Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
i
ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY
THE EXPLORATION OF MINDFULNESS AND FLOW IN AN ART
THERAPEUTIC CONTEXT
BY
RACHELA L. BUONINCONTRI
A Final Project submitted to the
Graduate Centre for Applied Psychology, Athabasca University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
MASTER OF COUNSELLING:
ART THERAPY SPECIALIZATION
Alberta
April 2009
ii
DEDICATION
This project is dedicated to the profession of art therapy and to those individuals that
believe in the power of creativity, imagination, and artistic expression to aid in healing
and transformation toward subjective well-being.
iii
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
The members of this final project committee are:
Name of Supervisor Dr. Paul Jerry
Name of Second Reader Dr. Kenneth Barabash
iv
ABSTRACT
This project provides a comprehensive review of the literature on art therapy,
mindfulness, and flow theory. An examination of the three topics in the area of
philosophical, theoretical and applied basis is discussed. An art therapy manual for
inducing mindfulness and flow is also included. The purpose of this project is two-fold
including: (a) to examine the relationship between mindfulness and flow through a
comprehensive literature review; and (b) to illustrate how such states of consciousness
can be induced in an art therapeutic context. The literature review sets the foundation for
the synthesis of mindfulness and flow, and also for the integration of inducing
mindfulness and flow in an art therapeutic context. The manual is intended as a guideline
for trained art therapists to induce states of mindfulness and flow with individual clients.
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
My academic endeavor was not only a journey into a new career but also an adventure of
self-discovery, including the passage leading to self-growth, self-love, and self-
acceptance. Thank you to my wonderful parents, brothers, and sister-in-laws for their
faith in me to continue towards a goal and dream that has always been incredibly
meaningful to me on a personal and academic level. Thank you to my beautiful nephews
for always bringing a smile to my face, for making me laugh, and for giving me the
opportunity to live joyfully in the moment! A special thank you goes out to all of my dear
friends that have offered support and encouragement over the past few years. You have
been a reliable pillar of strength. Thank you for believing in me and for believing in my
dreams even at times when I gave up. To my art therapy colleagues and classmates, thank
you for being an inspiration. I want to especially thank Laura Worrall for her guidance
and supervision. Heather Dawson, no words can express how much you mean to me and
how much I have learned from you – thank you. To Carmen Richardson for your
mentorship and genius creativity that is as beautiful to witness as it is to learn from. To
Amy and Nalini, thank-you for being you! Your friendship means the world to me. To
my practicum supervisor, Jim Haycock, thank you for believing in me and witnessing the
‘magic’ in the profession of art therapy! To my supervisor, Dr. Paul Jerry, a heartfelt
thanks for your wisdom, commitment, and dedication in assisting me to complete this
project.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………. ii
ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………… iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………… v
TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………… vi
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION………………………………………………... 1
Project Procedures……………………………………………………………...... 4
CHAPTER 2: ART THERAPY………………………………………………….. 6
Philosophical Basis of Art Therapy………………………………………………. 6
Theoretical Basis of Art Therapy………………………………………………… 10
Applied Basis of Art Therapy…………………………………………………….. 20
CHAPTER 3: MINDFULNESS………………………………………………….. 25
Philosophical Basis of Mindfulness………………………………………………. 25
Theoretical Basis of Mindfulness…………………………………………………. 28
Applied Basis of Mindfulness……………………………………………………. 34
CHAPTER 4: FLOW……………………………………………………………… 37
Philosophical Basis of Flow………………………………………………………. 37
Theoretical Basis of Flow…………………………………………………………. 44
Applied Basis of Flow…………………………………………………………….. 55
CHAPTER 5: SYNTHESIS……………………………………………………….. 58
References…………………………………………………………………………. 74
APPENDIX A: ART THERAPY PRACTICAL MANUAL……………………… 87
APPENDIX B: BETENSKY’S (2001) PHENOMENOLOGICAL METHOD........ 105
1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Art therapy, mindfulness, and flow have been receiving increased attention from
mental health practitioners, researchers, and the general public. According to some, art
therapy, mindfulness, and flow are processes by which a state of consciousness may be
derived that leads to an increased propensity towards health and well being (Gutman &
Schindler, 2007; Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Malchiodi, 2007). Research has been conducted in
the areas of art therapy, mindfulness, and flow but little is known about these three
subjects in relationship to one another. This paper proposes that flow and mindfulness are
present in an art therapeutic context (Malchiodi).
The profession of art therapy combines both art and therapy as a means towards
healing, transformation, and change (Malchiodi, 2007). Although, the profession is in an
early stage of development, it is strongly grounded in psychotherapeutic processes
(Rubin, 1999). To approach therapy in this manner is to consider that healing includes
the: (a) capacity for non-verbal means of expression; (b) cultivation of the mind-body
connection; and (c) propensity toward self-healing. Art therapy encourages clients to look
inward for answers to healing and to be open, honest, and accepting of what presents
itself through creative expression (Allen, 1995).
Mindfulness is a state of being and the focus is on awareness and acceptance of
the present moment (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Mindfulness is a process that supports inward
introspection of the mind and body; and through practices such as meditation, a state of
awakening may be attained (Kabat-Zinn). Awakening infers that there is an optimal state
of consciousness that can be attained through mindfulness. To approach therapy from the
mindfulness perspective proposes that awareness and acceptance of one’s internal and
2
external surroundings are essential to conscious and healthy living. Essentially,
mindfulness is focused on understanding the mechanisms of the mind and implies that
attention must be given to thoughts, sensations, and feelings presented in any given
moment (Kabat-Zinn).
Flow has been described as a “state of being while doing” (Warren, 2006, p.103);
it is a considered an optimal state of experience (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). This state of
optimal experience or flow is characterized by the complete absorption and focus of
attention on the activity at hand (Schmidt, Shernoff, & Csikszentmihalyi, 2007). When
individuals experience flow their perception of time becomes warped and they perceive
the experience as pleasurable and enjoyable (Csikszentmihalyi). Proponents of flow
theory state that by focusing one’s attention on an activity for its own sake, subjective
well-being and an expanded sense of self is obtained (Csikszentmihalyi). After a flow
experience, individuals describe feeling a sense of accomplishment and increased self-
esteem (Csikszentmihalyi). The concept of flow falls under the umbrella of positive
psychology where the strength of human capacity is of focus and where research is
centered on ascertaining what leads to happiness or subjective well-being (Nakamura &
Csikszentmihalyi, 2002).
There are currently several branches of research that describe the relationship
between mindfulness and flow. One branch of research sees mindfulness and flow as
conceptually similar states of consciousness (e.g., Budilovsky & Adamson, 2002).
Another branch supports the notion that mindfulness and flow share some similar
characteristics or elements but consider them to be distinctive processes (e.g., Gutman &
Schindler, 2007). A third branch proposes that the two states are in symbiotic relationship
3
to one another whereby, the propensity to be in a mindfulness state also increases one’s
flow state (e.g., Germer, Siegel, & Fulton, 2005; Kee & Wang, 2008). Clearly our
understanding of mindfulness and flow, and their relationship to one another in a
psychotherapeutic context requires clarification. Researchers propose that interventions
must be created in order to induce states of mindfulness and flow (Germer et al., 2005;
Warren, 2006); art therapy may be a viable discipline (Malchiodi, 2007; Warren). Art
therapy may serve as a bridge or a means for creating flow and mindfulness in a
therapeutic setting (Malchiodi; Warren). For example, Warren (2006) proposed that art
therapy is a natural approach to facilitating a flow experience. Art therapy offers the
client the opportunity to be completely focused and absorbed in art-making. To
understand the relationship between flow and mindfulness has important implications not
only for art therapy, but for counselling in general and the profession of psychology as a
whole. If such states of being and doing reflect healthy practices for living, then they
require further examination and analysis.
This paper investigates the processes of art therapy, mindfulness, and flow and
synthesizes information regarding their interrelationship with one another. The goal of
the paper is to increase understanding of the processes of art therapy, mindfulness, and
flow, on their own, combined, and within the context of psychotherapeutic practice. The
paper is oriented toward informing psychotherapeutic practice, specifically art therapy
practice, and to facilitate future research in this area.
In this paper, a chapter is devoted to each term – art therapy, mindfulness, and
flow. It is evident from the literature on art therapy, mindfulness, and flow that there are
many similarities philosophically, theoretically, and within an applied context. Each
4
chapter begins with a thorough understanding of the philosophical basis of the term as it
sets the foundation for comprehending: (a) the historical tone for which the term was
intended; and (b) explaining the initial use and basis for the term in a psychological
context. Second, the theoretical basis of each term will be reviewed, specifically, the
psychological mechanisms, processes, or characteristics deemed important in effecting
change. Third, the applied basis of each term will be evaluated such that an understanding
on how to induce such a state can be attained. After a comprehensive review of each
term, comparison and synthesis of the terms will be discussed in the fifth chapter of this
paper. This paper ends with a manual (see Appendix A) on how to induce mindfulness
and flow in an art therapeutic context. The manual includes a description of mindfulness
states and flow. The manual is intended to assist art therapists to induce a state of
mindfulness and flow with clients through specific art therapy interventions in order to
increase subjective well-being.
Project Procedures
In development of the comprehensive review, current available information on art
therapy, mindfulness, and flow was found through searching library collections and
appropriate databases. Such databases included PsycINFO, PsycArticles, and MEDLINE
via the Athabasca University Library and the University of Calgary Library. Various
books were accessed from the following libraries: (a) the University of Calgary, (b)
Athabasca University, (c) the Vancouver Art Therapy Institute, and (d) the City of
Calgary Public Library. Keywords applied in the search included mindfulness,
meditation, flow, optimal experience, art therapy, creativity, and psychotherapy. Further,
5
the reference lists of studies retrieved in the initial search were reviewed, and relevant
publications were selected.
In order to create the practical application component of this paper, the art therapy
manual is based on information gathered from the comprehensive review. Underlying the
manual is information outlining the theoretical and conceptual basis of mindfulness states
and flow, and information on the importance of inducing such states of consciousness in
an art therapeutic context. In addition, art therapy-based interventions for inducing
mindfulness states and flow are suggested.
6
CHAPTER 2: ART THERAPY
Philosophical Basis of Art Therapy
Art Therapy
There are many events, circumstances, and influential people that have set the
foundation for the development of art therapy. Art therapy is an evolving field that has
been influenced by: (a) related fields such as art, art history, psychology, psychiatry, and
anthropology; (b) unique historical events in the twentieth century; and (c) pioneers that
advanced the development and movement of the field (Malchiodi, 2007). The following
section describes how art therapy advanced over time.
Development of Art Therapy
Throughout history humans have created art for several different reasons
including as a form of communication, symbolic expression, healing ritual, worship,
magic, to relieve physical and psychological pain, and as a form of protection to ward off
evil (Edwards, 2004; Malchiodi, 2007). Art has been documented since about 20,000
B.C. or as early as the Stone Age period whereby art was considered a natural instinct
such as language is today (Malchiodi, p. 23). Caves were marked with images and
symbols believed to serve as a form of symbolic communication. There is proof through
art that humanity has a strong bond through the language of visual art (Malchiodi). The
view of art over centuries may be an indication of the purposefulness of art and why it is
viewed as therapeutic (Malchiodi; McNiff, 1981). There are similarities in the way art
was viewed in ancient times and how it is viewed today in contemporary cultures
(Malchiodi; McNiff; Rubin, 1999; Wadeson, 1980). According to McNiff “Today’s art
therapists are practicing one of the most ancient forms of healing” (p. 5).
7
In the early twentieth century, art therapy advanced due to: (a) popularity gained
by psychoanalysis; (b) interest in symbolic and spontaneous images; and (c) psychiatry’s
fascination with the art produced by those suffering from mental illnesses (Malchiodi,
2007). During this period there was movement toward understanding the human psyche,
particularly the unconscious (Douglas, 2005). Psychoanalysis gained popularity as
Sigmund Freud’s and Carl Jung’s work linking the psyche and visual expression
progressed (Arlow, 2005; Douglas; Malchiodi).
Freud (as cited in Edwards, 2004) posited that the unconscious played a
significant role in neurosis, dreams, and the art work of his patients. He discovered early
on with his patients that their communication was actually a description of visual images
(as cited in Rubin, 1999). He recognized that dreams could be linked to the unconscious
and further expressed visually by his clients but not verbally (as cited by Wadeson,
1980). In addition to his recognition of the unconscious and visual expression, Freud also
proposed that individuals engaging in creative and imaginative processes were
denouncing reality (as cited in Edwards). Although Freud inspired others to see the
connection between art expression and the inner psyche, he favored reason and intellect
over the intuitive, creative, imaginative, and artistic aspects of psychological life and was
more interested in free association and verbal therapy (as cited in Rubin).
Carl Jung (as cited in Edwards, 2004) on the other hand, believed that the arts
were a way to reveal the unconscious. Jung encouraged his patients to express themselves
through art analysis to gain awareness of their emotions thereby leading to well-being
and positive change (as cited in Douglas, 2005). Jung was intrigued with the art
expression of his patients and throughout his career he explored his own inner psyche
8
through artistic expression, especially during times of personal crisis (as cited in
Edwards, 2001).
Carl Jung’s work influenced other professionals including Hanz Prinzhorn.
Prinzhorn was a psychiatrist in the 1920s that was intrigued with the creative process and
artistic expression of mentally ill patients (as cited in Hinz, 2006). He collected over five
thousand art pieces from patients throughout Europe for his research. Prinzhorn (as cited
in Malchiodi, 2007) believed that humans have a “universal creative urge” or drive
towards personal expression and communication that is “basic to all people, with or
without mental illness and that art was a natural way to achieve psychological integration
and wellness” (p. 27).
Art Therapy Pioneers
Art expression developed as a therapeutic modality with the efforts of pioneers
such as Edith Kramer and Margaret Naumburg (as cited in Wadeson, 1980). Both women
predicate their theories based on psychoanalytical theory and the belief that art expression
allows for unconscious material to be revealed (as cited in Rubin, 1999). By mid-century,
when Naumburg’s and Kramer’s work flourished there was a rising belief that art making
and the creative process could be a transformative and a rehabilitative force leading to
change and growth in clients (as cited in Malchiodi, 2007). Art focused on the subjective
reality and self-expression of the artists rather than on their external environment (as
cited in Edwards, 2004).
Margaret Naumburg was the founder of the Walden School in New York and has
been credited with introducing art as a therapeutic modality in the 1940s (Peterson, 2006;
Rubin, 1999). She was “one of the first to delineate art therapy as a distinctive form of
9
psychotherapy” (Malchiodi, 2007, p. 36), whereas, Kramer in the 1950s emphasized art
as therapy rather than as a tool in psychotherapy (Malchiodi). Kramer (2002) emphasized
the client’s purpose to express “inner truth” through their art (p. 222). She encouraged her
clients to express their authentic self and allow for genuine and truthful expression
through the art work in moving toward an integrated and reconciled emotional state
(Kramer, 2002). Naumburg (as cited in Rubin, 1999) emphasized psychoanalytical
techniques like free association and transference in art therapy to obtain client change. In
summary, Naumburg posited the use of art in therapy and Kramer advocated art as
therapy. The distinction is significant in understanding the theoretical and practical use of
art therapy today; art therapy has been developed along these two streams of thought
(Waller, 1993).
Art Therapy Today
Art therapy is practiced all over the world in a variety of settings (Peterson, 2006;
Stoll, 2005). It is being applied in mental health agencies, nursing homes, drug and
alcohol addiction centers, prisons, schools, hospitals, private practice, open studios,
halfway houses, wellness centers, corporate settings, outreach programs, and
rehabilitative centers for developmentally and physically challenged individuals
(Malchiodi, 2007; Peterson). Art therapists work with individuals, couples, families,
groups, communities, and may also be found working in settings as part of a clinical team
(Malchiodi; Peterson). Art therapy’s use is not limited to specific populations or age
groups (Malchiodi).
Art therapists around the world have unique standards for practicing as a
professional (Stoll, 2005). For example, art therapists may be found working as
10
psychologists, social workers, educators, occupational therapists, and nurses (Stoll).
There is a desire to establish universally recognized academic programs and professional
standards of practice (Stoll). It is uncertain whether the profession will be restricted to
licensed art therapists in the future (McNiff, 1997). As a result of the diversity in practice
and in educational standards, art therapy has developed from one-nation to the next
according to social, economic, and cultural circumstances (Stoll). Yet, the power of art
therapy is undeniable throughout the world and for this reason continues to expand and
grow as a profession (McNiff; Stoll).
Theoretical Basis of Art Therapy
Art Therapy Defined
According to the Canadian Art Therapy Association (CATA, n.d.) and the
American Art Therapy Association (AATA, 2009), art therapy is a mental health
profession that combines the intentional use of art as a therapeutic intervention to
enhance the well-being of individuals on a physical, emotional and mental level. Art
therapy includes the utilization of images, symbols, and creativity to express one’s self
through visual means with the use of diverse art materials or media (Malchiodi, 2007).
The creative expression helps individuals to increase self-awareness and autonomy,
problem-solve, regulate emotions, expand interpersonal skills, and reduce stress (AATA).
The art materials and application is the main form of communication, however, verbal
and non-verbal means of expression are encouraged as well (Kahn, 1999). The art
creation and expression are at the core of art therapy practice (Malchiodi).
The above definition is not universally accepted (Stoll, 2005). Operationally
defining art therapy has been a problem for a number of different reasons (Stoll; Ulman,
11
2001). One, art therapy is used in diverse practices such as rehabilitation, education,
nursing, social work, and psychotherapy, and practice standards are based on the needs of
the organization (Stoll; Ulman). Second, art therapists have differing views and theories
on what art therapy is (Ulman). Third, the profession is young and evolving (Stoll).
