Upload
phungnhu
View
216
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Disclaimer and Forward-Looking Statements
2
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation, and certain information that management may discuss in connection with this presentation, contains forward-
looking statements, within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are intended to
come within the safe harbor protection provided by such Act. These forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations,
beliefs, plans, or forecasts with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance and trends in our business
and industry. Forward-looking statements are often characterized by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,”
“would,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “target,” “prospects,” “potential” and “forecast,” and
other words, terms, and phrases of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, expectations, projections,
goals, forecasts, assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. We caution that a forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of future
performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statement.
Risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking
statements include, among others, those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Prospectus dated April 5, 2017 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which is
deemed to be part of our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-215244), as well as our other filings with the SEC.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures Reconciliation
This presentation, and certain information that management may discuss in connection with this presentation, references certain
non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted enterprise revenue (excluding fuel surcharge), adjusted income from operations,
adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share. Reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial
measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP are in an
appendix to this presentation. Management believes the use of these non-GAAP measures assists investors in understanding our
business as further described below. The non-GAAP information provided is used by our management and may not be
comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies. The non-GAAP measures used herein have limitations as
analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.
Leading North American Transportation Services Company
3
2016 Adjusted Enterprise
Revenue (xFSC)1
2016 Adjusted Income from
Operations1
Truckload
$2.1bnIntermodal
$0.8bn
Logistics
$0.7bn
Other 2
$0.2bn
Truckload
$221mm
Intermodal
$46mm
Logistics
$31mm
Truckload: Second Largest in North America
Intermodal: One of the Largest in North America
Logistics: Fastest-Growing Segment
$3.8bn $293mm3
Broad Portfolio of Market-Leading Businesses
56%
20%
20%
4%
16%
74%
10%
Founded in 1935 in Green Bay, Wis.
Brand reputation of operational excellence
built on service, trust, and reliability
Industry-leading safety culture and
performance
Comprehensive presence throughout
North America
Portfolio of businesses with different asset
intensities
Only known industry peer of size to have
completed a comprehensive ERP
transformation
Strong balance sheet with access to
capital provides flexibility to pursue
organic and acquisitive growth initiatives
Iconic Orange Brand
Notes:
1 See appendix for reconciliations; adjusted for fuel surcharge
2 Other is net of intersegment eliminations
3 Includes loss of $5mm from other revenue
A Superior Business Built for Sustainable Growth
4
Iconic Large-Scale Transportation Services Provider1
Transformative Technology Driving Profitability Across Segments3
Leadership in First-to-Final Mile4
A Leading Intermodal Business with Built-In Margin Growth5
Fast-Growing Non-Asset Logistics Business6
Diversified Revenue Mix Supporting Resilient Growth Through Cycles2
Well Positioned for Sustainable Growth7
1,757 2,091
3,026
1,356 810
555
3,472
758
319
2,191
779
738
