Upload
rajeswari-vachali
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
1/34
Social Psychology
Behaviors and Attitudes- Chapter 4
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
2/34
What is an Attitude?
Feelings toward some object, person, or idea.
Reflect underlying differences in the extent to whichwe feel positive or negative (or both) about anattitude object.
Thus, attitudes reflect a positive, negative, or mixedevaluation of a person, object, or idea expressed atsome level of intensity.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
3/34
Conceptualizing Attitudes:
4 Possible Reactions to Attitude Objects
Cacciopo, et al. 1997
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
4/34
How Attitudes Are Measured:
Self-Report Measures
Attitude Scale: A multiple-item questionnaire
designed to measure a persons attitude toward
some object. e.g., Likert Scale
Bogus Pipeline: A phony lie-detector device that
is sometimes used to get respondents to give
truthful answers to sensitive questions.
Sigall & Page (1971)- Acknowledging Prejudice
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
5/34
How Attitudes Are Measured:
Covert Measures
Observable behavior
Facial Electromyograph (EMG): An
electronic instrument that records facial
muscle activity associated with emotions
and attitudes.
Implicit attitudes (IAT)
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
6/34
The Facial EMG: A Covert Measure of
Attitudes?
From Cacioppo, J .T., and Petty, R.E. (1981). E lectromyograms as measures of extent and affectivity of information
processing. American Psychologist, 36, 441-456. Copyright 1981 by the American Psychological Association.
Reprinted with permission.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
7/34
How Attitudes Are Measured: The
Implicit Association Test (IAT)
Based on notion that we have implicit attitudes (non-conscious attitudes that we may be unaware of).
Implicit Association Test (IAT): Measures the speedwith which one responds to pairings of concepts(Black-Bad/White-Good vs. Black-Good/White-Bad). Average correlation between IAT scores and explicit self-
reported attitudes r= .24 (Hoffman, et al., 2005)
IAT website: www.yale.edu/implicit, dates back to 1998,over 2.5 million tests administered.
Studies have yielded an average implicit preference for (1)self over other, (2) white over black, (3) young over old, (4)and the stereotype that links males with careers and femaleswith family (Greenwald et al., 2003)
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
8/34
The Link Between Attitudes
and Behavior:
Consistency or Inconsistency?
Is the assumption that attitudes influencebehavior a valid one?
Historically, social psychology wrestled withthe paradox that peoples attitudes did not tendto accurately predict their behaviors.
LaPieres (1934) provocative but flawed study.Wickers (1969) conclusion that attitudes and
behavior are only weakly correlated.
The SituationistChallenge
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
9/34
Attitudes and Behavioral Links
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
10/34
The Link Between Attitudes & Behavior:
Putting Attitudes in Context
Why do such disparities exist between peoples attitudes andtheir behaviors?
Across > 100 studies, Ajzen and Fishbeins (1977) found thatattitudes correlate with behavior only when attitude measuresclosely match the behavior in question.
General vs. Specific attitudes/behaviors- General attitudes tendto poorly predict specific behaviors, but that specific attitudes
predict well specific behaviors Davidson & Jaccard (1979): Predicting birth control usage within thenext 2 yrs was better predicted by specific attitudes (How do you feelabout using birth control pills during the next 2 yrs.) rather thangeneral ones (How do you feel about birth control?).
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
11/34
W
hen Do Attitudes Predict Behavior?
Minimizing socialinfluences on expressedattitudes
Minimizing other specificsituational influences on
behavior (Theprinciple of
aggr
egation) Examining attitudesspecific to the behavior
When attitudes arepotentorstrong(i.e., salient)
Prettyman/ PhotoEdit
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
12/34
Strength of the Attitude
Why do some attitudes have more influence
on behavior?
Depends on attitudes importance or strength.
Why are some attitudes stronger than
others?
Because of our genetic make-up?
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
13/34
Genetic Influences on Attitudes
(Olson et al., 2001., N = 672)
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
14/34
Theory of Reasoned Action (Fishbein, 1980) &
The Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1991)
Proposes that attitudes influence our behavior through a rationalprocess of deliberate decision making. The decision to or not to enact a particular behavior is understood in
terms of ourbehavioral intentions.
Behavioral intentions are often strong predictors of how we act in agiven situation (Ajzen, 1987).
Several factors influence ones behavioral intentions
(1) attitudes toward a specific behavior(positive or negative
evaluations of performing the act/whether it will yield positive ornegative consequences)
(2) subjective norms (perceptions of others approval or disapprovalof the act)
(3)perceived control(appraisals of ones ability to perform the act)
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
15/34
Theory of Planned Behavior
(Ajzen, 1991)
Reprinted from Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, ProfessorAjzen,
pp. 179-211. Copyright (c) 1991, with permission from Elsevier.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
16/34
Theory of Planned Behavior Application:
Does attitudes about Ecstasy predict its usage?(Orbell, Blair, Sherlock, & Conner, 2001)
Young people were approached in various locations and asked tocomplete a questionnaire designed to assess theirAttitudes Toward Ecstasy (e.g., is the drug enjoyable-unenjoyable,
pleasant-unpleasant, beneficial-harmful, etc.)