Possibly the only point of agreement in defining art therapy by professionals is that “the
visual arts are used in some attempt to assist integration or reintegration of personality”
(Ulman, para 2). Art therapy is a unique form of psychotherapy that is more than the sum
of its parts (Betensky, 1995). Although many diverse practitioners are incorporating art in
therapy, this is not art therapy. Art therapy requires specialized training in the art therapy
process that is beyond the training required for counselors, psychologists, social workers,
and nurses (Heywood, 2003; Rubin, 1999).
There are two general categories by which art therapists define art therapy; one
definition is based on the art making process, and the other on the art product (Malchiodi,
2007). Art as therapy emphasizes the importance of the art-making process and the
inherent healing power of creative expression. This view proposes that art-making is
healing and transformative on its own. McNiff (1992) writes about art making as
medicine and refers to it as a form of depth psychology whereby the psyche is deeply
explored. Such exploration and art creation leads to healing. There are several authors
that have created art to heal from illness or life difficulties (e.g., Coupar, 1992; Swados,
2005). The second definition of art therapy is called art psychotherapy; it emphasizes the
therapeutic process including the art product and its symbolic communication
(Malchiodi, 2002; Rubin, 1999). The final art product becomes significant in not only
enhancing communication between the client and therapist but also in allowing the client
12
to express her issues, concerns, conflicts, and emotions via the art product (Malchiodi,
2007). Some art therapists base their work on one or a combination of both of these
definitions (Malchiodi, 2007).
Efficacy of Art Therapy
Despite the fact that art therapy has been evolving for several decades, the
efficacy of art therapy has been largely unevaluated (Gabriel et al., 2001). Only very
recently has the effectiveness of art therapy been investigated empirically through
scientific study and quantitative research (Eaton, Doherty, & Widrick, 2007; Saunders &
Saunders, 2007). Earlier studies reviewing the efficacy of art therapy were based on case
studies and qualitative reports (Reynolds, Nabors, & Quinlan, 2000; Saunders &
Saunders). The lack of empirical research in art therapy may be attributed to art therapists
not receiving formal training in conducting experimental research (Tibbets, 1995).
Another problem is in deciding what aspect art therapy should be studied (Gantt,
1998). The interest in research ranges from “how, what, why and what effect” (Gantt,
para 4). Some questions that require further research include: How do people draw? Why
do people draw? What effect does art making have on one’s psychological or physical
well-being? Where does symbolic content come from? (Gantt). Although there are
difficulties in gaining empirical evidence for the efficacy of art therapy, research in this
area is expanding (Eaton et al., 2007).
Several pilot studies have been conducted to determine the usefulness of art
therapy in improving psychological well-being in the treatment of patients suffering from
depression (e.g., Bar-Sela et al., 2007); chemical dependency (e.g., Dickman, Dunn, &
Wolf, 1996); grief and loss (e.g., Graham & Suntag, 2001); posttraumatic stress disorder
13
(e.g., Lyshak-Stetzler, Singer, St. John, et al., 2007); and trauma (e.g., Eaton et al., 2007).
These studies found support for art therapy as an effective intervention. It is imperative
that further empirical research be performed in examining the efficacy of art therapy.
Art therapy is not only an enjoyable means for gaining therapeutic insight; also,
many studies propose that art therapy is effective in improving health and well-being
(Saunders & Saunders, 2007). Several quantitative studies in art therapy have
investigated the behavioural or attitudinal changes of clients involved in art therapy
(Brooke, 1995; Rosal, 1993; Saunders & Saunders). Most studies evaluated an outcome
measure before and after the use of art therapy concluding that there were significant
improvements in the outcome measure (e.g., Harvey, 1989; Saunders & Saunders). For
example, Saunders and Saunders (2007) completed a quantitative study reviewing the
effectiveness of an art therapy program with children struggling with behavioural and
attitudinal concerns such as aggression, depression, alcohol/drug abuse, and self-esteem.
The study found that the art therapy program had a significantly positive impact on all 94
children in the program. The behavioural ratings decreased significantly in severity and
frequency after the art therapy intervention. For example, hyperactivity, poor
concentration, poor motivation, fighting and other behaviours were found to decrease in
severity and frequency as compared to the participants’ intake scores.
The limitation of art therapy research is that the majority of studies lack a control
group (Reynolds et al., 2000). Scholars recommend that additional studies in assessing
the effectiveness of art therapy be conducted (Reynolds et al.). Art therapists are
determining the best way to conduct empirical research on a field of study that bridges art
and therapy, while taking into consideration the complexity of mind and body
14
proponents, such as creativity and artistic expression as personal and unique attributes of
the individual.
Mechanisms of Art Therapy
Scholars are interested in understanding how and why art therapy works. What
mechanisms, factors, or processes contribute to its effectiveness? What benefits and
therapeutic value does art therapy provide? Art therapists recognize the transformative
power of art therapy and subscribe to a number of different beliefs about how art therapy
influences health and well being. Some art therapists argue for the importance of: (a)
psychoanalytical processes (Rubin, 1999; Ulman, 2001); (b) creative and imaginative
processes (London, 1989; McNiff, 1981; Csikszentmihalyi, 1996); (c) authentic
expression or self-awareness gained from art making (Allen, 1995); and (d)
phenomenological perspective (Betensky, 1995, 2001; Knill, Levine, & Levine, 2004).
Aside from such diverse beliefs, since art therapy emerged directly from two movements:
(a) psychoanalysis’s belief that images are representations of the unconscious; and (b)
belief that art-making and the creative process have therapeutic value, these primary
mechanisms will be reviewed in this section (Malchiodi, 2007). Specifically, the
unconscious, creativity, and imagination will be discussed in the context of art therapy
practice.
The unconscious. Psychoanalysis is based on the theory that the human psyche is
composed of conscious and unconscious elements (Arlow, 2005; Edwards, 2004).
Through psychoanalytical processes, the inner world or that which remains unconscious
is revealed which leads to the integration of the psyche (Arlow; Edwards).
15
Psychoanalysis has played a role in the development of art therapy and offers both a
theory and method for understanding the processes of art therapy (Edwards).
From a psychoanalytical perspective, art therapy is concerned with gaining access
into the inner world of the individual and relating such processes to the external world
(Edwards, 2004). Self-understanding is gained by externalizing and exposing internal
processes through art-making (Edwards; Malchiodi, 2007). According to psychoanalysis,
the unconscious reveals itself in a number of different ways through art expression
including by: (a) free association; (b) symbolic communication; and (c) metaphors
(Malchiodi).
Free association is the free flow of thoughts that are expressed without
censorship, criticism, or disparagement; the client expresses his truth (Arlow, 2005).
Freud developed this concept as a way of clinically working with his clients to uncover
the unconscious process and understand human behaviour (Arlow; Malchiodi, 2007).
Free association is seen in art therapy through spontaneous or free drawings (Malchiodi).
It is believed that when a client expresses himself freely that the art expression is a
manifestation of unconscious workings. The image or art creation increases self-
understanding when explored through free association with an art therapist (Malchiodi).
Through art making the unconscious reveals itself through symbolic
communication (Malchiodi, 2002). It is believed that the unconscious is projected in
visual form and expresses the client’s fears, dreams, and fantasies (Malchiodi, 2002). The
image becomes a form of symbolic communication from unconscious processes. Self-
awareness increases when unconscious components of the psyche become available
through creative work (Kramer, 2001). The final art product becomes significant in not
16
only enhancing communication between the client and therapist, but also in serving as an
external object to allow the client to discuss his problems, feelings and thoughts via the
art product (Malchiodi, 2007).
A metaphor is a “figure of speech used to imply that the properties or qualities
possessed by one thing are like those belonging to something else” (Edwards, 2004, p.
61). In art therapy a metaphor is used the same way as it is used verbally to “evoke an
idea or emotion beyond the specific object depicted” (Edwards, p. 61). Metaphors assist
in communicating a message that may be difficult to articulate. In addition, metaphors
have the potential to expand expression and also create an opportunity for viewing
something in a new and novel way. In art therapy a client draws a picture that is
figuratively an expression of her state of mind and is depicted through the image
metaphorically (Edwards). Art therapists pay attention to the client’s expression and
thoughts about the metaphorical image looking for opportunities to expand awareness
(Edwards).
Through psychoanalytical theory an understanding of the processes in art therapy
are apparent. In addition to the benefits of exposing the unconscious through free
association, symbolic communication, and metaphors, other secondary processes may
also occur during art therapy such as: (a) cathartic release; (b) self-expression; and (c)
positive physiological responses. Catharsis is the emotional release that comes from the
expulsion and expression of strong emotions (Malchiodi, 2007). The art acts as a
container for difficult emotions and sensations. The art-making process becomes a form
of self expression whereby the art gives the emotions a cognitive-linguistic voice
(Malchiodi, 2007). In addition, art therapy has an influence on the mind-body connection
17
whereby a relaxed physiological response can be experienced (Malchiodi, 2005). Art
therapy can engage the body’s relaxation response further encouraging emotional
stability, reducing stress and anxiety, and improving the therapeutic alliance (Malchiodi,
2003). Studies show that art making may act as a form of meditation that also has a
positive effect on reducing stress and anxiety (Malchiodi, 2007).
Many studies have been conducted to support psychoanalytical processes in
therapeutic practice (Arlow, 2005). Yet, little research has reviewed such processes in an
art therapeutic context. From psychoanalysis, art therapy gains a theory and a model for
practice (Edwards, 2004). Psychoanalytical mechanisms such as free association,
symbolic communication, metaphors, self-expression, catharsis, and physiological
response of the mind and body offer an understanding for how and why art therapy
works. Many art therapists follow psychoanalytical theory to guide their art therapy
practice, thereby recognizing the psychoanalytical mechanisms that play a role in its
function (Edwards).
Creativity. Creativity is defined as the ability to generate a novel idea or product
into existence (Malchiodi, 2007). A creative individual has qualities and characteristics
that may include: “spontaneity, playfulness, imagination, motivation, originality, self-
expression, inventiveness, divergent thinking, and intuition” (Malchiodi, p. 65).
Researchers propose that a creative individual possess the ability to be autonomous,
flexible, self-accepting, assertive, resourceful, persistent, and nonconforming (Ivcevic &
Mayer, 2006). Self-expression plays a significant role in everyday creativity (Ivcevic &
Mayer). Researchers propose that creativity and imagination have therapeutic value and
lead to healthy approaches to living (London, 1989; Peterson & Seligman, 2004). An
18
important factor in art therapy is to allow a client to increase her creative potential and to
enter into a state of using her imagination to improve health and well-being (Malchiodi).
Art therapy cultivates an environment for creativity to occur. Allowing a client to focus
her energy and attention on creativity enables her to tap into new ways of thinking and
being in the world (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997; London). Art therapy honors creativity and
encourages original thinking.
The interest in creativity is growing within the field of psychology (Peterson &
Seligman, 2004; Simington, 2000). Creativity is seen as a sign of positive mental health
and optimal functioning (Simington). Cognitive, clinical, personality, and developmental
psychologies are interested in understanding creativity in the context of their theoretical
orientations (Peterson & Seligman). For example, personality psychologists are interested
in understanding personal characteristics, morals, values, and traits related to creativity
(Peterson & Seligman). In addition, clinical psychologists are moving towards
understanding creativity as an intervention modality, such as applying art therapy in
clinical treatments (Peterson & Seligman).
According to Peterson and Seligman (2004), there are a number of character
strengths and virtues that are important in the classification system of positive
psychology. Such strengths are meaningful in leading a good life. One such character
strength is creativity. Creativity falls under the following criteria in positive psychology’s
classification system noting that creativity is: (a) fulfilling, (b) morally valued, and (c)
not diminishing of others (Peterson & Seligman). One, creativity is fulfilling and most
people enjoy making art. The creative act itself is intrinsically motivating whereby the
individual finds personal satisfaction in the act itself. Second, creativity is morally valued
19
whereby the art creation can elicit purpose, beauty, and expression into the world.
People’s creative expressions are encouraged, without creativity the development and
expansion of civilization would cease. For example, lights, cars, computers, and airplanes
are all creative accomplishments that have expanded our human existence. Third,
creativity does not diminish others; in fact, it may inspire and encourage others to be
creative as well. Creativity is seen as a positive sign of subjective well-being and mental
health (Peterson & Seligman). Hence, creative therapies such as art and music therapy
have emerged to “promote psychological adjustment and growth through creative
expression” (Peterson & Seligman, p. 96).
Art making as a creative process allows an individual to express himself
imaginatively; over time transformation and reparation in personality formation occurs
(Malchiodi, 2007). The art product can facilitate new understanding to the problem, and
bring new perceptions and insights leading to growth, healing, and positive changes
(Malchiodi).
Imagination. Creativity allows individuals to access their “greatest resource” – the
imagination (Allen, 1995, p. 3). Imagination permits an individual to access
opportunities, choice, and potential (Allen). Fostering a relationship with one’s
imagination is a chance to develop a “relationship with our deepest self” (Allen, p. 3). Art
therapy provides access into the imagination, encouraging an individual to intimately
know himself while doing so in a manner that enables him to see past patterns and
problems that have held him back (Allen).
According to Knill, Levine, and Levine (2004), de-centering is about moving
away from the thought patterns or rigid thinking that emerges during problem solving; to
20
focus or move away from the problem at hand and move into a liminal space of the
imagination. In art therapy the client is able to open up to an alternative experience of the
world through art making and perhaps even play. By externalizing inner processes
through art making, the client is able to gain distance from the problem or concern and
detach from the experience and approach it from a novel view (Knill et al., 2004). Silence
serves this function by replacing verbal expression with the act of doing and participating
actively in life.
The mechanisms associated with psychoanalysis, creativity and imagination are
potential advocates for establishing how art therapy works and for extrapolating the
essential therapeutic factors for its effectiveness. Art therapy utilizes internal sources of
the psyche by revealing unconscious processes and increasing self-awareness (Allen,
1995; Arlow, 2005; Edwards, 2004; Malchiodi, 2002, 2007). Creativity and imagination
foster new ways of thinking and being in the world allowing clients to think, feel, and
participate in life fully (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996; Knill et al., 2004; London, 1989;
Peterson & Seligman, 2004). Although there is limited research on the mechanisms of art
therapy, the theories that researchers and art therapists propose are vast, and with further
research will continue to establish the profession of art therapy.
Applied Basis of Art Therapy
Art Supplies
The art therapist supplies art materials including paper, oil pastels, chalk pastels,
pencils, felt markers, paint, scissors, glue, magazines or other collage materials, glitter,
clay, notebook for writing, and other supplies as needed (Hogan, 2001; Malchiodi, 2007).
The art materials range from being fluid to resistant; diverse materials elicit different
21
emotional responses (Peterson, 2006; Malchiodi). The materials are assorted to provide
clients with an array of products to engage their senses and to encourage creative
expression (Hogan).
Directive versus Nondirective Approach
Art therapy utilizes two main approaches to art-making: (a) directive; and (b) non-
directive (Malchiodi, 2007). A directive approach includes instruction from the art
therapist to create art according to a specific theme (Malchiodi). Some examples of
directives include drawing: (a) your family as trees in the forest; (b) an emotional
landscape; and (c) a self-portrait. A nondirective approach is also called a free or
spontaneous drawing whereby the client receives no direction from the art therapist
(Malchiodi). Although both types elicit personal expression, directives elicit a particular
art outcome and goal from the client whereas free drawings are spontaneous. Art
therapists will choose to be directive or nondirective based on the needs and responses of
the client (Malchiodi).
Attitudinal Characteristics
In art therapy there are attitudinal characteristics in the client that must be
nurtured in order to support the process. Characteristics that contribute to the
effectiveness of art therapy include a permissive attitude, non-judgment, openness to new
experiences, letting go of self-criticism, acceptance of the process and art work, and
intention and commitment (Malchiodi, 2007). The art therapist is responsible for creating
a therapeutic space and alliance conducive to including such attitudinal characteristics.
Therapeutic Space
22
Edwards (2004) writes about the boundary or physical space required for art
therapy. The art space serves a function and includes specific rules. It is a temporary
space dedicated to the expression of the imaginative and creative inner world (Edwards,
2004; Knill et al., 2004). Further, the space serves to differentiate between external
reality and internal symbolic expression (Edwards).
The physical conditions that must be present include a clear and consistent
approach to offering the client art materials, encouraging their use, facilitating self-
expression, and reflecting upon the final art product, if the client agrees to do so (Rubin,
1999). Safety in therapy means that the client has the option to discuss the meaning of her
art product or sit with the image (Malchiodi, 2007; Rubin). The therapist is respectful of
the client’s decision and creates a space that allows the client to feel safe and secure
(Rubin). Respecting the client’s art is a means for respecting the client and allowing her
to express her self authentically.
In art therapy, the first step is to create the environment and then to focus on
evoking expression (Rubin, 1999). The client is given the freedom to express her self
creatively. The client is also given the opportunity to find catharsis in the process of art
making as well as reflect on how it felt to create art and express ideas, feelings, concerns
through the final art product (Rubin).
The challenge that art therapists face is to find the best approach to help a client
understand her self through the art in a way that is meaningful (Rubin, 1999). This can be
done verbally or non-verbally through diverse means such as talking about what appears
aesthetically in the image, creative writing, poetry, drama, using metaphors or symbolic
speech, and free association discussing whatever the image evokes for the client (Rubin).
23
Meaning may also be evoked nonverbally by viewing the image and allowing its
expression to be present; the art therapist acts as a witness to the art process and product
(Rubin).
