Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Asbestos Reinspection Report
(with Priority Assessments)
Liberty Primary School
Western Road
Mitcham
Surrey
CR4 3ER
55911
Project Number: B-67538
Issue Date: 17th July 2017
Issue No: 1
Client Contact: Life Environmental Services Ltd Contact: Jonathan Browne
London Borough of Merton Transactional Services Team 6th Floor, Civic Centre Murden Surrey SM4 5DX
4 Duckett’s Wharf South Street Bishop’s Stortford Hertfordshire CM23 3AR
Tel: 02085453382 Tel: 01279 503117 Fax: Fax: 01279 503162
Life Environmental - Survey Report Guide
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 2 of 30
This guide explains the Section content of the survey report. Failure to use the information provided in the report correctly may result in incorrect information or assumptions being obtained.
Section 1.0 Executive Summary
The Executive Summary contains details of the scope and extent of the works. The reader must ensure that the scope covers the required areas and that any variations do not impact on any proposed works or management of the site. All areas of no access should be considered as containing asbestos until proven otherwise.
Recommended Actions provides a summary of all identified and presumed asbestos containing materials (ACMs). ACMs are listed by recommendation with those requiring urgent attention listed first.
The Asbestos Register presents ACMs by building, floor & location. It provides a detailed list of all locations included within the survey where positive samples have been taken or items are presumed to contain asbestos. Items physically sampled will show the asbestos type within the analysis column.
Items cross referenced (strong presumption) have their asbestos type determined by the sample result of materials of similar appearance and use that have been sampled elsewhere on site. These will show the analysis proceeded by X.
Strongly Presumed samples are items that the surveyor was unable to sample but the materials are similar in appearance and use to known asbestos-containing materials and hence they are confirmed as containing asbestos.
Presumed items are those that the surveyor was unable to sample or inspect adequately to confirm the presence of asbestos, as such there is a potential for asbestos being present and the item is presumed to contain asbestos.
A Material Assessment algorithm has been completed for all positive samples. It should be noted that to enable an accurate Priority Assessment to be undertaken this requires a detailed knowledge of the property. The responsibility for this lies with the dutyholder, although Life Environmental can assist with the provision of information or generic assessments where agreed.
Recommendations within this report are based on the condition of the asbestos and the Material Assessment. Prior to carrying out these recommendations consideration should be given to the Priority Assessment Algorithm.
Section 2.0 Introduction
The Introduction provides a general overview of the purpose, aims and type of survey undertaken. It also presents Project particulars and Quality Assurance.
Section 3.0 Survey Findings – Survey Reinspection Data Sheets
Survey Data Sheets contains detailed information on all suspect items with a photographic record of each item.
Section 4.0 – Survey Findings – Certificate & Schedule of Additional Bulk Samples This section provides analysis information and results of any additional samples taken.
Appendix 1 - Definitions & Recommended Guidance
These contain a general guidance relating to Samples, Assessments and Recommendations and a detailed Risk Assessment explanation.
Appendix 2 - Material & Priority Assessment algorithms
These contain a general guidance relating to detailed Risk Assessment explanation.
Appendix 3 - Survey Drawings
All locations will be given a unique reference number which corresponds to the location detailed within the Asbestos Register. The drawings highlight areas containing positive information and areas of no access. In the case of planned works, a check should always be made of adjacent areas.
1. Introduction
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 3 of 30
1. Introduction
a. Purpose & Aim of Survey
b. Quality Assurance
2. Executive Summary
a. Revisions
b. Recommended Actions
c. Asbestos Register
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
4. Additional Bulk Samples
Appendices:
• Appendix 1 - Definitions & Recommended Guidance
• Appendix 2 - Material & Priority Assessment algorithms
• Appendix 3 - Survey Drawings
1. Introduction
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 4 of 30
Life Environmental Services Ltd received an order of confirmation to undertake a Reinspection Survey from London Borough of Merton. This order has been accepted on the basis of the original Quotation and our terms and conditions of business. This reinspection is subject to copyright and protected by copyright law.
The brief for these works was to carry out a reinspection of the Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) within the Liberty Primary School. The reinspection is based upon the previous report refs 041099, J14071 and 74732.
This reinspection considered any damage and disturbance to items identified in the above survey. Every effort has been made to access any areas that were previously not accessible in the original survey. Where such locations have still not been accessed, asbestos should be presumed to be present within these areas.
Each section of this report focuses on one or two aspects; no section should be taken and read as a stand-alone document. It is imperative that each section is read in conjunction with each other.
This reinspection report forms an addendum to the original survey. The original survey report should be referred to for the following items of information:
• Information on the original survey methodology/caveats
• Original laboratory bulk analysis certificate of analysed samples
• Original drawings
It should be noted that this report is not intended as a Scope of Works for asbestos removal and that a detailed technical document could be provided upon request.
If any maintenance works are to be undertaken within the areas not accessed then a further survey and assessment should be carried out prior to these works.
Client Details: London Borough of Merton
Date(s) of Survey: 29-June-2017, 03-July-2017
Surveyor(s): Lead Surveyor(s): Ricky Gray
Report Prepared by: Matthew Richards 17th July 2017
Quality Control by:
Life Environmental Project Manager:
Jonathan Browne
2. Executive Summary
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 5 of 30
a. Revisions
The following table summarises the items removed between the most recent re-inspection and its predecessor.
Removal Summary
ACMs removed during the period between previous site inspection visits. For removal details please liaise with the dutyholder.
Building Floor Location Number
and Name Item Material
Level of Identification
Risk Assessment
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room Boilers No Suspect Materials Seen
IA 0
BLOCK A 0 020 - Toilet (girls) Toilet Cistern
No Suspect Materials Seen
IA 0
BLOCK A 1 012 - Toilet (girls) Toilet Cistern
No Suspect Materials Seen
IA 0
BLOCK B 0 022 - Boiler Room Floor Debris
No Suspect Materials Seen
IA 0
BLOCK B 0 022 - Boiler Room Pipework Flange - Gaskets
No Suspect Materials Seen
IA 0
BLOCK B 0 022 - Boiler Room Boilers No Suspect Materials Seen
IA 0
b. Recommended Actions
Detailed below is guidance on actions to be taken to prevent potential exposure to ACMs. There follows a summary of all reinspected asbestos items that require further action in order that they can be managed safely
Please note that if additional samples or suspect items have been identified during the reinspection these will be detailed in Section 3 (Reinspection Data Sheets) of this report only and will not be detailed below or within any part of Section 2 of the report.
Please note the colour coding is based on the recommendation only and is not determined by the Material Assessment scores, these are explained within the original asbestos survey report. Some lower risk items may be recommended for removal based on its location or usage rather than the score only.
Please contact Life Environmental Services Ltd for advice in dealing with any asbestos in poor, unsealed or damaged condition or for assistance in developing your management plan and scheduling reinspections.
Manage / Remove if Affected by Scope of Works
ACMs have been identified which are in a good condition. A management policy and plan needs to be implemented to manage these materials safely. However, should these materials be disturbed as part of the planned works, they should be removed prior to these works commencing.
