Upload
rochelle-arayata-aguilar
View
55
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation of recently conducted consultations with barangay disaster risk reduction and management committees.
Citation preview
Barangay Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Committees
CONSULTATION MEETINGAngeles City Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Office
JANUARY 22, 2013Conference Room, Office of the Mayor
ANGELES CITY
PROGRAM
Invocation
Introductions
Consultation Meeting
Meeting Objectives
1. To share highlights/overview and coordinate ACDRRMC Plans and Programs for 2013
2. Update and to consolidate information on barangay disaster risk reduction and management efforts and initiatives, present status and capability of BDRRMCs, and the organizing of Emergency Response Teams
3. Identify areas of mutually-reinforcing partnerships and support between ACDRRMC and BDRRMCs
Proposed Agenda1. Quick review of NDRRMP Framework and Targets
2. Updates on ACDRRMO Status and Highlights of 2013 Plans, Programs and Activities
3. Sharing of Accomplishment Reports of the BDRRMCs including:– Development and Implementation of BDRRMPs– DRRM initiatives, including reaching out to the private
sector and the local civil society organizations– Organizing and training of local Community
Emergency Response Teams (CERT)
4. Discussion on enhancement of City Government support / assistance to key areas of BDRRMCs Plans and Programs and vise versa
A QUICK REVIEW OF THE
NDRRMP FRAMEWORK
PRINCIPLES AND TARGETS AS BASIS OF LGU (City & Barangays)
DRRM PLANS AND PROGRAMS
PRINCIPLES of NDRRMF
• In conformity with and captures the essence and priorities of Republic Act 10121 – Empowering leaders and communities – Building back better – Being adaptive– Using and understanding the right information
PRINCIPLES of NDRRMF• Paradigm shift: from reactive to
proactive DRR and Climate Change
Top-down and decentralized disaster management
Bottom-up and participatory disaster risk
reduction
Disasters are merely a function of physical hazards
Disaster mainly a reflection of people’s
vulnerability
Focus on disaster response and anticipation
Integrated approach to genuine social and human
development to reduce disaster risk
• Invest in disaster prevention and mitigation, preparedness and climate change adaptation (DRR, CC info, EWS, Search and Rescue, capacity building, others)Prepare for disastersMitigate the potential impacts of existing disasters and
climate risksPrevent hazards from becoming disastersSubstantially reduce loss of lives and damages to social,
economic and environmental assets.
PRINCIPLES of NDRRMF
SHIFT FROM THIS…
Response
Rehabilitation
and Recovery
Preparedness
Prevention and
Mitigation
RESOURCE INVESTMENT
Through the process of
BOTTOM-UP PARTICIPATORY
PROCESS
RISK FACTORSHazards
ExposuresVulnerabilities
Capacities
Mainstreaming DRR and CCA in
Planning and Implementation
LAND USE PLAN
BUILDING CODE
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
RISK
ASSESSMENTS
CAPACITY BUILDING
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
ORDERS AND LEGISLATIONS
PREPAREDNESS CAMPAIG
N
ALL STAKEHOLDERS (LGUs and AGENCIES, CSOs, PRIVATE
SECTOR, INSTITUTIONS)
EARLY WARNING SYSTEM
… to this
Preven-tion and Mitiga-
tion
Preparedness
Response
Recovery and Rehabilitation
RESOURCE INVESTMENT
RISK FACTORSHazards
ExposuresVulnerabilities
Capacities
Mainstreaming DRR and CCA in
planning and implementation
SAFER, ADAPTIVE AND DISASTER RESILIENT FILIPINO COMMUNITIES TOWARD SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
BOTTOM – UP PARTICIPATORY PROCESS
SAFERMen and women have increased awareness and understanding of DRRM and are now more prepared and away from harm when disaster strikes
ADAPTIVE
People and communities are better empowered to quickly adjust to new conditions; increased resilience and decrease in vulnerabilities; involves the right mindset; “building back better”, learning to innovate and go to the next level
DISASTERRESILIENT
Successful risk reduction efforts, instilling the culture of safety among the people enabling them to be stronger with increased ability to bounce back after the disaster
FILIPINO COMMUNITIES
Filipino men and women of all ages, sectors and localities; it reinforces the overall approach in DRRM which is community-based or according to the strengths, cultural /and or local contexts of the people
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Ties all DRRM and CCA efforts, mainstreamed and integrated in all development policies and plans of local governments and communities
DRRM ASPECTS, OUTCOMES
AND KEY AREA
RESULTS
PREVENTION AND MITIGATION
• Mainstreamed and Integrated DRRM and CCA in local development policies, plans and budgets
• DRRM / CCA sensitive environment management
• Increased disaster resiliency of infrastructure systems
• Community-based and scientific DRR/CCA assessments, mapping,
analysis and monitoring• Risk Transfer Mechanisms
• Avoided hazards and mitigated their potential impacts by reducing vulnerabilities and exposure and enhancing capacities of communities
EXPECTED OUTCOME KEY RESULTS AREA
PREPAREDNESS
• Established and strengthened capacities of communities to anticipate, cope and recover from negative impacts of emergency occurrences and disasters
• Community awareness and understanding of the risk factors
• Contingency Planning at the local level, incl. ICS, EWS, Pre-emptive evac., stockpiling and equipping
• Local drills and simulation exercises
