15
August H. Ankum, 1027 Arch, Suite 304 Philadelphia, PA 19107 2152371180 August H. Ankum, Ph.D. Senior Vice President Founding Partner QSI Consulting, Inc. [email protected] Biography t.QSI 9 consulting, inc. Dr. Ankum is a founding partner of QSI, serves as Senior Vice President, and is the firm's Chief Economist. Dr. Ankum is a practicing economist and consultant specializing in both domestic and international telecommunications issues. Dr. Ankum also practices in QSI's international transfer pricing group. Before co-founding QSI, Dr. Ankum worked directly with a number of the country's largest communications clients in his own practice. Prior to that he served as Senior Economist for MCI Telecommunications Corporation's Public Policy Division, and before that as a Manager in the Regulatory and External Affairs Division of Teleport Communications Group, Inc. (later purchased by AT&T). In his capacity with both MCI and TCG, Dr. Ankum provided expert testimony regarding the economics of telecommunications and public policy in contested proceedings across the country. Dr. Ankum specializes in competitive telephony issues pertaining to removing barriers to entry in local telecommunications markets. Dr. Ankum began his career in telecommunications with the Texas Public Utility Commission, where he served as the Commission Staffs Chief Telecommunications Economist before leaving in 1994. Educational Background Ph.D., Economics University of Texas, Austin, Texas 1992 Master of Arts, Economics University of Texas, Austin, Texas 1987 Bachelor of Arts, Economics Quincy College, Quincy, Illinois 1982 Page I ..

August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph~D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.

Senior Vice PresidentFounding PartnerQSI Consulting, [email protected]

Biography

t.QSI9 consulting, inc.

Dr. Ankum is a founding partner of QSI, serves as Senior Vice President, and is the firm's ChiefEconomist. Dr. Ankum is a practicing economist and consultant specializing in both domestic andinternational telecommunications issues. Dr. Ankum also practices in QSI's international transfer pricinggroup. Before co-founding QSI, Dr. Ankum worked directly with a number of the country's largestcommunications clients in his own practice. Prior to that he served as Senior Economist for MCITelecommunications Corporation's Public Policy Division, and before that as a Manager in theRegulatory and External Affairs Division of Teleport Communications Group, Inc. (later purchased byAT&T). In his capacity with both MCI and TCG, Dr. Ankum provided expert testimony regarding theeconomics of telecommunications and public policy in contested proceedings across the country. Dr.Ankum specializes in competitive telephony issues pertaining to removing barriers to entry in localtelecommunications markets. Dr. Ankum began his career in telecommunications with the Texas PublicUtility Commission, where he served as the Commission Staffs Chief Telecommunications Economistbefore leaving in 1994.

Educational Background

Ph.D., EconomicsUniversity ofTexas, Austin, Texas 1992

Master ofArts, EconomicsUniversity ofTexas, Austin, Texas 1987

Bachelor ofArts, EconomicsQuincy College, Quincy, Illinois 1982

Page I~-----~..

Page 2: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

';~.QSI,.... consulting, inc.

PROCEEDINGS IN WHICH DR. ANKUM HAS FILED EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY:

Before the California Public Utilities CommissionConsolidated DocketJoint Application ofAT&T Communications ofCalifornia, Inc. (U 5002 C) and WorldCom, Inc.for the Commission to Reexamine the Recurring Costs and Prices ofUnbundled Switching in ItsFirst Annual Review ofUnbundled Network Element Costs Pursuant to Ordering Paragraph 11ofD.99-11-050On behalf of AIT and MCI

Before the Connecticut Department of Public Utility ControlDocket No. 02-05-17DPUC Investigation ofIntrastate Carrier Access ChargesOn behalf of AT&T and MCI

Before the Delaware Public Service CommissionPSC Docket No. 00-025Petition ofFocal Communications Corporation ofPennsylvania For Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) ofthe Telecommunications Act of1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement with BellAtlantic - Delaware, Inc.On behalf ofFocal Communications Corporation of Pennsylvania

Before the Florida Public Utilities CommissionDocket No. 990649B-TPInvestigation into Pricing ofUnbundled Network ElementsOn behalf of AT&T Communications ofthe Southern States, Inc. MClmetro AccessTransmission Services, LLC & MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc., Florida Digital Network,Inc. (collectively called the "ALEC Coalition").

