28
Asset Management Program

Asset Management Program. 2 Program Priorities Program Focus –System safety and security –Regulatory requirements –State of Good Repair (SGR) - 85% of

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Asset Management Program

2

Program Priorities

• Program Focus– System safety and security– Regulatory requirements– State of Good Repair (SGR) - 85% of program– System Expansion– System Enhancements

Definition State of Good Repair (SGR) – the condition of an

asset where the asset, at a minimum, is capable of delivering the required performance safely and reliably for a predetermined period of time*

* state of good repair may include short or long term replacement/rehabilitation based on the needs of the Authority. It does not necessarily constitute complete replacement/rehabilitation of an asset

3

4

Current Planning Methodology

• Inventory assets

• Assess conditions

• Quantify deficiencies

• Prioritize actions

• Evaluate alternatives

• Program acquisition, renewal, or disposal

AssetDatabase

EstablishPriorities

AssessConditions

Life Expectancyand

Unit Costs

CommitResources

Repairor

Replace

5

Condition Assessment The Condition Assessment forms the basis for MARTA’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

The last formal system wide condition assessment was performed in 2000.

Asset Breakdown StructureThere were sixteen (16) asset categories assessed: - Buildings - Traction Power- Structures - Communications- Other Structures - Vehicle Service Equipment- Mechanical Equipment - Buses- Track - Rail Cars- Fare Collection - Other Vehicles- Automatic Train Control - Computers- Signage - Office Furniture

• Assets were broken down by system, component and type

Asset Breakdown Structure (ABS)

6

Condition Assessment - Points• Focused on age, condition and replacement/rehabilitation cost• It included 10, 20 and 40 year projections of Remaining Useful Life and the

Investment Required to maintain a State of Good Repair. • Data gathering (historical data, legacy systems, active data bases, physical

inspection and work sessions/partnering with asset owners - operators and maintainers)

• Used handheld inspection tools (pre-loaded) • Five (5) Point Ranking System(New, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor)• Cost Adjustment Factors (single tracking, wayside safety, demolition, non-

revenue windows etc.)• Burdening (Design, Construction Management, Authority Staff, Insurance,

Contingency etc.) – cost of performing work• Produced useful tools• Maintainability (challenge) - change management and control

7

Condition AssessmentRemaining Useful Life (RUL) and Percent of Assets

8

Bus Projections 2000-2040

9

10

Condition Assessment CIPRoad Map - Next Condition Assessment Study funded in Fiscal FY10

• Conduct a MARTA-wide inventory of assets requiring capital funding, to validate the asset base used in resource projections (38% of all assets were inspected in the 2000 Condition Assessment)

• Implement a MARTA-wide system for condition-based replacement, using a consistent set of prioritization criteria applicable to all MARTA assets, systems and components.

• Develop a MARTA-wide process for prioritizing projects• Develop a computer interface program to provide MARTA staff with tools to

update, sort, group, filter and create reports from the condition database• Obtain preliminary cost and funding data information and integrate it into a

database that parallels the structure of the condition database• Develop the methodology and program to export the condition database and

funding databases into a cost loaded scheduling software• Review schedules and performance of “what-if” scenarios to develop sensitivity

analysis to identify how the Condition Assessment components impact on the CIP• Integrate Maintenance Management Information System (MMIS) data with

Condition Assessment Program and CIP Planning.• Revise data, as necessary, and refine the data files until an appropriate CIP is

developed• Aligned with Contracts & Procurement, Budget and Federal/Local funding

11

Capital Improvement ProgramPlanned Expenditures FY2008 – FY2018

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018

Fiscal Year

($ M

illio

ns

)

State of Good Repair Service Enhancements System Expansion Regulatory Requirements

12

Capital Improvement ProgramActual Expenditures FY2002 – FY2008

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Fiscal Year

($ M

illio

ns

)

Planned Expenditures Actual Expenditures

13

Program Review• Continued Focus on “State of Good Repair”• Safety/Regulatory Mandates

In 2008, MARTA completed an independent comprehensive system wide Safety Assessment of all safety related systems to be used for CIP prioritization.

