Upload
harold
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Epidermolytic Palmoplantar Keratoderma
Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (EPPK), first
described by Vorner in 1901, may be the most common
form of diffuse keratoderma and is characterized by
keratosis restricted to the palms and soles. The disease
is also known as keratosis palmaris et plantaris
familiaris. The estimated incidence is at least 4.4 per
100,000 in Northern Ireland (Covello et al. 1998)
Synonyms and Related Disorders
Keratosis of Greither; Keratosis palmaris et plantaris;
Localized epidermolytic hyperkeratosis; Vorner type
plamoplantar keratoderma
Genetics/Basic Defects
1. Inheritance:
a. Autosomal dominant
b. Highly penetrant
2. Cause
a. Keratin 9 (K9)
i. A type 1 keratin gene (KRT9, located at
17q12-q21), a type 1 keratin expressed exclu-
sively in the suprabasal keratinocytes of
palmoplantar epidermis
ii. Nearly 20 distinct pathogenic mutation in
KRT9 have been identified in various ethnic
kindreds with EPPK (Chen et al. 2009)
b. Mutations in keratin 1 gene (KRT1) underlies mild
EPPK (Terron-Kwiatkowski et al. 2002, 2006)
Clinical Features
1. Characteristic hyperkeratosis (Covello et al. 1998)
a. Early onset: present at birth or during the first
months of life
b. Diffuse thick yellowish hyperkeratosis, dis-
tinctly limited to the palms and soles, with
sharply bordered erythematous margins (virtu-
ally diagnostic of EPPK)
c. Absence of associated features
2. Differential diagnosis (Lee et al. 2008)
a. Diffuse hereditary PPK without associated
features (Hatsell et al. 2001)
i. Diffuse nonepidermolytic PPK (NEPPK)
a) NEPPK: an autosomal dominant disorder
b) Clinically difficult to distinguish between
EPPK and NEPPK
c) Histologically, EPPK shows
epidermolysis of keratinocytes in the
suprabasal layers, a characteristic not
observed in NEPPK
d) In mild cases of EPPK, diagnosis can
still be problematic as detection of
epidermolysis can be difficult
ii. Progressive PPK
a) Hyperkeratosis extends onto the dorsa of
the hands and the feet with characteristic
involvement of the Achilles tendon
b) Hyperhidrosis common
c) Intrafamilial phenotypic variation
common
d) Course of the disease: worsen during
childhood, static after puberty, and
improves in the fifth decade of life
H. Chen, Atlas of Genetic Diagnosis and Counseling, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-1037-9_82,# Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
749
iii. Gamborg-Nielson PPK
a) An autosomal recessive disorder
b) Severe form of PPK delineated in two
families with six patients in Sweden
c) Thick, diffuse keratoderma with knuckle
pads
d) Occasional keratosis on the dorsa of the
hands
e) Mutilating changes due to constricting
bands surrounding the fingers have been
described
b. Diffuse hereditary PPK with associated features
i. Mal de Meleda
a) Described initially in inhabitants of the
Adriatic Island of Meleda (Miljet)
b) An autosomal recessive disorder
c) Diffuse, thick keratoderma with promi-
nent erythematous border extending
onto the dorsa of the hands and the feet
d) Constricting bands around digits
resulting in spontaneous amputation
e) Well-circumscribed psoriasis-like plaques
or lichenoid patches on the knees and the
elbows
f) Hyperhidrosis
g) Periorbital erythema and hyperkeratosis
h) Nail changes (koilonychias, subungual
hyperkeratosis)
i) Other associated features (lingua plicata,
syndactyly, hair on the palms and the
soles, high arched palate, left handedness)
ii. Vohwinkel PPK mutilans
a) An autosomal dominant disorder
b) Honeycomb-like keratosis of the palms
and soles in infancy
c) Constricting fibrous bands on the digits,
leading to progressive strangulation and
autoamputation
d) Starfish-shaped keratosis on the dorsa of
the fingers and the knees
e) Other associated features (alopecia,
deafness, spastic paraplegia, myopathy,
ichthyosiform dermatosis, and nail
abnormalities)
iii. Olmsted mutilating PPK with periorificial
keratotic plaques (Olmsted syndrome)
(Da Rosa Santos et al. 1997; Tao et al. 2008)
a) An autosomal dominant disorder
b) Onset in the first year of life
c) Symmetric, sharply circumscribed PPK,
surrounded by erythema with flexion
deformities of the digits, leading to con-
striction and spontaneous amputation
(Poulin et al. 1984)
d) Presence of hyperkeratotic plaques with
a periorificial pattern (Atherton et al.
