Upload
perry-hendricks
View
18
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Immune Responses of Healthy Subjects to a Single Dose of Intramuscular Inactivated Influenza A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) Vaccine After Priming With an Antigenic Variant. Nega Ali Goji, M.D., Carrie Nolan, N.P., Heather Hill, M.S., CCRC, Mark Wolf, Ph.D., Thomas Rowe, M.S., John J Treanor, M.D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Immune Responses of Healthy Subjects to a Single Dose of Intramuscular Inactivated
Influenza A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) Vaccine After Priming With an Antigenic Variant.
Nega Ali Goji, M.D., Carrie Nolan, N.P., Heather Hill, M.S., CCRC, Mark Wolf, Ph.D., Thomas Rowe, M.S.,
John J Treanor, M.D. University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD, Southern
Research Institute, Birmingham, AL
2
Background
• Non-adjuvanted, inactivated subvirion H5N1 vaccine required two 90 mcg doses to elicit neutralizing antibody in more than half of subjects
• In one study, a third dose of inactivated A/Duck/Singapore/97 (H5N3) vaccine 16 months after a priming series resulted in significant boosting (Stephenson, 2003)
• Pre-priming might generate better immunity, allowing a single dose strategy in face of emerging pandemic. However, any emergent pandemic virus will likely represent antigenic variant from the priming virus
• We took advantage of a previous study evaluating a baculovirus recombinant H5 A/HK/156/97 (clade 3) vaccine performed in 1998 to evaluate effect of boosting with a single dose of subvirion A/VN/1203/04 (clade 1) vaccine.
3
Neutralizing antibody responses to rH5 A/HK/156 vaccine
Treanor Vaccine 19:1732, 2001
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7
25 ug
45 ug
90 ug
90 ug / 10 ug
Placebo
Ne
utr
aliz
ing
GM
T
Vaccine administered at visit S1 and S3
8
16
32
64
128
4
Objectives
• Determine the ability of a clade 3 H5 recombinant vaccine to prime for immune responses to a subsequent clade 1 H5 subvirion vaccine in healthy adults– Comparison of responses in H5 primed
subjects to those of H5 naïve subjects
• Determine the safety of revaccination with a clade 1 vaccine in primed subjects
5
Methods
• Subjects: participants in 1998 study who received a clade 3 rH5 vaccine baculovirus-expressed recombinant H5 vaccine (A/HK/156/97, Clade 3)
• Vaccine: single 90 mcg dose of subvirion rgA/Vietnam/1203/04 x PR8 (clade 1) vaccine
• Safety diary card x 7 days, all adverse events recorded over 56 days
• Serum HAI and MN antibody tested at days 0, 28, and 56
• Results compared to responses to one (primary analysis) or two (secondary analysis) 90 mcg doses of clade 1 vaccine in naïve subjects
6
Evaluation of priming with an antigenic variant: schematic of study design
Placebo25 ug x 245 ug x 290 ug x 290 ug x 1
+10 ug x 1
UR-98012
A/HK/156/97rH5
147 subjects
1998
DMID 05-0043
rgA/VN/1203/04
90 ug x 1
37 subjects
DMID 04-063
rgA/VN/1203/04
90 ug x 2
103 subjects
Healthy recipients of any rH5
Placebo excluded
CLADE 1CLADE 3
NEJM 354:1343, 2006
Vaccine 19:1732, 2001
H5-PRIMED
H5-NAIVE
2005
7
Demographics
H5 NAIVE(DMID 04-063)
n=103
WhiteBlackAsianPacific IslanderMultiracialHispanicFemaleAge (median, range)
84 (82%)11 (11%) 8 (8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)13 (13%)55 (54%)38 (18-64)
H5 PRIMED(DMID 05-0043)