Therapeutic Alliance
The therapeutic process in art therapy involves a triangular relationship between
the client, art therapist, and the artwork (Edwards, 2004). The therapist’s presence is
meaningful in art therapy as he serves as a witness to the art making process and to the
final art product (Edwards). In verbal therapy, the client and therapist solely contribute to
the therapeutic alliance; however, in art therapy the artwork adds a third component. The
dynamic interaction requires that the art therapist play an active role in deciphering when
to interact with the client and when to permit the art-making process to be the focal point
in the therapeutic process (Edwards).
To Process or Not to Process
Art therapy contains several dimensions for learning and self-discovery which
may include processing the final art product or solely witnessing the artwork (Malchiodi,
2007). Meaning can be found in processing the final art product with the therapist or
through other means such as journal writing, poetry, drama or sharing with others. To
process the final product further or to solely witness the final art product is the client’s
choice.
The following are examples of questions an art therapist may ask a client in order
to process the final art product: What was the art-making process like for you? What
comes to mind when you look at the art piece? What stands out? Tell me about the art
piece. List five words that come to mind when looking at the art piece. What title do you
24
give the art piece? Are there any changes you would make to the art piece? There are
several ways an art therapist can process the art product with a client, but what is most
important is to help the client find meaning through creative expression.
Conclusion
Positive attributes of art therapy include that it can be: (a) an enjoyable approach
to therapy; (b) utilized with diverse individuals, couples, and group settings; and (c) used
for different client concerns and issues (Malchiodi, 2007). Art therapy serves a number of
different functions but has one primary goal. This goal is fostering a movement toward
psychological well-being (Malchiodi). Art therapy empowers clients to gain self-
awareness of their thoughts, feelings, sensations, and to understand their life
circumstances through the art-making process (Malchiodi). Art therapy is a
phenomenological approach to self-discovery (Betensky, 1995, 2001). Such personal
understanding leads to the ability to self-support, self-regulate, self-sustain, and heal
through awareness (Johnson, 1998).
25
CHAPTER 3: MINDFULNESS
Philosophical Basis of Mindfulness
Mindfulness Defined
Mindfulness is a quality of presence that requires gentleness and acceptance (Bien
& Bien, 2003). It entails the capacity to live life in the present moment with the ability to
do so freely without attachment, judgment, reservation, or analysis and with a willingness
and intention to accept life here and now (Bien & Bien; Bishop, 2002; Brown & Ryan,
2003; Kabat-Zinn, 1990). There are many misconceptions about what mindfulness is, to
clarify, mindfulness is not a relaxation technique, positive thinking, a trance state, or an
approach to avoiding difficulty (Brantley, 2007). The following section will explore the
philosophical basis of mindfulness including: (a) the historical basis of the mindfulness in
Buddhist philosophy, and (b) a philosophical description of the term.
Historical Basis of Mindfulness
Mindfulness originated 2,500 years ago from the teachings of the Eastern
philosophy, Buddhism (Gowans, 2003). The story begins with a Prince named Siddhartha
Gautama who lived in India; he later became known as Buddha, the enlightened one
(Gowans). The literature states that Siddhartha was shielded from the outside world as he
lived secluded within the palace gates. However, Siddhartha made his way out of the
palace and into the real world; for the first time he witnessed sickness, old age, and death.
Deeply disturbed by the suffering in the world, Siddhartha left his wife, son, and the
comfort of the palace gates to search for understanding of and liberation from human
suffering (Gowans). Undertaking several diverse practices and following various
teachers, Siddhartha discovered that by quieting the mind, inner peace and enlightenment
26
could be attained (Gowans). Buddha spent much time meditating and spoke of such a
state of mindfulness as being ‘Awake’ (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). Awakening is considered an
optimal state of experience that includes deep awareness of the present moment (Kabat-
Zinn; Shapiro et al., 2006). Buddha was candidly an historical man that investigated his
own mind and the mind’s working in understanding human suffering (Kabat-Zinn).
Buddha believed that suffering was an inevitable part of life. He educated people
about his view of suffering and spoke of the cessation of suffering by focusing the mind
through meditation and by awakening to life (Gowans, 2003; Kabat-Zinn, 2005). Buddha
taught people that the potential for inner peace and well-being is linked to mindfulness
and by approaching life with a compassionate heart (Gowans). At the centre of
mindfulness teaching is an approach to being fully present in the world. Buddha’s
teachings are found in the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path (see Gowans).
Mindfulness as a State of Being
Mindfulness is a difficult term to comprehend because it describes not only a
practice but a way of being (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Mindfulness is not a state of achievement
or a goal to be realized; it is a compassionate state of being that requires one to look
inward towards his heart’s intrinsic capacity. Intrinsic qualities such as affection,
compassion, openness, and kindness are required (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Mindfulness is not
about changing who we are but about accepting and acknowledging who we are (Kabat-
Zinn, 1990). In essence, mindfulness is not a prescription on how to live life, but on how
to approach life and be fully engaged in life, as we are (Kabat-Zinn, 2005).
Mindfulness is based on the belief that the wandering mind is the source of human
suffering (Kabat-Zinn, 1990, 2005). According to Wallace and Shapiro (2007) all
27
individuals are prone to cognitive imbalances that stem from the wandering mind; such
imbalances include: (a) cognitive deficit or absentmindedness; (b) cognitive
hyperactivity, whereby the mind is overactive and prone to misconceptions and
assumptions; and (c) cognitive dysfunction or misapprehension of circumstances. Central
to mindfulness practice is to overcome cognitive imbalance (Wallace & Shapiro).
Mindfulness is about attending to what the mind is doing, and through stillness
one may lead her life with intention and awareness (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). According to
Kabat-Zinn (2005) “In awakening, we free ourselves from the suffering and anguish that
come from mis-taking the nature of reality…” (p. 129). Awakening is about bringing
awareness to the cognitive imbalances that shadow our daily life. Mindfulness has been
described as “psychological freedom” and as “emancipation from one’s own habitual
view of self and the world” (Martin, 1997, p. 293). In short, mindfulness is about
stepping back from the incessant workings of the mind and instead cultivating a
conscious and objective approach to living that is focused on the here and now (Kabat-
Zinn, 1990).
Mindfulness Today
Historically, mindfulness is based in Buddhist teachings and the experiences of
the Buddha’s understanding of human suffering. Today the term offers additional views
as related to health and well-being and serves as a complement to treating illness (Kabat-
Zinn, 1990, 2005). People today commonly suffer from stress, overexertion, depression,
anxiety, and other physical and psychological illnesses that are prominent in our fast-
paced world (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Our thoughts are clouded, our lives are overrun with
things to do; this is an unhealthy and unproductive approach to living (Kabat-Zinn,
28
1990). Our mind is consumed and the focus of our attention is suboptimal. Mindfulness is
not only a philosophy; it also holds prominence in improving psychological and physical
health through practice and application (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). The next section will review
the integration of mindfulness in the context of psychology.
Theoretical Basis of Mindfulness
Mindfulness and Health
Mindfulness has historically been practiced within a spiritual context; however,
its application in psychotherapeutic practice is relatively recent and not affiliated with
any particular philosophy or belief (Allen, Blashki, & Gullone, 2006; Kabat-Zinn, 2005).
Mindfulness in the context of mental health has been adopted as a form of treatment
employed to increase awareness and mental skills to better deal with emotional,
behavioural, and cognitive maladjustments associated with disorders (Bishop et al., 2004;
Segal, Williams, & Teasdale, 2002). Mindfulness-based approaches have been applied
primarily in the treatment of stress reduction (Kabat-Zinn, 2005), and as a supporting
form of cognitive treatment to combat the relapse/recurrence of depression (Segal et al.;
Teasdale et al., 2000).
Recently an interest in mindfulness in psychotherapy has been developed as a
result of two main approaches: (a) Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) (Kabat-
Zinn, 1982, 1990, 2005), and (b) Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) (Segal
et al., 2002). The MBSR Clinic was conceived by Jon Kabat-Zinn and his colleagues
from the University of Massachusetts Medical School in 1979 (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). The
program was developed for two primary reasons: (a) to relieve stress, pain and suffering,
and (b) to serve as a model for other clinics and centers (Kabat-Zinn, 2003, 2005).
29
Initially, the clinic provided services to diverse patients that were not responding to
traditional medical treatments (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). The eight-week educational course
teaches patients to increase awareness of internal and external stimuli through meditation
practice (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). MBSR successfully followed through on its primary
intentions. Research has found that mindfulness is an effective form of treatment for
reducing pain, stress, and a number of other conditions (Kabat-Zinn, 1982; Kristeller &
Hallet, 1999). In addition, the program is being offered in approximately 240 clinics,
hospitals, and centers worldwide (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). Interest in MBSR is emerging;
however, empirical support at this point is still limited (Bishop, 2002).
Efficacy of Mindfulness
Mindfulness has been applied in psychology and has been the focus of research
with diverse populations (Kabat-Zinn, 2003, 2005) and diverse physical and
psychological disorders (Shapiro, Carlson, Astin, & Freedman, 2006). Mindfulness has
been applied in psychology and has been the focus of research with diverse populations
(Kabat-Zinn, 2003, 2005). Research shows that as mindfulness increases so does
improvement in well-being (Anderson, Lau, Segal, & Bishop, 2007). Some examples of
the types of physical and psychological conditions treated with mindfulness include:
chronic pain (e.g., Bonadonna, 2003; Kabat-Zinn, 1982), cancer (e.g., Carlson, Speca,
Patal, & Goodey, 2003; Speca, Carlson, Goodey, & Angen, 2000), anxiety and panic
disorders (e.g., Miller, Fletcher, & Kabat-Zinn, 1995), depression (e.g., Segal et al.,
2002), and substance abuse (e.g., Leigh, Bowen, & Marlatt, 2005). Mindfulness has been
exemplified as an efficacious form of treatment in many of these conditions (Kabat-Zinn,
30
2005). In all of the mentioned studies, mindfulness was a means of coping with the
illness or disorder.
Mindfulness is not a cure but a method for restoring health and balance and for
coping with stress, illness, and suffering (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). Studies have found that
mindfulness meditation significantly reduces stress, depression, and anxiety and has been
well-documented through the use of psychometric tools (Yuen & Baime, 2006). In
addition, regular meditation practice has been attributed to improvements in self-
confidence, relationships, quality of life, internal locus of control, and appreciation and
enjoyment of life (Yuen & Baime).
Mindfulness Defined
Only recently has mindfulness been operationally defined in the literature by
clinicians and researchers (Bishop et al., 2004). For the purpose of this paper,
mindfulness is a psychological process of “regulating attention in order to bring a quality
of non-elaborative awareness to current experience and a quality of relating to one’s
experience within an orientation of curiosity, experiential openness, and acceptance”
(Bishop et al., p. 234). Mindfulness has been defined by a model including: (a) the self-
regulation of attention, and (b) acceptance of the present moment (Bishop et al.). To be
mindful, one must be aware of her thoughts, feelings, and sensations and accept them as
they arise in the present moment (Bishop et al.; Kabat-Zinn, 2005). Acceptance in
mindfulness does not refer to avoidance or “resignation” of the experience, but rather that
there is a “reduction in the degree to which the experience is evaluated and suppressed”
(Allen et al., 2006, p. 288). Acceptance is about the willingness to let go and not judge
the experience (Germer et al., 2005). The intent or purpose for practicing mindfulness
31
(i.e., through mediation) is to increase self-awareness and to accept the reality in which
one lives (Hall, 2003; Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
Mechanisms of Mindfulness
Future research on mindfulness is moving toward investigating the actions or
mechanisms that underlie mindfulness interventions, questioning how mindfulness works
(Anderson et al., 2007; Shapiro et al., 2006). Researchers propose that there are a number
of mechanisms that play a role in facilitating change when it comes to mindfulness-based
interventions (Shapiro et al.). Such change occurs on a cognitive, behavioural, emotional,
physical, and spiritual level. For the purpose of this paper, a discussion of the
psychological mechanisms will be reviewed, primarily focusing on the cognitive
mechanisms.
Attention-regulation. The main focus of mindfulness practice involves the
modification of cognitive processes (Ramel, Goldin, Carmona, & McQuaid, 2004).
Mindfulness is defined as a process of recognition and acceptance of thoughts or feelings
that arise in the present moment (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). The objective of mindfulness is to
increase awareness while decreasing the desire to ‘reflexively’ react to mental processes
(Bishop et al., 2004; Hall, 2003). Attention is focused on thoughts and feelings and then
released (Bishop et al.). In fact, such “thoughts and feelings are observed as events in the
mind, without over-identifying with them and without reacting to them in an automatic,
habitual pattern of reactivity” (Bishop et al., p. 232). Cognitive processes play a central
role in mindfulness especially through attention-regulation (Bishop et al.).
Attention-regulation is a primary mechanism of action in mindfulness that leads
to positive change (Bishop et al., 2004). The self-regulation of attention is important as it
32
allows the individual to focus his attention on changes in feelings and thoughts in the
present moment (Bishop et al.). When practicing mindfulness through the sitting
meditation, for example, the individual’s focus is on the breath, yet, as new thoughts and
feelings are recognized, attention switches to those sensations for a short period of time,
and then back to the breath. Thus, regulating attention also includes “sustained attention”
on the present moment and “switching” between recognition of sensations and focus on
the breath (Bishop et al.). As such, mindfulness requires attention as well as flexibility in
cognitive focus (Bishop et al.; Segal et al., 2002). By regulating attention energy is
focused on the here and now and leads to a feeling of being alert, vigilant, and alive in the
present moment (Bishop et al.).
The self-regulation of attention also functions to “inhibit secondary elaborative
processing of the thoughts, feelings and sensations as they arise in the stream of
consciousness” (Allen et al., 2006; Bishop et al., 2004, p. 233). Mindfulness is associated
with the focus of energy on selective stimulus and with enhancement in cognitive
inhibition (Bishop et al.). For example, researchers studying the effects of mindfulness on
the relapse/recurrence of depression have found that rumination, defined as the focus of
one’s attention on a negative mood state, leads to the maintenance of depression and
amplified sad affect (Ramel et al., 2004; Teasdale et al., 2000). Mindfulness helps to
reduce ruminative tendencies in thought processes as individuals learn to relate to the
content of the mind in an objective manner (Ramel et al.; Teasdale et al.). Such function
thereby decreases the relapse/recurrence of depression because the individual no longer
thinks repeatedly about his state of mind and causes and consequences; instead the focus
shifts to the present moment (Ramel et al.; Segal et al., 2002; Teasdale et al.). By
33
inhibiting secondary processes of the mind, attention is focused on the present moment
rather than on insignificant stimuli. In summary, regulation of attention requires cognitive
control, reflexivity, and monitoring.
Metacognitive. Metacognition includes decentering whereby thoughts are
“understood as transient mental events rather than necessarily direct representations of
reality, leading to a form of metacognitive insight” (Allen et al., 2006, p. 288).
Metacognition refers to the monitoring of one’s own attention and thought processes
which is a primary mechanism in mindfulness (Allen et al.). Paying attention in
mindfulness includes a number of different domains such as paying attention: (a) in a
specific way; (b) to the present moment with intention and purpose; and (c) in a non-
judgmental way (Allen et al.). Paying attention in a specific way requires an individual to
monitor and direct the focus of her attention. The practice of directing attention and
maintaining present-moment focus requires concentration and results in an increased
sense of awareness of the mind’s workings and possible ruminative tendencies and a
sense of accomplishment or triumph over attention processes (Allen et al.). Paying
attention in a non-judgmental manner allows individuals to evaluate their subjective
experiences in a new and novel way contrary to old patterns of adaptability. Thereby,
mindfulness teaches an individual to notice her subjective experiences rather than analyze
the experience. In contrast to cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness does not change
or disrupt cognitive dysfunction but does change one’s relationship to cognitions (Allen
et al.).
34
Applied Basis of Mindfulness
Shapiro et al. (2006) have taken the definition of mindfulness “paying attention in
a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment and non-judgmentally” (Kabat-Zinn,
1994, p. 4) and propose that three axioms or building blocks are present that form the
primary mechanisms of mindfulness. These three axioms include: (a) intention; (b)
attention; and (c) attitude. It is proposed that such axioms be present in an applied
context.
First, one must have intention or personal vision and reason to practice
mindfulness; and this intention may change and evolve over time (Shapiro et al., 2006).
Second, attention is about noticing or observing the internal and external experiences that
occur from moment to moment (Shapiro et al.). Third, the qualities and attitudes one
brings to paying attention is another fundamental component of mindfulness. It is not
enough to have intention and to pay attention one must also have attitudinal
characteristics as well including compassion, kindness, and openness (Kabat-Zinn, 2005;
Shapiro et al.).
Mindfulness is an approach to living that can only be learned through practice
(Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Some examples of mindfulness-based practices include a sitting
meditation, yoga, walking or eating meditation, body scan, and journal writing (Hall,
2003). To demonstrate mindfulness in the context of this discussion, the following is an
example of a sitting mediation. According to Kabat-Zinn (2005), the participant can
either sit in a chair or lay on the floor, and centers attention on his breath. When thoughts
and feelings arise, the goal is to acknowledge the sensations and recognize the point at
which the mind wanders away from the breath. When this point of recognition is noted,
35
the participant draws his attention back to the breath. This process is repeated each time
the mind shifts attention away from the breath. The goal of the sitting mediation is to
teach the participant to “passively observe thoughts and feelings simply as mental events
with no inherent value of their own” (Bishop, 2002, p. 72).