Before the Florida Public Utilities CommissionDocket No. 030829-TPIn the Matter ofComplaint ofFDNCommunicationsfor Resolution ofCertain Billing Disputes andEriforcement ofUNE Orders and Interconnection Agreements with BellSouth Telecommunications,Inc.On behalf of Florida Digital Network, Inc. d/b/a FDN Communications

Before the Georgia Public Service CommissionDocket No. 6352-U.AT&TPetitionfor the Commission to Establish Resale Rules, Rates and terms and Conditions andthe Initial Unbundling ofServicesOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation

Page 2

Page 3: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

... August H. Ankum, Ph.D.·1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

~.QSI~t consulting, inc.

Before the DIinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 94-0048Adoption ofRules on Line-Side Interconnection and Reciprocal InterconnectionOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.

Before the DIinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 94-0096Proposed Introduction ofa Trial ofAmeritech's Customer First Plan in IllinoisOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.

Before the DIinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 94-0117Addendum to Proposed Introduction ofa Trial ofAmeritech's Customer First Plan in IllinoisOn behalf ofTeleport Communications Group, Inc.

Before the DIinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 94-0146AT&T's Petition for an Investigation and Order Establishing Conditions Necessary to PermitEffective Exchange Competition to the Extent Feasible in Areas Served by Illinois Bell TelephoneCompanyOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.

Before the DIinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 95-0315Proposed Reclassification of Bands Band C Business Usage and Business OperatorAssistance/Credit Surcharges to Competitive StatusOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the UIinois Commerce CommissionDocket 94-480Investigation Into Amending the Physical Collocation Requirements of83 Ill. Adm. Code 790On behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the DIinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 95-0458Petition for a Total Local Exchange Wholesale Tarifffrom Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/aAmeritech Illinois and Central Telephone Company Pursuant to Section 13-505.5 of the IllinoisPublic Utilities ActOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Page 3

Page 4: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

~.QSTf consulting, inc.

Before the Dlinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 95-0296Citation to Investigate Illinois Bell Telephone Company's Rates, Rules and regulations For itsUnbundled Network Component Elements, Local Transport Facilities, and End office IntegrationServicesOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Dlinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 96-AB-006In the Matter ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation Petitionfor Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) ofthe Telecommunications Act of1996 to Establish and Interconnection Agreement withIllinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a Ameritech IllinoisOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the D1inois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 96-AB-007In the Matter ofMCITelecommunications Corporation Petitionfor Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) ofthe Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish and Interconnection Agreement withCentral Telephone Company ofIllinois ("Sprint")On behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Dlinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 96-0486Investigation into forward looking cost studies and rates ofAmeritech Illinoisfor interconnection,network elements, transport and termination oftraffic.On behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Dlinois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 98-0396.Phase II ofAmeritech Illinois TELRIC proceedingOn behalfofMCIWorldCom.

Before the D1inois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 00-0700Illinois Commerce Commission On its Motion vs Illinois Bell Telephone Company Investigation intoTariffProviding Unbundled Local Switching with Shared TransportOn behalf of AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc., and WorldCom, Inc.

Page 4

Page 5: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

~- ..

~~QSl···.' consulting, inc.

Before the D1inois Commerce CommissionDocket No. 02-9864In the Matter of Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Filing to Increase Unbundled Loop andNonrecurring Rates (Tariffs Filed December 24, 2002)On Behalf of WorldCom, Inc., McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc., CovadCommunications Company, TDS Metrocom, LLC, Allegiance Telecom of Illinois, Inc.,RCN Telecom Services ofIllinois, LLC., Globalcom, Inc., Z-Tel Communications, Inc., XOIllinois, Inc., Forte Communications, Inc., CIMCO Communications, Inc.

