f

ATTACHMENT IGLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIERS

Lr GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIERS

I CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION

(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds)

NOT DETECTED, SUBSTANTIALLY ABOVE THE LEVELREPORTED IN LABORATORY OR FIELD BLANKS.

R » UNRELIABLE RESULT. ANALYTE MAY OR MAY NOT BEPRESENT IN THE SAMPLE. SUPPORTING DATANECESSARY TO CONFIRM RESULT.

N - NEGATED COMPOUND WAS CONSIDERED AS NOTPRESENT IN THE SAMPLE.

(NO CODE) = CONFIRMED IDENTIFICATION

CODES RELATING TO QOANTITATION

I (can be used for both positive results and sample guantitationlimits) :

J ANALYTE PRESENT. REPORTED VALUE HAY NOT BEACCURATE OR PRECISE.

DJ = THE REPORTED QUANTITATION LIMITS AREQUALIFIED ESTIMATED.

OTHER CODES

Q NO ANALYTICAL RESULT

flR3036l)l

fL

ATTACHMENT IIDATA SUMMARY

fiR3Q36l*2

ri

§- ———— — -1

. * Contrac

1t

* •

I-ri'

9

ISri

5n \<J i- ift '* ii

i

ii

XN

f

r

Ic,

&NB

-•

S§&•••

••3

J >

5li^

i>

ifi

A

eV*

<"•v

a

1ii

U£>

i?«»•§

£

*znKmr

e*N

7

C

a

I

'

•»•

.a*ri

I

S

^

£X?

ni

n if•• ,f* •

0

*n

ifrP

U

y

r/o"I

12

tf

JL

a

I

f

b cDJ2

2otTi

tk

5

iKzn

AJO

if

c

HO

£n-» iia rC "Z 0 '

5 ii < ft-C H«l »1 ii m oii 3

!! »ii i!! 1

iII 1II tfi !II ;MIIIIuMIIIIflIIIISIIfII

tlII

IIIIIfIIMH

IIIIIIII11IfIIIIII

IIIItlIIIIIIIIIIII

IfIIIIttIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

ItIfIIIINIIIIIIM

. IIII

IIIIIItlIIIIII

IIII

N f ~

11 * *M e z?!! * f[ » in i5 n • «r» 4 .M — i?» *r »(An a i_>

4'< %£!! fe-K.II [cy" 'H UT

>A!! i§VAu £5

oil SVll !M t

ti iH 1 IIIMIIIIIIIIIIII

IIii rH Sn —M ?xM £II Nv*1ii rr" v«n rn mII if.niiniiiinnnnn *K|/i \f,aM 5 ifn m i inn C C**M r «^oup •»- n W c aH w «*«^II 5 » -•H f fi CIK 3 f»11 -

"fi • 311 —ii n • «

-"fi tfig ^jn n OTup 7n m •11 1 *112 * •n- •- 5({•4 *!*»

HO C *»ii z v rII tf * 0nH •»M »•II •II »ii rn ••II HIIC *II *»II *i" tII 0II r»" f

IIII0

f

ATTACHMENT IIICLP DATA REVIEW FORM

fiR3036l*5

. 19$$.. _„....>.,,. ii^rAt Number: KV-2

Appendix A.I: Data Ajsessaent - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Reviav - Inorganics)

A.:.l Contract Coer.'. r* ?.:r«er.-:ng -s-e?~~: (CCS - Present? __ __ j^—— ——

A.1.2 Record of Coceur.ication Cfroe RSCC) - Present?——ACTION: If nc. request from RSCC.

A.1.3 Sample Traffic Report - Present or on file?

Legible? f J 1* v •*^ ACTION: If no, request from Regional Sample Control

Center (RSCC).

A.1.4 Cover Page - Present? [XJ

Is cover page properly filled in and signed by themanager or the manager's designee? [

ACTION: If no, prepare Telephone Record Log, andcontact laboratory*

Do nuabers of samples correspond to numbers on Recordof Comaunicstion? , [__]

Do staple numbers on cover page agree vlth samplenuabers on:

(a) Traffic Report Sheet? [ V]

(b) For» !'•? [VI

ACTION: If no for any of the above, contact RSCC forclarification*

A. 1.5 Fora I (final Pats) * Are all For* I'a present and complete? [

ACTION: If DO, prepare telephone record log and contactlaboratory for aubeittal.

Are correct units (ug/1 for waters and Kg/kg for soils) ,indicated on fora !'•? [ >V ]

~&:.Lract

i

Are soi: sax?:- -.**-its f ^1percent solid<- ' " "°r c*ch Parameter corrected for

H';Hlif:;-'-«-- .-.«r.r, °"Are eomputition/trinscrloM — f-;—'°f rep0rted v,lues" tptlon «"°« l««s than 10J

Are til "iefl than 1D,,. f A.1value. Properly coded with ,vit

yr»-i?.r ^ «*«**•» - ..8Pie. flven oa • [-!Were the result qualifiers used correctly with finald* tjlJACTION: If no for any of the above, prepare Telephone

Record Log, and contract laboratory forcorrected data.

Were any ssaples diluted beyond requirements of contract? f V

-— -A-If yes, vere dilutions noted on Form I's? [__] __ \^

ACTION': If no, note under contract -proble«/non-co»plianceof the"Data Assessment Narrative".

* A.I.6 Holding Tines * (aqueous samples )

[ * (Examine sample t

Mercury (28 days)i • • • . . exceeded? ^Cyanide (U day,). ... —— UD

• • • - . . exceeded? .,Other Metals (6 months). . —— ——

- " • * • • • exceeded?Soil sample ——

Metals and Cyanide (6 months*•oncns;......exceeded?£22S.: Prepare a H«t *t .1 ""—s =2." % £- 5~".'"Jn-,-«.=..„,. „.—i-isr- .,.

flR3036it7

rl»

=.•".•«=itle; Evaluation of Metal* for the Contract Cat*.- t*c. l?$

Laboratory Program Number: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Cotapliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES £C

ACT!-' *•': If y*t rejr:: ,'rei-line) valu-s less thar.Irrtruser.t Detection Limit (IDL); flag asestimated (J) the values above IDL.

A.1.7 Raw Data

A.1.7.1 Digestion Log* for flameAA/ICP present? [ Xl

Digestion Log for furnace AA present? [ X] __

Digestion Log for mercury present? [ yj __

Digestion Log for cyanides present? [ j^ ] yf

Are pH values (pH<2 for all eetals, pR>12 for cyanide)present in Digestion/Distillation Logs?

*Veightc, dilutions and volumes used to obtain values*of

Percent solids calculation present for soils/sediments? [ _] y~"

Are preparation dates present on Digestion Log? [ )? ] __

A.1.7.2 Measurement read out record present? ICP [ /\] __

Fl«»* AA [__] __

Furnace AA [ X] __

Mercury [X ] __

Cyanides

A. 1.7. 3 Are all raw data to support all sacple analyses andQC operations present? ( X )

Properly Labeled? [ Xl

ACTION': If no for any of the above, write TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory.

&R3Q36U8

ITitle: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Aug. 195;

Contract Laboratory Program Number: *HV~:Appendix A.I: Data Assessaent - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

A.J.?

A.).8.1 Calibration

A.1.8.1.1 U record of at least 2 poi-t calibrationpresent for ICP analysis? [

Is record of 5 point calibration present forHg analysis? [ >C]

ACTION': If no for any of the above, write in thecontract problem/non-compliance section ofthe "Dara Assessment Narrative*'.

A.2.8.1-2 Is record of 4 point calibration present for:Flame AA?

Furnace AA?~ Wnfe -

V/ , mkCyanides? [A ] ^mm/-V — J)NOTE: 1• If less than 4, other standards must be run immediately

after calibration and be 51 of true value.2. For all AA and Cyanide analyses one calibration standard

is at CKDL level.

ACTION: Flag associated data as estimated if standardsare not within 5X of true values (except CRDLcalibration standard).

A.1.8.1.3 Is correlation coefficient less than 0.995 for:

Mercury Analytic? __ [ 7<!

Cyanide Analysis? __ I V]

Atomic Absorption Analysis? ___ [ X 1

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A.1.8.2 Fora It A (Initial and Continuing Calibration Verifleatlon)-

A.1.8.2.1 Present and complete for every metal and cyanide? [X )

flR3036U9

Date: Dec.. Program Nuober: RV-2

Appendix A.I: Data AlfesSOCnt - Contract Revision: 8Coepllance (Total Review - Inorganics)

Y!$ NC VPresent *8d c>er>t--r fir AA *r.J 1C- w*ien fc: areused 'or saoe tr.aiyrt1

ACT:**- '-: r? *->r ar.y of the above, prepare telephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory..

A. 1.8. 2. 2 Circle all values on data summary sheet that areoutside of contract windows. Are all calibrationstandards (initial and continuing) within controllicits?

Metals 90-1102 [ V ]

Hg - 80-1202 \> ]

-* ' Cyanides 85-1 15Z IX }

Are all calibration standards (initial and continuing)within 50-1501? - • [>Q

ACTION: Flag at estimated (J) all positive data (uotflagged with a "U") analyzed between acalibration standard of 75-892 (65-79t for Hg;70-8it for CN) or 11J-125T (121-135J for Rg;116-130J for CN) recovery and nearest good calibrationstandard. Qualify results <IDL as estimated (UJ),if the ICV or CCV tR is 75-89t(CN, 70-8 2 ; HC, 65-792).Reject (red-line) as unacceptable data if recovery ofthe ICV or CCV 2R is outside the range 75-1252(CN, 70-1302; Hg, 65-1352).

Was continuing calibration perforated every 10 samplesor^every 2 hours?

ACTION: If no, flag the excess sample* (eleventh andup) data as estimated (J).

A. 1.8. 3 Fora II B (CRDl Standards for AA and ICP) -

A. 1.6. 3.1 Was a CRDl standard (CRA) analyzed for all AA metals(except Hg>? [

* Was a eld -range callb. verification standard distilledand analyzed for cyanide analysis? [ X )

Was a 2xCRDL or 2xIDL (when IDL>CRDl) analyzed (CRI) for ,each ICP run? f X](Note: CRI for AL.Ba.Ca.Fe.Mg.Na.or K is not required.)

Find the results of mid-range standard in the raw data

V

ftR3Q3650

Nueber: HW-2Appendix A.I; Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Cottpliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

ACTI3N: If nc for any of the above, flag as estimated YES SOpsj-'itivc data f^::ing within the range —

«\'tr<s»- vs.:-.- j- C?- ', Tor CK, t--.> ran?e 1**'trj* ^»=;«e ^ ".: v true value).

A. i.fi.3.2 Va* -"*'- *••»./:-.•: art^r ICV/ZCB atic" be-fore the iir.&lCCV'ICA, or every four hours of ICP run? [ ]

ACTION': If no, write in Contract Problem/Son-ConplianceSection of the "Data Assessment Narrative11.

A.J.B.3.3 Are CRA and CRI standards within control limits:

Metals 90 - 110? [__] V

Is eid-range standard within control limits:

Cyanide 85 - 115? fj£j __ __

ACTION': Flag the affected data within the range*(true value CRDL) as estimated (J) if recoveryis less than 901 (for CN <85Z); flag the positivedata within the range (true value CRDL), ifrecovery is greater than 110Z (for~CN >1152).The range for CN is *(true value JK 0.5 x tnie value).

A.1.8.4 Fore III (Initial and Continuing Calibration Blanks)

A.I.8.4.1 Present and complete? . [ X ] __

For both AA and ICP when both are used for same analyte? [ ] __ »

ACTION': If no, prepare Telephone Record Log andcontact laboratory.

A.1.8.A.2 Circle all calibration blank values on Data Sumaary Sheetthat are above IDL. Are all calibration blanks(when IDL<CRDL) less than or equal to Contract RequiredDetection""Lisiit8 (CRDL)? [

Are all calibration blanks less than two timesInstrument Detection Limit (when IDL>CRDL>? [__) __

ACTION; If no for any of the above, flag as estimated (J)on form I's all data <5xIDL between calibrationblank with value over CRDL or IDL and nearestgood calibration blank. Flag five samples on titherside of the calibration blank.

* -True value of CRA, CRI or mid-range CN standard.-Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > CRDL. ^

flR30365

Title: Evaluation of Kettle Data for the Date: D«c. 1998Contract Laboratory Program Number: "flV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganic*)

YES NO

A.:.9.4.3 U'fis ars initial ' calibration blan* anaV/zed1 [ Xj

Was £ L->r.tinutns cslttratior. blank, analyzed afterevery 10 samples or every 2 hour* (whichever is acrefrequent)?

ACTION': If no, flag as estimated (J) all values OxIDLnot analyzed within 5 aaaple* of calibration blank.

A.1.8.5 FORM III (Preparation Blank) —

( Note: The preparation blank for mercury it the tame"-% as the calibration blank.)

A.1.8.5.1 Was one prep, blank analyzed for: each 20 saaples?

each batch? L2L' __

each matrix type? [ ] __

both AA and ICP when both are used for sane analyte? [__J __ ^

ACTION: If no for any of the above, flag as estimated (J)all associated positive data <10 x IDLs for whichprep.blank was not analyzed.

NCTE: If only one blank was analyzed for sorethan 20 samples, then first 20 samples analyzeddo not have to be flagged aa estimated (J).

A*1.8.5.2 Do concentrations of prep, blank fall below two timesIDL when IDL is greater than CRDL? [ X) __ _

ACTION: If no, reject (red-line) all data that has* concentration leas than 10 times the prep*blank value, but not flagged with a "U"(last than).

A.1.8.5.3 Is concentration of prep, blank greater than CRDLwhen IDL is less than or equal to CRDL? __ [ Xl _

If yes, is the concentration of the aaople with theleast concentrated analyte leas than 10 times the .prep, blsnk value? __ [__] s

fiR303652

Tirle.

—— „ . . n- -~»*.ir«ci Revision: 8- Inorganics)————————————————,

I* YES SO

I ACTION: If ves, reject (red-line/ all associated* d.-\ tk.as i.*s a concentrator, less char.

t-Ti times the prep, blank value, but notJ flagged with a "U" (less than).

A.1.8*5.4 Is concentration of prep, blank below the negative CRDL? __ f X

ACTION': If yes. reject (red-line) all associated datathat has a concentration less than lOxCRDl.

A»I.8.6 Form IV (ICP Interference Check Sample)—* — ~~ -"--•"---••-"•"-••-111—------ - - - -•- - ._.._-.-A.1.8.6.1 Present and complete? [^ ] __

(NOTE: Not required for furnace AA, flame AA, mercury,cyar.ide and Ca, Mg, K and Na.)

A.1.8.6.2 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are morethin 20* of true or established mean value. Are allInterference Check Sample results inside of controllimits C + 202)? f %]

If nor is concentration of Al, Ca, Fe, or Mg lower insacple than in ICS?

ACTION: If no, flag as estimated (J) those positiveresults for which ICS recovery is between121-1502 ; flag all sample results as estimatedif ICS recovery falls within 50-791; reject(red-line) those sample results for which ICSrecovery la less than 50Z; if ICS recovery isabove ISOt, reject positive results only (notflagged with a "IT).

A. 1.8.6.3 Vas ICS analyzed at beginning and end of run(or at least twice every 8 hours)? [ V 1

ACTIOM: If no, flag as estimated (J) all samples forwhich AL, Ca, Fe, or Mg is higher than in ICS*

A.I.8.7Form V A (Spiked saaplc Recovery * Pre-Digestion/Fre-Pistallation)-( Hote: Not required for Ca, Mg, K, and Na (both matrices), Al, and Fe(soil only.)

6R303653

rt

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Dar*,- I>ec-Contract Laboratory Program Number: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Conpliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NO

A.3.8.7.1 Present at,: camp let* for- etch 20 saoples* [__}

each matrix type? {__] X

each cone, range (i.e. low, aed., high)? [__} ^•«••»•" y

For both AA and 1C? when both are used for aameanalyte? ' [__I __ >

If no for any of the above, flag asestimated (J) all positive data lessthan four times spiking level for

-* which spiked sasple vas not analyzed.

VOTE: If one spiked sa&ple vas analyzed for aorethan 20 samples, then first 20 samplesanalyzed do not have to be flagged asestimated (J).

A. 1.8.7.2 Was field blank used for spiked sample? __ [__] _,

If yes, vas field blank described as such on TrafficReport? __ [__] _

ACTION': If yes, flag all positive data less than6 x spike added as estimated (J) for vhichfield blank vas used as apiked sample.

A.1.8.7*3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outsideof control Halts (751 to 1252). Are all recoveriesvithin control Unit*? [__] __ J>

If no, is sample concentration greater than or equalto four times apike concentration? [__] __ V"

ACTION: If yea, disregard apike recoveries foranalytes whose concentrations are greaterthan or equal to four times spike added.If oo, circle those analytes on For* V forvhich sample concentration is less thanfour times the spike concentration.

Are results outside the control Halts (75-125Z) iflagged vith "N" on Form I'» *zu! Fora VA? f__1 __ 2.

ACTION: If no, vrite in the contract problem/non compliancesection of "Data Assessment Narrative".

I1I

A*1.8*7.& Ac-gout

Are any >F:kl. recoveries:

<*> less than 30:?

Cb) between 30-74Z?

CO between 126-1503?

Cd) greater than 150Z?

— in'S SBlf ;!'•:;?="<" *-~•queou, data a. e.ti V f'>J *"ocl«-

t J

NOTE:

_,, —.. -v-f**, nag all associatedaqueous data as estimated (J); if between126-150Z, flag as estimated (J) all associatedaqueous data not flagged with a "U"; ifgreater than 1502, reject (red-line) allassociated aqueous data not flagged with a "U".

If pre- digestion apike result is rejectable due tocoefficient of correlation of MSA, analytical spikerecovery, or duplicate injections criteria , disregard spikerecovery on Form V. Flag the associated data as estimated(J).

I A.1.8.7.5 Soil/Sediment

Are any spike recoveries:I (a) less than 10J? __ [__]

(b) between 10-74Z? __ [__]

I (c) between I26-200Z? __ f__]

(d) greater than 200Z? __ [__J

ACTION'; If less than 101, reject all associated data;if between 10-741, flag all associated data asestimated; if between 126-2001, flag at estimatedall associated data was cot flagged with a "U";if greater than 200Z, reject all associateddata not flagged with a "U".

A*1.8*8 Fore VI CL*b Duplicates)

A. 1.8.8.1 Present and complete for: each 20 samples? [__1 ^

mach matrix type? [__] Xeach concentration range (i.«. low, mcd., high)? [__J

flR303655

**:..*. *v*.«*i;on o: hetais Data tor th« Date: Dec. I9€aContract Laboratory Program Kuaber: *KW'-2~Append!* A.I: Data As»es*«ent - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

TES NO S'A

both AA ind TC^-vhen both are us*'* for sa*e mnalvte? [__) j(

ACTID^ If no fsr any the above, flae as estimated (J)all data >C1wL* for which duplicate »ample wasnot analyzed.

Note: If one duplicate sasple was analyzed for corethan 20 samples, then first 20 camples do nothave to be flagged as estimated.

A.l.£.8.2 Vas field blank used for duplicate analysis? __ [__] /

If yes, was field blink identified as such on^ Traffic Report? __ [__] ^/

ACTION: If yes, flag all data >CRDL* as estimated (J)for which field blank was used ss duplicate.

A.K6.8.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outsidecontrol limits:

Aqueous Sample* (a) 20! RPD or*(b) + CRDt

Soil Samples (a) 35t RPD or*(b)+ CRDL

Are all values within control liaits? [__] __

If no, are all results outside the control limitsflagged with an * on Fom I'a and VI? [__] __

ACTION: If no, write in the contract problesu/non-compliance section of "Data Aaiessaent Narrative*1.

NOTE: 1* RPD is not calculable for an analyteof the sample - duplicate pair whenboth values are less than IDL.

2. If lab duplicate result is rejectable due to coefficientof correlation of KSA, analytical spike recovery, orduplicate injections criteria, do not apply precisioncriteria. Flag the associated data as estimated.