Another example of a mindfulness meditation practice is the body scan (Kabat-
Zinn, 2005). This meditation occurs lying down and attention of the mind is brought
systemically to different parts of the body (Kabat-Zinn). Attention is brought first to the
toes on the left foot and up to the left leg, ankle, shin, knee, thigh, groin, left hip, and then
over to the toes on the right foot and systemically upward toward the right hip. The focus
then shifts from the hips to the buttocks, genitals, lower back, abdomen, upper back,
chest, ribs, breasts, heart, lungs, rib cage, collarbones, shoulders, arms, fingers, palms,
backs of hands, wrists, forearms, elbows, upper arms, armpits, and up into the neck and
throat region, ending with the face and head. Metaphorical expressions may be expressed
by the practitioner to bring attention to feelings or sensations surrounding each area of the
body. For example, when bringing focus to the heart questions may be asked such as: is
your heart heavy, hard, broken, or light? The body scan requires approximately 45
minutes and the purpose is to bring awareness to the body (Kabat-Zinn).
Meditation is a practice, whereby the goal is to focus attention on the present
moment (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). By way of this practice, mindfulness develops (Kabat-Zinn,
2005). Through the recognition of thoughts, feelings, and sensations, one is able to let go
of the commotion, worry, stress, and chaos that daily life presents (Hall, 2003). Through
the awareness that mindfulness creates, life becomes more manageable and meaningful
(Kabat-Zinn, 2003). Through the cultivation and practice of mindfulness it is possible to
36
be mindful during everyday activities. Mindfulness can be activated at any time during
the day as long as one has intention, attention, and attitude (Shapiro et al., 2006).
Conclusion
Although mindfulness originated in the Buddhist religion, the Buddha himself
was not a Buddhist or a monk (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). Mindfulness is really a universal
function that can be attained and cultivated by all regardless of religious affiliation,
gender, and age (Kabat-Zinn). In essence, mindfulness teaches one to investigate the
mind through the stabilization of the mind’s functions (Kabat-Zinn). Self-regulation of
attention and decentering from one’s thoughts, feelings, and sensations brings greater
awareness to one’s state of being, and greater resiliency to coping and managing life
circumstances. Today mindfulness has been received as a complementary form of
treatment in medical and mental health settings. It is a promising intervention in
psychotherapeutic practice (Baer, 2003).
37
CHAPTER 4: FLOW
Philosophical Basis of Flow
Flow is a state of optimal experience. It comprises of both a theory and a model
for inducing such a state of consciousness. Optimal experience in the context of flow
theory is the name given to a state of consciousness that is linked to happiness and
positive well-being. To understand the concept of flow requires a deep understanding of
the philosophical base of the man that conceived the term. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi is the
psychologist that has developed and researched flow over the past 30 years
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). The following section will describe Csikszentmihalyi’s
philosophy of human nature, consciousness, and the mind, and also describe his
collaboration with positive psychology. This section will describe Csikszentmihalyi’s
background basis for developing and researching the term flow.
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
Psychologist. Csikszentmihalyi has conducted research in the area of happiness,
optimal experience, intrinsic motivation, and creativity. His work over the past three
decades has resulted in the concept of flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). He has written
several books and published numerous papers on the subject (e.g., Csikszentmihalyi
1975, 1990, 1993, 1996, 1999). His work is receiving a great deal of attention by scholars
and the general public (Warren, 2006).
As part of his doctoral research Csikszentmihalyi spent time observing artists
(Csikszentmihalyi & Csikszentmihalyi, 2006). He became fascinated by the intense
concentration the artists held during the art-making process. As a psychology student, he
was interested in learning about human behaviour, specifically what motivated these
38
artists to intensely concentrate on making art? During his observation he noted that the
paintings were not being sold and they were not going into a museum to be viewed by
others, therefore there was no extrinsic reward or reason for the artists’ hard work. Thus,
from a psychological perspective his quest was to understand the causal reason for their
actions, which led him to discover the concept of flow (Csikszentmihalyi &
Csikszentmihalyi).
Philosophy of human nature. Csikszentmihalyi (1990) proposed that at the core of
all human action, whether it includes the chase of money, power, beauty, or health, the
underlying aspiration is happiness. Such actions are deemed meaningful because people
expect that they will lead to happiness. Csikszentmihalyi has dedicated several decades of
research to understanding happiness specifically the qualities that an individual possesses
and her experience of enjoyable activities.
Csikszentmihalyi’s (as cited in Warren, 2006) work is in direct relation to the
stressful climate of living in today’s society whereby work hours are longer, employers
have higher expectations and place higher demands on their employees, materialism is
prominent, and the search for happiness is apparent. In today’s society, it is evident from
research and from the experiences of the general public that “true” happiness through
external rewards is unachievable (Baher & Stauth, 2003). Western societies, especially,
are programmed to believe that extrinsic goals such as money, a school grade, a
popularity contest, an increase in power or status, the prolongation of health or life, a
holiday, a new car, and/or a new house will lead to true happiness; this is not the case
(Baher & Stauth). True happiness is about improving the quality of an individual’s life
experience, not waiting for something external to happen to make him happy
39
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Society’s ideology in materialism was once a dominant belief,
however people are recognizing that it is a trivial truth that holds little merit
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1999).
In Csikszentmihalyi’s (1975) first book called Beyond Boredom and Anxiety
(1975), he discusses the philosophical basis for the search of happiness. He described
how people are commonly in a state of anxiety or boredom and that in order to be happy
one must find a medium between these two states. Boredom is a subjective experience
whereby the individual’s skills are greater than challenges. Anxiety is the opposite state
whereby, challenges are perceived to be greater than skills. Interestingly, most people
pursue happiness through the desire of external or materialistic gains such as power,
money, and prestige while other people sacrifice such gains in order to pursue
intrinsically rewarding goals and undertake activities for their own sake.
Csikszentmihalyi’s research has focused on understanding what motivates people to
“give up material rewards for the elusive experience of performing enjoyable acts”
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990, p. 1). Essentially, he is interested in understanding what
happiness consists of and how we can improve the quality of our life.
Philosophy of consciousness. The world we live in appears chaotic and “there is
not much that we as individuals can do to change the way the universe runs”
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990, p. 9). We have limited power and control over injustice found
in the world. However, we ultimately have direct control over our mind and how it
perceives, interprets and in turn, responds to everyday experiences. As such, one’s mind
directly impacts how an individual: (a) conducts his life, (b) experiences joy, and (c) how
40
he feels about himself. “Inner harmony” plays a direct role in happiness and “mastery
over consciousness” is the means (Csikszentmihalyi, p. 9).
Consciousness is comprised of psychic energy or stimuli including events,
experiences, sensations, feelings, and cognitions that are experienced subjectively and
can be manipulated and changed (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Although, there is a great deal
of stimuli from the external environment and from within one’s body that can potentially
enter consciousness, only those experiences that an individual chooses to process actually
become part of his life (Csikszentmihalyi). The events of consciousness shape and create
one’s reality, “although we believe that there are “things” outside consciousness, we have
direct evidence only of those that find a place in it” (Csikszentmihalyi, p. 27).
Intentions allow an individual to bring order to consciousness (Csikszentmihalyi,
1990). Information shaped by “biological needs or by internalized social goals” are
intentions (Csikszentmihalyi, p. 27). Intentions arise as a means of obtaining something
that the individual wants or needs (Csikszentmihalyi). Scholars over the years have called
intentions by other names such as drives, impulses, and desires. However, the term
intention in this context is not concerned with the underlying reason for why the
individual has the intention but rather that the individual has an intention
(Csikszentmihalyi). As such, the reason for intending something is not as important as the
intention itself. Humans have the capacity to achieve goals and bring order to one’s state
of consciousness through intentions.
Philosophy of the mind. The mind is in chaos without direction (Csikszentmihalyi,
1975, 1990, 1993; Foster & Lloyd, 2007; Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Shapiro et al., 2006).
Individuals must direct attention to goal-oriented activity otherwise their attention will
41
focus on negativity and useless stimuli (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993; Foster & Lloyd). It is
evident from Csikszentmihalyi’s book The Evolving Self, that he believes that there is
“something inherently wrong with how the mind functions” (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, p.
29). Although the mind is complex, it is conducive to biases and dangers. By gaining
mastery over the mind, and learning how the mind works is important in gaining control
over one’s life.
There are two general ways to prevent an individual’s mind from drifting. One is
through external means such as focusing on external events like socializing, reading,
writing, playing sports, art-making, and watching television (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993).
Two, is to develop a discipline that is focused inward like meditation and yoga. Both
ways require energy, practice and discipline. The goal is to bring order to consciousness
and shape one’s experiences through by focusing the mind. Through purposeful activity
that requires skill, the mind is released from its disordered and unruly state
(Csikszentmihalyi).
Positive psychology. The scholarly work of Csikszentmihalyi has been a leading
force in positive psychology. The concept of flow is allied with positive psychology as it
lends a theory for developing human potential and understanding what leads to subjective
well-being and a life worth living (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). Responsibility
in understanding happiness is in the hands of researchers, academics, and the government
(Peterson & Seligman, 2004). Such understanding forces and imposes substantial changes
in the ideological beliefs once deemed true, psychology also needs to change with the
times (Peterson & Seligman). Csikszentmihalyi’s work is linked to positive psychology
as the concept of flow is connected to subjective well-being. In order to better understand
42
the concept of flow, the following section will describe the general philosophy of positive
psychology.
Primarily the focus of mental health practice, specifically clinical psychology has
been on pathology. The focus has been on what is wrong with people. Clinical
psychology focuses on pathologies and complaints such as depression, anxiety, and
hopelessness to name a few. Pathologies can be measured and described through the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychological
Association, 2000) but this document does not state what is right with people (Peterson &
Seligman, 2004). This format in psychology lends little understanding towards clarifying
what people should strive for in their life, rather it encourages wellness through the
elimination or absence of illness and/or distress, the same way that medical doctors
practice (Peterson & Seligman). It is believed that by eliminating ailments or pathologies
will lead to happiness.
A shift is taking place in psychology away from pathology and focusing to
positive psychology whereby, the positive core constructs of human experience are being
reviewed (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002; Peterson & Seligman, 2004). The
positive psychology movement has flourished over the past five years and there are
numerous researchers and authors adding to the field’s strength (Gable & Haidt, 2005;
Seligman, Steen, Park, & Peterson, 2004). Conferences are being conducted to create
collaboration around the world, as well, courses are being offered in universities in the
field (Gable & Haidt; Seligman et al., 2004). Positive psychologists are marveled by the
progress of the field over the past few years (Gable & Haidt).
43
There are three main topics of study that fall under the domain of positive
psychology including: (a) positive subjective experiences; (b) positive characteristics or
traits, and (c) the study of establishments that encourage and instill positive experiences
and traits (Seligman et al., 2004; Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). Positive
psychology is defined as “the study of the conditions and processes that contribute to the
flourishing or optimal functioning of people, groups, and institutions” (Gable & Haidt,
2005, p. 104). It should be noted that positive psychology does not deny human suffering
but is intended to balance out the totality of human experience including “the peaks, the
valleys and everything in between” (Seligman et al., p. 410).
Flow is a theory that has emerged out of positive psychology. It is interested in
understanding what motivates individuals toward enjoyable activities that bring no
external reward or compensation (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). The concept of flow is
important in enhancing the quality of life and it is meaningful in psychology as it is
concerned with subjective well-being and educating individuals on how to live life fully.
Optimal experience or flow is a state of involvement and absorption in purposeful
activity in the present moment. Flow theory advocates for a way of living that is
prosperous, enjoyable, and worthwhile (Csikszentmihalyi).
Flow Today
The experience of flow is being explored by occupational therapists,
psychologists, psychiatrists, sociologists, educators, and the general population
(Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002). The concept is being researched by those
interested in linking flow with mental health, sports, work, leisure, corporate industries,
creativity, and the expressive arts (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Flow is a popular concept
44
that has captured the publics’ attention especially because it holds much promise in
uncovering an understanding of happiness. Flow proposes that happiness comprises of an
inner locus of control and can be attained by anyone at any time (Csikszentmihalyi).
In summary, Csikszentmihalyi’s work is multifaceted and highly diverse. He has
accomplished research in the area of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, happiness,
boredom and anxiety, positive psychology, and creativity. His initial work on intrinsic
motivation developed into the concept of flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975). His
philosophical and theoretical orientation is linked to positive psychology. His goal is
strongly grounded in the pursuit of understanding happiness and what contributes to a life
worth living. Flow theory is a model for pursuing purposeful goals and focusing attention
on activities that bring order to a mind normally in chaos (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975, 1990,
1996, 1999; Csikszentmihalyi & Csikszentmihalyi, 2006).
Theoretical Basis of Flow
Definition of Flow
Flow is a deep state of activity whereby, the individual engages in a challenging
task that requires complete demand of attention and focus (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). The
activity is pursued with intention; all else unrelated to the activity fades away including
worry, anxiety, and preoccupation with one’s self (Dietrich, 2004). The task includes a
balance of challenge and skill as well as clear set goals and immediate feedback
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). A major component of flow is that the activity is enjoyable for
its own sake, indicating that it is intrinsically motivating and intrinsically rewarding
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). People that have experienced this state of flow describe it as:
45
ecstasy; an alternative reality; a loss of self-consciousness; spontaneous; effortless;
enjoyable; and pleasurable (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990, 1999; Warren, 2006).
Initial Research on Flow
In order to fully understand the concept of flow, it is important to comprehend the
research behind the term. Csikszentmihalyi (1975) studied individuals’ experiences of
enjoyment and intrinsic motivation. He wanted to learn why individuals pursue activities
for intrinsic value. He contended that understanding such human experience could benefit
society by leading to a theory of happiness. He conducted a qualitative study that
including hundreds of people from all across the world, he requested a description of
what it felt like to perform activities they enjoyed (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975, 1990, 2002).
Participants in the study included, for example, artists, musicians, surgeons, chess
players, and athletes (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Unique similarities in the way people
described optimal experience and enjoyment was found without discriminate difference
across culture, gender, or age (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). From the participants’ accounts
of their experiences, the theory of optimal experience based on the concept of flow was
developed (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
Initially the research consisted of questionnaires and interviews with participants.
Later a technique called Experience Sampling Method (ESM) was developed to improve
measurement of subjective experiences (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). ESM consists of an
electronic paging device that participants wear for a week and when the pager is activated
the participant writes what he is doing, what he is thinking of, how he feels at that
moment, who he is with or is he alone, and the participant also rates his skill level and
challenge level for the activity he is undertaking (Csikszentmihalyi; Foster & Lloyd,
46
2007). From the information gathered in the studies an understanding of the similarities
in experience were gathered forming the premise of flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi).
According to Foster and Lloyd (2007) three types of activities were found in
common amongst participants all over the world: work, leisure, and maintenance. Work
or productive activities include anything related to school, volunteer, or work. Leisure
activities include passive and active tasks. Passive leisure activities include watching
television, surfing the internet, or resting. Active leisure activities for example, include
cooking, sports, hobbies, playing music, live theatre, and socializing. The active leisure
activities require deep engagement and attention in comparison to the other types of
activities. Maintenance activities are those activities that are essential for daily living
such as taking a shower and getting dressed, grocery shopping, preparing a meal, and
cleaning the house; these activities are considered mindless and do not require much
effort or attention. Flow was found to be present in all three types of activities. According
to Csikszentmihalyi (1990) flow can be attained in everyday activities.
Components of Flow
From the qualitative studies on flow, a set of components were established that
uniquely defined this state of optimal experience (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). There are
eight components of flow including the: (a) balance of challenge and skill; (b) fusion of
awareness and action; (c) clear goals; (d) feedback; (e) focus of attention; (f) sense of
control over actions; (g) loss of self-consciousness; and (h) transformation of time
(Csikszentmihalyi; Foster & Lloyd, 2007; Warren, 2006).
One, the skill level and challenge level of each of the participants were charted
and Csikszentmihalyi (1990) found that flow was linked to experiences requiring high
47
challenge and high skill in comparison to average individual scores. He described this
state of optimal experience or flow as the “boundary between boredom and anxiety, when
the challenges are just balanced with the person’s capacity to act” (Csikszentmihalyi, p.
52). The skills and challenges are perceived constructs and were rated subjectively by the
participants in the study. Two, there is a fusion of awareness and action that is described
as spontaneous and automatic (Csikszentmihalyi). People lose themselves in the activity,
“where they stop being aware of themselves as separate from the actions they are
performing” (Csikszentmihalyi, p. 53). Three, clarity of intention is required. The task
must include goals that are attainable and manageable (Csikszentmihalyi). Four,
immediate feedback is required usually in the form of personal evaluation
(Csikszentmihalyi). Five, attention is placed on the task leaving no focus on external
stimuli thereby, no room for worry or anxiety (Csikszentmihalyi). In fact, individuals
would not feel hunger, thirst, fatigue, or aches and pains during a flow experience but
would as soon as the activity was accomplished (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002).
Six, the “paradox of control” means that there is a sense of control over the activity and
environment, whereby the activity feels effortless. However, there is also a sense of
surrender or freedom that feels as though one is out of control (Foster & Lloyd, 2007, p.
35). Seven, loss of self-consciousness means to release one’s concern about her self and
focus all energy on the activity (Csikszentmihalyi). In anxiety and depression studies it
was found that an individual enters such states because too much focus and energy is
placed on one’s self. For example, the relapse and recurrence of depression is linked to
rumination in thought processes suggesting that preoccupation with the self can lead to
disorder (Segal et al., 2002). In fact, Csikszentmihalyi (1990) wrote that when one is
48
engrossed or deeply concerned with the self, psychic energy is consumed leaving little
time for enjoyment and creativity. Thus, releasing self consciousness may be meaningful
in mental health research as it is in flow theory. Eight, time is transformed, whereby
one’s perception of time is different than measured time (Csikszentmihalyi). Hence, time
measured by the clock is either faster or slower than what is perceived by the individual.
According to Dietrich (2004) “timelessness is one of the hallmarks of any altered state of
consciousness” (p. 758).
