Upload
wes
View
42
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ASSIMILATION OF IMAGES FOR GEOPHYSICAL FLUIDS. François-Xavier Le Dimet Arthur Vidard Innocent Souopgui Université Joseph Fourier and INRIA, Grenoble. NASA, JPL,January 2011 . ADDISA Research Group. CLIME INRIA Paris Météo France Institut de Mathématiques, Université de Toulouse - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ASSIMILATION OF
IMAGES FOR GEOPHYSICAL FLUIDSFrançois-Xavier Le Dimet
Arthur Vidard Innocent Souopgui
Université Joseph Fourier and INRIA, Grenoble
NASA, JPL,January 2011
ADDISA Research Group CLIME INRIA Paris Météo France Institut de Mathématiques, Université
de Toulouse LEGI, Grenoble MOISE INRIA Grenoble and Université
de Grenoble
SUMMARY Observing the Earth with satellites. Data Assimilation. Images. Plugging images into numerical models. Variational approach. Pseudo-Observations methods. Direct Assimilation of Images Sequences. Operational Applications Perspectives
Data Assimilation Numerical models are not sufficient to carry out
a prediction. Numerical models are based on non linear
PDE’s and after a spatial discretisation a system of first order ODE’s of huge dimensionnality (at the present time around one billions of equations for operational models.
Prediction is obtained by an integration of the model starting from an initial condition.
The process necessary for obtaining an initial condition from data is named Data Assimilation
Data Assimilation (2) Basically it’s a ill-posed problem : about 10
millions of daily data to retrieve 1 billions of unknowns
Interpolation methods are not sufficient to obtain consistant fields (with respect to fluid dynamics)
Variational Methods are based on Optimal Control Methods and are presently used by the main meteorological centers
Kalman filter approach is used in mainly in a research context
Assimilation of Images Images provided by the observation of
the earth quantity a large amount of information
This information is used in a qualitative way rather than in a quantitative one.
How to couple this source of information with mathematical models in order to improve prediction?
ICTMA 13
NOAA AMSUA/B HIRS, AQUA AIRS DMSP SSM/I
SCATTEROMETERS GEOS
TERRA / AQUA MODIS OZONE
27 satellite data sources used in 4D-Var
ICTMA 13
Number of Data used per Day
Images Images are defined by pixels For black and white image each pixel is
associated with a grey level (0<gl<1). For Meteosat 256 grey levels
For color images each pixel is associated to 3 numbers.
Each image (Meteosat) has around 25 millions of pixels.
A full sequence of images is a very large data set and cannot be directly used in an operational context
What is seen ? The basic variables of meteorological models are : wind,
temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure only humidity can be seen on some satellites.
For oceanic models : stream, temperature, salinity, surface elevation. Only salinity and temperature give images.
For the atmosphere the images represent the integral of the radiative properties of the atmosphere.
For the ocean the images represent the surface values of the radiative properties of the ocean
Information in images is borne by the discontinuities in the images (e.g. fronts)
Images of the ocean can be occulted by clouds.
Experimental framework: Coriolis Rotating Platform
Mathematical Models for Geophysical Flows
Based on laws of conservation (mass, energy) Nonlinear PDE’s linking the state variables of the
model To use images it is necessary to introduce the
evolution of the quantities dispalyed by images:› Humidity (for meteorological models)› Salinity (for oceanic models)› Conservation of a (supposed to be) passive tracer (e.g.
phyloplakton in oceanic models) › Conservation of luminance› In any case a complexification of the models if images
are taken into account.
Variational approach for Data Assimilation.
Observation Operator
Optimality System: using adjoint variable
dpdt
+∂M∂x
⎡⎣⎢
⎤⎦⎥*
p =∂H∂x
⎡⎣⎢
⎤⎦⎥*
.(H(x)−y),t∈[T,0],
p(T)=0.
⎧⎨⎪
⎩⎪⎪
∇J=∇UJ∇V J
⎛⎝⎜⎜
⎞⎠⎟⎟ =
−∂M∂U
⎡⎣⎢
⎤⎦⎥*
0
T
∫ .p
−p(0)
⎡
⎣
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥⎥⎥⎥.
Two basic approaches for assimilating images.
Pseudo Observations Methods.› From images velocities are extracted, then
used as regular observations. Direct Assimilation of Images.
› An extra term is added in the cost function evaluating the discrepancy between the pseudo-images issued from the numerical model and the oberved image, then the usual tools of VDA are used
Using Image model
Image Model Approach (1) The temporal coherency of a sequence of
image is obtained by a law of conservation of brightness
If the gradient of brightness and the velocity are orthogonal then no information is added (if an image is uniform then it can’t provide information on velocity)
How to isolate structures such that this equation is representative of the flow?
dIdt
=0 =∂I∂t
+u∂I∂x
+ v∂I∂y
Image Model Approach (2) Recovering U from I is a ill posed
problem Introducing a problem of optimization
J(u,v) =0
T
∫∂I∂t
+ u∂I∂x
+v∂I∂y
⎛⎝⎜
⎞⎠⎟Ω
∫2
dtdx + R(u,v)
The problem is to determ ine (u*,v*) m inim izing J
R(u,v) is a regularisation term is the sense of Tykhonov to ensure the existence and uniqueness of a m inim um .It worth noting that the physical properties of the flow are not taken into account.
Zoology of Regularization
Multiscale Approach The minimization of the cost function is
performed in nested subspaces of admissible deplacements fields at scale q. It contains piecewise affine vector fields with respect to each space variables on a square of size qxq pixels.
In practice with 2 successive time steps
Example : Shallow-Water equation
Object Tracking
Experimental Data (Coriolis Rotating Platform)
Extended Image Model
Extended Model Image Model Image methods do no take into
account the physical properties of the fields issued from fluid mechanics.
The retrieved field can be coherent but with few physical sense.
The idea is to add to the optimization problem a physical constraint issued from the equation governing the fields.
Example : Shallow Water model + Thermodynamics.
Optimization Problem
Comparison of IM and EIM (SST)
Comparison of IM and EIM (Velocity)
Twin Experiments : Images ( 1 hour between 2 images
Initial Condition for the optimization
Retrieved fields after Optimization
Direct Assimilation of Images : principle
Direct Assimilation of Images : Cost Function
Frequential Characteristics Extraction
Curvelets
Model and Structure Operators
True, Analyzed and Forecast (velocity profiles)
Experimentation on Coriolis Platform with curvelets
Coriolis : Structure operator identity
Coriolis ; Stucture Operator Curvelets+ Threshold
Direct Assimilation of Images using Finite Time Lyapunov Exponents and Vectors
FSLE is a Lagrangian tool to characterize coherent structures in time-dependant flows.
Widely used in oceanography to link ocean tracer distribution with mesoscale geostrophic currents in order to study stirring and mixing processes .
FTLE are not directly observed but extracted from the ocean tracer images
Finite-Time Lyapunov exponents and vectors
Justification For a 2D decaying turbulent flow, the
orientation of the gradient of the concentration of a passive tracer converges to backward FLTV orientation
Extracting structure from images
Principle of the assimilation of structure.
Structure are extracted by applying a threshold of the gradient of concentration.
Same operation is carried out on the results of the numerical model.
The comparison between these structures is done on the associated FTLE
Operational Applications Evolution of dry intrusion in
cyclogenesis Follow-up of convective cells in radar
meteorology : short term prediction of severe storms
Conclusions Images have a strong predictive
potential Images can be plugged in numerical
models Some new developments are underway
for the study and parametrization of turbulence
Other developments e.g. in heart modelling and other scientific fields