Building Floor Location Number
and Name Item Material
Level of Identification
Risk Assessment
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room Pipework Residue
Thermal Insulation
Sgs100810/24 7
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room Wall Residue
Thermal Insulation
Sgs100810/20 7
2. Executive Summary
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 6 of 30
Manage / Remove if Affected by Scope of Works
ACMs have been identified which are in a good condition. A management policy and plan needs to be implemented to manage these materials safely. However, should these materials be disturbed as part of the planned works, they should be removed prior to these works commencing.
Building Floor Location Number
and Name Item Material
Level of Identification
Risk Assessment
BLOCK A 1 009 - Classroom Wall Residue
Thermal Insulation
Sgs090810/09 6
Manage and Re-inspect
ACMs have been identified which are in good condition. A management policy and plan need to be implemented to manage these materials safely.
Building Floor Location Number
and Name Item Material
Level of Identification
Risk Assessment
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room Pipework Flanges
Gasket Sgs100810/19 4
BLOCK A 0 017 - 17 Store Pipework Flanges
Gasket P 4
BLOCK A 0 020 - Toilet (girls) Toilet Seats Reinforced Composites
P 2
BLOCK A 0 022 - Toilet (boys) Toilet Seats Reinforced Composites
P 2
BLOCK A 1 012 - Toilet (girls) Toilet Seats Reinforced Composites
P 2
BLOCK A External
015 - External Flue Cement Products
P 2
BLOCK B External
014 - External Window Adhesive
Mastics P 2
BLOCK B External
014 - External Flat Roof Lining
Roofing Felt / Bitumen
P 2
Presumed Items
The following items have been presumed to contain asbestos where it was not possible to access the item in order to sample. These items must be treated as containing asbestos until access can be arranged in order to inspect or sample to confirm or refute the presence of asbestos.
Building Floor Location Number
and Name Item Material
Level of Identification
Risk Assessment
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room Electrics Textile Rope & Yarn
P 4
BLOCK A 0 013 - Parquet Flooring
Parquet Floor Adhesive
Bitumen Products
P 2
BLOCK A 0 017 - 17 Store Pipework Flanges
Gasket P 4
BLOCK A 0 020 - Toilet (girls) Toilet Seats Reinforced Composites
P 2
BLOCK A 0 022 - Toilet (boys) Toilet Seats Reinforced Composites
P 2
BLOCK A 1 012 - Toilet (girls) Toilet Seats Reinforced Composites
P 2
2. Executive Summary
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 7 of 30
Presumed Items
The following items have been presumed to contain asbestos where it was not possible to access the item in order to sample. These items must be treated as containing asbestos until access can be arranged in order to inspect or sample to confirm or refute the presence of asbestos.
Building Floor Location Number
and Name Item Material
Level of Identification
Risk Assessment
BLOCK A External
015 - External Flue Cement Products
P 2
BLOCK B 0 020 - Elect Store Electrics Textile Rope & Yarn
P 4
BLOCK B 0 020 - Elect Store Cable Wrap Bitumen Products
P 2
BLOCK B External
014 - External Window Adhesive
Mastics P 2
BLOCK B External
014 - External Flat Roof Lining
Roofing Felt / Bitumen
P 2
Areas of No Access and Limited Access
ACMs have been presumed as being present to the following areas where access could not be gained or access was limited. Asbestos is presumed to be present within these areas until further inspection and sampling to confirm or refute the presence of asbestos.
Building Floor Location Number
and Name Item Further Information
Material Assessment
(default)
BLOCK A 0 012 - Floor Duct Floor Duct
No access into floor ducts present throughout the ground floor of Block A. Asbestos has been presumed in this location in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy and Re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
12
BLOCK A 0 015 - Store Lead Tray No access beyond the lead lining to low level tray. Presume asbestos lining to be present.
12
2. Executive Summary
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 8 of 30
b. Asbestos Register
Building
Flo
or
Location
Leve
l o
f Id
en
tifi
cati
on
Item
Exte
nt
Material Assessment
Acces
sib
ilit
y
Pri
ori
ty
As
se
ssm
en
t
Recommendation N
ext
Insp
ecti
on
Product Type Condition Surface
Treatment Asbestos
Type
To
tal
Sc
ore
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room P Electrics Multiple Textile Rope &
Yarn Good
Condition Sealed AIB,
spray, textile etc. Chrysotile 4
Usually inaccessible
3 No Access – Inspection Required
29 June 2018
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room Sgs100810/
19 Pipework Flanges
Multiple Gasket Good
Condition Sealed AIB,
spray, textile etc. Chrysotile 4
Usually inaccessible
3 Manage & Re-Inspect
29 June 2018
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room Sgs100810/
20 Wall Residue
50m² Thermal
Insulation Good
Condition
Unsealed AIB, encapsulated
spray etc. Amosite 7
Occasional Disturbance
4 Manage / Remove if Affected by Scope of Works
29 June 2018
BLOCK A -1 B01 - Boiler Room Sgs100810/
24 Pipework Residue
Extensive LM
Thermal Insulation
Good Condition
Unsealed AIB, encapsulated
spray etc. Amosite 7
Occasional Disturbance
4 Manage / Remove if Affected by Scope of Works
29 June 2018
BLOCK A 0 012 - Floor Duct P Floor Duct Multiple Unspecified
Material Presumed Asbestos
12 No Access - Inspection Required
03 July 2018
BLOCK A 0 013 - Parquet Flooring
P Parquet Floor Adhesive
Unknown
Bitumen Products
Good Condition
Composite materials containing asbestos,
plastics, resins etc.
Chrysotile 2 Usually
inaccessible 2
No Access – Inspection Required
03 July 2018
BLOCK A 0 015 - Store P Lead Tray Unspecified
Material Presumed Asbestos
12 No Access - Inspection Required
03 July 2018
BLOCK A 0 017 - 17 Store P Pipework Flanges
× 1 Gasket Good
Condition Sealed AIB,
spray, textile etc. Chrysotile 4
Usually inaccessible
3 Manage & Re-Inspect
29 June 2018
BLOCK A 0 020 - Toilet (girls) P Toilet Seats Multiple Reinforced Composites
Good Condition
Composite materials containing asbestos,
plastics, resins etc.
Chrysotile 2 Easily Disturbed 5 Manage & Re-Inspect
03 July 2018
2. Executive Summary
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 9 of 30
Building
Flo
or
Location
Le
vel o
f Id
en
tifi
cati
on
Item
Ex
ten
t
Material Assessment
Acces
sib
ilit
y
Pri
ori
ty
As
se
ssm
en
t
Recommendation N
ext
Insp
ecti
on
Product Type Condition Surface
Treatment Asbestos
Type
To
tal S
co
re
BLOCK A 0 022 - Toilet (boys) P Toilet Seats Multiple Reinforced Composites
Good Condition
Composite materials containing asbestos,
plastics, resins etc.
Chrysotile 2 Easily Disturbed 5 Manage & Re-Inspect
03 July 2018
BLOCK A 1 009 - Classroom Sgs090810/
09 Wall Residue
<1m² Thermal
Insulation Good
Condition Sealed AIB,
spray, textile etc. Amosite 6
Occasional Disturbance
7 Manage / Remove if Affected by Scope of Works
29 June 2018
BLOCK A 1 012 - Toilet (girls) P Toilet Seats Multiple Reinforced Composites
Good Condition
Composite materials containing asbestos,
plastics, resins etc.