Autotelic Experience and Personality
The autotelic experience refers to “a self-contained activity, one that is done not
with the expectations of some future benefit, but simply because the doing itself”
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990, p. 67). A person with an autotelic personality experiences a
state of flow regularly (Csikszentmihalyi). The autotelic individual can regulate
consciousness and manage his psychic energy or the stimuli that enters the realm of
consciousness (Csikszentmihalyi). According to Csikszentmihalyi we are bombarded
with stimuli entering our stream of consciousness and it is important to bring order to
consciousness to regulate function within a state of optimal experience. Even during
unbearable situations an individual with an autotelic personality is able to enjoy such an
experience simply for its own sake (Csikszentmihalyi). It is believed that all people have
the potential to obtain autotelic experiences through training and discipline
(Csikszentmihalyi; Warren, 2006).
Psychic Entropy
Happiness is a state of mind that involves the order of consciousness and the
focus of attention (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Psychic entropy, the opposite of flow, is
49
described as a state of consciousness whereby, the mind is in chaos and stimuli are
flooding the individual’s system beyond the scope of her ability to bring order to
consciousness (Csikszentmihalyi). Psychic entropy conflicts with an individual’s
intentions and may lead to psychological disorders or the experience of negative
experiences such as anxiety, fear, and rage (Csikszentmihalyi). Flow is considered a
means to happiness that enables an individual to focus her attention on activities and
perform at an optimal level of experience (Csikszentmihalyi).
Efficacy of Flow
From the literature review on flow it is unclear whether: (a) all characteristics of
flow need to be present in order to call the experience “flow”; (b) certain characteristics
take precedence over others in the experience of flow; and (c) flow is associated with
other psychological states especially other terms related to positive psychology
(Demerouti, 2006; Peterson & Seligman, 2004; Wright et al., 2006). Basically, the theory
of flow describes an optimal state of experience, yet, there is limited research to validate
what it is and what it is not. However, this does not discount the flow experience that
individuals have described it only confirms that there is considerable work to be further
explored on this topic.
According to Wright and colleagues (2006), research needs to further investigate
“what flow is, when and how it might be used, and what it is likely to achieve” (p. 27).
The theory of flow is testable (Moneta & Csikszentmihalyi, 1996); there are many areas
that are currently unexplored (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2005). For example, one,
there is little research of flow in psychotherapeutic contexts where attention is focused on
inner resources (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi). Two, flow has not been examined in
50
group settings where participants of a group share a flow experience (Nakamura &
Csikszentmihalyi). Three, there is little research on the mechanisms of flow specifically,
attention processes.
From the literature, flow has been investigated in several different arenas
including: art and creativity (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996); work (Csikszentmihalyi &
LeFevre, 1989; Demerouti, 2006); sports (Harmison, 2006; Jackson, 1995, 1996); leisure
(Csikszentmihalyi & LeFevre, 1989); relationships (Graham, 2008); and education
(Shernoff et al., 2003). Researchers in diverse areas of study are interested in advancing
the flow theory which is important in this early stage of development (Nakamura &
Csikszentmihalyi).
Mechanisms of Flow
Understanding the mechanisms associated with flow will lend support for the
theory and practice of flow. This section will explore two primary psychological
mechanisms related to the experience of flow: (a) consciousness and attention; and (b)
intrinsic motivation.
Consciousness and attention. According to Csikszentmihalyi (1990) the quality of
life is dependent on one’s control of consciousness and the focus of attention. The
concept of flow is based on a theoretical model of consciousness that describes how using
one’s attention in an optimal manner leads to subjective well-being and a life worth
living. The study of consciousness or the use of attention from the perspective of flow
theory has been unevaluated empirically. Thereby, the difficulty in establishing an
understanding of the mechanisms involved in flow is a result of the lack of research to
51
support the theory. For the purpose of this paper, a review of Csikszentmihalyi’s
theoretical description of consciousness and the use of attention will be described.
To be fully human requires one to master his emotions and cognitions; thereby,
such mastery warrants an understanding of consciousness and how it works
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Consciousness in this context is not a mystifying process but
one that is supported by biological and neurological processes, also requiring a self-
directed proponent. Individuals have the capacity to override genetic and biological
information that directs action (Csikszentmihalyi). Consciousness functions to inform the
individual about his external and internal environment and through evaluation the
individual acts accordingly (Csikszentmihalyi). Thereby, consciousness acts as a
“clearinghouse for sensations, perceptions, feelings, and ideas establishing priorities
among all the diverse information” (Csikszentmihalyi, p. 24).
Consciousness allows individuals to choose how to respond to their environment.
For example, an individual may be faced with a difficult life situation and depending on
how she chooses to face the challenge, it is possible to overcome the challenge “by
changing the contents of consciousness” (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990, p. 24). This is a quality
that individuals can develop in order to live life successfully and find joy in living.
Individuals can develop the potential to live life in this manner by bringing order to
consciousness and mastering control over emotions and cognitions. Control is fostered
through intention and the choice to attend to one’s consciousness. Flow is a model that is
intended to help individuals bring order to consciousness through purposeful activity and
the focus of attention.
52
The conception of attention processing in flow theory is based on a
phenomenological approach related to information theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
Phenomenology refers to the idea that events in consciousness are phenomenon that are
experienced and interpreted as they arise in the moment (Csikszentmihalyi). Information
theory refers to an understanding that sensory data is dynamic and takes into
consideration memory and attention processing. From Csikszentmihalyi’s theoretical
framework this means that conscious stimuli composed of feelings, thoughts, sensations
and intentions can be manipulated and directed by the individual. Thereby, we have
direct control over stimuli that enters into our realm of consciousness and we can
intentionally monitor and order such information. Important to this theory is that our
awareness of such information is imperative whereby the stimuli can be consciously
directed.
According to Csikszentmihalyi (1990) a phenomenological approach to
understanding consciousness is a vital component of flow theory. The flow theory is
based on the dynamics of consciousness and the way information is processed and
experienced as part of one’s reality. Flow may be linked to psychoanalysis or may gain
grounding through consciousness studies. It may also be beneficial to develop a more
grounded basis for flow theory through neuroscientific study.
Intrinsic motivation. Central to psychology has been the study of human
motivation. Flow theory is linked to the notion that individuals will find enjoyment in an
activity as long as the activity is intrinsically motivating. The focus of intrinsic
motivation has been at the core of developing flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
Motivation theories in psychology investigate what directs and energizes human
53
behaviour, specifically investigating why individuals engage in behaviour (Deci & Ryan,
1985). Two main types of motivation that fall along a continuum include mechanistic and
organismic (Deci & Ryan). Mechanistic refers to those theories of motivation based on
physiological drive and distinguishes individuals as passive in their environment (Deci &
Ryan). Organismic motivation is based on the view that individuals are active
participants in their environment, motivated by not only physiological need but also inner
desire; it is the intrinsic need that provides motivation for action (Deci and Ryan).
Motivation theories take into account the nature of humans and what leads to
action-oriented direction in their lives. Individuals that are intrinsically motivated
experience enjoyment, pleasure, competence, self-determination, and an internal locus of
control (Deci & Ryan, 1985). During intrinsically motivated action, individuals may
experience a state of flow (Deci & Ryan).
Flow theory is based on an organismic view of motivation and also proposes that
“affects and emotions as either initiators or concomitants of intrinsically motivated
behaviour” (Deci & Ryan, 1985, p. 28). Flow theory is based on the premise that intrinsic
motivation is relevant to seeking enjoyment. The individual enjoys the activity and will
do the activity over and over again for its own sake. According to Csikszentmihalyi
(1990) the purpose or motivation for completing the activity is for pleasure. However, it
is unclear from the literature whether individuals experiencing flow are motivated by
enjoyment only.
It is hypothesized that if activities are intrinsically motivated by enjoyment then
the activities will have a strong relationship between challenge and enjoyment. Even
highly challenging activities are enjoyable. The relationship between the challenge and
54
enjoyment of an activity is unclear in the literature. As such, some studies have found a
weak relationship between challenge and enjoyment of an activity (Moneta &
Csikszentmihalyi, 1996); a positive but weak relationship (Tauer & Harackiewicz, 2001);
and no relationship (Csikszentmihalyi & Shernoff, 2003). It is uncertain whether
individuals engage in intrinsically motivating activities for enjoyment-sake only or if
other factors, such as competence, also plays a role. It is unclear what intrinsically
motivates individuals to experience flow.
Intrinsic motivation is also based on a theory of perceived competence (Deci &
Ryan, 1985). Intrinsically motivated behaviour is maintained and continued when the
individual perceives her self competent at an activity (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Researchers
have found a relationship between perceived competence, feedback and enjoyment
(Reeve & Deci, 1996; Vaneskeene & Deci, 2004). That is, individuals enjoyed an activity
more if they won a competition in comparison to those that lost the competition (Reeve &
Deci, 1996; Vaneskeene & Deci, 2004). Competence has been found to be a mediator
between feedback and enjoyment (Reeve & Deci, 1985). It is unclear from the research
whether competence plays a role in flow.
Consciousness, attention, and intrinsic motivation studies are potential
mechanisms for establishing how flow works. Overall, the research in the realm of
motivation studies adds to our understanding of the concept of flow. Further research
must be conducted to gain insight into the mechanisms of flow and how it affects health
and well-being.
55
Applied Basis of Flow
People have reported flow during diverse sports activities, playing musical
instruments, creating art, playing chess, reading, writing, watching television, during
work, spending time with a friend, and many other activities. It is assumed that such
activities are considered enjoyable by the participants undertaking them. Flow can be
experienced anytime without apparent reason (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Warren, 2006).
Although flow may occur by chance the likelihood that it will occur during a structured
activity is more likely (Csikszentmihalyi).
What needs to be present for flow to happen? According to Csikszentmihalyi
(1990) the following intrinsic factors must be present in order for flow to occur: (a) clear
goals; (b) immersion in the activity; (c) deep concentration and focus of attention on the
activity; (d) choice and intention to engage in the activity; and (e) enjoyment. Extrinsic
factors that contribute to the flow experience include: (a) undertaking activities outside of
the realm of normal everyday activity; and (b) no distractions interfering with the flow
state. Attitudinal characteristics required for the experience of flow include discipline,
will, perseverance, and determination (Csikszentmihalyi).
Wright and colleagues (2006) studied what flow comprised of before, during, and
after a flow experience. The findings indicate that to get into a flow state, the individual
needs to: (a) be in a relaxed state, (b) have no interruptions, and (c) make an intention to
start the activity. During flow, individuals experience: (a) immersion in the activity, (b)
clear idea of achievement, (c) immediate feedback in their performance which increased
a sense of feeling joy and pleasure while reducing worry, and (d) outside stimuli
disappears. After flow individuals experienced: (a) joy, (b) a sense that time had passed
56
quickly, (c) that the occurrence was stimulating, and (d) increased motivation. Individuals
stated that starting the activity itself was a means for entering into a flow state. As such,
the act of doing or beginning the activity was important in inducing a flow state. The
engagement of mind and body, physical and mental merging, was important to creating a
flow experience.
Since flow is an intrinsically motivated state, we can assume certain external
conditions must be present but the applied context relates to intrinsic qualities and
characteristics associated with the autotelic personality (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). In
order to experience flow an individual must engage in an activity that is enjoyable for its
own sake. That is, the activity must hold personal meaning and purpose for the individual
and also bring a sense of contentment. The individual must have the ability to meet the
challenge and have the skill set to reach her goal. The essential ingredient in flow
experience is that the activity must be something that the individual enjoys doing and her
skill and challenge level increases over time leading to a sense of accomplishment and
pleasure (Csikszentmihalyi). To experience flow an intention and choice to enter into a
state requiring complete attention and focus on the activity is vital and also there needs to
be a space with no distractions to interrupt one’s frame of mind (Wright et al., 2006).
Emphasis is placed on doing the activity (Csikszentmihalyi).
Conclusion
Flow theory advanced from research conducted on the pursuit of happiness.
Csikszentmihalyi (1990) focused his research on understanding what happiness is, how
people experience happiness, and why people experience happiness. Flow is a state of
optimal experience. It is a dynamic process of being while doing and requires the
57
continued experience of focusing one’s attention (Csikszentmihalyi; Warren, 2006). Flow
is intended to serve as a means for coping and managing daily life stressors. In addition,
flow is a way to cultivate meaningful and purposeful life experiences (Warren). As such,
flow appeals to psychotherapy as it is interested in the quality of life experience and in
general, happiness and subjective well-being.
58
CHAPTER 5: SYNTHESIS
Comparing Mindfulness and Flow
Summary of Mindfulness
Mindfulness is grounded in Buddhist teaching and philosophy. It is applicable in a
psychotherapeutic context as it is based in understanding and relieving human suffering.
Buddhism attributes the source of suffering to the wandering mind (Wallace & Shapiro,
2007). The unbalanced and unfocused mind leads to cognitive disturbances that interfere
with daily living (Wallace & Shapiro). The premise of mindfulness is to attend to the
workings of the mind in order to live life fully in the present moment (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
Mindfulness is a state of being whereby one’s reality is constructed thoughtfully
rather than mechanically or impulsively (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Awareness is important
because instead of living one’s life on autopilot, the individual can make conscious
choices to attend to his mind’s functioning. The individual can choose how to respond to
feelings, thoughts, and sensations by decentering or deconstructing one’s conditioned
responses to internal or external stimuli (Kabat-Zinn).
Mindfulness includes ultimate acceptance of the present moment and a quality of
serene presence (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Mindfulness consists of openness to novel
experience and receptivity to one’s own experience and perspective in the present
moment (Langer, 2005). Flexibility and reflexivity in attention which adds to a sense of
resiliency in daily living (Wallace & Shapiro, 2007).
The psychological mechanisms relevant to mindfulness include: attention-
regulation, and metacognitive processes (Shapiro et al., 2006). Focusing the mind on the
present moment can be attained by paying attention to one’s breath while accepting
59
stimuli that enters into one’s present moment experience. Through intention of focusing
the mind through meditation practice, cognitive balance is established leading to health
and well-being.
Mindfulness is an approach to living that can only be cultivated through practice
(Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Mindfulness is carried out in an applied context primarily through
meditation. A popular meditation practice focuses attention on one’s breath. When
thoughts and feelings arise, the goal is to acknowledge the sensations and recognize the
point at which the mind wanders away from the breath. When this point of recognition is
noted, the participant draws her attention back to the breath. This process is repeated each
time the mind shifts attention away from the breath. The goal is to observe the thoughts
and feelings passively without instinctive reactivity or automatic identification with them
(Bishop et al., 2004).
Mindfulness is meaningful in a psychotherapeutic context as it establishes an
intervention for maintaining and sustaining attention to the present moment (Bishop et
al., 2004). Through attention-regulation one has the ability to see objective and subjective
experiences more clearly without the distraction of useless stimuli (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
As such, mindfulness provides release of stress, anxiety, and ruminative thoughts that
lead to health and well-being. Although practiced through meditation it can also be
applied regularly in one’s daily life through intention and the will to pay attention to
experiences in the present moment. There are several activities that may induce a state of
mindfulness, such as: art-making, writing, drawing, reading, gardening, cooking, yoga,
tai chi, and a variety of other activities. Mindfulness teaches individuals to take
60
responsibility for their life experience and to do so through autonomy, choice, and the
will to find power in awakening to life and all that it has to offer in the present moment.
Summary of Flow
Flow is a psychological state of optimal experience whereby consciousness is
balanced with one’s intentions and goals (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Flow theory posits
that the mind, if left unattended will wander and reflect on useless and negative stimuli
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1975, 1990, 1996). Flow proposes a means for attending to the mind
in a manner that cultivates optimal life experiences.
Included in the flow experience are several elements such as the complete
absorption in an activity, clear set goals, immediate feedback, skills to complete the
activity, ability to meet the challenge, fusion of action and awareness, timelessness,
intrinsic motivation, and the loss of self-consciousness. The flow experience is enjoyable
and people indicate that the activity itself is intrinsically motivating whereby they would
pursue it for its own sake. This model of flow suggests that happiness is an intrinsic
factor that can be attained through inner strengths and resources.
Flow can be described by: (a) the prerequisite components made possible for it to
occur; or (b) reflecting on the effect it has had on the individual after the fact (Warren,
2006). It is difficult to ascertain exactly what is taking place during a flow for a number
of different reasons. The experience of flow is based essentially on subjective inner
experience and the phenomenological experience of human consciousness (Wright et al.,
2006). Individuals taking part in flow research are not only participants but also the
primary researchers. As such, flow may be a very personal experience that can only be
described by the person experiencing it.
61
Flow is meaningful in a psychotherapeutic context as it is interested in the quality
of one’s life experience. Flow is interested in understanding what motivates individuals
toward enjoyable activities that are intrinsically rewarding. It is a model and a theory for
pursuing purposeful goals and focusing attention on activities that bring order to one’s
state of being (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975, 1990).
Comparison of Flow and Mindfulness
Philosophical basis. From the literature review on flow and mindfulness there are
several characteristics or elements that are shared by the two concepts on a philosophical
level. Mindfulness stems from a philosophy seeking to relieve suffering, whereby flow
originated from research on intrinsic motivation and enjoyment. Flow and mindfulness
are both concerned with helping individuals to move toward subjective well-being. The
premise of both theories is to enhance the potential of human ability by moving toward
optimal life experiences. Similarities shared by flow and mindfulness include: (a) the
mind as a chaotic entity; (b) subjective well-being as an internal resource; (c) positive
psychology; and (d) phenomenological approach. The major differences between flow
and mindfulness include how they promote human potential and the concepts used to
describe the philosophical beliefs.