1,382
417
218
166 378
57
$6,007
$3,752 $3,723
$3,573
$1,830
$1,028
$555
Truckload Intermodal Logistics Other
Iconic Large-Scale Diversified Transportation Services Provider
5
Our formula for resiliency: a balanced business mix
2016 Revenue (xFSC) ($mm)
1 2
Scale in all segments
Ability to move freight between modes
Provides more options to drivers, increasing
retention
Provides more options to shippers who want
access to capacity and logistics solutions
Aligned and incentivized salesforce
1 4
Sources: SEC filings, public investor presentations and SNDR management estimates
Notes:
1 Intersegment eliminations allocated across segments pro rata for revenue contribution
2 Fuel surcharge allocated across segments pro rata for revenue contribution and excluded to calculate revenue (excluding fuel surcharge)
3 Other revenue is net of intersegment eliminations
4 Includes fuel surcharge revenue. Peer 3 does not disclose fuel surcharge revenue
3 1 Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 5 Peer 6Peer 4
2011 2016
38%30%
12%
11%
51%
59%
Change in Customer Concentration 1
Sources: SEC filings, public investor presentations and SNDR management estimates
Note:
1 Based on adjusted enterprise revenue (excluding fuel surcharge). See appendix for reconciliation
Diversity of Customers and End-Markets Served Supports Stable
Growth Through Business Cycles
6
…that Includes More than 200 of the Fortune 500
…With a Broadening Customer Base…
Consumer Products
Goods 11%
Electronics &
Appliance 6%
Furniture & Floor
Covering
5%
Chemicals
3%
Transportation
3%
Food & Beverage
11%
Auto
7%
General
Merchandise
34%
Construction
4%
Plastics
3%
Paper
4%
Freight Management
9%
2016 Revenue (xFSC) 1
Diverse End-Market Footprint…
#1 – #10 #11 – #20 All Others
Transformation: Digitizing Our Value Chain
7
SUSPECT LEAD PROSPECT QUALIFY QUOTE ORDER EXECUTION BILLING CASH
STATIC CONTRIBUTION DYNAMIC CONTRIBUTION
PREDICTIVE, PREVENTIVE, AND PRESCRIPTIVE ANALYTICS
Driven by “One Version of the Truth”
$250mm technology investment differentiates us and enables optimized decisions that
drive enhanced contribution
Transformation of culture and business process
Feedback loops to enhance performance over time
Significant driver of margin expansion
Turns “order takers” to “profit makers”
INTERNAL &
EXTERNAL
DATA SOURCES
$1,382
$779 $738
$417 $378
$218
$0
$3,472
$2,191
$758
$319 $0 $0 $0
Peer 1 Peer 3
Peer 1
Peer 34 8
8
Significant Scale in Each Core Business …
2016 Truckload Revenue (xFSC)1
2016 Intermodal Revenue (xFSC)1
# of
Trucks2
84,594# of
Containers 2 29,300 17,653 9,131 na na na
17,548 11,722 9,529 7,100 4,706 na na
Revenue (xFSC) ($mm)1
Revenue (xFSC) ($mm)1
4 5
2016 Logistics Revenue (xFSC)1
6 7
Revenue (xFSC) ($mm)1
2016 Operating Revenue (xFSC)1
$6,007
$3,752 $3,723 $3,573
$1,830
$1,028
$555
6
4 5
Operating Revenue (xFSC) ($mm)1
6
3
4 5
Sources: SEC filings, public investor presentations and SNDR management estimates
Notes:
1 Revenue excludes fuel surcharge
2 Represents FY 2016 year end equipment count, Peer 5 and SNDR represent average FY 2016 equipment count
3 Represents adjusted enterprise revenue (excluding fuel surcharge) and net of intersegment eliminations. See appendix
for reconciliation
4 Intersegment eliminations allocated across segments pro rata for revenue contribution
5 Fuel surcharge allocated across segments pro rata for revenue contribution and excluded to
calculate revenue (excluding fuel surcharge)
6 Includes fuel surcharge. Peer 3 does not disclose fuel surcharge revenue
7 Represents truck brokerage and logistics operations
8 Represents non-reportable segment, which includes the Company's logistics and freight
brokerage services, as well as support services
4
4
4
4 4Peer 1
Peer 1
Peer 4
Peer 4
Peer 4
Peer 4
Peer 5
Peer 5
Peer 5
Peer 5
Peer 6 Peer 6
Peer 6Peer 6Peer 6 Peer 3
Peer 2
Peer 2
Peer 2
Peer 2
$3,026
$2,091
$1,757
$1,356
$810$555
$0
… With Broadest Portfolio of Service Offerings in North America
BULK
• Long-Haul
• Regional /
Short-Haul
• Chemical
• Energy
• Expedited
COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO OF SERVICE OFFERINGS
BROKERAGE
