BArch Analysis Introduction

7/29/2019 BArch Analysis Introduction

1/53

CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller

11x17 11x17


2/53



3/53



4/53



5/53



6/53



7/53



8/53


CC h j i ll


9/53


Christoph Niemann - I Lego NY

diagrams

CCA hit t l l i tj t i ll


10/53


Le Corbusier - Unite D`Habitation

CCA hit t l l i antje steinmuller


11/53


Aldo van Eyck



12/53


CCTV, OMA



13/53


TEK Building, B.I.G.



14/53


TVCC, OMA



15/53


PLOT, Maritime Youth House



16/53


DBook Infographics



17/53

CCA architectural analysis j

Any Warhol, Dance Diagrams



18/53

y j

Peter Zumthor - Baths, Vals



19/53

y j

extracting informationorganizational diagrams

Peter Zumthor - Elderly Housing, Chur



20/53

Renee Chow - San Francisco fabric drawings



21/53

Stan Allen - Field Conditions Diagrams



22/53



23/53



24/53

combining information-

diagram hypotheses

Split, Croatia - open space diagrams



25/53

25



26/53

cut/scan



27/53

OMA, Dutch Embassy

Un Studio, Moebius House



28/53

MVRDV - Double House, Utrecht



29/53

elevational (unfolded / by unit)

planimetric (facade depth)

sectional/perspectival (layered filter)



30/53

Mona Hatoum

visualization choicesmedia + method



31/53

OMA, Seattle Library



32/53

circulation diagrams - different techniques



33/53

Renee Chow - fabric structure, Pueblo Ribera, Charleston, San Francisco



34/53

Mark Campos, Arch.Analysis 2010



35/53

Mark Campos, Arch.Analysis 2010



36/53

Souzan Kachbi, Arch.Analysis 2010



37/53

Souzan Kachbi, Arch.Analysis 2010


38/53

CCA architectural analysis antje steinmullerTHIRDFLOOR PLAN

.

,


39/53

I I

% %% % % % % % % % %% % % % .% % % ,% % % % %% % % % % % % % % %

,% % % % % % % .

%% %%

I % F% I %

T . % K I

I % F% I % I T.% L KIT %T %

I

%

l l l

MASKING VS. IDENTIFYING

Formosa exhibits two contrary attitudes: (1) to maskthe units into one intergrated whole and (2) to create

unique experiences within each unit. The skincreates an irregular pattern that does not disguishone unit from another from the exterior, whileproducing varied interior conditions among the units.

UNFOLDEDELEVATION

TYPOLOGYSTYDIES

SOUTH

11TINU01TINU9TINU8TINU7TINU

UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6

SOUTH ELEVATION

SECONDFLOOR PLAN

(FRONT)

(FRONT)

SOUTH ELEVATION

, ,

,

, , ,

B. Leong, A. Iwan

THIRD FLOOR PLANUNIT POROSITY

.

I

I I I I I

I

, ,

,

, , ,

II I

Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch. Analysis 2011



40/53

transposing informationtransformational strategies

Alvar Aalto, vase



41/53

Reiser Umemoto, The Typologists Error



42/53

Reiser Umemoto, The Abuse of Data



43/53

Stan Allen, Field Conditions



44/53

Aranda Lasch - Packing diagrams

Zumthor, Baths Vlas

Aranda Lasch, Packing Algorithm, from Tooling



45/53

Studio 4 - diagram set



46/53

Studio 4 - transformation



47/53

Morphosis, Madrid Housing

Pranay Mowji, Madrid Social Housing (Morphosis)



48/53

Francis Silagon, David Gastaneta, Arch.Analysis 2011



49/53

module 1aresearch - redraw - represent

Studio 4 - edited plans



50/53

Vanessa Carvalho, Jeff Moody, Arch. Analysis 2011



51/53

B. Leong, A. Iwan

TYPICAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING BLOCKl l

ll

l

I I Il l l

l l

l l l ll l

ll l l

l ll

l

.

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

11

11

11

1

1 1

1

11

1 1

1 1

11

1 11

1 1

1

1

1 1

1

1111

1 1

1 1 -1

11

11

1

1

11

1

1

111

1

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1 1

1 11 11 11

1 11 1

11

1

1 1

111

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1 1

1 1

1

1

11

11

11

11

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

111

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1111

1111

1111

1111

11

1 11

1 11 1

11

11

1 1

1 11 1

11111111

11111111

11111111

11 1

1

1

1 11 1

1 11 1

11

1

1 1

1111

1111

1111 1

1111

1111 1

1 1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1 11

1

I

I I I I DOUBLE DECKERThis bar typology takes the idea of street-accessed singlefamily housing and stacks one bar over another due to theneed for density. This creates an elevated street condition

(direct street access) for both upper and lower units.

POSITIVE EXTENSIONThe lot is under the residential zoning of 3-storey buildings.

But in order to maximize the experiential qualities of eachlot (double aspects), a third of the lot is allotted for a publicpark as a tradeoto grow one storey higher.

SHARED COURTYARDThough this housing scheme is predominantly a bar ty-

pology, it can also be interpreted as a courtyard typology.Given its location, sandwiched between two buildings, andthe subtraction to provide public park, the schemes court-

yard becomes shared with the adjacent building.

.

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

11

11

11

1

1 1

1

11

1 1

1 1

11

1 11

1 1

1

1

1 1

1

1111

1 1

1 1 -1

11

11

1

1

11

1

1

111

1

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1 1

1 11 11 11

1 11 1

11

1

1 1

111

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1 1

1 1

1

1

11

11

11

11

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

111

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1111

1111

1111

1111

11

1 11

1 11 1

11

11

1 1

1 11 1

11111111

11111111

11111111

11 1

1

1

1 11 1

1 11 1

11

1

1 1

1111

1111

1111 1

1111

1111 1

1 1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1 11

1

li ili

ill i ill

CIRCULATIONThe circulation through this housing scheme ismostly horizontal with the exception of a fewvertical movements for when there is a levelchange. It is a continuous system that glidesthrough the housing units, public park, andunderground parking space.

HOUSING OUTDOOR SPACE CIRCULATION

Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011



52/53

hugh Vanho, Vincent Nieto, Arch.Analysis 2011



53/53

Documents

BArch Analysis Introduction