n=37
35 (95%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)23 (62%)42 (33-51)
8
Rates and severity of side effects after 1 (D1) or 2 doses (D2) in naïve subjects and after one dose in H5
vaccine-primed (PR) subjects
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
D1 D2 PR D1 D2 PR D1 D2 PR D1 D2 PR D1 D2 PR D1 D2 PR D1 D2 PR
Pain Tenderness Feverish Malaise Myalgia Headache Nausea
Pe
rce
nt
Severe
Moderate
Mild
9
Serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) titers following one or two doses of H5 vaccine in naïve subjects or following a single dose in
H5 vaccine-primed subjects
Day 0 Day 28 Day 56 Day 0 Day 28 Day 56
4
8
16
32
64
128
256
4
8
16
32
64
128
256H5 NAIVE H5 PRIMED
DMID 04-063 DMID 05-0043
GM
T H
AI
Ant
ibod
y
GM
T H
AI
Ant
ibod
y
90 mcg 90 mcg 90 mcg
5.1 13.3
27.7
5.2
64.0
48.2
10
Serum neutralizing (NT) antibody responses following one or two doses of H5 vaccine in naïve subjects or following a single dose in
H5 vaccine-primed subjects
Day 0 Day 28 Day 56 Day 0 Day 28 Day 56
4
8
16
32
64
128
256
4
8
16
32
64
128
256H5 NAIVE H5 PRIMED
DMID 04-063 DMID 05-0043
GM
T N
T A
ntib
ody
GM
T N
T A
ntib
ody
90 mcg 90 mcg 90 mcg
5.18.3
22.9
6.4
93.868.9
11
Rates of serum HAI and NT antibody responses and proportion achieving a titer of 1:40 or greater after one or two
doses of H5 vaccine in naïve subjects or after one dose in H5 vaccine-primed subjects
Result 28
days after:
Dose 1Dose 2
Dose 1
HAI
23 (15, 33)43 (33, 54)
68 (50, 82)
NT
10 (5, 18)41 (32, 52)
76 (59, 88)
Percent responding*
(95% CI)
HAI
24 (16, 34)44 (34, 55)
70 (53, 84)
NT
11 (6, 19)42 (33, 53)
76 (59, 88)
Percent >1:40
(95% CI)
Group
H5 naïve
H5 primed
* Response defined as 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline. For the HAI assay, a response also must achieve a titer of 1:40 or greater
12
Effect of the priming dose of recombinant H5 vaccine administered in 1998 on responses to
90 mcg of H5 vaccine in 2006
1998PrimingDose
25 ug x 245 ug x 290 ug x 290 ug/10 ug
N
1278
10
GMT
63.5155.142.148.7
Response*n (%)
7 (58%)6 (86%)5 (63%)7 (70%)
GMT
195.6304.5174.5134.5
Response*n (%)
10 (83%)6 (86%)7 (88%)9 (90%)
HAI NT
* Response defined as 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline. For the HAI assay, a response also must achieve a titer of 1:40 or greater
Response to a single dose of H5 vaccine in 2006
13
Relationship between response in 1998 and response in 2005
Response to rH5 in 1998^
No Yes
GMT
44.3172.5
Response*n (%)
17 (63%)8 (80%)
GMT
67.7226.3
Response*n (%)
22 (81%)10 (100%)
HAI NT
Response to a single dose of H5 vaccine in 2006
N
2710
* Response defined as 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline. For the HAI assay, a response also must achieve a titer of 1:40 or greater
^ Response in 1998 was defined as 4-fold or greater increase in MN titer to a titer of 1:80 or greater, accompanied by positive WB
14
Memory B cell responses of primed subjects in study DMID 05-043
B
B
B
B
J
J
J J
H
H
H
HF F
F
F
Ñ ÑÑ
ÑÉ É É É0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
% H
A/T
ota
l Ig
Days
B H5/VN
J H5 HK
H H1 NC
F H3 WY
Ñ H6 TEAL
É KLH
**
Figure 1: Human memory B cell ELISPOT analysis of H5 specificresponses in H5/97 immune subjects revaccinated with H5/04experimental influenza vaccine. ** H5/97 and H5/04 responsessignificantly increased from day 0, P < 0.01.
