15
Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study Methodology for measuring diversion in Austin 1

Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study 

Methodology for measuring diversion in Austin

1

Page 2: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Austin’s Zero Waste Goal and Milestones 

2

90% Diversion by 2040

Page 3: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Baseline study

• Goals for measuring diversion in Austin– Research best practices of other communities– Comprehensive approach– Capture activities such as Reduction, Reuse, Repurposing

• Goals for future studies– Transparency– Repeatability

3

Page 4: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Challenges

• City of Austin directly controls less than 25% of the resource stream– Services residential (single family) homes

• Private/Self haulers handle at least 75% of materials generated in Austin– Universal Recycling Ordinance (URO) influences market

• Multiple haulers and facilities manage commercial and multifamily waste

• No City of Austin landfill or MRF

4

Page 5: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Methodology: Four Pillars

• Comprehensive approach to diversion– Data Collection– Business Surveys– Lid‐lifting observations– Waste Characterization

5

Page 6: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Data Collection

• Data from publicly available sources– Licensed Hauler Tons– URO Annual Diversion Plans– City facility and contracts

• Direct outreach to businesses– Donation Centers– Large Employers

6

Page 7: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

BusinessSurvey

• 3000 randomly selected businesses 

• 1,000 follow up calls• ~3% response rate

7

Page 8: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Lid‐Lifting Observations

8

Page 9: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Waste Characterizations

• Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost facilities

• Expanded category list, 30+ material categories• No control over routes

9

Page 10: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Success: What worked?

• Met study objectives within budget and schedule

• Built awareness in the community• Included diversion activities not previously captured

• Foundation for continuous improvement

10

Page 11: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Success: Methodology

• We have a lot of good data available

• Good response rate for business sureys

• Easy mobile reporting for lid‐lifting through Re‐Trac

• Laminated labels on bins increased sort efficiency

11

Page 12: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Lessons Learned

• Statistically significant waste sorts• Observations are good, but difficult to include in calculations

• Improved survey techniques

12

Page 13: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Challenges and Next Steps

• How do you measure what isn’t there?

• Real Diversion includes Reduction, Reuse, Repair, not just Recycling

• No standardized way to quantify

13

Page 14: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Next Steps

• What can we do now to improve the next study– Help establish national standards– Get systems and processes in place for 2020– Is diversion rate the best way to calculate how well we’re doing?

14

Page 15: Austin’s 2015 Diversion Study...Waste Characterizations • Sorts at 3 landfills, 3 MRFs, observations at 2 compost ... Microsoft PowerPoint - FINAL Diversion Study - TxSWANA 2016

Thank you

Questions? • Roslyn Kygar, P.G.

[email protected]

• Business Outreach [email protected]‐9727

• Diversion Study web page –coming soon!

• www.austintexas.gov\URO

15