50
Michael P Busch, MD, PhD Blood Systems Research Institute University of California, San Francisco ASSURING THE SAFETY OF THE BLOOD SUPPLY

ASSURING THE SAFETY OF THE BLOOD SUPPLYsabloodcongress.org/2017/images/presentations/Tuesday... · 2017. 9. 22. · IND NS1Ag screening implemented by ARC in PR & S Florida NS1 Ag

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Michael P Busch, MD, PhDBlood Systems Research Institute University of California, San Francisco

    ASSURING THE SAFETY OF THE BLOOD SUPPLY

  • Risks of major TTVs linked to interventions, and accelerating rate of EIDs of concern to blood safety

    Perkins HA, Busch MP. Transfusion-Associated Infections: 50 Years of Relentless Challenges and Remarkable Progress. Transfusion, 2010; 50(10):2080-99

    ZIK

    V

    Recent arbovirus threats

  • Arboviruses

    •Arthropod Borne viruses

    • Descriptive, not taxonomic

    • Mosquitoes, gnats, sandflies, etc

    • Ticks

    • Four major families

    • Togaviridae, Flaviviridae, Alphaviruses, Bunyaviridae

    • These are all ss-RNA enveloped viruses

    •Human and sylvatic cycles

    3

  • Simplified Patterns of Vector-Borne Disease Transmission

    National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

    Division of Vector-Borne Diseases | Bacterial Diseases Branch

    Scenario one:People are incidental hosts

    Scenario two:People are primary hosts

    Courtesy of Lyle Petersen, US CDC

  • Daily Airplane Flights

  • Evaluating an EID threat to blood safety3 basic questions need to be answered:

    • Is it in the blood supply?• Necessitates a way to measure the agent in donors during epidemics

    • Estimation of donor risks: prevalence, incidence, durations of detection• Estimation of blood component risks

    • Temperature, preparation, storage duration effects on infectivity?• Is antibody in the infected donor or co-transfused components protective?

    • Is it transfusion-transmitted and what is the risk?• Is transmission risk dependent on stage of infection or VL in the

    donor/component• Do recipient antibodies from prior infection protect from TT

    • If transmissible by transfusion, does it have a clinical impact in transfused recipients?• Is TT disease more or less severe than usual routes of infection

  • World distribution and spread of WNV

    Clade 1a

    Clade 1b

    Clade 1c

    Lignage 1

    Lignage 2

  • U.S. WNV blood donor screening timeline

    1Lanciotti, RT, Roehrig JT, Deubel V, Smith J, Parker M, Steele K, et al. Science, 19992Pealer LN, Marfin AA, Petersen LR, Lanciotti RS, Page PL, Stramer SL, Stobierski MG et al. N Engl J Med. 20033Busch MP, Caglioti S, Robertson EF, McAuley, JD, Tobler LH, Kamel H et al. New England J Med, 2005Stramer SL, Fang CT, Foster GA, Wagner AG, Brodsky JP, Dodd RY. N Engl J Med. 2005

    4Kleinman SH, Williams JD, Robertson G, Caglioti S, Williams RC, Spizman R et al. Transfusion. 20095Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 20096Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2013

    1 TTIreported4

    MP NATadopted3

    ID NATtriggeringadopted3

    23 TTIsreported2

    WNV foundin Queens, NY1

    1999 2006

    1 TTI reported5

    20082002 2003 2004

    6 TTIsreported3

    1 TTI reported3

    All transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) traced to WNV RNA(+) / Antibody(-) transfusions,

    except for 2013 case in which donation had very low VL with IgM and IgG

    ID NATtriggeringenhanced4

    ID NATtriggeringenhanced4

    2012

    1 TTI reported6

  • 101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    WN

    V R

    NA

    (g

    Eq

    pe

    r m

    L)

