45
Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets. Angles & Coordinates:. 1 full circle = 360 degrees 1 degree = 60 arcminutes 1 arcminute = 60 arcseconds ~ 1 inch @ 100 yards (2.908 cm at 100 meters) 1 milliarcsec (mas) = 0.001 arcsec 1 microarcsec ( µas) = 0.000001 arcsec - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Page 2: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Angles & Coordinates:• 1 full circle = 360 degrees

• 1 degree = 60 arcminutes

• 1 arcminute = 60 arcseconds ~ 1 inch @ 100 yards (2.908 cm at 100 meters)

1 milliarcsec (mas) = 0.001 arcsec

1 microarcsec (µas) = 0.000001 arcsec

Astronomical coordinates on sky:

E-W: Right Ascension (RA) in h:m:s (0-24h)

N-S: Declination (DEC) in deg:arcm:arcs (-90 - +90)

Page 3: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Stellar Motion

There are 4 types of stellar „motion“ that astrometry can measure:

1. Parallax (distance): the motion of stars caused by viewing them from different parts of the Earth‘s orbit

2. Proper motion: the true motion of stars through space

3. Motion due to the presence of companion

4. „Fake“ motion due to other physical phenomena

Page 4: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

1 milliarcsecond

Our solar system from 32 light years (10 pcs)

Page 5: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometry - the branch of astronomy that deals with the measurement of the position and motion of celestial bodies

• It is one of the oldest subfields of the astronomy dating back at least to Hipparchus (130 B.C.), who combined the arithmetical astronomy of the Babylonians with the geometrical approach of the Greeks to develop a model for solar and lunar motions. He also invented the brightness scale used to this day.

Brief History

• Hooke, Flamsteed, Picard, Cassini, Horrebrow, Halley also tried and failed

• Galileo was the first to try measure distance to stars using a 2.5 cm telescope. He of course failed.

Page 6: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

• 1887-1889 Pritchard used photography for astrometric measurements

• Modern astrometry was founded by Friedrich Bessel with his Fundamenta astronomiae, which gave the mean position of 3222 stars.

• 1838 first stellar parallax (distance) was measured independently by Bessel (heliometer), Struve (filar micrometer), and Henderson (meridian circle).

Page 7: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

• Astrometry is also fundamental for fields like celestial mechanics, stellar dynamics and galactic astronomy. Astrometric applications led to the development of spherical geometry.

• Mitchell at McCormick Observatory (66 cm) telescope started systematic parallax work using photography

• Astrometry is also fundamental for cosmology. The cosmological distance scale is based on the measurements of nearby stars.

Page 8: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometry: Parallax

Distant stars

1 AU projects to 1 arcsecond at a distance of 1 pc = 3.26 light years

Page 9: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometry: Proper motion

Discovered by Halley who noticed that Sirius, Arcturus, and Aldebaran were over ½ degree away from the positions Hipparchus measured 1850 years earlier

Page 10: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometry: Proper motion

Barnard is the star with the highest proper motion (~10 arcseconds per year)

Barnard‘s star in 1950 Barnard‘s star in 1997

Page 11: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometry: Orbital Motion

×

a1

a2

a1m1 = a2m2

a1 = a2m2 /m1

D

To convert to an angular displacement you have to divide by the distance, D

Page 12: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

mM

aD

=

The astrometric signal is given by:

m = mass of planet

M = mass of star

a = orbital radius

D = distance of star

= mM2/3

P2/3

D

Astrometry: Orbital Motion

Note: astrometry is sensitive to companions of nearby stars with large orbital distances

Radial velocity measurements are distance independent, but sensitive to companions with small orbital distances

This is in radians. More useful units are arcseconds (1 radian = 206369 arcseconds) or milliarcseconds (0.001 arcseconds) = mas

Page 13: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometry: Orbital Motion

With radial velocity measurements and astrometry one can solve for all orbital elements

Page 14: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

-9.45

-9.40

-9.35

-9.30

-9.25

53.5053.4553.4053.3553.30

53.50

53.45

53.40

53.35

53.30

2.4500x106

2.44902.4480

Julian Date

So we find our astrometric orbit

-9.45

-9.40

-9.35

-9.30

-9.25

53.5053.4553.4053.3553.30

53.50

53.45

53.40

53.35

53.30

2.4500x106

2.44902.4480

Julian Date

But the parallax can disguise it

-9.5

-9.4

-9.3

-9.2

-9.1

-9.0

-8.9

-8.8

53.853.653.4

53.8

53.6

53.4

2.4500x106

2.44902.4480

Julian Date

And the proper motion can slinky it

Page 15: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometric Detections of Exoplanets

The Challenge: for a star at a distance of 10 parsecs (=32.6 light years):

Source Displacment (as)

Jupiter at 1 AU 100

Jupiter at 5 AU 500

Jupiter at 0.05 AU 5

Neptune at 1 AU 6

Earth at 1 AU 0.33

Parallax 100000

Proper motion (/yr) 500000

Page 16: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

The Observable Model

Must take into account:

