Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States
December 2004
FDOT BC137- 43
TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No.
NCTR - 527 - 03 FDOT BC137-43
2. Government Accession No.
3. Recipient's Catalog No.
5. Report Date
December 2004 4. Title and Subtitle
Benchmark Rankings for Transit Systems in the United States 6. Performing Organization Code
7. Author(s)
Perk, Victoria; and Kamp, Nilgün 8. Performing Organization Report No.
10. Work Unit No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
National Center For Transit Research (NCTR) University of South Florida CUT 100 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620
11. Contract or Grant No.
DTRS98-G-0032 13. Type of Report and Period Covered
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Research and Special Programs (RSPA) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 20590 Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS 26, Tallahassee, FL 32399
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
15. Supplementary Notes
Supported by a Grant from the USDOT Research and Special Programs Administration, and the Florida Department of Transportation 16. Abstract
Benchmarking is a well-established practice among public and private entities that are interested in improving their performance. Benchmarking allows agencies to measure their own performance against other similar agencies, assuming that similar types of data are maintained to allow for meaningful comparisons. The benchmarking practice also allows agencies to measure their own progress over time. Transit agencies do maintain considerable data that are required by the federal government in order to receive federal funds. These data could provide the foundation for meaningful benchmarks of performance to be established, which would help transit agencies realize “where they stand” in the industry. However, at this time there is no effort to utilize these data on a national basis that is universally regarded as constructive by the transit industry. Part of the problem is that transit agencies do operate in different economic and geographic environments with different policy goals, making broad comparisons of system performance misleading.
17. Key Words
public transit, National Transit Database (NTD); transit performance measures; benchmarking; peer analysis
18. Distribution Statement
Available to the public through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650, http://www.ntis.gov/, and through the NCTR web site at http://www.nctr.usf.edu/.
19. Security Classif. (of this report)
Unclassified
20. Security Classif. (of this page)
Unclassified 21. No. of pages
45
22. Price
Form DOT F 1700.7
State of Florida D Pub 605 Tallaha ( P
Plan
National Cen
Center for Urba Univer 4202 E. F Tamp ( Project Staff: Victo Nilgü Meli
The opinions, findings and conclusionauthors and not necessarily those of tof Florida Department of Transporta
epartment of Transportation lic Transit Office
Suwannee Street ssee, FL 32399-0450 850) 414-4500
roject Manager: Tara Bartee
ning Administrator
ter for Transit Research n Transportation Research
sity of South Florida owler Avenue, CUT 100 a, FL 33620-5375
813) 974-3120
ria A. Perk, Senior Research Associate n Kamp, Senior Research Associate
ssa Salzler, Research Assistant
s expressed in this publication are those of the he U.S. Department of Transportation or the State tion.
BENCHMARK RANKINGS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS IN THE UNITED STATES
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1
RELEVANT LITERATURE ............................................................................................. 2
SUMMARY OF INPUT FROM ADVISORY COMMITTEE & OTHERS........................... 7
INITIAL BENCHMARK DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................... 10
Source of Data............................................................................................. 10 Peer Group Selection ................................................................................... 10 Initial Benchmarks ....................................................................................... 12
Scoring Procedure .................................................................................... 13 Results of Initial Benchmarking.................................................................... 14
Southeast (SE) Region............................................................................... 14 Northeast (NE) Region .............................................................................. 19 Midwest (MW) Region ............................................................................... 24 Southwest (SW) Region ............................................................................. 29 Northwest (NW) Region............................................................................. 36 Largest Transit Systems in the U.S............................................................ 39
CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................ 42
REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 44
APPENDIX A – LIST OF DEFINITIONS..................................................................... A-1
APPENDIX B – DETAILED DATA TABLES .............................................................. B-1
ii
List of Tables
TABLE 1: Geographic Groups for Peer Comparisons............................................................11 TABLE 2: Initial Benchmarking Criteria..............................................................................12 TABLE 3: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group A............................................14 TABLE 4: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group B............................................15 TABLE 5: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group C............................................16
TABLE 6: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group D ...........................................18 TABLE 7: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group A ...........................................19
TABLE 8: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group A(1).......................................19
TABLE 9: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group B ...........................................20
TABLE 10: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group C .........................................21
TABLE 11: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group D .........................................23
TABLE 12: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group A........................................24
TABLE 13: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group A(1) ...................................25
TABLE 14: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group B........................................26
TABLE 15: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group C........................................27
TABLE 16: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group D .......................................28
TABLE 17: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group A ........................................30
TABLE 18: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group A(1) ....................................30
TABLE 19: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group B ........................................31
TABLE 20: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group C ........................................32
TABLE 21: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group D ........................................33
TABLE 22: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group E.........................................35
TABLE 23: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group A ........................................36
TABLE 24: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group B ........................................37
TABLE 25: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group B(1)....................................37
TABLE 26: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group C ........................................38
TABLE 27: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group – (> 500 Vehs)...............................39
TABLE 28: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group – (> 1000 Vehs).............................40
TABLE 29: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group – (< 1000 Vehs).............................41
iii
iv
INTRODUCTION As part of its National Center for Transit Research (NCTR) Program, the Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) has been working with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to conduct analyses regarding benchmark rankings of U.S. transit systems. Benchmarking is a well-established practice among public and private entities that are interested in improving their performances. Benchmarking allows agencies to measure their own performances against other similar agencies, assuming that similar types of data are maintained to allow for meaningful comparisons. The benchmarking practice also allows agencies to measure their own progress over time. Transit agencies do maintain considerable data that are required by the federal government in order to receive federal funds (the National Transit Database, or NTD). These data could provide the foundation for meaningful benchmarks of performance to be established, which would help transit agencies realize “where they stand” in the industry. However, at this time there is no effort to utilize these data on a national basis that is universally regarded as constructive by the transit industry. Part of the problem is that transit agencies operate in different economic and geographic environments with different policy goals, making broad comparisons of system performance misleading. This study aimed to develop a method of measuring commonly maintained performance statistics in a manner that is broadly acceptable to the transit industry, and thereby provide useful information that helps agencies improve their performance over time. In the course of this study, CUTR reviewed previous research that ranked transit agencies or otherwise studied transit performance measurements. Strengths and weaknesses of these studies were evaluated. Also, this study benefited from guidance in the form of an advisory committee composed of representatives of transit agencies and the transit industry throughout the United States. With assistance from the study advisory committee, CUTR used existing NTD information to develop comparative measures that can allow transit agencies to measure their own performance against relative peers. Suggestions in the selection of an appropriate peer group are provided (e.g., geographical location, agency size, service area population size, etc.). In addition, a variety of categories are established (e.g., service availability, quality of service, cost efficiency, etc.), along with a simple index system, that provide transit agencies with an instant means of comparison for their fixed-route motorbus services. This report first discusses existing literature on the subject of transit performance, and then summarizes input obtained from the study advisory committee and other representatives of the
1
transit industry. This information is followed by a description of the selection of peer groups and performance measurement categories developed for this study, along with the results for the fixed-route motorbus service of all transit systems that operate this mode in the United States (as of 2001). Finally, conclusions are presented along with suggestions for future refinements of the process developed herein.
RELEVANT LITERATURE The first task of this study was to examine some of the literature related to transit performance measurement and rankings. This section summarizes that literature. One of the more well-known and controversial reports is Hartgen’s and Horner’s Compa ative Performance of Major U.S. Bus Transit Systems: 1988—1995 (1997). This report uses NTD data, and ranked the performance of the 127 largest urban bus operators in the country. The transit agencies were categorized into six groups using American Public Transportation Association (APTA) definitions for mode and population served. The groups are:
r
Multi-modal, serving over 2 million persons Multi-modal, serving between 500,000 and 2 million persons Bus only, serving over 2 million persons Bus only, serving between 500,000 and 2 million persons Bus only, serving between 250,000 and 500,000 persons Bus only, serving less than 250,000 persons.
Twelve measures were used to rank the transit agencies, and were chosen to measure the resources available to operate service, the amount of service provided, and the resulting utilization of the service. Measures commonly used in the transit industry were targeted. To determine system performance, the authors computed the ratio of each system’s statistics to the overall mean of the statistic. This yielded 12 ratios for each operator, for each year. The overall system ratio was then computed as the average of these 12 ratios, and the 127 systems were ranked according to this overall performance ratio, with the best performing systems having the lowest ratios. The systems were also ranked within their own peer groups. Some of the criticism of this study included that there was no industry consensus or agreement on the measures that were used, that inconsistencies in the data exist, and that systems have different goals, regional demographics, and regional economies. The authors do not believe that geographic or size differences affect their results. Their top-rated systems were those with lower-than-average costs and subsidies, low fares, high relative ridership, and area-targeted
2
service. The authors did acknowledge that their findings did not shed light on the reasons why apparently similar systems differed so much in performance. Hartgen and Collins also performed a similar analysis in 1996 (Comparative Per ormance of Transit Systems is Valuable but Con roversial), using 108 of the largest urban bus operators and reviewing their performance from 1988 to 1993.
ft
In the Winter 2002 issue of Transportation Quarterly, Hartgen and Neumann engaged in a Point/Counterpoint Exchange on performance. Key points included the comparison of performance measurements used in the private sector versus the public sector. In the private sector, performance measures are reinforced by clear, quantifiable objectives that tend to be widely agreed upon among firms and their ownership. In transportation agencies in the public sector, some broad agreement has been reached on appropriate measures of performance; however, there is less consensus regarding objectives, many of which are not easily quantified and can tend to vary over time even within the same agency. For example, policies change, political leadership changes, and objectives/measures must reflect these changes. Another key point from the Hartgen/Neumann discussion is that the existence of performance measures alone cannot guarantee effective change or improved performance. To be truly effective, performance measures must be integrated into the ongoing planning, management, and decision-making processes of agencies. Other studies have explored the performance measurement and ranking of transit systems. A Transit Performance Index was developed by APTA (1998), which suggested using NTD information to highlight a set of performance indicators that evaluate resource utilization and transit output, including:
Cost per passenger mile Cost per seat mile Load factor In-service productivity (passenger miles per driver).
APTA’s study explains that these measures can be used directly to compare systems, assess changes over time, and identify potential sources of improvement for a given system. To resolve the difficulty in understanding the relationship among the measures and the inter-city comparisons, a model was constructed to transform the key measures into an index between 0 and 1 (with the best performers near 1 and the worst performers near 0). With this index system, different agencies can be compared. Factors that are unique to cities of various sizes can be identified and accounted for in the index. Rey, Perk, and Thompson conducted annual performance reviews, including trend and peer analyses, over a period of several years for the FDOT. The last complete report was the 2000
3
Performance Evaluation of Florida’s Transit Systems (CUTR, 2000). In this study, the performance of each transit system in Florida was compared against itself over a 16-year period and against peer systems for the most recent year complete NTD data were available. Fixed-route and demand-response modes were considered separately. The peer selection process developed by Rey, Perk, and Thompson, was tailored to Florida and therefore was concentrated in the Southeastern U.S. Systems were first selected based on the number of vehicles operated in maximum service, and then further analyzed based on seven additional indicators:
Passenger trips Revenue miles Revenue hours Average speed Total operating expense Service area population Service area population density.
Using a simple scoring system based on the standard deviations from the Florida means for each measure, the peer groups were formed. The peer groups were then analyzed using several NTD-based indicators and measures, divided into three categories: general performance indicators, which consisted of absolute values obtained directly from the NTD; effectiveness measures, which indicate the extent to which various service-related goals are being achieved and are developed from the performance indicators (vehicle miles per capita, passenger trips per revenue mile, etc.); and efficiency measures, which involve reviewing the level of resources (labor or cost) required to achieve a given level of output and are also developed from the performance indicators (operating expense per passenger trip, maintenance expense per revenue mile, farebox recovery, etc.). This study simply presented the transit systems’ data along with the peer group means; the intent was not to explicitly rank systems. The study’s authors indicated that performance evaluation based solely on NTD information will not directly measure several relevant considerations such as passenger satisfaction with regard to levels of service, public attitudes toward the agency, employee morale, quality of planning, contributions to economic development, air quality improvements, or other goals that may be important to an agency. In addition, this type of performance review does not measure several aspects of quality of service such as vehicle cleanliness and comfort, operator courtesy, on-time performance, quality of marketing and passenger information support, and level of satisfaction with hours of operation, frequency of service, and geographic coverage of service. It should be noted that the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 100, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Second Edi ion (Kittelson & Associates, Inc., et. al., 2003) includes a framework t
4
designed to measure several of these quality of service characteristics from the transit passenger’s point of view. Chu, Fielding, and Lamar created single measures of efficiency and effectiveness for peer groups (1992). Two peer groups were included, one serving large metropolitan areas and the other serving small cities and large towns. The efficiency measure was a function of annual revenue hours divided by the sum of weighted annual vehicle operating expenses, maintenance expenses, general/administrative expenses, and other expenses. The effectiveness measure was a function of annual unlinked passenger trips divided by the sum of weighted annual revenue hours, urbanized area population density, proportion of households without automobiles, and annual financial assistance per passenger. The results showed that a transit system might be relatively efficient but ineffective, and vice versa. Chu also evaluated six alternative approaches to creating a transit performance index (1996), including:
Average Performance Approach—ranks transit systems based on their average performance across a set of performance dimensions (used by Hartgen, for example).
Best Performance App oach—ranks systems by what they do best, and assumes that a system’s priority objective is the one for which it achieves the most.
r
r
Worst Performance Approach—is the opposite of the Best Performance Approach, and ranks systems with respect to the objective for which they achieve the least.
Stated Objective App oach—ranks systems by their priority objective obtained from a system survey, and addresses the issue of a system not being able to achieve its priority objective due to external constraints.
Stated Priority Approach—ranks systems by a weighted average of their performance across a set of performance dimensions (or categories), with the weights derived from a survey of systems.
Total Performance Approach—ranks systems based on how they rank on individual dimensions, and overcomes the potential problem encountered by the previous methods of results being dominated by dimensions that show wide variation across systems.
Other studies have addressed the issue of transit performance more broadly. For example, accurate estimates of transit service area population are essential if an agency uses measures that incorporate density or per-capita data. Horner and Murray investigated issues of spatial representation of potential transit riders using geographic information systems (GIS). The authors concluded that the best estimates are those obtained suing block-group level data based on the location of transit stops. The Transit Performance Monitoring System (TPMS) was designed to collect data on transit customers through an ongoing, systematic program of on-board surveys (McCollom, et. al.). It
5
resulted from an effort by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to develop and test a plan for collecting data on transit benefits that could be implemented by transit systems at minimal cost. The TPMS involved 14 standard on-board survey questions, and implementation in conjunction with NTD surveys. Some of the results included the following:
Low-income users represent a larger percentage of users at small transit systems (61%) than in medium (51%) or large (40%) systems.
Work trips are a greater percentage of transit trips in large systems (58%) than in small systems (33%).
There are more choice riders in medium (39%) and large (42%) systems than in small systems (33%).
In terms of policy objectives, mobility is most important in smaller systems. In terms of congestion management, on average, 79% of riders are associated with
this objective (large shares of riders associated with this objective in larger systems and in rail services of multi-modal systems).
The National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis Report 238 addresses performance measures in state departments of transportation (Poister, 1997). The report notes Washington DOT’s transit mobility index (which was under development), which is intended to be able to track the availability, connectivity, and affordability of both fixed-route and paratransit services in the state’s counties. The report found that, in terms of public transit operating, ridership, and financial statistics, most of the measures tracked by state DOTs are the same as those used by individual agencies. The amount of service provided is typically measured by vehicle miles/hours, or revenue miles/hours. Overall capacity can be measured by the number of seat-miles operated. Labor productivity is often measured by revenue hours per employee (or vehicle operator, or maintenance employee). Vehicle productivity is also sometimes monitored, in terms of measures including vehicle hours/miles per vehicle. Indicators of service quality may include on-time performance, and measures incorporating breakdowns and collisions. Many state DOTs track the number of passenger trips per vehicle hour/mile as a measure of overall transit system productivity. Passenger trips per capita can be a measure of the need for (or importance of) public transportation in a given service area. The cost per passenger trip is a standard measure of cost-effectiveness. Also, most state DOTs compare farebox recovery across transit systems and over time. NCHRP Report 446, A Guidebook for Performance-Based Transportation Planning (Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 2000) provides an ideal summary for this literature review. It indicates that no two performance-based planning processes will be exactly alike. This is because agencies across the country have different organizational needs to satisfy, different types and levels of resources, and unique local and regional issues to consider. These differing needs, resources, and issues affect the environments in which transit agencies operate and make it difficult to
6
develop a performance review/ranking process that can reveal the true relative performance of these agencies throughout the country.
SUMMARY OF INPUT FROM ADVISORY COMMITTEE & OTHERS As part of this study, input was gathered from an advisory committee consisting of transit industry representatives from around the United States. In addition, others with relevant experience also provided input. Those willing to share ideas and opinions were informed that the intent of this study is to develop a method of measuring commonly-maintained performance statistics in a manner that is broadly acceptable to the transit industry, and to provide useful information that helps agencies improve their performance over time. It was also noted that this particular study’s scope was limited to NTD data representing the fixed-route motorbus mode. There are several national ranking studies available in various industries. Typically, these studies provide a resource for customers to make more informed decisions. In the case of transit, such a study could target a national audience, the media, the industry policy-makers, or it could target individual agencies either focusing on information for management or the oversight board. Committee members were asked about any thoughts on where the greatest need and prospect for added value would be, and whether trend or peer analyses would be most appropriate. Members of the committee responded that one of the major current issues in transit is the balance between ridership and cost-effective service with a reasonable farebox return. Support was voiced for the use of both trend and peer analyses. It was thought that there needs to be a way for agencies to compare and contrast themselves with one another, and that the study should include several peer groups with a detailed set of measurement criteria. It was noted that the most challenging part of this effort would be in the appropriate selection of peers. One member indicated the importance of benchmarking at the local level so agency management and governing boards can determine where a transit system stands relative to its peers and itself over time. Advisory committee members were also asked if they had any opinions as to whether any study, regardless of methodology, would be embraced by the transit industry. The general consensus is that it will be difficult to get the industry to accept any methodology used for performance measurement. Peer comparison, if done well, is not simple. Previous studies have tended to focus on a single measure or small set of measures, and the committee members do not believe that such studies produce meaningful and useful results. There has always been a
7
level of resistance to performance rankings, and the low-ranked agencies, especially, will always argue that the studies are inherently flawed or biased in some manner. According to the committee, the argument that all systems are different is often used, and may be valid, but it is not supported in most other industry comparisons. One member stated that the transit industry should have standards or benchmarks that practitioners and managers can use to identify areas that are strong and areas that are weak. In most cases, transit managers succumb to political pressures to run clearly inefficient service instead of making decisions that will result in optimal efficiency and use of available resources. Without a national or industry standard, transit agencies operate in a vacuum with no comparative accountability for efficient operations. Committee members were asked if there are any types of measures that they believe strongly should be included or excluded. Some members provided a list of measures used at their agency. For example, one member noted that the measures provided do well at explaining the “overall picture,” are easy to understand, and others can see the analogy in other industries (most of the measures provided by this member are included in the methodology presented later in this report). One noted that caution should be used in applying cost-per-employee measures, because different agencies outsource different functions, and comparisons would not be meaningful. Another member noted that, because transit agencies often cannot conduct “business” as a private entity would, it is necessary to evaluate transit agencies against their particular constraints, and keeping in mind other various goals of a public service. For example, farebox recovery might not be the best indicator for agencies required to keep lower fares or operate routes with low ridership. Others cautioned against the aggregation of measures for multi-modal agencies, which could reduce the usefulness of results. When asked their opinions on the number of measures that can be usefully absorbed, responses were varied. Some believed a large number of measures should be used, with the research focused on “tell(ing) the story” rather than just assembling large amounts of data. Others believed the number of measures used should not exceed six to ten. Some committee members expressed reservations about using NTD data for benchmarking in this study. It is clear that some NTD requirements necessitate agencies to compile data differently from their internal accounts. Also, some noted limitations in the accuracy of NTD information, and that some agencies remain inconsistent in their reporting despite experience and the validation process. Committee members were informed that this relatively small study would begin with NTD data, and the results would make apparent any need for revisions or additional types of data that could be explored in further research. Other types of data suggested include cost of living, regional wage rates, and the consumer price index (CPI) to normalize wage and/or benefit information.
8
At least one of the committee members was not in favor of using peer comparisons. However, this study examines the establishment of peer groups. In categorizing transit agencies into peer groups, committee members indicated that common variables such as population (actual service area population, as defined by a ¾-mile route buffer), population density, geographic region, agency size (in terms of vehicles operated and/or operating budget), and other fleet information might be used. Modes operated, governance structure, and contracting information might also be incorporated. Other variables not derived from the agency itself such as climate, labor market information, cost of living, and transit-dependency levels could also be appropriate (some of these variables would be at least partially addressed by looking at geographic regions). Overall, committee members advised that any type of benchmarking or peer comparison study, such as this one, should not be considered an end in itself. The data used alone are never sufficient without further explanation and analysis. Results of such efforts are best used as a starting point for fully understanding the performance of a particular agency. They can also be presented to the industry and policy-makers as comparative information on how well their transit dollars are being utilized, and can make transit governing boards more accountable for the decisions they make and the priorities they set. It is hoped that the industry will welcome this effort.
9
INITIAL BENCHMARK DEVELOPMENT Based on a review of previous transit performance/ranking analyses, input from the study advisory committee, and the scope of services prepared for this study, CUTR developed an initial transit benchmarking system incorporating several measures from the National Transit Database for all NTD reporters in the U.S. that operate fixed-route motorbus. Initial sets of peer groups were also established. This section of the report outlines how the peer groups were selected, which measures were chosen for inclusion in the benchmarking, and the derivation of the results. It should be noted that the process described herein is not considered to be “finished.” It is anticipated that this process will evolve as future research efforts allow deeper analysis and further refinements.
Source of Data This study is limited to the NTD data. Data were compiled using a relatively new tool called the Florida Transit Information System (FTIS) prepared for FDOT by the Lehman Transportation Center at Florida International University. This software tool contains a database with NTD information dating back to 1984, with 2001 being the most current report year available. While additional, more detailed information is available with this tool for Florida transit systems (such as precalculated measures and geographic information systems, or GIS, capabilities), data compiled directly from the NTD report forms are available for every transit system in the U.S. All data used in this benchmarking study (unless otherwise noted) are report year 2001 NTD data compiled from the latest available version of the FTIS at the time this report was written.
Peer Group Selection According to previous studies, advisory committee input, and CUTR’s past experience with transit performance evaluation, it is clear that the appropriate selection of peers is one of the most important tasks in this benchmarking study, yet it is also one of the most difficult. It is the goal of this study to allow for comparisons among transit systems that have some similarities, rather than compare all transit systems across the country with each other. Factors including climate, population characteristics, and cost of living issues have an effect on the environment in which a transit agency operates. It was beyond the scope of this study to collect detailed data such as that mentioned previously for all transit systems; however, grouping first by geographic region does address some of the issues related to climate, populations, and costs. Table 1 shows how fixed-route transit agencies in different states were initially grouped.
10
Table 1: Geographic Groups for Peer Comparisons Southeast Southwest Midwest Northeast Northwest
Alabama Arkansas Florida Georgia Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Virginia West Virginia
Arizona California Colorado Hawaii Nevada New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Utah
Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Michigan Minnesota Missouri Nebraska North Dakota Ohio South Dakota Wisconsin
Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Maine Maryland Massachusetts New Hampshire New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Rhode Island Vermont
Alaska Idaho Montana Oregon Washington Wyoming
Once placed into their respective geographic groups, the transit systems were further divided based on the following variables, obtainable from the NTD (for the fixed-route motorbus mode):
Service area population Service area population density Total Operating Expense Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Annual Total Vehicle Miles.
Service area population and density provide information on the size of the area served while operating expense, vehicles operated, and vehicle miles convey information on the size of the system. Operating expense, vehicles operated, and vehicle miles were compiled for fixed-route motorbus service only (directly-operated and purchased services). From the ranges for each of the above variables, a mean and standard deviation were calculated. This information was used to generate a simple scoring system based on whether an agency’s value for a variable was within one standard deviation of the mean, between one and two standard deviations above than the mean, or greater than two standard deviations above the mean. For each transit system a composite score was computed as the sum of the five individual scores for the variables being considered. Then, the mean and standard deviation of the composite scores were calculated to provide break points for the peer groups. In general, for each geographic region, peer groups were determined based on whether the transit systems’ scores were greater than one standard deviation above the mean, above the mean but within one standard deviation, or below the mean. This analysis was performed again on the transit systems that fell below the mean of the original composite scores to break
11
them down into two additional peer groups per geographic region. In some instances, closer inspection of the group results indicated that, due to an unusually high score on one of the measures in the selection criteria, an agency needed to be re-categorized into the next group (either above or below). Approximately 10 transit agencies were re-categorized in this way. In some cases, the very largest systems in each geographic region (such as New York City Transit, Chicago Transit Authority, etc.) did not have other comparable systems within their regions. As such, 20 of the largest systems from around the country were also put into a separate group and compared among themselves.
Initial Benchmarks The measures selected for this benchmarking process were determined based on the other studies that were reviewed, input from the advisory committee and others, and CUTR’s past experience conducting similar performance analyses. A total of 37 measures were used, which are listed in Table 2. As Table 2 indicates, some measures are absolute values (revenue miles, passenger trips, etc.), while others are ratios derived from these absolute values (passenger trips per capita, revenue miles per route mile, etc.). Several comparisons were completed, some using all 37 measures and some using just the ratios. The results presented in this report were generated from a composite index of the 23 measures shown in italics in Table 2. Appendix A provides a list of definitions for the measures shown in Table 2. Table 2: Initial Benchmarking Criteria
Service Supply/Availability Service Consumption Quality of Service
Revenue Miles Revenue Hours Vehicle Miles Vehicle Hours Total Operating Expense Revenue Miles per Route Mile Average Weekday Span of Service
Passenger Trips Passenger Trips per CapitaPassenger Trips per Revenue Mile Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour Passenger Miles
Average Speed Number of Vehicle System Failures Revenue Miles Between FailuresNumber of Collisions Revenue Miles Between CollisionsAverage Headway
Cost Efficiency Operating Ratios Vehicle Utilization
Operating Expense per Capita
Vehicle Maintenance Expense Non-Vehicle Maintenance Expense General/Administrative Expense Operating Expense per Revenue Hour Vehicle Maint. Exp. per Operating Exp.Non-Veh. Maint. Exp. per Operating Exp.Gen./Admin. Exp. per Operating Exp.
Farebox RecoveryLocal Revenue per Operating Expense*
Peak Vehicles Total Vehicles Vehicle Miles per Peak Vehicle Vehicle Hours per Peak Vehicle Revenue Miles per Vehicle Mile Revenue Miles per Total VehiclesRevenue Hours per Total VehiclesRevenue Miles per Peak Vehicle Spare Ratio
*System total measure NOTE: Benchmarking results shown later in this report were derived from a composite of the measures shown in italics.
12
Scoring Procedure All data used in this analysis were compiled from the FTIS (2001 NTD data) and imported into Microsoft Excel. For each peer group, the mean and standard deviation of the transit agencies’ values for each of the measures shown in Table 2 were computed. Each transit agency received a score for each measure based on the following relatively simple method:
2 points if the agency’s value was greater than 2 standard deviations above the mean. 1.5 points if the agency’s value was between 1 and 2 standard deviations above the
mean. 1 point of the agency’s value was within 1 standard deviation above the mean. 0.75 point if the agency’s value was within 1 standard deviation below the mean. 0.5 point is the agency’s value was between 1 and 2 standard deviations below the
mean. 0 points if the agency’s value was greater than 2 standard deviations below the mean.
By awarding 1 point to an agency whose value for a particular measure was within one standard deviation above the mean, and only 0.75 point if the agency’s value was within one standard deviation below the mean, a slight weight is given to being greater than the average of those in the group. No other weights were introduced to the procedure in this initial phase. Composite scores were calculated for each transit agency, and then the agencies in each group were ranked by their composite scores in descending order. Agencies with higher scores would be considered the better performers in their respective group. Because group means and, subsequently, scores, were calculated separately for each peer group, composite scores cannot be compared outside of a given peer group (that is, Miami-Dade Transit’s composite score should not be compared to Central Ohio Transit Authority’s score, or that for Tallahassee Transit). Composite scores can only be compared within each peer group analysis. Several composite scores were calculated in each peer group. For example, a composite score was calculated using all 37 measures from Table 2, and one was calculated using only the 23 measures in italics from the same table. Results based on the latter score are presented in the next section of this report. In addition, composite scores were computed for each of the six subcategories from Table 2 so that the transit agencies can be compared on the basis of, for instance, service consumption or cost efficiency alone. The composite scores from the subcategories can also be used to help explain a transit agency’s particularly high or low overall composite score. For example, an agency may have a low overall composite score in its peer group, but closer inspection of the subcategory results may show it performs very well in one or two areas, but has relatively worse performance in other areas, thus compressing its overall score. Using the 23 measures, composite scores could have a range between 0 and 46.
13
Results of Initial Benchmarking This section of the report details the results of the initial benchmarking process. Results are shown for each of the peer groups developed in each geographic region (southeast, northeast, midwest, southwest, and northwest). In addition, results are shown for a peer group containing the largest transit systems in the U.S. Benchmark rankings are presented using the composite score of the 23 measures shown in italics in Table 2. For each group examined, a brief discussion of the results is included, although further analysis beyond what is revealed by the NTD data is not provided. It should be noted that all information is for the fixed-route motorbus mode. Directly-operated and purchased transportation data were combined for those measures that are reported for purchased transportation service; where noted, data represent directly-operated service only. Appendix B provides detailed data tables for all transit agencies reviewed in this report.
Southeast (SE) Region The Southeast (SE) Region includes a total of 95 transit agencies in the following states:
Alabama Mississippi Arkansas North Carolina Florida South Carolina Georgia Tennessee Kentucky Virginia Louisiana West Virginia
The transit agencies in this region were divided into four separate peer groups, using the methodology discussed previously. Table 3 shows the results for the SE Region Group A. Table 3: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group A
Transit Agency Composite Score
Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority (Lynx) – FL 23.25
Regional Transit Authority of Orleans and Jefferson – LA 21.50
Broward County Mass Transit Division – FL 20.50
Miami-Dade Transit – FL 19.25
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority – GA 19.25
Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads – VA 15.50
14
The composite scores in Table 3 exclude the measure of revenue miles between collisions, because there were no data available in FTIS for the Regional Transit Authority of Orleans and Jefferson for the number of collisions. The most noticeable result in Table 3 is the relatively low score for the Transportation District of Hampton Roads. Further examination of the scores for the subcategories of measures shows this agency to be comparably weak in most areas, but very strong in cost efficiency. The data also show that, based on the peer selection criteria for this study, this agency does belong in this particular peer group. Just for informational purposes, Transportation District of Hampton Roads was reviewed in the SE Region Group B, and it appeared third from the bottom out of 19 transit agencies. Table 4 lists the results of the next group in this region, Group B, which contains 18 agencies. Table 4: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group B
Transit Agency Composite Score
Lee County Transit – FL 24.25
City of Kingsport – TN 24.00
Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority – FL 23.00
Capital Transportation Corporation – LA 23.00
Palm Tran, Inc. – FL 22.50
Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority – NC 22.25
Jacksonville Transportation Authority – FL 22.00
Greater Richmond Transit Company – VA 22.00
City of Alexandria, Alexandria Transit Company – VA 21.75
Charlotte Area Transit System – NC 20.75
Fairfax Connector Bus System – VA 20.50
Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky – KY 20.25
Petersburg Area Transit – VA 19.75
Memphis Area Transit Authority – TN 19.50
Transit Authority of River City – KY 19.25
Metropolitan Transit Authority – TN 19.25
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority – FL 18.50
Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority – AL 15.00
Lee County Transit and the City of Kingsport are the best performers in this peer group, despite the fact that these two transit agencies are fourth-last and second-last, respectively, in the subcategory of service consumption, and they are second-last and last, respectively, in the subcategory of operating ratios (which includes farebox recovery and local revenue as a percent of operating expense). However, Lee County and Kingsport perform well in every other subcategory, with Lee County being the best in terms of vehicle utilization, and third-best in
15
cost efficiency, and Kingsport being the best in service supply and cost efficiency. The agencies with the lowest scores in Table 4 are Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority and Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority. In all subcategories, Hillsborough ranks in the middle to lower part of the group. Birmingham-Jefferson is last in three subcategories (service supply, quality of service, and vehicle utilization). Closer inspection of the peer selection criteria used in this study confirms that Birmingham-Jefferson should be in this group. Table 5 shows results from the next group, SE Region Group C, which contains 27 agencies. Table 5: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group C
Transit Agency Composite Score
Durham Area Transit Authority – NC 24.00
Albany Transit System – GA 23.25
Charleston Area Regional Transportation – SC 22.75
Shreveport Area Transit System – LA 22.75
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company-Columbia – SC 22.50
Chatham Area Transit Authority – GA 21.75
Central Arkansas Transit Authority – AR 21.50
Gainesville Regional Transit System – FL 21.25
Chapel Hill Transit – NC 21.00
Kanawha Valley Regional Transportation Authority – WV 21.00
Sarasota County Transportation Authority – FL 20.75
Transit Authority Lexington- Fayette Urban County Government – KY 20.75
Jefferson Parish Department of Transit Administration – LA 20.25
Winston-Salem Transit Authority - Trans-Aid of Forsyth County – NC 20.00
Greensboro Transit Authority – NC 19.50
Knoxville Transportation Authority – TN 19.50
Capital Area Transit – NC 19.25
Cobb Community Transit – GA 19.00
County of Volusia dba: VOTRAN – FL 19.00
City of Tallahassee-TALTRAN – FL 18.75
Metro Transit – AL 18.75
Augusta Richmond Co. Transit Dept – GA 18.50
Escambia County Area Transit – FL 18.50
Greater Roanoke Transit Company – VA 18.50
Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority – TN 17.75
Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission – VA 17.25
Space Coast Area Transit – FL 17.00
16
The composite scores listed in Table 5 do not include the measure of revenue miles between vehicle system failures. Six of the transit agencies in this peer group operate purchased motorbus services only, and so failures are not reported in the NTD (these six agencies are: Charleston Area Regional Transportation, Cobb Community Transit, Greensboro Transit Authority, Jefferson Parish Department of Transit Administration, Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission, and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company-Columbia). The two best performers in SE Region Group C are Durham Area Transit Authority and Albany Transit System. Despite ranking second-last in the subcategory of quality of service, Durham performs well in the other areas, ranking fourth-best in cost efficiency and best in vehicle utilization. Albany was strong in the subcategories of cost efficiency and the operating ratios, placing third-best in each, and was tied for best in the subcategory of vehicle utilization with Durham. Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission and Space Coast Area Transit placed at the bottom of this peer group. Potomac and Rappahannock ranked high in the subcategories of quality of service and the operating ratios, but ranked low in the subcategories of service consumption and cost efficiency (placing last in the latter subcategory). Space Coast appeared in the middle of the group in most subcategories but placed last in service consumption and second-last in vehicle utilization. Space Coast does have a unique service area geography that may help explain its performance in this peer group. However, when Space Coast was placed in the next peer group, Group D, it ranked 40th out of 45 transit agencies. Table 6, on the following page, shows the results of the initial benchmarking within the SE Region Group D, the last group in this region. Group D contains 44 transit agencies. The best performers in this group are the City of Fairfax CUE Bus and Okaloosa County Transit. Those ranked near the bottom of this group are Polk County Transit Services, Lee-Russell Council of Governments, and Indian River County. It must be noted that the composite scores for this group do not include measures incorporating failures or collisions, due to a lack of data for several transit agencies in this group. The City of Fairfax performs well in most of the subcategories, and is best in service supply. However, Fairfax did rank near the bottom of the group for the subcategory of quality of service (which, in this group, only contains the measures for average speed and average headway). Okaloosa County performs best in the group for cost efficiency, and is ranked near the top for the operating ratios. However, Okaloosa County ranked in the middle of the group for most of the other subcategories, and was second-last in service consumption. Polk County, Lee-Russell, and Indian River County were the three transit agencies with the lowest composite scores in this group. Polk ranked near the bottom in most subcategories but was near the top in terms of cost efficiency. Lee-Russell’s strongest subcategories were quality
17
of service and cost efficiency, where it ranked near the top of the group. Indian River was sixth-best in cost efficiency, but ranked near the bottom of the group in most other subcategories, placing last in terms of service supply, and second-last in quality of service. Table 6: Initial Benchmarking Results: SE Region – Group D
Transit Agency Composite
Score Transit Agency
Composite Score
City of Fairfax CUE Bus – VA 23.25 Greenville Transit Authority – SC 19.00
Okaloosa County – FL 22.00 Athens Transit System – GA 18.75
Clarksville Transit System – TN 21.75 City of Rome Transit Department – GA 18.75
Department of Transportation/METRA – GA
20.75 Loudoun County Commuter Bus Service – VA
18.75
Jackson Transit Authority – TN 20.75 High Point Transit – NC 18.50
Wilmington Transit Authority – NC 20.75 Johnson City Transit System – TN 18.50
Lafayette Transit System LTS – LA 20.50 City of Alexandria – LA 18.25
Lakeland Area Mass Transit District – FL 20.50 City of Danville Mass Transit System – VA
18.25
Pasco County Public Transportation – FL 20.50 Fayetteville Area System of Transit – NC
18.25
SunTran – FL 20.50 Mid-Ohio Valley Transit Authority – WV 18.25
Bay County Council On Aging - Bay Coordinated Transportation – FL
20.25 Tuscaloosa County Parking and Transit Authority – AL
18.25
City of Key West - Department of Transportation – FL
20.25 City of Jackson Transit System – MS 18.00
Manatee County Area Transit – FL 20.25 City of Monroe Transit System – LA 18.00
Mississippi Coast Transportation Authority – MS
20.25 Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government – LA
18.00
City of Huntsville Department of Parking & Public Transit – AL
19.75 The Tri-State Transit Authority – WV 18.00
James City County Transit – VA 19.75 Pee Dee Regional Transportation Authority – SC
17.50
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville/Razorback Transit – AR
19.75 Santee Wateree Regional Transportation Authority – SC
17.50
Charlottesville Transit Service – VA 19.50 CRPTA - Waccamaw Regional Transportation Authority – SC
17.00
Greater Lynchburg Transit Company – VA 19.50 Montgomery Area Transit System – AL 17.00
Ohio Valley Regional Transportation Authority – WV
19.50 Polk County Transit Services Division – FL
16.75
Spartanburg Transit System – SC 19.50 Lee-Russell Council of Governments – AL
16.50
Asheville Transit Authority – NC 19.25 Indian River County Council on Aging, Inc. – FL
16.00
18
Northeast (NE) Region In this analysis, the Northeast (NE) Region includes a total of 107 transit agencies in the following states:
Connecticut New Hampshire Delaware New Jersey District of Columbia New York Maine Pennsylvania Maryland Rhode Island Massachusetts Vermont
The transit agencies in this region were divided into four separate peer groups, using the methodology discussed previously. Table 7 shows the results for the NE Region Group A. Table 7: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group A
Transit Agency Composite Score
New York City Transit – NY 25.25
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority – PA 22.25
New Jersey Transit Corporation (Consolidated) – NJ 22.25
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – MA 21.00
Port Authority of Allegheny County – PA 19.75
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC 19.50
GTJC – NY 19.50
Maryland Transit Administration – MD 18.75
Because New York City Transit is so much larger than the other systems in this peer group (as well as the entire country), this group was analyzed without it; results are shown in Table 8. Table 8: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group A(1)
Transit Agency Composite Score
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority – PA 23.50
New Jersey Transit Corporation (Consolidated) – NJ 23.25
GTJC – NY 21.00
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – MA 21.00
Port Authority of Allegheny County – PA 21.00
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC 19.75
Maryland Transit Administration – MD 18.50
19
It is clear from Tables 7 and 8 that the results are not significantly different when New York City Transit is excluded from the analysis. The best performer in the group is the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), and the agency with the lowest composite score is the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA). In terms of the measures used in this study, New York City Transit is strong in all subcategories except cost efficiency. SEPTA is strong in vehicle utilization, and MTA’s low rank in quality of service and vehicle utilization accounted for its relatively low composite score in both Tables 7 and 8. Table 9 presents the results of NE Region Group B, which consists of 14 transit agencies. Despite ranking last in the subcategory of service consumption, Suburban Transit Corporation is first overall in this group, largely due to ranking best in terms of cost efficiency and vehicle utilization. Delaware Transit Corporation and Queens Surface Transportation had relatively low scores in this group. Delaware Transit appeared in the middle of the group for most subcategories, but finished last in quality of service and the operating ratios. Queens Surface Transportation ranked second-best in terms of service consumption, but ranked last in the group in terms of service supply and cost efficiency. Table 9: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group B
Transit Agency Composite Score
Suburban Transit Corporation – NJ 26.00
Academy Lines, Inc. – NJ 23.50
Ride-On Montgomery County Government – MD 23.50
Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. – NJ 23.25
Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority dba MTA Long Island Bus – NY 22.00
Liberty Lines Transit, Inc. – NY 21.75
New York Bus Tours, Inc., dba New York Bus Service – NY 21.00
Connecticut Transit-Hartford Division – CT 21.00
Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc. – NY 20.75
Capital District Transportation Authority – NY 20.50
Regional Transit Service, Inc. and Lift Line, Inc. – NY 20.00
Rhode Island Public Transit Authority – RI 20.00
Delaware Transit Corporation – DE 18.00
Queens Surface Corporation – NY 17.75
On the following page, the results of NE Region Group C are shown in Table 10. This peer group contains a total of 25 transit agencies.
20
Table 10: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group C Transit Agency Composite Score
Olympia Trails Bus Co., Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 25.25
Trans-Bridge Lines, Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 22.50
Trans-Hudson Express c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 22.00
Private Transportation – NY 20.00
City of Long Beach – NY 19.75
Worcester Regional Transit Authority – MA 19.50
York County Transportation Authority – PA 19.25
Pioneer Valley Transit Authority – MA 19.25
Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority – CT 19.25
Rockland Coaches, Inc. – NJ 19.25
Connecticut Transit-New Haven Division – CT 19.00
CNY Centro, Inc. – NY 19.00
Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 19.00
Red Rose Transit Authority – PA 19.00
Transit Express – MA 18.75
New Jersey Transit Corporation – NJ 18.75
Transport of Rockland – NY 18.75
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. - -NY 18.75
Private One of New York LLC, d.b.a. New York Airport Service – NY 18.25
Liberty Lines Express, Inc. – NY 18.00
Southeastern Regional Transit Authority – MA 17.75
Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority – PA 17.50
DeCamp Bus Lines c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ 17.50
Westchester County Department of Transportation – NY 16.75
Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority – PA 16.50
Due to several transit agencies not having complete NTD data for vehicle failures and/or collisions, the composite scores in Table 10 do not include the measures of revenue miles between failures and revenue miles between collisions. Olympia Trails Bus Co., Trans-Bridge Lines, and Trans-Hudson Express, all part of NJ Transit, are the best performers in this peer group. Olympia Trails had the highest score, and is ranked best in terms of service supply and vehicle utilization, but is not as strong in terms of service consumption and cost efficiency. Trans-Bridge lines ranked best in quality of service, while Trans-Hudson ranked best in service consumption.
21
Westchester County Department of Transportation and Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg Transit Authority had the lowest scores in NE Region Group C. Further examination of the subcategory scores can provide insight into these results. Westchester ranked last in the group in terms of quality of service and cost efficiency, but ranked best in the operating ratios and was strong in terms of vehicle utilization. Cumberland-Dauphin-Harrisburg ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in each of the subcategories of measures. Table 11, on the following page, presents the initial benchmarking results of the last peer group in the NE Region, which is Group D. This peer group, one of the largest in this report, contains 60 mostly small and medium-sized transit agencies in the NE Region. Once again, because of a lack of data on failures and collisions for several systems in this group, composite scores listed in Table 11 do not include the measures of revenue miles between failures and revenue miles between collisions. The best three performers in this peer group are Orange-Newark-Elizabeth, Inc. and South Orange Avenue IBOA, both affiliated with NJ Transit, and Putnam County Transit. Both Orange-Newark-Elizabeth and South Orange Avenue IBOA ranked near the top of the group in all subcategories except cost efficiency, where the ranked near the bottom (South Orange Avenue actually ranked last). The three transit agencies with the lowest scores in Table 11 are Western Maine Transportation Services, Inc., G G & C Bus Company, Inc., and Cape Ann Transportation Authority. Western Maine ranked in the middle to lower part of the group for most all subcategories, ranking lowest in cost efficiency. Similarly, G G & C and Cape Ann both ranked in the lower part of the group in most subcategories. G G & C ranked last in quality of service and Cape Ann ranked last in vehicle utilization.
22
Table 11: Initial Benchmarking Results: NE Region – Group D
Transit Agency Composite Score Transit Agency Composite
Score
Orange-Newark-Elizabeth, Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ
26.50 City of Nashua Nashua Transit System – NH
18.75
Putnam County Transit – NY 24.50 New Britain Transp. Co. Inc. (1047)–CT 18.75
South Orange Avenue IBOA c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ
24.00 Middletown Transit District – CT 18.75
Clarkstown Mini-Trans – NY 23.25 Berks Area Reading Transp. Auth. – PA 18.50
Howard Transit c/o Corridor Transp – MD 23.25 Village of Spring Valley Bus – NY 18.50
Community Transit, Inc. c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ
22.25 Norwalk Transit District – CT 18.25
Greater Glens Falls Transit System – NY 22.00 Centro of Cayuga, Inc. – NY 18.25
Lafeyette-Greenville IBOA c/o NJ Transit, Carrier Admin. – NJ
22.00 Southeast Area Transit – CT 18.25
Connecticut Transit-Stamford Div. -- CT 21.25 TransIT Svcs of Frederick Count – MD 18.25
Centre Area Transp. Authority – PA 21.00 Merrimack Valley Reg Transit Auth–MA 18.00
Monsey New Square Trails Corp. – NY 21.00 T-Tran – NY 18.00
Dutchess Cty. Div. of Mass Transp – NY 20.75 Huntington Area Rapid Transit – NY 18.00
Greater Hartford Transit District – CT 20.50 Manchester Transit Authority – NH 18.00
Milford Transit District – CT 20.50 Beaver County Transit Authority – PA 18.00
Greater Attleboro-Taunton Regional Transit Authority – MA
20.25 Centro of Oswego, Inc. – NY 18.00
Chemung County Transit System – NY 20.25 Montachusett Reg Transit Auth – MA 18.00
Leisure Line c/o NJT, Carrier Admin. – NJ 20.25 Connecticut Dept. of Transp. – CT 17.75
Greater Portland Transit District – ME 20.25 Utica Transit Authority – NY 17.75
Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit – NY 20.00 Cty of Lackawanna Trans. System – PA 17.75
Harford County Transp. Services – MD 19.75 Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority 17.75
Broome Cty Dept. of Public Transp. – NY 19.50 Northeast Transp. Company, Inc. – CT 17.50
Chittenden County Transp. Auth. – VT 19.50 Washington County Transp Dept – MD 17.25
Luzerne County Transp. Auth. – PA 19.25 Cambria County Transit Authority – PA 17.25
Williamsport Bureau of Transp. – PA 19.25 Lowell Regional Transit Authority – MA 17.00
City of Bangor – ME 19.25 New Britain Transp. Co. Inc. (1052)–CT 17.00
Housatonic Area Regional Transit – CT 19.25 Altoona Metro Transit – PA 16.00
Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority – PA 19.00 Cape Cod Regional Transit Auth. – MA 16.00
Westmoreland County Transit Auth. – PA 19.00 Western Maine Transp Svcs, Inc. – ME 15.50
Brockton Area Transit Authority – MA 18.75 G G & C Bus Company, Inc. – PA 14.75
Annapolis Department of Transp. – MD 18.75 Cape Ann Transp. Auth – MA 14.75
23
Midwest (MW) Region For this benchmarking analysis, the Midwest (MW) Region includes a total of 105 transit agencies in the following states:
Illinois Missouri Indiana Nebraska Iowa North Dakota Kansas Ohio Michigan South Dakota Minnesota Wisconsin
Following the peer selection methodology discussed previously, the transit agencies in this region were divided into four separate peer groups. Tables 12 and 13 show the results for the MW Region Group A, which contains 11 of the largest transit agencies in the region. Due to its size in comparison with the other transit agencies in this region, Chicago Transit Authority is included in Table 12, but is not included in the results in Table 13 (on the following page). Table 12: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group A
Transit Agency Composite Score
Chicago Transit Authority – IL 27.75
Milwaukee County Transit System – WI 23.50
Pace, Suburban Bus Division – IL 23.25
Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation – MI 22.25
City of Detroit Department of Transportation – MI 21.50
The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority – OH 20.00
Bi-State Development Agency – MO 19.75
Metro Transit – MN 19.50
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority – OH 19.25
Kansas City Area Transportation Authority – MO 19.25
Central Ohio Transit Authority – OH 18.50
24
Table 13: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group A(1)
Transit Agency Composite Score
Milwaukee County Transit System – WI 27.50
Pace, Suburban Bus Division – IL 23.25
City of Detroit Department of Transportation – MI 22.50
Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation – MI 21.75
The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority – OH 20.75
Metro Transit – MN 20.75
Bi-State Development Agency – MO 20.00
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority – OH 19.25
Kansas City Area Transportation Authority – MO 19.25
Central Ohio Transit Authority – OH 18.75
Table 12 shows Chicago Transit Authority to be the best performer in the group, which might be expected given its size relative to the other agencies in the group. Chicago performed well in all subcategories, with its lowest ranking in quality of service (still in the middle of the group). Milwaukee County Transit System is the best performer when Chicago Transit Authority is not considered. Upon closer examination of the subcategories of performance measures, Milwaukee ranked high in terms of service consumption, cost efficiency, and vehicle utilization, but ranked lower in terms of quality of service. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, Kansas City Area Transportation Authority, and Central Ohio Transit Authority had the lowest overall composite scores in this group. While Kansas City and Central Ohio are two of the smaller transit agencies in this group, it should be noted that Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation is similarly sized, but ranked much higher. Southwest Ohio was very strong in terms of cost efficiency, but ranked last in vehicle utilization. Kansas City ranked in the middle to lower part of the group for most subcategories but was very strong in terms of quality of service. Central Ohio ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in all subcategories, but did not have one or more areas in which it performed well enough to boost its score. Table 14, on the following page, presents the results of the next group in this region, MW Region Group B. This group consists of 10 transit agencies. It should be noted that the composite scores shown in Table 14 do not include the measure of revenue miles between failures, because the Metropolitan Council is a purchased-transportation service and failures are not reported in the NTD.
25
Table 14: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group B
Transit Agency Composite Score
Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation – IN 22.50
Miami Valley Regional Transit Authority – OH 22.00
Capital Area Transportation Authority – MI 21.75
Madison Metro Transit – WI 20.25
Mass Transportation Authority – MI 20.25
Interurban Transit Partnership – MI 20.00
Transit Authority of Omaha – NE 19.50
Metropolitan Council – MN 19.50
Metro Regional Transit Authority – OH 19.00
Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority – OH 18.50
As shown in Table 14, Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation is the best performer in this group, based on the analysis used in this report, while Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority has the lowest composite score. Interestingly, both Indianapolis and Toledo are in the middle of the group in terms of service consumption and cost efficiency. However, Indianapolis ranked second-best in terms of both service supply and vehicle utilization. Toledo ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in most subcategories of measures. The next group in this region, MW Region Group C, contains 30 transit agencies. Its results are listed in Table 15 on the following page. Due to a lack of data on vehicle system failures for several transit agencies in this group, the composite scores in Table 15 do not include the measure of revenue miles between failures. According to Table 15, University of Michigan Parking and Transportation Services and Stark Area Regional Transit Authority have the highest overall composite scores in this group. University of Michigan ranked best in the subcategories of service supply and service consumption, and was also strong in cost efficiency. Stark ranked best in terms of vehicle utilization, and ranked well in the other subcategories except service consumption, where it was one of four transit agencies with the lowest score in the group. Five Seasons Transportation and Springfield Mass Transit District have the lowest composite scores in this group, as shown in Table 15. Both transit agencies ranked in the middle to lowest parts of the group in all subcategories of measures.
26
Table 15: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group C Transit Agency Composite Score
University of Michigan Parking and Transportation Services – MI 26.25
Stark Area Regional Transit Authority – OH 24.00
Belle Urban System-Racine – WI 23.25
Southwest Missouri State University – MO 23.25
Lorain County Transit – OH 23.00
Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District – IL 22.25
LaCrosse Municipal Transit Utility – WI 21.25
Madison County Transit District –IL 21.00
Butler County Regional Transit Authority – OH 21.00
Wichita Transit – KS 20.25
Campus Bus Service – OH 20.25
Pekin Municipal Bus Service – IL 20.25
South Bend Public Transportation Corporation – IN 20.00
Greater Peoria Mass Transit District – IL 19.75
Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation – IN 19.75
Kalamazoo Metro Transit System – MI 19.50
Ann Arbor Transportation Authority – MI 19.25
Waukesha County Transit System – WI 19.25
Gary Public Transportation Corporation – IN 19.25
Greater Lafayette Public Transportation Corporation – IN 19.00
Muncie Indiana Transit System – IN 19.00
Duluth Transit Authority – MN 18.75
Western Reserve Transit Authority – OH 18.75
Rock Island County Metropolitan Mass Transit District – IL 18.75
StarTran – NE 18.75
Kenosha Transit – WI 18.25
Des Moines Metropolitan Transit Authority – IA 18.00
Green Bay Metro – WI 17.75
Five Seasons Transportation – IA 17.25
Springfield Mass Transit District – IL 16.75
On the following page, Table 16 presents the results for the 54 transit agencies in MW Region Group D, the last group in this region. Group D represents most of the smaller transit agencies in this region. With several agencies lacking NTD data for vehicle failures and/or collisions, the composite scores in Table 16 do not include measures derived from these two variables.
