Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan
Kaleem Ullah Kakar, et al., BAOJ Biotech 2016, 2: 12: 009
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
Kaleem Ullah Kakar1, 3, Raqeeb Ullah5, Zarqa Nawaz1, 2, 4*, Muhammad Ishtiaq4, Faizan Ullah4, Syed Anil Gilani4, Robina Shaheen4, Kokab Satti6 and Rizwana Aleem Qureshi4*
1China Tobacco Key Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Guizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, 550081, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China2Wuxi Hupper BioSeed technology Company, Jiangsu Province, 21000 China
3State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Crop Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China4Quaid –i- Azam University, Department of Plant Sciences, Islamabad
5Quaid –i- Azam University, Department of Environmental Sciences, Islamabad6PARC Institute of Advanced studies in Agriculture, NARC, Islamabad
BAOJ Biotechnology
*Corresponding author: Zarqa Nawaz, China Tobacco Key Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Guizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, 550081, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China, Tel: +86-18786003752; E-mail: [email protected]
Rizwana Aleem Qureshi, Azam University, Department of Plant Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, E-mail: [email protected]
Sub Date: February 8, 2016, Acc Date: March 12, 2016, Pub Date: March 14, 2016
Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
Copyright: © 2016 Kaleem Ullah Kakar, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Research Article
AbstractDraba L. is considered taxonomically the most difficult and important genus of family Brassicaceae. Keeping in mind the importance of the taxon, palynological studies of nineteen species of Draba from Pakistan was carried out using light and electron microscopy. Despite nearly half a century of research, the systematic relationships among species in the genus Draba remain unresolved. In this study we analyzed pollen morphology and examined how variations in key pollen characteristics relate to our current understanding of the taxonomy of this genus. Palynological studies are known to aid in the morphological studies and classification of a taxon. The results show that the pollen grains of Draba species studied are usually radially symmetrical, isopolar sub-prolate to prolate, or prolate-spheroidal, tricolpate, reticulte exine sculpturing and long sunken apertures. Along with these qualitative features some qualitative characters like size of the pollen, equatorial length and diameter, polar length and diameter, number of colpi, colpus length, distance between apertures and exine thickness were also studied. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) exhibited the significance of these results. Moreover, hierarchical analysis was also carried out on the basis of quantitative characters to see the interspecies relationship among the taxa under study. Cluster analysis showed that nineteen species of this genus belong to two distinct clades. Groupings based on pollen characteristics alone aligned completely with those based on all morphological data supporting the current systematic treatment of the genus.
Keywords: Draba, Brassicaceae; Pollen Morphology; Light and Electron Microscopy; Pakistan.
IntroductionThe family Brassicaceae, also known as Cruciferae is one of the largest families of the Angiosperms with more than 330 genera and above 3500 species found in all continents except Antarctica, mainly in temperate areas, with highest diversity in Irano-Turanian, Mediterranean, and W. North American regions. Of these only 92 genera and about 250 species are reported from Pakistan and among these, 5 genera and 14 species are cultivated [1]. Draba is
a natural group of family Brassicaceae, with rich species diversity [2]. It is the largest and taxonomically the most complex genus of the family bearing more than 950 binomials and several infra specific taxa [3]. It is distinctly separated from other genera of the family Brassicaceae by: indumentum type, latiseptate siliculae, biseriate seeds, accumbent dicotyledons etc [4-8]. Schulz [4] recognized about 210 species of the genus Draba world over which have increased up to 400 species by now. The genus is distributed in the Arctic, subarctic, alpine and most mountainous regions of the world. About 90 species of Draba occur in Russia, 70 species in South America, 43 species in Europe, 48 species in China, 37 species in India, 24 species in Nepal, 17 species in Turkey, and 10 species in Afghanistan [9]. However this number is increasing rapidly with the report of new species from these areas. Draba laegaardii Al-Shehbaz is the latest member from South America [10]. Hooker [11] described 12 species of the genus Draba in British Indian region. Jafri [1] mentioned about 23 species of Draba from Pakistan and Kashmir. In our previous studies about recent taxonomic revision of the Draba genus, we reported 30 species which include 5 new species from the area taking account the one under discussion[12,13].
