Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Availability of Generators:
Reliability and Efficiency in the
Present Operating Regime
Workshop on “Regulatory Framework in Electricity Industry
in India – Challenges, Governance & Future Roadmap” Ranchi, 7th Dec’2018
Power Scenario
Coal, 195992,
57%
Gas, 24937,
7%
Nuclear, 6780, 2%
Hydro, 45487, 13%
Renewables, 72013, 21%
Others, 838, 0%
Installed Capacity, MWAs on 31.10.2018
3,46,048 MW
Growth in Demand: CAGR- 5%
Growth in Renewable Supply: CAGR- 24%
Growth in Overall Capacity: CAGR- 8%
Growth in Renewable Capacity: CAGR- 19%
Renewables planned to be ramped up to 175GW by 2022
Grid Operating RegimeTypical Demand & Renewable Supply Curve
• Evening Peak coincides with low Renewable availability
• Day Lean coincides with High Solar; Night Lean coincides with High Wind
• This creates additional Cycling Requirements from Conventional Generators
• Seasonal Variation
– Peak Demand 175GW in
Oct’18
– Peak Demand as low as
135GW in Jan’18
• Daily Variation
– Peak to Off-Peak: upto 1.25
• Hourly Variation
– Hourly Ramp rates: around
6000 MW/hr
– In 2022, max net Load Ramp
expected to be 92GW over 6
hours
Evening Peak
Morning Peak
Day Lean
Night Lean
NTPC Operating Fleet- 52+ GW
• By Size/ Technology• By Fuel Type/ Vintage
122
44.1035
5.985 0.8113.0 0.91
No of Units Capacity (GW)Coal Gas/Liquid Hydro Solar Wind
111
36.4
11 7.7
No of units Capacity (GW)
Sub Critical Super Critical
33
4.6
28
6.8
50
25.0
11 7.7
No of units Capacity (GW)
<200 200 Series 500 Series 660 & 800
33
9.69
27
7.16
36
14.614
27
12.635
No of units Capacity (GW)
>25 15~ 25 5 ~ 15 <5
Availability, Reliability & Efficiency
• Availability: Capability to deliver
– Readiness of machine
– Adequate Availability of inputs- coal, water
– Operating conditions- quality of inputs, ambient
conditions
• Reliability: Available when required
– Also as required- matching demand characteristics?
• Efficiency- at best cost- normalised for inputs?
– How do we measure efficiency? Cost? M/c efficiency
Parameters?
– Since there are asymmetries in inputs, machine
efficiency alone may not define merit order
NTPC’s Fleet Characteristics
• NTPC’s fleet predominantly Thermal
– Coal Plants comprise 85% of NTPC’s portfolio
– Gas Capacity 9%; however effectively 2%
• APM gas availability around 20%
• 50% GTs generally not on bar
• Capacity set up as Base Load units
– Both as Designed & as Contracted
• 60 units (~17GW) more than 15 years old
– Technological Limitations of Cycling, Ramping and Low load
operations
– Impact on Safe, Reliable and Efficient Operations
The Above Scenario of NTPC largely representative of the Scenario in the CountryThe country is looking to the Thermal Generators to match the net demand
variation characteristics that are now incident on the system
• Start up/Shut down
(Hot/Warm/Cold)
• On load cycling
(LL1,LL2,LL3)
• High frequency load
variations
(RGMO/AGC/Condensate
throttling)
Type of Cycling
Cyclic Operation-Safety Concern
• Sub-optimised combustion can lead to
frequent tripping on flame failure, furnace
pressurisation, slagging and clinkering
• Low flue gas temp below Acid Dew point
can lead to duct , APH basket and ESP
fields corrosion. Even chances of Collapse
of ESP
• Due to corrosion boiler drains may also
burst leading to unsafe situation
Cyclic Operation- Impacts
• Fast & Frequent thermal cycling of
components lead to fatigue, creep
• Stresses on components and turbine shells
resulting from changing pressure & temp
• Failures of boiler tubes caused by cyclic
fatigue, corrosion fatigue and pitting.
• Cracking in dissimilar metal welds,
headers and valves, and other thick-walled
components due to rapid changes in steam
temperature.
• Cracking of generator rotors due to the
movement between the rotor and casing
during “barring”.
