Upload
aruncbe07
View
895
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A STUDY ON CUSTOMER LOYALTY TOWARDS LOGISTICS IN
SAFE EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED
by
M.S ARUN KUMAR
Register Number – 0891003
of
SRI RAMAKRISHNA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, COIMBATORE – 641022
(AUTONOMOUS INSTITUTION, AFFILIATED TO ANNA UNIVERSITY COIMBATORE)
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted to the
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the award of the degree
of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
ANNA UNIVERSITY COIMBATORE – 641 047
JUNE, 2010
1
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
Certified that the a project report titled “A STUDY ON CUSTOMER
LOYALTY TOWARDS LOGISTICS IN SAFE EXPRESS PVT LTD” is the bonafide
work of Mr. M.S ARUN KUMAR who carried out the research under my supervision.
Certified further, that to the best of my knowledge the work reported herein does not
from part of any other project.
Faculty Guide DIRECTOR
(Department of Management Studies)
Viva Voce Examination Held On
Internal Examiner External Examiner
2
DECLARATION
This is to certify that the project titled “A STUDY ON CUSTOMER LOYALTY
TOWARDS LOGISTICS IN SAFE EXPRESS PVT LTD”submitted to the
Department of Management Studies, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College,
affiliated to Anna University; Coimbatore is an original record of project done by me,
under the supervision of Mrs. V.VANAJA, Assistant Professor, and Department
of Management Studies. Certified further, that to the best of my knowledge the
work reported herein does not from part of any other project.
M.S ARUN KUMAR (0891003)
Place: Coimbatore
Date:
3
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank Management, Principal, and Director of Sri
Ramakrishna Engineering College for giving me the opportunity to
carry out my project work.
Also I wish to thank Dr.K.Chitra, Director, Department of
Management Studies, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College for the
invaluable guidance throughout the project work.
I am also grateful to my guide faculty member, Prof.V.Vanaja,
Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies for her
valuable suggestion and guidance leading to my successful completion
of this project.
I owe my bound less thanks to the project guide Mr.E.Karthik IT
Head, Safe Express Pvt Ltd., Coimbatore for his valuable
encouragement and proper timely advice.
Last but not least I extend my grateful thanks to all my faculty
members of Department of Management Studies and my beloved
parents.
5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In the current scenario logistics plays an important role in the
transfer of goods and services to the customers and logistics services
provide a variety of warehousing, transportation, and supply chain
management services. The services offer that customized product
solutions can perform custom, custom labeling, and packaging
operations.
Logistics forms the system that ensures the delivery of the
product in the entire supply pipeline. This includes transportation,
packaging, storage and handling methods, and information flow.
Safe Express was started in 1993. It started its business as a
door-to-door service in 1995 with 4 routes, 9 offices, 12 container
mounted vehicles and 20 employees. Safexpress –India’s Leading
Logistics Company is renowned for its domain expertise and
experienced manpower in the LSCM sector
The study is conducted with the main objective of
understanding the demographic profile of the customers, service usage
behavior of the customers and level of customer loyalty towards
safexpress.
6
The study is descriptive as the objectives and purpose is very
clear. A sample of 100 respondents is drawn from the population based
on convenience sampling method. The data is collected with the help
of Specially Designed Questionnaire. The tools used for analysis are
Percentage Analysis and mean score.
The limitations are , the study is limited to the survey is restricted
to the customers of Safe Express Pvt ltd and time limit restricts
detailed survey work for this particular topic of research and Some
customers have lack of time, so they may not communicate properly.
From the findings of the study Demographic profile of
respondents most of the respondent’s annual turnover is more than 25
Lakhs and followed by and in the service usage behavior and Majority
(66%) of the respondents identified the safe express through friends
And Relatives and (80 %) of the respondents are satisfied with the way
of handling goods and (85%) are satisfied in the 3PL.
From the Level of customer loyalty Majority of respondents is
very much satisfied in clearance department and Majority (70%) of the
respondents are excellent in risk coverage in safe express, Majority
(62%) of the respondents is very much satisfied in transit days and
Most (41%) of the respondents are very much satisfied in security
system and Most (33%) of the respondents values people relationship
ahead in short term goals.
7
Also it reveals that the over all Satisfaction level of customers
will recommend to others and satisfied with the over all services
provided with the safexpress
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER CONTENTS
PAGE NO
1 INTRODUCTION 1.
1 Background 1
1.
2 Review of literature 4
1.3 Statement of the problem 8
1.4 Objectives of the study 8
1.5 Scope of the study 9
1.6 Methodology 9
1.7 Limitations 10
1.8 Chapter scheme 11
2 COMPANY PROFILE
2.1 History of the organization 12
2.2 Management 16
2.3 Organization structure 17
2.4 Product profile and market potential 18
2.5 Competitive strength of the company 20
8
2.6 Future plans 21
2.7 Description of various functional areas 22
3 MICRO - MACRO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
3.1 Industry position in Global Scenario 23
3.2 Industry position in Indian Scenario 25
4 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTREPRETATION 28
5 CONCLUSION 53
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE
PAGE
NO
1 Type of Organization 28
2 Type of Business 28
3 Annual Turnover 29
4 Association with Safe Express 29
5 Information Resources 30
6 Service Utilization 30
7 Type of Express service 31
8 Trustworthiness of goods handling 31
9 Reasons for dissatisfaction 31
10 Trustworthiness of Warehouse facility 32
11 Reasons for dis-satisfaction 32
12 Client Handling 33
13 Risk Coverage 34
14 Employee Efficiency 35
15 Online track information 36
16 Trustworthiness of Third-party Logistics 37
9
17 Reasons for dissatisfaction 37
18 Representative Ability 38
19 Responsiveness to Telephone / email 40
20 Handling & Packing 41
21 Clearance Department 42
22 Security System 43
23 Transit Days 44
24 Shipment Delivery on Doorstep 45
25 Logistics services of other companies 46
26 Switch over to other Logistics Services 46
27 Switch over to other companies. 47
28 Safe express deserves loyalty 47
29 Increase in loyalty 49
30 Value people & Short term goals 50
31 Recommendation to others. 51
32 Rating the overall services 51
33 Mean score 52
LIST OF CHARTS
CHART NO. TITLE
PAGE
NO
4.1 Client Handling 33
4.2 Risk Coverage 34
4.3 Employee Efficiency 35
4.4 Online Track Information 36
4.5 Representative Ability 39
4.6 Responsiveness to Telephone / email 40
4.7 Handling & Packing 41
4.8 Clearance Department 42
4.9 Security System 43
10
4.10 Transit Days 44
4.11 Shipment Delivery 45
4.12 Increase in Loyalty 49
4.13 Safe express Value people & Short term goals 50
CHAPTERS
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
1.2 Review of Literature
1.3 Statement of the Problem
1.4 Objectives pf the study
1.5 Scope of the study
1.6 Methodology
1.7 Limitations
1.8 Chapter scheme (report structure)
Chapter 2: ORGANIZATION PROFILE
2.1 History of the Organization
2.2 Management
2.3 Organization Structure
2.4 Products profile and market potential
2.5 Competitive strength of the company
2.6 Future plans
2.7 Description of various functional areas.
Chapter 3: MACRO – MICRO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
3.1 Industry position in global scenario
3.2 Industry position in Indian scenario
11
3.3 Competitors profile - a snapshot
Chapter 4: DATA ANLYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Chapter 5: CONCLUSION
i) Results and Discussions
ii) Considered recommendations
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
A multitude of companies today has already identified the need
to create a loyal customer base and acknowledges that maintaining
existing customers and extending business with them is significantly
less expensive than acquiring new customers. Empirical proof of the
proliferation of such customer loyalty efforts in the business world is
e.g. provided in the form of loyalty programs, which many companies
have installed during the past years by engaging in efforts aimed at
creating customer loyalty, which in turn fosters financial success in
monetary terms firms react to increasing competitive challenges.