The application of pollen morphology to plant systematics is
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
Page 2 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
comparatively a recent trend. It has already provided a wealth of taxonomically useful information. In terms of taxonomic – phylogenetic usefulness, pollen diameter, aperture type, their number, position, structure and the internal structure of exine are the most important characters [14]. Pollen data are quite helpful in the construction of diagnosis of new species. The classification of pollen is based on number, position and character analysis known as “NPC” system, suggested by Erdtman [15]. This system helps in the formation of diagnosis below family level. The pollen characters have often been in agreement with conclusions drawn from other fields of study, particularly anatomy.
Chiguriaeva [16] was the first worker to examine the pollen morphology of the family Brassicaceae in relation to taxonomy. Later Javied and Naqshi [17] also utilized pollen data in the classification of family Brassicaceae. Jonsell [18] also examined pollen morphology of the family during monographic studies. Lahham and Al-Essawi [19] reported the pollen morphology of the family Brassicaceae from Jordan. Pollen morphology of the family Brassicaceae has been examined by various other researchers in past [15,20-22], however, the most comprehensive study of Brassicaceae pollen was carried out by Rollins and Banerjee [23]. Christian Brochmann [24] described pollen morphology of species of Nordic Draba. Though, Perveen et al. [25] reported the pollen morphological studies of the family Brassicaceae from Pakistan. After nearly half a century of research on the taxon, systematic relationship between pollen morphology and all plant morphological features was lacking. Present investigations are based on the pollen morphology of nineteen species of genus Draba of the family Brassicaceae viz. D. setosa, D. oreades, D. korschinskyi, D. cahcemirica, D. affghanica, D. olgae, D. trinervis, D. altaica, D. glomerata, D. winterbottomii, D. lasiophylla, D. lanceolata, D. tibetica, D. falconeri, D. nemorosa, D. melanopus, D. stenocarpa, D. gracillima, D. nuda were observed under light and scanning electron microscopes. The present study assisted in finding out taxonomic significance of pollen morphology in the delimitation of the genus Draba.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material
The florets of fresh & dried specimens of some species of genus Draba (Family Brassicaceae) viz., D. setosa, D. korschinskyi, D. cachemirica, D. affghanica, D. olgae, D. trinervis, D. altaica, D. glomerata, D. winterbottomii, D. lasiophylla, D. lanceolata, D. lanceolata var. sonmargensis, D. tibetica, D. falconeri, D. nemorosa, D. melanopus, D. stenocarpa, D. gracilima, D. nuda were extracted from freshly collected material from the field and herbarium specimen of Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.
Light and Electron Microscopy
The pollen grains were prepared for light (LM) and scanning microscopy (SEM) by the standard methods described by Erdtman [26]. The scanning electron micrography was carried out in the Centralised Science Labs, Karachi University. Pollen diameter, polar
axis (P) and equatorial diameter (E), aperture size, apocolpium, mesocolpium and exine thickness were measured (Tables 1-3). The terminology used was obtained from previous reports [26-28].
Statistical Analysis of the Data
The data were subjected to analysis of variance using a COSTAT computer package (Cohort Software, Berkeley, California), version 6.4 and comparison among mean values of species was made by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test [29].
Results and DiscussionA summary of pollen morphological characters of the nineteen species of genus Draba is presented in Table 1 and 2. Quantitative observations are recorded under Scanning electron microscope. Whereas scanning electron micrographs of selected species of the genus are presented in Figure 1.
The pollen grains of all the species studied are similar in morphology hence the genus is stanopalynous.
Class
The class of all the pollen grains studies is tricolpate in all the species observed in this study.
Size
The size of pollen grains (polar axis × equatorial diameter) ranges from 15.52 x 17.23 - 26.29 x 18.2. D. winterbottomii was observed to be the smallest (15.5 – 16.8) and D. falconeri has the largest (18.4 - 30.57). The P/E (Polar/ Equatorial diameter) ratio varied from 119 – 171. This lowest ratio was found in D. setosa (119) and the highest in D. nemorosa (171). This range shows existence of slight variation in size among different species of the genus Draba. (Table: 2)
Symmetry and Shape
Pollen grains are radially symmetrical, isopolar, isodiametric and monads. Outline is trilobed, with apertures on the angles of the outline of the pollen grain, circular, angular, semi- angular in polar view and sub- prolate, prolate and prolate-spheroidal in equatorial view, showing great variation in pollen size. The most common shape is prolate, a type found in all species of the genus observed in the current study. Some Draba species have prolate- spheroidal or subprolate pollen grains as well. These results are congruent with the results of other researchers [19,23,25,26]. The shape of pollen grains varies very rarely within a genus.