• Local disaster response planning
EXPECTED OUTCOME KEY RESULTS AREA
• Provided life preservation and met the basic subsistence needs of basic population based on acceptable standards during or immediately after a disaster
• Disaster Assessment and Needs Analysis (DANA)
• Relief Operations• Search, Rescue and
Retrieval• WAT/SAN and Health• Development/provision of
temporary shelter• Psycho-social support
RESPONSE
EXPECTED OUTCOME KEY RESULTS AREA
• Early recovery mechanisms• Management of dead and missing• Evacuation management• Social Protection Intervention• Civil and uniformed services and
cooperation
RESPONSE
KEY RESULTS AREA
REHABILITATION AND RECOVERY
• Restored and improved facilities, livelihood, living conditions and organizational capacities of affected communities, and reduced disaster risks in accordance with the “building back better” principle
• Livelihood (1st priority)• Shelter (2nd priority)• Infrastructure (3rd
priority)
EXPECTED OUTCOME KEY RESULTS AREA
NDRRM STRATEGIES
Advocacy Information Education and
Communication
Competency-based capability building
Education on DRRM and CCA for all
Mainstreaming DRRM in all plans
Research, Technology Development and
Knowledge Management
Monitoring, evaluation and learning
Institutionalization of DRRMCs and
DRRMOs
Networking and partnership building between and among
stakeholders, media and tiers of government
Contingency Planning
NDRRM STRATEGIES
Mobilize and harness media to regularly
communicate, warn, and educate people about
DRRM
Customized training programs based on needed skills in the
different DRRM aspects
A living document which is updated and used in the different
DRRM aspects
Ensure that DRRM and CCA is mainstreamed in various
plans, programs and projects of LGU, private sector groups and other
members of the community
Research to help us innovate, adapt and maximize the use of
resources to help people reduce and manage risks to
disasters; data base development, documentation, replication and recognition of
good practices
Feedback mechanisms to gauge performance targets and learning
from experience on the ground
Creation of permanent local DRRM offices and functional councils to
ensure implementation of DRRM Plans and
Programs
Education through integration of DRRM
concepts in the curriculum and for
public sector employees
Effective and mutually reinforcing partnerships and
networks to ensure multi-sectoral and multi-
stakeholders participation of the different DRRM players
PREPAREDNESS CYCLE
Planning
Organizing
Training
EquippingExercising
Evaluating
Taking Corrective Action
THE STATUS OF ANGELES CITY’S DISATER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
PRESENT SITUATION:
• SP Reso. No. 6057, S2011– Establishment of ACDRRMC and ACDRRMO
• Executive Order No. 3, Series of 2011 & Executive Order No. 3A, Series of 2011– Creation of Angeles City Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Council – Establishment of Angeles City Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Office (under the Special Program of the Office of the Mayor)
• SP Reso. No. 6141, S2011– Utilization of 70% of LDRRMF for Pre-Disaster Programs
Institutionalization of ACDRRMC, ACDRRMO and DRRM systems
• SP Ordinance No. 328, Series of 2012 enacted by the Angeles City Council and approved by Mayor Ed Pamintuan on December 26, 2012.– Sponsored by SP Chair on Disaster Management and
Resettlement City Councilor Alexander Indiongco– Ordinance creating the Angeles City Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Council and other matters related thereto
– IRR and Executive Orders (in the process of drafting)
Institutionalization of ACDRRMC, ACDRRMO and DRRM systems
Status of Institutionalization of BDRRMCs
• All 33 BDRRMCs have organized and activated their BDRRMCs through local Executive Orders– with Functional Organizational Structures
• Some have: – Hazards Maps– All-Hazards Contingency Plans– Vulnerabilities profile – Profile of vulnerable communities, families
and individuals
Current DRRM Capabilities
• Organized and activated 24/7 Angeles City Emergency Rescue Team with basic Emergency Medical Services (EMS) training and capabilities; limited number of certified and trained crew for Search, Rescue and Retrieval
• In the process of consolidating and enhancing City’s Emergency Response Capabilities: – BFP; PNP; CHO; ONA; CSWDO; AC Phoenix ERT;
Barangay ERTs; Private / Volunteer Emergency Fire and Rescue Groups/Teams
• With recent passing of City Ordinance No. 328 and Chief-of-Staff Alexander Cauguiran’s positioned as the City Civil Defense Officer, ACDRRMO is in the process of reorganization and setting-up necessary divisions / sections in compliance with requirements of RA 10121 and City Ordinance No. 328
DRRM Capabilities
OVERVIEW OF 2013 PLANS AND PROGRAMS
Angeles City Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council
GENERAL CONTEXT / BACKGROUND
2013 ANGELES CITY DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (ACDRRMP)
Global trend of occurrences of disasters within the last decade indicates their growing complexities and intensities
2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami
2008 Super Severe Cyclone Nargis
2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
2012 Hurricane Sandy
NARGIS
IO ET
JAPAN
SANDY
Here in the Philippines…
From 1997 – 2007: • 84 tropical storms• 13, 155 human casualty, • affecting 51 million
families and• with recorded economic
losses of P158.242 billion.
