29
This is a repository copy of Becoming us and them : Social learning and intergroup bias . White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/126272/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Over, Harriet orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-043X and McCall, Cade Andrew orcid.org/0000- 0003-0746-8899 (2018) Becoming us and them : Social learning and intergroup bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. e12384. ISSN 1751-9004 https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12384 [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.

Becoming us and them : Social learning and intergroup biaseprints.whiterose.ac.uk/126272/...Social_learning_and_intergroup_bia… · for interventions to reduce stereotyping, prejudice

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • This is a repository copy of Becoming us and them : Social learning and intergroup bias.

    White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/126272/

    Version: Accepted Version

    Article:

    Over, Harriet orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-043X and McCall, Cade Andrew orcid.org/0000-0003-0746-8899 (2018) Becoming us and them : Social learning and intergroup bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. e12384. ISSN 1751-9004

    https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12384

    [email protected]://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/

    Reuse

    Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item.

    Takedown

    If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.

  • 1

    BecomingUsandThem:

    Sociallearningandintergroupbias

    HarrietOverandCadeMcCall

    UniversityofYork

    Acknowledgements:ThisresearchwassupportedbytheEuropeanResearch

    CouncilundertheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020Programme,grantnumber

    ERC-STG-755719.

    Addressforcorrespondence:

    HarrietOver

    DepartmentofPsychology

    UniversityofYork

    YO105DD

    Email:[email protected]

    Tel:+44(0)1904322096

  • 2

    Abstract

    Inrecentyears,researchhasdemonstratedthatthebasicfeaturesofprejudice

    anddiscriminationemergeearlyinchildren’sdevelopment.Thesediscoveries

    callintoquestiontheroleofsociallearninginintergroupbias.Specifically,

    throughwhatmeansdowelearntodistinguish“us”from“them”?Herewe

    explorethisquestion,focusingonthreekeyissues:howchildrenrespondto

    biasedinformationtheyreceivefromothers,howchildrenselectivelyseekout

    certaintypesofbiasedinformation,andhowchildrencommunicatebiased

    informationtoothers.Weclosebydiscussingtheimplicationsofthisresearch

    forinterventionstoreducestereotyping,prejudiceanddiscrimination.

  • 3

    Becomingusandthem:Sociallearningandintergroupbias

    Intergroupbiasremainsapowerfulanddestructiveforceinthecontemporary

    world.Eveninostensiblyopensocieties,stigmatizedgroupsfacediscrimination

    inemployment,housing,andthelaw(e.g.,U.S.CensusBureau,2011;Goldin,

    2014).Themanyformsofprejudiceanddiscriminationleavetheirmarkon

    individuals’mindsandbodiesviachronicstressandevenoutrightviolence

    (Pascoe,&SmartRichman,2009;Townsend,Major,Gangi,&Mendes,2011).Ata

    globallevel,intergroupconflictfuelswarswithinandbetweencountriesand

    preventscooperationonpressingenvironmentalconcerns(Biliuc,McGarty,

    Thomas,Lala,Berndsen,&Misajon,2015).Recentpoliticaltrendsacrossthe

    globesuggestthattheseproblemsarenotabatingandmay,infact,beontherise

    (e.g.,Hainsworth,2016).Giventheseriouscostsofintergroupbias,itis

    imperativethatweunderstanditsnatureandorigins.

    Researchrevealsthatthepsychologicaloriginsofintergroupbiasappearearlyin

    development.Beforetheageoffive,childrenshowconsistentpreferencesfor

    membersoftheirowngender(Shutts,Banaji,&Spelke,2010;Shutts,Roben,&

    Spelke,2013),race(Baron&Banaji,2006)andlanguagegroup(Kinzler,Dupoux,

    &Spelke,2007).Thesepreferencesareinextricablylinkedwithdiscriminatory

    behaviour.Youngchildrenaretypicallymorelikelytohelpandsharewith

    membersoftheirownsocialgroups(Buttelmann&Boehm,2014;Killen&

    Verkuyten,2017;Over,2018)andtoavoidandevenbetraymembersofother

    groups(Misch,Over,&Carpenter,2015;Oostenbroek&Over,2016).Negative

    stereotypessurroundingspecificsocialgroupsarelearnedbytheearlyschool

    yearsandconstrainchildren’sestimatesoftheirownpotential(Bian,Leslie,&

    Cimpian,2017;Liben,Bigler,&Krogh,2001).

    Inthispaper,wereviseandextendsociallearningaccountsofintergroupbiases,

    discussingthewaysinwhichsociallearningcontributestotheoriginsofthese

    socialproblems.Previousaccountsdifferintheweighttheyplaceonsocial

    learning,withsometheoristssuggestingthatitcanaccountforawiderangeof

    phenomenainthisarea(Allport,1954;Devine,1989)andothersarguingfora

    morerestrictedrole,suggestingthatitprovides‘finetuning’forearlyemerging

  • 4

    processesofcategorisationandreasoning(Aboud,1988;Dunham,Baron,&

    Banaji,2008).Delineatingthewaysinwhichlearningdoesanddoesnot

    contributetointergroupbiasisessentialforidentifyingwhenandhow

    interventionscanreducetheprevalenceofthesesocialproblems(Paluck&

    Green,2009).

    Traditionalsociallearningaccountsofintergroupbiasandtheircritics

    Sociallearningaccountsofintergroupbiashavedeeprootsinsocialpsychology,

    datingbackatleastasfarasAllport(1954).Theideathatsociallearningwas

    importantgainedincreasingsupportwiththeworkofBandura(1977)who

    showedthatchildrenlearnsocialbehaviourssuchasaggressionfromobserving

    otherpeople.Ithasbeenargued,byextension,thatprejudice,stereotyping,and

    discriminationcouldalsobelearnedfromobservingothers(Smith&Mackie,

    2007).Earlysocialisationaccountswereveryinfluentialindevelopmental

    psychology,particularlyinapplieddomains,buttheyalsoprovedcontroversial.

    Criticismoftheseaccountshaventakenanumberofdifferentforms.

    Maturationalaccountssuggestthatintergroupbiasisprimarilytheproductof

    immaturereasoningabilitiesratherthansociallearning.Oneofthemost

    influentialmaturationaltheorieshasbeenofferedbyAboud(1988;Aboud&

    Doyle,1996)whoarguedthatintergroupbiasisaproductofyoungchildren’s

    difficultieswithmultiplecategorisationandtheirtendencytoengagein

    egocentricandrigidthinking(Aboud,1988).Theseimmaturereasoning

    abilities,sheargues,explaintheapparentpeakinexplicitprejudiceinmiddle

    childhood.However,maturationalaccountsalonecannotexplaintheprevalence

    ofprejudiceanddiscriminationamongadults.Norcantheyexplainthestability

    andpersistenceofimplicitbiasesacrossdevelopment(Dunhametal.,2008).

    Evolutionaryaccountshavesoughttoexplaintheprevalenceofintergroupbias

    amongbothchildrenandadults.Accordingtotheseaccounts,humanshavean

    evolvedtendencytoseekoutingroupmembersaspotentialco-operators

    (Fishbein,1996;Lewis&Bates,2010;Tomasello,2016).Insupportofarolefor

    innatearchitecture,twinstudieshaveshownthatmonozygotictwinsshow

  • 5

    greaterconcordanceintermsofingroupfavouritismthandodyzgotictwins

    (Lewis&Bates,2010).Furtherevidenceusedtosupporttheseclaimscomes

    fromresearchwithinfantsshowingthattheyseemtoprefermembersoftheir

    owngroupsbeforetheyhavehadextensiveopportunitiestolearnabouttheir

    historicalandculturalsignificance(Bar-Haimetal.,2006;Conway&Schaller,

    2007;Kinzler,etal.2007;Mahajan&Wynn,2012).