Chrysotile 2 Easily Disturbed 5 Manage & Re-Inspect
03 July 2018
BLOCK A Extern
al 015 - External P Flue 1LM
Cement Products
Good Condition
Composite materials containing asbestos,
plastics, resins etc.
Chrysotile 2 Usually
inaccessible 2
Manage & Re-Inspect
03 July 2018
BLOCK B 0 020 - Elect Store P Cable Wrap <1LM Bitumen Products
Good Condition
Composite materials containing asbestos,
plastics, resins etc.
Chrysotile 2 Usually
inaccessible 3
No Access – Inspection Required
03 July 2018
BLOCK B 0 020 - Elect Store P Electrics Multiple Textile Rope &
Yarn Good
Condition Sealed AIB,
spray, textile etc. Chrysotile 4
Usually inaccessible
3 No Access – Inspection Required
29 June 2018
BLOCK B Extern
al 014 - External P
Flat Roof Lining
100m² Roofing Felt /
Bitumen Good
Condition
Composite materials containing asbestos,
plastics, resins etc.
Chrysotile 2 Easily Disturbed 4 Manage & Re-Inspect
03 July 2018
2. Executive Summary
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 10 of 30
Building
Flo
or
Location
Le
vel o
f Id
en
tifi
cati
on
Item
Ex
ten
t
Material Assessment
Acces
sib
ilit
y
Pri
ori
ty
As
se
ssm
en
t
Recommendation N
ext
Insp
ecti
on
Product Type Condition Surface
Treatment Asbestos
Type
To
tal S
co
re
BLOCK B Extern
al 014 - External P
Window Adhesive
× 1 Mastics Good
Condition
Composite materials containing asbestos,
plastics, resins etc.
Chrysotile 2 Easily Disturbed 4 Manage & Re-Inspect
03 July 2018
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 11 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area B01 - Boiler Room
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Inspected Area
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Boilers
Floor -1 Amount
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
No Suspect Materials Seen
Asbestos Removed 0
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) E – Main type of activity Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
0 Risk Coding
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 F – Location G – Accessibility H – Extent
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 I – Number of occupants J – Frequency of use K – Average time in use
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/2 L – Type of maintenance M – Frequency of maintenance
Recommendation:No recommendation required
Further Information: Area visually inspected. No suspect materials seen. Live boilers were previously presumed to contain asbestos containing material in Type 2 report 041099 by Tribal Environmental Services. These boilers have now been removed and replaced with modern boilers.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area B01 - Boiler Room
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Electrics
Floor -1 Amount Multiple
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Textile Rope & Yarn
2 Good Condition
0 Cement products Sealed AIB, spray, textile etc.
1 Chrysotile 1 4
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
3 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
7 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 1 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 0 H – Extent 1
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 2 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:No Access – Inspection Required
Further Information: No access into live electrical boxes. Presume asbestos textile flashguards to be present within these units. This has been recorded previously in Type 2 report by Tribal Environmental Services, Management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy and Re-Inspection report 74732 Lucion Environmental. Electrician will be required to isolate to allow inspection.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 12 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area B01 - Boiler Room
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Sampled
Sample No gs100810/19
Building BLOCK A Item Pipework Flanges
Floor -1 Amount Multiple
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Gasket 2 Good Condition
0 Cement products Sealed AIB, spray, textile etc.
1 Chrysotile 1 4
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
3 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
7 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 1 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 0 H – Extent 0
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 2 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage & Re-Inspect
Further Information: Asbestos gaskets to pipework flanges confirmed to contain Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy, Sample ref gs100810/19 and Re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area B01 - Boiler Room
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Sampled
Sample No gs100810/20
Building BLOCK A Item Wall Residue
Floor -1 Amount 50m²
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Thermal Insulation 3 Good Condition
0 Unsealed AIB, encapsulated spray, textiles, & T.I.
2 Amosite 2 7
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
4 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
11 Risk Coding LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 2 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 1 H – Extent 3
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 2 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage / Remove if Affected by Scope of Works
Further Information: Asbestos thermal insulation residue to walls confirmed to contain Amosite & Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy, Sample ref gs100810/20, 21 & 23. There is clear evidence that remedial work to the walls have taken place. However presume residual fibres are present to the brickwork beyond the encapsulant.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 13 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area B01 - Boiler Room
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Sampled
Sample No gs100810/24
Building BLOCK A Item Pipework Residue
Floor -1 Amount Extensive LM
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Thermal Insulation 3 Good Condition
0 Unsealed AIB, encapsulated spray, textiles, & T.I.
2 Amosite 2 7
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
4 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
11 Risk Coding LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 2 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 1 H – Extent 3
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 2 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage / Remove if Affected by Scope of Works
Further Information: Asbestos thermal insulation residue to pipework confirmed to contain Amosite in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy, Sample gs100810/24. There is clear evidence that remedial work has taken place within this area. However inspection is not possible beyond existing MMMF lagging during this visit therefore presume elements of this item is still present.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 012 - Floor Duct
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Floor Duct
Floor 0 Amount Multiple
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Unspecified Material
Presumed Asbestos 12
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) E – Main type of activity Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
12 Risk Coding
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 F – Location G – Accessibility H – Extent
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 I – Number of occupants J – Frequency of use K – Average time in use
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/2 L – Type of maintenance M – Frequency of maintenance
Recommendation:No Access - Inspection Required Presumed Asbestos is scored 12 (worst case) until sampled/inspected
Further Information: No access into floor ducts present throughout the ground floor of Block A. Asbestos has been presumed in this location in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy and Re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 14 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 013 - Parquet Flooring
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Parquet Floor Adhesive
Floor 0 Amount Unknown
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Bitumen Products 1 Good Condition
0 Composite materials containing asbestos, plastics, resins etc.
0 Chrysotile 1 2
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
2 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
4 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 2 F – Location 3 G – Accessibility 0 H – Extent 3
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 0 I – Number of occupants 0 J – Frequency of use 0 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/20
L – Type of maintenance0
M – Frequency of maintenance 0
Recommendation:No Access – Inspection Required
Further Information: No access below parquet flooring throughout the ground floor of Block A. Asbestos bitumen adhesive has been presumed in this location in re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 015 - Store
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Lead Tray
Floor 0 Amount
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Unspecified Material
Presumed Asbestos 12
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) E – Main type of activity Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
12 Risk Coding
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 F – Location G – Accessibility H – Extent
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 I – Number of occupants J – Frequency of use K – Average time in use
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/2 L – Type of maintenance M – Frequency of maintenance
Recommendation:No Access - Inspection Required Presumed Asbestos is scored 12 (worst case) until sampled/inspected
Further Information: No access beyond the lead lining to low level tray. Presume asbestos lining to be present.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 15 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 017 - 17 Store