• Full
Truckload
• LTL
• Intermodal
• Temperature
Control
• Flatbed
• Sole-Source
SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES (3PL)
• Supply Chain
Management
• Supply Chain
Design
• Supplier
Management
• Procurement
• Cross Border
IMPORT / EXPORT SERVICES
• Ware-
housing
• Port
Drayage
• Trans-
loading
DOOR-TO-DOOR
CONTAINER ON
FLAT CAR (COFC)
LONG-HAUL
REGIONAL
NORTH AMERICAN
CROSS-BORDER
LOGISTICSINTERMODAL
NORTH AMERICAN CROSS-BORDER / INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT:
SP
EC
IA
LT
Y
DRY VAN
TRUCKLOAD
FOR HIRE DEDICATED
OTHER SPECIALTY
• Specialty Van
• Flatbed
• Multi-Stop
• Cross-Dock
• Long-Haul
• Regional /
Short-Haul
• Expedited
ST
AN
DA
RD
FINAL MILE+ /
E-COMMERCE
• White Glove
• Expedited
• Threshold
TEMPERATURE CONTROL
• Reefer • Freeze
Protection
9
10Sources: Management estimates based on SEC filings and public investor presentations
First Mile
Vertical Coverage
Geographic Coverage
Technology
Claims
Last Mile
Leader in E-Commerce Driven First-to-Final Mile
No Offering Comprehensive Offering
Schneider's portfolio of services virtually eliminates problems like dropped handoffs and high claims
INTEGRATED
PHYSICAL MOVES
CLAIMS-FREE
SERVICE
REVERSE
LOGISTICS
END-TO-END
VISIBILITY
INCREASING DEMANDPORT TO DOOR WITH
“WHITE GLOVE” SERVICEEND-TO-END VISIBILITY
BUY NOW
SIMPLEXConsumer Order
Tracking
Vendor and Customer
Communication
Inventory Control
Reverse Logistics
PORT TRANSLOAD
DISTRIBUTION
CENTER
HOME
DELIVERY
STOREOVER THE ROAD /
INTERMODAL
PORT DRAY
Differentiated Offering From First to Final Mile
Focus on First-to-Final Mile for difficult-to-handle products
Delivering As Promised in a Multi-Channel World
Peer 8Peer 7 Peer 1 Peer 4 Peer 2 Peer 5 Peer 6
11
Premium Intermodal Segment with Upside Potential
Strong track record of growth and profitability with a clear path to margin expansion
through transition to chassis ownership model
Balanced National Network with
Strong Eastern CoreAsset-Based Operations with Significant Scale
Chicago
SeattleSt. Paul
Green Bay
Richland
Jacksonville
Savannah
AtlantaCharlotte
Greensboro
Marion
Montreal
Toronto
Syracuse
WorcesterChambersburg
Philadelphia
Portsmouth
Little Ferry/North Jersey
Calgary
Edmonton
Reno
Otay
Los Angeles
Phoenix
Denver
Louisville
Cincinnati
Miami
Boston
Laredo
Mexico City
Monterrey
San Luis Potosi
Minneapolis
Milwaukee
St. Louis
Memphis
Jackson
Orlando
Kansas City
Houston
Dallas
Stockton
San Bernardino
North Baltimore
Baltimore
Portland
Schneider Driver Location
Rail Ramp Location
Schneider Driver and
Field Dispatch Location
Rail Ramp Location
BNSF
CSX
KCS/KCSM
CN
FEC
NS
Strong East
Coast Offering
Concentrate spend around two primary railroads
(BNSF - West and CSX - East) to driver operational
excellence and high levels of collaboration
Door to door truck-like experience with company
dray drivers and owned containers / chassis
In 2017 - leased to owned chassis conversion:
lowering chassis cost by ~55%
Economies of scale are key in Intermodal (only
three relevant and profitable Intermodal providers)
Significant growth opportunity: < 50% penetration
of the addressable market, particularly in the East
where the largest competitor does not enjoy a
structural advantage
~20% of Schneider’s adjusted enterprise
revenue (excluding fuel surcharge)
Managed approximately $2bn in
transportation spend and leveraged nearly
23,000 carriers in 2016
Significant cross-selling opportunity
― Serves a large portion of the entire
Schneider portfolio
Growth strategy capitalizes on expertise in:
― Decision support technologies
― Collaborative solutions with assets
Fast Growing Logistics Offering Complementing Our
Asset-Based Network
12
2013 2014 2015 2016
$467
$588
$639
$738
Revenue (xFSC) ($mm)
Brokerage
~
Supply Chain Services (3PL)
~
Import / Export Services
Generated ~$147mm in revenue in 2016 for our
Truckload and Intermodal segments
High return business with little incremental capital
14
Operational Excellence Translated into Financial Performance
Note:
1 See appendix for reconciliations
Key Takeaways from 2Q17
REVENUE REVENUE (xFSC)
Operating
Income (adj.)
Net Income (adj.)