Both mindfulness and flow view the mind as a chaotic entity (Csikszentmihalyi,
1975, 1990; Kabat-Zinn, 1990). The chaotic mind is at the core of human suffering and
can interfere with the attainment of joy and pleasure. Flow proposes that the mind is
conditioned to think in negative and pessimistic ways and therefore requires purposeful
activity to function at an optimal level (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996). Mindfulness suggests
that the wandering mind leads to cognitive imbalance and the focus of attention on the
62
present moment is required to restore cognitive functioning and well-being (Shapiro et
al., 2002). Both theories propose that the key to subjective well-being is to understand
how the mind works and to attend to stimuli in consciousness in a reflective manner
rather than in a mechanical and habitual way (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Shapiro et al.).
Mindfulness and flow teach us that subjective well-being is an internal resource
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1999). Flow theory is based on the premise that happiness is an
intrinsic factor, not something that money can buy (Csikszentmihalyi). Ironically, the
Buddha himself left his worldly possessions to pursue peace of mind and on his journey
learned that going inward to attend to the workings of the mind was the key to relief from
suffering. In essence, mindfulness and flow philosophically contend that external stimuli
or stimulus-driven pleasure will not lead to happiness. Both establish that well-being is
associated with the need to cultivate attitudes, behaviours, and strengths as highlighted by
positive psychology (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000; Wallace & Shapiro, 2007).
Mindfulness and flow promote inner strengths as a source of health and well-being.
Mindfulness and flow are allied with positive psychology and the movement
towards valuing positive attributes and experiences (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000;
Shapiro et al., 2002). The strength of human capacity is fostered by mindfulness and flow
theory. Mindfulness and flow are dedicated to expanding human potential and focusing
on the positive characteristics, traits, and subjective experiences that lead to well-being.
Mindfulness is interested in the positive resources of the individual and her internal
healing potential (Shapiro, Schwartz, & Santerre, 2006). Flow is concerned with optimal
life experiences, and the individual’s potential to create such experiences in her life on a
regular basis through purposeful activity (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
63
Both flow and mindfulness are dynamic processes that include a
phenomenological view of consciousness. The difficulty with studying phenomenological
processes is that the participants involved in the research are also primary researchers;
flow and mindfulness struggle with the same empirical concerns. As such, both theories
encourage the unfolding of phenomenon in consciousness and conceive that individuals
have the means to cope or manage with contents in consciousness since energy is not
wasted on useless stimuli occupying one’s state of presence (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990;
Kabat-Zinn, 1990). That is, during flow, an individual’s attention is completely focused
leaving no energy to focus on external stimuli that may distract the individual. In
contrast, however, during mindfulness an individual’s attention is focused on the breath
and when the focus is distracted away from the breath, the individual has one primary
goal, that is to return his attention back to the breath. Mindfulness and flow teach
individuals to attend to stimuli in the present moment.
One significant difference between flow and mindfulness is in how they promote
and foster human potential. Mindfulness is a state of being; whereas, flow is a state of
being while doing (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Warren, 2006). Mindfulness teaches individuals to
focus attention on the workings of the mind through practice such as meditation. It is
through such practice and discipline that individuals learn to accept the contents that
enter in and out of the present moment experience. Mindfulness also encourages
attitudinal characteristics such as compassion and openness as a way of approaching life
(Kabat-Zinn). Flow on the other hand, teaches individuals to focus attention on activities
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). The focus is outward even though the after-effect of flow has
an internal impact (i.e., enjoyment and self growth). Perhaps there are similarities in how
64
flow and mindfulness foster human potential however, the research on flow focuses
primarily on external activities such as sports, work, and relationships, rather than on
internal sources such as psychotherapy, meditation, and tai chi (Nakamura &
Csikszentmihalyi, 2002).
Another significant difference between the philosophical basis of flow and
mindfulness is associated with the concepts and terms used to describe various
philosophical beliefs. In mindfulness theory, the concepts are derived from Buddhist
teaching and philosophy, whereby flow is centered on Western terminology. For
example, flow describes a state of optimal experience, whereby challenge and skill are
high and the individual is completely engaged in activity. Mindfulness, on the other hand,
proposes that a state of optimal experience is equivalent to the Buddhist teaching of being
“Awake” (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Awakening refers to a state of consciousness that is
optimal and requires tending to the workings of the mind. In addition, meditation is a
practice for awakening, whereas, the flow model and all of its constituent components are
important in attaining a state of optimal experience. Thereby, meditation is equivalent to
the “purposeful activity” described by flow theory. Again, the means of attaining the state
of optimal experience is diverse and the concepts are different. As a result of the
differences in terminology (East versus West) it is difficult to compare and contrast
mindfulness and flow. Perhaps a study comparing the terminology of flow and
mindfulness would be useful in order to gain further understanding of their similarities
and differences.
Primarily, mindfulness and flow are similar in that they both focus on subjective
well-being and approach psychology from a positive viewpoint. Both mindfulness and
65
flow advocate that it isn’t important what we do in life but how we approach life
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Kabat-Zinn, 1990). The key to optimal life experience is
provided in understanding how consciousness works. Although mindfulness and flow
share similar philosophical beliefs, their model and goals are slightly different.
Theoretical basis. Flow and mindfulness are primarily concerned with how one
attends to information. On a theoretical level, both theories propose that attention-
regulation and maintenance is vital for subjective well being (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990;
Kabat-Zinn, 1990). In a psychological context, attention-regulation is important for
healthy functioning especially for individuals that suffer from stress, anxiety, or
depression. The following section will explore the similarities and differences related to
flow and mindfulness in relation to attention-regulation. Physiological and neurological
mechanisms associated with mindfulness and flow theory will also be considered in this
section.
The difficulty in comparing flow and mindfulness from a theoretical perspective
is that flow has been largely unevaluated in a psychotherapeutic context, especially in
comparison to mindfulness. As a result, it is challenging to compare attention processes
in flow and mindfulness. However, from the research it is likely that flow and
mindfulness share similarities in self-regulation of attention.
Self-regulation is a function of adapting to change as well as sustaining and
maintaining the ability to function (Shapiro et al., 2006). Mindfulness and flow have a
common ground and that is the importance of focused and sustained attention (Wallace &
Shapiro, 2007). However, in mindfulness, attention is uncensored whereby thoughts,
feelings, and sensations are observed but attention is not centered on any stimuli other
66
than the intended focus (e.g., the breath or the present moment). In contrast, attention in
the experience of flow is censored and the focus is on the activity. However, the goals are
different in that mindfulness is about non-striving whereas flow is about the attainment of
clear set goals (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Kabat-Zinn, 2005). Essentially, mindfulness and
flow differ in their approach to attention-regulation whereas mindfulness is uncensored
and flow is censored.
In mindfulness practice, there is a constant shift in the focus of attention back to
the present moment. At the core of mindfulness is the intention to pay attention non-
judgmentally to the present moment (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Shapiro et al., 2006). However,
in flow, the intention to pay attention and to focus on the activity is required before the
start of the activity, yet it is unclear whether this state of attention-regulation is required
throughout the flow experience. From the research it appears that “something” happens
during flow that sustains one’s attention and focus on the activity; however, it is unclear
whether this state of maintaining attention is intentional or not. On a cognitive level is the
individual responsible for maintaining attention throughout the flow experience? Or are
there neurological and/or physiological mechanisms that take effect to sustain attention
without the individual’s cognitive awareness?
It is unclear whether metacognitive processes occur during flow. In fact,
Csikszentmihalyi (1990) wrote that individuals do not recognize that they are hungry or
fatigue until after a flow experience. Once an individual enters a flow state nothing else
matters but the activity. It seems as though one’s attention during flow is captured by the
activity leaving no energy to process extra stimuli (Warren, 2006). Further, awareness is
unintentional and effortless, whereby, action and awareness merge, self-consciousness is
67
diminished, and the individual experiences a reality outside of the norm (Warren). The
activity in flow is “spontaneous, automatic, and self-unaware” (Warren, p. 104); quite the
opposite of mindfulness. Hence, flow seems to diverge from mindfulness during the
experience. To interrupt an individual during flow would suspend the experience, thereby
rendering it difficult to study in-course. The attention processes active during flow
require further investigation. To understand what is happening during flow may have
significance in comprehending how flow and mindfulness are interrelated.
According to Shapiro and colleagues (2006) self-regulation of attention in
mindfulness research is based on feedback loops. Such an understanding of attention-
regulation may also be linked to the experience of flow. The feedback model includes:
“intention – attention – connection - regulation –order – health” (Shapiro et al., p. 380).
For example, one’s intention to pay attention non-judgmentally leads to a connection
with one’s environment or activity in the present moment further establishing self-
regulation and then greater order of self, health, and well-being. The feedback loop also
serves as a model for comprehending the benefits of self-regulation and the intrinsic
motivation towards such action. Thereby, there are positive health benefits of regulating
attention that are advocated by both mindfulness and flow theory. The feedback loop may
serve as a model for professing the benefits of mindfulness and flow.
According to Gutman and Schindler (2007) mindfulness and flow may share
similarities in physiological and neurological mechanisms, as well as, the stimulation of
the brain’s reward system. Flow and mindfulness share common features such as: intense
concentration; diminished focus on the external environment; complete absorption in the
present moment; a sense of union with the world; release of worry and anxiety; and
68
subjective well-being and contentment. It is believed that both flow and mindfulness
activate the brain’s reward system which distinguishes pleasurable activities from
harmful activities whereby, pleasurable activities are repeated while harmful activities are
avoided.
Related to the research on the brain’s reward system is Herbert Benson’s research
on the relaxation response. Benson (1974) proposes that certain activities elicit a
relaxation response that is beneficial to one’s health and well-being. The relaxation
response is opposite to the body’s fight/flight response (Gutman & Schindler, 2007). For
example, the response has been found to decrease heart rate and blood pressure (Newberg
et al., 2001), and increase immune functioning (Jacobs, 2001). It is believed that flow and
mindfulness elicit such physiological responses (Gutman & Schindler). Benson and
colleagues (1974) state that the relaxation response can be found in activities that share
the following characteristics: (a) quiet environment or space; (b) increased inward focus;
(c) everyday anxiety and worry is unnoticed; and (d) attention and concentration is
centered on an activity. Understanding the neurological and physiological mechanisms of
flow and mindfulness would provide further merit for their importance in a psychological
context.
Applied basis. Mindfulness teaches individuals to focus attention on the workings
of the mind through practice such as meditation. It is through such practice and discipline
that individuals learn to accept the contents that enter in and out of the present moment
experience. Flow on the other hand teaches individuals to focus attention on activities
that either focus on external stimuli such as, socializing, sports activities, work, and
school, or on internal stimuli such as, meditation, art-making, or yoga. Flow encourages
69
individuals to focus attention on activities in order to organize consciousness.
Mindfulness, in contrast teaches individuals to bring order to consciousness through
silence and by going inward. Both mindfulness and flow bring order to inner processes
through activity, whether the activity is the breath or action-oriented tasks may not be
relevant.
Mindfulness and flow both occur on a continuum of intensity. Warren (2006)
proposes that flow is equivalent to an intense state of mindfulness. Wright and colleagues
(2006) conceived that mindfulness is a phenomenon found in the experience of flow.
Researchers believe that in some way, flow includes a mindfulness component (Warren;
Wright et al.). Thereby, it is assumed that by cultivating mindfulness a flow state may be
induced.
Mindfulness can be cultivated daily and easily by focusing on the breath or by
forming an intention to focus attention on the present moment. For example, an
individual can be mindful by asking himself questions such as: What am I feeling right
now? What am I sensing right now? What is in awareness at this moment? (Germer,
Siegel, & Fulton, 2005). Flow, on the other hand, is difficult to cultivate easily especially
because there is no simple way to enter a flow state, although it is proposed that flow can
be experienced in daily activities such as in conversations with others, watching
television, reading, and writing (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Csikszentmihalyi proposes that
if the requirements for flow are present, it is likely that one will enter into a flow state.
Flow is cultivated through activity that is enjoyable, whereby one has the skills to meet
the challenge.
70
Flow and mindfulness share similarities in the environmental space required to
induce their respective states such as: quiet space without interruption; activity that
requires attention; and the intention to pay attention. Flow and mindfulness both begin
with the intention and the will to pay attention. The environmental space required for
flow and mindfulness is more conducive to one’s internal frame of being more so than
one’s external environment.
Conclusion
Mindfulness and Flow
Flow and mindfulness share similar elements and characteristics. It is
indeterminable if these two states are one of the same along a continuum of optimal
experience or if they are distinct processes. One possibility is that flow is an extension of
mindfulness philosophy and practice in everyday life whereby mindfulness is one
component of flow (Wright et al., 2006). Another possibility is that the diverse
characteristics of flow and mindfulness create a unique entity of consciousness rendering
them as distinct processes (Gutman & Schindler, 2007). However, it is difficult to
ascertain the relationship between mindfulness and flow given the limited research on
flow theory in particular. It could be argued that the philosophical foundation of
mindfulness and flow actually impedes our understanding of their true theoretical
processes and interferes with the ability to compare the two. Both mindfulness and flow
would benefit from comparison studies through the evaluation of physiological and/or
neurological mechanisms.
Flow and mindfulness conceive that optimal life experiences are dependent on the
use of psychic energy or consciousness (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
71
Flow theory proposes that vast amounts of psychic energy entering consciousness
requires attention otherwise, the individual may enter into a state of psychic entropy or
psychological distress (Csikszentmihalyi). Further, the individual needs to bring order to
consciousness and move towards self-growth. The way to bring order to consciousness is
by creating intention and to set clear goals for focusing attention (Csikszentmihalyi).
Mindfulness advocates that the wandering mind leads to cognitive imbalance and
psychological distress (Shapiro et al., 2006). In order to balance the mind, attention must
be given to the present moment whereby thoughts, feelings, and sensations are brought
into awareness and accepted non-judgmentally (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). The goal of
mindfulness is to be aware of all that enters into consciousness but not to expend energy
attached to any stimuli, other than by focusing on the present moment (e.g., the breath).
Both theories predicate that consciousness plays a central role in the demise of
psychological distress and/or the opposite, psychological well-being (Csikszentmihalyi;
Kabat-Zinn). The goal of both theories is to educate people to attend to consciousness in
a manner that leads to subjective well-being. Mindfulness teaches individuals to focus on
the here and now, while flow teaches individuals to engage in enjoyable activities.
From the literature review on mindfulness and flow, it is noted that the two terms
share similarities in describing the philosophy of human nature. One similarity is found in
the illustration of the wandering mind as a source of cognitive imbalance or
psychological distress (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Another similarity is
that optimal experience is a subjective inner experience and disassociated with stimulus-
driven pleasure. Another similarity is that the mind is in chaos without direction and
thereby focusing the mind leads to subjective well-being (Csikszentmihalyi; Kabat-Zinn).
72
Flow and mindfulness share commonalities in attention-regulation. Important to
both mindfulness and flow is sustained and maintained attention on the present moment
(Wallace & Shapiro, 2007). However, the confusion remains with understanding what
happens during the experience of flow. Such clarification is imperative in further
understanding the attention-regulation processes in flow. Mindfulness and flow are
beneficial processes for psychotherapeutic practice as they are focused on the mind and
cognitive skill to aid in health and well-being.
From an applied perspective, it is difficult to know how to induce a state of flow.
Essentially, it is important to engage in enjoyable activities that are challenging, require
skill, and have the potential for meaning and purpose in one’s life (Csikszentmihalyi,
1990). By practicing mindfulness one may enter into a flow experience (Warren, 2006).
Mindfulness is normally practiced through meditation but can be cultivated in one’s daily
life through intention. The importance of flow and mindfulness is in training the mind to
focus on the present moment, whether that is by focusing on one’s breath or by engaging
in an enjoyable activity. The premise of mindfulness and flow is to be present in
whatever one is doing, and to intentionally focus on one’s life in the here and now.
Art Therapy, Mindfulness, and Flow
Both mindfulness and flow require practice in order to cultivate such states of
consciousness. However, the difficulty is that there are not many structured interventions
for inducing flow and mindfulness rendering it difficult to practice. Art therapy provides
an avenue for the practice of flow and mindfulness. Art therapy is a profession that
acknowledges the importance of active participation in one’s life (Allen, 1995). Through
art-making, observation and reflection, a sense of awareness can be attained that leads to
73
subjective well-being (Malchiodi, 2003). Art therapy is a viable intervention for inducing
flow and mindfulness because it includes: (a) an enjoyable activity; (b) a functional
space; (c) focus on the mind’s workings; and (d) an inward focus. Art therapy aids to
focus clients’ attention to the present moment through the art process and art product, and
allows the process to be bearable through the pleasurable experience of creative
expression (Allen).
74
References
Allen, N., Blashki, G., & Gullone, E. (2006). Mindfulness-based psychotherapies: A
review of conceptual foundations, empirical evidence and practical
considerations. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 285-294.
Retrieved October 3, 2008, from the PsycINFO database.
Allen, P. (1995). Art is a way of knowing. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
American Art Therapy Association (2009). About Art Therapy. Retrieved
November 23, 2008, from http://www.arttherapy.org/aboutart.htm
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders (4th ed., text revision.). Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, N. D., Lau, M. A., Segal, Z. V., & Bishop, S. R. (2007). Mindfulness-based
stress reduction and attentional control. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,
14, 449-463.
Arlow, J. A. (2005). Psychoanalysis. In R. J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.), Current
psychotherapies (7th ed., pp. 15-51). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole – Thomson
Learning.
Bar-Sela, G., Atid, L., Danos, S., Gabay, N., & Epelbaum, R. (2007). Art therapy
improved depression and influenced fatigue levels in cancer patients on
chemotherapy. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 980-984.
Benson, H., Beary, J. F., & Carol, M. P. (1974). The relaxation response. Psychiatry, 37,
37-46.
Betensky, M. (1995). What do you see? Phenomenology of therapeutic art expression.
London: Jessica Kingsley.