A.1.8.8.4 Is any value for sample duplicate pair leas than CRDL* *and other value greater than or equal to 10 x *CRDL? __ [__J

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data.

* Substitute IDL for CRDL vhen IDL > CRDL.

flR303656

rii

Tide: Evaluati n f Metals Data for the .Contract Laboratory ?rogram N K -Appendix A,l: Data Assessment - Contract Revision- IT"""2Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics) »ion. i

TES

A.!.£.8.5 Aqueous

Is any R?D greater than 50: where sample and duplicateare both greater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL? r i

Is any difference between sample and duplicate greaterthan *CRDL where sample and/or duplicate is less than5 times *CRDL? , .__ I__J

ACTIC.Vr If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A.1.8*8.6 Soll'Sediment

Is any UPD (where sample and duplicate are bothgreater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL) :

1001? __ I__1 _:

Is any difference between sample and duplicate(where sample and/or duplicate is less than 5x*CRDL) :

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A. 1.8. 9 Kielc* Duplicates

A. 1.8. 9.1 Were field duplicates analysed? [ __ ] __ >

ACTIOV : If yes, prepare * form VI for each field duplicatepair* report concentrations of soils in ug/1 on vetweight basis and calculate RPDs.

KOTE : 1 * Do not calculate t-PD vhen both values are less than IDL.2. Flag all Associated data only for field duplicate.

A. 1.8*9. 2 Circle all values oc Form VI for field duplicates that are outsidecontrol limits:

Aqueous Samples (a) 201 KPD orCRDL

Soil Samples (a) 351 RPD orCRDL

* Substitute IDL for CRDt when IDL > CRDL.

BR303657

• ..*«, * u 01 Ju

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1999Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I; Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

TSS NO S'

I jr-? a;i v*:-**- i.-.:':« ccr.crol limits? [__J >

I A.l«£»9-3 Is any value for sample duplicate pair less than *CRDLand other value greater than or equal to 10 x *CRDL? __ [__] v

t| ACTION': If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A.1.8.9.4 Aqueous

It any RPD greater than 501 where sample a,ad duplicate^ are both greater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL? __ [__J

It any difference between sample and duplicate greaterthan *CKPL vhere sample and/or duplicate it lett than

, 5 times «CRDL? __ [__] _>

ACTION: If yet, flag the associated data at estimated.

| A.1.8.9.5 Soll/Sediaent

Is any RPD (where* sample and duplicate are bothgreater than 5 times *CRDL) :

21 OCX? __ [__]

It any difference between sample and duplicate(where sample and/or duplicate it lest than 5x *CRDL ):

x7>2x •CRDL? __ [__] _

ACTION: If yet, flag the associated data AS estimated.

A. 1.8.10 Form VII (Laboratory Control Sample) (Note: LCS - notrequired for aqueous Hg and cyanide analyses.)

A. 1.8.10*1 Vat one LCS prepared and analyted for:every 20 water aamples? [ X ] -• __

every 20 solid tamp let? [ X 1 __ __

both AA and ICP when both, are used for same mnalyte? [__J __ y-

* Substitute IDl for CXDL when IDL > CRDL.

.SR303658

Title: Evaluation of Hetals Data for theContract Laboratory Program Date: Dee. 1988Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Number: HV-2Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics) Revision: s

YES

*: "r.3 :^r sry c: th» abc•••£•» prepare Tele'r..-jneF.ecorc Log and contact laboratory for submittalof results of solid LCS. Flag as estimated(J)all data for which LCS was not analyzed.

If only one LCS was analyzed for more than 20samples, then first 20 samples close to LCSdo not have to be flagged as estimated.

A. 1*8.10.2 Aaueoitf

Circle all LCS values outside of controlliaits(80. - 1207- except aqueous Ag and Sb).

Is £ny LCS recovery: less than 50X? __ [ y ]

between 50J and 792? __ [ / ]

between 12IX and 150t? __ [ V ]

greater than 150X? __ [< ]

ACTION': Lest than 50t, reject (red-line) all data;between 50t and 79Z, flag til associated dataas estimated (J); between 1211 and 1501, flag,all positive (not flagged with a "U") resultsas estimated; greater than 150Z, reject allpositive results.

A.1.8.10.3 Solid LCS

KOTE: 1. If IDL of an analyte is equal to or greater thanTrue Value of LCS, disregard the following criteria.

2. If"Found"value of LCS is rejectable due to duplicateinjections or analytical spike recovery criteria,disregard LCS recovery; flag the associated data astitiutedCJ).

«* If the Solid LCS recovery for any analyte fallsoutside EPA control limits, qualify all sampleresults >IDL as estimated (J).

b. If the LCS results are higher than the controllimits and the sample results < IDL, the dataare acceptable.

c. If the LCS results are lover than the controllimits,qualify all sample results < IDL asestimated(UJ)»

flR303659

Of 30

ITitle: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Oat*: Dee.

Contract Laboratory Prograa Number: HV-2Appendix A..X: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Cocpliance (Total Reviev - Inorganics)

Yes NO

A.1.8.11 Fore IX (ICP Serial Dilution) -

A.1.8.11.2 Vd» SeriaJ Tilution analysis performed for:etch 20 samples? [__] X

each matrix type? f__I y(

each concentration range (i.e. low, m*d.)? [__J __

^ ACTION: If tto for any of rhe above, flag all positive datagreater than cr equal to lOxIDLs as estimated (J)fs>r which Serial Dilution Analysis was not performed,and summarize the deficiency on the DPO report*

A.1.8.11.2 Was field blank(s) used for Serial Dilution Analysis? __ f__]

If yes, vas field blank described as such on TrafficReport? __ [__]

ACTION: If yes, flag all associated data 2 *° * IDLas estimated (J).

A.1.8.11.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are ousideof control limit (_+10 Z). Are all values within 10 I ? [__] __

Are results outside control limit flaggedwith an "E" on Fora I'a and Form IX? f__] __

ACTION: If no, write in the contract problea/non-compiiancesection of the"Data Assessment Narrative'*.

A.1.6.11.4 Are any X Diff. values : __ f__]> 10: ?2 loot ? _ [_]

ACTION: Flag as estimated (J) all associated sample resultsequal to or greater than lOxIDLs for which percentdifference is greater than 102 but less than 100Z.Reject (red-line) all associated saaple resultsequal to or greater than lOxIDLs for which PD lagreater than or equal to 100S.

5R303660

w

II

iI

Title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: D«c.Contract Laboratory Program Nunber: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: gCompliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

A ... £.LI Furr.ac* AU;£:c Ass-:—.:: •-__f,a ' QC Ar.a! sls

A.K8.12.1 A-r = .:"..?*:» Injections present in furnace r«v dataf£>crr: during full Method of Standard Addition) for veach sample analyzed by GFAA? [ /-•]

ACTIOV: If no, reject the data on Form I'a for whichduplicate .Injections were not performed.

A.1.8.12.2 Do the duplicate Injection readings asree within 20ZRelative Standard Deviation (BSD) or Coefficient ofVariation (CV) for concentration greater than CRDL? [ ,\ ] __

i Was a dilution analyzed for sample with post digestionj spike recovery less than 401? [__]

ACTIOV; If no for any of the above, flag all theassociated data as estimated (J).

A. 1.8. 12. 3 Is *post digestion spike recovery less than lOt orgreater than 1502 for any result?

ACTION: If yes, reject (red-line) the affected data ifrecovery is <10Z; reject data not flagged with "U"if spike recovery is >150X.

NOTE : Reject the data only if the affected sample was, not subsequently analyzed by Method of Standardj Addition.•»

! A .l.8.13 Fora VIII (Method of Standard Addition Results)

A. 1.8. 13.1 Present? [JM __

If no, is *ny For» I result coded with "S" or a "+"? __ [ __ ]

ACTION: If yea, write request on Telephone Record Log and; contact laboratory for submit tal of Fore VIII.

A. 1.8. 13. 2 Is coefficient of correlation for MS A less than 0.990 for1 any aa»ple? __ i V ]

ACTION; If ye§, reject (red-line) affected data.

* Post digestion spike is not required on the pre-digestion spiked saaple when pre-

digeition apike recovery is within control limits of 75-125Z or when SRJHrSA.

flR30366l

Title; Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date; O*c. t9g$Contract laboratory Program Number: H»-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessoent - Contract Revision: 8Cocpliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES N£

A.1.8.13.3 Vis *MSA required for any sample b'Jt not perforned? __ [ y \

Is coefficient of correlation for MSA less than 0.995? __ [ ,x;

Are MSA calculations outside the linear range of thecalibration curve generated at the beginning of theanalytical run? __ [ / ;

ACTION: If yes for any of the above, flag allthe associated data as estimated (J),

A-«J.8*13.4 Was proper <?uantitation procedure followed correctlyas outlined in the SOW on page £-16 through E-17? [ X ] __

ACTION: If no, note exception under contract problem/non-compliance of data assessment narrative, orprepare a aeperate liat.

A.1.8.14 Dissolved/Total or Inorganic/Total Analytes *

A.1.8.14.1 Were any analyses performed for dissolved as veil astotal analytes on the aaoe aasple(s). w __ [__J

Were any analyses performed for inorganic as veil as total(organic + inorganic) analytes on the aaae aa«ple(s)? __ I__] _

j-If yes, apply the following questions only ifinorganic (or dissolved ) results are (1) aboveCRDl, and (ii) greater than total constituents.

A.1,8.14.2 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)analyte greater than its total concentration bymore than lOt? __ I__1 2

A.2.8.U.3 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)analytt greater than its total concentration by»ore than 50J? __ I__] ^

NOTE : Prepare a list comparing differencesbetween all dissolved (or inorganic) andtotal analytes.Compute the differencesas a percent of the total analyte onlywhen both are above CRDL.

* MSA is not required on LCS and prep* blank.

fl.R303662

Title: Evaluation of 'Metals Data for the Date: Dec. *Contract Laboratory Program Nuober: "ffAppendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES

ACT:?N if *>re thar 20:, flag both dissolved (or inorganic)and total values as estimated (J); if acre than50t, reject (red-line) the data for both valuse,

A.1.8.15 Fore I to IX

A.1.8.15.1 Are all t*e Fora I through Tom IX labeled with:taboratory name? [ )< ]

Cate number? [ y* ]

EPA sample Ho.? \y }

SDG No.? [y ]

Contract No.?

Correct unitt?

Matrix? I-y 1

ACTION': If no for any of the above,note undercontract problem/non-conpliance section of narrative.of the"Data Assessment Narrative".

A. 1.8.15.2 Do any computation/transcription error* exceed 10Z ofreported values on Forms I-1X for:

(NOTE: Check all forms against rav data.)

(a) all analytes analyzed by TCP? __ [ >' 1

(b) all analyt" analyzed by CFAA? __ IX 1

(c) all analytes analyzed by AA Flame? __ [__!

(d) Mercury? __ [J/J

(«) Cyanide?

ACTION': If y«s, prepare Telephone Log, contact laboratoryfor corrected data and correct arrors with redpencil and Initial.

flR303663

' ***

r\

Title: Evaluation of Metals Dati for the Dace: Dec* 198£Contract Laboratory Program Number: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: gCoepliance (Total Review - Inorganic*)

v-v-*»* ,A.1.8*16 FoTBlJlltid Slar.k) -

YES NC

Circle all field blank values on Data Summary Sheetthat are greater than 2xIDL.Do concentrations of field blank(s) fall below tvotimes IDLs for all parameters of associated aqueousand soil samples? [

If no, was field blank value already rejected due to fother QC criteria? [__) X*

ACTION': If no, reject (red line) all associatedaqueous and soil/sediment data (except fieldblank) that has a concentration less thanfive times the field blank value not flaggedvith a "U" (less than).

A. 1.8. 17 Perm XI, XII, XIII (Quarterly Verification of InstrumentalParameters ).

A. 1.8. 17.1 Is quarterly verification report present for:

Instrument Detection Limits? [ X }

ICP Intereleaent Correction Factors? [ y )

ICP Linear Ranges? f __ 1

ACTION: If no, contact DPO of the

A. 1*8.17.2 Fore XI (Instrument Detection .Haiti.) - (Note: IDL is notrequired for Cyanide.)

Are IDLs present for: all the analytes? [ /] __ _

•11 the instruments used? [ ] __ __

For both AA and ICP when both are used for sameanalyt«? I __ 5 __ V

ACTION: If no for any of the above, prepareTelephone Record Log and contact laboratory.

4R30366U

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Bate: Dec. 1988r Contract Laboratory Program Number: *HU-2

Appendix A. 2: Data Assessment Narrative Revision: g

Case* ny • Site gU_,/fi / CU.v.\, Matrix: Soil

Reviewer jG-""______ lab c^vfrvv__________ Water

Contractor ____________ Other

A.2.1 All data sre of acceptable quality? Yes ___ No V

If no, exceptions are noted below with rea»on(§) for-* rejection or qualification as estimated value (J).

Ai/1 /'L. /A <;?<"^/ fer ' ' ' •'* ^ ^ -/ ^ Xcf&e/feFfftf.

flR303667

O Oi-£RAliNC f*OCEDUR£ Page 29 of 30

Evaluation of Hectic Data for the Date: Dec. 1968Contract Laboratory Prog race Nuabtr: HW-2Appendix A.6: CLP Data Aaaeaaaeot bvislon: 8Sumnary Form (Inorganic*)

CLP DATA ASStSSKEWT SUMHAJtY

Type of *«^**:_Lk£2 ____________________ Pata: )-^C-f>j Cast I:

Sita: * f*JfrsJ hkvi'Vu ________________________ Ub Maa* ;

t.vl.wr'a laitlaia: j^"________ ttu»bar «f I«»Pl«»:

An»lytt» Ktjtcttd Put to E»c»tfilnc it»l«v CrittrU:•

icr

HoldingTiMI

c>Fla»« AA '

Purniet AA

H«rcury

|et«l

Och«r

oco\J

Califoraclon

O>

Cr.

(:L

?r«pllan*

(-•

(•-0r "L.

U

Heldllaafc

O

0c(,0

lotar-ftraaca*

0

0obu

Spikettcovgry

C

CC

0i

DuplUb&

0n

r-0

icat»Pltld

D«t*etionHaiti

6

oOc.0

LCS

6

0cc&

ferUlDilution

c-c000

HSA

6

O

00u

Toc.lAnalrc**

?G

So£1205

I«^tCt J:

o

CC=c-C1

(J) &u« to tie««dlng Crlttria

*«-

\ m

XCP

fl«»* AA*

Furnact AA

Mtrcurr

Total

Other

6 1

00c-L

0

ooc^

6o00u

b

OOOU

60oou

w12c-Lf(j(J

w42^^O

0

OUCL

0

£CC0

0

c-..0U

%tcc5Y0

O

0o0b

fv505

/«?6

I!s2~

3iC/ft

5 \ 0Kotc:Ajc«rl«k {*) laatcictt arf41tio&*l «xc*«4aDC» of r«vi«v criteria.

flR303668

Page 30 of X

I? Title: Evaluation of M*tala Data for the Date: Dec- 19SgContract Laboratory Program Number: RW-2Appendix A.7: CLP Data Assessment Checklist Revision: 8Inorganic Analysis

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA A S S E S S M E N T R e g i o n — —

CASE NO. 6TP6U- ________ SITE

LABORATORY g&ygVV_______________ NO. OF SAMPLES/MATRIX 5 (Z M 3 1>M

REVIEWER (IF NOT

REVIEWER'S NAME

0 * Data has no problems/or qualified due to minor problems,M • Data qualified due to major problem*,Z " Data unacceptable,X • Problems, but do not affect data.

ACTION ITEMS; TV ./ VQ sa.'k* *-/ S*s ,** l

ARZAS OF CONCERN:

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE:

DPO: ACTION_________FYI V_________ COMPLETION DATE__^

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

ICP AA Hg CYANIDE

1. HOLDINC TIMES ,_____ £. C C2. CALIBRATIONS j c' C o3. BLANKS L_____ ff u ———2———4. ICS t,_____ ——-———— ———fc———5. LCS .,_____ ^6. DUPLICATE ANALYSIS ^ .^ ^ ^7. MATRIX SPIKE ^ ^ ^ _ _ _ J "fi. KSA v9. SERIAL DILUTION ^10. SAMPLE VERIFICATION .} ^ ^ .11. OTHER QC ^ g c g1 2 . OVERALL ASSESSMENT t u x ——~f———

flR303669

ATTACHMENT VSUPPORT DOCUMENTATION

BR303670

r Contract Labortt

^ "nortante.tevi»ion

MO."IT DATr.7-,-v ou -^ ———

flR30367

III

fiR303672

r S ^ L S12 SsouSAK?U NOS:

DIL77ZON SAKTU HO.II I *x

flR303673

Cor.iract Labor.torjr Profr.a D«Ec:Appendix A. 5: Suoaary of Inorf,nlc. Nu.b.r:Qu«lity Control D«. * "1C« *«vl,ton

i:

4R303675

rac: La&oracory Frogran * «*t«: D«c. 195Appendix A.5: Suaoary of Inorganics Nu«b«r: KV-2Quality Control Data *«vijiOti: $

4R303676

pCLIENT/SUBJECT

«-«« V-X aaoeMOfciwn

SHEET___of.

TASK DESCRIPTIONPRFPAREOBYMATH CHECK BYMETHOD REV. BY . , ,, ...._

T* P . rd/i

,. DFPT_ DPPTDFPT

- C<&- « »

nATPHATF

DATE

^ . ^

wo wnTASK NO

APPROVED BY

HFPT OATF

c

7-/2

/•;' 3

C C I/ I/? 3, / 2ft>< i j i/ £/p 6- -9 p v* 33^?T

>

CrBWIO-05-003/A.5/85

r\ CUFNT/SURJFCT .,,,,.,..

TASK DESCRIPTIONDDPDAQPn PVrntrAntU oi __.„ .• ...11.1

MATHCHFCKRYMETHOD RFV. BY

'tfc -- - /^ ^^' L i C

DEPT

DPPT

DPPT

A!cv ??*•>

once i_

DATERATF

AfKKOVtD

——— Of ____

BY

DEPT . _. DATE1 X"1 / /' ' /

J ^ '/ *' L/

3o

7

\ t >{

— K r—

( y,'

r1( \ cc\j

/US /A i , jf[«^.\"w" 7,7f*~cv*- ^ Jx1 "P- -riTiA£V€ CCP3 forwi St.

AR30367810.QS-003'A-5/S5

rSHEET.CLIENT/SUBJECT ____________________________________ W,0. NO,

TASK DESCRIPTION _______PREPARED BYMATH CHECK BY,METHOD REV. BY

flR303679

rSHEET___of,

CLIENT/SUBJECTTASK DESCRIPTIONPREPARED BYMATH CHECK!METHOD REV. BY

7*1-1 3 1

^ i a

TION —————————————————DPPT

5Y nPPT

BY DPPT

TARIf MH M

HATF

nATPHATP

APPROVED BY

nFPT HATP

Al$

n r/Vu\\7.Vs.(*

*$t

•' * t141i a. a- ic^t

F^ tXK «•

ii?^ ^ V ^£* t -/f ft A: ,rn _ _ —•-<Utj -

rjp n ._^3 T rK t .-^ <X

>^ GO/ "?

flR303680rrji, •* -* v»'t t

U.S. EPA - CLP

6 EPA SAMPLE NO.DUPLICATES

STD011DLab Name: WESTON-LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD768

Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Level (low/med): LOW

% Solids for Sample: 91.2 * Solids for Duplicate: 91.2

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercury-NickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

ControlLimit

0.1

Sample (S)

0.1458

o.-svyj-

c

u

Duplicate (D)

0.145S

0. S'/XZ-

c

w-

RPD

0.0

Q M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPP£

5R30368!