• Detailed Capital Program Review– Good Project Definition– Dedicated Project Manager/Team– Constructability/Phasing– GEC Transition & Staffing Lags– Needs Based Justification– Realistic Cash flow

14

Capital Improvement Looking Forward

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

400.0

450.0

FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

Fiscal Year

Do

llars

(m

illio

ns

)

CIP January CIP April

15

Bus - Vehicles• Infrastructure (average bus age 5.5 years)

– 532 - 40 foot low floor buses, 428 CNG, 104 Diesel– 22 - 30 foot low floor buses, all CNG– 55 - 35 foot low floor buses, all Diesel

• Proposed CIP– Continuation of Baseline (major programs)

• Replacement (CNG ~$350,000, Diesel ~$320,000, Accessories)– 30-40 foot bus – 12 years or 500,000 miles

• State of Good Repair– Engine/Transmission Rebuild– Mid-Life Overhaul – @ 6-7 years (replace engine, transmission, charger,

cooler, radiator, paint)– New Initiatives

• Memorial Drive BRT Bus Procurement

16

Bus - Facilities• Infrastructure

– Operating Garages• Hamilton – diesel only, S. Fulton, 31 years old, capacity: 223• Laredo – diesel/CNG, DeKalb, 24 years old, rehab project ~2000, capacity: 250 • Perry – diesel/CNG, W. Atlanta, 11 years old, capacity: 225

– Browns Mill heavy maintenance – 31 years old, S. Atlanta– Street furniture (shelters and benches)

• Proposed CIP– Continuation of Baseline (major programs)

• State of Good Repair– Facility renovation – Hamilton (Title VI issue)– Facility upgrades – Laredo, Perry & Browns Mill– Equipment upgrades/replacements – all facilities & street furniture

• Enhancements– Stonecrest Park & Ride

– New Initiatives• Replacement of Rotary Lifts• Relocate Non-revenue Vehicle Maintenance

17

Mobility• Infrastructure

– Lift Vans – 130 in revenue service, 45 pending• 50 medium duty vans, 5 years old• 12 heavy duty vans, 3 years old• 33 heavy duty vans, 2 years old• 5 heavy duty vans, 1 year old• 30 medium duty vans, less than 1 year• 45 heavy duty vans, currently being equipped for revenue service

– Brady Avenue – 33 years old, W. Atlanta• Proposed CIP

– Continuation of Baseline (major programs)• Replacement (Medium – 4 years or 100,000 mi. Heavy – 5 years or

200,000 mi.)• State of Good Repair

– Brady Renovation• Enhancement

– Mapping Device for Vans

18

Rail - Vehicles• Infrastructure

– Fleet – 338 heavy rail cars• 118 CQ310, Franco Belge (1979-1981) - Rehabilitated 2007-2009*• 120 CQ311, Hitachi (1984-1988) - Rehabilitated 2004-2008*• 100 CQ312, Breda (2000-2006)* 15 year life extension at average cost of $1.1 M per car

– SystemsTrain Control HVAC Doors

PropulsionCommunications Aux. Power Supply Cab & Fault Monitoring

CouplerSCADA Air System/Brakes Trucks Car

Body• Proposed CIP

– Continuation of Baseline (major programs)• Procurement – close out CQ312 Breda contract• State of Good Repair

– Mid-Life Overhaul (final car delivered FY09)– Life Cycle Asset Reliability Enhancement Program (LCARE) – Rotables/Rebuilds

– New Initiatives• Configuration Management – standardize fleet

19

Rail - Facilities• Infrastructure

– Maintenance/Yard Facilities• Avondale – 28 years old • South – 19 years old• Armour – 2 years old

– Passenger Facilities• 38 rail stations – service dates 1979-2000

– Ancillary Facilities (Traction Power Sub Station, Gap Breaker Sub Station, Train Control Rooms, Auxiliary Power)

– Structures• Bridges - 19 Pedestrian, 6 General• Aerial Structures – 58 structures totaling 12.6 miles• Parking Decks – 10 decks

– Tunnels/Cut & Cover – 41 structures, 9.4 miles– Track – 48 miles double trackway in revenue service (100+ miles total)– Support Facilities

