Upload
tracen
View
25
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
East Halls . Green Redesign. Michael Sarcona, Brad Cronin, Chris Guyan, & Shane Davis Class of 2015. Problem . Solved. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
…Because the next generation of building is restorative.Green Redesign
East Halls
After the last few decades, in direct relation with industrial development, the environment has been negatively affected. The environment does not have a voice of its own, and for this reason it is in our hands as living intellect to establish a more stable and sustainable community. In order to contribute to environmental relief, the Green Dorm Project was developed. The development and the re-conceptualization of the halls will better the Penn State community and set a standard for other universities to come. The new Penn State East Halls renovation is a green step in the right direction for our world.
Problem After assessing customer needs our team decided that our design would be focused on environment impact. High efficiency would also play a key role in the overall design of the buildings. To achieve these goals our design will contain green, energy efficient applications. Implementing a roof garden would help to utilize water runoff. Over more, the implementation of solar panels and awnings for the windows would greatly reduce the energy usage of the building. Small devices will be installed in every room in order to display and monitor the energy usage. These additions and much more will be used in the redesign of East Halls to make environmental impact minimal and the Penn State community more sustainable.
Solved
1. Environmental Impact (0.60) 1.1 Low Utility Use 1.2 Cost Efficiency C.1 Small Carbon Footprint C.2 Sustainable Materials 1.3 Local Materials 2. Residential Amenities (0.20) F.1 Movable furniture 2.1 Upgraded Bathrooms F.2 Low Water Use 2.2 Indoor Bike Storage System 2.3 Purifying water filling station (per floor)3. Residential Comfort(0.20) 3.1 Lounge/Study room 3.2 Communal Kitchen (per building) 4. High Efficiency (0.40) 4.1 Rooftop Garden 4.2 Solar Panels 4.3 Sun Visor Awnings
Weighted Hierarchal Customer Needs List Morphological Chart
Concept Heating/Energy System
Features Flooring Insulation
1 Lenox SLP98V Rooftop Garden Recycled Tiles
Polyurethane Foam Board
2 Lenox G61MPV Indoor Bike-rack Reclaimed Wood
Cotton Fiber Insulation
3 Energy Star Furnace
Tinted Windows Ceramic Tiles
Cellulose Insulation
4 Solar Motion Sensor Lights
Porcelain Tiles
“I’d rather have a dorm TWICE the size but with
4 people” Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Environmental Impact
Residential Amenities
Residential Comfort
High Efficiency
Total Weighting
Environmental Impact
1.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 9.00 0.60
Residential Amenities
0.33 1.00 1.00 0.50 2.83 0.20
Residential Comfort
0.33 1.00 1.00 0.50 2.83 0.20
High Efficiency
0.50 2.00 2.00 1.00 5.50 0.40
AHP Pairwise Comparison Chart to Determine
• Lenox SLP98V• Rooftop Garden • Indoor Bike-rack• Motion Light Sensors• Wattage Meters • Awnings (sun visors)• Solar Panels• Energy Efficient Windows• High Efficiency washer/dryers • High Efficiency Faucets and Toilets • Reclaimed Wood• Polyurethane Insulation
Key Selected Concepts
Michael Sarcona, Brad Cronin, Chris Guyan, & Shane Davis
Class of 2015
Concept Generation