20
Nicolas Suarez, Iciar GarciaOvies, Danlin Zheng, CRIDA Jean Boucquey, EUROCONTROL Assessing the viability of an occupancy count prediction model SESAR Innovation Days 2017 Belgrade, 28 th November 2017

Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

Nicolas Suarez, Iciar Garcia‐Ovies, Danlin Zheng, CRIDAJean Boucquey, EUROCONTROL

Assessing the viability of an occupancy count prediction modelSESAR Innovation Days 2017

Belgrade, 28th November 2017

Page 2: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

Contents

COPTRA SID 2017 2

Introduction• Uncertainty in ATM• COPTRA Project• COPTRA Validation

Exercise 01• Description • Methodology• Results

Exercise 02• Description• Methodology• Results

Page 3: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

IntroductionUNCERTAINTY IN ATM

COPTRA SID 2017 3

The actual DCB process is subject to uncertainty

COPTRA project aims at improving the demand predictions through thequantification of uncertainty in order to better understand the likelyevolution of the demand and therefore improve decision making.

Page 4: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

COPTRA ProjectDESCRIPTION

COPTRA General Presentation 2017 4COPTRA General Presentation 2017 4

COPTRA is a SESAR Exploratory Research Project. Activities are organised in 3 main WP:

WP02 Building Probabilistic Trajectories WP03 Combining Probabilistic Trajectories WP04 Application of Probabilistic traffic prediction to ATC planning

TTOT

Probabilistic Trajectory

Flight Plan

Trajectory

Critical aircraft and network impact

FPL

Hotspot

Probabilistic Occupancy

Count

WP03 WP04WP02

Page 5: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

COPTRA ProjectALGORITHM

COPTRA SID 2017 5

• Obtain the probability that a flight is in a sector

1 STEP

• Compute the distribution of the probabilistic occupancy count from the individual probabilities of a flight being in a sector

2 STEP• Improve planning accuracy in the tactical phase

RESULT

Page 6: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

COPTRA ProjectVALIDATION EXERCISES 

COPTRA General Presentation 2017 6

Initial viability of the COPTRA algorithm

Operational applicability 

of the COPTRA algorithm

Asses the quality of the current occupancy count 

predictions 

Establish the initial viability 

of the COPTRA algorithm to improve occupancy count predictions

Determine the potential improvements brought by the COPTRA approach in 

occupancy counts prediction accuracy and 

uncertainty

Evaluate the use of occupancy count 

distributions in predicting hotspot

Explore the visualization of uncertainty in 

enhanced occupancy count graphs

EXE 01EXE 02

EXE 03

EXE 04

EXE 05

Page 7: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 01DESCRIPTION

COPTRA General Presentation 2017 7

Assess the accuracy and quality of current occupancy prediction 

to establish the baseline for further 

validation 

Occupancy counts obtained through FPLs in 3 time horizons

(‐3h, ‐1h and 0h)

Occupancy counts obtained through the improved flight plan 

(imFPL)

COMPARE

Page 8: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 01imFPL

COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8

FPL

imFPL

Average radar track

imFPL = FPL with no uncertaintyMost probable trajectory between a given city pair

Methodology:• FPL (3 time horizons ‐3h, ‐1h, 0h)• Radar Track 

COMBINES

The use of the imFPL will enhance the accuracy of the occupancy count predictions 

used by ANSPs and NM

Page 9: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 01SCENARIO SELECTION

COPTRA SID 2017 9

1• Ranking of days with more controller issued vectors

2• Ranking of sectors with more controller issued vector

3• Ranking of origin/destination with more controller issued vectors

4 SECTOR IN BARCELONA ACC12th May 2016

LECBPP2

LECBP1L

LECBP1U

LECBLVL

Page 10: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 01METHODOLOGY

COPTRA SID 2017 10

Calculation of the occupancy count using FPLs at the three time horizons

Calculation of the occupancy count using imFPL

Calculate difference between occupancy count variables using Glass’ delta indicator