«'4£feL_

U.S. EPA - CLP

EPA SAMPLE NO.IF 3ASPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY

, STD011S ,1 Lab Name: WESTON-LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057 __________j

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD768

I Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Level (low/med): LOW

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaanesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

ControlLimit%R

75*125

-)*?'&<

Spiked SampleResult (SSR) C

0.5609

V»7 s 34

SampleResult (SR) C

0.1458

C ,^43<P*

«

—

-

y

SpikeAdded (SA)

0.5

6- 5-

%R

83.0

Yf.O

Q M

NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRmmNRNRNRCVNRNRNRNRNRNRNRNRIffir

»

o

Comments:

FORM V (PART 1) - IN

AR303682

r FORM IX - IN 7/87

U.S. EPA - CLP

1OHOLDING TIMES

Lab Name: WESTON-LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD768

EPASample No.

SS-613SS1311SS1311DSS1311SSS1312SS1315SS1603

Matrix

WATERSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILWATER

DateReceived

12/08/8912/08/8912/08/8912/08/8912/08/8912/08/8912/08/89

MercuryPrepDate

12/27/8912/27/8912/27/8912/27/8912/27/8912/27/8912/27/89

MercuryHoldingTime

19191919191919

-

CyanidePrepDate

CyanideHoldingTime

6R303683

STANDARD CELORIHESD6 ISTD769

DATA REVIEWER: Douglas GodfreyDATA SUPERVISOR: Zohreh Hamid, Ph.D.

The laboratory's portion of SDG #STD769 consisted of eleven samples(five aqueous and six soils) analyzed for TAL metals by Roy F.Weston, Inc.

The laboratory reported no problems with the receipt and analysisof the samples received on 12-08,12-89.

The reviewer has commented on the criteria specified under eachanalysis heading method. All criteria has been assessed, but nodiscussion is given where the evaluator has determined thatcriteria were adequately performed or require no comment. A listof samples with criteria deficiencies and qualifier codes aresummarized in Table I. A glossary of qualifier codes is presentedin Attachment I. Amounts of detected analytes are summarized inAttachment II.

flR30368ii

rINORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD76914 MAY 1990PAGE 2 OF 7

EVALUATION BY ANALYSIS

I- ICP Analysis

___ Initial Calibration___ Continuing Calibration___ Interference Checkx Matrix Spikex Duplicate___ Laboratory Control Sample___ Blanks___ Preparation Blankx Serial Dilution_X_ CRI

Matrix spike, duplicate digestion, and serial dilution samples werenot prepared for the aqueous samples in this SDG. All associatedsample results are qualified as estimated due to the unknown samplematrix effects.

The soil duplicate digestion relative percent differences (RPD) forAl (28.1) and Fe (23.6) were outside the CLP control limit. Allassociated sample results are qualified as estimated.

The CRI sample percent recoveries for Al, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe,Mg, Mn, Ni, K, Nar and Zn were above the CLP control limits. Allassociated sample results below the CRDL are qualified asestimated.

The CRI sample percent recoveries for Al, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe,Mg, Mn, Ni, K, Na, and Zn were above the CLP control limits. Allassociated positive results below the CRDL are qualified asestimated.

The CRI sample percent recoveries for Sb and Ba were below the CLPcontrol limits. All associated sample results between ± CRDL arequalified as estimated.

NOTE

Because sample results were above the CRDL, no sample results werequalified for Mn and Zn.

flR303685

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD76914 MAY 1990PAGE 3 OF 7

EVALUATION BY ANALYSIS

II. Graphite Furnace Analysis

Initial CalibrationContinuing CalibrationMatrix SpikeDuplicateLaboratory Control SampleBlanksAnalytical Spiking, MSACRA

Matrix spike and duplicate digestion samples were not prepared forthe aqueous samples in this SDG. All associated sample results arequalified as estimated due to the unknown sample matrix effects.

The soil matrix spike percent recoveries for As (47.5%) , Pb(62.9%), and Se (57.3%) were below the CLP control limits. Allassociated sample results and detection limits are qualified asbiased low.

The post matrix spike recoveries for As, Pb, Se, and Tl were belowthe CLP control limits for at least one sample result. Allassociated sample results are qualified as biased low.

NOTE

The post matrix spike recoveries for Se and Tl were above the CLPcontrol limit for at least one sample result.

All associated sample results are <IDL and no qualification isrequired.

The CRA sample recoveries for Pb were outside the CLP controllimits due to high sample results (>CRDL), no qualification isrequired.

The soil matrix spike percent recovery for Tl (128.5%) was abovethe CLP control limit. All associated sample results are <IDL andare not required to be qualified as biased high.

flR303686

rINORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD76914 MAY 1990PAGE 4 OF 7

EVALUATION BY ANALYSIS

III. Mercury Analysis

___ Initial Calibration___ Continuing Calibrationx Matrix Spikex Duplicate___ Laboratory Control Sample___ Blanks___ Holding Time

Matrix spike and duplicate digestion samples were not prepared forthe aqueous samples in the SDG. All associated sample results arequalified as estimated due to the unknown sample matrix effects.

6R303687

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD76914 MAY 1990PAGE 5 OF 7

TABLE I

Sample # Analvte + Results - PL Comments*

All Aqueous All AnalytesSamples except CN J UJ 1

All SoilSamples As , Pb, Se L UL 2

All SoilSamples Al , Fe J UJ 3

SW1801 Pb,Se L UL 4

SW1802 As,Pb,Se L UL 4

SW1803 Tl L UL 4

SW1801,SW1802,SW1803,SS2503 Ba,K J UJ 5

551721,551712,SS2515 Sb,Ba J UJ 5

551725 Ba J UJ 5

551721,551712551725,552511,552512,552515 Be, Caf Mg,Ni ,Na J UJ 5

551721,551712,SS1725 CU J UJ 5

SS1721, SS1725,552511,552512,552515 K J UJ 5

SW1803,SW1802/SWISOI^WISOS,SS2503 Cr,Cu J UJ 5

SV71803,SS2503 Ca,Fe,Mg J UJ 5

552503 Al J UJ 5

SW1301,SW1802,SW1803,SW1805 Cd J UJ 5

* Comments for Table I are listed on the proceeding page.

&R303688

rINORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD7€914 MAY 1990PAGE 6 OF 7

COMMENTS

1. Due to the lack of matrix spike, duplicate digestion, andserial dilution samples, all associated sample resultsare qualified as estimated.

2. Due to a low matrix spike percent recovery, indicating amatrix interference or laboratory specific problem, allassociated sample results are qualified as biased low.

3» Due to a poor duplicate digestion RPD, all associatedsample results are qualified as estimated.

4. Due to a low post matrix spike percent recovery, allassociated sample result are qualified as biased low.

5. Due to a low CRDL sample percent recovery, all associated1 sample results between ± CRDL are qualified as estimated.

6. Due to a high CRDL sample percent recovery, allassociated positive sample results <CRDL are qualifiedestimated.

flR303689

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD76914 MAY 1990PAGE 7 OF 7

3EHTOSHATXON REGABDIHG REPORT CONTENT

All data have been validated with regard to usability according toCLP Guidelines. If you have any questions or comments on this datareview, please call Zohreh Hamid at (215)524-7360

INORGANIC ATTACHMENTS

1. Glossary of Data Qualifier Codes.

2. Data Summary. This includes:

All positive results with qualifier codes if applicable;all estimated detection limits qualified with "UJ".

3. Appendix A - Data Validation Form for Inorganic (Metalsand Cyanide).

4. Appendix B - DPO Report - This addresses laboratorycompliance issues with respect to the Statement of Work.

5. Appendix C - Support Documentation.

flR303690

rL

ATTACHMENT IGLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIERS

flR30369i

I GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIERS">••*

I CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION

(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds):

J « NOT DETECTED, SUBSTANTIALLY ABOVE THE LEVELREPORTED IN LABORATORY OR FIELD BLANKS.

R « UNRELIABLE RESULT. ANALYTE MAY OR MAY NOT BEPRESENT IN THE SAMPLE. SUPPORTING DATANECESSARY TO CONFIRM RESULT.

N « NEGATED COMPOUND WAS CONSIDERED AS NOTPRESENT IN THE SAMPLE.

(NO CODE) = CONFIRMED IDENTIFICATION

CODES RELATING TO QUANTITATION

(can be used for both positive results and sample quantitationlimits):

J = ANALYTE PRESENT. REPORTED VALUE MAY NOT BEACCURATE OR PRECISE.

UJ « THE REPORTED QUANTITATION LIMITS AREQUALIFIED ESTIMATED.

OTHER CODES

Q NO ANALYTICAL RESULT.

6R303692

MV

k

ATTACHMENT IIDATA SUMMARY

AR3Q3693

fr

za:o

oz

36 ft u- - In**» in ii'•03

8* r

H—-n t

» -

'i i\\ iiiVi

nuvii •ii ti i iIP"! Jni

n i * t i iM r»i i I-N i i K «,1

ii rtn i "l 1 - O l l >!1 1 1 I I 1

i ii ii ti ii ii ii iPI 1 If— )l _«t , I.-.II i 1* /i Ml Ji Hi

ii -i i l

JV—y •• .- '

"nn * *

Up!11 1II Oln SuIt

ir M^it Oi» i

11 OlH ./M1! *!It 1

nV

PT

PI

1 1

i rxiI \*iti iv> H^ i i*0^ Mr/V II xh I 1 I> N'l H I l l l«j « U *«••.•..»«.«...«..«»...••..nj ? I' c H • * •»* * i i•^ *" !!5 . f wi! Ji fi 01' i —A*^ * X •* f n c i 5»•«•' i -fl ft, it *o ** > M « t l t £ i 3 i -I ! ' •* * j n f i -1 11 •• i >• tn !! 0. ? 8 11! ' ' c i w I k ! Ii , »! i * -* rnelf liiiil

" J-V*

" *£* • ' ft! -^! «K-« *.? i " - » f 1» - i HJs. I _ I \^1 '*_• i-V fc f——)

1 COi i i i " i i i 1 i ^ " ' U

i i ti i ii i ii i ii i ii i ii i ii i ii i ii i ii i it i ii i ii i ii i ii i it i ii i ii i ii i ii i ii i ii i it i ii i ii i i

t i ii i ii i it i i

D.i i

i i ii i t

1l— vlr>

i . i1 \nl

Sin

I II tI II II II II II II II II It I1 II II II II II I1 11 1t 11 11 11 11 1t 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 I1 11 1

f 1

) s3| fi

PNipf

!)->>-> >~fc! '~l V« ——i* Uis»^ JT-w I -i. —— i s.- O

r i i i

, . -Vm ii i ii i i

I I i ii i i_ i i »f 3i i3i --» w i•- I | i — 1 1 1 lOl*! ?! f ! i! 51 « '

i f ii 3 1i i 1*i i i • i*! ?! f ! i! 51 « ' t1i i * f 5 ' w ' ?•Sl^lS\2^\^ll\

N

D

^

o

i i

:§:•i - i 3•* 1 ft 1 -Mt 1 M I CJf. 1 « 1 fU I ** 1 •*- 1 0 1 fX I 4. I Jl Iff

r>\

o!

frytP!

P!i n!

*i Wi vi ^'ii i i

ii

§l N

*tit

9

•-J

I en

*

f ' 2 13 i fl i5 ifl. ii 1

i i i - i ~ * < i i * i nl 5, i - 1C If 5 ! « l*I •- i1 C »i l li l l

i l li, i ilUll Ii o iiii

I f

Vo'

I

• 9 *:'5'C0*010

- i C * f»-'*'*C I I1 i Ii tI Ir iI Ii ii ii ii i

_ _ _ I/I

iO

I Ir< in!lOl

C Jr |C

* — ii t * III m tp* •

!0i« r!-!*!_!«!* a - 6 .i i Si.ini XXX // » 7 J161alll*

•* i M i mc i i r1 1C i'I i

f ti ii fi it ii t1 *"-

I I

'

0<

i 3 i a i « i - i1 1 1 1 i r 1 1 ii 3 ic i m i o 1o i» i 3 i 2 ' * ic if i f i o i iJ 1 5 1 « I 1 I< i i 15- 1 i ii y f e ii i 1 1 i i ii i

i i i i ii i ii i it inji i i1 K. 1 1 1

' ii i

8

ot>*

' " * " «P» " f Jill f Mi*-Kf5'I 3 to? !• n £ R5 i

1 1 1 1 1 II1 1 1 1 1 II1 1 1 1 1 Mt 1 1 1 1 II1 1 1 1 1 M1 1 1 I 1 IIi i i i i ii7<"7C7<f7c"n IPJi

' ' in. i

i iO rC> ii i i i it -MI t-Jli

I . I II

M|Ljr i - l- l i *- i( -iu-1 JteiX -* "

l l.l Il lI l

' C '/J 'tu|<-»| un'1 1 1 f1 1 11 1 *w 1 1i i-C:i i1 1* 1 1t ttjH 11 F* 1 I

olS

I I I I I I In .Hr^ i i ilfv i i IXJH1 r\ ' ' ' V 11I* I I ~fe-fc!1 (V> 1

c

n rC. i

IIii: o!

i iv n penI I II |O||

i/ jf Cw1 1

C I. I C

.IVMIOQ iu i«*!' t

' ' ^

LiU1 11 11 1t 1i if ii i

H

"*

.cnitiiitnnII ll rrrn ii r *^c i----——nJ callnnifllntin n n • «nnnnitnH

112IIII

II.»——„II II »- IM n • IIIll

!! R !!! !! f I

ATTACHMENT IIICLP DATA REVIEW FORM

SR303696

"" --"-***:J < rograa Numberr 15Appendix A.I: Data Aasessaent - Contract R«vi*ion: 6

IP Compliance (Tocal Review - Inorganics)

• * YES N2

A.:.: Contract, Corr;.j~* >:r**r.lng Se??-: (CCS> - Present*

A. 1.2 Record of Coeaunicatlon (froc RSCC) - Present?

ACTION: If nc. request from RSCC.

A. 1.3 Sample Traffic Report - Present or on file?

^ ACTION: If no, request froo Regional Sample ControlCenter (RSCC).

A.I. * Cover Page - Present?

Is cover page properly filled in and signed by themanager or the manager's designee?

ACTION: If no, prepare Telephone Record Log, andcontact laboratory*

Do nuobers of samples correspond to ouabers on Recordof Communication? [ J

Do aaople numbers on cover page agree vith samplenumbers on:

(a) Traffic Report Sheet?

(b) Form I'a?

ACTION: If no for any of the above, contact RSCC forclarification.

A.I.5 Fora I (Final Data) * Are all Form I'a present end complete?

ACTION': If BO. prepare telephone record log and contactlaboratory for tubmittal.

Are correct units (ug/1 for vaters and ag/kg for toils) ,indicated on Form !'•? f__J __ S_

SR303697

. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: KW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES

Are so:: sample r*j*clts for each parameter corrected for **percent solid** * \^ \

Are E?A 5«ttrl* * » and corresponding laboratory saapleIS * s the saae as on the Cover Page, Form I's andin the raw data? *

Are computation/transcription errors less than IOZof reported values? [

Are all "less than IDL" values properly coded with "U"? [

Was a brief physical description of samples given on-*• Forte I's? [ .,

Were the result qualifiers used correctly with final

ACTION: If no for any of the above, prepare TelephoneRecord Log, and contract laboratory forcorrected data*

Were «ny simples diluted beyond requirenents of contract? __

If yes, were dilutions nottd on Form I!s? {__]

ACTION: If no, note under contract -proble«/non-co«pli*nceof the'*Data Assesssxnt Narrative".

A.1.6 Holding Tiaes - (aqueous sastples )

(Enmin* sample traffic reports and digestion/distillation logs.)

Mercury (28 days). ........ exceeded? __ [

Cyanide (14 days). ........ exceeded? S* I

Other Metals (6 stonths). ..... exceeded? __ l.

Soil samples

Metals and Cyanide (6 months). .....exceeded? __ I

HOTS; Prepare a list of all samples and analytesfor which holding times have been exceeded. Specifythe number of days from date of collection to thedate of analysis (fro* raw data). Attach to checklist.

,f

5£/?/> / jLSo.

fiR303698

r'.

_.. -.; ;.ne Contract Datt: Dec. J9lLaboratory Frograo Nuaber: HV-2Appendix A*]; Data Aasescnent - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES V

ACT:'1'. If y*$ r-j*:: .'rei-line^ values less thar.Zrstruser.t Detection Limit (IDl); flag a£estimated (J) the values above IDL.

A.I.7 Rav Data

A.3.7.1 Digestion Log* for flameAA/ICP present? [

Digest!an Log for furnace AA present? f

Digestion Log"for mercury present? [

Digestion Log for cyanides present? [__

Are pH values (pH<2 for all metals, pR>12 for cyanide)present in Digestion/Distillation Logs? [ ""j

*tfeights, dilutions and volumes used to obtain values.

Percent aolids calculation present for soils/sediments? [ )

Are preparation dates present on Digestion Log? [ }

A. 1.7.2 Measurement read out record present? ICP [/]

Flas* AA [__J

Furnace AA [__]

Mercury

Cyanides __

A.1.7.3 Are all raw data to support all aample analyses andQC operations present? [ \

Ufible?

Properly Labeled? f__I

ACTION: If no for any of the above, vrite TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory*

SR3Q3699

i/*ta for th« Date: Aug. J9«Contract Laboratory Profra« Number: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

A.1*8.1 Calibration

A. 1.8.1.1 Is record of at least 2 point calibrationpresent for ICP analysis?

Is record of 5 point calibration present forKg analysis?

ACTION*: If no for any of the above, write in thecontract problea/non-cofipliance section ofthe "Data Assessment Narrative".

A.1.8.1.2 Is record of 4 point calibration present for:Flame AA?

Furnace AA?

Cyanides? \S )

NOTE: 1. If less than 4, other standards must be run immediatelyafter calibration and be 5J of true value.

2. For all AA and Cyanide analyses one calibration standardis at CRDL level*

ACTION: Flag associated data as estimated If standardsare not within j+5J of true values (except CRDLcalibration standard).

A.1.8.1*3 Is correlation coefficient less than 0.995 for:

Mercury Analysis? __ r /\

Cyanide Analysis? __ [ Q

Atomic Absorption Analysis? _

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A.1.8.2 Form II A (Initial and Continuing Calibration Verification)*

A.1.8.2.1 Present and complete for every metal and cyanide?

SR3Q370Q

Date:.. __..-...-vr} rrograai Number: Kfc

Appendix A.I: Data Assesssxnt - Contract *evi»ton: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NOPresent 4>*d c.>e;l»t-t for AA a.-.ii IC* when tr:K are "—used 'or sa« ar.aly: 1 { j

ACnrtt- 1: r? for ar.y of the above, prepare TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory.

A.1.8.2.2 Circle all values on data su&oary aheet that areoutside of contract windows. Are all calibrationstandards (initial and continuing) within controlliclts?

Metals 90-110* [

H£ - 80-120* [_J

-* Cyanides 85-115* [ }

Are all calibration standards (initial and continuing) ./within 50-J50J? \J_]

ACTION': Flag as ettiaated (J) all positive data (notflagged with a "U") analyzed between acalibration standard of 75-89* (65-79* for Hg;70-84* for CK) or 111-125* (121-135* for Hg;116-130* for CK) recovery and nearest good calibrationstandard. Qualify results <IDL as estimated (UJ),if the 1CV or CCV *R is 75-89*(CN, 70-84* ; HC, 65-79*).Reject (red-line) as unacceptable data if recovery ofthe ICV or CCV *R is outside the range 75-125*(CN, 70-130*; Hg, 65-135*).

Was continuing calibration performed every 10 samplesor every 2 hours? f

ACTION: If DO, flag the excess samples (eleventh andup) data as estisttted (J).

A.U8.3 Fora II B (CRDl Standards for AA and ICP) -

A* 1*8.3.1 Vas a CRDL standard (CRA) analyzed for all AA aetals(except Hg)? [

* Was a aid-range calib. verification standard distilledand analyted for cyanide analysis? [

Vas a 2xCRUt or 2xIDL (when IDL>CRPL) analyzed (CRI) foreach ICP run? \(Note: CRI for ALfBa>Ca,Fe>Kg,Na,or K is not required.)