EBITDA
$916.29 $1,006.44
$22.57
$111.42$0.14
Metric 1 2Q17 1H17
Operating
Revenues$1,075 $2,082
Revenue (xFSC) $983 $1,899
Adjusted Income
from Operations$68 $113
Adjusted Net
Income$40 $63
Adjusted Diluted
EPS$0.23 $0.38
Adjusted
EBITDA$136 $249
2Q17 / 1H17 Results (values in $mm except EPS)
Enterprise revenue (xFSC) growth 6.5% for Q2;
5.8% for 1H17; all segments grew in 2Q and 1H17
year over year
Truckload revenue per truck per week increased
2.9% for 2Q and Intermodal orders increased 10.6%
for 2Q year over year
Weak market conditions, inflationary driver costs,
and reduced gain on sale of used equipment
translated into reduced earnings against 'tough
comps'
Market conditions improved in the second quarter in
excess of seasonal trends; market improvement
combined with the impact of ELD regulations is
expected to favorably impact 2H17
Strong cash position and balance sheet
Continue to diversify end-markets and services
Transition to Intermodal 'owned chassis' model on
track for December 2017 completion
Note:
1 See appendix for reconciliations
2013 2014 2015 2016
$3,004$3,334
$3,588$3,752
Adjusted Net Income1
Adjusted EBITDA1Adjusted Enterprise Revenue (xFSC)1
2013 2014 2015 2016
$387
$474$529
$559
2013 2014 2015 2016
$97
$136
$163 $158
($mm) ($mm)
($mm)
15
Consistent Track Record of Strong Financial Performance…
Adjusted Income from Operations1
2013 2014 2015 2016
$174
$244
$293 $293
($mm)
+6%
Revenue
(xFSC)
CAGR
+270bps
Operating
Margin
Change
+4%
Revenue
(xFSC)
CAGR
+16bps
Operating
Margin
Change
+16%
Revenue
(xFSC)
CAGR
+126bps
Operating
Margin
Change
Revenue (xFSC) & Adjusted EBITDA Margin1 2013 – 2016 Results
($mm)
Notes:
1 Adjusted EBITDA margin is segment earnings plus segment depreciation & amortization divided by segment revenue (excluding fuel surcharge)
2 Operating margin is segment earnings divided by segment revenue (excluding fuel surcharge)
… Driven by Growth and Margin Expansion in Each Segment
2013 2014 2015 2016
$665$723
$790 $758
Operating Margin2 : 5.9% 5.7% 7.4% 6.1%
Intermodal
Operating Margin2 : 2.9% 3.1% 4.0% 4.2%
2013 2014 2015 2016
$467
$588$639
$738
Logistics
2013 2014 2015 2016
$1,744$1,862
$1,977 $2,091
Truckload
Operating Margin2 : 7.9% 10.8% 11.0% 10.6%
16
9.6%10.2%
12.2%
10.2%
5%
7%
9%
11%
13%
15%
17%
19%
3.1% 3.2%
4.1% 4.2%
16.5%
19.4% 19.1% 19.8%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Outperformance vs. Peer Group Through Economic Cycles
17
2011 – 2016 Operating Ratio Improvement (bps)12011 – 2016 Income from Operations CAGR
0% 1% (17%) 6% (35%) (37%)
'15–'16
Change
(%)(35) 23 (209) (97) (328) (266)
'15–'16
Change
(bps)(27%) (400)
(10)
(5)
0
5
10
15
20
16
10
8
6
(4)
(6)(6)
2
(1,000)
(800)
(600)
(400)
(200)
0
200
400
289
75 34
(8)
(355)(413)
(989)
2
(%)
(bps)
Sources: SEC filings and public investor presentations
Notes:
1 Calculated using revenue (excluding fuel surcharge)
2 Represents adjusted income from operations. See appendix for reconciliations
Peer 4 Peer 4Peer 1 Peer 1Peer 5 Peer 5Peer 3 Peer 3Peer 6 Peer 6Peer 2 Peer 2
Non-GAAP Reconciliation – Adjusted Enterprise Revenue
(excluding fuel surcharge)
($mm) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2Q17 1H17
Operating revenues 3,624 3,941 3,959 4,046 1,075 2,082
less: Fuel surcharge revenue 620 607 371 294 92 183
Adjusted enterprise revenue (excluding fuel
surcharge)3,004 3,334 3,588 3,752 983 1,899
19
Non-GAAP Reconciliation – Adjusted Income from Operations
($mm) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2Q17 1H17
Income from operations 171 239 260 290 79 123
Litigation 1 10 5 27 – – –
Goodwill impairment 2 – – 6 – – –
Duplicate chassis costs 3 – – – – 2 3
Change in vacation policy 4 (7) – – – – –
Acquisition cost and other 5 – – – 3 – –
WSL contingent consideration adjustment 6 – – – – (13) (13)
Adjusted income from operations 174 244 293 293 68 113
20
Notes:
1 Costs associated with certain lawsuits challenging compliance with aspects of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
2 As a result of our annual goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2015, we took an impairment charge for our Asia reporting unit
3 By the end of 2017, the Company expects Intermodal to have completed its migration to an owned chassis model, which requires the replacement of rented chassis with owned chassis. The existing lease
