13

As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not
Page 2: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not
Page 3: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not
Page 4: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survivalof the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not progress, only a change. Darwin’s theory does notconsider any stage of a species’ development to be superior to any other.

Page 5: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

The book basically says that we’re not as greatas we consider ourselves to be. We have actually only been around for a fairly insignificant amount of time in comparison to other species. Any changes we might have undergone over the years (like average height) does not make us “more evolved” or any better than our ancestors.We are just different. It is presumptuous of us to think that we have reached perfection.

Page 6: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

His claims in this chapter are based purely on scientific reasons.

Page 7: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

Gould uses the arguments of Charles and Charles Darwin and Thomas Henry and Julian Huxely. He does not make many of his own points, but instead restates their arguments in simpler terms.

Page 8: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

His entire argument is secular. None of it has To do with religion. He never mentions Creationism, but does evaluate the theory of Evolution.

Page 9: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

Darwin tries to compromise his stand on The validity of evolution by making a Distinction between two kinds of struggle:

Page 10: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

This is an “abiotic” competition. ItIs the struggle “against the rigors ofThe physical environment.

Page 11: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not
Page 12: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not

This is “biotic” competition. It is a struggle “directly against other organisms for limited resources”.

Page 13: As we showed you through our demonstration, the main idea of this chapter was that survival of the fittest is not equivalent to evolution. It is not