Indian Supply Chain and Logistics Industry is more than USD 100
Billion in size and is the backbone of Indian Economy. In India the
industry is growing at a rate of 8-10% annually and has been a crucial
contributor in the growth and development of the Indian economy. In
the near future, Traditional Logistics services like Transportation and
Warehousing would continue to grow at a good rate.
12
In addition, we expect strong Foreign Direct Investment inflows
in the Indian markets, which would lead to increased market
opportunities for providers of Third-Party Logistics in India. Therefore,
India possesses substantial opportunities for growth in the Supply
Chain & Logistics industry in the coming years, notwithstanding the
temporary jolt due to the economic slowdown.
Currently the annual logistics cost of the world is about USD 3.5
trillion. For any country, the annual logistics cost varies between 9%
and 20% of the GDP, the figure for the US being about 9%. US-based
Armstrong & Associates, Inc. tracks the issues and trends in the world
logistics market and in the US logistics market, in particular, in their
annual surveys of top 25 global LSP. According to the firm, the
global logistics market sizes in 1992, 1996 and 2000 were USD 10
billion, USD 25 billion and USD 56 billion, respectively. In 2003 and
2004, the corresponding figures were USD 70 billion and USD 333
billion, registering high growth rates. Though most of the large LSPs
are headquartered in Europe, the US logistics market is the largest in
the world capturing one-third of the world logistics market. In 2003, it
was about USD 80 billion.
In 2004, it grew to USD 89 billion, and in 2005, it registered an
impressive growth rate of 16% to cross the USD 100 billion mark for
the first time and reach USD 103.7 billion (Foster and Armstrong, 2004,
2005, 2006). However, considering the fact that the logistics market in
the US is about 10% of its annual logistics cost (Foster and Armstrong,
2006), there is still immense potential for growth of 3PL in the US in
particular, and in the world in general.
Since the beginning of the 1990s, customer loyalty has gained
13
importance both in relationship marketing research and in business. In
business, this can be attributed to changing market- and competition-
environments. Due to a shift from a sellers’ to a buyers’ market and
because of an increasing degree of globalization, most industries find
themselves confronted with new challenges.
A loyal customer base represents a barrier to entry, a basis for a
price premium, time to respond to competitor innovations, and a
bulwark against deleterious price competition. Loyalty is critical to
brand volume, is highly correlated to market share, and can be used as
the basis of predicting future market share; consequently,
understanding loyalty appears critical to any meaningful analysis of
marketing strategy.
In the supplier-focused perspective, customer loyalty is seen as a
bundle of measures that aim at improving relationships with
customers. The supplier is in the center of attention and the customer
is only regarded as the factor at which success of customer loyalty
becomes manifest. Here it becomes clear that this approach contains a
conceptual deficit. It is the customer who eventually decides on
whether customer loyalty management is successful or not, because
all activities undertaken by a supplier can only be geared at influencing
14
customers to be loyal. A customer-focused perspective therefore has to
be added to evaluate the success of customer loyalty management.
Within the customer-focused perspective, customer loyalty is
conceptualized taking into account customers’ complex characteristics.
These can either be approached as customers’ directly observable
actions and/or take into account their attitudes and intentions. Since
customers’ actions are directly influenced by their attitudes and
intentions, it is obvious that these have to be scrutinized to understand
and manage loyalty.
The relationship-focused perspective directly examines the
relationship between suppliers and customers. Accordingly, the
objectives of study in this perspective usually are buying behavior in
retail contexts and long-term relationships marked by frequent
interaction between suppliers and buyers in industrial contexts.
1.1 Review of literature
15
This section deals with the review of literature conducted in
regard to the study. Martin sa al. (1998)1 in their study evaluated the
qualitative and quantitative differences in logistics and courier. The
objective of the study was to identify the customer loyalty in courier &
logistics services in India. The data was collect from 170 customers in
two groups: those under the age of 20 and those 65 and over. The
important question is loyalty in services provided in logistics and
courier. The results indicated that most of the service provided by the
logistics company is satisfied by the customers. From the findings of
the study known that most of the customers are loyalty in logistics
services provided in the India.
Paul Joseph Raj. (2001)2 in their study evaluated the customer
satisfaction in logistics, provided by the various companies. The
objective of the study was to identify the customer satisfaction in
logistics services. The data was collected from 150 respondents, under
the age from 20 to above 65.From the findings of the study, most of
the customers are satisfied with the service provided in the logistics.
From the findings of the study, known that, few customers are neutral
in services providing quick in delivery.
William M. Weilbacher (2006)3 evaluates in her study comparison
of Indian Logistics & Foreign logistics Services. The objective of the is
to find out the level of usage in the logististics services in India as well
as in globally. The data is mostly collected as secondary data. The
scope of the study is broad in nature. From the findings of the study
most of the users are very much satisfied in logistics services provided
in all the aspects, the satisfaction level is very much satisfied in
1 Martin sa al. (1998) “A Study on Qualitative and quantitative analysis of logistics services in India & loyalty towards in logistics.
2 Paul Joseph Raj,“A Study on Customer Satisfaction in Logistics , provide by the various companies in India.
3 William M. Weilbacher, “A study on Comparison of Indian Logistics and Foreign Logistics.
16
logistics services in India, on concluding that, logistics are very much
useful in all the categories.
Rathore Singh (2006)4, in their study evaluated the impact of
logistics services in India, The main objective of the study is to identify
the problems in logistics services, and to know about the customers
loyalty in the logistics usage, the data is collected from 100
respondents under the age from 22 to above 60, From the findings of
the study, most of the respondents are satisfied with the
transportation, in transit, Insurance cover provided by the logistics
company. Few respondents dissatisfied with the warehouse and the
online tracking information. On concluding that the logistics services
are useful in all aspects.
Robertson. Eliza (2003)5, in their study on Customer preference
in the Courier and the logistics Services, The study used an
experimental design in which certain groups of participants were
exposed to a logistics to identified it well, The objective of the study is
to identify the customer preference in the logistics services. From the
findings of the study few customers are dissatisfied with damage of
goods when in transit , most of the customers are very much satisfied
in the logistics services provided. The result was that the respondents
are well aware in choosing the logistics company.
