Aryan Nations the Curse of Ham

Aryan Nations

The Curse of Ham

I was inspired to write this article after watching a presentation by a Negro, that through historical fact and whilejust teaching truth, was accosted by the jEwish entity called the media, and almost ostracized for daring to teachfact at his College, as a professor. This professor teaches that the jews were predominant in the slave trade,despite their low numbers in population, being the foremost group of people during to and prior to the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. His theory of the cause for such jEwish predominance was their talmudic teachings that theNegro is under the curse of Ham. I have seen this for myself in the talmud, so I will verify in paraphrase form,what the professor’s statement is. The talmud claims that Ham was the progenitor of the Negro race, and whenNoah cursed Ham, for "looking upon Noah’s nakedness" the following transformations occurred creating theNegro;

Ham looked upon Noah in the darkness, so his skin was made dark.

Also because of the darkness, the Negro’s eyes were made large and bulging.

Noah was supposedly sodomized by Ham, so as a curse, the male "part" was made largeas a curse. [Some Curse]

Ham’s son Canaan was made to be the servant of servants, therefore all"Hamites" [Negroes] were born as slaves.

This is why the professor states that the jew looked upon the Negro slave trade as a proper and acceptable meansof profit, it was from the talmudic excuse that it was the curse of Ham which made them slaves, therefore placingthe Hamites where they belonged, under bondage, was perfectly acceptable. I have heard this from the Christianelderly, as well as from some old Klan literature, however this Negro professor was correct in identifying the rootof this belief as being talmudic in origin, further jewish in origin. This "jewish fable" contrary to the warnings ofthe Epistle of Titus somehow crept into the Churches and left their stain. This dissertation is specifically made forthe clarification of the fact that the Negro is not Ham, nor Canaan, they are Negroes, having almost nothing to dowith scripture, mentioned so seldom, one cannot even make a provable point that they even were mentioned with100% accuracy. Ham was not the original Negro, neither was Canaan, and here the facts will be set straight.

What Race was Ham

In Genesis 6, we are told that the reason for Noah’s Flood was for the pollution of the race, as we read from theKJV; Genesis 6:4 "There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came into the daughters of men, and they bore children to them: the same became mighty men, who were of old, men ofrenown." Further from the NAT; Genesis 6:1-4 "And it came to pass, when Aryans bred and multiplied upon thesurface of the higher ground and daughters were begotten, 2 that the rebels of the Heavenly Hosts took for

Holy a Order

Page 1 of 8The Curse of Ham

08/11/2009http://www.aryannationsrevival.org/curse_of_ham.htm

themselves the daughters of Aryans because they were beautiful; and they took their choice of these woman,away from their kind, whomever they selected. 3 And Yahweh said My anger shall no longer be concealed fromthe Aryans, for they are also accountable for the use of their bodies: I will give them a continuance of onehundred and twenty rotations. 4 There were evil ones on the land at that time, and also the times that followed,when the rebels of the Heavenly Hosts procreated with daughters of Aryans, and they produced offspring tothem, these were the tyrants from the beginning, men of infamy." Now we come to understand that the ideas of"diversity" and "multiculturalism" are satanic, so if Noah was among these people, mixing along, he would nothave been saved, for proof we go to Genesis 6:9-10 "This is the story of Noah, Noah was a lawful man, withoutblemish in his genetic history, and Noah’s conduct was alike that of the Heavenly Hosts. 10 Noah begat threesons, named Sham, Ham and Japheth."

What can be discerned here is that Noah was a pure bred of the race of Adam, the Hebrew word for Adammeaning, "to blush", therefore the Negro cannot be from the race of Adam, the race of Adam was the AryanRace, thus, if Noah is pure in his genetic history, he also is and Aryan. The next point is the question as to howHam could possibly be black, or Canaan for that matter, simply stated, races do not spontaneously change color,further, a man and a woman cannot have a multiracial family, they could produce mongrels, but not races. Hamwas an Aryan was well, therefore, there is no way an Aryan could Patriarch the entire Negro race, in thiscapacity, the curse of Ham would be upon another race.

What exactly did Ham do Wrong?

