ba

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y22

,938

0.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1,

471

0.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity25

,158

0.5

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

0.97

1St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on33

,159

1St

. Clo

ud M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it C

omm

issi

on2,

345

0.75

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

42,6

331

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

951

Tope

ka M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity30

,276

1To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1,85

30.

75To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y41

,810

1Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

0.96

1Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

33,3

521

Bloo

min

gton

-Nor

mal

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m2,

703

1Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

44,4

701

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne0.

971

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne17

,927

0.5

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne1,

934

0.75

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne26

,890

0.5

City

of L

awre

nce

Law

renc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.95

1C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m50

,822

2C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m4,

202

1C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m50

,822

1.5

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.96

1C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m32

,770

1C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

333

0.75

City

of M

iddl

etow

n-M

iddl

etow

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

49,1

551.

5Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it0.

951

East

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

31,0

391

East

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

2,29

00.

75Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it31

,039

0.75

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

0.97

1Fa

rgo

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t41

,057

1.5

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

3,56

41

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

44,4

781

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.93

0.75

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

35,8

771

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2,37

60.

75H

amm

ond

Tran

sit S

yste

m43

,053

1Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

0.94

1Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

26,0

470.

75Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

2,14

30.

75Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

32,1

750.

75O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.98

1O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

31,3

221

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em2,

123

0.75

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em44

,745

1Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t0.

981

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

18,5

250.

5Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t1,

503

0.75

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

18,5

250.

5U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

0.96

1U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

23,3

190.

75U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

2,27

40.

75U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

31,9

100.

75W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on0.

941

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

28,0

700.

75W

auke

sha

Tran

sit C

omm

issi

on2,

138

0.75

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

42,8

441

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

0.97

1Ba

ttle

Cre

ek T

rans

it26

,626

0.75

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

1,76

20.

75Ba

ttle

Cre

ek T

rans

it26

,626

0.5

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

991

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em30

,858

1Be

ttend

orf T

rans

it S

yste

m1,

770

0.75

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

41,1

441

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

0.99

1Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e27

,106

0.75

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

1,47

00.

75Br

unsw

ick

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

e67

,766

2C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Syst

em0.

961

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

54,4

052

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

22,5

152

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n Sy

stem

54,4

051.

5C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.95

1C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

24,2

750.

75C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

1,49

00.

75C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

32,3

660.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss0.

961

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

26,5

040.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss2,

064

0.75

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

35,3

380.

75C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t0.

920.

75C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t29

,133

1C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t2,

009

0.75

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

36,4

160.

75C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

0.53

1C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

17,4

970.

5C

ity o

f New

ark

Tran

sit O

pera

tions

596

0.75

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns17

,497

0.5

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.96

1C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m29

,373

1C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

444

0.75

Col

umbi

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

42,4

281

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it S

yste

m0.

951

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

26,9

970.

75D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1,

684

0.75

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

29,4

520.

75Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

981

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

27,8

130.

75Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1,

855

0.75

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

50,4

101.

5G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us0.

941

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

30,0

151

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

2,08

20.

75G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us30

,015

0.75

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

0.90

0.75

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

53,2

642

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

3,24

31

Hea

rt C

ity R

ider

/Gos

hen

Tran

sit

62,1

412

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

961

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em19

,812

0.5

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1,

279

0.75

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em32

,549

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o0.

971

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o24

,848

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o1,

712

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o40

,660

1O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s0.

731

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

36,9

501

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

1,49

80.

75O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s36

,950

0.75

Rap

id T

rans

it S

yste

m0.

961

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

23,3

930.

75R

apid

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1,

714

0.75

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

40,9

381

Siou

x C

ity T

rans

it S

yste

m0.

910.

75Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

21,0

070.

75Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1,64

10.

75Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Syst

em30

,958

0.75

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t0.

951

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t32

,935

1St

. Jos

eph

Tran

sit

3,81

61

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t39

,522

1Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

1.00

1Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y21

,166

0.75

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

1,28

30.

75Tw

in C

ities

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y31

,750

0.75

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

981

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em23

,168

0.75

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1,

582

0.75

Wau

sau

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em26

,477

0.5

B-37

Page 94: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: M

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

16.6

7%0.

75H

eart

City

Rid

er/G

oshe

n Tr

ansi

t24

.00

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct48

.15%

1U

nive

rsity

of I

owa

22.7

5C

ity U

tiliti

es o

f Spr

ingf

ield

Tra

nsit

Ser

vice

s27

.78%

0.75

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

22.7

5Fo

rt W

ayne

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Cor

pora

tion

45.4

5%1

City

Util

ities

of S

prin

gfie

ld T

rans

it S

ervi

ces

22.5

0D

aven

port

Publ

ic T

rans

it18

.75%

0.75

Eau

Cla

ire T

rans

it Sy

stem

21.7

5Sa

gina

w T

rans

it A

utho

rity

Reg

iona

l30

.30%

0.75

City

of A

nder

son

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

yste

m21

.50

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it S

yste

m0.

00%

0.5

Roc

kfor

d M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct21

.00

John

son

Cou

nty

Kans

as a

ka J

ohns

on C

ount

y Tr

16.1

3%0.

75Io

wa

City

Tra

nsit

21.0

0LA

KETR

AN

20.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m20

.75

Siou

x Fa

lls T

rans

it12

.50%

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Eva

nsvi

lle T

rans

it Sy

stem

20.5

0R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

42.8

6%1

Osh

kosh

Tra

nsit

Syst

em20

.50

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity28

.57%

0.75

Rap

id T

rans

it Sy

stem

20.5

0C

ity o

f Roc

hest

er, M

inne

sota

34.6

2%1

Fort

Way

ne P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

orpo

ratio

n20

.25

Sheb

oyga

n Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

36.0

0%1

City

of R

oche

ster

, Min

neso

ta20

.25

Blue

Wat

er A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n C

omm

issi

on8.

33%

0.75

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

20.2

5C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity37

.50%

1C

ity o

f Jac

kson

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity20

.00

Mus

kego

n Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

38.4

6%1

Dav

enpo

rt Pu

blic

Tra

nsit

19.7

5Po

rtage

Are

a R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y40

.00%

1Fa

rgo

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t19

.75

Bay

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

9.68

%0.

75Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em19

.50

St. C

loud

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Com

mis

sion

28.5

7%0.

75Be

ttend

orf T

rans

it Sy

stem

19.5

0To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

38.1

0%1

Gra

nd F

orks

City

Bus

19.5

0Bl

oom

ingt

on-N

orm

al P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em33

.33%

1Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Syst

em19

.50

City

of D

ubuq

ue-K

eyLi

ne50

.00%

1To

peka

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.2

5C

ity o

f Law

renc

e La

wre

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

00%

0.5

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

19.2

5C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m50

.00%

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Bla

ck H

awk

Co

19.2

5Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it0.

00%

0.5

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t19

.25

Farg

o M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit

8.33

%0.

75C

ity o

f Mid

dlet

own-

Mid

dlet

own

Tran

sit S

yste

m19

.00

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

20.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Hol

land

Mac

ataw

a Ar

ea E

xpre

ss19

.00

Iow

a C

ity T

rans

it23

.53%

0.75

Oza

ukee

Cou

nty

Tran

sit S

ervi

ces

19.0

0O

shko

sh T

rans

it Sy

stem

42.8

6%1

City

of A

pple

ton-

Val

ley

Tran

sit

18.7

5Sp

ringf

ield

City

Are

a Tr

ansi

t0.

00%

0.5

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns18

.75

Uni

vers

ity o

f Iow

a36

.84%

1C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m18

.75

Wau

kesh

a Tr

ansi

t Com

mis

sion

52.6

3%1

Siou

x Fa

lls T

rans

it18

.50

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

0.00

%0.

5Sh

eboy

gan

Tran

sit S

yste

m18

.50

Bette

ndor

f Tra

nsit

Syst

em33

.33%

1Jo

hnso

n C

ount

y Ka

nsas

aka

Joh

nson

Cou

nty

T r18

.00

Brun

swic

k Tr

ansi

t Alte

rnat

ive

150.

00%

2R

ichl

and

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

18.0

0C

ity o

f And

erso

n Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Sys

tem

0.00

%0.

5Bl

ue W

ater

Are

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Com

mis

sion

18.0

0C

ity o

f Bel

oit T

rans

it Sy

stem

33.3

3%1

Jane

sville

Tra

nsit

Syst

em18

.00

City

of H

olla

nd M

acat

awa

Area

Exp

ress

33.3

3%1

LAKE

TRAN

17.7

5C

ity o

f Moo

rhea

d-Tr

ansi

t25

.00%

0.75

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity17

.75

City

of N

ewar

k Tr

ansi

t Ope

ratio

ns0.

00%

0.5

Ham

mon

d Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

17.2

5C

olum

bia

Tran

sit S

yste

m44

.44%

1D

ecat

ur P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Syst

em17

.25

Dec

atur

Pub

lic T

rans

it Sy

stem

9.09

%0.

75W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

17.2

5Ea

u C

laire

Tra

nsit

Syst

em81

.25%

1.5

Sprin

gfie

ld C

ity A

rea

Tran

sit

17.0

0G

rand

For

ks C

ity B

us0.

00%

0.5

Sagi

naw

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y R

egio

nal

16.7

5H

eart

City

Rid

er/G

oshe

n Tr

ansi

t16

.67%

0.75

Porta

ge A

rea

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

16.7

5Ja

nesv

ille T

rans

it Sy

stem

64.2

9%1.

5Ea

st C

hica

go T

rans

it16

.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of B

lack

Haw

k C

o63

.64%

1.5

Battl

e C

reek

Tra

nsit

16.7

5O

zauk

ee C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Ser

vice

s0.

00%

0.5

City

of B

eloi

t Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.75

Rap

id T

rans

it S

yste

m75

.00%

1.5

City

of M

oorh

ead-

Tran

sit

16.7

5Si

oux

City

Tra

nsit

Syst

em47

.37%

1M

uske

gon

Area

Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.50

St. J

osep

h Tr

ansi

t20

.00%

0.75

Terr

e H

aute

Tra

nsit

Util

ity16

.00

Twin

Citi

es A

rea

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity50

.00%

1Ba

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

15.7

5W

ausa

u Ar

ea T

rans

it Sy

stem

14.2

9%0.

75C

ity o

f Dub

uque

-Key

Line

15.2

5

B-38

Page 95: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up A

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n17

,998

.34

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

24.0

01

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n39

.80

0.75

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n4.

191

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T14

,260

.73

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T24

.33

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

33.2

80.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

2.30

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct7,

632.

840.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

24.0

01

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct29

.36

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct1.

920.

75Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay18

,466

.10

1Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay24

.00

1Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay12

0.99

2Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay7.

712

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity9,

974.

320.

5O

rang

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

21.3

31

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity21

.46

0.75

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity2.

840.

75C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

20,4

63.6

11.

5C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

24.0

01

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t83

.63

1.5

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t3.

791

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

16,3

90.7

21

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

24.0

01

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

50.2

21

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

3.11

0.75

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

,609

.61

0.75

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity22

.25

0.5

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity22

.46

0.75

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

500.

75Sa

nta

Cla

ra V

alle

y Tr

ans.

Aut

horit

y11

,769

.98

0.75

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

24.0

01

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

28.4

40.

75Sa

nta

Cla

ra V

alle

y Tr

ans.

Aut

horit

y2.

490.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide )

Alt S

core

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n51

.44

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

12.2

80.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

2,74

10.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

111,

193

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T32

.50

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T14

.14

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

4,01

20.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

172,

426

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

28.4

80.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

14.8

31.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

31,8

292

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct13

9,01

01

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

68.3

22

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

8.86

1Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay2,

145

0.75

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

86,4

440.

75O

rang

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

39.1

60.

75O

rang

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

13.7

71

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity5,

299

0.75

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity62

,798

0.75

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t52

.54

1C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

13.8

61

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t4,

709

0.75

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t20

8,63

71.

5Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct36

.26

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

11.6

70.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ctn/

a2

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

89,0

610.

75D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

33.3

50.

75D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.3

21

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

128

0.75

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity47

,359

0.5

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

31.8

90.

75Sa

nta

Cla

ra V

alle

y Tr

ans.

Aut

horit

y12

.81

0.75

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

2,05

80.

75Sa

nta

Cla

ra V

alle

y Tr

ans.

Aut

horit

y26

4,37

31.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n10

.76

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

$73.

751

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$9

5.32

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

23.4

2%0.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

10.8

01

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T$7

1.74

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

$70.

061.

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

8.55

%2

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct22

.56

0.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct$8

5.89

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

$83.

311

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct19

.78%

1Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay11

.45

1Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay$1

95.9

50.

5Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay$1

10.6

50.

75Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay25

.19%

0.75

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity21

.43

0.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$4

4.94

1.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity$8

1.99

1O

rang

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

20.4

4%1

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t8.

891.

5C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

$133

.91

0.75

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t$8

4.13

1C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

22.0

9%0.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct10

.88

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct$1

39.9

00.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct$1

01.0

00.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct20

.07%

1D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

14.4

50.

75D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$84.

901

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$1

26.0

60.

5D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.1

7%0.

75Sa

nta

Cla

ra V

alle

y Tr

ans.

Aut

horit

y17

.00

0.75

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

$116

.77

0.75

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

$130

.93

0.5

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

24.7

2%0.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n3.

35%

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

16.7

1%1

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

00%

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

0.00

%1

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T7.

40%

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T7.

55%

2M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

25.2

2%1

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T74

.02%

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

8.10

%0.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

22.2

5%0.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

19.7

3%1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct63

.72%

1Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay2.

14%

1.5

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

17.4

9%1

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

25.4

4%1

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

55.5

6%0.

75O

rang

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

4.06

%1

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity18

.80%

0.75

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity29

.06%

1.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity57

.64%

0.75

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t2.

50%

1C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

14.2

6%1

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t22

.24%

1C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

76.9

9%1

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2.12

%1.

5Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct17

.07%

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct23

.04%

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct68

.78%

1D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

5.43

%0.

75D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

23.4

2%0.

5D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

12.1

9%0.

75D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

106.

35%

1.5

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

4.85

%0.

75Sa

nta

Cla

ra V

alle

y Tr

ans.

Aut

horit

y23

.52%

0.5

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

13.8

2%0.

75Sa

nta

Cla

ra V

alle

y Tr

ans.

Aut

horit

y44

.34%

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n46

,416

0.75

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n3,

495

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

0.85

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

31,4

340.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

42,9

430.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

2,81

60.

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

0.85

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T30

,436

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct52

,308

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

3,30

60.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

0.81

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

31,5

550.

75Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay36

,017

0.5

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

3,81

71.

5Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay0.

871.

5Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay21

,574

0.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity58

,134

1.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

882

1.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

840.

75O

rang

e C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

ority

40,8

891.

5C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

49,1

201

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t3,

301

0.75

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t0.

861

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t35

,101

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct40

,205

0.5

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

3,23

40.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct0.

861.

5Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct29

,268

0.75

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity51

,814

1D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3,64

41

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

840.

75D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

36,2

011

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

50,5

171

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

3,64

21

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

0.85

0.75

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

36,0

061

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n2,

560

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

39,6

260.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

26.0

6%1

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

25.0

0M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

2,15

30.

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

36,2

920.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

19.2

4%0.

75C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

23.5

0R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

2,12

80.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

42,5

741

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct34

.92%

1.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity23

.25

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

2,43

60.

75Sa

n Fr

anci

sco

Mun

icip

al R

ailw

ay31

,198

0.5

San

Fran

cisc

o M

unic

ipal

Rai

lway

44.6

1%2

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T21

.50

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

969

1.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity49

,046

1.5

Ora

nge

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.95%

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct21

.50

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t2,

532

0.75

City

and

Cou

nty

of H

onol

ulu

Dep

t of T

rans

porta

t42

,011

1C

ity a

nd C

ount

y of

Hon

olul

u D

ept o

f Tra

nspo

rtat

19.6

8%0.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct21

.50

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,50

70.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct34

,702

0.5

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

18.5

7%0.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

21.0

0D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,71

81

Dal

las

Area

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity43

,651

1D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

20.5

8%0.

