Article of Economic Times

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Article of Economic Times

    1/5

    Article of economic times

    Economic Survey 2011-12: Minimum agriculturalgrowth required for inclusive growthAgencies Mar 15, 2012, 01.29PM IST

    Tags:

    gdp| Economic Survey 2011-12| Agriculture|

    agricultural growth

    NEW DELHI: TheEconomic Survey 2011-12, tabled in the Parliament on Thursday said the following on

    onagriculture& food:

    Agriculture has been a way of life and continues to be the single most important livelihood of the masses.

    Agricultural policy focus in India across decades has been on self-sufficiency and self-reliance in

    foodgrains production. Considerable progress has been made on this front. Foodgrains production rose

    from 52 million tonnes in 1951-52 to 244.78 million tonnes in 2010-11.

    The share of agriculture in realGDPhas fallen given its lower growth rate relative to industry and

    services. However, what is of concern is that growth in the agricultural sector has quite often fallen short

    of the Plan targets. During the period 1960-61 to 2010-11, food grains production grew at a compoundedannual growth rate (CAGR) of around 2 per cent.

    Budget at ET:Budget 2012|Union Budget|Railway Budget 2012|Budget News|Economic Survey

    2012

    In fact, the Ninth and Tenth Five Year Plans witnessed agricultural sectoral growth rate of 2.44 per cent

    and 2.30 per cent respectively compared to 4.72 per cent during Eighth Five Year Plan. During the

    current Five Year plan, agriculture growth is estimated at 3.28 per cent against a target of 4 per cent.

    The Approach Paper to the Twelfth Five Year Plan emphasises the need to "redouble our efforts to

    ensure that 4.0 per cent average growth" is achieved during the Plan if not more.

    Without incremental productivity gains and technology diffusion across regions, achieving this higher

    growth may not be feasible and has implications for the macroeconomic stability given the rising demandof the 1.2 billion people for food. Achieving minimumagricultural growthis a pre-requisite for inclusive

    growth, reduction of poverty levels, development of the rural economy and enhancing of farm incomes.

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/gdphttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/gdphttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Economic-Survey-2011-12http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Economic-Survey-2011-12http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Agriculturehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Agriculturehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agricultural-growthhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agricultural-growthhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Economic%20Survey%202011-12http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Economic%20Survey%202011-12http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Economic%20Survey%202011-12http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agriculturehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agriculturehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agriculturehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/GDPhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/GDPhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/GDPhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/budget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/budget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/budget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/budget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/budget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/budget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/railwaybudget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/railwaybudget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/railwaybudget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Budget-2012-Newshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Budget-2012-Newshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Budget-2012-Newshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/economicsurvey2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/economicsurvey2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/economicsurvey2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/economicsurvey2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agricultural%20growthhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agricultural%20growthhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agricultural%20growthhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agricultural%20growthhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/economicsurvey2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/economicsurvey2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Budget-2012-Newshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/railwaybudget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/budget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/budget2012.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/GDPhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agriculturehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Economic%20Survey%202011-12http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/agricultural-growthhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Agriculturehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Economic-Survey-2011-12http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/gdp
  • 7/29/2019 Article of Economic Times

    2/5

    http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-03-15/news/31197212_1_inclusive-growth-growth-

    rate-foodgrains-production

    .

    Economic prosperity must reach all: PresidentPTI Jan 14, 2013, 05.25PM IST

    Tags:

    Pranab Mukherjee| global economy|

    gdp|

    economy

    (Benefits of economic prosperity)

    NEW DELHI: Inclusive growth should not remain a mere slogan and the benefits of economic prosperity

    must reach all sections of the society, PresidentPranab Mukherjeesaid today.

    He also expressed confidence that the country's economic growth would bounce back to 8-9 per cent.

    "The economic prosperity that our country has experienced over the last few decades will mean nothing

    if, on account of poverty, a significant percentage of our population is not able to participate in its

    development," Mukherjee said at the CII-ITC sustainability awards 2012 presentation ceremony here.

    The current poverty ratio of around 30 per cent and illiteracy rate of 26 per cent in the country, he said, "is

    simply not acceptable".