27
Table 16: Initial Benchmarking Results: MW Region – Group D
Transit Agency Composite Score Transit Agency Composite
Score
Heart City Rider/Goshen Transit – IN 24.00 City of Holland Macatawa Area Express – MI
19.00
University of Iowa – IA 22.75 Ozaukee County Transit Services – WI 19.00
Brunswick Transit Alternative – OH 22.75 City of Appleton-Valley Transit – WI 18.75
City Utilities of Springfield Transit Services – MO
22.50 City of Newark Transit Operations – OH 18.75
Eau Claire Transit System – WI 21.75 Columbia Transit System – MO 18.75
City of Anderson Transportation System – IN
21.50 Sioux Falls Transit – SD 18.50
Rockford Mass Transit District – IL 21.00 Sheboygan Transit System – WI 18.50
Iowa City Transit – IA 21.00 Johnson County Transit – KS 18.00
Lawrence Transit System – KS 20.75 Richland County Transit – OH 18.00
Metropolitan Evansville Transit System – IN
20.50 Blue Water Area Transportation Commission – MI
18.00
Oshkosh Transit System – WI 20.50 Janesville Transit System – WI 18.00
Rapid Transit System – SD 20.50 LAKETRAN – OH 17.75
Fort Wayne Public Transportation Corporation – IN
20.25 Twin Cities Area Transportation Authority – MI
17.75
City of Rochester, Minnesota – MN 20.25 Hammond Transit System – IN 17.25
St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission – MN
20.25 Decatur Public Transit System – IL 17.25
City of Jackson Transportation Authority – MI
20.00 Wausau Area Transit System – WI 17.25
Davenport Public Transit – IA 19.75 Springfield City Area Transit – OH 17.00
Fargo Metropolitan Area Transit – ND 19.75 Saginaw Transit Authority Regional – MI
16.75
Bloomington-Normal Public Transit System – IL
19.50 Portage Area Regional Transportation Authority – OH
16.75
Bettendorf Transit System – IA 19.50 East Chicago Transit – IN 16.75
Grand Forks City Bus – ND 19.50 Battle Creek Transit – MI 16.75
Sioux City Transit System – IA 19.50 City of Beloit Transit System – WI 16.75
Topeka Metropolitan Transit Authority – KS
19.25 City of Moorhead-Transit – MN 16.75
Waukesha Transit Commission – WI 19.25 Muskegon Area Transit System – MI 16.50
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Black Hawk County – IA
19.25 Terre Haute Transit Utility – IN 16.00
St. Joseph Transit – MO 19.25 Bay Metropolitan Transportation Authority – MI
15.75
Middletown Transit System – OH 19.00 City of Dubuque-KeyLine – IA 15.25
28
Further examination of the subcategory scores can be used to help explain the results shown in Table 16. Heart City Rider/Goshen Transit, University of Iowa, and Brunswick Transit Alternative had the highest composite scores in this group. Heart City Rider performed best in terms of cost efficiency and vehicle utilization, but ranked low in terms of service consumption. University of Iowa ranked best in service supply and service consumption, but ranked lowest in terms of the operating ratios, mainly as a result of a low farebox recovery ratio, which can be expected for a university transit system that often has low or free fares (University of Iowa reported low passenger fare revenues). Brunswick Transit Alternative ranked low in terms of service supply and service consumption, but ranked very high in terms of quality of service, operating ratios, and vehicle utilization. Bay Metropolitan Transportation Authority and City of Dubuque—Key Line had the lowest composite scores in this group. Both transit agencies ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in all subcategories of measures, but ranked lowest in terms of service supply.
Southwest (SW) Region The Southwest (SW) Region includes a total of 110 transit agencies in the following states:
Arizona New Mexico California Oklahoma Colorado Texas Hawaii Utah Nevada
Using the peer selection methodology discussed previously, the transit agencies in this region were divided into five separate peer groups. Table 17, on the following page, shows the results for the SW Region Group A, which contains 9 of the largest transit agencies in the region, including Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Due to its size in comparison with the other transit agencies in this group, LACMTA is included in Table 17, but is not included in the results in Table 18 (on the following page).
29
Table 17: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group A Transit Agency Composite Score
San Francisco Municipal Railway – CA 25.00
City and County of Honolulu Dept of Transportation Services – HI 23.50
Orange County Transportation Authority – CA 23.25
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County – TX 21.50
Regional Transportation District – CO 21.50
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District – CA 21.50
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – CA 21.00
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority – CA 19.00
Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority – TX 18.75
Table 18: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group A(1)
Transit Agency Composite Score
San Francisco Municipal Railway – CA 25.50
Orange County Transportation Authority – CA 22.75
City and County of Honolulu Dept of Transportation Services – HI 22.75
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District – CA 21.75
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County – TX 21.25
Regional Transportation District – CO 21.00
Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority – TX 19.50
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority – CA 18.50
Both Table 17 and Table 18 show San Francisco Municipal Railway (which directly-operates motorbus services), to be the best performer in this group. Both tables also indicate that Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority have the overall lowest composite scores in this peer group. From closer inspection of the results in Table 17, LACMTA ranked high in the subcategories of service supply and service consumption, as well as the operating ratios. However, LACMTA ranked lower in terms of quality of service. San Francisco Municipal Railway, upon examination of the subcategory measures, ranked the best in the group in terms of service supply and service consumption, and was strong in vehicle utilization. Dallas and Santa Clara ranked in the middle to lower part of the group for most of the subcategory measures; however, Dallas ranked the best in the group in terms of the
30
operating ratios. Both Dallas and Santa Clara ranked solidly in the middle of the peer group in terms of vehicle utilization. Table 19 below presents the initial benchmarking results of the next group in this region, SW Region Group B. This group consists of 8 transit agencies from this region. Table 19: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group B
Transit Agency Composite Score
RTC of Southern Nevada – NV 25.25
San Diego Transit Corporation – CA 21.25
First Transit, Inc. (6057) – TX 20.50
VIA Metropolitan Transit – TX 20.50
Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority – TX 19.75
City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation – CA 19.25
City of Phoenix Public Transit Department – AZ 18.50
San Mateo County Transit District – CA 16.50
The scores in Table 19 show that RTC of Southern Nevada is the strongest performer in this group, while San Mateo County Transit District has the lowest overall score. Further examination of the subcategory scores shows that both RTC and San Mateo have the same scores for service supply, placing them in the middle of the group; however, RTC ranks near the top in terms of service consumption while San Mateo ranks near the bottom. Also, RTC’s high overall composite score was due, in part, to its very high score in the subcategory of vehicle utilization. RTC ranked best in the group in terms of vehicle utilization, while San Mateo ranked the lowest. The next group in this region is SW Region Group C. Results for this group are shown on the following page in Table 20. SW Region Group C includes 18 transit agencies. As shown in the table, there is more than one transit system operated by Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., and First Transit, Inc. These transit systems are differentiated by their NTD identification numbers, which are the four-digit numbers in parentheses. In addition, the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority in this peer group represents the purchased motorbus services operated for LACMTA under a separate NTD identification number. It should also be noted that the composite scores shown in Table 20 do not include the measure of revenue miles between failures, due to a lack of data on vehicle system failures for several transit agencies in this group.
31
Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. (9178), which operates in El Monte, California, ranked the best in this group. Laidlaw (9178) ranked the best in the subcategories of quality of service and the operating ratios, and was strong in the other subcategories. Another system operated by Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., (NTD #9158) which operates in Santa Ana, California, had one of the lowest scores in this group. This system ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in most subcategories but ranked the best in the group in terms of cost efficiency. Finally, Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation Authority and Fort Worth Transportation Authority had the two lowest composite scores in the group. Golden Gate did rank near the top in terms of service supply and quality of service. Fort Worth ranked in the lower part of the peer group in most of the subcategories of measures. Table 20: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group C
Transit Agency Composite Score
Laidlaw Transit Services Inc. (9178) – CA 25.25
Long Beach Public Transportation Company – CA 22.50
Santa Monica's Big Blue Bus – CA 22.25
Mass Transit Department-City of El Paso – TX 22.00
North San Diego County Transit Development Board – CA 22.00
San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board – CA 21.75
OMNITRANS – CA 21.75
First Transit, Inc. (6087) – TX 21.25
Riverside Transit Agency – CA 20.50
City of Tucson – AZ 20.50
Sun Tran of Albuquerque – AZ 19.50
First Transit, Inc. (9179) – CA 19.25
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – CA 18.50
Sacramento Regional Transit District – CA 18.25
Central Contra Costa Transit Authority – CA 18.00
Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. (9158) – CA 17.50
Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District – CA 17.25
Fort Worth Transportation Authority – TX 15.50
32
Table 21 below summarizes the results of the next group, SW Region Group D. A total of 27 transit agencies form this peer group. Composite scores in this group exclude the measure of revenue miles between failures due to a lack of NTD data on vehicle system failures from several agencies. Table 21: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group D
Transit Agency Composite Score
Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County – NV 24.25
Culver City Municipal Bus Lines – CA 24.00
City of Vallejo: Vallejo Transit Vallejo-San Francisco Ferry – CA 24.00
Laredo Metro, Inc. – TX 23.25
UNITRANS University of California, Davis – CA 22.50
Fresno Area Express – CA 22.00
Norwalk Transit System – CA 21.75
Montebello Bus Lines – CA 21.50
City of Gardena Transportation Department – CA 21.50
Golden Empire Transit District – CA 21.50
Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District – CA 21.50
Santa Clarita Transit – CA 21.50
County of San Diego Transit System – CA 20.50
City of Tempe Transportation Planning & Transit Division – AZ 20.25
South Coast Area Transit – CA 20.00
Regional Public Transportation Authority – AZ 19.75
Colorado Springs Transit System – CO 19.00
Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority – CA 18.75
Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District – CA 18.50
Monterey-Salinas Transit – CA 18.50
Sonoma County Transit – CA 18.50
Central Oklahoma Transit & Parking Authority – OK 17.75
City of Torrance Transit System – CA 17.75
Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority – OK 17.75
Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority – TX 17.25
SunLine Transit Agency – CA 17.25
San Joaquin Regional Transit District – CA 15.25
According to the results in Table 21 above, the Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County has the highest overall composite score in this peer group, while San Joaquin Regional
33
Transit District has the lowest. Closer examination of the subcategory scores provides some insight into these results. Washoe County ranks at the top of the group in terms of service supply, while San Joaquin ranks at the bottom. San Joaquin also ranks lowest in the group in terms of vehicle utilization, while Washoe County ranks best in this subcategory. Both transit agencies place in the middle of the group in terms of cost efficiency and the operating ratios. The final group in this region is SW Region Group E, which contains 48 of the smaller transit agencies in the southwest region. Table 22, on the following page, provides the initial benchmarking results of this group. It should be noted that, due to a lack of NTD data on vehicle system failures and collisions from several agencies in the group, the composite scores listed in Table 22 do not include the measures of revenue miles between failures and revenue miles between collisions. The City of Lodi, National City Transit, Beaumont Transit System, and The Logan Transit District have the best composite scores in this group. All four are strong in the subcategories of service supply and service consumption. The City of Lodi ranked best in the group in terms of vehicle utilization. National City was strong in most subcategories, but ranked low in terms of quality of service and cost efficiency. Beaumont also was strong in most subcategories, ranking third-best in vehicle utilization, but it ranked relatively low in the operating ratios. Finally, Logan’s strongest subcategory is service consumption, where it ranked second-best in the group. Santa Fe Trails, Waco Transit System, and the Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council have the lowest composite score in this group. Santa Fe ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in each subcategory, and ranked last in terms of vehicle utilization. Waco ranked in the lower part of the group in each subcategory. Lower Rio Grande also ranked in the lower part of the group in most subcategories, including having the lowest score in quality of service; however, this transit agency was relatively strong in terms of cost efficiency and the operating ratios.
34
Table 22: Initial Benchmarking Results: SW Region – Group E
Transit Agency Composite Score Transit Agency Composite
Score
City of Lodi – CA 24.00 Livermore/Amador Valley Transit Authority – CA
19.00
National City Transit – CA 23.50 Chico Area Transit System City of Chico – CA
19.00
Beaumont Transit System – TX 23.25 City of Union City Transit Division – CA 19.00
The Logan Transit District – UT 23.00 Amarillo City Transit – TX 18.75
Island Transit – TX 22.25 Pueblo Transit – CO 18.50
City of Mesa – AZ 22.00 City of Greeley-Transit Services – CO 18.25
Western Contra Costa Transit Authority – CA
21.75 Santa Maria Area Transit – CA 18.25
Victor Valley Transit Authority – CA 21.50 City of Fairfield, Fairfield/Suisun Transit – CA
18.00
City Transit Management Company, Inc. – TX
21.25 City of San Angelo – TX 18.00
Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority – CA
21.25 Yuba-Sutter Transit Authority – CA 18.00
Yolo County Transportation District – CA 21.00 City of Denton Public Transportation Department – TX
17.75
Merced County Transit – CA 21.00 Mesa County – CO 17.75
City of Santa Rosa – CA 20.75 Roseville Transit – CA 17.75
Antelope Valley Transit Authority – CA 20.50 Thousand Oaks Transit c/o City of Thousand Oaks – CA
17.75
Modesto Area Express – CA 20.25 City of Scottsdale - Scottsdale Connection – AZ
17.50
Simi Valley Transit – CA 20.25 Abilene Transit System – TX 17.50
City of Commerce Municipal Buslines – CA 20.00 Brazos Transit District – TX 17.50
Redding Area Bus Authority – CA 20.00 Hill County Transit District – TX 17.25
Transfort – CO 20.00 Port Arthur Transit – TX 17.25
City of Visalia-Visalia City Coach – CA 19.75 City of Lompoc-Lompoc Transit – CA 16.50
City of Napa Napa Valley Transit/ The V.I.N.E. – CA
19.75 City of Glendale – Transit – AZ 16.25
City of Brownsville Brownsville Urban System – TX
19.50 Santa Fe Trails - City of Santa Fe – NM 16.00
City of San Luis Obispo – CA 19.50 Waco Transit System, Inc. – TX 16.00
Las Cruces Area Transit-RoadRUNNER – NM
19.25 Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council – TX
15.75
35
Northwest (NW) Region The Northwest (NW) Region includes 24 transit agencies in the following states:
Alaska Idaho Montana Oregon Washington Wyoming
Transit agencies in this region were divided into four separate peer groups based on the peer selection process used throughout this study. The NW Region contains two transit agencies that are significantly larger in size than the other agencies in the region: King County Department of Transportation (Seattle Metro) and Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon. These two agencies are too large to compare with the other agencies in the region, and are too few to be considered one peer group. For informational purposes, Table 23 presents their composite scores when compared with the next two largest agencies in the region, Pierce County Public Benefit Authority and Snohomish County Transportation Benefit Area Corporation (NW Region Group A). King County and Tri-County are also included in the “Large” peer comparisons presented after this region’s results are discussed. The two large systems, Tri-County and King County ranked the best in terms of service supply, service consumption, and the operating ratios. However, Pierce County ranked very strong in terms of quality of service, cost efficiency, and vehicle utilization. Table 23: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group A
Transit Agency Composite Score
Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon – OR 23.25
Pierce County Public Benefit Authority – WA 22.00
King County Department of Transportation - Metro Transit Division – WA 20.75
Snohomish County Transportation Benefit Area Corporation – WA 17.25
Table 24, on the following page, presents the results of NW Region Group B, which places Pierce County and Snohomish County with this next peer group. Group B has a total of 9 transit agencies.
36
Table 24: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group B
Transit Agency Composite Score
Pierce County Public Benefit Authority – WA 24.50
Clark County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority – WA 22.75
Spokane Transit Authority – WA 22.00
Lane Transit District – OR 22.00
Municipality of Anchorage - Public Transportation Department – AK 21.75
Salem Area Mass Transit District – OR 21.25
Snohomish County Transportation Benefit Area Corporation – WA 21.00
Intercity Transit – WA 19.25
Kitsap Transit – WA 19.25
Table 24 shows that Pierce County ranks best in this group, while Snohomish County ranks lower in the group. The two lowest scores belong to Intercity Transit and Kitsap Transit. In this peer group, Pierce County ranked best in the subcategories of service supply and vehicle utilization, but ranked low in the operating ratios. Snohomish County ranked second-best in terms of quality of service, but ranked the lowest in cost efficiency. Intercity Transit ranked in the middle to lower part of the group for all subcategories except cost efficiency, where it ranked best in the group. Finally, Kitsap Transit ranked lowest in terms of service supply and vehicle utilization, but did rank best in the group in quality of service. Table 25 presents this peer group without the relatively large systems of Pierce County and Snohomish County. Now, NW Region Group B(1) contains 8 transit agencies, with the addition of Ben Franklin Transit (Ben Franklin was on the border between this group and Group C, and so was not included in Group B with the two larger agencies of Pierce and Snohomish). Table 25: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group B(1)
Transit Agency Composite Score
Clark County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority – WA 22.75
Spokane Transit Authority – WA 22.50
Lane Transit District – OR 22.25
Municipality of Anchorage - Public Transportation Department – AK 21.75
Ben Franklin Transit – WA 21.50
Kitsap Transit – WA 20.75
Salem Area Mass Transit District – OR 20.50
Intercity Transit – WA 19.00
37
The results of NW Region Group B(1), shown in Table 25 on the previous page, indicate that Clark County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority ranks the highest in this group. Intercity Transit has the lowest composite score in this peer group. Upon closer examination of the subcategory scores, it is evident that Clark County ranked near the top of the group in most of the subcategories. Intercity Transit mostly ranked near the bottom of the group, but ranked third-best in terms of cost efficiency. Both Clark County and Intercity Transit had the same score for the operating ratios, placing them in the middle of the peer group for that subcategory. The final group in the NW Region is Group C. This peer group contains 12 transit agencies, and the results are provided in Table 26. Targhee Regional Public Transit Authority operates only purchased motorbus services, and does not report failures in the NTD; as such, the composite scores in Table 26 do not include the measure of revenue miles between failures. Table 26: Initial Benchmarking Results: NW Region – Group C
Transit Agency Composite Score
Whatcom Transportation Authority – WA 24.75
Yakima Transit – WA 22.25
Community Urban Bus Service – WA 22.00
Boise Urban Stages/VIATrans – ID 21.00
Everett Transit – WA 20.25
City of Pocatello, Pocatello Regional Transit – ID 20.25
Targhee Regional Public Transit Authority – ID 20.25
Rogue Valley Transit District – OR 19.75
Missoula Urban Transportation District – MT 19.75
The City of Cheyenne Transit Program – WY 19.00
Great Falls Transit District – MT 18.50
Billings Metropolitan Transit – MT 18.25
Whatcom Transportation Authority has the highest composite score in this peer group. Whatcom ranked near the top of most subcategories, having the best score in service consumption (tied with another transit agency); however, it ranked lowest in terms of cost efficiency. Great Falls Transit District and Billings Metropolitan Transit received the lowest composite scores in this peer group. Both ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in each of the subcategories of measures.
38
Largest Transit Systems in the U.S. There are several transit agencies from each of the geographic regions analyzed thus far in the report that are significantly larger than most of the agencies in their respective regions or groups. For informational purposes, the 20 largest transit agencies from all geographic regions were placed in a peer group called simply “Large.” Transit agencies were placed in this group using the arbitrary criterion of operating more than 500 vehicles in peak service. This group of 20 agencies was then further categorized into those agencies operating greater than 1,000 peak vehicles, and less than 1,000 peak vehicles. Table 27 shows the first of these comparisons, using all 20 of the transit agencies operating more than 500 vehicles in peak service. Table 27: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group (> 500 Vehs)
Transit Agency Composite Score
Chicago Transit Authority – IL 25.50
New York City Transit – NY 24.25
Miami-Dade Transit – FL 23.50
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County – TX 22.75
Utah Transit Authority – UT 22.75
Regional Transportation District – CO 22.50
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority – GA 22.25
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – CA 21.25
Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon – OR 20.75
GTJC – NY 20.50
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District – CA 20.25
The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority – OH 20.25
New Jersey Transit Corporation (Consolidated) – NJ 19.75
King County Department of Transportation - Metro Transit Division – WA 19.75
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – MA 19.75
Pace, Suburban Bus Division – IL 19.75
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC 19.25
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority – PA 19.25
Port Authority of Allegheny County – PA 18.75
Metro Transit – MN 18.75
39
Table 27 indicates that Chicago Transit Authority and New York City Transit have the highest scores in this group, followed by Miami-Dade Transit. Port Authority of Allegheny County and Metro Transit have the lowest scores in this group. Further examination of the subcategory results shows that Chicago and New York are tied for the best score in terms of service supply, and are second-best and best, respectively, in service consumption. Both agencies rank at the top or in the upper part of the group for all the subcategories; except New York ranked lowest in terms of cost efficiency. Miami-Dade Transit ranked best in the group in terms of vehicle utilization. Port Authority and Metro Transit ranked in the middle to lower part of the group in all subcategories; Metro Transit ranked lowest in vehicle utilization. Table 28 shows the results of all transit systems that operate more than 1,000 vehicles in peak service. There are 7 transit agencies in this group. Table 28: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group (>1000 Vehs)
Transit Agency Composite Score
Chicago Transit Authority – IL 24.75
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County – TX 22.75
New York City Transit – NY 21.00
New Jersey Transit Corporation (Consolidated) – NJ 21.00
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – CA 20.00
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority – PA 19.75
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – DC 18.00
In this group of agencies that operate more than 1,000 vehicles in their peak, Chicago Transit Authority had the highest composite score, while Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) had the lowest score. Chicago tied for the best score in terms of service supply (with New York City Transit), had the highest score in vehicle utilization, and was second-best in terms of service consumption. WMATA, however, ranked mainly in the middle to lower part of the group in the subcategories, and ranked lowest in service supply. Lastly, Table 29, on the following page, illustrates the results of those transit systems in this larger group that operate less than 1,000 vehicles in the peak. A total of 13 transit agencies are placed in this group.
40
Table 29: Initial Benchmarking Results: Large Group (<1000 Vehs) Transit Agency Composite Score
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority – GA 24.00
Miami-Dade Transit – FL 24.00
GTJC – NY 22.50
Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon – OR 22.25
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority – MA 21.75
Utah Transit Authority – UT 21.00
Regional Transportation District – CO 20.75
Metro Transit – MN 20.25
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District – CA 20.00
The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority – OH 20.00
King County Department of Transportation - Metro Transit Division – WA 19.75
Pace, Suburban Bus Division – IL 19.75
Port Authority of Allegheny County – PA 18.50
The results in Table 29 above indicate that large systems from the southeast region perform the strongest in this peer group. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) and Miami-Dade Transit tied for the best score in the group. Port Authority of Allegheny County had the lowest composite score in the group. Closer analysis of the subcategory scores shows that MARTA ranked in the middle to upper part of the group in all subcategories, ranking second-best in vehicle utilization. Miami-Dade ranked second-worst in quality of service, but had the third-best score in cost efficiency and the best score in vehicle utilization. Port Authority typically ranked in the middle to lower parts of the group, having the group’s lowest score in the operating ratios. However, Port Authority did rank second-best in terms of quality of service.
41
Conclusions As the results and discussion on the previous pages illustrate, placing transit agencies into different peer groups produces varied results. It is clear that the most crucial element of a benchmarking analysis, such as the one undertaken in this study, is the categorization of transit agencies into appropriate peer groups. The intent of this study was to be a first approach to this issue using NTD data, and to address the limitations of previous efforts, as described in the review of literature. It should be noted that the peer groups presented in this report are reasonable given the NTD information used, and provide a valid analysis for 2001 data. However, the work presented in this report lays the foundation for a refinement of the peer selection process used herein. Additional research is required to incorporate other NTD and non-NTD data (such as U.S. Census or other available socio-economic data including transit-dependency, income levels, cost of living, and/or wage rates) into the process. Other factors that might be considered include the age of the transit agency, modes operated systemwide, and whether services are directly operated, contracted, or some combination of both. It may also be appropriate to form peer groups of only the smallest transit agencies in each region, such as those operating less than 10 peak vehicles, for example. This study developed benchmark rankings for fixed-route motorbus systems in the U.S. The method used in this study can also be applied to other modes such as rail and demand-response, creating additional peer groups. Future efforts may also refine the measures used in the generation of the benchmarking results. One issue that arose during the study involved the lack of NTD data on vehicle failures and collisions for some transit agencies. Without such information, some of the benchmarks do not include the quality of service measures dealing with safety (revenue miles between failures) and security (revenue miles between collisions). It should be noted that, beginning in 2002, NTD data are more complete with regard to incidents (collisions); however, vehicles system failures are still not required to be reported for purchased transportation services. This study used a relatively simple scoring method; other, more complex techniques might be explored, such as different indexes and the introduction of weighting schemes. Everything required for the benchmarking process has been prepared in Microsoft Excel. Modifications to peer groups, measures used, or the scoring method would be relatively simple to accomplish using what was developed in this study as a starting point (or template). Future benchmarking studies might also examine performance indexes based on three to five years of trend data for each transit agency, to capture major changes that can occur from year to year. The initial benchmarking results presented in this report are not intended to indicate that one particular transit agency is “better” than another. Rather, the development of peer groups and
42
a composite scoring system based on an array of standardized NTD information allows transit agencies to see where they fit into a group of similar agencies. An inspection of the tables listing benchmarking results in this report show that many transit agencies have identical composite scores within their groups; this is not unintentional, as it shows that such transit agencies are performing at about the same level, as opposed to explicitly ranking them from “best” to “worst.” These benchmarking results show how transit agencies in the U.S. perform within the peer groups as defined in this study, using measures and a scoring system developed for this project. Brief discussions of results are included, but the analysis does not go beyond what is revealed by the NTD data used in the study. While this benchmarking process is intended to be comprehensive, there is no doubt that future benchmarking efforts will benefit from additional input from the industry. Finally, it must be noted that the results of this initial benchmarking study, or any other single ranking effort, do not conclusively define the overall performance of any transit agency. As discussed earlier in this report, there are countless other factors, both exogenous and endogenous to a transit agency’s operations, that influence performance. One of the most important factors is the agency goals. Goals such as geographic coverage, service to specific areas or groups, low fares, etc., often dictate a level of performance that can be acceptable to transit agencies and their governing boards, even when that performance appears “low” by the definitions used in a study such as this one. Benchmarking studies such as this never reveal the whole picture regarding transit performance, and should always be used as only one of many tools to measure performance and target areas for improvements.
43
References American Public Transportation Association (APTA), Measuring Transit Fixed Route Performance
r f
t f r
– The T ansit Per ormance Index, October 4, 1998. Chu, Xuehao, On Ranking Transit Operators (Internal CUTR Report), December 1996. Chu, Xuehao, Gordon J. Fielding, Bruce W. Lamar, Measuring Transit Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis, 1992. CUTR, 2000 Performance Evaluation of Florida’s Transit Systems, December 2000. Hartgen, David T. and Mark W. Horner, Compara ive Performance o Major US Bus T ansit Systems: 1988-199, Transportation Publication Report Number 163, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, May 1997.
44
Appendix A – List of Definitions Average Headway - Average headway, in minutes, for the system as a whole that is computed utilizing the following performance indicators: directional route miles, revenue miles, revenue hours, and the number of vehicles operated in maximum service. The equation used to determine this measure first doubles the directional route mileage to produce an estimate of system size in terms of total (non-directional) route miles. The resulting mileage figure is then divided by the system’s calculated average speed (revenue miles per revenue hour) to produce an estimate of the time it would take, in hours, to traverse all of the system’s total route miles. Finally, this time figure is divided by the system’s number of peak vehicles (then multiplied by 60 to convert time in hours to minutes) to determine the number of minutes it takes for a vehicle to complete its portion of the total route miles one time. Average Speed - Average speed of vehicles in revenue service operation (i.e., not including travel to and from the garage or any other deadhead) calculated by dividing total revenue miles by total revenue hours.
Average Weekday Span of Service – Time, in hours, from the start of service to the end of service, for an average weekday. Directly-Generated Non-Fare Revenue - All revenues, except passenger fares, generated through the operation of the transit agency. Includes special transit fares, school bus service revenues, freight tariffs, charter service revenues, auxiliary transportation revenues, subsidy from other sectors of operations, and non-transportation revenues. Farebox Recovery - Ratio of passenger fare revenues to total operating expenses; an indicator of the share of total operating costs that is covered by the passengers’ fares. This measure is expressed as a percentage.
General/Administrative Expense - General administration is all the activities associated with supporting the provision of transit service. Usually, these activities benefit all modes and types of service and are reported using a cost allocation plan. General/Administrative Expense Per Operating Expense - Calculated by dividing general/administrative expense by operating expense; expressed as a percent of total operating expense. Local Contribution - Any financial assistance obtained from a local government or agency (below the State level) to assist in paying the operating costs of providing transit service. Local Revenue - All revenues originating at the local level (excluding state and federal assistance). This represents the sum of local contribution, directly-generated non-fare revenue, and passenger fare revenue.
A-1
Local Revenue Per Operating Expense - Ratio of total local commitment with respect to total operating expense; expressed as a percent of total operating expense. Non-Vehicle Maintenance Expense - Non-vehicle maintenance are all the activities associated with ensuring buildings, grounds and equipment (garages, passenger stations and shelters, administration buildings); fare collection equipment; and communications systems, track, structures, tunnels and power systems are operable. Non-Vehicle Maintenance Expense Per Operating Expense - Calculated by dividing non-vehicle maintenance expense by operating expense; expressed as a percent of total operating expense. Number of Collisions - Total number of unforeseen occurrences resulting in collisions (excluding suicides) with property damage in excess of $1,000 as reported in the Safety and Security NTD forms. Number of Vehicle System Failures - Total number of failures that occur during revenue service, deadheading, and layovers. A failure is classified as the breakdown of either a major or minor element of the revenue vehicle’s mechanical system. Failures are tabulated regardless of whether they result in a vehicle completing or not completing its trip. Operating Expense Per Capita - Annual operating budget divided by the service area population; a measure of the resource commitment to transit by the community. Operating Expense Per Revenue Hour - Operating expense divided by revenue hours of operation; a key comparative measure which differs from operating expense per vehicle mile in that the vehicle speed is factored out. This is often important since vehicle speed is strongly influenced by local traffic conditions. Passenger Fare Revenue - Revenue generated annually from carrying passengers in regularly scheduled service. Passenger Miles - Number of annual passenger trips multiplied by the system's average trip length (in miles). This number provides a measure of the total number of passenger miles of transportation service consumed. Passenger Trips - Annual number of unlinked passenger boardings on the transit vehicles. A trip is counted each time a passenger boards a transit vehicle. Thus, if a passenger has to transfer between buses to reach a destination, he/she is counted as making two passenger trips.
Passenger Trips Per Capita - Average number of transit boardings per person per year. This number is larger in areas where public transportation is emphasized and in areas where there are more transit dependents, and is a measure of the extent to which the public utilizes transit in a given service area.
A-2
Passenger Trips Per Revenue Hour - The ratio of passenger trips to revenue hours of operation; reports on the effectiveness of the service since hours are a better representation of the resources consumed in providing service Passenger Trips Per Revenue Mile - The ratio of passenger trips to revenue miles of service; a key indicator of service effectiveness that is influenced by the levels of demand and the supply of service provided. Peak Vehicles - Number of revenue vehicles operated to meet the annual maximum service requirement, i.e., the revenue vehicle count during the peak hours of the peak days/weeks of the peak season (typically the rush period). Vehicles operated in maximum service exclude atypical days or one-time special events. Revenue Hours - Total hours of operation by revenue service vehicles in active revenue service. Revenue Hours Per Total Vehicles - Total revenue hours of service that are provided, on average, by each vehicle available for maximum service. Revenue Miles - Number of annual miles of vehicle operation while in active service (available to pick up revenue passengers). This number is smaller than vehicle miles because of the exclusion of deadhead miles such as vehicle miles from the garage to the start of service, vehicle miles from the end of service to the garage, driver training, and other miscellaneous miles that are not considered to be in direct revenue service. Revenue Miles Between Collisions - Number of revenue miles divided by the number of collisions (excluding suicides); reports the average interval, in miles, between collisions. Revenue Miles Between Failures - Number of revenue miles divided by the number of vehicle system failures; an indicator of the average frequency of delays because of a problem with the equipment. Revenue Miles Per Peak Vehicle - Total revenue miles of service that are provided, on average, by each vehicle operated in maximum service. Revenue Miles Per Route Mile - Number of revenue miles divided by the number of directional route miles of service; an indicator of the availability of transit service. Revenue Miles Per Total Vehicles - Total revenue miles of service that are provided, on average, by each vehicle available for maximum service. Revenue Miles Per Vehicle Mile - Reflects how much of the total vehicle operation is in passenger service. Higher ratios are favorable, but garage location, training needs, and other considerations may influence the ratio.
A-3
Route Miles - Number of directional route miles as reported in NTD data; defined as the mileage that service operates in each direction over routes traveled by public transportation vehicles in revenue service. Service Area Population - This measure provides a suitable approximation of overall market size for comparison of relative spending and service levels. According to NTD definitions, it should be measured as a ¾-mile buffer around a fixed-route network; however, agencies that serve a larger area with another mode such as demand-response will report the larger figure.
Service Area Population Density – Measured as service area population per square mile of service area. Service area size, in square miles, is reported in the NTD.
Spare Ratio - Vehicles operated in maximum service subtracted from vehicles available for maximum service divided by vehicles operated in maximum service. This measure is an indicator of the number of spare vehicles available for service. A spare ratio of approximately 20 percent is considered appropriate in the industry. However, this varies depending on the size and age of fleet as well as the condition of equipment. Total Operating Expense - Reported total spending on operations, including administration, maintenance, and operation of service vehicles. Total Vehicles - Number of vehicles available for use by the transit agency to meet the annual maximum service requirement. Vehicles available for maximum service include spares, out-of-service vehicles, and vehicles in or awaiting maintenance, but exclude vehicles awaiting sale and emergency contingency vehicles.
Vehicle Hours - Total hours of operation by revenue service vehicles including hours consumed in passenger service and deadhead travel. Vehicle Hours Per Peak Vehicle - Substitutes vehicle hours for vehicle miles and again reflects how intensively equipment is utilized. Vehicle Maintenance Expense - Vehicle maintenance are all the activities associated with ensuring revenue vehicles and service vehicles are operable, cleaned, fueled, inspected and repaired. Vehicle Maintenance Expense Per Operating Expense - Calculated by dividing vehicle maintenance expense by operating expense; expressed as a percent of total operating expense. Vehicle Miles - Total distance traveled annually by revenue service vehicles, including both revenue miles and deadhead miles.
A-4
Vehicle Miles Per Peak Vehicle - Vehicle miles divided by the number of vehicles operated in maximum service. It is an indicator of how intensively the equipment is used and is influenced by the bus travel speeds as well as by the levels of service in the off-peak time periods. A more uniform demand for service over the day would result in a higher number.
A-5
Appendix B – Detailed Data Tables
B-1
B-2
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up A
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
14,6
78.9
31
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
24.0
01
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
34.4
30.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t2.
601
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it A
utho
rity
13,5
88.0
91
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity22
.00
1M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
60.1
51
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
991
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n10
,019
.19
0.75
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n21
.50
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
19.4
20.
75Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
2.38
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
19,8
04.6
51.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs14
.00
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
102.
151.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs4.
181.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
9,11
7.96
0.5
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct C
omm
issi
on o
f Ham
pton
9.
500.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
12.9
30.
75Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
1.50
0.5
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
11,7
47.2
60.
75C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it22
.83
1C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it14
.85
0.75
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
1.84
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
re
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
33.2
30.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t12
.79
0.75
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
1,54
30.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t14
.71
1M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y37
.34
1M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
12.4
90.
5M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,24
70.
75M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
15.9
81
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n32
.65
0.75
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n13
.72
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
28,3
021.
5Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
22.6
70.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs57
.75
1.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
13.8
31
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
1,69
40.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs8.
551.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
19.0
50.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
12.6
60.
75Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
4,89
70.
75Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
19.3
10.
75C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it25
.71
0.75
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
13.9
81.
5C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it16
,851
1C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it22
.26
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r R
even
ue H
our
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
$85.
220.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t$8
2.25
0.75
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
21.5
8%0.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t4.
90%
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it A
utho
rity
$130
.50
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$8
1.01
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity27
.99%
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
86%
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
$38.
111
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n$6
4.07
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
18.8
1%1
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n2.
89%
1R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs$1
74.9
60.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs$9
8.92
0.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
19.5
1%1
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
3.39
%1
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct C
omm
issi
on o
f Ham
pton
$3
5.45
1Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
$52.
241.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
17.7
1%1
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct C
omm
issi
on o
f Ham
pton
3.
71%
0.75
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
$35.
151
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
$60.
871
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
18.0
6%1
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
3.43
%1
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
11.0
4%1.
5M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t26
.82%
0.75
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
52.1
5%1
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
53,6
851
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it A
utho
rity
15.5
0%1
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity30
.26%
1M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
62.0
1%1
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity53
,137
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
12.2
0%1
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n22
.56%
0.5
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n56
.89%
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
56,3
011
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffer s
26.0
3%0.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs37
.43%
1.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
54.8
2%1
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
41,1
080.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
23.8
9%0.
75Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
28.2
9%0.
75Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
19.5
2%0.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
41,6
770.
5C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it21
.48%
0.75
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
33.9
0%1
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
40.4
3%0.
75C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it66
,294
1.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Hou
rs
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
3,94
51
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
0.86
0.5
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
34,3
930.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t2,
690
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it A
utho
rity
3,98
41
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
850.
5M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
38,2
891
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
065
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
3,94
61
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n0.
921
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n40
,382
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
2,94
31
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffer s
3,33
80.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs0.
951.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs30
,911
0.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
2,23
50.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
3,09
60.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
0.89
0.75
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct C
omm
issi
on o
f Ham
pton
35
,141
0.75
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct C
omm
issi
on o
f Ham
pton
2,
775
0.75
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
4,65
41.
5C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it0.
921
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
49,4
741.
5C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it3,
539
1.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
46,0
250.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t33
.82%
1.5
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
23.2
5M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y45
,210
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.08%
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffer s
21.5
0Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
51,9
431
Brow
ard
Cou
nty
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Div
isio
n28
.63%
1Br
owar
d C
ount
y M
ass
Tran
sit D
ivis
ion
20.5
0R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Orle
ans
and
Jeffe
rs39
,024
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of O
rlean
s an
d Je
ffers
26.2
5%1
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
19.2
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
37,1
490.
5Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
Com
mis
sion
of H
ampt
on
5.71
%0.
5M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.2
5C
entra
l Flo
rida
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it60
,931
1.5
Cen
tral F
lorid
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
23.1
6%1
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct C
omm
issi
on o
f Ham
pton
15
.50
B-3
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up B
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
4,38
8.43
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
21.0
01
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
21.4
11.
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Riv
er C
ity2.
121
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
6,85
0.73
0.75
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
22.1
41.
5Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity9.
600.
75Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
1.07
0.75
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
10,3
39.9
41
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
19.8
31
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
27.2
71.
5C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
781
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4,22
6.87
0.75
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.1
70.
75Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity10
.58
0.75
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.30
0.75
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
7,46
2.44
0.75
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
20.6
71
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
6.58
0.75
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
1.20
0.75
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.5,
174.
990.
75Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
17.0
00.
75Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
6.64
0.75
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.0.
980.
75M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
7,70
9.54
0.75
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.17
1M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
15.0
11
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
611
Hills
boro
ugh
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
6,68
5.23
0.75
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.67
1H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
17.3
61
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
480.
75G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny9,
688.
001
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
20.3
31
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
25.6
61.
5G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny3.
532
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4,31
1.13
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.9
21
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
12.2
10.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
701
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny12
,021
.61
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
19.3
31
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny0.
790.
5C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
2.49
1.5
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
12,6
74.8
41
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
18.9
21
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
14.6
71
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
2.09
1Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
853.
090.
5Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y15
.00
0.5
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4.09
0.5
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.44
0.75
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
5,89
1.04
0.75
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
12.5
00.
5Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t19
.33
1Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t1.
801
City
of K
ings
port
23,5
25.5
42
City
of K
ings
port
10.5
81
City
of K
ings
port
6.47
0.75
City
of K
ings
port
0.45
0.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Ken
tuck
y7,
798.
650.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
21.0
81
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Ken
tuck
y18
.78
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n Ke
ntuc
ky1.
300.
75Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t6,
603.
590.
75Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t16
.50
0.75
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
5.26
0.75
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.82
0.75
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
4,40
5.80
0.75
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
19.0
01
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
0.71
0.5
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
0.43
0.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
26.9
71
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
12.7
40.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Riv
er C
ity2,
283
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
190,
787
0.75
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
14.7
30.
75Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity13
.78
0.75
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
6,12
40.
75Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
115,
314
0.75
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
25.4
71
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
14.3
40.
75C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
269
0.75
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
144,
617
0.75
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.0
70.
75Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity14
.64
0.75
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
20,9
251.
5Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
9,96
30.
75Fa
irfax
Con
nect
or B
us S
yste
m18
.71
0.75
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
15.6
11
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
11,4
781
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
64,5
080.
75Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
16.2
70.
75Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
16.5
21
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.21
,886
1.5
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.24
0,74
11
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y25
.29
1M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
15.6
61
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
546
0.75
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y28
7,26
41
Hills
boro
ugh
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.7
20.
75H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
12.6
20.
75H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3,98
30.
75H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
182,
878
0.75
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
41.1
82
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
11.6
70.
5G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny2,
018
0.75
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
130,
025
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
23.7
51
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.9
50.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
272
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
342,
735
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
26.1
81
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny10
.52
0.5
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny4,
021
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny88
,459
0.75
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
33.7
31.
5C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n16
.13
1C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n12
,732
1C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n12
9,28
30.
75Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.66
0.75
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
12.9
50.
75Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
261
0.75
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
123,
120
0.75
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
26.4
31
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
14.7
21
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
3,90
40.
75Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t79
,647
0.75
City
of K
ings
port
6.50
0.5
City
of K
ings
port
14.3
40.
75C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt38
,229
2C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt15
2,91
60.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
19.9
30.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
15.3
71
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Ken
tuck
y4,
000
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Kent
ucky
475,
941
1.5
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
13.1
90.
75Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t16
.04
1Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t4,
630
0.75
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
216,
903
0.75
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
9.78
0.5
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
22.6
32
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
8,15
70.
75R
esea
rch
Tria
ngle
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tio82
3,88
42
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
39.3
90.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Riv
er C
ity$5
3.59
0.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
$67.
520.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Riv
er C
ity21
.34%
0.75
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
32.8
60.
75Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$3
8.85
0.75
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$59.
581
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y18
.64%
1C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m16
.48
1C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m$6
6.93
0.5
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$62.
520.
75C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m17
.98%
1Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity57
.19
0Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$3
2.39
1Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
8.38
1Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity14
.52%
1.5
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
20.2
01
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
$21.
291
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
$60.
591
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
21.2
2%0.
75Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
37.3
70.
75Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
$31.
041
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.$7
6.11
0.5
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.23
.12%
0.75
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.02
1M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$44.
000.
75M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$74.
120.
5M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
20.3
0%0.
75H
illsbo
roug
h Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity27
.37
0.75
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
5.05
0.5
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
9.35
1H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
20.2
0%0.
75G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny17
.12
1G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny$4
1.28
0.75
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
$66.
240.
75G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny18
.29%
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity37
.65
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$36.
980.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$7
1.90
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
26.8
3%0.
5C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
15.7
31
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny$1
.60
1.5
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny$5
3.24
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
24.5
0%0.
5C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n13
.89
1.5
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
$23.
741
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
$54.
571
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
21.5
9%0.
75Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y41
.09
0.5
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$19.
151
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$87.
460
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
14.0
5%1.
5Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t22
.97
1Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$3
5.91
0.75
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
$49.
091
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
9.64
%2
City
of K
ings
port
6.80
1.5
City
of K
ings
port
$27.
121
City
of K
ings
port
$27.
232
City
of K
ings
port
15.3
0%1
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Ken
tuck
y17
.75
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
$51.
640.
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
$54.
801
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Kent
ucky
18.7
2%1
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
37.1
50.
75Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t$1
8.17
1Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t$4
5.56
1.5
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
16.1
3%1
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
30.9
90.
75R
esea
rch
Tria
ngle
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tio$4
.77
1.5
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
$65.
700.
75R
esea
rch
Tria
ngle
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tio25
.77%
0.5
B-4
In
itial
Ben
chm
arki
ng R
esul
ts:
SE
Reg
ion
-- G
roup
B
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
1.77
%1
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
19.0
4%0.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Riv
er C
ity13
.26%
0.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
67.8
6%1
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1.51
%1
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
20.1
1%0.
75Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity28
.39%
1Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
54.1
1%1
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
1.15
%1
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
24.7
0%0.
5C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m20
.17%
0.75
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
71.5
5%1.
5Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity5.
31%
0.5
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
20.5
4%0.
75Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity25
.17%
1Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity49
.25%
1Fa
irfax
Con
nect
or B
us S
yste
m1.
14%
1Fa
irfax
Con
nect
or B
us S
yste
m19
.72%
0.75
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
22.4
2%1
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
72.6
9%1.
5Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
0.91
%1
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.14
.62%
1Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
15.2
8%0.
5Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
53.5
8%1
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y4.
77%
0.5
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y16
.88%
1M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
24.9
0%1
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y43
.59%
0.75
Hills
boro
ugh
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4.44
%0.
5H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.9
4%1
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.39%
0.75
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity61
.04%
1G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny4.
08%
0.5
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
25.0
2%0.
5G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny32
.65%
1.5
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
29.4
1%0.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3.
47%
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
11.0
0%1.
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity25
.90%
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity32
.76%
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny1.
40%
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
12.4
5%1
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny29
.56%
1.5
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny1.
17%
1C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n2.
43%
0.75
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
19.5
9%0.
75C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n32
.44%
1.5
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
15.5
3%0.
5Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2.
43%
0.75
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
23.9
7%0.
5Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.25%
0.75
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
63.1
3%1
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
1.45
%1
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
27.6
0%0.
5Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t22
.87%
1Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t18
.67%
0.5
City
of K
ings
port
0.00
%1.
5C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt8.
51%
1.5
City
of K
ings
port
10.2
9%0.
5C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt20
.33%
0.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Ken
tuck
y1.
77%
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
16.9
3%1
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Ken
tuck
y21
.85%
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Kent
ucky
69.9
7%1.
5Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t2.
80%
0.75
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
17.5
0%1
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
16.6
9%0.
75Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t33
.45%
0.75
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtati o
1.31
%1
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
9.63
%1.
5R
esea
rch
Tria
ngle
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tio16
.96%
0.75
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
64.9
6%1
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
40,2
170.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Riv
er C
ity3,
063
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
0.91
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Riv
er C
ity28
,476
0.75
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
59,9
001.
5Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
953
1.5
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.86
0.75
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y42
,109
1C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m43
,356
0.75
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3,00
50.
75C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
941
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
34,9
491
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
65,0
541.
5Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity4,
265
1.5
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.91
1Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity42
,096
1Fa
irfax
Con
nect
or B
us S
yste
m50
,373
1Fa
irfax
Con
nect
or B
us S
yste
m3,
031
0.75
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
0.78
1Fa
irfax
Con
nect
or B
us S
yste
m29
,121
0.75
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.59
,103
1.5
Palm
Tra
n, In
c.3,
745
1Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
0.90
1Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
46,2
961.
5M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
47,3
121
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
958
0.75
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
850.
75M
emph
is A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
29,8
960.
75H
illsbo
roug
h Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity43
,990
0.75
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
289
1H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.88
0.75
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity31
,805
0.75
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
35,3
600.
5G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny3,
028
0.75
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
0.91
1G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny22
,118
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
43,0
360.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
952
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.88
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
28,7
610.
75C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
35,5
940.
75C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
3,35
01
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny0.
931
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny21
,663
0.5
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
49,0
201
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
3,06
30.
75C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n0.
971.
5C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n41
,498
1Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y28
,827
0.5
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,17
00.
5Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
880.
75Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y24
,300
0.5
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
33,4
720.
5Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t2,
303
0.5
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
0.99
1.5
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
33,1
860.
75C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt38
,229
0.75
City
of K
ings
port
2,66
60.
75C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt1.
001.
5C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt38
,229
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
43,5
410.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
2,63
20.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
0.81
0.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Kent
ucky
27,9
970.
75Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t70
,167
1.5
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
4,36
62
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.93
1Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t48
,616
1.5
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtati o
59,4
781.
5R
esea
rch
Tria
ngle
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tio2,
717
0.75
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
0.87
0.75
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
41,1
941
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
2,23
60.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Riv
er C
ity36
,690
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
28.8
5%1
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
24.2
5Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
056
1.5
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
51,6
921
Jack
sonv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
22.7
6%0.
75C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt24
.00
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2,43
81
Cha
rlotte
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
40,7
170.
75C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m16
.50%
0.75
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
23.0
0Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
874
1.5
Pine
llas
Sunc
oast
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
59,0
031.
5Pi
nella
s Su
ncoa
st T
rans
it Au
thor
ity40
.16%
1.5
Cap
ital T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
23.0
0Fa
irfax
Con
nect
or B
us S
yste
m1,
866
0.5
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
39,2
010.
75Fa
irfax
Con
nect
or B
us S
yste
m34
.62%
1Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
22.5
0Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
2,80
21.
5Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
53,2
611.
5Pa
lm T
ran,
Inc.
15.0
4%0.
75R
esea
rch
Tria
ngle
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tio22
.25
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
909
0.75
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y40
,287
0.75
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y34
.76%
1Ja
ckso
nville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
22.0
0H
illsbo
roug
h Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
519
1H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
38,5
010.
75H
illsbo
roug
h A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.0
5%0.
75G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny22
.00
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
1,89
50.
75G
reat
er R
ichm
ond
Tran
sit C
ompa
ny32
,262
0.75
Gre
ater
Ric
hmon
d Tr
ansi
t Com
pany
45.8
6%1.
5C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria, A
lexa
ndria
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
21.7
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
062
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
37,7
320.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity31
.19%
1C
harlo
tte A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m20
.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny2,
059
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny33
,172
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
, Ale
xand
ria T
rans
it C
ompa
ny53
.13%
1.5
Fairf
ax C
onne
ctor
Bus
Sys
tem
20.5
0C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n2,
573
1C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n47
,343
1C
apita
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n14
.08%
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of N
orth
ern
Kent
ucky
20.2
5Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
877
0.5
Birm
ingh
am-J
effe
rson
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
25,2
990.
5Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y4.
11%
0.5
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
19.7
5Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t2,
255
0.75
Pete
rsbu
rg A
rea
Tran
sit
33,1
860.
75Pe
ters
burg
Are
a Tr
ansi
t0.
00%
0.5
Mem
phis
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.50
City
of K
ings
port
2,66
61
City
of K
ings
port
38,2
290.
75C
ity o
f Kin
gspo
rt0.
00%
0.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of R
iver
City
19.2
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
1,82
20.
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
35,4
420.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Nor
ther
n K
entu
cky
26.6
0%1
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.2
5Le
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t3,
031
1.5
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
65,5
752
Lee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
34.8
8%1
Hills
boro
ugh
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.50
Res
earc
h Tr
iang
le R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtati o
1,82
00.
5R
esea
rch
Tria
ngle
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tio51
,493
1R
esea
rch
Tria
ngle
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tio25
.00%
1Bi
rmin
gham
-Jef
fers
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y15
.00
B-5
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
5,70
6.60
0.75
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
14.5
80.
75Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em9.
110.
75Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
460.
75Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t5,
200.
820.
75Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t15
.50
0.75
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
11.0
90.
75Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t1.
951
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
5,77
9.01
0.75
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
19.6
71.
5C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t11
.63
0.75
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
1.85
1C
entra
l Ark
ansa
s Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y8,
809.
571
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.0
01
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
20.5
41
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.41
0.75
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t9,
907.
771.
5C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
19.0
81
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t50
.34
2C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
2.23
1.5
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta7,
499.
871
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta8.
001
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta11
.63
0.75
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta2.
081
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y10
,688
.46
1.5
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.50
1C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
16.6
81
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
440.
75C
hatta
noog
a Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut h
9,04
8.02
1.5
Cha
ttano
oga
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
th19
.42
1C
hatta
noog
a A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
th11
.55
0.75
Cha
ttano
oga
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
1.17
0.75
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN8,
106.
731
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN16
.67
1C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
25.6
11
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN2.
411.
5C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it4,
684.
550.
75C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it19
.25
1C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it10
.17
0.75
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
1.40
0.75
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN3,
692.
000.
5C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
12.0
00.
5C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
8.61
0.75
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN1.
540.
75D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
7,86
1.64
1D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.0
01
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y21
.43
1D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.91
1Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
4,93
9.28
0.75
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it13
.75
0.75
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it5.
740.
75Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
1.07
0.75
Gai
nesv
ille R
egio
nal T
rans
it Sy
stem
9,65
8.58
1.5
Gai
nesv
ille R
egio
nal T
rans
it S
yste
m15
.00
0.75
Gai
nesv
ille R
egio
nal T
rans
it S
yste
m45
.02
2G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3.21
2G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny6,
075.
210.
75G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny14
.50
0.75
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
20.5
01
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
1.63
1G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y3,
964.
680.
5G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y14
.00
0.75
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
9.58
0.75
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.79
1Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
8,56
3.67
1Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
19.5
01
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t8.
350.
75Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
1.63
1Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
o r4,
969.
400.
75Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or20
.58
1.5
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
8.97
0.75
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
0.82
0.5
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity7,
001.
801
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.00
1Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
11.9
10.
75Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.80
0.5
Met
ro T
rans
it5,
437.
380.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
13.5
00.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
5.03
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it0.
930.
5Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o5,
084.
440.
75Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o16
.85
1Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o3.
900.
75Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o0.
670.
5Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
4,02
8.06
0.5
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity15
.42
0.75
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity5.
780.
75Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
1.05
0.75
Shre
vepo
rt A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m6,
594.
220.
75Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em15
.08
0.75
Shre
vepo
rt Ar
ea T
rans
it S
yste
m13
.74
0.75
Shre
vepo
rt Ar
ea T
rans
it S
yste
m1.
711
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b9,
195.
421.
5So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
19.0
01
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b12
.83
0.75
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b1.
370.
75Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
1,05
9.95
1Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
13.0
00.
5Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
0.69
0.5
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t0.
480.
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
9,31
6.05
1.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n19
.33
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
16.0
91
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n2.
061
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-A
id o
f F7,
934.
511
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F18
.00
1W
inst
on-S
alem
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
- Tr
ans-
Aid
of F
16.5
11
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F1.
981
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
re
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
19.1
90.
75Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em13
.17
0.75
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
79,2
270.
75Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em47
.43
0.75
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
23.8
81
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
12.2
20.
75Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t13
4,80
50.
75Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t35
.36
0.75
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
24.5
01
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
13.2
60.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t12
5,90
00.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t30
.01
1C
entra
l Ark
ansa
s Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.10
0.75
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
14.3
01
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
265,
168
0.75
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
25.7
71
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t31
.58
1.5
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t14
.18
0.75
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t94
,832
0.75
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t11
.34
1.5
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta30
.47
1.5
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta14
.62
1C
harle
ston
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
104,
748
0.75
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta27
.99
1C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.6
30.
75C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
13.5
90.
75C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
241,
559
0.75
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y22
.17
1C
hatta
noog
a Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut h
16.6
50.
75C
hatta
noog
a Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
14.1
70.
75C
hatta
noog
a A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
th44
1,09
11
Cha
ttano
oga
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
16.1
91
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN28
.37
1.5
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN11
.75
0.5
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN74
,066
0.75
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN21
.38
1C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it23
.19
1C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it16
.53
1.5
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
154,
590
0.75
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
35.3
90.
75C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
22.2
51
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN14
.45
1C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
495,
910
1C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
58.0
90.
5D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
25.6
11
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y13
.43
0.75
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y16
7,71
50.
75D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
34.6
50.
75Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
14.9
50.
75Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
14.0
00.
75Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
1,40
6,70
62
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it32
.12
1G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Syst
em39
.11
2G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
12.1
70.
5G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
490,
173
1G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
13.9
01
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
19.8
10.
75G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny12
.15
0.5
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
402,
584
1G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny31
.66
1G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.49
0.75
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
11.4
70.
5G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y49
,577
0.75
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
59.7
00.
5Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
25.6
41
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t15
.72
1Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
38,2
710.
75Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
20.1
91
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
tho r
14.0
50.
5Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or17
.14
1.5
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
194,
762
0.75
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
38.7
70.
75Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
10.9
00.
5Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
13.6
10.
75Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1,30
0,93
52
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity24
.09
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
13.3
10.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
14.2
51
Met
ro T
rans
it18
3,16
20.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
39.7
10.
75Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o12
.72
0.5
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
18.9
22
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
210,
157
0.75
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
18.1
51
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity15
.83
0.75
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity15
.01
1Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
317,
733
1Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
54.3
50.
75Sh
reve
port
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
25.6
11
Shre
vepo
rt Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.0
01
Shre
vepo
rt Ar
ea T
rans
it S
yste
m14
7,42
80.
75Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
33.8
51
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b18
.59
0.75
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b13
.56
0.75
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b34
3,35
71
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b24
.30
1Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
9.44
0.5
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t19
.72
2Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
234,
603
0.75
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t11
8.87
0Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
26.1
41
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n12
.71
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n67
,001
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n21
.22
1W
inst
on-S
alem
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
- Tr
ans-
Aid
of F
24.8
11
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F12
.51
0.75
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F91
,013
0.75
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F25
.27
1
B-6
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r R
even
ue H
our
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
$18.
431
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
$38.
811.
5Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.99%
1Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em4.
28%
0.5
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
$22.
301
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
$48.
031
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
20.7
0%0.
75Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t4.
22%
0.5
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
$29.
071
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
$61.
250.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t20
.46%
0.75
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
1.41
%1
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$47.
120.
75C
entra
l Ark
ansa
s Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$4
6.11
1C
entra
l Ark
ansa
s Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.91%
0.75
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.09
%1.
5C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
$106
.30
0C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
$66.
690.
5C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
12.7
8%1.
5C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
0.69
%1
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta$2
2.58
1C
harle
ston
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
$59.
130.
75C
harle
ston
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
31.7
6%0
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta0.
62%
1.5
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$4
5.24
0.75
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$5
3.26
1C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
21.8
4%0.
75C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.46
%1.
5C
hatta
noog
a Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut h
$46.
750.
75C
hatta
noog
a Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
$67.
360.
5C
hatta
noog
a A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
th22
.98%
0.75
Cha
ttano
oga
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
1.98
%1
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN$5
4.02
0.5
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN$5
9.86
0.75
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN21
.42%
0.75
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN1.
96%
1C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it$2
5.88
1C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it$5
9.03
0.75
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
18.0
0%1
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
2.00
%1
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN$1
8.38
1C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
$47.
501
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN22
.68%
0.75
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN2.
63%
0.75
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$4
1.87
0.75
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$5
0.03
1D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
14.7
9%1.
5D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.33
%1
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it$1
9.96
1Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
$51.
981
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it21
.04%
0.75
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it4.
21%
0.5
Gai
nesv
ille R
egio
nal T
rans
it Sy
stem
$60.
420.
5G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
$52.
491
Gai
nesv
ille R
egio
nal T
rans
it S
yste
m16
.73%
1G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1.28
%1
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
$43.
740.
75G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny$4
2.26
1.5
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
17.0
2%1
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
4.08
%0.
5G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$2
9.72
1G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$6
3.54
0.75
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
8.17
%2
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.01
%1
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t$2
3.01
1Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
$70.
640.
5Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
14.5
6%1.
5Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
4.38
%0.
5Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
o r$3
0.61
1Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or$4
7.96
1Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or24
.51%
0.75
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
3.46
%0.
5Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$49.
120.
75Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$44.
931
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity17
.89%
1K
noxv
ille T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1.43
%1
Met
ro T
rans
it$1
6.31
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
$43.
141
Met
ro T
rans
it20
.20%
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it1.
15%
1Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o$2
7.91
1Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o$9
1.08
0Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o24
.12%
0.75
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
3.56
%0.
5Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
$17.
401
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$4
7.69
1Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
21.6
1%0.
75Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
0.91
%1
Shre
vepo
rt A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m$2
7.03
1Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$5
0.39
1Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
22.3
2%0.
75Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
2.97
%0.
75So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
$26.
231
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b$3
8.01
1.5
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b16
.00%
1So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
1.00
%1
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$4
.09
1.5
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$5
6.22
0.75
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t28
.13%
0.5
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t1.
00%
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
$28.
441
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n$4
6.21
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
21.1
2%0.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
1.47
%1
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-A
id o
f F$3
5.35
0.75
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F$5
3.11
1W
inst
on-S
alem
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
- Tr
ans-
Aid
of F
14.0
4%1.
5W
inst
on-S
alem
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
- Tr
ans-
Aid
of F
1.39
%1
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
13.6
1%1.
5Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em20
.10%
0.75
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
66.5
7%1.
5Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em60
,118
1.5
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
18.3
2%1
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
23.4
5%1
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
47.5
6%1
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
41,0
380.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t18
.24%
1C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t22
.03%
0.75
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
48.2
1%1
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
40,5
250.
75C
entra
l Ark
ansa
s Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.97%
0.75
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.1
7%0.
75C
entra
l Ark
ansa
s Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y65
.50%
1.5
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
58,0
531.
5C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
16.0
8%1
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t24
.31%
1C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
23.1
1%0.
75C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
27,2
611
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta13
.70%
1.5
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta18
.44%
0.75
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta0.
00%
1C
harle
ston
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
51,1
561
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.34%
0.75
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y31
.46%
1.5
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y51
.30%
1C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
55,2
651
Cha
ttano
oga
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
t h19
.30%
0.75
Cha
ttano
oga
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
th30
.36%
1C
hatta
noog
a A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
th29
.17%
0.75
Cha
ttano
oga
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
38,5
230.
75C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
23.3
6%0.
75C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
29.3
5%1
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN49
.41%
1C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
36,0
870.
5C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it33
.50%
0C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it26
.12%
1C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it44
.74%
1C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it50
,110
1C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
12.6
1%1.
5C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
13.6
7%0.
5C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
43.6
0%1
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN55
,425
1D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
15.2
6%1
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y23
.67%
1D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
41.9
9%1
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y63
,845
1.5
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it21
.17%
0.75
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it15
.25%
0.75
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it39
.81%
0.75
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it37
,447
0.5
Gai
nesv
ille R
egio
nal T
rans
it Sy
stem
23.8
0%0.
75G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
8.66
%0.
5G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
63.9
9%1.
5G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
29,5
830.
5G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny21
.67%
0.75
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
29.7
1%1
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
12.0
5%0.
5G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny41
,925
0.75
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
18.0
4%1
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
11.4
2%0.
5G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y39
.24%
0.75
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
45,7
390.
75Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
26.8
8%0.
5Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
43.7
3%2
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t38
.38%
0.75
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t49
,466
1Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or15
.37%
1Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or16
.56%
0.75
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
66.3
3%1.
5Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or56
,289
1Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
18.3
2%1
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity15
.13%
0.75
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity45
.69%
1Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
40,9
530.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
19.2
0%0.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
21.3
6%0.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
63.0
0%1.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
55,1
631
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
26.0
2%0.
5Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o31
.16%
1.5
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
32.3
3%0.
75Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o40
,950
0.75
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity14
.03%
1Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
9.62
%0.
5Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
49.0
4%1
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity58
,935
1.5
Shre
vepo
rt A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m10
.85%
1.5
Shre
vepo
rt Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
25.7
6%1
Shre
vepo
rt Ar
ea T
rans
it S
yste
m47
.56%
1Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
57,1
831.
5So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
13.0
0%1.
5So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
22.6
7%0.
75So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
0.00
%1
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b50
,833
1Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
19.4
0%0.
75Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
34.5
0%1.
5Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
14.8
1%0.
5Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
44,5
510.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
14.3
1%1
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n22
.48%
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n50
.32%
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
43,8
360.
75W
inst
on-S
alem
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
- Tr
ans-
Aid
of F
22.6
9%0.
75W
inst
on-S
alem
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
- Tr
ans-
Aid
of F
27.7
5%1
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F21
.65%
0.5
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F43
,352
0.75
B-7
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Hou
rs
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
4,98
92
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.99
1Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em29
,710
0.75
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
2,25
50.
75Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t3,
113
0.75
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
0.91
0.75
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
24,9
640.
5Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t2,
043
0.75
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
3,06
80.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t0.
951
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
26,3
070.
5C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t1,
984
0.75
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3,99
11
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.93
0.75
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
40,7
951
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,85
21
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t1,
973
0.5
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t0.
971
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t23
,292
0.5
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t1,
643
0.5
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta3,
498
1C
harle
ston
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
1.00
1.5
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta45
,827
1.5
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta3,
134
1.5
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y4,
046
1C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.97
1C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
39,6
001
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
913
1C
hatta
noog
a Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut h
3,01
10.
75C
hatta
noog
a Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
0.90
0.75
Cha
ttano
oga
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
26,7
330.
5C
hatta
noog
a A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
th1,
886
0.5
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN3,
027
0.75
City
of T
alla
hass
ee-T
ALTR
AN0.
940.
75C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
28,0
940.
75C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
2,39
10.
75C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it3,
038
0.75
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
0.91
0.75
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
37,9
181
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
2,29
40.
75C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
3,74
51
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN0.
930.
75C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
42,0
261
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN2,
908
1D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4,65
61.
5D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.96
1D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
46,8
041.
5D
urha
m A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3,48
41.
5Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
2,67
40.
75Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
0.99
1Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
37,0
191
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it2,
644
1G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Syst
em2,
369
0.5
Gai
nesv
ille R
egio
nal T
rans
it S
yste
m0.
920.
75G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
23,9
110.
5G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1,96
50.
75G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny3,
361
1G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny0.
930.
75G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny31
,783
0.75
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
2,61
51
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4,03
11
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.99
1G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y35
,901
1G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y3,
129
1.5
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t3,
144
0.75
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t0.
920.
75Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
38,2
711
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t2,
434
0.75
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
tho r
3,31
10.
75Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or0.
981
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
46,0
351.
5Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or2,
686
1Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,99
20.
75Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.93
0.75
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity29
,567
0.75
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
172
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it3,
795
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
0.93
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it40
,067
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
2,81
21
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
1,89
40.
5Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o0.
711
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
24,2
490.
5Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o1,
282
1Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
3,92
41
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
930.
75Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
32,4
220.
75Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
2,15
90.
75Sh
reve
port
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3,91
41
Shre
vepo
rt Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.98
1Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
45,8
661.
5Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3,05
91.
5So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
3,76
41
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b0.
991
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b40
,876
1So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
3,01
41.
5Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
2,25
20.
5Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
0.93
0.75
Spa
ce C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t33
,515
0.75
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t1,
700
0.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n3,
380
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
0.96
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
36,4
141
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
Lexi
ngto
n- F
ayet
te U
rban
Cou
n2,
865
1W
inst
on-S
alem
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
- Tr
ans-
Aid
of F
3,44
71
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F0.
961
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F28
,652
0.75
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F2,
290
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
59,4
201.
5Al
bany
Tra
nsit
Syst
em10
0.00
%2
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y24
.00
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
37,4
460.
75Au
gust
a R
ichm
ond
Co.
Tra
nsit
Dep
t50
.00%
1.5
Alba
ny T
rans
it Sy
stem
23.2
5C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t38
,317
0.75
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
sit
45.6
5%1
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta22
.75
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
54,1
161
Cen
tral A
rkan
sas
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
32.6
5%1
Shre
vepo
rt Ar
ea T
rans
it S
yste
m22
.75
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t26
,553
0.5
Cha
pel H
ill Tr
ansi
t14
.00%
0.75
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b22
.50
Cha
rlest
on A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rta51
,156
1C
harle
ston
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
11.6
3%0.
75C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
21.7
5C
hath
am A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
53,6
801
Cha
tham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y35
.56%
1C
entra
l Ark
ansa
s Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y21
.50
Cha
ttano
oga
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
t h34
,595
0.5
Cha
ttano
oga
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
th29
.41%
1G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
21.2
5C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
33,9
470.
5C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
20.8
3%0.
75C
hape
l Hill
Tran
sit
21.0
0C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it45
,674
1C
obb
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it20
.45%
0.75
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
tho r
21.0
0C
ount
y of
Vol
usia
dba
: VO
TRAN
51,6
571
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN22
.92%
0.75
Sara
sota
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity20
.75
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y60
,987
1.5
Dur
ham
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y30
.30%
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
20.7
5Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
37,0
190.
75Es
cam
bia
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
0.00
%0.
5Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
20.2
5G
aine
sville
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Syst
em27
,232
0.5
Gai
nesv
ille R
egio
nal T
rans
it S
yste
m13
.89%
0.75
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F20
.00
Gre
ater
Roa
noke
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
38,9
600.
75G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny22
.58%
0.75
Gre
ensb
oro
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.5
0G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y45
,266
1G
reen
sbor
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y26
.09%
0.75
Knox
ville
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.50
Jeffe
rson
Par
ish
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nsit
Adm
inis
t45
,300
1Je
ffers
on P
aris
h D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
it Ad
min
ist
18.3
7%0.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansi
t19
.25
Kana
wha
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
55,0
421.
5Ka
naw
ha V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or19
.57%
0.75
Cob
b C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit
19.0
0Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
38,2
630.
75Kn
oxvi
lle T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
29.4
1%1
Cou
nty
of V
olus
ia d
ba: V
OTR
AN19
.00
Met
ro T
rans
it51
,285
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
28.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Tal
laha
ssee
-TAL
TRAN
18.7
5Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o29
,099
0.5
Poto
mac
and
Rap
paha
nnoc
k Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Co
20.0
0%0.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
18.7
5Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
54,7
821.
5Sa
raso
ta C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
68.9
7%2
Augu
sta
Ric
hmon
d C
o. T
rans
it D
ept
18.5
0Sh
reve
port
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
55,7
841.
5Sh
reve
port
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em21
.62%
0.75
Esca
mbi
a C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it18
.50
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Elec
tric
& G
as C
ompa
ny-C
olum
b50
,494
1So
uth
Car
olin
a El
ectri
c &
Gas
Com
pany
-Col
umb
23.5
3%0.
75G
reat
er R
oano
ke T
rans
it C
ompa
ny18
.50
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t41
,400
0.75
Spac
e C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t23
.53%
0.75
Cha
ttano
oga
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut h
17.7
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
41,8
760.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y Le
ton-
Fay
ette
Urb
an C
oun
15.0
0%0.
75Po
tom
ac a
nd R
appa
hann
ock
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
o17
.25
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-A
id o
f F41
,817
0.75
Win
ston
-Sal
em T
rans
it Au
thor
ity -
Tran
s-Ai
d of
F45
.95%
1Sp
ace
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
17.0
0
B-8
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4,73
6.83
1As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.50
0.75
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.4
81.
5As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
911
Athe
ns T
rans
it S
yste
m3,
879.
210.
75At
hens
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
13.2
50.
75At
hens
Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.40
1At
hens
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2.
681.
5Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T1,
487.
550.
75Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T12
.50
0.75
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
0.61
0.75
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
0.43
0.75
Cha
rlotte
sville
Tra
nsit
Serv
ice
9,40
7.18
1.5
Cha
rlotte
sville
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
17.7
51.
5C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce16
.39
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce1.
231
City
of A
lexa
ndria
3,06
2.30
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
13.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria8.
891
City
of A
lexa
ndria
1.95
1C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2,92
5.29
0.75
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m11
.83
0.75
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m4.
040.
75C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.76
0.75
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
19,0
51.4
22
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
18.5
81.
5C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E Bu
s48
.53
2C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E Bu
s1.
961
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P3,
977.
160.
75C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
13.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
1.53
0.75
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P0.
480.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nsit
Syst
em3,
600.
670.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nsit
Syst
em13
.67
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
4.17
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.87
0.75
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n7,
188.
761.
5C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
16.5
01
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n11
.16
1C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
1.60
1C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m4,
221.
011
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.4
50.
75C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m12
.37
1C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
050.
75C
ity o
f Rom
e Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent
1,42
2.05
0.75
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t12
.00
0.75
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t29
.50
2C
ity o
f Rom
e Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent
2.02
1C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em3,
570.
970.
75C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.58
1C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em5.
080.
75C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
0.88
0.75
CR
PTA
- W
acca
maw
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
3,81
2.79
0.75
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A21
.50
2C
RPT
A - W
acca
maw
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
12.2
51
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A0.
680.
75D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
5,33
4.80
1D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
16.0
01
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A3.
930.
75D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
0.90
0.75
Faye
ttevi
lle A
rea
Syst
em o
f Tra
nsit
5,30
5.37
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it13
.75
0.75
Faye
ttevi
lle A
rea
Syst
em o
f Tra
nsit
7.99
0.75
Faye
ttevi
lle A
rea
Syst
em o
f Tra
nsit
1.11
0.75
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny6,
393.
551
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny17
.83
1.5
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny13
.43
1G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
1.27
1G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4,59
8.71
1G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
15.0
01
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
230.
75G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.12
0.75
Hig
h Po
int T
rans
it4,
650.
111
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
12.7
50.
75H
igh
Poi
nt T
rans
it8.
641
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
1.97
1In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
1,03
2.00
0.5
Indi
an R
iver
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
on A
ging
, Inc
.10
.00
0.5
Indi
an R
iver
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
on A
ging
, Inc
.1.
380.
75In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
0.68
0.75
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
5,25
4.74
1Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y16
.50
1Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y9.
791
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.04
0.75
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t2,
507.
050.
75Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
12.0
80.
75Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
1.54
0.75
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t0.
360.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
3,16
2.54
0.75
John
son
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
12.0
00.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m6.
900.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m1.
150.
75La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
4,34
2.12
1La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
12.0
00.
75La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
8.28
0.75
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS2.
231.
5La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
5,74
0.64
1La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
13.5
00.
75La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
12.6
21
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n1.
070.
75Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
2,49
2.86
0.75
Lee-
Rus
sell
Cou
ncil
of G
over
nmen
ts11
.00
0.5
Lee-
Rus
sell
Cou
ncil
of G
over
nmen
ts0.
490.
75Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
0.48
0.75
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o2,
728.
090.
75Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
15.0
01
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o1.
000.
75Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
0.60
0.75
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
4,32
2.46
1M
anat
ee C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it13
.00
0.75
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Are
a Tr
ansi
t2.
740.
75M
anat
ee C
ount
y A
rea
Tran
sit
1.03
0.75
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3,86
5.64
0.75
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
11.4
20.
75M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y5.
520.
75M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
720.
75M
issi
ssip
pi C
oast
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
6,13
2.11
1M
issi
ssip
pi C
oast
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
17.7
51.
5M
issi
ssip
pi C
oast
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
5.63
0.75
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.59
0.75
Mon
tgom
ery
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em29
3.67
0.5
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.0
00.
75M
ontg
omer
y A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
290.
75M
ontg
omer
y A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
550.
75O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity5,
645.
721
Ohi
o V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.0
00.
75O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity5.
200.
75O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
490.
75O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e2,
249.
390.
75O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e12
.33
0.75
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
0.17
0.75
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
0.22
0.75
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n2,
113.
060.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
13.9
20.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
0.78
0.75
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
460.
75Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
581.
580.
5Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
14.0
00.
75Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.36
0.75
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
160.
5Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
1,88
2.06
0.75
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y13
.00
0.75
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y1.
760.
75Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
0.41
0.75
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
o r58
1.30
0.5
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or12
.00
0.75
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or0.
620.
75Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
0.36
0.75
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
771.
020.
75Sp
arta
nbur
g Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
24.1
72
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m9.
401
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m2.
781.
5Su
nTra
n2,
915.
770.
75Su
nTra
n12
.50
0.75
SunT
ran
3.16
0.75
SunT
ran
0.65
0.75
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t4,
934.
301
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t14
.00
0.75
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t3.
790.
75Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
0.75
0.75
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,65
2.89
0.75
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
17.6
71.
5Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it A
utho
rity
8.10
0.75
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y0.
870.
75Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Par
king
and
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
2,74
7.88
0.75
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y P
arki
ng a
nd T
rans
it A
utho
rit19
.00
1.5
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
1.14
0.75
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
0.61
0.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T5,
599.
201
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T13
.00
0.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T28
.14
2U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
5.83
2W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
5,69
7.76
1W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
14.0
00.
75W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
25.6
01.
5W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2.36
1.5
B-9
B-10
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Hea
dway
(m
inut
es)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
re
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
25.5
91
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.4
10.
75As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity36
.99
1As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$3
7.14
0.75
Athe
ns T
rans
it S
yste
m37
.43
1.5
Athe
ns T
rans
it S
yste
m13
.94
0.75
Athe
ns T
rans
it Sy
stem
35.9
51
Athe
ns T
rans
it Sy
stem
$24.
830.
75Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T7.
100.
75Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T16
.66
1Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T10
6.25
0.75
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
$2.0
81.
5C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it Se
rvic
e14
.53
0.75
Cha
rlotte
sville
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
11.7
90.
5C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce21
.15
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce$4
8.05
0.5
City
of A
lexa
ndria
25.7
01
City
of A
lexa
ndria
13.1
80.
75C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria72
.83
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
$19.
381
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m10
.26
0.75
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m13
.43
0.75
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m61
.29
1C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$12.
301
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
23.0
51
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
11.7
60.
5C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E Bu
s11
.05
1C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E Bu
s$9
3.89
0C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
8.14
0.75
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P16
.96
1C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
46.5
71
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P$6
.64
1C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nsit
Syst
em13
.89
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
16.0
51
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
36.4
21
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
$16.
941
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n23
.88
1C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
14.9
71
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n25
.33
1C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
$39.
830.
5C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m14
.31
0.75
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
13.6
70.
75C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m45
.07
1C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m$3
9.19
0.5
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t38
.81
1.5
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t19
.18
1.5
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t48
.86
1C
ity o
f Rom
e Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent
$50.
040.
5C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.10
0.75
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.9
41
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
71.2
90.
75C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
$15.
661
CR
PTA
- W
acca
maw
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
10.3
40.
75C
RPT
A - W
acca
maw
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
15.1
91
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A22
.67
1C
RPT
A - W
acca
maw
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
$38.
110.
75D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
13.1
50.
75D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
14.5
50.
75D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
41.2
31
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A$1
2.32
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it17
.72
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it15
.97
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it33
.60
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it$2
2.52
0.75
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny18
.07
1G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
14.2
60.
75G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
33.1
61
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny$3
5.45
0.75
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.21
1G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16.3
11
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity42
.62
1G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$6.5
71
Hig
h Po
int T
rans
it26
.92
1H
igh
Poi
nt T
rans
it13
.66
0.75
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
30.7
51
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
$14.
071
Indi
an R
iver
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
on A
ging
, Inc
.7.
810.
75In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
11.4
30.
5In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
144.
380.
5In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
$5.2
61
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
12.6
20.
75Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.18
0.5
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
52.0
01
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$30.
720.
75Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
6.85
0.75
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t19
.15
1.5
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t84
.58
0.75
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t$1
9.92
1Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
16.5
71
John
son
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
14.3
60.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m64
.98
0.75
John
son
City
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$2
2.81
0.75
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS28
.60
1.5
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS12
.81
0.75
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS41
.55
1La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
$15.
071
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n17
.43
1La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
16.3
61
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n33
.30
1La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
$31.
450.
75Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
7.55
0.75
Lee-
Rus
sell
Cou
ncil
of G
over
nmen
ts15
.86
1Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
27.0
11
Lee-
Rus
sell
Cou
ncil
of G
over
nmen
ts$1
.61
1.5
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o10
.74
0.75
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o17
.94
1.5
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o33
.99
1Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
$7.5
81
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
16.1
10.
75M
anat
ee C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it15
.64
1M
anat
ee C
ount
y A
rea
Tran
sit
49.2
21
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$9
.52
1M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y9.
670.
75M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y13
.42
0.75
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
49.1
61
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$23.
130.
75M
issi
ssip
pi C
oast
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
7.64
0.75
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y12
.86
0.75
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y37
.10
1M
issi
ssip
pi C
oast
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$2
6.05
0.75
Mon
tgom
ery
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em7.
870.
75M
ontg
omer
y A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m14
.40
0.75
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
482.
320
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$9.8
41
Ohi
o V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
6.31
0.75
Ohi
o V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.8
50.
75O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity44
.01
1O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$3
1.15
0.75
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
3.20
0.5
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
14.8
61
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
76.8
70.
75O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e$0
.75
1.5
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n7.
940.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
17.3
71.
5Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
69.4
20.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
$3.6
31
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3.
440.
5Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
21.2
12
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity14
8.49
0.5
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$3
.15
1.5
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y5.
750.
75Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
14.0
10.
75Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
76.8
90.
75Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
$10.
061
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
o r6.
800.
75Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
19.0
51.
5Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
132.
100.
75Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
$2.5
61.
5Sp
arta
nbur
g Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
34.9
41.
5Sp
arta
nbur
g Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.5
70.
75Sp
arta
nbur
g Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
37.0
91
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m$1
2.45
1Su
nTra
n10
.68
0.75
SunT
ran
16.3
71
SunT
ran
79.3
40.
75Su
nTra
n$1
2.79
1Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
12.8
80.
75Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
17.1
51
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t33
.77
1Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
$13.
631
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.4
60.
75Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.51
1Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it A
utho
rity
65.3
10.
75Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it A
utho
rity
$37.
570.
75Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Par
king
and
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
5.34
0.75
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y P
arki
ng a
nd T
rans
it A
utho
rit8.
741
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
77.7
70.
75Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Park
ing
and
Tran
sit A
utho
rit$6
.11
1U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
62.1
32
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T10
.66
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T17
.02
1U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
$19.
881
Wilm
ingt
on T
rans
it Au
thor
ity31
.02
1.5
Wilm
ingt
on T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.17
0.75
Wilm
ingt
on T
rans
it Au
thor
ity34
.47
1W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$35.
730.
75
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$51.
430.
75As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity16
.03%
1As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
92%
0.75
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
14.3
6%1
Athe
ns T
rans
it S
yste
m$5
3.41
0.75
Athe
ns T
rans
it S
yste
m13
.15%
1At
hens
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
90%
1At
hens
Tra
nsit
Syst
em20
.70%
0.75
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
$24.
281.
5Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T7.
08%
1.5
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
0.08
%1
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
23.2
5%0.
75C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it Se
rvic
e$4
2.60
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce14
.89%
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce1.
33%
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille
Tran
sit S
ervi
ce20
.60%
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
$56.
040.
75C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria16
.11%
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria3.
52%
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
41.0
9%0
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m$3
1.19
1C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
16.6
9%1
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m2.
08%
1C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
13.8
9%1
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
$44.
601
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
11.8
5%1
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
0.00
%1.
5C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E Bu
s5.
67%
1.5
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P$3
5.27
1C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
25.1
0%0.
5C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
0.59
%1
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P9.
07%
1.5
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
$56.
450.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nsit
Syst
em19
.65%
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
3.84
%0.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.14%
1C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
$85.
250
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n12
.57%
1C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
2.43
%0.
75C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
27.8
7%0.
75C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m$4
5.32
1C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m31
.10%
0C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
08%
1C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m11
.28%
1C
ity o
f Rom
e Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent
$65.
840.
5C
ity o
f Rom
e Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent
28.8
5%0.
5C
ity o
f Rom
e Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent
2.04
%1
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t20
.45%
0.75
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
$43.
481
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
10.0
5%1.
5C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em8.
17%
0C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
19.0
3%1
CR
PTA
- W
acca
maw
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
$32.
161
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A8.
77%
1.5
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A2.
43%
0.75
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A25
.06%
0.75
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A$4
1.21
1D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
19.2
3%0.
75D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
1.17
%1
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A13
.16%
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it$4
9.94
0.75
Faye
ttevi
lle A
rea
Syst
em o
f Tra
nsit
22.5
8%0.
75Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it3.
32%
0.75
Faye
ttevi
lle A
rea
Syst
em o
f Tra
nsit
20.6
9%0.
75G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
$47.
710.
75G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
11.9
8%1
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny4.
32%
0.75
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny29
.67%
0.5
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
3.65
0.75
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity27
.43%
0.5
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3.
07%
0.75
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity22
.44%
0.75
Hig
h Po
int T
rans
it$4
3.87
1H
igh
Poi
nt T
rans
it20
.12%
0.75
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
0.99
%1
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
17.8
8%1
Indi
an R
iver
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
on A
ging
, Inc
.$2
9.63
1.5
Indi
an R
iver
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
on A
ging
, Inc
.16
.47%
1In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
1.19
%1
Indi
an R
iver
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
on A
ging
, Inc
.18
.61%
1Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$3
9.58
1Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y23
.07%
0.75
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.95
%1
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
13.8
2%1
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t$8
8.43
0Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
17.8
7%0.
75Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
6.95
%0
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t16
.66%
1Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
$54.
810.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m19
.14%
0.75
John
son
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
2.81
%0.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m18
.20%
1La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
$52.
070.
75La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
11.2
8%1.
5La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
1.87
%1
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS22
.34%
0.75
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n$4
3.43
1La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
20.2
3%0.
75La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
0.18
%1
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n17
.45%
1Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
$25.
061.
5Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
22.2
0%0.
75Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
3.29
%0.
75Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
17.7
8%1
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o$8
1.14
0Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
22.0
1%0.
75Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
0.17
%1
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o9.
42%
1.5
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
$55.
900.
75M
anat
ee C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it14
.66%
1M
anat
ee C
ount
y A
rea
Tran
sit
9.77
%0
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Are
a Tr
ansi
t12
.75%
1M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$4
0.49
1M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.81%
0.75
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.70
%1
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
22.1
2%0.
75M
issi
ssip
pi C
oast
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
$35.
321
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y24
.05%
0.5
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y3.
32%
0.75
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.4
9%1
Mon
tgom
ery
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$6
0.03
0.75
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
13.3
4%1
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
6.29
%0.
5M
ontg
omer
y A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m12
.40%
1O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$3
7.76
1O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity21
.00%
0.75
Ohi
o V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1.77
%1
Ohi
o V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
19.8
7%0.
75O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e$1
4.12
2O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e16
.74%
1O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e0.
00%
1.5
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
0.00
%2
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$3
7.21
1Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
2.82
%2
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
00%
1.5
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n7.
74%
1.5
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$3
0.16
1Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
10.6
1%1.
5Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.00
%1.
5Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
16.4
6%1
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y$3
2.79
1Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
12.0
9%1
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y0.
71%
1Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
19.8
9%0.
75Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
tho r
$27.
911.
5Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
11.9
4%1
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or0.
00%
1.5
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or30
.45%
0.5
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m$4
6.25
0.75
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m10
.38%
1.5
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
34%
1Sp
arta
nbur
g Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
34.2
5%0.
5Su
nTra
n$4
3.21
1Su
nTra
n16
.85%
1Su
nTra
n0.
00%
1.5
SunT
ran
40.2
2%0
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t$4
6.33
0.75
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t25
.98%
0.5
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t1.
61%
1Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
16.7
0%1
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$62.
410.
5Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it Au
thor
ity23
.76%
0.5
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y4.
90%
0.5
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y13
.94%
1Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Par
king
and
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
$28.
681.
5Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Par
king
and
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
18.6
0%0.
75Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Park
ing
and
Tran
sit A
utho
rit3.
58%
0.75
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
44.1
0%0
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T$4
3.89
1U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
21.2
5%0.
75U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
0.45
%1
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T16
.17%
1W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$43.
301
Wilm
ingt
on T
rans
it Au
thor
ity16
.43%
1W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3.53
%0.
75W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
15.4
8%1
B-11
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
re
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.2
8%1
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
31.4
7%0.
75As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity39
,560
0.75
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,99
50.
75At
hens
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
28.7
4%1
Athe
ns T
rans
it S
yste
m50
.30%
1At
hens
Tra
nsit
Syst
em35
,568
0.75
Athe
ns T
rans
it Sy
stem
2,47
40.
75Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T51
.28%
2Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T0.
00%
0.5
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
47,5
451
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
2,89
10.
75C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it Se
rvic
e13
.02%
0.75
Cha
rlotte
sville
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
44.3
4%1
Cha
rlotte
sville
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
39,6
410.
75C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce3,
358
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria11
.50%
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
54.1
4%1
City
of A
lexa
ndria
49,5
821
City
of A
lexa
ndria
3,75
51
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m27
.21%
1C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
21.1
9%0.
75C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
41,8
070.
75C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3,07
51
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
8.77
%0.
75C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E B
us35
.71%
1C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E Bu
s43
,189
0.75
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
3,60
41
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P11
.97%
0.75
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P43
.46%
1C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
54,3
101
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P3,
228
1C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.07%
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
85.9
8%2
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
38,1
110.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2,
317
0.75
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n9.
14%
0.75
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n63
.13%
1.5
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n53
,935
1C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
4,23
51.
5C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m16
.19%
0.75
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
38.9
8%1
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
44,8
871
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3,25
61
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t28
.04%
1C
ity o
f Rom
e Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent
47.4
4%1
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t22
,272
0.5
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t1,
402
0.5
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
13.6
9%0.
75C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em28
.95%
0.75
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
67,6
101.
5C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
4,24
31.
5C
RPT
A -
Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A5.
12%
0.75
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A5.
74%
0.5
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A24
,812
0.5
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A1,
511
0.5
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A25
.90%
1D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
71.3
4%1.
5D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
53,3
481
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A3,
666
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it14
.30%
0.75
Faye
ttevi
lle A
rea
Syst
em o
f Tra
nsit
30.3
1%0.
75Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it48
,528
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it3,
095
1G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
25.1
7%1
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny16
.43%
0.75
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny53
,991
1G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
3,81
01
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity16
.92%
1G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.2
7%0.
75G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
53,7
301
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
395
1H
igh
Poin
t Tra
nsit
28.5
6%1
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
16.8
8%0.
75H
igh
Poi
nt T
rans
it32
,706
0.75
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
2,47
60.
75In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
2.24
%0.
5In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
20.1
5%0.
75In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
29,0
250.
5In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
2,54
80.
75Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.33%
1Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.53%
0.75
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
55,5
921
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4,64
51.
5Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
8.54
%0.
75Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
29.9
5%0.
75Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
77,6
112
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t3,
841
1Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
11.4
9%0.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m24
.27%
0.75
John
son
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
49,8
221
John
son
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3,52
21
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS12
.47%
0.75
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS62
.71%
1.5
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS41
,930
0.75
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS3,
357
1La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
13.8
5%0.
75La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
22.4
8%0.
75La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
52,7
461
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n3,
220
1Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
7.52
%0.
75Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
8.08
%0.
5Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
19,3
290.
5Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
1,22
41
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o55
.07%
2Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
29.0
0%0.
75Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
51,6
591
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o2,
341
0.75
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
8.07
%0.
75M
anat
ee C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it38
.14%
1M
anat
ee C
ount
y A
rea
Tran
sit
58,8
291.
5M
anat
ee C
ount
y A
rea
Tran
sit
3,72
61
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
9.64
%0.
75M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y49
.92%
1M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y43
,084
0.75
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3,19
61
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y12
.19%
0.75
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y33
.41%
0.75
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y51
,521
1M
issi
ssip
pi C
oast
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
981
1.5
Mon
tgom
ery
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em11
.13%
0.75
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
85.4
6%2
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
34,4
940.
75M
ontg
omer
y A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
400
0.75
Ohi
o V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.6
5%0.
75O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity35
.80%
1O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity53
,606
1O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity4,
184
1.5
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
54.9
2%2
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
4.42
%0.
5O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e42
,978
0.75
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
2,96
40.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
4.91
%0.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
20.9
7%0.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
45,8
281
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n2,
641
0.75
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity11
.07%
0.75
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
53%
0.5
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity37
,407
0.75
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1,
931
0.5
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y2.
09%
0.5
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y48
.44%
1Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
40,5
560.
75Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
2,93
60.
75Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
tho r
5.84
%0.
75Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
53.2
8%1
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or27
,961
0.5
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or1,
457
0.5
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m22
.46%
1Sp
arta
nbur
g Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
35.0
3%1
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m21
,964
0.5
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m1,
750
0.5
SunT
ran
12.9
5%0.
75Su
nTra
n27
.91%
0.75
SunT
ran
66,5
861.
5Su
nTra
n3,
978
1.5
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t20
.00%
1Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
8.94
%0.
5Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
47,7
871
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t2,
811
0.75
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
10.5
6%0.
75Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it Au
thor
ity52
.73%
1Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it A
utho
rity
47,9
361
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y3,
089
1Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Par
king
and
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
20.6
9%1
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y P
arki
ng a
nd T
rans
it A
utho
rit33
.02%
0.75
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
34,3
020.
75Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Park
ing
and
Tran
sit A
utho
rit3,
925
1.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T0.
00%
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T2.
85%
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T18
,845
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T1,
656
0.5
Wilm
ingt
on T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.49%
1W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
22.0
3%0.
75W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
44,0
160.
75W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3,34
81
B-12
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per V
ehic
le M
ileAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.99
1As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity39
,168
1As
hevi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
920
1.5
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
39,1
680.
75At
hens
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
0.91
0.75
Athe
ns T
rans
it S
yste
m26
,231
0.75
Athe
ns T
rans
it Sy
stem
1,88
20.
75At
hens
Tra
nsit
Syst
em32
,403
0.75
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
0.92
0.75
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
29,2
550.
75Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T1,
756
0.75
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
43,8
831
Cha
rlotte
sville
Tra
nsit
Serv
ice
0.99
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce32
,119
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce2,
723
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it S
ervi
ce39
,101
0.75
City
of A
lexa
ndria
0.99
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria35
,634
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria2,
703
1C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria48
,997
1C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.96
1C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
28,0
830.
75C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2,09
20.
75C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
40,1
180.
75C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E B
us0.
961
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
41,2
781.
5C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E Bu
s3,
509
2C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E Bu
s41
,278
0.75
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P0.
961
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P44
,299
1.5
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P2,
612
1C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
52,3
541
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.92
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
25,5
940.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1,
595
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
35,0
730.
75C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
0.84
0.5
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n22
,716
0.75
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1,
518
0.75
City
of K
ey W
est -
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n45
,433
1C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
971
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
34,2
121
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2,50
31
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
43,3
361
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t1.
001
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t13
,719
0.5
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t71
51
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t22
,211
0.5
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
1.00
1C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em46
,807
1.5
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
2,93
71.
5C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
67,6
102
CR
PTA
- W
acca
maw
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
0.88
0.75
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A21
,009
0.5
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A1,
383
0.5
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A21
,884
0.5
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A1.
001
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A32
,009
1D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
2,19
91
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n/M
ETR
A53
,348
1Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it0.
981
Faye
ttevi
lle A
rea
Syst
em o
f Tra
nsit
33,3
851
Faye
ttevi
lle A
rea
Syst
em o
f Tra
nsit
2,09
10.
75Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it47
,441
1G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
0.93
0.75
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny35
,697
1G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
2,50
31
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny50
,396
1G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.99
1G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
35,5
121
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
178
1G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
53,2
681
Hig
h Po
int T
rans
it1.
001
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
24,4
130.
75H
igh
Poi
nt T
rans
it1,
787
0.75
Hig
h P
oint
Tra
nsit
32,5
510.
75In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
0.98
1In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
18,9
200.
5In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
1,65
60.
75In
dian
Riv
er C
ount
y C
ounc
il on
Agi
ng, I
nc.
28,3
800.
5Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
001
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
35,6
571
Jack
son
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,92
81.
5Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y55
,467
1.5
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t0.
870.
75Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
33,8
451
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t1,
767
0.75
Jam
es C
ity C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t67
,690
2Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.99
1Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m24
,589
0.75
John
son
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1,71
30.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
49,1
781
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS0.
920.
75La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
27,8
140.
75La
faye
tte T
rans
it Sy
stem
LTS
2,17
21
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS38
,511
0.75
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n0.
991
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n50
,120
2La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
3,06
31.
5La
kela
nd A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
Citr
us C
onn
52,1
251
Lee-
Rus
sell
Cou
ncil
of G
over
nmen
ts0.
920.
75Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
17,7
990.
5Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
1,12
20.
5Le
e-R
usse
ll C
ounc
il of
Gov
ernm
ents
17,7
990.
5Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
0.54
1Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
25,4
170.
75Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
1,41
70.
5Lo
udou
n C
ount
y C
omm
uter
Bus
Ser
vice
Offi
ce o
27,7
270.
5M
anat
ee C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it0.
941
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
45,0
621.
5M
anat
ee C
ount
y A
rea
Tran
sit
2,88
11.
5M
anat
ee C
ount
y A
rea
Tran
sit
55,4
601.
5M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
991
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
22,5
120.
75M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
677
0.75
Mid
-Ohi
o Va
lley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
42,5
221
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y0.
951
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y40
,625
1.5
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y3,
160
1.5
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
48,7
501
Mon
tgom
ery
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
991
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
19,8
350.
5M
ontg
omer
y A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m1,
377
0.5
Mon
tgom
ery
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
34,0
030.
75O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
991
Ohi
o V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
39,1
931
Ohi
o V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
3,05
11.
5O
hio
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity53
,191
1O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e1.
001
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
32,1
101
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
2,16
11
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
42,8
131
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
930.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
33,0
341
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1,
902
0.75
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n42
,473
1Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.82
0.5
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity30
,533
0.75
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1,
439
0.5
Pee
Dee
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity30
,533
0.75
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y0.
830.
5Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
33,7
911
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Pol
k C
ount
y2,
412
1Po
lk C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
33,7
910.
75Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
tho r
0.87
0.75
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or24
,376
0.75
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or1,
280
0.5
Sant
ee W
ater
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
or24
,376
0.5
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
981
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m21
,538
0.5
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m1,
713
0.75
Spar
tanb
urg
Tran
sit S
yste
m21
,538
0.5
SunT
ran
0.95
1Su
nTra
n45
,069
1.5
SunT
ran
2,75
41
SunT
ran
63,0
971.
5Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
1.00
1Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
35,7
121
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t2,
083
0.75
Terr
ebon
ne P
aris
h C
onso
lidat
ed G
over
nmen
t47
,616
1Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
930.
75Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it Au
thor
ity26
,007
0.75
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y1,
677
0.75
The
Tri-S
tate
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y44
,790
1Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Par
king
and
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
0.91
0.75
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y P
arki
ng a
nd T
rans
it A
utho
rit21
,560
0.5
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
2,46
61
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
31,1
430.
75U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
0.90
0.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T10
,697
1U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
1,00
30.
5U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
16,9
380.
5W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.98
1W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
33,5
221
Wilm
ingt
on T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
546
1W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
43,1
001
B-13
B-14
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: SE
Reg
ion
-- G
roup
DTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Spar
e Ve
hicl
e R
atio
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yC
ompo
site
Sco
re
(Mea
sure
s O
nly)
Ashe
ville
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.00
%0.
5C
ity o
f Fai
rfax
CU
E B
us23
.25
Athe
ns T
rans
it Sy
stem
23.5
3%0.
75O
kalo
osa
Cou
nty
Boar
d of
Cou
nty
Com
mis
sion
e22
.00
Bay
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
On
Agin
g Ba
y C
oord
inat
ed T
50.0
0%1
Cla
rksv
ille T
rans
it S
yste
m21
.75
Cha
rlotte
sville
Tra
nsit
Serv
ice
21.7
4%0.
75D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
ME
TRA
20.7
5C
ity o
f Ale
xand
ria37
.50%
1Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.75
City
of D
anvi
lle M
ass
Tran
sit S
yste
m42
.86%
1W
ilmin
gton
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y20
.75
City
of F
airfa
x C
UE
Bus
0.00
%0.
5La
faye
tte T
rans
it S
yste
m L
TS20
.50
City
of H
unts
ville
, Ala
bam
a D
ept.
of P
arki
ng &
P18
.18%
0.75
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n20
.50
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
37.0
4%0.
75Pa
sco
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
20.5
0C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
100.
00%
2Su
nTra
n20
.50
City
of M
onro
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
26.6
7%0.
75Ba
y C
ount
y C
ounc
il O
n Ag
ing
Bay
Coo
rdin
ated
T20
.25
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t61
.90%
1C
ity o
f Key
Wes
t - D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
20.2
5C
lark
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em44
.44%
1M
anat
ee C
ount
y Ar
ea T
rans
it20
.25
CR
PTA
- Wac
cam
aw R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
A4.
17%
0.5
Mis
siss
ippi
Coa
st T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
20.2
5D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion/
MET
RA
66.6
7%1.
5C
ity o
f Hun
tsvi
lle, A
laba
ma
Dep
t. of
Par
king
& P
19.7
5Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it42
.11%
1Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
19.7
5G
reat
er L
ynch
burg
Tra
nsit
Com
pany
41.1
8%1
Uni
vers
ity o
f Ark
ansa
s, F
ayet
tevi
lle/R
azor
back
T19
.75
Gre
envi
lle T
rans
it Au
thor
ity50
.00%
1C
harlo
ttesv
ille T
rans
it Se
rvic
e19
.50
Hig
h Po
int T
rans
it33
.33%
0.75
Gre
ater
Lyn
chbu
rg T
rans
it C
ompa
ny19
.50
Indi
an R
iver
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
on A
ging
, Inc
.50
.00%
1O
hio
Valle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
19.5
0Ja
ckso
n Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y55
.56%
1Sp
arta
nbur
g Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
19.5
0Ja
mes
City
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
100.
00%
2As
hevi
lle T
rans
it A
utho
rity
19.2
5Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
100.
00%
2G
reen
ville
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y19
.00
Lafa
yette
Tra
nsit
Syst
em L
TS38
.46%
1At
hens
Tra
nsit
Syst
em18
.75
Lake
land
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct C
itrus
Con
n4.
00%
0.5
City
of R
ome
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t18
.75
Lee-
Rus
sell
Cou
ncil
of G
over
nmen
ts0.
00%
0.5
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o18
.75
Loud
oun
Cou
nty
Com
mut
er B
us S
ervi
ce O
ffice
o9.
09%
0.75
Hig
h Po
int T
rans
it18
.50
Man
atee
Cou
nty
Area
Tra
nsit
23.0
8%0.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
18.5
0M
id-O
hio
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y88
.89%
1.5
City
of A
lexa
ndria
18.2
5M
issi
ssip
pi C
oast
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
20.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Dan
ville
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
18.2
5M
ontg
omer
y Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
71.4
3%1.
5Fa
yette
ville
Are
a Sy
stem
of T
rans
it18
.25
Ohi
o Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity35
.71%
0.75
Mid
-Ohi
o V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.25
Oka
loos
a C
ount
y Bo
ard
of C
ount
y C
omm
issi
one
33.3
3%0.
75Tu
scal
oosa
Cou
nty
Park
ing
and
Tran
sit A
utho
rit18
.25
Pasc
o C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n28
.57%
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
it Sy
stem
18.0
0Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.00
%0.
5C
ity o
f Mon
roe
Tran
sit S
yste
m18
.00
Pol
k C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s D
ivis
n P
olk
Cou
nty
0.00
%0.
5Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
18.0
0Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
0.00
%0.
5Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it A
utho
rity
18.0
0Sp
arta
nbur
g Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.00
%0.
5Pe
e D
ee R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
17.5
0Su
nTra
n40
.00%
1Sa
ntee
Wat
eree
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
17.5
0Te
rreb
onne
Par
ish
Con
solid
ated
Gov
ernm
ent
33.3
3%0.
75C
RPT
A - W
acca
maw
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
17.0
0Th
e Tr
i-Sta
te T
rans
it Au
thor
ity72
.22%
1.5
Mon
tgom
ery
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.00
Tusc
aloo
sa C
ount
y Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
44.4
4%1
Polk
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
Div
isn
Polk
Cou
nty
16.7
5U
nive
rsity
of A
rkan
sas,
Fay
ette
ville
/Raz
orba
ck T
58.3
3%1
Lee-
Rus
sell
Cou
ncil
of G
over
nmen
ts16
.50
Wilm
ingt
on T
rans
it Au
thor
ity28
.57%
0.75
Indi
an R
iver
Cou
nty
Cou
ncil
on A
ging
, Inc
.16
.00
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up A
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
9,14
8.97
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
22.2
50.
5M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity24
.14
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
4.17
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y13
,253
.66
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y23
.67
1W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
42.4
20.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3.91
0.75
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it54
,239
.05
2N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
24.0
01
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it12
6.47
2N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
9.17
2So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
13,9
48.8
70.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
24.0
01
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o44
.09
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
ho4.
420.
75M
aryl
and
Tran
sit A
dmin
istra
tion
7,94
9.24
0.75
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n24
.00
1M
aryl
and
Tran
sit A
dmin
istra
tion
40.0
20.
75M
aryl
and
Tran
sit A
dmin
istra
tion
3.89
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
16,2
05.8
40.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)24
.00
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)20
.41
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
2.13
0.5
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Av e
11,2
68.6
50.
75Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
ve22
.58
0.5
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
47.0
81
Port
Auth
ority
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve2.
230.
5G
TJC
24,9
03.6
91
GTJ
C24
.00
1G
TJC
11.6
20.
75G
TJC
6.25
1
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
46.4
90.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity11
.15
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
4,94
5.64
1M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity15
1,82
01
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y43
.93
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y11
.22
1W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4,35
9.76
1W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
30,8
880.
75N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
72.4
51.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
7.90
0.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it2,
863.
620.
75N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
17,9
350.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
45.6
90.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
10.3
30.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
6,37
3.48
1.5
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
ho10
5,91
61
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n46
.95
1M
aryl
and
Tran
sit A
dmin
istra
tion
12.0
81
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n5,
271.
811
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n12
,039
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
31.3
20.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)14
.74
1.5
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
4,45
6.73
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)21
1,00
91.
5Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
v e29
.21
0.5
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Ave
13.0
91
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
961.
050.
5Po
rt Au
thor
ity o
f Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
163,
420
1G
TJC
57.1
11
GTJ
C9.
130.
75G
TJC
4,06
0.60
0.75
GTJ
C21
,338
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
17.3
70.
5M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$4
9.20
1M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$9
4.76
1M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity24
.76%
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.13
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$9
7.83
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$1
01.3
20.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
27.4
9%0.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
3.64
1.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it$1
92.7
00.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
$110
.40
0.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it24
.40%
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o13
.99
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o$9
4.61
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o$9
8.05
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
17.7
9%2
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n17
.29
0.5
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n$8
5.96
1M
aryl
and
Tran
sit A
dmin
istra
tion
$100
.83
1M
aryl
and
Tran
sit A
dmin
istra
tion
24.0
3%1
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
9.84
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)$6
6.10
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)$1
01.4
60.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)23
.93%
1Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
v e14
.19
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Ave
$141
.58
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
$87.
831.
5Po
rt Au
thor
ity o
f Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
23.8
4%1
GTJ
C5.
851.
5G
TJC
$23.
441.
5G
TJC
$115
.19
0.5
GTJ
C26
.83%
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1.61
%1.
5M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity12
.49%
1.5
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
40.9
2%1
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
19.4
5%1.
5W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3.69
%1
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.21%
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y46
.75%
1W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
23.3
7%1.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
5.43
%0.
75N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
15.7
2%1
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it57
.06%
1.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it14
.43%
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
11.1
2%0
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o18
.34%
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o41
.22%
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
8.97
%0.
75M
aryl
and
Tran
sit A
dmin
istra
tion
3.43
%1
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n18
.80%
0.75
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n31
.09%
0.75
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n0.
00%
0.5
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
3.94
%1
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
22.6
0%0.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)48
.91%
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)1.
40%
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Av e
6.05
%0.
75Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
ve14
.02%
1Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve22
.90%
0.5
Port
Auth
ority
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve9.
22%
0.75
GTJ
C2.
83%
1G
TJC
11.5
6%1.
5G
TJC
38.4
2%0.
