3
3rd International Conferences and Workshops on Basic and Applied Sciences 2010 ISBN: 978-979-19096-1-7 B005 Evaluation of Hyperthermia Effect on Cell Viability by a Simple Crystal Violet Method of MDA-MB 231 Cell Line E.Asita and H.Salehhuddin Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioengineering, University of Technology Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected] email: [email protected] Abstract Viability of cultured mammalian cells is evaluated by a variety of techniques. In this study, a simple crystal violet staining method was used to determine hyperthermia effect on viability of human breast cancer MDA-MB 231 cell. The cells were exposed to heat at 42˚C for 2 hours to estimate the percentage of cell viability using crystal violet procedure (4% paraformaldehyde fixation). The value assay was measured continuously from day 1 to day 7. The percentage of viability was significantly decreased after 7 days of heat exposure at 42˚C (74.11±1.11%) compared to control (100% viability) (p< 0.05). More cells were killed at high temperature (42˚C) and longer duration of heat. However, temperatures above 42˚C and longer exposure of heat (> 2 hours) can cause damages in healthy cells. This study revealed that crystal violet was a sensitive assay for adherent cell. It is also very effective; simple; and rapid quantitative assay to measure the cell viability of MDA-MB 231 cell. Keywords: Cell viability; Crystal violet assay; Hyperthermia; Sensitive assay. 1 Introduction A variety of methods have been used for evaluating the cytotoxic effects of cultured cells, depending on the cell or tissue type. The assays widely used in mammalian cell are based either on colorimetric method or microscopic analysis (Juan et al., 2003). One of the techniques, crystal violet (CV) staining assay is a well known quantitative colorimetric procedure. The colorimetric determination of the stained cells is based on loss of ability to maintain and provide energy for metabolic growth and function (Chiba et al., 1997). Crystal violet or gentian violet is a triphenylmethane dye which taken up by cells (Jorge et al., 2007). This technique has been used with modifications for a wide number of applications, most of them to determine effect of chemicals, drugs, or toxins from pathogens on cytotoxicity or cell death (Harhaji et al., 2004; Shaik et al., 2004; Rothman, 1986 (tdk ad dlm dapus)), and to evaluate cell viability (Thomas et al., 2004) or proliferation of cell (Zivadinovc et al., 2005) under different conditions. The most common method used with adherent cells has been the crystal violet assay when compared to other procedure such as trypan blue method which the cells have to be physically or enzymatically removed from the growth surface before measure the cell viability (Sanford et al., 1951). Therefore, crystal violet staining technique is very effective because it is simple; reproducible assay of cytotoxicity; and a number of materials can be evaluated simultaneously (Itagaki et al., 1991; Saotome et al., 1989). Hyperthermia means that body tissue is exposed to high temperatures (up to 45°C). It is a type of cancer treatment (Samia et al., 2007). Research has shown that high temperatures can damage or kill cancer cells with usually minimal injury to normal tissue (Van der zee, 2002). In the present study, it was aimed to determine the effect of hyperthermia on viability in human breast cancer MDA-MB 231 cell. 2 Methodology 2.1 Cells The human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB 231 was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 4.5 g/L glucose, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and 10% fetal

B005 Asita Elengoe

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Paper

Citation preview

  • 3rd International Conferences and Workshops on Basic and Applied Sciences 2010 ISBN: 978-979-19096-1-7

    B005

    Evaluation of Hyperthermia Effect on Cell Viability by a Simple Crystal Violet Method of MDA-MB 231 Cell Line

    E.Asita and H.Salehhuddin

    Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioengineering,

    University of Technology Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia e-mail: [email protected]

    email: [email protected]

    Abstract

    Viability of cultured mammalian cells is evaluated by a variety of techniques. In this study, a simple crystal violet staining method was used to determine hyperthermia effect on viability of human breast cancer MDA-MB 231 cell. The cells were exposed to heat at 42C for 2 hours to estimate the percentage of cell viability using crystal violet procedure (4% paraformaldehyde fixation). The value assay was measured continuously from day 1 to day 7. The percentage of viability was significantly decreased after 7 days of heat exposure at 42C (74.111.11%) compared to control (100% viability) (p< 0.05). More cells were killed at high temperature (42C) and longer duration of heat. However, temperatures above 42C and longer exposure of heat (> 2 hours) can cause damages in healthy cells. This study revealed that crystal violet was a sensitive assay for adherent cell. It is also very effective; simple; and rapid quantitative assay to measure the cell viability of MDA-MB 231 cell. Keywords: Cell viability; Crystal violet assay; Hyperthermia; Sensitive assay.