Pollen grains of all investigated species of Draba are tricolpate [24,25]. Minor variations in aperture size were observed. The colpi are usually elongated nearly to the poles. Although exine ornamentation of the pollen grains plays a vital role within the family Brassicaceae [4,24,30], but at no significant variations occur at the species level with in a genus. Exine ornamentation remains hetero brochate reticulate with lumina equal to or exceeding the muri in size, in all species examined.
Apertures vary in length, mostly broad in centre and have acute ends. Exine sculpturing is heterobrochate reticulate with lumina
Page 3 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
Figure 1: Electron micrographs of selected species of Draba L., from Pakistan, showing exine sculpturing (a), polar (b) and equatorial view (c).
Page 4 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
ab
cd
abbc
efg
h
a
gh
def
gh
i
hh
i
defgefgfgh
defde
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
D. seto
sa
D. orea
des
D. kors
chins
kyi
D. cac
hemiric
a
D. affg
hanic
a
D. olga
e
D. trine
rvis
D. alta
ica
D. glom
erata
D. wint
erbott
omii
D. lasio
phylla
D. lanc
eolat
a
D. tibe
tica
D. falco
neri
D. nem
orosa
D. mela
nopu
s
D. sten
ocarp
a
D. grac
illima
D. nud
a
Taxon
Equi
toria
l len
gth
in (U
M)
Figure 2: Equitorial length of pollen grains in different species of Draba. The data represents mean of 6 replicates and all such means which share a common English letter are similar; otherwise differ significantly at P< 0.05
bcdcde
def
h
i
abc
def
ghfgh
hh
fghh
fgh
ab
efgfgh
bcde
a
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
D. seto
sa
D. orea
des
D. kors
chins
kyi
D. cac
hemiric
a
D. affg
hanic
a
D. olga
e
D. trine
rvis
D. alta
ica
D. glom
erata
D. wint
erbott
omii
D. lasio
phylla
D. lanc
eolat
a
D. tibe
tica
D. falco
neri
D. nem
orosa
D. mela
nopu
s
D. sten
ocarp
a
D. grac
illima
D. vern
a
Taxon
equi
toria
l dia
met
er in
um
Figure 3: Equitorial diameter of pollen grains in different species of Draba. The data represents mean of 6 replicates and all such means which share a common English letter are similar; otherwise differ significantly at P< 0.05
Page 5 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
efghij
a
defgbcd
kl
bc
cdefdefgh
ll
efghighijk
hijk
ijk
cde
fghijjk
defghi
ab
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
D. seto
sa
D. orea
des
D. kors
chins
kyi
D. cac
hemiric
a
D. affg
hanic
a
D. olga
e
D. trine
rvis
D. alta
ica
D. glom
erata
D. wint
erbott
omii
D. lasio
phylla
D. lanc
eolat
a
D. tibe
tica
D. falco
neri
D. nem
orosa
D. mela
nopu
s
D. sten
ocarp
a
D. grac
illima
D. nud
a
Taxon
Pola
r dia
met
er in
um
Figure 4: Polar diameter of pollen grains in different species of Draba. The data represents mean of 6 replicates and all such means which share a common English letter are similar, otherwise differ significantly at P< 0.05
bc
bcdefg
a
b
g
a
bcdbcd
cdefg
g
bcdef
defgefg
a
defg
a
bc
fg
bcde
0
5
10
15
20
25
D. setosa
D. oreades
D. korsc
hinskyi
D. cach
emirica
D. affg
hanica
D. olgae
D. trinervi
s
D. alta
ica
D. glomerata
D. winterbotto
mii
D. lasio
phylla
D. lance
olata
D. tibetica
D. falco
neri
D. nemorosa
D. melanopus
D. stenoca
rpa
D. gracill
ima
D. nuda
Taxon
Colp
us le
ngth
in u
m
Figure 5: Colpus length of pollen grains in different species of Draba. The data represents mean of 6 replicates and all such means which share a common English letter are similar; otherwise differ significantly at P< 0.05
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
Page 6 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
defgh
ab
bcde
ab
gh
a
abcabc
efghefgh
bcdef
efgh
abc
defghfgh
bcd
efgh
cdefg
h
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
D. seto
sa
D. orea
des
D. kors
chins
kyi
D. cac
hemiric
a
D. affg
hanic
a
D. olga
e
D. trine
rvis
D. alta
ica
D. glom
erata
D. wint
erbott
omii
D. lasio
phylla
D. lanc
eolat
a
D. tibe
tica
D. falco
neri
D. nem
orosa
D. mela
nopu
s
D. sten
ocarp
a
D. grac
illima
D. nud
a
Taxon
Dis
tanc
e be
twee
n ap
ertu
res
in u
m
Figure 6: Distance between apertures of pollen grains in different species of Draba. The data represents mean of 6 replicates and all such means which share a common English letter are similar, otherwise differ significantly at P< 0.05
Figure 7: Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of Draba L. species on the basis of palynology.
