Upload
gwendoline-hicks
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Becky Martin Continuous Improvement FacilitatorPaul Hayes Secondary Student Services Facilitator
17th National Quality Education Conference October 2009 Jacksonville, FL
Amy Russell CI Curriculum Facilitator
Steph Stulken Teacher and CI Trainer
Formative Assessment Formative Assessment Using Quality ToolsUsing Quality Tools
What do we want to know or be able to do at the end of the session?
Learning Outcomes
Explore a process and strategies for formative/in-process measures
Pair quality tools with assessment for learning Build student confidence and motivation for
achievement with formative assessment
Video Clip
Pre Planning: Identification of Need1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments3. Review assessment data4. Identify areas of need based on assessment
Plan:1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram)3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Why’s, Relations Diagram)4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need
DO1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan)2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity4. Assess student learning
Study:1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline)2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on
student achievement
Act:1. Standardize the implementation of research-based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system)2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes)
Action ResearchOverview
for Professional
Learning Communitie
s
Identify areas of Identify areas of strength and weakness?strength and weakness?
WhatWhat do they know? do they know?WhatWhat have they learned? have they learned?
Most effective/best practice Most effective/best practice teaching and learning strategies?teaching and learning strategies?
Have they learned it?Have they learned it?What do we do if they don’t?What do we do if they don’t?
Formative Assessment Collection of practices with a common
feature: they all lead to some action that improves learning.
Formal and informal processes teachers and students use to gather evidence for the purpose of improving learning
Rick Stiggins
Characteristics of Formative Assessment In-process measures Throughout the teaching/learning process Indicators of progress during the learning
process Used diagnose student needs Checks for understanding Assessments that support the learner
For the learner Engage students in their own learning Ongoing review of my progress Supports my learning Extends my learning
“I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make them think.”
Socrates (BC 469- BC 399)
Classroom Uses of Assessment
SUMMATIVESUMMATIVE Assessments Assessments OFOF LearningLearning
How much have students learned as of a particular point in time?
FORMATIVEFORMATIVE Assessments Assessments FORFOR LearningLearning
How can we use assessment information to help students learn more?
Rick Stiggins Assessment for Learning
Use Formative Assessment as a Regular Practice
How much do I know about this? How skilled am I at doing this? How often do I do this?
Respond~
Routinely = Green Dot
Sometimes = Yellow Dot
Seldom-just thinking about it =Red Dot
Providing Effective Feedback on Student Work
How much do I know about this? How skilled am I at doing this? How often do I do this?
Respond~
Routinely = Green Dot
Sometimes = Yellow Dot
Seldom-just thinking about it =Red Dot
Using Formative Assessment Information in Instructional
Planning
How much do I know about this? How skilled am I at doing this? How often do I do this?
Respond~
Routinely = Green Dot
Sometimes = Yellow Dot
Seldom-just thinking about it =Red Dot
Taft Middle School Improvement Plan
2008-2009
Excellence for All
To create an environment where respect, responsibility, and learning are valued and celebrated
Customer Satisfaction Data-Driven Decisions
Learning for All Teamwork
Visionary Leadership
Reading Comprehension By June of 2009, non -proficient student sub groups (identified by the Scholastic Reading Inventory administered in the Spring of 2008) at Taft Middle School will improve their reading skills as measured by an increase in the percentage of students reading within their grade level "proficient "or "advanced" range on the SRI.
Mathematics During the 2008 -2009 school year, the perc entage of Taft students proficient in estimation and problem solving skills will be at or above 80% as measured by bi -monthly Taft Estimating/Problem Solving Skills Tests.
Social, Emotional, Behavioral - School Climate • During the 2008 -2009 school year, t he num ber of Taft Middle School students who receive of fice
referrals for inappropriate behav ior, disrespect, or classroom disrupt ions will decrease by 5% from the 2007 -2008 school year as m easured by the num ber of referrals on record in the m ain of fice.
• During the 2008 -2009 school year, the num ber of Taft Middle School students who are engaged in co- curricular or ex tra curricular act iv it ies will increase by 5% as m easured by the results of a Zoom erang survey adm inistered to all students.
Continuous Imp rovement
VISION
TAFT MISSION
CORE VALUES
TAFT MIDDLE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GOALS
GUIDING PHILOSOPHY
Pierce Improvement Plan 2008-2009
VISION
PIERCE MISSION
CORE VALUES
PIERCE IMPROVEMENT GOALS
GUIDING PHI LOSOPHY
Continuous Improvement
Customer Satisfaction Data-Driven Decisions
Learning for All Teamwork
Visionary Leadership
Excellence for All
The mission of the Pierce community is to produce lifelong learners and responsible citizens through a commitment to continuous improvement and quality education.
Reading Comprehension By June 2009, all elementary classrooms in the Cedar Rapids community School District will implement the District literacy program with integrity and fidelity as meas ured by classroom walkthroughs, the administration of unit assessments and teacher self -assessments. Math Concepts and Estimation During the 2008 -09 school year the percentage of proficient students (as indicated by the I TBS Math Problem Solving and Data I nterpretation and District grade -level assessments) at Pierce Elementary School will increase by 3% as measured by the I TBS and District math assessments. Social, Emotional, Behavioral - School Climate During the 200 8-09 school year, Pierce students will increase r espect ful behavior measured by a 5% increase in students who receive zero office referrals as shown by the SWI S System .
Truman Elementary School Improvement Plan 2008-2009
Excellence for All
The Truman community will work together to accomplish its mission of promoting student growth and responsible citizens by using
quality data tools.
Customer Satisfa ction Data-Driven Decisions
Learning for All Teamwork
Visionary Leadership
Reading
By June 5, 2009, all elementary classrooms in the Cedar Rapids Community School District will implement the District literacy program with integrity and fidelity as
measured by classroom walkthroughs, the administration of unit assessments and teacher self -assessments.
