Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ASNE (Tidewater Section) INSURV Brief. G. B. Sanford Deputy 21 SEP 05. Overview. Board of Inspection and Survey Mission/Goals Changes Who We Are Fleet Scorecard Trends Path to Success Challenges Initiatives. INSURV Mission. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ASNE (Tidewater Section)INSURV Brief
G. B. Sanford Deputy21 SEP 05
Overview
• Board of Inspection and Survey– Mission/Goals– Changes– Who We Are
• Fleet Scorecard• Trends• Path to Success
– Challenges– Initiatives
INSURV Mission“. . . To periodically ascertain and report on the
material condition and performance capabilities or limitations of navy ships; . . .”
INSURV GoalTo independently verify that our ships are materially combat ready to take our Sailors into harm’s way
INSURV Goal Develop cooperative energy among stakeholders to improve material readiness on a continuing basis.
‘Recent’ InSurv Changes
• Terminations -> Limited MIs• U/W (was Day #2) is now Day #3• Inspection Periodicities• Functional Org vice Team Org
InSurv Organization Chart (2005)
DOCS SUBMARINESCAPT 1120
CAPT Jackson Roeske
DCOS NEP/IHOCDR 2300
CDR Ted Carrell
DCOS DC & HULL/INSP TECHCAPT 1110/BSC: 20310
CAPT Holman/1110 (May 06)
DCOS ENGINEERINGCAPT 1110
CAPT Darrel Morben
DCOS COMBAT SYSTEMSCAPT 1110
CAPT Tom Holman
DCOS AVIATIONCAPT 1300
CAPT Mike Zamesnik
DCOS SUP/HABCDR 3100
CDR Dennis W ilson
DCOS SURFACE TRIALSCAPT 1110
CAPT John W ilson
CHIEF OF STAFFCAPT 1110
CAPT Scott Anderson
TECHNICAL DEPUTYGS-00801-15
Mr. Greg Sanford
PRESIDENTRADM 1110
RADM Curtis Kemp
FLEET REPORT CARD
(How Did the Fleet Do Last Year?)
MATERIAL INSPECTIONSMATERIAL INSPECTIONS2004 REPORT CARD2004 REPORT CARD
AUX CRUDES AMPHIB
3 2 17 9 8 16 55
DC
DECK
AUXILIARY
ELECTRICAL
PROPULSION
COMBAT SYS
AVIATION
NAVOSH
EP
SUPPLY/HAB
SUBMINE
INSPECTION GROUP
TOTALCV/CVN
C4I
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
DamageControl
DECK Auxiliaries Electrical Propulsion CombatSys/C4I
Aviation NAVOSH EP Supp/Hab
Functional Areas
EOC
2001
2002
2003
2004
MI TRENDS (Surface ships)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
DC Deck Auxiliaries Electrical Propulsion CS/C4I NAVOSH EP Supp/Hab
EOC
2001 - 16
2002 - 8
2003 - 9
2004 - 16
MI TRENDS (Submarines)
Functional AreasFunctional Areas
Overall - Solid Overall - Solid PerformancePerformance
……
• The “brain” and the “sword” are sound. Some critical vital organs are weak (Damage Control, Propulsion, Electrical/Aux).
• How could we do DC differently or change DC capabilities while still guaranteeing crew safety? For today’s ships? For tomorrow’s ships?
• MCM/MHC, LSD, CG systems are “aging” too fast. What can be done to arrest these conditions?
•Does everyone understand shipboard material standards?
•How do we improve self-assessment capability? How do we verify progress/status?
ChallengesChallenges
What Needs AttentionWhat Needs AttentionTechnical Issues:Technical Issues:
Oily Water Separators/Oil Content Monitors Initial Point Detection System (IPDS)Air Flow AlarmsVertical Package Conveyors/ElevatorsWatertight DoorsHydrogen Sulfide (H2S) DetectorsHalocarbon Monitors
What Needs AttentionWhat Needs AttentionDisciplines:Disciplines:
PMS Accomplishment
Zone Inspection Program
EOSS/CSOSS Usage
Self-Assessment Capability Outside Assessment Cycle Equipment Ownership
DC – Org & Training
Fuel Oil/Lube Oil leaks
OPA Systems
CHT Systems
Auxiliary Systems
Valve Maintenance
Gage Calibration
InSurv Support Initiatives• Qtrly SEA 05 Meetings• SATs (Self Assessment Training visits)• BG Lessons Learned Briefs• AR (Annual Report) exchange w/ TyComs• RAMs (Recommended Action Msgs)/
TIPs (Technical Issue Papers)• GCC (Grading Criteria Conference) Review• STANCO (Standardization Conference)
Summary
• Material Health of the Fleet – mixed.- Good: Combat Systems/OPS/Deck- Poor: DC/Auxiliaries/Environmental Protection
• Leading Issues in Poor Performing Ships:- PMS: inadequate performance- Standards: too low/not understood/not enforced- Ownership
Your systems better be ready to fight… they won’t get a second chance