Subjective Norms (whether their friends would approve of their usingEcstasy)
Perceived Control(1. whether they could obtain it, 2. whether theycould resist taking it if they had it)
Behavioral Intention (whether they planned on using Ecstasy withinthe next 2 months)
Intentions To andActual Ecstasy Use were significantly predictedby a positive attitude toward Ecstasy, seeing its use as normativelyaccepted by ones peers, and perceived control over using it.
Intentions to use ecstasy significantly predictedActual ecstasy use
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
17/34
The Link Between Behaviors and Attitudes (B A)
Self-Persuasion Effects
Do changes in our behaviors produce changes inattitude?
Various evidence supports the contention that ourbehaviors come to alter our attitudes.
Role Playing (Zimbardo, 1971) The foot-in-the-door phenomena (Cialdini)
Several theories suggest that our behaviors candetermine our attitudes
Cognitive Dissonance Theory Self-Perception Theory
Self-Affirmation Theory
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
18/34
Does Behavior Determine Attitudes?
Role playing (Zimbardo,
1971)
Phil Zimbardo
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
19/34
Cognitive Dissonance Theory:(Leon Festinger (1957)
We are motivated by a desire for cognitive consistency
We experience psychological tension- (i.e., a state of negative
arousal, dissonance) when we are aware of inconsistencies
among our attitudes, cognitions, and behaviors.
e.g., saying things you dont believe you look great in that outfit ,
deciding among two attractive options (who to date, what to major in)
We become highly motivated to reduce dissonance and often doso by adjusting their thinking which often often involves
irrational or sometimes maladaptive behavior.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
20/34
Ways to Reduce Dissonance:
Embracing your chocolate mousse option despite that
Youre Dieting
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
21/34
A Dissonance Classic:
Festinger & Carlsmiths (1959) Boring Task Study
Would a counterattitudinal actionproduce
changes in how participants really feel?
Would being paid $1 or $20 to tell others that a
boring task was actually interesting alter how
enjoyable the participants found the boring task?
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
22/34
A Dissonance Classic:
Festinger & Carlsmiths (1959) Boring Task Study
From "Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance," by L. Festinger and J.M. Carlsmith (1959), Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203.210. Reprinted with permission.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
23/34
Dissonance & Insufficient Justification
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
24/34
Festinger & Carlsmiths study:
Participants experienced cognitive dissonance
because they had insufficient justification for
lying (i.e., saying the study was exciting when it
was actually boring).
Contributions of Festinger & Carlsmiths study:
Showed the phenomenon ofself-persuasion. Contradicted the behaviorists widely accepted belief
that big rewards produce greater change.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
25/34
Why Do Actions Affect Attitudes?
A Cognitive Dissonance Theory Perspective
Insufficient Justification (e.g., Festinger & Carlsmith Study) Dissonance produced from counterattitudinal actions.
Post Decisional Self-Justification Effects Dissonance produced from making decisions results in
justifying our behaviors.
e.g., Knox & Inkster (1968)- In contrast to those bettors whowere still waiting in line to bet, racetrack bettors who had justfinished placing their bets were more prone to believe thattheir horse would win.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
26/34
Justifying Difficult Decisions:When
Good Choices Get Even Better
Whenever we make difficult decisions, we
feel dissonance.
We rationalize the correctness of our
decision by exaggerating:
The positive features of the chosen alternative
The negative features of the unchosenalternative.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
27/34
Other Applications:
Justifying Attitude-Discrepant Behavior
Mild punishment is insufficient deterrence
for attitude-discrepant nonbehavior.
The less severe the threatened punishment, the
greater the attitude change produced.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
28/34
Alternative Routes to Self-Persuasion
Self-Perception Theory (Bem, 1972): Self-persuasionthrough observation of own behavior (i.e., inferring ourattitudes based on attribution processes). Especially prone to occur when our attitudes are weak or
ambiguous.
Impression Management Theory:What matters is not amotive to be consistent but rather a motive to appearconsistent to others (i.e., self-presentation concerns toappear socially desirable).
Self-Affirmation Theory: Dissonance situations create athreat to the self which can be resolved by affirming orrevalidating ones integrity. The affirmation can occur in a non-dissonance related area!!!
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
29/34
Comparison of Cognitive Dissonance &
Self-Perception Theories
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
30/34
Applying Self-Perception Theory:
Overjustification Effects and Intrinsic Motivation
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
31/34
Necessary Conditions for the Arousal and
Reduction of Dissonance
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
32/34
Applying Self-Affirmation Theory(Galinsky, et al., 2000)
When would dissonant speeches (advocating bans on popular campustraditions) produce the strongest endorsement for the ban?
Self-Affirmation Conditions: Participants given a chance to express their
values after giving the speech.
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
33/34
Self-Concept Change Study
(Tice, 1992)W
ould participants sit closer or further away from the confederateafter portraying themselves as introverted or extraverted in either a
private or public setting?
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165
170
Introvert Extravert
Private
Public
8/6/2019 Behavior and Attitudes CH4
34/34
Critically Comparing the Theories of
Self-Persuasion