21
Bayes Filters Pieter Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS Many slides adapted from Thrun, Burgard and Fox, Probabilistic Robotics

Bayes Filters Pieter Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

  • Upload
    akio

  • View
    59

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Bayes Filters Pieter Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS Many slides adapted from Thrun , Burgard and Fox, Probabilistic Robotics. TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A A A A A A A A A A A. Actions. Often the world is dynamic since - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Bayes Filters

Pieter AbbeelUC Berkeley EECS

Many slides adapted from Thrun, Burgard and Fox, Probabilistic Robotics

Page 2: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

2

Actions Often the world is dynamic since

actions carried out by the robot, actions carried out by other agents, or just the time passing by

change the world.

How can we incorporate such actions?

Page 3: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

3

Typical Actions The robot turns its wheels to move The robot uses its manipulator to grasp

an object Plants grow over time…

Actions are never carried out with absolute certainty.

In contrast to measurements, actions generally increase the uncertainty.

Page 4: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

4

Modeling Actions To incorporate the outcome of an action u into

the current “belief”, we use the conditional pdf

P(x|u,x’)

This term specifies the pdf that executing u changes the state from x’ to x.

Page 5: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

5

Example: Closing the door

Page 6: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

6

State TransitionsP(x|u,x’) for u = “close door”:

If the door is open, the action “close door” succeeds in 90% of all cases.

open closed0.1 10.9

0

Page 7: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

7

Integrating the Outcome of Actions

')'()',|()|( dxxPxuxPuxP

)'()',|()|( xPxuxPuxP

Continuous case:

Discrete case:

Page 8: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

8

Example: The Resulting Belief

Page 9: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Bayes rule

Measurements

Page 10: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

10

Bayes Filters: Framework Given:

Stream of observations z and action data u:

Sensor model P(z|x). Action model P(x|u,x’). Prior probability of the system state P(x).

Wanted: Estimate of the state X of a dynamical system. The posterior of the state is also called Belief:

),,,|()( 11 tttt zuzuxPxBel

},,,{ 11 ttt zuzud

Page 11: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

11

Markov Assumption

Underlying Assumptions Static world Independent noise Perfect model, no approximation errors

Page 12: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

12111 )(),|()|( ttttttt dxxBelxuxPxzP

Bayes Filters

),,,|(),,,,|( 1111 ttttt uzuxPuzuxzP Bayes

z = observationu = actionx = state

),,,|()( 11 tttt zuzuxPxBel

Markov ),,,|()|( 11 tttt uzuxPxzP

Markov11111 ),,,|(),|()|( tttttttt dxuzuxPxuxPxzP

1111

111

),,,|(

),,,,|()|(

ttt

ttttt

dxuzuxP

xuzuxPxzP

Total prob.

Markov111111 ),,,|(),|()|( tttttttt dxzzuxPxuxPxzP

Page 13: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Bayes Filter Algorithm 1. Algorithm Bayes_filter( Bel(x),d ):2. 03. If d is a perceptual data item z then4. For all x do5. 6. 7. For all x do8. 9. Else if d is an action data item u then10. For all x do11. 12. Return Bel’(x)

)()|()(' xBelxzPxBel

)(' xBel

)(')(' 1 xBelxBel

')'()',|()(' dxxBelxuxPxBel

111 )(),|()|()( tttttttt dxxBelxuxPxzPxBel

Page 14: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Example Applications Robot localization:

Observations are range readings (continuous) States are positions on a map (continuous)

Speech recognition HMMs: Observations are acoustic signals (continuous valued) States are specific positions in specific words (so, tens

of thousands)

Machine translation HMMs: Observations are words (tens of thousands) States are translation options

Page 15: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

16

Summary Bayes rule allows us to compute probabilities that

are hard to assess otherwise. Under the Markov assumption, recursive Bayesian

updating can be used to efficiently combine evidence.

Bayes filters are a probabilistic tool for estimating the state of dynamic systems.

Page 16: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Example: Robot Localization

t=0Sensor model: never more than 1 mistake

Know the heading (North, East, South or West)Motion model: may not execute action with small prob.

10Prob

Example from Michael Pfeiffer

Page 17: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Example: Robot Localization

t=1Lighter grey: was possible to get the reading, but less likely

b/c required 1 mistake

10Prob

Page 18: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Example: Robot Localization

t=2

10Prob

Page 19: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Example: Robot Localization

t=3

10Prob

Page 20: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Example: Robot Localization

t=4

10Prob

Page 21: Bayes Filters Pieter  Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS

Example: Robot Localization

t=5

10Prob