92
1 AISC LRFD and ASD Source: GT STRUDL Users Group Las Vegas, Nevada, 2005 Hamid Zand

ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

1

AISC

LRFD and ASD

Source: GT

STRUDL Users GroupLas Vegas, Nevada, 2005

Hamid Zand

Page 2: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

2

AISC ASD and LRFD

AISC =

American Institute of SteelConstruction

ASD =

Allowable Stress DesignAISC Ninth Edition

LRFD

=

Load and Resistance Factor DesignAISC Third Edition

Page 3: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

3

ASD and LRFD Major Differences

Load

Combinations and load factors•

ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based on the forces and moments capacity

Cb

computation

Page 4: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

4

ASD Load Combinations

1.0D

+ 1.0L•

0.75D

+ 0.75L

+ 0.75W

0.75D

+ 0.75L

+ 0.75E

D

=

dead loadL

=

live loadW

=

wind loadE

=

earthquake load

Page 5: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

5

LRFD Load Combinations

1.4D•

1.2D

+ 1.6L

1.2D

+ 1.6W + 0.5L•

1.2D

±

1.0E

+ 0.5L

0.9D

±

(1.6W or 1.0E)

D

=

dead loadL

=

live loadW

=

wind loadE

=

earthquake load

Page 6: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

6

Deflection Load Combinations for ASD and LRFD

1.0D

+ 1.0L•

1.0D

+ 1.0L

+ 1.0W

1.0D

+ 1.0L

+ 1.0E

D

=

dead loadL

=

live loadW

=

wind loadE

=

earthquake load

Page 7: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

7

Forces and Stresses

ASD =

actual stress values are compared to the AISCallowable stress values

LRFD

=

actual forces and momentsare compared to the AISClimiting forces and momentscapacity

Page 8: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

8

Slenderness Ratio

CompressionKL/r

200

TensionL/r

300

Page 9: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

9

Tension Members

Check L/r

ratio•

Check Tensile Strength based on the cross-

section’s Gross Area•

Check Tensile Strength based on the cross-

section’s Net Area

Page 10: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

10

Tension Members

ASDft

= FX/Ag

Ft

Gross Area

ft

= FX/Ae

Ft

Net Area

LRFD

Pu

= FX

ϕt Pn

= ϕt Ag Fy

ϕt

= 0.9 for Gross Area

Pu

= FX

ϕt Pn

= ϕt Ae

Fu

ϕt

= 0.75 for Net Area

Page 11: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

11

Tension Members

ASD (ASD Section D1)

Gross Area Ft

= 0.6Fy

Net Area

Ft

= 0.5Fu

LRFD (LRFD Section D1)

Gross Area ϕt Pn

= ϕt Fy

Ag

ϕt

= 0.9Net Area

ϕt Pn

= ϕt Fu Ae

ϕt

= 0.75

Page 12: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

12

Compare ASD to LRFD

ASD

1.0D

+ 1.0LLRFD

1.2D

+ 1.6L

0.6Fy

(ASD)

×

(1.5)

= 0.9Fy

(LRFD)

0.5Fu

(ASD)

×

(1.5)

= 0.75Fu

(LRFD)

ASD ×

(1.5)

= LRFD

Page 13: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

13

Tension Members

X

Y

Z

FIXED JOINT

-400.

o

Page 14: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

14

Tension Members•

Member is 15 feet long

Fixed at the top of the member and free at the bottom•

Loadings are:

Self weight•

400 kips tension force at the free end

Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Steel grade is A992•

Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Page 15: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

15

Tension Members

ASD

W18x46

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.989

LRFD

W10x49

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989

Page 16: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

16

Tension Members

ASDW18x46

Area = 13.5 in.2

FX = 400.688 kips

Ratio = 0.989

LRFDW10x49

Area = 14.4 in.2

FX = 640.881 kips

Ratio = 0.989

Page 17: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

17

Tension MembersLoad Factor difference between LRFD and ASD

640.881 / 400.688 = 1.599Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD

LRFD = (1.5) ×

ASD

Estimate required cross-sectional area for LRFD

LRFD W10x49 Area = 14.4 in.2

Area for LRFD 135 640881400 688

1015

0 9890 989

14 395. ..