75
Betensky, M. (2001). Phenomenological art therapy. In J. A. Rubin (Ed.), Approaches to
art therapy: Theory and technique (2nd ed., pp. 121-132). Philadelphia: Brunner-
Routledge.
Bien, T., & Bien, B. (2003). Finding the center within: The healing way of mindfulness
meditation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Bishop, S. R. (2002). What do we really know about mindfulness-based stress reduction?
Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 71-84. Retrieved July 4, 2008, from the PsycINFO database. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al.
(2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology:
Science and Practice, 11(3), 230-240. Retrieved September 30, 2006, from the
PsycINFO database.
Brantley, J. (2007). Calming your anxious mind (2nd ed.). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Brooke, S. L. (1995). Art therapy: An approach to working with sexual abuse survivors.
The Arts in Psychotherapy, 22(5), 447-466.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its
role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
84(4), 822-848. Retrieved January 24, 2009, from the PsycINFO database.
Budilovsky, J., & Adamson, E. (2002). The complete idiot’s guide to meditation (2nd ed.).
Indianapolis, IN: Alpha Books.
Canadian Art Therapy Association (n.d.). Art therapy FAQ. Retrieved
March 5, 2009, from http://www.catainfo.ca/faq.php
76
Carlson, L., Speca, M., Patel, K., & Goodey, E. (2003). Mindfulness-based stress
reduction in relation to the quality of life, mood, symptoms of stress, and immune
parameters in breast and prostate cancer outpatients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65,
571-581. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from
http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/cgi/content/full/65/4/571
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York: Harper Collins. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). If we are so rich, why aren’t we happy? American
Psychologist, 54(10), 821-827. Retrieved January 7, 2009, from the PsycINFO
database.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (2006). A life worth living: Contributions to
positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815-822. Retrieved January
13, 2009, from the PsycINFO database.
Coupar, R. (1992). The spirit sings: Reflections from an artist’s journal. Truro, Nova
Scotia: Gamaliel.
77
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
behavior. New York: Plenum.
Demerouti, E. (2006). Job characteristics, flow, and performance: The moderating role of
conscientiousness. Journal of Occupation Health Psychology, 11(3), 266-280.
Dickman, S. B., Dunn, J. E., & Wolf, A. W. (1996). The use of art therapy as a predictor
of relapse in chemical dependency treatment. Art Therapy, 13(4), 232-237.
Retrieved October 24, 2008, from the PsycINFO database.
Dietrich, A. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow.
Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 746-761. Retrieved February 24, 2009, from
the PsycINFO database.
Douglas, C. (2005). Analytical psychotherapy. In R. J. Corsini & D. Wedding (Eds.),
Current psychotherapies (7th ed., pp. 96-129). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole –
Thomson Learning.
Eaton, L. G., Doherty, K. L., & Widrick, R. M. (2007). A review of research and methods
used to establish art therapy as an effective treatment method for traumatized
children. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 34, 256-262.
Edwards, D. (2004). Art therapy. Thousand Oakes, CA: SAGE.
Edwards, M. (2001). Jungian analytic art therapy. In J. A. Rubin (Ed.), Approaches to art
therapy: theory and technique (2nd ed., pp. 81-94). Philadelphia: Brunner
Routledge.
Foster, S. L., & Lloyd, P. J. (2007). Positive psychology principles applied to consulting
psychology at the individual and group level. Consulting Psychology Journal:
78
Practice and Research, 59(1), 30-40. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from the
PsycINFO database.
Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of
General Psychology, 9(2), 103-110. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from the
PsycINFO database.
Gabriel, B., Bromberg, E., Vandenbovenkamp, J., Walka, P., Kornblith, A. B., &
Luzzatto, P. (2001). Art therapy with adult bone marrow transplant patients in
isolation: A pilot study. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 114-123. Retrieved September 24,
2008, from the PsycINFO database.
Gantt, L. M. (1998). A discussion of art therapy as a science. Art Therapy: Journal of the
American Art Therapy Association, 15(1), 3-12.
Germer, C. K., Siegel, R. D., & Fulton, P. R. (2005). Mindfulness and psychotherapy.
New York: Guilford Press.
Gowans, C. W. (2003). Philosophy of the Buddha. New York: Routledge.
Graham, J. M. (2008). Self-expansion and flow in couples’ momentary experiences: An
experience sampling study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3),
679-694.
Graham, M., & Suntag, M. (2001). Art as an evaluative tool: A pilot study. Art Therapy,
18(1), 37-43.
Gutman, S. A., & Schindler, V. P. (2007). The neurological basis of occupation.
Occupational Therapy International, 14(2), 71-85. Retrieved January 30, 2009,
from the MEDLINE database.
Hall, D. (2003). Meditation. Seek serenity through self-knowledge. London: Anness.
79
Harmison, R. J. (2006). Peak performance in sport: Identifying ideal performance states
and developing athletes’ psychological skills. Professional Psychology: Research
and Practice, 37(3), 233-243.
Hay, L. L. (1999). You can heal your life. Carlsbad, CA: Hay House.
Heywood, K. (2003). Introducing art therapy into the Christie hospital Manchester UK
2001-2002. Complementary Therapies in Nuring and Midwifery , 9, 125-132.
Hinz, L. D. (2006). Drawing from within: Using art to treat eating disorders.
Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Hogan, S. (2001). Healing arts: The history of art therapy. Philadelphia: Jessica
Kingsley.
Ivcevic, Z., & Mayer, J. D. (2006). Creative types and personality. Imagination,
Cognition, and Personality, 26, 65–86.
Jackson, S. A. (1995). Factors influencing the occurrence of flow state in elite athletes.
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7, 135-163. Retrieved February 4, 2009,
from the PsycINFO database.
Jackson, S. A. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding of the flow experience in elite
athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1), 76-90. Retrieved
February 4, 2009, from the PsycINFO database.
Johnson, D. R. (1998). On the therapeutic action of the creative arts therapies: The
Psychodynamic model. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 25(2), 85-99.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain
patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical
80
considerations and preliminary results. Journal of General Hospital Psychiatry, 4,
33-47. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from MEDLINE database.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living. New York: Bantam Dell.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and
future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144-155. Retrieved
October 10, 2008, from http://www.apa.org
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Coming to our senses. New York: Hyperion.
Kahn, B. B. (1999). Art therapy with adolescents: Making it work for school counselors.
Professional School Counseling, 2(4), 291-299.
Kee, Y. H., & Wang, C. K. J. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness, flow
dispositions, and mental skills adoption: A cluster analytic approach. Psychology
of Sport and Exercise, 9, 393-411. Retrieved January 24, 2009, from the
PsycINFO database.
Knill, P. J., Levine, E. G., & Levine, S. K. (2004). Principles and practice of expressive
arts therapy: Towards a therapeutic aesthetics. Philadelphia: Jessica
Kingsley.
Kramer, E. (2001). Art and emptiness: New problems in art education and art therapy.
American Journal of Art Therapy, 40, 6-15.
Kramer, E. (2002). On quality in art and art therapy. American Journal of Art Therapy,
40(4), 218-222.
Kristeller, J., & Hallett, B. (1999). An exploring study of a meditation-based intervention
for binge eating disorder. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(3), 357-363. Retrieved
September 27, 2008, from MEDLINE database.
81
Langer, E. (2005) Well-being: Mindfulness versus positive evaluation. In C. R. Snyder &
S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 214-230). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse.
Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1335-1341. Retrieved October 7, 2008, from the
MEDLINE database.
London, P. (1989). No more secondhand art: Awakening the artist within. Boston:
Shambhala.
Lyshak-Stelzer, F., Singer, P., St. John, P., & Chemtob, C. M. (2007). Art therapy for
adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: A pilot study. Art
therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 24(4), 163-169.
Malchiodi, C. A. (2002). The soul’s palette: Drawing on art’s transformative powers for
health and well-being. Boston: Shambhala.
Malchiodi, C. A. (2003). Art therapy and the brain. In C. A. Malchiodi (Ed.), Handbook
of art therapy (pp. 16-24). New York: Guildford Press.
Malchiodi, C. A. (2005). Art therapy. In C. A. Malchiodi (Ed.), Expressive Therapies
(pp. 16-45). New York: Guilford Press.
Malchiodi, C. A. (2007). The art therapy sourcebook. New York: McGraw Hill.
Martin, J. R. (1997). Mindfulness: A proposed common factor. Journal of Psychotherapy
Integration, 7(4), 291-311.
McNiff, S. (1981). The arts and psychotherapy. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
McNiff, S. (1992). Art as medicine. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
82
McNiff, S. (1997). Art therapy: A spectrum of partnerships. The Arts in Psychotherapy,
24(1), 37-44.
Miller, J., Fletcher, K., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (1995). Three-year follow up and clinical
implications of a mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention in the treatment
of anxiety disorders. General Hospital Psychiatry, 17(3), 192-200. Retrieved
October 1, 2008, from the MEDLINE database.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and
skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 275-
310. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from the PsycArticles database.
Monti, D. A., Peterson, C., Kunkel, E. J. S., Hauck, W. W., Pequignot, E., Rhodes, L., et
al. (2005). A randomized, controlled trial of mindfulness-based art
therapy (MBAT) for women with cancer. Psycho-Oncology,
15(5), 363-373.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S.
Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89-105). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Newberg, A., Alvi, A., Baime, M., Poudehnad, M., Santanna, J., & d’Aquli, E. (2001).
The measurement of regional cerebral blood flow during the complex cognitive
task of meditation: a preliminary SPECT study. Psychiatry Research, 106, 113-
122.
Peterson, C. (2006). Art therapy. In E. R., Mackenzie (Ed.), Complementary and
alternative medicine for older adults: A guide to holistic approaches to healthy
aging. New York: Springer Publishing.
83
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook
and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ramel, W., Goldin, P. R., Carmona, P. E., & McQuaid, J. R. (2004). The effects of
mindfulness mediation on cognitive processes and affect in patients with past
depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28(4), 433-455.
Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic
motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(1), 24-33. Retrieved
March 4, 2009, from the PsycArticles database.
Reynolds, M. W., Nabors, L., & Quinlan, A. (2000). The effectiveness of art therapy:
Does it work? Art Therapy, 17, 207-213.
Rosal, M. L. (1993). Comparative group art therapy research to evaluate changes in locus
of control in behavior disordered children. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 20, 231-
241.
Rubin, J. A. (1999). Art therapy: An introduction. Lillington, NC: Edwards Brothers.
Rubin, J. (2001). Approaches to art therapy: Theory and technique (2nd ed.). New York:
Brunner-Routledge.
Saunders, E. J., & Saunders, J. A. (2000). Evaluating the effectiveness of art therapy
through a quantitative, outcomes-focused study. The Arts in Psychotherapy,
27(2), 99-106.
Schmidt, J. A., Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Individual and situational
factors related to the experience of flow in adolescence. In A. Ong & M. van
Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 542-
558). New York: Oxford University Press.
84
Segal, Z., Williams, J., & Teasdale, J. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for
depression. New York: Guilford Press.
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction.
American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14. Retrieved February 4, 2009, from the
PsycINFO database.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2004). Positive psychology
progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5),
410-421. Retrieved February 14, 2009, from the PsycArticles database.
Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Astin, J., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373-386. Retrieved October 7, 2008,
from the MEDLINE database.
Shapiro, S., Schwartz, G., & Santerre, C. (2002). Meditation and positive psychology. In
C. R. Snyder, & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology, (pp. 632-645).
New York: Oxford University Press.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. (2003). Student
engagement is high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory.
School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176. Retrieved January 29, 2009, from
the PsycINFO database.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental and social
aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151-158. Retrieved January 29, 2009,
from the PsycINFO database.
Speca, M., Carlson, L., Goodey, E., & Angen, M. (2000). A randomized wait list
controlled clinical trial: The effect of a mindfulness meditation-based stress
85
reduction program on mood and symptoms of stress in cancer outpatients.
Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 613-622. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from the
MEDLINE database.
Stoll, B. (2005). Growing pains: The international of art therapy. The Arts in
Psychotherapy, 32, 171-191.
Swados, E. (2005). My depression a picture book. NY: Hyperion.
Tauer, J. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1999). Winning isn’t everything. Competition,
achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 35(3), 209-238. Retrieved March 4, 2009, from the PsycINFO
database.
Teasdale, J., Williams, J., Soulsby, J., Segal, Z., Ridgeway, V., & Lau, M. (2000).
Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based
cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 615-
623. Retrieved October 1, 2008, from the PsycINFO database.
Tibbetts, T. J. (1995). Art therapy at the crossroads. Art and Scientific Art Therapy, 12,
257-258.
Ulman, E. (2001). Art therapy: Problems of definition. American Journal of Art Therapy,
40, 16-26.
Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2003). Competitively contingent rewards and intrinsic
motivation: Can losers remain motivated? Motivation and Emotion, 27(4), 273-
299. Retrieved March 14, 2009, from the PsycINFO database.
Wadeson, H. (1980). Art psychotherapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
86
Wallace, B. A., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges
between Buddhism and western psychology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 690-
701. Retrieved January 24, 2009, from the PsycINFO database.
Waller, D. (2003). Gender issues in art therapy. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Warren, S. (2006). An exploration of the relevance of the concept of “flow” in art
therapy. International Journal of Art Therapy, 11, 2, 102-110. Retrieved January
24, 2009, from the PsycINFO database.
Wright, J. J., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2006). Challenge-skills and mindfulness: An
exploration of the conundrum of flow process. OTJR, 26(1), 25-32. Retrieved
March 2, 2009, from the PsycINFO database.
Yuen, E. J., & Baime, M. J. (2006). Meditation and healthy aging. In E. R. Mackenzie &
B. Rakel (Eds.), Complementary and alternative medicine for older adults (pp.
233-270). New York: Springer Publishing.
87
APPENDIX A
Art Therapy: A Practical Guide for Inducing States of Mindfulness and Flow
This manual is intended for the use of trained art therapists interested in inducing
a state of mindfulness and flow with their clients. In today’s society, individuals are
consumed by the over-exertion of daily living including stress accrued from work,
school, and/or family demands. People’s thoughts are clouded, lives are overrun with
things to do, and this manifests in an unhealthy and unproductive approach to living
(Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Our mind is consumed and the focus of our attention is suboptimal.
Mindfulness and flow both tap into the individuals’ subjective experiences and propose a
means to engage life fully at an optimal level of experience (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990;
Kabat-Zinn). This can be effective for mental health by empowering individuals to seek
out their own resources and inner strengths for defining and reaching a subjective state of
optimal experience. Art therapy, mindfulness, and flow are all interested in helping
individuals be present in their lives and to find more satisfying approaches to living life
fully.
How to Use this Manual
This manual is a practical guide for inducing states of mindfulness and flow in an
art therapeutic context with clients. The guide is proposed to enrich art therapy practice
by inviting mindfulness and flow states. The manual combines art therapy philosophy
and practice with the proponents of mindfulness and flow. The author of this manual
subscribes to a phenomenological perspective of art therapy and approaches the practice
from an arts-based perspective. The exercises will follow Betensky’s (2001) method of
art therapy (see Appendix B). This manual is intended to be used by trained art therapists
88
and serves as a practical guideline that can be adjusted according to the needs of the
client. Included in the manual are a number of exercises for inducing states of
mindfulness and flow with clients. The guideline describes examples of opening and
closing exercises for the session with the client, as well as a format for presenting the art
exercise and materials recommended for use.
Mindfulness
What is Mindfulness?
Mindfulness is a state of being that includes radical acceptance and awareness of
the present moment (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). Mindfulness includes a number of attitudinal
characteristics such as: non-judging, patience, a beginner’s mind, trust, non-striving,
acceptance, and letting go (Kabat-Zinn). In addition, mindfulness includes intrinsic
qualities of being such as affection, compassion, openness, and kindness (Kabat-Zinn).
From a psychological perspective, mindfulness is two-tiered including the self-
regulation of attention and acceptance of the present moment (Bishop et al., 2004).
Mindfulness is a psychological process of “regulating attention in order to bring a quality
of nonelaborative awareness to current experience and a quality of relating to one’s
experience within an orientation of curiosity, experiential openness, and acceptance”
(Bishop et al., p. 234).
Mindfulness has been linked to improving stress, anxiety, depression and a
number of other psychological conditions (Anderson et al., 2007). The premise of
mindfulness practice is to create a sense of awareness that directs attention to the present
moment fostering a sense of connectedness with the here and now (Kabat-Zinn, 1990).
89
Such focus is believed to eliminate the suffering and pain associated with the wandering
mind, ruminative thoughts, and unproductive attention-regulation (Kabat-Zinn).
Common mindfulness practices include meditation, yoga, body scan, and writing
(Hall, 2003). However, researchers have created a practice called Mindfulness-based Art
Therapy (MBAT) which combines art therapy and mindfulness (Moneti et al., 2005).
Researchers believe that art therapy induces a state of mindfulness (Malchiodi, 2007).
Since mindfulness encourages inward introspection, art therapy offers a method.
It is likely that any type of art therapy practice will induce a mindfulness state.
However, art therapists need to be aware that the requirements for mindfulness include:
(a) no interruption to the mindfulness state; (b) focus of attention on the activity; (c)
attitudinal components such as openness, beginner’s mind, and letting go; and (d) a space
conducive to foster such attitudinal characteristics which is naturally inherent in art
therapy practice and philosophy.
Flow
What is Flow?
According to Csikszentmihalyi (1990) flow is a psychological term used to denote
a state that occurs when an individual is completely immersed in an activity. Flow is a
deep state of activity whereby the individual engages in a challenging task that requires
complete demand of attention and focus. To be in a state of flow entails that there is a
challenge to be met, skills to be used, and clear set goals to attain. Expectations are clear
and attainable. Attention is focused and intention is made towards the goal. In addition,
outside external factors become irrelevant as the primary focus is on the activity at hand.