15
Conclusions
• The antibody responses to a single dose of non-adjuvanted vaccine support the hypothesis that previous vaccination with a clade 3 H5 vaccine primed for responses to a clade 1 H5 vaccine
• Antibody responses to a single booster dose exceeded those seen after two doses in naïve subjects, and were better than those seen with the original recombinant vaccine. The reasons for such vigorous responses to revaccination are unclear:
• Revaccination was well tolerated, with a side effect profile similar to vaccination of naïve subjects.
16
Conclusions
• Further studies to evaluate different priming schedules and to verify priming between clade 1 and clade 2 viruses are needed
• If the results were confirmed in larger studies, then pre-pandemic vaccination programs could be considered for some populations (first responders, HCW, military)
17
Acknowledgements
University of Rochester Carrie Nolan Diane O’Brien Mhorag Hay Dave Topham John TreanorDMID Roland Levandowski Linda Lambert Shy Shorer
EMMES Corporation Mark Wolff Ken Wilkins Heather Hill
Southern Research Institute Tom Rowe
18
Response of healthy adults to a third dose of subvirion H5 vaccine (study DMID 04-090)
7.5 mcg (n=84)
15 mcg (n=86)
45 mcg (n=78)
90 mcg (n=85)
180 208562804
8
16
32
64
GM
T H
AI a
ntib
ody
Study day
Vaccine
19
Alignment of A/Hong Kong/156/97 and A/Vietnam/1203/04 H5 Hemagglutinins
Clade 3 Clade 2 Clade 1´ Clade 1 H3 No. Functional significance
N45* D D D 54† Antigenic site C
S84 N N N 92 Antigenic site E
A86 A A V 93 Antigenic site E
N94 D D D (1) 101 Near Y91; receptor binding?
N124 D S S 129 Antigenic site B
S129 S L L 133a Receptor binding
L138 Q Q Q 142 Antigenic site A
S155 – N155 – 159 Antigenic site B
T156‡ A A T 160 N154 glycosylation motif
L175 L L L (2) 179 Near H179; receptor binding?
T188 T T T (3) 192 Near L190; receptor binding?
K189 R R K 193 Adjacent to receptor binding, antigenic site B
E212 K K R 216 Antigenic site D
S223 – N223§ – (4) 227 Receptor binding
T263 A A T 266 Antigenic site E
325R¶ Absent – – Absent HA cleavage efficiency
EID 11:1515-1521, 2005
20
Antigenic relatedness of clade 3 and clade 1 viruses
Table 2. Antigenic analysis of H5N1 isolates from Asia
Virus antigen Clade
Reference ferret antisera*
HK156 NCVD8 HK213 VN1203 VN04xPR8-rg VN78 VN4207 VN14 VN32321
A/Hong Kong/156/97 3 1,280 320 640 80 320 40 80 80 80
A/ck/Vietnam/NCVD8/03 2 640 160 80 80 160 20 <10 160 40
A/Hong Kong/213/03 1´ 1,280 1,280 2,560 80 640 160 160 640 640
A/Vietnam/1203/04 1 40 20 <10 640 320 40 160 80 40
A/Vietnam/1203/04xPR8-rg 1 80 <10 10 640 320 40 160 160 40
A/Vietnam/1194/04 1 40 20 10 640 320 40 160 160 40
A/Vietnam/JP178/04 1 80 10 <10 1,280 320 80 160 160 80
A/Vietnam/JP4207/05 1 160 40 40 1,280 640 80 320 160 80
A/Vietnam/JP14/05 1 20 <10 10 640 80 20 40 80 40
A/Vietnam/JP30321/05 1 40 40 10 <10 40 10 <10 40 160
*Homologous HI titers are in boldface.
EID 11:1515-1521, 2005