Upload
neal
View
39
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ASCO 2010 Lenalidomide maintenance after transplantation for myeloma (IFM 2005-02 Study). Authors: Attal et al , ASCO 2010 Abstract: 8018 Reviewed by: Dr. Tom Kouroukis Date posted: Jul 2 2010. Thank you for downloading this update. Please feel free to use it for educational purposes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
www.OncologyEducation.ca
ASCO 2010Lenalidomide maintenance after
transplantation for myeloma (IFM 2005-02 Study)
Authors: Attal et al, ASCO 2010Abstract: 8018Reviewed by: Dr. Tom KouroukisDate posted: Jul 2 2010
www.OncologyEducation.ca
Thank you for downloading this update. Please feel free to use it for educational purposes.
Please acknowledge OncologyEducation.ca and Dr. Kouroukis when using these slides.
www.OncologyEducation.ca
Background
• Lenalidomide is an active anti-myeloma agent in new diagnosed or relapsed patients; it is more potent than thalidomide
• Previous studies have shown benefits to thalidomide maintenance post autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with myeloma
• In Canada, practice has been to suggest thalidomide maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed patients; barrier is typically accessibility via the CANTAP program
• Lenalidomide is being tested as a maintenance therapy post transplantation
Attal et al., ASCO 2010, abstract 8018
www.OncologyEducation.ca
IFM 2005-02 Study
• Patients post single autologous transplant for multiple myeloma, age less than 65 years
• Most patients were treated with induction consisting of VAD or bortezomib/dexamethasone
• Received consolidation with lenalidomide 25 mg/day x 21 days, monthly for 2 months followed by randomization to either:– Lenalidomide 10-15 mg/day until relapse, or– Placebo
• PFS was the main outcome
Attal et al., ASCO 2010, abstract 8018
www.OncologyEducation.ca
IFM 2005-02 Study
• This abstract represents the first pre-planned interim analysis
• The DSMB recommended unblinding the study due to superiority of the lenalidomide arm
• With a median f/u of 24 months, 614 patients were randomized
• Baseline patient characteristics were similar
Attal et al., ASCO 2010, abstract 8018
www.OncologyEducation.ca
IFM 2005-02 Study
• Consolidation improved response rate post transplant by 20%
• 3 year PFS was 68% vs. 35% in favour of lenalidomide maintenance (HR 0.46, P<0.000001)
• 2 year OS was similar between both arms• Conclusions: lenalidomide maintenance post autologous
stem cell transplant in myeloma improves PFS
Attal et al., ASCO 2010, abstract 8018
www.OncologyEducation.ca
BOTTOM-LINE FOR CANADIAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS
• Currently lenalidomide is approved and funded for use in relapsed myeloma, after at least one prior therapy, in combination with dexamethasone
• Thalidomide has no official Health Canada approval yet, but has been used through Special Access as maintenance post autologous stem cell transplant in myeloma
• Thalidomide does have toxicities including neuropathy which may limit its long term use
Attal et al., ASCO 2010, abstract 8018
www.OncologyEducation.ca
BOTTOM-LINE FOR CANADIAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS
• Lenalidomide is associated with less neuropathy but can be associated with myelosuppression over time
• We don’t have comparative data between the two agents in the maintenance setting
• Lenalidomide, when approved, will be an attractive option for maintenance post transplantation
• The final report from this study may tell us how many patients in the placebo group crossed over to receive lenalidomide maintenance; and whether there is any data regarding patients who received treatment with lenalidomide for relapse compared to those who received it for maintenance
Attal et al., ASCO 2010, abstract 8018