Prof.P.R.S.Sharma (2006)6, A Study on Current Scenario of
Logistics service Iin India, The objective of the study is , to know the
current scenario of the logistics services , and to identify well and
measured by using the quantitative and qualitative analysis. The
survey was collected mostly from the secondary data as well as 4 Rathore Singh, “A Study on Impact of Logistics Services in India with special reference to the North India & South India.
5 Robertson .Eliza, “Customer Preference in the logistics services”, International journal of Logistics, vol 25(1), pp.71-86.
6 Prof.P.R.S.Sharma, “A Study on Current Scenario of Indian logistics”, International journal of Logistics, vol 28(1), pp.61-86.
17
primary data; the data is collected from the 75 respondents. From the
findings of the study the Indian logistics is pretty good in nature and
respondents are well aware of the logistics service providers’.
Paul E. Hendry et al. (2008)7, in their study under stand the
Brand Recall Gati Brand in Logistics and Cargo Needs, The main
objective if the study is to identify the brand strategy in Gati , in cargo
needs as well in logistics services. The data is collected from the 150
respondents from the Gati, most of the respondents in the age from 22
to above 65, from the findings of the study most of the respondents
are well aware and satisfied towards Gati cargo and logistics services.
Prof.Ajay Sharma (2006)8, evaluated in their research
investigated in supply chain management and competitive marketing
strategy of major courier and cargo services in India, The main
objective of the study is to identify the marketing strategy evaluated,
the data is mostly collected from the secondary data. From the
findings of the study most of the respondents are satisfied with the
marketing strategy by the cargo service provided, and few
respondents are in not agree with the marketing.
Peter R. Drake et al. (2004)9, in their study investigates the
impact of Logistics services in globally, the main objective of the study
is to identify the problems faced in the logistics services by the users,
the data is collected from the 100 respondents, from the findings of
the study most of the respondents are neutrally aware of the logistics
services provided in domestically, and most of the respondents are
very much satisfied in the logistics services provided globally.
Prof.Srikanth.Gupta (2008)10, in their study Customer perception
towards logistics services provided in India, The main objective of the
7 Paul E. Hendry et al , A Study on Brand recall of Gati Logistics and Cargo services
8 Prof.Ajay Sharma , ‘ A Research in Supply chain Management and Competitive Marketing Strategy of Major Courier and Cargo services in India.
9 Peter R.Drake et al, “ The Study on Impact of logistics services in global”
18
study is to identify the customer perception towards logistics services,
The data is collected from the 100 respondents, secondary data is
been collected mostly , from the findings of the study , some
respondents are not satisfied with the services provided and few are
neutrally satisfied in it. Concluding that the customers are well
satisfied in cargo services.
10 Prof.Srikanth Gupta, “A Study on customer perception towards Logistics services provided in India.
19
1.3 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
In the current scenario the competition is very high in the
logistics industry. The satisfaction of the customers is very
important to promote the products among the customers. The
customers are business organizations the factor leading to
customer loyalty is different from the factors that influence
individual customers .The company wants to take necessary steps
to increase sales. The clarity of information, advice provided to
customers by staff, the language used by the staff to communicate
it properly, are the main problems faced by the customers. The
analysis of customers’ perception will help the company to know the
satisfaction level of customers and customer loyalty towards the
organization and also help the company to improve the services.
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1. To know about the demographic profile of the customers.
2. To Study the service usage behavior of customers.
3. To study the customers’ opinion about the various services provided by Safe Express Ltd., and the customer loyalty.
4. To provide suggestions to safe express limited for further
improvement.
20
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The study is conducted at safe express pvt ltd. The
respondents are various business houses in Coimbatore making use of
logistics services provided by Safe Express Ltd.The present customers
alone are considered for conducting this study.
1.6 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Type of Study:
The study is a descriptive study because it enables the quick
assimilation of data.
Sampling Design and Sample Size
The Sampling method used in this study is convenience
sampling. The sample size is 100. The respondents are chosen on the
basis of accessibility to the researcher.
Data collection
Questionnaire method is used for data collection
Questionnaire consists of three parts they are
1. Customer Profile.
2. Service usage behavior.
21
3. Level of Customer Loyalty.
Tools for Data Analysis:
Simple percentage method and Mean Score is performed
for the samples collected to estimate the overall customer satisfaction
level of customers.
1.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
Time limit restricts detailed survey work for this particular topic of research
The survey is restricted to the customers of Safe Express Pvt ltd who belong to Coimbatore region only.
Some customers did not have enough time, so they were not able to communicate properly.
22
1.8 CHAPTER SCHEME
Chapter 1:INTRODUCTION
This part deals with Background, Review of Literature,
Statement of a problem, Objective of the study, Scope of the study,
Research Methodology, Limitations, Chapter Scheme (Report
Structure)
Chapter 2:ORGANIZATION PROFILE
This part deals with History of the organization,
Management, Organization Structure, Products profile and Market
potential, Competitive strength of the company, Future plans,
Description of various functional areas
Chapter 3:MACRO-MICRO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The prevailing economic scenario with respect to the
industry
Selected for the study is briefly discussed in this chapter
Chapter 4:DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
This part of the project deals with the analysis of data
using the
Statistical tools and interpretation of the results
Chapter 5:CONCLUSION
This part deals with the Results and Discussions,
Considered
23
CHAPTER - 2
ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE
Organizational Profile deals with the history of the organization, its
management, organizational structure, programme profile and market
potential, competitive strengths, future plans and the description of
various functional areas.
2.1 HISTORY OF THE ORGANISATION
Safe Express was started in 1993. Pawan Jain (Chairman and
Managing Director Safexpress), Anil Sayal (General Manager
Safexpress). Safexpress started its business as a door-to-door service
in 1995 with 4 routes, 9 offices, 12 container mounted vehicles and 20
employees.Safexpress' door-to-door services include niche products
like DoD and To-Payfreight. In 1996 Safexpress opens super hubs at
Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore.Next year Safexpress launches
Integrated Logistics Services. Our first ILS client is NIIT; the first
international ILS account is signed with Hilti from Europe. Spurred on
by a surging domestic economy, Safexpress extends its fleet to 250
and number of stations to 290. Safexpress Private Limited emerges as
an independent entity
In1998 Safeair and Safebox are launched, setting a new standard
in value added cargo services.All hubs are connected through web-
24
based software. In 1999 Having grown by over 300%in 4 years without
compromising quality, Safexpress is awarded the Golden Peacock
Award for quality and innovation in Logistics Management.In 2000 Pilot
run for GPS starts on 28 routes.
Safexpress reaches the 350-destinations mark and the fleet
crosses 1400. Again 2001 Safexpress upgrades and launches a whole
lot of features on www.safexpress.com including ePod, Virtual Cargo
and Privileged Member.In the year 2002,2003 Safexpress was declared
India's "Largest Logistics Service Provider" by Limca Book of Records.
In 2005 Safexpress bags the MICO:Power of We Award for excellent
service in logistics. In the same year Safexpress fleet crosses
3000 mark. Next year in 2006 Safexpress was awarded by ADC Krone
for providing best logistics services and in same year Safexpress bags
prestigious RAI's (Retailers Association of India) Award for Best
Logistics Service Provider.