    Days following infectious mosquito bite

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

    RNA IgM

    IgG

    MP-NAT

    ID-NAT

    3.4

    9.5

    5.8

    IgM SC

    IgG SC

    6.1

    6.9 days

    13.2

    3.9

    7.7

    1x ID-TMA

    6x ID-TMA

    MP-TMA

    detection

    Window Periods for acute WNV infection parameters,

    and need for tragetted ID-NAT

    Busch et al, JID, 2008

  • 2003230

    2004125

    2005123

    2006112

    2007162

    200879

    200980

    No WNV positive cases during winter months

    201076

    WNV Positive Donations 2003-2012, CTS 201148

    0

    61

    130

    36

    3000000

    811

    39

    46

    14

    52000000

    4

    21

    51

    42

    50000000

    3

    28

    53

    24

    40000000

    9

    28

    75

    37

    10

    21000011

    17

    31

    21

    7

    1000000

    7

    2428

    19

    200000002

    13

    35

    24

    500000002

    15

    35

    27

    10000000

    16

    83

    118

    48

    31

    40

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    t

    De

    c

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    t

    De

    c

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    t

    De

    c

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    t

    De

    c

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    t

    De

    c

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    t

    De

    c

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    t

    De

    c

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    t

    De

    cem

    ber

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    tem

    ber

    De

    cem

    ber

    Ma

    rch

    Jun

    e

    Sep

    tem

    ber

    De

    cem

    ber

    2012353

  • 2010 2011 2012

    Estimated DENV prevalence in PR blood donors from 1995 to 20102

    2006 2007

    Seroprevalence in PR blood donors1

    DENV RNA in blood donors and TTI in PR3

    DENV RNA in Brazilian blood donors4

    2002

    TTI in Hong-Kong

    TTI in Singapore

    2008

    IND NS1Ag screening implemented by ARC in PR & S Florida

    NS1 Ag + rapid retrospective TMA testing

    IND prospective TMA screening implemented

    Dengue virus blood screening timeline

    1 Mohammed H., Tomashek K.M., Stramer S.L., Hunsperger E., Transfusion August 20122 Petersen L.R, Tomashek K.M., Biggerstaff B.J., Transfusion August 2013 Stramer S.L., Linnen J.M., Carrick J.M., et, Transfusion August 20124 Dias L.L., Amarilla A.A., Poloni T.R., Covas D.T., Aquino V.H., Figueiredo L.T.M., Transfusion August 2012

    REDS-III Study of donor viremia and TT in Brazil

    TTI in PR

  • Estimated and observed RNA donor viremiain Puerto Rico

    2005

    0.07%

    2007

    0.19%

    2010

    0.31%

    2011

    0.03%

    TMA: 2012-2013 = 0.18%

    Petersen, Biggerstaff, Stramer

  • REDS-III Dengue Study Sites and Epidemic ActivityRecife and Rio de Janeiro

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1 3 5 7 9 1113151719212325272931333537

    Nu

    mb

    er

    of

    case

    s

    Weeks

    Dengue Epidemic in Recife

    2011

    2012

    Dengue Epidemics in Recife

    (2011-2012)N

    um

    ber

    of

    case

    s p

    er

    wee

    k

    Weeks

    Dengue Epidemics in Rio de Janeiro (2008-2012)

    Sabino et al, JID 2016Busch et al, JID 2016

  • Subject accrual & results of DENV RNA testing

    Sabino et al, JID 2016

  • 2%

    9%

    IgM Rate6.2%

    NAT

    9.1 days (95%CI: 4.4-13.9 days) period of detectable RNA by ID-NAT

    Busch et al, JID 2016

    1 case of clinical dengue diagnosed for every 3 infections

    853 cases of reported clinical disease per NAT yield donation

  • DENV symptoms for case and control patients during the 45-day chart review period

    Sabino et al, JID 2016

  • Chikungunya VirusMakonde language: “to dry up or be contorted”

    Alphavirus

    3 genotypes

    • West African

    • East/Central/Southern/East African (ESCA)

    • Asian

    Like dengue

    • Man-mosquito-man transmission cycle

    • Aedes aegypti is the traditional urban vector

    • Also spread by Aedes albopictus

  • Chikungunya Virus Disease

    Acute onset of fever and severe pain in multiple joints

    Mortality low but extremely debilitating; symptoms often last months to years

    Most infected persons become symptomatic

    No antiviral therapy; treatment is symptomatic

    Lifelong immunity following infection

    No licensed vaccines; prevention relies on avoidance of mosquito bites & mosquito control

  • Reported Chikungunya cases and Number of Countries/Territories

    with Local Transmission in the Americas, Dec 2013–Mar 2015

    Cases reported to PAHO

    to April 24 (week 16 2015)