1990; Lucker and Steijlen 1994)
e) Onychodystrophy
f) Universal congenital alopecia
g) Oral leukokeratosis
h) Joint hyperlaxity
iv. PPK with sclerodactyly
a) An autosomal dominant disorder
b) Sclerodactyly
c) Diffuse keratoderma more marked on
the soles than the palms
d) Nail abnormalities
e) Hypohidrosis
f) Associated with squamous cell
carcinoma
v. PPK with periodontitis
a) An autosomal recessive disorder
b) Diffuse trangrediens palmoplantar
dermatosis
c) Periodontosis, unless treated, results
in severe gingivitis and loss of teeth by
age 5 years
d) Increased susceptibility to infection
e) Scaly, erythematous lesions often obser-
ved over the knees, the elbows, and the
interphalangeal joints
f) Hyperhidrosis with malodor
vi. Clouston hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia
a) Diffuse, papillomatous PPK
b) Nail dystrophy
c) Universal sparsity of hair
d) Other associated features (sensorineural
deafness, polydactyly, syndactyly, finger
clubbing, mental retardation, dwarfism,
photophobia, and strabismus)
vii. Diffuse NEPPK and sensorineural deafness
a) An autosomal dominant disorder
b) Diffuse palmoplantar hyperkeratosis
c) Associated with a slowly progressive,
bilateral, high-frequency hearing loss
d) Deafness precedes the skin changes
750 Epidermolytic Palmoplantar Keratoderma
c. Focal (nummular) PPK without associated
features
i. Focal NEPPK
a) An autosomal dominant disorder
b) Palmar keratosis with a nummular, linear,
membranaceous, fissured, or periungual
configuration
c) Plantar keratosis with a nummular
appearance, localized to pressure points
ii. Focal epidermolytic PPK
a) An autosomal dominant disorder
b) Nummular keratotic lesions,located
mainly on plantar pressure points
c) Painful lesions
iii. Siemens PPK areata/striata
a) An autosomal dominant disorder
b) Marked variable phenotypic expression
c) Marked erythema initially, followed by
islands of linear hyperkeratosis
d. Focal (nummular) hereditary PPK with associ-
ated features
i. Oculocutaneous tyrosinemia (tyrosinemia
type II)
a) Focal, painful PPK
b) Bilateral, pseudoherpetic corneal ulceration,
leading to corneal scarring and glaucoma
c) Mental retardation
d) Occasional hyperkeratotic lesions on the
elbows, knees, and tongue
e) Hyperhidrosis
f) Occasional bullous lesions
ii. Pachyonychia congenita
a) Autosomal recessive disorder
b) Localized areas of hyperkeratosis on the
palms and the soles
c) Discoloration and thickening of the nails
iii. Keratosis palmaris and plantaris with carci-
noma of the esophagus
a) Autosomal dominant disorder
b) Age of onset: 5–15 years
c) Focal PPK
d) Increased susceptibility to developing car-
cinoma of the esophagus (38-fold increase)
e) Variable oral leukokeratosis and follicu-
lar keratosis
iv. Focal palmoplantar and oral mucosa
hyperkeratosis
a) Autosomal dominant disorder
b) Focal PPK, especially on weight-bearing
areas
c) Oral hyperkeratosis
d) Increased severity with age
e) Subungual and circumungual
hyperkeratosis
e. Papular PPK without associated features
i. Keratosis palmoplantaris punctata
a) Autosomal dominant disorder
b) Asymptomatic, tiny hyperkeratotic pap-
ules present on the palmoplantar surface
c) Absence of associated features in most
patients
d) Spastic paralysis, ankylosing spondylitis,
facial sebaceous hyperplasia reported
e) Possible association with gastrointestinal
malignancy
ii. Acrokeratoelastoidosis
a) Autosomal dominant disorder
b) Round or oval, yellowish, hyperkeratotic
papules that can appear umbilicated
c) Distribution of the lesions: along the
border of the palms and the soles
d) Associated hyperhidrosis
iii. Focal acral hyperkeratosis
a) Autosomal dominant disorder
b) Condition similar to acrokeratoelastoidosis
c) Insidious onset in childhood, reaching
maximum in early life
d) Race: African origin
f. Papular PPK with associated features
i. Rare single-pedigree syndromes
a) Syndrome of cystic eyelids, punctate
PPK, hypotrichosis, and hypodontia
(Schopf–Schulz–Passarge syndrome)
b) Punctate PPK with ankylosing spondylitis
c) Punctate PPK with facial sebaceous
hyperplasia
d) Punctate PPK with spastic paralysis
e) PPK with lipomata
ii. Punctate PPK and cancer
g. Acquired palmoplantar keratoderma