.

...

.

Page 18: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

18

Tension MembersCode Check based on the ASD9 and using W10x49

FX = 400.734 kips

Ratio = 0.928

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD640.881 / 400.734 = 1.599

LRFD W10x49

Ratio = 0.989

LRFD Ratio computed from ASD 0 928 640881400 734

1015

0 989. ..

.

..

Page 19: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

19

Tension MembersASD

Example # 1Live Load = 400 kips

W18x46

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.989LRFD

Example # 1Live Load = 400 kips

W10x49

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989Example # 2

Dead Load = 200 kipsLive Load = 200 kips

W14x43

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989Code check W14x43 based on the ASD9

W14x43

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 1.06

Page 20: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

20

Compression Members

Check KL/r

ratio•

Compute Flexural-Torsional Buckling and Equivalent (KL/r)e

Find Maximum of KL/r

and (KL/r)e

Compute Qs

and Qa

based on the b/t

and h/tw

ratios•

Based on the KL/r

ratio, compute allowable

stress in ASD or limiting force in LRFD

Page 21: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

21

Compression Members

ASD

fa

= FX/Ag

Fa

LRFD

Pu

= FX

ϕc Pn

= ϕc Ag FcrWhere

ϕc

= 0.85

Page 22: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

22

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements

ASD

b/t

=

h/tw

=

LRFD

b/t

=

h/tw

=

95 / Fy

056. /E Fy

253 / Fy

149. /E Fy

Page 23: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

23

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements

Assume E

= 29000 ksiASD

b/t

=

h/tw

=

LRFD

b/t

=

h/tw

=

95 / Fy

9536. / Fy

253 / Fy

25374. / Fy

Page 24: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

24

Compression Members

ASD KL/r

C′c

(ASD E2-1 or A-B5-11)

LRFD (LRFD A-E3-2)

F

QKL r

CF

KL rC

KL r

C

ac

y

c c

12

53

38 8

2

2

3

3

/

/ /

F Q FcrQ

yc 0 658

2

.

Where C EQFc

y

2 2

Where c

yKLr

FE

c Q 15.

Page 25: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

25

Compression Members

ASD KL/r

> C′c

(ASD E2-2)

LRFD (LRFD A-E3-3)

F E

KL ra

1223

2

2

/Where C E

QFcy

2 2

c Q 15.

F Fcrc

y

08772

.

Where c

yKLr

FE

Page 26: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

26

Compression Members

LRFDF Fcr

cy

08772

. Where

cyKL

rFE

FKLr

FE

Fcr

y

y

08772

.

F E

KL rcr

0877 2

2.

/

F

EKL rcr

2017123

2

2

./

Page 27: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

27

Compression Members

ASD LRFD

Fcr

/ Fa

= 1.681

LRFD Fcr

= ASD Fa

×

1.681

F E

KL ra

1223

2

2

/ F

EKL rcr

2017123

2

2

./

Page 28: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

28

Compression Members

ASD

(ASD C-E2-2)

LRFD

λc

= Maximum of

( λcy

, λcz

, λe )

KL rK L

rK L

rKLr

y Y

y

z z

z e/ , ,

WhereKLr

EFe e

Page 29: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

29

Compression Members

LRFDWhere:

cy

y y

y

yK Lr

FE

cz

z z

z

yK Lr

FE

ey

e

FF

Page 30: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

30

Compression Members

Flexural-Torsional Buckling

F

EC

K LGJ

I Iew

x x y z

2

210.

Page 31: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

31

Qs

Computation

ASD

LRFD

When 95 195/ / / / /F k b t F ky c y c

Q b t F ks y c 1293 0 00309. . ( / ) /

When 056 103. / / . /E F b t E Fy y

Q b t F Es y 1415 0 74. . ( / ) /

k

h th t kc c

4 05 70 100.46.