Safexpress –India’s Leading Logistics Company is renowned for
its domain expertise and experienced manpower in the LSCM sector.
Safexpress can best understand your Logistics and distribution
requirements and can offer the most suitable Logistics model and
solution to you. Safexpress has the largest network coverage across
India traversing over 3,50,000 km.
Every day covering over 550 locations through more than 750
routes operating 24 hours a day 365 days a year reaching these
locations through it’s fleet of 3000 vehicles operating on. All
Safexpress vehicles have all-weather proof containers for safe transit.
Safexpress also operates through Air to locations directly covered by
flights and to all other locations on a multi modal basis.
25
Safexpress have a Integrated Logistics Management. It is our 3PL
Product that optimises your company’s supply chain. First, we examine
the linkages between your suppliers, producers, buyers, intermediaries
and end users in order to identify time and cost inefficiencies. Next, we
deploy o ur uniquemix of local know-how, global practices and cutting-
edge technology to provide integrated supply chain solutions. These
range from specific services such as warehouse management,
statutory compliance and invoicing - to an entire gamut of third party
logistics services.
Mission:
To adopt and internalize a work culture which demonstrates a
"we can we will" attitude to reflect in our daily responsibilities so as to
far exceed our objectives, consistently striving towards market
dominance. It will create historical landmarks forming a strong edifice
for the future overcoming all obstacles pro-actively as our personal
responsibility and commitment to create delight for the customer with
impeccable personalized services.
Vision:
To be a conscious learning organization maintaining flexibility for
change so as to provide the most customized solutions. Striving
towards global market share whilst maintaining dominance in the
domestic market through good hr practice and excellent customer
service.
Quality:
A quality service relies upon constant customer interaction and
feedback. An immediate response to the changing environment with
pre-defined business processes managed effectively and efficiently
26
lead to the highest output from the lowest input and this is the
strongest measure of quality.
The best certification of a quality organization is the
measurement of the scale of the smile on the customers face”
HISTORY
1995 Safexpress launches as a door-to-door service with 4 routes, 9 offices, 12 container mounted vehicles and 20 employees.Safexpress' door-to-door services include niche products like DoD and To-Pay freight.
1996 Safexpress opens super hubs at Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore.
1997 Safexpress launches Integrated Logistics Services. Our first ILS client is NIIT; the first international ILS account is signed with Hilti from Europe.Spurred on by a surging domestic economy, Safexpress extends its fleet to 250 and number of stations to 290. Safexpress Private Limited emerges as an independent entity
1998 Safeair and Safebox are launched, setting a new standard in value added cargo services.All hubs are connected through web-based software.
1999 Having grown by over 300%in 4 years without compromising quality, Safexpress is awarded the Golden
27
Peacock Award for quality and innovation in Logistics Management.
2000 Pilot run for GPS starts on 28 routes.Safexpress reaches the 350-destinations mark and the fleet crosses 1400.
2001 Safexpress upgrades and launches a whole lot of features on www.safexpress.com including ePod, Virtual Cargo and Privileged Member.
2002 Safexpress declared India's "Largest Logistics Service Provider" by Limca Book of Records 2002
2003 Safexpress declared India's "Largest Logistics Service Provider" by Limca Book of Records 2003Mr.pawan Jain, CMD, Safexpress, becomes one of the finalists in the prestigious EnY's Entrepreneur of the Year Award.
2005 Safexpress inaugurated its 500th scheduled delivery locationSafexpress bags the Franchise Awards04 for excellence in Team Work.
2006 Safexpress bags the MICO:Power of We Award for excellent service in logistics Safexpress fleet crosses 3000 mark.
2.2 MANAGEMENT
Mr.Pawan Jain
(Chairman and Managing Director Safexpress)
15 Years of experience in the industry
Mr.Anil Sayal
General Manager of Safexpress.
Mrs. Jain
Director – HR & Admin.
28
Mr.E Karthik
Head – IT
Southern Region.
P.Suresh
Head – Coimbatore Region
Mr.Uday Sharma
Director – Marketing Head
R.K Jain
Director - Finance
Mr.N.D Kishore–
Director – Southern Region
Mr. P.S Nair
Director - Coimbatore Branch.
2.3 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
REGIONAL OFFICER
AREA MANAGER
ASST. MANAGER
Logistics HR Marketing System Finance & Accounts Manager Manager Manager Manager Manager
29
Executives Executives Executives Executives Executives
R & D Administration Manager Manager
Executives Executives
2.4 PRODUCT PROFILE AND MARKET POTENTIAL
SAFEXPRESS SERVICES
EXPRESS
Safexpress service is an express service which involves
movement of cargo in all weather proof sealed containers on feeder
and express routes. The service is time definite with a published transit
schedule covering more than 550 destinations nation wide and
provides the flexibility for surface, air and multi-modal connectivity
with a wide reach associated with Indian airlines and air taxi operators
such as jet airways, Sahara etc.
30
DRAFT-ON-DELIVERY
Draft on delivery is an unparalleled value-added service wherein
the seller can dispatch goods through Safexpress to the buyer and be
assured that the delivery would take place only when the draft has
been collected.
In the Safexpress DOD system pre-alerts are sent to the
consignee to allow reasonable time for the draft to be made, thus
meeting the desired objective of express transit with the amount ready
for collection.
ALL RISK COVER
The management of Safexpress hereby undertakes and declares
that:
14 “The company would redeem the value of the loss in the uneventful
case of any shortage or damage to the consignment whilst in the
custody of Safexpress, subject to the risk charge having been paid by
the sender or the recipient as per the company policy.
SAFEBOX
The safebox comes in two convenient sizes of 17” x 17” x 12”
and 16” x 12” x 9” easily accomodating upto 20 & 10 kgs respectively
of your cargo.
The robust design is further reinforced with internal insulation for
safety of your cargo. So you save on packaging cost and for a nominal
amount it is ready for delivery with an auto insurance upto rs. 5000
absolutely free of cost.
31
SAFEAIR
To ensure that time sensitive cargo reaches the destination
through a faster mode meeting all your requirements for the time
definite deliveries. Safeair connects your cargo through airlines, atos
and uses the services for morning and evening flights to provide a wide
variety of connectivety to suit different market cutoffs.
ILM
Safexpress works on the value chain concept using a framework
for examining linkages between suppliers, producers, buyers,
intermediaries & end users.Safexpress ensures the success of the
entire chain, marrying local knowhow with the best global practices,
technology & perspective
CONSULTING
Safexpress offers value added services beyond physical
operations in the form of logistics consultancy covering a wide
spectrum of the Indian economy.The company plays a pivotal role in
guiding diverse market segments on existing and recommended
logistics models with various simulation modules to map transactions
using historical data and providing befitting supply chain solutions.
2.5 COMPETITIVE STRENGTH OF THE COMPANY
Strength
Over 550 destinations spread across 28 states & 7 union
territories.
Warehousing space exceeding 3 million square feet.
Over 3,000 all weather-proof ISO 9002 vehicles.