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Pipework Flanges
Floor 0 Amount × 1
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Gasket 2 Good Condition
0 Cement products Sealed AIB, spray, textile etc.
1 Chrysotile 1 4
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
3 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
7 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 1 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 0 H – Extent 0
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 2 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage & Re-Inspect
Further Information: Asbestos gasket to pipework flange presumed to contain Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy and Re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 020 - Toilet (girls)
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Inspected Area
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Toilet Cistern
Floor 0 Amount
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
No Suspect Materials Seen
Asbestos Removed 0
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) E – Main type of activity Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
0 Risk Coding
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 F – Location G – Accessibility H – Extent
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 I – Number of occupants J – Frequency of use K – Average time in use
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/2 L – Type of maintenance M – Frequency of maintenance
Recommendation:No recommendation required
Further Information: Area visually inspected. No suspect materials seen. Asbestos toilet cistern confirmed to contain Amosite in Type 2 survey report 041099 by Tribal Environmental Services, sample ref TW01. This item has now been removed and replaced with modern cistern.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 16 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 020 - Toilet (girls)
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Toilet Seats
Floor 0 Amount Multiple
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Reinforced Composites
1 Good Condition
0 Composite materials containing asbestos, plastics, resins etc.
0 Chrysotile 1 2
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 1 E – Main type of activity 1 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
5 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
7 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 2 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 2 H – Extent 1
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 3 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage & Re-Inspect
Further Information: Asbestos reinforced composite toilet seats presumed to contain Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 022 - Toilet (boys)
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Toilet Seats
Floor 0 Amount Multiple
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Reinforced Composites
1 Good Condition
0 Composite materials containing asbestos, plastics, resins etc.
0 Chrysotile 1 2
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 1 E – Main type of activity 1 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
5 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
7 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 2 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 2 H – Extent 1
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 3 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage & Re-Inspect
Further Information: Asbestos reinforced composite toilet seats presumed to contain Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy and Re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 17 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 009 - Classroom
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Sampled
Sample No gs090810/09
Building BLOCK A Item Wall Residue
Floor 1 Amount <1m²
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Thermal Insulation 3 Good Condition
0 Cement products Sealed AIB, spray, textile etc.
1 Amosite 2 6
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 2 E – Main type of activity 2 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
7 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
13 Risk Coding LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 1 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 1 H – Extent 1
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 3 I – Number of occupants 3 J – Frequency of use 3 K – Average time in use 3
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage / Remove if Affected by Scope of Works
Further Information: Asbestos thermal insulation residue confirmed to contain Amosite & Chrysotile in Management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy, Sample ref gs090810/09 and strongly presumed in Re-Inspection report 74732 Lucion Environmental. This item cannot be visually inspected due to it being located beyond fixed white board. Presume this item remains in situ.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 012 - Toilet (girls)
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Inspected Area
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Toilet Cistern
Floor 1 Amount
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
No Suspect Materials Seen
Asbestos Removed 0
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) E – Main type of activity Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
0 Risk Coding
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 F – Location G – Accessibility H – Extent
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 I – Number of occupants J – Frequency of use K – Average time in use
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/2 L – Type of maintenance M – Frequency of maintenance
Recommendation:No recommendation required
Further Information: Area visually inspected. No suspect materials seen. Asbestos toilet cistern strongly presumed to contain Amosite in Type 2 survey report 041099 by Tribal Environmental Services, same as sample ref TW01. This item has now been removed and replaced with modern cistern.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 18 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 012 - Toilet (girls)
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Toilet Seats
Floor 1 Amount Multiple
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Reinforced Composites
1 Good Condition
0 Composite materials containing asbestos, plastics, resins etc.
0 Chrysotile 1 2
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 1 E – Main type of activity 1 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
5 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
7 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 2 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 2 H – Extent 1
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 3 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage & Re-Inspect
Further Information: Asbestos reinforced composite toilet seats presumed to contain Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 015 - External
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK A Item Flue
Floor External Amount 1LM
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Cement Products 1 Good Condition
0 Composite materials containing asbestos, plastics, resins etc.
0 Chrysotile 1 2
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
2 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
4 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 0 F – Location 0 G – Accessibility 0 H – Extent 1
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 3 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage & Re-Inspect
Further Information: Asbestos cement flue presumed to contain Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy and Re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 19 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 020 - Elect Store
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK B Item Cable Wrap
Floor 0 Amount <1LM
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Bitumen Products 1 Good Condition
0 Composite materials containing asbestos, plastics, resins etc.
0 Chrysotile 1 2
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
3 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
5 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 1 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 0 H – Extent 1
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 1 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:No Access – Inspection Required
Further Information: Presumed asbestos bitumen cable wrap. Unable to obtain sample due to cable being live.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 020 - Elect Store
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK B Item Electrics
Floor 0 Amount Multiple
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Textile Rope & Yarn
2 Good Condition
0 Cement products Sealed AIB, spray, textile etc.
1 Chrysotile 1 4
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
3 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
7 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 1 F – Location 2 G – Accessibility 0 H – Extent 1
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 2 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:No Access – Inspection Required
Further Information: No access into live electrical boxes. Presume asbestos textile flashguards to be present within these units. This has been recorded previously in Re-Inspection report 74732 Lucion Environmental. Electrician will be required to isolate to allow inspection.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 20 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 022 - Boiler Room
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Inspected Area
Sample No
Building BLOCK B Item Boilers
Floor 0 Amount
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
No Suspect Materials Seen
Asbestos Removed 0
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) E – Main type of activity Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
0 Risk Coding
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 F – Location G – Accessibility H – Extent
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 I – Number of occupants J – Frequency of use K – Average time in use
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/2 L – Type of maintenance M – Frequency of maintenance
Recommendation:No recommendation required
Further Information: Area visually inspected. No suspect materials seen. Live boilers were previously presumed to contain asbestos containing material in Type 2 report 041099 by Tribal Environmental Services. These boilers have now been removed and replaced with modern boilers.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 022 - Boiler Room
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Inspected Area
Sample No
Building BLOCK B Item Pipework Flange - Gaskets
Floor 0 Amount
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
No Suspect Materials Seen
Asbestos Removed 0
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) E – Main type of activity Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
0 Risk Coding
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 F – Location G – Accessibility H – Extent
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 I – Number of occupants J – Frequency of use K – Average time in use
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/2 L – Type of maintenance M – Frequency of maintenance
Recommendation:No recommendation required
Further Information: Area visually inspected. No suspect materials seen. Asbestos pipework flange gaskets confirmed to contain Chrysotile in Management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy, Sample ref gs100810/07 have been removed and replaced with modern pipework and flanges.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 21 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 022 - Boiler Room
Survey Date 29 June 2017
Level of Identification
Inspected Area
Sample No
Building BLOCK B Item Floor Debris
Floor 0 Amount
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
No Suspect Materials Seen
Asbestos Removed 0
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) E – Main type of activity Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
0 Risk Coding
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 F – Location G – Accessibility H – Extent
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 I – Number of occupants J – Frequency of use K – Average time in use
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/2 L – Type of maintenance M – Frequency of maintenance
Recommendation:No recommendation required
Further Information: Area visually inspected. No suspect materials seen. Asbestos debris found to floor confirmed to contain Amosite & Chrysotile in Management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy, Sample ref gs100810/08 has been removed.