// , .if otherwise

Page 32: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

32

Qs

Computation

Assume E

= 29000 ksiASD

LRFD

When 95 195/ / / / /F k b t F ky c y c

Q b t F ks y c 1293 0 00309. . ( / ) /

When 9536 1754. / / . /F b t Fy y

Q b t Fs y 1415 0 004345. . ( / )

Page 33: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

33

Qs

Computation

ASD

LRFD

When b t F ky c/ / / 195

Q k F b ts c y 26200 2/ /

When b t E Fy/ . / 103

Q E F b ts y 0 69 2. / /

Page 34: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

34

Qs

Computation

Assume E

= 29000 ksiASD

LRFD

When b t F ky c/ / / 195

Q k F b ts c y 26200 2/ /

When b t Fy/ . / 1754

Q F b ts y 20010 2/ /

Page 35: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

35

Qa

Computation

ASD

LRFD

b tf b t f

be

253 1 44 3.

( / )

b t Ef b t

Ef

be

191 1 0 34. .

( / )

Assume ksiE b tf b t f

e

29000 32526 1 57 9, . .( / )

Page 36: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

36

Compression Members

X

Y

Z FIXED JOINT

-100.o

Page 37: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

37

Compression Members•

Member is 15 feet long

Fixed at the bottom of the column and free at the top•

Loadings are:

Self weight•

100 kips compression force at the free end

Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Steel grade is A992•

Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Page 38: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

38

Compression Members

ASD

W10x49

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941

LRFD

W10x54

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.944

Page 39: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

39

Compression Members

ASDW10x49

Area = 14.4 in.2

FX

= 100.734 kips

Ratio = 0.941

LRFDW10x54

Area = 15.8 in.2

FX

= 160.967 kips

Ratio = 0.944

Page 40: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

40

Compression MembersLoad Factor difference between LRFD and ASD

160.967 / 100.734 = 1.598Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD

LRFD Fcr

= (1.681) ×

ASD Fa

Estimate required cross-sectional area for LRFD

LRFD W10x54 Area = 15.8 inch

Area for LRFD 14 4 160 967100 734

101681

10085

0 9410 944

16 05. ..

..

..

.

..

Page 41: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

41

Compression MembersCode Check based on the ASD9 and use W10x54

FX

= 100.806 kips

Ratio = 0.845

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD160.967 / 100.806 = 1.597

LRFD W10x54

Ratio = 0.944

LRFD Ratio computed from ASD 0845 160 967100806

101681

10085

0 944. ..

..

..

.

Page 42: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

42

Compression MembersASD

Example # 1Live Load = 100 kips

W10x49

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941LRFD

Example # 1Live Load = 100 kips

W10x54

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.944Example # 2

Dead Load = 50 kipsLive Load = 50 kips

W10x49

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.921Code check W10x49 based on the ASD9

W10x49

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941

Page 43: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

43

Flexural Members•

Based on the b/t

and h/tw

ratios determine the compactness of the cross-section

Classify flexural members as Compact, Noncompact, or Slender

When noncompact

section in ASD, allowable stress Fb

is computed based on the l/rt

ratio. l

is the laterally unbraced length of the compression flange. Also, Cb

has to be computed•

When noncompact

or slender section in LRFD, LTB, FLB,

and WLB are checked•

LTB for noncompact

or slender sections is computed using Lb

and Cb

. Lb

is the laterally unbraced

length of the compression flange

Page 44: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

44

Flexural Members

ASD

fb

= MZ/SZ

Fb

LRFD

Mu

= MZ

ϕb Mn

Where ϕb

= 0.9

Page 45: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

45

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements

ASD

LRFD

Assume E

= 29000 ksi

d t Fw y/ / 640

b t E Fy/ . / 0 38 h t E Fw y/ . / 376

b t Fy/ / 65

b t Fy/ . / 64 7 h t Fw y/ . / 640 3

Page 46: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

46

Flexural Members Compact Section

ASD (ASD F1-1)

Fb

= 0.66Fy

LRFD (LRFD A-F1-1)