32
More than 1000 routes, linked through 41 super hubs & hubs.
Delivering more than 3 million packages a month.
Traversing more than 5, 00,000 kms a day.
Operating 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
Weakness
Safe express is still lagging in ware house management to its
competitors.
Safe express was a late entrant to generic cargo business.
Opportunities
Automotive industry in India is growing at 18% per annum
creating a huge opportunity for Indian logistics companies like
Safe express.
Indian retail sector is growing 25% annually creating US$ 175-
200 billion by 2016.
Threats
Safe express business model was cloned by several retail courier
operators thus creating threat for Safe express business.
Safe express employees were recruited by its competitors with
high salary and other perk and allowances.
2.6 FUTURE PLANS
Logistics services provider Safexpress plans to invest Rs 800-
1,000 crore (Rs 8-10 billion) in five years to expand its operations
on the back of the boom in manufacturing and retail activities in
the country.
33
As a result of the expansion, the company's turnover is likely to
touch Rs 1,000 crore (Rs 10 billion) by 2012.
The company is also establishing a 3 lakh sq ft logistics park near
Chennai at an investment of Rs 35 crore (Rs 350 million). It
already operates a 80,000 sq ft warehouse in Chennai.
The warehousing capacity of the company will grow to 10 million
sq ft in the next three years from the current 3 million sq ft.
The company was planning to strengthen its presence in the air
cargo segment by taking three Boeing-737 cargo aircraft on
lease.
Safexpress has also placed an order for 380 trucks to add to its
current fleet of 3,000 vehicles.
Safexpress intends to set up logistics parks comprising
warehouses, vendor management services, raw material
management and finished products storages at 32 locations
across the country.
2.7 DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS FUNCTIONAL AREAS
Human resource department
Marketing department
System & administration department
Finance & accounts department
34
Research and development department
Dispatch Department
Human Resource Department:
A human resource department plays a vital role in the
organization, to recruit the employees and train them to satisfying the
need of the customer, and motivate the employees in the organization
to achieve the goals.
Marketing Department:
It will try and maximize the level of sales by carrying out market
research and promoting the goods or service through a motivated
sales team.
Finance & Accounting Department:
Keep a record of all money coming in and going out of the
business. They have responsibility for securing finances for future
expansion and paying staff.
System & Administration Department:
Coordination of branch activities and provision of interaction
between branches and the main office, and maintain the documents
and invoice bills upto dates to be maintained to record it.
Research and Development Department:
Usually, the primary function of the R&D department is to
conduct researches for new services and develop new solutions.
CHAPTER-3
MICRO-MACRO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
35
3.1 GLOBAL SCENARIO:
Logistics is a quite an old concept, it has been becoming very
efficient only after the wave of 1990s globalization. With the advent of
intense competition coupled with globalization and liberalization forced
both public and private firms committing themselves to make available
to the customers, the right condition material, at the right place, at the
right time, at the very lowest cost-may be a product or a service.
The World Bank in a recent survey connecting to compete: Trade
logistics in global economy which conducts the LPI survey for every
two years. The LPI is a multidimensional assessment of logistics
performance, rated on a scale from one (worst) to five (best). The
index uses more than 5,000 individual country assessments made by
nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders to compare the trade
logistics profiles of 155 countries.
Based on a worldwide survey of freight forwarders and express
carriers, the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) is a benchmarking tool
developed by the World Bank that measures performance along the
logistics supply chain within a country. Allowing for comparisons across
155 countries, the index can helps in identify challenges and
opportunities and improve their logistics-performances.
Technological progress and worldwide trade and investment
liberalization are presenting new opportunities for countries to harness
global markets for growth and poverty reduction. But with the advent
of global supply chains, a new premium is being placed on being able
to move goods rapidly, reliably, and cheaply.
The ability to connect to the worldwide logistics web depends on
a country'sinfrastructure, service markets, and trade processes.
36
The government and the private sectors in many developing countries
should improve these areas - or face the large and growing costs of
exclusion, said a World Bank report.
REVENUE DISTRIBUTION GLOBALLY:
Size of the global logistics industry:
Currently the annual logistics cost of the world is about USD 3.5
trillion. For any country, the annual logistics cost varies between 9%
and 20% of the GDP, the figure for the US being about 9%. US-based
Armstrong & Associates, Inc. tracks the issues and trends in the world
logistics market and in the US logistics market, in particular, in their
annual surveys of top 25 global LSPs.
According to the firm, the global logistics market sizes in 1992,
1996 and 2000 were USD 10 billion, USD 25 billion and USD 56 billion,
respectively. In 2003 and 2004, the corresponding figures were
USD270 billion and USD 333 billion, registering high growth rates.
37
Though most of the large LSPs are headquartered in Europe, the US
logistics market is the largest in the world capturing one-third of the
world logistics market. In 2003, it was about USD 80 billion.
In 2004, it grew to USD 89 billion, and in 2005, it registered an
impressive growth rate of 16% to cross the USD 100 billion mark for
the first time and reach USD 103.7 billion (Foster and Armstrong, 2004,
2005, 2006). However, considering the fact that the logistics market in
the US is about 10% of its annual logistics cost (Foster and Armstrong,
2006), there is still immense potential for growth of 3PL in the US in
particular, and in the world in general.
3.2 INDIAN SCENARIO:
Indian Supply Chain and Logistics Industry is more than USD 100
Billion in size and is the backbone of Indian Economy. Our industry is
growing at a rate of 8-10% annually and has been a crucial contributor
in the growth and development of the Indian economy. In the near
future, Traditional Logistics services like Transportation and
Warehousing would continue to growth at a good rate. However, the
big ticket growth would come from the Value Added Logistics services
in the near future.
At present, Outsourced Logistics accounts for only one-third of
the total Logistics market in India, which is a significantly lower
proportion vis-a-vis the developed markets. Growth in this industry is
currently being driven in India by over USD 300 billion worth of
infrastructure investments, the phased introduction of VAT, the
development of organized Retail and Agro-processing industries, along
with a strong manufacturing growth.
38
In addition, we expect strong Foreign Direct Investment inflows
in the Indian markets, which would lead to increased market
opportunities for providers of Third-Party Logistics in India. Therefore,
India possesses substantial opportunities for growth in the Supply
Chain & Logistics industry in the coming years, notwithstanding the
temporary jolt due to the economic slowdown.
The logistics and warehousing sector in India, till now, has been
highly fragmented and characterised by the presence of numerous
unorganised players. A large number of players have been providing
services in individual segments like transportation, warehousing,
packaging etc.
In 2007, organised players accounted for only 6 per cent of the
total US$ 100 billion Indian logistics industry However, changing
business dynamics and the entry of global third party logistics players
(3PL) has led to the remodelling of the logistics services in India. From
a mere combination of transportation and storage services, logistics is
fast emerging as a strategic function that involves end-to-end solutions
that improve efficiencies.
India’s logistics sector attracted investments worth Rs. 23,200
crore in first half of 2008, according to a study by Assocham”Trade
logistics”2008. The report said about 110 logistics parks spread over
approximately 3,500 acres at an estimated cost of $1 bn are expected
to be operational and an estimated 45 mn sq ft of warehousing space
with an investment of $500 mn is expected to be developed by various
logistics companies by 2012.