    1 Introduction

    A variety of methods have been used for evaluating the cytotoxic effects of cultured cells, depending on the cell or tissue type. The assays widely used in mammalian cell are based either on colorimetric method or microscopic analysis (Juan et al., 2003). One of the techniques, crystal violet (CV) staining assay is a well known quantitative colorimetric procedure. The colorimetric determination of the stained cells is based on loss of ability to maintain and provide energy for metabolic growth and function (Chiba et al., 1997). Crystal violet or gentian violet is a

    triphenylmethane dye which taken up by cells (Jorge et al., 2007). This technique has been used with modifications for a wide number of applications, most of them to determine effect of chemicals, drugs, or toxins from pathogens on cytotoxicity or cell death (Harhaji et al., 2004; Shaik et al., 2004; Rothman, 1986 (tdk ad dlm dapus)), and to evaluate cell viability (Thomas et al., 2004) or proliferation of cell (Zivadinovc et al., 2005) under different conditions.

    The most common method used with adherent cells has been the crystal violet assay when compared to other procedure such as trypan blue method which the cells have to be physically or enzymatically removed from the growth surface before measure the cell viability (Sanford et al., 1951). Therefore, crystal violet staining technique is very effective because it is simple; reproducible assay of cytotoxicity; and a number of materials can be evaluated simultaneously (Itagaki et al., 1991; Saotome et al., 1989). Hyperthermia means that body tissue is exposed to high temperatures (up to 45C). It is a type of cancer treatment (Samia et al., 2007). Research has shown that high temperatures can damage or kill cancer cells with usually minimal injury to normal tissue (Van der zee, 2002). In the present study, it was aimed to determine the effect of hyperthermia on viability in human breast cancer MDA-MB 231 cell.

    2 Methodology

    2.1 Cells The human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB 231 was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 4.5 g/L glucose, 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and 10% fetal

  • Asita, Evaluation of Hyperthermia Effect on Cell Viability by a Simple Crystal Violet Method of MDA-MB 231 Cell Line

    B005

    calf serum (FCS). Cells are maintained in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37C. 2.2 Hyperthermic exposure MDA-MB 231 cells, 1104 cells/well in 200l culture medium, were seeded in each well of 96-well plates and were pre-cultured overnight incubation at 37C.Then, hyperthermic exposure was performed by placing culture plates in an incubator maintained at 42C. Well temperature was monitored and maintained within 0.1C during the treatment period. Cultured cells were maintained at 37C served as controls for all experiments.

    2.3 Crystal Violet Assay Cell viability was measured by the crystal violet staining method. After hyperthermic exposure, the cultivation medium was removed gently from the wells and cells were washed with PBS. Non-adherent cells were washed off and remaining cells were fixed with 200l of 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. After washing, 100 l of 0.05% crystal violet (CV) solution in 20% ethanol was added and cells were allowed to stain for 30 min. Following three washes with distilled water, the plates were aspirated and allowed to air-dry at room temperature. To each well, 200l of 10% acetic acid was added and incubated for 20 min with shaking. 100 l of the dissolved dye solution was taken out and diluted in (1:4) distilled water. The optical density at 570nm at each well was measured on a microplate reader. 10% acetic acid was used as blank. The average absorbance of the control cells exposed to free culture medium was set to represent 100% of viability and the results were expressed as percentage of these controls (Ito, 1984). 2.4 Statistical analysis Results were expressed as a mean standard error of the mean (SEM). The mean values were calculated from data taken from three different experiments performed in triplicates on separate days using freshly prepared reagents for all cases. Significance testing was performed where indicated using an independent t-test (Students; 2 populations) and an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The differences were evaluated significant at p < 0.05(5%).

    3 Result

    Effect of hyperthermia on cell viability of MDA-MB 231 was evaluated using crystal violet staining with fixation of 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were treated at heat 42C for 2 hours to determine the percentage of cell viability. The results were summarized in Table 1 and Figure 1. The value

    assay was measured continuously from day 1 to day 7. The percentage of viability was significantly decreased after 7 days of heat exposure at 42C (74.111.11%) compared to control (100% viability) (p< 0.05). More cancer cells were killed at high temperature (42C) and longer duration of heat with minimal damage to normal cells. This shows that hyperthermia had a significant effect on cell viability of MDA-MB-231. However, temperatures above 42C and longer exposure of heat (> 2 hours) can cause damages in healthy cells. Table 1: Viability of MDA-MB 231 cell line exposed to heat shock treatment at 42C for 2 hours as measured with crystal violet staining procedure (4% paraformaldehyde fixation). The data are presented as the mean SD (SD was within 5% of the mean) of triplicate observations from three independent experiments.