• Headquarters, South Annex, Rail Services Control Center

20

Rail – Facilities (continued)• Proposed CIP

– Continuation of Baseline (major programs)• State of Good Repair

– Elevator/Escalator rehabilitation– Replace Station Mechanical Equipment– Structural Rehabilitations– Roofing & Paving Programs– Track Renovations– Train Control rehabilitation and upgrades– Station Upgrades– Station Lighting upgrades

• Enhancements– Buckhead North Entrance

– New Initiatives• Five Points Renovation• Rehabilitate Station Chillers

21

Technology• Infrastructure

– Radio Communication - AFC System (Breeze)

– Network Ops Center - Call Centers– EDP Hardware & Software - CCTV– LAN/WAN Systems - Admin Systems– Ops & Maint. Info Systems - Dispatch Centers

• Proposed CIP– Continuation of Baseline (major programs)

• Replacement– ERP/EAM System (Financial/Maintenance/HR)

New MMIS System on-line October 2006 – Bus & System wide Radio– Automated Fare Collection (Breeze)– Equipment & Software upgrades

• New Initiatives– DEO Management Systems

22

Safety & Security• Infrastructure

– CCTV System– Environmental– Security Related Equipment

• Proposed CIP– Continuation of Baseline (major programs)

• CCTV replacement• Facilities Security• Underground storage tank management programs• Pollution Prevention Program

– New Initiatives• CCTV on revenue rolling stock

23

System Support• Infrastructure

– Non-Revenue Vehicles– Administrative Facilities– Tools & Equipment

• Proposed CIP (major programs)– Replace non-revenue vehicles– Facility renovations– Tools & equipment (shop, printing, etc.)– Furniture

• New Initiatives– Training Equipment & E-lab

24

Communications• Infrastructure

– Life Safety• Fire Alarm• Public Address (audio & visual)• Telephone

– Signage• Multipurpose LED Signs (by Sign Post)• CBS Rail Network• TTN Fixed route bus

• Proposed CIP– Continuation of Baseline (major programs)

• State of Good Repair– Station signage upgrades– Fire alarm upgrades– Upgrade PA system– Voice communication

– New Initiatives• Seamless Bus, Rail, Station and Vehicle communication system

25

• Proposed CIP (major programs)– System Optimization Study

• Facility Requirements• Infill Stations• Neighborhood Circulators• Fleet Sizing and Configuration

– Expansion • I-20 East Line BRT• I-20 West Line BRT• BeltLine• Clifton Corridor

– Other• Peachtree Street Car• Woodruff Arts Center• Transit Oriented Development• Greening Initiative

Planning

26

New Initiatives[$millions]

Configuration Management 30.0CCTV Cameras in Buses 13.0CCTV Cameras in Rail Cars 8.0Relocation of Nonrevenue Vehicle Maintenance 2.5Update Condition Assessment of Fixed Assets 2.5Decatur Tunnel Vibration Remediation 0.5Seamless Bus, Rail, Station, and Vehicle Communication System (planning) 0.5E-Labs and Equipment 0.4Environmental "Greening" Initiative 0.3Multimodal Facility Requirements and Plan 0.3Peachtree Streetcar Project 0.3GIS/REIS Needs Assessment 0.2DEO Management Systems 0.2Rail Station Chiller Plant Rehabilitation Evaluation (Five Points – Arts Center) *Replacement of Rotary Lifts *Five Points Station Renovation *Accelerate Systemwide Escalators Groups 4, 5, & 6 *Arts Center Station Modifications for Woodruff Arts Center *

* Funded within existing projects

27

FY08 – FY18 Ten Year Plan

Program Type

Capital Program 282.5 373.2 350.4 312.7 290.6 244.5 221.6 164.6 158.3 154.6 158.3 2,711.3

Expansion Program 3.8 8.8 12.1 25.8 25.4 22.4 23.7 25.7 39.8 35.2 29.5 252.1

Total Program Cost 286.3 382.0 362.5 338.5 316.0 267.0 245.3 190.3 198.1 189.8 187.8 2,963.5

MARTA's Operating Budget is approx. $400M

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityFY08-FY18 Proposed Capital Program Analysis (M)

28

Questions