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 014 - External
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK B Item Flat Roof Lining
Floor External Amount 100m²
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Roofing Felt / Bitumen
1 Good Condition
0 Composite materials containing asbestos, plastics, resins etc.
0 Chrysotile 1 2
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
4 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
6 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 2 F – Location 0 G – Accessibility 2 H – Extent 3
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 3 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage & Re-Inspect
Further Information: Asbestos bitumen flat roof lining presumed to contain Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy and Re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
3. Reinspection Data Sheets
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 22 of 30
Surveyor Ricky Gray Room/Area 014 - External
Survey Date 03 July 2017
Level of Identification
Presumed
Sample No
Building BLOCK B Item Window Adhesive
Floor External Amount × 1
A - Product Type: B - Extent of Damage: C – Surface Treatment D – Asbestos Type Material Ass (M.A) (A+B+C+D):
Mastics 1 Good Condition
0 Composite materials containing asbestos, plastics, resins etc.
0 Chrysotile 1 2
1 = Normal Occupant Activity = (E) 0 E – Main type of activity 0 Total Priority Score (P.A.) = (1+2+3+4):
4 Total Risk Ass’ Score (P.A. + M.A)
6 Risk Coding VERY LOW
2 = Disturbance = (F+G+H)/3 2 F – Location 0 G – Accessibility 2 H – Extent 3
3 = Exposure potential = (I+J+K)/3 1 I – Number of occupants 1 J – Frequency of use 3 K – Average time in use 0
4 = Maintenance activity = (L+M)/21
L – Type of maintenance1
M – Frequency of maintenance 1
Recommendation:Manage & Re-Inspect
Further Information: Asbestos window adhesive presumed to contain Chrysotile in management report J14071 by Noble Health & Safety Consultancy and Re-Inspection report 74732 by Lucion Environmental.
4. Additional Bulk Samples
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 23 of 30
No further Bulk samples taken
Appendix 1 – Definitions & Recommended Guidance
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 24 of 30
Level of Identification
Sample (S) A physical sample was taken on site by the Surveyor and analysed by the laboratory.
Cross reference (X) No sample was taken but the material is visually similar to a sample that has been analysed from
the survey. This is a form of Strong Presumption as defined in HSG264.
Strongly Presumed (SP) No sample was taken but due to the appearance of the material and with the surveyor’s
knowledge and experience the material has been identified as containing asbestos.
Presumed (P) No sample was taken and therefore due to this lack of information the material or item must be
presumed to contain asbestos. This will often be because the item could not be sampled due to excessive height (such
as soffits) or an item could not be inspected (or sampled) as this may have presented a risk to the Surveyor (e.g.
opening up live plant and electrics).
No access areas are also treated as a presumption.
Recommendations
The various recommendations given within this report are explained below:-
Manage & Re-inspect
Where asbestos is left in situ there is a duty to formulate and implement a Management Plan to help prevent accidental
damage and exposure.
The basic requirements of this policy are (from HSG 264):
• Keep and maintain an up-to-date record of the location, condition, maintenance and removal of all asbestos-
containing materials
• Maintain it in a good state of repair and regularly monitor the condition
• Inform anyone who will potentially come into contact with or disturb the material as to its location and condition
• Have arrangements and procedures in place, so that work which may disturb the materials complies with the Control
of Asbestos Regulations 2012
• Review the plan at regular intervals
Label
A decision should be taken as to whether to label ACMs. The decision will depend on the confidence in the
administration of the asbestos management system and whether communication with workers and contractors coming
to work on site can be effective.
Labelling ACMs should not be solely relied on as a control measure; however it is an effective method of preventing
exposure to building occupants (and, in particular, maintenance workers). If, for any reason, management procedures
fail, it may act as an effective last barrier to uncontrolled damage to the ACM.
It may not always be prudent or practical to label all installations of asbestos; for example high level items such as roof
sheets, flue cowls and soffits or items such as gaskets to pipe flanges, textured coating and floor tiles.
Encapsulate
When this recommendation has been given, the ACM is raw and requires encapsulating with a suitable sealant or the
existing sealant or covering has deteriorated and the installation requires either a complete or partial re-encapsulation.
Appendix 1 – Definitions & Recommended Guidance
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 25 of 30
We recommend that sealing or painting of insulating board, insulation or spray coatings should be undertaken by a
licensed contractor and is likely to be subject to a 14 day notification to the HSE, (as per the Control of Asbestos
Regulations 2012).
Repair
The material has sustained damage to some area or areas and requires attention to make good the material so that it
can be managed safely. This will often involve some element of decontamination if debris is associated with the
damage.
Remove
If an item is recommended for removal it has either sustained damage and is posing an increased risk in its current
condition; or due to its location it is considered high risk as it could easily be disturbed in the future. Materials
recommended for removal will be given one of the following recommendations:-
Removal by Licensed Contractor. This will include removal of AIB, Insulation, and Spray Coatings and is likely to be
subject to a 14 day notification to the HSE, (as per the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012).
Removal by Approved Contractor. This will include removal of lower risk materials such as Asbestos Cement,
Bitumen Products, Reinforced Composites, and Floor Tiles etc. Some such works may be considered Notifiable Non-
Licensed Works.
The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 does not necessarily require such removal works to be undertaken by a
licensed contractor. However it is good practice, and we would strongly recommended that all removal works are
undertaken by a licensed contractor.
Restrict Access
Materials have been identified that are in a damaged condition often with associated debris that can be easily
disturbed. As such access to the area should be prevented to all persons until such a time when the area has been
deemed safe for reoccupation. This will usually be once removal works have been completed.
No Access – Inspection Required
Access to the given location was either not possible at all or only limited access was possible. In both instances there
is the potential for unidentified asbestos being present and as such the area must be treated as containing asbestos
until full access is possible.
Arrangements should be made at the earliest opportunity to revisit locations where access was not possible or access
was limited in order that such areas can be inspected fully.
Items and materials that are presumed to contain asbestos will also be given the recommendation of ‘No Access –
Inspection required’. In these instances the item or material should be treated as containing asbestos until
arrangements can be made to access such items or materials in order to carry out an inspection or sample to confirm
or otherwise the presence of asbestos.
No Recommendation Required
Asbestos has not been identified and as such no further action is required.
Recommended Guidance
To comply with and ensure that the requirements of section 2 & 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act (as amended)
1974, the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 and
the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health 2002 are met, the following recommendations should be implemented:
Appendix 1 – Definitions & Recommended Guidance
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 26 of 30
Undertake suitable and sufficient Risk Assessments of identified ACMs against normal occupation and maintenance
operations, in compliance with Regulations 3 of the Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999 and
Regulation 6 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.
The findings of the survey be brought to the attention of those persons who are likely to come in contact with asbestos, in
compliance with Section 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act (as amended) 1974 and Regulation 9 of the Control
of Asbestos Regulations 2012.
Implement an Asbestos Management Policy, Plan and review process in compliance Regulation 4 of the Control of
Asbestos Regulations 2012.
During the course of the survey it may not have been possible to access all areas of the site. Details of areas requiring
further access is identified within the Data Sheets and Executive Summary of this report. In accordance with HSG 264,
asbestos is presumed to be present within these areas and should be treated accordingly until further inspection and
analysis of building fabric and services proves otherwise.
It is recommended that air monitoring is carried out within any areas where ACMs have been identified in order to assess
airborne fibre levels within adjacent occupied areas in relation to the clearance indicator, as documented by HSG 248 The
Analyst Guide.
Where asbestos debris or asbestos in poor condition has been found it is recommended that access is restricted to these
areas in accordance with Regulation 11 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 and that air monitoring is carried out
within adjacent areas in order to assess airborne fibre levels.