equal to or exceeding the muri in size. Colpus length varies from 10.19 - 19.73. The lowest value D. falconeri and D. nemorosa and D. stenocarpa have the highest value. Exine thickness varies from 0.75– 2.24, the lowest value observed in D. lanceolata and highest in D. gracillima.
The quantitative characters like equatorial length & diameter, P/E ratios, polar diameter, colpus length, distance between apertures, exine thickness and shape of pollen grains (coded) were analyzed by One-way ANOVA software (Table 3) and the mean values obtained were subjected to Hierarchical cluster analysis. The results revealed that the highest dissimilarity exists between D. setosa & D. nemorosa. Figures 2-6 show the graphical representation of these statistical analyses exhibiting relationships among different Draba species. Moreover, the data was found to be highly significant (Supplementary Table 1 and 2).
Hierarchical cluster analysis resulted in two main clades (Figure 7), clade I & II. Clade I includes species: D. setosa D. oreades, D. affghanica, D. trinervis, D. winterbottomii, D. tibetica, D. altaica, D. lasiophylla, D. nuda, D. glomerata. Species included in clade II are: D. falconeri & D. stenocarpa, D. lanceolata, D. melanopus, D.
gracillima, D. korschinkskyi, D. cachemirica, D. olgae & D. nemorosa. The two clades distinctly vary from each other by clade I having sub-prolate kind of pollen grains as most common along with other kinds. While, the members of clade II contain prolate kind of pollen grains predominantly. The other major dissimilarity between two clades is size of grains. Clade II consists of comparatively larger grains with greater P/E ratio & greater value of exine thickness.
The species in clade I, closely relate to each other, in their equatorial length, diameter, P/E ratios and distance between apertures. Equatorial length of these species is in range of 16 – 22.6 µm; diameter 12.9 – 17.9 µm; P/E ratio 119.6 – 142.1; polar diameter 12.5 – 17.2 µm; colpus length 10.5 – 15.9 µm; distance between apertures 7 – 10.2 µm and exine thickness 0.87 – 2.19 µm. D. glomerata seem little different from rest of the members by having prolate shaped pollen grains more numerous. Some sub- prolate pollen grains also occur in this species but it lacks prolate - spheroidal pollen grains, a character found in other members of the clade.
Similarly species falling in clade II contain: equatorial length in range of 18.4 – 26.3 µm, width 11.1 – 16.9 µm; P/E ratio 150.2 – 171.3; polar diameter 13.6 – 18.2 µm; colpus length 10.2 – 20.4 µm;
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
Page 7 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
Supplementary Table 1: Data matrix of Draba L. species for Hierarchical Cluster Analysis on the basis of palynology
No Taxon Equi length um Equidiam P/ E ratio Pol diam Col leng dis btap Ex thick Pl Shp
1 D. setosa 21.3 17.9 119.4 17.2 13.7 7 1.67 4
2 D. oreades 19.9 16.2 122.3 15.5 10.7 8.8 1.07 2
3 D. korschinskyi 20.7 14.05 150.2 13.9 15.2 8.1 1 3
4 D. cachemirica 25.5 14.9 171.1 14.8 18.7 9.8 2.19 1
5 D. affghanica 20.9 17.5 119.8 16 12 7.8 1.95 4
6 D. olgae 22 13.9 163.8 14.3 19.3 8.4 2.14 3
7 D. trinervis 16 13.2 123.4 15.8 10.9 10.1 0.87 4
8 D. altaica 18.6 14.03 132.3 14.6 11.9 8.2 1.94 2
9 D. glomerata 18.3 12.9 142.1 15 13.5 9.3 1.37 2
10 D. winterbottomii 15.5 12.9 119.6 12.5 10.5 8.1 1.1 4
11 D. lasiophylla 19.4 14.1 136.7 12.5 12.7 8.2 0.93 3
12 D. lanceolata 21.4 13.8 159.4 15.5 14.8 10.3 0.75 3
13 D. tibetica 19.4 15.3 127.3 15.9 13.9 10.2 1.96 3
14 D. falconeri 26.3 16.9 155.4 16.9 20.4 11.6 2.07 2
15 D. nemorosa 18.4 11.1 171.3 13.6 10.2 7.2 1.86 1
16 D. melanopus 20.5 13.1 158.4 16.3 15.7 10.6 2.22 1
17 D. stenocarpa 24.1 15.3 159.1 15.8 19.7 9.6 2.01 2
18 D. gracillima 24.8 15.9 156 18.2 12.8 10.6 2.24 2
19 D. nuda 22.6 16.4 138.2 15 15.4 8.5 2.19 3
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
Page 8 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
Supp
lem
enta
ry T
able
2.D
issim
ilarit
y m
atrix
of D
raba
L. s
peci
es o
n th
e ba
sis o
f pal
ynol
ogy.