    Finally,researcherswithinthesocialidentitytraditiontypicallyfocusonthe

    importanceofsocialcategorisationasanexplanationforintergroupbiasrather

    thansociallearning(Tajfel,1970;Turner,1999).Accordingtothisperspective,

    intergroupbiasemergesasanaturalresultofcategorisingselfandotherin

    groupterms.Insupportofthisclaim,empiricalresearchusingtheminimal

    groupparadigmhasshownthatlearningaboutaparticulargroupisnot

    necessaryforintergroupbiasestoemerge.Ingrouppreferenceand

    discriminatorybehaviourcanbequicklyinducedinbothchildrenandadults

    fromanarbitraryandapparentlymeaninglessdistinction,forexampledividing

    individualsintotwogroupsonthebasisofacoinflip(Dunham,Baron,&Carey,

    2011;Tajfel,1970;Turner,1999).

    Revisitingsociallearningaccounts

    Researchdemonstratingtheexistenceofearlyemergingbiasesandthepowerful

    effectsofcategorisationhasledsomeresearcherstoquestionwhethersocial

    learningplaysasignificantroleinthedevelopmentofintergroupbias.However,

    thesefindingsarenotincompatiblewithasubstantial,additionalrolefor

    learning(Bigler&Leaper,2015;Bigler&Liben,2007;Gelmanetal.,2004;

    Kashima,2008;Rhodes,Leslie,andTworek,2012).Childrengrowupinrich

    socialenvironments.Intergroupbiasissituatedwithinabroadlegal,political

    andeconomiccontext.Itwouldbesurprisingifthecultureschildreninhabitdid

    notsubstantiallyshapethewaysinwhichintergroupbiasesmanifestinthe

    individual.Sociallearningaccountsofferustheopportunitytounderstandthese

    culturalinfluencesonchildren’sintergrouppsychology.

  • 6

    Severalsourcesofempiricalevidencesupportthenotionthatsociallearning

    playsanimportantroleintheoriginsofintergroupbiasaboveandbeyondthe

    effectsofcategorisationandearlyemergingbiases.First,culturelevel

    differencesdeterminewhichgroupsarepositivelyandnegativelyevaluated.For

    example,whereasdivisionsbasedonreligionmaybemoresalientinsome

    culturalcontexts,divisionsbasedonraceandsocialclassaremorecommonin

    others(Segall,Birnbaum,Deeb,&Diesendruck,2015).Relatedtothis,thenature

    ofanygivenindividual’sbiasesvariesacrosstheparticulargroupsinquestion.

    AnindividualmayhaveanequallynegativeattitudetowardsAfricanAmerican

    menandSyrianrefugees,butthecontentoftheirstereotypesaboutthosegroups

    islikelytodiffer(e.g.,Operario&Fiske,2001).Second,correlationalresearch

    suggeststhatthereiscross-generationalsimilarityintheintergroupattitudesof

    parentsandtheirchildren.Arecentmeta-analysisofover45,000parent-child

    dyadssuggestsamoderateandpositiverelationshipbetweentheattitudesof

    parentsandthoseoftheirchildren(Degner&Dalege,2013).Althoughcausal

    inferenceremainsachallengewithcorrelationaldata,sociallearningisa

    plausibleexplanationforthisassociation.Third,weknowfromresearchinother

    domainsthatchildrenareprolificsociallearners(Fridland&Moore,2014;Over

    &Carpenter,2012;2013).Indeed,inthedomainoftooluse,childrenaresokeen

    tolearnfromotherpeoplethattheydosoevenattheexpenseofperforminga

    taskefficiently(Nagell,Olguin,&Tomasello,1993;Horner&Whiten,2005;

    Lyons,Young,&Keil,2007).Takentogether,thisevidencerequiresusto

    considerwhethertheroleofsociallearninginthedevelopmentofintergroup

    biasmayhavebeenunderestimated(Oostenbroek&Over,2016).

    Thekeyquestionforthefieldisnotsomuchwhethersociallearninginfluences

    thedevelopmentofintergroupbiasbutratherhowitinfluencesthedevelopment

    ofintergroupbiasandhowitinteractswithothercognitiveconstraints(Bigler&

    Leaper,2015;Bigler&Liben,2007;Gelmanetal.,2004;Over,Eggleston,Bell,&

    Dunham,2017;Over&Cook,2018;Rhodes,etal.,2012).Experimentalresearch

    directlyinvestigatingthisquestionisrelativelyrare.However,importantsources

    ofevidencedoexist.Intheremainderofthispaper,wediscussexperimental

    researchthatspeakstothisquestion.

  • 7

    Whatfeaturesofbiascouldbesociallylearned?

    Tobegindiscussingtheroleofsociallearninginmoredepth,itisnecessaryto

    mapoutthetypesofinformationthatchildrenmightattendtowhenobserving

    othersandreproduceintheirowninteractions(Carpenter&Call,2002;

    Oostenbroek&Over,2016).First,childrenmaylearnthataparticularsocial

    divisionexistsandcarriessocialmeaning(Tirell,2012).Forexample,achild

    maylearnthatskincolourmarksmeaningfuldivisionsbetweensocialgroupsin

    manyWesterncultureswhereaseyecolourtypicallydoesnot(Bigler&Liben,

    2007).Second,childrenmaylearntoassociateparticulartraits,activities,roles

    andoccupationswithparticularsocialgroups(Devine,1989;Over&Cook,

    2018).Totheextentthatchildrenrigidlyapplythesegeneralisationsabout

    particularsocialgroupsthroughoutdevelopment,theywillhavelearnedcultural

    stereotypes(e.g.,Lurye,Zosuls,&Ruble,2009).Third,childrenmaylearna

    particularattitudetowardsasocialgroupfromobservingorlisteningtoothers.

    Totheextentthattheylearnanegativeattitudetowardsanothersocialgroup,

    theywouldhavelearnedtobeprejudiced.Finally,childrenmaylearnanormor

    socialruleabouttheappropriatewaytotreatasocialgroup.Totheextentthat

    theylearntotreatsomesocialgroupsmorefavourablythanothers,theywould

    havelearnedtodiscriminate.Ofcourseintherealworld,stereotypicbeliefs,

    prejudicedattitudesanddiscriminatorybehaviorarecloselyintertwined.

    Nevertheless,thesedistinctionsprovidevaluableconstructsforunderstanding

    thepossiblemechanismsunderlyingintergroupbias(Dovidioetal.,1996).

    Earlysociallearningaccountsofintergroupbiashavesometimesbeencriticized,

    perhapsunfairly,forassumingthatsociallearningtakestheformofsimple

    mimicryinwhichchildrenautomaticallyreproducetheattitudesandbehaviours

    oftheirparents(Aboud&Doyle,1996).Inreality,therelationshipbetweenwhat

    childrenobserveandwhattheylearn,however,isconsiderablymorecomplex.It

    isclearfromresearchinthedomainoftoolusethatsociallearningneednot

    simplybeacaseofmimickingorpassivelyabsorbinginformationfromothers

    (Meltzoff,1995;Over&Carpenter,2012).Sociallearningcanalsoinvolveactive

    interpretationofsocialsituationsandmakinginferencesfromlimiteddata

    (Carpenter,2006;Gergely,Bekkering,&Király,2001;Meltzoff,1995;Over&

  • 8

    Carpenter,2012).Applyingthisobservationtointergrouppsychology,wecan

    reasonthatachildmayobservediscriminatorybehaviourandinferthata

    particularattitudeisappropriatetowardsthatgroup.Alternatively,achildmay

    learnanattitudefromanotherpersonandthenextrapolatewhatbehavioursare

    justifiedbythatattitude(Oostenbroek&Over2016;Tirrell,2012).