For this we go back to the KJV and we will read from Genesis 9:19-27 "These three were the sons of Noah: andfrom them was the whole earth overspread. And Noah began to be a husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: Andhe drank the wine, and was drunken, and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, sawthe nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid itupon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father: and their faces werebackward, and they saw not their father's nakedness. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his youngerson had done to him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan, a servant of servants shall he be to his brethren. And hesaid, Blessed be Yahweh God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shalldwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant."

The Bible is unclear as to the actual sin; the talmud claims that Ham sodomized his father Noah, however otherscriptural passages show the contrary,

Lev 18:6 "None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: Iam Yahweh."

Lev 18:10 "The nakedness of thy son's daughter, or of thy daughter's daughter, even their nakednessthou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thy own nakedness."

Lev 18:16 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother's wife: it is thy brother's nakedness."

Lev 20:20 "And if a man shall lie with his uncle's wife, he hath uncovered his uncle's nakedness:they shall bear their sin; they shall die childless."

Lev 18:10 "The nakedness of thy son's daughter, or of thy daughter's daughter, even their nakednessthou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thy own nakedness."

So far, all I can see for the sin of "uncovering someone’s nakedness" is sexual, however all of these items listedare obviously incestuous, not showing anything to do with the sexual disorientation of homo-sexuality, therefore



http://www.aryannationsrevival.org/curse_of_ham.htm

it is clear that Ham did not sodomize Noah, he did something otherwise in a means of sexual defilement, now letus read about "uncovering thy father’s nakedness";

Lev 18:8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.

Lev 20:11 And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness;both of them shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them.

It is clear here that Ham using the fact that Noah, and probably his wife also, became heavily intoxicated,violated his own mother and conceived a son, a product of incest, this was Canaan. Some will try to sat that itclearly states that when Noah woke up he cursed Ham’s son Canaan, so it was the same day, but in Biblicallanguage, that could have been months later, or a curse upon the possible inbred offspring in advance, either way,Canaan was cursed as an inbreed, the product of Ham and his mother. Proof of this can be found all over in theprophecies where the Canaanites are often called "Children of Incest", they would not have been incestuous ifNoah had a second wife, so it was Ham’s own mother that he violated in the night.

Noah was an Aryan, Noah’s wife was an Aryan, or Yahweh would have also let them swim for 10 months likeeveryone else in the flood. Thus, Ham was an Aryan, and so was Canaan, although of a corrupt conception,having a weakened genome, having been cast aside from the rest of his race he would have had to breedelsewhere. The land of Canaan is modern Palestine; the Canaanites were mongrel offspring of a genetically weakAryan genome as well as the breed common to this land in antiquity.

What Race did Canaan Become?

We read further in the Holy Scriptures that the offspring of Canaan continued in a downward spiral, starting withtheir progeny; Genesis 10:15-19 "And Canaan begat Sidon his first-born, and Heth [Hittite-Hethite], And theJebusite, and the Emorite [Amorite], and the Girgasite, And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite, And theArvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites dispersed.And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, to Gaza; as thou goest to Sodom andGomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even to Lashah."

Forget the fact that some names disappear; they are the same people as listed below, the same that Yahwehordered Genocide when encountered.

Deuteronomy 20:16-18 "But of the cities of these people which Yahweh thy God doth give thee for aninheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: But thou shalt utterly destroy them, namely, theHittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, as Yahweh thyGod hath commanded thee: That they may not teach you to do after all their abominations which they have doneto their gods; so would ye sin against Yahweh your God."

The fact that the names are somewhat different, they are the same people, with a few others added that Canaanbred with. Some of these people were of the Kenite lineage, or the mongrel offspring of Cain, so we have nowthe means to determine the race of the Canaanite. We have some names from Canaan disappearing, because theymost likely merged with the original inhabitants of Canaan, erased through breeding, also, since Canaan was




banned from the Aryan Race, his offspring would have bred with whatever lived in this land. For this we returnearlier in scripture to see who was living there, and there is only one reference, Genesis 4:18-24 "And unto Erechwas born Irad: and Irad fathered Mehujael: and Mehujael fathered Methusael: and Methusael fathered Lamech. 19And Lamech took for himself two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. 20 And

Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such that live in tents, who deal cattle. 21 And his brother's name was Jubal:

he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ. 22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, a fabricator of

many wares of brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah. [22]23 And Lamech said to his wives,

