1
Barriers to Active Transport (and why we continue to drive cars) HEALTHY BUILT ENVIRONMENTS PROGRAM Poster designed by Andrew Wheeler © 2012. Acve transport, which includes walking, cycling and public transport, is oſten idenfied as a way to address the rising incidence of chronic diseases associated with physical inacvity. It is also desned to play an important role in society’s transion to less carbon intensive cies. THE BENEFITS OF ACTIVE TRANSPORT This research uses qualitave methods to record very personal barriers to the uptake of alternave transport. It explores the daily pracces and percepons of those who connue to drive, despite having access to viable alternave transport. The research finds that the autonomous mobility enabled by the private car is deeply engrained in the way people make sense of, and navigate, not only their streets but also their place in the world. WHY PEOPLE CHOOSE TO DRIVE Jennifer Kent is an urban planner and PhD candidate in the Faculty of the Built Environment at the University of New South Wales (UNSW). Her research interests lie at the intersecon of planning and health, with a parcular focus on barriers to acve transport. This poster presents some of the findings from her doctoral research, which is supported by the Australian Housing and Urban Research Instute and the Australian Research Council. THE RESEARCHER: A SNAPSHOT What will it take to challenge the hegemony of the car? Transion away from car use will require unprecedented disrupon to exisng ways of ‘being’ in modern life. The extent of this disrupon has been underesmated by exisng policy approaches to urban planning for acve transport and needs to be considered if the car’s hegemony is to be challenged. ENDURING AUTOMOBILITY Despite the benefits of acve transport, the private car connues to dominate mobility behaviour. Research oſten conceptualises this dominaon in relavely funconal terms, such as the car’s unparalleled speed and reliability. Policies aimed at reducing car use are usually directed at overcoming these barriers. The pursuit of higher density cies, for example, is regularly jusfied as a way to decrease distances between uses and facilitate the uptake of acve transport. THE BARRIERS TO ACTIVE TRANSPORT A potenal flaw in this policy approach is that even when the car is not the fastest, most convenient or even reliable way to travel, people sll choose to drive. Deeper understandings of resistance to acve transport modes are therefore required. A FLAWED APPROACH?

Barriers to Active Transport (and why we continue to drive ... · Barriers to Active Transport (and why we continue to drive cars) ... Active transport, which includes walking, cycling

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Barriers to Active Transport (and why we continue to drive ... · Barriers to Active Transport (and why we continue to drive cars) ... Active transport, which includes walking, cycling

Barriers to Active Transport (and why we continue to drive cars)

HEALTHY BUILT ENVIRONMENTS PROGRAMPoster designed by Andrew Wheeler © 2012.

Active transport, which includes walking, cycling and public transport, is often identified as a way to address the rising incidence of chronic diseases associated with physical inactivity. It is also destined to play an important role in society’s transition to less carbon intensive cities.

THE BENEfITS Of AcTIVE TRANSPORT

This research uses qualitative methods to record very personal barriers to the uptake of alternative transport. It explores the daily practices and perceptions of those who continue to drive, despite having access to viable alternative transport.

The research finds that the autonomous mobility enabled by the private car is deeply engrained in the way people make sense of, and navigate, not only their streets but also their place in the world.

WHY PEOPLE cHOOSE TO DRIVE

Jennifer Kent is an urban planner and PhD candidate in the Faculty of the Built Environment at the University of New South Wales (UNSW). Her research interests lie at the intersection of planning and health, with a particular focus on barriers to active transport. This poster presents some of the findings from her doctoral research, which is supported by the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute and the Australian Research Council.

THE RESEARCHER: A SNAPSHOT

What will it take to challenge the hegemony of the car?

Transition away from car use will require unprecedented disruption to existing ways of ‘being’ in modern life. The extent of this disruption has been underestimated by existing policy approaches to urban planning for active transport and needs to be considered if the car’s hegemony is to be challenged.

ENDURING AUTOMOBILITY

Despite the benefits of active transport, the private car continues to dominate mobility behaviour. Research often conceptualises this domination in relatively functional terms, such as the car’s unparalleled speed and reliability. Policies aimed at reducing car use are usually directed at overcoming these barriers. The pursuit of higher density cities, for example, is regularly justified as a way to decrease distances between uses and facilitate the uptake of active transport.

THE BARRIERS TO AcTIVE TRANSPORT

A potential flaw in this policy approach is that even when the car is not the fastest, most convenient or even reliable way to travel, people still choose to drive. Deeper understandings of resistance to active transport modes are therefore required.

A fLAWED APPROAcH?