i. Inflammatory and reactive dermatoses
a) Hyperkeratotic eczema
b) Psoriasis
c) Reiter syndrome
d) Lichen planus
e) Pityriasis rubra pilaris
Epidermolytic Palmoplantar Keratoderma 751
f) Lupus erythematosus
g) Callosities
h) Darier disease
ii. Infective causes
a) Dermatophytes
b) Viral (human papilloma virus) warts
mimicking keratoderma
c) AIDS-related psoriasis with discrete
keratotic pustular keratoderma
d) Late secondary syphilis in patients
with HIV with diffuse, symmetric
keratoderma or papular PPK
e) Yaws
f) Leprosy
iii. Drugs
a) Chronic arsenic exposure with multiple,
irregular, warty keratosis
b) Lodine: manifestation of drug
hypersensitivity
iv. Cutaneous features of systemic disease
a) Myoedema with hyperkeratosis
b) Diabetes with discrete plantar keratosis
c) Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with
subungual hyperkeratosis
v. Haxthausen keratoderma climactericum
a) Onset in the 40s
b) Initial lesion: pressure areas on the soles
c) Erythema and hyperkeratosis with fissur-
ing making walking painful
d) Minimal pruritus
e) Discrete and centrally confined palmar
involvement
vi. Keratoderma associated with internal
malignancy
a) Keratoderma as a paraneoplastic phenom-
enon, such as acrokeratosis
paraneoplastica of Bazex associated with
squamous cell carcinoma of the upper gas-
trointestinal tract and acanthosis palmaris
associated with gastric or pulmonary
malignancy in 90% of cases
b) Keratoderma as evidence of predisposi-
tion to malignancy such as late-onset
punctate keratoderma associated with
cutaneous and internal malignancy
h. Syndromes with PPK as an associated features
i. Basal cell nevus syndrome
ii. Congenital bullous ichthyosiform
erythroderma
iii. Congenital nonbullous ichthyosiform
erythroderma
iv. Darier disease
v. Epidermodysplasia verruciformis
vi. Epidermolysis bullosa herpetiformis
vii. Ichthyosis vulgaris
viii. Incontinentia pigmenti
ix. Keratitis, ichthyosis, and deafness (KID)
syndrome
x. Lamellar ichthyosis
Diagnostic Investigations
1. Histology and ultrastructures: cytolysis of
keratinocytes and abnormal aggregation of
tonofilaments in the suprabasal layers of the
epidermis
2. Molecular genetic analysis
a. KRT9 mutations analysis
i. Sequencing of entire coding region
ii. Sequencing of select exons
iii. Targeted mutations analysis
b. KRT1 mutation analysis for patients with no
mutations in KRT9
Genetic Counseling
1. Recurrence risk
a. Patient’s sib: not increased unless a
parent is affected in which case there is a 50%
risk
b. Patient’s offspring: 50%
2. Prenatal diagnosis
a. Not usually requested because of mild nature of
the disease
b. Possible to pregnancy at-risk, provided the
disease-causing mutation has been identified in
the proband
c. Accomplished in a Chinese kindred affected by
EPPK for detection of c. T470C (p.M157T) of
the keratin 9 gene from fetal DNA obtained by
amniocentesis (Chen et al. 2009)
3. Management
a. Topical keratolytics
b. Topical retinoids such as tretinoin
752 Epidermolytic Palmoplantar Keratoderma
References
Atherton, D. J., Sutton, C., & Jones, B. M. (1990). Mutilating
palmoplantar keratoderma with periorificial keratotic
plaques. British Journal of Dermatology, 122, 245–252.Chen, X. L., Xu, C. M., Cai, S. R., et al. (2009). Prenatal
diagnosis of epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma caused
by c.T470C (p.M157T) of the keratin 9 gene in a Chinese
kindred. Prenatal Diagnosis, 29, 922–923.Christiano, A. M. (1997). Frontiers in keratodermas: Pushing the
envelope. Trends in Genetics, 13, 227–233.Coleman, C. M., Munro, C. S., Smith, F. J., et al. (1999).
Epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma due to a novel
type of keratin mutation, a 3-bp insertion in the keratin 9
helix termination motif. British Journal of Dermatology,140, 486–490.
Corden, L. D., & McLean, W. H. I. (1996). Human keratin
diseases: Hereditary fragility of specific epithelial tissues.
Experimental Dermatology, 5, 297–307.Covello, S. P., Irvine, A. D., McKenna, K. E., et al. (1998).
Mutations in keratin K9 in kindreds with epidermolytic
palmoplantar keratoderma and epidemiology in Northern
Ireland. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 111,1207–1209.