Adah and Zillah, Listen to my voice, women of Lamech, listen to my assertion: for I have killed a man for a

wound, and a boy because of a bruise. 24 If Cain is to be avenged sevenfold, then Lamech seventy and

sevenfold." Now read the following footnote; [22] Naamah is important here, women are rarely mentioned in theBible, almost never in Genealogies, this name is important because it gives a researcher clues as to the origin ofthis insert passage, Namaah was a city in Palestine named after this woman, therefore it was probably the originof this passage, it was probably borrowed as a reference point in scripture, since this information would not havebeen part of the Aryan knowledge at least until they settled in Shinar, in Genesis 11, but this woman’s nameshows a later timeframe, Post conquest of Palestine. This passage is the genetic lineage of Cain.

Here we have it, Cain’s race was settled in Palestine, so now we need to determine what the race of Cain was,since they also were part of this Canaanite Curse, so we go to the Strong’s Concordance where we find Kenite,the same word as Cain. Hebrew Listing 7014;

קין qayin kah'-yin The same as H7013 (with a play upon the affinity to H7069); Kajin, the name of the first child,also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe: - Cain, Kenite (-s).

The name of Cain, to quote, "Kajin, the name of the first child"

Where did Cain’s horde go? We have one of their addresses now, quote, "also of a placein Palestine"

What did the Kenites look like? Quote, "and of an Oriental tribe"

Cain was cast East of Eden into the land of Nod, assumedly Mongolia, so Cain’s wife was an oriental, so theracial pattern of this cursed race of Cain can be assumed to be part Asiatic, Part Aryan. Where is the Negro inthis? NOWHERE.

The Cursed Race of Canaan

Now we have to look into the racial picture, we have Aryan Eve, with Satan the father of Cain, whatever race thatdid represent, most likely satan, being a fallen angel had some White racial characteristics, this is a guess, but theonly one we have due to a lack of proof. To begin, we will start with Hybrid Aryan #1, Cain, and add into thisAsiatic, thus the very definition of the Kenite is fulfilled. An Aryan, Asiatic Hybrid horde, I fail to see Negro inhere.

Second, we have Canaan, the Aryan Inbreed settling in this land where the cities are named Cain, and Namaah, areal good means of tracing where some of Cain’s oriental race settled, besides Shinar. Now we have 2 PartsAryan, 1 Part Asiatic, 1 Part Unknown, Even if Satan was the first Negro, he would have had to be so Black, hewould have been tar colored, invisible at night, far beyond anything we could ever comprehend, because I haveseen Negroes that almost could fit this description, and for their mother to be an Aryan Woman, this cannot




possibly be, so now we can rule out satan as a Negro. If you want some proof that satan was not the first negro,look at a full blooded Negro, add an Aryan woman, and some Asian, you do not get an Oriental, you get a mixedNegro, if you remove the Negro from this you get an Oriental mongrel. Now, we have no picture of Kenites, butwe do have pictures of Canaanites, so let us look at this realistically.

¼ Aryan in Pure Form, ¼ Aryan Inbreed, ¼ Asiatic and ¼ Unknown, "serpent race" what we also know is thatCain was "marked" so he would be protected, this "marking" was the changing of his appearance, or his face.Genesis 4:13-15 "And Cain said to Yahweh, My iniquity is too great to be forgiven.14 I understand that You have

driven me out this day from the face of my homeland; and I will be cast off from Your favor, and I will be afugitive and a vagabond upon this earth; someday, someone will find me and kill me.15 And Yahweh said to him,

Therefore whosoever kills Cain, vengeance will be taken on him sevenfold. And Yahweh changed the appearanceof Cain, lest any finding him should kill him." If you look at the Original King James from 1611, the translatorsknew who Cain was, because in the cross-reference, they write, "Between the Eyes", that’s the nose.