The damages and losses caused by Tropical Storm Ondoy and Typhoon Pepeng in 2009 amounted to at least 2.7% of our country’s GDP.
In Central Luzon
• Southwest Monsoon “Habagat” of 2012• Damages and Losses:
– Php 2,036,179,561.36 in terms of agriculture and infrastructure
– Affected 579,037 families or 2,514,519 persons in 1,403 Brgys
– Pampanga, our province, suffered the worse of casualty and damages with 15 dead and a total of Php1,258,976,283.67 worth of damages.
ANGELES CITY
• occurrence of typhoons associated with thunderstorms and extended periods of heavy rains, flooding and erosion of riverbank remains the most immediate threat to the safety of the communities living in low-lying areas, along the Abacan River and creeks.
ANGELES CITY
• 2012 August and October, the city provided emergency disaster response services to more than 846 low-income and at-risk families and totaling 2,179 individuals from eleven (11) barangays that were evacuated to prevent the possible danger of riverbank flooding and erosion.
ANGELES CITY
• the whole population -- most vulnerable of which is the city’s poorest and marginalized -- is exposed in varying levels of other natural and man-made hazards such as earthquakes, fires as well as epidemics like dengue and H-fever.
• The real and potential risks of climate change, fast growing and increase in population densities, urbanization, criminality, environmental degradation and pollution intensifies the challenges to city and communities’ safety, capability and resilience in responding and recovering from identified natural and man-made hazards.
ANGELES CITY
GENERAL OBJECTIVES
2013 ANGELES CITY DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (ACDRRMP)
General Objectives
• reduce the vulnerability and exposure of communities to natural and man-made hazards
• enhance the capacity of the local governments (city and barangays) and communities to reduce the risks and cope with the impacts of such hazards.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES
2013 ANGELES CITY DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (ACDRRMP)
ACDRRMP TARGETS
Institutionalized ACDRRMO and
sustained enhancement of
DRRM capabilities
Systematized EWS, communications and
data reporting and management
Sustained Support for the Enhancement of DRRM capabilities
of 33 BDRRMCs
Launch and Sustain TV and Radio Weekly Program on DRR and
CCA
Developed a 5-Year Comprehensive and Integrated Angeles
City DRRM and CCA Plan
Launched and sustained ALERTO ALISTO, ANGELEÑO
Campaign
Rolled out the Awarding System for
the Most Disaster Ready Barangay in
Angeles City
Mainstreaming of DRRMP and CCAP in Local Development Plans and Budget
Active and functional ACDRRMC with committees and
teams
ACDRRMP TARGETS
Hold multi-stakeholder
consultations, forums and conferences
Launched and Sustained
Community Emergency
Response Teams Training Program
Conducted City-wide Risk Mapping of
Hazards and Vulnerabilities
Conduct timely and regular assessments
and evaluations of plans and programs
Initiate Private-Public Partnerships with Local Business
Community
Conduct Annual SAR Olympics
Form Volunteer Groups from among the WOMEN, YOUTH,
LGBT and other sectors
CONDUCT ANNUAL ALL BDRRMC CONFERENCE
Launched and Sustained Volunteer
Mobilization Program
1ST QUARTER TARGETS
• Sustained support to BDRRMCs– ALL BDRRMCs Conference in early February – Monthly consultation with BDRRMCs per
barangay and quarterly cluster consultations– Support in organizing, training and other
capability building activities of Emergency Response Team
– Technical support in research and updating of Contingency Plans and BDRRMPs.