Math
By June 5, 2009, K-5 students at Truman Elementary School will increase problem solving skills as measured by a 5% increase on weekly problem solvi ng assessments.
Social, Emotional, Behavioral
By June 5, 2009, AK -5 students at Truman Elementary School will increase appropriate social skills by a 5% increase as measured by the respect behavioral expectations on the
district progress report.
Continu ous Improvement
VISION
TRUMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MISSION
CORE VALUES
TRUMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GOALS
GUIDING PHILOSOPHY
Mr. Probert’s Class Improvement Plan 2007-2008
Excellence for All
The mission of the proud members of Room 205 is to keep getting better at all subjects by staying focused on our work, not giving up, and not procrastinating .
1. Work q uietly
2. Cooperate with others
Reading Comprehension All students will average 80% or higher on in - process comprehension checks by the end of the second trimester . Reading Fluency The class will average 130 wpm or higher on in -process fluency check s by the end of the second trimester . Math Secure Goals All students will average 70% or higher on in - process secure goal checks by the end of the second trimester . Math Basic Facts All students will average 95% or higher on monthly addition, subtracti on, and multiplication tests, and 85% or higher on monthly division tests by the end of the second trimester .
Continuous Improvement
VISION
MISSION
GROUND RULES
IMPROVEMENT GOALS
GUIDING PHILOSOPHY
Classroom Data Center
Math Computation During the 2006-2007 school year, the percentage of
students scoring in the high and intermediate math total proficiency
levels will increase by 5% as measured by the district math
assessments and ITBS.
Pre Planning: Identification of Need1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments3. Review assessment data4. Identify areas of need based on assessment
Plan:1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram)3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Why’s, Relations Diagram)4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need
DO1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan)2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity4. Assess student learning
Study:1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline)2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on
student achievement
Act:1. Standardize the implementation of research-based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system)2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes)
Action ResearchOverview
SMART Goal - SIP to Classroom Original: During the 2007-08 school year, SAMPLE
school will increase students’ proficiency in math estimation skills in the non-proficient student subgroups as measured by the ITBS estimation sub-test assessment
will improve their understanding of estimation strategies as measured by accurately answering the questions on the biweekly check tests.
Student Friendly: This year, the 7th grade class…
September Baseline 68 %
1st Trimester %
2nd Trimester %
3rd Trimester %
SMART Goal - SIP to Classroom
will improve their understanding of estimation strategies as measured by accurately answering the questions on the biweekly check tests.
Student Friendly: This year, the 7th grade class…
Student Goal (in data folder): This year, I will focus on getting better using estimation strategies. I will measure how I’m doing by keeping track of the number and types of errors I have on the biweekly check tests. My goal is to consistently score X% correct the first trimester.
Classroom PDSA
In-Process Measure Example
Estimation Check Sheet Weekly Class
ErrorsHour 1 - Mr. Albert
Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 6
Total1-6
Week 12-Sep 19-Sep 29-Sep 3-Oct 10-Oct 17-Oct
Addition 2 2 1 1 0 0 6
Subtraction 2 2 3 1 2 1 11
Multiplication 7 8 7 8 7 7 44
Division 10 11 10 11 12 10 64
Application 11 11 10 11 12 12 67
28 students
Total Errors 32 34 31 32 33 30 192
Number of Students 28 28 28 28 28 28
Estimation Check SheetHour 1 - Class Errors
15
20
25
30
35
40
9/12 9/19 9/26 10/3 10/10 10/17
Total Number of Errors
Estimation Check Sheet SkillsWeeks 1- 6
67 64 44 11 6 192
35%
68%
91%
97%100%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Application Division Multiplication Subtraction Addition Total N
Item
Numbe of Errors
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percentage
This bar represents the total (N) of your pareto.
Secure Math Learning Goals
Goal: 80% or better 10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Number correct
1f Draw arrays
to model multiplicati on
1g Know
multiplication facts
1h Identify even and
odd numbers
1i Find the factors
of numbers
2f Find the sum and
difference of
multidigit whole
numbers and
decimals
2g Identify
the maximum, minimum, median,
mode and mean fro a data set
3f Identify
place value in numbers
to billions
3g Know
properties of
polygons
3h Define and create
tessellations
4h Know
place value to the
hundredths
“The primary purpose of formative assessment
is to improve learning.”
“Classroom assessment for student learning turns the classroom assessment process
and its results into instructional strategies
designed to increase, not merely monitor, student learning,
confidence and motivation.”
~ Rick Stiggins
4 PLC Questions What do we want each students to know
or be able to do? How will we know they have learned?
What evidence do we have of the learning?
How do we respond when students don’t learn or struggle?
How do we respond to those who have already learned?
Student Learning ExpectationsStudent Learning Expectations
Formative AssessmentFormative Assessment
Pyramid Of InterventionPyramid Of Intervention
Student QuestionsWhat do I need to know ?Where am I now?How do I get there?What happens if I struggle or
fail?
Keys to moving to the next levelRubric system Scaffold, deconstruct, unwrap,
unpack Using materials embedded in
curriculum
Rubric Based Marzano’s Model
I Can Rubric
Skill: Skill Indicators:
4ExpertExceeds
I understand completely! I can do it without making mistakes. I can help others.
5 or more events in order
3MasterProficient
I understand the important ideas.I can do it by myself. Once in awhile, I make little or careless mistakes.
4 events in order
2ApprenticeDeveloping
I’m getting there! My mistakes show I understand most of the important ideas. Sometimes I need help.
3 events in order
1NoviceBeginning
I don’t understand yet. I can’t do it by myself.My mistakes show that I have trouble with the important ideas.
1-2 events given, may not be in order