    "A decisive reduction in poverty will be possible only if there is an expansion in economic opportunities forall sections of the society. Inclusive growth should not be a mere slogan but a fundamental driving force

    for sustainable development," Mukherjee added.

    The President also exuded confidence of India's economy bouncing back to 8-9 per cent, overcoming

    multiple challenges including the slowdown in the global economy.

    "I hope that we would be successful in overcoming the challenge of reversing this short-term deceleration

    and bring our economy back to the growth levels of 8 to 9 per cent per year," Mukherjee said.

    Attributing India's slow pace of economic growth to the "slowdown in theglobal economyand other

    factors," Mukherjee said theGDPgrowth rate declined from 8.4 per cent in 2010-11 to 6.5 per cent in

    2011-12, and further to 5.4 per cent in the first half of 2012-13..

    'Strong Inclusive Growth'

    http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-03-15/news/31197212_1_inclusive-growth-growth-rate-foodgrains-productionhttp://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-03-15/news/31197212_1_inclusive-growth-growth-rate-foodgrains-productionhttp://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-03-15/news/31197212_1_inclusive-growth-growth-rate-foodgrains-productionhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Pranab-Mukherjeehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Pranab-Mukherjeehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/global-economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/global-economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/gdphttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/gdphttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Pranab%20Mukherjeehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Pranab%20Mukherjeehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Pranab%20Mukherjeehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/global%20economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/global%20economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/global%20economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/GDPhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/GDPhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/GDPhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/GDPhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/global%20economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Pranab%20Mukherjeehttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/photo/18020311.cmshttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/gdphttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/global-economyhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Pranab-Mukherjeehttp://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-03-15/news/31197212_1_inclusive-growth-growth-rate-foodgrains-productionhttp://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-03-15/news/31197212_1_inclusive-growth-growth-rate-foodgrains-production
  • 7/29/2019 Article of Economic Times

    3/5

    'Our immediate priority must be to orchestrate a rebound in the second half of the current year. We should then try toaccelerate growth to reach around 9 percent by the end of the Plan period. This will yie ld a target growth rate ofaround 8.2 percent over the Twelfth Plan'MANMOHAN SINGH

    Prime Ministers Statement at the Full Planning Commission Meeting

    I welcome you to this meeting to consider the draft Twelfth Five Year Plan.

    Thefull text of my remarksis being distributed separately, so I will be brief.

    We ended the Eleventh Plan with some notable achievements. The economy grew at an average annual

    rate of 7.9 percent. This is commendable for a period which saw two global crises one in 2008 and

    another in 2011.

    Poverty declined twice as fast between 2004-05 and 2009-10 than it did in the previous ten years.

    Agriculture grew at 3.3 percent per year in the Eleventh Plan, much faster than the 2.4 percent observedin the Tenth Plan.

    These are positive features. However, we must also recognise that the Twelfth Plan is starting in a year

    when the world economy is experiencing difficulties and our economy has also slowed down.

    These short term problems present a challenge, but they should not lead to undue pessimism about our

    medium term prospects.

    The economy has gained many strengths. Our immediate priority must be to orchestrate a rebound in the

    second half of the current year. We should then try to accelerate growth to reach around 9 percent by the

    end of the Plan period.

    This will yield a target growth rate of around 8.2 percent over the Twelfth Plan. This is lower than the 9

    percent originally projected, but some downward revision is realistic given the state of the world.

    As the Plan document points out, our objective is not just growth of GDP, but growth that is inclusive and

    also sustainable. The SC/STs, OBCs, and the minorities must all participate fully in the growth process.

    The Plan has many elements designed to ensure this.

    The most important area for immediate action is to speed up the pace of implementation of infrastructure

    projects. This is critical for removing supply bottlenecks which constrain growth in other sectors. It will

    also boost investor sentiment to raise the overall rate of investment.

    The infrastructure ministries must set ambitious goals for their sectors over the Twelfth Plan. We need

    close to a trillion dollars of investment in infrastructure and we have to work hard to achieve this.

    I will personally review the performance of the infrastructure Ministries compared with targets at the end

    of the first six months. I hope that out of this review we can define an agenda for improved

    implementation.