* Find the results of Bid-range standard in the raw data.

6R303701

Appendix A.I: Data A*.e,.MR£ - Contr.~ ""****:""" m-l'Compliance (Total Reviev - i.org.Sc.) *«vi.ion: f 2

A.:- 8.3.3 Are OU .«J CRI .t.nd.rds within control li.it.:

Met*l« 90-UO?^ I« .id-range .t.ndard within control li.it.:

" Cyanide 85 - 115?A£IIOK: Flag the affected data within the

data within the range crecovery i, gre.ter than HOt (forCN

J The range for CK i. .(true value * f. v.lue)

A<1'8-4 F°" "1 (Initial and e M... c.libr.M . .,.-.-.

I A. 1.8. 4.1 Present «nd complete?

For both AA and ICP when both .re u.ed for ..« .n.lne? f^

A£IIP1= If no, prepare Telephone Record Log andcontact laboratory. 8

(CRDD?

C*"br"loB "«"k« !"• than two ti«.nt Detection Li^t (when IDLXRDL)'

* "IT T*1Ue °f CRA> CRI or -"-range CN .t.ndard,-Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > CRDL.

SR303702

litie: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Dee.Contract Laboratory Program Nunber: *HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Reviev - Inorganic*)

YES NO

A.!.5.A.3 ;;as ar, iniriaj' Ubratlo- blan* analyzed'* ( _/\

Va* a :cr:iTiuIns Cilibtatior. blank srV.yted afterevery 10 camples or every 2 hours (whichever is worefrequent)? L_l

ACTION': If no, flag as estimated (J) all value* <5xIDLnot analyzed vithln 5 aasplet of calibration blank.

A.1.8.5 FOES III (Preparatiop Blank) «-

( Note: The preparation blank for vercury is the aa&e"•*• as the calibration blank.)

A. 1.8.5.1 Was one prep, blank analyzed for: each 20 aaoples? [

each batch? \.

each aatrix type? { __

both AA and ICP when both are uaed for taae analyte? [__] __

ACTION: If oo for any of the above, flag a* estimated (J)all associated positive data <10 x IDLs for whichprep.blank was not analyzed.

NOTE: If only one blank was analyzed for svrethan 20 samples, then first 20 ssvples analyzeddo not have to be flagged as eat is* ted (J).

A. 1.8.5.2 Do concentrations of prep, blank fall below two tisjes ^IDL when XDZ. is greater than CRDL? t .^j __

ACTION: If nov reject (red-line) all data that hasa concentration less than 10 ti»es the prep.blank value, but not flagged with a "U"(lass than)*

A. 1.8.5.3 Is concentration of prep, blank greater than CRDL ^when IDt is less than or equal to CRDL? __ [ j

If yes, is the concentration of the eaaple with theleast concentrated analyte Itss than 10 tis>es theprep, blank value? , ^^ \ ]

flR303703

,Date: D«e. 19,

Laboratory Program Number: RW-;Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES

ACTIOS: If vc$f reject (red-line; all associatedd<,--n cha: has a concentrator, less char.tc:; tines the prep, blank value, but notflagged with a "U" (less than).

A.1.8.5.4 Is concentration of prep, blank below the negative CRDL? __

ACTION': If yes, reject (red-line) all associated datathat has a concentration less than lOxCRDL.

A.1.8.6 Fora IV (2CP Interference Cheek Sample)—% -- - ————A.1.8.6.1 Present and complete? [ -^

(NOTE; Not required for furnace AA, flame AA, mercury,cyanide and Ca, Mg, K and Na.)

A.1.8.6.2 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are worethan + 201 of true or established mean value. Are allInterference Check Sample results inside of control ^limits (+ 201)? r J

If no, is concentration of Al, Ca, Fe, or Mg lower in /sample than in ICS? - L_J

ACTION': If no, flag as estimated (J) those positiveresults for which ICS recovery is between121-150Z ; flag all sample results as estimatedif ICS recovery falls within 50-79X; reject(red-line) those sample results for which ICSrecovery is leas than 502; if ICS recovery isabove I SOS, reject positive results only (notflagged with a "U").

A,1.8.6.3 Was ICS analyted at beginning end end of run(or *t least twice every 8 hours)?

ACTION: If no, flag as estimated (J) all samples forvhich AL, Ca, Fe, or Mg is higher than in ICS.

A. 1.8.7 Form V A (Spiked sample Recovery - Pre-Digestion/Pre-Pi»tallation)-( Note: Not required for Ca, Mg, X, and Na (both matrices), Al, and Fe(soil only.)

Tirle: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dee. 1986Contract Laboratory Program Number: *HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assetssent - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

_YES NO

A.!.8.7.I Present «c£ complete? for: each 20 samples? [ )

each matrix type? \J_\ __

each cone, range (i.e. low, med., high)? [ J __

For both AA and ICP when both are used for same•nalyte? [__] __

ACTION'- if no for any of the above, flag asestimated (J) all positive data lessthan four tines spiking level for

•^ which spiked sample vas not analyzed.

NOTE: If one spiked aaaple was analyzed for Borethan 20 samples, then first 20 samplesanalyzed do not have to be flagged asestimated (J).

A.1.8.7.2 Was field blank used for spiked sample? __ [ /]

If yes, was field blank described as such on TrafficReport? __ [__]

ACTION: If yes, flag all positive data less than4 * spike added as eatiaated (J) for whichfield blank was used as spiked sample.

A.1.8.7.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outsideof control limits (75J to 1251). Are all recoveries .fwithin control limits? [__]

If no, is sample concentration greater than or equalto four times spike concentration? [__)

ACTION: If yes, disregard spike recoveries foramalytes whose concentrations are greaterthan or equal to four times spike added.If no, circle those analytes on form V forwhich sample concentration is less thanfour times the spike concentration.

Are results outside the control limits (75-1251) sflagged with "N" on Form I's and Form VA? I S\

ACTION: If no, write in the contract problem/non complisn,cesection of "Data Assessment Narrative".

RR303705

tn

. .. ._. * w*i* tor th« Dat«: D«c. 1988Contract Laboratory Prograa Number: HV-"*Appendix A.I: Data Assessment- Contract Kevision- 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES KO

ii

A_:-«ous-

Are any spiX* recoveries:(a) less than 302? __ j

Cb) between 30-74*? j

(c) between 126-1502? __ [

(d) greater than 1502? [

ACTIDK: If less than 302, reject all associated aqueousdata: if betweer. 30-742, flag «u associatedaqueous data as estimated (J); if between126-150:, flag as estiaated (J) all associatedaqueous data not flagged with a "U"; ifgreater than 150Z, reject (red-line) allassociated aqueous data not flagged with a "U"«

NOTE: If pre- digestion spike result is rejectable due tocoefficient of correlation of MSA, analytical spikerecovery, or duplicate injections criteria , disregard spikerecovery on fora V. Flag the associated data as estimated(J).

A. 1. 8*7. 5 Soll/Sediaent

Are any spik* recoveries:(a) less than 102? __ [

(b) between 10-741? ^ \

(c) between 126-200Z? ^ {

(d) greater than 2001? __

ACT I OK: If less than 101, reject all associated data;if between 10-741, flag all associated data as•stisated; if between 126-2002, flag as estimatedall associated data was Dot flagged with a "U";if greater than 2002, reject all associateddata cot flagged with a *'U".

A. 1.8.6 Fora VI (Lab Duplicates)

A« 1.8. 8.1 Present and complete for: «ach 20 aamples? [ __ ]

«ach matrix type? [ __ ] J^J

tach concentration range (i.t. lev, mcd., high)? I __ J __

flR303706

Dee, merrogram Number.- fffc'-2

Appendix A*l: Data Assessment * Contract Revision: e(Total Review - Inorganics)

TES NO

both AA and TC*-vhe?i both are u«*<* for saw »nal*te? [ __ J

ACTION'. T* no for any the above, flae e« estimated (J)til data >CiwL* for vhich duplicate sample vasnot analyzed.

Note: If one duplicate aaople vas analyzed for morethan 20 samples, then first 20 saeples do nothave to be flagged aa estimated.

A. 1-8*8. 2 Was field blank used for duplicate analysis? __ [

If yes, vas field blank identified as such on^ Traffic Report? __ [

ACTION: If yes, flag all data >CRDl* as estimated (J)for which field blank vas used as duplicate.

A. 1.8. 8. 3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outsidecontrol limits:

Aqueous Samples (a) 20t RPD or*(b)+ CRDt

Soil Samples (a) 351 RPD or*(b}_* CRDL

Are all values within control limits?

If oo, are all results outside the control limitsflagged with an * on Form I'a and VI?

L/f

ACTIOK: If no, write io the contract problems/non-compliance section of "Data Assessment Narrative".

NOTE: 1* RPD is not calculable for an analyteof the sample * duplicate pair vhenboth values are leas than XDL*

2. If lab duplicate result ia rejeetable due to coefficientof correlation of MS A, analytical spike recovery, orduplicate injections criteria, do not apply precisioncriteria. Flag the associated data as estimated.

A. 1.8.8.4 la any value for sample duplicate pair leaa than CRDL*and other value greater than or equal to 10 x *CRDi? __

ACTIOM: If yes, flag the associated data.

* Substitute IDL for CKDL vhen XDL > CRDL*

fiR3Q3707

cne Dtt«.Contract Laboratory Program Kumber: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data As*««*a*nt - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

TES NO

A.1.5.8.5 Aqueous

Is any RPD greater than 501 where sample ani duplicateare both greater than or equal to 5 tines *CRDL?

Is any difference between saople and duplicate greaterthan *CRDL where sample and/or duplicate i« less than5 tines *CRDl?

ACTIfrV: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A.1.8*8.6 SoU/Sediaent

Is any RPD (where *anple and duplicate are bothgreater than or equal to 5 tines *CRDL) :

2 loot? _Is any difference between sample and duplicate(where sample and/or duplicate is less than 5x*CRDL) :

>2x*CRDL? __ L/J

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A.I.8.9 Field Duplicates

A.1.8.9.1 Were field duplicates analyzed? [__J

ACTION: If yea, prepare a For* VI for each field duplicatepair, report concentration* of soils in ug/1 on vetweight basis and calculate RPDg.

NOTE: 1. Do not calculate RPD when both values are lest than IDL*2* Flag all associated data only for field duplicate-

A.1.8.9.2 Circle all values on Fora VI for field duplicates that are outsidecontrol limits:

Aqueous Saaples (a) 201 RPD orCRDL

Soil Samples (a) 35t RPD orCRDL

* Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > CRDL.

HR3Q37Q8

- Contract Labowt^ p""! for th« - - - - ,I Appendix A.I: D,t, L,f D<t«: »«e i,.I Compliance (Total R.vl!jl"Tt ~ Con=r«ct Number: V.;;

——-——————_________ " Inorganlet) *evi,ion: g

« -.-, : .-• -•• ccr.tia: Ha

^i: If T«. flag the ...oci.ted*•»-••».* Acueous "" " «"««.

anv difference

—— I__)— ~ — -»«^WA.« tea » . -_

A.1.8,9.5

I« «ny RPD*«.ter t TelJZ1 " ?-.*»Plie.c. .re

i: If „„, „., th...

"""""

i, iet§

' If T«. n.. th. nmMmf^ ' ——— [——I»» MtlMted.

•very 20 tf.t«r

«v«^ 20 .olid .Mpl..? X

" " ~I__J __

• SubTUute IDL for CRDL vh.n IDL > CROL.

SR303709

for the Dace: Dec.Contract Laboratory Program Nu«fa«r: KW-2Appendix A.2: Data Assescaenc - Contract Revision: 8Conpliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

TKS NO

vJL-.iJLL; ": "° -jr ar-" c:" t(v£ abcve, prepare TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory for submlttalof results of solid LCS. Flag as estimated(J)all data for which LCS was not analyzed.

NOTE: If only one LCS was analyzed for more than 20samples, then first 20 camples close to LCSdo not have to be flagged as estiaated.

A.I.8.10.2 Aqueous

Circle all LCS values outside of controllimitsCSO - I20Z- except aqueous Ag and Sb).

Is sny LCS recovery: less than 50X?

between 501 and 79X?

between 121t and 150J?

greater than 150Z?

ACTION: Less than 50Z, reject (red-line) all data;between 50t and 791, flag all associated dataas estiaated (J); between 1211 and 1SOZ, flagall positive (not flagged with a "U") resultsas estiaated; greater than 1501, reject allpositive results.

A.1.6.10.3 Solid LCS

NOTE: 1. If IDL of an analyte Is equal to or greater thanTrue Value of LCS, disregard the following criteria.

2. If'Found'Value of LCS is rejectable due to duplicateInjections or analytical splice recovery criteria,disregard LCS recovery; flag the associated data asestlaated(J).

a. If the Solid LCS recovery for any analyte fallsoutside EFA control Units, qualify all sampleresult* >IDL as estimated (J).

b. If the LCS results are higher than the controllimits and the staple result* < IDL, the dataare acceptable.

c. If the LCS results art lover than the controlHalts,qualify all sample results < IDL asestimated(UJ).

fiR3037tO

- - - - - - rage ib oi 30

Title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Dec. 1938Contract Laboratory Program Number: *Htf-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

Yes so

A.1*8.11 Forr IX CICP Serial Dilution) -

A.1*8.11.1 »as Serial Tilation analysis performed for: Jeach 20 samples? [J J

each matrix type? [__]

each concentration range (i.e. lov, med.)? [__] __ ^

-*• ACTION: If no for any of the above, flag all positive datagreater than cr equal to lOxIDLs as estimated (J)for which Serial Dilution Analysis vas not performed,and summarize the deficiency on the DPO report.

A.1.8.11.2 Vas field blank(s) used for Serial Dilution Analysis? __ [ /")

If yes, was field blank described as such on TrafficReport? __ [] /

ACTION: If yes, flag all associated data _> 10 x IDtas estimated (J).

A.1.8.11.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are ouside ,^of control limit (_+10 Z). Are all values within^ 10 t ? [</]

Are results outside control limit flaggedwith an "E" on Fora I's and For» IX? [__]

ACTION': If no, write in the contract problem/non-compliancesection of the"Data Assessment Narrative".

A. 1.8.11.4 Are any Z Diff. values : __> 10Z ?

> 100Z ? __

ACTION: Flag as estimated (J) all associated sample resultsequal to or greater than lOxIDLs for which percentdifference is greater than 10Z but less than 1001,Reject (red-line) all associated sample resultsequal to or greater than lOxIDts for which PD lagreater than or equal to 3001.

flR3037lI

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: Kw-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: gCompliance (Total Reviev - Inorganics)

YES NO

Furr«acfe Acer.:; .A&_s_vr_y:: •- • y ' QC Analyses

A-KB.12.1 A~* s ::;.?*:.* injections present in furnace raw data(£>-=.?* -Airing full Method of Standard Addition) for ^each cample analyzed by GFAA? [ ]

ACTION': If no, reject the data on Form I's for whichduplicate injections were not performed.

A.1.8.22.2 Do the duplicate injection readings aeree within 202Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) or Coefficient ofVariation (CV) for concentration greater than CRDL? fj T

Was a dilution analyzed for sample with post digeationspike recovery leca than 402? [__) __

ACT10V; If no for any of the above, flag all theAssociated data as estimated (J).

A.1.8.12.3 Is *post digestion spike recovery less than 10? or ,greater than 1502 for any result? __ [ /

ACTION: If yes, reject (red-line) the affected data ifrecovery is <10I; reject data not flagged with "U"if spike recovery is >150Z.

NOTE : Reject the data only if the affected sample wasnot subsequently analyzed by Method of StandardAddition.

4.1.6.13 Fora VIII (Method of Standard Addition Results)

A.1.8.13.1 Present? L- T" __

If no, is any Fora I result coded with "S" or a "+"? __ [__]

ACTION; If yes, write request on Telephone Record tog andcontact laboratory for submittal of Forsi VIII.

A.1.8.13.2 Is cotfficient of correlation for MSA less than 0.990 forany sa«pl«? __

ACTION: If yes, reject (red-line) affected data.

* Post digestion spike is not required on the pre-digestion spiked sample when pre-

digestion spike recovery is within control limits of 75-1252 or when SR>**SA.

A. 1.8*13. 3 Uas *MSA required for any sample but not performed?

Is coefficient of correlation for MSA less than 0.995? __

Are MSA calculations outside the linear range of thecalibration curve generated at the beginning of theanalytical run? __

ACTION: If yes for any of the above, flag allthe associated data as estimated (J).

A-J.8.13.4 Vas proper ^aantitatiotv procedure folloved correctly -Xas outlined in the SOW on page E-16 through E-17? [ __ J

ACTION: If no, note exception under contract problem/non-compliance of data assessment narrative, orprepare a aeperate list.

A'K8'U M"pl ot.1 or Incr /T,.. ^ -A. 1.8. 14,1 Were any analyses performed for dissolved as veil aa

total analytes on the sa or isstotal analytes on the same aample(a)

m Were any analyses performed for inorganic as veil as total(organic + inorganic) analytes on the same sample(a)? __ [__]

I If yes, apply the following question* only Ifinorganic (or dissolved ) results are (1) above

| • CRDL, and (ii) greater than total constituents.-— *.w*t»t Atuents.

A-K8-"-! iLSL-ssra s.-s.s-r-<-1-»«-'•ore than 10Z? Ctl con««rttion by

A. 1.8.14.3 I, tht con«ntr«tion of .By dii.olv^d tnr *SILTST tk- "• -."sniini"?-'0222' L"L"::,,":;"?»"»«««.™.«.- ss.'s.'sflKir'".; Krs.- js- «•"- »"

* MSA it not required on LCS .nd prep, blank.

[ __ ]

[ ]

AR3037I3

Date: t>ec."

Title: Evaluation of Hetals Data for the uate: £>**. *9Gr Contract Laboratory Prograa Number: "nw-2

Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: gCompliance (Total Review - Inorganics){¥ -_———- - _. _.

j

YES NOACTION', if

if more thar 10?, flag both dissolved (or inorganic)and total values as estimated (J); if more than50S, reject (red-line) the data for both valuse.

A.1.8.15 Fora I to IX

A. 1.8.15.1 Are all the Fora I through Form IX labeled with:

Laboratory name? [ >j

Case number? { */]

EPA ssaple No.? [__I

SDC No.? [ ]

Contract No.? [__J

Correct units? [f ]

Matrix? [ s jACTION': If no for any of the above.note under

contract problem/non-compliance section of narrative.of the"Data Assessment Narrative"*

A.1.6.15.2 Do any computation/transcription errors exceed 10Z ofreported values on Forms I-IX for:

(NOTE: Check all forvs against rav data.)

(a) all analyte* analyzed by ICP? __

(b) all analytes analyzed by CFAA? __ {' 1

(c) all analytes analyzed by AA Flaie? __ [__](d) Mercury?

(e) Cyanide?

If yes, prepare Telephone Log,for eorr*^*-*^ Jr-» - -- J

HR3037U

lit!.: Ev.l,wSlon of M««l, D.c. for t-h. ' "" " "* •**Cor.tracc L.bor.tory Progr.m D««: „„. .

• . rI'YES NCA.1,8.16 Form I ineid Blank) *

Circle all field blank values OR Data Summary Sheetthat are greater than 2xIDL.Do concentrations of field blank(s) fall below twotimes IDLs for all parameters of associated Aqueousand soil samples? [^

If no, was field blank value already rejected due toother QC criteria? [__

ACTION'• If no, reject (red line) all associated-». aqueous and soil/sediment data (except field

blank) that has a concentration less thanfive times the field blank value not flaggedwith a "U" (less than).

\ A.1.8.17 Fore XI. XII, XIII (Quarterly Verification of InstrumentalParameters).