    Conceptualisingthesociallearningprocess

    Howmightwebestconceptualisethesociallearningprocess?Traditionalsocial

    learningaccountshavetendedtofocusonhowadults,mosttypicallyparents,

    communicateinformationaboutsocialgroupstotheirchildren(Bandura,1977;

    Degner&Dalege,2013).Thisisanimportantaspectofsociallearningbutitis

    nottheonlyone.Inordertoconsidertheroleofsociallearninginmoredepth,

    webroadenthefocusbyposingthreequestions.First,andmostcloselyrelated

    tothemajorityofpreviousresearch,howdochildrenrespondtoandinternalize

    informationaboutsocialgroupsthatispresentedtothembyothers?Inorderto

    addressthisquestion,weanalysesocialpsychologicalresearchonhowprejudice

    isexpressedinlanguageandbehavioranddevelopmentalresearchonhow

    childrenrespondtothesebiases.Second,whattypesofinformationdochildren

    seekoutaboutsocialgroups?Inordertoaddressthisquestion,wediscuss

    recentworkonchildren’smodelpreferencesandinformationselectionbiases.

    Third,howdochildrentransmitintergroupbiasestoothers?Inordertoaddress

    thisquestion,wediscussanemergingbodyofresearchonchildren’sown

    communicationofprejudiceanddiscrimination(seeFigure).

    Question1:Howdochildrenrespondtoandinternalizeinformationabout

    socialgroupsthatispresentedtothembyothers?

    Thefirststeptowardsunderstandingtheculturaltransmissionprocessisto

    understandthewaysinwhichindividualscommunicatetheirstereotypes,

    attitudesandsupportfordiscriminatorysocialnormsandbehaviourtochildren.

    Belowweoutlinesocialpsychologicalresearchonhowintergroupbiases

    expressthemselvesincommunication,anddevelopmentalresearchonhow

    thesedifferentwaysofexpressingintergroupbiasesinfluencechildren’s

    attitudesandbehavior.Foreaseofexposition,westructurethisdiscussionof

  • 9

    theexistingliteratureintofoursubsectionscentredaroundtheacquisitionof

    groupdistinctions,stereotypes,prejudiceanddiscrimination.

    Groupdistinctions.Inanygivensociety,somesocialdistinctionsaremarkedas

    significantwhereasothersarenot.Researchershaveinvestigatedthetypesof

    environmentalinputthatmightleadchildrentointerpretsomedimensionsof

    variabilityasmoreimportantthanothersandtotreatthemincategoricalterms.

    BiglerandLiben(2006)havepointedoutthatchildrenoftenobservedefacto

    segregationbetweengroups,forexample,intheneighbourhoodsinwhichthey

    liveorinthestructureoftheirpeers’relations.Asaresult,theymightinferthat

    aparticulardistinction,likeskincolour,issociallyimportant.Insomesocieties,

    socialdistinctionsbetweengroupswillbemoreclearlymarkedthanothers.For

    example,theymaybehighlightedbyclothingchoiceandotherformsofbody

    adornment.

    Individualsmayalsocommunicatetherelativesignificanceofsocialdivisions

    moresubtlythroughtheirbehaviourandlanguage.Forexample,parentswithin

    Westernsocietiesregularlydrawattentiontogenderdistinctions.Evenin

    infancy,toysandclothingareregularlygenderspecific(Bigler&Leaper,2015).

    Withgrowinglinguisticcompetence,childrenbecomemorevulnerabletoverbal

    meansofmarkingsocialdivisions.Thiscouldinvolvedirectlycontrastingone

    groupwithanotherbutitcouldinvolvesomethingassimpleasusinglabelsto

    refertoparticulargroups(Bigler&Liben,2006;Tirrell,2012).Gelmanetal.

    (2004),forexample,investigatedhowmotherstalktotheirchildrenwhile

    discussingapicturebookandfoundthatparentsoftenmarkthegenderofthe

    charactersbylabellingdrawingsofchildrenaslittleboysandlittlegirls.The

    extenttowhichadultsmarkaparticularsocialcategoryappearstobeinfluenced

    bytheextenttowhichtheybelievethatcategoryisimportant.Segalletal.(2015)

    investigatedthelanguageJewishIsraeliparents’usedtotalktotheir5-year-old

    childrenaboutreligiousgroups.Theyfoundthatparentswhowerethemost

    opposedtonegotiationswithPalestinianswerealsothemostlikelytomark

    ethniccategoriesinconversationwiththeirchildren.Thedegreetowhichachild

    encodesthesecategory-baseddifferencesislikelytohaveasignificanteffecton

  • 10

    theirownintergroupbiases.Asotherdevelopmentalresearchhasshown,once

    childrencategorisethemselvesasbelongingtoaparticulargroup,preferences

    anddiscriminatorybehavioursfollow(Bigler&Liben,2007;Dunhametal.,

    2011).

    Stereotypes.ChildrenwithinWesternculturesareexposedtoaconsiderable

    amountofstereotypicalinformationfromthebroaderculturalcontext.Research

    withinlinguisticsandcommunicationhasshownthatstereotypesareoften

    presentinvariousformsofmediadesignedspecificallyforchildren.One

    exampleofthisisstereotypeconsistentrepresentationsofgenderrolesin

    children’sbooks.CrabbandBielawski(1994)investigatedpresentationsof

    genderinCaldecottAwardchildren’sbooks,typicallyreadbychildrenuptothe

    ageof14,publishedbetween1937and1989inAmerica.Femaleswereshown

    moreoftenusinghouseholdartefactsandmaleswereshownwithnon-domestic

    artefacts.Interestingly,therewasnochangeinthistrendovertime,suggesting

    thatatleastduringthelatterpartofthetwentiethcentury,advancesmadeby

    womeninAmericancultureandtheworkforcewerenotnecessarilyreflectedin

    theinformationcommunicatedtochildren.Morerecently,Hamilton,Anderson,

    Broaddus,andYoung(2006)analysed200best-sellingchildren’sbooksin

    Americaandfoundthatfemalesweremoreoftenpresentedinnurturingroles

    thanweremalesandweremoreoftenseeninsidethehomeratherthanoutside.

    Depictionsofoccupationswerealsogenderstereotyped,withmorefemales

    appearingtohavenooccupationoutsidethehome.Acomparisonofthissample

    ofbookstosamplesofbooksfromthe1980sand1990ssuggestedthattherehad

    beennoreductioninstereotypicalcontentovertime.Otherresearchhasshown

    thatthistypeofenvironmentalinputinfluenceschildren’sendorsementof

    stereotypes.Flerx,Fidler,andRogers(1976)reportedthatwhen4-and5-year-

    oldchildrenwereexposedtogenderegalitarianstorybooks,itreducedtheir

    genderstereotyping.Generalisingfromdataasthese,SchauandScott(1984)

    suggestthat,throughoutdevelopment,exposuretogenderbiasinchildren’s

    booksleadstolessflexibilityinviewsofgenderrolescomparedtoexposureto

    moreegalitarianmaterial.

  • 11

    Adultsmayalsocommunicatestereotypestochildrenthroughtheir

    conversation.Abodyofdevelopmentalresearchhasinvestigatedtheroleof

    genericlanguageinchildren’sintergroupbias.Genericlanguageinvolvestalking

    abouttypicalqualitiesofagivengroup.Forexample,genericstatementsmight

    describeapparenttruthssuchas‘girlslikedolls’or‘Americansarefriendly’

    (Gelmanetal.,2004).Researchhasshownthathearinggenericlanguageabouta

    socialgroupencourageschildrentoholdessentialisedbeliefsaboutthatgroup

    wherebytheycometothinkthatallindividualsfromagrouppossessabasicand

    unchangeablequalityor‘essence’(Gelman,etal.2004).Inaparticularlyelegant

    demonstrationofthis,Rhodesetal.(2012)introduced4-year-oldchildrentoa

    novelgroupcalledZarpiesthroughapicturebook.Theindividualsinthisbook

    wereeitherdescribedwithgenericlanguage(e.g.,‘Zarpiesarescaredof

    ladybugs’)ornongenericlanguage(e.g.,‘ThisZarpieisafraidofladybugs’).

