Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Asbestos & Lead Based Paint Assessment
City of Anderson 220 Wardlaw Street
Anderson, South Carolina 29624
Prepared for: City of Anderson
Community Development Department 601 South Main Street
Anderson, South Carolina 29624
Prepared by: Apex Environmental Management, Inc.
7 Winchester Court Mauldin, South Carolina 29662
Project Number: 1115-232
March 4, 2015
7 Winchester Court Mauldin, SC 29662 864.404.3210 office 864.404.3213 fax www.apex-ehs.com
SERVICES
Indoor Air Quality
Mold Remediation
Asbestos & Lead
Industrial Hygiene
Worker Health & Safety
Mold Consulting
Moisture
Management Plans
Safety
Assessment
Environmental Site Assessments
Hazard
Communication
Apex Project Number 1115-232
March 4, 2016 Ms. Erica Craft City of Anderson Community Development Department 601 South Main Street Anderson, South Carolina 29624 Reference: Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Services 220 Wardlaw Street
Anderson, South Carolina 29624 Dear Ms. Craft: Apex Environmental Management, Inc. (Apex) is pleased to provide the results of our assessment services for the referenced property in accordance with Apex proposal number 1115-231P dated November 10, 2015. This report and the associated attachments summarize our evaluation of the conditions observed at the project site. The findings presented by Apex are based upon sampling performed in the subject building. There is a chance that undetected ACM may exist in the building between walls or in other areas that would only be exposed during demolition or structural renovations. Should material be discovered that could potentially contain asbestos during the demolition process, additional samples of the material should be collected by a licensed asbestos inspector and submitted to an accredited laboratory for analytical interpretation. Our recommendations are based on the guidelines presented in EPA and/or OSHA regulations. Please note that this document is not a specification for asbestos removal. It does not contain means and methods for abatement. Quantities are estimates and contractors must verify amounts prior to bidding or removal. If you are planning an abatement project, please contact Apex to discuss the requirements. Use of this document without the express written consent of Apex is at the sole risk of the user and or/abatement contractor. The conclusions and/or recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the applicable standards at the time this report was prepared. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If you have any questions please feel free to contact us at (864) 404-3210. Respectfully submitted, APEX ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, INC. Thomas H. Oliver Tedman K. Shultz Director of Operations Project Manager Appendices
ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT
CITY OF ANDERSON 220 WARDLAW STREET
ANDERSON, SOUTH CAROLINA 29624
APEX PROJECT NO. 1115-232
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION
I Asbestos & Lead Evaluation Report II Asbestos & LBP Data Tables III Laboratory Analytical Results IV Photographic Log
V SC DHEC Asbestos Inspector License
SECTION I
Asbestos & Lead Evaluation Report
1
Date:
3/4/2016 Page Number: 1 of 4
Client: City of Anderson Client Contact: Ms. Erica Craft Client Address:
601 South Main Street Anderson, SC 29624
Client Phone Number:
(864) 231-2223
Project:
Asbestos and Lead Evaluation
Property Address:
220 Wardlaw Street Anderson, SC
Assessor: Ted Shultz Date of
Assessment: 2/19/2016
Company:
Apex Environmental Management 7 Winchester Court Mauldin, SC 29662
Phone Number (864) 404-3210
Purpose of Assessment:
Demolition Age of Structure:
50 ± years
Building Type:
Residential Number of Stories:
1
Foundation: Brick & CMU block crawlspace
Approximate Square Footage
1,100 SF
EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS INTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS Pitched wooden roof with shingles felt. Wooden siding. Wooden windows. Window glazing & caulk. Chimney mastic assumed positive on 1
chimney.
Multiple types & layers of vinyl floor with & without mastic.
Wooden floors. Bead board ceilings. Large portion of building materials
previously removed.
