8

repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-
Page 2: repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-
Page 3: repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-
Page 4: repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-
Page 5: repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-
Page 6: repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-
Page 7: repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-
Page 8: repozytorium.amu.edu.pl · behave like contraries. But it is the gradable vs. ungradable distinction that is primary here, not the logical distinction between contraries and contradic-