    50 countries/territories in the Americas

    Susp’d Lab conf’d Imprt’d Deaths

    US 0 11 2574 0

    PR 31,433 4349 31 21

    All 1,367,343 30,580 3637 191

  • Real-time TMA Assays on the Panther

    Target amplification by “biphasic” real-time TMA

    Amplification reaction is divided into 2 steps (linear/exponential)

    Allows higher level of multiplexing

    Detection occurs during the amplification step using “molecular torches” or beacons (paired fluorophore/quencher)

    Quantitative or qualitative assays

    Up to 6 real time fluorometer modules could be mounted under the incubator

    • The real-time TMA technology is currently under development and is not available for commercial sale; the performance characteristics of this product in development have not been established.

  • Jun

    Jul

    Aug

    Sep

    tO

    ctNov

    Dec Ja

    nFe

    bM

    ar0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    % N

    AT

    reactive

    Calculated ID rate IgG%

    Sero

    reactiv

    e

    Simmons et al, EID 2016

    High Incidence of Chikungunya Virus and Frequency of Viremic Blood Donations during Epidemic, Puerto Rico, 2014

  • Sep

    tOct

    Nov

    0

    1

    2

    3

    % N

    AT

    reactive

    ID NAT only

    MP detectable

    NAT Serology #

    ID.only. Seronegative 2

    ID.only. IgM.and/or.IgG 30

    MP.detectable Seronegative 11

    MP.detectable IgM.and/or.IgG 13

    NAT Serology #

    ID-NAT+ only no antibody 2

    1/16 diln (1/2 tests positive) no antibody 1

    1/16 diln (2/2 tests positive) no antibody 10

    1/16 diln IgM+ 6

    1/16 diln IgM+ & IgG+ 7

    ID-NAT+ only IgM+ & IgG+ 30

    Detection of CHIKV RNA+ donations by HologicCHIKV/DENV assay applied to 3008 individual donations

    Simmons et al, EID 2016

  • Dynamics of CHIKV viremia in blood donations

    ID onlySeronegative

    (n=2)

    MP+veSeronegative

    (n=11)

    MP+veIgM positive

    (n=6)

    MP+veIgM and IgG

    positive

    (n=4)

    ID onlyIgM and/or IgG

    positive

    (n=33)

    100

    102

    104

    106

    108

    CH

    IKV

    vir

    al lo

    ad

    (c

    /ml)

    Eclipseperiod

    ID-NATonly

    MP-NATID-NAT &

    seropositive

    Indeterminate 0.5 days±0.8 5.1 days±1.0 8.0 days±5.3

    Simmons et al, EID 2016

  • 24

    Zika virus (ZIKV)

    • Arbovirus surveillance (Dick et al. 1952):

    • Isolated from the blood of a sentinel rhesus monkey (placed

    in the forest in 1947)

    • Isolated from a pool of Aedes africanus mosquitoes in Ziika

    forest, Uganda (1952)

    • Humans:

    • Serosurveillance: detection of neutralizing antibodies in

    human sera collected from East Africa (Smithburn et al.

    1952)

    • Isolated from a human in Nigeria in 1954

    • First isolation of the virus itself from ZIKV-infected human

    (Simpson et al. 1964)

  • 25

    ZIKV is a Flavivirus related to DENV

    Classification:

    • Flaviviridae family

    • Flavivirus genus

    • West Nile virus

    • Dengue

    • Japanese encephalitis

    • Yellow fever

    • Spondweni virus clade

    Structure:

    • 50 nm in diameter

    • Enveloped: cell membrane

    derived

    • Capsid: icosahedral

    symmetry

    • + single stranded RNA

    ~11kb

    Asian strains

    East Africa

    West Africa

  • 26

    Transmission Cycle of ZIKV

    Transmission cycle of ZIKV

    aegypti, albopictus, stegomyia, polynesiensis, africanus, apicoargenteus, furcifer, hensilli, luteocephalus, and vitattus , etc.

    Vector: Aedes mosquitoesSylvaticUrban Different Aedes mosquitoes can transmit

    ZIKV including:

    Aedes aegypti

    • Nervous mosquito• Feeds on Humans meal • Year round

    Aedes albopictus

    • Calm• Feeds on multiple animals• Diapause in winter

    Figure 2. Distribution of ZIKV mosquito vector

  • WHO cumulative detection of mosquito-borne ZIKV infections, Jan 2013 to April 2017

    77 countries since 2007- 70 first outbreak since 2015- 13 countries reporting sexual transmission- 29 countries reporting congenital abnormalities- 22 countries reporting increases in Guillain-Barré syndrome

  • Why ZIKV Transfusion Transmission Concerns?