ASBESTOS/LEAD EVALUATION REPORT APEX PROJECT NUMBER: 1115-232
City of Anderson 220 Wardlaw Street Apex Project No. 1115-232 March 4, 2016
2
SCOPE OF THE SURVEY The objectives of the asbestos and lead assessment included the following:
Identification of suspect asbestos-containing material (ACM) and lead based paints (LBP) in readily observable locations. Limited demolition of building finishes was conducted.
Asbestos survey with sample collection by a South Carolina accredited inspector. Suspect ACM analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) utilizing CEI Labs (CEI) as
an NVLAP certified laboratory, their accreditation number is 101768-0. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of non-friable organically bound
materials suspected to contain asbestos and testing negatively by PLM analysis. Lead inspection by a lead inspector certified by the Environmental Protection Agency
and licensed to conduct LBP surveys in South Carolina. In situ analysis of suspected lead based paints by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Presenting the results in a report identifying confirmed ACMs and LBPs.
METHODS Asbestos Containing Materials In order to determine if the suspect materials observed during the visual survey contained asbestos, representative bulk samples were collected and placed in sealed packages. Fifteen (15) bulk samples were collected during the survey and submitted to CEI Labs (CEI) in Cary, North Carolina for analysis using the EPA recommended method of Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining (Method No. EPA 600/M4-82-020, Dec. 1982). CEI participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). Their NVLAP accreditation number is 101768-0. EPA regulations require that multiple samples of each homogeneous material be collected for laboratory analysis. In accordance with South Carolina Regulation 61-86.1, non-friable organically bound materials that are reported to be non-asbestos containing by PLM analysis must also be analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Ten (10) samples were analyzed using TEM. Lead-Based Paint Lead painted surfaces were analyzed in place using X-ray fluorescence. Painted surfaces were selected based on color of topcoat, underlying layers and substrate on which it was painted. RESULTS Asbestos Containing Materials The EPA defines an asbestos-containing material (ACM) as a material containing more than 1% asbestos. OSHA defines ACM as a material containing any amount of asbestos. Provided below is a general discussion of the asbestos containing materials identified in the residence. A specific PLM and TEM table is located in Appendix II of this report and identifies positive materials and designates approximate quantities.
City of Anderson 220 Wardlaw Street Apex Project No. 1115-232 March 4, 2016
3
Suspect asbestos containing materials that were identified to be asbestos containing include: Chimney/roof mastic assumed positive located on 1 chimney, approximately 6 LF. Lead Based Paint OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the presence or absence of lead. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of thirty micrograms per cubic meter (30 µg/m3) during an eight-hour workday and a permissible exposure level of fifty micrograms per cubic meter (50 µg/m3) for employees. Currently, the EPA defines LBP as paint containing in excess of, or equal to, 1.0 mg/cm3. The XRF analytical results and approximate locations of the paint samples collected are included in the Lead Analysis Report in Appendix II. Several surfaces in the building tested positive for lead in excess of the regulatory definition: Exterior Yellow wooden siding Brown wooden door frames Interior No surfaces tested positive for LBP
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCUSSION Asbestos Containing Materials If the above referenced asbestos materials are to be disturbed by renovations or demolition, the asbestos must be removed in accordance with EPA, State of South Carolina and OSHA asbestos regulations. The State of South Carolina, Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) has specific regulations that must be adhered to during asbestos removal/abatement projects. Apex recommends the following: 1. Abate the asbestos containing materials in the structure prior to renovation or demolition. 2. Follow applicable asbestos regulations during renovation or demolition of the structure. You
should be aware that stringent requirements are imposed upon anyone renovating or demolishing a structure in which ACM will be disturbed. This work must be performed in accordance with OSHA asbestos regulations, 29 CFR 1910 & 1926, and NESHAP asbestos regulations 40 CFR 61, subpart M. South Carolina regulations require the accreditation of personnel who work in the asbestos field and notification and permitting fees for asbestos removal projects. There is a 10 working day notification period required prior to abatement of asbestos in a facility. Failure to take proper precautions and actions to protect human health and the environment can result in penalties, danger to personnel, and construction delays.
