13
Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web Gordon Dunsire Presented to the Authority Control Interest Group (ACIG) meeting, ALA Annual, New Orleans, 26 June 2011

Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

  • Upload
    hazel

  • View
    45

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web. Gordon Dunsire Presented to the Authority Control Interest Group (ACIG) meeting, ALA Annual, New Orleans, 26 June 2011. Overview. RDA, FRBR, FRAD and authority control Extending authority control concepts to data linking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Gordon DunsirePresented to the Authority Control Interest

Group (ACIG) meeting, ALA Annual, New Orleans, 26 June 2011

Page 2: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Overview

RDA, FRBR, FRAD and authority controlExtending authority control concepts to data

linkingLinked data and the Semantic Web

Page 3: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

RDA implementation scenario 1: Relational/object-oriented database structure

FRBR

FRAD

Page 4: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Title: Cataloguing is fun!

Author: Mary MacDonald

Content type:

Media type:

LCSH:

microfiche

text

Cataloging

Bibliographic record: 12345 Name authority record: 8765

Heading: MacDonald, Mary

Place of birth: Edinburgh

LCSH authority record: 5432

Heading: Cataloging

See also: BooksRDA content type record: 1234

Term: text

Definition: Content expressed through a form of notation for language intended to be perceived visually.

ISBD media type record: 5432

Term: microform

Definition:Media used to store reduced-size images, not readable to the human eye, and designed for use with a device such as a microfilm or microfiche reader.

8765

5432

1234

5432

9876

65443

Page 5: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Title: Cataloguing is fun!

Author:

Content type:

Media type:

LCSH:

Bibliographic record: 12345

8765

5432

1234

5432

Name authority record: 8765

Heading: MacDonald, Mary

Place of birth: 9876

12345 8765Author

8765 Place of birth 9876

8765 Heading “MacDonald, Mary”

9876 Name “Edinburgh”

9876 Country 4567

Stop! Ambiguous: link not safe.

Identifier: ok to link.

8765 Heading “MacDonald, Mary”

12345 8765Author 8765 Place of birth 9876

9876 Name “Edinburgh”

12345 8765Author 8765 Place of birth 9876

9876 Country 4567

Page 6: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Linked data is not a new idea!It extends concepts of authority control

“Preferred” labelsCreate/maintain once; link many times

Re-use of metadataMore than one “attribute” associated with a “heading”

E.g. Place of birth of person with name headingConcepts can be applied to authority records

As well as bibliographic description recordsFull extension leads to “record” dis-aggregation

All “records” in bibliographic control systems

Page 7: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Linked data and RDF

Resource Description Framework (RDF)Designed for machine-processing of metadata

at global scale (Semantic Web)24/7/365Trillions of operations per second

Everything must be dis-ambiguatedMachines are dumb

Simplicity helps!Machine-readable identifiers

Page 8: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

RDF tripleMetadata expressed as “atomic” statements

A simple, single, irreducible statementThe title of this book is “Cataloguing is fun!”

Constructed in 3 parts“Triple”

The title of this book is “Cataloguing is fun!”Subject of the statement = Subject: This bookNature of the statement = Predicate: has titleValue of the statement = Object: “Cataloguing is fun!”

This book – has title – “Cataloguing is fun!”subject – predicate - object

Page 9: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Identifiers

Need unambiguous way of identifying each part of the triple for efficient machine-processingHuman labels (“This book”, “has title”) no good

Same thing, different labels; different things, same label

Exploit the utility of the URLMachine-readable, regular syntax, unambiguous

Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)

Page 10: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Uniform Resource IdentifierCan be any unique combination of numbers and

lettersNo intrinsic meaning; it’s just an identifier

Can look like a URLhttp://iflastandards.info/ns/isbd/elements/P1001But does not lead to a Web page (in principle ...)

RDF requires the subject and predicate of triple to be URIsObject can be a URI, or a literal string (“Cataloguing is

fun!”)

Page 11: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

RDF propertiesPredicates are called properties in RDF“Verbal” part of the metadata statement

E.g. “A has author B”, “B has heading ...”Properties link specific instances of two things

A = a specific book, B = a specific person... = a specific label, character string, annotation

=> a “literal”Properties are the links in linked data, the pathways

through the Semantic Web to human-readable metadata

Page 12: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Labels, global identifiers, linked data

Headings can be managed in the same way as other controlled vocabulariesThey are all RDF labels

Global identifiers (URIs) and RDF allow distributed authority controlBut without need to copy and maintain in local systems

Different labels for the same thing can be linked, and a chain can link a label to a resourceIts all linked data ...

Page 13: Authority control, new library standards, and the Semantic Web

Thank you

[email protected]