    • Up to 80% of ZIKV infections asymptomatic/illness is generally mild • public health surveillance based on clinical case reporting is insensitive

    • ZIKV can result in severe congenital syndromes & Guillain-Barré syndrome

    • ZIKV RNA detected in asymptomatic blood donors

    • ZIKV transfusion transmission reported – 4 cases (Brazil); 3 donors

    • ZIKV may persist in whole blood longer than plasma

    • 1-3 months vs weeks (diagnostic assays)

    • Unknown impact of travel/sexual contact

    • ZIKV interventions are available

    • 2 investigational screening assays on newly available platforms

    • Licensed pathogen inactivation for plasma/platelets; investigational methods in development (red cells/whole blood)

    • FDA classification as a Relevant Transfusion-Transmitted Infection

  • ZIKV disease cases reported to CDC by US state or territory

    (Jan 1 2016-March 1 2017)

    http://www.cdc.gov/zika/geo/united-states.html

    US Local TravelContinental 221 (215 FL) 4,779

    (6 TX)Territories 38,161 145

  • 2014 2015 2016

    ECDCrecommenda on

    FDAguidelines

    20132007

    HighseroprevalenceinYappopula on

    ZIKVTTIsinBrazil

    FDArevisedguidelines

    WHOrecommenda ons

    Poten alforZIKVTTI

    CDCEUADiagnos cassay

    WHOInterna onalStandard

    FDAapprovedINTERCEPTTM(Cerus)

    1stNATforbloodscreening(RocheIND)

    2ndNATforbloodscreening(HologicIND)

    YapIsland2007

    FrenchPolynesia10/2013–02/2014

    Brazil/La nAmerica03/2015–present

    CaribbeanIslandsincludingPuertoRico01/2016–present

    ZIKVoutbreaks:

    Con guousU.S.includingFLandTX08/2016–present

    SouthEastAsia08/2016–present

    Distribu onofZIKVassayanaly cperformancepanelstoaddi onaldiagnos candresearchlabs.

    Returnofresults.03/2016-06/2016Produc on/characteriza on

    ofZIKVviralstocks12/2015–03/2016

    Discussionofdonorscreeningop onwithCDC,FDA,andbloodscreeningcompanies

    12/2015-04/2016

    Distribu onofZIKVassayanaly cperformancepanelstobloodscreeningcompanies,CDC,andFDAlabs.

    02/2016

    2015

    AccesstoZIKVisolates10/2015

    2016

    Compila onofresultsandanalysesoftestperformance.07/2016-09/2016AccesstoBrazilZIKVTTIRNA+plasma02/2016

  • 31

    Nucleic acid detection assays for blood screening (IND)

    • Roche cobas® 6800/8800 System

    – cobas® ZIKV test

    • Hologic/Grifols Procleix Panther system

    – Procleix Zika virus assay

  • Weekly Detection Rate of ZIKV RNA in Blood Donated in Puerto Rico

    This project has been funded in wholeor in part with Federal funds from theBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Office of theAssistant Secretary for Preparednessand Response, Office of the Secretary,Department of Health and HumanServices, under Contract #HHSO100201600010C.

    365 (0.53%)68.380 tested

  • ZIKV Confirmed Positive Blood Donations in US StatesN=47 (Aug 14 2016 - Mar 18 2017)

    6.25 million donations screened47 confirmed positive/210 reactive

    Conf’d based on repeat 1° NAT, alt NAT, Ab (IgM)1:133,000 conf pos; 22.4% PPV; 99.9974% spec

    Of 47, state of residence:25 (53%) FL, 6 CA, 4 NY, 5 TX, 1 NV, 1 AZ, 1 MA, 1 WV, 1 TN, 1 PA, 1 IA

    Majority have remote travel to an active area

  • ID-N

    AT

    only

    IgM

    neg

    (n=1

    4)

    MP-N

    AT

    reac

    tive

    IgM

    neg

    ativ

    e

    (n=1

    92)