City of Anderson 220 Wardlaw Street Apex Project No. 1115-232 March 4, 2016
4
Lead-Based Paint
1. Currently the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) define LBP as paint containing greater than 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) lead or in excess of, or equal to, 0.5 percent lead. Building materials identified as being painted with LBP should be segregated from the other building materials and recycled or disposed of in a municipal lined landfill. The removed wastes would need to be containerized and further tested by Toxic Characteristic Leaching procedures (TCLP) to determine if the waste is classified as hazardous. The remaining building materials that are not painted with LBP may be disposed of in a construction and demolition landfill. However, the landfills should be contacted to determine their specific disposal requirements.
2. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Lead Regulations apply to actions
initiated on lead containing materials. This regulation applies to lead concentrations greater than the analytical limit of detection. This regulation sets exposure levels on airborne lead and does not reference the percent lead in paint. Therefore, initial personal air monitoring should be conducted on workers performing work on surfaces which have a lead concentration of 0.1 mg/ cm2 or above to satisfy the OSHA requirements. If a baseline exposure lower than the OSHA Action Level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (g/m3) is established, personal air monitoring may be terminated. The full OSHA lead standard should be referenced for compliance.
This report summarizes our evaluation of the conditions observed at the site. The findings prepared by Apex are based upon testing performed in the structures. Our recommendations are based on the guidelines presented in EPA, State of South Carolina and OSHA asbestos regulations. Please note that this document is not a specification for asbestos or lead paint removal. It does not contain means and methods for asbestos or lead paint abatement. If you are planning an asbestos or lead paint abatement project, please contact Apex to discuss the requirements. Use of this document without the express written consent of Apex is at the sole risk of the user and/or abatement contractor. Quantities provided in this report are estimated. Contractors must verify material amounts prior to bidding or removal. This report summarizes our evaluation of the conditions observed at the site. The findings prepared by Apex are based upon testing performed in the building space. Additional ACM or LBP may exist (undetected) in other areas due to their inaccessibility or due to the limited nature of our testing. Our assessment procedures and recommendations are based on the guidelines presented in EPA, State of South Carolina or OSHA asbestos regulations. A copy of this report must be submitted to SCDHEC at least ten (10) working days prior to demolition when applying for a demolition permit.
SECTION II
Asbestos & LBP Data Tables
Project Name: COA 220 Wardlaw St ACM/LBP Sampled By: Ted Shultz
Project Location: 220 Wardlaw St, Anderson, SC Project Manager: Rebecca Shultz
Project Number: 1115-232 Date: 2/19/2016
1
2
3 TEM - NAD
4
5
6 TEM - NAD
7
8
9 TEM - NAD
10
11
12 TEM - NAD
13
14
15 TEM - NAD
Assumed Roof/Chimney Roof/Chimney Mastic Assumed Positive Non-Friable Good 6 LF
NAD = No Asbestos Detected LF = Linear Feet EA = Each
Bold = Positive For Asbestos SF = Square Feet
Good 1,350 SF
PLM - NAD
PLM - NAD
PLM - NAD
BathroomMarble pattern vinyl floor tile & mastic with brown vinyl floor with no mastic
Non-Friable
40 SF
Windows Window glazing Friable Damaged 4 EA
Sample No. ConditionSample Description
Good 40 SF
Living room Brick pattern vinyl floor with no mastic Non-Friable Damaged
Non-Friable Good 4 EA
Non-Friable
ASBESTOS SURVEY PLM & TEM FIELD DATA SHEET
QuantityAnalytical ResultsFriable/Non
FriableLocation
PLM - NAD
PLM - NAD
Windows
Roof/Chimney
Window caulk
Roof shingles (3 layers) & felt
Project Name: COA 220 Wardlaw St ACM/LBP Sampled By: Ted Shultz
Project Location: 220 Wardlaw St, Anderson, SC Project Manager: Rebecca Shultz
Project Number: 1115-232 Date: 2/19/2016
19 exterior siding yellow wood 2.7820 front porch door frame brown wood 3.4621 front porch door brown wood 0.0522 interior ceiling gray wood 0.1423 interior ceiling yellow wood 0.1524 interior ceiling white wood 0.0325 interior door frame tan wood 0.9226 interior window frame gray wood 0.00
Bold = Positive for LBP in excess of 1.0 mg/cm2 NA = Insufficient Test Time
FIELD DATA SHEETLBP ANALYSIS
Sample No. Sample Location Component Color SubstrateAnalytical Result
(mg/m3)
SECTION III
Laboratory Analytical Results
February 25, 2016
Apex Environmental Management7 Winchester CourtMauldin, SC 29662
CLIENT PROJECT: COA 220 Wardlaw StCEI LAB CODE: A16-0598
Dear Customer:
Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for PLM Bulk samples received at our laboratory onFebruary 23, 2016. The samples were analyzed for asbestos using polarizing light microscopy(PLM) per the EPA 600 Method.