I A.1.8.17*1 Is quarterly verification report present for:

Instrument Detection Limits? [ ]

I ICP Intereles«nt Correction Factors? [__]

• ICP Linear Ranges? [_JJ" ACTION': If no, contact DPO of the lab.I

A.I.8.17.2 Fore XI (Instrument Detection Liaits) - (Note: IDL is notrequired for Cyanide.)

Are IDLs present for: all the anmlytes? I_< 1

all the instruments used? [_

For both AA and ICP when both are used for sameanalTt**

ACTION: If no for any of the above, prepareTelephone Record Log end contact laboratory.

SR3037I5

23 of 3ff '3ft

Title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for th* 0«ce: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory .Program Number: KW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES £0 N A

Is IDL greater than CRDL. for any analyte? __ [_

If yes, is the concentration of the sample analyzed onthe Instrunent whose ID I. exceeds CRDL, greater than5 x IDL? ' [ ]

MMB ACTION': If no, reject (red-line) all values less thanfive times IDL of the instrument whose IOLexceeds CRDL.

A.l.fl.17.3 Fore XII (Linear Ranges)

Was any sample result higher than high linear rangeof ICP'by more than IDS? __ {_

Was any sample result higher than the highestcalibration standard for non-ICP parameters? ___ [

If yes for any of the above, was dilution performedon the sample to bring raw data In linear range or [___)belov the highest standard*

MMB ACTION': If no, flag the result reported on Form Ias estimated(J).

flR3037i6

ri

ATTACHMENT IVDPO REPORT

4R303717

_....-c,..c..% o: neLAx* Data for the Date: Dee. 1988Contract Laboratory Prograa Number: HW-2Appendix A.2: Data As*essment Narrative Revision: 8

Case* _________^__ Site SlM'Mtf)CtiUD&fj£. Matrix: Soil >

A. 2.1 All data are of acceptable quality? Yes ___ No

If no, exceptions are noted below with reason(i) for-^ rejection or qualification as estimated value (J).

, fa> (</7. rA

/ ^^ Carrel leev-

. L/.6 - n~3_S &<.,* <

Reviewer W<______ Ub t S7?_ft LpM}V$ tt£ Water

Contraccor ____________ Other

flR303718

ATTACHMENT VSUPPORT DOCUMENTATION

flR3037!9

SCtUL DILCTIDK SAKFU NO.TT

SR303720

Appendix A.5Quality Control

fiR30372i

SERIAL DILUTION SAK7U NO.TT

:. <.. .*.*.* uac* tor the Date: D*c. 1956Contract Laboratory Profram Nueb«r: HV-2Appendix A.5: Summary of Inorfanle* Reviiion- 8Quality Control Data

•_»WHA»? or iMotCAincs QUALITY eorntoL DATA$OU WO._________ UMTU TYPE:

ii*aiFIELD OUF. * ' * : _ _ . U J DUF. *'S:

5RUL DILUTION SAKFLI HO. CWTLIT10N DA3T:XI I IIA III TTT

::»•;Dtctetioo'

CC'LcRn :;;.

Al

Sb

Ai

• l

1*

C4

C.

Cr

Co

Cu

,.

»

"I

KB

It

Mi

t

S*

Af

Kt

Tl

f

Z.

CK

200

40

10

200

5

5

5000

10

50

25

300

5

5000

15

sv&>fr$4/3&0*£J

5Vtf^

f?^

0.2 IW2

40

5000

5

10

500C

10

50

20

10

7^5L>f^y£(/fv:

tff 'ver. X 1

I Concl&utdInlt 1 2 3

1

Id-'

ilfll-1

.°

(»>0

*.°

|0 i'

no

/«*•>

M>

!°

,,0-°

iCf**

piS

o>n

\0#

fro

,,w

I-1'1

Inlt

^

'Ml

i

ittp

rtn

4/

CalibrjtioDBlADkl

lalt 1 2 3

F1EF

UTTtVCB IKITlALS: I £ —

1LAN

•U

, w

ICF ICSz t

Itlt FlD

H St 9r ix k

UbDup

IFD

US

t I

«tt

fry?Tn.2

1\K.iffT *^

ffi,3,uo

Aow,n

h0fT.»

«t-'*V.7

fti.^ '

/fr 'l

jtrZt)

»«

StrDll

X P

« .

th

^

/=r5'rfcL/7 I

fFcr:<vP.r t

Pf^^^p:c

flR303723

SniAL DILUTION SAMPLE MO ___II 1_______^UA

j D t c * c t l o e r " C*llb' " • *i*itf ti___

Uftftk ( CoBClnuvd

flR30372U

i

I

' " '"'r'"r' ' i ' j 1 1 1*

flR303725

Api*ndix A.5: Summary fQuality Concrol T °f

SCZUI DILCTIOK SAHFU HO.II I ____IIA

Ullb

flR303727

.I1

oU.S. EPA - CLP

EPA SAMPLE NO.1

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEETSS1721

Lab Naae: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 8912769006

Lev*i (low/med): LOW Date Received: 12/08/89

% Solids: 89.2

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG

CAS No.

7429-90-57440-36-07440-38-27440-39-37440-41-77440-43-97440-70-27440-47-37440-48-47440-50-87439-89-67439-92-17439-95-47439-96-57439-97-67440-02-07440-09-77782-49-27440-22-47440-23-57440-28-07440-62-27440-66-6

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotass iumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Concentration

46304.20.529.0

£>>20-Q.190.5846.85.01.53.950205.316134.40.112.1378

' 0.320.5834.50.6410.111.00.56

C

UBB•8"UB

BB

B

UBBUUBU

U

Q*

N

fo

*N

NW

NW

M

P"PFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: FINE

~olor After: BROWN Clarity After: Artifacts:

Mnments:

FORM I - IN 7/87Rev. IFB Amendment One

7U.S. EPA - CLP

EPA SAMPLE HO.1

INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEETSS1712

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 8912769007

Level (low/med): tt>W Date Received: 12/08/89

% Solids: 88.7

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG

CAS No.

7429-90-57440-36-07440-38-27440-39-37440-41-77440-43-97440-70-27440-47-37440-48-47440-50-87439-89-67439-92-17439-95-47439-96-57439-97-67440-02-07440-09-77782-49-27440-22-47440-23-57440-28-07440-62-27440-66-6

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Concentration

21803.3

0.4710.8

Ofo &*-&-0.4647.64.00.652.645605.1130

23.50.111.1110

- 0.370.4613.80.758.78.70.56

C

uBB•*ruB

BB

B

UUUUUUU

u

Q*

N

6

*N

N

NW

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: FINE

jolor After: BROWN Clarity After: Artifacts:

' .'omments:

FORM I - IN 7/87Rev. IFB Amendment One

HR30373Q

r -toU.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaonesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.097.9

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5342.103162.7030.20

4953.90239.00257.10

24819.80469.402311.801229.804726.4097.20

24742.60702.002.17

1862.0023823.70

30.50472.00

24166.8030.50

2382.10953.7099.50

106.8105.4100.799.195.6102.899.393.992.598.494.599.399.093.6108.593.195.3101.794.496.7101.795.395.499.5

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.097.9

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5295.003144.40

3Q/P3-0 . 4 0-4827.80232.30243.90

24483.30467.402266.101199.804688.60100.00

24433.90692.602.17

1828.6023666.90

29.20464.20

24758.2028.60

2329.30943.60100.10

105.9104.8

96.692.997.697.993.590.696.093.8102.197.792.3108.591.494.797.392.899.095.393.294.4100.1

5398.003225.7030.40

4924.50239.20254.50

24955.70471.702315.701225.104772.5097.20

24799.10703.80

2.101882.3023964.90

30.10470.20

24101.90

2376.70957.1098.20

108.0107.5101.398.595.7101.899.894.392.698.095.499.399.293.8105.094.195.9100.394.096.4

95.195.798.2

M

PPFPPP

pl

PPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM'11 (PART 1) - IN 7/87

»

flR3Q373i

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Naae: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.05.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

-4.94

30.10

————

^__ «__»

————

• 98.8

100.3

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

97.925000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5333.303238.80

%3,$ft31.204855.00237.20261.40

24891.90470.502306.201208.904721.7088.80

24428.40699.60

2.171855.7023541.40

32.30468.80

23580.2028.90

2360.10953.70

f9T°101- 10

106.7JL08.0SL04.097.194.9

104.699.694.192.296.794.490.797.793.3

108.592.894.2

107.793.894.396.394.495.410 1 . 4te*<T

5338.103210.003/' <A_o4867.70234.80256.10

25126.20473.202306.601209.804760.20

91.2024699.80702.40

1.961865.6023823.70

30.50472.90

24037.2029.20

2362.20962.50

<\i*-100. 70

106.8107.0

97.493.9

102.4100.594.692.396.895.293.298.893.798.093.395.3

101.794.696.197.394.596.2100.?-

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

AR3G3732

rii

10U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaqnesiumManqaneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0-30.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

5119,503285.5030.70

4936.20247.30263,30

24105,70489.502413.001291.204889.30

24192.20736.30

1953.4024109.00

500.4024039.60

94.802471.30989.3095.54

102.4109.5102,398,798.9105.396,497.996.5103.397,8

96.898.2

97.796.4

100.196.297.498.998.995.5

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.097.9

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

5024.803190.3031.70

4845.50243.80257.80

23800.40483.002378.601272.704808.9095.60

23761.00724.302.10

1929.7023217.90

30.10489.70

23266.50101.202420.60983.00

lo\H 93-r3-0

100.5106.3105.796.997.5103.195.296.695.1101.896.297.795.096.6105.096.592.9100.397.993.1104.096.898.3

5146.103299.1030.20

4946.60249.00270.40

24426.50497.002430.401294.204926.80

24090.50738.902.32

1970.8024083.50

30.10498.20

23500.4095.60

2472.40996.80

<&,7tfW *0

102.9110.0100.798.999.6108.297.799.497.2103.598.5

96.498.5116.098.596.3100.399.694.098.398.999.7

M

PPFPPPpH

Mppp"FPPCVPPFPPFPPC

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

SR3Q3733

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.0"1000.0100.0

5164.003255.00

4992.00248.4.0236.40

24360.00493.502413.001289.00489V- 0032.00

24380.00737.40

1970.0024310.00

497.8024240.00

2469.00991.70

103.3108.5

99.8

94.697.498.796.5103.1

J.06.T97.598.3

98.597.2

99.697.0

98.899.2

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

5113.903194.9030.20

4888.00246.20259.40

24342.00491.402406.201280.204907.0030.40

23932*60732.901.68

1946.1024159.90

29.70495.40

23370.2098.00

2439.80999.10^r/To

102.3106.5100.797.898.5103.897.498.396.2102.498.1

Jtfi /3>95.797.784.097.396.699.099.193.5

97.699.91*f/ ~

5294.902843.20

5139.20255.30230.80

25144.00518.102484.401324.905075.5032.00

25059.80760.901.75

2021.5024752.50

30.50508.00

24663.3098.00

2519.101032.70

38 , Vo*

105.994.8

102.8102.192.3100.6103.699.4106.0101.5106.7100.2101,587.5101.199.0101.7101.698.7100.7100.8103.3

-***-

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

•

flR30373i4

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVTLLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciuaChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

.2500.01000.0100.0

30.20

?$'<V

100.7

————

————

————

————

*£*"

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250-05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.9

2500.01000.0100.0

5151.802708.8030.40

5008.20248.60247.60

24410.50507.402394.401288.004967.50

31.7024473.30738.201.75

1998.1023910.90

30.50486.20

24954.2095.60

2420.801005.90

57 -/

103.090.3101.3100.299.499.097.6101.595.8103.099.4105.797*998,487.599-995.6101.797.299.897.796.8100.6J02.

29.50

31.40

1.82

99.60

98.3

104.7

91.0

101.7

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPJL

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

*

AR303735

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumj CalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0* 30.025000.0750.0

$.O -3-s-G2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.0"1000.0100.0

31.00

</,?*/

30.00

103.3

TTS"

100.0

————

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

30.80

30.80

1 *°t$

30.80

104.80

102.7

102.7

f ?'O

102.7

107.7

31.20

30.50

/,7S

31.80

98.00

104.0————

101.7

Jfcfi.

106.0

100.7

M

—

F

F

&

F

F

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

»

BR3Q3736

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManaaneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000,03000.030.0

5000*0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

x32.60

31.20

108.7

104.0

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

32.30

31.10

f.7t

31.70

97.20

107,7

————

103.7

31_o_

105.7————

99.9————

31.70

I.M'

32.50

97.20

105.7

*?,o

108.3

99.9

M

F——

— .

L_

C<,

F—

F

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

•

AR303737

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Na*e: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmium! CalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnes iumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

-\5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.0"1000.0100.0

30.30

30.90

101.0

———103.0

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R ( 1 ) Found %R ( 1 )

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

30.90

32.10

/,7V

31.10

32.20

103.0

107.0

?*7, o

103.7

107.3

30.30

31.20

/,<w

32.70

31.50

————

101.0————

104.0

SP.O

109.0

105.0

M

—

F

F

(.v

F

F

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM'II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

AR3Q3738

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

30.60 102.0

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R ( 1 ) Found %R ( 1 )

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250,05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

30.20

31,50

/,-?/

31.90

29.30

100.7————

105.0

_i£ T

106.3

97.7

'•78

27.80

29.10

-- -- - —

————

iLZT

92.7

97.0

————

M

F

*F~

Q/

F"

F_

—

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

-> *

SB303739

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

] Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumkCalciumfchromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadium2incCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000,0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

31.60

94.00

————

————

105.3

————

————

96.6————

————

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

31.30

/'&3~

93.60

104.3

Tfrr

96.2

31.60

£>/c?T"

92.00

————

105,3

&2 L

94.6

M

—

—

—

F

5?

F

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

»

flR3037l40

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

————

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

30.50

J. It

89.20

101.7

J&£_

91.7

J,3k

96.80

/13.0

99.5

M

—

-4

F

(V

F

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

flR3037l»l

U.S. EPA - CLP

: 2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 6S-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No,: SDG No.: STD769

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromium

j CobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found *R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500,01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

.2500.01000.0100,0

————

————

*

————

————

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R ( 1 ) Found %R ( 1 )

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500,0

25000.097.3

2500.01000.0100.0

LM

93.60

————

————

-J7*

96.2

————

/'7& ffi,0

M

——

—

7

F

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

• »

flR3037U2

U.S. EPA - CLP

2BCRDL STANDARD FOR AA AND ICP

C7

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

AA CRDL Standard Source: IV

ICP CRDL Standard Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

CRDL St

True

10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

:andard foi

Found

10.10

- 2.70

4.90

-9-r*tS"*? "?n 1 A A AIT (,** -1. \J » *J W-"

- AA

%R

101.0

90.0

98.0

*KL£>looTo

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0

CRDL StarInitialFound

564.70123.40

204.6010.9013.20

1392.7024.90102.3056.10359.70

1374.4032.30

83.00439.10

19.601000.20

101.3044.20

idard 1

%R

141.2102.8

51.2109.0132.0139.3124.5102.3112.2179.8

137.4107.7

103.843.9

98.0100.0

101.3110.5

:or ICPFinal

Found

596.00118.10

196.3010.0011.10

1396.4025.6093.2056.40369.60

1380.7030.90

79.30643.00

20.50993.60

98.7044.20

%R

149.098.4

49.1100.0ni.cd139.61128.093.2

112.8184.8

138.1103.0

99.164.3

102.599.4

98.7110.5

FORM II (PART 2) - IN 7/87•

AR3037l*3

0.S. EPA - CLP ,..

2BCRDL STANDARD FOR AA AND ICP

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract; 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

AA CRDL Standard Source: IV

ICP CRDL Standard Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

s£

i*i\iiFi

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

CRDL St

True

10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

.andard foi

Found

9.90

• 2.30

5.00

- 9.90

- AA

%R

99.0

76.7

100.0

99.0

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0

CRDL StarInitialFound

864.8063.40

205.1011.3011.00

1668.202y,2> -2-5-r O

108.7063.60498.40

1648.5034.20

95.801502.00

21.301076.30

101.9045.60

idard i

%R ,

216.252.8

51.3113.0110.0166.8130*5-108.7127.2249.2

164.8114.0

119.8150.2

106.5107.6

101.9114.0

!or ICPFinaJ

Found

889.80122.40

199.9011.309.40

1689.50Ol'fztffe&r&Q

105.1067.10501.10

1651.3033.40

86.701502.00

19.901110.90

103.0055.40

L%R

222.4102.0

50.0113.094,0

L169.0

105.1134.2250.6

165.1111.3

108.4150.2

99.5111.1

103.0138.5

FORM II (PART 2) - IN 7/87

U.S. EPA - CLP

2BCRDL STANDARD FOR AA AND ICP

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

I Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: ST0769

AA CRDL Standard Source: IV\ICP CRDL Standard Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

CRDL S1

True

10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

;andard foi

Found

10.00

' 2.70

**«Q

- 10.00

: AA

%R

100.0

90.0

Jftusd

100.0

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0

CRDL StaiInitialFound

idard i

%R

for ICPFinal

FoundL%R

FORM II (PART 2) - IN 7/87

U.S. EPA - CLP

2BCRDL STANDARD FOR AA AND ICP

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

< Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769\AA CRDL Standard Source: IV

ICP CRDL Standard Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

«

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumfcCalciumfchromiumI CobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

CRDL St

True

10,0

3.0

5.0

. 10.0

-andard foi

Found

10.00

„

2.60

f/ *f Q 9 » 7 O•

- AA

%R

100.0

86.7

jfl?7.iO

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0

CRDL StarInitialFound

idard 1

%R

for ICPFinaJ

Found.%R

FORM II (PART 2) - IN 7/87»

AR3037U6

ri

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): WATER

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or ag/kg): UG/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumchro»iumCobaltCopperIronLeadMacmesiumManaaneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThallium.Vanadium ,ZincCyanide

InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) c

4.0 u

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1 C 2 C 3 C

84,031.52.05.01.03,066.02.04.05.044.03,056.02.00.27.0

723.02.03.0

111.34.05.05.010.0

UBUUuuuuuuuuuu\JuuuuBuuuu

- 3.0

Ox^

-?.0

4.0

/b.O

U

^

UL

u

U

O . 2.

*>.o

/o,0

\s

(L

~

Lf

Prepa-rationBlank C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.02.04.05.0

44.03.056.02.0

100.07.0

723.02.03.091.04.05.08.4

UUUUUUuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuB

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

FORM III - IN 7/87

•

flR3Q3747

V?>

U.S. £PA -- CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadium .ZincCyanide

InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) C

84.036.32.05.01.03.0

66.02.04.06.044.03.0

56.02.0

7.01400.2

™ • A3.0

103.84.05.05.0

3-£\ f\" 1 V 1 w

UBUUUuuuuBUUUU

UB-BUBUUu-u

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1C 2 C 3 C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.03.74.05.544.03.056.02.00.27.0

1654.82.03.091.04.05.05.010.0

UUuuuuuBUBUUUUUUBUUUUUuu

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.02.04.08.544.03.0

56.22.00.2

-7.32164.0

2.03.6

134.34.05.05.010.0

UUuuuuuuuBUUBUUBBUBBUUUU

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.03.34.010.044.03.084.42.00.27.0

2291.22.03.0

191.34.05.05.0

UUUUUuuBUBUUBUUUBUUBUUU

Prepa-rationBlank C

16.8004.4000.4001.0000.2000.60013.200

0*05-8 frr ee-0.8001.0008.800-0.60011.2000.4000.1001.400

144.6000.4000.60018.2000.8001.000

/,</£ l.OOfr5.000

UUUUUuurTuUuuBUUUUuuuuuu-BU

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

FORM III - IN 7/87

36U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaqnesiumManaaneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066,02.04.05.0

44,0

56,02.0

7.0792.1J.O3.091.0

5.05.0

fd.O

UuuuuuuuuuuuuuB\Juuuuu.