    MP-N

    AT

    reac

    tive

    IgM

    pos

    itive

    (n=2

    6) ID-N

    AT

    only

    IgM

    pos

    itive

    (n=9

    3)

    102

    104

    106

    108

    1010

    RN

    A c

    op

    ies/m

    l

    Black symbols = Peurto Rico (n=306)Red symbols = Continental US (n=19)

    Staging of ZIKV NAT yield cases with valid IgM results

  • ◊ Participate in development of INDs to enable testing of the US blood supply

    ◊ Study viral and immune parameters and clinical outcomes in ZIKV+ donors

    ◊ Characterize viral, serological and cellular immune markers of early stages of asymptomatic vs symptomatic ZIKV infection (with and w/o prior DENV Abs)

    ◊ Investigate compartmentalization of Zika virus in blood components

    ◊ Identify and store index blood components and follow-up samples that can be further studied to characterize the performance of existing and future assays,

    ◊ Characterization of transfusion-transmission of ZIKV in macaques (collaboration between REDS-III with the UC Davis Primate Center)

    ◊ ZIKV/CHIKV/DENV NAT testing surveillance of minipools from the 4 REDS-III Brazil Hemocenters

    ◊ ZIKV/CHIKV/DENV transfusion-transmission study being launched at the largest hospital in Latin America (Hospital das Clinicas, Sao Paulo)

    ◊ ZIKV/CHIKV transfusion-transmission study in chronically transfused SCD patients

    NHLBI-funded REDS-III Studies of ZIKV

  • 37

    Zika RNA positive donor enrollment and follow-up activities

    Month 9 Month 126

    Extended Follow-up• Characterization of humoral and cellular immunity• Discriminate recent vs remote infections• Detect ZIKV reinfections

  • WNV RNA compartmentalization in blood

    • Rios et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007

    • 1 log higher WNV viral load in whole blood than in plasma

    • Lai et al. Transfusion. 2012

    • Longitudinal cohort of 10 WNV+ blood donors

    • Higher WNV viral load in whole blood than in plasma after seroconversion

    • WNV RNA cleared in plasma within 15 days post-index in 9/10 donors

    • Persisted in whole blood up to 90 days post-index in 5/10 donors

    • Confirmed in cohort of 56 WNV+ blood donors, Lanteri et al. Transfusion,

    • Re-testing plasma PBMC and whole blood WNV persists in the RBC fraction

    • WNV RNA is more persistent in symptomatic WNV+ blood donors pathogenesis

    • How does WNV stick to the RBCs?

  • 6 symptomatic travelersSerum + for 3 days; WB + for 2 months

    5 Asymptomatic donorsPlasma - 10 days (range 7–37)WB -22 days (range 14–100)VL higher in whole blood

  • Higher levels of ZIKV RNA in red cells vs plasma in index donation samples after IgM seroconversion

    Plasma RBC unit0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8Pre-IgM (n=65)

    Lo

    g1

    0Z

    IKV

    RN

    AIU

    /mL

    Plasma RBC unit0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8Post-IgM (n=45)

    Lo

    g1

    0Z

    IKV

    RN

    AIU

    /mL

  • Longer persistence of ZIKV RNA in whole blood and RBC blood compartments than in plasma and body fluids

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106

    107

    Visit

    ZIK

    V IU

    /mL

    Plasma

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106

    107

    Visit

    ZIK

    V IU

    /mL

    PBMC

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106

    107

    Visit

    ZIK

    V IU

    /mL

    Red blood cells

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106

    107

    Visit

    ZIK

    V IU

    /mL

    Urine

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106

    107

    Visit

    ZIK

    V IU

    /mL

    Whole Blood

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6100

    101

    102

    103

    104

    105

    106

    107

    Visit

    ZIK

    V IU

    /mL

    Saliva

    1. Testing whole blood extends detection period for diagnosis of clinical cases and monitoring pregnant women and travelers.

    2. Impact on donation policy: to extend deferral period or consider NAT testing whole blood.3. Considerations for testing for solid organ, tissue and semen donations 4. IS RBC-ASSOCIATED VIRUS INFECTIOUS?