2 OBJECTIVES

1. Determine the quality of the current occupancy count estimations and determine the occupancy count error

2. Establish the baseline for further validation experiments

Page 11: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 01RESULTS

[Insert name of the presentation] 11

Page 12: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 01RESULTS

[Insert name of the presentation] 12

EXE 01 SD MSE Glass' Δ CI t‐test

LECBLVL

3h 2,7506 31,0000 1,5690 [0.5672;2.5708] 4,2689

1h 2,5774 28,2857 1,2258 [0.3050;2.1465] 3,4353

0h 2,4862 14,0000 0,5393 [‐0.2674;1.3461] 1,5351

LECBP1L

3h 2,4099 45,4286 1,5018 [0.5169;2.4869] 4,8116

1h 3,1483 31,3571 1,1979 [0.2831;2.1126] 3,5203

0h 3,3553 21,1429 0,9297 [0.0671;1.7923] 2,6638

LECBP1U

3h 4,4308 68,1429 1,6671 [0.6398;2.6943] 4,2906

1h 3,6132 54,9286 1,5480 [0.5515;2.5445] 4,3904

0h 4,4973 34,2857 1,1227 [0.2235;2.0218] 2,8669

LECBPP2

3h 1,6723 31,9286 1,8668 [0.7851;2.9483] 5,9928

1h 3,1796 11,1429 0,6649 [‐0.1570;1.4867] 1,64186038

0h 2,6520 6,2857 0,3069 [‐0.4798;1.0936] 0,8327

Page 13: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 02DESCRIPTION

COPTRA General Presentation 2017 13

Assess the initial viability of the COPTRA 

algorithm

Real occupancy counts

Predicted occupancy counts with COPTRA algorithm 

COMPARE

Page 14: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 02METHODOLOGY

COPTRA SID 2017 14

Calculation of the real occupancy count using radar tracks

Calculation of the predicted occupancy count using COPTRA algorithm

Calculate difference between occupancy count variables using Glass’ delta indicator

2 OBJECTIVES

1. Improve the prediction of hotspots through the provision of probabilistic occupancy counts

2. Understand the use of probabilistic occupancy counts on contiguous sectors

Page 15: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 02RESULTS

[Insert name of the presentation] 15

Page 16: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 02RESULTS

[Insert name of the presentation] 16

Page 17: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

EXERCISE 02RESULTS

COPTRA SID 2017 17

EXE02 SD MSE Glass' ΔLECBLVL 1,3842 2,5104 0,6456LECBP1L 1,8319 2,1097 0,5061LECBP1U 2,3142 4,3931 0,5191LECBPP2 2,4153 5,8417 0,4630

EXE01 vs EXE02  SD MSE Glass' Δ

LECBLVL

3h 2,7506 31,0000 1,56901h 2,5774 28,2857 1,22580h 2,4862 14,0000 0,5393

EXE02 1,4315 4,4413 1,0952

LECBP1L

3h 2,4099 45,4286 1,50181h 3,1483 31,3571 1,19790h 3,3553 21,1429 0,9297

EXE02 2,0090 5,6655 0,8744

LECBP1U

3h 4,4308 68,1429 1,66711h 3,6132 54,9286 1,54800h 4,4973 34,2857 1,1227

EXE02 2,5778 10,9181 0,9398

LECBPP2

3h 1,6723 31,9286 1,86681h 3,1796 11,1429 0,66490h 2,6520 6,2857 0,3069

EXE02 2,1673 13,0107 1,4133

Values of glass delta show a medium size effect of the similarity between the two dataset.

The values of glass delta corresponding to EXE02 shown in the table are, in general, between the same indicator for 1h and 0h of the EXE01 (predicted occupancy). 

In the best cases, the size effect is even better than 0h predicted occupancy (LECBP1U).

Page 18: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

Limitations of the results

COPTRA SID 2017 18

Only archived data

Limited network view

Mathematical viability of the algorithm

Page 19: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

Conclusions

COPTRA SID 2017 19

Description of the operational context of the use ofuncertainty in a trajectory based operationsenvironment.

Description of the validation approach of COPTRA.

Establishment of a baseline to explore the viabilityof the COPTRA algorithm.

Improvements in the occupancy count predictionthrough the use of the COPTRA algorithm.

Page 20: Assessing the viability of an occupancy model...COPTRA General Presentation 2017 8 FPL imFPL Average radar track imFPL = FPL with no uncertainty Most probable trajectory between a

This project has received funding from the SESAR Joint Undertaking under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No  699274

The opinions expressed herein reflect the author’s view only. Under no circumstances shall the SESAR Joint Undertaking be responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.

Thank you very much for your attention!