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1C 2 C 3 C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.02.34.05.044*03.056.02.00.27.0

723.02.04.491.04.05.05.0

/£, <J

UUuuuuuBUUuuuuuuuuBUUuuu\

84.022.0-?, O5.01.03.066.02.36.07.244.03.075.22.00.2-8.4

1435.62.03.0

142.84.05.05.0so.u

UU\)UUUUBBBUUBUUBBUUBUUu\J

9.0

3.0

-S-r2-

•" W

4.0

\L

u

*B

tf

U

Prepa-rationBlank C

16.800<g,t fe 4i406"

1.0000.2000.60013.200

f-CB>~0". 400"0.8001,0008.8000.60011.2000.4000.1001.400

144.6000.4000.60018.2000.8001.000

/-* B 4r.OOO

U-truuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuIt**J

M

ppFppppppppFppcvppFPPFPPO

9

FORM III - IN 7/87

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) C

y 3 , Q-

3.0

-2.C?

-y

U

12

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1C 2 C 3 C

2.0

3.0

O*7_

2.0

4.0

U

U

V

U

U

3.0

o*t_

2.0

4.0

U

U

U

U

3.0

0' 7.

2.0

4.0

U

U

U

U

—

Prepa-rationBlank C

—

—

M

F

F

t(S

F

F

FORM III - IN 7/87

AR3Q375Q

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaqnesiumMancraneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) C

5U:

4.0

VL

U

—

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1C 2 C 3 C

y.o

3.0

L). £-

2.0

4.0

Si

U

u

u

u

=?, 0

3.0

o .2-

2.0

4.0

a

u

•L.

U

U

L>, 2-

2.0

4.0

—

V

—

U—u

—

Prepa-ration

• Blank C M

T"

F

< 7

F

F

FORM III - IN 7/87

" flR30375!

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) c

3.0 U

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1 C 2 C 3 C

3.0

b.L

- a.o

4.0

U

U

•&

U

3.0

0*2,

——— 2-r-o-

u

U

*

—

3.0

6,2.

————— ? , n

U

«L

-U-

Prepa-rationBlank C

—

M

F

tU

F-

F

FORM III - IN 7/87

»

AR3Q3752

41U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057jLab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg) : MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManqaneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadium „ZincCyanide

InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) c

4.0

—

U

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1C 2 C 3 C

O 'Z i

3.Q

4.0

^

-U-

u

o, t-

————— 2JL

4.0

U

TJ

U

2 . 0_

4.0

U-

U

Prepa-rationBlank C K

—

^ ( /

-f~

F

FORM III - IN 7/87

flR3Q3753

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Najne: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057ti Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water) : SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): MG/KG

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) C

^

—

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1C 2 C 3 C

-*r6-

4.0

*tf-

U

————— £7-6-

4.0

&

U

————— 2- 0- &

Prepa-rationBlank c

—

M

-F-

F

FORM III - IN 7/87

flR3Q375i*

II

U.S. EPA - CLP

4ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

ICP ID Number: ICP61 ICS Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

FORM IV - IN 7/87

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaqnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

TrueSol. Sol.A AB

581588

523176

186175

535367

520285

482439891

470448433529521

169926

482850516

816

1027

530985

Initial FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

473214126

721

441320-1-638

165770

44227290

4-1427

-27540

7195

493072.070.9

473.6469.3938.6

462139.0439.0429.4531.2

172566.0

461341.0538.4

857.4-1411.5

981.8521.7

530.41005.5

94.80.0

98.3106.9105.398.2

101.481.2

102.0101.6

95.5104.3

105.10.0

95.60.0

100.1102.1

Final FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

47785466

72

-/ j .444869- / -a-

-837

167853

44551791

6-863

-26643

7398

476917.034.1

454.4427.7904.8

445281.0429.1499.3507.1

168034.0

449098.0518.3

840.2-1552.7

951.3496.8

505.2975.2

91.70.0

94.397.4

101.594.799.194.497.398.9

93.0100.4

103.00.0

92.60.0

95.399.0

5*24 *

NPv

flR303755

U.S. EPA - CLP

4ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

ICP ID Number: ICP61 ICS Source; IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

TrueSol. sol.A AB

Initial FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

Final FoundSol.AB %R

AluminumAntimony

Beryllium

Chromiu-m

MagnesiumManganese

PotassiumSeleniirm

ThalliumVanadium

FORM*IV - IN7/87

SR3Q3756

U.S. EPA - CLP

4ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

ICP ID Number: ICP61 ICS Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

TrueSol. Sol.A AB

581588

523176

186175

535367

520285

482439891

470448433529521

169926

482850516

816

1027

530985

Initial FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

482200126

72-4

455900-8-944

190400

466100107

8-1683

• fr xte376

9589

491300.085.5

514.1480.61033.0

468100.0488.4597.8572.7

194100.0

476300.0604.2

971.1-594.1

1084.0460.1

590.41082.0

94.40.0

106.7109.5115.999.5112.8113.0109.9114.2

98.6117.1

119.00.0

105.60.0

111.4109.8

Final FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

488500130

822

466500-2-849

195400

473100111

-20-1114

-40411

10093

491300.036.7

517.4485.91026.0

474100.0509.7591.8576.3

197600.0

477400.0613.8

976.7-347,0

1067.0476.0

591.01096.0

94.40.0

107.3110.7115.2100.8117.7111.9110.6116.3

98.9119.0

119.70.0

103.90.0

111.5111.3____

FORM IV - IN 7/87

*

HR3Q3757

5

FORM VI - IN 7/87

U.S. EPA - CLP

7LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Solid LCS Source: IV

Aqueous LCS Source: IV

Analyte

AluminumkntimonyUrsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMacmesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Aqueous (ug/L)True Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

24300.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

r 5071.503063.0027.60

4918.00235.00267.20

25881.10469.902320.901225.104690.1027.00

24618.60707.101087.001859.9024325.60

29.60477.90

24111.9030.70

2384.70994.1096.10

101.4102.192.098.494.0106.9103.594.092.898.093.890.098.594.35435093.097.398.795.696.4102.395.499.496.1

Solid (mg/kg)True Found C Limits %R

1000.0600.06*0

1000.050.050.0

5000.0100.0

tyP OOOO.O250.01000.0

6.05000.0150.01.0

400.05000.0

6.0100.05000.0

6.0500.0200.010.0

1002.2635.45.2

1008.850.349?*

5068.1105tf5v509,6 *8268.21042.8

6.34904.0156.7

418.44856.0

6.0104.94924.0

5.4519.3215.09.8

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

100.2105.986.7100.9100.699 U101,4105*5101.9107.3104.3105.098.1104.5

104.697.1100.0104.998.590.0103.9107.598.0

AR303758

5G

FORM VII - IN 12/87 Rev<

U.S. EPA - CLP

7LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Solid LCS Source: IV

Aqueous LCS Source: IV

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariunBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaqnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliuaVanadiumZincCyanide

Aqueous (ug/L)True Found %R ( 1 )

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2J300.025000. O1

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5219.103052.5029.20

5063.60241.00267.70

26568.60482.902383.501259.204815.6027.80

25351.50725.902.17

1908.9024858.80

31.50489.30

24637.0031.00

2449.60998.3096.70

104.4101.897.3101.396.4107.1106.396.695.3100.796.392.7101.496.8108.595.499.4105.097.998.5103,398.099.896.7

Solid (mg/kg)True Found C Limits %R

looo.b600.06.0

1000.050.050.0

5000.0100.0

frrS*Gif\f\f\ A^ *^ U U U • V

250.01000.0

6.05000.0150.01.0

400.05000.0

6.0100.05000.0

6.0500.0200.010.0

996.2628.25.6

992.449 J 47.6

5000,0104.9503.4265.81040.2

6.24838.0155,1

413.44892.0

6.5104.74860.1

5.9515.6214.09.7

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00,00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

99. g104. H93.399.29995.2100.0104.9r l-G-rl106.3104.0103.396.8

103.4

103,497.8108,3104,797.298.3103.1107.097.0

SR3Q3759

57

FORM VII - IK 12/87 Rev.

U.S. EPA - CLP

7LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Solid LCS Source: IV

Aqueous LCS Source: IV

Analyte

|Aluminum'AntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Aqueous (ug/L)True Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2.000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5199.902965.9028.80

5042.10242.10270.40

26542.10485.902390.401259.204817.4028.20

25239.10727.30

uiossreo1916.2024921.60

31.30492.00

24726.7031.70

2444.001002.1093.80

104.098.996.0100.896.8108.2106.297.295.6100.796.394.0101.097.0FV fV\il<

95.899.7104.398.498.9105.797.8100.293.8

Solid (mg/kg)True Found C Limits %R

1000.0600.06.0

1000.050.050.0

5000.0100.0500.0250.01000.0

6.05000.0150.0

tf.o 1.0400.05000.0

6.0100.05000.0

6.0500.0-200.010.0

983.0613.4

984.244.2

VM *9v34964.0105.6503.0265.61035.0

6.14792.1155.1

414.84852.0

6.1104 ?S4838.1

6.1513.4213 tt.9.4

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0'0.0

0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

98.3102.2

98.488.4

*. *9 8 .~"G99.3105.6100.6106.2103.5101.795.8103.4

103.797.0101.7104?$96.8101.7102.7106.894.0

pKV*

05 1***

&I'l

flR303760

FORM VII - IN 12/87 Rey<

U.S. EPA - CLP

8STANDARD ADDITION RESULTS

Lab Na»e: WESTON - LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

Concentration Units: ug/L

EPASampleNo.

SS2512

An

AS

Dil

2

m

0 ADDABS

4.400

CO1

10

1 ADDT ABS14.100

V

CON

20

> ADDABS

21.800

CON

30

1 ADDABS

30.600

FinalCone.

11.0

r

0.99941

Q

dI-

flR30376

61

FORM IX - IN 7/87

U.S. EPA - CLP

10HOLDING TIMES

Lab Name: WESTON - LIONVILLE • Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: STDCH SAS No.: SDG No.: STD769

>5

PS

J5/Z-953

EPASample No.

D£¥£0X4.prrnni *•t^i LLJ\J ±3-STDOlfrnTnnvT^*5 X LJ\J J. /

-CTDOM*- STD018D-

-STD01-93TDQ20-STD02-1SJD022STFW*STP024&TD024S-

•

Matrix

WATERWfcTPP*Vn J.£i£v

WATERW^TVPWAX £jX\WATPPTln± Ltl\WATPP

SOILSOILSOILSOILSOILWATERSOILSOILSOILSOIL

DateReceived

12/08/89i o /nfl /BQJ.riS/ Uo/ Oj

12/08/89i 5 /nn /so}.£, / \JO / O 7/ 7 /s* C / *1/ *•/ (?O/%1

1 5 /Afl /fiQi^/ uo/ oy

/2/ >7S'412/08/8912/08/8912/12/8912/12/8912/12/8912/12/8912/12/89

MercuryPrepDate

12/27/891 9 / *7 /flQJ-£>/ £• 1 / Qy12/27/891 "? /97 /flQl-£> / £> 1 / O 2?

1 /O7 /fid*.£,/ £ / / oy

12/27/8912/27/8901/03/9001/03/9001/03/9001/03/9001/03/90

MercuryHoldingTime

19191919

19

19192222222222

CyanidePrepDate

/Z/ZZ f%Qii/c 1 f^S '/2-/2Z / §1!*-/ w ?f O

I 7 i-y ~i. / & &1 *~ f C sf O "

' »• I£^MCI

l-Li^/tf

/L/23/T?/i/2 /f/ 2./zjr/ fn/if/**)tt/?</V'i/2 /2f'kJ'1 / 7 WSi'S

CyanideHoldingTime

-A^ ——/ 4r/</

/ -f,/

/ *f^

/T"

/r/?/^/i./

snonO"7£OflRouo tbl

f 1 Hrojeci NO..^E—————————————————————————————————————— Book No..

r* ^» t

nomMfl-No—^.tlf^f, j$_ :f,_ y!/3_ .•>? r 77-7

. 333 •5/7'Z'

/ 5^'i- 7 y'cV 6 S'Z,

. / 3^7 5 gg / :

. /3^t/ . fr 335.7-7?-; .<

.7.7/V77

.7t> 525

, S2I.YO® _t «/ ^ 5^ii 91'/ 3?? 6- v#y ^ o3U , •?' •^ 39? i- //_> 5 ttf ?.'£

oof I 3^ 7 0* / £.03

Witnessed & Understood by me,

SHEET___of.CLIENT/SUBJECT

PREPARED BYMATH CHECK!METHOD REV. BY

S'T

TION

... „ DFPT1Y HFPT

TACV kl/%

nATE3Y DEPT nATF

MrrKuvtu BY

HFPT HATE

Cr -

CV- 3v 70.^/^56 9

U

/6 CL/ #Cc (/^ ^ c t u t,A^A CCU

p B f r - or 6rB

RFW TO-05-003/A-5/S5

5

<•<-" i -*

SHEET___of.

TASK INSCRIPTIONppPPAprn RVMATHCHFCKRYMETHOD RFV BY

nPPTni?PTHFPT

TASK wrv 4RATF

HATE

HATF

———————

APPROVED BY

nFPT HATE

\^ <J/^, 7

flR303765

UANUBB \ S cooewawuujwrsSHEET___of

CLIENT/SUBJECTTASK DESCRIPTION .PREPARED RY

MATH CHFCK RYMPTHnn REV RY

Jls*& p z_*I*~J

DFPTDEPT

DEPT

# <CC3JS, -5

—————————————— W.U. NO

TASK NO—— DATE .-.—— -..

DATE

DATE

AKKHOVED BY 1j

PFPT DATF

a Y ** <"sj &<* /U, ,0 \

3o -Se = f O

CC 6

3-7

/)/(

y? «

RFW lO-0

SHEET———of.CLIENT/SUBJECT .—————————————————————————————————————— W.O. NO.

MATH

5CRIPTION ,.,. ....nnvcr*%f pvCXr!\ D T ——————— .M.MI.I III 1 —————

QC\I nvntv. DT . "—

nPPTDFPT

TASK wn ^HATF

HATF

HATF

•APPROVED BY ^

nFPT HATF

23 Ayr '

3V

pi* 3<-< <-^S?5

31 5 c6 . Cc6

3V

*> ? §>'

RFW 10-05.003M.5/85 flR3037G7

CLIENT/SUBJECT

TASK DESCRIPTIONPREPARED BYMATH CHECK BVMETHOD REV. BY

VM_ rr , , W*r\i r i—k)^ ^.,^o/gN n rK:lf _ j_ *

^ / // / /%^ / / _// j

. Aigj ^ ic clecT—I

fiR303768

STAHDARD CHLORINESDG #STI>900

DATA REVIEWER: Douglas GodfreyDATA SUPERVISOR: Zohreh Hamid, Ph.D.

The laboratory's portion of SDG #STD900 consisted of four samples(one water and three soils) analyzed for TAL metals by Roy F.Weston, Inc.

The laboratory reported no' problems with the receipt and analysisof the samples received on 12-15-89.

The reviewer has commented on the criteria specified under eachanalysis heading method. All crireria has been assessed, but nodiscussion is given where the evaluator has determined thatcriteria were adequately performed or require no comment. A listof samples with criteria deficiencies and qualifier codes aresummarized in Table I. A glossary of qualifier codes are presentedin Attachment I. Amounts of detected analytes are summarized inAttachment II.

6R303769

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD90027 JUNE 1990PAGE 2 OF 7

EVALUATION BY ANALYSIS

*• ICP Analysis

___ Initial Calibration___ Continuing Calibration___ Interference Checkx Matrix Spikex Duplicate

___ Laboratory Control Sample___ Blanks___ Preparation Blankx Serial Dilution

_jc_ CRI

Matrix spike, duplicate digestion, and serial dilution samples werenot prepared for the soil samples in this SDG. All associatedsample results are qualified as estimated due to the unknown samplematrix effects.

The CRI sample percent recoveries for Al, Sb, Ba, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr,Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, N»V Kr Ag, Na, and Zn were outside the CLP controllimits. All associated samples between ± CRDL are qualified asestimated.

Note j-iThe concentration of at least one sample was above the CRDL for Al,Sbf Ba, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mg, Mn, Ni, K, Ag, and Zn. Theassociated samples are not affected by poor CRI sample recoveriesand are not qualified as estimated.

flR303770

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD90027 JUNE 1990PAGE 3 OF 7

EVALUATION BY ANALYSIS

II. Graphite Furnace Analysis

Initial CalibrationContinuing CalibrationMatrix SpikeDuplicateLaboratory Control SampleBlanksAnalytical Spiking, MSACRA

Matrix spike and duplicate digestion samples were not prepared forsoil samples in this SDG. All associated sample results are

* qualified as estimated due to the unknown sample matrix effects.

I T h e CRA sample percent recovery for Pb was outside the CLP controllimits.

j NOTE|

Due to the high concentration of Pb in the associated samples, nosamples were affected by the low CRA sample percent recovery for

* Pb.

BR30377I

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD90027 JUNE 1990PAGE 4 OF 7

EVALUATION BV ANALYSIS

III. Mercury Analysis

___ Initial Calibration___ Continuing Calibrationx Matrix Spikex Duplicate___ Laboratory Control Sample___ Blanks___ Holding Time

Matrix spike an duplicate digestion samples were not prepared forthe soil samples for Hg and Cn. All associated sample" results arequalified as estimated due to the unknown sample matrix effects.

Matrix spike and duplicate digestion samples were not prepared forthe water samples for CN. All associated sample results arequalified as estimated due to the unknown sample matrix effects.

flR303772

rINORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #STD90027 JUNE 1990PAGE 5 OF 7

TABLE I

Sample # Analyte + Results - QL Comments*

All Samples CN J UJ 1

All Soil Samples All Analytes J UJ 1

SS3213 Cr, Cu, J UJ 2Ag, Na

SS3211, SS3212 Sb,Na J — 2

SS3215 Na J 2

* Comments for Table I are listed on the proceeding page.

flR303773

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG ISTD90027 JUNE 1990PAGE 6 OF 7

COMMENTS

1. No matrix spike duplicate or ICP serial dilution samplewas prepared for this SDG. All associated sample resultsare qualified as estimated.

2. Due to a CRDL sample recovery outside of the CLP controllimits, all associated sample result <CRDL are qualifiedas estimated.

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG ISTD90027 JUNE 1990PAGE 7 OF 7

INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT CONTENT

All data have been validated with regard to usability according toCLP Guidelines. If you have any questions or comments on this datareview, please call Zohreh Hamid at (215)524-7360

INORGANIC ATTACHMENTS

1. Glossary of Data Qualifier Codes.

2. Data Summary. This includes:

All positive results with qualifier codes if applicable;all estimated detection limits qualified with "UJ".

3. Appendix A - Data Validation Form for Inorganic (Metalsand Cyanide).

4. Appendix B - DPO Report - This addresses laboratorycompliance issues with respect to the Statement of Work.

5. Appendix C - Support Documentation.

/5R303775

ATTACHMENT IGLOSSARY OP DATA QUALIFIERS

fiR303776

fGLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIERS

CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION

(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds)

NOT DETECTED, SUBSTANTIALLY ABOVE THE LEVELREPORTED IN LABORATORY OR FIELD BLANKS.

R - UNRELIABLE RESULT. ANALYTE MAY OR MAY NOT BEPRESENT IN THE SAMPLE. SUPPORTING DATANECESSARY TO CONFIRM RESULT.

N = NEGATED COMPOUND WAS CONSIDERED AS NOTPRESENT IN THE SAMPLE.

(NO CODE) = CONFIRMED IDENTIFICATION

CODES REXiATING TO OUANTITATION

(can be used for both positive results and sample quantitationlimits):

J = ANALYTE PRESENT. REPORTED VALUE MAY NOT BEACCURATE OR PRECISE.

UJ = THE REPORTED QUANTITATION LIMITS AREQUALIFIED ESTIMATED.

OTHER CODES

Q NO ANALYTICAL RESULT.