Before the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 39948In the matter ofthe Petition ofMCI Telecommunications Corporationfor the Commission to ModifYits Existing Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity and to Authorize the Petitioner toProvide certain Centrex-like Intra-Exchange Services in the Indianapolis LATA Pursuant to I.e. 8­I -2-88, and to Decline the Exercise in Part ofits Jurisdiction over Petitioner's Provision ofsuchService, Pursuant to I.e. 8-1-2.6.On behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation

Before the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40178In the matter ofthe Petition ofIndiana Bell Telephone company, Inc. For Authorization to Apply aCustomer Specific Offering Tariffto Provide the Business Exchange Services Portion ofCentrex andPBX Trunking Services andfor the Commission to Decline to Exercise in Part Jurisdiction over thePetitioner's Provision ofsuch Services, Pursuant to I.e. 8-1-2.6On behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40603-INT-OlMCI Telecommunications Corporation Petition for Arbitration Pursuant to Section 252(b) oftheTelecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish and Interconnection Agreement with Indiana BellTelephone Company d/b/a Ameritech IndianaOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40611In the matter ofthe Commission Investigation and Generic Proceeding on Ameritech Indiana'sRatesfor Interconnection Service, Unbundled Elements and Transport and Termination under theTelecommunications Act of1996 and Related Indiana StatutesOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Page 5

Page 6: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

":t*QSI.•' consulting, inc,

Before the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40618In the Matter of the Commission Investiga.;v" w •.: :;0"0';0 , ".." V" :;~~ 0 "WOO J"v,Interconnection, Service, Unbundled Elements, and Transport under the FTA 96 andrelatedIndianaStatutesOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunication Corporation.

Before the Indiana Regulatory CommissionCause No. 40611-81In the matter ofthe Commission Investigation and Generic proceeding on the Ameritech Indiana'srates for Interconnection, Unbundled Elements, and Transport and Termination Under theTelecommunications Act of1996 and Related Indiana StatutesOn behalf of WorldCom, Inc., AT&T Communications ofIndiana, G.P.

Before the Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionCause No. 42393In the Matter ofthe Commission Investigation and Generic Proceeding ofRates and UnbundledNetwork Elements and Collocationfor Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated D/B/A SBCIndiana Pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of1996 and Related Indiana Statues.On Behalf of WorldCom, Inc. ("MCI") McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc., CovadCommunications Company, Z-Tel Communications, Inc.

Before the Iowa Department of Commerce Utilities BoardDocket No: RPU - 00 - 01US West Communications, Inc.,On behalf of McLeodUSA.

Before the Maryland Public Utilities CommissionCase No. 8988In The matter, The Implementation OfThe Federal Communications Commission's Triennial ReviewOrder.On Behalfof Cavalier Telephone, LLC

Before the Massachusetts Department of Energy and TransportationD.P.U. 96-83NYNEX/MCI ArbitrationOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Page 6

Page 7: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 19107215237 1180

?4QO~--"...- consulting, inc.

Before the Massachusetts Department of Energy and TransportationDocket 01-20Investigation into Pricing basedonTELRICjor-ffnbundledNe/Wvorl,~hmrre71ts",rmw"urH.'mm"b!·'mltir1=-rrfvJ''---t--­Unbundled Networks Elements and the Appropriate Avoided Cost Discount for Verizon NewEngland, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts' Resale Services.On behalf Allegiance, Network Plus, Inc., £1 Paso Networks, LLC, and Covad CommunicationsCompany.

Before the Massachusetts Department of Energy and TransportationDocket 01-03Investigation by the Department ofTelecommunications and Energy on its own Motion into theAppropriate Regulatory Plan to succeedPrice Cap Regulationfor Verizon New England, Inc. d/b/aVerizon Massachusetts' intrastate retail telecommunications services in the Commonwealth ofMassachusettsOn behalf ofNetwork Plus, Inc.

Before the Commonwealth OfMassachusetts Department OfTelecommunications and EnergyD.T.E.03-60Proceeding by the Department on its own Motion to Implement the Requirements ofthe FederalCommunications Commission's Triennial Review Order Regarding Switching for Mass marketCustomersOn Behalfof Conversent Communications of Massachusetts, LLC

Before the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-I0647In the Matter of the Application of City Signal, Inc. for an Order Establishing and ApprovingInterconnection Arrangements with Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyOn behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc.

Before the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-I0860In the Matter, on the Commission's Own Motion, to Establish Permanent InterconnectionArrangements Between Basic Local Exchange ProvidersOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-1l280In the Matter, on the Commission's Own Motion, to consider the total service long run incrementalcosts and to determine the pricesfor unbundled network elements, interconnection services, resoldservices, and basic local exchange services for Ameritech MichiganOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Page 7

Page 8: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

-August H. Ankum, Ph.D~1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

'CQST ---;1>' consulting, inc.