  • ZIKV IgM non-reactive (P/N 3.0) at index

    ZIKV IgM

    0 50 100 150 2000

    5

    10

    15

    20

    Day(s) from Index

    P/N

    ZIKV IgG

    0 50 100 150 2000

    5

    10

    15

    20

    Day(s) from Index

    P/N

    ZIKV IgM Equivocal (P/N 2.0 to

  • Characterization of transfusion-transmission of ZIKV in macaques (collaboration between REDS-III Central Lab (BSRI) and the UC Davis Primate Center)

    Aims:

    Dynamics of acute ZIKV TT infection in a macaque model

    Characterization of minimal infectious dose for ZIKV in pre and post-Ab SC stages of infection

    Characterization of the effect of pathogen-reduction on transmission—specifically at high viral loads

    FDA and HRSA leveraging this study by extending monitoring of ZIKV infected macaques to investigate distributions/persistence in tissues and organs of interest

    Characterization of blood transfusion-transmission of

    Zika virus in macaques

  • Acute ZIKV Infection Dynamics in Blood in Macaques

    Coffey et al., PlosOne, 2017

  • Coffey et al., PlosOne 2017

    ZIKV RNA in organs/tissues 14 days post-infection in Macaques

  • Characterization of blood transfusion-transmission of Zika virus in macaques

    Aim 2A. Minimal infectious dose in ramp-up phase

    Plasma from ZIKV

    RNA+ IgM- blood donor

    Serial dilutions in

    macaque plasmaSerial follow-up

    For ZIKV infection

    Aim 2B Minimal infectious dose in the presence of ZIKV antibodies

    Plasma from ZIKV

    RNA+/IgM+/IgG blood donor

    Serial dilutions

    Serial follow-up

    For ZIKV

    infection

    Intravenous

    infection

    of macaques

    Aim 3. Analysis of efficacy pathogen reduction technologiesSerial follow-up

    For ZIKV

    infection

    PRT of plasmaPlasma from ZIKV RNA+

    blood donors

    Re-challenge of

    uninfected animals

    with non-PRT

    plasma

  • Dilution in

    macaque

    plasma

    Viral load

    (IU/ml)

    In vitro infectivity

    (PFU/ml)

    Mouse

    infectivity

    adjusted to be equivalent of

    1ml

    Macaque

    infectivity

    using 1 ml

    “100” 228500 648 Not Tested Not Tested

    “30” 68500 396 Not Tested Not Tested

    “10” 27900 270 Not Tested Not Tested “3” 8900 72 - 1/1 infected

    “1” 3325 24 - 1/2 infected

    “0.3” 813 4 6/6 infected 0/2 infected

    “0.1” 423 Below LOD 6/6 infected 0/2 infected

    “0.3” 130 Below LOD 4/6 infected 0/1 infected “0.01” 49 Below LOD (~0.2) 6/6 infected 0/1 infected

    “0.03” ND (~13) Below LOD (~0.04) 1/6 infected ND

    “0.001” ND (~5) Below LOD 0/6 infected ND

    Infectivity of Brazilian plasma implicated in TT

    Macaque infection occurred between 3,000 – 9,000 RNA copies and 24 – 72 pfu.

  • • REDS-III Central Laboratory, Blood Systems Research Institute

    • Brian Custer

    • Marion Lanteri

    • Thema Gonzalez

    • Sonia Bakkoor

    • Tzong-Hae Lee

    • Graham Simmons

    • Mars Stone

    • REDS-III Brazil Program

    • Ester Cerdeira Sabino, the Fundaçao Faculdade de Medicina and Hospital das Clinicas of the Medical School of the University of São Paulo with participation of 4 blood centers located in: Bello Horizonte - Minas Gerais(Fundaçao Hemominas), Recife - Pernambuco (FundaçaoHemope), Rio de Janeiro (Fundaçao Hemorio), and São Paolo (Fundaçao Pro-Sangue).

    • REDS-III Data Coordinating center, RTI International

    • Don Brambilla

    • Marian Sullivan

    Acknowledgements

    • UC Davis

    • Koen Van Rompay

    • Lark Coffee

    • REDS-III Chair

    • Steve Kleinman

    • REDS-III ZIKV Oversight Committee

    • Jay Epstein, FDA

    • Hira Nakhasi, FDA

    • Matt Kuehnert, CDC

    • Lyle Peterson, CDC

    • Brad Biggerstaff, CDC

    • NHLBI

    • Simone Glynn

    • Allison Cristman

    • Kelli Malkin

    • Shimian Zou