All identified asbestos to be appropriately identified and subject to Risk Assessment, management, and re-inspection.
Site specific recommendations in respect to the location and condition of asbestos materials identified during the
course of this inspection are detailed in the Survey Data Sheets and Asbestos register. In considering the management
of asbestos materials identified to date, these recommendations should be referred to and complied with.
It is recommended that work on, or removal of, both licensed and non-licensed ACMs is undertaken by a licensed
asbestos removal contractor so that the Duty Holder / Client can have confidence that the contractor has provided the
correct level of training and has the experience and knowledge necessary to deal with these products safely.
It is a requirement of CAR 2012 that further intrusive investigations and sampling be carried out where any refurbishment,
maintenance, or similar activity is planned that may expose asbestos materials. This should be a refurbishment/demolition
survey as documented by HSG 264.
The findings of this report should not be solely relied upon in obtaining costs for proposed asbestos abatement work. Any
proposed abatement/removal of the asbestos should be undertaken against a detailed specification.
Appendix 2 – Material & Priority Assessment Algorithms
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 27 of 30
Where ACMs have been identified or presumed to be present a Material Assessment Algorithm has been calculated as detailed in HSG 264 and reproduced in line with the table overleaf.
The Material Assessment is an assessment of the condition of the ACM, or the presumed ACM, and the likelihood of it releasing fibres in the event of it being disturbed in some way. This Material Assessment will give a good initial guide to the priority for management as it will identify the materials which will most readily release airborne fibres if disturbed. However, there are other factors to take into account when prioritising action. These are considered in the Priority Assessment which is described later.
For each of the four variables given by the table a score is allocated. The four scores are added together to give a Material Assessment score of between 2 and 12.
HIGH RISK 10-12 Materials with scores of 10 or more should be regarded as high risk with a significant potential to release fibres if disturbed;
MEDIUM RISK 7- 9 Those materials with a score between 7 and 9 are regarded as medium risk to release fibres.
LOW RISK 5-6 Materials with a score between 5 and 6 are low risk to release fibres.
VERY LOW RISK 4 or less Scores of 4 or less are very low risk.
Section Sample Variable
Score Examples of Score
A Product type (or debris from product).
1 Asbestos reinforced composites (plastics, resins, mastics, roofing felts, vinyl floor tiles, semi rigid paint or decorative finishes, asbestos cement, etc).
2 Asbestos insulating board, mill boards, other low-density insulation boards, asbestos textiles, gaskets, ropes and woven textiles, asbestos paper and felt.
3 Thermal insulation (e.g.: pipe and boiler lagging), sprayed asbestos, loose asbestos, asbestos mattresses and packing.
BExtent of damage/ deterioration.
0 Good condition: no visible damage.
1 Low damage: a few scratches or surface marks; broken edges on boards, tiles, etc.
2 Medium damage: significant breakage of materials or several small areas where material has been damaged revealing loose asbestos fibres.
3 High damage or delamination of materials, sprays and thermal insulation. Visible asbestos debris.
C Surface Treatment
0 Composite materials containing asbestos: reinforced plastics, resins, vinyl tiles.
1 Enclosed sprays and lagging, AIB (with exposed face painted or encapsulated), unsealed cement sheets, etc.
2 Unsealed AIB, or encapsulated lagging and sprays.
3 Unsealed lagging and sprays.
D Asbestos type
1 Chrysotile.
2 Amphibole asbestos excluding Crocidolite.
3 Crocidolite.
Material Assessment Score = A + B + C + D
Appendix 2 – Material & Priority Assessment Algorithms
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 28 of 30
The Material Assessment identifies the high risk materials, that is, those which will most readily release airborne fibres if disturbed. It does not automatically follow that those materials assigned the highest score in the Material Assessment will be the materials that should be given priority for remedial action. Management priority must be determined by carrying out a Risk Assessment which will also take into account the likely maintenance activity; occupant activity; likelihood of disturbance; and human exposure potential.
The Priority Assessment Algorithm looks at the likelihood of someone disturbing the ACM. Please note Priority Assessments have not been undertaken as part of this survey.
A legal requirement to carry out a Risk Assessment for all work activities exists under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. The requirement to assess the risk posed by asbestos is further enforced by the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012. These regulations require that asbestos present in the workplace must not present a hazard to health
The risks from asbestos should be assessed and managed for all identified or presumed ACMs. The Risk Assessment or priority rating will establish the likelihood of people being exposed to the hazard and identify the measures to be taken that will either eliminate the hazard or adequately control it.
The Priority Assessment Score is calculated on the average scores for each of the four human exposure factors given by the table on the following page.
It is the responsibility of the Duty Holder to complete the Priority Risk Assessment, and ensure it remains up to date and accurate.
Section Factor Score Examples of Score
Normal Occupant Activity Score = E
E Main Type of Activity
0 Rare Disturbance activity (e.g. Store Room) 1 Low Disturbance Activity (e.g. Office) 2 Periodic Disturbance (May contact ACMs) 3 High Level of disturbance (e.g. panel on door)
Likelihood of Disturbance Score = Average of F + G + H
F Location
0 Outdoors 1 Large Rooms or well ventilated Areas 2 Rooms up to 100sqm 3 Confined Spaces
G Accessibility
0 Usually Inaccessible or unlikely to be disturbed 1 Occasional Disturbance 2 Easily Disturbed 3 Routinely Disturbed
H Extent
0 Very Small Amounts 1 <10sqm or <10lm 2 >10sqm to <50sqm or >10lm to <50lm 3 <50sqm or >50lm
Human Exposure Potential Score = Average of I + J + K
I No of Occupants
0 None 1 1-3 2 4-10 3 >10
J Frequency of Use
0 Infrequent 1 Monthly 2 Weekly 3 Daily
K Average Time in Use
0 <1 Hour 1 >1 hour and <3 hours 2 >3 hours to <6 hours 3 >6 Hours
Maintenance Activity Score = Average of L + M
L Type of Activity
0 Minor disturbance e.g. possible contact 1 Low disturbance e.g. removing light bulb 2 Medium Disturbance 3 High levels of disturbance
Appendix 2 – Material & Priority Assessment Algorithms
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 29 of 30
MFrequency of Maintenance
0 ACM unlikely to be disturbed 1 1 per Year 2 >1 per year 3 >1 per Month
Risk Assessment
The Risk Assessment Priority Algorithm is calculated by adding the Material Assessment Score obtained during the survey to the Priority Assessment Score.
HIGH RISK - 18 POINTS OR MORE
The potential hazard arising from this category warrants urgent action. Immediate plans should be made for the removal/containment of the ACM. If delay in remedial action is likely to occur the affected area should initially be sealed-off and appropriate warning signs posted.
MEDIUM RISK - 14-17 POINTS
This category indicates that deterioration in any of the contributory factors may result in fibre release. Therefore all asbestos should be contained/sealed/encapsulated.
LOW RISK - 9-13 Points
This category indicates the need for regular monitoring. Although the current risk of fibre release is low, this material may suffer deterioration through age/local accidental damage.
VERY LOW RISK 8 or less
Similarly this category requires regular monitoring. Although the current risk of fibre release is low, this material may suffer deterioration through age/local accidental damage.