Before the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-11366In the matter ofthe application under Section 310(2) and 204, and the complaint under Section205(2) and 203, of MCI Telecommunications Corporation against AMERITECH requesting areduction in intrastate switched access chargesOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-13531In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, to review the costs oftelecommunications servicesprovided by SBC MichiganOn behalf of AT&T, Worldcom, Inc., McLeodUSA and TDS Metrocom.

Before the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-11831In the Matter ofthe Commission's own motion, to consider the total service long run incrementalcosts for all access, toll, and local exchange services provided by Ameritech MichiganOn behalfofMCIWorldCom, Inc.

Before the Michigan Public Service CommissionCase No. U-11830In the matter ofAmeritech Michigan's Submission on Performance Measures, Reporting, andBenchmarks, Pursuant to the October 2, 1998 Order in Case No. U-11654On behalf of Covad Communications, McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc., LDMITelecommunications Inc., Talk America Inc., and XO Communications Services, Inc.

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionPUC Docket No. P-442, 421, 3012/M-01-1916In Re Commission Investigation OfQwest 's Pricing OfCertain Unbundled Network Elements,On behalf of Otter Tail Telecom, Val-Ed Joint Venture D/B/A 702 Communications,McCleoudUSA, Eschelon Telecommunications, USLink.

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionPUC Docket No. P-421!AM-06-713OAH Docket No. 3-2500-17511-2In the Matter ofQwest Corporation's Applicationfor Commission Review ofTELRIC rates Pursuantto 47 U.S.c. § 251On BehalfofIntegra Telecom ofMinnesota, Inc.; McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc.;POPP.com, Inc.; DIECA Communications, Inc., d/b/a Covad Communications Company; TDSMetrocom; and XO Communications of Minnesota, Inc.

Page 8

Page 9: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

·August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

~~QSI.~. consulting, inc.

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionPUC Docket #P-421/CI-05-1996OAB Docket No. 12-2500-17246-2In the Matter ofa Potential Proceeding to Investigate the Wholesale Rate Charged by QwestOn behalfofIntegra Telecom ofMinnesota, Inc., McLeodUSA Telecommunications Service, Inc.,POPP.com, Inc., DIECA Communications, Inc. d/b/a Covad Communications Company, TDSMetrocom, and XO Communications of Minnesota, Inc.

Before the New Jersey Board of Public UtilitiesPetition ofFocal Communications Corporation ofNew Jersey For Arbitration Pursuant toSection 252(b) ofthe Telecommunications Act of /996 to Establish an InterconnectionAgreement with Bell AtlanticOn behalf of Focal Communications Corporation ofNew Jersey.

Before the New Jersey Board of Public UtilitiesDocket No. T000060356I/M/O the Board's Review ofUnbundled Network Elements Rates, Terms and Conditions ofBellAtlantic-New Jersey, Inc. New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, On behalf of WorldCom, Inc.

Before the State Of New Jersey Public Service CommissionDocket No. T003090705In The Matter, The Implementation Ofthe Federal Communications Commission's Triennial ReviewOrderOn Behalfof Conversent Communications ofNew Jersey, LLC

Before Tbe New Mexico State Corporation CommissionDocket No. 96-307-TCBrooks Fiber Communications ofNew Mexico, Inc. Petition for ArbitrationOn behalf of Brooks Fiber Communications ofNew Mexico, Inc.

Before The New Mexico State Corporation CommissionUtility Case No. 3495, Phase BIn the matter ofthe consideration ofcosting and pricing rules for OSS, collocation, sharedtransport, non-recurring charges, spot frames, combination ofnetwork elements and switching.On behalf ofthe Commission Staff.

Before the New York Public Service CommissionCase Nos. 95-C-0657, 94-C-0095, 91-C-1174Commission Investigation into Resale, Universal Service and Link and Port Pricing

Page 9

Page 10: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

On behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

'~*QSl"~~t consulting. inc.

Before the New York Public Service Commission­Case 99-C-0529In the Matter ofProceeding on Motion ofthe Commission To Reexamine Reciprocal CompensationOn BehalfOf Cablevision LightPath, Inc.