Da Rosa Santos, O. L. R., Amorim, J. H., & Voloch, K. (1997).
The Olmsted syndrome. International Journal of Dermatol-ogy, 36, 356–373.
Hatsell, S. J., Eady, R. A., Wennerstrand, L., et al. (2001). Novel
splice site mutation in keratin 1 underlies mild epidermolytic
palmoplantar keratoderma in three kindreds. The Journal ofInvestigative Dermatology, 116, 606–609.
He, X. H., Zhang, X. N., Mao, W., et al. (2004). A novel muta-
tion of keratin 9 in a large Chinese family with epidermolytic
palmoplantar keratoderma. British Journal of Dermatology,150, 647–651.
Lee, R. A., Yassaee, M., Bowe, W. P., et al. (2008). Keratosispalmaris et plantaris. Medscape Reference. Retreived July
28, 2008. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/arti-
cle/1108406-overview
Lucker, G. P. H., & Steijlen, P. M. (1994). The Olmsted syn-
drome: Mutilating palmoplantar and periorificial
keratoderma. Journal of the American Academy of Derma-tology, 31, 508–509.
Lucker, G. P., Van de Kerkhof, P. C., & Steijlen, P. M. (1994).
The hereditary palmoplantar keratoses: An updated review
and classification. British Journal of Dermatology, 131,1–14.
Navsaria, H. A., Swensson, O., Ratnavel, R. C., et al. (1995).
Ultrastructural changes resulting from keratin-9 gene muta-
tions in two families with epidermolytic palmoplantar
keratoderma. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology,104, 425–429.
Poulin, Y., Perry, H. O., & Muller, S. A. (1984). Olmsted
syndrome – congenital palmoplantar and periorificial
keratoderma. Journal of the American Academy of Derma-tology, 10, 600–610.
Ratnavel, R. C., & Griffiths, W. A. (1997). The inherited
palmoplantar keratodermas. British Journal of Dermatology,137, 485–490.
Reis, A., Hennies, H. C., Langbein, L., et al. (1994). Keratin 9
gene mutations in epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma
(EPPK). Nature Genetics, 6, 174–179.Reis, A., Kuster, W., Eckardt, R., et al. (1992). Mapping of
a gene for epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma to the
region of the acidic keratin gene cluster at 17q12-q21.
Human Genetics, 90, 113–116.Stevens, H. P., Kelsell, D. P., Bryant, S. P., et al. (1996).
Linkage of an American pedigree with palmoplantar
keratoderma and malignancy (palmoplantar ectodermal dys-
plasia type III) to 17q24. Literature survey and proposed
updated classification of the keratodermas. Arch Dermatol,132, 640–651.
Tao, J., Huang, C. Z., Yu, Nw, et al. (2008). Olmsted syndrome:
A case report and review of literature. International Journalof Dermatology, 47, 432–437.
Terron-Kwiatkowski, A., Paller, A. S., Compton, J., et al. (2002).
Two cases of primarily palmoplantar keratoderma associated
with novel mutations in keratin 1. The Journal of Investiga-tive Dermatology, 119, 966–971.
Terron-Kwiatkowski, A., van Steensel, M. A. M., van Geel, M.,
et al. (2006). Mutation S233L in the 1B domain of keratin 1
causes epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma with
“tonotubular” keratin. The Journal of Investigative Derma-tology, 126, 607–613.
Vorner, H. (1901). Zur Kenntnis des Keratoma hereditarium
palmare et plantare. Archiv f€ur Dermatologie und Syphilis,56, 3–31.
Epidermolytic Palmoplantar Keratoderma 753
a b c
Fig. 1 (a–c) A 47-year-old woman with epidermolytic
palmoplantar keratoderma showing diffuse keratoderma affect-
ing both the palms and the soles. The keratoderma had erythem-
atous border at the margins of both palms and soles and was
completely restricted to the palms and soles. The dorsa of the
hands and soles were spared. This patient has multiple affected
relatives in several generations
Fig. 2 This 17-year-old girl was seen for hyperkeratosis of the
palms and soles associated with severe nail hyperplasia of
the toes. She has mental retardation and short stature. Clinically
she has type IV epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma with
pachyonychia congenita Fig. 3 She has marked midfacial hypoplasia
754 Epidermolytic Palmoplantar Keratoderma
Fig. 4 Diffuse thickyellowish hyperkeratosis was
noted on her palms. Her soles
also have same thick yellowishhyperkeratosis
Fig. 5 Her toe nails show
subungual keratinous mass
pushing the nail bed upward
Epidermolytic Palmoplantar Keratoderma 755