75Sa

nta

Cla

ra V

alle

y Tr

ans.

Aut

horit

y19

.00

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

2,81

21

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

42,6

971

Sant

a C

lara

Val

ley

Tran

s. A

utho

rity

18.5

8%0.

75D

alla

s Ar

ea R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.7

5

B-39

Page 96: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up B

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yA

vera

ge

Wee

kday

Spa

n of

Se

rvic

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Pass

enge

r Trip

s Pe

r Cap

itaA

lt Sc

ore

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileA

lt Sc

ore

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti o7,

078.

940.

75C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

18.8

30.

75C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

2.46

0.5

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tio3.

231

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

7,47

7.99

0.75

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

19.6

71

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

24.3

20.

75Sa

n M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2.

330.

75S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

14,2

09.5

20.

75S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

22.0

01.

5Sa

n D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

30.2

01

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n3.

361.

5Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.15

2,61

4.04

2Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.19

.75

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.6.

280.

5Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.1.

210.

5R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a13

,077

.16

0.75

RTC

of S

outh

ern

Nev

ada

20.0

01

RTC

of S

outh

ern

Nev

ada

44.6

21

RTC

of S

outh

ern

Nev

ada

3.06

1C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t8,

111.

280.

75C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t20

.67

1C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t23

.08

0.75

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

2.47

0.75

Cap

ital M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y10

,270

.14

0.75

Cap

ital M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.5

01

Cap

ital M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

55.1

81.

5C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2.

490.

75VI

A M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it12

,129

.18

0.75

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

19.5

01

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

32.3

21

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

2.31

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ave

rage

Spe

edAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt

Scor

eTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Hea

dway

(m

inut

es)

Alt

Scor

e

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti o40

.60

1C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

12.5

70.

75C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

2,18

9,98

82

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tio21

.61

0.75

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

28.9

10.

75S

an M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct12

.43

0.75

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

74,8

230.

75S

an M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct17

.89

0.75

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n39

.42

1Sa

n D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

11.7

40.

5Sa

n D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

188,

750

0.75

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n17

.37

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

19.9

00.

5Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.16

.45

1.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

181,

821

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

0.79

2R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a41

.07

1R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a13

.44

0.75

RTC

of S

outh

ern

Nev

ada

337,

772

0.75

RTC

of S

outh

ern

Nev

ada

23.9

70.

5C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t38

.12

1C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t15

.43

1.5

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

262,

721

0.75

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

17.8

90.

75C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity32

.05

0.75

Cap

ital M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.8

70.

75C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity12

6,34

20.

75C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity18

.71

0.75

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

33.1

20.

75VI

A M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it14

.36

1VI

A M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it27

6,71

40.

75VI

A M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it17

.07

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r R

even

ue H

our

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt

Scor

eTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt

Scor

e

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tio$3

.50

1.5

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tio$5

7.81

1C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

21.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

3.00

%0.

75S

an M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$8

8.42

0.75

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$105

.13

0.5

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

13.4

9%1.

5Sa

n M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct4.

91%

0.75

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n$5

1.54

1Sa

n D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

$67.

291

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n20

.60%

0.75

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n1.

87%

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.$1

6.86

1.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

$53.

391

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

31.2

8%0

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

0.08

%1.

5R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a$5

3.14

1R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a$4

8.91

1R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a19

.52%

1R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a0.

94%

1C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t$5

9.70

0.75

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

$98.

600.

5C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t18

.33%

1C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t2.

55%

1C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$1

14.5

70.

5C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$6

6.55

1C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.25%

1C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3.

31%

0.75

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

$53.

601

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

$54.

941

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

16.8

7%1

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

6.58

%0.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt

Scor

eTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Vehi

cle

Mile

s Pe

r Pe

ak V

ehic

leA

lt Sc

ore

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

ti o14

.00%

1C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

15.0

1%0.

75C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

5.37

%0.

75C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

43,5

990.

75S

an M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct22

.73%

0.75

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

22.0

5%1

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

33.9

3%0.

75Sa

n M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct37

,557

0.5

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n19

.40%

0.75

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n34

.42%

1Sa

n D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

40.1

1%1

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n54

,651

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.3.

50%

1.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

0.00

%0.

5Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.0.

00%

0.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

40,2

270.

75R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a15

.21%

1R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a48

.20%

1.5

RTC

of S

outh

ern

Nev

ada

0.00

%0.

5R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a73

,230

2C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t29

.13%

0.5

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

25.2

3%1

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

45.6

5%1

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

43,7

960.

75C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity13

.63%

1C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity10

.80%

0.75

Cap

ital M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

83.9

6%1.

5C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity47

,367

0.75

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

15.7

0%1

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

16.1

5%0.

75VI

A M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it71

.21%

1.5

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

53,8

111

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esA

lt Sc

ore

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt

Scor

e

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tio2,

880

0.75

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tio0.

740.

5C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

25,6

640.

75C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

2,04

20.

75S

an M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

601

0.75

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.74

0.5

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

23,6

410.

5Sa

n M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct1,

902

0.75

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n4,

506

1Sa

n D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

0.88

1Sa

n D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

39,1

741

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n3,

337

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.2,

315

0.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

0.82

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

33,0

580.

75Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.2,

010

0.75

RTC

of S

outh

ern

Nev

ada

5,45

91.

5R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a0.

961.

5R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a55

,524

2R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a4,

132

1.5

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

3,13

90.

75C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t0.

851

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

30,8

330.

75C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t1,

998

0.75

Cap

ital M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

3,47

60.

75C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

871

Cap

ital M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

30,7

870.

75C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

393

0.75

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

3,59

81

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

0.92

1VI

A M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it40

,007

1VI

A M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it2,

786

1

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tio32

,049

0.75

City

of L

os A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tio24

.88%

1R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a25

.25

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

27,7

220.

5Sa

n M

ateo

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct17

.27%

0.75

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n21

.25

San

Die

go T

rans

it C

orpo

ratio

n48

,285

1Sa

n D

iego

Tra

nsit

Cor

pora

tion

23.2

6%1

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

20.5

0Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c.33

,058

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

0.00

%1

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

20.5

0R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a70

,186

2R

TC o

f Sou

ther

n N

evad

a26

.41%

1C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

19.7

5C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t37

,309

0.75

City

of P

hoen

ix P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Dep

artm

ent

21.0

1%0.

75C

ity o

f Los

Ang

eles

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

19.2

5C

apita

l Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity41

,207

0.75

Cap

ital M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

33.8

5%1.

5C

ity o

f Pho

enix

Pub

lic T

rans

it D

epar

tmen

t18

.50

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

49,5

611

VIA

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

23.8

8%1

San

Mat

eo C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

16.5

0

B-40

Page 97: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtati o

8,97

4.89

0.75

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

24.0

01.

5G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

tio15

.60

0.75

Gol

den

Gat

e Br

idge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

1.21

0.75

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o9,

108.

490.

75Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

21.7

51

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o5.

700.

75Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

2.81

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

93,4

91.8

52

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)20

.75

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

4.71

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)2.

051

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

, Inc

. (91

58)

2,54

5.55

0.75

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

, Inc

. (91

58)

19.4

20.

75La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)0.

380.

5La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)0.

630.

5Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

4,27

8.40

0.75

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct19

.25

0.75

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct20

.53

1Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2.52

1Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s B

ig B

lue

Bus

17,7

86.5

11

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blu

e Bu

s20

.00

0.75

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blue

Bus

50.0

42

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blue

Bus

4.57

2Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

16,8

99.4

11

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny21

.00

1Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

45.0

42

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny3.

671.

5Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

5,89

7.13

0.75

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n15

.50

0.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n4.

800.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

2.57

1M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o11

,849

.70

0.75

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

18.3

30.

75M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o21

.13

1M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o2.

111

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

6,30

6.80

0.75

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

24.0

01.

5N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B13

.53

0.75

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

1.33

0.75

OM

NIT

RA

NS

9,15

5.03

0.75

OM

NIT

RA

NS

19.0

00.

75O

MN

ITR

AN

S12

.89

0.75

OM

NIT

RA

NS

2.04

1R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy4,

567.

960.

75R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy21

.92

1R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy5.

780.

75R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy1.

210.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

10,9

09.1

30.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.2

50.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

10.2

00.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.26

0.75

City

of T

ucso

n15

,062

.94

1C

ity o

f Tuc

son

18.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Tuc

son

30.9

51.

5C

ity o

f Tuc

son

2.29

1Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity14

,501

.38

0.75

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

19.2

50.

75Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

13.1

30.

75Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

1.43

0.75

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue10

,630

.86

0.75

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue17

.67

0.75

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue20

.80

1Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

1.67

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)4,

669.

570.

75Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

18.5

00.

75Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

3.40

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)1.

200.

75La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

23,8

89.8

81

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)24

.00

1.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)8.

050.

75La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

1.78

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

re

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

22.8

20.

75G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

tio18

.81

1.5

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

248,

688

0.75

Gol

den

Gat

e Br

idge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

12.1

41

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o34

.97

1Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

12.4

60.

75Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

592,

833

1Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

24.3

70.

75Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

31.7

51

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)15

.51

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

125,

695

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)1.

791.

5La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)8.

970.

5La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)14

.32

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)21

9,64

50.

75La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)47

.74

0.5

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct32

.68

1Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

12.9

60.

75Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

95,9

550.

75Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

44.5

80.

5Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s B

ig B

lue

Bus

52.5

22

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blu

e Bu

s11

.49

0.5

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blue

Bus

111,

541

0.75

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blue

Bus

10.6

81

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny40

.33

1.5

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny11

.00

0.5

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny26

1,00

20.

75Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

14.1

31

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n27

.99

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

10.9

00.

5Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

37,7

420.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

25.1

60.

75M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o26

.44

0.75

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

12.5

50.

75M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o78

6,96

81

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

22.4

70.

75N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B22

.84

0.75

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

17.1

61.

5N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B65

,555

0.75

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

29.5

00.

75O

MN

ITR

AN

S27

.10

0.75

OM

NIT

RA

NS

13.2

70.

75O

MN

ITR

AN

S21

0,43

90.

75O

MN

ITR

AN

S27

.51

0.75

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

19.1

00.

75R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy15

.77

1R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy16

0,32

20.

75R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy46

.80

0.5

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity17

.28

0.5

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.76

0.75

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity29

8,07

10.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

14.9

01

City

of T

ucso

n30

.20

1C

ity o

f Tuc

son

13.2

10.

75C

ity o

f Tuc

son

126,

138

0.75

City

of T

ucso

n12

.91

1Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity17

.74

0.75

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.3

90.

75Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

180,

301

0.75

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y9.

341

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue27

.55

1Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

16.5

21.

5Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

141,

846

0.75

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue14

.62

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

20.2

20.

75Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

16.8

21.

5Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

422,

648

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

24.6

30.

75La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

28.9

21

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)16

.26

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

3,04

1,18

22

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)8.

171.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r R

even

ue H

our

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtati o

$88.

110.

5G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

tio$1

28.8

80

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

11.7

1%1.

5G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

tio1.

86%

1Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

$7.6

41.

5Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

$46.

851

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o21

.56%

0.75

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o0.

03%

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

$7.3

61.

5Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

$49.

621

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)23

.93%

0.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)1.

64%

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)$1

.66

1.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

, Inc

. (91

58)

$39.

661.

5La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)17

.19%

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)0.

92%

1Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$63.

780.

75Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$101

.55

0.5

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct16

.36%

1Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

5.24

%0.

75Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s B

ig B

lue

Bus

$64.

030.

75Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s B

ig B

lue

Bus

$67.

210.

75Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s Bi

g Bl

ue B

us21

.75%

0.75

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blue

Bus

2.12

%1

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny$7

9.37

0.5

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny$7

1.08

0.75

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny16

.46%

1Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

5.07

%0.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

$9.0

51.

5Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

$52.

751

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n15

.10%

1.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n5.

27%

0.75

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

$40.

210.

75M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o$5

0.31

1M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o22

.48%

0.75

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

3.28

%1

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

$44.

070.

75N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B$7

4.37

0.75

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

16.5

7%1

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

4.59

%0.

75O

MN

ITR

AN

S$3

2.59

1O

MN

ITR

AN

S$6

8.50

0.75

OM

NIT

RA

NS

21.6

8%0.

75O

MN

ITR

AN

S1.

16%

1R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy$2

1.66

1R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy$7

1.67

0.75

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

25.1

9%0.

5R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy2.

87%

1C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$43.

600.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$73.

840.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.4

3%1.

5C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2.12

%1

City

of T

ucso

n$6

1.83

0.75

City

of T

ucso

n$6

0.33

1C

ity o

f Tuc

son

20.8

7%0.

75C

ity o

f Tuc

son

3.34

%1

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$50.

610.

75Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$6

8.42

0.75

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y22

.15%

0.75

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y8.

09%

0.5

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue$5

3.25

0.75

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue$7

0.54

0.75

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue21

.42%

0.75

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue16

.82%

0Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

$8.8

31.

5Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

$52.

481

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)27

.12%

0.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)1.

00%

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

$12.

471

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)$4

4.80

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

17.9

0%1

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)0.

70%

1

B-41

Page 98: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtati o

34.9

4%0

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

30.4

7%1

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

21.0

2%0.

75G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

tio41

,510

0.75

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o19

.20%

0.75

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o39

.96%

1.5

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o7.

52%

0.5

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o51

,418

1Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

11.9

5%1

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)23

.74%

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)0.

00%

0.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)53

,991

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)13

.74%

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)2.

89%

0.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

, Inc

. (91

58)

0.00

%0.

5La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)43

,886

0.75

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct24

.33%

0.75

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct24

.01%

1Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

59.3

1%1

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct49

,428

0.75

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blu

e Bu

s17

.46%

1Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s B

ig B

lue

Bus

28.0

7%1

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blue

Bus

56.5

3%1

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blue

Bus

40,1

160.

75Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

17.2

5%1

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny27

.02%

1Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

43.6

3%0.

75Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

47,3

010.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

11.9

0%1

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n7.

99%

0.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n88

.82%

1.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n29

,267

0.5

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

14.1

0%1

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

21.7

0%0.

75M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o70

.31%

1M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o59

,566

1N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B24

.24%

0.75

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

23.7

0%0.

75N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B56

.24%

1N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B57

,286

1O

MN

ITR

AN

S24

.02%

0.75

OM

NIT

RA

NS

21.3

8%0.

75O

MN

ITR

AN

S70

.87%

1O

MN

ITR

AN

S60

,595

1.5

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

24.9

0%0.

75R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy19

.06%

0.75

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

68.2

5%1

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

63,0

631.

5C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

20.5

6%0.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16.8

1%0.

75C

entra

l Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

73.1

4%1

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity43

,599

0.75

City

of T

ucso

n17

.17%

1C

ity o

f Tuc

son

20.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Tuc

son

60.0

5%1

City

of T

ucso

n48

,483

0.75

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

17.8

6%0.

75Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity11

.15%

0.5

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y66

.22%

1Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

32,1

070.

5Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

4.45

%1.

5Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

14.1

6%0.

75Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

86.3

7%1.

5Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

49,1

220.

75Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (9

179)

16.2

2%1

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)43

.40%

1.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)0.

00%

0.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)51

,566

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

2.63

%1.

5La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

52.8

2%2

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)0.

00%

0.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)69

,701

1.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Hou

rs

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

2,07

80.

5G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

tio0.

820.

75G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

tio28

,626

0.75

Gol

den

Gat

e Br

idge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtatio

1,52

20.

5Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

4,13

01.

5Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

0.90

1Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

38,7

831

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o3,

112

1.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)3,

139

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)0.

800.

75Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

34,2

800.

75Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

2,21

00.

75La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)2,

637

0.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

, Inc

. (91

58)

0.66

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)21

,964

0.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

, Inc

. (91

58)

1,53

30.

5Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

3,44

81

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct0.

830.

75Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

33,6

910.

75Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,59

91

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blu

e Bu

s3,

388

1Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s B

ig B

lue

Bus

0.91

1Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s Bi

g Bl

ue B

us28

,358

0.75

Sant

a M

onic

a's

Big

Blue

Bus

2,46

80.

75Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

4,15

81.

5Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

0.93

1Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

32,1

780.

75Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

2,92

61

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n2,

757

0.75

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

921

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n23

,013

0.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n2,

111

0.75

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

4,59

51.