75G
TJC
0.00
%0.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
33,7
330.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
010
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.88
1.5
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
24,9
650.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
37,0
121
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
957
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
810.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
25,4
881
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it30
,240
0.75
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it3,
801
1.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it0.
861
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it22
,667
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o39
,232
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
3,59
91.
5So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
0.86
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
27,7
231
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n32
,803
0.75
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n2,
598
0.5
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n0.
841
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n22
,880
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
48,5
051.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)3,
067
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
0.81
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
32,7
511.
5Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
v e45
,051
1.5
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Ave
3,11
60.
75Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve0.
770.
5Po
rt Au
thor
ity o
f Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
28,6
621
GTJ
C28
,401
0.5
GTJ
C3,
080
0.75
GTJ
C0.
780.
5G
TJC
18,4
350.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,23
90.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity29
,540
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
18.3
3%0.
75N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
25.2
5W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,27
10.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
30,0
720.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.9
9%0.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
uth o
22.2
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
2,86
81.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
25,9
910.
75N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
14.6
6%1
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
22.2
5So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
2,68
31.
5So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
33,6
141
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o21
.25%
1M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity21
.00
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n1,
894
0.5
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n27
,675
0.75
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n20
.96%
1Po
rt Au
thor
ity o
f Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Av e
19.7
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)2,
222
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
39,1
481.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)19
.53%
1W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.5
0Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
v e2,
190
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Ave
34,8
811
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
21.7
0%1.
5G
TJC
19.5
0G
TJC
2,01
80.
75G
TJC
22,1
660.
5G
TJC
20.2
4%1
Mar
ylan
d Tr
ansi
t Adm
inis
tratio
n18
.75
B-15
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up B
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s Au
thor
ity d
ba M
TA L
10,2
27.2
30.
75M
etro
polit
an S
ubur
ban
Bus
Aut
horit
y db
a M
TA L
24.0
01
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L23
.26
1M
etro
polit
an S
ubur
ban
Bus
Aut
horit
y db
a M
TA L
3.08
1N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 26
,550
.06
1.5
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
21.0
01
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
0.57
0.5
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
1.49
0.75
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.41
,248
.18
2Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
18.0
00.
75Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
1.83
0.5
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.1.
130.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
6,75
7.41
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n21
.75
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
15.6
71
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n2.
581
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
6,32
3.15
0.75
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
21.3
31
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
16.7
71
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
2.44
1D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n3,
896.
370.
75D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n24
.00
1D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n10
.21
0.75
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
1.46
0.75
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.4,
595.
320.
75H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
23.2
01
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.0.
490.
5H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
0.35
0.5
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
18,4
58.9
01
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
15.1
70.
5Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n0.
990.
5Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n0.
540.
5C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
5,76
9.42
0.75
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
22.0
81
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
17.1
31
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1.76
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
8,71
8.88
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
21.1
71
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
29.8
21.
5Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.3.
391.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
it Se
rvic
e, In
c. a
nd L
ift L
ine,
Inc.
5,45
2.06
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.23
.67
1R
egio
nal T
rans
it Se
rvic
e, In
c. a
nd L
ift L
ine,
Inc.
16.9
71
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.2.
131
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity14
,605
.38
1R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
8.25
1R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.9
61
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
121
Rid
e-O
n M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y G
over
nmen
t8,
126.
060.
75R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
19.0
00.
75R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
27.2
81.
5R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
2.31
1Q
ueen
s Su
rface
Cor
pora
tion
8,60
4.93
0.75
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n24
.00
1Q
ueen
s Su
rface
Cor
pora
tion
14.1
81
Que
ens
Sur
face
Cor
pora
tion
4.67
2
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide )
Alt S
core
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s Au
thor
ity d
ba M
TA L
38.2
81.
5M
etro
polit
an S
ubur
ban
Bus
Aut
horit
y db
a M
TA L
12.4
20.
75M
etro
polit
an S
ubur
ban
Bus
Aut
horit
y db
a M
TA L
2,73
7.09
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L55
3,80
41
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
16.2
40.
75N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 10
.90
0.75
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
14,8
06.7
61
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
57,3
370.
75Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
23.8
50.
75Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
21.0
31.
5Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
82,9
24.4
12
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.43
,950
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n34
.58
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
13.4
10.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
1,28
5.29
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n90
,756
0.75
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
24.5
60.
75N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.10
.05
0.5
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
2,04
3.44
0.75
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
114,
289
0.75
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
20.4
60.
75D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n14
.04
0.75
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
7,45
2.28
0.75
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
274,
617
0.75
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.8.
120.
5H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
22.8
92
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.14
,979
.46
1H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
28,9
260.
75Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n10
.87
0.5
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
20.1
91.
5Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n12
,705
.44
0.75
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
32,6
770.
75C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
21.8
90.
75C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity12
.43
0.75
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,07
7.50
0.75
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
507,
709
1Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.40
.06
1.5
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
11.8
20.
75Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.23
,767
.87
1Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.47
8,15
41
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.26
.11
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.12
.25
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.3,
570.
640.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
it Se
rvic
e, In
c. a
nd L
ift L
ine,
Inc.
196,
631
0.75
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity34
.08
1R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16.0
81
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1,
649.
840.
75R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
335,
413
0.75
Rid
e-O
n M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y G
over
nmen
t33
.07
1R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
14.3
20.
75R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
5,59
5.10
0.75
Rid
e-O
n M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y G
over
nmen
t1,
913,
525
2Q
ueen
s Su
rface
Cor
pora
tion
45.6
21.
5Q
ueen
s Su
rface
Cor
pora
tion
9.77
0.5
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n4,
318.
130.
75Q
ueen
s S
urfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n11
8,57
60.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s Au
thor
ity d
ba M
TA L
17.5
11
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L$6
0.54
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L$9
9.63
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L23
.75%
1N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 4.
361.
5N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s $3
.37
1.5
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
$96.
410.
75N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 14
.62%
1.5
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.2.
191.
5Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
$5.5
61.
5Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
$72.
481
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.31
.56%
0.5
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n23
.51
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n$3
2.21
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
$71.
091
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n23
.06%
1N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.27
.65
0.75
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
$46.
880.
75N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.$6
8.66
1N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.21
.37%
1D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n35
.42
0.5
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
$34.
201
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
$68.
531
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
17.9
1%1.
5H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
30.7
60.
5H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
$4.2
41.
5H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
$69.
891
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.21
.11%
1Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n9.
041
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
$4.7
51.
5Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n$5
2.17
1.5
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
32.8
1%0.
5C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
29.0
50.
75C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$5
2.37
0.75
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$66.
941
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
21.2
4%1
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
17.1
41
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
$71.
270.
5Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.$9
5.74
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
26.9
7%0.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
it Se
rvic
e, In
c. a
nd L
ift L
ine,
Inc.
25.8
70.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
it Se
rvic
e, In
c. a
nd L
ift L
ine,
Inc.
$49.
390.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
it Se
rvic
e, In
c. a
nd L
ift L
ine,
Inc.
$75.
971
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.22
.32%
1R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
9.17
1R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$64.
660.
5R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$116
.23
0.5
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity21
.80%
1R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
19.6
60.
75R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
$67.
520.
5R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
$81.
851
Rid
e-O
n M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y G
over
nmen
t23
.11%
1Q
ueen
s Su
rface
Cor
pora
tion
15.1
11
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n$4
2.01
0.75
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n$1
35.1
80
Que
ens
Sur
face
Cor
pora
tion
35.7
8%0
B-16
B-17
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up B
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s Au
thor
ity d
ba M
TA L
6.06
%0.
75M
etro
polit
an S
ubur
ban
Bus
Aut
horit
y db
a M
TA L
15.5
6%0.
75M
etro
polit
an S
ubur
ban
Bus
Aut
horit
y db
a M
TA L
36.6
2%0.
75M
etro
polit
an S
ubur
ban
Bus
Aut
horit
y db
a M
TA L
13.5
2%0.
75N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 2.
69%
1N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 16
.29%
0.75
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
46.6
3%1
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
59.4
2%2
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.0.
51%
1Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
12.5
5%1
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.77
.42%
1.5
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.0.
00%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n3.
57%
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
14.2
2%1
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n31
.50%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n0.
00%
0.75
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
6.85
%0.
75N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.14
.04%
1N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.29
.85%
0.75
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
36.2
7%1.
5D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n3.
26%
1D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n27
.02%
0D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n5.
26%
0.5
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
0.00
%0.
75H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
19.9
1%0
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.8.
66%
1.5
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.99
.68%
1.5
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.0.
00%
0.75
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
0.71
%1
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
8.70
%1.
5Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n94
.86%
1.5
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
0.00
%0.
75C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
1.31
%1
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
20.4
5%0.
5C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity24
.43%
0.75
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
17.2
9%1
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
3.85
%1
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
8.03
%1.
5Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.53
.97%
1Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.0.
00%
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.5.
08%
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.12
.27%
1R
egio
nal T
rans
it Se
rvic
e, In
c. a
nd L
ift L
ine,
Inc.
39.7
6%0.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
it Se
rvic
e, In
c. a
nd L
ift L
ine,
Inc.
20.0
7%1
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
57%
1R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
20.7
2%0.
5R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.3
0%0.
75R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.00
%0.
75R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
2.16
%1
Rid
e-O
n M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y G
over
nmen
t11
.78%
1R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
16.3
9%0.
75R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
51.9
8%1.
5Q
ueen
s Su
rface
Cor
pora
tion
0.82
%1
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n9.
66%
1Q
ueen
s Su
rface
Cor
pora
tion
38.1
8%0.
75Q
ueen
s S
urfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n0.
00%
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s Au
thor
ity d
ba M
TA L
42,3
691
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L3,
315
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L0.
871
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L30
,672
1N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 27
,760
0.5
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
2,33
20.
75N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 0.
760.
5N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 18
,845
0.5
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.36
,609
0.75
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.1,
654
1Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
0.86
0.75
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.29
,203
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
39,7
621
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n2,
884
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
0.89
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
29,4
341
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
33,9
290.
75N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.3,
301
1.5
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
0.86
0.75
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
24,4
410.
75D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n34
,602
0.75
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
2,51
70.
75D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n0.
931
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
27,0
560.
75H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
55,5
031.
5H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
2,41
30.
75H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
0.97
1.5
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.43
,640
1.5
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
58,2
682
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
2,87
11
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
0.96
1.5
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
47,8
432
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y37
,650
0.75
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,98
61
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.92
1C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity26
,401
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
39,1
410.
75Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.2,
920
1Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.0.
750.
5Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.23
,699
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.32
,831
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.2,
678
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.0.
881
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.21
,518
0.75
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity43
,054
1R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3,20
81
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
830.
75R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
28,7
911
Rid
e-O
n M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y G
over
nmen
t42
,487
1R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
3,47
31.
5R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
0.90
1R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
31,0
641
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n29
,926
0.5
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n2,
732
0.75
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n0.
710.
5Q
ueen
s S
urfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n17
,593
0.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s Au
thor
ity d
ba M
TA L
2,47
01.
5M
etro
polit
an S
ubur
ban
Bus
Aut
horit
y db
a M
TA L
37,0
581
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L20
.82%
0.75
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
26.0
0N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 1,
728
0.75
New
Yor
k Bu
s To
urs,
Inc.
D/B
/A N
ew Y
ork
Bus
21,0
530.
5N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 11
.72%
0.5
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.23
.50
Acad
emy
Line
s, In
c.1,
388
1Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
31,6
190.
75Ac
adem
y Li
nes,
Inc.
8.27
%0.
5R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
23.5
0C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
2,19
41
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n35
,513
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-H
artfo
rd D
ivis
ion
20.6
5%0.
75H
udso
n Tr
ansi
t Lin
es, I
nc.
23.2
5N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.2,
431
1.5
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
29,2
940.
75N
iaga
ra F
ront
ier T
rans
it M
etro
Sys
tem
, Inc
.19
.86%
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Sub
urba
n Bu
s A
utho
rity
dba
MTA
L22
.00
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
1,92
60.
75D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n32
,308
0.75
Del
awar
e Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
19.4
1%0.
75Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.21
.75
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.1,
907
0.75
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.53
,926
1.5
Hud
son
Tran
sit L
ines
, Inc
.23
.57%
1N
ew Y
ork
Bus
Tour
s, In
c. D
/B/A
New
Yor
k Bu
s 21
.00
Subu
rban
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
2,37
01.
5Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n56
,175
2Su
burb
an T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n17
.42%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Har
tford
Div
isio
n21
.00
Cap
ital D
istri
ct T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y2,
123
1C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity34
,738
1C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity31
.58%
1.5
Nia
gara
Fro
ntie
r Tra
nsit
Met
ro S
yste
m, I
nc.
20.7
5Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.2,
004
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
29,4
510.
75Li
berty
Lin
es T
rans
it, In
c.24
.28%
1C
apita
l Dis
trict
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity20
.50
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.1,
757
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.28
,800
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.33
.84%
1.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Serv
ice,
Inc.
and
Lift
Lin
e, In
c.20
.00
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1,
791
0.75
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity35
,873
1R
hode
Isla
nd P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
24.6
0%1
Rho
de Is
land
Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity20
.00
Rid
e-O
n M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y G
over
nmen
t2,
169
1R
ide-
On
Mon
tgom
ery
Cou
nty
Gov
ernm
ent
38,1
181
Rid
e-O
n M
ontg
omer
y C
ount
y G
over
nmen
t22
.71%
1D
elaw
are
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n18
.00
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n1,
800
0.75
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n21
,174
0.5
Que
ens
Surfa
ce C
orpo
ratio
n20
.36%
0.75
Que
ens
Sur
face
Cor
pora
tion
17.7
5
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per
Rou
te M
ileA
lt Sc
ore
Tran
sit A
genc
yA
vera
ge
Wee
kday
Spa
n of
Se
rvic
eA
lt Sc
ore
Tran
sit A
genc
yP
asse
nger
Trip
s Pe
r Cap
itaA
lt Sc
ore
Tran
sit A
genc
yP
asse
nger
Trip
s Pe
r Rev
enue
Mile
Alt
Scor
e
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtat i
2,57
8.92
0.75
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
17.5
00.
5W
estc
hest
er C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti0.
360.
75W
estc
hest
er C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti1.
170.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n6,
637.
200.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n21
.17
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n17
.27
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
3.53
1.5
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss8,
555.
270.
75Tr
ansi
t Exp
ress
20.8
31
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss15
.02
0.75
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss2.
021
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.8,
186.
420.
75C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
22.7
51.
5C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
22.0
70.
75C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
2.71
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
4514
,200
.67
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
4519
.00
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
0.76
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
3.56
1.5
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A12
,656
.67
0.75
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A21
.00
1P
rivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
0.18
0.75
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A0.
730.
5Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rit4,
815.
740.
75Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rit18
.58
0.75
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
9.89
0.75
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
1.83
1Y
ork
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
4,93
9.29
0.75
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y18
.17
0.75
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y11
.02
0.75
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y0.
950.
75P
ione
er V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y5,
757.
820.
75P
ione
er V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.08
0.75
Pio
neer
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4.53
0.75
Pio
neer
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2.84
1.5
City
of L
ong
Bea
ch5,
648.
940.
75C
ity o
f Lon
g B
each
18.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Lon
g B
each
13.8
80.
75C
ity o
f Lon
g B
each
2.53
1La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
7,42
7.23
0.75
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r 21
.08
1La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
328.
501.
5La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
0.67
0.5
DeC
amp
Bus
Lin
es c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i12
,669
.94
0.75
DeC
amp
Bus
Lin
es c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i21
.08
1D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
471.
521.
5D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
1.20
0.75
Tran
s-H
udso
n E
xpre
ss c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A46
,536
.83
1.5
Tran
s-H
udso
n E
xpre
ss c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A24
.00
1.5
Tran
s-H
udso
n E
xpre
ss c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A96
0.17
2Tr
ans-
Hud
son
Exp
ress
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
2.81
1.5
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y7,
670.
730.
75G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
18.3
30.
75G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.0
60.
75G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2.49
1C
umbe
rland
-Dau
phin
-Har
risbu
rg T
rans
it A
utho
ri2,
650.
170.
75C
umbe
rland
-Dau
phin
-Har
risbu
rg T
rans
it A
utho
ri19
.58
0.75
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Aut
hori
6.45
0.75
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Aut
hori
1.35
0.75
Tran
s-B
ridge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A13
,862
.88
1Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
21.1
71
Tran
s-B
ridge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A15
1.69
1Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
0.28
0.5
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
5,00
4.98
0.75
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
19.5
00.
75W
orce
ster
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y16
.00
0.75
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
2.03
1S
outh
east
ern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y3,
619.
350.
75S
outh
east
ern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y15
.00
1S
outh
east
ern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y12
.65
0.75
Sou
thea
ster
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
1.66
0.75
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y4,
000.
490.
75R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.0
80.
75R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4.82
0.75
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
230.
75Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d4,
524.
450.
75Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d21
.67
1Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d7.
780.
75Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d1.
220.
75O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
94,6
25.3
62
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r24
.00
1.5
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r16
6.07
1O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
0.43
0.5
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n12
,239
.94
0.75
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n17
.00
0.5
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n0.
210.
75P
rivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
2.63
1Li
berty
Lin
es E
xpre
ss, I
nc.
16,9
67.9
61
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.20
.58
1Li
berty
Lin
es E
xpre
ss, I
nc.
2.17
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.1.
400.
75R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.10
,642
.35
0.75
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
21.7
51
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
0.82
0.75
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
0.99
0.75
Met
ro-N
orth
Com
mut
er R
ailro
ad C
o.4,
298.
370.
75M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
18.2
50.
75M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
0.06
0.75
Met
ro-N
orth
Com
mut
er R
ailro
ad C
o.2.
911.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rA
lt Sc
ore
Tran
sit A
genc
yA
vera
ge S
peed
Alt
Scor
eTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ave
rage
H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)A
lt Sc
ore
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaA
lt Sc
ore
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
14.6
70.
75W
estc
hest
er C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti12
.52
0.75
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
62.7
00
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
$89.
371
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
41.2
91.
5C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n11
.71
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
27.7
70.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n$2
9.09
1Tr
ansi
t Exp
ress
25.9
51
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss12
.84
0.75
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss18
.35
1Tr
ansi
t Exp
ress
$27.
841
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.32
.86
1.5
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.12
.14
0.75
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.14
.50
1C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
$52.
291
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
28.1
81
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
7.93
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
12.2
31
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
$1.3
21
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A10
.95
0.5
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A15
.01
0.75
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A11
.99
1P
rivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
$1.5
41
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
23.0
61
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
12.6
20.
75Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rit34
.63
0.75
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
$25.
401
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y13
.66
0.75
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y14
.33
0.75
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y37
.81
0.75
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y$3
7.91
1P
ione
er V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y42
.81
2P
ione
er V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y15
.08
0.75
Pio
neer
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
20.2
61
Pio
neer
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$33.
421
City
of L
ong
Bea
ch20
.85
0.75
City
of L
ong
Bea
ch8.
240.
75C
ity o
f Lon
g B
each
27.5
00.
75C
ity o
f Lon
g B
each
$42.
501
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r 23
.12
1La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
34.4
62
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r 11
.36
1La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
$1,8
97.7
40.
5D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
17.2
60.
75D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
14.3
80.
75D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
10.6
71
DeC
amp
Bus
Lin
es c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i$2
,443
.97
0Tr
ans-
Hud
son
Exp
ress
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
30.9
01
Tran
s-H
udso
n E
xpre
ss c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A11
.01
0.75
Tran
s-H
udso
n E
xpre
ss c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A3.
301.
5Tr
ans-
Hud
son
Exp
ress
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
$1,3
68.5
50.
5G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
32.2
11
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.95
0.75
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y31
.91
0.75
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$3
7.92
1C
umbe
rland
-Dau
phin
-Har
risbu
rg T
rans
it A
utho
ri16
.09
0.75
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Aut
hori
11.8
80.
75C
umbe
rland
-Dau
phin
-Har
risbu
rg T
rans
it A
utho
ri47
.43
0.5
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Aut
hori
$26.
251
Tran
s-B
ridge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A13
.07
0.5
Tran
s-B
ridge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A47
.18
2Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
8.04
1.5
Tran
s-B
ridge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A$1
,394
.28
0.5
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
24.9
21
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
12.3
00.
75W
orce
ster
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y49
.44
0.5
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
$42.
931
Sou
thea
ster
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
20.1
40.
75S
outh
east
ern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y12
.16
0.75
Sou
thea
ster
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
37.4
00.
75S
outh
east
ern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$4
0.09
1R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
18.1
10.
75R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
14.7
40.
75R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
46.7
10.
5R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$13.
071
Tran
spor
t of R
ockl
and
24.4
31
Tran
spor
t of R
ockl
and
19.9
51
Tran
spor
t of R
ockl
and
27.0
00.
75Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d$3
5.36
1O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
6.32
0.5
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r14
.56
0.75
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r3.
021.
5O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
$2,0
28.8
20
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n38
.71
1.5
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n14
.73
0.75
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n10
.86
1P
rivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
$0.2
41
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.14
.86
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.10
.59
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.9.
181
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.$1
4.00
1R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.23
.08
1R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.23
.35
1R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.11
.07
1R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.$3
.48
1M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
14.8
90.
75M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
5.12
0.5
Met
ro-N
orth
Com
mut
er R
ailro
ad C
o.33
.99
0.75
Met
ro-N
orth
Com
mut
er R
ailro
ad C
o.$0
.21
1
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rA
lt Sc
ore
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt
Scor
eTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Exp
ense
Per
O
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Alt
Scor
eTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt
Scor
e
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
$3,6
25.8
60
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
22.7
9%0.
75W
estc
hest
er C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti0.
36%
1W
estc
hest
er C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti21
.44%
0.5
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
$69.
581
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
21.4
5%0.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n3.
62%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
14.1
4%1
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss$4
8.10
1Tr
ansi
t Exp
ress
18.5
2%1
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss2.
47%
0.75
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss10
.90%
1C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
$77.
861
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.16
.56%
1C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
4.11
%0.
75C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
16.2
1%0.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
45$4
8.84
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
4525
.06%
0.5
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
3.93
%0.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
4518
.99%
0.75
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A$9
2.02
1P
rivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
20.0
4%0.
75P
rivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
2.00
%1
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A22
.98%
0.5
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
$59.
261
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
15.2
6%1
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
5.44
%0.
5Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rit20
.23%
0.75
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y$4
6.98
1Y
ork
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
17.1
8%1
Yor
k C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y1.
79%
1Y
ork
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
15.8
4%0.
75P
ione
er V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$3
15.9
50.
75P
ione
er V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.10%
1P
ione
er V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2.
06%
1P
ione
er V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y15
.86%
0.75
City
of L
ong
Bea
ch$6
3.83
1C
ity o
f Lon
g B
each
16.1
1%1
City
of L
ong
Bea
ch0.
14%
1.5
City
of L
ong
Bea
ch4.
45%
1.5
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r $1
33.5
51
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r 23
.51%
0.75
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r 0.
49%
1La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
18.1
6%0.
75D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
$89.
471
DeC
amp
Bus
Lin
es c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i24
.01%
0.75
DeC
amp
Bus
Lin
es c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i0.
50%
1D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
10.9
4%1
Tran
s-H
udso
n E
xpre
ss c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A$4
4.05
1Tr
ans-
Hud
son
Exp
ress
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
28.8
1%0.
5Tr
ans-
Hud
son
Exp
ress
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
1.07
%1
Tran
s-H
udso
n E
xpre
ss c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A2.
72%
1.5
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$6
4.09
1G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
14.7
0%1
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y6.
62%
0.5
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y15
.17%
0.75
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Aut
hori
$65.
551
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Aut
hori
15.9
5%1
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Aut
hori
2.35
%1
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Aut
hori
17.0
8%0.
75Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
$120
.12
1Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
24.6
8%0.
5Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
0.94
%1
Tran
s-B
ridge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A24
.46%
0.5
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
$66.
891
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
20.4
4%0.
75W
orce
ster
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y2.
64%
0.75
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
15.0
5%0.
75S
outh
east
ern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$6
3.81
1S
outh
east
ern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y13
.59%
1.5
Sou
thea
ster
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
1.56
%1
Sou
thea
ster
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
31.3
9%0
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$4
9.07
1R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
15.7
3%1
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2.
24%
1R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
15.7
3%0.
75Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d$1
10.9
91
Tran
spor
t of R
ockl
and
23.6
4%0.
75Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d9.
46%
0Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d5.
43%
1.5
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r$7
7.25
1O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
21.5
1%0.
75O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
0.58
%1
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r13
.79%
1P
rivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
$45.
021
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n12
.25%
1.5
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n0.
00%
1.5
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n12
.77%
1Li
berty
Lin
es E
xpre
ss, I
nc.
$95.
871
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.27
.46%
0.5
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.0.
87%
1Li
berty
Lin
es E
xpre
ss, I
nc.
8.65
%1
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
$98.
391
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
13.3
5%1.
5R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.1.
22%
1R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.8.
58%
1M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
$54.
931
Met
ro-N
orth
Com
mut
er R
ailro
ad C
o.7.
63%
2M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
3.81
%0.
75M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
7.63
%1.
5
B-18
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
re
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
43.8
1%0.
75W
estc
hest
er C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti44
.29%
2W
estc
hest
er C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti37
,713
0.75
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
2,84
60.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n31
.58%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
0.00
%0.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n38
,578
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
3,33
21
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss32
.35%
0.75
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss0.
00%
0.75
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss34
,449
0.75
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss2,
705
0.75
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.30
.20%
0.75
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.20
.50%
1C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
26,2
330.
75C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
2,17
80.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
4510
8.33
%1.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
450.
00%
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
25,9
820.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
453,
053
1Pr
ivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
100.
00%
1.5
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A0.
00%
0.75
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A43
,990
1Pr
ivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
3,17
01
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
20.3
5%0.
75Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it3.
88%
0.75
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
39,8
040.
75Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it3,
028
1Yo
rk C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y34
.32%
0.75
York
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
5.75
%0.
75Yo
rk C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y46
,150
1Yo
rk C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
3,28
11
Pion
eer V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.50%
0.75
Pion
eer V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.36%
1Pi
onee
r Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
30,5
540.
75Pi
onee
r Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,16
20.
75C
ity o
f Lon
g Be
ach
26.2
7%0.
75C
ity o
f Lon
g Be
ach
48.2
6%2
City
of L
ong
Beac
h21
,920
0.5
City
of L
ong
Beac
h2,
630
0.75
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r 87
.70%
1La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
0.00
%0.
75La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
58,1
501
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r 1,
633
0.5
DeC
amp
Bus
Line
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i10
1.08
%1.
5D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
0.00
%0.
75D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
41,3
110.
75D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
2,63
40.
75Tr
ans-
Hud
son
Expr
ess
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
109.
67%
1.5
Tran
s-H
udso
n Ex
pres
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A0.
00%
0.75
Tran
s-H
udso
n Ex
pres
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A36
,753
0.75
Tran
s-H
udso
n Ex
pres
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A3,
189
1G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.24
%0.
5G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.00
%0.
75G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
55,7
611
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y4,
304
1.5
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Auth
ori
24.9
0%0.
75C
umbe
rland
-Dau
phin
-Har
risbu
rg T
rans
it Au
thor
i6.
81%
0.75
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Auth
ori
28,2
770.
75C
umbe
rland
-Dau
phin
-Har
risbu
rg T
rans
it Au
thor
i2,
308
0.75
Tran
s-Br
idge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A10
3.19
%1.
5Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
0.00
%0.
75Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
88,8
482
Tran
s-Br
idge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A1,
880
0.5
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.02%
0.75
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.54%
1W
orce
ster
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
53,5
201
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity4,
350
1.5
Sout
heas
tern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.2
0%0.
75So
uthe
aste
rn R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
16.7
9%1
Sout
heas
tern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y28
,917
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y2,
342
0.75
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y23
.89%
0.75
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2.
18%
0.75
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y47
,409
1R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3,29
31
Tran
spor
t of R
ockl
and
14.6
9%0.
5Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d52
.95%
2Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d47
,869
1Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d2,
529
0.75
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r95
.41%
1.5
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r0.
00%
0.75
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r77
,104
2O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
5,29
52
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n88
.61%
1.5
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n0.
00%
0.75
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n34
,569
0.75
Priv
ate
Tran
spor
tatio
n2,
331
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.41
.42%
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.0.
00%
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.37
,354
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.3,
020
1R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.73
.36%
1R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.0.
00%
0.75
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
57,1
411
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
2,55
10.
75M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
58.5
3%1
Met
ro-N
orth
Com
mut
er R
ailro
ad C
o.10
.10%
1M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
14,5
290.
5M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
2,67
50.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per V
ehic
le M
ileAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtat i
0.89
0.75
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
20,7
700.
75W
estc
hest
er C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti1,
658
0.75
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
33,7
520.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n0.
931
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
28,5
910.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n2,
441
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n35
,969
0.75
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss0.
971.
5Tr
ansi
t Exp
ress
27,3
140.
75Tr
ansi
t Exp
ress
2,12
81
Tran
sit E
xpre
ss33
,583
0.75
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.0.
921
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.20
,723
0.75
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.1,
707
0.75
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.24
,020
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
0.88
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n-45
20,1
750.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
452,
545
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
4522
,944
0.75
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A0.
860.
75Pr
ivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
32,5
461
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A2,
169
1Pr
ivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
37,9
701
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
0.88
0.75
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
orit
26,9
800.
75Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it2,
138
1Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it35
,075
0.75
York
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
0.97
1.5
York
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
37,6
471
York
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
2,62
71.
5Yo
rk C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
44,6
181
Pion
eer V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
961
Pion
eer V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y21
,995
0.75
Pion
eer V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
458
0.5
Pion
eer V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y29
,327
0.75
City
of L
ong
Beac
h0.
971.
5C
ity o
f Lon
g Be
ach
16,0
050.
5C
ity o
f Lon
g Be
ach
1,94
20.
75C
ity o
f Lon
g Be
ach
21,3
400.
5La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
0.83
0.75
Lake
land
Bus
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r 38
,632
1La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
1,12
10.
5La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
48,4
661
DeC
amp
Bus
Line
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i0.
780.
5D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
27,0
720.
75D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
1,88
20.
75D
eCam
p B
us L
ines
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmi
32,4
040.
75Tr
ans-
Hud
son
Expr
ess
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
0.77
0.5
Tran
s-H
udso
n Ex
pres
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A22
,160
0.75
Tran
s-H
udso
n Ex
pres
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A2,
013
0.75
Tran
s-H
udso
n Ex
pres
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A28
,204
0.75
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
951
Gre
ater
Brid
gepo
rt Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y38
,682
1G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,98
71.
5G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
52,8
341
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Auth
ori
0.88
0.75
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Auth
ori
20,5
000.
75C
umbe
rland
-Dau
phin
-Har
risbu
rg T
rans
it Au
thor
i1,
725
0.75
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Auth
ori
24,8
930.
75Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
0.99
1.5
Tran
s-Br
idge
Lin
es, I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A80
,555
2Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
1,70
80.
75Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
87,6
622
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
951
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity37
,834
1W
orce
ster
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3,07
61.
5W
orce
ster
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
50,7
321
Sout
heas
tern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.95
1So
uthe
aste
rn R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
18,2
920.
75So
uthe
aste
rn R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
1,50
40.
5So
uthe
aste
rn R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
27,4
370.
75R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.97
1.5
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y38
,423
1R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,60
71.
5R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
45,8
951
Tran
spor
t of R
ockl
and
0.85
0.75
Tran
spor
t of R
ockl
and
34,2
441
Tran
spor
t of R
ockl
and
1,71
60.
75Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d40
,615
1O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
0.90
1O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
44,2
931.
5O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
3,04
11.
5O
lym
pia
Trai
ls B
us C
o., I
nc. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arr
69,3
921.
5Pr
ivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
0.94
1Pr
ivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
27,9
770.
75Pr
ivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
1,90
00.
75Pr
ivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
32,6
400.
75Li
berty
Lin
es E
xpre
ss, I
nc.
0.74
1Li
berty
Lin
es E
xpre
ss, I
nc.
23,9
520.
75Li
berty
Lin
es E
xpre
ss, I
nc.
2,26
31
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.27
,465
0.75
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
0.80
0.5
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
36,2
181
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
1,55
10.
5R
ockl
and
Coa
ches
, Inc
.45
,827
1M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
0.86
0.75
Met
ro-N
orth
Com
mut
er R
ailro
ad C
o.10
,907
0.5
Met
ro-N
orth
Com
mut
er R
ailro
ad C
o.2,
131
1M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
12,4
650.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtat i
62.5
0%2
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r25
.25
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
New
Hav
en D
ivis
ion
25.8
1%0.
75Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
22.5
0Tr
ansi
t Exp
ress
22.9
5%0.
75Tr
ans-
Hud
son
Expr
ess
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
22.0
0C
NY
Cen
tro, I
nc.
15.9
1%0.
75Pr
ivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
20.0
0N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
4513
.73%
0.75
City
of L
ong
Beac
h19
.75
Priv
ate
One
of N
ew Y
ork
LLC
, d.b
.a. N
ew Y
ork
A16
.67%
0.75
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.50
Lehi
gh a
nd N
orth
ampt
on T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
30.0
0%1
York
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
19.2
5Yo
rk C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y18
.52%
0.75
Pion
eer V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.25
Pion
eer V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y33
.33%
1G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.2
5C
ity o
f Lon
g Be
ach
33.3
3%1
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
19.2
5La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
25.4
5%0.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-N
ew H
aven
Div
isio
n19
.00
DeC
amp
Bus
Line
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i19
.70%
0.75
CN
Y C
entro
, Inc
.19
.00
Tran
s-H
udso
n Ex
pres
s c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A27
.27%
1La
kela
nd B
us L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier
19.0
0G
reat
er B
ridge
port
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
36.5
9%1
Red
Ros
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.00
Cum
berla
nd-D
auph
in-H
arris
burg
Tra
nsit
Auth
ori
21.4
3%0.
75Tr
ansi
t Exp
ress
18.7
5Tr
ans-
Brid
ge L
ines
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
8.82
%0.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion-
4518
.75
Wor
cest
er R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity34
.09%
1Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d18
.75
Sout
heas
tern
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
50.0
0%1.
5M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
18.7
5R
ed R
ose
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.4
4%0.
75Pr
ivat
e O
ne o
f New
Yor
k LL
C, d
.b.a
. New
Yor
k A
18.2
5Tr
ansp
ort o
f Roc
klan
d18
.60%
0.75
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.18
.00
Oly
mpi
a Tr
ails
Bus
Co.
, Inc
. c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
r56
.67%
2So
uthe
aste
rn R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
17.7
5Pr
ivat
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
16.6
7%0.
75Le
high
and
Nor
tham
pton
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
it17
.50
Libe
rty L
ines
Exp
ress
, Inc
.14
.67%
0.75
DeC
amp
Bus
Lin
es c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
i17
.50
Roc
klan
d C
oach
es, I
nc.
26.5
3%1
Wes
tche
ster
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtati
16.7
5M
etro
-Nor
th C
omm
uter
Rai
lroad
Co.
14.2
9%0.
75C
umbe
rland
-Dau
phin
-Har
risbu
rg T
rans
it Au
thor
i16
.50
B-19
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,88
8.95
0.75
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
19.0
81.
5Be
rks
Area
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
15.6
00.
75Be
rks
Area
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
2.22
1C
onne
ctic
ut D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
2,41
8.28
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n13
.67
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
470.
75C
onne
ctic
ut D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
0.92
0.75
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
8,65
1.13
1G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct15
.50
0.75
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.08
0.75
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
1.18
0.75
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
844.
350.
75M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
16.0
00.
75M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.91
0.75
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct1.
160.
75G
reat
er A
ttleb
oro-
Taun
ton
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut h
3,10
1.73
0.75
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th13
.08
0.5
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th3.
470.
75G
reat
er A
ttleb
oro-
Taun
ton
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
0.41
0.75
Luze
rne
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
690.
420.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
13.5
00.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
16.0
90.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
3.33
1.5
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.3,
705.
060.
75N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
13.0
00.
5N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
11.7
10.
75N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
2.13
1Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
4,11
7.11
0.75
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it16
.00
0.75
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it10
.34
0.75
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it1.
090.
75Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
8,01
2.83
1Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.0
01.
5Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.0
20.
75Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2.26
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-St
amfo
rd D
ivis
ion
9,47
6.82
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-St
amfo
rd D
ivis
ion
17.9
21
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n20
.83
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n4.
152
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4,46
5.83
0.75
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
17.7
51
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.0
90.
75Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
681
Mer
rimac
k V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
927.
170.
75M
errim
ack
Valle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.00
0.75
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
10.1
10.
75M
errim
ack
Valle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
210.
75C
entre
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
11,5
96.6
81
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity18
.92
1C
entre
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
69.5
71
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity5.
062
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
6,80
4.14
1To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t22
.00
2To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t27
.34
0.75
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
1.76
1U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4,70
8.41
0.75
Utic
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.50
1U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
9.47
0.75
Utic
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
170.
75T-
Tran
1,04
7.26
0.75
T-Tr
an12
.25
0.5
T-Tr
an0.
570.
75T-
Tran
0.09
0.5
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t5,
380.
470.
75W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
16.0
00.
75W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
0.83
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t0.
120.
5W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n S
ervi
ces,
Inc.
2,99
0.57
0.75
Wes
tern
Mai
ne T
rans
porta
tion
Serv
ices
, Inc
.11
.25
0.5
Wes
tern
Mai
ne T
rans
porta
tion
Serv
ices
, Inc
.1.
720.
75W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
0.76
0.75
Wes
tmor
elan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
249.
580.
75W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.1
71
Wes
tmor
elan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
040.
75W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.40
0.75
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n4,
057.
810.
75W
illiam
spor
t Bur
eau
of T
rans
porta
tion
18.2
51
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n16
.49
0.75
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1.
631
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
5,15
3.45
0.75
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
17.2
51
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
20.6
90.
75N
orw
alk
Tran
sit D
istri
ct1.
811
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
port a
5,43
2.41
0.75
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
porta
18.2
51
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
porta
22.7
60.
75Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rta2.
811.
5O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C34
,825
.14
2O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C21
.17
1.5
Ora
nge-
New
ark-
Eliz
abet
h, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
1726
.11
2O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-El
izab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C6.
162
Sout
h O
rang
e Av
enue
IBO
A c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
ar30
,045
.99
2So
uth
Ora
nge
Aven
ue IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
21.4
21.
5So
uth
Ora
nge
Ave
nue
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
ar10
21.5
02
Sout
h O
rang
e A
venu
e IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
4.61
2C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
640.
120.
75C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m16
.75
1C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m6.
450.
75C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
450.
75C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
25,1
22.4
52
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A20
.42
1.5
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A11
4.07
1C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
0.65
0.75
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it Sy
stem
2,66
1.83
0.75
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it S
yste
m13
.33
0.75
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it S
yste
m7.
480.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1.45
1D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
ti o1,
552.
410.
75D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio20
.00
1.5
Dut
ches
s C
ount
y D
ivis
ion
of M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
3.38
0.75
Dut
ches
s C
ount
y D
ivis
ion
of M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
0.79
0.75
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1,
520.
240.
75C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.4
20.
75C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.48
0.75
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
540.
75C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
9,77
7.31
1C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
17.7
51
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y19
.51
0.75
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y1.
571
Leis
ure
Line
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmin
.5,
218.
940.
75Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
16.6
71
Leis
ure
Line
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmin
.79
.64
1Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
0.77
0.75
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity4,
192.
680.
75Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
12.3
50.
5Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
6.42
0.75
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
871
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n8,
068.
431
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n18
.00
1An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
23.1
10.
75An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
2.39
1C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
151.
250.
75C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.50
1C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y13
.51
0.75
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.42
1C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
966.
950.
75C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m17
.75
1C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m3.
080.
75C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
471
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns3,
576.
130.
75C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
13.1
70.
5C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
0.59
0.75
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns0.
470.
75G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
941.
700.
75G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
12.5
00.
5G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
0.84
0.75
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.0.
430.
75G
reat
er G
lens
Fal
ls T
rans
it Sy
stem
3,03
3.28
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.00
0.5
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
5.54
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1.07
0.75
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
6,19
3.28
1G
reat
er P
ortla
nd T
rans
it D
istri
ct18
.42
1G
reat
er P
ortla
nd T
rans
it D
istri
ct15
.98
0.75
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
1.69
1H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Serv
ices
1,88
3.77
0.75
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
13.0
00.
5H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Ser
vice
s0.
460.
75H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Ser
vice
s0.
470.
75H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
1,28
3.50
0.75
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it14
.00
0.75
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it1.
410.
75H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
0.85
0.75
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
258.
750.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.4
20.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3.31
0.75
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
800.
75M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y3,
899.
810.
75M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.33
1.5
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3.27
0.75
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.69
0.75
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n21
,501
.82
2M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
17.0
01
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n1.
680.
75M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
0.53
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.2,
202.
580.
75N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
Inc.
12.0
00.
5N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
Inc.
1.08
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.0.
660.
75N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.1,
997.
520.
75N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.13
.75
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
3.15
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
0.92
0.75
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
565.
000.
75Be
aver
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
16.5
01
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2.
040.
75Be
aver
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.58
0.75
Cap
e An
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
2,71
4.27
0.75
Cap
e A
nn T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
13.0
00.
5C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity7.
350.
75C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1.
080.
75C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.1,
084.
350.
75C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.19
.52
1.5
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
4.76
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
0.67
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
1,25
7.42
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
19.0
01.
5C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.4.
860.
75C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.1.
190.
75C
ity o
f Ban
gor
4,60
1.36
0.75
City
of B
ango
r13
.00
0.5
City
of B
ango
r7.
620.
75C
ity o
f Ban
gor
1.01
0.75
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
4,18
2.51
0.75
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
17.3
31
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
4.14
0.75
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
1.01
0.75
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n4,
017.
220.
75H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
18.1
71
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1.
960.
75H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
0.37
0.75
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
ri e7,
126.
141
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rie19
.00
1.5
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rie54
1.92
1.5
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rie4.
062
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct4,
489.
910.
75M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
13.0
00.
5M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
3.74
0.75
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
960.
75M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
5,42
9.41
0.75
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y13
.50
0.75
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y4.
250.
75M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
0.84
0.75
Putn
am C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t2,
041.
050.
75Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
16.1
71
Putn
am C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t3.
120.
75Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.37
0.75
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t2,
396.
150.
75So
uthe
ast A
rea
Tran
sit
14.2
50.
75So
uthe
ast A
rea
Tran
sit
4.67
0.75
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t1.
210.
75Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
4,30
8.79
0.75
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt16
.00
0.75
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt1.
220.
75Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
0.83
0.75
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s2,
080.
000.
75Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
12.5
00.
5Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
2.06
0.75
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s0.
800.
75
B-20
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Hea
dway
(m
inut
es)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Ca p
itaAl
t Sco
re
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
27.4
61
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.3
90.
75Be
rks
Area
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
56.3
60.
75Be
rks
Area
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
$29.
251
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n25
.62
1C
onne
ctic
ut D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
27.9
62
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n14
.18
1.5
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$1
4.77
1G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct15
.76
0.75
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
13.3
00.
75G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct18
.05
1G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct$0
.39
1M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
13.5
00.
75M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
11.6
50.
75M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
86.9
40.
5M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$2.9
71
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
t h9.
570.
75G
reat
er A
ttleb
oro-
Taun
ton
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
23.1
01.
5G
reat
er A
ttleb
oro-
Taun
ton
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
40.4
21
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th$1
6.71
1Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
49.6
72
Luze
rne
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity14
.91
0.75
Luze
rne
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity34
.40
1Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
$20.
701
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.26
.41
1N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
12.3
90.
75N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
37.5
11
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.$2
7.99
1Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
14.9
90.
75Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
13.7
20.
75Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
24.9
81
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it$4
0.78
1Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
28.5
41
Broc
kton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.66
0.75
Broc
kton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.76
1Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$44.
811
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n48
.22
2C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-St
amfo
rd D
ivis
ion
11.6
10.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-St
amfo
rd D
ivis
ion
20.2
01
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n$2
7.37
1Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity21
.04
1Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity12
.54
0.75
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
31.4
01
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$36.
681
Mer
rimac
k V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity16
.90
0.75
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.9
60.
75M
errim
ack
Valle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity51
.56
0.75
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$38.
031
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity48
.44
2C
entre
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
9.58
0.5
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity12
.39
1.5
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$6
8.18
1To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t21
.70
1To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t12
.29
0.75
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
26.1
51
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
$64.
011
Utic
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y14
.15
0.75
Utic
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.14
0.75
Utic
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y35
.63
1U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$28.
221
T-Tr
an3.
000.
5T-
Tran
33.4
92
T-Tr
an71
.22
0.75
T-Tr
an$8
.97
1W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
1.88
0.5
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t15
.66
1W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
21.6
31
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t$1
7.21
1W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n S
ervi
ces,
Inc.
10.4
80.
75W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
13.7
80.
75W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
38.4
51
Wes
tern
Mai
ne T
rans
porta
tion
Serv
ices
, Inc
.$6
.50
1W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
7.29
0.75
Wes
tmor
elan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.01
1W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
112.
500.
5W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$8.5
81
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n25
.04
1W
illiam
spor
t Bur
eau
of T
rans
porta
tion
15.3
51
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n42
.47
1W
illiam
spor
t Bur
eau
of T
rans
porta
tion
$35.
221
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
24.7
81
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
13.6
90.
75N
orw
alk
Tran
sit D
istri
ct29
.37
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$4
6.27
1Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rt a38
.17
1.5
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
porta
13.5
80.
75Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rta27
.86
1Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rta$3
2.03
1O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C56
.55
2O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C9.
180.
5O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-El
izab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C7.
531.
5O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-El
izab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C$9
95.2
40
Sout
h O
rang
e Av
enue
IBO
A c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
ar43
.70
2So
uth
Ora
nge
Aven
ue IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
9.47
0.5
Sout
h O
rang
e A
venu
e IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
7.70
1.5
Sout
h O
rang
e A
venu
e IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
$1,0
29.9
20
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
9.71
0.75
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
21.4
91.
5C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m65
.37
0.75
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$38.
881
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A9.
270.
75C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
14.2
20.
75C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
7.62
1.5
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A$5
24.3
80
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it Sy
stem
17.9
80.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
12.4
30.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
67.6
20.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
$19.
421
Dut
ches
s C
ount
y D
ivis
ion
of M
ass
Tran
spor
tati o
17.9
00.
75D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio22
.65
1.5
Dut
ches
s C
ount
y D
ivis
ion
of M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
78.6
30.
75D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio$8
.03
1C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
6.82
0.75
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity12
.51
0.75
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity53
.37
0.75
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$8
.67
1C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
20.5
01
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y13
.06
0.75
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y13
.52
1.5
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y$4
8.70
1Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
24.6
41
Leis
ure
Line
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmin
.31
.80
2Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
5.62
1.5
Leis
ure
Line
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmin
.$3
83.4
50.
5Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.6
41
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity10
.52
0.75
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity37
.47
1Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$19.
231
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n36
.40
1.5
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n15
.25
0.75
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n13
.11
1.5
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$4
7.61
1C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.39
0.75
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
12.2
50.
75C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y80
.11
0.75
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$46.
991
City
of N
ashu
a N
ashu
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
18.6
21
City
of N
ashu
a N
ashu
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.6
30.
75C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m55
.37
0.75
City
of N
ashu
a N
ashu
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$7.3
51
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns8.
480.
75C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
17.9
01
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns62
.36
0.75
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns$4
.15
1G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
5.82
0.5
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.13
.51
0.75
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.14
2.13
0G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
$9.0
61
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.02
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Syst
em15
.98
1G
reat
er G
lens
Fal
ls T
rans
it S
yste
m72
.75
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
$13.
641
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
18.5
71
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
11.0
10.
75G
reat
er P
ortla
nd T
rans
it D
istri
ct27
.92
1G
reat
er P
ortla
nd T
rans
it D
istri
ct$4
9.71
1H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Serv
ices
7.14
0.75
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
15.3
41
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
89.1
80.
5H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Ser
vice
s$1
.87
1H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
12.3
70.
75H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
14.6
30.
75H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
104.
580.
5H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
$10.
851
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity9.
880.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
12.3
00.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
54.4
90.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$17.
951
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
9.47
0.75
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
13.6
40.
75M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y31
.16
1M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$1
6.26
1M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
12.8
30.
75M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
24.2
21.
5M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
4.37
1.5
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n$7
.42
1N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
Inc.
10.9
50.
75N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
Inc.
16.5
11
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.53
.55
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.$4
.56
1N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.14
.92
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
16.2
11
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
82.7
80.
5N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.$9
.14
1Be
aver
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
12.7
70.
75Be
aver
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
22.0
91.
5Be
aver
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
47.8
01
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$1
1.63
1C
ape
Ann
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity16
.42
0.75
Cap
e A
nn T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
15.2
70.
75C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity23
.99
1C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$2
7.18
1C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.13
.91
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
20.7
81.
5C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.11
9.99
0C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.$2
1.92
1C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.17
.60
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
14.8
10.
75C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.12
5.59
0C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.$1
5.04
1C
ity o
f Ban
gor
16.2
70.
75C
ity o
f Ban
gor
16.1
41
City
of B
ango
r37
.51
1C
ity o
f Ban
gor
$14.
251
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
16.3
60.
75H
ousa
toni
c Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it16
.16
1H
ousa
toni
c Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it37
.14
1H
ousa
toni
c Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it$1
1.76
1H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
6.49
0.5
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n17
.35
1H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
46.8
91
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$1
5.92
1La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arri e
22.3
61
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rie5.
510.
5La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
44.4
31
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rie$7
53.5
40
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct15
.36
0.75
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct16
.04
1M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
41.9
51
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$1
3.12
1M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
8.81
0.75
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y10
.52
0.75
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y36
.11
1M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
$23.
671
Putn
am C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t7.
630.
75Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
20.6
51.
5Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
110.
400.
5Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
$22.
591
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t19
.19
1So
uthe
ast A
rea
Tran
sit
15.8
71
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t65
.39
0.75
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t$1
4.15
1Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
9.57
0.75
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt11
.49
0.75
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt31
.44
1Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
$5.7
61
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s7.
700.
75Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
9.67
0.5
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s86
.85
0.5
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s$9
.89
1
B-21
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$51.
481
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
15.0
9%1
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y1.
84%
1Be
rks
Area
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
20.0
7%0.
75C
onne
ctic
ut D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
$807
.64
0C
onne
ctic
ut D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
12.2
8%1
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
85%
1C
onne
ctic
ut D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
16.1
7%1
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$81.
000.
75G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct2.
47%
2G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct0.
00%
1.5
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
6.61
%1.
5M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$44.
241
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct7.
47%
1.5
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
00%
1.5
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct21
.10%
0.75
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
t h$4
6.03
1G
reat
er A
ttleb
oro-
Taun
ton
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
8.66
%1.
5G
reat
er A
ttleb
oro-
Taun
ton
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
0.90
%1
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th7.
54%
1.5
Luze
rne
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$6
3.90
1Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
23.6
5%0.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
2.13
%1
Luze
rne
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity14
.93%
1N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
$63.
111
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.13
.90%
1N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
1.29
%1
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.20
.19%
0.75
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it$5
9.13
1Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
16.8
0%1
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it2.
94%
0.75
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it17
.73%
0.75
Broc
kton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$6
7.23
0.75
Broc
kton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.09%
1Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.07
%1
Broc
kton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y15
.98%
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-St
amfo
rd D
ivis
ion
$63.
361
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n22
.70%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n3.
49%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n10
.77%
1Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
8.97
1Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity21
.37%
0.75
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.71
%1
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
7.40
%1.
5M
errim
ack
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$63.
571
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16.2
1%1
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.38
%1
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
15.9
6%1
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$4
7.47
1C
entre
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
15.2
7%1
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity4.
71%
0.5
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity10
.82%
1To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$5
0.80
1To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t17
.38%
0.75
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
1.24
%1
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
23.8
7%0.
75U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$42.
181
Utic
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y14
.14%
1U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
5.33
%0.
5U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.8
8%0.
75T-
Tran
$47.
191
T-Tr
an10
.58%
1T-
Tran
1.81
%1
T-Tr
an24
.45%
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t$3
8.94
1W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
20.3
6%0.
75W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
2.55
%0.
75W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
15.9
1%1
Wes
tern
Mai
ne T
rans
porta
tion
Ser
vice
s, In
c.$3
9.55
1W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
35.0
2%0
Wes
tern
Mai
ne T
rans
porta
tion
Serv
ices
, Inc
.7.
02%
0W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
0.72
%1.
5W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$60.
241
Wes
tmor
elan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y10
.84%
1W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.00
%1.
5W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
26.6
7%0.
5W
illiam
spor
t Bur
eau
of T
rans
porta
tion
$53.
451
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n19
.89%
0.75
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n2.
60%
0.75
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n14
.74%
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$5
5.42
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit D
istri
ct18
.87%
0.75
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.67
%1
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
9.96
%1
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
port a
$53.
711
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
porta
17.3
9%0.
75Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rta1.
64%
1Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rta9.
11%
1O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C$3
2.60
1O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C20
.12%
0.75
Ora
nge-
New
ark-
Eliz
abet
h, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
2.16
%1
Ora
nge-
New
ark-
Eliz
abet
h, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
13.9
3%1
Sout
h O
rang
e Av
enue
IBO
A c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
ar$4
4.06
1So
uth
Ora
nge
Aven
ue IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
40.2
5%0
Sout
h O
rang
e A
venu
e IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
4.93
%0.
5So
uth
Ora
nge
Ave
nue
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
ar11
.42%
1C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m$5
8.49
1C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m17
.56%
0.75
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
8.66
%0
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
28.8
5%0.
5C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
$42.
611
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A18
.51%
0.75
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A0.
76%
1C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
23.7
6%0.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$4
6.71
1C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
15.5
2%1
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it S
yste
m4.
84%
0.5
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it S
yste
m16
.10%
1D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
ti o$4
2.51
1D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio14
.58%
1D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio1.