Sample results containing >1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials(ACMs) per EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the EPA 600 Method is <1%asbestos by weight as determined by visual estimation.
Thank you for your business and we look forward to continuing good relations. If you have anyquestions, please feel free to call our office at 919-481-1413.
107 New Edition Court • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413
Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIHLaboratory Director
Kind Regards,
ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORTBy: Polarized Light Microscopy
Prepared for
Apex Environmental Management
TEL: 866-481-1412www.ceilabs.com
CLIENT PROJECT:
CEI LAB CODE:
TEST METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020
REPORT DATE:
TOTAL SAMPLES ANALYZED:
# SAMPLES >1% ASBESTOS:
COA 220 Wardlaw St
A16-0598
10
02/25/16
Asbestos Report SummaryBy: POLARIZING LIGHT MICROSCOPY
PROJECT: COA 220 Wardlaw St CEI LAB CODE: A16-0598
Client ID Lab ID Color Sample DescriptionASBESTOS
%Layer
METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020
A2072605 Brick Pattern Vinyl Flooring None Detected1
A2072606 Brick Pattern Vinyl Flooring None Detected2
A2072607 Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis
3
A2072608A Brown Vinyl Flooring None Detected4
A2072608B Black,White Tile None Detected
A2072608C Clear Mastic None Detected
A2072609A Brown Vinyl Flooring None Detected5
A2072609B Black,White Tile None Detected
A2072609C Clear Mastic None Detected
A2072610 Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis
6
A2072611 Brown,White Window Glazing None Detected7
A2072612 Brown,White Window Glazing None Detected8
A2072613 Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis
9
A2072614 White Window Caulking None Detected10
A2072615 White Window Caulking None Detected11
A2072616 Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis
12
Layer 1 A2072617 Black Shingle None Detected13
Layer 2 A2072617 Gray Shingle None Detected
Layer 3 A2072617 White Shingle None Detected
Layer 4 A2072617 Black Felt None Detected
Layer 1 A2072618 Black Shingle None Detected14
Layer 2 A2072618 Gray Shingle None Detected
Layer 3 A2072618 White Shingle None Detected
Layer 4 A2072618 Black Felt None Detected
A2072619 Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis
15
Page 1 of 1
ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSISBy: POLARIZING LIGHT MICROSCOPY
CEI Lab Code: A16-0598Date Received: 02-23-16Date Analyzed: 02-25-16Date Reported: 02-25-16
Client IDLab ID
LabAttributes
LabDescription
ASBESTOS%
ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHODNON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS
Non-Fibrous
Client: Apex Environmental Management7 Winchester CourtMauldin, SC 29662
Project: COA 220 Wardlaw St
Fibrous
Brick PatternVinyl Flooring1
A207260560%Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
20%20%
Cellulose VinylTar
None Detected
Brick PatternVinyl Flooring2
A207260660%Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
20%20%
Cellulose VinylTar
None Detected
Sample Submitted forTEM Analysis
3A2072607
BrownVinyl Flooring4
A2072608A25%10%
Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
50%15%
CelluloseFiberglass
VinylBinder
None Detected
Black,WhiteTileA2072608B Heterogeneous
Non-fibrousBound
100% Vinyl None Detected
ClearMasticA2072608C Heterogeneous
Non-fibrousBound
90%10%
MasticSilicates