5M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o0.

941

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

39,5

961

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

3,15

41.

5N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B3,

260

0.75

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

0.93

1N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B53

,211

2N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B3,

101

1.5

OM

NIT

RA

NS

4,37

81.

5O

MN

ITR

AN

S0.

921

OM

NIT

RA

NS

45,3

641.

5O

MN

ITR

AN

S3,

418

1.5

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

3,81

31

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

0.89

1R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy45

,806

1.5

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

2,90

41

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

141

0.75

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

851

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity34

,598

0.75

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

515

1C

ity o

f Tuc

son

3,58

41

City

of T

ucso

n0.

881

City

of T

ucso

n34

,228

0.75

City

of T

ucso

n2,

590

1Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

566

0.5

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.87

1Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

26,0

330.

5Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

2,10

00.

75Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

2,97

80.

75Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

0.87

1Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

35,9

751

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue2,

177

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)2,

843

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)0.

631

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)25

,529

0.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)1,

518

0.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)3,

652

1La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es In

c. (9

178)

0.76

0.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)44

,075

1.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)2,

710

1

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Gol

den

Gat

e B

ridge

, Hig

hway

and

Tra

nspo

rtati o

34,1

550.

75G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

tio19

.31%

0.75

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)25

.25

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o46

,109

1Sa

n D

iego

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dev

elop

men

t Bo

18.8

9%0.

75Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

22.5

0Fi

rst T

rans

it, In

c. (6

087)

43,1

781

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)25

.95%

1Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s Bi

g Bl

ue B

us22

.25

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

, Inc

. (91

58)

29,0

100.

5La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)32

.08%

1.5

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

22.0

0Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

41,1

980.

75Sa

cram

ento

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

22.2

8%1

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

22.0

0Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s B

ig B

lue

Bus

36,3

720.

75Sa

nta

Mon

ica'

s B

ig B

lue

Bus

28.2

6%1

San

Die

go M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

evel

opm

ent B

o21

.75

Long

Bea

ch P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

ompa

ny43

,771

1Lo

ng B

each

Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Com

pany

36.0

2%1.

5O

MN

ITR

AN

S21

.75

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n26

,958

0.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n17

.14%

0.75

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(608

7)21

.25

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dep

artm

ent-C

ity o

f El P

aso

55,7

151.

5M

ass

Tran

sit D

epar

tmen

t-City

of E

l Pas

o40

.71%

1.5

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

20.5

0N

orth

San

Die

go C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dev

elop

men

t B53

,211

1.5

Nor

th S

an D

iego

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

evel

opm

ent B

0.00

%1

City

of T

ucso

n20

.50

OM

NIT

RA

NS

55,7

041.

5O

MN

ITR

AN

S22

.79%

1Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

19.5

0R

iver

side

Tra

nsit

Agen

cy56

,195

1.5

Riv

ersi

de T

rans

it Ag

ency

22.6

8%1

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)19

.25

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity37

,259

0.75

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity7.

69%

0.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n18

.50

City

of T

ucso

n42

,839

1C

ity o

f Tuc

son

25.1

6%1

Sacr

amen

to R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct18

.25

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

27,9

780.

5Fo

rt W

orth

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity7.

47%

0.5

Cen

tral C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.00

Sun

Tran

of A

lbuq

uerq

ue42

,798

1Su

n Tr

an o

f Alb

uque

rque

18.9

7%0.

75La

idla

w T

rans

it Se

rvic

es, I

nc. (

9158

)17

.50

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)32

,236

0.5

Firs

t Tra

nsit,

Inc.

(917

9)26

.27%

1G

olde

n G

ate

Brid

ge, H

ighw

ay a

nd T

rans

porta

ti o17

.25

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)52

,890

1.5

Laid

law

Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

Inc.

(917

8)20

.00%

0.75

Fort

Wor

th T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y15

.50

B-42

Page 99: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

11,3

03.4

11.

5Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s16

.83

0.75

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

29.0

71.

5Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s3.

281.

5Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct8,

337.

441

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

19.5

81

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

23.6

91

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

1.76

0.75

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em3,

747.

000.

5C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

17.8

30.

75C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

8.29

0.75

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1.42

0.75

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsi t

11,1

89.3

61.

5C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

it21

.00

1.5

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

23.7

51

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

1.04

0.5

Cen

tral O

klah

oma

Tran

sit &

Par

king

Aut

horit

y4,

037.

030.

5C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

16.0

00.

5C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

6.90

0.5

Cen

tral O

klah

oma

Tran

sit &

Par

king

Aut

horit

y1.

760.

75Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

446.

750.

5Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct16

.33

0.5

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

7.05

0.5

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

1.40

0.75

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m5,

880.

000.

75C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

18.7

51

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m7.

950.

75C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2.42

1R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity7,

073.

080.

75R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.00

1R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity4.

500.

5R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1.

140.

5M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es8,

873.

911

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

19.9

21

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

27.3

21

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

3.17

1.5

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Syst

em6,

696.

600.

75C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it Sy

stem

17.5

00.

75C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it S

yste

m5.

390.

5C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it S

yste

m1.

580.

75C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t9,

818.

741

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

20.6

71.

5C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t21

.15

1C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t3.

841.

5G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

10,8

66.9

81.

5G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

17.9

20.

75G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

19.0

71

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct2.

100.

75C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y5,

201.

950.

75C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y17

.83

0.75

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

17.8

61

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2.

030.

75M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

5,70

2.09

0.75

Mon

tere

y-S

alin

as T

rans

it19

.33

1M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

17.5

71

Mon

tere

y-S

alin

as T

rans

it1.

730.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3,57

2.56

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tul

sa T

rans

it Au

thor

ity17

.25

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tul

sa T

rans

it Au

thor

ity8.

180.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.03

0.5

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es14

,136

.57

2C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

18.6

71

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es26

.72

1C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

3.85

1.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

8,77

7.79

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e24

.00

2R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e25

.55

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e2.

601

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct10

,583

.91

1.5

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct18

.42

0.75

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct36

.81

1.5

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct3.

141.

5C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

8,68

1.81

1C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

19.5

01

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc13

.44

0.75

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc1.

150.

75Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

3,45

0.71

0.5

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y19

.33

1Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

12.0

50.

75Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

1.74

0.75

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t6,

568.

670.

75So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

17.0

00.

75So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

11.9

00.

75So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

2.58

1U

NIT

RA

NS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

8,43

3.71

1U

NIT

RAN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is17

.50

0.75

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

40.7

82

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

3.95

1.5

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.4,

590.

290.

75La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

16.0

00.

5La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

27.8

31.

5La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

3.15

1.5

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

7,30

7.20

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m13

.50

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m7.

620.

75N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m1.

780.

75Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity8,

964.

931

East

ern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

22.0

01.

5Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity9.

460.

75Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity1.

200.

75So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t4,

424.

080.

75So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t18

.00

0.75

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

5.46

0.5

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.96

0.5

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t5,

834.

700.

75Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

18.2

50.

75Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

20.1

21

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t1.

090.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

re

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

43.7

91.

5Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s13

.36

0.75

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

211,

612

0.75

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

19.0

21

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

24.9

90.

75Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct14

.21

1Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct31

8,11

10.

75Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct21

.35

1C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

21.8

40.

75C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.3

61

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em45

4,88

50.

75C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it S

yste

m49

.39

0.5

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsi t

12.6

40.

5C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

it12

.18

0.75

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

750,

359

1C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

it21

.73

1C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

28.5

31

Cen

tral O

klah

oma

Tran

sit &

Par

king

Aut

horit

y16

.18

1C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

87,2

450.

75C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

29.4

51

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

21.9

80.

75Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct15

.71

1Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct20

3,85

00.

75Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct41

.25

0.75

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m31

.05

1C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

12.8

30.

75C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

117,

220

0.75

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m26

.87

1R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity15

.42

0.5

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

13.5

70.

75R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity17

0,41

70.

75R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity31

.00

0.75

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

37.0

21

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

11.6

60.

75M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es30

6,92

60.

75M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es24

.12

1C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it Sy

stem

23.8

20.

75C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.1

21

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3,15

5,44

02

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

25.9

81

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

54.4

82

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

14.1

91

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

143,

978

0.75

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

17.0

51.

5G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

28.4

61

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct13

.56

0.75

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct56

6,17

01

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct20

.96

1C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y28

.16

0.75

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

13.8

60.

75C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y46

1,58

60.

75C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

36.5

80.

75M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

23.9

00.

75M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

13.7

80.

75M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

684,

251

1M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

26.1

31

Met

ropo

litan

Tul

sa T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.29

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tul

sa T

rans

it Au

thor

ity14

.88

1M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

208,

740

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tul

sa T

rans

it Au

thor

ity44

.58

0.5

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es40

.56

1.5

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es10

.55

0.5

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es1,

327,

424

1.5

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es19

.08

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e33

.38

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e12

.82

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

291,

104

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

30.5

00.

75Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

42.1

11.

5Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

13.4

10.

75Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

457,

225

0.75

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct14

.42

1.5

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc23

.85

0.75

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc20

.74

2C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

175,

249

0.75

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc19

.47

1Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

27.6

90.

75Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

15.9

41

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y43

1,54

50.

75Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

57.4

00

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t30

.33

1So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

11.7

60.

75S

outh

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

474,

258

0.75

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t32

.50

0.75

UN

ITR

AN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is41

.39

1.5

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

10.4

90.

5U

NIT

RAN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is31

1,62

60.

75U

NIT

RAN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is13

.63

1.5

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.33

.14

1La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

10.5

10.

5La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

1,55

3,81

31.

5La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

58.5

40

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

24.9

20.

75N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m13

.98

0.75

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

468,

026

0.75

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

32.3

40.

75Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity16

.36

0.5

East

ern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

13.6

60.

75Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity88

,260

0.75

East

ern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

19.2

21

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

15.3

70.

5So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t15

.98

1So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t14

2,77

70.

75So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t33

.33

0.75

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t21

.71

0.75

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t19

.86

2Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

264,

779

0.75

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t29

.17

1

B-43

Page 100: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-44

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r R

even

ue H

our

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

$52.

500.

75Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s$7

9.09

0.75

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

21.5

7%0.

75Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s2.

22%

1Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct$9

4.20

0Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct$9

9.39

0Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct17

.82%

1Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct5.

26%

0.75

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$1

8.97

1C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

$49.

961.

5C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.6

0%1

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3.12

%0.

75C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

i t$1

13.6

50

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

$60.

461

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

24.9

6%0.

5C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

it1.

44%

1C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

$14.

891.

5C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

$61.

581

Cen

tral O

klah

oma

Tran

sit &

Par

king

Aut

horit

y22

.20%

0.75

Cen

tral O

klah

oma

Tran

sit &

Par

king

Aut

horit

y1.

08%

1Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct$2

6.92

1Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct$8

3.96

0.5

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

22.4

6%0.

75Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct1.

38%

1C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$23.

341

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m$9

1.18

0.5

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m16

.95%

1C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.57

%1

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$29.

151

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$99.

910

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

8.49

%1.

5R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

26%

1M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es$4

2.58

0.75

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

$57.

691

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

22.8

2%0.

75M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es0.

60%

1C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it Sy

stem

$10.

381.

5C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it Sy

stem

$45.

841.

5C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it S

yste

m22

.94%

0.75

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

8.33

%0

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

$28.

351

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

$73.

040.

75C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t15

.28%

1C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t3.

13%

0.75

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct$3

6.83

1G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$54.

961

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct18

.66%

0.75

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct5.

12%

0.75

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

$37.

931

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

$59.

801

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

22.8

6%0.

75C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

5.93

%0.

5M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

$48.

990.

75M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

$66.

621

Mon

tere

y-S

alin

as T

rans

it15

.56%

1M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

4.13

%0.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$31.

201

Met

ropo

litan

Tul

sa T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

8.34

1M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

10.5

1%1.

5M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.52

%1

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es$4

4.46

0.75

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es$6

7.49

0.75

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es17

.82%

1C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

0.34

%1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

$50.

550.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e$6

6.03

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e16

.92%

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e3.

80%

0.75

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct$6

2.99

0.5

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct$7

2.06

0.75

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct15

.57%

1Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.74

%1

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc$3

3.43

1C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

$59.

341

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc17

.33%

1C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

0.53

%1

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y$3

9.91

1Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

$91.

720.

5Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

20.3

7%0.

75Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

8.74

%0

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$2

4.78

1So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

$63.

181

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t20

.45%

0.75

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t1.

09%

1U

NIT

RA

NS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

$37.

671

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

$38.

241.

5U

NIT

RAN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is32

.11%

0U

NIT

RAN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is0.

06%

1.5

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.$4

2.00

0.75

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.$5

0.02

1.5

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.9.

09%

1.5

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.6.

85%

0.5

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$19.

421

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

$63.

511

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

14.3

4%1

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.00

%1.

5Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$3

3.34

1Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

7.64

1Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.96%

1Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

88%

0.75

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

$25.

151

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

$70.

730.

75So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t16

.41%

1So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t3.

17%

0.75

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t$6

1.17

0.75

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t$6

6.00

1Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

20.0

0%0.

75Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

1.00

%1

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

18.0

4%1

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

25.5

9%1

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

0.25

%0.

5Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s50

,919

1Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct18

.90%

1Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct20

.35%

0.75

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

73.8

8%1.

5Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct48

,242

1C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

19.3

0%1

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em22

.09%

0.75

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em55

.43%

1C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it S

yste

m51

,598

1C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

i t30

.56%

0.5

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

14.9

2%0.

75C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

it60

.34%

1C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

it53

,611

1C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

21.1

6%0.

75C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

20.2

1%0.

75C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

47.4

1%1

Cen

tral O

klah

oma

Tran

sit &

Par

king

Aut

horit

y34

,021

0.5

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

23.5

9%0.

75Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct21

.73%

0.75

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

59.1

9%1

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

33,7

220.

5C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

25.9

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

17.7

6%0.

75C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

55.4

0%1

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m38

,400

0.75

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

15.2

9%1.

5R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.79%

0.75

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

68.8

8%1

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

60,1

751.

5M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es18

.35%

1M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es36

.60%

1.5

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

35.9

9%0.

75M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es41

,940

0.75

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Syst

em14

.07%

1.5

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Syst

em25

.29%

1C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it S

yste

m0.

00%

0.5

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

51,2

451

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

29.8

4%0.

5C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t25

.09%

1C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t32

.73%

0.75

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

42,1

080.

75G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

29.6

3%0.

5G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

26.9

8%1

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct59

.57%

1G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

54,9

271

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

27.9

9%0.

5C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y7.

95%

0.5

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

0.00

%0.

5C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

49,5

601

Mon

tere

y-S

alin

as T

rans

it17

.99%

1M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

28.9

5%1

Mon

tere

y-S

alin

as T

rans

it54

.13%

1M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

35,3

370.

5M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

21.8

9%0.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16.0

0%0.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

44.8

9%0.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

42,7

900.

75C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

18.4

2%1

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es24

.14%

1C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

41.3

5%0.

75C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

50,8

251

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

20.0

2%1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

28.7

5%1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

44.6

3%0.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e59

,928

1.5

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct25

.59%

0.75

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct43

.91%

2Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

3.96

%0.

5Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

37,1

420.

5C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

11.4

0%1.

5C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

56.4

8%2

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc25

.25%

0.75

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc64

,484

1.5

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y28

.17%

0.5

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y16

.58%

0.75

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y74

.21%

1.5

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y55

,419

1So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

17.3

0%1

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t23

.43%

1So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

53.5

9%1

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t43

,065

0.75

UN

ITR

AN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is19

.61%

1U

NIT

RAN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is4.

52%

0.5

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

75.5

1%1.

5U

NIT

RAN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is21

,539

1La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

15.3

6%1.

5La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

25.7

5%1

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.29

.21%

0.75

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.48

,386

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m28

.46%

0.5

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

15.4

6%0.

75N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m76

.34%

1.5

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

55,8

671

East

ern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

15.1

5%1.

5Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.60%

0.75

East

ern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

16.5

6%0.

5Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity46

,956

0.75

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

17.3

8%1

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

20.0

5%0.

75So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t71

.67%

1.5

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

51,3

661

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t16

.00%

1Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

15.8

7%0.

75Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

55.0

8%1

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t61

,242

1.5

Page 101: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-45

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up D

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Hou

rs

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

4,00

71

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

0.94

1Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s36

,551

1Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s2,

736

1Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct3,

230

0.75

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.87

0.75

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

28,4

490.

75Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

002

0.75

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em3,

249

0.75

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

921

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em37

,907

1C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it S

yste

m2,

468

0.75

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsi t

4,39

61.

5C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

it0.

921

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

41,2

281

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

3,38

41.

5C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

2,08

00.

5C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

0.94

1C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

32,0

490.

75C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

1,98

10.

75Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct1,

889

0.5

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.78

1Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct26

,183

0.5

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

1,66

70.

5C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

2,83

40.

75C

ity o

f Tor

ranc

e Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

0.88

0.75

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m31

,136

0.75

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

427

0.75

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

4,43

81.

5R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity0.

820.

5R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity37

,870

1R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

792

1M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es3,

558

1M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es0.

991.

5M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es35

,077

1M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es3,

007

1C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it Sy

stem

3,50

41

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Syst

em0.

860.

75C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it S

yste

m35

,857

1C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it S

yste

m2,

372

0.75

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

3,04

20.

75C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t0.

941

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

31,6

750.

75C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t2,

232

0.75

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct3,

924

1G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.94

1G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

42,4

631.

5G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

3,13

21.

5C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y3,

355

0.75

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

0.89

0.75

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n A

utho

rity

35,9

681

Cor

pus

Chr

isti

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

595

1M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

2,68

40.

75M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

0.97

1M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

33,3

780.

75M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

2,42

30.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,80

30.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.92

1M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

29,2

240.

75M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1,96

40.

75C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

4,58

91.

5C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

0.93

1C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

31,6

050.

75C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

2,99

71

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

4,57

71.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e0.

951

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

47,7

931.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e3,

729

2Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,84

10.

75Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.92

1Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

26,8

960.

5Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,00

50.

75C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

3,21

10.

75C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

0.91

0.75

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc43

,044

1.5

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc2,

076

0.75

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y3,

425

1Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

0.95

1Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

38,5

311

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y2,

417

0.75

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t3,

653

1So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

0.97

1.5

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t33

,088

0.75

Sout

h C

oast

Are

a Tr

ansi

t2,

813

1U

NIT

RA

NS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

2,00

70.

5U

NIT

RAN

S U

nive

rsity

of C

alifo

rnia

, Dav

is0.

931

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

15,5

811

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

1,48

50.

5La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

4,58

91.

5La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

0.97

1.5

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.34

,529

1La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

3,28

41.

5N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m4,

109

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m0.

991.

5N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m40

,698

1N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m2,

911

1Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3,

951

1Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

840.

5Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity31

,521

0.75

East

ern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,30

80.

75So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t2,

907

0.75

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.76

1So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t28

,046

0.75

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

1,75

50.

5Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

3,17

70.

75Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

0.92

1Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

44,8

781.

5Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

2,25

90.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

47,8

651

Fres

no A

rea

Expr

ess

30.9

5%1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

24.2

5Sa

nta

Cru

z M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct42

,159

0.75

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

48.1

9%1.

5C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

24.0

0C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

47,3

841

Col

orad

o Sp

rings

Tra

nsit

Syst

em25

.00%

0.75

City

of V

alle

jo: V

alle

jo T

rans

it Va

llejo

-San

Fra

nc24

.00

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsi t

49,3

661

City

of T

empe

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Pl

anni

ng &

Tra

nsit

19.7

4%0.

75La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

23.2

5C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

32,0

490.

5C

entra

l Okl

ahom

a Tr

ansi

t & P

arki

ng A

utho

rity

0.00

%1

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

22.5

0Sa

n Jo

aqui

n R

egio

nal T

rans

it D

istri

ct26

,425

0.5

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.93

%0.

5Fr

esno

Are

a Ex

pres

s22

.00

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m33

,775

0.5

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m8.

47%

0.5

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

21.7

5R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity49

,576

1R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity30

.91%

1M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es21

.50

Mon

tebe

llo B

us L

ines

41,6

170.

75M

onte

bello

Bus

Lin

es18

.64%

0.75

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

21.5

0C

ount

y of

San

Die

go T

rans

it Sy

stem

43,8

261

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Syst

em22

.22%

0.75

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct21

.50

City

of G

arde

na T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

ent

39,5

940.

75C

ity o

f Gar

dena

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

t25

.00%

0.75

Sant

a Ba

rbar

a M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct21

.50

Gol

den

Empi

re T

rans

it D

istri

ct51

,470

1G

olde

n Em

pire

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

21.2

1%0.

75Sa

nta

Cla

rita

Tran

sit

21.5

0C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y43

,961

1C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y22

.22%

0.75

Cou

nty

of S

an D

iego

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

20.5

0M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

34,2

130.

75M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

2.50

%0.

5C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

rans

porta

tion

Plan

ning

& T

rans

i t20

.25

Met

ropo

litan

Tul

sa T

rans

it Au

thor

ity39

,491

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tul

sa T

rans

it Au

thor

ity35

.14%

1So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

20.0

0C

ulve

r City

Mun

icip

al B

us L

ines

47,4

081

Cul

ver C

ity M

unic

ipal

Bus

Lin

es50

.00%

1.5

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

19.7

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Com

mis

sion

of W

asho

e57

,181

1.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n C

omm

issi

on o

f Was

hoe

19.6

4%0.

75C

olor

ado

Sprin

gs T

rans

it Sy

stem

19.0

0Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

34,1

210.

75Sa

nta

Barb

ara

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

26.8

7%1

East

ern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.7

5C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

58,4

161.

5C

ity o

f Val

lejo

: Val

lejo

Tra

nsit

Valle

jo-S

an F

ranc

35.7

1%1

Sant

a C

ruz

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

18.5

0Su

nLin

e Tr

ansi

t Age

ncy

52,6

271

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y36

.59%

1M

onte

rey-

Sal

inas

Tra

nsit

18.5

0So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

41,8

460.

75So

uth

Coa

st A

rea

Tran

sit

26.4

7%1

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

18.5

0U

NIT

RA

NS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

20,1

051

UN

ITR

ANS

Uni

vers

ity o

f Cal

iforn

ia, D

avis

29.0

3%1

Cen

tral O

klah

oma

Tran

sit &

Par

king

Aut

horit

y17

.75

Lare

do M

etro

, Inc

.47

,085

1La

redo

Met

ro, I

nc.

36.3

6%1

City

of T

orra

nce

Tran

sit S

yste

m17

.75

Nor

wal

k Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

55,0

621.

5N

orw

alk

Tran

sit S

yste

m35

.29%

1M

etro

polit

an T

ulsa

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

17.7

5Ea

ster

n C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity39

,227

0.75

East

ern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

24.4

4%0.

75C

orpu

s C

hris

ti R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Aut

horit

y17

.25

Sono

ma

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

39,2

640.

75So

nom

a C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t40

.00%

1.5

SunL

ine

Tran

sit A

genc

y17

.25

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t56

,336

1.5

Sant

a C

larit

a Tr

ansi

t25

.53%

0.75

San

Joaq

uin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

15.2

5

Page 102: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-46

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up E

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4,98

3.75

0.75

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.9

22

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

12.8

31

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1.16

0.75

Mod

esto

Are

a Ex

pres

s4,

092.

000.

75M

odes

to A

rea

Expr

ess

15.5

01

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss19

.55

1.5

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss2.

491.

5C

ity o

f Mes

a7,

588.

551

City

of M

esa

19.6

72

City

of M

esa

2.55

0.75

City

of M

esa

0.64

0.75

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es2,

568.

360.

75C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

13.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

4.52

0.75

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es1.

080.

75C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

6,71

2.09

1C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

14.5

00.

75C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

16.7

01

City

of S

anta

Ros

a2.

481.

5An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

345.

680.

75An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y16

.50

1An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.49

1An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

240.

75C

ity T

rans

it M

anag

emen

t Com

pany

,Inc

11,3

16.5

92

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c13

.58

0.75

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c19

.87

1.5

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c2.

111

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

4,31

2.81

0.75

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

12.0

00.

5C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it0.

340.

5C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it0.

470.

75Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

6,72

2.61

1Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

19.3

32

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct8.

931

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct1.

000.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Val

ley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

1,23

0.05

0.5

Low

er R

io G

rand

e Va

lley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

13.0

00.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Valle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il0.

890.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Valle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il0.

810.

75Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

5,86

8.44

1Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

12.7

50.

75Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

3.28

0.75

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it0.

510.

75C

hico

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

City

of C

hico

3,49

1.81

0.75

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co15

.50

1C

hico

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

City

of C

hico

8.36

0.75

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co1.

571

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

3,91

5.84

0.75

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

14.4

20.

75C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m13

.02

1C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m2.

381.

5C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it5,

389.

331

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

12.1

70.

5C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it7.

780.

75C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it1.

120.

75C

ity o

f Lod

i11

,258

.44

2C

ity o

f Lod

i13

.50

0.75

City

of L

odi

6.79

0.75

City

of L

odi

1.37

1C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o7,

914.

171.

5C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o16

.42

1C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o18

.92

1.5

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

2.24

1.5

City

of S

cotts

dale

- Sc

otts

dale

Con

nect

ion

n/a

2C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Sco

ttsda

le C

onne

ctio

n13

.50

0.75

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

0.71

0.75

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

0.25

0.5

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n8,

014.

981.

5C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

17.0

81.

5C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

8.29

0.75

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n1.

110.

75C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch6,

510.

481

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

13.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch12

.80

1C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch1.

611

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t3,

333.

820.

75Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

12.0

00.

5Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

5.80

0.75

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t1.

851

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

4,12

2.24

0.75

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

17.0

01.

5Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

010.

75Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

280.

5W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity12

,029

.05

2W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity19

.92

2W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity21

.91

1.5

Wes

tern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.21

0.75

Abile

ne T

rans

it Sy

stem

3,24

4.55

0.75

Abile

ne T

rans

it Sy

stem

12.0

00.

5Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em4.

030.

75Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1.16

0.75

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

7,69

0.77

1.5

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

15.5

01

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

18.4

21.

5Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m2.

101

Braz

os T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

816.

840.

75Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

14.0

00.

75Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

1.89

0.75

Braz

os T

rans

it D

istri

ct0.

550.

75C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

1,81

5.74

0.5

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es15

.83

1C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

44.8

22

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es3.

752

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

4,39

2.99

0.75

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

15.0

01

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

1.31

0.75

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

0.43

0.5

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct7,

377.

011

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct15

.50

1C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

21.8

11.

5C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

3.05

2C

ity o

f Lom

poc-

Lom

poc

Tran

sit

2,08

2.30

0.5

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t12

.00

0.5

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t2.

210.

75C

ity o

f Lom

poc-

Lom

poc

Tran

sit

0.40

0.5

City

of N

apa

Nap

a Va

lley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

6,45

6.74

1C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.16

.08

1C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Val

ley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

6.94

0.75

City

of N

apa

Nap

a V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.1.

200.

75C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

3,63

1.14

0.75

City

of S

an A

ngel

o12

.00

0.5

City

of S

an A

ngel

o2.

360.

75C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

0.75

0.75

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

706.

480.

75H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

13.0

00.

75H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

1.00

0.75

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

390.

5Is

land

Tra

nsit

n/a

2Is

land

Tra

nsit

17.0

01.

5Is

land

Tra

nsit

13.3

31

Isla

nd T

rans

it1.

351

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

6,64

9.21

1La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R12

.75

0.75

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

8.72

0.75

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

1.82

1M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t1,

704.

170.

5M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t12

.50

0.75

Mer

ced

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

4.87

0.75

Mer

ced

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.96

0.75

Mes

a C

ount

y6,

002.

271

Mes

a C

ount

y12

.00

0.5

Mes

a C

ount

y2.

680.

75M

esa

Cou

nty

0.23

0.5

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it2,

423.

950.

75Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

12.0

00.

5Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

2.83

0.75

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it0.

650.

75Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

3,24

9.95

0.75

Pueb

lo T

rans

it12

.50

0.75

Pueb

lo T

rans

it9.

211

Pueb

lo T

rans

it1.

841

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s A

utho

rity

2,24

6.58

0.5

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s Au

thor

ity12

.00

0.5

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s Au

thor

ity8.

390.

75R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

1.10

0.75

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

4,63

0.52

0.75

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

13.7

50.

75R

osev

ille T

rans

it3.

800.

75R

osev

ille T

rans

it0.

970.

75Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e5,

678.

261

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

16.8

31

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

7.29

0.75

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

0.65

0.75

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

4,06

1.25

0.75

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

15.0

01

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

2.99

0.75

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

0.96

0.75

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

3,03

1.55

0.75

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

13.0

00.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a1.

290.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a0.

680.

75Tr

ansf

ort

5,50

9.43

1Tr

ansf

ort

17.7

51.

5Tr

ansf

ort

16.1

91

Tran

sfor

t2.

161

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

354.

600.

75Vi

ctor

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

13.5

80.

75Vi

ctor

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

5.02

0.75

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

940.

75W

aco

Tran

sit S

yste

m, I

nc.

3,55

7.25

0.75

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.13

.50

0.75

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.6.

060.

75W

aco

Tran

sit S

yste

m, I

nc.

1.27

0.75

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

746.

170.

75Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

14.0

00.

75Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

6.19

0.75

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

830.

75N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it10

,127

.99

1.5

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

16.0

01

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

13.5

41

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

3.97

2

Page 103: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-47

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up E

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Hea

dway

(m

inut

es)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

re

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.8

50.

75Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y15

.43

1Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y29

.71

1Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$4

4.31

0.5

Mod

esto

Are

a Ex

pres

s33

.68

1.5

Mod

esto

Are

a Ex

pres

s13

.54

0.75

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss46

.20

0.75

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss$3

0.78

0.75

City

of M

esa

9.58

0.75

City

of M

esa

14.8

90.

75C

ity o

f Mes

a31

.53

1C

ity o

f Mes

a$1

7.49

1C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

15.0

00.

75C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

13.8

70.

75C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

65.5

20.

75C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

$14.

621

City

of S

anta

Ros

a30

.71

1.5

City

of S

anta

Ros

a12

.40

0.75

City

of S

anta

Ros

a32

.42

1C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

$37.

660.

75An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y22

.65

1An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.21

1.5

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

67.7

30.

75An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$2

8.87

0.75

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c29

.12

1.5

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c13

.77

0.75

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c15

.10

1.5

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c$2

7.65

0.75

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

6.86

0.5

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

14.7

20.

75C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it36

.69

1C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it$9

.06

1Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

19.1

01

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct19

.05

1.5

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct25

.61

1Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

$26.

970.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Val

ley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

10.3

50.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Valle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il12

.86

0.75

Low

er R

io G

rand

e Va

lley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

132.

810

Low

er R

io G

rand

e Va

lley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

$3.6

01.

5Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

8.07

0.5

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it15

.94

1Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

33.2

51

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it$1

8.50

1C

hico

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

City

of C

hico

22.1

11

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co14

.05

0.75

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co48

.96

0.75

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co$1

4.84

1C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m29

.24

1.5

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

12.3

10.

75C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m58

.51

0.75

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

$30.

220.

75C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it19

.44

1C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it17

.32

1C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it29

.48

1C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it$2

5.70

0.75

City

of L

odi

17.2

60.

75C

ity o

f Lod

i12

.55

0.75

City

of L

odi

23.9

01

City

of L

odi

$17.

151

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

24.1

71

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

10.7

90.

5C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o24

.88

1C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o$3

3.05

0.75

City

of S

cotts

dale

- Sc

otts

dale

Con

nect

ion

3.58

0.5

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

14.0

80.

75C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Sco

ttsda

le C

onne

ctio

n0.

001.

5C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Sco

ttsda

le C

onne

ctio

n$2

6.33

0.75

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n14

.60

0.75

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n13

.15

0.75

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n23

.73

1C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

$32.

850.

75C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch22

.39

1C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch13

.95

0.75

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

30.3

61

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

$25.

140.

75Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

23.6

51

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t12

.78

0.75

San

ta M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t55

.18

0.75

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t$1

2.85

1Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity8.

080.

5Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity29

.30

2Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity31

.63

1Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$1

3.15

1W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.68

1W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity15

.47

1W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity12

.74

1.5

Wes

tern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$63.

050

Abile

ne T

rans

it Sy

stem

15.6

20.

75Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em13

.51

0.75

Abile

ne T

rans

it Sy

stem

32.1

91

Abile

ne T

rans

it S

yste

m$8

.30

1.5

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

30.9

41.

5Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m14

.72

0.75

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

29.5

61

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

$32.

020.

75Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

9.26

0.75

Braz

os T

rans

it D

istri

ct16

.69

1Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

57.9

70.

75Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$9.5

81

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es50

.48

2C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

13.4

70.

75C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

99.5

70

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es$7

9.22

0C

ity o

f Den

ton

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

en6.

310.

5C

ity o

f Den

ton

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

en14

.62

0.75

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

29.3

41

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

$7.3

41.

5C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

37.6

61.

5C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

12.3

40.

75C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

29.6

71

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct$2

2.89

1C

ity o

f Lom

poc-

Lom

poc

Tran

sit

7.29

0.5

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t18

.09

1.5

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t61

.72

0.75

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t$1

7.99

1C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.19

.45

1C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.16

.21

1C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Val

ley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

25.9

11

City

of N

apa

Nap

a V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.$2

1.53

1C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

11.9

20.

75C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

15.9

61

City

of S

an A

ngel

o57

.90

0.75

City

of S

an A

ngel

o$9

.60

1H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

6.13

0.5

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct15

.79

1H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

59.3

60.

75H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$5.2

21.

5Is

land

Tra

nsit

15.7

20.

75Is

land

Tra

nsit

11.6

10.

5Is

land

Tra

nsit

0.00

1.5

Isla

nd T

rans

it$3

1.83

0.75

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

22.2

11

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

12.1

80.

75La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R26

.30

1La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R$1

7.11

1M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t21

.21

1M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t22

.03

2M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t10

7.69

0M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t$1

2.25

1M

esa

Cou

nty

3.15

0.5

Mes

a C

ount

y13

.65

0.75

Mes

a C

ount

y33

.98

1M

esa

Cou

nty

$27.

720.

75Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

10.0

50.

75Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

15.4

41

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it66

.01

0.75

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it$1

5.91

1Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

25.9

21

Pueb

lo T

rans

it14

.05

0.75

Pueb

lo T

rans

it56

.59

0.75

Pueb

lo T

rans

it$2

1.47

1R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Aut

horit

y18

.04

0.75

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s Au

thor

ity16

.35

1R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

98.8

60.

5R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

$21.

171

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

14.1

30.

75R

osev

ille T

rans

it14

.64

0.75

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

28.9

41

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

$13.

261

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

9.43

0.75

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

14.5

00.

75Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e22

.70

1Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e$5

1.42

0.5

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

15.1

10.

75Si

mi V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t15

.77

1Si

mi V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t55

.00

0.75

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

$17.

361

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

9.33

0.75

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

13.7

60.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a50

.14

0.75

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

$8.2

31.

5Tr

ansf

ort

28.6

81.

5Tr

ansf

ort

13.2

80.

75Tr

ansf

ort

34.2

51

Tran

sfor

t$4

1.10

0.5

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.83

0.75

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.97

1.5

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y95

.19

0.5

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$1

4.50

1W

aco

Tran

sit S

yste

m, I

nc.

16.6

30.

75W

aco

Tran

sit S

yste

m, I

nc.

13.1

00.

75W

aco

Tran

sit S

yste

m, I

nc.

48.2

70.

75W

aco

Tran

sit S

yste

m, I

nc.

$18.

141

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity14

.70

0.75

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity17

.62

1Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

57.5

40.

75Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$17.

271

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

42.8

62

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

10.7

90.

5N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it27

.38

1N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it$1

6.81

1

Page 104: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-48

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up E

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$61.

650.

75Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.13%

1Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2.

64%

0.75

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

18.6

5%0.

75M

odes

to A

rea

Expr

ess

$53.

031

Mod

esto

Are

a Ex

pres

s25

.97%

0.75

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss3.

57%

0.75

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss10

.23%

1C

ity o

f Mes

a$6

5.78

0.75

City

of M

esa

37.9

2%0.

5C

ity o

f Mes

a3.

30%

0.75

City

of M

esa

1.39

%1.

5C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

$48.

481

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es22

.78%

0.75

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es2.

59%

0.75

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es7.

36%

1.5

City

of S

anta

Ros

a$6

9.23

0.75

City

of S

anta

Ros

a17

.61%

1C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

1.70

%1

City

of S

anta

Ros

a20

.81%

0.75

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$52.

331

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

24.2

4%0.

75An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

17%

1An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y8.

19%

1.5

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c$4

0.54

1C

ity T

rans

it M

anag

emen

t Com

pany

,Inc

18.5

6%1

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c3.

98%

0.75

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c21

.04%

0.75

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

$180

.28

0C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it22

.13%

0.75

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

4.05

%0.

75C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it23

.62%

0.75

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct$5

7.67

0.75

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct27

.74%

0.75

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct0.

18%

1Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

18.0

1%0.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Val

ley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

$42.

081

Low

er R

io G

rand

e Va

lley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

24.1

4%0.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Valle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il2.

68%

0.75

Low

er R

io G

rand

e Va

lley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

20.6

9%0.

75Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

$45.

441

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it24

.55%

0.75

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it3.

50%

0.75

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it8.

29%

1.5

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co$3

9.26

1C

hico

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

City

of C

hico

25.1

3%0.

75C

hico

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

City

of C

hico

1.23

%1

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co4.

73%

1.5

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

$67.

840.

75C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m41

.67%

0C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m2.

28%

0.75

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

15.7

0%1

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

$64.

230.

75C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it24

.96%

0.75

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

1.84

%1

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

30.7

3%0.

5C

ity o

f Lod

i$4

3.61

1C

ity o

f Lod

i6.

39%

1.5

City

of L

odi

9.49

%0

City

of L

odi

17.5

3%0.

75C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o$4

2.22

1C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o26

.10%

0.75

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

0.62

%1

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

22.6

1%0.

75C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Scot

tsda

le C

onne

ctio

n$1

32.0

60

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

18.0

0%1

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

2.00

%1

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

10.0

0%1

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n$5

7.87

0.75

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n8.

52%

1.5

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n0.

33%

1C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

19.2

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch$4

3.98

1C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch9.

30%

1.5

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

1.56

%1

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

26.9

4%0.

5Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

$52.

381

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t24

.01%

0.75

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t1.

34%

1Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

12.2

7%1

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$52.

961

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

59.4

6%0

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.00

%1

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2.85

%1.

5W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$5

3.76

1W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity13

.98%

1W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

65%

1W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity10

.07%

1Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em$3

2.13

1Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em16

.10%

1Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em1.

93%

1Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

22.1

5%0.

75Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m$5

3.78

1Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m23

.00%

0.75

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

2.43

%0.

75Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m12

.74%

1Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$46.

991

Braz

os T

rans

it D

istri

ct25

.51%

0.75

Braz

os T

rans

it D

istri

ct3.

35%

0.75

Braz

os T

rans

it D

istri

ct18

.98%

0.75

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es$8

9.22

0.5

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es19

.64%

1C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

0.00

%1

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es23

.57%

0.75

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

$35.

431

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

11.1

9%1.

5C

ity o

f Den

ton

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

en0.

00%

1C

ity o

f Den

ton

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

en3.

36%

1.5

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct$3

9.53

1C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

9.64

%1.

5C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.64

%1

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct19

.02%

0.75

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t$5

9.40

0.75

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t17

.32%

1C

ity o

f Lom

poc-

Lom

poc

Tran

sit

2.01

%1

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t17

.73%

0.75

City

of N

apa

Nap

a Va

lley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

$60.

330.

75C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.8.

79%

1.5

City

of N

apa

Nap

a V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.0.

65%

1C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Val

ley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

14.5

5%1

City

of S

an A

ngel

o$4

8.45

1C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

27.0

2%0.

75C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

6.56

%0

City

of S

an A

ngel

o7.

35%

1.5

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$3

1.93

1H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

9.87

%1.

5H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.35

%1

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct16

.57%

0.75

Isla

nd T

rans

it$3

7.54

1Is

land

Tra

nsit

22.9

4%0.

75Is

land

Tra

nsit

1.95

%1

Isla

nd T

rans

it27

.41%

0.5

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

$43.

591

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

24.7

8%0.

75La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R0.

68%

1La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R11

.40%

1M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t$5

3.41

1M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t24

.94%

0.75

Mer

ced

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

0.77

%1

Mer

ced

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

10.0

7%1

Mes

a C

ount

y$3

2.58

1M

esa

Cou

nty

28.4

9%0.

75M

esa

Cou

nty

0.00

%1

Mes

a C

ount

y16

.00%

1Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

$56.

421

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it20

.04%

1Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

1.90

%1

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it20

.01%

0.75

Pueb

lo T

rans

it$6

0.41

0.75

Pueb

lo T

rans

it20

.80%

1Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

1.77

%1

Pueb

lo T

rans

it11

.66%

1R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Aut

horit

y$4

5.52

1R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

20.7

4%1

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s Au

thor

ity0.

03%

1R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

21.0

6%0.

75R

osev

ille T

rans

it$4

9.26

1R

osev

ille T

rans

it19

.81%

1R

osev

ille T

rans

it0.

92%

1R

osev

ille T

rans

it15

.65%

1Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e$6

6.50

0.75

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

15.8

8%1

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

2.75

%0.

75Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e19

.01%

0.75

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

$87.

890.

5Si

mi V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t11

.48%

1.5

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

0.04

%1

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

34.1

2%0

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

$59.

690.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a19

.13%

1Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a0.

00%

1Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a9.

21%

1Tr

ansf

ort

$72.

790.

75Tr

ansf

ort

19.7

7%1

Tran

sfor

t1.

74%

1Tr

ansf

ort

20.6

9%0.

75Vi

ctor

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$51.

481

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y26

.64%

0.75

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y5.

03%

0.5

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y11

.78%

1W

aco

Tran

sit S

yste

m, I

nc.

$49.

801

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.24

.55%

0.75

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.2.

10%

0.75

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.27

.25%

0.5

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$4

1.01

1Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

15.0

1%1

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity3.

00%

0.75

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity27

.95%

0.5

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

$53.

211

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

26.6

2%0.

75N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it9.

74%

0N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it10

.95%

1

Page 105: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up E

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

re

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.7

5%1

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

69.5

8%1.

5Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y44

,395

0.75

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,69

40.

75M

odes

to A

rea

Expr

ess

31.3

5%1.

5M

odes

to A

rea

Expr

ess

0.00

%0.

5M

odes

to A

rea

Exp

ress

44,6

090.

75M

odes

to A

rea

Exp

ress

3,31

31

City

of M

esa

11.7

9%0.

75C

ity o

f Mes

a84

.90%

1.5

City

of M

esa

65,3

581.

5C

ity o

f Mes

a4,

384

1.5

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es10

.79%

0.75

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es43

.61%

1C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

39,3

400.

75C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

2,95

80.

75C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

25.7

3%1.

5C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

0.35

%0.

5C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

45,3

320.

75C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

3,64

41

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

38.1

1%2

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

56.9

8%1

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

53,7

031

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3,01

90.

75C

ity T

rans

it M

anag

emen

t Com

pany

,Inc

25.2

7%1

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c12

.70%

0.75

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c39

,509

0.75

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c2,

922

0.75

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

15.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it27

.32%

0.75

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

40,1

530.

75C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it2,

773

0.75

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct17

.29%

1Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

1.78

%0.

5Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

67,2

311.

5Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

3,52

81

Low

er R

io G

rand

e V

alle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il12

.81%

0.75

Low

er R

io G

rand

e Va

lley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

37.6

4%1

Low

er R

io G

rand

e Va

lley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

38,6

810.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Valle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il2,

920

0.75

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it7.

14%

0.5

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it15

.65%

0.75

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it53

,248

1Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

3,32

91

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co28

.25%

1.5

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co0.

00%

0.5

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co43

,363

0.75

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co3,

046

0.75

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

21.0

3%1

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

27.5

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m50

,257

1C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m3,

973

1.5

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

18.9

8%1

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

43.1

6%1

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

48,5

381

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

2,80

40.

75C

ity o

f Lod

i10

.80%

0.75

City

of L

odi

69.0

0%1.

5C

ity o

f Lod

i59

,217

1.5

City

of L

odi

4,76

32

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

24.1

8%1

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

0.00

%0.

5C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o36

,549

0.5

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

3,31

21

City

of S

cotts

dale

- Sc

otts

dale

Con

nect

ion

15.0

9%0.

75C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Sco

ttsda

le C

onne

ctio

n53

.81%

1C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Sco

ttsda

le C

onne

ctio

n43

,219

0.75

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

3,06

80.

75C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

14.3

5%0.

75C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

3.21

%0.

5C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

44,4

200.

75C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

3,31

31

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

30.4

1%1.

5C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch34

.23%

0.75

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

46,9

140.

75C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch3,

518

1Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

17.4

8%1

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t35

.87%

0.75

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t42

,963

0.75

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t3,

537

1Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity11

.14%

0.75

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

26.8

1%0.

75Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity69

,078

2Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

357

0.5

Wes

tern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

17.7

9%1

Wes

tern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

70.4

7%1.

5W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity42

,257

0.75

Wes

tern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,70

70.

75Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em9.

37%

0.75

Abile

ne T

rans

it Sy

stem

4.27

%0.

5Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em23

,979

1Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

1,77

61

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

15.2

3%0.

75Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m29

.06%

0.75

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

56,3

261

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

3,85

81.

5Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

9.19

%0.

75Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.00

%0.

5Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

47,3

510.

75Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,97

40.

75C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

0.00

%0.

5C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

78.4

2%1.

5C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

41,0

080.

75C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

3,24

01

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

10.1

4%0.

75C

ity o

f Den

ton

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

en11

.72%

0.75

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

32,1

950.

5C

ity o

f Den

ton

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

en2,

322

0.5

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct0.

00%

0.5

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct99

.50%

2C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

48,1

951

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct3,

827

1C

ity o

f Lom

poc-

Lom

poc

Tran

sit

25.0

5%1

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t24

.36%

0.75

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t40

,457

0.75

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t2,

248

0.5

City

of N

apa

Nap

a Va

lley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

20.4

4%1

City

of N

apa

Nap

a Va

lley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

51.2

8%1

City

of N

apa

Nap

a V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.46

,110

0.75

City

of N

apa

Nap

a V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.2,

954

0.75

City

of S

an A

ngel

o6.

05%

0.5

City

of S

an A

ngel

o0.

83%

0.5

City

of S

an A

ngel

o57

,262

1C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

3,56

51

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct6.

60%

0.5

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct12

.05%

0.75

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct45

,029

0.75

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

826

0.75

Isla

nd T

rans

it17

.12%

1Is

land

Tra

nsit

17.6

6%0.

75Is

land

Tra

nsit

52,8

191

Isla

nd T

rans

it4,

204

1.5

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

15.4

6%0.

75La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R75

.67%

1.5

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

37,6

180.

75La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R3,

062

0.75

Mer

ced

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

15.5

1%0.

75M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t10

.02%

0.75

Mer

ced

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

67,8

381.

5M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t3,

133

0.75

Mes

a C

ount

y4.

51%

0.5

Mes

a C

ount

y39

.22%

1M

esa

Cou

nty

48,3

321

Mes

a C

ount

y3,

574

1Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

15.1

0%0.

75Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

8.16

%0.

75Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

41,6

670.

75Po

rt Ar

thur

Tra

nsit

2,70

80.

75Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

14.1

9%0.

75Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

39.0

9%1

Pueb

lo T

rans

it43

,420

0.75

Pueb

lo T

rans

it3,

112

0.75

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s A

utho

rity

18.7

1%1

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s Au

thor

ity66

.19%

1R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

63,9

651.

5R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

3,90

71.

5R

osev

ille T

rans

it21

.96%

1R

osev

ille T

rans

it78

.04%

1.5

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

38,7

310.

75R

osev

ille T

rans

it2,

563

0.5

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

5.81

%0.

5Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e92

.78%

1.5

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

34,4

450.

5Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e2,

330

0.5

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

13.1

7%0.

75Si

mi V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t33

.11%

0.75

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

61,9

541.