requirements do not expire until December 31, 2017. Accordingly, the Company is adjusting its income from operations for rental costs related to idle chassis as rented units are replaced
4 Reflects a change to our vacation policy in 2013 in which the award of vacation days changed from being based on a vesting plan to an annual granting plan, resulting in a one-time benefit to income from
operations
5 Costs related to the acquisitions of Watkins & Shepard and Lodeso and one-time preparation costs in connection with the IPO and initiating the transition from privately held to public company status
6 Related to a change in the fair value of a contingent liability, which reflected three year growth targets established by the sell prior to the close of the WSL acquisition
Non-GAAP Reconciliation – Adjusted Net Income
($mm) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2Q17 1H17
Net income 95 134 141 157 46 69
Litigation 1 10 5 27 – – –
Goodwill impairment 2 – – 6 – – –
Duplicate chassis costs 3 – – – – 2 3
Change in vacation policy 4 (7) – – – – –
Acquisition cost and other 5 – – – 3 – –
WSL contingent consideration adjustment 6 – – –
–(13) (13)
Income tax adjustment 7 (1) (2) (11) (1) 5 4
Adjusted net income 97 136 163 158 40 63
21
Notes:
1 Costs associated with certain lawsuits challenging compliance with aspects of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
2 As a result of our annual goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2015, we took an impairment charge for our Asia reporting unit
3 By the end of 2017, the Company expects Intermodal to have completed its migration to an owned chassis model, which requires the replacement of rented chassis with owned chassis. The existing lease
requirements do not expire until December 31, 2017. Accordingly, the Company is adjusting its income from operations for rental costs related to idle chassis as rented units are replaced
4 Reflects a change to our vacation policy in 2013 in which the award of vacation days changed from being based on a vesting plan to an annual granting plan, resulting in a one-time benefit to income from
operations
5 Costs related to the acquisitions of Watkins & Shepard and Lodeso and one-time preparation costs in connection with the IPO and initiating the transition from privately held to public company status
6 Related to a change in the fair value of a contingent liability, which reflected three year growth targets established by the sell prior to the close of the WSL acquisition
7 Income tax adjustment is based on determining the tax effect of each individual item presented in the table
Non-GAAP Reconciliation – Adjusted EBITDA
($mm) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2Q17 YTD
Net Income 95 134 141 157 46 69
Provision for income taxes 61 92 98 109 28 43
Interest expense 14 12 19 21 5 10
Depreciation & amortization 213 230 236 266 68 137
Other non-operating expenses 1 2 3 3–
–
Litigation 1 10 5 27 ––
–
Goodwill impairment 2 – – 6 ––
–
Duplicate chassis costs 3 – – – – 2 3
Change in vacation policy 4 (7) – – ––
–
Acquisition cost and other 5 – – – 3–
–
WSL contingent consideration adjustment 6 – – – –(13) (13)
Adjusted EBITDA 387 474 529 559 136 249
Notes:
1 Costs associated with certain lawsuits challenging compliance with aspects of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
2 As a result of our annual goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2015, we took an impairment charge for our Asia reporting unit
3 By the end of 2017, the Company expects Intermodal to have completed its migration to an owned chassis model, which requires the replacement of rented chassis with owned chassis. The existing lease
requirements do not expire until December 31, 2017. Accordingly, the Company is adjusting its income from operations for rental costs related to idle chassis as rented units are replaced
4 Reflects a change to our vacation policy in 2013 in which the award of vacation days changed from being based on a vesting plan to an annual granting plan, resulting in a one-time benefit to income from
operations
5 Costs related to the acquisitions of Watkins & Shepard and Lodeso and one-time preparation costs in connection with the IPO and initiating the transition from privately held to public company status
6 Related to a change in the fair value of a contingent liability, which reflected three year growth targets established by the sell prior to the close of the WSL acquisition 22