Upload
kadri
View
221
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Behcet’s Disease and Breast Cancer
To the Editor:
Behcet’s disease (BD) is a systemic vasculitis, char-
acterized by orogenital ulcers, uveitis, arthritis, and
involvement of the gastrointestinal tract, central ner-
vous system, and blood vessels which is frequently
seen in Korea, China, Japan, and Turkey (1). In such
rheumatic diseases, it has been theorized that the fre-
quency of malignancies increase due to the disrupted
immune system and use of immunosuppressive drugs;
a conjecture which has been supported in a few stud-
ies (2). Even fewer studies have looked into the rela-
tionship between BD and malignancies (3). Here, we
present four cases with a history of BD and briefly
review literature pertinent to possible explanations
regarding the connection between autoimmunity and
malignancies.
The first patient is a 49-year-old premenopausal
patient with no predisposing risk factors of breast can-
cer. In 2007, she was diagnosed with BD and has been
using colchicine ever since. Also, in 2007 she had a cyst
excised from her left breast, which turned out to be
benign in the pathologic examination. In March 2011,
the patient presented with a mass in the upper outer
quadrant of the left breast. A biopsy was performed
which revealed signet ring cell carcinoma of the breast.
A modified radical mastectomy was performed. The
pathologic examination revealed a strong ER+, weak
PR+, HER2+, T2N2M0 Grade 2 pure signet ring cell
carcinoma of the breast. Adjuvant chemotherapy con-
sisting of four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophospha-
mide (AC), concomitantly administered with 12 cycles
of paclitaxel and a year of herceptin was initiated.
Radiotherapy is also in the treatment plan.
The second patient is a 45-year-old premenopausal
female with a history of 36 months of oral contracep-
tive use. She was diagnosed with BD at the age of 37
and has been using colchicine ever since. She also has
a history of 20 package years of smoking, and a cyst
excision from the ovary, 12 years ago. The patient
was being followed up for 3 years due to a mass in
the breast via USG when a breast conserving excision
was performed which revealed strong ER, PR+ and
HER2 negative grade 2, T1N0M0 infiltrative ductal
carcinoma in the upper outer quadrant of the right
breast. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of six cycles
of tamoxifen concomitantly administered two cycles
of goserelin acetate and a single dose of leuprolide
acetate and radiotherapy was commenced. The patient
did not have any recurrences during follow-up.
The third patient is a 56-year-old postmenopausal
patient with no risk factors for breast cancer which
has been diagnosed with BD for unknown duration of
time. She presented with a mass in the lower outer
quadrant of the breast, from which a biopsy was per-
formed which revealed infiltrative lobular carcinoma
(ILC). Following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy a modi-
fied radical mastectomy was performed which revealed
a strongly ER+, weakly PR+, HER2 negative, grade 2,
T2N1M0 ILC. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated
accordingly; the patient is being followed up with no
recurrence.
The last patient that we will take into consideration
is a 51-year-old premenopausal patient with no risk
factors for breast cancer who has been diagnosed with
BD 25 years ago. She has quit using colchicine only
for the past 2 years. She presented with a mass in the
lower inner quadrant of the left breast from which a
biopsy was performed, which revealed a infiltrative
ductal carcinoma. A modified radical mastectomy was
performed. The pathologic examination identified a
ER�, PR+, HER2+ T2N0M0, Grade 3 infiltrative
ductal carcinoma. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisting
of four cycles of AC and five cycles of tamoxifen were
initiated. The patient’s malignancy progressed despite
a multitude of chemotherapy regimens that were
administered, consistent with liver and brain metasta-
sis. Currently the patient is stable and receiving paclit-
axel and trastuzumab with signs of regression in the
brain metastasis.
A single center study conducted in Korea has iden-
tified three patients out of 1,769 who have concurrent
breast cancer and BD (3). We have four patients of
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Emir Charles Roach,
MD, Cleveland Clinic – Pathobiology, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH
44106, USA, or e-mail: [email protected]
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12320
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., 1075-122X/14The Breast Journal, Volume 20 Number 5, 2014 566–567
2,006 breast cancer patients as such. It has been
reported that due to a polymorphism of TGF-b recep-
tor gene in BD may have a protective role in develop-
ment of malignancy (4). Conversely, however, small
vessel vasculitis are known to increase the risk of
malignancies (5). Other solid cancers associated with
BD are bladder, uterus, thyroid, and stomach cancer
(6). The relationship between BD and breast cancer
remains controversial at best. Large scale, multicentric
studies ought to be conducted to firmly establish the
relationship between these two pathologies.
Emir Charles Roach, MD*
Ibrahim Petekkaya, MD†
Kadri Altundag, MD†
*Department of Pathobiology
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland
Ohio
and †Institute of Oncology
Hacettepe University
Ankara
Turkey
REFERENCES
1. Sakane T, Takeno M, Suzuki N, Inaba G. Behcet’s disease. NEngl J Med 1999;341:1284–91.
2. Szekanecz Z, Szekanecz E, Bak�o G, et al. Malignancies in auto-
immune rheumatic diseases - a mini-review.Gerontology 2011;57:3–10.3. Ahn JK, Oh JM, Lee J. Behcet’s disease associated with
malignancy in Korea: a single center experience. Rheumatol Int2010;30:831–5.
4. Kaklamani VG, Sadim M, Koumantaki Y, Kaklamanis P,Pasche B. Role of polymorphisms in adamantiades—Behcet’s dis-
ease. J Rheumatol 2008;35:2376–8.5. Pankhurst T, Savage CO, Gordon C, Harper L. Malignancy
is increased in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Rheumatology (Oxford)2004;43:1532–3.
6. Kaklamani VG, Tzonou A, Kaklamanis PG. Behcet’s disease
associated with malignancies. Report of two cases and review of the
literature. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:S35–41.
Letter to the Editor • 567