39
Comparison of Indian logistics performance index with other
countries:
Country LPI Score
USA 3.85
UK 3.84
Singapore 4.19
India 3.07
China 3.64
Mexico 2.64
The Logistics Performance Index (LPI) indicators provide the in-
depth each country assessment of the logistics gap among countries.
As the above graph shows those LPI scores of different countries and
also the performance of developed countries comparing to the
developing nations. Singapore-1stUSA- 9th
China-30th India-39th.
CHAPTER-4
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
40
This Chapter 4 deals with the analysis and the interpretation of the
data collected through questionnaire and the data is presented under
suitable headings.
4.1 Respondents’ demographic profile.
This part deals of the study deals with the
demographic profile of the respondents like type of the
organization, type of the business, annual turnover and
association with safe express.
Table 4.1.1: Type of Organization
Nature of Organization No. of Respondents
Percentage
Sole Proprietorship 27 27Partnership 24 24Private Limited Company 23 23Public Limited Company 21 21Others 5 5.Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (27%) of the customers are Sole
proprietors followed by Partnership business (24%), Private limited
company(23%) and Public limited company (21%).
Table 4.1.2: Type of Business
Type of Business No. of Respondents Percentage
Manufacturing 36 36Trading 47 47Assembling 13 13Others 4 4Total 100 100
41
The above table reveals that most (47%) of the customers are in
trading business followed by manufacturing business (36%) and
assembling business (13%).
Table 4.1.3: Annual Turnover
Annual Turnover No. of Respondents Percentage
Less than 25 Lakhs 56 5626-50 Lakhs 20 2051-100Lakhs 16 16Above 101 Lakhs 8 8Total 100 100
The above table reveals that majority (56%) of the customers have
an Annual turnover less than 25 Lakhs and most (20%) are in 26-50 Lakhs
category 16% are in 51-100 Lakhs category followed by 8% who are
above 101 Lakhs category.
Table 4.1.4: Association with Safe Express
Association with Safe Express No. of Respondents PercentageLess than 3 Years 55 553 to 5 Years 22 225 to 7 Years 12 127 to 10 Years 5 5More than 10 Years 6 6Total 100 100
The above table reveals that majority (55%) respondents are
associated with Safe Express for less than 3 years followed by most of
the (22%) respondents are in 3-5 years category, 12% in 5-7 years
category, 6% in more than 10 years and 5% are in 7-10 years category.
4.2 Information resources and service utilization.
42
This part deals of the study deals with the information
resources, service utilization, and type of express service.
Table 4.2.1: Information Resources
Information Resources No. of Respondents PercentageNewspaper 11 11Television 16 16Friends & Relatives 66 66Others 7 7Total 100 100
The above table reveals that majority (66%) respondents came to
know about safe express through Friends & Relatives and (16%) from
Television and (11%) of the respondents from Newspaper.
Table 4.2.2: Service Utilization
Services Utilized No. of Respondents
Percentage
Express 56 56Warehouse 17 173 P'L 11 11Draft on Delivery (DOD) 14 14Check on Delivery 2 2Total 100 100
The above table reveals that majority (56%) respondents availed
Express Services, 17% are using Warehouse services, 14% are using Draft
on Delivery services, 11% are using Third Party Logistics and 2% are
using Check on Delivery services.
43
Table 4.2.3: Type of Express service
Type of Express Service
No. of Respondents Percentage
Surface 43 43Air 13 13Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (43%) of the respondents are
availing Surface services followed by 13% who are availing Air services.
4.3 Respondents’ opinion about Goods Handling
This part deals of the study deals with the
trustworthiness of goods handling, reasons for dissatisfaction,
trustworthiness of warehouse facility and reasons for dissatisfaction.
Table 4.3.1: Trustworthiness of goods handling
Respondents Opinion
No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 80 80No 20 20Total 100 100
The above table reveals that majority (80%) of the respondents are
satisfied with the way of goods handled and feel it is trustworthy.
Table 4.3.2: Reasons for dissatisfaction
Reasons No. of Respondents PercentageTransit Damages 8 40Method Of Packing 5 25Accidents 4 20Others if any 3 15Total 20 100.0
44
Out of 20 respondents who feel that goods handling system is not
trustworthy, 40% of them expressed that it is due to transit damages
followed by 25 % of the respondents who felt that it is due to improper
packing.
4.4 Respondents opinion about warehouse facility
This part deals of the study deals with the
trustworthiness of warehouse facility and also the reasons for
dissatisfaction
Table 4.4.1: Trustworthiness of Warehouse facility
Respondents Opinion
No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 81 81
No 19 19Total 100 100
The above table shows that majority (81%) of the respondents
expressed that warehouse facility provided by Safe Express Ltd is
trustworthy.
Table 4.4.2: Reasons for dissatisfaction
Reasons for Dis-satisfaction No. of Respondents PercentageLack of Space 8 40Security 5 25Damages 4 20Marking Problems 2 15Total 19 100
45
Out of 19 respondents who feel that warehouse facility is not
trustworthy, 40% expressed that lack of space is the main reason for the
dissatisfaction and 20% of them expressed that it is due to lack of
security.
4.5 Respondents’ opinion about other services
This part of the project deals with the respondents’ ratings
(Such as Excellent , Good , Fair and Poor) about other services like
Client Handling , Risk Coverage, Employee Efficiency and providing
online track information.
Table 4.5.1: Client Handling
Respondents Opinion No. of Respondents PercentageExcellent 44 44Good 26 26Fair 21 21
Poor 9 9Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (44%) of the respondents expressed that
client handling is excellent and 26% of the respondents stated that client handling is good.
Chart 4.1: Client Handling
46
Table 4.5.2: Risk Coverage
Respondents Opinion No. of Respondents PercentageExcellent 70 70Good 17 17Fair 10 10Poor 3 3Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (70%) of the respondents
expressed that Risk coverage is excellent and 17% of the respondents
stated that Risk Coverage is good.
Chart 4.2: Risk Coverage
47
Table 4.5.3: Employee Efficiency
Respondents Opinion No. of Respondents PercentageExcellent 28 28Good 22 22Fair 20 20Poor 30 30
Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (30%) of the respondents
expressed that Employee Efficiency is poor and 28% of the
respondents stated that Employee Efficiency is Excellent.
Chart 4.3: Employee Efficiency
48
Table 4.5.4: Online track information
Respondents Opinion No. of Respondents PercentageExcellent 30 30Good 18 18Fair 27 27Poor 12 12Very poor 13 13Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (30%) of the respondents
expressed that Online track information is excellent and 27% of the
respondents stated that Online track information is fair.
49
Chart 4.4: Online Track Information
4.6 Respondents’ Opinion about Third-party Logistics
This part of the project deals with the respondents’ opinion about
the trustworthiness of the Third Party Logistics and reasons for
dissatisfaction.