ϕb Mn

= ϕb Mp

= ϕb Fy ZZ

≤ 1.5Fy SZ

Where ϕb

= 0.9

Page 47: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

47

Flexural Members Compact Section

X

Y

Z

FIXED JOINT

-15.00

-15.00

o

o

FIXED JOINT

Braced at 1/3 Points

Page 48: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

48

Flexural Members Compact Section

Member is 12 feet long•

Fixed at both ends of the member

Loadings are:•

Self weight

15 kips/ft uniform load•

Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Steel grade is A992•

Braced at the 1/3 Points

Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Page 49: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

49

Flexural Members Compact Section

ASD

W18x40

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959

LRFD

W18x40

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.982

Page 50: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

50

Flexural Members Compact Section

ASDW18x40

Sz

= 68.4 in.3

MZ

= 2165.777 inch-kips

Ratio = 0.959

LRFDW18x40

Zz

= 78.4 in.3

MZ

= 3462.933 inch-kips

Ratio = 0.982

Page 51: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

51

Flexural Members Compact Section

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD3462.933 / 2165.777 = 1.5989

Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASDLRFD = (0.66Sz

)(1.5989) / (0.9Zz

) ×

ASD

Zz

LRFD W18x40

Zz

= 78.4 in.3

for LRFD 68 4 3462 9332165777

0 660 9

0 9590 982

78 3. ..

..

.

..

Page 52: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

52

Flexural Members Compact Section

Code Check based on the ASD9, Profile W18x40MZ

= 2165.777 inch-kips

Ratio = 0.959

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD3462.933 / 2165.777 = 1.5989

LRFD W18x40 Ratio = 0.982

LRFD Ratio computed from ASD 0 959 3462 9332165777

0 660 9

68 478 4

0 981. ..

..

.

..

Page 53: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

53

Flexural Members Compact Section

ASDExample # 1

Live Load = 15 kips/ftW18x40

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959LRFD

Example # 1Live Load = 15 kips/ft

W18x40

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.982Example # 2

Dead Load = 7.5 kips/ftLive Load = 7.5 kips/ft

W18x40

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.859Code check W18x40 based on the ASD9

W18x40

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959

Page 54: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

54

Flexural Members Noncompact

Section

ASD•

Based on b/t, d/tw

and h/tw

determine if the section is noncompact

Compute Cb

Compute Qs

Based on the l/rt

ratio, compute allowable stress Fb

Laterally unbraced

length of the compression flange (l) has a direct effect on the equations of the noncompact

section

Page 55: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

55

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

ASD

fb

= MZ/SZ

Fb

LRFD

Mu

= MZ

ϕb Mn

Where ϕb

= 0.9

Page 56: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

56

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements

ASD

LRFD

65 95F b t Fy y

d t Fw y 640

0 38 083. / .E F b t E Fy L

376 57. .E F h t E Fy w y

h t Fw b 760

Page 57: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

57

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements

Assume E

= 29000 ksiASD

LRFD

65 95F b t Fy y

d t Fw y 640

64 7 1413. / / . /F b t Fy L

640 3 970 7. / . /F h t Fy w y

h t Fw b 760

Page 58: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

58

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

ASD

(ASD F1-3)

(ASD F1-2)

ASD Equations F1-6, F1-7, and F1-8 must to be checked.

F Fbt

Fb yf

fy

0 79 0 0022

. .

If minimum orL L

b

F d A Fb cf

y f y

76 20000

Page 59: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

59

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

ASD

When

(ASD F1-6)

102 10 510 103 3

CF

lr

CF

b

y T

b

y

F

F l r

CF F Qb

y T

by y s

23 1530 10

0 62

3

/.

Page 60: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

60

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

ASD

When

(ASD F1-7)

lr

CFT

b

y

510 103

F

C

l rF Qb

b

Ty s

170 100 6

3

2/.

Page 61: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

61

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

ASD

For any value of l/rT

(ASD F1-8)FC

ld AF Qb

b

fy s

12 100 6

3

/.