    Childrenwhoheardthegenericdescriptionscametoholdessentialisedbeliefs

    aboutthe‘Zarpie’group,thinkingthatmembersofthatgroupsharedadeep

    underlyingnature.BecauseRhodesandcolleaguesusednovelgroupstowhich

    childrenwerenotthemselvesassigned,theycouldconcludethatgeneric

    languagealonewassufficienttogeneratetheseessentialisedbeliefsinchildren.

    Prejudice.Otherresearchhasinvestigatedhowindividualsmightcommunicate

    prejudicedattitudestochildren.Traditionalsociallearningaccountstendedto

    focusontheeffectofhearingexplicitlynegativestatementsaboutstigmatised

    socialgroups(Dalhouse&Frideres,1996).Theexplicitexpressionofprejudice

    ispresumablycommonwithincertainsubgroupsandculturalcontextsmaking

    thisanimportanttopicofinvestigation(Hainsworth,2016).However,inlab-

    basedstudies,parentsrarelyexpressexplicitlyprejudicedattitudesin

    conversationwiththeirchildren(Gelmanetal.,2004).Furthermore,atleast

    withintheWest,theexplicitexpressionofprejudiceisoftenactively

    discouraged.Nevertheless,prejudicedattitudescanstillbecommunicatedto

    children.Extensivesocialpsychologicalresearchhasdemonstratedthat

    prejudicecan‘leak’intosubtleaspectsoflanguageandbehaviour(McLoughlin&

    Over,2017;Werkman,Wigboldus&Semin,1999).

  • 12

    Recentresearchhassuggestedthatobservingsubtlemanifestationsofprejudice

    caninfluencechildren’sintergroupattitudes.Oneroutebywhichthiscanoccur

    isthroughobservingthenonverbalbehaviorofindividualsengagedin

    intergroupinteractions(Weisbuch,Pauker,&Ambady,2009).Whereas

    interactionswithingroupmembersaretypicallymarkedbypositivenon-verbal

    signalssuchassmiling,eyecontactandphysicalproximity,interactionswith

    outgroupmembersmaybemarkedbyfewersignsofpositivity(Weisbuchetal.,

    2009;Word,Zanna,&Cooper,1974).Developmentalresearchhasshownthat

    observingbiasednon-verbalbehaviorcaninfluencechildren’sattitudestowards

    membersofcertainsocialgroups.Castelli,DeaandNesdale(2008)presented3-

    to6-year-oldwhitechildrenwithvideosinwhichablackpersoninteractedwith

    awhiteperson.Thenonverbalbehaviourofthewhitepersonwasmanipulated

    suchthattheyeitherdisplayedeasiness(higheyecontactandphysical

    closeness)oruneasiness(distanceandavoidanceofeyecontact).These

    nonverbalcuesinfluencedchildren’sattitudestowardstheblackindividual,and

    towardsother,unconnected,blackindividuals,suchthattheywerejudgedless

    positivelyfollowingexposuretononverbalsignsofuneasiness.Thesefindings

    haverecentlybeenextendedbySkinner,MeltzoffandOlson(2016)who

    demonstratedthatobservingnegativenon-verbalbehaviourtowardsastranger

    issufficientinandofitselftoleadchildrentoholdanegativeattitudetowards

    thatpersonandtowardsthatperson’sfriends.Moreappliedresearchon

    vicariouscontactlendsfurthersupporttotheclaimthatobservingintergroup

    interactionsinfluenceschildren’sownintergroupattitudes.Forexample,

    Cameron,Rutland,BrownandDouch(2006)foundthatreadingstoriesdepicting

    intergroupfriendshipsto5-to11-year-oldEnglishchildrenledthemtohave

    morepositiveattitudestowardsrefugees.

    Discrimination.Sociallearningmayalsoinfluencechildren’swillingnessto

    engageindiscriminatorybehaviour.Theprocessesbywhichdiscriminatory

    behaviourislearnedmaybeatleastpartiallyseparablefromtheprocessesby

    whichnegativeintergroupattitudesarelearned.Inprinciple,childrencould

    learnadiscriminatorynormwithouthavinganegativeattitudetowardsa

    particulargroup(Killen&Verkuyten,2017).Theroleofsociallearninginthe

  • 13

    acquisitionofdiscriminatorybehaviourhasbeeninvestigatedwithinthecontext

    ofresourcedistribution.Olson,Dweck,SpelkeandBanaji(2011)presented3-to

    11-year-old(predominantlywhite)childrenwithstoriesinwhichonesocial

    groupreceivedmoreresourcesthananother.Theinfluenceofthesestorieson

    children’sownresourcedistributionwasthenmeasuredbygivingthemthe

    opportunitytodistributeadditionalresourcestonewmembersofthesesame

    groups.WhendistributingbetweenanAsianpersonandaWhiteperson,

    childrenfollowedtheexampleinthestoryandunfairlyfavouredtheWhite

    person.Interestingly,whendistributingbetweenaBlackpersonandaWhite

    personolderchildrenrectifiedtheunfairdistributionfromthestory,distributing

    moreresourcestotheBlackperson.Thisflexibilityinresponseisarguedbythe

    authorstobetheresultofsocialisationpracticesemphasisingtheimportanceof

    rectifyingdiscriminationexperiencedbyBlackpeoplewithintheUSA.

    Question2:Whattypeofinformationdochildrenseekoutaboutsocial

    groups?

    Sofar,wehavediscussedhowintergroupbiasmaybetransmittedfromparents,

    teachersandothermodelstochildren.Ineachoftheexamplesdiscussedabove,

    thedirectionofinfluenceisfromthebroaderculturalcontexttochildren.This

    formofculturaltransmissionisclearlyimportant.However,itisnotthewhole

    story.Sociallearningaccountsaresometimescriticisedforassumingthat

    childrenaremerely‘blankslates’ontowhichtheeffectsoflearningslowly

    accumulate(Aboud,1988).However,sociallearningaccountsneednotbe

    committedtothisassumptionofpassivity.Inordertounderstandthesocial

    learningprocess,wealsoneedtounderstandhowchildrenthemselvesengagein

    andinfluencelearningsituations(Degner&Dalege,2013).Oneimportantaspect

    ofthisrelatestowhichinformationchildrenchoosetolearn.Researchon

    children’slearningaboutthephysicalworldhasshownthattheymakechoices

    aboutwhomtolearnfrombasedontheirpreviousreliability,apparentprestige,

    age,andthenatureoftheirpersonalrelationshipwiththem(Chudek,Heller,

    Birch,&Henrich,2012;Harris,2007).Thisselectivityinsociallearningis

    typicallyreferredtoas‘modelchoice’.

  • 14

    Thetopicofmodelchoicehasnotbeenwidelyinvestigatedwithinthedomainof

    intergroupbias.However,onerelevantsetofstudieshasbeenconductedby

    Overandcolleagues.Overetal.(2017)investigatedwhetherchildrenpreferto

    learnfrommodelswhoarebiasedinfavouroftheirowngroup.Overand

    colleaguesallocated5-and6-year-oldchildrentooneoftwogroupsandthen

    presentedthemwithachoicebetweenwhichoftwostoriestheywantedtohear.

    Whereasoneoftheauthorswasdescribedasfavouringtheirowngroupand

    disfavouringtheothergroup,theotherwasdescribedasfavouringtheother

    groupanddisfavouringchildren’sowngroup.Intwostudies,childrenshoweda

    strongtendencytochoosetohearthestorythatfavouredtheirowngroup.