Back to the beginning, ¼ Aryan Inbreed, ¼ Asiatic and ¼ Aryan from Eve, ¼ serpent, with a strange prominentnose. Gee, I wonder who that might be? Let’s have a closer look at the Canaanites……

The Nose godThis Hittite and Canaanite Deity is one of our

favorites, after all, who else would yousuppose should be worshiping the "Nose

god". I see pictures of Buddha represented asan oriental or a continental Indian, and I haveseen our Messiah represented as an Aryan as

he should be, but the point here is thatnations usually worship gods and idols that

represent themselves, unless they areanimals, so we can assume that this

Canaanite and Hittite [Heth-ite] "deity" lookslike the people that deified their "Holy

Presence"

Oy, the SourceThis is an ancient drawing of a Canaanite, now

please ask yourself, who today has this aardvark likebeak, sloped forehead, and an obviously irregular

profile. In the past we have labeled certain selfprofessed "Chosen Ones" with this certain Pinocchiolike feature as Toucan Schmeuls, Irregular featuressuch as large noses, large ears, chins, or an absence




Also,

of chins or forehead ridges is usually associated withinbreeding, or the hereditary effects of past

inbreeding, for example, when Ham had sex with hismother, Canaan the offspring of incest would carry a

weakened genetic code forever. This is a child ofCanaan, what the prophets called, "Children of

Incest"

The Hittite/Heth-ite These nasally well-endowed persons had a large

protrusion, as well as the fold down effect,although the pictures of Hittites have variations

from the large straight beak, to the mediumthrough large hooked beak, the fact cannot bedenied, the people that most closely resemble

these condemned races are today those that callthemselves the "Chosen Ones", you can ask, howcan that be? We can all see from the pictures all

around here, that modern "jewry" has thesefeatures, in fact it is these very features thatseparates them from all other races, these

features we know associate as "jewish" areactually evidence that they are mixed breeds ofCanaanite Origin, this would also explain why

Yahweh has rejected them for salvation, and has"Chosen" them for damnation.

An Ancient "jew"?Notice the "jewish" features again, the recessedchin, the hooked beak, as well as what is called

"saucer lip" is all to clear here, and these featuresare today associated with "jewry". This is aHittite warrior, this is what the race Esau

interbred with, looked like, and this is also therace of the Chasers, after all, they once ruled theBabylonian Empire for a small time, and were

then driven north into Kazakhstan, as it is knowntoday. Shall we name him Schlomo, Schmeul,Jaime, or Yankl? What we can all call him is a



http://www.aryannationsrevival.org/curse_of_ham.htmAlso

These are copies of an article, "Whatever Happened to the Canaanites"

Where does the Negro fit in?

This is a great question, and here is the great answer, the Negro fits inas a scapegoat.

This myth was fabricated and taught by the jEws about the Negro to pass the buck, so to say, from the fact thatthe curse of Ham, or more correctly, the curse of Canaan is upon themselves. This is why I am so concernedabout this myth being taught to Christians and Klansmen, the Negro always claims to have been "wrongfullyaccused" and a victim of "racist lies" well, this time the Negro is right.

It was jEwish racism against the Negro that caused this myth to be passed into Christianity, and it is talmudic inorigin, a satanic compilation of the religion from Babylon. The only Negroes involved in the Curse of Canaan arethe ones bred into jEwry, other than that, Biblically, they barely exist, this is a jEwish fabrication, and a jEwishlie.

What Qualifies the Author?

As a Pastor in the Aryan Nations, I have no need to vindicate the Negro from this claim, however, it is all tooclear from facts, both Biblical and archaeological that there is no way that the Negro is possibly Ham, or Canaan.I decided to write this in such a way as to allow Negroes to use this information for their own benefit, as long asthey abide by the few terms of use. After years of studying the Bible, and viewing a Negro Professor explainingfact, but being politically crucified for truth, I felt obligated to straighten out the facts that even this professormissed. The Negro cannot be Canaan, nor Ham, it is impossible, the Negro by no means possible is derived from

Canaanite hybrid bastard, and he is the ancestorof what today calls themselves "jewry".



http://www.aryannationsrevival.org/curse_of_ham.htmThese

the Aryan Race, or the Oriental race for that matter, however, obviously the jEw is, so let us face facts, the jEwbest fits the description of Canaan, and sure looks like the Archeological proof of what Canaanites actuallylooked like, and we can all see, they were not Negroes. How does this qualify the author? There is noqualification necessary, facts are facts, and indisputable, I did not bury Canaanite artifacts 3000+ years ago, and Idid not write the Bible, I just study it, and put 1+1 together. Neither did I write the Lexicons, or the Strong’sConcordance that clearly states that the race of Cain was of an Oriental breed. I do not need qualification for this,the facts speak for themselves.

Death to the Canaanites, Death to the jEws

Return




Documents

Aryan Nations the Curse of Ham