Page 62: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

62

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

LRFD

1. LTB, Lateral-Torsional Buckling

2. FLB, Flange Local Buckling

3. WLB, Web Local Buckling

Page 63: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

63

Flexural Members Noncompact

Section

LRFD–

LTB

Compute Cb•

Based on the Lb

, compute limiting moment capacity. Lb

is the lateral unbraced

length of the compression flange,λ

= Lb

/ry•

Lb

has a direct effect on the LTB equations for noncompactand slender sections

FLB•

Compute limiting moment capacity based on the b/t

ratio of the flange, λ

= b/t–

WLB

Compute limiting moment capacity based on the h/tw

ratio of the web, λ

= h/tw

Page 64: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

64

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

LRFD LTB (Table A-F1.1)

For λp

< λ

λr

(LRFD A-F1-2)

Where:Mp

= Fy

Zz

1.5Fy Sz

Mr

= FL

Sz

FL

= Smaller of (Fyf

Fr

) or Fyw

λ

= Lb

/ry

λp

=

M C M M M Mn b p p rp

r pp

176. E Fyf

Page 65: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

65

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

LRFD LTB (Table A-F1.1)

Where:

λr

=

X1

=

X2

=

XF

X FL

L1

221 1

S

EGJA

z 2

42C

ISGJ

w

y

z

Page 66: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

66

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

LRFD FLB (Table A-F1.1)

For λp

< λ

λr

(LRFD A-F1-3)Where:

Mp

= Fy

Zz

1.5Fy Sz

Mr

= FL

Sz

FL

= Smaller of (Fyf

Fr

) or Fyw

λ

= b/tλp

=λr

=

M M M Mn p p rp

r p

0 38. E Fy

083. E FL

Page 67: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

67

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

LRFD WLB (Table A-F1.1)

For λp

< λ

λr

(LRFD A-F1-3)Where:

Mp

= Fy

Zz

1.5Fy Sz

Mr

= Re Fy

Sz

Re

= 1.0

for non-hybrid girder

M M M Mn p p rp

r p

Page 68: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

68

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

LRFD WLB (Table A-F1.1)

λ = h/tw

λp

=

λr

=

376. E Fy

57. E Fy

Page 69: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

69

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

ASD

LRFD

C M M M MM M

M M M C

b

b

175 105 0 3 2 3

10

1 2 1 22

1 2

1 2

. . . .

, .maxIf between and

CM

M M M MMMM

bA B C

A

B

C

12 52 5 3 4 3

..

max

max

absolute value of moment at quarter pointabsolute value of moment at centerlineabsolute value of moment at three quarter point

Page 70: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

70

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

X

Y

Z

Roller

-12.00

-12.00

o

o

Pin

Page 71: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

71

Flexural Members Noncompact

Section

Member is 12 feet long•

Pin at the start of the member

Roller at the end of the member•

Cross-section is W12x65

Loadings are:•

Self weight

12 kips/ft uniform load•

Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Steel grade is A992•

Check code based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Page 72: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

72

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

ASDW12x65

Cb

= 1.0Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988

LRFDW12x65

Cb

= 1.136Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.971

Code check is controlled by FLB.Cb

= 1.0

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.973

Page 73: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

73

Flexural Members Noncompact

Section

ASDExample # 1

Live Load = 12 kips/ftW12x65

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988LRFD

Example # 1Live Load = 12 kips/ft

W12x65

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.971Example # 2

Dead Load = 6 kips/ftLive Load = 6 kips/ft

W12x65

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.85Code check W12x65 based on the ASD9

W12x65

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988

Page 74: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

74

Design for Shear

ASD

fv

= FY/Aw

Fv

= 0.4Fy

(ASD F4-1)

LRFD

Vu

= FY

ϕv

Vn

= ϕv

0.6Fyw Aw

(LRFD F2-1)

Where ϕv

= 0.9

h t Fw y/ 380

h t E Fw yw/ . / 2 45

Page 75: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

75

Design for ShearAssume E

= 29000 ksi

ASD

fv

= FY/Aw

Fv

= 0.4Fy

(ASD F4-1)

LRFD

Vu

= FY

ϕv

Vn

= ϕv

0.6Fyw Aw

(LRFD F2-1)Where ϕv

= 0.9

h t Fw y/ 380

h t Fw yw/ . / 417 2

Page 76: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

76

Design for ShearASD

fv

= FY/Ay

(ASD F4-2)

LRFD

Vu

= FY

ϕv

Vn

= ϕv

(LRFD F2-2)

Where ϕv

= 0.9

h t Fw y/ 380

2 45 307. / / . /E F h t E Fyw w yw

FF

C Fvy

v y 2 89

0 4.

