Upload
lowell
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
BBQ and Other Developments. Peter Cameron. Outline. 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday Chromaticity measurement/feedback slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline slow (>fs) phase modulation multitone continuous head-tail e-cloud tune shift along the bunch - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
BBQ and Other DevelopmentsBBQ and Other Developments
Peter Cameron
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
OutlineOutline• 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday• Chromaticity measurement/feedback
– slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline– slow (<0.5 fs) or fast (>>fs) phase modulation– multitone– continuous head-tail
• e-cloud tune shift along the bunch• Central frequency measurement
– two parameters – non-lin chrom and momentum offset
• BTF– optimize (Wolfram) – BBTF for lumi,…
• Monopole squid
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback
• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement
(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)
• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – frequency must avoid synchrotron frequency, possible beam
loss, not clear S/N is better than slow radial
– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of
synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…
– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantage – no proper theoretical understanding (yet)
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Summary of Chromaticity
t
t
vert
horiz
+5
-5
dp/p of +/-10-4 gives ~+/-100 radial modulation (RHIC&LHC)
-5
-5
+5
+5
Q'
Q'
Q'ramp 6380
ramp 6382
ramp 6381
in RHIC modulation is at 1Hz
chrom - good results under sequencer control
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback
• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement
(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)
• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – limited to <~1/2 synchrotron frequency, possible beam loss,
not clear S/N is better than slow radial
– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of
synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…
– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantage – no proper theoretical understanding (yet)
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
SPS testing Sep 2006courtesy Ralph Steinhagen
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
so far – S/N poor for comparatively large dp/p
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback
• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement
(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)
• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – limited to <~1/2 synchrotron frequency, possible beam loss,
not clear S/N is better than slow radial
– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of
synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…
– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantage – no proper theoretical understanding (yet)
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
courtesy C.Y. Tan
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
courtesy C.Y. Tan
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Multi-tone methodMulti-tone method
• Recent (yesterday) results from SPS– 3 tones – central lock plus 2 side tones– same kicker power at all 3 lines– 40Hz offset– PLL BW 20 Hz– fs ~100Hz to 200Hz – general statement - “good results” - no quantitative data yet
• Difficult to implement at RHIC– varying synchrotron frequency on ramp, as low as ~10Hz at transition– PLL BW ~10Hz– just the same, it is worth studying, especially in light of……
• Hermann’s suggestion – 10 tone? 100 tone? – 3D AFE gives headroom on S/N before emittance growth becomes an issue– with FPGA-based BBQ it becomes somewhat trivial (at least from
hardware/software point-of-view) to lock MANY loops on the beam – starts to look more like continuous BTF
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback
• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement
(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)
• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – limited to <~1/2 synchrotron frequency, possible beam loss,
not clear S/N is better than slow radial
– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of
synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…
– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantage – no proper theoretical understanding (yet)
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
continuous continuous head-tailhead-tail
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Rhodri Jones – continuous head tail 500 turn simulation results, phase difference between head and tail (settling time evident)
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
head tail
lowpass filtered head x tail
1 second
mean = .758
mean = .283
February 2006 RHIC Run 6 - continuous head-tail chromaticity measurement using BBQ (no momentum perturbation)
Marek and Rhodri
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement
(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)
• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – limited to <~1/2 synchrotron frequency, possible beam loss,
not clear S/N is better than slow radial
– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of
synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…
– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages
– no proper theoretical understanding (yet – effort at both CERN and FNAL)– RHIC results not repeated at SPS
• Marek is working on improved detector
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
OutlineOutline• 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday• Chromaticity measurement/feedback
– slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline– slow (<0.5 fs) or fast (>>fs) phase modulation– multitone– continuous head-tail
• e-cloud tune shift along the bunch – use 3D AFE?• Central frequency measurement
– two parameters – non-lin chrom and momentum offset
• BTF– optimize (Wolfram) – BBTF for lumi,…
• Monopole squid
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
OutlineOutline• 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday• Chromaticity measurement/feedback
– slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline– slow (<0.5 fs) or fast (>>fs) phase modulation– multitone– continuous head-tail
• e-cloud tune shift along the bunch• Central frequency measurement
– ‘two’ parameters – non-linearities and momentum offset
• BTF– optimize (Wolfram) – BBTF for lumi,…
• Monopole squid
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Tune spread measurement methods
• Sliding window fit to response to Artus kick • gives amplitude dependence of coherent tune
• Schottky – difficult to get needed resolution• (upper width + lower width) - (2 x rev width) • gives tune spread due to octupole and higher, (plus beam-beam,…)
• Zoomed Schottky • width of central line of incoherent betatron distribution • gives tune spread due to all contributions (sextupole, octupole, beam-beam,…)
• Central Frequency - all contributions
from 23 Jan 04 BMX meeting
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
LF Schottky at Injection
chrom = (lower - upper) / dp/p
tune spread =(lower + upper) - (2 x rev)
gives tune spread due to octupole and higher, (plus beam-beam,…)
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
zoomed HF Schottky - revolution line
At store with storage RF on
central line ‘infinitely narrow’
Synchrotron freq ~ 250Hz
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
LF Schottky at injection - 9 Dec 03
BH ~ 41 Hz~ .0005
BV ~ 29 Hz ~ .0003
YH ~ 81 Hz~ .001
YV ~ 30 Hz ~ .0003
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
• Data from Dec 03 RHIC BMX• Max beam lifetime was not at central frequency• At that time not obvious how to improve RHIC performance using this measurement
• Steve Tepikian presentation a few weeks ago
• effect of NL chrom on tune footprint, beta fcns,…• suggests why CF not optimal
A possible relatively simple APEX:• two knobs – amount beam is off-momentum, and non-lin corrector strength• explore this parameter space for beam lifetime
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
OutlineOutline• 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday• Chromaticity measurement/feedback
– slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline– slow (<0.5 fs) or fast (>>fs) phase modulation– multitone– continuous head-tail
• e-cloud tune shift along the bunch• Central frequency measurement
– ‘two’ parameters – non-linearities and momentum offset
• BTF– optimize (Wolfram) – BBTF for lumi,…
• Monopole squid
APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06
Monopole squidMonopole squid• just a heads up• squid based monopole detector proposed
to PAC by Chaudhari et al• committee recommendation was to get
experience with squid in RHIC IP radiation environment – concern is spurious radiation-induced quantum flux jumps
• test installation is in preparation for IP10• will need ~1hr access at start of APEX to
transfer helium to the dewar