Euc
lidia
n Di
stan
ces
Case
s 1
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
1415
1617
1819
15.
723
31.2
9952
.416
2.35
145
.064
9.28
614
.289
23.7
399.
6218
.532
40.4
199.
265
37.3
1452
.75
39.6
4540
.491
37.0
819
.2
25.
723
28.4
2549
.822
4.08
142
.54
5.59
310
.477
20.3
457.
146
15.0
4737
.478
6.34
135
.241
49.3
6936
.666
38.1
4834
.294
16.8
77
331
.299
28.4
2521
.953
30.8
6714
.319
27.7
1618
.387
8.90
931
.461
13.8
629.
634
23.2
110
.815
22.1
329.
2710
.976
9.32
312
.488
452
.416
49.8
2221
.953
52.1
448.
551
49.4
0840
.046
30.4
2853
.309
35.6
4613
.302
44.5
4516
.208
12.0
614
.192
12.2
1416
.659
33.3
12
52.
351
4.08
130
.867
52.1
4444
.808
7.94
813
.406
23.1
318.
104
17.7
339
.986
8.58
637
.238
52.1
3339
.245
40.3
2536
.683
18.8
88
645
.064
42.5
414
.319
8.55
144
.808
41.7
9732
.554
22.8
545
.604
28.0
986.
853
37.0
9410
.829
12.8
797.
606
5.77
311
.661
26.0
32
79.
286
5.59
327
.716
49.4
087.
948
41.7
979.
892
19.1
675.
467
14.4
2236
.632
6.51
135
.255
48.2
5235
.772
37.7
8234
.103
17.2
93
814
.289
10.4
7718
.387
40.0
4613
.406
32.5
549.
892
10.0
8313
.537
5.20
327
.538
6.16
26.2
7339
.186
26.6
4328
.537
24.9
658.
366
923
.739
20.3
458.
909
30.4
2823
.131
22.8
519
.167
10.0
8323
.127
6.41
117
.721
15.1
3717
.717
29.5
716
.749
19.1
8316
.051
7.20
2
109.
627.
146
31.4
6153
.309
8.10
445
.604
5.46
713
.537
23.1
2717
.747
40.6
5810
.466
39.3
5551
.925
39.8
5641
.744
38.3
3821
.005
1118
.532
15.0
4713
.862
35.6
4617
.73
28.0
9814
.422
5.20
36.
411
17.7
4723
.178
10.3
8622
.308
34.9
3522
.538
24.2
7621
.116
5.74
4
1240
.419
37.4
789.
634
13.3
0239
.986
6.85
336
.632
27.5
3817
.721
40.6
5823
.178
32.2
359.
347
14.0
543.
162
6.06
76.
491
21.5
31
139.
265
6.34
123
.21
44.5
458.
586
37.0
946.
511
6.16
15.1
3710
.466
10.3
8632
.235
29.7
6644
.572
31.3
1932
.686
29.3
4211
.673
1437
.314
35.2
4110
.815
16.2
0837
.238
10.8
2935
.255
26.2
7317
.717
39.3
5522
.308
9.34
729
.766
22.0
049.
031
5.17
68.
006
18.6
82
1552
.75
49.3
6922
.132
12.0
652
.133
12.8
7948
.252
39.1
8629
.57
51.9
2534
.935
14.0
5444
.572
22.0
0414
.968
17.3
4518
.404
34.2
95
1639
.645
36.6
669.