    Figure 1: After 2 hours of hyperthermic exposure, percent cell viability of MDA-MB 231 was determined by crystal violet staining technique with 4% paraformaldehyde fixation. The values assay was measured from day 1 to day 7. The data are presented as mean SD (SD was within 5% of the mean) from three independent experiments in triplicate. The crystal violet assay involves simultaneous cell lysis and the released nuclei to stain purple in a hypertonic solution (citric acid) (Berry et al., 1996). The stained nuclei are measured by a microplate

    Day Percentage of cell viability (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    91.004.82 87.283.59 85.804.36 83.694.96 82.032.82 76.550.60 74.111.11

  • 3rd International Conferences and Workshops on Basic and Applied Sciences 2010 ISBN: 978-979-19096-1-7

    B005

    reader at absorbance 595nm. This method has been widely used for monitoring mammalian cell cultures because of the fast and quantitative release of stained nuclei. Percentage viability of MDA-MB 231 cell line determined by the crystal violet method; was significantly and consistently high (p< 0.05). Therefore, it proved that crystal violet was a sensitive assay for adherent cell. It is also very effective; simple; and permits many samples to be analyzed rapidly and simultaneously (Itagaki et al., 1991; Saotome et al., 1989).

    4 Conclusion

    In this study, it revealed that crystal violet was a sensitive and useful assay for adherent cell. Besides that, hyperthermia enhanced reduction in viability of MDA-MB-231 cell.

    References

    [1] Berry, J.M., Huebener, E. and Butler, M., The crystal violet nuclei staining technique leads to anomalous results in monitoring mammalian cell cultures. Cytotechnology, 21: 73-80, 1996.

    [2] Chiba, K., Kawakami, K and Tohyama,

    K., Simultaneous Evaluation of Cell Viability by Neutral Red, MTT and Crystal Violet Staining Assays of the Same Cells. Toxicology in Vitro, 12: 251-258, 1998.

    [3] Harhaji, L., Vuckovic, O., Miljkovic, D.,

    Stosic-Grujicic, S. and Trajkovic, V., Iron down-regulates macrophage anti-tumour activity by blocking nitric oxide production. Clin Exp Immunology, 137: 109116, 2004.

    [4] Itagaki, H., Hagino, S., Kobayashi, T. and

    Umeda, M., An in vitro alternatine to the Darize eye irritation test: evaluation of the crystal violet staining method. Toxicology in Vitro, 5: 139-143, 1991.

    [5] Ito, M., Microassay for studying

    anticellular effects of human interferon. Journal of Interferon Research, 4: 603608, 1984.

    [6] Jorge, C.G.,Hugo, B.,Barrios, G., Delia,

    E.C., Salvador S.,1 Pilar C., Carmen, A., Molina, T. and Lucio, V.C., Use of a colorimetric assay to measure differences in cytotoxicity of Mycobacterium

    tuberculosis strains. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 56: 733-737, 2007.

    [7] Juan, M. Capasso, A, Belen, R. Cosso,

    B, Tomas Berl, A, Christopher, J. Rivard, A, Carlos, Jimenez, B., A colorimetric assay for determination of cell viability in algal Cultures.Biomolecular Engineering, 20: 133-158, 2003.

    [8] Samia, I., Mostafa, Abd, E., Hady, A.,

    Abd, E.W., Gamal, M., Abu, Sinna., and Amal, I.H., The relationship between hyperthermia and heat shock proteins in human breast and hepato cellular carcinoma cell lines. J.Med.Lab.Sci, 16(1): 27-42, 2007.

    [9] Sanford, K.K., Earle, W.R., Evans, V. J.,

    Waltz, H.K. and Shannon J.E., The measurement of proliferation in tissue cultures by enumeration of cell nuclei. J Natl Cancer Inst, 11: 773-795, 1951.

    [10] Saotome, K., Morita, H. and Umeda, M.,

    Cytotoxicity test with simplified crystal violet staining method using microtitre plates and its application to injection drugs. Toxicology in Vitro, 3: 317-321, 1989.

    [11] Shaik, M. S., Chatterjee, A. and Singh, M.,

    Effects of monensin liposomes on the cytotoxicity, apoptosis and expression of multidrug resistance genes in doxorubicin-resistant human breast tumour (MCF-7/dox) cell-line. J Pharm Pharmacology, 56: 899907, 2004.

    [12] Thomas, M., Finnegan, C. E., Rogers, K.

    M., Purcell, J. W., Trimble, A., Johnston, P. G. and Boland, M. P., STAT1: a modulator of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res, 64: 83578364, 2004.

    [13] van der Zee, J., Heating the patient: A

    promising approach? Annals of Oncology: ESMO, 13(8): 1173-1184, 2002.

    [14] Zivadinovic, D., Gametchu, B. and

    Watson, C. S., Membrane estrogen receptor-alpha levels in MCF-7 breast cancer cells predict cAMP and proliferation responses. Breast Cancer Res, 7: R101R112, 2005.