47%
1D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio5.
64%
1.5
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$3
9.88
1C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
9.17
%1.
5C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4.59
%0.
5C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
8.28
%1
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y$5
1.17
1C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
19.1
4%0.
75C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
0.82
%1
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y11
.84%
1Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
$118
.62
0.75
Leis
ure
Line
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmin
.28
.28%
0.5
Leis
ure
Line
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmin
.0.
35%
1Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
4.83
%1.
5Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$58.
811
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity11
.21%
1Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
7.85
%0
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity23
.18%
0.75
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$7
5.01
0.75
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n17
.44%
0.75
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
46%
1An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
9.94
%1
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$60.
491
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
22.1
1%0.
75C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y6.
07%
0.5
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
16.9
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m$4
4.40
1C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m13
.44%
1C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
69%
1C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m15
.09%
1C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
$59.
271
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns12
.92%
1C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
0.68
%1
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns16
.07%
1G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
$62.
581
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.25
.68%
0.5
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.2.
89%
0.75
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.39
.13%
0G
reat
er G
lens
Fal
ls T
rans
it Sy
stem
$41.
901
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.62%
1G
reat
er G
lens
Fal
ls T
rans
it S
yste
m3.
05%
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
16.5
8%1
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$57.
791
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
17.0
1%1
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2.40
%0.
75G
reat
er P
ortla
nd T
rans
it D
istri
ct13
.85%
1H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Serv
ices
$29.
131
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
24.4
5%0.
75H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Ser
vice
s0.
05%
1.5
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
5.86
%1.
5H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
$95.
070.
75H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
18.7
3%0.
75H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
1.83
%1
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it11
.21%
1M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$53.
631
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity20
.48%
0.75
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity4.
46%
0.5
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.54%
1M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$4
7.11
1M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.00%
1M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2.
00%
1M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.00%
0.75
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n$5
6.62
1M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
9.95
%1.
5M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
7.24
%0
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n24
.37%
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.$4
6.45
1N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
Inc.
14.0
1%1
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.1.
19%
1N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
Inc.
18.1
8%0.
75N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.$4
3.28
1N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.15
.83%
1N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.1.
28%
1N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.16
.85%
0.75
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$7
2.70
0.75
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.01%
1Be
aver
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.52
%1
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y45
.90%
0C
ape
Ann
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$6
0.69
1C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity14
.06%
1C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
91%
1C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity34
.41%
0C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.$6
4.01
1C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.19
.75%
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
1.57
%1
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
26.0
1%0.
5C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.$5
4.50
1C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.15
.68%
1C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.1.
66%
1C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.24
.11%
0.75
City
of B
ango
r$3
0.41
1C
ity o
f Ban
gor
13.4
0%1
City
of B
ango
r0.
28%
1C
ity o
f Ban
gor
14.9
1%1
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
$46.
501
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
12.2
7%1
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
1.07
%1
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
24.3
2%0.
75H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
$52.
781
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n6.
98%
1.5
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1.
18%
1H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
14.6
6%1
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rie$3
1.09
1La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
43.9
1%0
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rie1.
00%
1La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
13.2
6%1
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$5
3.94
1M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
14.9
3%1
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct1.
56%
1M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
39.0
0%0
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$4
9.12
1M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
15.4
3%1
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y4.
20%
0.75
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y14
.59%
1Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
$55.
331
Putn
am C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t25
.44%
0.5
Putn
am C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t0.
30%
1Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.45
%1.
5So
uthe
ast A
rea
Tran
sit
$58.
151
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t24
.54%
0.5
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t1.
86%
1So
uthe
ast A
rea
Tran
sit
16.3
3%1
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt$4
5.26
1Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
13.8
5%1
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt0.
04%
1.5
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt16
.49%
1Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
$36.
941
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s13
.12%
1Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
0.40
%1
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s10
.51%
1
B-22
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
re
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
29.0
5%0.
75Be
rks
Area
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2.
81%
0.75
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y34
,295
0.75
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y2,
771
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n21
.55%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
00%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n27
,698
0.5
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1,
283
0.5
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.45
%0.
5G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct52
.43%
1.5
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
36,4
260.
75G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
739
0.75
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct33
.53%
1M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
18.0
6%0.
75M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
49,5
181
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct4,
382
1.5
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
t h27
.39%
0.75
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th10
.61%
0.75
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th51
,110
1G
reat
er A
ttleb
oro-
Taun
ton
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
2,28
10.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
16.1
6%0.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
7.83
%0.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
34,0
150.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
2,34
80.
75N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
22.8
5%0.
75N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
0.00
%0.
75N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
32,2
760.
75N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
2,49
00.
75Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
25.6
5%0.
75Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
2.91
%0.
75Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
24,9
670.
5Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
1,78
00.
5Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
26.6
7%0.
75Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
12.4
6%0.
75Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
34,5
340.
75Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,66
80.
75C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-St
amfo
rd D
ivis
ion
40.5
0%1
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n0.
00%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n37
,849
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n3,
276
1Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity42
.19%
1Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity4.
75%
0.75
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
30,7
990.
75Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
464
0.75
Mer
rimac
k V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity11
.80%
0.75
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.7
6%1
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
40,1
101
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,92
91
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity43
.14%
1C
entre
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
5.31
%0.
75C
entre
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
30,5
970.
75C
entre
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
2,95
71
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
32.9
1%1
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
21.0
4%1
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
38,0
220.
75To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t3,
110
1U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
26.8
6%0.
75U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
8.53
%0.
75U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
35,3
750.
75U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,87
81
T-Tr
an41
.67%
1T-
Tran
7.22
%0.
75T-
Tran
45,0
081
T-Tr
an1,
403
0.5
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t21
.58%
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t24
.86%
1W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
30,8
280.
75W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
2,08
20.
75W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n S
ervi
ces,
Inc.
5.64
%0.
75W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
0.00
%0.
75W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
28,9
580.
75W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
2,04
20.
75W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
10.7
9%0.
75W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
16.4
5%0.
75W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
52,6
531.
5W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,80
81
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n18
.14%
0.75
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n9.
06%
0.75
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n45
,451
1W
illiam
spor
t Bur
eau
of T
rans
porta
tion
3,12
31
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
22.6
6%0.
75N
orw
alk
Tran
sit D
istri
ct6.
42%
0.75
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
36,3
980.
75N
orw
alk
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
689
0.75
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
port a
26.1
0%0.
75Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rta10
.78%
0.75
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
porta
37,1
230.
75Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rta2,
653
0.75
Ora
nge-
New
ark-
Eliz
abet
h, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
97.8
4%2
Ora
nge-
New
ark-
Eliz
abet
h, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
0.00
%0.
75O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-El
izab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C45
,765
1O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-El
izab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C4,
722
2So
uth
Ora
nge
Aven
ue IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
109.
47%
2So
uth
Ora
nge
Aven
ue IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
0.00
%0.
75So
uth
Ora
nge
Ave
nue
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
ar39
,237
0.75
Sout
h O
rang
e A
venu
e IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
4,01
71.
5C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m43
.23%
1C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m6.
96%
0.75
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
62,7
481.
5C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
996
1C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
116.
40%
2C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
0.00
%0.
75C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
56,1
401.
5C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
3,56
71
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it Sy
stem
18.6
1%0.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
8.63
%0.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
40,7
001
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it S
yste
m3,
183
1D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
ti o19
.55%
0.75
Dut
ches
s C
ount
y D
ivis
ion
of M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
22.5
0%1
Dut
ches
s C
ount
y D
ivis
ion
of M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
54,4
171.
5D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio2,
564
0.75
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity26
.86%
0.75
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.73%
0.75
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity17
,480
0.5
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1,
456
0.5
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y23
.40%
0.75
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y39
.25%
1.5
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y30
,584
0.75
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y2,
319
0.75
Leis
ure
Line
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
dmin
.87
.60%
2Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
0.00
%0.
75Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
22,6
740.
5Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
687
1Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.9
2%0.
75Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.5
4%1
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity31
,047
0.75
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
861
1An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
24.1
8%0.
75An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
23.5
3%1
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n27
,277
0.5
Anna
polis
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1,
781
0.5
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
14.0
3%0.
75C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y8.
56%
0.75
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
36,4
720.
75C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
957
1C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m15
.40%
0.75
City
of N
ashu
a N
ashu
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
28.9
6%1
City
of N
ashu
a N
ashu
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
36,3
710.
75C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
951
1C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
5.49
%0.
75C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
66.6
8%2
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns71
,064
2C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
3,86
01.
5G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
33.8
3%1
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.15
.60%
0.75
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.33
,569
0.75
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.2,
384
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.80%
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Syst
em10
.80%
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
64,7
172
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3,80
11.
5G
reat
er P
ortla
nd T
rans
it D
istri
ct26
.21%
0.75
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
57.6
3%2
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
32,5
360.
75G
reat
er P
ortla
nd T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
977
1H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Serv
ices
12.3
7%0.
75H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Ser
vice
s50
.40%
1.5
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
47,4
001
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
3,05
01
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it8.
07%
0.75
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it71
.61%
2H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
33,9
680.
75H
untin
gton
Are
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
2,46
50.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
11.2
8%0.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
38.6
8%1.
5M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
37,7
960.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3,16
01
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
23.4
5%0.
75M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
02%
0.75
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
30,3
290.
75M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
230
0.75
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n54
.68%
1.5
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n9.
54%
0.75
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n37
,897
0.75
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n1,
565
0.5
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.19
.04%
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.0.
00%
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.36
,741
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.2,
244
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
28.2
3%0.
75N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.0.
00%
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
47,3
381
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
2,92
21
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y26
.65%
0.75
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y13
.85%
0.75
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y50
,436
1Be
aver
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,59
80.
75C
ape
Ann
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity13
.02%
0.75
Cap
e A
nn T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
16.1
6%0.
75C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity18
,213
0.5
Cap
e A
nn T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1,20
00.
5C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.18
.49%
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
20.4
2%1
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
46,7
381
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
2,34
80.
75C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.19
.66%
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
16.4
4%0.
75C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.42
,460
1C
entro
of O
sweg
o, In
c.2,
861
1C
ity o
f Ban
gor
31.9
4%1
City
of B
ango
r30
.96%
1C
ity o
f Ban
gor
47,4
001
City
of B
ango
r2,
979
1H
ousa
toni
c Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it14
.75%
0.75
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
25.5
4%1
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
44,6
701
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
2,77
30.
75H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
4.72
%0.
75H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
60.0
5%2
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n57
,804
1.5
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n3,
214
1La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
100.
76%
2La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
0.00
%0.
75La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
31,9
880.
75La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
5,70
92
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct13
.09%
0.75
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct24
.39%
1M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
51,7
721
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct3,
525
1M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
23.8
5%0.
75M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
17.0
8%0.
75M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
35,8
390.
75M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
3,35
51
Putn
am C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t10
.68%
0.75
Putn
am C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t60
.07%
2Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
80,5
362
Putn
am C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t3,
856
1.5
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t31
.31%
1So
uthe
ast A
rea
Tran
sit
6.70
%0.
75S
outh
east
Are
a Tr
ansi
t45
,098
1So
uthe
ast A
rea
Tran
sit
2,72
60.
75Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
18.0
5%0.
75Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
20.6
0%1
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt27
,184
0.5
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt2,
308
0.75
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s12
.73%
0.75
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s61
.22%
2Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
29,4
080.
75Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
3,16
11
B-23
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per V
ehic
le M
ileAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.98
1Be
rks
Area
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity25
,206
0.75
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y2,
035
0.75
Berk
s Ar
ea R
eadi
ng T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y33
,608
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
581
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n15
,981
0.5
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n57
21
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n15
,981
0.5
Gre
ater
Har
tford
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.95
1G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct34
,605
1G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
602
1G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct34
,605
0.75
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
971
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct36
,017
1M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
3,09
11.
5M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
48,0
221
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
t h0.
941
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th44
,411
1.5
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th1,
923
0.75
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
th48
,272
1Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
0.93
1Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
25,7
360.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
1,72
60.
75Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
31,5
470.
75N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
0.89
0.75
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.21
,697
0.75
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.1,
751
0.75
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.28
,696
0.75
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it0.
941
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it16
,891
0.5
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it1,
231
0.5
Alto
ona
Met
ro T
rans
it23
,526
0.5
Broc
kton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
920.
75Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
27,6
000.
75Br
ockt
on A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,18
11
Broc
kton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y31
,710
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n0.
981
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n28
,430
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n2,
449
1C
onne
ctic
ut T
rans
it-St
amfo
rd D
ivis
ion
37,0
461
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.95
1Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity23
,251
0.75
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1,85
50.
75Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity29
,296
0.75
Mer
rimac
k V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
880.
75M
errim
ack
Valle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity28
,239
0.75
Mer
rimac
k Va
lley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,02
20.
75M
errim
ack
Valle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity35
,126
0.75
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
751
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity20
,574
0.75
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
147
1C
entre
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
22,9
480.
5To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t0.
961
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
24,9
140.
75To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t2,
027
0.75
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
36,4
600.
75U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.96
1U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
27,1
610.
75U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,23
71
Utic
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y33
,951
0.75
T-Tr
an0.
921
T-Tr
an37
,003
1T-
Tran
1,10
50.
5T-
Tran
41,6
291
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t0.
991
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
epar
tmen
t30
,366
1W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
1,94
00.
75W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
30,3
660.
75W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n S
ervi
ces,
Inc.
0.91
0.75
Wes
tern
Mai
ne T
rans
porta
tion
Serv
ices
, Inc
.19
,813
0.5
Wes
tern
Mai
ne T
rans
porta
tion
Serv
ices
, Inc
.1,
438
0.75
Wes
tern
Mai
ne T
rans
porta
tion
Serv
ices
, Inc
.26
,417
0.75
Wes
tmor
elan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
800.
5W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
28,1
250.
75W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1,56
20.
75W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
42,1
871
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
971
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n30
,681
1W
illiam
spor
t Bur
eau
of T
rans
porta
tion
1,99
80.
75W
illiam
spor
t Bur
eau
of T
rans
porta
tion
44,1
031
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.95
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit D
istri
ct30
,115
0.75
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
2,19
91
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
34,5
430.
75Br
oom
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rt a0.
921
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
porta
31,0
661
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
porta
2,28
81
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
porta
34,2
520.
75O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C0.
880.
75O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C32
,454
1O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-El
izab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C3,
535
2O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-El
izab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C40
,141
1So
uth
Ora
nge
Aven
ue IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
0.93
1So
uth
Ora
nge
Aven
ue IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
28,0
200.
75So
uth
Ora
nge
Ave
nue
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
ar2,
959
1.5
Sout
h O
rang
e A
venu
e IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
36,5
100.
75C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
981
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
46,8
851.
5C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
182
1C
hem
ung
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m61
,803
2C
omm
unity
Tra
nsit,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rier A
0.81
0.5
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A41
,397
1.5
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A2,
912
1.5
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A45
,340
1C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
920.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
30,0
490.
75C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
2,41
71
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it S
yste
m37
,302
1D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
ti o0.
850.
5D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio42
,786
1.5
Dut
ches
s C
ount
y D
ivis
ion
of M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
1,88
90.
75D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tio46
,077
1C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.97
1C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16,3
700.
5C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1,30
90.
5C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16,9
150.
5C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
0.94
1C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
23,9
780.
75C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
1,83
50.
75C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
28,7
730.
75Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
0.69
1Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
15,5
410.
5Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
489
1Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
15,5
410.
5Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.89
0.75
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity22
,724
0.75
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
160
1Lo
wel
l Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
27,5
450.
75An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
0.99
1An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
26,8
950.
75An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
1,76
30.
75An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
26,8
950.
75C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
961
Cam
bria
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
28,3
830.
75C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
316
1C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y35
,194
0.75
City
of N
ashu
a N
ashu
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.95
1C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m24
,710
0.75
City
of N
ashu
a N
ashu
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
1,95
60.
75C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m34
,595
0.75
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns0.
941
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns33
,258
1C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
1,85
80.
75C
lark
stow
n M
ini-T
rans
66,5
162
G G
& C
Bus
Com
pany
, Inc
.0.
900.
75G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
20,0
900.
5G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
1,48
70.
75G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
30,1
340.
75G
reat
er G
lens
Fal
ls T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.91
0.75
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Syst
em58
,785
2G
reat
er G
lens
Fal
ls T
rans
it S
yste
m3,
678
2G
reat
er G
lens
Fal
ls T
rans
it S
yste
m58
,785
1.5
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.98
1G
reat
er P
ortla
nd T
rans
it D
istri
ct23
,805
0.75
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,16
11
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
31,7
410.
75H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Serv
ices
0.91
0.75
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
17,8
960.
5H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Ser
vice
s1,
167
0.5
Har
ford
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
ervi
ces
42,9
501
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it0.
961
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it25
,176
0.75
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it1,
721
0.75
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it32
,729
0.75
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
961
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity31
,545
1M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,56
51
Man
ches
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity36
,398
0.75
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.91
0.75
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
25,3
160.
75M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
857
0.75
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
27,6
180.
75M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
1.00
1.5
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n37
,897
1M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
1,56
50.
75M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
37,8
971
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.0.
880.
75N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
Inc.
32,4
511
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.1,
966
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.32
,451
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
0.94
1N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.44
,672
1.5
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
2,75
61
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
44,6
721
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
900.
75Be
aver
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
34,3
951
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
557
0.75
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y45
,144
1C
ape
Ann
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
910.
75C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity16
,570
0.5
Cap
e A
nn T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1,08
50.
5C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity16
,570
0.5
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
0.96
1C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.39
,058
1C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.1,
879
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Cay
uga,
Inc.
45,0
671
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
0.92
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
36,1
961
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
2,44
41
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
38,9
801
City
of B
ango
r0.
981
City
of B
ango
r33
,163
1C
ity o
f Ban
gor
2,05
50.
75C
ity o
f Ban
gor
46,4
281
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
0.94
1H
ousa
toni
c Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it25
,095
0.75
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
1,55
30.
75H
ousa
toni
c Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it41
,825
1H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
0.94
1H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
54,4
562
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n3,
139
1.5
How
ard
Tran
sit
(HT)
c/o
Cor
ridor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n54
,456
1.5
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
ri e0.
910.
75La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
25,9
600.
75La
feye
tte-G
reen
ville
IBO
A c/
o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
4,71
12
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
rie29
,075
0.75
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
971
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct35
,246
1M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
2,19
71
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit D
istri
ct50
,351
1.5
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y0.
961
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y25
,790
0.75
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y2,
451
1M
onta
chus
ett R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
34,3
860.
75Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.96
1Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
64,6
332
Put
nam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
3,13
01.
5Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
77,5
602
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t0.
920.
75So
uthe
ast A
rea
Tran
sit
31,5
051
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t1,
985
0.75
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t41
,453
1Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
0.95
1Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
25,9
310.
75Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
2,25
71
Tran
sIT
Serv
ices
of F
rede
rick
Cou
nt25
,931
0.75
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s0.
991
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s23
,296
0.75
Villa
ge o
f Spr
ing
Valle
y Bu
s2,
409
1Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
29,1
200.
75
B-24
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
E R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Berk
s A
rea
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity33
.33%
1O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-El
izab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C26
.50
Con
nect
icut
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
00%
0.75
Put
nam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
24.5
0G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct0.
00%
0.75
Sou
th O
rang
e A
venu
e IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
24.0
0M
ilfor
d Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
33.3
3%1
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns23
.25
Gre
ater
Attl
ebor
o-Ta
unto
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
uth
8.70
%0.
75H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
23.2
5Lu
zern
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y22
.58%
0.75
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A22
.25
Nor
thea
st T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.32
.26%
1G
reat
er G
lens
Fal
ls T
rans
it Sy
stem
22.0
0Al
toon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
39.2
9%1
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
ri e22
.00
Broc
kton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y14
.89%
0.75
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Stam
ford
Div
isio
n21
.25
Con
nect
icut
Tra
nsit-
Sta
mfo
rd D
ivis
ion
30.3
0%1
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
21.0
0Er
ie M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity26
.00%
1M
onse
y N
ew S
quar
e Tr
ails
Cor
pora
tion
21.0
0M
errim
ack
Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y24
.39%
1D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
ti o20
.75
Cen
tre A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
11.5
4%0.
75G
reat
er H
artfo
rd T
rans
it D
istri
ct20
.50
Tom
pkin
s C
onso
lidat
ed A
rea
Tran
sit
46.3
4%1
Milf
ord
Tran
sit D
istri
ct20
.50
Utic
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y25
.00%
1G
reat
er A
ttleb
oro-
Taun
ton
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
h20
.25
T-Tr
an12
.50%
0.75
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
20.2
5W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
0.00
%0.
75Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
20.2
5W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
33.3
3%1
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
20.2
5W
estm
orel
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
50.0
0%1.
5To
mpk
ins
Con
solid
ated
Are
a Tr
ansi
t20
.00
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n43
.75%
1H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Ser
vice
s19
.75
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
14.7
1%0.
75B
room
e C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rt a19
.50
Broo
me
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pub
lic T
rans
port a
10.2
6%0.
75C
hitte
nden
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
19.5
0O
rang
e-N
ewar
k-E
lizab
eth,
Inc.
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
C23
.68%
0.75
Luze
rne
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.25
Sout
h O
rang
e A
venu
e IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
30.3
0%1
Willi
amsp
ort B
urea
u of
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n19
.25
Che
mun
g C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
31.8
2%1
City
of B
ango
r19
.25
Com
mun
ity T
rans
it, In
c. c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r A9.
52%
0.75
Hou
sato
nic
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
19.2
5C
ount
y of
Lac
kaw
anna
Tra
nsit
Syst
em24
.14%
0.75
Erie
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.0
0D
utch
ess
Cou
nty
Div
isio
n of
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
ti o7.
69%
0.75
Wes
tmor
elan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.00
Cap
e C
od R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
3.33
%0.
75B
rock
ton
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.75
Chi
ttend
en C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y20
.00%
0.75
Ann
apol
is D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
18.7
5Le
isur
e Li
ne c
/o N
J Tr
ansi
t, C
arrie
r Adm
in.
0.00
%0.
75C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m18
.75
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity21
.21%
0.75
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
18.7
5An
napo
lis D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
0.00
%0.
75M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
18.7
5C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y24
.00%
0.75
Ber
ks A
rea
Rea
ding
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
18.5
0C
ity o
f Nas
hua
Nas
hua
Tran
sit S
yste
m40
.00%
1V
illage
of S
prin
g V
alle
y B
us18
.50
Cla
rkst
own
Min
i-Tra
ns10
0.00
%2
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
18.2
5G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
50.0
0%1.
5C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.18
.25
Gre
ater
Gle
ns F
alls
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
0.00
%0.
75S
outh
east
Are
a Tr
ansi
t18
.25
Gre
ater
Por
tland
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
33.3
3%1
Tran
sIT
Ser
vice
s of
Fre
deric
k C
ount
18.2
5H
arfo
rd C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Serv
ices
140.
00%
2M
errim
ack
Valle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.00
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it30
.00%
1T-
Tran
18.0
0M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y15
.38%
0.75
Hun
tingt
on A
rea
Rap
id T
rans
it18
.00
Mid
Mon
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
9.09
%0.
75M
anch
este
r Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y18
.00
Mon
sey
New
Squ
are
Trai
ls C
orpo
ratio
n0.
00%
0.75
Bea
ver C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.00
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.0.
00%
0.75
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
18.0
0N
ew B
ritai
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
pany
, Inc
.0.
00%
0.75
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y18
.00
Beav
er C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y31
.25%
1C
onne
ctic
ut D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
17.7
5C
ape
Ann
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
0.00
%0.
75U
tica
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.7
5C
entro
of C
ayug
a, In
c.15
.38%
0.75
Cou
nty
of L
acka
wan
na T
rans
it S
yste
m17
.75
Cen
tro o
f Osw
ego,
Inc.
7.69
%0.
75M
id M
on V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.75
City
of B
ango
r40
.00%
1N
orth
east
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
17.5
0H
ousa
toni
c A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
66.6
7%1.
5W
ashi
ngto
n C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
17.2
5H
owar
d Tr
ansi
t (H
T) c
/o C
orrid
or T
rans
porta
tion
0.00
%0.
75C
ambr
ia C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.25
Lafe
yette
-Gre
envi
lle IB
OA
c/o
NJ
Tran
sit,
Car
ri e12
.00%
0.75
Low
ell R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
17.0
0M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
42.8
6%1
New
Brit
ain
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
ompa
ny In
c.17
.00
Mon
tach
uset
t Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y33
.33%
1A
ltoon
a M
etro
Tra
nsit
16.0
0Pu
tnam
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
20.0
0%0.
75C
ape
Cod
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y16
.00
Sout
heas
t Are
a Tr
ansi
t31
.58%
1W
este
rn M
aine
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Se
rvic
es, I
nc.
15.5
0Tr
ansI
T Se
rvic
es o
f Fre
deric
k C
ount
0.00
%0.
75G
G &
C B
us C
ompa
ny, I
nc.
14.7
5Vi
llage
of S
prin
g Va
lley
Bus
25.0
0%1
Cap
e A
nn T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
14.7
5
B-25
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up A
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
13,4
19.0
41
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
22.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n38
.70
1C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n2.
320.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y10
,162
.34
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
23.1
71
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.1
30.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
910.
75Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
7,99
0.59
0.75
Subu
rban
Mob
ility
Auth
ority
for R
egio
nal T
rans
p23
.17
1Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
3.65
0.5
Subu
rban
Mob
ility
Auth
ority
for R
egio
nal T
rans
p1.
000.
5So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
9,10
4.35
0.75
Sout
hwes
t Ohi
o R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity21
.83
0.75
Sout
hwes
t Ohi
o R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity35
.05
1So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2.13
0.75
Kans
as C
ity A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity8,
903.
430.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
19.7
51
Kans
as C
ity A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity29
.71
0.75
Kans
as C
ity A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity1.
700.
75M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m11
,620
.13
0.75
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
23.5
01
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
70.8
01.
5M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m3.
531.
5Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
13,9
92.0
01
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
it24
.00
1.5
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit33
.35
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit2.
050.
75Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y8,
781.
000.
75Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y22
.50
0.75
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
13.9
00.
75Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y1.
870.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
10,2
26.1
10.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
24.0
01.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
44.8
71
Met
ro T
rans
it2.
921
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
4,31
3.79
0.75
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
21.4
20.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n8.
820.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n1.
690.
75C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
47,8
91.6
82
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y24
.00
1.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y81
.35
1.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y4.
732
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
27.2
30.
75C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n11
.76
0.75
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
2,27
00.
75C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n29
1,85
31.
5C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y24
.36
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
12.7
30.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y3,
010
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
108,
018
0.75
Subu
rban
Mob
ility
Auth
ority
for R
egio
nal T
rans
p17
.79
0.5
Subu
rban
Mob
ility
Auth
ority
for R
egio
nal T
rans
p17
.82
2Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
3,84
10.
75Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
202,
555
1So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
28.3
80.
75So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.3
40.
75So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
10,4
231.
5So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
49,2
130.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
26.0
10.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
15.2
71
Kans
as C
ity A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity8,
383
1Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
177,
712
1M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m45
.81
1.5
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.9
60.
75M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m1,
905
0.75
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
126,
378
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
it25
.72
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
it12
.56
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit4,
938
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit80
,420
0.75
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
28.9
80.
75Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y15
.51
1Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y6,
828
1Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y54
,415
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it39
.87
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
13.6
71
Met
ro T
rans
it1,
304
0.5
Met
ro T
rans
it14
7,05
90.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n23
.87
0.75
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
14.1
61
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
10,2
111.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n41
5,52
32
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y47
.09
1.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y9.
950.
5C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
3,83
80.
75C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
44,4
930.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
17.4
10.
75C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$1
59.1
80.
5C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$1
12.0
10.
5C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n21
.28%
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
15.8
11
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$70.
001
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$89.
150.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y16
.83%
1Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
20.8
90.
75Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
$20.
941.
5Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
$102
.02
0.5
Subu
rban
Mob
ility
Auth
ority
for R
egio
nal T
rans
p32
.80%
0So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16.0
11
Sout
hwes
t Ohi
o R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$8
9.04
1So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$72.
091.
5So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.4
5%0.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
16.6
91
Kans
as C
ity A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$9
7.27
0.75
Kans
as C
ity A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$8
5.13
1Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
22.1
4%0.
75M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m17
.45
0.75
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$115
.38
0.75
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$74.
661.
5M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m16
.71%
1Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
12.7
91
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
it$1
20.6
80.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
$93.
050.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
20.5
2%1
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
18.2
80.
75Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y$4
3.81
1.5
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
$91.
310.
75Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y21
.37%
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it13
.63
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
$113
.41
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it$1
00.7
80.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
16.7
1%1
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
32.7
80
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
$26.
271.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n$7
1.11
1.5
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
16.5
0%1
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y4.
931.
5C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
$141
.02
0.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$8
1.64
1C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
21.3
7%0.
75
B-26
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up A
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
5.88
%0.
75C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n25
.67%
0.5
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
14.0
1%0.
75C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n46
.02%
1C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y6.
15%
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
22.3
2%0.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.49%
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
58.4
9%1
Subu
rban
Mob
ility
Auth
ority
for R
egio
nal T
rans
p3.
40%
1Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
13.1
8%1.
5Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
12.1
1%0.
5Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
26.3
2%0.
75So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3.36
%1
Sout
hwes
t Ohi
o R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.84%
0.75
Sout
hwes
t Ohi
o R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity27
.64%
1So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
43.4
8%0.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
4.88
%0.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
19.0
8%0.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
15.7
0%0.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
58.2
1%1
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3.95
%1
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
14.5
4%1
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
31.0
2%1
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
13.1
5%0.
5Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
7.11
%0.
5Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
21.8
5%0.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
17.9
6%0.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
76.6
2%1.
5Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y5.
93%
0.75
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
18.8
8%0.
75Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y21
.54%
0.75
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
63.9
1%1
Met
ro T
rans
it3.
62%
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
19.3
3%0.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
35.0
5%1.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
32.5
9%0.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n2.
33%
1.5
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
16.7
8%1
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
n/a
2Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
nn/
a2
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y5.
78%
0.75
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y10
.76%
1.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y41
.93%
1.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y31
.90%
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
52,1
321
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
4,04
91.
5C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
881
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
30,4
330.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y41
,608
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,97
50.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
820.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y27
,785
0.75
Subu
rban
Mob
ility
Auth
ority
for R
egio
nal T
rans
p64
,661
2Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
3,28
81
Subu
rban
Mob
ility
Auth
ority
for R
egio
nal T
rans
p0.
770.
5Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
35,9
961.
5So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
37,7
000.
5So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,65
10.
5So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.86
1So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
24,2
490.
5Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
42,8
220.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
2,68
90.
5Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
0.88
1Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
28,8
490.
75M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m48
,214
1M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m3,
577
1M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
911
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
38,4
521.
5Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
43,6
360.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
3,27
71
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit0.
861
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit30
,343
0.75
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
51,4
261
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
3,53
91
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
0.81
0.75
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
33,6
901
Met
ro T
rans
it40
,666
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it2,
977
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it0.
780.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
26,3
870.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n41
,648
0.75
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
2,72
40.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n0.
800.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n29
,594
0.75
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y39
,750
0.75
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y4,
006
1.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y0.
992
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y33
,225
1
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
2,58
91
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
45,7
661.
5C
ity o
f Det
roit
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n50
.39%
2C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
27.7
5C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
182
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
34,0
910.
75C
entra
l Ohi
o Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y22
.70%
0.75
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
23.5
0Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
2,02
00.
75Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
49,5
881.
5Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
37.7
6%1.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n23
.25
Sout
hwes
t Ohi
o R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1,
818
0.5
Sout
hwes
t Ohi
o R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity32
,399
0.5
Sout
hwes
t Ohi
o R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity33
.61%
1Su
burb
an M
obilit
y Au
thor
ity fo
r Reg
iona
l Tra
nsp
22.2
5Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
1,89
00.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
37,8
110.
75Ka
nsas
City
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
31.0
6%1
City
of D
etro
it D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
21.5
0M
ilwau
kee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
967
1.5
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
43,8
001
Milw
auke
e C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
13.9
1%0.
5Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
20.0
0Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
2,41
61
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
it37
,459
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit23
.45%
0.75
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
19.7
5Bi
-Sta
te D
evel
opm
ent A
genc
y2,
172
0.75
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
41,4
811
Bi-S
tate
Dev
elop
men
t Age
ncy
23.1
3%0.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
19.5
0M
etro
Tra
nsit
1,93
00.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
31,7
510.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
20.3
3%0.
75So
uthw
est O
hio
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.2
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n2,
090
0.75
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
33,3
780.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n12
.79%
0.5
Kans
as C
ity A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.25
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y3,
338
2C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
39,1
881
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y17
.95%
0.75
Cen
tral O
hio
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
18.5
0
B-27
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up B
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity6,
453.
100.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
18.6
70.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
18.1
31
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity2.
742
Tole
do A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y5,
210.
310.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.25
0.75
Tole
do A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
10.1
30.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
170.
75In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n6,
928.
800.
75In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n23
.08
1.5
Indi
anap
olis
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
12.6
40.
75In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n1.
651
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it Pa
rtner
ship
10,1
99.1
41
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it Pa
rtner
ship
19.0
80.
75In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip11
.45
0.75
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it P
artn
ersh
ip1.
330.
75M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
9,45
0.01
1M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
20.9
21
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
11.7
10.
75M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y1.
550.
75M
iam
i Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
7,84
1.50
0.75
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity21
.25
1M
iam
i Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
25.8
71
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
831
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it11
,819
.28
1.5
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it21
.33
1M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
46.5
92
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it2.
191.
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
5,91
0.68
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of O
mah
a19
.58
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of O
mah
a6.
930.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
1.04
0.75
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
13,6
64.4
11.
5M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity18
.25
0.5
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
18.1
61
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
1.64
1M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il2,
636.
230.
5M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il18
.00
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
1.42
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
0.79
0.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
re
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity37
.19
2C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
13.5
70.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
239,
840
1C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
25.6
10.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
17.1
80.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity14
.71
1To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity20
5,37
30.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.82
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n23
.75
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n14
.39
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n11
8,99
20.
5In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n29
.19
0.75
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it Pa
rtner
ship
18.2
90.
75In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip13
.74
0.75
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it Pa
rtner
ship
179,
403
0.75
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it P
artn
ersh
ip16
.70
1M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
22.2
90.
75M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
14.3
61
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
277,
493
1M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y11
.84
1M
iam
i Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
25.2
01
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.80
0.75
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity32
9,96
41
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity25
.23
0.75
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it27
.35
1M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
12.4
70.
5M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
186,
177
0.75
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it11
.42
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
13.8
50.
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
13.2
90.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
139,
197
0.75
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of O
mah
a24
.26
0.75
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
25.0
71
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
15.2
61
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
469,
714
2M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity5.
411.
5M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il13
.63
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
17.2
62
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
195,
896
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
35.7
40.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r R
even
ue H
our
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$4
0.05
1C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
$82.
130.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
15.4
2%1
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity4.
37%
0.75
Tole
do A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$4
3.87
1To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$7
4.40
0.75
Tole
do A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.1
0%0.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
67%
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n$3
4.26
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n$6
4.37
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n14
.85%
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n3.
53%
1In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip$3
7.30
1In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip$5
9.57
1In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip15
.22%
1In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Par
tner
ship
2.51
%1
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$4
1.55
1M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$79.
120.
75M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y15
.97%
1M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y4.
31%
0.75
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$7
7.20
0.75
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$7
5.22
0.75
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.09%
0.5
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity7.
25%
0M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
$130
.65
0M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
$76.
710.
75M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
18.3
4%0.
75M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
2.71
%1
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of O
mah
a$2
6.32
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
$52.
591.
5Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
17.5
1%0.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
3.74
%1
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
$42.
401
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
$58.
541
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
19.4
8%0.
5M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity3.
03%
1M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il$1
1.17
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
$106
.97
0M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il11
.64%
2M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il3.
31%
1
B-28
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up B
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity16
.79%
1C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
12.2
3%0.
5C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
42.2
5%0.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
42,0
571
Tole
do A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y15
.25%
1To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity22
.57%
1To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity49
.50%
1To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity30
,309
0.75
Indi
anap
olis
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
25.5
1%0.
5In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n18
.65%
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n26
.80%
0.5
Indi
anap
olis
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
55,1
001.
5In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip20
.15%
0.75
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it Pa
rtner
ship
13.8
2%0.
75In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip41
.31%
0.75
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it P
artn
ersh
ip40
,576
1M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.7
5%0.
75M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.2
5%0.
75M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y67
.64%
1.5
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
30,5
430.
75M
iam
i Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
14.8
1%1
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.23%
0.75
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity69
.30%
1.5
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity47
,923
1.5
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it11
.80%
1.5
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it19
.22%
1M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
29.1
6%0.
75M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
33,0
150.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
14.7
5%1
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of O
mah
a25
.76%
1.5
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
of O
mah
a50
.86%
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
34,8
290.
75M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity16
.95%
1M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity25
.68%
1.5
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
20.4
1%0.
5M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity21
,056
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
20.5
7%0.
75M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il18
.49%
1M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il58
.87%
1M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il42
,413
1
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Hou
rs
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
067
1C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
0.89
1C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
29,9
801
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
210
1To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
2,24
70.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
840.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity20
,201
0.75
Tole
do A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1,37
30.
75In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n3,
664
1.5
Indi
anap
olis
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
0.88
1In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n41
,491
1.5
Indi
anap
olis
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
2,88
31.
5In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip2,
953
1In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip0.
961.
5In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip32
,036
1In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Par
tner
ship
2,33
21
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
168
0.75
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
881
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
26,2
490.
75M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y1,
828
0.75
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
478
1.5
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
951
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity35
,353
1.5
Mia
mi V
alle
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
562
1.5
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it2,
515
0.75
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it0.
850.
75M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
23,6
270.
75M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
1,89
50.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
2,52
60.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
0.91
1Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
26,0
370.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
1,96
01
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
1,28
20.
5M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
891
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
16,7
760.
5M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity1,
099
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
2,32
30.
75M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il0.
641
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
18,5
760.
5M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il1,
076
0.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Cap
ital A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity37
,378
1C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
24.6
8%1
Indi
anap
olis
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
22.5
0To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rity
25,3
200.
75To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity25
.34%
1M
iam
i Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
22.0
0In
dian
apol
is P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n48
,512
1.5
Indi
anap
olis
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
16.9
2%0.
75C
apita
l Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
21.7
5In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip39
,001
1In
teru
rban
Tra
nsit
Partn
ersh
ip21
.74%
0.75
Mad
ison
Met
ro T
rans
it20
.25
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity26
,792
0.75
Met
ro R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
07%
0.5
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
20.2
5M
iam
i Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
45,5
121.
5M
iam
i Val
ley
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
28.7
4%1
Inte
rurb
an T
rans
it Pa
rtner
ship
20.0
0M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
28,0
390.
75M
adis
on M
etro
Tra
nsit
18.6
7%0.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
19.5
0Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
31,7
470.
75Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y of
Om
aha
21.9
3%1
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
19.5
0M
ass
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity18
,789
0.5
Mas
s Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
12.0
0%0.
75M
etro
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y19
.00
Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil
27,1
050.
75M
etro
polit
an C
ounc
il45
.91%
2To
ledo
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.50
B-29
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4,21
5.35
0.75
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
17.7
50.
75D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity11
.41
0.75
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.87
1C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct12
,991
.07
1C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct21
.50
1C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct86
.60
2C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct4.
012
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
6,79
4.84
0.75
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
17.0
00.
75An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity21
.97
1An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1.
650.
75M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
3,70
8.27
0.75
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct19
.00
0.75
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct7.
090.
75M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.71
0.75
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
6,35
5.41
0.75
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
13.0
00.
75W
ichi
ta T
rans
it8.
530.
75W
ichi
ta T
rans
it1.
671
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct14
,399
.03
1G
reat
er P
eoria
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
13.7
50.
75G
reat
er P
eoria
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
12.1
10.
75G
reat
er P
eoria
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
1.22
0.75
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
9,14
8.35
1D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.75
1D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y25
.61
1D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
650.
75W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it A
utho
rity
3,19
6.60
0.75
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y18
.67
0.75
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y3.
710.
75W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
060.
75W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m3,
054.
290.
75W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m18
.75
0.75
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
1.42
0.75
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.61
0.75
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n9,
333.
161
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n17
.00
0.75
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n18
.76
1So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
1.64
0.75
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,13
8.71
0.75
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.0
00.
75Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
410.
75Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
480.
5R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
10,1
53.8
51
Roc
k Is
land
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t D22
.00
1R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
23.6
81
Roc
k Is
land
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t D1.
440.
75C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce2,
225.
920.
75C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce17
.00
0.75
Cam
pus
Bus
Ser
vice
1.44
0.75
Cam
pus
Bus
Serv
ice
2.09
1Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n5,
146.
790.
75Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n18
.33
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
31.8
41
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
2.56
1La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
7,97
7.49
0.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity17
.67
0.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity19
.07
1La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
1.26
0.75
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
7,00
9.97
0.75
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
13.5
80.
75Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t21
.59
1Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t1.
821
Star
Tran
3,87
9.16
0.75
Star
Tran
13.8
30.
75St
arTr
an6.
870.
75St
arTr
an1.
110.
75Ka
lam
azoo
Met
ro T
rans
it Sy
stem
8,34
3.64
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.58
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.27
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
600.
75Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
3,41
8.93
0.75
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t17
.67
0.75
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t1.
330.
75Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.27
0.5
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
r a13
,293
.74
1G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
16.5
00.
75G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
28.6
11
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra2.
451
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n7,
568.
350.
75G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
18.0
00.
75G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
16.8
80.
75G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
1.27
0.75
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e7,
578.
160.
75Be
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
-Rac
ine
81.5
02
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e17
.47
0.75
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e1.
460.
75Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
11,6
64.6
81
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n13
.58
0.75
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n11
.04
0.75
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1.
100.
75M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
6,80
2.69
0.75
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m15
.00
0.75
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m17
.99
0.75
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
550.
75Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
4,49
6.26
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct12
.67
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct12
.99
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct1.
490.
75Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce2,
873.
000.
75Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce12
.00
0.75
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
0.11
0.75
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
0.36
0.5
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
6,53
7.27
0.75
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
17.5
00.
75G
reen
Bay
Met
ro10
.73
0.75
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
1.25
0.75
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
28,6
48.8
72
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
17.0
00.
75So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity37
.38
1.5
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
4.61
2U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
Park
ing
and
Tran
spor
tati o
35,4
68.0
82
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio21
.33
1U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
Park
ing
and
Tran
spor
tatio
66.1
02
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio4.
922
Star
k Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity10
,739
.15
1St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.0
01
Star
k Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3.
570.
75St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.42
0.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
re
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
25.1
31
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.4
60.
75D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity24
8,23
10.
75D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity25
.01
1C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct46
.57
2C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct11
.61
0.75
Cha
mpa
ign-
Urb
ana
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
58,0
070.
75C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct13
.59
1An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity22
.95
1An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity13
.92
1An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1,
260,
783
2An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity25
.80
1M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
12.3
30.
75M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
17.3
71.
5M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
517,
674
1M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
40.8
70.
75W
ichi
ta T
rans
it24
.11
1W
ichi
ta T
rans
it14
.46
1W
ichi
ta T
rans
it1,
554,
533
2W
ichi
ta T
rans
it21
.60
1G
reat
er P
eoria
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
21.2
41
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct17
.46
1.5
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct48
8,12
71
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct8.
321.
5D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y22
.70
1D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y13
.76
1D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y63
6,11
51
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
14.4
41
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y12
.98
0.75
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y12
.20
0.75
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y62
9,73
01
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
53.8
20.
5W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m11
.91
0.75
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
19.5
42
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
249,
719
0.75
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
41.8
50.
75So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
24.1
11
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n14
.68
1So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
183,
552
0.75
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n16
.45
1Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity4.
900.
5Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity10
.10
0.5
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
n/a
2Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity75
.41
0R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
18.8
40.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
13.0
80.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
159,
839
0.75
Roc
k Is
land
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t D16
.99
1C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce23
.60
1C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce11
.29
0.75
Cam
pus
Bus
Ser
vice
92,3
760.
75C
ampu
s Bu
s Se
rvic
e91
.88
0Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n26
.83
1Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n10
.50
0.5
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
377,
775
1Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n32
.27
0.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity17
.07
0.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity13
.58
0.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity77
3,81
71.
5La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
26.7
81
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
25.5
81
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
14.0
91
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
178,
637
0.75
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
14.8
01
Star
Tran
15.4
00.
75St
arTr
an13
.91
1St
arTr
an82
,398
0.75
Star
Tran
33.1
30.
75Ka
lam
azoo
Met
ro T
rans
it Sy
stem
20.7
51
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.95
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em13
1,98
10.
75Ka
lam
azoo
Met
ro T
rans
it Sy
stem
24.4
41
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t5.
630.
5Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
20.9
62
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t17
4,53
60.
75Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
64.9
60.
5G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
por a
29.1
61
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra11
.92
0.75
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra84
,548
0.75
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra10
.01
1G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
18.3
80.
75G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
14.5
01
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n19
5,48
00.
75G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
26.7
21
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e19
.44
0.75
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e13
.32
0.75
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e89
,422
0.75
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e30
.67
0.75
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n14
.24
0.75
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n12
.93
0.75
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n81
,653
0.75
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n10
.53
1M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
20.7
11
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m13
.33
0.75
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m84
4,21
41.
5M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
22.3
41
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct18
.39
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct12
.37
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct12
2,89
80.
75Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
26.5
21
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
5.89
0.5
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
16.2
81
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
n/a
2Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce47
.37
0.75
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
20.2
60.
75G
reen
Bay
Met
ro16
.26
1G
reen
Bay
Met
ro32
5,88
30.
75G
reen
Bay
Met
ro18
.87
1So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity35
.55
1.5
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
7.71
1So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ityn/
a2
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
4.12
1.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
ti o44
.27
2U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
Park
ing
and
Tran
spor
tatio
8.99
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio14
1,87
20.
75U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
Park
ing
and
Tran
spor
tatio
5.00
1.5
Star
k Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity5.
790.
5St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.7
21
Star
k Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity35
4,98
80.
75St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
24.5
61
B-30
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r R
even
ue H
our
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$28.
441
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$62.
670.
75D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.99%
1D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3.
26%
0.75
Cha
mpa
ign-
Urb
ana
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$108
.48
0C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$5
8.34
0.75
Cha
mpa
ign-
Urb
ana
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
23.2
8%0.
75C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct1.
87%
1An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$8
4.21
0.5
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$87.
960
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
21.3
2%0.
75An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity6.
89%
0.5
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$3
0.88
1M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$53.
651
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct16
.23%
1M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.50
%1.
5W
ichi
ta T
rans
it$2
1.04
1W
ichi
ta T
rans
it$5
9.49
0.75
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
22.0
3%0.
75W
ichi
ta T
rans
it0.
99%
1G
reat
er P
eoria
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$50.
460.
75G
reat
er P
eoria
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$88.
520
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct23
.20%
0.75
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
72%
1D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$7
0.01
0.5
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$62.
060.
75D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y14
.09%
1D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y3.
40%
0.75
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$1
5.22
1.5
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$5
3.31
1W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it A
utho
rity
19.2
7%0.
75W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3.
43%
0.75
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$9.0
71.
5W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m$7
6.30
0.5
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
15.0
0%1
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3.00
%0.
75So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
$44.
740.
75So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
$57.
520.
75So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
14.2
0%1
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n4.
05%
0.75
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$3.5
31.
5Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$4
2.50
1.5
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3.94
%2
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.49
%1
Roc
k Is
land
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t D$6
7.44
0.5
Roc
k Is
land
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t D$5
3.67
1R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
19.4
2%0.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
3.49
%0.
75C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce$3
.06
1.5
Cam
pus
Bus
Ser
vice
$50.
061
Cam
pus
Bus
Ser
vice
26.6
6%0.
5C
ampu
s Bu
s Se
rvic
e3.
81%
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
$48.
630.
75Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n$4
0.97
1.5
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
23.8
5%0.
75Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n3.
07%
0.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity$5
6.63
0.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity$5
0.69
1La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
16.0
6%1
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity1.
37%
1Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t$4
7.24
0.75
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
$55.
981
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
22.4
5%0.
75Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t1.
55%
1St
arTr
an$2
4.39
1St
arTr
an$5
4.65
1St
arTr
an23
.96%
0.75
Star
Tran
2.85
%1
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$4
7.22
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$6
0.22
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em24
.56%
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2.
49%
1Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
$11.
501.
5Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
$48.
551
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t30
.47%
0Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.00
%1.
5G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
por a
$45.
170.
75G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
$46.
051
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra19
.55%
0.75
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra1.
06%
1G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
$77.
910.
5G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
$84.
830.
5G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
21.6
1%0.
75G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
11.2
4%0
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e$4
7.17
0.75
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e$5
2.50
1Be
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
-Rac
ine
13.3
4%1.
5Be
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
-Rac
ine
3.53
%0.
75Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
$48.
850.
75Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
$63.
000.
75Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
22.4
4%0.
75Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
5.78
%0.
5M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$52.
980.
75M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$60.
990.
75M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.8
9%1.
5M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2.25
%1
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$4
2.26
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$5
9.83
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct21
.40%
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct3.
35%
0.75
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
$1.3
21.
5Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce$7
0.32
0.75
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
10.8
6%1.
5Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce0.
00%
1.5
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
$30.
541
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
$57.
660.
75G
reen
Bay
Met
ro13
.99%
1G
reen
Bay
Met
ro3.
60%
0.75
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
$31.
211
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
$29.
692
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
23.7
0%0.
75So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity4.
30%
0.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
ti o$5
5.82
0.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio$3
7.39
1.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio11
.77%
1.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio2.
44%
1St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$27.
451
Star
k Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$4
4.55
1St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
20.8
3%0.
75St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.34
%1
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
22.0
1%0.
75D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity32
.30%
1.5
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
36.6
2%1
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
27,4
110.
75C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct17
.40%
1C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct30
.30%
1.5
Cha
mpa
ign-
Urb
ana
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
26.8
2%0.
75C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct35
,548
0.75
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
25.4
4%0.
75An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity12
.32%
0.75
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
37.8
4%1
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
43,3
861
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct9.
32%
1.5
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct11
.70%
0.75
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct26
.05%
0.75
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct54
,019
1.5
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
20.2
5%0.
75W
ichi
ta T
rans
it20
.51%
1W
ichi
ta T
rans
it42
.91%
1W
ichi
ta T
rans
it37
,053
0.75
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct19
.83%
0.75
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct11
.71%
0.75
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct73
.92%
1.5
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct48
,913
1D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y21
.13%
0.75
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.4
3%1
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
26.7
3%0.
75D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y32
,296
0.75
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y16
.82%
1W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it A
utho
rity
10.4
1%0.
75W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it A
utho
rity
35.6
8%1
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
35,4
790.
75W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m19
.00%
0.75
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
17.0
2%1
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
18.9
0%0.
75W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m49
,737
1So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
17.7
5%1
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n16
.73%
1So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
67.3
1%1.
5So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
38,7
580.
75Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.84%
1Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity41
.63%
2Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity12
.41%
0.75
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
32,3
840.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
20.4
8%0.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
12.1
6%0.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
21.1
4%0.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
41,1
671
Cam
pus
Bus
Ser
vice
23.2
9%0.
75C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce8.
06%
0.75
Cam
pus
Bus
Ser
vice
90.7
2%2
Cam
pus
Bus
Serv
ice
40,0
841
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
12.8
1%1
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
24.8
9%1.
5Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n20
.64%
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
30,3
200.
75La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
15.9
8%1
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity15
.97%
1La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
23.7
6%0.
75La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
49,8
641
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
10.3
5%1
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
11.2
1%0.
75Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t19
.55%
0.75
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
25,8
610.
5St
arTr
an12
.53%
1St
arTr
an14
.72%
0.75
Star
Tran
71.4
9%1.
5St
arTr
an31
,084
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em20
.53%
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em13
.59%
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em42
.82%
1Ka
lam
azoo
Met
ro T
rans
it Sy
stem
44,6
281
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t22
.07%
0.75
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t6.
34%
0.5
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t46
.84%
1Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
83,8
602
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
r a18
.03%
1G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
24.3
1%1
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra17
.37%
0.75
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra28
,291
0.75
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n15
.45%
1G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
16.1
4%1
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n26
.70%
0.75
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n50
,204
1Be
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
-Rac
ine
17.3
0%1
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e17
.71%
1Be
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
-Rac
ine
16.3
0%0.
75Be
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
-Rac
ine
54,4
961.
5Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
17.8
4%1
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n11
.44%
0.75
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n47
.28%
1Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
27,4
850.
75M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
24.4
2%0.
75M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
6.57
%0.
5M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
57.7
2%1
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m35
,526
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct17
.71%
1Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
12.8
5%0.
75Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
16.2
6%0.
75Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
26,5
230.
75Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce55
.35%
0Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce3.
97%
0.5
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
12.7
6%0.
75Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce38
,052
0.75
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
11.2
6%1
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
14.9
4%0.
75G
reen
Bay
Met
ro21
.09%
0.75
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
34,3
860.
75So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity17
.00%
1So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity0.
00%
0.5
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
0.00
%0.
5So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity16
,184
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
ti o3.
03%
1.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio25
.93%
1.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio0.
00%
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio28
,597
0.75
Star
k Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.06%
1St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
8.01
%0.
75St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
78.3
4%1.
5St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
61,8
801.
5
B-31
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Hou
rs
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,01
00.
5D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
860.
5D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity17
,420
0.75
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1,29
50.
5C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct3,
020
1C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
961
Cha
mpa
ign-
Urb
ana
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
28,0
260.