    Furthermore,hearingtheingroupfavouringstoryledtoanincreaseinchildren’s

    intergroupbias,suggestingthatchildrenwerechoosingtherawmaterialfrom

    whichtofurnishtheirownintergroupattitudes.Inthissense,children’sown

    choicessetintomotionafeedbackloop.Afurtherstudydemonstratedthat

    childrenpreferingroupfavouringinformationeventobalanced,unbiased

    information(Overetal.,2017).Thisbiasininformationseekingcanbeviewedas

    asimpleformofnicheconstructioninwhichchildrencreatesituationswhere

    theyaremorelikelytobeexposedtosometypesofinformationthanothers

    (Flynn,Laland,Kendal,&Kendal,2013).Itisimportanttoconsiderhowthisbias

    mightoperateacrossdevelopment.Aschildrengrowolder,theyhaveincreasing

    scopeforchoosingtheinformationtheyconsumeand,oncetheyengagein

    extensiveactivitiesonline,thisscopeforchoiceexpands(andbecomesyetmore

    difficulttosupervise)(Kahanetal.,2012).

    Question3:Howdochildrentransmitintergroupbiasestoothers?

    Inordertounderstandtheculturaltransmissionprocess,itisnecessaryto

    appreciatethatchildrenarenotonlytherecipientsofculturaltransmission,but

    agentsofculturaltransmissionwiththepotentialtocommunicateprejudiceand

    discriminationtoothers(Overetal.,2017).Childrenmayexertasystematic

    influenceovertheattitudesandbehaviouroftheirpeersandperhapsevenover

    thoseoftheirparents(Bigler&Liben,2007;Degner&Dalege,2013;Harris

    1998;Paluck,2016).Thereisrelativelylittleexperimentalresearchonhow

    childrencommunicateintergroupbiastoothers,perhapsbecauseresearchhas

  • 15

    tendedtofocusprimarilyonchildrenasrecipientsofsocialinformation.

    However,itispossibletopiecetogethersomeimportantevidencerelatingto

    howchildrencommunicatetoothersaboutsocialgroups.

    Stereotypes.Researchsuggeststhatchildrensometimesexplicitlycommunicate

    stereotypestotheindividualsaroundthem.Forexample,theymaydirectly

    enforcestereotypeconsistentbehaviourontheirpeers.Weknowfromresearch

    inotherdomainsthat,fromatleasttheageof3,childrenregularlyenforce

    adherencetoconventionalnormsonothers(Rakoczy,Warneken&Tomasello,

    2008).Thistendencyextendstopolicingactivitiesthataretypicalofthegroup

    (Killen&Rutland,2011).Takingtheexampleofgender,Fagot(1977)

    investigated3-and4-yearoldchildren’sreactionstogendercounter-

    stereotypicalbehaviouramongtheirpeers.Shefoundthatchildrencriticised

    boysforengaginginstereotypicallyfemininebehaviours

    Childrenmayalsoinadvertentlycommunicatestereotypestotheirpeersthrough

    otheraspectsoftheirbehaviour.Onewayinwhichthiscanoccurissimplyby

    repeatedlyactinginlinewithculturalstereotypes,thusprovidingmodelsof

    culturallytypicalbehaviour.Thiscanagainbeillustratedthroughadherenceto

    genderstereotypes.BanerjeeandLintern(2000)demonstratedthat4-to6-year-

    oldboysconformtogendernormsanddosomoreoftenwhentheyarebeing

    observedbytheirpeersthanwhentheyareinprivate.Byengaginginreputation

    managementinthisway,theyprovidemodelsofnormativebehaviourtothose

    aroundthem.Moreover,thefactthattheyaremorelikelytoexhibitnormative

    behaviourinthepresenceofotherssuggeststhattheymaybehaveinstereotype

    consistentmanner,thusprovidingstereotypicalmodelsofbehaviourtoothers,

    evenwhentheydonotnecessarilyendorsethosestereotypesthemselves.

    Prejudice.Childrenmayalsocommunicateintergroupattitudestotheirpeers.

    Onewayinwhichthiscanhappenisthroughexplicitchoicesrelatingtowhat

    informationotherindividualshearorread.Overandcolleagues(Overetal.,

    2017)investigatedwhether5-to6-year-oldchildrenseektocommunicate

    biasedinformationaboutsocialgroupstoothers.Theyallocatedfive-andsix-

  • 16

    year-oldchildrentooneoftwominimalgroupsandthenaskedthemwhichstory

    theywouldlikeanotherchildtohear–onethatwasbiasedinfavourofthe

    participants’owngrouporonethatwasbiasedinfavouroftheothergroup.The

    majorityofparticipantspreferredtheotherchildtohearinformationthatwas

    biasedinfavouroftheirowngroup.Thisstudysuggeststhatchildren

    sometimesmakeexplicitchoicestocommunicatebiasedinformationtoothers.

    Onepossiblemechanismforthisisadesiretomanagethereputationoftheir

    socialgroup,whichispresentfromatleasttheageoffiveinchildrenfrom

    Westernculturalbackgrounds(Engelmann,Herrmann,&Tomasello,2017).

    Intergroupbiasesmayalsobecommunicatedmoresubtly,andperhapseven

    inadvertently,throughlanguage.Oneinterestingtopicwithinthisgeneral

    domainistheuseofdehumanizinglanguage(Haslam&Loughnan,2014;Leyens

    etal.,2000).Relatedtothis,McLoughlinandOver(2017)investigatedhow5-

    and6-year-oldchildrenspontaneouslydescribetheactionsofingroupmembers

    andoutgroupmembers.Theyfoundthatchildrenrefertomentalstates,suchas

    whatindividualsbelieve,thinkandfeel,lessoftenwhentalkingaboutmembers

    ofanoutgroup.Thiseffectheldacrosstwodifferenttypesofgroupdivision–

    thosebasedongenderandnationality.Itremainsforfutureresearchto

    determinewhetherhearinglanguageofthissortinfluenceschildren’sattitudes

    andbehaviour(McLoughlin&Over,2018).

    Discrimination.Verylittleresearchhasdirectlyinvestigatedhowchildren

    mightcommunicatediscriminationorsupportfordiscriminationtoother

    people.However,totheextentthatchildrenengageindiscriminatorybehaviour

    themselves,theyprovidemodelsfortheirpeersofhowtotreatmembersof

    differentsocialgroups.Weknowfrompreviousresearchthat,withinlab-based

    settings,childrentypicallydistributemoreresourcestomembersoftheirown

    group(Dunhametal.,2011;Over,2018),offermorehelptomembersoftheir

    owngroup(Sierskma,Thijs,&Verkuyten,2014)andshowloyaltytomembersof

    theirowngroup(Misch,Over,&Carpenter,2015).Inadditiontomodelling

    discriminatorybehaviour,childrenmayalsoprovidemodelsofpassivityinthe

    faceofotherpeople’sdiscriminatorybehaviour,failingtointervenetoencourage

  • 17

    moreegalitarianrelations(Ploetner,Over,Carpenter,&Tomasello,2015).The

    observationthatchildreninfluencethosearoundthemhasimportantapplied

    implicationsbecauseitsuggeststhattheeffectsofinterveningtomodifythe

    behaviourofcertainindividualswithinasocialnetworkmayspreadtoother

    individualswithinthatnetwork(Paluck&Green,2009;Paluck,Shepherd,&

    Aronow,2016).Thisisanissuetowhichwereturnbelow.