5Si

mi V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t3,

890

1.5

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

9.72

%0.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a89

.13%

1.5

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

37,5

400.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a2,

760

0.75

Tran

sfor

t16

.80%

1Tr

ansf

ort

69.4

6%1.

5Tr

ansf

ort

44,9

850.

75Tr

ansf

ort

3,27

11

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y16

.25%

0.75

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y59

.70%

1Vi

ctor

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

76,7

742

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y4,

011

1.5

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.15

.51%

0.75

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.0.

00%

0.5

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.38

,691

0.75

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.2,

947

0.75

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity25

.12%

1Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

41.5

7%1

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity51

,447

1Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,93

70.

75N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it45

.45%

2N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it0.

00%

0.5

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

51,8

101

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

4,81

32

B-49

Page 106: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-50

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: S

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up E

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per V

ehic

le M

ileAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.86

1Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y28

,415

0.75

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

1,84

10.

75Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y38

,076

0.75

Mod

esto

Are

a Ex

pres

s0.

961

Mod

esto

Are

a Ex

pres

s34

,734

1M

odes

to A

rea

Exp

ress

2,56

51

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss42

,674

0.75

City

of M

esa

0.91

0.75

City

of M

esa

39,0

271

City

of M

esa

2,62

11

City

of M

esa

59,3

891.

5C

ity o

f Gre

eley

-Tra

nsit

Serv

ices

0.99

1.5

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es27

,793

0.75

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es2,

003

0.75

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es38

,911

0.75

City

of S

anta

Ros

a0.

991.

5C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

36,3

231

City

of S

anta

Ros

a2,

929

1C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

44,9

711

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.90

0.5

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

40,8

711

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,24

50.

75An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y48

,207

1C

ity T

rans

it M

anag

emen

t Com

pany

,Inc

0.99

1.5

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c33

,309

0.75

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c2,

418

1C

ity T

rans

it M

anag

emen

t Com

pany

,Inc

39,2

310.

75C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it0.

971

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

15,5

261

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

1,05

50.

5C

ity o

f Gle

ndal

e - T

rans

it38

,815

0.75

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct0.

811

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct39

,285

1Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

2,06

20.

75Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

54,6

581

Low

er R

io G

rand

e V

alle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il0.

900.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Valle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il24

,063

0.5

Low

er R

io G

rand

e Va

lley

Dev

elop

men

t Cou

ncil

1,87

20.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Valle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il35

,001

0.5

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it0.

971

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it36

,591

1Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

2,29

60.

75Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

51,8

381

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co0.

920.

75C

hico

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

City

of C

hico

34,6

851

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co2,

469

1C

hico

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

City

of C

hico

40,0

210.

75C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m0.

940.

75C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m22

,685

0.5

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

1,84

30.

75C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m46

,990

1C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it0.

951

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

31,7

560.

75C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it1,

833

0.75

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

45,8

691

City

of L

odi

0.95

1C

ity o

f Lod

i56

,292

2C

ity o

f Lod

i4,

484

2C

ity o

f Lod

i56

,292

1.5

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

0.97

1C

ity o

f San

Lui

s O

bisp

o26

,562

0.75

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

2,46

11

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

35,4

160.

75C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Scot

tsda

le C

onne

ctio

n0.

900.

75C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Sco

ttsda

le C

onne

ctio

n28

,804

0.75

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

2,04

60.

75C

ity o

f Sco

ttsda

le -

Sco

ttsda

le C

onne

ctio

n39

,092

0.75

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n0.

940.

75C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

38,4

721

City

of U

nion

City

Tra

nsit

Div

isio

n2,

926

1C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

41,6

780.

75C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch0.

981

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

31,2

500.

75C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch2,

240

0.75

City

of V

isal

ia-V

isal

ia C

ity C

oach

45,9

561

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t0.

910.

75Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

39,1

721

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t3,

066

1.5

Sant

a M

aria

Are

a Tr

ansi

t39

,172

0.75

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.92

0.75

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

56,6

122

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1,93

20.

75Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it Au

thor

ity63

,689

1.5

Wes

tern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.94

0.75

Wes

tern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

34,5

841

Wes

tern

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,23

60.

75W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity39

,524

0.75

Abile

ne T

rans

it Sy

stem

0.98

1Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em18

,818

0.5

Abile

ne T

rans

it Sy

stem

1,39

30.

5Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

23,5

231

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

0.99

1.5

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

45,3

281.

5Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m3,

078

1.5

Beau

mon

t Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

55,7

881.

5Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.96

1Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

45,4

361.

5Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,72

21

Braz

os T

rans

it D

istri

ct45

,436

1C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

0.99

1.5

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es22

,136

0.5

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es1,

644

0.5

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es40

,582

0.75

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

0.98

1C

ity o

f Den

ton

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

en31

,410

0.75

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

2,14

90.

75C

ity o

f Den

ton

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Dep

artm

en31

,410

0.5

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct0.

930.

75C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

32,7

270.

75C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,65

31

City

of L

ogan

dba

, The

Log

an T

rans

it D

istri

ct45

,000

1C

ity o

f Lom

poc-

Lom

poc

Tran

sit

0.96

1C

ity o

f Lom

poc-

Lom

poc

Tran

sit

38,7

571

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t2,

142

0.75

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t38

,757

0.75

City

of N

apa

Nap

a Va

lley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

0.98

1C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Valle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.31

,442

0.75

City

of N

apa

Nap

a V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.1,

940

0.75

City

of N

apa

Nap

a V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t/ Th

e V.

I.N.E

.45

,197

1C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

0.98

1C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

39,9

431

City

of S

an A

ngel

o2,

503

1C

ity o

f San

Ang

elo

55,9

201.

5H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

0.94

0.75

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct33

,813

0.75

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct2,

142

0.75

Hill

Cou

nty

Tran

sit D

istri

ct42

,266

0.75

Isla

nd T

rans

it0.

920.

75Is

land

Tra

nsit

48,4

511.

5Is

land

Tra

nsit

4,17

32

Isla

nd T

rans

it48

,451

1La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R0.

941

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

20,8

860.

5La

s C

ruce

s Ar

ea T

rans

it-R

oadR

UN

NE

R1,

714

0.75

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

35,5

070.

75M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t0.

991.

5M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t37

,429

1M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t1,

699

0.75

Mer

ced

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

67,3

722

Mes

a C

ount

y0.

961

Mes

a C

ount

y36

,327

1M

esa

Cou

nty

2,66

11

Mes

a C

ount

y46

,418

1Po

rt A

rthur

Tra

nsit

0.99

1.5

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it24

,700

0.5

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it1,

600

0.5

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it41

,167

0.75

Pueb

lo T

rans

it0.

991.

5Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

32,2

960.

75Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

2,29

90.

75Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

43,0

620.

75R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Aut

horit

y0.

951

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s Au

thor

ity39

,349

1R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

2,40

61

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s Au

thor

ity60

,537

1.5

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

0.84

1R

osev

ille T

rans

it23

,351

0.5

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

1,59

50.

5R

osev

ille T

rans

it32

,692

0.5

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

0.90

0.75

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

31,1

460.

75Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e2,

148

0.75

Sant

a Fe

Tra

ils -

City

of S

anta

Fe

31,1

460.

5Si

mi V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t0.

951

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

27,4

000.

75Si

mi V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t1,

737

0.75

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

58,7

141.

5Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a0.

930.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a29

,882

0.75

Thou

sand

Oak

s Tr

ansi

t c/o

City

of T

hous

and

Oa

2,17

10.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a34

,863

0.5

Tran

sfor

t0.

930.

75Tr

ansf

ort

26,4

450.

75Tr

ansf

ort

1,99

20.

75Tr

ansf

ort

41,7

560.

75Vi

ctor

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

0.92

0.75

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y44

,276

1.5

Vict

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

335

1Vi

ctor

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

70,8

422

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.0.

971

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.29

,150

0.75

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.2,

226

0.75

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.37

,478

0.75

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

900.

5Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

46,4

101.

5Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,63

41

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity46

,410

1N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it0.

961

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

37,3

891

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

3,46

71.

5N

atio

nal C

ity T

rans

it49

,852

1

Page 107: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: SW

Reg

ion

-- G

roup

ETr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Spar

e Ve

hicl

e R

atio

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yC

ompo

site

Sco

re

(Mea

sure

s O

nly)

Live

rmor

e/Am

ador

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

34.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Lod

i24

.00

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss22

.86%

0.75

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

23.5

0C

ity o

f Mes

a52

.17%

1Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m23

.25

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es40

.00%

1C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

23.0

0C

ity o

f San

ta R

osa

23.8

1%0.

75Is

land

Tra

nsit

22.2

5An

telo

pe V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y17

.95%

0.75

City

of M

esa

22.0

0C

ity T

rans

it M

anag

emen

t Com

pany

,Inc

17.7

8%0.

75W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity21

.75

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

150.

00%

2Vi

ctor

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

21.5

0Yo

lo C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dis

trict

39.1

3%1

City

Tra

nsit

Man

agem

ent C

ompa

ny,In

c21

.25

Low

er R

io G

rand

e V

alle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il45

.45%

1Ve

ntur

a In

terc

ity S

ervi

ce T

rans

it A

utho

rity

21.2

5Am

arillo

City

Tra

nsit

41.6

7%1

Yolo

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

istri

ct21

.00

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co15

.38%

0.75

Mer

ced

Cou

nty

Tran

sit

21.0

0C

ity o

f Bro

wns

ville

Bro

wns

ville

Urb

an S

yste

m10

7.14

%2

City

of S

anta

Ros

a20

.75

City

of F

airfi

eld,

Fai

rfiel

d/Su

isun

Tra

nsit

44.4

4%1

Ante

lope

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

20.5

0C

ity o

f Lod

i0.

00%

0.5

Mod

esto

Are

a E

xpre

ss20

.25

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

33.3

3%0.

75Si

mi V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t20

.25

City

of S

cotts

dale

- Sc

otts

dale

Con

nect

ion

35.7

1%0.

75C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce M

unic

ipal

Bus

lines

20.0

0C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

8.33

%0.

75R

eddi

ng A

rea

Bus

Auth

ority

20.0

0C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch47

.06%

1Tr

ansf

ort

20.0

0Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

0.00

%0.

5C

ity o

f Vis

alia

-Vis

alia

City

Coa

ch19

.75

Vent

ura

Inte

rcity

Ser

vice

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

12.5

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Nap

a N

apa

Val

ley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

19.7

5W

este

rn C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it Au

thor

ity14

.29%

0.75

City

of B

row

nsvi

lle B

row

nsvi

lle U

rban

Sys

tem

19.5

0Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Syst

em25

.00%

0.75

City

of S

an L

uis

Obi

spo

19.5

0Be

aum

ont T

rans

it S

yste

m23

.08%

0.75

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

19.2

5Br

azos

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.00

%0.

5Li

verm

ore/

Amad

or V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

.00

City

of C

omm

erce

Mun

icip

al B

uslin

es83

.33%

1.5

Chi

co A

rea

Tran

sit S

yste

m C

ity o

f Chi

co19

.00

City

of D

ento

n P

ublic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

0.00

%0.

5C

ity o

f Uni

on C

ity T

rans

it D

ivis

ion

19.0

0C

ity o

f Log

an d

ba, T

he L

ogan

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

37.5

0%1

Amar

illo C

ity T

rans

it18

.75

City

of L

ompo

c-Lo

mpo

c Tr

ansi

t0.

00%

0.5

Pueb

lo T

rans

it18

.50

City

of N

apa

Nap

a Va

lley

Tran

sit/

The

V.I.N

.E.

43.7

5%1

City

of G

reel

ey-T

rans

it Se

rvic

es18

.25

City

of S

an A

ngel

o40

.00%

1Sa

nta

Mar

ia A

rea

Tran

sit

18.2

5H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

25.0

0%0.

75C

ity o

f Fai

rfiel

d, F

airfi

eld/

Suis

un T

rans

it18

.00

Isla

nd T

rans

it0.

00%

0.5

City

of S

an A

ngel

o18

.00

Las

Cru

ces

Area

Tra

nsit-

Roa

dRU

NN

ER

70.0

0%1.

5Yu

ba-S

utte

r Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

18.0

0M

erce

d C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t80

.00%

1.5

City

of D

ento

n Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

epar

tmen

17.7

5M

esa

Cou

nty

27.7

8%0.

75M

esa

Cou

nty

17.7

5Po

rt Ar

thur

Tra

nsit

66.6

7%1

Ros

eville

Tra

nsit

17.7

5Pu

eblo

Tra

nsit

33.3

3%0.

75Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a17

.75

Red

ding

Are

a Bu

s A

utho

rity

53.8

5%1

City

of S

cotts

dale

- S

cotts

dale

Con

nect

ion

17.5

0R

osev

ille T

rans

it40

.00%

1Ab

ilene

Tra

nsit

Sys

tem

17.5

0Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e0.

00%

0.5

Braz

os T

rans

it D

istri

ct17

.50

Sim

i Val

ley

Tran

sit

114.

29%

2H

ill C

ount

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

17.2

5Th

ousa

nd O

aks

Tran

sit c

/o C

ity o

f Tho

usan

d O

a16

.67%

0.75

Port

Arth

ur T

rans

it17

.25

Tran

sfor

t57

.89%

1C

ity o

f Lom

poc-

Lom

poc

Tran

sit

16.5

0Vi

ctor

Val

ley

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

60.0

0%1

City

of G

lend

ale

- Tra

nsit

16.2

5W

aco

Tran

sit S

yste

m, I

nc.

28.5

7%0.

75Sa

nta

Fe T

rails

- C

ity o

f San

ta F

e16

.00

Yuba

-Sut

ter T

rans

it Au

thor

ity0.

00%

0.5

Wac

o Tr

ansi

t Sys

tem

, Inc

.16

.00

Nat

iona

l City

Tra

nsit

33.3

3%0.

75Lo

wer

Rio

Gra

nde

Valle

y D

evel

opm

ent C

ounc

il15

.75

B-51

Page 108: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up A

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t12

,493

.63

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

24.0

01.

5Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

41.0

91

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et2.

181

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O15

,760

.01

1.5

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O22

.42

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

53.5

41.

5Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

2.85

1.5

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

8,35

4.79

0.75

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

21.6

30.

75Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity20

.48

0.75

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

1.55

0.75

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

6,48

9.19

0.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

20.2

20.

5Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 19

.08

0.75

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

1.12

0.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et29

.25

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

13.4

00.

75Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

7,54

00.

75Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

145,

757

0.75

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O35

.25

1.5

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O12

.37

0.75

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O6,

593

0.75

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O15

4,07

81

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

24.4

00.

75Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity15

.76

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity17

,845

1.5

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

155,

504

1Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 20

.81

0.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

18.6

11.

5Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 13

,811

1Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 13

2,43

70.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t12

.15

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

$144

.19

0.75

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et$1

02.6

40.

75Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

21.0

2%0.

5Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

12.4

41

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O$1

25.9

20.

75Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

$82.

891

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O16

.77%

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity23

.08

0.5

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

$66.

751.

5Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity$7

9.53

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity19

.25%

0.75

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

16.9

80.

75Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a $1

08.2

71

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

$118

.14

0.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

17.4

3%1

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l )

Alt S

core

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et8.

03%

0.5

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et11

.62%

1.5

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et22

.55%

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

63.7

9%1.

5Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

2.46

%1

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O20

.86%

0.5

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O25

.84%

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

57.3

4%1

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

3.26

%1

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

17.4

1%0.

75Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity13

.90%

0.5

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

50.9

6%0.

75Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 3.

72%

1Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 18

.00%

0.75

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

23.0

5%1

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

53.3

9%0.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t41

,485

0.5

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et2,

847

0.75

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et0.

821

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et32

,186

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

46,8

710.

75Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

3,55

61

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O0.

861

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O33

,033

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity61

,102

1.5

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

3,56

91

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

0.83

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity35

,256

1Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 50

,048

1Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 2,

696

0.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

0.68

0.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

24,0

800.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t2,

403

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

33,9

000.

75Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

5.33

%0.

5Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

23.2

5Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

2,67

11

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O40

,418

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

22.3

6%0.

75Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity22

.00

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

2,23

81

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

50,6

291.

5Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity43

.60%

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

20.7

5Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 1,

294

0.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

34,1

770.

75Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 41

.94%

1Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 17

.25

B-52

Page 109: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up B

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

8,35

4.79

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity21

.63

2Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity20

.48

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity1.

550.

5Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 6,

489.

190.

75Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 20

.22

1.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

19.0

80.

75Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 1.

121

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

9,42

9.01

1.5

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

19.8

31.

5Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y22

.61

1Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

800.

75La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct3,

512.

230.

5La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct18

.50

1La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct31

.35

1.5

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2.23

1.5

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

6,29

6.16

0.75

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

18.3

01

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

14.5

10.

75M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio1.

820.

75In

terc

ity T

rans

it7,

213.

471

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

17.6

70.

75In

terc

ity T

rans

it11

.94

0.5

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

1.57

0.5

Kits

ap T

rans

it3,

726.

110.

5Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

15.6

70.

5Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

15.1

10.

75Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

1.76

0.75

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a8,

636.

581

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a17

.85

1C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

19.6

00.

75C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

1.63

0.75

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

8,36

2.78

1Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct16

.75

0.75

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

27.6

41.

5Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct1.

921

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

24.4

00.

75Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity15

.76

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity17

,845

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity15

5,50

40.

5Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 20

.81

0.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

18.6

12

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

13,8

111

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

132,

437

0.5

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

24.8

80.

75Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y13

.80

0.75

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3,13

60.

75Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y19

3,41

30.

75La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct31

.58

1.5

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

14.1

50.

75La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct3,

954

0.75

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

241,

466

0.75

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

26.8

51

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

14.7

81

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

7,82

30.

75M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio26

2,64

00.

75In

terc

ity T

rans

it20

.68

0.5

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

13.2

00.

5In

terc

ity T

rans

it4,

973

0.75

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

177,

932

0.75

Kits

ap T

rans

it29

.82

1Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

16.9

81.

5Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

16,6

081

Kits

ap T

rans

it65

8,77

61.

5C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

24.1

50.

75C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

14.8

01

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a21

,591

1.5

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a45

6,12

01

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

27.9

81

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

14.5

50.

75Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct25

,272

1.5

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

328,

538

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

23.0

81

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

$66.

750.

75Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity$7

9.53

1Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity19

.25%

0.75

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

16.9

81

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

$108

.27

0Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a $1

18.1

40

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

17.4

3%1

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

20.3

91

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$69.

150.

75Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$7

6.10

1Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y16

.79%

1La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct49

.63

0La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct$7

7.81

0.5

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$78.

381

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

16.7

5%1

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

29.6

40.

75M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio$5

0.91

1M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio$9

4.20

0.5

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

22.3

3%0.

5In

terc

ity T

rans

it19

.41

1In

terc

ity T

rans

it$4

5.06

1.5

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

$78.

051

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

13.5

0%1.

5Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

22.8

51

Kits

ap T

rans

it$5

0.93

1Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

$100

.52

0.5

Kits

ap T

rans

it21

.59%

0.5

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a20

.39

1C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

$59.

521

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a$7

3.34

1C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

13.3

2%1.

5Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct16

.43

1Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct$8

1.89

0.5

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$82.

901

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

17.8

4%0.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

3.26

%1

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

17.4

1%1

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

13.9

0%0.

75Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity50

.96%

0.5

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

3.72

%1

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

18.0

0%1

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

23.0

5%2

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

53.3

9%0.

5Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y6.

69%

0.75

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

15.7

7%1

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

13.4

6%0.

75Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y73

.97%

1La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct4.

02%

1La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct19

.76%

0.75

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

19.8

5%2

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

65.9

3%0.

75M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio1.

80%

1.5

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

16.2

7%1

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

15.4

7%1

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

68.0

2%1

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

7.21

%0.

75In

terc

ity T

rans

it26

.11%

0.5

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

13.4

3%0.

75In

terc

ity T

rans

it73

.00%

1Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

2.34

%1.

5Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

25.7

6%0.

5Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

13.2

6%0.

75Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

83.5

1%1.

5C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

6.85

%0.

75C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

14.6

1%1

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a16

.03%

1C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

54.0

4%0.

5Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct6.

17%

0.75

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

16.9

3%1

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

13.9

7%0.

75Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct47

.62%

0.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

61,1

022

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

3,56

91.

5Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity0.

831

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

35,2

561

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

50,0

481

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

2,69

60.

75Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 0.

681

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

24,0

800.

5Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y48

,023

1Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y3,

409

1Sp

okan

e Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

921

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

36,5

501

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

46,4

151

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

3,36

71

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.89

0.75

Lane

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

34,1

901

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

51,0

691.

5M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio3,

354

1M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio0.

900.

75M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio36

,770

1In

terc

ity T

rans

it32

,759

0.75

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

2,43

80.

75In

terc

ity T

rans

it0.

941.

5In

terc

ity T

rans

it26

,690

0.75

Kits

ap T

rans

it27

,533

0.5

Kits

ap T

rans

it1,

702

0.5

Kits

ap T

rans

it0.

880.

5Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

19,1

880.

5C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

48,8

471

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a3,

191

1C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

0.89

0.75

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a33

,477

1Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct35

,626

0.75

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

2,40

50.

75Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

941.

5Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct33

,330

1

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

2,23

81

Pier

ce C

ount

y Pu

blic

Ben

efit

Auth

ority

50,6

291.

5Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity43

.60%

2Pi

erce

Cou

nty

Publ

ic B

enef

it Au

thor

ity24

.50

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

1,29

40.

5Sn

ohom

ish

Cou

nty

Tran

spor

tatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a 34

,177

0.75

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

41.9

4%2

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a22

.75

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,64

91

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

44,2

091

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

20.9

5%1

Spok

ane

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

22.0

0La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

417

1La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct41

,101

1La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct20

.21%

1La

ne T

rans

it D

istri

ct22

.00

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

2,48

81

Mun

icip

ality

of A

ncho

rage

- Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

45,9

621.

5M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio25

.00%

1M

unic

ipal

ity o

f Anc

hora

ge -

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tio21

.75

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

2,02

20.

75In

terc

ity T

rans

it30

,796

0.75

Inte

rcity

Tra

nsit

15.3

8%0.

75Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct21

.25

Kits

ap T

rans

it1,

130

1Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

24,1

020.

5Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

25.6

1%1

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

21.0

0C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

2,26

21

Cla

rk C

ount

y Pu

blic

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Be

nefit

Are

a43

,440

1C

lark

Cou

nty

Publ

ic T

rans

porta

tion

Bene

fit A

rea

29.7

6%1.

5In

terc

ity T

rans

it19

.25

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

2,29

11

Sale

m A

rea

Mas

s Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

33,3

300.

75Sa

lem

Are

a M

ass

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

00%

1Ki

tsap

Tra

nsit

19.2

5

B-53

Page 110: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-54

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

Ever

ett T

rans

it4,

483.

301

Ever

ett T

rans

it19

.08

2Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

16.4

11.

5Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

1.51

1Ya

kim

a Tr

ansi

t4,

816.

491

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

12.5

00.

75Ya

kim

a Tr

ansi

t17

.87

1.5

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

2.37

1.5

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIA

Tran

s6,

754.

392

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIA

Tran

s14

.42

1Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/VI

ATra

ns7.

450.

75Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/VI

ATra

ns1.

140.

75C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce3,

272.

650.

75C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce12

.00

0.75

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

5.97

0.75

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

1.30

0.75

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity4,

635.

391

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity17

.57

1.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity17

.11

1.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2.

431.

5C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

3,75

5.30

0.75

City

of P

ocat

ello

, Poc

atel

lo R

egio

nal T

rans

it12

.50

0.75

City

of P

ocat

ello

, Poc

atel

lo R

egio

nal T

rans

it7.

330.

75C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

1.41

1R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct3,

925.

210.

75R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct13

.00

0.75

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

6.42

0.75

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

1.44

1Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,86

0.00

0.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity11

.00

0.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it A

utho

rity

0.78

0.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it A

utho

rity

0.54

0.5

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it3,

294.

160.

75Bi

llings

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

12.8

30.

75Bi

llings

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

7.60

0.75

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it1.

020.

75M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

2,68

4.81

0.5

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct16

.00

1M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

10.6

21

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct1.

160.

75G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct4,

803.

081

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

13.2

50.

75G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct8.

800.

75G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct1.

330.

75Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

3,30

7.70

0.75

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am12

.00

0.75

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am2.

640.

5Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

0.61

0.5

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

re

Ever

ett T

rans

it18

.63

0.75

Ever

ett T

rans

it12

.32

0.75

Ever

ett T

rans

it14

7,37

20.

75Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

32.9

51

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

28.5

11.

5Ya

kim

a Tr

ansi

t12

.02

0.75

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

180,

297

0.75

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

40.0

60.

75Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/V

IATr

ans

15.4

70.

75Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/V

IATr

ans

13.5

10.

75Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/VI

ATra

ns32

2,40

91.

5Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/VI

ATra

ns21

.20

1.5

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

16.6

50.

75C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce12

.84

0.75

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

212,

722

1C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce60

.74

0.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity34

.22

1.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity14

.11

1W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

400,

807

1.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity36

.77

1C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

18.1

90.

75C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

12.9

20.

75C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

55,5

780.

5C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

42.9

60.

75R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct26

.49

1R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct18

.44

2R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct27

4,17

61

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

23.9

21.

5Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

6.42

0.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity12

.00

0.75

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it A

utho

rity

n/a

2Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y45

.00

0.75

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it16

.47

0.75

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it16

.10

1.5

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it40

,189

0.5

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it34

.09

1M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

17.7

20.

75M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

15.3

31

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct20

1,80

80.

75M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

55.1

80.

5G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct16

.66

0.75

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

12.5

40.

75G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct21

0,37

51

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

29.9

41

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am8.

860.

5Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

14.5

41

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

amn/

a2

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am30

.39

1

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Cap

itaAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r R

even

ue H

our

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Ever

ett T

rans

it$7

2.40

0Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

$82.

170.

75Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

17.3

7%0.

75Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

2.05

%1

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

$47.

710.

75Ya

kim

a Tr

ansi

t$7

6.14

0.75

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

23.5

3%0.

5Ya

kim

a Tr

ansi

t0.

00%

1.5

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIA

Tran

s$2

9.57

0.75

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIA

Tran

s$6

1.37

0.75

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIAT

rans

22.4

2%0.

75Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/VI

ATra

ns1.

02%

1C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce$2

3.58

1C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce$6

5.78

0.75

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

11.0

9%1

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

2.33

%1

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$4

3.95

0.75

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$8

7.90

0.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity23

.88%

0.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity5.

80%

0.5

City

of P

ocat

ello

, Poc

atel

lo R

egio

nal T

rans

it$1

2.00

1C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

$29.

791.

5C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

21.0

9%0.

75C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

1.33

%1

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$25.

101

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

$103

.66

0.5

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

22.8

3%0.

75R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct4.

37%

0.75

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$3

.36

1.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$2

7.80

1.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it A

utho

rity

8.99

%1.

5Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y0.

74%

1Bi

llings

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

$29.

301

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it$6

3.53

0.75

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it9.

88%

1.5

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it9.

45%

0M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

$29.

560.

75M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

$49.

331

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct21

.08%

0.75

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct3.

05%

1G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct$2

8.19

1G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct$5

3.35

1G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct15

.02%

1G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct4.

03%

0.75

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am$7

.18

1.5

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am$2

4.12

1.5

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am7.

46%

1.5

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am3.

00%

1

Page 111: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: N

W R

egio

n --

Gro

up C

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Ever

ett T

rans

it17

.29%

1Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

9.76

%0.

75Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

85.8

1%1.

5Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

35,3

321

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

17.1

0%1

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

8.66

%0.

75Ya

kim

a Tr

ansi

t49

.26%

0.75

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

40,9

061.

5Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/V

IATr

ans

22.6

2%1

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIA

Tran

s12

.67%

0.75

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIAT

rans

38.2

5%0.

75Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/VI

ATra

ns38

,026

1C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce37

.85%

0C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce5.

61%

0.75

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

87.0

5%1.

5C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce42

,544

1.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity18

.91%

1W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

7.76

%0.

75W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

78.2

8%1.

5W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

41,3

521.

5C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

14.9

6%1.

5C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

14.3

9%0.

75C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

31.5

3%0.

75C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

35,7

411

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

21.1

4%1

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

19.1

1%1

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

40.2

8%0.

75R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct29

,723

0.75

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity32

.10%

0.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it Au

thor

ity46

.60%

2Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y14

.05%

0.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it A

utho

rity

25,7

400.

5Bi

llings

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

22.4

9%1

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it15

.84%

1Bi

llings

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

39.7

6%0.

75Bi

llings

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

31,0

740.

75M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

21.3

3%1

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct15

.11%

1M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

54.7

6%1

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct39

,277

1G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct24

.83%

0.75

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

8.22

%0.

75G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct35

.44%

0.75

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

32,4

990.

75Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

25.7

4%0.

75Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

10.4

9%0.

75Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

46.3

0%0.

75Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

25,0

810.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Hou

rs

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

Ever

ett T

rans

it2,

658

1Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

0.86

0.5

Ever

ett T

rans

it25

,161

0.75

Ever

ett T

rans

it2,

042

1Ya

kim

a Tr

ansi

t3,

377

1.5

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

0.94

0.75

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

25,7

571

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

2,14

41

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIA

Tran

s2,

654

1Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/V

IATr

ans

0.85

1Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/VI

ATra

ns24

,181

0.75

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIAT

rans

1,79

00.

75C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce3,

314

1.5

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

1.00

1.5

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

30,3

891.

5C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce2,

366

1.5

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity2,

967

1W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.97

1W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

31,6

431.

5W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,24

31.

5C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

2,72

71

City

of P

ocat

ello

, Poc

atel

lo R

egio

nal T

rans

it0.

971

City

of P

ocat

ello

, Poc

atel

lo R

egio

nal T

rans

it17

,368

0.5

City

of P

ocat

ello

, Poc

atel

lo R

egio

nal T

rans

it1,

345

0.5

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

1,61

80.

5R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

971

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

28,8

611

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

1,56

50.

75Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

2,14

50.

75Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

1.00

1.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it A

utho

rity

25,7

401

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it A

utho

rity

2,14

51

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it1,

930

0.5

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it0.

971

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it26

,210

1Bi

llings

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

1,62

80.

75M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

2,53

51

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct0.

961

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct28

,830

1M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

1,88

11

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2,53

61

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

0.92

0.75

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

24,7

500.

75G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct1,

974

1Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

1,74

30.

5Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

0.97

1Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

19,1

370.

5Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

1,31

60.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

Ever

ett T

rans

it30

,341

0.75

Ever

ett T

rans

it20

.59%

0.75

Wha

tcom

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity24

.75

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

38,6

351

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

50.0

0%1

Yaki

ma

Tran

sit

22.2

5Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/V

IATr

ans

32,2

410.

75Bo

ise

Urb

an S

tage

s/V

IATr

ans

33.3

3%1

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

22.0

0C

omm

unity

Urb

an B

us S

ervi

ce42

,544

1.5

Com

mun

ity U

rban

Bus

Ser

vice

40.0

0%1

Bois

e U

rban

Sta

ges/

VIAT

rans

21.0

0W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

40,0

811.

5W

hatc

om T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

26.6

7%0.

75Ev

eret

t Tra

nsit

20.2

5C

ity o

f Poc

atel

lo, P

ocat

ello

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

34,7

371

City

of P

ocat

ello

, Poc

atel

lo R

egio

nal T

rans

it10

0.00

%2

City

of P

ocat

ello

, Poc

atel

lo R

egio

nal T

rans

it20

.25

Rog

ue V

alle

y Tr

ansi

t Dis

trict

28,8

610.

75R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct0.

00%

0.5

Targ

hee

Reg

iona

l Pub

lic T

rans

it A

utho

rity

20.2

5Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

25,7

400.

5Ta

rghe

e R

egio

nal P

ublic

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.00

%0.

5R

ogue

Val

ley

Tran

sit D

istri

ct19

.75

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it30

,142

0.75

Billin

gs M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it15

.00%

0.75

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct19

.75

Mis

soul

a U

rban

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct37

,839

1M

isso

ula

Urb

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

31.2

5%1

The

City

of C

heye

nne

Tran

sit P

rogr

am19

.00

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

30,0

540.