.

0 62 45

.. /

/F A

E F

h tyw wyw

w

Page 77: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

77

Design for Shear

LRFD

Vu

= FY

ϕv

Vn

= ϕv

(LRFD F2-3)

Where ϕv

= 0.9

307 260. / /E F h tyw w

A E

h tw

w

4 522

./

Page 78: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

78

Design for Shear

X

Y

Z

FIXED JOINT

-15.00

-15.00

o

o

FIXED JOINT

Braced at 1/3 Points

Page 79: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

79

Design for Shear•

Same as example # 3 which is used for design of flexural member with compact section

Member is 12 feet long•

Fixed at both ends of the member

Loadings are:•

Self weight

15 kips/ft uniform load•

Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Steel grade is A992•

Braced at the 1/3 Points

Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes

Page 80: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

80

Design for Shear

ASD (Check shear at the end of the member, equation “F4-1 Y”)

W18x40

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8

LRFD (Check shear at the end of the member, equation “A-F2-1 Y”)

W18x40

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.948

Page 81: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

81

Design for Shear

ASDW18x40

Ay

= 5.638 in.2

FY

= 90.241 kips

Ratio = 0.8

LRFDW18x40

Ay

= 5.638 in.2

FY

= 144.289 kips

Ratio = 0.948

Page 82: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

82

Design for ShearCode Check based on the ASD9, Profile W18x40

FY

= 90.241 kips

Ratio = 0.8Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD

144.289 / 90.241 = 1.5989Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD

LRFD = (0.4)(1.5989) /(0.6)(0.9) ×

ASD

LRFD W18x40 Ratio = 0.948

LRFD Ratio computed from ASD 08 144 28990 241

0 40 6

100 9

0 948. ..

.

...

.

Page 83: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

83

Design for ShearASD

Example # 1Live Load = 15 kips/ft

W18x40

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8LRFD

Example # 1Live Load = 15 kips/ft

W18x40

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.948Example # 2

Dead Load = 7.5 kips/ftLive Load = 7.5 kips/ft

W18x40

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.83Code check W18x40 based on the ASD9

W18x40

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8

Page 84: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

84

Combined Forces

ASD fa

/Fa

> 0.15

(ASD H1-1)

(ASD H1-2)

LRFD Pu

/ϕPn

≥ 0.2

(LRFD H1-1a)

fF

C f

fF

F

C ffF

a

a

my by

a

eyby

mz bz

a

ez

1 110.

fF

fF

fF

a

y

by

by

bz

bz0 610

..

PP

MM

MM

u

n

uy

b ny

uz

b nz

89

10.

Page 85: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

85

Combined Forces

ASD fa

/Fa

0.15

(ASD H1-1)

LRFD Pu

/ϕPn

< 0.2

(LRFD H1-1a)

fF

fF

fF

a

a

by

by

bz

bz

10.

PP

MM

MM

u

n

uy

b ny

uz

b nz210

.