    Implicationsforinterventions

    Formanyresearchers,theacademicstudyofintergroupbiasisintimately

    connectedwiththedesireforresearch-ledinterventionstoreduceprejudiceand

    discrimination.Differenttheoreticalperspectivesonthedevelopmentof

    intergroupbiassuggestdifferentroutestointervention.Socialproblemsas

    complexasprejudiceanddiscriminationrequireaconcertedeffortfrom

    differentapproachesand,ofcourse,differentacademicdisciplines.

    Psychologicalinterventionsthatstemfromasociallearningperspectivehave

    typicallysoughttocontributetothismissionbyemphasisingtheimportanceof

    modifyingtheculturalinputavailabletochildren,forexamplesupporting

    egalitarianorcounterstereotypicmodels(Schau&Scott,1984).Theresearchwe

    havehighlightedinthisreviewsuggestssomeimportantconsiderationsfor

    futureinterventions.First,researchinthisfielddemonstratestheimportanceof

    modifyingsubtleexpressionsofstereotypes,prejudiceanddiscriminationin

    children’smediaaswellastheirmoreexplicitexpressions.Italsosuggests,

    however,thatmodifyingtheavailableculturalinputisnotenoughtoameliorate

    thesesocialproblems.Ifchildrenareuninterestedinegalitarianmaterialor

    models,theirpotentialtomodifyattitudesandbehaviourwillremainunfulfilled

    (Overetal.2017).Thusinterventionsalsoneedtoconsiderhowchildrencanbe

    encouragedtoreadandengagewithegalitarianmaterialandhowthematerials

    themselvescanbeconstructedtobemoreappealing.Beyondthese

    observations,sociallearningaccountsmakeonefurthercontributiontothe

    interdisciplinarymissiontoreduceintergroupbias.Understandinghow

    egalitarianattitudesandbehaviourcanspreadthroughchildren’ssocial

    networkscanhelpbroadenthescopeofinterventions,makingthembothmore

    powerfulandmorecosteffective.Forexample,Paluckandcolleaguesusedsocial

  • 18

    networkanalyses,andparticularlyunderstandingofwhichmodelsarethemost

    influential,toencouragethespreadofinterventionsamonghighschoolstudents

    (Palucketal.,2016).Thisexcitingnewapproachsuggeststhatbiasreduction

    mayflourishonitsownoncetheseedsaresown.

    Conclusions

    Thepicturethatemergesfromthisreviewisoneinwhichsociallearningshapes

    children’sintergroupbeliefs,attitudesandbehaviours.Justaschildrenlearn

    aboutthephysicalworldthroughotherpeople(Carpenter&Call,2002;Meltzoff,

    1995)sotoodotheylearnaboutthesocialworld.Inmakingthisargument,we

    donotseektominimisethecontributionofotherfactors.Sociallearningclearly

    interactswithothercognitiveprocesses.Itisguidedandconstrainedbyinnate

    patternsandthemoregeneraleffectsofcategorisingoneselfaspartofagroup.

    Sociallearningissometimespresentedasanalternativetoevolutionaryorself-

    categorizationaccountsbutwerejectthisdichotomy.Sociallearningcanhelp

    explainhowtheboundariesandassociationsofspecificcategoriesare

    constructedwithinagivenindividualandhowthatconstructionisinfluencedby

    theenvironment.Socialcategoriesandthecognitivemechanismsthatsupport

    themcan,inturn,shapechildren’ssubsequentlearning(Bigler&Liben,2007;

    Gelmanetal.,2004;Oostenbroek&Over,2016;Rhodes,etal.2012).

    Wehaveofferedasociallearningaccountofintergroupbiasthat,liketraditional

    sociallearningaccounts,emphasizestheculturalenvironmentasanimportant

    contributingfactortointergroupbias.Wehaveaddedtothistraditionby

    incorporatingrecentadvancesindevelopmentalandsocialpsychology.For

    example,wehavehighlightedtheeffectsofsubtleexpressionsofintergroup

    biasesaswellasmoreexplicitformsofcommunication(Weisbuchetal.,2009;

    Skinneretal,2016).Inaddition,wehaveemphasisedworkdemonstratingthat

    sociallearningisnotrestrictedtosimplemimicry(Overetal.,2017).Finally,

    ratherthanpostulatingapassiveroleforthechildintheculturaltransmission

    process,wehaveemphasisedthatchildrenareactiveagentswhomakechoices

    aboutwhatinformationtheyconsumeandhowtheycommunicatewithothers

    (Bigler&Liben,2007;Palucketal.,2016).

  • 19

    Attitudesandbehaviourstowardsdifferentgroupscanbetransmittedbetween

    andacrossgenerationsthroughmultipledifferentmechanisms.Our

    understandingofthesemechanismsnecessarilyshapesthewaysinwhichwetry

    (orfail)tointervenetopreventormitigateintergroupbias.Developmental

    psychologyhasacriticalroletoplayinidentifyingeffectivepsychological

    interventionsforreducingprejudiceanddiscriminationinthenextgeneration.

  • 20

    References

    Aboud,F.E.(1988).ChildrenandPrejudice.NewYork:BasilBlackwell.

    Aboud,F.E.,&Doyle,A.B.(1996).Parentalandpeerinfluencesonchildren's

    racialattitudes.InternationalJournalofInterculturalRelations,20,371-383.

    Allport,G.A.(1954).Thenatureofprejudice.Cambridge,Mass:Addison-Wesley.

    Bandura,A.(1977).Sociallearningtheory.EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:PrenticeHall.

    Banerjee,R.,&Lintern,V.(2000).Boyswillbeboys:Theeffectofsocial

    evaluationconcernsongender-typing.SocialDevelopment,9,397-408.

    Bar-Haim,Y.,Ziv,T.,Lamy,D.,&Hodes,R.(2006).Natureandnurtureinown-

    racefaceprocessing.PsychologicalScience,17,159–163.

    Baron,A.S.,&Banaji,M.R.(2006).Thedevelopmentofimplicitattitudes:

    Evidenceofraceevaluationsfromages6,10&adulthood.Psychological

    Science,17,53-58.

    Bian,L.,Leslie,S.-J.,&Cimpian,A.(2017).Genderstereotypesaboutintellectual

    abilityemergeearlyandinfluencechildren’sinterests.Science,355,389–

    391.

    Bigler,R.S.,&Leaper,C.(2015).Genderedlanguage:Psychologicalprinciples,

    evolvingpractices,andinclusivepolicies.PolicyInsightsfromBehavioral

    andBrainSciences,2,187-194.

    Bigler,R.S.,&Liben,L.S.(2006).Adevelopmentalintergrouptheoryofsocial

    stereotypesandprejudice.AdvancesinChildDevelopmentandBehavior,34,

    39-89.

    Bigler,R.S.,&Liben,L.S.(2007).Developmentalintergrouptheory:Explaining

    andreducingchildren'ssocialstereotypingandprejudice.Current

    DirectionsinPsychologicalScience,16,162-166.

    Bliuc,A.M.,McGarty,C.,Thomas,E.F.,Lala,G.,Berndsen,M.,&Misajon,R.

    (2015).Publicdivisionaboutclimatechangerootedinconflictingsocio-

    politicalidentities.NatureClimateChange,5,226-229.

    Buttelmann,D.&Boehm,R.(2014).Theontogenyofthemotivationthat

    underliesin-groupbias.PsychologicalScience,25,921-927.

    Cameron,L.,Rutland,A.,Brown,R.J.,&Douch,R.(2006).Changingchildren’s

    intergroupattitudestowardrefugees:Testingdifferentmodelsofextended

    contact.ChildDevelopment,77,1208–1219.

  • 21

    Carpenter,M.(2006).Instrumental,social,andsharedgoalsandintentionsin

    imitation.InS.J.Rogers&J.Williams(Eds.),Imitationandthedevelopment

    ofthesocialmind:Lessonsfromtypicaldevelopmentandautism(pp.48-70).