90
A major component of flow is that the activity is enjoyable for its own sake, indicating
that it is intrinsically motivating.
Flow theory has emerged out of positive psychology. It is interested in
understanding what motivates individuals toward enjoyable activities that are intrinsically
rewarding (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Flow theory is based on the premise that intrinsic
motivation is relevant to seeking enjoyment. The individual enjoys the activity and will
do the activity over and over again for its own sake (Csikszentmihalyi).
Flow is a model for pursuing purposeful goals and focusing attention on activities
that bring order to one’s state of being (Csikszentmihalyi). Individuals can develop the
potential to live life in this manner by bringing order to consciousness and mastering
control over emotions and cognitions (Csikszentmihalyi). Control is fostered through
intention and the choice to attend to one’s consciousness through purposeful activity
(Csikszentmihalyi).
There are eight components of flow including the: (a) balance of challenge and
skill; (b) fusion of awareness and action; (c) clear goals; (d) feedback; (e) focus of
attention; (f) sense of control over actions; (g) loss of self-consciousness; and (h)
transformation of time (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Foster & Lloyd, 2007; Warren, 2006).
To enter into a state of flow requires the focus and absorption of attention on an activity
that one enjoys doing.
Flow can be experienced anytime without apparent reason (Csikszentmihalyi,
1990; Warren, 2006). To experience flow an intention and choice to enter into a state
requiring complete attention and focus on the activity is vital and there needs to be a
91
space with no distractions to interrupt one’s frame of mind (Wright et al., 2006).
Emphasis is placed on doing the activity (Csikszentmihalyi).
Flow has been linked to self-esteem, happiness, life satisfaction, and work
productivity (Wright et al., 2006). Flow serves as a means for coping and managing daily
life stressors (Warren, 2006). In addition, flow is a way to cultivate meaningful and
purposeful life experiences (Warren). As such, flow appeals to psychotherapy as it is
interested in the quality of life experience and in general, happiness and subjective well-
being (Warren).
Mindfulness and Flow
Mindfulness and flow describe that what we attend to or pay attention to in life is
an important factor in determining the quality of our life experiences and more so the
quality of our moment to moment experience (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Kabat-Zinn,
1990). Attention is the variable that either supports a healthy and productive life or leads
to illness and pain (Csikszentmihalyi; Kabat-Zinn).
Csikszentmihalyi (1990) and Kabat-Zinn (1990) leave us with is a philosophy and
a model for living life fully and completely – their primary core statement is to pay
attention. Happiness and relief from suffering are found in moments of optimal
experience whereby attention is focused on now. In addition, by gaining mastery over our
consciousness we can live fully present and engaged in life in the present moment. Flow
theory proposes that the way towards optimal experience is by training the mind to focus
on purposeful activity. Mindfulness theory proposes that the way towards optimal life
experiences is to awaken to the moment by fully engaging in the present moment
experience. As such, mindfulness and flow suggest that the point in power in our lives is
92
the focus of our immediate attention on the present moment. Art therapy is an
intervention that teaches us to focus on the present moment, to engage our senses fully,
and become aware of what is represented in our consciousness through creative
expression. Through creativity, reflection, and self-growth, subjective well-being can be
attained.
Art Therapy Art therapy facilitates healing towards psychological well-being by: increasing
self-awareness and self-understanding, empowering clients towards inherent personal
healing, expressing difficult emotions, sensations, and thoughts, experiencing one’s
authentic self, and witnessing one’s own life through art (Hinz, 2006; London, 1989;
Malchiodi, 2002). Mindfulness and flow are states of consciousness that have positive
affect on subjective well-being and therefore would be beneficial in an art therapeutic
context (Monti et al., 2005; Warren, 2006).
Art therapy is a viable intervention for inducing flow and mindfulness. Warren
(2006) proposes that art therapy is a natural approach to facilitating a flow experience.
Art therapy offers the client the opportunity to be completely focused and absorbed in art-
making. Art therapy can either be a practice that assists individuals to engage in a flow
activity or it can help individuals uncover potential flow activities. Through fostering
creativity and imagination, the values of flow and intrinsic motivation are introduced to
the client. In a psychotherapeutic context the goal may entail helping individuals to
identify the activities that he enjoys doing and to assist the client in devoting attention
toward these activities (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002; Warren, 2006).
93
Monti and colleagues (2005) proposed that the combination of verbal and non-verbal
interventions, as offered by art therapy and mindfulness meditation enrich
psychotherapeutic practice. Art therapy can induce mindfulness and flow because it
includes: (a) an enjoyable activity; (b) a functional space; (c) focus on the mind’s
workings; and (d) an inward focus. Art therapy aids to focus clients’ attention to the
present moment through the art process and art product, and allows the process to be
bearable through the pleasurable experience of creative expression (Allen, 1995).
Flow and mindfulness are both states of experience that are primarily concerned
with how energy is used in consciousness; art therapy also follows a phenomenological
perspective (Betensky, 2001). However, art therapy offers a unique component. It allows
clients to not only be present with their subjective and objective experiences but also to
“see” their experiences via the art creation (Monti et al., 2005). From a phenomenological
perspective, art therapy allows us to see what is truly authentic to our state of being
(Betensky). That is, it allows us to see our experience of consciousness directly through
creative expression. Once we are able to see our consciousness directly we also have the
opportunity to see our experience in novel and diverse ways (Betensky). From a
therapeutic stance this is beneficial because such experiences assist the client in gaining
self-awareness, focusing attention on the present moment, and understanding their inner
truth and consciousness which all can lead to subjective well-being (Allen, 1995;
Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Malchiodi, 2007). Art therapy teaches us to
look and see in new ways providing us with the opportunity to learn, grow, and expand
our sense of self.
94
Primarily art therapy is concerned with externalizing one’s inner experience
through art expression (Allen, 1995). Thereby, making one’s energy visible and bringing
one’s state of awareness outward through the art expression (Allen). Art therapy is a way
to get to know our deepest self (Allen). In addition, it allows us to attend to phenomenon
that enters consciousness in the present moment through creative expression (Allen).
Essentially, art therapy teaches us to focus our attention on the here and now which is
also the premise of mindfulness and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Kabat-Zinn,
1990).
95
Exercise One
Theme: Intention
Purpose: The purpose of this exercise is to allow the client the opportunity to set his/her
intention for entering into art therapy. This allows the client and therapist to build a sense
of rapport. It serves to clarify the client’s goal(s) for counselling, and to open dialogue for
what art therapy is and what it can offer.
Opening: (Directive to the client). Express how you are feeling in this moment. Express
at least five feelings.
Art Activity: (Directive to the client). Draw a picture of your intention for art therapy
practice. What is it that you intend to gain from art therapy? An intention can be anything
that is important and meaningful to you personally.
Processing: What does your image represent? What did you notice?
Closing: (Directive to the client). Write in your notebook about what today’s art therapy
experience was like for you. Your notebook, along with your art work will serve as a
record of your work accomplished in art therapy.
Art Materials: White paper, colored paper, magazines, tempera paint, paintbrushes,
water canister, oil pastels, chalk pastels, and notebook.
96
Exercise Two
Theme: Mandala drawing
Purpose: Mandala means sacred circle and is described as an individual’s map of
consciousness (Malchiodi, 2007). The purpose of this exercise is to have the client focus
on the present moment through the creation of a mandala representing his/her current life
experience. The directive is as open as possible to allow for free expression.
Opening: A grounding exercise to begin the session includes focusing on one’s breath.
The client closes his/her eyes while focusing on his/her breathing for three minutes.
Art Activity: (Directive to the client). Draw a circle on your paper. The circle can take
up a large or small part of the page. Fill in the circle and/or the page until you feel that
your image is complete.
Processing: What was the art-making process like for you? What comes to mind when
you look at the art piece? Tell me about the art piece.
Closing: (Directive to the client). In your notebook, create a title for your mandala. List
five words that come to mind when you look at your mandala and create a short statement
using those five words. The purpose of this exercise is to document a summary of today’s
session for your records.
Art Materials: White paper, colored paper, oil pastels, chalk pastels, felt markers,
tempera paint, paintbrushes, water canister, and a notebook.
97
Exercise Three
Theme: Scribble Drawing
Purpose: The purpose of the scribble drawing is to allow the client to draw
spontaneously while experiencing a state of non-judgment, beginner’s mind, openness,
and diminished self-consciousness.
Opening: The purpose of this opening exercise is to ground the client in the present
moment. (Directive to the client). Name five things you see, five things you hear, and
five things you sense.
Art Activity: (Directive to the client). Scribble on the paper using oil pastel(s) and/or felt
pen(s). If you want you can close your eyes while scribbling. Continue scribbling until
you feel that your portrait is complete.
Processing: What was the process like? What did you notice?
Closing: (Directive to the client). To document today’s session, summarize in one
sentence what it felt like to scribble. In your notebook this week create scribble drawings.
Art Materials: White paper, oil pastels, felt markers, and notebook.
98
Exercise Four
Theme: Free Drawing
Purpose: The purpose of this exercise is to allow the client the opportunity to enter a
state of mindfulness and flow without a directive. The client has the freedom to express
whatever comes to his/her mind through creative expression.
Opening: Finger paint with the non-dominant hand as a pre-play warm up exercise.
Art Activity: (Directive to the client). Using the art supplies available draw one picture
or as many pictures as you would like.
Processing: Ask the client for permission to hold the picture up. If the client would like
to process the image through discussion or writing then do so, otherwise observe and
witness the image through silence only.
Closing: (Directive to the client). Taking what you have learned today from your art
creation, how can you apply this information so that it positively affects your life this
week? In your notebook, write one word that comes to mind about today’s session.
Art Materials: White paper, colored paper, oil pastels, chalk pastels, felt markers,
magazines, glue, scissors, finger paint, tempera paint, paintbrushes, water canister, and a
notebook.
99
Exercise Five
Theme: Going Inward
Purpose: The purpose of this exercise is to allow the client the opportunity to go inward
and access his/her inner resources as a means to move toward strength and well-being.
Opening: (Directive to the client). Close your eyes and visualize a place that brings you a
sense of inner harmony. While in this place, observe feeling, thoughts, and sensations
that come to mind. If your mind begins to wander, go back to envisioning this place of
inner harmony.
Art Activity: (Directive to the client). Choose two paintbrushes. Choose two colors of
paint, one for each brush. Stand up in front of the paper with a paintbrush in each hand.
The brushes do not touch the paper at this time. Eyes closed. Focus attention on what it
feels like to hold the brush in your hands. (Continue for a minute). Now begin moving the
paintbrushes in the air in small circles. (Continue for a minute). Now begin moving the
paintbrushes in the air in progressively bigger circles. (Continue for a minute). Now
move the paintbrushes in a combination of small and big circles as you wish. (Continue
for a minute). Move closer to your piece of paper. I want you to continue this movement
of your paintbrushes on paper. When you need more paint, open your eyes and continue
painting until you feel that your portrait is complete. You may add different colors if you
wish to do so. (Allow the client to stay in this space uninterrupted until she is complete).
Processing: What was that like for you? What did you notice? What title do you give
your portrait? What are five words that describe your portrait?
100
Closing: (Directive to the client). In your notebook, write what you have learned today
about inner harmony. Reflect on how you can access this point of strength daily in your
life. Choose a symbol that evokes this state of inner harmony.
Art Materials: White paper (tacked on to a wall), tempera paint, two paint brushes, a
water canister, and a notebook.
101
Exercise Six
Theme: Just Breathe
Purpose: The purpose of this exercise is to focus on the breath and bring awareness to
the present moment. Focusing on one’s breath is an easy way of teaching a client to
practice mindfulness regularly.
Opening: Listen to sounds of the ocean.* Reflect on how the rhythm of the ocean sound
is similar to one’s breath. Breathe in and out.
Art Activity: Continue listening to the sound of the ocean. Have the client close his/her
eyes and focus on his/her breathing. Open eyes and have the client draw a picture of
his/her breath.
Processing: What did you notice? What did you feel and sense while creating the image?
What do you see?
Closing: Close with a visualization of the breath. (Directive to the client). Eyes are
closed. Visualize the breath coming up through the feet and out through the mouth. Again
the breath comes up through the feet and out through the mouth.
Art Materials: White paper, colored paper, oil pastels, chalk pastels, felt markers,
tempera paint, brushes, and water canister.
• (One suggested C.D. is Relaxing Pachelbel by Joseph Stevenson).
102
Exercise Seven
Theme: Clay
Purpose: The purpose of this exercise is to have the client focus inward while
disregarding external stimuli by keeping his/her eyes closed. The exercise allows the
client to experience letting go of expectation and rather to cultivate a frame of mind that
includes openness, non-judgment, and acceptance of the present moment.
Opening: (Directive to the client). Draw a picture of five things you saw today. The
purpose is to bring awareness to one’s day and to examine one’s thoughtful approach to
daily living.
Art Activity: The client closes his/her eyes. Holding the piece of clay in his/her hands,
the client is asked to hold the clay for a few minutes. The client is asked to shape the
piece of clay, listening to what the clay wants to be, not what the client wants it to be.
When the client is ready, he/she can create the image doing so with his/her eyes closed, if
comfortable.
Processing: What was the process like for you? What did you notice? Was it difficult or
easy? Tell me about your creation.
Closing: (Directive to the client). In your notebook, write as though the image is
speaking to you. What does the image want you to know?
Art Materials: Clay, water canister, and notebook.
103
Exercise Eight
Theme: Drawing your Here and Now
Purpose: The purpose of this exercise is to create awareness of one’s consciousness in
the present moment. The opening exercise is a warm-up of bringing order to
consciousness even when one’s present moment appears chaotic.
Opening: (Directive to the client). Thinking of the word chaos, create an image that
represents chaos. Use the art supplies in a chaotic way. From that image pick a part of the
picture that you like and develop it further on a separate piece of paper (adapted from
Liebmann, 2004).
Art Activity: Using the art supplies available create an image that represents your life
here and now.
Processing: What did you notice? When looking at the image what stands out? What do
you see?
Closing: (Directive to the client). In your notebook, write about what stood out in today’s
session.
Art Materials: White paper, colored paper, oil pastels, chalk pastels, felt markers,
tempera paint, brushes, water canister, and a notebook.
104
Exercise Nine
Theme: Things I Enjoy
Purpose: The purpose of this activity is to gather information about the client on what
areas of life they may have experienced flow. Flow experiences are enjoyable, so the best
approach is to inquire about what the client enjoys doing (Warren, 2006).
Opening: (Directive to the client). Create a scribble drawing. Once you complete the
drawing, create a story about the image. Begin the story with the phrase “In this moment”
Art Activity: (Directive to the client). Create an image depicting things that you enjoy.
The drawing could include one or several images.
Processing: What was the process like for you? What did you feel in your body? What
do you see? Tell me about your picture.
Closing: (Directive to the client). In your notebook write about how can you cultivate
some of these things that you enjoy into your daily or weekly life?
Art Materials: White paper, colored paper, oil pastels, chalk pastels, felt markers,
tempera paint, brushes, water canister, and a notebook.
105
APPENDIX B
Betensky’s (2001) Phenomenological Method of Art Therapy
Sequence 1: Pre-art play with art materials
Direct experiencing
Sequence 2: The process of artwork – Creating a phenomenon
Sequence 3: Phenomenological intuiting
Phase 1: Perceiving
(a) Visual display
(b) Distancing
(c) Intentional looking
Phase 2: What-do-you-see procedure
(a) Phenomenological description
(b) Phenomenological unfolding
Sequence 4: Phenomenological integration
106
References
Allen, P. (1995). Art is a way of knowing. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
Anderson, N. D., Lau, M. A., Segal, Z. V., & Bishop, S. R. (2007). Mindfulness-based
stress reduction and attentional control. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,
14, 449-463.
Betensky, M. (2001). Phenomenological art therapy. In J. A. Rubin (Ed.), Approaches to
art therapy: Theory and technique (2nd ed., pp. 121-132). PA: Brunner-Routledge.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al.
(2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology:
Science and Practice, 11(3), 230-240. Retrieved September 30, 2006, from the
PsycINFO database.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. New York: Harper Collins.
Foster, S. L., & Lloyd, P. J. (2007). Positive psychology principles applied to consulting
psychology at the individual and group level. Consulting Psychology Journal:
Practice and Research, 59(1), 30-40. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from the
PsycINFO database.
Hall, D. (2003). Meditation. Seek serenity through self-knowledge. London: Anness.
Hinz, L. D. (2006). Drawing from within: Using art to treat eating disorders.
Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living. New York: Bantam Dell.
Liebmann, M. (2004). Art therapy for groups: A handbook of themes and exercises. New
York: Brunner-Routledge.
107
London, P. (1989). No more secondhand art: Awakening the artist within. Boston:
Shambhala.
Malchiodi, C. A. (2002). The soul’s palette: Drawing on art’s transformative powers for
health and well-being. Boston: Shambhala.
Malchiodi, C. A. (2007). The art therapy sourcebook. New York: McGraw Hill.
Monti, D. A., Peterson, C., Kunkel, E. J. S., Hauck, W. W., Pequignot, E., Rhodes, L., &
Brainard, G. C. (2005). A randomized, controlled trial of mindfulness-based art
therapy (MBAT) for women with cancer. Psycho-Oncology,
15(5), 363-373.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S.
Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89-105). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Warren, S. (2006). An exploration of the relevance of the concept of “flow” in art
therapy. International Journal of Art Therapy, 11, 2, 102-110.
Wright, J. J., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2006). Challenge-skills and mindfulness: An
exploration of the conundrum of flow process. OTJR, 26(1), 25-32.