1. Location and motion of target

2. Instrumental motion and changes

3. Orbital parameters

4. Physical effects that modify the position of the stars

Page 17: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

The Importance of Reference stars

Perfect instrument Perfect instrument at a later time

Reference stars:1. Define the „plate scale“2. Monitor changes in the plate scale (instrumental effects)3. Give additional measures of your target

Focal „plane“

Detector

Example

Typical plate scale on a 4m telescope (Focal ratio = 13) = 3.82 arcsecs/mm = 0.05 arcsec/pixel (15 m) = 57mas/pixel. The displacement of a star at 10 parsecs with a Jupiter-like planet would make a displacement of 1/100 of a pixel (0.00015 mm)

Page 18: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Good Reference stars can be difficult to find:

1. They can have their own (and different) parallax

2. They can have their own (and different) proper motion

3. They can have their own companions (stellar and planetary)

4. They can have starspots, pulsations, etc (as well as the target)

Page 19: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Astrometric detections: attempts and failures

To date no extrasolar planet has been discovered with the astrometric method, although there have been several false detections

Barnard´s star

Page 20: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets
Page 21: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets
Page 22: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets
Page 23: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

New cell in lens installed Lens re-aligned

Hershey 1973

Van de Kamp detection was most likely an instrumental effect

Page 24: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Real Astrometric Detections with the Hubble Telescope Fine Guidance Sensors

Page 25: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

HST uses „Narrow Angle Interferometry“!

HST is achieving astrometric precision of 0.1–1 mas !

G. Fritz Benedict(McD Obs.)

Page 26: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

One of our planets is missing: sometimes you need the true mass!

HD 33636 b

P = 2173 d

Msini = 10.2 MJup

B

i = 4 deg → m = 142 MJup

= 0.142 Msun

Bean et al. 2007AJ....134..749B

Page 27: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets
Page 28: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

• The more massive companion to Gl 876 (Gl 876b) has a mass Mb = 1.89 ± 0.34 MJup and an orbital inclination i = 84° ± 6°.

• Assuming coplanarity, the inner companion (Gl 876c) has a mass Mc = 0.56 MJup

The mass of Gl876b

Page 29: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

55Cnc d

Perturbation due to component d,

P = 4517 days = 1.9 ± 0.4 mas

i = 53° ± 7°

Mdsin i = 3.9 ± 0.5 MJ

Md = 4.9 ± 1.1 MJ

McArthur et al. 2004 ApJL, 614, L81

Combining HST astrometry and ground-based RV

Page 30: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

The 55 Cnc (= 1 Cnc) planetary system, from outer- to inner-most ID r(AU) M (MJup)d 5.26 4.9 ± 1.1c 0.24 0.27 ± 0.07b 0.12 0.98 ±0.19e 0.04 0.06 ± 0.02

Where we have invoked coplanarity for c, b, and e

= (17.8 ± 5.6 Mearth) a Neptune!!

Page 31: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Distance = 3.22 pcs = 10 light years

Period = 6.9 yrs

The Planet around Eridani

Page 32: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Mass (true) = 1.53 ± 0.29 MJupiter

Eri

= 0.3107 arcsec (parallax)

a = 2.2 mas (semi-major axis) i = 30° (inclination)

X-d

ispl

acem

ent (

arc-

seco

nds)

Y-d

ispl

acem

ent (

arc-

seco

nds)

HST Astrometry of the extrasolar planet of Eridani

Page 33: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Orbital inclination of 30 degrees is consistent with inclination of dust ring

Page 34: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

One worrisome point: The latest radial velocities do not fit the orbit:

Page 35: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets
Page 36: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

The Planetary System of And

Page 37: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets
Page 38: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Note: the planets do not have the same inclination!

Page 39: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets
Page 40: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Planets c and d are inclined by 30 degrees to each other!

Page 41: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

The Purported Planet around Vb10

Up until now astrometric measurements have only detected known exoplanets. Vb10 was purported to be the first astrometric detection of a planet. Prada and Shalkan 2009 claimed to have found a planet using the STEPS: A CCD camera mounted on the Palomar 5m. 9 years of data were obtained.

Page 42: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

The astrometric perturbation of Vb 10

Mass = 6.4 MJup

Page 43: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

The RV data does not support the astrometry. The only way is to have eccentric orbits which is ruled out by

the astrometric measurements.

Page 44: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Comparison between Radial Velocity Measurements and Astrometry.

Astrometry and radial velocity measurements are fundamentally the same: you are trying to measure a displacement on a detector

1. Measure a displacement of a spectral line on a detector

1. Measure a displacement of a stellar image on a detector

2. Thousands of spectral lines (decrease error by √Nlines)

2. One stellar image

3. Hundreds of reference lines (Th-Ar or Iodine) to define „plate solution“ (wavelength solution)

3. 1-10 reference stars to define plate solution

4. Reference lines are stable 4. Reference stars move!

AstrometryRadial Velocity

Page 45: Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

• Astrometry is the oldest branch of Astronomy

• It is sensitive to planets at large orbital distances → complimentary to radial velocity

• Gives you the true mass

• Very useful for system architecture (e.g. ups And)

• Least successful of all search techniques because the precision is about a factor of 1000 too large.

• Will have to await space based missions to have a real impact

Summary