Appendix 3 – Survey Drawings
Version 7, March 2016 Life Environmental Services Issue No. 1
Reinspection Survey & PA B-67538 - Liberty Primary School Page 30 of 30
BasementBlock A
UP
B01
P
gs100810/19
gs100810/24
gs100810/23
gs100810/20
gs100810/21P/Boilers
Board Cement Gaskets Floor Tiles Textile Reinforced Composite Textured Coating Bitumen Thermal Insulation
Life Environmental Services Ltd.
4 Ducketts WharfSouth Street
Bishop’s Stortford CM23 3AR
Telephone: 0844 335 1281
Email: [email protected]
www.lifeenvironmental.co.uk
Registered in England No. 3053057
Survey Plan
Drawn By:
Surveyor Initials:
Survey Date:
Revision No.:
Date:
Page:
2.4 Oct 2016
Drawing Not to Scale Drawing should not be viewed in isolation. Please refer to Report Asbestos Register.
Key
- Location Number
- No Access
- Limited Access
- Outside Scope of Survey
- Asbestos Removed
- Positive Sample
- Cross Referenced Sample
- Strongly Presumed Asbestos
- Presumed Asbestos
- Negative Sample
- Negative Cross Referenced Sample
S0001
001
S0001
X0001
S0001
X0001
Job No.:
SP
P
Reinspection
London Borough of Merton
Liberty Primary SchoolWestern Road
Mitcham, SUrreyCR4 3ER
Jun/Jul 2017
RG
04/07/2017
WJ
1 of 6
B-67538
UP UP
UP
Ground FloorBlock A
UP
E1
A-E8
A-E7
A-E6
A-E5
A-E4
A-E3
A-E2
0/038Corridor18.18 m²
0/051Lobby3.92 m²
0/055Corridor64.72 m²
0/054Corridor27.36 m²
0/033Corridor56.72 m²
0/037BReception42.55 m²
0/002Admin Office12.46 m²
0/001Head's Office16.93 m²
0/043Store9.46 m²
0/044Sta irwell4 .06 m²
0/004AToile t (V isitors)8.30 m²
0/004BToile t (Accessible)4.75 m²
0/046Corridor1.52 m²
0/031BCorridor3.98 m²
0/032Corridor5.92 m²0/045
Sta irwell7 .42 m²
0/041Store5.72 m²
0/032AStore5.08 m²0/034
Lobby4.05 m²
0/036Admin Office13.52 m²
0/035Toile t (Staff)3 .97 m²
0/031Toile t (Staff/Female)11.15 m²
0/031AToile t (Staff/Male)13.08 m²
0/047Shower Room1.93 m²
0/030Reprographics Room8.80 m²
0/053Bus Man Office9.60 m²
0/029Afterschool/Breakfast Club48.35 m²
0/028Library46.36 m²
0/027Classroom Year 246.14 m²
0/026Classroom Year 248.67 m²
0/025Classroom Year 246.13 m²
0/024Classroom Year 143.96 m²
0/023Group Room21.74 m²
0/007Store5.54 m²
0/006Time Out Room5.69 m²
0/048Office15.00 m² 0/009
Changing (Staff)8 .12 m²
0/008Toile t (Staff)2 .30 m²
0/010Kitchen68.98 m²
0/012Servery22.56 m²
0/011Hall284.48 m²
0/049Store (Tables)25.84 m²
0/005BEESD Unit54.98 m²
0/013Store3.08 m²
0/014Cleaning Store4.07 m²
0/016Classroom Year 153.37 m²
0/018Classroom Year 155.38 m²
0/042Store5.75 m²
0/050Sta irwell7 .56 m²
0/019Lobby3.49 m²
0/021Music Room8.99 m²
0/052Caretaker's Office9.28 m²
020
022
017015
TW01
012 - No access into floorducts present throughout
013 - No access belowparquet flooring throughout
P
P
P
No access beyond the leadlining to low level tray
Board Cement Gaskets Floor Tiles Textile Reinforced Composite Textured Coating Bitumen Thermal Insulation
Life Environmental Services Ltd.
4 Ducketts WharfSouth Street
Bishop’s Stortford CM23 3AR
Telephone: 0844 335 1281
Email: [email protected]
www.lifeenvironmental.co.uk
Registered in England No. 3053057
Survey Plan
Drawn By:
Surveyor Initials:
Survey Date:
Revision No.:
Date:
Page:
2.4 Oct 2016
Drawing Not to Scale Drawing should not be viewed in isolation. Please refer to Report Asbestos Register.
Key
- Location Number
- No Access
- Limited Access
- Outside Scope of Survey
- Asbestos Removed
- Positive Sample
- Cross Referenced Sample
- Strongly Presumed Asbestos
- Presumed Asbestos
- Negative Sample
- Negative Cross Referenced Sample
S0001
001
S0001
X0001
S0001
X0001
Job No.:
SP
P
Reinspection
London Borough of Merton
Liberty Primary SchoolWestern Road
Mitcham, SUrreyCR4 3ER
Jun/Jul 2017
RG
04/07/2017
WJ
2 of 6
B-67538
UP
balcony
UP
Mezzanine FloorBlock A
0/M02Sta irwell13.75 m²
0/M01Sta irwell13.74 m²
Board Cement Gaskets Floor Tiles Textile Reinforced Composite Textured Coating Bitumen Thermal Insulation
Life Environmental Services Ltd.
4 Ducketts WharfSouth Street
Bishop’s Stortford CM23 3AR
Telephone: 0844 335 1281
Email: [email protected]
www.lifeenvironmental.co.uk
Registered in England No. 3053057
Survey Plan
Drawn By:
Surveyor Initials:
Survey Date:
Revision No.:
Date:
Page:
2.4 Oct 2016
Drawing Not to Scale Drawing should not be viewed in isolation. Please refer to Report Asbestos Register.
Key
- Location Number
- No Access
- Limited Access
- Outside Scope of Survey
- Asbestos Removed
- Positive Sample
- Cross Referenced Sample
- Strongly Presumed Asbestos
- Presumed Asbestos
- Negative Sample
- Negative Cross Referenced Sample
S0001
001
S0001
X0001
S0001
X0001
Job No.:
SP
P
Reinspection
London Borough of Merton
Liberty Primary SchoolWestern Road
Mitcham, SUrreyCR4 3ER
Jun/Jul 2017
RG
04/07/2017
WJ
3 of 6
B-67538
First Floor & ExternalBlock A
UP
UP
1/026Corridor85.49 m²
1/033Corridor84.52 m²
1/030Corridor3.42 m²1/027
Reprographics Room11.51 m²
1/038Corridor1.30 m²
1/032Store1.90 m²
1/029Sta irwell14.02 m²
1/024Deputy Head's Office14.24 m²
1/026Toile t (Boys)21.26 m²
1/002Toile t (Staff/Female)13.46 m²
1/001Group Room31.02 m²
1/003Classroom Year 354.62 m²
1/005Classroom Year 455.83 m²
1/023Classroom Year 346.27 m²
1/022Classroom Year 348.40 m²
1/021Classroom Year 446.50 m²
1/020Classroom Year 446.22 m²
1/019Classroom Year 548.50 m²
1/018Classroom Year 546.25 m²
1/010Store4.53 m²
1/008Cleaning Store11.18 m²
1/007Teacher's Work Room36.50 m²
1/034PE Store18.46 m²
1/006Gym Hall157.95 m²
1/003AStore6.70 m²
1/004Store4.72 m²
1/031Sta irwell18.80 m²
1/011The Den55.78 m²
1/011ALobby3.50 m²
1/014Lobby5.58 m²
1/035Store3.04 m²
1/013Office11.17 m²
1/015Assistant Head's Office10.13 m²
1/036Toile t (Staff)3 .03 m²
1/037Toile t (Staff)3 .04 m²
1/016Staff Room79.19 m²
012009
AS TW01
gs100810/09
015 - External
P
P
Board Cement Gaskets Floor Tiles Textile Reinforced Composite Textured Coating Bitumen Thermal Insulation
Life Environmental Services Ltd.