75C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
414
1An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
047
1An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
941
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
33,1
791
Ann
Arb
or T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,38
31
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
894
1M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.81
0.5
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct34
,058
1M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
1,96
10.
75W
ichi
ta T
rans
it2,
399
0.75
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
0.89
0.75
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
31,0
911
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
2,15
11
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
668
0.75
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
711
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct25
,691
0.75
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct1,
471
0.75
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,34
60.
75D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
941
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
24,4
660.
75D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
779
0.75
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y2,
997
1W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it A
utho
rity
0.99
1W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it A
utho
rity
23,7
630.
75W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1,
948
0.75
Wau
kesh
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2,66
90.
75W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
840.
5W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m37
,836
1W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m1,
937
0.75
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n2,
839
0.75
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n0.
971
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n29
,499
1So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
2,01
00.
75Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
893
1Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
840.
5Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
,401
0.75
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1,92
00.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
3,13
71
Roc
k Is
land
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t D0.
910.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
29,0
621
Roc
k Is
land
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t D2,
221
1C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce3,
522
1C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce0.
961
Cam
pus
Bus
Ser
vice
16,4
960.
5C
ampu
s Bu
s Se
rvic
e1,
461
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
2,89
41
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
0.96
1Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n22
,895
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
2,18
11
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity3,
731
1.5
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity0.
971
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity32
,242
1La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
2,37
41
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
1,87
90.
5Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t0.
941
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
20,6
120.
75Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t1,
463
0.75
Star
Tran
2,24
50.
75St
arTr
an0.
961
Star
Tran
24,5
750.
75St
arTr
an1,
766
0.75
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em3,
440
1Ka
lam
azoo
Met
ro T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.99
1Ka
lam
azoo
Met
ro T
rans
it Sy
stem
35,4
101
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2,
735
1.5
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t3,
975
1.5
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t0.
930.
75Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
55,8
522
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t2,
665
1G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
por a
2,36
00.
75G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
0.93
1G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
22,2
500.
75G
reat
er L
afay
ette
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
1,86
70.
75G
ary
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
3,49
91
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n0.
971
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n45
,612
1.5
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n3,
146
1.5
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e4,
137
1.5
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e0.
951
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e40
,646
1.5
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e3,
052
1.5
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n2,
114
0.5
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
961
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n21
,774
0.75
Five
Sea
sons
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n1,
684
0.75
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
717
0.75
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
951
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m25
,582
0.75
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m1,
919
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
125
0.5
Sprin
gfie
ld M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
930.
75Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
22,1
220.
75Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
1,78
90.
75Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce2,
394
0.75
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
0.97
1Pe
kin
Mun
icip
al B
us S
ervi
ce18
,459
0.75
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
1,13
40.
5G
reen
Bay
Met
ro2,
182
0.5
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
0.97
1G
reen
Bay
Met
ro33
,424
1G
reen
Bay
Met
ro2,
056
0.75
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
2,08
80.
5So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity0.
941
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
9,49
00.
5S
outh
wes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
1,23
10.
5U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
Park
ing
and
Tran
spor
tati o
3,08
51
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio0.
931
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio15
,477
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Mic
higa
n Pa
rkin
g an
d Tr
ansp
orta
tio1,
721
0.75
Star
k Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity4,
548
2St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.97
1St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
60,2
812
Star
k Ar
ea R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity4,
395
2
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
23,6
410.
5D
es M
oine
s M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity35
.71%
1U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
Park
ing
and
Tran
spor
tati o
26.2
5C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct34
,168
0.75
Cha
mpa
ign-
Urb
ana
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
21.9
2%0.
75St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
24.0
0An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity40
,670
1An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity22
.58%
0.75
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e23
.25
Mad
ison
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct43
,871
1M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
28.8
1%0.
75So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity23
.25
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
33,0
750.
75W
ichi
ta T
rans
it6.
38%
0.75
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t23
.00
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct34
,866
0.75
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct35
.71%
1C
ham
paig
n-U
rban
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct22
.25
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
30,2
910.
75D
ulut
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y23
.81%
0.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity21
.25
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y34
,985
0.75
Wes
tern
Res
erve
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y47
.22%
1M
adis
on C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
21.0
0W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m41
,620
1W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m10
.00%
0.75
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.0
0So
uth
Bend
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
37,5
451
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n27
.27%
0.75
Wic
hita
Tra
nsit
20.2
5Bu
tler C
ount
y R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
ity27
,162
0.75
Butle
r Cou
nty
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
40.0
0%1
Cam
pus
Bus
Ser
vice
20.2
5R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
37,6
091
Roc
k Is
land
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t D29
.41%
0.75
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
20.2
5C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce38
,490
1C
ampu
s B
us S
ervi
ce13
3.33
%2
Sout
h Be
nd P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n20
.00
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
29,0
600.
75Bl
oom
ingt
on P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n26
.92%
0.75
Gre
ater
Peo
ria M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct19
.75
LaC
ross
e M
unic
ipal
Tra
nsit
Util
ity48
,364
1La
Cro
sse
Mun
icip
al T
rans
it U
tility
50.0
0%1
Bloo
min
gton
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
19.7
5Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t24
,360
0.75
Keno
sha
Tran
sit
18.1
8%0.
75Ka
lam
azoo
Met
ro T
rans
it Sy
stem
19.5
0St
arTr
an29
,803
0.75
Star
Tran
21.2
8%0.
75An
n A
rbor
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.25
Kala
maz
oo M
etro
Tra
nsit
Syst
em43
,994
1Ka
lam
azoo
Met
ro T
rans
it Sy
stem
24.2
4%0.
75W
auke
sha
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
yste
m19
.25
Lora
in C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t77
,572
2Lo
rain
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
38.8
9%1
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n19
.25
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
r a26
,421
0.75
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra18
.75%
0.75
Gre
ater
Laf
ayet
te P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ra19
.00
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n48
,870
1.5
Gar
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n7.
14%
0.75
Mun
cie
Indi
ana
Tran
sit S
yste
m19
.00
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e51
,590
1.5
Belle
Urb
an S
yste
m-R
acin
e26
.92%
0.75
Dul
uth
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
18.7
5Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
26,4
820.
75Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
21.6
2%0.
75W
este
rn R
eser
ve T
rans
it A
utho
rity
18.7
5M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
33,7
690.
75M
unci
e In
dian
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
32.0
0%0.
75R
ock
Isla
nd C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an M
ass
Tran
sit D
18.7
5Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
24,5
800.
75Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
11.1
1%0.
75St
arTr
an18
.75
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
36,9
181
Peki
n M
unic
ipal
Bus
Ser
vice
100.
00%
2Ke
nosh
a Tr
ansi
t18
.25
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
33,4
240.
75G
reen
Bay
Met
ro0.
00%
0.5
Des
Moi
nes
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.0
0So
uthw
est M
isso
uri S
tate
Uni
vers
ity15
,184
0.5
Sout
hwes
t Mis
sour
i Sta
te U
nive
rsity
60.0
0%1
Gre
en B
ay M
etro
17.7
5U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
Park
ing
and
Tran
spor
tati o
26,6
010.
75U
nive
rsity
of M
ichi
gan
Park
ing
and
Tran
spor
tatio
71.8
8%1.
5Fi
ve S
easo
ns T
rans
porta
tion
17.2
5St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
60,2
811.
5St
ark
Area
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.00
%0.
5Sp
ringf
ield
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
16.7
5
B-32
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
5,90
6.79
1C
ity o
f App
leto
n-V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t17
.50
1.5
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
5.68
0.75
City
of A
pple
ton-
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t0.
940.
75R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
5,01
9.10
0.75
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct22
.25
2R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
12.2
91
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2.
161.
5C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s5,
900.
951
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it S
ervi
ces
18.5
01.
5C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s9.
271
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it Se
rvic
es1.
411
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n4,
658.
550.
75Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
16.2
51
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n7.
350.
75Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
1.13
0.75
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
5,01
8.25
0.75
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
13.8
30.
75D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it10
.04
1D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it1.
471
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l4,
921.
670.
75Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
15.4
21
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l5.
400.
75Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
1.09
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it Sy
stem
6,12
9.93
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em18
.50
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it Sy
stem
10.3
61
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it Sy
stem
1.08
0.75
John
son
Cou
nty
Kan
sas
aka
John
son
Cou
nty
T r2,
279.
950.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr14
.67
1Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr1.
420.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr0.
500.
75LA
KETR
AN1,
799.
970.
5LA
KETR
AN17
.00
1LA
KETR
AN2.
550.
75LA
KETR
AN0.
770.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
4,02
2.77
0.75
Siou
x Fa
lls T
rans
it14
.25
0.75
Siou
x Fa
lls T
rans
it5.
270.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
0.99
0.75
Ric
hlan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t3,
482.
290.
75R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
11.0
00.
5R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
3.64
0.75
Ric
hlan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t1.
221
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity2,
421.
530.
75Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
11.7
50.
75Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
2.25
0.75
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity0.
640.
75C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
4,67
9.38
0.75
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta16
.50
1C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
11.7
51
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta1.
511
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
10,9
01.2
51.
5Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m19
.00
1.5
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.4
61
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.91
0.75
Blue
Wat
er A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
omm
issi
on5,
599.
621
Blue
Wat
er A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
omm
issi
on12
.00
0.75
Blue
Wat
er A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
omm
issi
on2.
560.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
1.14
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
5,19
3.10
1C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity12
.00
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
3.99
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
1.68
1M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em3,
313.
030.
75M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em11
.42
0.5
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
2.68
0.75
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
1.08
0.75
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity97
3.22
0.5
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
17.2
51
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
0.35
0.75
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
0.32
0.5
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
1,70
6.56
0.5
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
12.5
00.
75Ba
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
4.59
0.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
660.
75St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on7,
010.
851
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
19.4
21.
5St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on23
.64
2St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on1.
631
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity5,
386.
611
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.00
0.75
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity9.
981
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it A
utho
rity
1.39
1Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
4,63
5.50
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m19
.00
1.5
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m8.
801
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m1.
211
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne1,
807.
720.
5C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
12.5
00.
75C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
5.95
0.75
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne1.
661
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
5,60
3.25
1C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m14
.00
0.75
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
1.94
0.75
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.31
0.5
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3,49
8.54
0.75
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m3.
960.
75C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
000.
75Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it3,
816.
210.
75Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it14
.75
1Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it7.
510.
75Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it1.
371
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
4,73
5.94
0.75
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
16.0
01
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
5.25
0.75
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
0.84
0.75
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
5,00
6.13
0.75
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
13.5
80.
75H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m3.
990.
75H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
820.
75Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
8,48
0.34
1.5
Iow
a C
ity T
rans
it17
.00
1Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
22.0
11.
5Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
2.40
1.5
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
,784
.35
2O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
12.9
20.
75O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
13.9
61
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
411
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
2,79
8.35
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
11.0
00.
5Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t7.
050.
75Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t2.
031.
5U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
21,6
52.9
32
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a18
.00
1.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a47
.49
2U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
5.59
2W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on7,
078.
631
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
17.4
21.
5W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on11
.40
1W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on0.
950.
75Ba
ttle
Cre
ek T
rans
it4,
700.
360.
75Ba
ttle
Cre
ek T
rans
it13
.50
0.75
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
6.81
0.75
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
1.26
1Be
ttend
orf T
rans
it Sy
stem
3,34
0.47
0.75
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.00
0.75
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
4.14
0.75
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
0.52
0.75
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
3,66
3.00
0.75
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
13.3
30.
75Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e0.
500.
75Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e0.
160.
5C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em4,
137.
260.
75C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em13
.50
0.75
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
4.61
0.75
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
0.84
0.75
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em2,
853.
050.
75C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
12.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
7.39
0.75
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
900.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss5,
422.
761
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
12.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss1.
100.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss0.
320.
5C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t6,
697.
171
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
12.5
00.
75C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t9.
201
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
1.09
0.75
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns38
0.37
0.5
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns12
.33
0.75
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns0.
310.
75C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
0.33
0.5
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
4,05
7.90
0.75
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
16.0
01
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
9.14
1C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
271
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m4,
254.
350.
75D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.50
0.75
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
8.59
1D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
271
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
7,27
9.47
1Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.83
1.5
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
12.7
81
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
1.48
1G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us3,
603.
270.
75G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us12
.00
0.75
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
14.1
61
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
2.69
1.5
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
6,21
4.12
1H
eart
City
Rid
er/G
oshe
n Tr
ansi
t14
.92
1H
eart
City
Rid
er/G
oshe
n Tr
ansi
t1.
030.
75H
eart
City
Rid
er/G
oshe
n Tr
ansi
t0.
230.
5Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
3,06
6.49
0.75
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.00
1Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
8.09
1Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
1.07
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o4,
717.
970.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
12.0
00.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
3.59
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o0.
810.
75O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s7,
515.
221
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
18.5
01.
5O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s1.
030.
75O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s0.
380.
75R
apid
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
4,99
2.38
0.75
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
12.0
00.
75R
apid
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2.
800.
75R
apid
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
020.
75Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3,58
0.02
0.75
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m12
.00
0.75
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m12
.90
1Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2.
111.
5St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
6,33
3.65
1St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
15.8
31
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t3.
310.
75St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
0.62
0.75
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
848.
420.
75Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y8.
501
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
0.99
0.75
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
0.38
0.75
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em5,
186.
781
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.50
0.75
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em18
.12
1.5
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
451
B-33
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Hea
dway
(m
inut
es)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Ca p
itaAl
t Sco
re
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
15.7
71
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
16.7
61
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
22.3
11
City
of A
pple
ton-
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t$2
1.55
1R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
29.0
91.
5R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
13.4
60.
75R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
40.4
61
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$2
5.84
0.75
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it S
ervi
ces
19.6
01
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it S
ervi
ces
13.9
50.
75C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s38
.82
1C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
$29.
280.
75Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
15.2
70.
75Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
13.5
30.
75Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
52.5
90.
75Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
$29.
350.
75D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it18
.91
1D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it12
.85
0.75
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
39.2
31
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
$34.
050.
75Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
8.08
0.75
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l7.
440.
5Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
40.0
61
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l$2
9.49
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.2
10.
75M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.11
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em27
.22
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$3
1.44
0.75
John
son
Cou
nty
Kan
sas
aka
John
son
Cou
nty
T r8.
080.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr16
.15
1Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr33
.31
1Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr$1
1.39
1LA
KETR
AN12
.86
0.75
LAKE
TRAN
16.6
11
LAKE
TRAN
50.0
80.
75LA
KETR
AN$1
3.00
1Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
13.0
50.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
13.1
40.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
32.8
91
Siou
x Fa
lls T
rans
it$1
8.27
1R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
14.9
90.
75R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
12.2
70.
75R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
58.6
70.
75R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
$10.
031.
5Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
5.47
0.5
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity8.
590.
5Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
93.1
40.
5Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
$16.
741
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta22
.23
1C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
14.7
11
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta25
.97
1C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
$26.
170.
75Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m11
.65
0.75
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.8
00.
75Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m13
.50
1Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m$5
1.81
0Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
14.7
50.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
12.8
80.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
25.6
21
Blue
Wat
er A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
omm
issi
on$8
.88
1.5
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
22.4
51
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
13.3
40.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity37
.66
1C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$9
.58
1.5
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
13.8
60.
75M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.89
0.75
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
45.8
20.
75M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$1
0.11
1.5
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity5.
180.
5Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y16
.13
1Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y12
5.77
0.5
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
$2.3
61.
5Ba
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y10
.27
0.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
15.6
01
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity56
.71
0.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$2
7.50
0.75
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
23.0
11
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
14.1
41
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
25.8
11
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
$53.
000
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity22
.72
1To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16.3
41
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity28
.50
1To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$2
3.77
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m14
.98
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m12
.34
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m46
.65
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m$2
7.14
0.75
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne15
.39
0.75
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne9.
270.
5C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
96.2
90.
5C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
$19.
471
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3.70
0.5
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.0
90.
75C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m45
.00
1C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m$2
1.78
1C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m14
.00
0.75
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
14.0
40.
75C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m60
.03
0.75
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$14.
821
East
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
18.5
21
East
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
13.5
50.
75Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it36
.00
1Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it$2
8.06
0.75
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
9.63
0.75
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
11.5
20.
75Fa
rgo
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t48
.91
0.75
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
$17.
221
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.3
50.
75H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m15
.10
1H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m34
.18
1H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m$2
2.02
1Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
29.2
21.
5Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
12.1
60.
75Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
18.7
31
Iow
a C
ity T
rans
it$4
5.72
0.5
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em20
.78
1O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
14.7
51
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.23
1O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
$34.
700.
75Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t25
.00
1Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t12
.33
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
32.2
21
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
$13.
471
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a57
.34
2U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
10.2
60.
5U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
8.62
1U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
$22.
980.
75W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on12
.50
0.75
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
13.1
30.
75W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on27
.66
1W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on$4
1.70
0.5
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
18.9
71
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
15.1
11
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
22.4
91
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
$23.
890.
75Be
ttend
orf T
rans
it Sy
stem
9.05
0.75
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.43
1Be
ttend
orf T
rans
it S
yste
m42
.40
1Be
ttend
orf T
rans
it S
yste
m$1
7.13
1Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e2.
990.
5Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e18
.44
1.5
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
60.1
90.
75Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e$7
.49
1.5
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
2.04
0.5
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
2.42
1C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em32
6.52
0C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em$2
5.88
0.75
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.69
0.75
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.29
1C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
41.7
81
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em$3
5.36
0.5
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
4.16
0.5
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
12.8
40.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss30
.45
1C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss$9
.08
1.5
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
15.8
31
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
14.5
01
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
22.5
01
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
$26.
410.
75C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
9.63
0.75
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns29
.36
2C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
94.0
10.
5C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
$2.4
61.
5C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m15
.29
0.75
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.0
20.
75C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m52
.20
0.75
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$36.
140.
5D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
20.4
01
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
16.0
31
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
25.9
11
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
$28.
130.
75Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em22
.13
1Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.99
1Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em27
.72
1Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$2
9.01
0.75
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
38.7
52
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
14.4
11
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
34.6
81
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
$20.
251
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
3.76
0.5
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
16.4
21
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
36.5
41
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
$11.
551
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.56
1Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.4
91
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em41
.12
1Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
$31.
260.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
11.7
60.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
14.5
21
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o35
.62
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
$15.
771
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
9.44
0.75
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
24.6
62
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
11.9
61
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
$10.
401.
5R
apid
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
13.9
00.
75R
apid
Tra
nsit
Syst
em13
.65
0.75
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
36.0
51
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
$7.1
01.
5Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
27.0
11.
5Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
12.8
00.
75Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
40.5
41
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
$23.
030.
75St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
5.35
0.5
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t8.
630.
5St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
43.3
81
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t$1
8.33
1Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
6.34
0.75
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
16.4
91
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
30.0
11
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
$7.0
41.
5W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
21.2
21
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.65
1W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
20.9
11
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$4
9.91
0
B-34
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
$59.
880.
75C
ity o
f App
leto
n-V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t16
.04%
1C
ity o
f App
leto
n-V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t5.
01%
0.75
City
of A
pple
ton-
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t14
.72%
1R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$61.
180.
75R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
15.9
4%1
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct4.
39%
0.75
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct21
.00%
0.75
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it S
ervi
ces
$61.
940.
75C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s10
.05%
1.5
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it S
ervi
ces
2.05
%1
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it Se
rvic
es23
.26%
0.75
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n$6
0.96
0.75
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n16
.71%
1Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
1.91
%1
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n15
.77%
1D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it$6
4.15
0.75
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
19.3
6%0.
75D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it5.
13%
0.75
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
13.6
4%1
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l$4
4.14
1Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
8.03
%1.
5Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
7.80
%0.
5Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
20.5
1%0.
75M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$4
6.17
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.72%
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
02%
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em10
.03%
1Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y K
ansa
s ak
a Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y T r
$64.
820.
75Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr12
.63%
1Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr0.
17%
1Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr10
.11%
1LA
KETR
AN$6
5.61
0.75
LAKE
TRAN
15.0
6%1
LAKE
TRAN
2.64
%1
LAKE
TRAN
16.0
3%1
Siou
x Fa
lls T
rans
it$4
5.23
1Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
8.17
%1.
5Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
5.06
%0.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
12.9
2%1
Ric
hlan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t$4
1.31
1R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
21.2
5%0.
75R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
15.6
7%0
Ric
hlan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t8.
23%
1Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
$40.
681
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity8.
81%
1.5
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity6.
80%
0.5
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity44
.19%
0C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
$49.
501
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta16
.44%
1C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
1.00
%1
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta5.
05%
1.5
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$48.
441
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
21.9
0%0.
75Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m2.
13%
1Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m8.
44%
1Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
$51.
081
Blue
Wat
er A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
omm
issi
on28
.01%
0.5
Blue
Wat
er A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
omm
issi
on6.
89%
0.5
Blue
Wat
er A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
omm
issi
on16
.31%
1C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$5
3.98
0.75
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
24.6
0%0.
5C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
24%
1C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity13
.88%
1M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$5
2.30
0.75
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
26.8
6%0.
5M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
00%
1M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.10%
1Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$35.
171.
5Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y14
.30%
1Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y0.
64%
1Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y29
.21%
0.5
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
$61.
470.
75Ba
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y16
.21%
1Ba
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
5.64
%0.
75Ba
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
19.2
4%0.
75St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on$5
1.61
1St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on19
.68%
0.75
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
2.53
%1
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
12.8
6%1
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
4.13
0.75
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.68%
1To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4.31
%0.
75To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y17
.66%
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m$4
6.19
1Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
16.6
9%1
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m2.
45%
1Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
10.6
6%1
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne$5
0.34
1C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
36.4
9%0
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne0.
15%
1C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
17.1
9%0.
75C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m$4
1.47
1C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m11
.20%
1.5
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.00
%1
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
8.33
%1
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$52.
390.
75C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m14
.12%
1C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m2.
09%
1C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m20
.23%
0.75
East
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
$69.
230.
5Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it17
.23%
1Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it8.
89%
0.5
East
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
17.5
6%0.
75Fa
rgo
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$3
1.59
1.5
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
23.1
7%0.
75Fa
rgo
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t9.
05%
0.5
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
14.2
5%1
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$68.
100.
5H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m27
.27%
0.5
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2.68
%1
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
20.2
3%0.
75Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
$60.
700.
75Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
16.6
3%1
Iow
a C
ity T
rans
it2.
44%
1Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
11.3
4%1
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$5
1.66
1O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
16.5
0%1
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
33%
1O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
22.6
9%0.
75Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$4
7.74
1Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t19
.88%
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
8.20
%0.
5Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t20
.72%
0.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a$2
7.75
1.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a27
.00%
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a2.
27%
1U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
8.74
%1
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
$45.
731
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
18.3
7%0.
75W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on2.
38%
1W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on10
.69%
1Ba
ttle
Cre
ek T
rans
it$6
6.51
0.5
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
16.1
9%1
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
2.00
%1
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
9.86
%1
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em$3
7.46
1.5
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em15
.56%
1Be
ttend
orf T
rans
it S
yste
m0.
12%
1Be
ttend
orf T
rans
it S
yste
m20
.33%
0.75
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
$44.
431
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
20.6
6%0.
75Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e0.
00%
1Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e11
.52%
1C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em$1
1.44
2C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em10
.78%
1.5
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
13.3
0%0
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
19.6
8%0.
75C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
$70.
350.
5C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
17.3
3%1
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em2.
00%
1C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
24.1
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss$3
4.31
1.5
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
9.26
%1.
5C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss0.
39%
1C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss9.
58%
1C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t$4
5.45
1C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t24
.03%
0.5
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
1.09
%1
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
67.3
3%0
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns$7
6.90
0.5
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns9.
56%
1.5
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns0.
80%
1C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
10.1
4%1
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$60.
460.
75C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m16
.58%
1C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
40%
1C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m26
.73%
0.5
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m$6
6.84
0.5
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
19.3
2%0.
75D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2.
91%
1D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em22
.28%
0.75
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
$50.
231
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
16.5
4%1
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.00
%1
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
20.3
0%0.
75G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us$5
5.43
0.75
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
17.7
0%0.
75G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us0.
18%
1G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us22
.65%
0.75
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
$42.
231
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
4.15
%2
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
0.00
%1
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
5.90
%1.
5Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
$63.
960.
75Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
17.7
0%0.
75Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
8.58
%0.
5Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
8.40
%1
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o$5
1.70
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
15.5
7%1
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o2.
62%
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
17.1
3%0.
75O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s$9
4.89
0O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s15
.82%
1O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s3.
80%
0.75
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
19.1
4%0.
75R
apid
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
$35.
271.
5R
apid
Tra
nsit
Syst
em23
.71%
0.5
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
1.73
%1
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
7.09
%1
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m$4
8.23
1Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
19.9
6%0.
75Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1.63
%1
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
7.70
%1
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t$2
9.62
1.5
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t24
.50%
0.5
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t2.
40%
1St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
6.82
%1
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$4
5.19
1Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y22
.62%
0.75
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
7.00
%0.
5Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y20
.06%
0.75
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$5
8.47
0.75
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em13
.91%
1W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
4.51
%0.
75W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
17.0
3%0.
75
B-35
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
re
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
13.2
7%0.
75C
ity o
f App
leto
n-V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t24
.35%
0.75
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
42,3
821
City
of A
pple
ton-
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t2,
476
0.75
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct14
.93%
1R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
19.5
8%0.
75R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
45,5
441
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct3,
385
1C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s10
.08%
0.75
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it S
ervi
ces
53.0
8%1.
5C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s54
,447
1.5
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it Se
rvic
es3,
915
1Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
12.9
0%0.
75Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
47.7
3%1
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n57
,688
1.5
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n4,
325
1D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it7.
53%
0.75
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
72.0
4%2
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
44,4
371
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
3,41
61
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l13
.01%
0.75
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l23
.39%
0.75
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l25
,288
0.5
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l3,
352
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em19
.73%
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em33
.73%
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em41
,152
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2,
997
0.75
John
son
Cou
nty
Kan
sas
aka
John
son
Cou
nty
T r12
.51%
0.75
John
son
Cou
nty
Kans
as a
ka J
ohns
on C
ount
y Tr
55.1
4%1.
5Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr34
,553
0.75
John
son
Cou
nty
Kans
as a
ka J
ohns
on C
ount
y Tr
1,65
00.
75LA
KETR
AN9.
19%
0.75
LAKE
TRAN
62.5
8%1.
5LA
KETR
AN35
,050
0.75
LAKE
TRAN
1,91
20.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
13.9
4%0.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
61.2
7%1.
5Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
30,1
040.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
2,29
40.
75R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
14.5
4%1
Ric
hlan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t23
.12%
0.75
Ric
hlan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t42
,767
1R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
3,52
41
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity8.
11%
0.75
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity21
.76%
0.75
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity32
,782
0.75
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity3,
867
1C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
39.8
8%2
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta11
.43%
0.75
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta34
,480
0.75
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta2,
297
0.75
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
16.3
6%1
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
17.6
8%0.
75Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m32
,373
0.75
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2,69
10.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
27.2
3%1.
5Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
9.45
%0.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
31,2
320.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
2,44
20.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity24
.22%
1.5
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.8
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity45
,525
1C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
565
1M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em11
.49%
0.75
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
2.25
%0.
5M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em37
,861
0.75
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
2,84
70.
75Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
5.60
%0.
5Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y5.
22%
0.5
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
35,9
040.
75Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y2,
499
0.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
9.18
%0.
75Ba
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y28
.24%
0.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity25
,413
0.5
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1,
629
0.75
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
17.0
5%1
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
20.4
2%0.
75St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on44
,034
1St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on3,
142
0.75
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity16
.81%
1To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
45.3
2%1
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity44
,213
1To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y2,
633
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m12
.23%
0.75
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m0.
03%
0.5
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m46
,307
1Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3,76
61
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne13
.06%
0.75
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne36
.72%
1C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
27,7
170.
5C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
3,00
90.
75C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m4.
20%
0.5
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
42.4
8%1
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
53,3
211.
5C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m4,
350
1C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m11
.55%
0.75
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
19.4
3%0.
75C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m51
,278
1.5
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
3,57
71
East
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
0.00
%0.
5Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it46
.50%
1Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it32
,574
0.75
East
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
2,37
30.
75Fa
rgo
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t22
.31%
1.5
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
21.2
5%0.
75Fa
rgo
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t45
,839
1Fa
rgo
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t4,
012
1H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m14
.15%
0.75
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
27.4
0%0.
75H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m46
,334
1H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m3,
284
1Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
20.2
1%1
Iow
a C
ity T
rans
it56
.24%
1.5
Iow
a C
ity T
rans
it34
,216
0.75
Iow
a C
ity T
rans
it2,
754
0.75
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.50%
1O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
19.6
4%0.
75O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
45,7
651
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em3,
099
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
15.3
2%1
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
11.5
1%0.
75Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t18
,995
1Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t1,
541
0.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a2.
72%
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a0.
00%
0.5
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a33
,261
0.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a3,
265
1W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on14
.38%
1W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on19
.16%
0.75
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
45,3
661
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
3,37
11
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
11.3
6%0.
75Ba
ttle
Cre
ek T
rans
it17
.93%
0.75
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
27,4
500.
5Ba
ttle
Cre
ek T
rans
it1,
849
0.75
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em6.
32%
0.5
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em51
.13%
1.5
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
41,4
441
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
2,37
80.
75Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e2.
30%
0.5
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
97.7
0%2
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
68,4
402
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
3,71
31
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
5.83
%0.
5C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em35
.67%
1C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em56
,829
1.5
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
22,6
672
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em11
.34%
0.75
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em21
.76%
0.75
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em34
,169
0.75
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em2,
100
0.75
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
8.60
%0.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss13
.47%
0.75
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
36,9
000.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss2,
803
0.75
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
13.0
2%0.
75C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t21
.48%
0.75
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
39,5
570.
75C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t2,
617
0.75
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns38
.18%
2C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
14.7
0%0.
75C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
33,2
910.
75C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
1,13
50.
75C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m7.
97%
0.75
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
65.0
1%1.
5C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m44
,166
1C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m3,
746
1D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
9.82
%0.
75D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em12
.31%
0.75
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
30,8
940.
75D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1,
881
0.75
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.7
1%1
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
23.7
2%0.
75Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em51
,401
1.5
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
3,41
41
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
14.8
2%1
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
27.1
1%0.
75G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us32
,020
0.75
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
2,16
50.
75H
eart
City
Rid
er/G
oshe
n Tr
ansi
t24
.73%
1.5
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
15.1
3%0.
75H
eart
City
Rid
er/G
oshe
n Tr
ansi
t69
,431
2H
eart
City
Rid
er/G
oshe
n Tr
ansi
t4,
014
1Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
17.4
3%1
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em19
.56%
0.75
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em34
,042
0.75
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2,
257
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o21
.23%
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
44.4
7%1
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o41
,724
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
2,90
30.
75O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s14
.12%
0.75
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
18.0
9%0.
75O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s50
,339
1O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s1,
901
0.75
Rap
id T
rans
it S
yste
m25
.58%
1.5
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
32.8
6%1
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
42,6
881
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
3,25
01
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m26
.56%
1.5
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m25
.64%
0.75
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m33
,983
0.75
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it Sy
stem
2,52
10.
75St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
4.98
%0.
5St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
59.7
4%1.
5St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
41,4
951
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t4,
840
1Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
14.1
3%0.
75Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y10
.03%
0.75
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
31,7
500.
75Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y1,
925
0.75
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em15
.02%
1W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
21.1
8%0.
75W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
27,1
370.
5W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
1,89
60.
75
B-36
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per V
ehic
le M
ileAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
0.87
0.75
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
31,5
591
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
1,88
30.
75C
ity o
f App
leto
n-Va
lley
Tran
sit
36,8
190.
75R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
1.00
1R
ockf
ord
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
30,7
421
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
285
0.75
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct45
,544
1C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s0.
981
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it S
ervi
ces
41,6
661.
5C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s2,
988
1C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
53,2
401.
5Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
0.96
1Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
37,9
961.
5Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
2,80
71
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n55
,267
1.5
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
0.95
1D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it35
,498
1D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it2,
763
1D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it42
,153
1Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
0.97
1Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
18,7
600.
5Sa
gina
w T
rans
it Au
thor
ity R
egio
nal
2,52
21
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
Reg
iona
l24
,444
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.95
1M
etro
polit
an E
vans
ville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em39
,251
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it Sy
stem
2,78
11
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it Sy
stem
39,2
511
John
son
Cou
nty
Kan
sas
aka
John
son
Cou
nty
T r0.
591
John
son
Cou
nty
Kans
as a
ka J
ohns
on C
ount
y Tr
17,6
000.
5Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
Tr1,
090
0.75
John
son
Cou
nty
Kans
as a
ka J
ohns
on C
ount
y Tr
20,4
390.
5LA
KETR
AN0.
711
LAKE
TRAN
20,8
000.
75LA
KETR
AN1,
252
0.75
LAKE
TRAN
24,9
600.
5Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
0.96
1Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
25,7
460.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
1,96
00.
75Si
oux
Falls
Tra
nsit
28,9
640.
75R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.98
1R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
29,2
511
Ric
hlan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t2,
384
0.75
Ric
hlan
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t41
,787
1Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
0.98
1Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
25,1
030.
75Te
rre
Hau
te T
rans
it U
tility
2,92
41
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity32
,276
0.75
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta0.
860.
75C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
22,1
400.
75C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
1,50
50.
75C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
29,8
040.
75Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
971
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
23,0
850.
75Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m1,
803
0.75
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
31,3
960.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
0.99
1Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
28,4
290.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
2,20
70.
75Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
30,7
980.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
961
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
31,6
311
City
of J
acks
on T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,37
10.
75C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity43
,492
1M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
860.
75M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em23
,559
0.75
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
1,82
70.
75M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em32
,621
0.75
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
920.
75Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y23
,496
0.75
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
1,45
70.
75Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y32
,895
0.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
0.99
1Ba
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y22
,938
0.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1,
471
0.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity25
,158
0.5
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
0.97
1St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on33
,159
1St
. Clo
ud M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it C
omm
issi
on2,
345
0.75
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
42,6
331
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
951
Tope
ka M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity30
,276
1To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1,85
30.
75To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y41
,810
1Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
0.96
1Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
33,3
521
Bloo
min
gton
-Nor
mal
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m2,
703
1Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
44,4
701
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne0.
971
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne17
,927
0.5
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne1,
934
0.75
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne26
,890
0.5
City
of L
awre
nce
Law
renc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.95
1C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m50
,822
2C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m4,
202
1C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m50
,822
1.5
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.96
1C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m32
,770
1C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
333
0.75
City
of M
iddl
etow
n-M
iddl
etow
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
49,1
551.
5Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it0.
951
East
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
31,0
391
East
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
2,29
00.
75Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it31
,039
0.75
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
0.97
1Fa
rgo
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t41
,057
1.5
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
3,56
41
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
44,4
781
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.93
0.75
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
35,8
771
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2,37
60.
75H
amm
ond
Tran
sit S
yste
m43
,053
1Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
0.94
1Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
26,0
470.
75Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
2,14
30.
75Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
32,1
750.
75O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.98
1O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
31,3
221
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em2,
123
0.75
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em44
,745
1Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t0.
981
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
18,5
250.
5Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t1,
503
0.75
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
18,5
250.
5U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
0.96
1U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
23,3
190.
75U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
2,27
40.
75U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
31,9
100.
75W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on0.
941
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
28,0
700.
75W
auke
sha
Tran
sit C
omm
issi
on2,
138
0.75
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
42,8
441
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
0.97
1Ba
ttle
Cre
ek T
rans
it26
,626
0.75
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
1,76
20.
75Ba
ttle
Cre
ek T
rans
it26
,626
0.5
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
991
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em30
,858
1Be
ttend
orf T
rans
it S
yste
m1,
770
0.75
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
41,1
441
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
0.99
1Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e27
,106
0.75
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
1,47
00.
75Br
unsw
ick
Tran
sit A
ltern
ativ
e67
,766
2C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Syst
em0.
961
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
54,4
052
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
22,5
152
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
54,4
051.
5C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.95
1C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
24,2
750.
75C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
1,49
00.
75C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
32,3
660.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss0.
961
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
26,5
040.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss2,
064
0.75
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
35,3
380.
75C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t0.
920.
75C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t29
,133
1C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t2,
009
0.75
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
36,4
160.
75C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
0.53
1C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
17,4
970.
5C
ity o
f New
ark
Tran
sit O
pera
tions
596
0.75
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns17
,497
0.5
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.96
1C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m29
,373
1C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
444
0.75
Col
umbi
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
42,4
281
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it S
yste
m0.
951
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
26,9
970.
75D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1,
684
0.75
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
29,4
520.
75Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
981
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
27,8
130.
75Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1,
855
0.75
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
50,4
101.
5G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us0.
941
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
30,0
151
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
2,08
20.
75G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us30
,015
0.75
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
0.90
0.75
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
53,2
642
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
3,24
31
Hea
rt C
ity R
ider
/Gos
hen
Tran
sit
62,1
412
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
961
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em19
,812
0.5
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1,
279
0.75
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em32
,549
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o0.
971
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o24
,848
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o1,
712
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o40
,660
1O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s0.
731
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
36,9
501
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
1,49
80.
75O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s36
,950
0.75
Rap
id T
rans
it S
yste
m0.
961
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
23,3
930.
75R
apid
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1,
714
0.75
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
40,9
381
Siou
x C
ity T
rans
it S
yste
m0.
910.
75Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
21,0
070.
75Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1,64
10.
75Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Syst
em30
,958
0.75
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t0.
951
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t32
,935
1St
. Jos
eph
Tran
sit
3,81
61
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t39
,522
1Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
1.00
1Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y21
,166
0.75
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
rity
1,28
30.
75Tw
in C
ities
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
horit
y31
,750
0.75
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
981
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em23
,168
0.75
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1,
582
0.75
Wau
sau
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em26
,477
0.5
B-37
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: M
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
16.6
7%0.
75H
eart
City
Rid
er/G
oshe
n Tr
ansi
t24
.00
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct48
.15%
1U
nive
rsity
of I
owa
22.7
5C
ity U
tiliti
es o
f Spr
ingf
ield
Tra
nsit
Ser
vice
s27
.78%
0.75
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
22.7
5Fo
rt W
ayne
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Cor
pora
tion
45.4
5%1
City
Util
ities
of S
prin
gfie
ld T
rans
it S
ervi
ces
22.5
0D
aven
port
Publ
ic T
rans
it18
.75%
0.75
Eau
Cla
ire T
rans
it Sy
stem
21.7
5Sa
gina
w T
rans
it A
utho
rity
Reg
iona
l30
.30%
0.75
City
of A
nder
son
Tran
spor
tatio
n S
yste
m21
.50
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it S
yste
m0.
00%
0.5
Roc
kfor
d M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct21
.00
John
son
Cou
nty
Kans
as a
ka J
ohns
on C
ount
y Tr
16.1
3%0.
75Io
wa
City
Tra
nsit
21.0
0LA
KETR
AN
20.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m20
.75
Siou
x Fa
lls T
rans
it12
.50%
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Eva
nsvi
lle T
rans
it Sy
stem
20.5
0R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
42.8
6%1
Osh
kosh
Tra
nsit
Syst
em20
.50
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity28
.57%
0.75
Rap
id T
rans
it Sy
stem
20.5
0C
ity o
f Roc
hest
er, M
inne
sota
34.6
2%1
Fort
Way
ne P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
orpo
ratio
n20
.25
Sheb
oyga
n Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
36.0
0%1
City
of R
oche
ster
, Min
neso
ta20
.25
Blue
Wat
er A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n C
omm
issi
on8.
33%
0.75
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
20.2
5C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity37
.50%
1C
ity o
f Jac
kson
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity20
.00
Mus
kego
n Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
38.4
6%1
Dav
enpo
rt Pu
blic
Tra
nsit
19.7
5Po
rtage
Are
a R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y40
.00%
1Fa
rgo
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t19
.75
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
9.68
%0.
75Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em19
.50
St. C
loud
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Com
mis
sion
28.5
7%0.
75Be
ttend
orf T
rans
it Sy
stem
19.5
0To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
38.1
0%1
Gra
nd F
orks
City
Bus
19.5
0Bl
oom
ingt
on-N
orm
al P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em33
.33%
1Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Syst
em19
.50
City
of D
ubuq
ue-K
eyLi
ne50
.00%
1To
peka
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.2
5C
ity o
f Law
renc
e La
wre
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
00%
0.5
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
19.2
5C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m50
.00%
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Bla
ck H
awk
Co
19.2
5Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it0.
00%
0.5
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t19
.25
Farg
o M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit
8.33
%0.
75C
ity o
f Mid
dlet
own-
Mid
dlet
own
Tran
sit S
yste
m19
.00
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
20.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Hol
land
Mac
ataw
a Ar
ea E
xpre
ss19
.00
Iow
a C
ity T
rans
it23
.53%
0.75
Oza
ukee
Cou
nty
Tran
sit S
ervi
ces
19.0
0O
shko
sh T
rans
it Sy
stem
42.8
6%1
City
of A
pple
ton-
Val
ley
Tran
sit
18.7
5Sp
ringf
ield
City
Are
a Tr
ansi
t0.
00%
0.5
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns18
.75
Uni
vers
ity o
f Iow
a36
.84%
1C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m18
.75
Wau
kesh
a Tr
ansi
t Com
mis
sion
52.6
3%1
Siou
x Fa
lls T
rans
it18
.50
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
0.00
%0.
5Sh
eboy
gan
Tran
sit S
yste
m18
.50
Bette
ndor
f Tra
nsit
Syst
em33
.33%
1Jo
hnso
n C
ount
y Ka
nsas
aka
Joh
nson
Cou
nty
T r18
.00
Brun
swic
k Tr
ansi
t Alte
rnat
ive
150.
00%
2R
ichl
and
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
18.0
0C
ity o
f And
erso
n Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Sys
tem
0.00
%0.
5Bl
ue W
ater
Are
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Com
mis
sion
18.0
0C
ity o
f Bel
oit T
rans
it Sy
stem
33.3
3%1
Jane
sville
Tra
nsit
Syst
em18
.00
City
of H
olla
nd M
acat
awa
Area
Exp
ress
33.3
3%1
LAKE
TRAN
17.7
5C
ity o
f Moo
rhea
d-Tr
ansi
t25
.00%
0.75
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity17
.75
City
of N
ewar
k Tr
ansi
t Ope
ratio
ns0.
00%
0.5
Ham
mon
d Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
17.2
5C
olum
bia
Tran
sit S
yste
m44
.44%
1D
ecat
ur P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Syst
em17
.25
Dec
atur
Pub
lic T
rans
it Sy
stem
9.09
%0.
75W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
17.2
5Ea
u C
laire
Tra
nsit
Syst
em81
.25%
1.5
Sprin
gfie
ld C
ity A
rea
Tran
sit
17.0
0G
rand
For
ks C
ity B
us0.
00%
0.5
Sagi
naw
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y R
egio
nal
16.7
5H
eart
City
Rid
er/G
oshe
n Tr
ansi
t16
.67%
0.75
Porta
ge A
rea
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
16.7
5Ja
nesv
ille T
rans
it Sy
stem
64.2
9%1.
5Ea
st C
hica
go T
rans
it16
.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of B
lack
Haw
k C
o63
.64%
1.5
Battl
e C
reek
Tra
nsit
16.7
5O
zauk
ee C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s0.
00%
0.5
City
of B
eloi
t Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.75
Rap
id T
rans
it S
yste
m75
.00%
1.5
City
of M
oorh
ead-
Tran
sit
16.7
5Si
oux
City
Tra
nsit
Syst
em47
.37%
1M
uske
gon
Area
Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.50
St. J
osep
h Tr
ansi
t20
.00%
0.75
Terr
e H
aute
Tra
nsit
Util
ity16
.00
Twin
Citi
es A
rea
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity50
.00%
1Ba
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
15.7
5W
ausa
u Ar
ea T
rans
it Sy
stem
14.2
9%0.
75C
ity o
f Dub
uque
-Key
Line
15.2
5
B-38
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up A
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n17
,998
.34
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
24.0
01
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n39
.80
0.75
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n4.
191
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T14
,260
.73
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T24
.33
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
33.2
80.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
2.30
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct7,
632.
840.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
24.0
01
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct29
.36
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct1.
920.
75Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay18
,466
.10
1Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay24
.00
1Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay12
0.99
2Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay7.
712
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity9,
974.
320.
5O
rang
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
21.3
31
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity21
.46
0.75
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity2.
840.
75C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
20,4
63.6
11.
5C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
24.0
01
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t83
.63
1.5
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t3.
791
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
16,3
90.7
21
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
24.0
01
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
50.2
21
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
3.11
0.75
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
,609
.61
0.75
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity22
.25
0.5
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity22
.46
0.75
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
500.
75Sa
nta
Cla
ra V
alle
y Tr
ans.
Aut
horit
y11
,769
.98
0.75
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
24.0
01
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
28.4
40.
75Sa
nta
Cla
ra V
alle
y Tr
ans.
Aut
horit
y2.
490.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide )
Alt S
core
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n51
.44
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
12.2
80.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
2,74
10.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
111,
193
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T32
.50
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T14
.14
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
4,01
20.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
172,
426
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
28.4
80.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
14.8
31.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
31,8
292
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct13
9,01
01
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
68.3
22
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
8.86
1Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay2,
145
0.75
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
86,4
440.
75O
rang
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
39.1
60.
75O
rang
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
13.7
71
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity5,
299
0.75
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity62
,798
0.75
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t52
.54
1C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
13.8
61
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t4,
709
0.75
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t20
8,63
71.
5Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct36
.26
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
11.6
70.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ctn/
a2
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
89,0
610.
75D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
33.3
50.
75D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.3
21
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
128
0.75
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity47
,359
0.5
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
31.8
90.
75Sa
nta
Cla
ra V
alle
y Tr
ans.
Aut
horit
y12
.81
0.75
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
2,05
80.
75Sa
nta
Cla
ra V
alle
y Tr
ans.
Aut
horit
y26
4,37
31.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n10
.76
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
$73.
751
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$9
5.32
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
23.4
2%0.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
10.8
01
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T$7
1.74
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
$70.
061.
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
8.55
%2
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct22
.56
0.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct$8
5.89
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
$83.
311
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct19
.78%
1Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay11
.45
1Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay$1
95.9
50.
5Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay$1
10.6
50.
75Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay25
.19%
0.75
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity21
.43
0.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$4
4.94
1.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity$8
1.99
1O
rang
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
20.4
4%1
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t8.
891.
5C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
$133
.91
0.75
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t$8
4.13
1C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
22.0
9%0.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct10
.88
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct$1
39.9
00.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct$1
01.0
00.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct20
.07%
1D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
14.4
50.
75D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$84.
901
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$1
26.0
60.
5D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.1
7%0.
75Sa
nta
Cla
ra V
alle
y Tr
ans.
Aut
horit
y17
.00
0.75
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
$116
.77
0.75
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
$130
.93
0.5
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
24.7
2%0.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n3.
35%
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
16.7
1%1
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
00%
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
0.00
%1
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T7.
40%
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T7.
55%
2M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
25.2
2%1
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T74
.02%
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
8.10
%0.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
22.2
5%0.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
19.7
3%1
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct63
.72%
1Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay2.
14%
1.5
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
17.4
9%1
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
25.4
4%1
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
55.5
6%0.
75O
rang
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
4.06
%1
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity18
.80%
0.75
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity29
.06%
1.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity57
.64%
0.75
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t2.
50%
1C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
14.2
6%1
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t22
.24%
1C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
76.9
9%1
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2.12
%1.
5Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct17
.07%
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct23
.04%
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct68
.78%
1D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
5.43
%0.
75D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
23.4
2%0.
5D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
12.1
9%0.
75D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
106.
35%
1.5
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
4.85
%0.
75Sa
nta
Cla
ra V
alle
y Tr
ans.
Aut
horit
y23
.52%
0.5
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
13.8
2%0.
75Sa
nta
Cla
ra V
alle
y Tr
ans.
Aut
horit
y44
.34%
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n46
,416
0.75
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n3,
495
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
0.85
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
31,4
340.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
42,9
430.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
2,81
60.
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
0.85
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T30
,436
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct52
,308
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
3,30
60.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
0.81
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
31,5
550.
75Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay36
,017
0.5
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
3,81
71.
5Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay0.
871.
5Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay21
,574
0.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity58
,134
1.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
882
1.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
840.
75O
rang
e C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
ority
40,8
891.
5C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
49,1
201
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t3,
301
0.75
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t0.
861
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t35
,101
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct40
,205
0.5
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
3,23
40.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct0.
861.
5Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct29
,268
0.75
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity51
,814
1D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3,64
41
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
840.
75D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
36,2
011
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
50,5
171
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
3,64
21
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
0.85
0.75
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
36,0
061
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n2,
560
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
39,6
260.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
26.0
6%1
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
25.0
0M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
2,15
30.
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
36,2
920.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
19.2
4%0.
75C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
23.5
0R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
2,12
80.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
42,5
741
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct34
.92%
1.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity23
.25
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
2,43
60.
75Sa
n Fr
anci
sco
Mun
icip
al R
ailw
ay31
,198
0.5
San
Fran
cisc
o M
unic
ipal
Rai
lway
44.6
1%2
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T21
.50
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
969
1.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity49
,046
1.5
Ora
nge
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.95%
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct21
.50
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t2,
532
0.75
City
and
Cou
nty
of H
onol
ulu
Dep
t of T
rans
porta
t42
,011
1C
ity a
nd C
ount
y of
Hon
olul
u D
ept o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
19.6
8%0.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct21
.50
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,50
70.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct34
,702
0.5
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
18.5
7%0.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
21.0
0D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,71
81
Dal
las
Area
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity43
,651
1D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
20.5
8%0.
75Sa
nta
Cla
ra V
alle
y Tr
ans.
Aut
horit
y19
.00
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
2,81
21
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
42,6
971
Sant
a C
lara
Val
ley
Tran
s. A
utho
rity
18.5
8%0.
75D
alla
s Ar
ea R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.7
5
B-39
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up B
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yA
vera
ge
Wee
kday
Spa
n of
Se
rvic
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Pass
enge
r Trip
s Pe
r Cap
itaA
lt Sc
ore
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileA
lt Sc
ore
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti o7,
078.
940.
75C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
18.8
30.
75C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
2.46
0.5
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tio3.
231
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
7,47
7.99
0.75
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
19.6
71
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
24.3
20.
75Sa
n M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2.
330.
75S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
14,2
09.5
20.
75S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
22.0
01.
5Sa
n D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
30.2
01
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n3.
361.
5Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.15
2,61
4.04
2Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.19
.75
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.6.
280.
5Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.1.
210.
5R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a13
,077
.16
0.75
RTC
of S
outh
ern
Nev
ada
20.0
01
RTC
of S
outh
ern
Nev
ada
44.6
21
RTC
of S
outh
ern
Nev
ada
3.06
1C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t8,
111.
280.
75C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t20
.67
1C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t23
.08
0.75
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
2.47
0.75
Cap
ital M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y10
,270
.14
0.75
Cap
ital M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.5
01
Cap
ital M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
55.1
81.
5C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2.
490.
75VI
A M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it12
,129
.18
0.75
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
19.5
01
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
32.3
21
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
2.31
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ave
rage
Spe
edAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt
Scor
eTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Hea
dway
(m
inut
es)
Alt
Scor
e
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti o40
.60
1C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
12.5
70.
75C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
2,18
9,98
82
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tio21
.61
0.75
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
28.9
10.
75S
an M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct12
.43
0.75
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
74,8
230.
75S
an M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct17
.89
0.75
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n39
.42
1Sa
n D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
11.7
40.
5Sa
n D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
188,
750
0.75
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n17
.37
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
19.9
00.
5Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.16
.45
1.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
181,
821
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
0.79
2R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a41
.07
1R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a13
.44
0.75
RTC
of S
outh
ern
Nev
ada
337,
772
0.75
RTC
of S
outh
ern
Nev
ada
23.9
70.
5C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t38
.12
1C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t15
.43
1.5
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
262,
721
0.75
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
17.8
90.
75C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity32
.05
0.75
Cap
ital M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.8
70.
75C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity12
6,34
20.
75C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity18
.71
0.75
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
33.1
20.
75VI
A M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it14
.36
1VI
A M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it27
6,71
40.
75VI
A M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it17
.07
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r R
even
ue H
our
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt
Scor
eTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt
Scor
e
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tio$3
.50
1.5
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tio$5
7.81
1C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
21.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
3.00
%0.
75S
an M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$8
8.42
0.75
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$105
.13
0.5
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
13.4
9%1.
5Sa
n M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct4.
91%
0.75
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n$5
1.54
1Sa
n D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
$67.
291
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n20
.60%
0.75
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n1.
87%
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.$1
6.86
1.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
$53.
391
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
31.2
8%0
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
0.08
%1.
5R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a$5
3.14
1R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a$4
8.91
1R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a19
.52%
1R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a0.
94%
1C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t$5
9.70
0.75
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
$98.
600.
5C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t18
.33%
1C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t2.
55%
1C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$1
14.5
70.
5C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$6
6.55
1C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.25%
1C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3.
31%
0.75
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
$53.
601
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
$54.
941
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
16.8
7%1
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
6.58
%0.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt
Scor
eTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Vehi
cle
Mile
s Pe
r Pe
ak V
ehic
leA
lt Sc
ore
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
ti o14
.00%
1C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
15.0
1%0.
75C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
5.37
%0.
75C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
43,5
990.
75S
an M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct22
.73%
0.75
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
22.0
5%1
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
33.9
3%0.
75Sa
n M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct37
,557
0.5
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n19
.40%
0.75
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n34
.42%
1Sa
n D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
40.1
1%1
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n54
,651
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.3.
50%
1.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
0.00
%0.
5Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.0.
00%
0.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
40,2
270.
75R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a15
.21%
1R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a48
.20%
1.5
RTC
of S
outh
ern
Nev
ada
0.00
%0.
5R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a73
,230
2C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t29
.13%
0.5
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
25.2
3%1
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
45.6
5%1
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
43,7
960.