Before the New York Public Service CommissionCase 98-C-1357Proceeding on the Motion ofthe Commission to Examine New York Telephone Company's Ratesfor Unbundled Network ElementsOn behalf of Corecomm New York, Inc.

Before the New York Public Service CommissionCase 98-C-1357Proceeding on Motion ofthe Commission to Examine New York Telephone Company's Rates forUnbundled Network ElementsOn behalf ofMCIWorldCom.

Before the State Of New York Public Service CommissionCASE 02-C-1425In The Matter, Proceeding on Motion ofthe Commission to Examine the Processes, and RelatedCosts ofPerforming Loop Migrations on a More Streamlined (e.g., Bulk) BasicOn Behalf ofConversent Communications ofNew York, LLC

Before the Public Utilities Commission of OhioCase No. 96-888-TP-ARBIn the Matter ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation Petitionfor Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) ofthe Telecommunications Act of1996 to Establish and Interconnection Agreement withAmeritech OhioOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Public Utilities Commission of OhioCase No. 96-922-TP-UNC.In the matter ofthe review ofAmeritech Ohio's economic costs for interconnection, unbundlednetwork elements, and reciprocal compensation for transport and termination of localtelecommunications trafficOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Public Utilities Commission of OhioCase No. 00-1368-TP-ATA

Page 10

Page 11: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

", >.:~.

····~.QS1~·t'>+ consulting, inc.

In the Matter ofthe Review ofAmeritech Ohio's Economic Costs for Interconnection, UnbundledNetwork Elements, and Reciprocal Compensation for Transport and Termination of LocalTelecommunications Traffic. Case No. 96-922-TP-UNC ·andln-the--Ma//e. &f/he A-ppliee/itm 6f~~~1Ameritech Ohio for Approval ofCarrier to Carrier TariffOn behalf of MCIWorldCom and ATT of the Central Region.

Before the Public Utilities Commission of OhioCase No. 97-152-TP-ARBIn the matter ofthe petition ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation for arbitration pursuant tosection 252(b) ofthe Telecommunications Act of1996 to establish an interconnection agreementwith Cincinnati Bell Telephone CompanyOn behalf of the MCI Telecommunications Corporation

Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDocket No. 1-00940035In Re: Formal Investigation to Examine Updated Universal Service Principles and Policies fortelecommunications Services in the Commonwealth Interlocutory order, Initiation ofOral HearingPhaseOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Pennsylvania Pnblic Utility CommissionDocket No. M-0001352Structural Separation of VerizonOn behalfofMCI WorldCom.

Before the Puerto Rico Telecommunications Regulatory BoardDocket No. 97-0034-ARPetitionfor Arbitration Pursuant to 47 U.S.c. & (b) andthe Puerto Rico Telecommunications Act of1996, regarding Interconnection Rates Terms and Conditions with Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyOn behalf of Cellular Communications of Puerto Rico, Inc.

Before the State OfRbode Island And Providence Plantations Public Utilities CommissionDocket No. 2252Comprehensive Review ofIntrastate Telecommunications CompetitionOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the State OfRbode Island And Providence Plantations Public Utilities CommissionDocket Nos. 3550 and 2861In The Matter, Implementation ofthe Requirements ofthe FCC's Triennial Review Order r"TRO ")On behalf of Conversent Communications ofRhode Island, LLC

Page II

Page 12: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

> AugustH. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

>~«QSI,.t consulting, inc.

Before the Tennessee Public Service CommissionDocket No. 96-00067Avoidable Costs ofProviding BundledServicesjiJr-Resale'byLocal Exchange~,,'Fekp''''''''ne-<mmpam~----t--On behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation. '

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 7790Petition ofThe General Counsel for an Evidentiary Proceeding to Determine Market DominanceOn behalf of the Public Utility Commission ofTexas.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 8665Application of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for Revisions to the Customer SpecificPricing Plan TariffOn behalf of the Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 8478Application ofSouthwestern Bell Telephone Company to Amend its Existing Customer SpecificPricing Plan Tariff: As it Relates to Local Exchange Access through Integrated Voice/DataMultiplexersOn behalf of the Public Utility Commission ofTexas.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 8672Application of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company to Provide Custom Service to SpecificCustomersOn behalf ofthe Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 8585Inquiry ofthe General Counsel into the Reasonableness ofthe Rates and Services ofSouthwesternBell Telephone CompanyOn behalf of the Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 9301Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Application to Declare the Service Market for co LANService to be Subject to Significant CompetitionOn behalf of the Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Page 12