SR303777

ATTACHMENT IIDATA SUMMARY

AR3Q3778

r JIiu0l

i •1 fl.

f "*> u0 II

I . !!u. ll« If(1• 11— II

* Iti !!*« II

IIC IISi * Zll*» 0 Oil

C - M||i g Xj]TO. £11

M Ufllf On- L II0.5 unfu. 5"1 Of-if Ull

—— U

sT* 8"•*• it

— *» ft n— on

Or -J11w? 3 «uJ! w!!f m"(/i (Till* uti

MIIIIIIIIIIItII

\f\ II

2 !!E*. If2-J "w*1 V 11? uuUJ w ft

i I:nti-ltnuitiitiMit1 I IIt i itt J ii-IVjJl IIt — J Mt •<! n

i Si "i wi it

i . .1 nt vi Hi l iifO

1 VJ "'

°S ii/ . ?i M ii •.M cr' P I'.vTi r-* c n c

w\j £ "'- \ "i IM> " 1 1114 | IA II <11. »» 'J J V IIUX X O ni f * !!u 5 S Sl-

it iu tnuuuIIIIiinn •ituituuIIIIIIIIIIIIItflII11ItIIIIIIIIIt11IIItIIIIIIIIttIIuII11HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII— — -IIit11ItIfIIItIt1111

tttlttIt11UttHIIIt11ititnit

\ "t 11i u

Location

1 flNRLYTE

IHI u*.i no*

1 U

a n aK UNUll

m

S

u

s1o•M

§=*•

B

1

s

1to

•CRQHIUH

*

— . —————

Calciim

1

<0

r

o

Cob* It

8

nq

u

R

§§

-• — — —

—•LEAD

to

p

t

I

r£

L3

Ne

•NICKEL

o

§fl

0Q.

SpI

10

1

nlI

pj

vfl1t11

L 1I 1> 1— 1W 1

O 1— 11

S!11l1111111

1l

§

X

O

t

l1

-

C•mH

O

18

g•M

NJ

r->

|

it

^

Xu0j§|c

*»>••f•M

S

IBik•M

1*»

i *u

o,nQ7 7 QAU o / / 3B

use

1 •• 11C 'i

iol\K

:, !'~' ' ju' !"•<>! o-

r^1

.IT:?*- 1 n8 itVr !«C 1 •••ii1

t

r

i10'11C1CT

*>**>

loioja

0*U

1 1 1 1* 1r im iiiiiii

ci

!o

"cjaj jap

o i n i n i o

c

I I

ci1 M

iou

i i

S!

nrC 1 -•" ' C- 1 1r 'c \I i

ci

_1_J._1!J * V"7" i j i 3 n3 r in I !!i 5 17 HZ o e { tf lf* ! t !!* A X X51 f I C IIIi - 11 M r

l ft I H w- t 0 i 2 ii H U- ff z',;0 iJ !i!!m S o!!1C > I H 3 • H

t r •«^ ? ft- _!!n

i~ i " H! L •!! i

11"I)UI II

i ii^ r*

'ii

uHn i | it in yi pit i j it m i i -n : : MC -oM

III)Hi i I I I ! * Citu

ri

iii ATTACHMENT III

CLP DATA REVIEW FORM

flR30378

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 5 of 30*

Titl«-- t-walu»tion of Metal* Data for the Due*: Dec. 19$8Contract Laboratory Program Number: HU-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Rtviaion: 8CoBpllance (Total Review - Inorganics)

lEi £2. Jg/AAre soil sample recults for each parameter corrected forpercent solids?

Are EPA sample * a and corresponding laboratory sampleID * s the same as on the Cover Page, Form I's andin the raw data?

Are computation/transcription errors less than 10Zof reported values? [ / ] __

Are all "less than IDL" values properly coded with "U"? [ ] __

Was s brief physical description of samples given on-*- Fora I's? [X } __

Were the result qualifiers used correctly with finaldata? I / ]

ACTION: If no for any of the above, prepare TelephoneRecord Log, and contract laboratory forcorrected data*

Were any samples diluted beyond requirements of contract? __ [ V ]

If yes, were dilutions noted on Form I's? ULJ __

ACTION: If no, note under contract -problem/non-complianceof the"Data Assessment Narrative".

A.1*6 Holding Times - (aqueous samples )

(Examine sample traffic reports and digestion/distillation logs.)

Mercury (28 days). ........ exceeded? __ [ y ]

Cyanide (U days). ........ exceeded? __ I ]

Other Metals (6 months). ..... exceeded? __ [ > ]

Soil samples

Metals and Cyanide (6 months)......exceeded? __

NOTE: Prepare a list of all samples and analytesfor which holding times have been exceeded. Specifythe number of days from date of collection to thedate of analysis (from rav data). Attach to checklist.

^ .L, itff A *~ J 7 A-> t 5 S '*~ fl *- f\*i*~> & &* r -)

flR303782

OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 6 of 30•

Title: Evaluation of Metala for the Contract Date: Dec. 1968Laboratory Program Number: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

ACTION': If yes, reject (red-line) values less thanInstrument Detection Limit (IDL); flag asestimated (J) the values above IDL.

A. 1.7 Rav Data

A. 1.7.1 Digestion Log* for flameAA/ICP present? [j£j

Digestion Log for furnace AA present? [ __ ]

Digestion Log for mercury present? [ y ]

Digestion Log for cyanides present?

Are pH values (pH<2 for til net alt, pH>12 for cyanide)present in Digestion/Distillation Logs? [ X ]

*Veights, dilutions and volumes used to obtain values.

Percent solids calculation present for soils/sediaenti? [

Are preparation dates present on Digestion Log? [ X ]

A. 1.7.2 Measurement read out record present? ICP [^ _ ]

; Flame AA I __ ]

_**« -u Furnace AA [X ]• -^— .. Mercury [VI

Cyanides

A. 1.7.3 Are til rav data to support all sample analyses andQC operations present? [ X ]

Legible? [Xl

Properly Labeled? j>- ]

ACTION: If no for any of the above, write TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory.

TES NO N/

flR303783

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Faje 7 of 30

Title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Aug. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Nunber: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Coepliance (Total Review - Inorganic*)

YES NO

A. 2. 8 Data Validation and Verification

A. 1.6.1 Calibration

A. 1.8. 1.1 Ifi record of at least 2 point calibrationpresent for ICP analysis? [ X ]

It record of 5 point calibration present forHg analysis? [^ ]

ACTION: If no for any of the above, write in thecontract problem/non-compliance section ofthe "Data Assessment Narrative".

A. 1.8. 1.2 Is record of 4 point calibration present for;Flaae AA? [ __ ]

Furnace AA? [ X, __1

Cyanides?

NOTE : 1 . If less than 4, other standards mitt be run immediatelyafter calibration and be jf 5Z of true value.

2. For all AA and Cyanide analyses one calibration standardis at CRDL level.

ACTION: Flag associated data as estimated if standardsare not within +51 of true values (except CRDLcrlibration standard).

A.I. 6. 1.3 Is correlation coefficient l«sa than 0.995 for:

Mercury Analysis? __ [.x, 1 __

Cyanide Analysis? __ [ y ] __

Atomic Absorption Analysis?

ACTION ; If yes, flag the associated data aa estimated.

A. 1.8. 2 Form II A (Initial and Continuing Calibration Veriflcation)-

A. 1.8. 2*1 Present and complete for every metal and cyanide?

8R30378U

r STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 8 of 30*

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Data: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganic*)

TES NO N/APresent aarf complete for AA and 1C? when both are — ——u»ed for same analyte? [ __ ] __ v

ACT I OS: If no for any of the above, prepare TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory*

A. 1.8. 2. 2 Circle all values on data summary sheet that areoutside of contract windows. Are all calibrationstandards (initial and continuing) within controllimits?

Metals 90-1102 I V] __ __

Hg - 80-1202 I y \ __ __

• Cyanides 85-1152

Are all calibration standards (initial and continuing)within 50-1502? [Xl

ACTION: Flag as estimated (J) all positive data (notflagged with a HU") analyzed between acalibration standard of 75-892 (65-792 for Hg;70-842 for CN> or 111-1252 (121-1352 for Rg;116-1302 for CH) recovery and nearest good calibrationstandard. Qualify results <IDL as estimated (UJ),if the ICV or CCV 2R is 75-892(CNt 70-842 ; HG, 65-792).Reject (red-line) as unacceptable dats if recovery ofthe TCV or CCV 2R Is outside the range 75-1252(CN, 70-1302; Hg, 65-1352).

Was continuing calibration perforated every 10 samples .or every 2 hours? [ V ]

ACTION: If no, flag the excess samples (eleventh andup) data as estimated (J).

A. 1.8. 3 Fora II B (C*DL Standards for AA and ICP) -

A* 1.8. 3.1 Was a CRDL standard (CRA) analyzed for all AA metals(except Hg)? I/I

* Vas a mid-range callb. verification standard distilledand analysed for cyanide analysis? I X ]

Vaa a 2xCRDL or 2xIDL (when IDL>CRDL) analyzed (CRT) foreach 1C? run? [ N/l(Note: CR1 for AL(ls,Ca,Pe,Mg,Na,or K is not required.)

* Find the results of mid-range standard in the raw data.

AR303785

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the ^ . Date: Dec. 1968Co-ntrmcx laboratory Program Number: Htf-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Coopliance (Total Review - Inorganica)

ACTION'; If no for any *f the above, flag as estimated YES NO K/Apositive data falling within the range ——

*(tru«i value CREl.), For CK, the range is*(true value ^ 0.5 * true value).

A. 1.8.3.2 tfas CPI analyzed after ICV/ICB and before the filialCCV/CCB* or every four hours of 1CP run? [X 1 __

ACTIOK: If no, write in Contract Problem/Non-ComplianceSection of the "Data Assessment Narrative11.

A.3*8.3,3 Are CRA and CRI standards within control limits:

Metals 90 - 110? [__] y/ __

Is aid-range standard within control limits:

Cyanide 85-115? • [>C 1 __ __

ACTION: Flag the affected data within the range*(true value ± CRDL) as estimated (J) if recoveryis lea* than 901 (for CN <85Z); flag the positivedata within the range (true value CRDL), ifrecovery is greater than 110X (for~CN >115X).The range for CN is *(true value j* 0.5 x true value).

A.1.6.A Fora III {Initial and Continuing Calibration Blanks)

A.1.8.4.1 Present and complete? [X ] __ _

For both AA and 1CP when both are used for same analyte? [ / ] __ y

ACTION: If no, prepare Telephone Record Log andcontact laboratory.

A.1*8.4.2 Circle all calibration blank values on Data Summary Sheetthat are above IDL. Are all calibration blanks(when IDKCRDL) less than or equal to Contract RequiredDetection~Limits (CRDL)? [ V ] __ __

Are all calibration blanks less than two timesInstrument Detection Limit (when IDLXRDL)? [__] __

ACTION: If no for any of the above, flag as estimated (J)on form I's all data <5xIDL between calibrationblank with value over CRDL or IDL and nearestgood calibration blank. Flag five samples on eitherside of the calibration blank.

* -True value of CRA, CRI or mid-range CN standard.-Substitute IDL for CRDL when XDL > CRDL.

ftR303786

ri

rKt*.i.£>uK£ Pag* 10 of 30•

Title: Evaluation of Hetals Data for the Date: D«c. 1966Contract Laboratory Program Number: RV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

A. 1.fl.4.3 Was an initial calibration blank analyzed?

Vas a continuing calibration blank analyzed afterevery 10 savples or every 2 hour* (whichever is morefrequent)?

ACTION; If no, flag as estimated (J) all values <5xIDLnot analyzed within 5 samples of calibration blank.

A.I.ft.5 FORM III (Preparation Blank) —

( Note: The preparation blank for mercury is the same"*- as the calibration blank.)

A. 1.5.5.1 Vas one prep, blank analyzed for: each 20 samples? [ y ]

each batch? [ K ]

each matrix type? { >Q

both AA and ICP when both are used for same analyte? [__]

ACTION; If no for any of the above, flag as estimated (J)all associated positive daca <10 x IDLs for whichprep.blank was not analyzed.

NOTE; If only one blank was analyzed for morethan 20 samples, then first 20 samples analyzeddo not have to be flagged as estimated (J).»

A.1*8.5*2 !>o concentrations of prep, blank fall below two timesIDL when IDL is greater than CRDL? [% } __ y

ACTION: If no, reject (red-line) all data that hasa concentration leas than 10 times the prep.blank value, but not flagged vith a "0"(lass than)*

A.1.8.5.3 Is concentration of prep, blank greater than CRDLwhen IDL is Itss than or tqual to CRDL? __ [V] __

If yes, Is the concentration of the sample with theleast concentrated analyte less than 10 times th«prep, blank value? __ I__] V

flR303787

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 11 of 30•title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Dec. 1988

Contract Laboratory Program Number: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NO f

ACTIOE: If yes, reject (red-line) all associateddata thac has a concentration less thanten tines the prep, blank value, but notflagged with a "IT (less than).

A.1.8.5.4 Is concentration of prep, blank below the negative CRDL? __ [ X ]

ACTION: If yes, reject (red-line) all associated datathat has a concentration less than lOxCRDL.

A.1.8.6 Fora IV (1CP Interference Check Sample)

A.1.8.6*1 Present and complete? [X ] __

(NOTE: Not required for furnace AA, flame AA, mercury,cyanide and Ca, Hg, K and Na*)

A.1.8.6.2 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are BOrethan Jk 202 of true or established Bean value. Are allInterference Check Sample results inside of controllimits (+ 202)7 [ X' 1 __ _

If no, is concentration of Al, Ca, Fe, or Hg lover insample than in ICS? 12J __ ^

"' ACTION: If no, flag as estimated (J) those positiveresults for which ICS recovery la between121-1502 ; flag all sample results as estimatedif ICS recovery falls vithin 50-792; reject(red-line) those sample results for which ICSrecovery is less than 502; if ICS recovery isabove 1502, reject positive results only (notflagged with a "IT).

A. 1.8.6.3 Was ICS analyzed at beginning and end of run(or at -least twice every 8 hours)? [ i>d __ _

ACTION: If no, flag as estimated (J) all samples forwhich AL, Ca, Fe, or Mg is higher than in ICS.

A. 1.8.7 Form V A (Spiked sample Recovery - Pre-Digestion/Prc-Di§tallation)-( Note: Not required for Ca, Mg, K, and Na (both matrices), Al, and Fe(soil only*)

flR303788

r STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 12 of 30

Ti.tle: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NO K/A

A.1.8.7.1 Present aod complete for: etch 20 samples? [" t ] \/ __

each matrix type? 2_1

each cone, range (i.e. low, med., high)? [__] __ y

For both AA and ICP when both Are used for aaoeanalyte? t [__] __ y

ACTION: If no for any of the above, flag asestimated (J) all positive data lessthan four times spiking level for

-«*= which spiked sample was not analyzed,

NOTE: If one spiked sample was analyzed for morethan 20 samples, then first 20 samplesanalyzed do not have to be flagged asestimated (J).

A,1.8.7.2 Was field blank used for spiked sample? __ [__] V^_

If yes, was field blank described as such on TrafficReport? __ [__]

ACTION: If yes, flag all positive data less than4 x spike added as estimated (J) for whichfield blank was used as spiked sample.

A.1.8.7.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outsideof control limits (752 to 1251). Are all recoverieswithin control limits? [__] __

If nof is sample concentration greater than or equalto four times spike concentration? [__] __

ACTION: If yes, disregard spike recoveries foranalytes whose concentrations are greaterthan or equal to four times spike added.If no, circle those analytes on Torn V forwhich sample concentration is less thanfour times the spike concentration.

Are results outside the control limits (75-125J)flagged with "N" on Form !'• and Form VA? I__J __

ACTION: If no, write in the contract problem/non compliancesection of "Data Assessment Narrative".

BR303789

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 13 of 30

Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1958Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review * Inorganics)

A.I. 8.7.4 Aqueoua YES NO

Are any spike recoveries:(a) less than 30t? __ [ j

(b) between 30-7*2? __ [ j

(c) between 126-150*? __ [__]

(d) greater than 150J? __ [ ]

ACTION; If less than 30Z, reject all associated aqueousdata; if between 30-74Z, flag all associatedaqueous data as estiaated (J); if between

- 126-1502, flag as estimated (J) all associatedaqueous data not flagged with a "U"; ifgreater than 1501, reject (red-line) allassociated aqueous data not flagged with a "U".

NOTE: If pre- digestion spike result is rejectable doe tocoefficient of correlation of MSA, analytical spikerecovery, or duplicate injections criteria , disregard spikerecovery on Form V. Flag the associated data as estimated(J)*

A.1.8.7.5 Soil/Sediment

Are any spike recoveries:(a) less than 10Z? __ [__J

(b) between 10-741? __ [__]

(c) between 126-2001? __ I__]

(d) greater than 200Z? __ [__J

ACTION: If less than 101, reject all associated data;if between 10-74Z, flag all associated data asestimated; if between 126-200J, flag as estimatedall associated data was cot flagged with a "U";if greater than 2002, reject all associateddata not flagged with a "U".

A.1*8.8 Fora VI (Lab Duplicates)

A.1.8.8.1 Present and complete for: each 20 samples? {__J __

•ach matrix type? [__] __

each concentration range (i.«. low, med., high)? [__] __

8R303790

Title: Evaluation cf Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: RU-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

TES NO __

both *A and ICP when both are u*ec* for same analyte? [ __ ] __ V

ACTION : Tf no for any the above, flag as estimated (J)all data >CBI)L* for which duplicate sample wasnot analyzed.

Note: If one duplicate sample vas analyzed for morethan 20 samples, then first 20 sanples do nothave to be flagged as estimated*

A. 1.8. 8. 2 Was field blank used for duplicate analysis? __ [ ]

Soil Samples (a) 352 RPD orCRDL

Substitute IDL for CRDL- when IDL > CRDL.

SR30379

v

If yes, was field blank identified as such on j^ Traffic Report? __ I __ ]

ACTION; If yes, flag all data >CRDL* as estimated (J)for vhich field blank vas used as duplicate.

A. 1.8. 8. 3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outsidecontrol limits:

Aqueous Samples (a) 201 RPD orCRDL

Are all values within control limits? [ __ ] __ ^ _

If no, are all results outside the control limitsflagged with an * on Form !'• and VI? [ __ ] __ J _

ACTION: If no, write in the contract problems /non-compliance section of "Data Assessment Narrative91*

NOTE: 1. RPD is not calculable for an analyteof the sample - duplicate pair whenboth values are less than IDL.

2. If lab duplicate result is rejectable due to coefficientof correlation of KSA, analytical spike recovery, orduplicate injections criteria, do not apply precisioncriteria. Flag the associated data as estimated*

A. 1.8. 8. * Is any value for sample duplicate pair less than CRDL*and other value greater than or aqual to 10 x *CRDL? _ _ t __ 1 X

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data.

OrtKAXiNG PROCEDURE _ Page 15 Of 30

Title: Evaluati n f Ketllf Data for the Date; Dec, 1988Contract laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganic*)

TES NO H/A

A. I. 0.8*5 Aqueous

Is any RPD greater than 50Z where sample and duplicateare both greater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL? __ ( __ ] y

Is any difference between sample and duplicate greaterthan *CRDL where cample and/or duplicate is less than5 times *CRDL? __ [ __ j _v

ACTION; If yes* flag the associated data as estimated.

A. 1.8. 8. 6 Soil/Sediment

"*" Is any RPD (where sample and duplicate are bothgreater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL) :

> 100X? __ f __ )

Is any difference between sample and duplicate. (where sample and/or duplicate is less than Sx*CRDL) :

>2x*CRDL? __ [ __ ] j

ACTION; If yes, flag the associated data as estisuted.

A.I. 8. 9 Field Duplicates

A. 1.8. 9.1 Were field duplicates analysed? ( __ ] __ X

ACTIOK: If yes, prepare a For* VI for each field duplicatepair* report concentrations of soils in ug/1 on vetweight basis and calculate RPDs.

NOTE : I . Do not calculate RPD when both values are less than IDL.2. Flag til associated data only for field duplicate.