• LPT last stage blade is prone failure due to
handling of Wet steam
Shorter Component life expectancies result in higher EFOR- Reduced Reliability
Cycling and Fast Ramping- Cycle Chemistry
• Corrosion caused by oxygen entering the system (e.g.,
during start-up), and changes to water quality and
chemistry, resulting from, e.g. falling pH
• Condensation from cooling steam, which in turn can
cause corrosion of parts, leakage of water, and an
increased need for drainage.
• Oxidation, e.g, from exposure to air on start-up and
draining; oxides in boiler tubes can dislodge due to
thermal changes.
• Corrosion of turbine parts, not only from oxides but
also from wet steam that occurs on start-up, during low-
load operations
Cycling and Fast Ramping- Impact on η and
environment
• Heat rates typically degrade at partial load
due to lower steam parameter (Pr and temp) and Low Feed water temp at ECO inlet.
• NOX and SO2 rates are also affected by loading. Startup emissions of CO2, NOX, and SO2 may be significantly higher than steady-state emissions rates.
• Ramp ups in power output may also result in higher than steady-state emissions.
• Low flue gas temp below acid Dew point can damage APH basket and flue gas duct.
Cycling of Coal Plants- Effects
In Indian conditions there is limited data
Boiler Component Failure due to Cycling
(Intertek Global Benchmarking study)
Failure due to Cycling operation in thermal plants
(Siemens European study)
Case Study
A team of experts from EEC, Siemens and VGB carried out test runs in unit
6 of the NTPC Dadri power plant jointly with the local operations team.
The aim of the tests to run 500 MW block with a minimum load of 40% & it
was successfully demonstrated by running the unit safely for five hours with
a load of 200 MW.
The test team was also able to drive load ramps of 15 MW/min (3% ramp
rate) successfully in the range of 200 to 500 MW and ramp down to 200MW
Copyright © 2016 Your Company All Rights Reserved. 14
LOAD(%)
RAMP
DOWN
MAJOR ACTION
TAKEN
OBSERVATION REMARK
420
MW(84%)
One Mill Cut Out MS TEMP maintaining high
Eco outlet o2% =3.1%
Steam temp fluctuation
330MW(66
%)
2ND Mill Cut out HRH steam temp maintaining low Steam temp fluctuation
280MW(55
%)
4 Mill in service One TDBFP recirculation valve opened
and due to Feed water flow imbalance
Drum level dipped
HRH steam temp maintaining low
Flame intensity <35%
Drum level fluctuation
Steam temp fluctuation
250MW(50
%)
One TDBFP was
withdrawn
Super heater temp after de-superheater
is less than Sat temp(alarm)
Delta T left and right after de-
superheater >20degc
Flame intensity stable
Steam temp fluctuation
230MW(46
%)
3RD Mill was cut out Flame intensity improved,
Flue gas temp after APH was <113 deg
C at SAH and <108degc at PAH outlet
Flue gas temp of 108°C is below the
acid dew point which is approx. at
122°C as per a sulfur content of 0.3%.
This situation will lead to corrosion
within the flue gas duct and ESP
200
MW(40%)
O2% increased to 4.3%
to improve mill outlet
temp and windbox to
furnace DP
Single BFP and 3 mills in
service
Mill outlet temp improved >70 degc
Flame intensity remaining the same
FW Flow and drum level fluctuation
, flue gas temp running below acid
dew point causing potential for
corrosion
Steam temp parameter fluctuating
Systematic Ramp down
Cost Implications for Generators
• All of the effects of Low Load Operations, Cycling, fast
ramping etc. are imposing additional costs on the
generators
• Capex Costs: For modifications in equipment, processes
& systems- one time costs
– Automatic Mill Operation (Mill Scheduler)
– Smarter Main Steam Temperature Control
– Reheat Temperature Control
– Automated Start of Fans and Pumps
– Flue Gas Temperature Control
– Modulating Recirculation Valve Across Boiler Feed Pump
These Modification may require an additional Capex
requirement to the tune of Rs 50 Crores. However this will
vary from unit to unit
Cost Implications for Generators …contd.Recurring Cost
– Additional O&M Cost
– Reduction in Efficiency
– Emissions management
– Reduced Availability
• Modified Availability targets for such units- linked to resonse
Regulatory framework to address these cost implications