Page 13: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph,D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

'~.QSl,., consulting, inc.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 10382Petition ofSouthwestern Bell Telephone Company for Authority to Change RatesOn behalfof the Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 14658Application ofSouthwestern Bell Telephone Company, GTE Southwest, Inc., and Contel ofTexas,Inc. For Approval ofFlat-rated Local Exchange Resale Tariffs Pursuant to PURA 1995 Section3.2532On behalf ofOffice of Public Utility Counsel of Texas.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 14658Application ofSouthwestern Bell Telephone Company, GTE Southwest, Inc., and Contel ofTexas,Inc. For Interim Number Portability Pursuant to Section 3.455 ofthe Public Utility Regulatory ActOn behalf of Office of Public Utility Counsel of Texas.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket Nos. 16226 and 16285Application ofAT&TCommunicationsfor Compulsory Arbitration to Establish an InterconnectionAgreement Between AT&T and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Petition ofMCI forArbitration under the FTA96On behalf ofAT&T and MCI.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDocket No. 21982Proceeding to examine reciprocal compensation pursuant to section 252 of the FederalTelecommunications of1996On behalf ofTaylor Communications.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasDoeket No. 25834Proceeding on Cost Issues Severedfrom PUC Docket 24542On behalf ofAT&T and MCIMetro.

Before the Public Utility Commission of TexasSOAR Docket No. 473-07-1365PUC Docket No. 33545Application ofMcLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. for Approval ofIntrastateSwitched Access rates Pursuant to PURA Section 52.155 and PUC Subst. R. 26.223

Page 13

Page 14: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

On behalfofMcLeodUSA Telecommunications Services

$!fjQSI .~. consulting, inc.

Before the Utah public Service Commission-·Docket No. 01-049-85In the Maller ofthe Determination ofthe Costs Investigation ofthe Unbundled Loop ofQwestCorporation, Inc.On behalfof AT&T and WorldCom.

Before the Vermont Public Service BoardDocket No. 5713Investigation into NET's tarifffiling re: Open Network Architecture, including the Unbundling ofNET's Network, Expanded Interconnection, and Intelligent NetworksOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Public Service Commission ofWisconsinCause No. 05-TI-138Investigation ofthe Appropriate Standards to Promote Effictive Competition in the Local ExchangeTelecommunications Market in WisconsinOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Public Service Commission of WisconsinDocket 670-TI-120Mailers relating to the satisfaction ofconditions for offering interLATA services (Wisconsin Bell,Inc. d/b/a Ameritech Wisconsin)On behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Public Service Commission of WisconsinDocket Nos. 6720-MA-I04 and 3258-MA-I0lIn the Maller ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation Petitionfor Arbitration Pursuant to Section252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Establish an Interconnection Agreement withWisconsin Bell, Inc. d/b/a Ameritech WisconsinOn behalf ofMCI Telecommunications Corporation.

Before the Public Service Commission of WisconsinDocket No. 05-TI-349Investigation Into The Establishment ofCost-Related Zones For Unbundled Network Elements,On behalf of AT&T Communications of Wisconsin, McLEODUSA TelecommunicationsServices, Inc., TDS MetroCom, Inc., and Time Warner Telecom.

Before the Public Service Commission of WisconsinDocket No. 6720-TI-161

Page 14

Page 15: August H. Ankum, t · 2008. 8. 15. · CustomerSpecific OfferingTariffto Provide the BusinessExchange ServicesPortionofCentrexand PBXTrunkingServicesandfor the Commissionto Decline

August H. Ankum, Ph.D.1027 Arch, Suite 304Philadelphia, PA 191072152371180

·~*QSl~t consulting, inc.

Investigation into Ameritech Wisconsin's Unbundled Network ElementsOn BehalfOf AT&T Communications of Wisconsin, Inc., WorldCom, Inc., Rhythms Links, Inc.,KMC Telecom, Inc., and McLeodUSA ("CLEC Coalition")

Page 15