4 Ducketts WharfSouth Street
Bishop’s Stortford CM23 3AR
Telephone: 0844 335 1281
Email: [email protected]
www.lifeenvironmental.co.uk
Registered in England No. 3053057
Survey Plan
Drawn By:
Surveyor Initials:
Survey Date:
Revision No.:
Date:
Page:
2.4 Oct 2016
Drawing Not to Scale Drawing should not be viewed in isolation. Please refer to Report Asbestos Register.
Key
- Location Number
- No Access
- Limited Access
- Outside Scope of Survey
- Asbestos Removed
- Positive Sample
- Cross Referenced Sample
- Strongly Presumed Asbestos
- Presumed Asbestos
- Negative Sample
- Negative Cross Referenced Sample
S0001
001
S0001
X0001
S0001
X0001
Job No.:
SP
P
Reinspection
London Borough of Merton
Liberty Primary SchoolWestern Road
Mitcham, SUrreyCR4 3ER
Jun/Jul 2017
RG
04/07/2017
WJ
4 of 6
B-67538
UP
UP UP
First FloorBlock B
Ground FloorBlock B
B-E2
E1 B-E3
0/019Corridor15.08 m²
0/021Lift1.55 m²
0/018Store5.47 m²
0/017Store5.72 m²
0/016Reception Classroom59.79 m²
0/015Reception Classroom106.74 m²
0/014Reception Classroom61.57 m²
0/013Office22.98 m²
0/008Corridor11.90 m²
0/004Nursery135.45 m²
0/010Toilet (Accessible)6.61 m² 0/007
Kitchen (Nursery)10.17 m²
0/012Toilet (Staff)2.31 m²
0/011Toilet (Staff)2.15 m² 0/009
Toilet (Pupils)14.02 m²
0/005Toilet (Pupils)17.24 m²
0/006Store12.07 m²
0/003Store3.56 m²
0/001Stairwell17.96 m²
0/002Cleaning Store3.70 m²
1/019Lift1.55 m²
1/020Corridor19.42 m²
1/016Corridor29.50 m²
1/017ICT & Library84.29 m²
1/018Store8.71 m²
1/015Toilet (Girls)1.60 m²
1/014Toilet (Girls)1.63 m²
1/013Lobby4.29 m²
1/011Classroom Year 653.84 m²
1/006Corridor63.62 m²
1/009Classroom Year 657.02 m²
1/012Store1.94 m²1/010Store1.92 m²
1/008Store1.93 m²
1/007Classroom Year 662.85 m²
1/005Store6.74 m²
1/001Stairwell19.91 m²
1/002Lobby3.86 m²
1/004Toilet (Boys)1.49 m²
1/003Toilet (Boys)1.46 m²
020
022P/Boilers
gs100810/07
gs100810/08
P
External FloorBlock B
014 - External
P
P
P
Board Cement Gaskets Floor Tiles Textile Reinforced Composite Textured Coating Bitumen Thermal Insulation
Life Environmental Services Ltd.
4 Ducketts WharfSouth Street
Bishop’s Stortford CM23 3AR
Telephone: 0844 335 1281
Email: [email protected]
www.lifeenvironmental.co.uk
Registered in England No. 3053057
Survey Plan
Drawn By:
Surveyor Initials:
Survey Date:
Revision No.:
Date:
Page:
2.4 Oct 2016
Drawing Not to Scale Drawing should not be viewed in isolation. Please refer to Report Asbestos Register.
Key
- Location Number
- No Access
- Limited Access
- Outside Scope of Survey
- Asbestos Removed
- Positive Sample
- Cross Referenced Sample
- Strongly Presumed Asbestos
- Presumed Asbestos
- Negative Sample
- Negative Cross Referenced Sample
S0001
001
S0001
X0001
S0001
X0001
Job No.:
SP
P
Reinspection
London Borough of Merton
Liberty Primary SchoolWestern Road
Mitcham, SUrreyCR4 3ER
Jun/Jul 2017
RG
04/07/2017
WJ
5 of 6
B-67538
UP
Ground FloorBlock C
Ground FloorBlock D
C-E1
C-E2
D-E1
D-E2
D-E3
D-E4
0/003Kitchen9.03 m²
0/002Living Room18.03 m²
0/007Toilet1.25 m²
0/006Bathroom3.05 m²
0/001Stairwell3.84 m²
0/004Store1.22 m²
0/005Utility Room9.88 m²
0/001Store18.73 m²
UP
First FloorBlock C
1/003Bedroom10.12 m²
1/004Bedroom13.85 m²
1/002Bedroom7.15 m²1/001
Stairwell2.34 m²
1/005Store1.37 m²
Ground FloorBlock E
E-E3 E-E1
E-E4
E-E2
0/001Workshop18.70 m²
0/002Tea Room4.24 m²
Ground FloorBlock G
Unknown - no accessapprox dimensions
G-E1
G-E2 G-E3
door door
0/001Store18.85 m²
Ground FloorBlock F
F-E1F-E3
F-E4
F-E2
0/001Changing Room10.19 m²
0/003Changing Room10.19 m²
0/004Shower3.41 m²
0/002Shower3.44 m²
Board Cement Gaskets Floor Tiles Textile Reinforced Composite Textured Coating Bitumen Thermal Insulation
Life Environmental Services Ltd.
4 Ducketts WharfSouth Street
Bishop’s Stortford CM23 3AR
Telephone: 0844 335 1281
Email: [email protected]
www.lifeenvironmental.co.uk
Registered in England No. 3053057
Survey Plan
Drawn By:
Surveyor Initials:
Survey Date:
Revision No.:
Date:
Page:
2.4 Oct 2016
Drawing Not to Scale Drawing should not be viewed in isolation. Please refer to Report Asbestos Register.
Key
- Location Number
- No Access
- Limited Access
- Outside Scope of Survey
- Asbestos Removed
- Positive Sample
- Cross Referenced Sample
- Strongly Presumed Asbestos
- Presumed Asbestos
- Negative Sample
- Negative Cross Referenced Sample
S0001
001
S0001
X0001
S0001
X0001
Job No.:
SP
P
Reinspection
London Borough of Merton
Liberty Primary SchoolWestern Road
Mitcham, SUrreyCR4 3ER
Jun/Jul 2017
RG
04/07/2017
WJ
6 of 6
B-67538