18
ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Page 2: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Overview

• Defining Distance Education*• Current regulations*• Local processes for determining

suitability• 2011 Updated Accessibility

Guidelines

*2008 DE Guidelines – Chancellor’s Office Academic Affairs Division

Page 3: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Defining Distance Education (DE)- Curriculum & Instruction

• Any amount of instruction time

• Title 5 §55200: DE means instruction in which the instructor and student are separated by distance and interact through the assistance of communication technology… All DE is subject to the general requirements of this chapter as well as the specific requirements of this article…

Page 4: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

§ 55206: Separate Course Approval

• If any portion of the instruction in a proposed or existing course or course section is designed to be provided through DE in lieu of face-to-face interaction between instructor and student, the course shall be separately reviewed and approved according to the district's adopted course approval procedures.

ASCCC Curriculum Institute

Page 5: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

§ 55202: Course Quality Standards

• The same standards of course quality shall be applied to any portion of a course conducted through DE as are applied to traditional classroom courses, in regard to the course quality judgment made pursuant to the requirements of section 55002, and in regard to any local course quality determination or review process. Determinations and judgments about the quality of DE under the course quality standards shall be made with the full involvement of faculty…

Page 6: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

§ 55002. Standards and Criteria for Courses

(2) Standards for Approval. (A) Grading Policy. (B) (B) Units. (C) Intensity. (D) Prerequisites and Corequisites. (E) Basic Skills Requirements.(F) Difficulty. (G) Level.(3) Course Outline of Record. (4) Conduct of Course. Each section of the course is to be taught by a

qualified instructor in accordance with a set of objectives and with other specifications defined in the course outline of record.

Page 7: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

§ 55204: Instructor Contact

• In addition to the requirements of section 55002 and any locally established requirements applicable to all courses, district governing boards shall ensure that:

(a) Any portion of a course conducted through DE includes regular effective contact between instructor and students.

Page 8: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Separate Approval

• How this is done and what is involved is a local decision – but there are some common goals.

• Ensure that course is being taught to the existing course outline of record.

• Why is this important?

ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011

Page 9: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Separate Approval – Why?

• Articulation is based on the course outline of record – if and when courses are not taught to the COR, all articulations are placed in jeopardy.

• May be the only quality check.• Ensure compliance with all regulations.

– Title 5– Accessibility

ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011

Page 10: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Separate Approval

• Must provide “regular and effective contact between instructor and student,” as defined locally.

• Methods of Instruction and Methods of evaluation may change, but neither content nor objectives – we still teach to the existing COR.

• How may change, but not what.

ASCCC Curriculum Institute

Page 11: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Separate Approval

• What should you look for when approving online course addenda?

• Can the course objectives be achieved via DE?

• Do the methods of instruction seem plausible when applied via DE?

ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011

Page 12: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Separate Approval

• Are a variety of DE content delivery methods used that link back to the course objectives?

• Do the methods of evaluation make sense?

• Are there Are there integrityintegrity concerns that need to concerns that need to be addressed?be addressed?

ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011

Page 13: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Separate Approval

• Has consideration been given to compliance with accessibility guidelines?

• Is ensuring accessibility a component of your approval process?

ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011

Page 14: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

2011 DE Accessibility Guidelines

• Title 5 §55200: …In addition, instruction provided as DE is subject to the requirements that may be imposed by the Americans with Disabilities Act and section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.

Page 15: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

DE Accessibility Guidelines for Students with Disabilities

• DE Accessibility Guidelines Task Force, Issued January 2011

• “…provide an expansion of the guidance provided in the interim document, Distance Education Guidelines, 2008 Omnibus Version.”

Page 16: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

2011 DE Accessibility Guidelines

• “…intended to align with current technological access issues that colleges face in the delivery of DE courses, while offering practical solutions and strategies to address these accessibility challenges.”

Page 17: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

Updated DE accessibility guidelines reflect:

• Concept of Universal Design• New state regulations re: DE• Re-evaluation of global standards on

access• New technologies • Unintentional barriers created by

technologies

Page 18: ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College

DE Today

• Increased scrutiny• “Student authentication”