None Detected
BrownVinyl Flooring5
A2072609A25%10%
Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
50%15%
CelluloseFiberglass
VinylBinder
None Detected
Black,WhiteTileA2072609B Heterogeneous
Non-fibrousBound
100% Vinyl None Detected
Page 1 of 4
ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSISBy: POLARIZING LIGHT MICROSCOPY
CEI Lab Code: A16-0598Date Received: 02-23-16Date Analyzed: 02-25-16Date Reported: 02-25-16
Client IDLab ID
LabAttributes
LabDescription
ASBESTOS%
ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHODNON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS
Non-Fibrous
Client: Apex Environmental Management7 Winchester CourtMauldin, SC 29662
Project: COA 220 Wardlaw St
Fibrous
ClearMasticA2072609C Heterogeneous
Non-fibrousBound
90%10%
MasticSilicates
None Detected
Sample Submitted forTEM Analysis
6A2072610
Brown,WhiteWindow Glazing7
A2072611Heterogeneous
Non-fibrousBound
5%50%45%
PaintCalc CarbBinder
None Detected
Brown,WhiteWindow Glazing8
A2072612Heterogeneous
Non-fibrousBound
5%50%45%
PaintCalc CarbBinder
None Detected
Sample Submitted forTEM Analysis
9A2072613
WhiteWindow Caulking10
A2072614Heterogeneous
Non-fibrousBound
90%10%
CaulkBinder
None Detected
WhiteWindow Caulking11
A2072615Heterogeneous
Non-fibrousBound
90%10%
CaulkBinder
None Detected
Sample Submitted forTEM Analysis
12A2072616
Black13
A2072617
20%Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
55%25%
Fiberglass TarGravel
None DetectedLayer 1
Shingle
Page 2 of 4
ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSISBy: POLARIZING LIGHT MICROSCOPY
CEI Lab Code: A16-0598Date Received: 02-23-16Date Analyzed: 02-25-16Date Reported: 02-25-16
Client IDLab ID
LabAttributes
LabDescription
ASBESTOS%
ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHODNON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS
Non-Fibrous
Client: Apex Environmental Management7 Winchester CourtMauldin, SC 29662
Project: COA 220 Wardlaw St
Fibrous
GrayShingle
A207261720%Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
55%25%
Fiberglass TarGravel
None DetectedLayer 2
WhiteShingle
A207261730%Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
45%25%
Cellulose TarGravel
None DetectedLayer 3
BlackFelt
A207261770%Homogeneous
FibrousBound
30%Cellulose Tar None DetectedLayer 4
Black14
A2072618
20%Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
55%25%
Fiberglass TarGravel
None DetectedLayer 1
Shingle
GrayShingle
A207261820%Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
55%25%
Fiberglass TarGravel
None DetectedLayer 2
WhiteShingle
A207261830%Heterogeneous
FibrousBound
45%25%
Cellulose TarGravel
None DetectedLayer 3
BlackFelt
A207261870%Homogeneous
FibrousBound
30%Cellulose Tar None DetectedLayer 4
Sample Submitted forTEM Analysis
15A2072619
Page 3 of 4
LEGEND: Non-Anth = Non-Asbestiform AnthophylliteNon-Trem = Non-Asbestiform TremoliteCalc Carb = Calcium Carbonate
METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020
LIMIT OF DETECTION: <1% by visual estimation
REGULATORY LIMIT: >1% by weight
Due to the limitations of the EPA 600 method, nonfriable organically bound materials (NOBs) such asvinyl floor tiles can be difficult to analyze via polarized light microscopy (PLM). EPA recommends thatall NOBs analyzed by PLM, and found not to contain asbestos, be further analyzed by TransmissionElectron Microscopy (TEM). Please note that PLM analysis of dust and soil samples for asbestos is notcovered under NVLAP accreditation.