Page 86: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

86

Combined Forces

X

Y

Z

Page 87: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

87

Combined Forces•

3D Simple Frame

3 Bays in X direction

3 @ 15 ft•

2 Bays in Z direction

2 @ 30 ft•

2 Floors in Y direction

2 @ 15 ft

• Loadings

Self weight of the Steel•

Self weight of the Slab

62.5 psf•

Other dead loads

15.0 psf•

Live load on second floor

50.0 psf•

Live load on roof

20.0 psf•

Wind load in the X direction

20.0 psf•

Wind load in the Z direction

20.0 psf

Page 88: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

88

Combined Forces ASD

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>< Active Units Weight Unit = KIP Length Unit = INCH >< >< Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE >< Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members >< >< Profile Names Total Length Total Volume Total Weight # of Members >< W10x33 2.1600E+03 2.0974E+04 5.9418E+00 12 >< W12x58 1.4400E+03 2.4480E+04 6.9352E+00 4 >< W12x65 1.4400E+03 2.7504E+04 7.7919E+00 4 >< W12x72 2.1600E+03 4.5576E+04 1.2912E+01 12 >< W6x9 3.2400E+03 8.6832E+03 2.4600E+00 18 >< W8x40 1.4400E+03 1.6848E+04 4.7730E+00 4 >< W8x48 1.4400E+03 2.0304E+04 5.7521E+00 4 ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>< ACTIVE UNITS WEIGHT KIP LENGTH INCH >< >< TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS >< >< LENGTH = 1.3320E+04 WEIGHT = 4.6566E+01 VOLUME = 1.6437E+05 ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Page 89: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

89

Combined Forces LRFD

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>< Active Units Weight Unit = KIP Length Unit = INCH >< >< Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE >< Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members >< >< Profile Names Total Length Total Volume Total Weight # of Members >< W10x33 3.6000E+03 3.4956E+04 9.9030E+00 16 >< W10x39 1.4400E+03 1.6560E+04 4.6914E+00 4 >< W10x49 7.2000E+02 1.0368E+04 2.9373E+00 4 >< W12x45 1.4400E+03 1.9008E+04 5.3850E+00 4 >< W6x9 3.2400E+03 8.6832E+03 2.4600E+00 18 >< W8x31 1.4400E+03 1.3147E+04 3.7246E+00 4 >< W8x40 1.4400E+03 1.6848E+04 4.7730E+00 8 >< ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>< ACTIVE UNITS WEIGHT KIP LENGTH INCH >< >< TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS >< >< LENGTH = 1.3320E+04 WEIGHT = 3.3874E+01 VOLUME = 1.1957E+05 ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Page 90: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

90

Combined Forces

ASD

WEIGHT = 46.566 kips

LRFD

WEIGHT = 33.874 kips

Page 91: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

91

Deflection Design ASD

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>< Active Units Weight Unit = KIP Length Unit = INCH >< >< Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE >< Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members >< >< Profile Names Total Length Total Volume Total Weight # of Members >< W10x33 2.1600E+03 2.0974E+04 5.9418E+00 12 >< W12x58 1.4400E+03 2.4480E+04 6.9352E+00 4 >< W12x65 1.4400E+03 2.7504E+04 7.7919E+00 4 >< W12x72 2.1600E+03 4.5576E+04 1.2912E+01 12 >< W14x43 1.4400E+03 1.8144E+04 5.1402E+00 4 >< W14x48 1.4400E+03 2.0304E+04 5.7521E+00 4 >< W6x9 3.2400E+03 8.6832E+03 2.4600E+00 18 ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>< ACTIVE UNITS WEIGHT KIP LENGTH INCH >< >< TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS >< >< LENGTH = 1.3320E+04 WEIGHT = 4.6933E+01 VOLUME = 1.6566E+05 ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Page 92: ASD vs LRFD - · PDF file01/06/2016 · 3 ASD and LRFD Major Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based

92

Deflection Design LRFD

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>< Active Units Weight Unit = KIP Length Unit = INCH >< >< Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE >< Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members >< >< Profile Names Total Length Total Volume Total Weight # of Members >< W10x33 2.1600E+03 2.0974E+04 5.9418E+00 12 >< W10x49 1.4400E+03 2.0736E+04 5.8745E+00 8 >< W10x54 7.2000E+02 1.1376E+04 3.2228E+00 4 >< W12x40 1.4400E+03 1.6992E+04 4.8138E+00 4 >< W14x43 2.8800E+03 3.6288E+04 1.0280E+01 8 >< W14x48 1.4400E+03 2.0304E+04 5.7521E+00 4 >< W6x9 3.2400E+03 8.6832E+03 2.4600E+00 18 ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>< ACTIVE UNITS WEIGHT KIP LENGTH INCH >< >< TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS >< >< LENGTH = 1.3320E+04 WEIGHT = 3.8345E+01 VOLUME = 1.3535E+05 ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>