    NewYork:Guilford.

    Carpenter,M.,&Call,J.(2002).Thechemistryofsociallearning:Commentaryon

    Want&Harris(2002).DevelopmentalScience,5,22-24.

    Castelli,L.,DeDea,C.,&Nesdale,D.(2008).Learningsocialattitudes:Children's

    sensitivitytotheverbalandnonverbalbehaviorsofadultmodelsduring

    interracialinteractions.PersonalityandSocialPsychologyBulletin,34,223-

    237.

    Chudek,M.,Heller,S.,Birch,S.,&Henrich,J.(2012).Prestige-biasedcultural

    learning:bystander'sdifferentialattentiontopotentialmodelsinfluences

    children'slearning.EvolutionandHumanBehavior,33,46-56.

    Conway,L.G.,III,&Schaller,M.(2007).Howcommunicationshapesculture.InK.

    Fiedler(Ed.),Socialcommunication(pp.107–127).NewYork:Psychology

    Press.

    Crabb,P.B.&Bielawski,D(1994).Thesocialrepresentationofmaterialculture

    andgenderinchildren’sbooks.SexRoles,30,69-79.

    Dalhouse,M.,&Frideres,J.S.(1996).Intergenerationalcongruency:Theroleof

    thefamilyinpoliticalattitudesofyouth.JournalofFamilyIssues,17,227–

    248.

    Degner,J.,&Dalege,J.(2013).Theappledoesnotfallfarfromthetree,ordoes

    it?Ameta-analysisofparent–childsimilarityinintergroupattitudes.

    PsychologicalBulletin,139,1270.

    Devine,P.G.(1989).Stereotypesandprejudice:theirautomaticandcontrolled

    components.JournalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology,56,5-18.

    Dovidio,J.F.,Brigham,J.C.,Johnson,B.T.,&Gaertner,S.L.(1996).Stereotyping,

    prejudice,anddiscrimination:Anotherlook.Stereotypesandstereotyping,

    276,319.

    Dunham,Y.(inpress).Intergroupcognition.ToappearinH.Callan(Ed.),

    InternationalEncyclopediaofAnthropology:CognitiveAnthropology,

    London:Wiley.

  • 22

    Dunham,Y.,Baron,A.S.,&Banaji,M.R.(2008).Thedevelopmentofimplicit

    intergroupcognition.TrendsinCognitiveSciences,12,248-253.

    Dunham,Y.,Baron,A.S.,&Carey,S.(2011).Consequencesof"minimal"group

    affiliationsinchildren.ChildDevelopment,82,793-811.

    Engelmann,J.M.,Herrmann,E.,&Tomasello,M.(2017).Concernforgroup

    reputationincreasesprosocialityinyoungchildren.Psychological

    Science.Advanceonlinepublication.

    Engelmann,J.M.,&Rapp,D.(2018).Theinfluenceofreputationalconcernson

    children'sprosociality.CurrentOpinioninPsychology,20,92-95.

    Fagot,B.I.(1977).Consequencesofmoderatecross-genderbehaviourin

    preschoolchildren.ChildDevelopment,48,902-907.

    Fishbein,H.(1996).Peerprejudiceanddiscrimination.Boulder,CO:Westview

    Press.

    Fridland,E.&Moore,R.(2014).Imitationreconsidered.Philosophical

    Psychology,28,856-880.

    Flerx,V.C.,Fidler,D.S.,&Rogers,R.W.(1976).Sexrolestereotypes:

    Developmentalaspectsandearlyintervention.ChildDevelopment,47,998-

    1007.

    Flynn,E.G.,Laland,K.N.,Kendal,R.L.,&Kendal,J.R.(2013).Developmentalniche

    construction.DevelopmentalScience,16,296-313.

    Gelman,S.A.,Taylor,MG.,&Nguyen,S.(2004).Mother-childconversations

    aboutgender:Understandingtheacquisitionofessentialist

    beliefs.MonographsoftheSocietyforResearchinChildDevelopment,69,1-

    127.

    Gergely,G.,Bekkering,H.,&Király,I.(2002).Rationalimitationinpreverbal

    infants.Nature,415,755.

    Goldin,C.(2014).Agrandgenderconvergence:Itslastchapter.American

    EconomicReview,104,1091–1119.

    Hainsworth,P.(2016).Thepoliticsoftheextremeright.Fromthemarginstothe

    mainstream.Pinter,London.

    Hamilton,M.C.,Anderson,D.,Broaddus,M.,&Young,K.(2006).Gender

    stereotypingandunder-representationoffemalecharactersin200popular

  • 23

    children’spicturebooks:Atwenty-firstcenturyupdate.SexRoles,55,757-

    65.

    Harris,P.L.(2007).Trust.DevelopmentalScience,10,135-138.

    Harris,J.(1998).Thenurtureassumption:Whychildrenturnoutthewaytheydo.

    NewYork:Touchstone.

    Haslam,N.,&Loughnan,S.(2014).Dehumanizationandinfrahumanization.

    AnnualReviewofPsychology,65,399-423.

    Horner,V.,&Whiten,A.(2005).Causalknowledgeandimitationemulation

    switchinginchimpanzees(Pantro-glodytes)andchildren(Homosapiens).

    AnimalCognition,8,164–181.

    Kahan,D.M.,Peters,E.,Wittlin,M.,Slovic,P.,Ouellette,L.L.,Braman,D.,&Mandel,

    G.(2012).Thepolarizingimpactofscienceliteracyandnumeracyon

    perceivedclimatechangerisks.NatureClimateChange,2,732–735.

    Kashima,Y.(2008).Maintainingculturalstereotypesintheserialreproduction

    ofnarratives.PersonalityandSocialPsychologyBulletin,26,594-604.

    Killen,M.,&Rutland,A.(2011).Childrenandsocialexclusion:Morality,prejudice,

    andgroupidentity.NewYork,NY:Wiley/Blackwell.

    Lurye,L.E.,Zosuls,K.M.,&Ruble,D.N.(2008).Genderidentityandadjustment:

    Understandingtheimpactofindividualandnormativedifferencesinsex

    typing.Newdirectionsforchildandadolescentdevelopment,(120),31-46.

    Killen,M.&Verkuyten,M.(2017).Theimportanceofsocial-cognitive

    developmentandthedevelopmentalcontextforgroupdynamics.Group

    ProcessesandIntergroupRelations.Advanceonlinepublication.

    Kinzler,K.D.,Dupoux,E.,&Spelke,E.S.(2007).Thenativelanguageofsocial

    cognition.TheProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnited

    StatesofAmerica,104,12577-12580.

    Lewis,G.J.&Bates,T.C.(2010).Geneticevidenceformultiplebiological

    mechanismsunderlyingingroupfavoritism.PsychologicalScience,21,

    1623-1628.

    Leyens,J.Ph.,Paladino,M.P.,Rodriguez,R.T.,Vaes,J.,Demoulin,S.,Rodriguez,A.

    P.,&Gaunt,R.(2000).Theemotionalsideofprejudice:Theattributionof

    secondaryemotionstoingroupsandoutgroups.PersonalityandSocial

    PsychologyReview,4,186-197.

  • 24

    Liben,L.S.,Bigler,R.S.,&Krogh,H.R.(2001).Pinkandbluecollarjobs:

    Children'sjudgmentsofjobstatusandjobaspirationsinrelationtosexof

    worker.JournalofExperimentalChildPsychology,79,346-363.

    Lyons,D.E.,Young,A.G.,&Keil,F.C.(2007).Thehiddenstructureof

    overimitation.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnited

    StatesofAmerica,104,19751–19756.

    Mahajan,N.,&Wynn,K.(2012).Originsof“Us”versus“Them”:Prelinguistic

    infantsprefersimilarothers.Cognition,124,227-233.