This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full,without written approval by CEI Labs, Inc. CEI Labs makes no warranty representation regarding theaccuracy of client submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results. Interpretation ofthe analytical results is the sole responsibility of the client. This report may not be used by the client toclaim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government.
Page 4 of 4
ANALYST: APPROVED BY:Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIHLaboratory Director
Samantha Card
March 1, 2016
Apex Environmental Management7 Winchester CourtMauldin, SC 29662
CLIENT PROJECT: COA 22 Wardlaw StCEI LAB CODE: T16-0275
Dear Customer:
Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for TEM bulk samples received at our laboratory onFebruary 25, 2016. The samples were analyzed for asbestos using transmission electronmicroscopy (TEM) per Chatfield Method.
Sample results containing > 1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials(ACMs) per the EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the TEM Chatfieldmethod is <1% depending on the processed weight and constituents of the sample.
Thank you for your business and we look forward to continuing good relations. If you have anyquestions, please feel free to call our office at 919-481-1413.
107 New Edition Court • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413
Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIHLaboratory Director
Kind Regards,
ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORTBy: Transmission Electron Microscopy
Prepared for
Apex Environmental Management
TEL: 866-481-1412www.ceilabs.com
CLIENT PROJECT:
CEI LAB CODE:
TEST METHOD: Bulk ChatfieldEPA 600 / R93 / 116
REPORT DATE:
COA 22 Wardlaw St
T16-0275
03/01/16
ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSISBy: TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
CEI Lab Code: T16-0275Date Received: 02-25-16Date Analyzed: 03-01-16Date Reported: 03-01-16
Client IDLab ID
MaterialDescription
TEM BULK CHATFIELD / EPA 600 / R93 / 116
Client: Apex Environmental Management7 Winchester CourtMauldin, SC 29662
Project: COA 22 Wardlaw St
SampleWeight
(g)
OrganicMaterial
%
Acid SolubleMaterial
%
Acid InsolubleMaterial
%Asbestos
%
T473653 Brick Pattern Vinyl
Flooring0.31 68.4 22.3 9.3 None
Detected
T473666 Brown Vinyl Flooring 0.297 53.2 23.2 23.6 None
Detected
T473676 Black, White Tile 0.238 34.9 63.4 1.7 None
Detected
T473686 Clear Mastic 0.169 43.8 11.8 44.4 None
Detected
T473699 Brown, White Window
Glazing0.276 7.2 88.4 4.4 None
Detected
T4737012 White Window Caulking 0.229 32.3 64.6 3.1 None
Detected
T4737114 Black Shingle 0.466 19.5 49.1 31.4 None
Detected
T4737214 Gray Shingle 0.271 25.5 33.2 41.3 None
Detected
T4737314 White Shingle 0.528 56.4 21 22.6 None
Detected
T4737414 Black Felt 0.293 93.5 1.7 4.8 None
Detected
Page 1 of 2
LEGEND: None
METHOD: CHATFIELD & EPA/600/R-93/116
LIMIT OF DETECTION: Varies with the weight and constituents of the sample (<1%)
REGULATORY LIMIT: >1% by weight
This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full,without written approval by CEI Labs, Inc. CEI Labs makes no warranty representation regarding theaccuracy of client submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results. Interpretation ofthe analytical results is the sole responsibility of the client.
Page 2 of 2
ANALYST: APPROVED BY:Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIHLaboratory Director
Kamila Reichert
SECTION IV
Photographic Log
Apex Asbestos Assessment 220 Wardlaw Street Anderson, South Carolina
220 Wardlaw Street in Anderson, South Carolina
Gutted Walls
Living room vinyl floor
Apex Asbestos Assessment 220 Wardlaw Street Anderson, South Carolina
Bathroom Vinyl floor tile
SECTION V
SC DHEC Asbestos Inspector License