75C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity13
.63%
1C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity10
.80%
0.75
Cap
ital M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
83.9
6%1.
5C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity47
,367
0.75
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
15.7
0%1
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
16.1
5%0.
75VI
A M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it71
.21%
1.5
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
53,8
111
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esA
lt Sc
ore
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt
Scor
e
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tio2,
880
0.75
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tio0.
740.
5C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
25,6
640.
75C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
2,04
20.
75S
an M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
601
0.75
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.74
0.5
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
23,6
410.
5Sa
n M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct1,
902
0.75
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n4,
506
1Sa
n D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
0.88
1Sa
n D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
39,1
741
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n3,
337
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.2,
315
0.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
0.82
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
33,0
580.
75Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.2,
010
0.75
RTC
of S
outh
ern
Nev
ada
5,45
91.
5R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a0.
961.
5R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a55
,524
2R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a4,
132
1.5
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
3,13
90.
75C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t0.
851
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
30,8
330.
75C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t1,
998
0.75
Cap
ital M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
3,47
60.
75C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
871
Cap
ital M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
30,7
870.
75C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
393
0.75
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
3,59
81
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
0.92
1VI
A M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it40
,007
1VI
A M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it2,
786
1
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tio32
,049
0.75
City
of L
os A
ngel
es D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tio24
.88%
1R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a25
.25
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
27,7
220.
5Sa
n M
ateo
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct17
.27%
0.75
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n21
.25
San
Die
go T
rans
it C
orpo
ratio
n48
,285
1Sa
n D
iego
Tra
nsit
Cor
pora
tion
23.2
6%1
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
20.5
0Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c.33
,058
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
0.00
%1
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
20.5
0R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a70
,186
2R
TC o
f Sou
ther
n N
evad
a26
.41%
1C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
19.7
5C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t37
,309
0.75
City
of P
hoen
ix P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Dep
artm
ent
21.0
1%0.
75C
ity o
f Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
19.2
5C
apita
l Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity41
,207
0.75
Cap
ital M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
33.8
5%1.
5C
ity o
f Pho
enix
Pub
lic T
rans
it D
epar
tmen
t18
.50
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
49,5
611
VIA
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
23.8
8%1
San
Mat
eo C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
16.5
0
B-40
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtati o
8,97
4.89
0.75
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
24.0
01.
5G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
tio15
.60
0.75
Gol
den
Gat
e Br
idge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
1.21
0.75
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o9,
108.
490.
75Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
21.7
51
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o5.
700.
75Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
2.81
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
93,4
91.8
52
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)20
.75
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
4.71
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)2.
051
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
, Inc
. (91
58)
2,54
5.55
0.75
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
, Inc
. (91
58)
19.4
20.
75La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)0.
380.
5La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)0.
630.
5Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
4,27
8.40
0.75
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct19
.25
0.75
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct20
.53
1Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2.52
1Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s B
ig B
lue
Bus
17,7
86.5
11
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blu
e Bu
s20
.00
0.75
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blue
Bus
50.0
42
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blue
Bus
4.57
2Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
16,8
99.4
11
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny21
.00
1Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
45.0
42
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny3.
671.
5Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
5,89
7.13
0.75
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n15
.50
0.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n4.
800.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
2.57
1M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o11
,849
.70
0.75
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
18.3
30.
75M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o21
.13
1M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o2.
111
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
6,30
6.80
0.75
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
24.0
01.
5N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B13
.53
0.75
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
1.33
0.75
OM
NIT
RA
NS
9,15
5.03
0.75
OM
NIT
RA
NS
19.0
00.
75O
MN
ITR
AN
S12
.89
0.75
OM
NIT
RA
NS
2.04
1R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy4,
567.
960.
75R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy21
.92
1R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy5.
780.
75R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy1.
210.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
10,9
09.1
30.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.2
50.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
10.2
00.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.26
0.75
City
of T
ucso
n15
,062
.94
1C
ity o
f Tuc
son
18.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Tuc
son
30.9
51.
5C
ity o
f Tuc
son
2.29
1Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity14
,501
.38
0.75
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
19.2
50.
75Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
13.1
30.
75Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
1.43
0.75
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue10
,630
.86
0.75
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue17
.67
0.75
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue20
.80
1Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
1.67
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)4,
669.
570.
75Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
18.5
00.
75Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
3.40
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)1.
200.
75La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
23,8
89.8
81
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)24
.00
1.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)8.
050.
75La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
1.78
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
re
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
22.8
20.
75G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
tio18
.81
1.5
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
248,
688
0.75
Gol
den
Gat
e Br
idge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
12.1
41
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o34
.97
1Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
12.4
60.
75Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
592,
833
1Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
24.3
70.
75Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
31.7
51
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)15
.51
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
125,
695
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)1.
791.
5La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)8.
970.
5La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)14
.32
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)21
9,64
50.
75La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)47
.74
0.5
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct32
.68
1Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
12.9
60.
75Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
95,9
550.
75Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
44.5
80.
5Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s B
ig B
lue
Bus
52.5
22
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blu
e Bu
s11
.49
0.5
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blue
Bus
111,
541
0.75
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blue
Bus
10.6
81
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny40
.33
1.5
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny11
.00
0.5
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny26
1,00
20.
75Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
14.1
31
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n27
.99
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
10.9
00.
5Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
37,7
420.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
25.1
60.
75M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o26
.44
0.75
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
12.5
50.
75M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o78
6,96
81
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
22.4
70.
75N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B22
.84
0.75
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
17.1
61.
5N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B65
,555
0.75
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
29.5
00.
75O
MN
ITR
AN
S27
.10
0.75
OM
NIT
RA
NS
13.2
70.
75O
MN
ITR
AN
S21
0,43
90.
75O
MN
ITR
AN
S27
.51
0.75
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
19.1
00.
75R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy15
.77
1R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy16
0,32
20.
75R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy46
.80
0.5
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity17
.28
0.5
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.76
0.75
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity29
8,07
10.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
14.9
01
City
of T
ucso
n30
.20
1C
ity o
f Tuc
son
13.2
10.
75C
ity o
f Tuc
son
126,
138
0.75
City
of T
ucso
n12
.91
1Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity17
.74
0.75
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.3
90.
75Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
180,
301
0.75
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y9.
341
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue27
.55
1Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
16.5
21.
5Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
141,
846
0.75
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue14
.62
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
20.2
20.
75Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
16.8
21.
5Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
422,
648
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
24.6
30.
75La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
28.9
21
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)16
.26
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
3,04
1,18
22
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)8.
171.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r R
even
ue H
our
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtati o
$88.
110.
5G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
tio$1
28.8
80
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
11.7
1%1.
5G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
tio1.
86%
1Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
$7.6
41.
5Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
$46.
851
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o21
.56%
0.75
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o0.
03%
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
$7.3
61.
5Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
$49.
621
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)23
.93%
0.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)1.
64%
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)$1
.66
1.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
, Inc
. (91
58)
$39.
661.
5La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)17
.19%
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)0.
92%
1Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$63.
780.
75Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$101
.55
0.5
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct16
.36%
1Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
5.24
%0.
75Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s B
ig B
lue
Bus
$64.
030.
75Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s B
ig B
lue
Bus
$67.
210.
75Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s Bi
g Bl
ue B
us21
.75%
0.75
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blue
Bus
2.12
%1
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny$7
9.37
0.5
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny$7
1.08
0.75
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny16
.46%
1Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
5.07
%0.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
$9.0
51.
5Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
$52.
751
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n15
.10%
1.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n5.
27%
0.75
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
$40.
210.
75M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o$5
0.31
1M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o22
.48%
0.75
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
3.28
%1
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
$44.
070.
75N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B$7
4.37
0.75
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
16.5
7%1
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
4.59
%0.
75O
MN
ITR
AN
S$3
2.59
1O
MN
ITR
AN
S$6
8.50
0.75
OM
NIT
RA
NS
21.6
8%0.
75O
MN
ITR
AN
S1.
16%
1R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy$2
1.66
1R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy$7
1.67
0.75
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
25.1
9%0.
5R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy2.
87%
1C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$43.
600.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$73.
840.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.4
3%1.
5C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2.12
%1
City
of T
ucso
n$6
1.83
0.75
City
of T
ucso
n$6
0.33
1C
ity o
f Tuc
son
20.8
7%0.
75C
ity o
f Tuc
son
3.34
%1
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$50.
610.
75Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$6
8.42
0.75
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y22
.15%
0.75
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y8.
09%
0.5
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue$5
3.25
0.75
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue$7
0.54
0.75
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue21
.42%
0.75
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue16
.82%
0Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
$8.8
31.
5Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
$52.
481
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)27
.12%
0.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)1.
00%
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
$12.
471
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)$4
4.80
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
17.9
0%1
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)0.
70%
1
B-41
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtati o
34.9
4%0
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
30.4
7%1
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
21.0
2%0.
75G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
tio41
,510
0.75
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o19
.20%
0.75
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o39
.96%
1.5
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o7.
52%
0.5
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o51
,418
1Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
11.9
5%1
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)23
.74%
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)0.
00%
0.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)53
,991
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)13
.74%
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)2.
89%
0.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
, Inc
. (91
58)
0.00
%0.
5La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)43
,886
0.75
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct24
.33%
0.75
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct24
.01%
1Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
59.3
1%1
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct49
,428
0.75
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blu
e Bu
s17
.46%
1Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s B
ig B
lue
Bus
28.0
7%1
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blue
Bus
56.5
3%1
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blue
Bus
40,1
160.
75Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
17.2
5%1
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny27
.02%
1Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
43.6
3%0.
75Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
47,3
010.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
11.9
0%1
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n7.
99%
0.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n88
.82%
1.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n29
,267
0.5
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
14.1
0%1
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
21.7
0%0.
75M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o70
.31%
1M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o59
,566
1N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B24
.24%
0.75
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
23.7
0%0.
75N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B56
.24%
1N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B57
,286
1O
MN
ITR
AN
S24
.02%
0.75
OM
NIT
RA
NS
21.3
8%0.
75O
MN
ITR
AN
S70
.87%
1O
MN
ITR
AN
S60
,595
1.5
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
24.9
0%0.
75R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy19
.06%
0.75
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
68.2
5%1
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
63,0
631.
5C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
20.5
6%0.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16.8
1%0.
75C
entra
l Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
73.1
4%1
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity43
,599
0.75
City
of T
ucso
n17
.17%
1C
ity o
f Tuc
son
20.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Tuc
son
60.0
5%1
City
of T
ucso
n48
,483
0.75
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
17.8
6%0.
75Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity11
.15%
0.5
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y66
.22%
1Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
32,1
070.
5Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
4.45
%1.
5Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
14.1
6%0.
75Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
86.3
7%1.
5Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
49,1
220.
75Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (9
179)
16.2
2%1
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)43
.40%
1.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)0.
00%
0.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)51
,566
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
2.63
%1.
5La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
52.8
2%2
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)0.
00%
0.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)69
,701
1.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Hou
rs
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
2,07
80.
5G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
tio0.
820.
75G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
tio28
,626
0.75
Gol
den
Gat
e Br
idge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtatio
1,52
20.
5Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
4,13
01.
5Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
0.90
1Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
38,7
831
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o3,
112
1.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)3,
139
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)0.
800.
75Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
34,2
800.
75Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
2,21
00.
75La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)2,
637
0.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
, Inc
. (91
58)
0.66
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)21
,964
0.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
, Inc
. (91
58)
1,53
30.
5Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
3,44
81
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct0.
830.
75Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
33,6
910.
75Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,59
91
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blu
e Bu
s3,
388
1Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s B
ig B
lue
Bus
0.91
1Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s Bi
g Bl
ue B
us28
,358
0.75
Sant
a M
onic
a's
Big
Blue
Bus
2,46
80.
75Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
4,15
81.
5Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
0.93
1Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
32,1
780.
75Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
2,92
61
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n2,
757
0.75
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
921
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n23
,013
0.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n2,
111
0.75
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
4,59
51.
5M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o0.
941
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
39,5
961
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
3,15
41.
5N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B3,
260
0.75
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
0.93
1N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B53
,211
2N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B3,
101
1.5
OM
NIT
RA
NS
4,37
81.
5O
MN
ITR
AN
S0.
921
OM
NIT
RA
NS
45,3
641.
5O
MN
ITR
AN
S3,
418
1.5
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
3,81
31
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
0.89
1R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy45
,806
1.5
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
2,90
41
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
141
0.75
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
851
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity34
,598
0.75
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
515
1C
ity o
f Tuc
son
3,58
41
City
of T
ucso
n0.
881
City
of T
ucso
n34
,228
0.75
City
of T
ucso
n2,
590
1Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
566
0.5
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.87
1Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
26,0
330.
5Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
2,10
00.
75Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
2,97
80.
75Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
0.87
1Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
35,9
751
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue2,
177
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)2,
843
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)0.
631
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)25
,529
0.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)1,
518
0.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)3,
652
1La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es In
c. (9
178)
0.76
0.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)44
,075
1.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)2,
710
1
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Gol
den
Gat
e B
ridge
, Hig
hway
and
Tra
nspo
rtati o
34,1
550.
75G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
tio19
.31%
0.75
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)25
.25
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o46
,109
1Sa
n D
iego
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dev
elop
men
t Bo
18.8
9%0.
75Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
22.5
0Fi
rst T
rans
it, In
c. (6
087)
43,1
781
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)25
.95%
1Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s Bi
g Bl
ue B
us22
.25
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
, Inc
. (91
58)
29,0
100.
5La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)32
.08%
1.5
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
22.0
0Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
41,1
980.
75Sa
cram
ento
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
22.2
8%1
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
22.0
0Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s B
ig B
lue
Bus
36,3
720.
75Sa
nta
Mon
ica'
s B
ig B
lue
Bus
28.2
6%1
San
Die
go M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
evel
opm
ent B
o21
.75
Long
Bea
ch P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
ompa
ny43
,771
1Lo
ng B
each
Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Com
pany
36.0
2%1.
5O
MN
ITR
AN
S21
.75
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n26
,958
0.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n17
.14%
0.75
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(608
7)21
.25
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dep
artm
ent-C
ity o
f El P
aso
55,7
151.
5M
ass
Tran
sit D
epar
tmen
t-City
of E
l Pas
o40
.71%
1.5
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
20.5
0N
orth
San
Die
go C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dev
elop
men
t B53
,211
1.5
Nor
th S
an D
iego
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
evel
opm
ent B
0.00
%1
City
of T
ucso
n20
.50
OM
NIT
RA
NS
55,7
041.
5O
MN
ITR
AN
S22
.79%
1Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
19.5
0R
iver
side
Tra
nsit
Agen
cy56
,195
1.5
Riv
ersi
de T
rans
it Ag
ency
22.6
8%1
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)19
.25
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity37
,259
0.75
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity7.
69%
0.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n18
.50
City
of T
ucso
n42
,839
1C
ity o
f Tuc
son
25.1
6%1
Sacr
amen
to R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct18
.25
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
27,9
780.
5Fo
rt W
orth
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity7.
47%
0.5
Cen
tral C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.00
Sun
Tran
of A
lbuq
uerq
ue42
,798
1Su
n Tr
an o
f Alb
uque
rque
18.9
7%0.
75La
idla
w T
rans
it Se
rvic
es, I
nc. (
9158
)17
.50
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)32
,236
0.5
Firs
t Tra
nsit,
Inc.
(917
9)26
.27%
1G
olde
n G
ate
Brid
ge, H
ighw
ay a
nd T
rans
porta
ti o17
.25
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)52
,890
1.5
Laid
law
Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
Inc.
(917
8)20
.00%
0.75
Fort
Wor
th T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y15
.50
B-42
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
11,3
03.4
11.
5Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s16
.83
0.75
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
29.0
71.
5Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s3.
281.
5Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct8,
337.
441
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
19.5
81
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
23.6
91
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
1.76
0.75
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em3,
747.
000.
5C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
17.8
30.
75C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
8.29
0.75
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1.42
0.75
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsi t
11,1
89.3
61.
5C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
it21
.00
1.5
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
23.7
51
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
1.04
0.5
Cen
tral O
klah
oma
Tran
sit &
Par
king
Aut
horit
y4,
037.
030.
5C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
16.0
00.
5C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
6.90
0.5
Cen
tral O
klah
oma
Tran
sit &
Par
king
Aut
horit
y1.
760.
75Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
446.
750.
5Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct16
.33
0.5
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
7.05
0.5
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
1.40
0.75
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m5,
880.
000.
75C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
18.7
51
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m7.
950.
75C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2.42
1R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity7,
073.
080.
75R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.00
1R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity4.
500.
5R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1.
140.
5M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es8,
873.
911
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
19.9
21
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
27.3
21
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
3.17
1.5
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Syst
em6,
696.
600.
75C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it Sy
stem
17.5
00.
75C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it S
yste
m5.
390.
5C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it S
yste
m1.
580.
75C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t9,
818.
741
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
20.6
71.
5C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t21
.15
1C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t3.
841.
5G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
10,8
66.9
81.
5G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
17.9
20.
75G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
19.0
71
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct2.
100.
75C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y5,
201.
950.
75C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y17
.83
0.75
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
17.8
61
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2.
030.
75M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
5,70
2.09
0.75
Mon
tere
y-S
alin
as T
rans
it19
.33
1M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
17.5
71
Mon
tere
y-S
alin
as T
rans
it1.
730.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3,57
2.56
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tul
sa T
rans
it Au
thor
ity17
.25
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tul
sa T
rans
it Au
thor
ity8.
180.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.03
0.5
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es14
,136
.57
2C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
18.6
71
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es26
.72
1C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
3.85
1.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
8,77
7.79
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e24
.00
2R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e25
.55
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e2.
601
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct10
,583
.91
1.5
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct18
.42
0.75
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct36
.81
1.5
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct3.
141.
5C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
8,68
1.81
1C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
19.5
01
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc13
.44
0.75
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc1.
150.
75Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
3,45
0.71
0.5
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y19
.33
1Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
12.0
50.
75Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
1.74
0.75
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t6,
568.
670.
75So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
17.0
00.
75So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
11.9
00.
75So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
2.58
1U
NIT
RA
NS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
8,43
3.71
1U
NIT
RAN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is17
.50
0.75
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
40.7
82
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
3.95
1.5
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.4,
590.
290.
75La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
16.0
00.
5La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
27.8
31.
5La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
3.15
1.5
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
7,30
7.20
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m13
.50
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m7.
620.
75N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m1.
780.
75Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity8,
964.
931
East
ern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
22.0
01.
5Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity9.
460.
75Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity1.
200.
75So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t4,
424.
080.
75So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t18
.00
0.75
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
5.46
0.5
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.96
0.5
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t5,
834.
700.
75Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
18.2
50.
75Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
20.1
21
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t1.
090.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
re
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
43.7
91.
5Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s13
.36
0.75
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
211,
612
0.75
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
19.0
21
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
24.9
90.
75Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct14
.21
1Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct31
8,11
10.
75Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct21
.35
1C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
21.8
40.
75C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.3
61
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em45
4,88
50.
75C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it S
yste
m49
.39
0.5
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsi t
12.6
40.
5C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
it12
.18
0.75
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
750,
359
1C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
it21
.73
1C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
28.5
31
Cen
tral O
klah
oma
Tran
sit &
Par
king
Aut
horit
y16
.18
1C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
87,2
450.
75C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
29.4
51
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
21.9
80.
75Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct15
.71
1Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct20
3,85
00.
75Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct41
.25
0.75
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m31
.05
1C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
12.8
30.
75C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
117,
220
0.75
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m26
.87
1R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity15
.42
0.5
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
13.5
70.
75R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity17
0,41
70.
75R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity31
.00
0.75
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
37.0
21
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
11.6
60.
75M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es30
6,92
60.
75M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es24
.12
1C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it Sy
stem
23.8
20.
75C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.1
21
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3,15
5,44
02
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
25.9
81
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
54.4
82
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
14.1
91
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
143,
978
0.75
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
17.0
51.
5G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
28.4
61
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct13
.56
0.75
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct56
6,17
01
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct20
.96
1C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y28
.16
0.75
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
13.8
60.
75C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y46
1,58
60.
75C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
36.5
80.
75M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
23.9
00.
75M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
13.7
80.
75M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
684,
251
1M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
26.1
31
Met
ropo
litan
Tul
sa T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.29
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tul
sa T
rans
it Au
thor
ity14
.88
1M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
208,
740
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tul
sa T
rans
it Au
thor
ity44
.58
0.5
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es40
.56
1.5
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es10
.55
0.5
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es1,
327,
424
1.5
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es19
.08
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e33
.38
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e12
.82
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
291,
104
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
30.5
00.
75Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
42.1
11.
5Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
13.4
10.
75Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
457,
225
0.75
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct14
.42
1.5
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc23
.85
0.75
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc20
.74
2C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
175,
249
0.75
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc19
.47
1Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
27.6
90.
75Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
15.9
41
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y43
1,54
50.
75Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
57.4
00
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t30
.33
1So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
11.7
60.
75S
outh
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
474,
258
0.75
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t32
.50
0.75
UN
ITR
AN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is41
.39
1.5
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
10.4
90.
5U
NIT
RAN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is31
1,62
60.
75U
NIT
RAN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is13
.63
1.5
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.33
.14
1La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
10.5
10.
5La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
1,55
3,81
31.
5La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
58.5
40
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
24.9
20.
75N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m13
.98
0.75
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
468,
026
0.75
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
32.3
40.
75Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity16
.36
0.5
East
ern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
13.6
60.
75Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity88
,260
0.75
East
ern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
19.2
21
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
15.3
70.
5So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t15
.98
1So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t14
2,77
70.
75So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t33
.33
0.75
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t21
.71
0.75
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t19
.86
2Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
264,
779
0.75
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t29
.17
1
B-43
B-44
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r R
even
ue H
our
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
$52.
500.
75Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s$7
9.09
0.75
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
21.5
7%0.
75Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s2.
22%
1Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct$9
4.20
0Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct$9
9.39
0Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct17
.82%
1Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct5.
26%
0.75
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$1
8.97
1C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
$49.
961.
5C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.6
0%1
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3.12
%0.
75C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
i t$1
13.6
50
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
$60.
461
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
24.9
6%0.
5C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
it1.
44%
1C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
$14.
891.
5C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
$61.
581
Cen
tral O
klah
oma
Tran
sit &
Par
king
Aut
horit
y22
.20%
0.75
Cen
tral O
klah
oma
Tran
sit &
Par
king
Aut
horit
y1.
08%
1Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct$2
6.92
1Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct$8
3.96
0.5
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
22.4
6%0.
75Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct1.
38%
1C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$23.
341
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m$9
1.18
0.5
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m16
.95%
1C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.57
%1
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$29.
151
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$99.
910
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
8.49
%1.
5R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
26%
1M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es$4
2.58
0.75
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
$57.
691
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
22.8
2%0.
75M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es0.
60%
1C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it Sy
stem
$10.
381.
5C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it Sy
stem
$45.
841.
5C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it S
yste
m22
.94%
0.75
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
8.33
%0
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
$28.
351
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
$73.
040.
75C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t15
.28%
1C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t3.
13%
0.75
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct$3
6.83
1G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$54.
961
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct18
.66%
0.75
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct5.
12%
0.75
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
$37.
931
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
$59.
801
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
22.8
6%0.
75C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
5.93
%0.
5M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
$48.
990.
75M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
$66.
621
Mon
tere
y-S
alin
as T
rans
it15
.56%
1M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
4.13
%0.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$31.
201
Met
ropo
litan
Tul
sa T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
8.34
1M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
10.5
1%1.
5M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.52
%1
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es$4
4.46
0.75
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es$6
7.49
0.75
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es17
.82%
1C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
0.34
%1
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
$50.
550.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e$6
6.03
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e16
.92%
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e3.
80%
0.75
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct$6
2.99
0.5
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct$7
2.06
0.75
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct15
.57%
1Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.74
%1
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc$3
3.43
1C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
$59.
341
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc17
.33%
1C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
0.53
%1
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y$3
9.91
1Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
$91.
720.
5Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
20.3
7%0.
75Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
8.74
%0
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$2
4.78
1So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
$63.
181
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t20
.45%
0.75
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t1.
09%
1U
NIT
RA
NS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
$37.
671
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
$38.
241.
5U
NIT
RAN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is32
.11%
0U
NIT
RAN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is0.
06%
1.5
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.$4
2.00
0.75
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.$5
0.02
1.5
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.9.
09%
1.5
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.6.
85%
0.5
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$19.
421
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
$63.
511
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
14.3
4%1
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.00
%1.
5Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$3
3.34
1Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
7.64
1Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.96%
1Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
88%
0.75
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
$25.
151
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
$70.
730.
75So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t16
.41%
1So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t3.
17%
0.75
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t$6
1.17
0.75
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t$6
6.00
1Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
20.0
0%0.
75Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
1.00
%1
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
18.0
4%1
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
25.5
9%1
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
0.25
%0.
5Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s50
,919
1Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct18
.90%
1Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct20
.35%
0.75
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
73.8
8%1.
5Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct48
,242
1C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
19.3
0%1
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em22
.09%
0.75
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em55
.43%
1C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it S
yste
m51
,598
1C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
i t30
.56%
0.5
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
14.9
2%0.
75C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
it60
.34%
1C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
it53
,611
1C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
21.1
6%0.
75C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
20.2
1%0.
75C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
47.4
1%1
Cen
tral O
klah
oma
Tran
sit &
Par
king
Aut
horit
y34
,021
0.5
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
23.5
9%0.
75Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct21
.73%
0.75
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
59.1
9%1
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
33,7
220.
5C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
25.9
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
17.7
6%0.
75C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
55.4
0%1
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m38
,400
0.75
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
15.2
9%1.
5R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.79%
0.75
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
68.8
8%1
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
60,1
751.
5M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es18
.35%
1M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es36
.60%
1.5
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
35.9
9%0.
75M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es41
,940
0.75
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Syst
em14
.07%
1.5
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Syst
em25
.29%
1C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it S
yste
m0.
00%
0.5
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
51,2
451
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
29.8
4%0.
5C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t25
.09%
1C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t32
.73%
0.75
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
42,1
080.
75G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
29.6
3%0.
5G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
26.9
8%1
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct59
.57%
1G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
54,9
271
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
27.9
9%0.
5C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y7.
95%
0.5
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
0.00
%0.
5C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
49,5
601
Mon
tere
y-S
alin
as T
rans
it17
.99%
1M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
28.9
5%1
Mon
tere
y-S
alin
as T
rans
it54
.13%
1M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
35,3
370.
5M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
21.8
9%0.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16.0
0%0.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
44.8
9%0.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
42,7
900.
75C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
18.4
2%1
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es24
.14%
1C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
41.3
5%0.
75C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
50,8
251
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
20.0
2%1
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
28.7
5%1
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
44.6
3%0.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e59
,928
1.5
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct25
.59%
0.75
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct43
.91%
2Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
3.96
%0.
5Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
37,1
420.
5C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
11.4
0%1.
5C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
56.4
8%2
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc25
.25%
0.75
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc64
,484
1.5
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y28
.17%
0.5
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y16
.58%
0.75
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y74
.21%
1.5
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y55
,419
1So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
17.3
0%1
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t23
.43%
1So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
53.5
9%1
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t43
,065
0.75
UN
ITR
AN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is19
.61%
1U
NIT
RAN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is4.
52%
0.5
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
75.5
1%1.
5U
NIT
RAN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is21
,539
1La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
15.3
6%1.
5La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
25.7
5%1
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.29
.21%
0.75
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.48
,386
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m28
.46%
0.5
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
15.4
6%0.
75N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m76
.34%
1.5
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
55,8
671
East
ern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
15.1
5%1.
5Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.60%
0.75
East
ern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
16.5
6%0.
5Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity46
,956
0.75
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
17.3
8%1
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
20.0
5%0.
75So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t71
.67%
1.5
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
51,3
661
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t16
.00%
1Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
15.8
7%0.
75Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
55.0
8%1
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t61
,242
1.5
B-45
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up D
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Hou
rs
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
4,00
71
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
0.94
1Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s36
,551
1Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s2,
736
1Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct3,
230
0.75
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.87
0.75
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
28,4
490.
75Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
002
0.75
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em3,
249
0.75
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
921
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em37
,907
1C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it S
yste
m2,
468
0.75
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsi t
4,39
61.
5C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
it0.
921
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
41,2
281
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
3,38
41.
5C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
2,08
00.
5C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
0.94
1C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
32,0
490.
75C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
1,98
10.
75Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct1,
889
0.5
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.78
1Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct26
,183
0.5
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
1,66
70.
5C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
2,83
40.
75C
ity o
f Tor
ranc
e Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
0.88
0.75
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m31
,136
0.75
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
427
0.75
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
4,43
81.
5R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity0.
820.
5R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity37
,870
1R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
792
1M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es3,
558
1M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es0.
991.
5M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es35
,077
1M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es3,
007
1C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it Sy
stem
3,50
41
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Syst
em0.
860.
75C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it S
yste
m35
,857
1C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it S
yste
m2,
372
0.75
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
3,04
20.
75C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t0.
941
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
31,6
750.
75C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t2,
232
0.75
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct3,
924
1G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.94
1G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
42,4
631.
5G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
3,13
21.
5C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y3,
355
0.75
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
0.89
0.75
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n A
utho
rity
35,9
681
Cor
pus
Chr
isti
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
595
1M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
2,68
40.
75M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
0.97
1M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
33,3
780.
75M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
2,42
30.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,80
30.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.92
1M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
29,2
240.
75M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1,96
40.
75C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
4,58
91.
5C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
0.93
1C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
31,6
050.
75C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
2,99
71
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
4,57
71.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e0.
951
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
47,7
931.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e3,
729
2Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,84
10.
75Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.92
1Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
26,8
960.
5Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,00
50.
75C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
3,21
10.
75C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
0.91
0.75
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc43
,044
1.5
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc2,
076
0.75
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y3,
425
1Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
0.95
1Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
38,5
311
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y2,
417
0.75
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t3,
653
1So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
0.97
1.5
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t33
,088
0.75
Sout
h C
oast
Are
a Tr
ansi
t2,
813
1U
NIT
RA
NS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
2,00
70.
5U
NIT
RAN
S U
nive
rsity
of C
alifo
rnia
, Dav
is0.
931
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
15,5
811
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
1,48
50.
5La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
4,58
91.
5La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
0.97
1.5
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.34
,529
1La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
3,28
41.
5N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m4,
109
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m0.
991.
5N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m40
,698
1N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m2,
911
1Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3,
951
1Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
840.
5Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity31
,521
0.75
East
ern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,30
80.
75So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t2,
907
0.75
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.76
1So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t28
,046
0.75
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
1,75
50.
5Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
3,17
70.
75Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
0.92
1Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
44,8
781.
5Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
2,25
90.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
47,8
651
Fres
no A
rea
Expr
ess
30.9
5%1
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
24.2
5Sa
nta
Cru
z M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct42
,159
0.75
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
48.1
9%1.
5C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
24.0
0C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
47,3
841
Col
orad
o Sp
rings
Tra
nsit
Syst
em25
.00%
0.75
City
of V
alle
jo: V
alle
jo T
rans
it Va
llejo
-San
Fra
nc24
.00
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsi t
49,3
661
City
of T
empe
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Pl
anni
ng &
Tra
nsit
19.7
4%0.
75La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
23.2
5C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
32,0
490.
5C
entra
l Okl
ahom
a Tr
ansi
t & P
arki
ng A
utho
rity
0.00
%1
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
22.5
0Sa
n Jo
aqui
n R
egio
nal T
rans
it D
istri
ct26
,425
0.5
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.93
%0.
5Fr
esno
Are
a Ex
pres
s22
.00
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m33
,775
0.5
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m8.
47%
0.5
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
21.7
5R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity49
,576
1R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity30
.91%
1M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es21
.50
Mon
tebe
llo B
us L
ines
41,6
170.
75M
onte
bello
Bus
Lin
es18
.64%
0.75
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
21.5
0C
ount
y of
San
Die
go T
rans
it Sy
stem
43,8
261
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Syst
em22
.22%
0.75
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct21
.50
City
of G
arde
na T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
ent
39,5
940.
75C
ity o
f Gar
dena
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
t25
.00%
0.75
Sant
a Ba
rbar
a M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct21
.50
Gol
den
Empi
re T
rans
it D
istri
ct51
,470
1G
olde
n Em
pire
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
21.2
1%0.
75Sa
nta
Cla
rita
Tran
sit
21.5
0C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y43
,961
1C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y22
.22%
0.75
Cou
nty
of S
an D
iego
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
20.5
0M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
34,2
130.
75M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
2.50
%0.
5C
ity o
f Tem
pe T
rans
porta
tion
Plan
ning
& T
rans
i t20
.25
Met
ropo
litan
Tul
sa T
rans
it Au
thor
ity39
,491
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tul
sa T
rans
it Au
thor
ity35
.14%
1So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
20.0
0C
ulve
r City
Mun
icip
al B
us L
ines
47,4
081
Cul
ver C
ity M
unic
ipal
Bus
Lin
es50
.00%
1.5
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
19.7
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Com
mis
sion
of W
asho
e57
,181
1.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n C
omm
issi
on o
f Was
hoe
19.6
4%0.
75C
olor
ado
Sprin
gs T
rans
it Sy
stem
19.0
0Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
34,1
210.
75Sa
nta
Barb
ara
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
26.8
7%1
East
ern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.7
5C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
58,4
161.
5C
ity o
f Val
lejo
: Val
lejo
Tra
nsit
Valle
jo-S
an F
ranc
35.7
1%1
Sant
a C
ruz
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
18.5
0Su
nLin
e Tr
ansi
t Age
ncy
52,6
271
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y36
.59%
1M
onte
rey-
Sal
inas
Tra
nsit
18.5
0So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
41,8
460.
75So
uth
Coa
st A
rea
Tran
sit
26.4
7%1
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
18.5
0U
NIT
RA
NS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
20,1
051
UN
ITR
ANS
Uni
vers
ity o
f Cal
iforn
ia, D
avis
29.0
3%1
Cen
tral O
klah
oma
Tran
sit &
Par
king
Aut
horit
y17
.75
Lare
do M
etro
, Inc
.47
,085
1La
redo
Met
ro, I
nc.
36.3
6%1
City
of T
orra
nce
Tran
sit S
yste
m17
.75
Nor
wal
k Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
55,0
621.
5N
orw
alk
Tran
sit S
yste
m35
.29%
1M
etro
polit
an T
ulsa
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
17.7
5Ea
ster
n C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity39
,227
0.75
East
ern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
24.4
4%0.
75C
orpu
s C
hris
ti R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Aut
horit
y17
.25
Sono
ma
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
39,2
640.
75So
nom
a C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t40
.00%
1.5
SunL
ine
Tran
sit A
genc
y17
.25
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t56
,336
1.5
Sant
a C
larit
a Tr
ansi
t25
.53%
0.75
San
Joaq
uin
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
15.2
5
B-46
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up E
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4,98
3.75
0.75
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.9
22
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
12.8
31
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1.16
0.75
Mod
esto
Are
a Ex
pres
s4,
092.
000.
75M
odes
to A
rea
Expr
ess
15.5
01
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss19
.55
1.5
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss2.
491.
5C
ity o
f Mes
a7,
588.
551
City
of M
esa
19.6
72
City
of M
esa
2.55
0.75
City
of M
esa
0.64
0.75
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es2,
568.
360.
75C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
13.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
4.52
0.75
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es1.
080.
75C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
6,71
2.09
1C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
14.5
00.
75C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
16.7
01
City
of S
anta
Ros
a2.
481.
5An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
345.
680.
75An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y16
.50
1An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.49
1An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
240.
75C
ity T
rans
it M
anag
emen
t Com
pany
,Inc
11,3
16.5
92
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c13
.58
0.75
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c19
.87
1.5
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c2.
111
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
4,31
2.81
0.75
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
12.0
00.
5C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it0.
340.
5C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it0.
470.
75Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
6,72
2.61
1Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
19.3
32
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct8.
931
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct1.
000.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Val
ley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
1,23
0.05
0.5
Low
er R
io G
rand
e Va
lley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
13.0
00.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Valle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il0.
890.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Valle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il0.
810.
75Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
5,86
8.44
1Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
12.7
50.
75Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
3.28
0.75
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it0.
510.
75C
hico
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
City
of C
hico
3,49
1.81
0.75
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co15
.50
1C
hico
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
City
of C
hico
8.36
0.75
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co1.
571
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
3,91
5.84
0.75
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
14.4
20.
75C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m13
.02
1C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m2.
381.
5C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it5,
389.
331
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
12.1
70.
5C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it7.
780.
75C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it1.
120.
75C
ity o
f Lod
i11
,258
.44
2C
ity o
f Lod
i13
.50
0.75
City
of L
odi
6.79
0.75
City
of L
odi
1.37
1C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o7,
914.
171.
5C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o16
.42
1C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o18
.92
1.5
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
2.24
1.5
City
of S
cotts
dale
- Sc
otts
dale
Con
nect
ion
n/a
2C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Sco
ttsda
le C
onne
ctio
n13
.50
0.75
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
0.71
0.75
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
0.25
0.5
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n8,
014.
981.
5C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
17.0
81.
5C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
8.29
0.75
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n1.
110.
75C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch6,
510.
481
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
13.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch12
.80
1C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch1.
611
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t3,
333.
820.
75Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
12.0
00.
5Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
5.80
0.75
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t1.
851
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
4,12
2.24
0.75
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
17.0
01.
5Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
010.
75Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
280.
5W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity12
,029
.05
2W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity19
.92
2W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity21
.91
1.5
Wes
tern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.21
0.75
Abile
ne T
rans
it Sy
stem
3,24
4.55
0.75
Abile
ne T
rans
it Sy
stem
12.0
00.
5Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em4.
030.
75Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1.16
0.75
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
7,69
0.77
1.5
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
15.5
01
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
18.4
21.
5Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m2.
101
Braz
os T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
816.
840.
75Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
14.0
00.
75Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
1.89
0.75
Braz
os T
rans
it D
istri
ct0.
550.
75C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
1,81
5.74
0.5
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es15
.83
1C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
44.8
22
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es3.
752
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
4,39
2.99
0.75
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
15.0
01
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
1.31
0.75
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
0.43
0.5
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct7,
377.
011
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct15
.50
1C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
21.8
11.
5C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
3.05
2C
ity o
f Lom
poc-
Lom
poc
Tran
sit
2,08
2.30
0.5
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t12
.00
0.5
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t2.
210.
75C
ity o
f Lom
poc-
Lom
poc
Tran
sit
0.40
0.5
City
of N
apa
Nap
a Va
lley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
6,45
6.74
1C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.16
.08
1C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Val
ley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
6.94
0.75
City
of N
apa
Nap
a V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.1.
200.
75C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
3,63
1.14
0.75
City
of S
an A
ngel
o12
.00
0.5
City
of S
an A
ngel
o2.
360.
75C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
0.75
0.75
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
706.
480.
75H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
13.0
00.
75H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
1.00
0.75
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
390.
5Is
land
Tra
nsit
n/a
2Is
land
Tra
nsit
17.0
01.
5Is
land
Tra
nsit
13.3
31
Isla
nd T
rans
it1.
351
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
6,64
9.21
1La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R12
.75
0.75
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
8.72
0.75
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
1.82
1M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t1,
704.
170.
5M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t12
.50
0.75
Mer
ced
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
4.87
0.75
Mer
ced
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.96
0.75
Mes
a C
ount
y6,
002.
271
Mes
a C
ount
y12
.00
0.5
Mes
a C
ount
y2.
680.
75M
esa
Cou
nty
0.23
0.5
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it2,
423.
950.
75Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
12.0
00.
5Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
2.83
0.75
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it0.
650.
75Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
3,24
9.95
0.75
Pueb
lo T
rans
it12
.50
0.75
Pueb
lo T
rans
it9.
211
Pueb
lo T
rans
it1.
841
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s A
utho
rity
2,24
6.58
0.5
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s Au
thor
ity12
.00
0.5
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s Au
thor
ity8.
390.
75R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
1.10
0.75
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
4,63
0.52
0.75
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
13.7
50.
75R
osev
ille T
rans
it3.
800.
75R
osev
ille T
rans
it0.
970.
75Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e5,
678.
261
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
16.8
31
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
7.29
0.75
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
0.65
0.75
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
4,06
1.25
0.75
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
15.0
01
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
2.99
0.75
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
0.96
0.75
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
3,03
1.55
0.75
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
13.0
00.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a1.
290.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a0.
680.
75Tr
ansf
ort
5,50
9.43
1Tr
ansf
ort
17.7
51.
5Tr
ansf
ort
16.1
91
Tran
sfor
t2.
161
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
354.
600.
75Vi
ctor
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
13.5
80.
75Vi
ctor
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
5.02
0.75
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
940.
75W
aco
Tran
sit S
yste
m, I
nc.
3,55
7.25
0.75
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.13
.50
0.75
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.6.
060.
75W
aco
Tran
sit S
yste
m, I
nc.
1.27
0.75
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
746.
170.
75Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
14.0
00.
75Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
6.19
0.75
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
830.
75N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it10
,127
.99
1.5
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
16.0
01
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
13.5
41
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
3.97
2
B-47
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up E
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Hea
dway
(m
inut
es)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
re
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.8
50.
75Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y15
.43
1Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y29
.71
1Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$4
4.31
0.5
Mod
esto
Are
a Ex
pres
s33
.68
1.5
Mod
esto
Are
a Ex
pres
s13
.54
0.75
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss46
.20
0.75
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss$3
0.78
0.75
City
of M
esa
9.58
0.75
City
of M
esa
14.8
90.
75C
ity o
f Mes
a31
.53
1C
ity o
f Mes
a$1
7.49
1C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
15.0
00.
75C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
13.8
70.
75C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
65.5
20.
75C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
$14.
621
City
of S
anta
Ros
a30
.71
1.5
City
of S
anta
Ros
a12
.40
0.75
City
of S
anta
Ros
a32
.42
1C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
$37.
660.
75An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y22
.65
1An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.21
1.5
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
67.7
30.
75An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$2
8.87
0.75
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c29
.12
1.5
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c13
.77
0.75
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c15
.10
1.5
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c$2
7.65
0.75
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
6.86
0.5
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
14.7
20.
75C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it36
.69
1C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it$9
.06
1Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
19.1
01
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct19
.05
1.5
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct25
.61
1Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
$26.
970.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Val
ley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
10.3
50.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Valle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il12
.86
0.75
Low
er R
io G
rand
e Va
lley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
132.
810
Low
er R
io G
rand
e Va
lley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
$3.6
01.
5Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
8.07
0.5
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it15
.94
1Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
33.2
51
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it$1
8.50
1C
hico
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
City
of C
hico
22.1
11
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co14
.05
0.75
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co48
.96
0.75
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co$1
4.84
1C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m29
.24
1.5
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
12.3
10.
75C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m58
.51
0.75
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
$30.
220.
75C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it19
.44
1C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it17
.32
1C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it29
.48
1C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it$2
5.70
0.75
City
of L
odi
17.2
60.
75C
ity o
f Lod
i12
.55
0.75
City
of L
odi
23.9
01
City
of L
odi
$17.
151
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
24.1
71
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
10.7
90.
5C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o24
.88
1C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o$3
3.05
0.75
City
of S
cotts
dale
- Sc
otts
dale
Con
nect
ion
3.58
0.5
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
14.0
80.
75C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Sco
ttsda
le C
onne
ctio
n0.
001.
5C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Sco
ttsda
le C
onne
ctio
n$2
6.33
0.75
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n14
.60
0.75
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n13
.15
0.75
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n23
.73
1C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
$32.
850.
75C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch22
.39
1C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch13
.95
0.75
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
30.3
61
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
$25.
140.
75Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
23.6
51
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t12
.78
0.75
San
ta M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t55
.18
0.75
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t$1
2.85
1Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity8.
080.
5Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity29
.30
2Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity31
.63
1Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$1
3.15
1W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.68
1W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity15
.47
1W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity12
.74
1.5
Wes
tern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$63.
050
Abile
ne T
rans
it Sy
stem
15.6
20.
75Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em13
.51
0.75
Abile
ne T
rans
it Sy
stem
32.1
91
Abile
ne T
rans
it S
yste
m$8
.30
1.5
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
30.9
41.
5Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m14
.72
0.75
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
29.5
61
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
$32.
020.
75Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
9.26
0.75
Braz
os T
rans
it D
istri
ct16
.69
1Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
57.9
70.
75Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$9.5
81
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es50
.48
2C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
13.4
70.
75C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
99.5
70
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es$7
9.22
0C
ity o
f Den
ton
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
en6.
310.
5C
ity o
f Den
ton
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
en14
.62
0.75
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
29.3
41
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
$7.3
41.
5C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
37.6
61.
5C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
12.3
40.
75C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
29.6
71
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct$2
2.89
1C
ity o
f Lom
poc-
Lom
poc
Tran
sit
7.29
0.5
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t18
.09
1.5
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t61
.72
0.75
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t$1
7.99
1C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.19
.45
1C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.16
.21
1C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Val
ley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
25.9
11
City
of N
apa
Nap
a V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.$2
1.53
1C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
11.9
20.
75C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
15.9
61
City
of S
an A
ngel
o57
.90
0.75
City
of S
an A
ngel
o$9
.60
1H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
6.13
0.5
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct15
.79
1H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
59.3
60.
75H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$5.2
21.
5Is
land
Tra
nsit
15.7
20.
75Is
land
Tra
nsit
11.6
10.
5Is
land
Tra
nsit
0.00
1.5
Isla
nd T
rans
it$3
1.83
0.75
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
22.2
11
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
12.1
80.
75La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R26
.30
1La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R$1
7.11
1M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t21
.21
1M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t22
.03
2M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t10
7.69
0M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t$1
2.25
1M
esa
Cou
nty
3.15
0.5
Mes
a C
ount
y13
.65
0.75
Mes
a C
ount
y33
.98
1M
esa
Cou
nty
$27.
720.
75Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
10.0
50.
75Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
15.4
41
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it66
.01
0.75
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it$1
5.91
1Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
25.9
21
Pueb
lo T
rans
it14
.05
0.75
Pueb
lo T
rans
it56
.59
0.75
Pueb
lo T
rans
it$2
1.47
1R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Aut
horit
y18
.04
0.75
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s Au
thor
ity16
.35
1R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
98.8
60.
5R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
$21.
171
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
14.1
30.
75R
osev
ille T
rans
it14
.64
0.75
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
28.9
41
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
$13.
261
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
9.43
0.75
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
14.5
00.
75Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e22
.70
1Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e$5
1.42
0.5
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
15.1
10.
75Si
mi V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t15
.77
1Si
mi V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t55
.00
0.75
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
$17.
361
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
9.33
0.75
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
13.7
60.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a50
.14
0.75
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
$8.2
31.
5Tr
ansf
ort
28.6
81.
5Tr
ansf
ort
13.2
80.
75Tr
ansf
ort
34.2
51
Tran
sfor
t$4
1.10
0.5
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.83
0.75
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.97
1.5
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y95
.19
0.5
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$1
4.50
1W
aco
Tran
sit S
yste
m, I
nc.
16.6
30.
75W
aco
Tran
sit S
yste
m, I
nc.
13.1
00.
75W
aco
Tran
sit S
yste
m, I
nc.
48.2
70.
75W
aco
Tran
sit S
yste
m, I
nc.
$18.
141
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity14
.70
0.75
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity17
.62
1Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
57.5
40.
75Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$17.
271
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
42.8
62
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
10.7
90.
5N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it27
.38
1N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it$1
6.81
1
B-48
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up E
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$61.
650.
75Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.13%
1Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2.
64%
0.75
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
18.6
5%0.
75M
odes
to A
rea
Expr
ess
$53.
031
Mod
esto
Are
a Ex
pres
s25
.97%
0.75
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss3.
57%
0.75
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss10
.23%
1C
ity o
f Mes
a$6
5.78
0.75
City
of M
esa
37.9
2%0.
5C
ity o
f Mes
a3.
30%
0.75
City
of M
esa
1.39
%1.
5C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
$48.
481
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es22
.78%
0.75
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es2.
59%
0.75
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es7.
36%
1.5
City
of S
anta
Ros
a$6
9.23
0.75
City
of S
anta
Ros
a17
.61%
1C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
1.70
%1
City
of S
anta
Ros
a20
.81%
0.75
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$52.
331
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
24.2
4%0.
75An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
17%
1An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y8.
19%
1.5
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c$4
0.54
1C
ity T
rans
it M
anag
emen
t Com
pany
,Inc
18.5
6%1
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c3.
98%
0.75
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c21
.04%
0.75
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
$180
.28
0C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it22
.13%
0.75
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
4.05
%0.
75C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it23
.62%
0.75
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct$5
7.67
0.75
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct27
.74%
0.75
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct0.
18%
1Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
18.0
1%0.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Val
ley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
$42.
081
Low
er R
io G
rand
e Va
lley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
24.1
4%0.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Valle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il2.
68%
0.75
Low
er R
io G
rand
e Va
lley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
20.6
9%0.
75Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
$45.
441
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it24
.55%
0.75
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it3.
50%
0.75
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it8.
29%
1.5
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co$3
9.26
1C
hico
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
City
of C
hico
25.1
3%0.
75C
hico
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
City
of C
hico
1.23
%1
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co4.
73%
1.5
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
$67.
840.
75C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m41
.67%
0C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m2.
28%
0.75
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
15.7
0%1
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
$64.
230.
75C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it24
.96%
0.75
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
1.84
%1
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
30.7
3%0.
5C
ity o
f Lod
i$4
3.61
1C
ity o
f Lod
i6.
39%
1.5
City
of L
odi
9.49
%0
City
of L
odi
17.5
3%0.
75C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o$4
2.22
1C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o26
.10%
0.75
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
0.62
%1
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
22.6
1%0.
75C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Scot
tsda
le C
onne
ctio
n$1
32.0
60
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
18.0
0%1
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
2.00
%1
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
10.0
0%1
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n$5
7.87
0.75
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n8.
52%
1.5
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n0.
33%
1C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
19.2
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch$4
3.98
1C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch9.
30%
1.5
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
1.56
%1
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
26.9
4%0.
5Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
$52.
381
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t24
.01%
0.75
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t1.
34%
1Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
12.2
7%1
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$52.
961
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
59.4
6%0
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.00
%1
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2.85
%1.
5W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$5
3.76
1W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity13
.98%
1W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
65%
1W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity10
.07%
1Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em$3
2.13
1Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em16
.10%
1Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em1.
93%
1Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
22.1
5%0.
75Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m$5
3.78
1Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m23
.00%
0.75
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
2.43
%0.
75Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m12
.74%
1Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$46.
991
Braz
os T
rans
it D
istri
ct25
.51%
0.75
Braz
os T
rans
it D
istri
ct3.
35%
0.75
Braz
os T
rans
it D
istri
ct18
.98%
0.75
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es$8
9.22
0.5
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es19
.64%
1C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
0.00
%1
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es23
.57%
0.75
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
$35.
431
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
11.1
9%1.
5C
ity o
f Den
ton
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
en0.
00%
1C
ity o
f Den
ton
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
en3.
36%
1.5
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct$3
9.53
1C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
9.64
%1.
5C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.64
%1
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct19
.02%
0.75
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t$5
9.40
0.75
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t17
.32%
1C
ity o
f Lom
poc-
Lom
poc
Tran
sit
2.01
%1
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t17
.73%
0.75
City
of N
apa
Nap
a Va
lley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
$60.
330.
75C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.8.
79%
1.5
City
of N
apa
Nap
a V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.0.
65%
1C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Val
ley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
14.5
5%1
City
of S
an A
ngel
o$4
8.45
1C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
27.0
2%0.
75C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
6.56
%0
City
of S
an A
ngel
o7.
35%
1.5
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$3
1.93
1H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
9.87
%1.
5H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.35
%1
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct16
.57%
0.75
Isla
nd T
rans
it$3
7.54
1Is
land
Tra
nsit
22.9
4%0.
75Is
land
Tra
nsit
1.95
%1
Isla
nd T
rans
it27
.41%
0.5
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
$43.
591
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
24.7
8%0.
75La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R0.
68%
1La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R11
.40%
1M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t$5
3.41
1M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t24
.94%
0.75
Mer
ced
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
0.77
%1
Mer
ced
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
10.0
7%1
Mes
a C
ount
y$3
2.58
1M
esa
Cou
nty
28.4
9%0.
75M
esa
Cou
nty
0.00
%1
Mes
a C
ount
y16
.00%
1Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
$56.
421
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it20
.04%
1Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
1.90
%1
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it20
.01%
0.75
Pueb
lo T
rans
it$6
0.41
0.75
Pueb
lo T
rans
it20
.80%
1Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
1.77
%1
Pueb
lo T
rans
it11
.66%
1R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Aut
horit
y$4
5.52
1R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
20.7
4%1
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s Au
thor
ity0.
03%
1R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
21.0
6%0.
75R
osev
ille T
rans
it$4
9.26
1R
osev
ille T
rans
it19
.81%
1R
osev
ille T
rans
it0.
92%
1R
osev
ille T
rans
it15
.65%
1Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e$6
6.50
0.75
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
15.8
8%1
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
2.75
%0.
75Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e19
.01%
0.75
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
$87.
890.
5Si
mi V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t11
.48%
1.5
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
0.04
%1
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
34.1
2%0
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
$59.
690.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a19
.13%
1Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a0.
00%
1Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a9.
21%
1Tr
ansf
ort
$72.
790.
75Tr
ansf
ort
19.7
7%1
Tran
sfor
t1.
74%
1Tr
ansf
ort
20.6
9%0.
75Vi
ctor
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$51.
481
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y26
.64%
0.75
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y5.
03%
0.5
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y11
.78%
1W
aco
Tran
sit S
yste
m, I
nc.
$49.
801
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.24
.55%
0.75
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.2.
10%
0.75
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.27
.25%
0.5
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$4
1.01
1Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
15.0
1%1
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity3.
00%
0.75
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity27
.95%
0.5
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
$53.
211
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
26.6
2%0.
75N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it9.
74%
0N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it10
.95%
1
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up E
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
re
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.7
5%1
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
69.5
8%1.
5Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y44
,395
0.75
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,69
40.
75M
odes
to A
rea
Expr
ess
31.3
5%1.
5M
odes
to A
rea
Expr
ess
0.00
%0.
5M
odes
to A
rea
Exp
ress
44,6
090.
75M
odes
to A
rea
Exp
ress
3,31
31
City
of M
esa
11.7
9%0.
75C
ity o
f Mes
a84
.90%
1.5
City
of M
esa
65,3
581.
5C
ity o
f Mes
a4,
384
1.5
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es10
.79%
0.75
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es43
.61%
1C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
39,3
400.
75C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
2,95
80.
75C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
25.7
3%1.
5C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
0.35
%0.
5C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
45,3
320.
75C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
3,64
41
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
38.1
1%2
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
56.9
8%1
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
53,7
031
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3,01
90.
75C
ity T
rans
it M
anag
emen
t Com
pany
,Inc
25.2
7%1
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c12
.70%
0.75
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c39
,509
0.75
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c2,
922
0.75
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
15.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it27
.32%
0.75
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
40,1
530.
75C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it2,
773
0.75
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct17
.29%
1Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
1.78
%0.
5Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
67,2
311.
5Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
3,52
81
Low
er R
io G
rand
e V
alle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il12
.81%
0.75
Low
er R
io G
rand
e Va
lley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
37.6
4%1
Low
er R
io G
rand
e Va
lley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
38,6
810.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Valle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il2,
920
0.75
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it7.
14%
0.5
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it15
.65%
0.75
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it53
,248
1Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
3,32
91
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co28
.25%
1.5
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co0.
00%
0.5
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co43
,363
0.75
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co3,
046
0.75
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
21.0
3%1
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
27.5
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m50
,257
1C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m3,
973
1.5
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
18.9
8%1
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
43.1
6%1
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
48,5
381
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
2,80
40.
75C
ity o
f Lod
i10
.80%
0.75
City
of L
odi
69.0
0%1.
5C
ity o
f Lod
i59
,217
1.5
City
of L
odi
4,76
32
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
24.1
8%1
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
0.00
%0.
5C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o36
,549
0.5
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
3,31
21
City
of S
cotts
dale
- Sc
otts
dale
Con
nect
ion
15.0
9%0.
75C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Sco
ttsda
le C
onne
ctio
n53
.81%
1C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Sco
ttsda
le C
onne
ctio
n43
,219
0.75
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
3,06
80.
75C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
14.3
5%0.
75C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
3.21
%0.
5C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
44,4
200.
75C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
3,31
31
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
30.4
1%1.
5C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch34
.23%
0.75
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
46,9
140.
75C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch3,
518
1Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
17.4
8%1
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t35
.87%
0.75
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t42
,963
0.75
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t3,
537
1Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity11
.14%
0.75
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
26.8
1%0.
75Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity69
,078
2Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
357
0.5
Wes
tern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
17.7
9%1
Wes
tern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
70.4
7%1.
5W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity42
,257
0.75
Wes
tern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,70
70.
75Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em9.
37%
0.75
Abile
ne T
rans
it Sy
stem
4.27
%0.
5Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em23
,979
1Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
1,77
61
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
15.2
3%0.
75Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m29
.06%
0.75
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
56,3
261
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
3,85
81.
5Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
9.19
%0.
75Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.00
%0.
5Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
47,3
510.
75Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,97
40.
75C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
0.00
%0.
5C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
78.4
2%1.
5C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
41,0
080.
75C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
3,24
01
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
10.1
4%0.
75C
ity o
f Den
ton
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
en11
.72%
0.75
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
32,1
950.
5C
ity o
f Den
ton
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
en2,
322
0.5
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct0.
00%
0.5
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct99
.50%
2C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
48,1
951
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct3,
827
1C
ity o
f Lom
poc-
Lom
poc
Tran
sit
25.0
5%1
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t24
.36%
0.75
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t40
,457
0.75
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t2,
248
0.5
City
of N
apa
Nap
a Va
lley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
20.4
4%1
City
of N
apa
Nap
a Va
lley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
51.2
8%1
City
of N
apa
Nap
a V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.46
,110
0.75
City
of N
apa
Nap
a V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.2,
954
0.75
City
of S
an A
ngel
o6.
05%
0.5
City
of S
an A
ngel
o0.
83%
0.5
City
of S
an A
ngel
o57
,262
1C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
3,56
51
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct6.
60%
0.5
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct12
.05%
0.75
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct45
,029
0.75
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
826
0.75
Isla
nd T
rans
it17
.12%
1Is
land
Tra
nsit
17.6
6%0.
75Is
land
Tra
nsit
52,8
191
Isla
nd T
rans
it4,
204
1.5
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
15.4
6%0.
75La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R75
.67%
1.5
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
37,6
180.
75La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R3,
062
0.75
Mer
ced
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
15.5
1%0.
75M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t10
.02%
0.75
Mer
ced
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
67,8
381.
5M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t3,
133
0.75
Mes
a C
ount
y4.
51%
0.5
Mes
a C
ount
y39
.22%
1M
esa
Cou
nty
48,3
321
Mes
a C
ount
y3,
574
1Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
15.1
0%0.
75Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
8.16
%0.
75Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
41,6
670.
75Po
rt Ar
thur
Tra
nsit
2,70
80.
75Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
14.1
9%0.
75Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
39.0
9%1
Pueb
lo T
rans
it43
,420
0.75
Pueb
lo T
rans
it3,
112
0.75
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s A
utho
rity
18.7
1%1
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s Au
thor
ity66
.19%
1R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
63,9
651.
5R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
3,90
71.
5R
osev
ille T
rans
it21
.96%
1R
osev
ille T
rans
it78
.04%
1.5
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
38,7
310.
75R
osev
ille T
rans
it2,
563
0.5
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
5.81
%0.
5Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e92
.78%
1.5
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
34,4
450.
5Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e2,
330
0.5
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
13.1
7%0.
75Si
mi V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t33
.11%
0.75
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
61,9
541.
5Si
mi V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t3,
890
1.5
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
9.72
%0.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a89
.13%
1.5
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
37,5
400.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a2,
760
0.75
Tran
sfor
t16
.80%
1Tr
ansf
ort
69.4
6%1.
5Tr
ansf
ort
44,9
850.
75Tr
ansf
ort
3,27
11
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y16
.25%
0.75
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y59
.70%
1Vi
ctor
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
76,7
742
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y4,
011
1.5
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.15
.51%
0.75
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.0.
00%
0.5
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.38
,691
0.75
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.2,
947
0.75
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity25
.12%
1Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
41.5
7%1
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity51
,447
1Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,93
70.
75N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it45
.45%
2N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it0.
00%
0.5
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
51,8
101
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
4,81
32
B-49
B-50
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: S
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up E
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per V
ehic
le M
ileAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.86
1Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y28
,415
0.75
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
1,84
10.
75Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y38
,076
0.75
Mod
esto
Are
a Ex
pres
s0.
961
Mod
esto
Are
a Ex
pres
s34
,734
1M
odes
to A
rea
Exp
ress
2,56
51
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss42
,674
0.75
City
of M
esa
0.91
0.75
City
of M
esa
39,0
271
City
of M
esa
2,62
11
City
of M
esa
59,3
891.
5C
ity o
f Gre
eley
-Tra
nsit
Serv
ices
0.99
1.5
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es27
,793
0.75
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es2,
003
0.75
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es38
,911
0.75
City
of S
anta
Ros
a0.
991.
5C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
36,3
231
City
of S
anta
Ros
a2,
929
1C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
44,9
711
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.90
0.5
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
40,8
711
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,24
50.
75An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y48
,207
1C
ity T
rans
it M
anag
emen
t Com
pany
,Inc
0.99
1.5
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c33
,309
0.75
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c2,
418
1C
ity T
rans
it M
anag
emen
t Com
pany
,Inc
39,2
310.
75C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it0.
971
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
15,5
261
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
1,05
50.
5C
ity o
f Gle
ndal
e - T
rans
it38
,815
0.75
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct0.
811
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct39
,285
1Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
2,06
20.
75Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
54,6
581
Low
er R
io G
rand
e V
alle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il0.
900.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Valle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il24
,063
0.5
Low
er R
io G
rand
e Va
lley
Dev
elop
men
t Cou
ncil
1,87
20.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Valle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il35
,001
0.5
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it0.
971
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it36
,591
1Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
2,29
60.
75Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
51,8
381
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co0.
920.
75C
hico
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
City
of C
hico
34,6
851
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co2,
469
1C
hico
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
City
of C
hico
40,0
210.
75C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m0.
940.
75C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m22
,685
0.5
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
1,84
30.
75C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m46
,990
1C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it0.
951
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
31,7
560.
75C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it1,
833
0.75
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
45,8
691
City
of L
odi
0.95
1C
ity o
f Lod
i56
,292
2C
ity o
f Lod
i4,
484
2C
ity o
f Lod
i56
,292
1.5
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
0.97
1C
ity o
f San
Lui
s O
bisp
o26
,562
0.75
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
2,46
11
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
35,4
160.
75C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Scot
tsda
le C
onne
ctio
n0.
900.
75C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Sco
ttsda
le C
onne
ctio
n28
,804
0.75
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
2,04
60.
75C
ity o
f Sco
ttsda
le -
Sco
ttsda
le C
onne
ctio
n39
,092
0.75
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n0.
940.
75C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
38,4
721
City
of U
nion
City
Tra
nsit
Div
isio
n2,
926
1C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
41,6
780.
75C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch0.
981
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
31,2
500.
75C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch2,
240
0.75
City
of V
isal
ia-V
isal
ia C
ity C
oach
45,9
561
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t0.
910.
75Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
39,1
721
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t3,
066
1.5
Sant
a M
aria
Are
a Tr
ansi
t39
,172
0.75
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.92
0.75
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
56,6
122
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1,93
20.
75Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it Au
thor
ity63
,689
1.5
Wes
tern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.94
0.75
Wes
tern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
34,5
841
Wes
tern
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,23
60.
75W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity39
,524
0.75
Abile
ne T
rans
it Sy
stem
0.98
1Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em18
,818
0.5
Abile
ne T
rans
it Sy
stem
1,39
30.
5Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
23,5
231
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
0.99
1.5
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
45,3
281.
5Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m3,
078
1.5
Beau
mon
t Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
55,7
881.
5Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.96
1Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
45,4
361.
5Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,72
21
Braz
os T
rans
it D
istri
ct45
,436
1C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
0.99
1.5
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es22
,136
0.5
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es1,
644
0.5
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es40
,582
0.75
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
0.98
1C
ity o
f Den
ton
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
en31
,410
0.75
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
2,14
90.
75C
ity o
f Den
ton
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Dep
artm
en31
,410
0.5
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct0.
930.
75C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
32,7
270.
75C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,65
31
City
of L
ogan
dba
, The
Log
an T
rans
it D
istri
ct45
,000
1C
ity o
f Lom
poc-
Lom
poc
Tran
sit
0.96
1C
ity o
f Lom
poc-
Lom
poc
Tran
sit
38,7
571
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t2,
142
0.75
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t38
,757
0.75
City
of N
apa
Nap
a Va
lley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
0.98
1C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Valle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.31
,442
0.75
City
of N
apa
Nap
a V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.1,
940
0.75
City
of N
apa
Nap
a V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t/ Th
e V.
I.N.E
.45
,197
1C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
0.98
1C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
39,9
431
City
of S
an A
ngel
o2,
503
1C
ity o
f San
Ang
elo
55,9
201.
5H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
0.94
0.75
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct33
,813
0.75
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct2,
142
0.75
Hill
Cou
nty
Tran
sit D
istri
ct42
,266
0.75
Isla
nd T
rans
it0.
920.
75Is
land
Tra
nsit
48,4
511.
5Is
land
Tra
nsit
4,17
32
Isla
nd T
rans
it48
,451
1La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R0.
941
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
20,8
860.
5La
s C
ruce
s Ar
ea T
rans
it-R
oadR
UN
NE
R1,
714
0.75
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
35,5
070.
75M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t0.
991.
5M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t37
,429
1M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t1,
699
0.75
Mer
ced
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
67,3
722
Mes
a C
ount
y0.
961
Mes
a C
ount
y36
,327
1M
esa
Cou
nty
2,66
11
Mes
a C
ount
y46
,418
1Po
rt A
rthur
Tra
nsit
0.99
1.5
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it24
,700
0.5
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it1,
600
0.5
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it41
,167
0.75
Pueb
lo T
rans
it0.
991.
5Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
32,2
960.
75Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
2,29
90.
75Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
43,0
620.
75R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Aut
horit
y0.
951
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s Au
thor
ity39
,349
1R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
2,40
61
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s Au
thor
ity60
,537
1.5
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
0.84
1R
osev
ille T
rans
it23
,351
0.5
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
1,59
50.
5R
osev
ille T
rans
it32
,692
0.5
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
0.90
0.75
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
31,1
460.
75Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e2,
148
0.75
Sant
a Fe
Tra
ils -
City
of S
anta
Fe
31,1
460.
5Si
mi V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t0.
951
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
27,4
000.
75Si
mi V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t1,
737
0.75
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
58,7
141.
5Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a0.
930.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a29
,882
0.75
Thou
sand
Oak
s Tr
ansi
t c/o
City
of T
hous
and
Oa
2,17
10.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a34
,863
0.5
Tran
sfor
t0.
930.
75Tr
ansf
ort
26,4
450.
75Tr
ansf
ort
1,99
20.
75Tr
ansf
ort
41,7
560.
75Vi
ctor
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
0.92
0.75
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y44
,276
1.5
Vict
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
335
1Vi
ctor
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
70,8
422
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.0.
971
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.29
,150
0.75
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.2,
226
0.75
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.37
,478
0.75
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
900.
5Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
46,4
101.
5Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,63
41
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity46
,410
1N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it0.
961
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
37,3
891
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
3,46
71.
5N
atio
nal C
ity T
rans
it49
,852
1
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: SW
Reg
ion
-- G
roup
ETr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Spar
e Ve
hicl
e R
atio
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yC
ompo
site
Sco
re
(Mea
sure
s O
nly)
Live
rmor
e/Am
ador
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
34.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Lod
i24
.00
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss22
.86%
0.75
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
23.5
0C
ity o
f Mes
a52
.17%
1Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m23
.25
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es40
.00%
1C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
23.0
0C
ity o
f San
ta R
osa
23.8
1%0.
75Is
land
Tra
nsit
22.2
5An
telo
pe V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y17
.95%
0.75
City
of M
esa
22.0
0C
ity T
rans
it M
anag
emen
t Com
pany
,Inc
17.7
8%0.
75W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity21
.75
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
150.
00%
2Vi
ctor
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
21.5
0Yo
lo C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Dis
trict
39.1
3%1
City
Tra
nsit
Man
agem
ent C
ompa
ny,In
c21
.25
Low
er R
io G
rand
e V
alle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il45
.45%
1Ve
ntur
a In
terc
ity S
ervi
ce T
rans
it A
utho
rity
21.2
5Am
arillo
City
Tra
nsit
41.6
7%1
Yolo
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n D
istri
ct21
.00
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co15
.38%
0.75
Mer
ced
Cou
nty
Tran
sit
21.0
0C
ity o
f Bro
wns
ville
Bro
wns
ville
Urb
an S
yste
m10
7.14
%2
City
of S
anta
Ros
a20
.75
City
of F
airfi
eld,
Fai
rfiel
d/Su
isun
Tra
nsit
44.4
4%1
Ante
lope
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
20.5
0C
ity o
f Lod
i0.
00%
0.5
Mod
esto
Are
a E
xpre
ss20
.25
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
33.3
3%0.
75Si
mi V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t20
.25
City
of S
cotts
dale
- Sc
otts
dale
Con
nect
ion
35.7
1%0.
75C
ity o
f Com
mer
ce M
unic
ipal
Bus
lines
20.0
0C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
8.33
%0.
75R
eddi
ng A
rea
Bus
Auth
ority
20.0
0C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch47
.06%
1Tr
ansf
ort
20.0
0Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
0.00
%0.
5C
ity o
f Vis
alia
-Vis
alia
City
Coa
ch19
.75
Vent
ura
Inte
rcity
Ser
vice
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
12.5
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Nap
a N
apa
Val
ley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
19.7
5W
este
rn C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it Au
thor
ity14
.29%
0.75
City
of B
row
nsvi
lle B
row
nsvi
lle U
rban
Sys
tem
19.5
0Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Syst
em25
.00%
0.75
City
of S
an L
uis
Obi
spo
19.5
0Be
aum
ont T
rans
it S
yste
m23
.08%
0.75
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
19.2
5Br
azos
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.00
%0.
5Li
verm
ore/
Amad
or V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
.00
City
of C
omm
erce
Mun
icip
al B
uslin
es83
.33%
1.5
Chi
co A
rea
Tran
sit S
yste
m C
ity o
f Chi
co19
.00
City
of D
ento
n P
ublic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
0.00
%0.
5C
ity o
f Uni
on C
ity T
rans
it D
ivis
ion
19.0
0C
ity o
f Log
an d
ba, T
he L
ogan
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
37.5
0%1
Amar
illo C
ity T
rans
it18
.75
City
of L
ompo
c-Lo
mpo
c Tr
ansi
t0.
00%
0.5
Pueb
lo T
rans
it18
.50
City
of N
apa
Nap
a Va
lley
Tran
sit/
The
V.I.N
.E.
43.7
5%1
City
of G
reel
ey-T
rans
it Se
rvic
es18
.25
City
of S
an A
ngel
o40
.00%
1Sa
nta
Mar
ia A
rea
Tran
sit
18.2
5H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
25.0
0%0.
75C
ity o
f Fai
rfiel
d, F
airfi
eld/
Suis
un T
rans
it18
.00
Isla
nd T
rans
it0.
00%
0.5
City
of S
an A
ngel
o18
.00
Las
Cru
ces
Area
Tra
nsit-
Roa
dRU
NN
ER
70.0
0%1.
5Yu
ba-S
utte
r Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
18.0
0M
erce
d C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t80
.00%
1.5
City
of D
ento
n Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
epar
tmen
17.7
5M
esa
Cou
nty
27.7
8%0.
75M
esa
Cou
nty
17.7
5Po
rt Ar
thur
Tra
nsit
66.6
7%1
Ros
eville
Tra
nsit
17.7
5Pu
eblo
Tra
nsit
33.3
3%0.
75Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a17
.75
Red
ding
Are
a Bu
s A
utho
rity
53.8
5%1
City
of S
cotts
dale
- S
cotts
dale
Con
nect
ion
17.5
0R
osev
ille T
rans
it40
.00%
1Ab
ilene
Tra
nsit
Sys
tem
17.5
0Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e0.
00%
0.5
Braz
os T
rans
it D
istri
ct17
.50
Sim
i Val
ley
Tran
sit
114.
29%
2H
ill C
ount
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
17.2
5Th
ousa
nd O
aks
Tran
sit c
/o C
ity o
f Tho
usan
d O
a16
.67%
0.75
Port
Arth
ur T
rans
it17
.25
Tran
sfor
t57
.89%
1C
ity o
f Lom
poc-
Lom
poc
Tran
sit
16.5
0Vi
ctor
Val
ley
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
60.0
0%1
City
of G
lend
ale
- Tra
nsit
16.2
5W
aco
Tran
sit S
yste
m, I
nc.
28.5
7%0.
75Sa
nta
Fe T
rails
- C
ity o
f San
ta F
e16
.00
Yuba
-Sut
ter T
rans
it Au
thor
ity0.
00%
0.5
Wac
o Tr
ansi
t Sys
tem
, Inc
.16
.00
Nat
iona
l City
Tra
nsit
33.3
3%0.
75Lo
wer
Rio
Gra
nde
Valle
y D
evel
opm
ent C
ounc
il15
.75
B-51
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up A
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t12
,493
.63
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
24.0
01.
5Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
41.0
91
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et2.
181
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O15
,760
.01
1.5
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O22
.42
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
53.5
41.
5Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
2.85
1.5
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
8,35
4.79
0.75
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
21.6
30.
75Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity20
.48
0.75
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
1.55
0.75
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
6,48
9.19
0.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
20.2
20.
5Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 19
.08
0.75
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
1.12
0.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et29
.25
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
13.4
00.
75Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
7,54
00.
75Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
145,
757
0.75
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O35
.25
1.5
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O12
.37
0.75
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O6,
593
0.75
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O15
4,07
81
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
24.4
00.
75Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity15
.76
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity17
,845
1.5
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
155,
504
1Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 20
.81
0.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
18.6
11.
5Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 13
,811
1Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 13
2,43
70.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t12
.15
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
$144
.19
0.75
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et$1
02.6
40.
75Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
21.0
2%0.
5Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
12.4
41
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O$1
25.9
20.
75Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
$82.
891
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O16
.77%
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity23
.08
0.5
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
$66.
751.
5Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity$7
9.53
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity19
.25%
0.75
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
16.9
80.
75Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a $1
08.2
71
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
$118
.14
0.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
17.4
3%1
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l )
Alt S
core
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et8.
03%
0.5
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et11
.62%
1.5
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et22
.55%
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
63.7
9%1.
5Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
2.46
%1
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O20
.86%
0.5
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O25
.84%
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
57.3
4%1
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
3.26
%1
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
17.4
1%0.
75Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity13
.90%
0.5
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
50.9
6%0.
75Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 3.
72%
1Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 18
.00%
0.75
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
23.0
5%1
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
53.3
9%0.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t41
,485
0.5
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et2,
847
0.75
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et0.
821
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et32
,186
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
46,8
710.
75Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
3,55
61
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O0.
861
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O33
,033
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity61
,102
1.5
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
3,56
91
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
0.83
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity35
,256
1Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 50
,048
1Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 2,
696
0.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
0.68
0.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
24,0
800.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t2,
403
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
33,9
000.
75Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
5.33
%0.
5Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
23.2
5Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
2,67
11
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O40
,418
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
22.3
6%0.
75Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity22
.00
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
2,23
81
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
50,6
291.
5Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity43
.60%
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
20.7
5Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 1,
294
0.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
34,1
770.
75Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 41
.94%
1Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 17
.25
B-52
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up B
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
8,35
4.79
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity21
.63
2Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity20
.48
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity1.
550.
5Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 6,
489.
190.
75Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 20
.22
1.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
19.0
80.
75Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 1.
121
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
9,42
9.01
1.5
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
19.8
31.
5Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y22
.61
1Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
800.
75La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct3,
512.
230.
5La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct18
.50
1La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct31
.35
1.5
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2.23
1.5
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
6,29
6.16
0.75
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
18.3
01
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
14.5
10.
75M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio1.
820.
75In
terc
ity T
rans
it7,
213.
471
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
17.6
70.
75In
terc
ity T
rans
it11
.94
0.5
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
1.57
0.5
Kits
ap T
rans
it3,
726.
110.
5Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
15.6
70.
5Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
15.1
10.
75Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
1.76
0.75
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a8,
636.
581
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a17
.85
1C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
19.6
00.
75C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
1.63
0.75
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
8,36
2.78
1Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct16
.75
0.75
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
27.6
41.
5Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct1.
921
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
24.4
00.
75Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity15
.76
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity17
,845
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity15
5,50
40.
5Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 20
.81
0.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
18.6
12
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
13,8
111
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
132,
437
0.5
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
24.8
80.
75Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y13
.80
0.75
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3,13
60.
75Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y19
3,41
30.
75La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct31
.58
1.5
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
14.1
50.
75La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct3,
954
0.75
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
241,
466
0.75
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
26.8
51
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
14.7
81
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
7,82
30.
75M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio26
2,64
00.
75In
terc
ity T
rans
it20
.68
0.5
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
13.2
00.
5In
terc
ity T
rans
it4,
973
0.75
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
177,
932
0.75
Kits
ap T
rans
it29
.82
1Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
16.9
81.
5Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
16,6
081
Kits
ap T
rans
it65
8,77
61.
5C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
24.1
50.
75C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
14.8
01
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a21
,591
1.5
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a45
6,12
01
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
27.9
81
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
14.5
50.
75Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct25
,272
1.5
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
328,
538
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
23.0
81
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
$66.
750.
75Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity$7
9.53
1Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity19
.25%
0.75
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
16.9
81
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
$108
.27
0Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a $1
18.1
40
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
17.4
3%1
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
20.3
91
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$69.
150.
75Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$7
6.10
1Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y16
.79%
1La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct49
.63
0La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct$7
7.81
0.5
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$78.
381
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
16.7
5%1
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
29.6
40.
75M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio$5
0.91
1M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio$9
4.20
0.5
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
22.3
3%0.
5In
terc
ity T
rans
it19
.41
1In
terc
ity T
rans
it$4
5.06
1.5
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
$78.
051
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
13.5
0%1.
5Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
22.8
51
Kits
ap T
rans
it$5
0.93
1Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
$100
.52
0.5
Kits
ap T
rans
it21
.59%
0.5
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a20
.39
1C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
$59.
521
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a$7
3.34
1C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
13.3
2%1.
5Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct16
.43
1Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct$8
1.89
0.5
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$82.
901
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
17.8
4%0.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
3.26
%1
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
17.4
1%1
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
13.9
0%0.
75Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity50
.96%
0.5
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
3.72
%1
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
18.0
0%1
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
23.0
5%2
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
53.3
9%0.
5Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y6.
69%
0.75
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
15.7
7%1
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
13.4
6%0.
75Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y73
.97%
1La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct4.
02%
1La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct19
.76%
0.75
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
19.8
5%2
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
65.9
3%0.
75M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio1.
80%
1.5
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
16.2
7%1
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
15.4
7%1
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
68.0
2%1
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
7.21
%0.
75In
terc
ity T
rans
it26
.11%
0.5
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
13.4
3%0.
75In
terc
ity T
rans
it73
.00%
1Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
2.34
%1.
5Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
25.7
6%0.
5Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
13.2
6%0.
75Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
83.5
1%1.
5C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
6.85
%0.
75C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
14.6
1%1
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a16
.03%
1C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
54.0
4%0.
5Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct6.
17%
0.75
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
16.9
3%1
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
13.9
7%0.
75Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct47
.62%
0.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
61,1
022
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
3,56
91.
5Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity0.
831
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
35,2
561
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
50,0
481
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
2,69
60.
75Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 0.
681
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
24,0
800.
5Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y48
,023
1Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y3,
409
1Sp
okan
e Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
921
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
36,5
501
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
46,4
151
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
3,36
71
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.89
0.75
Lane
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
34,1
901
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
51,0
691.
5M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio3,
354
1M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio0.
900.
75M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio36
,770
1In
terc
ity T
rans
it32
,759
0.75
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
2,43
80.
75In
terc
ity T
rans
it0.
941.
5In
terc
ity T
rans
it26
,690
0.75
Kits
ap T
rans
it27
,533
0.5
Kits
ap T
rans
it1,
702
0.5
Kits
ap T
rans
it0.
880.
5Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
19,1
880.
5C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
48,8
471
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a3,
191
1C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
0.89
0.75
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a33
,477
1Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct35
,626
0.75
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
2,40
50.
75Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
941.
5Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct33
,330
1
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
2,23
81
Pier
ce C
ount
y Pu
blic
Ben
efit
Auth
ority
50,6
291.
5Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity43
.60%
2Pi
erce
Cou
nty
Publ
ic B
enef
it Au
thor
ity24
.50
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
1,29
40.
5Sn
ohom
ish
Cou
nty
Tran
spor
tatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a 34
,177
0.75
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
41.9
4%2
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a22
.75
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,64
91
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
44,2
091
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
20.9
5%1
Spok
ane
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
22.0
0La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
417
1La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct41
,101
1La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct20
.21%
1La
ne T
rans
it D
istri
ct22
.00
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
2,48
81
Mun
icip
ality
of A
ncho
rage
- Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
45,9
621.
5M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio25
.00%
1M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Anc
hora
ge -
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tio21
.75
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
2,02
20.
75In
terc
ity T
rans
it30
,796
0.75
Inte
rcity
Tra
nsit
15.3
8%0.
75Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct21
.25
Kits
ap T
rans
it1,
130
1Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
24,1
020.
5Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
25.6
1%1
Snoh
omis
h C
ount
y Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
21.0
0C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
2,26
21
Cla
rk C
ount
y Pu
blic
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Be
nefit
Are
a43
,440
1C
lark
Cou
nty
Publ
ic T
rans
porta
tion
Bene
fit A
rea
29.7
6%1.
5In
terc
ity T
rans
it19
.25
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
2,29
11
Sale
m A
rea
Mas
s Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
33,3
300.
75Sa
lem
Are
a M
ass
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
00%
1Ki
tsap
Tra
nsit
19.2
5
B-53
B-54
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
Ever
ett T
rans
it4,
483.
301
Ever
ett T
rans
it19
.08
2Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
16.4
11.
5Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
1.51
1Ya
kim
a Tr
ansi
t4,
816.
491
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
12.5
00.
75Ya
kim
a Tr
ansi
t17
.87
1.5
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
2.37
1.5
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIA
Tran
s6,
754.
392
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIA
Tran
s14
.42
1Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/VI
ATra
ns7.
450.
75Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/VI
ATra
ns1.
140.
75C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce3,
272.
650.
75C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce12
.00
0.75
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
5.97
0.75
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
1.30
0.75
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity4,
635.
391
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity17
.57
1.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity17
.11
1.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2.
431.
5C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
3,75
5.30
0.75
City
of P
ocat
ello
, Poc
atel
lo R
egio
nal T
rans
it12
.50
0.75
City
of P
ocat
ello
, Poc
atel
lo R
egio
nal T
rans
it7.
330.
75C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
1.41
1R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct3,
925.
210.
75R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct13
.00
0.75
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
6.42
0.75
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
1.44
1Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,86
0.00
0.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity11
.00
0.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it A
utho
rity
0.78
0.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it A
utho
rity
0.54
0.5
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it3,
294.
160.
75Bi
llings
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
12.8
30.
75Bi
llings
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
7.60
0.75
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it1.
020.
75M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
2,68
4.81
0.5
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct16
.00
1M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
10.6
21
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct1.
160.
75G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct4,
803.
081
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
13.2
50.
75G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct8.
800.
75G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct1.
330.
75Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
3,30
7.70
0.75
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am12
.00
0.75
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am2.
640.
5Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
0.61
0.5
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
re
Ever
ett T
rans
it18
.63
0.75
Ever
ett T
rans
it12
.32
0.75
Ever
ett T
rans
it14
7,37
20.
75Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
32.9
51
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
28.5
11.
5Ya
kim
a Tr
ansi
t12
.02
0.75
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
180,
297
0.75
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
40.0
60.
75Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/V
IATr
ans
15.4
70.
75Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/V
IATr
ans
13.5
10.
75Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/VI
ATra
ns32
2,40
91.
5Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/VI
ATra
ns21
.20
1.5
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
16.6
50.
75C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce12
.84
0.75
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
212,
722
1C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce60
.74
0.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity34
.22
1.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity14
.11
1W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
400,
807
1.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity36
.77
1C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
18.1
90.
75C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
12.9
20.
75C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
55,5
780.
5C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
42.9
60.
75R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct26
.49
1R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct18
.44
2R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct27
4,17
61
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
23.9
21.
5Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
6.42
0.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity12
.00
0.75
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it A
utho
rity
n/a
2Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y45
.00
0.75
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it16
.47
0.75
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it16
.10
1.5
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it40
,189
0.5
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it34
.09
1M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
17.7
20.
75M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
15.3
31
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct20
1,80
80.
75M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
55.1
80.
5G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct16
.66
0.75
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
12.5
40.
75G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct21
0,37
51
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
29.9
41
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am8.
860.
5Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
14.5
41
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
amn/
a2
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am30
.39
1
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Cap
itaAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r R
even
ue H
our
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Ever
ett T
rans
it$7
2.40
0Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
$82.
170.
75Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
17.3
7%0.
75Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
2.05
%1
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
$47.
710.
75Ya
kim
a Tr
ansi
t$7
6.14
0.75
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
23.5
3%0.
5Ya
kim
a Tr
ansi
t0.
00%
1.5
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIA
Tran
s$2
9.57
0.75
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIA
Tran
s$6
1.37
0.75
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIAT
rans
22.4
2%0.
75Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/VI
ATra
ns1.
02%
1C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce$2
3.58
1C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce$6
5.78
0.75
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
11.0
9%1
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
2.33
%1
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$4
3.95
0.75
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$8
7.90
0.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity23
.88%
0.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity5.
80%
0.5
City
of P
ocat
ello
, Poc
atel
lo R
egio
nal T
rans
it$1
2.00
1C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
$29.
791.
5C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
21.0
9%0.
75C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
1.33
%1
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$25.
101
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
$103
.66
0.5
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
22.8
3%0.
75R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct4.
37%
0.75
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$3
.36
1.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$2
7.80
1.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it A
utho
rity
8.99
%1.
5Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y0.
74%
1Bi
llings
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
$29.
301
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it$6
3.53
0.75
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it9.
88%
1.5
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it9.
45%
0M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
$29.
560.
75M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
$49.
331
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct21
.08%
0.75
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct3.
05%
1G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct$2
8.19
1G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct$5
3.35
1G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct15
.02%
1G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct4.
03%
0.75
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am$7
.18
1.5
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am$2
4.12
1.5
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am7.
46%
1.5
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am3.
00%
1
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: N
W R
egio
n --
Gro
up C
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Ever
ett T
rans
it17
.29%
1Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
9.76
%0.
75Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
85.8
1%1.
5Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
35,3
321
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
17.1
0%1
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
8.66
%0.
75Ya
kim
a Tr
ansi
t49
.26%
0.75
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
40,9
061.
5Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/V
IATr
ans
22.6
2%1
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIA
Tran
s12
.67%
0.75
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIAT
rans
38.2
5%0.
75Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/VI
ATra
ns38
,026
1C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce37
.85%
0C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce5.
61%
0.75
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
87.0
5%1.
5C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce42
,544
1.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity18
.91%
1W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
7.76
%0.
75W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
78.2
8%1.
5W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
41,3
521.
5C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
14.9
6%1.
5C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
14.3
9%0.
75C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
31.5
3%0.
75C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
35,7
411
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
21.1
4%1
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
19.1
1%1
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
40.2
8%0.
75R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct29
,723
0.75
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity32
.10%
0.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it Au
thor
ity46
.60%
2Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y14
.05%
0.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it A
utho
rity
25,7
400.
5Bi
llings
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
22.4
9%1
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it15
.84%
1Bi
llings
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
39.7
6%0.
75Bi
llings
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
31,0
740.
75M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
21.3
3%1
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct15
.11%
1M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
54.7
6%1
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct39
,277
1G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct24
.83%
0.75
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
8.22
%0.
75G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct35
.44%
0.75
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
32,4
990.
75Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
25.7
4%0.
75Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
10.4
9%0.
75Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
46.3
0%0.
75Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
25,0
810.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Hou
rs
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
Ever
ett T
rans
it2,
658
1Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
0.86
0.5
Ever
ett T
rans
it25
,161
0.75
Ever
ett T
rans
it2,
042
1Ya
kim
a Tr
ansi
t3,
377
1.5
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
0.94
0.75
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
25,7
571
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
2,14
41
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIA
Tran
s2,
654
1Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/V
IATr
ans
0.85
1Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/VI
ATra
ns24
,181
0.75
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIAT
rans
1,79
00.
75C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce3,
314
1.5
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
1.00
1.5
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
30,3
891.
5C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce2,
366
1.5
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity2,
967
1W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.97
1W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
31,6
431.
5W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,24
31.
5C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
2,72
71
City
of P
ocat
ello
, Poc
atel
lo R
egio
nal T
rans
it0.
971
City
of P
ocat
ello
, Poc
atel
lo R
egio
nal T
rans
it17
,368
0.5
City
of P
ocat
ello
, Poc
atel
lo R
egio
nal T
rans
it1,
345
0.5
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
1,61
80.
5R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
971
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
28,8
611
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
1,56
50.
75Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
2,14
50.
75Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
1.00
1.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it A
utho
rity
25,7
401
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it A
utho
rity
2,14
51
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it1,
930
0.5
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it0.
971
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it26
,210
1Bi
llings
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
1,62
80.
75M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
2,53
51
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct0.
961
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct28
,830
1M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
1,88
11
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2,53
61
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
0.92
0.75
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
24,7
500.
75G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct1,
974
1Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
1,74
30.
5Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
0.97
1Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
19,1
370.
5Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
1,31
60.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
Ever
ett T
rans
it30
,341
0.75
Ever
ett T
rans
it20
.59%
0.75
Wha
tcom
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity24
.75
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
38,6
351
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
50.0
0%1
Yaki
ma
Tran
sit
22.2
5Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/V
IATr
ans
32,2
410.
75Bo
ise
Urb
an S
tage
s/V
IATr
ans
33.3
3%1
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
22.0
0C
omm
unity
Urb
an B
us S
ervi
ce42
,544
1.5
Com
mun
ity U
rban
Bus
Ser
vice
40.0
0%1
Bois
e U
rban
Sta
ges/
VIAT
rans
21.0
0W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
40,0
811.
5W
hatc
om T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
26.6
7%0.
75Ev
eret
t Tra
nsit
20.2
5C
ity o
f Poc
atel
lo, P
ocat
ello
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
34,7
371
City
of P
ocat
ello
, Poc
atel
lo R
egio
nal T
rans
it10
0.00
%2
City
of P
ocat
ello
, Poc
atel
lo R
egio
nal T
rans
it20
.25
Rog
ue V
alle
y Tr
ansi
t Dis
trict
28,8
610.
75R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct0.
00%
0.5
Targ
hee
Reg
iona
l Pub
lic T
rans
it A
utho
rity
20.2
5Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
25,7
400.
5Ta
rghe
e R
egio
nal P
ublic
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.00
%0.
5R
ogue
Val
ley
Tran
sit D
istri
ct19
.75
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it30
,142
0.75
Billin
gs M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it15
.00%
0.75
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct19
.75
Mis
soul
a U
rban
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct37
,839
1M
isso
ula
Urb
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
31.2
5%1
The
City
of C
heye
nne
Tran
sit P
rogr
am19
.00
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
30,0
540.
75G
reat
Fal
ls T
rans
it D
istri
ct21
.43%
0.75
Gre
at F
alls
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
18.5
0Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
24,3
570.
5Th
e C
ity o
f Che
yenn
e Tr
ansi
t Pro
gram
27.2
7%0.
75Bi
llings
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
18.2
5
B-55
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: La
rge
Gro
up (>
100
0 V
ehic
les)
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it54
,239
.05
1.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it24
.00
1N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
126.
471.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
9.17
2Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
17,9
98.3
40.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
24.0
01
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n39
.80
0.75
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n4.
190.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)16
,205
.84
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
24.0
01
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
20.4
10.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)2.
130.
75C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
47,8
91.6
81.
5C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
24.0
01
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y81
.35
1C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
4.73
1W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
13,2
53.6
60.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
23.6
70.
5W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
42.4
20.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
3.91
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o13
,948
.87
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o24
.00
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
44.0
90.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
4.42
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
14,2
60.7
30.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
24.3
31.
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
33.2
80.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
2.30
0.75
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it72
.45
1.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it7.
900.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
2,86
40.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
17,9
350.
5Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
51.4
41
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n12
.28
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
2,74
10.
5Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
111,
193
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)31
.32
0.5
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
14.7
41.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)4,
457
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)21
1,00
91.
5C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
47.0
91
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y9.
950.
75C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
3,83
80.
75C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
44,4
930.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
43.9
30.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
11.2
20.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4,36
01
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y30
,888
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o45
.69
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o10
.33
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o6,
373
1.5
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
ho10
5,91
61
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T32
.50
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T14
.14
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T4,
012
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T17
2,42
61
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it3.
641.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
$192
.70
0.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it$1
10.4
00.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
24.4
0%0.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
10.7
60.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
$73.
751
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n$9
5.32
0.75
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n23
.42%
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
9.84
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
$66.
101
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
$101
.46
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
23.9
3%0.
75C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
4.93
1.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y$1
41.0
20.
75C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
$81.
641
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y21
.37%
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.13
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$9
7.83
1W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$101
.32
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y27
.49%
0.5
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o13
.99
0.5
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o$9
4.61
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
$98.
050.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
17.7
9%1
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T10
.80
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T$7
1.74
1M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
$70.
061.
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
8.55
%1.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it5.
43%
1N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
15.7
2%0.
75N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
57.0
6%1.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
14.4
3%0.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
3.35
%1
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n16
.71%
0.75
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
00%
0.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
00%
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
3.94
%1
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
22.6
0%0.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)48
.91%
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)1.
40%
0.75
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y5.
78%
1C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
10.7
6%1
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y41
.93%
1C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
31.9
0%1
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y3.
69%
1W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.2
1%0.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
46.7
5%1
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y23
.37%
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
11.1
2%0.
5So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
18.3
4%0.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
41.2
2%1
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Aut
ho8.
97%
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T7.
40%
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T7.
55%
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T25
.22%
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T74
.02%
2
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it30
,240
0.5
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it3,
801
1N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
0.86
0.75
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it22
,667
0.5
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n46
,416
1Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
3,49
51
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n0.
850.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
31,4
341
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
48,5
051.
5N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)3,
067
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
0.81
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
32,7
511
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y39
,750
0.75
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y4,
006
1.5
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y0.
992
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y33
,225
1.5
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y37
,012
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
957
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
810.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
25,4
880.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
39,2
320.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
3,59
91
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o0.
860.
75So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
27,7
230.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
42,9
431
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T2,
816
0.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T0.
850.
75M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
30,4
361
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
New
Yor
k C
ity T
rans
it2,
868
1N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
25,9
910.
5N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
14.6
6%0.
5C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
24.7
5Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
2,56
00.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
39,6
261
Los
Ange
les
Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n26
.06%
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T22
.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
2,22
20.
75N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)39
,148
1N
ew J
erse
y Tr
ansi
t Cor
pora
tion
(Con
solid
ated
)19
.53%
1N
ew Y
ork
City
Tra
nsit
21.0
0C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
3,33
81.
5C
hica
go T
rans
it A
utho
rity
39,1
881
Chi
cago
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y17
.95%
0.75
New
Jer
sey
Tran
sit C
orpo
ratio
n (C
onso
lidat
ed)
21.0
0W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
2,27
10.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
30,0
720.
75W
ashi
ngto
n M
etro
polit
an A
rea
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
17.9
9%0.
75Lo
s An
gele
s C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
20.0
0So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n Au
tho
2,68
31
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o33
,614
0.75
Sout
heas
tern
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Auth
o21
.25%
1So
uthe
aste
rn P
enns
ylva
nia
Tran
spor
tatio
n A
utho
19.7
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
2,15
30.
5M
etro
polit
an T
rans
it Au
thor
ity o
f Har
ris C
ount
y, T
36,2
921
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
of H
arris
Cou
nty,
T19
.24%
0.75
Was
hing
ton
Met
ropo
litan
Are
a Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.00
B-56
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: La
rge
Gro
up (<
100
0 Ve
hicl
es)
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per R
oute
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e W
eekd
ay S
pan
of
Serv
ice
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue M
ileAl
t Sco
re
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et12
,493
.63
0.75
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et24
.00
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
41.0
91
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et2.
180.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity9,
148.
970.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity22
.25
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
24.1
40.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity4.
171.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
7,63
2.84
0.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct24
.00
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
29.3
60.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
1.92
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Av e
11,2
68.6
50.
75Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
ve22
.58
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
47.0
81
Port
Auth
ority
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve2.
230.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
10,2
26.1
10.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
24.0
01
Met
ro T
rans
it44
.87
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
2.92
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct16
,390
.72
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct24
.00
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct50
.22
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct3.
111
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
i t13
,992
.00
1Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
24.0
01
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit33
.35
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit2.
050.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n4,
313.
790.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n21
.42
0.5
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
8.82
0.5
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
1.69
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it A
utho
rity
13,5
88.0
91
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity22
.00
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity60
.15
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2.
991
GTJ
C24
,903
.69
2G
TJC
24.0
01
GTJ
C11
.62
0.5
GTJ
C6.
252
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O15
,760
.01
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
22.4
20.
75Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
53.5
41.
5Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
2.85
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t14
,678
.93
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t24
.00
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t34
.43
0.75
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
2.60
0.75
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y10
,316
.16
0.75
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.75
0.5
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y12
.57
0.5
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1.
140.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yPa
ssen
ger T
rips
Per R
even
ue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Aver
age
Spee
dAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Failu
res
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Rev
enue
Mile
s B
etw
een
Col
lisio
ns
(exc
ludi
ng
suic
ide)
Alt S
core
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t29
.25
0.75
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et13
.40
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
7,54
00.
75Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
145,
757
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
46.4
91.
5M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity11
.15
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
4,94
60.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity15
1,82
00.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
28.4
80.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
14.8
31
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct31
,829
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
139,
010
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Av e
29.2
10.
75Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
ve13
.09
1Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve96
10.
75Po
rt Au
thor
ity o
f Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
163,
420
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
39.8
71
Met
ro T
rans
it13
.67
1M
etro
Tra
nsit
1,30
40.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
147,
059
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
36.2
61
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
11.6
70.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
317
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
89,0
610.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ori t
25.7
20.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
12.5
60.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
4,93
80.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
80,4
200.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n23
.87
0.5
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
14.1
61
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
10,2
110.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n41
5,52
32
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it A
utho
rity
37.3
41
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity12
.49
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity2,
247
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity20
1,93
91
GTJ
C57
.11
2G
TJC
9.13
0.5
GTJ
C4,
061
0.75
GTJ
C21
,338
0.5
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O35
.25
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
12.3
70.
75Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
6,59
30.
75Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
154,
078
0.75
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
33.2
30.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t12
.79
0.75
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
1,54
30.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t57
,088
0.75
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.84
0.5
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y18
.22
2U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
95,5
732
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y34
6,45
11.
5
Tran
sit A
genc
yAv
erag
e H
eadw
ay
(min
utes
)Al
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e Pe
r C
apita
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yO
pera
ting
Expe
nse
Per
Rev
enue
Hou
rAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Veh.
Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t12
.15
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
$144
.19
0.5
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et$1
02.6
40.
75Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
21.0
2%1
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
17.3
70.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity$4
9.20
1.5
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
$94.
760.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity24
.76%
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct22
.56
0.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct$8
5.89
1R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
$83.
311
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct19
.78%
1Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
v e14
.19
1Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
ve$1
41.5
80.
5Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve$8
7.83
1Po
rt Au
thor
ity o
f Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
23.8
4%0.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
13.6
31
Met
ro T
rans
it$1
13.4
10.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
$100
.78
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it16
.71%
1.5
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
10.8
81
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$139
.90
0.5
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
$101
.00
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
20.0
7%1
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
i t12
.79
1Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
orit
$120
.68
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit$9
3.05
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit20
.52%
1Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n32
.78
0Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n$2
6.27
1.5
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
$71.
111.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n16
.50%
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it A
utho
rity
15.9
80.
75M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
$130
.50
0.75
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity$8
1.01
1M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
27.9
9%0.
5G
TJC
5.85
1.5
GTJ
C$2
3.44
1.5
GTJ
C$1
15.1
90
GTJ
C26
.83%
0.5
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O12
.44
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
$125
.92
0.75
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O$8
2.89
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
16.7
7%1.
5M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t14
.71
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t$8
5.22
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t$8
2.25
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t21
.58%
0.75
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y10
.03
1U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
$55.
411
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y$9
1.86
0.75
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y20
.46%
1
B-57
B-58
Initi
al B
ench
mar
king
Res
ults
: La
rge
Gro
up (<
100
0 Ve
hicl
es)
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Non
-Veh
. Mai
nt.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Gen
. Adm
in.
Expe
nse
Per
Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yFa
rebo
x R
ecov
ery
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
y
Loca
l Rev
enue
Pe
r Ope
ratin
g Ex
pens
e (S
yste
m
Tota
l)
Alt S
core
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t8.
03%
0.5
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et11
.62%
1.5
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et22
.55%
0.75
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et63
.79%
1M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity1.
61%
1.5
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
12.4
9%1
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
40.9
2%1.
5M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity19
.45%
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct8.
10%
0.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct22
.25%
0.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct19
.73%
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct63
.72%
1Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
v e6.
05%
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Ave
14.0
2%1
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
22.9
0%0.
75Po
rt Au
thor
ity o
f Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
9.22
%0.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
3.62
%1
Met
ro T
rans
it19
.33%
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it35
.05%
1.5
Met
ro T
rans
it32
.59%
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
2.12
%1
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
17.0
7%0.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct23
.04%
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
68.7
8%1
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
i t7.
11%
0.5
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
it21
.85%
0.5
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit17
.96%
0.5
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
rit76
.62%
1.5
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
2.33
%1
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
16.7
8%1
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
28.2
3%1
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
4.89
%0.
5M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y2.
86%
1M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
15.5
0%1
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity30
.26%
1M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
62.0
1%1
GTJ
C2.
83%
1G
TJC
11.5
6%1.
5G
TJC
38.4
2%1.
5G
TJC
0.00
%0.
5Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
2.46
%1
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O20
.86%
0.75
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O25
.84%
0.75
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O57
.34%
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t4.
90%
0.75
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
11.0
4%1.
5M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t26
.82%
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t52
.15%
1U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
4.68
%0.
75U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
24.6
0%0.
5U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
15.0
6%0.
5U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
61.2
4%1
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e M
iles
Per
Peak
Veh
icle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yVe
hicl
e H
ours
Pe
r Pea
k Ve
hicl
eAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Rev
enue
Mile
s Pe
r Veh
icle
Mile
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per T
otal
Ve
hicl
esAl
t Sco
re
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t41
,485
0.75
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et2,
847
0.75
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
et0.
820.
75Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
32,1
861
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
33,7
330.
5M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity3,
010
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
0.88
1.5
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
24,9
650.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
52,3
081.
5R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
3,30
61
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct0.
810.
75R
egio
nal T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
trict
31,5
551
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Av e
45,0
511
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Ave
3,11
60.
75Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve0.
770.
5Po
rt Au
thor
ity o
f Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
28,6
620.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
40,6
660.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
2,97
70.
75M
etro
Tra
nsit
0.78
0.5
Met
ro T
rans
it26
,387
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
40,2
050.
75Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct3,
234
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct0.
861
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
29,2
680.
75Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ori t
43,6
361
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
it3,
277
1Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
0.86
1Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
30,3
431
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
41,6
480.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n2,
724
0.75
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
0.80
0.75
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
29,5
941
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it A
utho
rity
53,1
371.
5M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
3,98
41.
5M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
0.85
1M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Auth
ority
38,2
891.
5G
TJC
28,4
010.
5G
TJC
3,08
00.
75G
TJC
0.78
0.5
GTJ
C18
,435
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
46,8
711
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O3,
556
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
0.86
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
33,0
331
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
53,6
851.
5M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t3,
945
1.5
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
0.86
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t34
,393
1.5
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y36
,010
0.75
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y2,
289
0.5
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y0.
871.
5U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
24,6
000.
75
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue H
ours
Pe
r Tot
al
Vehi
cles
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
yR
even
ue M
iles
Per P
eak
Vehi
cle
Alt S
core
Tran
sit A
genc
ySp
are
Vehi
cle
Rat
ioAl
t Sco
reTr
ansi
t Age
ncy
Com
posi
te S
core
(M
easu
res
Onl
y)
King
Cou
nty
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rtatio
n - M
e t2,
403
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
33,9
000.
75Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
5.33
%1
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity24
.00
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
2,23
90.
75M
assa
chus
etts
Bay
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Au
thor
ity29
,540
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
18.3
3%0.
75M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t24
.00
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct2,
128
0.75
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct42
,574
1.5
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct34
.92%
1.5
GTJ
C22
.50
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 Si
xth
Av e
2,19
00.
75Po
rt A
utho
rity
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Sixt
h A
ve34
,881
0.75
Port
Aut
horit
y of
Alle
ghen
y C
ount
y 34
5 S
ixth
Ave
21.7
0%1
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O22
.25
Met
ro T
rans
it1,
930
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it31
,751
0.75
Met
ro T
rans
it20
.33%
0.75
Mas
sach
uset
ts B
ay T
rans
porta
tion
Auth
ority
21.7
5Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct2,
507
1Al
amed
a-C
ontra
Cos
ta T
rans
it D
istri
ct34
,702
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
18.5
7%0.
75U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
21.0
0Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Auth
ori t
2,41
61
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it Au
thor
it37
,459
1Th
e G
reat
er C
leve
land
Reg
iona
l Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
23.4
5%1
Reg
iona
l Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
istri
ct20
.75
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
2,09
00.
75Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n33
,378
0.75
Pace
, Sub
urba
n Bu
s D
ivis
ion
12.7
9%0.
5M
etro
Tra
nsit
20.2
5M
etro
polit
an A
tlant
a R
apid
Tra
nsit
Aut
horit
y3,
065
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity45
,210
1.5
Met
ropo
litan
Atla
nta
Rap
id T
rans
it Au
thor
ity18
.08%
0.75
Alam
eda-
Con
tra C
osta
Tra
nsit
Dis
trict
20.0
0G
TJC
2,01
80.
75G
TJC
22,1
661
GTJ
C20
.24%
0.75
The
Gre
ater
Cle
vela
nd R
egio
nal T
rans
it A
utho
ri t20
.00
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O2,
671
1Tr
i-Cou
nty
Met
ropo
litan
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n D
ist.
of O
40,4
181
Tri-C
ount
y M
etro
polit
an T
rans
porta
tion
Dis
t. of
O22
.36%
1Ki
ng C
ount
y D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
porta
tion
- Met
19.7
5M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t2,
690
1M
iam
i-Dad
e Tr
ansi
t46
,025
1.5
Mia
mi-D
ade
Tran
sit
33.8
2%1.
5Pa
ce, S
ubur
ban
Bus
Div
isio
n19
.75
Uta
h Tr
ansi
t Aut
horit
y1,
350
1U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
31,4
360.
75U
tah
Tran
sit A
utho
rity
27.7
9%1
Port
Auth
ority
of A
llegh
eny
Cou
nty
345
Six
th A
ve18
.50