Table 4.6.1: Trustworthiness of Third-party Logistics
Respondents’ Opinion
No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 85 85
No 15 15
Total 100 100
50
The above table shows that majority (85%) of the respondents
expressed that Third Party Logistics provided by Safe Express Ltd is
trustworthy.
Table 4.6.2: Reasons for dissatisfaction
Reasons No. of Respondents
Percent
Delay in Delivery 6 40Delivery status updates 2 14Frequent Inventory Damages & Shrinkage
4 26
Just in time requirements 3 20Total 15 100
Out of 15 respondents who feel that third-party logistics is not
trustworthy, 40 % of them expressed that the reason for dissatisfaction
and 26 % felt that it is due to frequent inventory damages & shrinkage.
4.7 Respondents’ Level of Satisfaction of Certain Facilities
This part of the project deals with the respondents’ ratings
(Very much Satisfied , Satisfied , Neutral, dissatisfied , Very much
Dissatisfied) about other services like Representative ability,
Responsiveness to telephone & email, Handling & packing, Clearance
Department , Security system, Transit days and Shipment delivery on
doorstep.
Table 4.7.1: Representative Ability
51
Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage
Very Much Satisfied 49 49Satisfied 27 27Neutral 24 24Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (49%) of the respondents are
very much satisfied with Representative Ability and 27% are Satisfied.
Chart 4.5: Representative Ability
Table 4.7.2: Responsiveness to Telephone / email
Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents PercentageVery Much Satisfied 26 26Satisfied 13 13Neutral 20 20Dis-satisfied 41 41Total 100 100
52
The above table reveals that most (41%) of the respondents are
dissatisfied with responsiveness to telephone /emails and 26% are very
much satisfied with responsiveness to telephone /emails.
Chart 4.6: Responsiveness to Telephone / email
Table 4.7.3: Handling & Packing
Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents PercentageVery Much Satisfied 22 22Satisfied 27 27Neutral 34 34Dis-satisfied 9 9Highly Dis-satisfied 8 8Total 100 100
53
The above table reveals that most (34%) of the respondents are
neutral in their opinion about handling & packing and 27% are satisfied
with the handling & packing services.
Chart4.7: Handling & Packing
Table 4.7.4: Clearance Department
Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents PercentageVery Much Satisfied 68 68Satisfied 21 21Neutral 11 11Total 100 100
54
The above table reveals that majority (68%) of the respondents are
very much satisfied and 21% are satisfied with the services of clearance
department.
Chart4.8: Clearance Department
Table 4.7.5: Security System
Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage
Very Much Satisfied 33 33
Satisfied 25 25
Neutral 26 26
Dis-satisfied 16 16
55
Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (33%) of the respondents are
very much satisfied and 25% are satisfied with the security system
followed in the company.
Chart 4.9: Security System
Table 4.7.6: Transit Days
Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage
Very Much Satisfied 62 62
Satisfied 28 28
Neutral 10 10
56
Total 100 100
The above table reveals that majority (62%) of the respondents are
very much satisfied and 28% are satisfied with the duration or time taken
for delivery.
Chart 4.10: Transit Days
Table 4.7.7: Shipment Delivery on Doorstep
Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage
Very Much Satisfied 38 38
57
Satisfied 25 25
Neutral 26 26
Dis-satisfied 11 11
Total 100 100
The above table reveals that most (38%) of the respondents are
very much satisfied and (26%) are neutral with regard to shipment
delivery on doorstep.
Chart 4.11: Shipment Delivery
4.8 Usage of Services of other logistics companies
This part of the project deals with the usage of logistics
services of other companies at present by respondents, switching back
58
to safe express in future and also switching over to other companies in
future.
Table 4.8.1: Logistics services of other companies
Usage No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 20 20
No 80 80
Total 100 100
The above table reveals that majority (80%) respondents are not
utilizing other logistics services and 20% are using other logistics
services.
Table 4.8.2: Switch over to other Logistics Services
Switch over to Safe Express
No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 12 60
No 8 40
Total 20 100
The above table shows that out of 20 respondents who are using
logistics services of other companies, majority (60%) have an idea to
switch over to Safe Express Ltd in future.
Table 4.8.3: Switch over to other companies
59
Switch over in Future
No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 20 25No 60 75Total 80 100
It is inferred from the above table that out of 80 respondents who
are using only the services of safe express 25% have an idea to switch
over to other logistics companies in future and 75 % expressed their wish
to remain with Safe Express Ltd.
4.9 Respondents’ Opinion about their Loyalty
This part deals with customer loyalty, increase in loyalty over
the years and also respondents opinion about the company’s value to
people and relationship ahead of short-term goals.
Table 4.9.1: Safe express deserves loyalty
Respondents Opinion No. of Respondents PercentageDis-agree 23 23Neutral 21 21Agree 32 32Strongly Agree 24 24Total 100 100
The above table shows that most (32%) of the respondents agree
that they are loyal towards safe express and 24% strongly agree that they
are loyal towards safe express.
Table 4.9.2: Increase in loyalty
60
Respondents Opinion No. of Respondents PercentageDis-agree 32 32Neutral 18 18Agree 17 17Strongly Agree 33 33Total 100 100
The above table reveals most (33%) of the respondents strongly
agree and 32% disagree about increase in loyalty over the period.
Chart 12: Increase in Loyalty
Table 4.9.3: Value people & Short term goals
61
Respondents Opinion No. of Respondents PercentageDis-agree 10 10Neutral 18 18Agree 31 31Strongly Agree 41 41Total 100 100
The above table reveals most (41%) of the respondents strongly
agree and 31% agree that safe express values people and relationship.
Chart 13: Safe express Value people & Short term goals
4.10 Recommendation to others.
62
This part deals with the Respondents recommendation of
safe express to others.
Table 4.10.1: Recommendation to others.
Recommendation
No. of Respondents Percentage
Yes 75 75
No 25 25
Total 100 100
The above table reveals majority (75%) of the respondents will
recommend safe express to others 25% will not recommend to others.
4.11 Rating of Overall services
This part deals with the Rating of the customers about the
over all services provided by the company.
Table 4.11.1: Rating the overall services
Rate the overall services No. of Respondents PercentageVery much Satisfied 26 26.0Satisfied 41 41.0Neutral 33 33.0Total 100 100.0
The above table reveals most (41%) of the respondents are satisfied
(33%) are neutral and (26%) are very much satisfied with respect to the
overall services of the company.
4.12 Mean Score
63
This part deals with the Ranking Level of customer loyalty, increase
in loyalty over the years and also respondents opinion about the
companies value to people and relationship ahead of short-term goals.
Reasons Mean Rank
Believe Company Safe express deserves my loyalty
3.9232 2
Loyalty towards Safe express has become better
3.4788 3
Safe express company values people and relationship ahead in short term goals
1.7692 1
The above table shows the categorization of the Customer
Loyalty on the basis of the reasons trustworthiness of safe express.
The respondents believe that safe express company values people and
relationship ahead in short term goals following deserves the loyalty
and loyalty towards safe express is become better.
CHAPTER-5
CONCLUSION
Chapter 5 deals with the results of the analysis and the
interpretations and the discussions upon the same. It also deals with
the considered recommendations.
