S. Borko

wski’s A

ssessm

ent Sample

ASL Level 2 -ASL 3: Rubric for Classroom Presentation - Worth 100 points total

Student Name: ______________________ Topic: ___________________________ Rater Initials:_________

Assessment Tool Drafted by Sharon L. Borkowski

Category Proficient Satisfactory Developing Emerging Points

ASL Sentence Structure

Excellent use of ASL grammar structure. No English inference.

Proper ASL grammar structure is used most of the time. Minimal English inference.

Inconsistent use of ASL grammar structure. Frequent English inference.

Limited use of ASL grammar structure. Constant English inference.

/25

Facial Grammar

Uses facial grammar correctly & consistently. Uses intensifiers & non-manual signals appropriately.

Appropriate use facial grammar most of the time. Inconsistent use of intensifiers & non-manual signals.

Some appropriate use of facial grammar. Limited use of intensifiers & non-manual signals.

Lacks proper facial grammar. Difficulty using intensifiers & non-manual signals.

/25

Sign Production

Uses facial grammar correctly & consistently. Uses intensifiers & non-manual signals appropriately.

Sign articulations generally are presented clearly, although occasional lapses in production have occurred. Good selection choices of signs based on meaning.

Sign articulation is somewhat clear, with some signing errors. Fair selection of sign choices based on meaning.

Sign articulation is not clear with extensive signing errors, which makes the presentation difficult to follow. Poor selection of sign choices bases on meaning.

/20

Fluency

Presents information with confidence & comfortably, moves from one sign to the next smoothly without hesitations and incorporates natural pauses.

Presents information comfortably most of the time. Signing is smooth with occasional hesitations.

Presents information somewhat comfortably, has difficulty presenting without frequent pauses and hesitations.

Information is not memorized; there are unnecessary pauses and moves nervously from one sign to the next with hesitations.

/10

Content

Quality of content is excellent with precise details and elaboration in a coherent manner.

Quality of content is adequate and occasionally elaborates with some appropriate details in a generally coherent manner.

Quality of content is fairly weak. Need more elaborations.

Quality of content is poor and insufficient. Provides few or no appropriate details, or did not attempt to elaborate at all.

/10

Meets Assignment

Requirements

Uses the appropriate language functions and vocabulary for the topic. Exceeds requirements and has put extra effort.

Usually uses the appropriate language functions and vocabulary for the topic. Fulfills most of the requirements.

Uses few of the appropriate language functions and vocabulary for the topic. Fulfills some of the requirements.

Uses none of the appropriate language functions and vocabulary for the topic. Fulfills few of the requirements.

/10

S. Borko

wski’s A

ssessm

ent Sample