    McLoughlin,N.,&Over,H.(2017).Youngchildrenaremorelikelyto

    spontaneouslyattributementalstatestomembersoftheirowngroup.

    PsychologicalScience.Advanceonlinepublication.

    McLoughlin,N.,&Over,H.(2018).Encouragingchildrentomentaliseabouta

    perceivedoutgroupincreasesempathichelpingtowardsthem.Manuscript

    submittedforpublication.

    Meltzoff,A.N.(1995).Understandingtheintentionsofothers:Re-enactmentof

    intendedactsby18-month-oldchildren.DevelopmentalPsychology,31,

    838-850.

    Misch,A.,Over,H.,&Carpenter,M.(2016).Iwon’ttell:Youngchildrenshow

    loyaltytotheirgroupbykeepinggroupsecrets.JournalofExperimental

    ChildPsychology,142,96-106

    Nagell,K.,Olguin,K.,&Tomasello,M.(1993).Processesofsociallearninginthe

    tooluseofchimpanzees(Pantroglodytes)andhumanchildren(Homo

    sapiens).JournalofComparativePsychology,107,174-186.

    Olson,K.R.,Dweck,C.S.,Spelke,E.S.,&Banaji,M.R.(2011).Children'sresponses

    togroup-basedinequalities:Perpetuationandrectification.Social

    Cognition,29,271-288.

    Oostenbroek,J.,&Over,H.(2016).Theculturaltransmissionofsocial

    information.InS.S.Obhi&E.S.Cross(Eds.)SharedRepresentations:

    SensorimotorFoundationsofSocialLife.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity

    Press,pp.136-151.

    Operario,Don,andSusanT.Fiske."Stereotypes:Content,structures,processes,

    andcontext."Blackwellhandbookofsocialpsychology:Intergroupprocesses

    1(2001):22-44.

  • 25

    Over,H.(2018).Theinfluenceofgroupmembershiponyoungchildren’s

    prosociality.CurrentOpinioninPsychology,20,17-20.

    Over,H.,Eggleston,A.,Bell,J.,&Dunham,Y.(2017).Youngchildrenseekout

    biasedinformationaboutsocialgroups.DevelopmentalScience.Advance

    onlinepublication.

    Over,H.,&Carpenter,M.(2012).Puttingthesocialintosociallearning:

    Explainingbothselectivityandfidelityinchildren'scopyingbehavior.

    JournalofComparativePsychology,126,182-192.

    Over,H.,&Carpenter,M.(2013).Thesocialsideofimitation.ChildDevelopment

    Perspectives,7,6-11.

    Over,H.&Cook,R.(2017).Wheredospontaneousfirstimpressionsoffacescome

    from?Manuscriptsubmittedforpublication.

    Paluck,E.L.(2016).Howtoovercomeprejudice.Science,352,147.

    Paluck,E.L.,&Green,D.P.(2009).Prejudicereduction:Whatworks?Acritical

    lookatevidencefromthefieldandthelaboratory.AnnualReviewof

    Psychology,60,339-367.

    Paluck,E.L.,Shepherd,H.,&Aronow,P.(2016).Changingclimatesofconflict:A

    socialnetworkexperimentin56schools.ProceedingsoftheNational

    AcademyofSciences,113,566-571.

    Pascoe,E.A.,&SmartRichman,L.(2009).Perceiveddiscriminationandhealth:a

    meta-analyticreview.PsychologicalBulletin,135,531-554.

    Ploetner,M.,Over,H.,Carpenter,M.,&Tomasello,M.(2015).Youngchildren

    showthebystandereffectinhelpingsituations.PsychologicalScience,

    26,499-506.

    Rakoczy,H.,Warneken,F.,&Tomasello,M.(2008).Thesourcesofnormativity:

    Youngchildren’sawarenessofthenormativestructureofgames.

    DevelopmentalPsychology,44,875-81.

    Rhodes,M.,Leslie,S.J.,&Tworek,C.(2012).Culturaltransmissionofsocial

    essentialism.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences,109,13526-

    13531.

    Segall,G.,Birnbaum,D.,Deeb,I.,&Diesendruck,G.(2014).Theintergenerational

    transmissionofethnicessentialism:Howparentstalkcountsthe

    most.DevelopmentalScience,18,543-555.

  • 26

    Schau,C.G.,&Scott,K.P.(1984).ImpactofGenderCharacteristicsof

    InstructionalMaterials:AnIntegrationoftheResearchLiterature.Journal

    ofEducationalPsychology,76,183-193.

    Shutts,K.,Banaji,M.R.,&Spelke,E.S.(2010).Socialcategoriesguideyoung

    children'spreferencesfornovelobjects.DevelopmentalScience,13,599-

    610.

    Shutts,K.,Roben,C.K.P.,&Spelke,E.S.(2013).Children'suseofsocialcategories

    inthinkingaboutpeopleandsocialrelationships.JournalofCognitionand

    Development,14,35-62.

    Sierksma,J.,Thijs,J.,&Verkuyten,M.(2014).In-groupbiasinchildren’s

    intentiontohelpcanbeoverpoweredbyinducingempathy.BritishJournal

    ofDevelopmentalPsychology,33,45-56.

    Skinner,A.L.,Meltzoff,A.N.,&Olson,K.R.(2016).“Catching”socialbias:Exposure

    tobiasednonverbalsignalscreatessocialbiasesinpreschool

    children.PsychologicalScience,28,216-224.

    Smith,E.R.,&Mackie,D.M.(2007).Socialpsychology(3rded.).Philadelphia,PA:

    PsychologyPress.

    Tajfel,H.(1970).Experimentsinintergroupdiscrimination.ScientificAmerican,

    223,96-102.

    Tirrell,L.(2012).Genocidallanguagegames.InI.Maitra&M.K.McGowan(Eds.),

    SpeechandHarm:ControversiesOverFreeSpeech(pp.174-221).Oxford:

    OxfordUniversityPress.

    Tomasello,M.(2016).Anaturalhistoryofhumanmorality.Cambridge,MA:

    HarvardUniversityPress.

    Townsend,S.S.,Major,B.,Gangi,C.E.,&Mendes,W.B.(2011).From“intheair”

    to“undertheskin”:Cortisolresponsestosocialidentitythreat.Personality

    andSocialPsychologyBulletin,37,151-164.

    Turner,J.C.(1999).Currentissuesinresearchonsocialidentityandself-

    categorizationtheories.InN.Ellemers,R.Spears,&B.Doosje(Eds.),Social

    identity:Context,commitment,content(pp.6-34)Oxford,UK.Blackwell.

    U.S.CensusBureau.(2011).Income,poverty,andhealthinsurancecoverageinthe

    UnitedStates:2010.Retrievedfrom

    http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/income.html

  • 27

    Weisbuch,M.,Pauker,K.,&Ambady,N.(2009).Thesubtletransmissionofrace

    biasviatelevisednonverbalbehavior.Science,326,1711-1714.

    Werkman,W.M.,Wigboldus,D.H.J.,&Semin,G.R.(1999).Children’s

    communicationofthelinguisticintergroupbiasanditsimpactupon

    cognitiveinferences.EuropeanJournalofSocialPsychology,29,95-104.

    Word,C.O.,Zanna,M.P.,&Cooper,J.(1974).Thenonverbalmediationofself-

    fulfillingpropheciesininterracialinteraction.JournalofExperimental

    SocialPsychology,10,109–120.

    Yanagizawa-Drott,D.(2014).Propagandaandconflict:Evidencefromthe

    Rwandangenocide.TheQuarterlyJournalofEconomics,129,1947-1994.

  • 28

    Figure.Examplesofsociallearningprocessesandthenegativeconsequences

    thatcanbetheresult.