A. 1.8. 9. 2 Circle all values on Forv VI for field duplicates that are outsidecontrol limits:

Aqueous Samples (a) 20Z RPD orCRDL

Soil Samples (a) 35Z RPD or*(b)+ CRDL

Substitute IDL for CRDL when XDL > CRDL.

fiR3Q3792

r STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 16 of 30»

Till*: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: *HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganic*)

TES NO K/A

Ire all values within control limits? [__] y

A.KS.9-3 Is any value for sample duplicate pair less than *CRDLand other value greater than or equal to 10 x *CRDL? __ [ ] i

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data a* estimated.

A.1.8.9.U Aqueous

Is any RPD greater than 50J where sample and duplicate ;^^ are both greater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL? __ \ ] ''

Is any difference between sample and duplicate greaterthan *CRDL where aample and/or duplicate is less than5 times *CRDL? __ [ ] >

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data at estimated.

A.1.8.9.5 Soil/Sediment

Is any RPD (where sample and duplicate are bothgreater than 5 times *CRDL) :

MOOX? __ [__]

Is any difference between sample and duplicate(where sample and/or duplicate is less than Sx *CRDL ):

>2x *CRDL? __ [__]

ACTIOK: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A.KB. 10 Form VII (Laboratory Control Sample) (Note: LCS - notrequired for aqueous Kg and cyanide analyses.)

A.1.8.10.1 Was one LCS prepared and analyzed for: .every 20 water samples? I / 1 \ __

every 20 solid samples?

both AA and ICP when both «re used for same analyte? [ ] __ y

* Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > CRDL.

SR303793

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dee. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Nusber: Rtf-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

NO

ACTIOK: If no for any c-f the above, prepare TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory for submittalof results of solid LCS. Flag as estimated(J)all data for which LCS was not analyzed.

NOTE: If only one LCS was analyzed for more than 20samples, then first 20 samples close to LCSdo not have to be flagged as estimated.

A.1.8.10.2 Aqueous

Circle all LCS values outside of controllimit§{80 - 1202- except aqueous Ag and Sb).

Is say LCS recovery: less than 50X? __ |

between 50* and 79Z? __ [_>O

between 12II and 150X? __ IX 1

greater than 150X? __ [ y ]

ACTION: Less than 50Z, reject (red-line) all data;between 501 and 79X, flag all associated dataas estimated (J); between 1212 and 1501, flagall positive (not flagged with a "U") resultsas estimated; greater than 1501, reject allpositive results.

A.1.8.10.3 Solid LCS

NOTE: 1. If IDL of an analyte is equal to or greater thanTrue Value of LCS, disregard the following criteria.

2* If"Found"v*lue of LCS is rejectable due to duplicateinjections or analytical spike recovery criteria,disregard LCS recovery; flag the associated data asestimated(J).

a. If the Solid LCS recovery for any analyte fallsoutside EPA control limits, qualify all sampleresults >IDL as estimated (J).

b. If the LCS results are higher than the controllimits «nd the sample results < IDL, the dataare acceptable.

c. If the LCS results are lower than the controllimits.qualify all sample results < IDL asestimated(UJ).

OFLKAIING PROCEDURE Page 18 of 30

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

Yes NO

A.l.8.11 Fore IX (ICP Serial Dilution) -

A.l.8.11*! Vgs Seria} Dilution analysis performed for:each 20 samples? [__] /

each sutrix type? [__] xv

each concentration range (i.e. low, s*d.)? [__] __

*"*" ACTION: H no for any of the above, flag all positive datagreater than or equal to lOxIDLs as estimated (J)far which Serial Dilution Analysis was not performed,and summarize the deficiency on the DPO report.

A.I.8.11.2 Was field blank(s) used for Serial Dilution Analysis? __ [__]

If yes, was field blank described as such on TrafficReport? __ [__]

ACTION: If yes, flag all associated data _> 10 x IDLas estimated (J). ~

A.1*8*11.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are ousideof control limit 0*10 Z). Are all values within £ 10 Z ? [__] __

Are results outside control limit flaggedwith an "E" on Form I's and Form IX? [__] __

ACTION: If no, write in the contract problem/non-compliancesection of the"Data Assessment Narrative*'.

A.1.8.11.4 Are any I Diff. values : [ ]

> 100Z ? __ [__]

ACTION: Flag as estimated (J) all associated sample resultsequal to or greater than lOxIDLs for which percentdifference is greater than 101 but less than 1001.Reject (red-line) all associated sample resultsequal to or greater than lOxIDLs for which PD isgreater than or equal to 100Z.

V

flR303795

STANDARD OPERATIKG PROCEDURE Page 19 of 30

Title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: HU-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES JJO N_

A. 1.8.12 Tumacg iconic Afascrfetiar. . <ftA* QC Analysis

A.1.8.12.1 Ari d-jr-licare Injections present in furnace raw data(except during full Method of Standard Addition) foreach »ample analyzed by CFAA? [ j ] __

ACTION: If no, reject the data on Form I'a for whichduplicate injections were not performed.

A.1.8.12.2 Do the duplicate injection readings agree vithin 201Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) or Coefficient of ,,Variation (CV) for concentration greater than CRDL? [ X] __

Vas a dilution analyzed for sample with post digestionspike recovery less than 40t? [__] __ V

ACTION: If no for any of the above, flag all theassociated data as estimated (J).

A.1.8.12.3 Is *post digestion spike recovery less than 10Z orgreater than 150Z for any result? __ fx I

ACTION: If yes, reject (red-line) the affected data ifrecovery is <10Z; reject data not flagged with "U"if spike recovery is >150Z.

NOTE : Reject the data only if the affected sample wasnot subsequently analyzed by Method of StandardAddition.

A .l.8.13 Fora VIII (Method of Standard Addition Results)

A. 1.8.13.1 Present? [ X] __

If no. is Any Form I result coded with "S" or a "+"? __ [__]

ACTION; If yes, write request on Telephone Record tog andcontact laboratory for submlttal of Form VIII.

A.1.8.13.2 Is coefficient of correlation for MS A less than 0.990 forany sasjple? __

ACTION: If yes, reject (red-line) affected data*

* Post digestion spike is not required on the pre-digestion spiked sample when pre*

digestion spike recovery is within control limits of 75-125Z or when SR>*xSA.

4R303796

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 20 of 30

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NO

A.1.8.13.3 Was *KSA required for any sample but not performed? __ [ y ]

Is coefficient of correlation for MSA less than 0.995? __ [ v ]

Are MSA calculations outside the linear range of thecalibration curve generated at the beginning of theanalytical run? __ [ ]

ACTION: If yes for any of the above, flag allthe associated data as estimated (J).

A-U.8.13.4 Was proper <?u*ntitatloTv procedure followed correctlyas outlined in the SOW on page E-16 through E-17? |

ACTIQK: If no, note exception under contract problem/non-compliance of data assessment narrative, orprepare a aeperate list.

A.1.8.14 Dissolved/Total or Inorganic/Total Analytes *

A.1.8.14.1 Were any analyses performed for dissolved as well astotal analytes on the same saople(s). __ [__] v_

Were any analyses performed for inorganic as well a* total(organic •*• inorganic) analytes on the same sample(a)? __ [__] 2L

If yes, apply the following questions only ifinorganic (or dissolved ) results are (1) aboveCRDt, and (ii) greater than total constituents.

A.1.8.14.2 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)analyte greater than its total concentration by•ore than 101? __ [__] __;

A.1.8.14.3 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)analyte greater than its total concentration by . ,more than 50Z? __ (__] ^

NOTE : Prepare a list comparing differencesbetween all dissolved (or inorganic) andtotal analytes.Compute the differencesas a percent of the total analyte onlywhen both are above CRDL.

* MSA is not required on LCS and-prep, blank.

BR303797

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE - Page 21 of 30

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1968Contract Laboratory Program Number: RW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NO

ACTION; If «?re than lOt, flag both dissolved (or inorganic)and total values as estimated (J); if more than50t, reject (red-line) the data for both valuse,

A.I.8.15 Form I to IX

A. 1.8.15.1 Are all the Form I through Form IX labeled with:Laboratory name? [X } __

Case number? [ ] __

EPA sample No,? IJX ] __

SDG No.? [Y ] __

Contract No.? [^ 1 __

Correct units? [ A } __

Matrix? Q<J __

ACTION: If no for any of the above,note undercontract problem/non-compliance section of narrative.of the"Data Assessnent Narrative".

A.1.8.15.2 Do any computation/transcription errors exceed 101 ofreported values on Forms I-IX for:

(NOTE: Check all forms against raw data.)

(a) all analyte* analyzed by ICP? __ [ >' ]

. (b) all analytei analyzed by CFAA? __ [ X]

(c) all analytes analyzed by AA Flame? __ [__]

(d) Mercury? __ IX ]

(e) Cyanide? __ .[i ]

ACTION: If yes, prepare Telephone Log, contact laboratoryfor corrected data and correct errors with redpencil and initial.

flR303798

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 22 of 30

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NO

A.1.8.16 Forn I (Field Blank) *

Circle all field blank values on Data Summary Sheetthat are greater than 2xIDL.Do concentrations of field blank(s) fall below twotimes IDLs for all parameters of associated aqueousand soil samples? (__] y

If no, was field blank value already rejected due toother QC criteria? [__] )(

ACTION': If BO, reject (red line) all associated AZ>•-*- aqueous and soil/sediment data (except field

blank) that has a concentration less thanfive times the field blank value not flaggedwith a "U" (less than).

A.I.8.17 Fora XI, XII, XIII (Quarterly Verification of InstrumentalParameters).

A. 1.8.17.1 Is quarterly verification report present for:

Instrument Detection Limits? [^ ] __ _

ICP Interelement Correction Factors? [ >C ] __ _

ICP Linear Ranges? [ A ] __ _

ACTION: If no, contact DPO of the lab*

A.1.8.17.2 Form XI (Instrument Detection Limits) * (Note: IDL is notrequired for Cyanide.)

Are IDLs present for: all the analytes? [ X 1 __ _

•11 the instruments used? I-/ 1 __ _

For both AA and ICP when both are-used for sameanalyte? [__1 __ V

ACTION; If no for any of the above, prepareTelephone Record Log and contact laboratory.

flR303799

STASDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 23 of 30

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: *KW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessoent - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

S N£ N/A

Is IDL greater than CRDL for any analyte? * __ I Xj

If yes, is the concentration of the sample analyzed onthe instruaent whose IDL exceeds CRDL, greater than5 x IDL? [ __ ] __ _x;

MMB ACTION: If no, reject (red-line) all values less thanfive times IDL of the instrument whose IDLexceeds CRDL.

A. 1.8. 17. 3 Forn XII (Linear Ranges)

Was any sample result higher than high linear rangeof ICP by more than 102? ' __ [ ] __

Any sample result higher than the highestcalibration standard for non-ICP parameters? ____ [ . ]

If yes for any of the above, was dilution performedon the sanple to bring raw data in linear range or [ __ ] __ X,below the highest standard*

MMB ACTION: If no, flag the result reported on Form Ias estimated(J)*

flR3038

r

ATTACHMENT IVDPO REPORT

flR30380

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE P«ge ±+ O; jw

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date; Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program lumber: HW-2Appendix A.2: Data Assessment Narrative Revision: 8

Case* 6f C\\- ______ SiteZk^Awvl Cdtcri** _____ Matrix: Soil

Reviewer "V^^" Lab Ujg^ ___________ Water /

Contractor ____________ Other

A.2.1 All data are of acceptable quality? Yes ___ No

If no, exceptions are noted belov with reason(i) for•**•• rejection or qualification as estimated value (J).

}c.\ C' '' "nU. ATV^cJvt'* t 'u* •*•

(<<. C. .O. ^ A /«*-h /ifc -, /, i/i* .A.,

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE P«ge 29 of 30

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dee. 19S8Contract Laboratory Program Nuaber: HW-2Appendix A.6: CLP Data Assessment Revision: 8Sumaary Form (Inorganics)

CLF DATA ASSESSMENT SIflttAJtY FOM (IHQiCAKICS)

Type of Uriev: <^~ ? 7%~)________________ Pete: ^ 'f-Ja______________ Gate I: 5r fV

Ub K*M:

»eviewer'* laitiale: lX\/!r_________ Nuaber of Saaplaa; V

Anilytei tejeeted Due to E»eeedlni leviev Criteria:*

ICf

riw uFurnace AA

Marcury

Total

Other

HoldinjTIMSo

60

V

^

Call^T»tlon

1 a

U

C0

\j

Treptlenk

>

C/

t/

O

t/

HeldBleakC

0

r6^

later-fcrcccti

6

C/6

o

is

Spikelecoverr

6

66p4

DuplUb

6

•7-

66

leeteeField

DetectionLiedti

O

C>U

c-U

LC5

0

r>

f'

{,

a

terUlDilution0

n0Cis

HSA

6

')

f>

f,'

6

TotalA&ilytet

7P

—— -

/("i964

tijtecioD

^

c

0 ^d

A»*ljt«t riatctd at Xttlftacvrf (J) Due Co Exceediaf Criteria for:*

•fr\

?

ICF

Flax JUT

Furmact AA

Htrcurr

Totml

Other

U

C?

n^0

j

0

Q

e)

6

O

0f

o0

0

000

0

/>

d00

0

S -f

/3^ 1y

fV

/^3ftV

d

600u

6

^

f,

6(/

C1

r;66fc

<5

;/

66c

7 -

/</fLf

Ajr

^ v£x

//6^

Hot.:cv erit»rl».

flR303803

r••

t . »* '

«* 'Title

CASE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 30 of 30

: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A. 7: CLP Data Assessment Checklist Revision: 8Inorganic Analysis

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT Region """

NO. $TDCtf. _ SITE <m ry sff/rtTAirLABORATORY c*X£ o- NO. OF SAMPLES/

SDG*

SOW*

MATRIX y 1 (p 5 i )

£fl 7> °° REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD)

7 1 REVIEWER'S NAME ~>s . x: . / (L,

DPO: ACTION FYI \ COMPLETION DATE S- /-9s-

\I!•i

1.2.3*4.5.6.7.6.9.10.11.12.

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

ICP AA Hg CYANIDE

HOLDING TIMES ° A 6 GCALIBRATIONS <* ~ ? O '" *" 'BLANKS 0 ^ 6' nICS ^ |V '-•'LCS 6 /.DUPLICATE ANALYSIS n a 0 6MATRIX SPIKE ^ £ V * 3MSA /, 'SERIAL DILUTION £SAMPLE VERIFICATION ^ <jOTHER QC o <r ^OVERALL ASSESSMENT / /; °

0 * Data has no problems/or qualified due to minor problems.M • Data qualified due to major problems.2 * Data unacceptable.X - Problems, but do not affect data*

ACTION ITEMS: *<* "A ^-,/^X^fc g, *~jl< j „> <*_ L -» /. /* /'**,*. tff

<>W

AREAS

^ ,ji .u < k ~tL f L+je Lk, ;, L<~J> .OF CONCERN:

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE:

• •

-

SR303

r

ATTACHMENT VSUPPORT DOCUMENTATION

SR3038

Oact: 0«c.Profraa 1*u«b*r: KV-:

Appendix A.5: Suaaary of Inorjanici Revision; aQuality Control Data

or lEotCAJHc* OUAJ.ITT comci DATA»s..5T?: :M »» «o.

r.-SY pgfctmw; ***~,.'~f«c ,llt, SAXPJJ

Pltld _________FIELD «?. I'S:______________ UJ W7P. rSi._.5S3J'> BAftll JHB I.

SnUt DIWTIOK SAKPU WJ.^^________ CCMFLETXOK OAg?:7< -%/ tmrvtP IiriTULS' PiO1'11___i____ "HA IT*____m___ . „ IT v ?: vii Ti '

ar**DtttetlocLlaltJrcri juank

T«r. Z ICoaeiaucd

lait I 2 3 lait Fin

C*ilbr«tloBIltnfc*Co&ciaucd

tale 1 2 3

II II A

ICP ICSt I

lait Pla

H 5 UDiC Pr ix k

LC5

1 I

StrOil

: D

M

200

Sb *0 rAl 10 7,8 tL

200

ft* { S J00 u? LiQ.V ft 3

C* 5000

Cr 10 .1 £0

Co 30 & 24)

Cu 23 f/f ttO'V

100 r-Ml sooo ffl L\Mfl 23 ft? ttf.e ,*

•f 0.2 O.IHi *0 01.*

5000

*• 3 7 f7.3 JeUAI 10 3 ft. 9

3000 t* c?.

Tl 10 ny . ?«&i«f 50 ft

20

10

ft.i ft? n<C

flR303

StKUI CILCTION SAXFU HO" i t* •mww mnuu-

Ti

ftR303807

DILCTION SAKFU HO.II 1

flR303808

flR3038

flR3038IO

Contract Laboratory Program """ Datt: D«c. itsAppendix A.5: SuBMry of Inorganic. *u«b«r: KW-2Quality Control Data * *«vlsien: 8

ftR3038l

Contract Laborato

SCTUI DILC710N SAM?U HO.

mui DILUTION SAKFU no.___ __ir"u.c ' ic. • ""rfr ' P u fel.

flR3038i3

tHOKCAjriCi Ql'AJLITT COmOl QATA

7JT? *M?U

U MOS:

$aua DILCTIOM SAKFU NOxi

R3038U

SH303815

, > - aa or t«»e«»e. r••iKVraa—_ C^SE KC,

SOtlAL DILCTION SAKFU NO»T

flR303816

Project No.____ C,. Book No.__

r \

i .I I {<*&ILIIO- oot.izy/:I i ! w2/3/7 .

i 3/z- .<• zyjr /n/c.

'.2 ?/ ;? o?/li

) 335 >. 0/7 5 3. ,fo>

3) . 373oo2.\i2>67' •.I's/o Iff?/ VZ-ll

;/ iJ/i- tr ?7^ ^ g-o tfi TL

14/7IslltO 3~-5~?/ Vt- C7. 7/C? fr-PS'f "f 3"cr

ooC/ .\-Lll .73/3 5. f 3

- oot.l^^i 4/3% H••/37^ ^70? VJj' fv f:;

JTJ5 / 5/3/3^^-t- £p?7 f7

00j I 3/3 %.*f~lX~~ *{tf/2~

" - w (f U i I*' t '

'I 7? I.IloC*3Z\ 5-%/z.

To Page o —

itn«ss«d & Understood by me. Date Invented by

Recorded by A ft 5 0 3 6 I 7Date

Project No..Book No..

»«»ed & Understood by me,

ICLIENT/SUBJECT

TASK DESCRIFPREPARED BYMATH CHECKMETHOD REV. BY

~r"T

>TION ———

KVPi — i

BY

DFPTDFPTDFPT

SHFFT Of

W.O. NO

TASK NO i

nATFHATF

DATF

APPROVED BY j

nPDT HATF

Cr ^ -1 t -/o Afi-p -

r r4a: £e- "=

Cr -

,?<!' <J

VT C,ir: 35.7

37 / "<

<& C~£>, «j '

SHEET___of,CLIENT/SUBJECT

MATHMETHOD REV. BY

FCT'TION

RY

BY

nFPTDFPT

HFPT

wo wnTASK NO

HATF

DATF

RATF

APPROVED BY

DEPT DATE

x^" LA, - '

A33

<P

<J

H10-05-003/A.5'85

too«««iAt»KT3 SHEET ____ Of __

CLIENT/SUBJECT ———— -

TASK DESCRIPTION ————PREPARED BY ———————MATH CHECK BY ——————METHOD REV. BY —————

DEPTDEPTDEPT

TASK NO. j

DATFDATFDATF

APPROVED BY

DEPT . DATE

~ 3

, \. -7 2-

2, '

3-ou

V

/?*

SHEET___of.CLIENT/SUBJECTTASK DESCRIPTION ————pnppARFn RVMATH CHFCK BYMFTWnn BFV BY

DFPTDFPT

OFPT. ..

TASK wnDATF , .. _DATF

DATP

——— • — • "*" »»--«•.— ——— . — _— _. —— „«

APPROVED BY

DEPT _ DATE

i\l

I<

V

M