75G

reat

Fal

ls T

rans

it D

istri

ct21

.43%

0.75

Gre

at F

alls

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

18.5

0Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

24,3

570.

5Th

e C

ity o

f Che

yenn

e Tr

ansi

t Pro

gram

27.2

7%0.

75Bi

llings

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

18.2

5

B-55

Page 112: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: La

rge

Gro

up (>

100

0 V

ehic

les)

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it54

,239

.05

1.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it24

.00

1N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

126.

471.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

9.17

2Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

17,9

98.3

40.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

24.0

01

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n39

.80

0.75

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n4.

190.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)16

,205

.84

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

24.0

01

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

20.4

10.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)2.

130.

75C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

47,8

91.6

81.

5C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

24.0

01

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y81

.35

1C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

4.73

1W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

13,2

53.6

60.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

23.6

70.

5W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

42.4

20.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

3.91

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o13

,948

.87

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o24

.00

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

44.0

90.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

4.42

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

14,2

60.7

30.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

24.3

31.

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

33.2

80.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

2.30

0.75

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it72

.45

1.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it7.

900.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

2,86

40.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

17,9

350.

5Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

51.4

41

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n12

.28

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

2,74

10.

5Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

111,

193

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)31

.32

0.5

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

14.7

41.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)4,

457

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)21

1,00

91.

5C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

47.0

91

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y9.

950.

75C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

3,83

80.

75C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

44,4

930.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

43.9

30.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

11.2

20.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4,36

01

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y30

,888

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o45

.69

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o10

.33

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o6,

373

1.5

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

ho10

5,91

61

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T32

.50

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T14

.14

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T4,

012

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T17

2,42

61

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it3.

641.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

$192

.70

0.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it$1

10.4

00.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

24.4

0%0.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

10.7

60.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

$73.

751

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n$9

5.32

0.75

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n23

.42%

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

9.84

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

$66.

101

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

$101

.46

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

23.9

3%0.

75C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

4.93

1.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y$1

41.0

20.

75C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

$81.

641

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y21

.37%

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.13

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$9

7.83

1W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$101

.32

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y27

.49%

0.5

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o13

.99

0.5

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o$9

4.61

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

$98.

050.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

17.7

9%1

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T10

.80

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T$7

1.74

1M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

$70.

061.

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

8.55

%1.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it5.

43%

1N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

15.7

2%0.

75N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

57.0

6%1.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

14.4

3%0.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

3.35

%1

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n16

.71%

0.75

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

00%

0.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

00%

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

3.94

%1

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

22.6

0%0.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)48

.91%

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)1.

40%

0.75

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y5.

78%

1C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

10.7

6%1

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y41

.93%

1C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

31.9

0%1

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y3.

69%

1W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.2

1%0.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

46.7

5%1

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y23

.37%

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

11.1

2%0.

5So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

18.3

4%0.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

41.2

2%1

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

ho8.

97%

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T7.

40%

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T7.

55%

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T25

.22%

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T74

.02%

2

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it30

,240

0.5

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it3,

801

1N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

0.86

0.75

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it22

,667

0.5

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n46

,416

1Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

3,49

51

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n0.

850.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

31,4

341

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

48,5

051.

5N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)3,

067

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

0.81

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

32,7

511

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y39

,750

0.75

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y4,

006

1.5

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y0.

992

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y33

,225

1.5

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y37

,012

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

957

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

810.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

25,4

880.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

39,2

320.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

3,59

91

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o0.

860.

75So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

27,7

230.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

42,9

431

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T2,

816

0.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T0.

850.

75M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

30,4

361

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

New

Yor

k C

ity T

rans

it2,

868

1N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

25,9

910.

5N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

14.6

6%0.

5C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

24.7

5Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

2,56

00.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

39,6

261

Los

Ange

les

Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n26

.06%

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T22

.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

2,22

20.

75N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)39

,148

1N

ew J

erse

y Tr

ansi

t Cor

pora

tion

(Con

solid

ated

)19

.53%

1N

ew Y

ork

City

Tra

nsit

21.0

0C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

3,33

81.

5C

hica

go T

rans

it A

utho

rity

39,1

881

Chi

cago

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y17

.95%

0.75

New

Jer

sey

Tran

sit C

orpo

ratio

n (C

onso

lidat

ed)

21.0

0W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

2,27

10.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

30,0

720.

75W

ashi

ngto

n M

etro

polit

an A

rea

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

17.9

9%0.

75Lo

s An

gele

s C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

20.0

0So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n Au

tho

2,68

31

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o33

,614

0.75

Sout

heas

tern

Pen

nsyl

vani

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Auth

o21

.25%

1So

uthe

aste

rn P

enns

ylva

nia

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

19.7

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

2,15

30.

5M

etro

polit

an T

rans

it Au

thor

ity o

f Har

ris C

ount

y, T

36,2

921

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

of H

arris

Cou

nty,

T19

.24%

0.75

Was

hing

ton

Met

ropo

litan

Are

a Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.00

B-56

Page 113: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: La

rge

Gro

up (<

100

0 Ve

hicl

es)

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per R

oute

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e W

eekd

ay S

pan

of

Serv

ice

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue M

ileAl

t Sco

re

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et12

,493

.63

0.75

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et24

.00

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

41.0

91

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et2.

180.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity9,

148.

970.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity22

.25

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

24.1

40.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity4.

171.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

7,63

2.84

0.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct24

.00

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

29.3

60.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

1.92

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Av e

11,2

68.6

50.

75Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

ve22

.58

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

47.0

81

Port

Auth

ority

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve2.

230.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

10,2

26.1

10.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

24.0

01

Met

ro T

rans

it44

.87

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

2.92

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct16

,390

.72

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct24

.00

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct50

.22

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct3.

111

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

i t13

,992

.00

1Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

24.0

01

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit33

.35

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit2.

050.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n4,

313.

790.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n21

.42

0.5

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

8.82

0.5

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

1.69

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it A

utho

rity

13,5

88.0

91

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity22

.00

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity60

.15

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2.

991

GTJ

C24

,903

.69

2G

TJC

24.0

01

GTJ

C11

.62

0.5

GTJ

C6.

252

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O15

,760

.01

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

22.4

20.

75Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

53.5

41.

5Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

2.85

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t14

,678

.93

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t24

.00

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t34

.43

0.75

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

2.60

0.75

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y10

,316

.16

0.75

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.75

0.5

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y12

.57

0.5

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1.

140.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yPa

ssen

ger T

rips

Per R

even

ue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Aver

age

Spee

dAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Failu

res

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Rev

enue

Mile

s B

etw

een

Col

lisio

ns

(exc

ludi

ng

suic

ide)

Alt S

core

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t29

.25

0.75

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et13

.40

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

7,54

00.

75Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

145,

757

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

46.4

91.

5M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity11

.15

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

4,94

60.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity15

1,82

00.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

28.4

80.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

14.8

31

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct31

,829

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

139,

010

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Av e

29.2

10.

75Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

ve13

.09

1Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve96

10.

75Po

rt Au

thor

ity o

f Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

163,

420

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

39.8

71

Met

ro T

rans

it13

.67

1M

etro

Tra

nsit

1,30

40.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

147,

059

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

36.2

61

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

11.6

70.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

317

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

89,0

610.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ori t

25.7

20.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

12.5

60.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

4,93

80.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

80,4

200.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n23

.87

0.5

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

14.1

61

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

10,2

110.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n41

5,52

32

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it A

utho

rity

37.3

41

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity12

.49

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity2,

247

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity20

1,93

91

GTJ

C57

.11

2G

TJC

9.13

0.5

GTJ

C4,

061

0.75

GTJ

C21

,338

0.5

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O35

.25

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

12.3

70.

75Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

6,59

30.

75Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

154,

078

0.75

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

33.2

30.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t12

.79

0.75

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

1,54

30.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t57

,088

0.75

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.84

0.5

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y18

.22

2U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

95,5

732

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y34

6,45

11.

5

Tran

sit A

genc

yAv

erag

e H

eadw

ay

(min

utes

)Al

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e Pe

r C

apita

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yO

pera

ting

Expe

nse

Per

Rev

enue

Hou

rAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Veh.

Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t12

.15

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

$144

.19

0.5

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et$1

02.6

40.

75Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

21.0

2%1

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

17.3

70.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity$4

9.20

1.5

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

$94.

760.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity24

.76%

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct22

.56

0.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct$8

5.89

1R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

$83.

311

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct19

.78%

1Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

v e14

.19

1Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

ve$1

41.5

80.

5Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve$8

7.83

1Po

rt Au

thor

ity o

f Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

23.8

4%0.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

13.6

31

Met

ro T

rans

it$1

13.4

10.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

$100

.78

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it16

.71%

1.5

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

10.8

81

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$139

.90

0.5

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

$101

.00

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

20.0

7%1

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

i t12

.79

1Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

orit

$120

.68

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit$9

3.05

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit20

.52%

1Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n32

.78

0Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n$2

6.27

1.5

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

$71.

111.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n16

.50%

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it A

utho

rity

15.9

80.

75M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

$130

.50

0.75

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity$8

1.01

1M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

27.9

9%0.

5G

TJC

5.85

1.5

GTJ

C$2

3.44

1.5

GTJ

C$1

15.1

90

GTJ

C26

.83%

0.5

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O12

.44

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

$125

.92

0.75

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O$8

2.89

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

16.7

7%1.

5M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t14

.71

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t$8

5.22

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t$8

2.25

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t21

.58%

0.75

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y10

.03

1U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

$55.

411

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y$9

1.86

0.75

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y20

.46%

1

B-57

Page 114: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States

B-58

Initi

al B

ench

mar

king

Res

ults

: La

rge

Gro

up (<

100

0 Ve

hicl

es)

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Non

-Veh

. Mai

nt.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Gen

. Adm

in.

Expe

nse

Per

Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yFa

rebo

x R

ecov

ery

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

y

Loca

l Rev

enue

Pe

r Ope

ratin

g Ex

pens

e (S

yste

m

Tota

l)

Alt S

core

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t8.

03%

0.5

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et11

.62%

1.5

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et22

.55%

0.75

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et63

.79%

1M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity1.

61%

1.5

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

12.4

9%1

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

40.9

2%1.

5M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity19

.45%

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct8.

10%

0.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct22

.25%

0.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct19

.73%

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct63

.72%

1Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

v e6.

05%

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Ave

14.0

2%1

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

22.9

0%0.

75Po

rt Au

thor

ity o

f Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

9.22

%0.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

3.62

%1

Met

ro T

rans

it19

.33%

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it35

.05%

1.5

Met

ro T

rans

it32

.59%

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

2.12

%1

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

17.0

7%0.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct23

.04%

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

68.7

8%1

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

i t7.

11%

0.5

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

it21

.85%

0.5

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit17

.96%

0.5

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

rit76

.62%

1.5

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

2.33

%1

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

16.7

8%1

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

28.2

3%1

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

4.89

%0.

5M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y2.

86%

1M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

15.5

0%1

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity30

.26%

1M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

62.0

1%1

GTJ

C2.

83%

1G

TJC

11.5

6%1.

5G

TJC

38.4

2%1.

5G

TJC

0.00

%0.

5Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

2.46

%1

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O20

.86%

0.75

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O25

.84%

0.75

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O57

.34%

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t4.

90%

0.75

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

11.0

4%1.

5M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t26

.82%

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t52

.15%

1U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

4.68

%0.

75U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

24.6

0%0.

5U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

15.0

6%0.

5U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

61.2

4%1

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e M

iles

Per

Peak

Veh

icle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yVe

hicl

e H

ours

Pe

r Pea

k Ve

hicl

eAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Rev

enue

Mile

s Pe

r Veh

icle

Mile

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per T

otal

Ve

hicl

esAl

t Sco

re

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t41

,485

0.75

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et2,

847

0.75

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

et0.

820.

75Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

32,1

861

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

33,7

330.

5M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity3,

010

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

0.88

1.5

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

24,9

650.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

52,3

081.

5R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

3,30

61

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct0.

810.

75R

egio

nal T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

trict

31,5

551

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Av e

45,0

511

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Ave

3,11

60.

75Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve0.

770.

5Po

rt Au

thor

ity o

f Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

28,6

620.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

40,6

660.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

2,97

70.

75M

etro

Tra

nsit

0.78

0.5

Met

ro T

rans

it26

,387

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

40,2

050.

75Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct3,

234

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct0.

861

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

29,2

680.

75Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ori t

43,6

361

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

it3,

277

1Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

0.86

1Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

30,3

431

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

41,6

480.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n2,

724

0.75

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

0.80

0.75

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

29,5

941

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it A

utho

rity

53,1

371.

5M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

3,98

41.

5M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

0.85

1M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Auth

ority

38,2

891.

5G

TJC

28,4

010.

5G

TJC

3,08

00.

75G

TJC

0.78

0.5

GTJ

C18

,435

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

46,8

711

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O3,

556

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

0.86

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

33,0

331

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

53,6

851.

5M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t3,

945

1.5

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

0.86

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t34

,393

1.5

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y36

,010

0.75

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y2,

289

0.5

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y0.

871.

5U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

24,6

000.

75

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue H

ours

Pe

r Tot

al

Vehi

cles

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

yR

even

ue M

iles

Per P

eak

Vehi

cle

Alt S

core

Tran

sit A

genc

ySp

are

Vehi

cle

Rat

ioAl

t Sco

reTr

ansi

t Age

ncy

Com

posi

te S

core

(M

easu

res

Onl

y)

King

Cou

nty

Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n - M

e t2,

403

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

33,9

000.

75Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

5.33

%1

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity24

.00

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

2,23

90.

75M

assa

chus

etts

Bay

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Au

thor

ity29

,540

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

18.3

3%0.

75M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t24

.00

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct2,

128

0.75

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct42

,574

1.5

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct34

.92%

1.5

GTJ

C22

.50

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 Si

xth

Av e

2,19

00.

75Po

rt A

utho

rity

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Sixt

h A

ve34

,881

0.75

Port

Aut

horit

y of

Alle

ghen

y C

ount

y 34

5 S

ixth

Ave

21.7

0%1

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O22

.25

Met

ro T

rans

it1,

930

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it31

,751

0.75

Met

ro T

rans

it20

.33%

0.75

Mas

sach

uset

ts B

ay T

rans

porta

tion

Auth

ority

21.7

5Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct2,

507

1Al

amed

a-C

ontra

Cos

ta T

rans

it D

istri

ct34

,702

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

18.5

7%0.

75U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

21.0

0Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Auth

ori t

2,41

61

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it Au

thor

it37

,459

1Th

e G

reat

er C

leve

land

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

23.4

5%1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

istri

ct20

.75

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

2,09

00.

75Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n33

,378

0.75

Pace

, Sub

urba

n Bu

s D

ivis

ion

12.7

9%0.

5M

etro

Tra

nsit

20.2

5M

etro

polit

an A

tlant

a R

apid

Tra

nsit

Aut

horit

y3,

065

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity45

,210

1.5

Met

ropo

litan

Atla

nta

Rap

id T

rans

it Au

thor

ity18

.08%

0.75

Alam

eda-

Con

tra C

osta

Tra

nsit

Dis

trict

20.0

0G

TJC

2,01

80.

75G

TJC

22,1

661

GTJ

C20

.24%

0.75

The

Gre

ater

Cle

vela

nd R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

utho

ri t20

.00

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O2,

671

1Tr

i-Cou

nty

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n D

ist.

of O

40,4

181

Tri-C

ount

y M

etro

polit

an T

rans

porta

tion

Dis

t. of

O22

.36%

1Ki

ng C

ount

y D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

- Met

19.7

5M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t2,

690

1M

iam

i-Dad

e Tr

ansi

t46

,025

1.5

Mia

mi-D

ade

Tran

sit

33.8

2%1.

5Pa

ce, S

ubur

ban

Bus

Div

isio

n19

.75

Uta

h Tr

ansi

t Aut

horit

y1,

350

1U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

31,4

360.

75U

tah

Tran

sit A

utho

rity

27.7

9%1

Port

Auth

ority

of A

llegh

eny

Cou

nty

345

Six

th A

ve18

.50

Page 115: Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States