2714
.192
39.2
457.
606
35.7
7226
.643
16.7
4939
.856
22.5
383.
162
31.3
199.
031
14.9
686.
048
6.71
620
.821
1740
.491
38.1
4810
.976
12.2
1440
.325
5.77
337
.782
28.5
3719
.183
41.7
4424
.276
6.06
732
.686
5.17
617
.345
6.04
88.
055
21.4
86
1837
.08
34.2
949.
323
16.6
5936
.683
11.6
6134
.103
24.9
6516
.051
38.3
3821
.116
6.49
129
.342
8.00
618
.404
6.71
68.
055
18.5
56
1919
.216
.877
12.4
8833
.312
18.8
8826
.032
17.2
938.
366
7.20
221
.005
5.74
421
.531
11.6
7318
.682
34.2
9520
.821
21.4
8618
.556
1= D
. set
osa
2= D
. ore
ades
3=
D. k
orsc
hins
kyi
4= D
. cac
hem
irica
5=
D. a
ffgha
nica
6=
D. o
lgae
7=
D. t
riner
vis
8= D
. alta
ica
9= D
. glo
mer
ata
10=
D. w
inte
rbott
omii
11=
D. la
sioph
ylla
12
= D.
lanc
eola
ta
13=
D. ti
betic
a 14
= D.
falc
oner
i 15
= D.
nem
oros
a 16
= D.
mel
anop
us
17=
D. st
enoc
arpa
18
= D.
gr
acill
ima
19=
D. n
uda
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
Page 9 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
distance between apertures 7.2 – 11.6 µm and exine thickness 0.75 – 2.24 µm. D. nemorosa shows more differences with rest of the group members by having only prolate type of grains along with relatively smaller size.
ConclusionIn present study stenopalynous nature of genus Draba is confirmed
as no major variations were seen among the species studied. Minute variations do exist which are reflected in the dendrogram by following into two distinct groups. Where as degree of similarity in palynological characters is same as observed in other taxonomic traits. No Significant deviation from systematic relationship among all morphological and pollen morphology were observed. Hence we can say that palynological traits can also be considered while
Table 3: Statistical analysis of quantitative characters of poeeln grains of genus Draba L.
Quntitative Characters Source df Type I SS MS F value P value
1 Equatorial length of pollen grains
Species 18 1567.74 87.09 20.37 0.000***
Error 171 731.09 4.27 <
Total 189 2298.84
Model 18 1567.74 87.09 20.37 0.000***
2 Equitorial diameter of pollen grains
Species 18 583.81 32.43 12.57 0.000***
Error 171 441.1 2.57 <
Total 189 1024.92
Model 18 583.81 32.43 12.57 0.000***
3 P/ E ratio
Species 18 60830 3379.4 10.47 0.000***
Error 171 55194.1 322.77 <
Total 189 116024.1
Model 18 60830 3379.4 10.47 0.000***
4 Polar diameter of pollen grains
Species 18 394.9 21.94 13.07 0.000***
Error 171 286.92 1.68 <
Total 189 681.82
Model 18 394.9 21.94 13.07 0.000***
5 Colpus length
Species 18 1883.9 104.65 9.65 0.000***
Error 171 1852.9 10.83 <
Total 189 3736.8
Model 18 1883.9 104.65 9.65 0.000***
6 Distance between apertures
Species 18 302.61 16.81 4.98 0.000***
Error 171 577.04 3.37 <
Total 189 879.65
Model 18 302.61 16.81 4.98 0.000***
7 Exine thickness
Species 18 51.94 2.88 26.96 0.000***
Error 171 18.3 0.107
Total 189 70.24
Model 18 51.94 2.88 26.96 0.000***
BAOJ Biotech, an open access journal Volume 2; Issue 1; 009
Page 10 of 10Citation: Kaleem Ullah Kakar, Raqeeb Ullah, Zarqa Nawaz, Muhammad Ishtiaq, Faizan Ullah, et al. (2016) Palynological Studies of Genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae) From Pakistan. BAOJ Biotech 2: 009.
classifying taxa. These palynological characters can provide an additional support for the delimitation of a taxon.
AcknowledgementWe are thankful to curator and staff of Herbarium Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad for provision of the necessary plant material and related facilities for the study.
References1. Jafri SM (1973) Flora of West Pakistan: Brassicaceae Stewart Herbar-
ium, Pakistan.