    Turning to the longer term policy agenda, the Plan can be seen as consisting of three broad components.

    http://www.outlookindia.com/peoplefnl.aspx?pid=3960&author=Manmohan+Singhhttp://pmindia.nic.in/press-details.php?nodeid=1512http://pmindia.nic.in/press-details.php?nodeid=1512http://pmindia.nic.in/press-details.php?nodeid=1512http://pmindia.nic.in/press-details.php?nodeid=1512http://www.outlookindia.com/peoplefnl.aspx?pid=3960&author=Manmohan+Singh
  • 7/29/2019 Article of Economic Times

    4/5

    One is the set of Government programmes aimed at achieving specific sectoral objectives. The Plan

    contains ambitious programmes in health, education, water resource management, infrastructure

    development, and a number of programmes aimed at inclusiveness, most notably the MGNREGA, the

    PMGSY, the IWDP and the National Rural Livelihoods Mission.

    Considerable resources are being allocated for these programmes. We need to pay much greater

    attention to making sure that these programmes are also delivering results on the ground, especially for

    the SCs/STs and the weaker sections. Some of the changes in the Centrally Sponsored Schemes

    suggested by the Chaturvedi Committee will help to improve effectiveness.

    The second component relates to macro economic balance. To achieve the target of 8.2 percent growth

    we need to revive investment in the economy. The investment environment is therefore critical.

    Our fiscal deficit is too high and is attracting adverse comment from analysts. It must be brought down

    over the medium term to release domestic resources for productive deployment in the economy.

    Because export prospects are weak, the Plan projects a current account deficit of 2.9 per cent of GDP.This must be financed mainly through FDI and FII flows, so that reliance on external debt is limited. I

    believe we can attract the financing we need provided our fiscal deficit is seen to be coming under control

    and the growth momentum is regained.

    The third key component of the Plan is the set of policies which can improve performance in individual

    sectors. Let me mention a few key sector priorities.

    Health, education, and skill development are key sectors which enhance human capability and can

    contribute hugely to the objective of inclusive growth. They have been given high priority in the Twelfth

    Plan.

    Agricultural growth must be accelerated to about 4 percent

    Manufacturing must grow much faster than it has, to generate the employment growth we need.

    Infrastructure development is vital. It needs a combination of public investment and PPP.

    Energy is a difficult area where our policy needs a comprehensive review. We are energy deficient and

    import dependence is increasing. It is vital for our energy security that we increase domestic production

    and also increase energy efficiency. Rational energy pricing is therefore critical. Our energy prices are out

    of line with world prices. The recent increase in diesel prices is an important step in the right direction.

    Water is another area where problems of scarcity and the challenges of effective resource managementare likely to expand in the years ahead.

    Urbanisation is a new challenge which we must address.

    The central message of the Plan is that we can achieve our objective provided we put in place policies

    that will take care of our weaknesses. The Plan for the first time introduces alternative scenarios.

    Scenario one is called Strong Inclusive growth. It presents what is possible if the policy actions outlined

  • 7/29/2019 Article of Economic Times

    5/5

    in the Plan are substantially implemented. One can expect a number of virtuous cycles to start operating,

    leading to positive results on both growth and inclusion. This is the scenario we should aim for.

    Scenario two is called insufficient action. It describes a state of partial action with weak implementation.

    The virtuous cycles that reinforce growth in Scenario I, will not kick in, and growth can easily slow down to

    6 to 6.5 percent. Inclusiveness will also suffer. This is where we will end up if we make only half-hearted

    efforts and slip in implementation. It is my sincere hope that we do not do so.

    Scenario three is called policy logjam. It reflects a situation where for one reason or another, most of

    the policies needed to achieve Scenario 1 are not taken. If this continues for any length of time, vicious

    cycles begin to set in and growth could easily collapse to about 5 percent per year, with very poor

    outcomes on inclusion. I urge everyone interested in the countrys future to understand fully the

    implications of this scenario. They will quickly come to an agreement that the people of India deserve

    better than this.

    I believe we can make Scenario I possible. It will take courage and some risks but it should be our

    endeavour to ensure that it materialises. The country deserves no less.