64
5.1 Results and Discussions
The Major findings are summarized under various sections.
5.1.1. Demographic profile
Most (27%) of the respondents are sole proprietorship firms.
Most (47%) of the respondents are engaged in trading business.
Majority (56%) of the respondents’ Annual turnover is less than 25 Lakhs.
Majority (55%) of the respondents are associated with safe express for less than 3 years.
5.1.2 Service usage behavior
Majority (66%) of the respondents said that they came to know about the safe express through their friends and Relatives.
Majority 43 %of the respondents is availing surface services.
Majority of the respondents are satisfied with way of goods handled in safe express (85%), warehouse facility (80%), Third-party logistics services (85%).
5.1.3 Level of Customer Loyalty
Majority of the respondents expressed that the client handling is either excellent (44%) or good (26%).
Majority of the respondents expressed that the Risk coverage is either excellent (70%) or good (17%).
30% of the respondents expressed that Employee Efficiency is poor whereas 28% stated that Employee Efficiency is Excellent.
The respondents expressed that online track information is excellent (30%) and 27% stated that online track information is fair.
Majority of the respondents are either very much satisfied (49%) or satisfied (27%) with Representative Ability.
65
41% of the respondents are dissatisfied with responsiveness to telephone /emails while 26% are very much satisfied with responsiveness to telephone /emails.
34% of the respondents are neutral in their opinion about handling & packing and 27% are satisfied with the handling & packing services.
Majority of the respondents are either very much satisfied (68%) or satisfied (21%) with the services of clearance department.
Majority of the respondents are either very much satisfied (33%) or satisfied 25% with the security system followed in the company.
Majority of the respondents are either very much satisfied (62%) or satisfied (28%) with the duration or time taken for delivery.
38% of the respondents expressed that they are very much satisfied and 26% are neutral with regard to shipment delivery on doorstep.
Majority (80%) of the respondents are using the logistics services of Safe Express Ltd only.
Out of 20% of the respondents who are using logistics services of other companies majority of them have an idea to switch back Safe Express Ltd.
Most of the respondents expressed that safe express deserves loyalty.
About 50% of the respondents strongly agree or agree that their loyalty has increased over the period.
Most of the respondents expressed that company values people relationship.
Majority (75%) of the respondents said that they will recommend safe express to others.
Majority of the respondents are either very much satisfied or satisfied in over all services provided by the safe express.
5.2 Suggestions
5.2.1 Most of the respondents are not satisfied with employee
efficiency, therefore, Safe express can initiate Human resource
66
Department to enhance employee motivation and to develop
employee skills.
5.2.2 Most of the respondents are not satisfied with Online track
information system, therefore Online track information system
can implemented and updated effectively to improve client
services.
5.2.3 Most of the respondents are neutral in handling and packing
therefore, handling and packing system can be well improved.
5.2 Observatory based Recommendations.
Security system can be upgraded with latest technologies as it
will increase the loyalty.
Proper communication with the clients regarding over all services to be updated frequently.
Client’s meeting/grievances cell should be instituted in the organization.
Appendix – 1
67
QUESTIONNAIRE
1) Name & Address of the organization:
2) Year of establishment:
3) Type of the organization:
a) Sole Proprietorship
b) Partnership
c) Private Limited Company
d) Public Limited Company
e) Others
4) Nature of the business: a) Manufacturing b) Trading
c) Assembling d) Others
5) Annual Turnover: a) Less than 25Lakhs b) 26 – 50 Lakhs
c) 51 – 100 Lakhs d d) Above 100 Lakhs
6) How long you are the customer/client of Safe Express Pvt Limited?
a) Less than 3 Years b) 3 to 5 Years
c) 5 to 7 Years d) 7 to 10 Years
e) More than 10 Years
7) How do you came to know about Safe Express Pvt Limited?
a) Newspapers b) Television
c) Friends & Relatives d) Others
8) Which of the following services offered by the Safe Express are availed by you at present?
a) Express b) Warehousing c) 3 P’L
d) Draft on Delivery (D0D) e) Check on Delivery
9) If express, which one of following services you are availing?
68
a) Surface b) Air
10) Is the way of goods handled by Safe Express Pvt Limited trustworthy?
a) Yes b) No
11) If No, what are the reasons?
a) Transit damages b) Method of packing
c) Accidents d) Others if any
12. Is the warehouse facility provided by Safe Express Pvt Limited trustworthy?
a) Yes b) No
13) If No, what are the reasons?
a) Lack of space b) Security
c) Damages d) Marking problem
14) Please rate the services offered by Safe Express Pvt Limited?
Services offered by the Safe Express
Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor
1)Client handling
2) Risk Coverage
3)Employee Efficiency
4)Online Track Information
15) Is the Third-Party Logistics services provided by the Safe Express Pvt Limited trust worthy?
69
a) Yes b) No
16) If no, what are the reasons?
a) Delay in delivery b) Delivery status updates
c) Frequent Inventory Damages & Shrinkage d) just in time requirements
17) Please mention the level of satisfaction regarding the following services provided by the Safe express Pvt Limited :
(VMS - Very much satisfied, S – Satisfied, N- Neutral, DS- Dissatisfied, HDS – Highly Dissatisfied)
VMS S N DS HDS
1.Representative ability to help you resolve your issue/need
2. Responsiveness to telephone calls & emails
4. Handling & packing
5. Clearance Department
6.Security system
7. Transit Days
8. Shipment Delivery at your doorstep
18) Do you also make use of logistics services of any other company at present?
a) Yes b) No
19) If yes, will you switch 100% to Safe Express Pvt Limited in future?
a) Yes b) No
70
20) If no, Do you have any idea of switching over to any other Logistics Services Company?
a) Yes b) No
21 ) Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements (10-1 scale with 10 being completely agree, 5 being neutral, and 1 being completely disagree):
1
(Strongl
y
Disagree
2
(Disagree
)
3
(Neutral
)
4a
Agre
e
5
(Strongl
y agree)
I believe Company Safe
Express deserves my loyalty
Over the years, my loyalty to
towards Safe Express has
become better
Safe Express Company values
people and relationships
ahead of short-term goals
22) Do you recommend the Safe Express Pvt Limited to others?
a) Yes b) No
23) Rate the overall services provided by the Safe Express Pvt Limited? a) Very much Satisfied b) Satisfied c) Neutral
d) Dissatisfied e) Very much Dissatisfied.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
71
Book Reference:
Logistical Management – Tata McGraw 2000 Edition. Written by
Donald. Bowersox, and David. Closs.
The Management of Business Logistics – 7th Edition: Written by
Edward J. Bardi, C.John Langley, and John Joseph Coyle
Kothari C.R. “Research Methodology” New Age International
Publishers
Kotter Philip “Marketing Management” Prentice Hall Of India
Private Ltd
Websites:
i) www.safexpress.co.in
ii) www.safexpresspackers.com
iii) http://www.indexuae.com/Top/Business_and_Economy/
Services/Logistics
iv) http://www.lintasfreight.com/
v) www.yahooanswers.com
72
73