Asset Management in Michiganmichiganltap.org/.../Asset_Management_in_Michigan.pdfMichigan’s Local Technical Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council Assistance Program TAMC

Asset Management in Michigan

Michigan’s Local Technical Assistance Program

Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council Michigan’s Local Technical Assistance Program

Michigan’s Asset Management Legislation Background

• 1998—Act 51 Trans. Funding Study Committee

• Manage Michigan’s highways???? What Resources?

• Consistent data?

• Allocation of Resources?

• Made Recommendations

• CRAM and MDOT Pilot Program

• Test the committee’s recommendations

• Establish a feasible data collection approach

• Prove it could work

• CRAM and MDOT sponsored asset management legislation


How did Michigan get here?

ACT 51

PA 499 of 2002


Act 499 of the Public Acts of 2002

• Defined asset management

• Established Transportation Asset Management Council

• ―Begin on the federal aid . . . continue on to the local system‖


Organization Chart

Central Data

Agency

State Transportation

Commission

Administration

MDOT

Technical Support

MPO/RPO

Commission

Advisor

Transportation Asset

Management Council


How did Michigan get here?

ACT 51

PA 199 of 2007

PA 338 of 2006

PA 499 of 2002


Council, Council, Council . . .

Who are they?

Do you know?


8

Carmine Palombo

MTPA

Bob Slattery

MML

Susan Mortel

MDOT

Roger Safford

MDOT

Bill McEntee

CRAM

Steve Warren

CRAM


Donald Disselkoen MAC

Jerry Richards

MTA

Spencer Nebel

MML

John Egelhaaf MAR

Rob Surber

CGI


Its Mission . . .

Support Excellence in managing Michigan’s transportation assets by:

Advising the Legislature and State Transportation Commission,

Promoting asset management principles

Providing tools and practices for road agencies


What is the TAMC Trying to Do?

• Implement recommendations of Act 51 Funding Committee

• Move from ―Needs‖ Studies to ―Management‖ of pavements and bridges

• See the road and bridge systems as the customer sees them

• Work cooperatively, rather than competitively


TAMC Activities

Condition Assessment Strategic Analysis

Education &

Training

96 86 82 68 58 57 52 50 45 41 39 36 29 25 25 21

273

275232

198

197169 174

156 181 174 172 168 167 174 176 181 179 183 188 190

272

220188

218

304338

375 375414 406 414 421 428 433 430 430 428 437 437 432 434

83125

168 181131

250

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Reconstruct Preserve Maintain


TAMC Activities –PASER Pavement Condition Rating That Makes Sense

• PASER – Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating

• Visual survey—based on sound engineering principles

• Measure of surface distress

• Scale of 1-10

• Michigan

• Engineers Managers

• Truck Drivers Sign Shop

• Clerks Cons. Techs

• Beauty of it—

• Explain to Elected Officials

• Explain to Constituents


TAMC Activities Strategic Analysis—Statewide

• Conduct statewide analysis

• Condition—What is it now?

• Future—5, 10, 15 years out

• Business as Usual

• Alternatives

• Funding Options

• Mix of Fixes


TAMC Activities Strategic Analysis—Agency Specific

• RoadSoft—GIS

• Roadway management

• CRC

• Cities

• Villages

• Provided at no cost

• User group directs development and functionality


TAMC Activities Strategic Analysis—Agency Specific

• RoadSoft—GIS

• Available public agencies at no cost

• User group directs development and functionality

• Key functionality—Pavements

• Inventory of roads (Michigan Framework GIS)

• PASER condition data

• Forecast deterioration

• Evaluate treatments

• Optimize budgets


TAMC Activities Education and Training

Introduction to Asset Management for Elected Officials

•16 in 2009

Asset Management Workshop

•5 in 2009

Asset Management Conferences

•Lansing

•Marquette

PASER

•Statewide


MPO and RPO Responsibilities

Regional

TAM

Champions

Tech Support

To

TAMC

Assist

Agencies

In Reporting

Coordinate

Fed Aid

Data Collection


Annual Reports Legislation Requires 3 Reports

• Mileage and condition

• Actual work conducted

• Planned work


0

5

10

15

20

25

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Lan

e M

ile

s

PASER Rating

2007 -- 84,444 Federal Aid Miles

2007 PASER Data


0

5

10

15

20

25

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Lan

e M

ile

s

PASER Rating


2008 PASER Data


2009 PASER Data

0

5

10

15

20

25

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Lan

e M

iles

PASER Rating




3.6%

16.5% 24.4%

2% 3%

2%

44.5%

15.4%

Good (10,9,8) Fair (7,6,5) Poor (4,3,2,1)

5.5% unchanged 29.2% unchanged 5.4% unchanged

2004 (26%)

2009 (18%)

2004 (11%)

2009 (33%)

2004 (64%)

2009 (48%)

Source: TAMC PASER data, GEC, Feb 4, 2010

Changes in Road Condition 2004 – 2009 Percent of total lane miles

(2008 – 42.3%)

(2008 – 14.6%)


$7.19 Billion

$3.68 Billion

$1.76

$0.77

$1.14

$1.92

$2.44

$2.84

Cost of Insufficient Investment

2004 – 2008 = $3.51 Billion


2008 Non Fed Aid Condition (~30%)


Bridge Condition—2004

• Structurally deficient

• NBI rating of 4 or less for substructure, superstructure, bridge deck, or culverts

• Functionally obsolete

• Rating of 3 or less for deck geometry, vertical or horizontal clearance, or approach alignment

Function

Structurally Deficient Functionality Obsolete Good

Bridges Percent Bridges Percent Bridges Percent

Arterials 664 9% 598 8% 2,871 40%

Collectors 447 6% 374 5% 2,232 31%

Total 1,111 15% 972 13% 5,103 71%


TF2 Task Force


Do Nothing $1.9 Billion

Good $6.1 Billion

Better $12.6 Billion


Road Agency Responsibilities Expectations of the Transportation Commission

Submit

• Total miles

• Condition of roads – TAMC Fed Aid collection

• Condition of bridges – NBIS submission

• Previous year’s expenditures on roads and bridges

• CSS Investment Reporting Tool

• RoadSoft

• New ! – Modification to Act 51 Financial Reports

• 3-year list of planned projects


31

Questions?

Documents

Asset Management in Michiganmichiganltap.org/.../Asset_Management_in_Michigan.pdfMichigan’s Local Technical Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council Assistance Program TAMC