2. Jordon-Thaden I, Koch M (2008) Species richness and polyploid patterns in the genus Draba (Brassicaceae): a first global perspective. Plant Ecol Divers 1: 255-263.
3. Cheo T, Lu L, Yang G, Al-Shehbaz I, Dorofeev V (2001) Brassicaceae. Flora of China 8: 120-121.
4. Schulz OE (1927) "Cruciferae-Draba et Erophila"... von O. E. Schulz, W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
5. Hitchcock CL (1941) A revision of the Drabas of western North America, University of Washington Press, USA.
6. Al Shehbaz IA (1988) The genera of Arabideae (Cruciferae: Brassicace-ae) in the southeastern United States. J Arnold Arbor 69: 85-166.
7. Appel O, Al-Shehbaz I (2003) Cruciferae, Flowering Plants· Dicotyle-dons. Springer 75-174.
8. Jordon-Thaden I, Hase I, Al-Shehbaz I, Koch MA (2010) Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the genus Draba (Brassicaceae) and identification of its most closely related genera. Mol Phylogen Evol 55: 524-540.
9. Kitamura S (1960) Flora of Afghanistan, Kyoto Univ.
10. Al-Shehbaz IA (2015) Draba laegaardii (Brassicaceae), a New Species from Cotopaxi (Ecuador), with Notes on the Distribution of Draba Species in South America. Novon 24: 231-233.
11. Hooker JD (1875) Flora Of British India L. Reeve And Co. Ltd, England. Vol-21,
12. Nawaz Z, Kakar K, Qureshi R (2013) Draba ishkomania (Brassicaceae). A new addition to flora of Pakistan Sarhad J Agic 29: 195-198.
13. Nawaz Z, Kakar K, Qureshi R, Ishtiaq M (2012) Draba sherwalii (Brassicaceae), a new addition to flora of Pakistan. 12th National and 3rd International Conference of Botany at Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad. Abstract-PPTE 55 Pakistan J Bot.
14. Saxena MR (1993) Palynology: a treatise, Oxford & IBH Pub. Co., Delhi
15. Erdtman G (1963) An introduction to a Scandinavian pollen flora, (2 edn), Almqvist and Wiksell, Sweden, Stockholm.
16. Chiguriaeva A (1973) Pollen morphology of Cruciferae in pollen and spore morphology of recent plant. Pora-3rd Int. Palynology Conf. Acad. Sci., USSR.
17. Javeid G, Naqshi A (1976) Pollen grains as an aid to taxonomy of Brassicaceae. Int. Symp. Physiology of sexual reproduction in flowering plants. Department of Botany, Punjab Agricultural University Abstract A-6.
18. Jonsell B (1986) monograph of Farsetia (Cruciferae), Almqvist and Wiksell International Press.
19. Lahham J, Al-Eisawi D (1987) Pollen morphology of Jordanian Cruciferae. Mitt Bot Staatssamml Munchen 23: 355-375.
20. Sharma R, Nair P (1970) A study of pollen production in Brassica L. Palynological Bulletin 6: 62-66.
21. Carter A, Williams S, McNeilly T (1975) Scanning electron microscope studies of pollen behaviour on immature and mature Brussels sprout (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera) stigmas. Euphytica 24: 133-141.
22. Moore PD, Webb JA (1978) Illustrated guide to pollen analysis, Hodder and Stoughton.
23. Rollins R, Banerjee U (1979) Pollens of the Cruciferae. Publ Bussey Inst Harvard Univ 33-64.
24. Brochmann C (1992) Pollen and seed morphology of Nordic Draba (Brassicaceae): phylogenetic and ecological implications. Nord J Bot 12: 657-673.
25. Perveen A, Qaiser M, Khan R (2004) Pollen flora of Pakistan. XLII. Brassicaceae. Pakistan J Bot 36: 683-700.
26. Erdtman G (1952) Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. GFF 74: 526-527.
27. Kremp G (1965) Encyclopaedia of pollen morphology. Tucson: Arizona University Press, USA.
28. Wolfe JA, Doyle JA, Page VM (1975) The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: paleobotany. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden: 801-824.
29. Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1-42.
30. Khalik KA, Van der Maesen L (2002) Seed morphology of some tribes of Brassicaceae (implications for taxonomy and species identification for the flora of Egypt). Blumea-Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants 47: 363-383.